Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2024 Jan 11;15:451. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-44689-2

Prostaglandin E2 controls the metabolic adaptation of T cells to the intestinal microenvironment

Matteo Villa 1,2,, David E Sanin 1,3, Petya Apostolova 1,3,4, Mauro Corrado 1,5,6,7, Agnieszka M Kabat 1,3, Carmine Cristinzio 1,8, Annamaria Regina 1,9, Gustavo E Carrizo 1, Nisha Rana 1, Michal A Stanczak 1, Francesc Baixauli 1, Katarzyna M Grzes 1, Jovana Cupovic 1, Francesca Solagna 1, Alexandra Hackl 1, Anna-Maria Globig 10, Fabian Hässler 1, Daniel J Puleston 1, Beth Kelly 1, Nina Cabezas-Wallscheid 1, Peter Hasselblatt 10, Bertram Bengsch 10,11, Robert Zeiser 4,11, Sagar 10, Joerg M Buescher 1, Edward J Pearce 1,3,11,12,13, Erika L Pearce 1,3,11,14,
PMCID: PMC10781727  PMID: 38200005

Abstract

Immune cells must adapt to different environments during the course of an immune response. Here we study the adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the intestinal microenvironment and how this process shapes the establishment of the CD8+ T cell pool. CD8+ T cells progressively remodel their transcriptome and surface phenotype as they enter the gut wall, and downregulate expression of mitochondrial genes. Human and mouse intestinal CD8+ T cells have reduced mitochondrial mass, but maintain a viable energy balance to sustain their function. We find that the intestinal microenvironment is rich in prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which drives mitochondrial depolarization in CD8+ T cells. Consequently, these cells engage autophagy to clear depolarized mitochondria, and enhance glutathione synthesis to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) that result from mitochondrial depolarization. Impairing PGE2 sensing promotes CD8+ T cell accumulation in the gut, while tampering with autophagy and glutathione negatively impacts the T cell pool. Thus, a PGE2-autophagy-glutathione axis defines the metabolic adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the intestinal microenvironment, to ultimately influence the T cell pool.

Subject terms: Mucosal immunology, Cellular immunity, CD8-positive T cells


CD8+ T cells reprogram their metabolism in response to the gut environment. Upon sensing of PGE2, gut CD8+ T cells reduce their mitochondrial content, an event that ultimately shapes the pool of CD8+ T cells in the intestinal tissue.

Introduction

The immune response is dynamic. Immune cells are activated, migrate, and perform effector functions in tissues characterized by different chemical and physical properties. In peripheral organs, immune cells surveil for pathogens as well as contribute to tissue homeostasis. At barrier sites such as the gut, immune cells are key to maintaining the symbiosis between host and microbiota, the breach of which promotes the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Understanding the mechanisms that control the adaptation of immune cells to the tissue niche is an important step toward identifying strategies to modulate immune function and designing mucosal vaccines against infections and cancer1.

To investigate how immune cells adapt to their microenvironment, we explored the intestinal CD8+ T cell response2,3. Upon activation in response to foreign antigens from the gut, naive CD8+ T cells (TN) in the mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN) differentiate into effector/effector memory T cells (TEM) or central memory T cells (TCM). Differentiation into memory T cells is accompanied by transcriptional and metabolic reprogramming, which in turn underlie the characteristic features of these cells47. TEM leave the lymph nodes and enter the blood stream to reach target organs (reviewed in ref. 8). There, after clearing the antigen that initiated the immune response, only a small proportion of TEM survives, and continues to circulate in and out of peripheral tissues. Moreover, during the early phases of the immune response, a fraction of CD8+ T cells commits to the tissue-resident memory T cell (TRM) fate, eventually seeding the gut tissue9,10. These long-lived and sessile cells constitute the front-line defense against future encounters to the same antigen1114. The cytokines interleukin-15 (IL-15) and tissue growth factor-β (TGF-β), together with a network of transcription factors, coordinate the development of TRM1521.

It is reasonable to hypothesize that adaptation of T cells to the gut environment influences the establishment of the intestinal CD8+ T cell pool. Indeed, some of the metabolic requirements of TRM are not shared across all tissues of residence, highlighting that tissue-specificity could impact metabolism22,23. Moreover, the surrounding microenvironment has been shown to influence the fate and function of CD8+ T cells. For instance, nutrient availability as well as cell-intrinsic metabolic programs impinge on fitness and function of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells2427. Similarly, tissue-specific cues regulate the transcriptional landscape and surface phenotype of T cells, thus influencing their residency28,29. These examples highlight how a variety of factors control the ability of T cells to adapt to and thrive in the surrounding environment.

Using single-cell RNA sequencing and oligo-tagged antibody staining, we resolved the transcriptional and metabolic adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the intestinal microenvironment. Upon sensing prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the gut tissue, CD8+ T cells decreased their mitochondrial content. PGE2 induced mitochondrial depolarization in CD8+ T cells, and as a consequence, CD8+ T cells enhanced their antioxidant capability and engaged autophagy to clear mitochondria. Our findings further the knowledge of how the intestinal CD8+ T cell pool is established, define a precise metabolic adaption of T cells in a tissue, and highlight therapeutic avenues to modulate immune function in a tissue-restricted fashion.

Results

CD8+ T cells in the intestinal LP and IEL compartments reduce the expression of mitochondria-related genes

To study the tissue adaptation of CD8+ T cells, we focused on cells in the small intestine under homeostatic conditions. By combining cell sorting, single-cell RNA sequencing, and oligo-tagged antibody sequencing, we analyzed the transcriptome and surface proteome of CD8+ T cells from the mesenteric lymph node (mLN), lamina propria (LP) and intraepithelial lymphocyte fraction (IEL, concentrating on CD8αβ induced IEL) of the gut (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a), presuming that we would capture the transition of these cells across these sites under homeostatic conditions. To assess the tissue-resident nature of LP-isolated cells we used in vivo intravascular staining and found that CD8+ T cells isolated from the gut LP were virtually free of cells associated with blood vessels30 (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Integrating the RNA and surface protein landscapes of 49,111 cells across 3 biological replicates we identified 10 clusters visualized on the uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP)-reduced dimensional space (Fig. 1b). Cell clusters were present in all biological replicates (Supplementary Fig. 1c) and displayed unique transcriptional and protein expression profiles (Supplementary Fig. 1d, e). In accordance with our sorting strategy, cluster 6 expressed Sell, Klf2, and S1pr1 (Supplementary Fig. 1d), which control retention of CD8+ T cells in lymphoid organs31, and CD62L, pointing to their residence in mLN (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Expression of Rora, previously associated with intestinal residency32, was observed in clusters 1 and 2, which also displayed increased expression of the ATP-to-AMP converting enzymes CD38 and CD39 (Supplementary Fig. 1d, e)33. Granzyme-encoding genes Gzma and Gzmb expression was increased in cluster 0 (Supplementary Fig. 1d), as well as CD103 and Integrin-β7, that help the positioning of CD8+ T cells in the gut (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Cells associated with clusters 0 and 5 also expressed CD326, better known as EpCAM, recently shown to be associated with IEL origin, to support the movement of T cells within the epithelial layer (Supplementary Fig. 1e34). Finally, expression of Lgals1 hinted at the ability of cells within cluster 7 to interact with the extracellular matrix (Supplementary Fig. 1d). These results highlighted the diversity of CD8+ T populations in the sites studied. Exploration of the tissue origin of the samples placed TN and TCM in close proximity to mLN TEM on the UMAP, whereas LP-isolated CD8+ T cells were between mLN TEM and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1c). Few clusters were shared between tissues, with cluster 6 almost exclusively populated by TN and TCM mLN cells; clusters 1, 2, and 4 were characteristic of LP, and clusters 0 and 5 originated mostly from the IEL fraction (Fig. 1d). A notable exception was cluster 7, which was distributed across both mLN and LP, suggesting a potential seeding point of mLN-activated CD8+ T cells in the intestinal LP (Fig. 1d). Altogether, we identified a substantial heterogeneity in the transcriptional landscape and surface profile of CD8+ T cells across the mLN-LP-IEL axis.

Fig. 1. CD8+ T cells in the gut LP and epithelial layer have remodeled the transcription of mitochondria-encoded genes.

Fig. 1

a Schematic representation of the gut-specific CD8+ T cell response and strategy designed to investigate it. Image created with Biorender.com. b Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) of the single cell RNA and ADT sequencing data obtained from the experiments designed as in (a). Upon clustering analysis, 10 RNA-based clusters (0–9) were identified, using a resolution of 0.2. 49,111 cells obtained from 4 tissues and 3 biological replicates were analyzed. Color-coding is indicated in the legend. c UMAP of the single cell RNA and ADT sequencing data. Color-coding is according to the tissue of origin as outlined in the legend. The labeling in quotation marks refers to the data in (b). d Bar graph of the distribution of the clusters identified in (b) across different tissues of origin. Within every tissue, cell numbers are normalized to 100% and the fractional contribution of every cluster is indicated. Color-coding resembles the one used in (b). e UMAP of the single cell RNA and ADT sequencing data showing the ratio of mitochondrial transcripts over the total transcriptome, across different clusters. The labeling in quotation marks refers to the data in (b). Violin plots show the fraction of mitochondria-derived transcripts over the total transcriptome, across different clusters. The black dashed line indicates the median value identified for cluster 6. f Plots representing the expression of selected genes as a function of pseudotime, as identified in the data shown in Supplementary Fig. 2a. On the x axis, the interquartile range of every cluster is indicated, to facilitate the correlation between gene expression and progression of cells through pseudotime. Color-coding is indicated in the legend.

The single-cell analysis highlighted that CD8+ T cell adaptation to the LP and epithelial layer of the intestine correlated with remarkable changes in the expression of mitochondria-encoded genes (Fig. 1e). To better explore how these changes were regulated across the clusters identified in Fig. 1b, we ranked CD8+ T cells during their transition from the mLN to the gut according to transcriptional similarity using Slingshot35. We calculated the average pseudotime estimation for each cell based on all predicted trajectories, setting cells in cluster 6 as the origin of the progression based on our cell sorting strategy. In this manner, we ordered cells based on estimated pseudotime (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Accordingly, clusters in the LP and IEL appeared later in this progression and were characterized by a higher pseudotime value (Supplementary Fig. 2a). When we plotted the expression profiles of several mitochondria-encoded transcripts as a function of pseudotime, we found that CD8+ T cells progressively decreased their expression during the transition from mLN to LP and ultimately to IEL (Fig. 1f, Supplementary Fig. 2b). Of note, the progressive reduction of gene expression across pseudotime was not a generalized phenomenon, since a number of genes relevant to CD8+ T cell physiology followed different expression patterns during the transition from mLN to intestinal LP and epithelium (Supplementary Fig. 2c). In conclusion, CD8+ T cells transiting from the mLN to the intestine exhibited reduced expression of mitochondria-encoded transcripts.

Intestinal LP- and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells have reduced mitochondrial content

To further explore the results we acquired from our single cell sequencing analyses, we obtained blood and intestinal biopsies from healthy human donors and isolated CD8+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. 3a). We used flow cytometry to assess mitochondrial content in TN, TEM, CD45RA-expressing TEM (TEMRA), and TCM isolated from the blood and TRM from the gut, by labeling with the mitochondria-selective dye Mitotracker green. TRM isolated from different areas of the gut showed a substantially reduced mitochondrial content as compared to blood-resident CD8+ T cell populations, recapitulating of our findings, in humans (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2. Intestinal LP and IEL T cells have reduced mitochondrial content.

Fig. 2

a Flow cytometry analysis of Mitotracker green in cell populations from blood and intestine of healthy humans. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and graph shows data from 2 to 5 independent experiments. b Mitotracker green in cell populations isolated from mLN and intestine of C57BL/6J mice. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and data show n = 3 biological replicates over nine independent experiments. c Western blot of Tom20 and TFAM. The data shown are representative of six independent experiments. d Mitotracker green in antigen-specific and polyclonal cell populations isolated from mLN and intestine of mice orally challenged with LmOVA and analyzed 7 days post-infection. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and data show n = 5 biological replicates over four independent experiments. e TMRM staining in the indicated cell populations. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and data show n = 3 biological replicates over five independent experiments. f TMRM in antigen-specific and polyclonal cells isolated from mLN and intestine of mice orally challenged with LmOVA and analyzed 7 days post-infection. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and data show n = 5 biological replicates over four independent experiments. g TMRM staining in cells upon treatment with oligomycin and FCCP. TMRM was used at a concentration of 10 nM. TMRM values are shown normalized to the baseline of staining in the respective population. Data are representative of three independent experiments. h Mass spectrometry analysis of AMP, ADP, ATP, and ATP:AMP ratio. The bars show mean ± SEM. Data show three independent experiments analyzed simultaneously. i Intracellular interferon-γ (IFN-γ) protein expression in cells isolated from mLN and intestine of GREAT mice. Lines in the dot plots show mean values and data show n = 3 biological replicates over two independent experiments. a, b, df, and h Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison correction. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To further investigate the relationship between the adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the intestinal tissue and the reduction of mitochondrial mass, we explored the physiological CD8+ T cell gut immune response in naive mice (Supplementary Fig. 3b, further details about the gating strategy and the nomenclature used throughout the manuscript is in the “FACS” paragraph of the Methods section). Supporting the single cell and human data, we found that CD8+ T cells progressively reduced their mitochondrial content during the transition from mLN-resident subsets (TN, TEM, TCM and TRM) to the LP and IEL, highlighting an inflection point between the CD69CD103 and the CD69+CD103+ phenotypes in the LP (Fig. 2b). Honing in on the LP, and comparing CD69CD103 cells, CD69+CD103 cells, and CD69+CD103+ cells19, it became apparent that the reduction in mitochondrial content positively correlated with the CD69+CD103+ profile (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Of note, the reduction in mitochondrial content upon adaptation to the LP and epithelial layer, as measured by Mitotracker green staining, was independent of the differential activity of mitochondrial efflux pumps (treatment with verapamil, a blocker of the xenobiotic efflux pumps encoded by Bcrp1 and Mdr1a/b)36 or cell death (treatment with KN-62, which prevents cell death triggered by ATP and/or NAD-induced activation of the P2RX7 receptor during tissue preparation) between mLN and CD8+ T cells isolated from the two intestinal compartments37 (Supplementary Fig. 3d, e). Adding to the Mitotracker green data, western blot analysis showed reduction of the mitochondrial structural protein TOM20 and slightly reduced expression of the mitochondria-specific transcription factor TFAM in CD8+ T cells isolated from the LP and IEL as compared to cells from the mLN (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 3f).

To confirm our results in an antigen-specific setting, we transferred CD90.1+ ovalbumin (OVA)-specific CD8+ T cells into CD90.1 recipient mice, and infected them orally with a transgenic strain of Listeria monocytogenes expressing OVA (LmOVA), to study the OVA-specific intestinal CD8+ T cell response. OVA-specific CD8+ T cells isolated 7 and 24 days post-infection from the LP and IEL of infected mice showed substantially reduced mitochondrial content as compared to OVA-specific cells isolated from the mLN, mirroring the results obtained from the analysis of the polyclonal response (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig 4a).

Since mitochondrial dynamics (fission vs fusion) have been linked to T cell fate acquisition4, we isolated CD8+ T cells from the mLN, LP, and IEL of PhAM mice, expressing the mitochondria-localized version of the fluorescent protein Dendra238, and assessed their mitochondrial morphology using live cell imaging. We found that CD69+CD103+ cells isolated from the LP and IEL showed reduced numbers of mitochondria as compared to spleen- and mLN-isolated T cell populations (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Moreover, mitochondria of CD8+ T cells isolated from the LP and the IEL fraction were fragmented and shared similarities with mLN-isolated TEM, as compared to TN or TCM, previously shown to form complex networks of fused mitochondria4 (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Western blot analysis of the distribution of OPA-1 isoforms, with the relative accumulation of the shortest being associated with mitochondrial fragmentation39, correlated with the data obtained from PhAM mice (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Finally, transmission electron microscopy analysis to assess mitochondrial ultrastructure showed that mitochondria present in LP and epithelia-isolated cells had dilated cristae, as compared to mLN-resident cells (red arrowheads, Supplementary Fig. 4d), supporting the data regarding the distribution of the OPA-1 isoforms. Altogether, these data corroborate the finding that CD8+ T cells isolated from the LP and epithelial layer of the gut have a fragmented mitochondrial network, as compared to CD8+ T cells localized in the mLN.

We next tested whether reduced mitochondrial mass was accompanied by defective mitochondrial function. We used TMRM to assess mitochondrial membrane potential across the inner mitochondrial membrane, as a readout of the functionality of the electron transport chain (ETC) and movement of protons across the inner mitochondrial membrane. Analysis of CD8+ T cells across the physiological intestinal immune response showed that LP- and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells had reduced mitochondrial membrane potential when compared to cell populations in the mLN, mirroring the staining pattern observed for Mitotracker green (Fig. 2e). Similarly, we found that the mitochondrial membrane potential of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell subsets in the LP and epithelial layer of the gut was reduced in comparison to the one recorded in mLN-isolated cells (Fig. 2f). Notwithstanding the reduction of mitochondrial mass, LP CD8+ T cells were able to effectively engage the ETC in the remaining mitochondria to produce ATP, as shown by TMRM staining increasing after inhibition of the ATP synthase by oligomycin, an effect dissipated by the uncoupling agent FCCP (Fig. 2g). CD69+CD103+ T cells isolated from the gut LP, as well as epithelial layer, had a significantly lower ATP/AMP ratio, but did not have significant defects in their energy balance, as measured by AMP, ADP, and ATP levels, as compared to cells isolated from mLN (Fig. 2h). To assess the potential impact of mitochondrial loss over the function of CD8+ T cells, we analyzed a mouse model that uses eYFP to report one-to-one interferon-γ protein expression, without requiring restimulation of cells (GREAT mice40). We found that the reduction of mitochondrial mass observed in LP- and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells did not necessarily lead to defective cytokine production, as most of the cells isolated from the LP and IEL produced interferon-γ (Fig. 2i).

To complement our analysis, we performed in-depth transcriptional profiling using bulk RNA sequencing of the different CD8+ T cell populations. Principal component analysis (PCA) of their transcriptome positioned the cell populations in a progression from more quiescent populations (mLN-isolated TN, TCM, and TRM) to activated ones (mLN-isolated TEM) and ultimately to populations isolated from the intestinal wall (LP and IEL-isolated CD69CD103 cells and CD69+CD103+ cells) (Supplementary Fig. 4e). As with our single cell analyses, we observed that TN and TCM clustered together, and were separated from the tissue populations by TEM. Moreover, LP populations laid between mLN and IEL cells, thus validating our earlier observations and trajectories (Supplementary Fig. 4e). When we analyzed the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across the cell subsets, we found that adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the LP triggered a transient global upregulation of transcripts (transition 3), whereas acquisition of the CD69+CD103+ phenotype (transitions 4 and 5) caused downregulation of the transcriptome (Supplementary Fig. 4f). Moreover, bulk RNA sequencing confirmed the transcriptional signature identified in Fig. 2, as transcripts involved in mitochondrial function showed broad downregulation during the transition between mLN TEM and LP CD69+CD103+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 4g). Overall, we found that adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the intestinal microenvironment correlates with reduced mitochondrial mass, membrane potential, and fragmentation of the mitochondrial pool. In spite of this, CD8+ T cells isolated from both the LP and epithelial layer of the gut maintained functionality of the remaining mitochondria to sustain a viable energy balance and cytokine production.

Prostaglandin E2 regulates mitochondrial content and fitness of intestinal LP and epithelial T cells

CD8+ T cells are distributed across nearly all peripheral organs. To test if the reduction of mitochondrial content is a phenomenon restricted to the gut or occurs in other tissues, we measured Mitotracker green uptake in CD8+ T cells isolated from the parenchyma of liver and lung. We found that gut LP-isolated CD69+CD103+ cells uniquely displayed substantially reduced mitochondrial mass as compared to counterparts isolated from mLN as well as from liver and lung (Fig. 3a). Interestingly, gut LP-resident macrophages did not show any reduction of mitochondrial content as compared to other tissues, suggesting that the phenotype was confined to CD8+ T cells isolated from the intestinal compartments (Supplementary Fig. 5a).

Fig. 3. Prostaglandin E2 regulates mitochondrial content of intestinal LP and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells.

Fig. 3

a Mitotracker green in CD8+CD69+CD103+/− cells isolated from the tissues of unchallenged mice. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and the data show n = 3 biological replicates over two independent experiments. b Volcano plot shows the differential distribution of metabolites isolated from the interstitial fluid of tissues. Dashed lines indicate the fold change filter of FC > 2 and FC < −2 and the p value filter of p = 0.05. Plot shows cumulative data of four independent experiments. Statistics were performed using Student’s t test between metabolites identified in the small intestine and metabolites identified in all the other tissues. No FDR correction was applied. c Relative abundance of PGE2 in interstitial fluid isolated from the indicated tissues. Graph shows mean values ± SEM of cumulative data of four independent experiments. d Mitotracker green and TMRM in CD8+ T cells activated in (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cell-polarizing conditions for 5 days and treated for 24 h with 10 μM PGE2. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and the data show n = 3 biological replicates over three independent experiments. Statistics were performed using two-tailed Student’s t test. e Mitotracker green and TMRM staining in CD8+ T cells activated in (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cell-polarizing conditions for 5 days and treated for 24 h with 100 nM of different prostaglandins. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and the data show n = 3 biological replicates over two independent experiments. Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA and Dunnet’s multiple comparison correction. f UMAP of the single cell RNA and ADT sequencing data showing expression across different clusters of Ptger4. g Schematic of the Listeria monocytogenes expressing OVA (LmOVA) infection model used in Figs. 3–5. OT-I donor cells were CD45.2+, whereas recipient mice were CD45.1+. CD90.1 and CD90.2 were used to additionally separate control guide- vs target gene guides-treated donor cells. LmOVA was administered by oral gavage. Image created with Biorender.com. hi Distribution of Ctrl vs Ptger4-deleted CD8+ T cells within the population of CD45.2+ cells upon LmOVA challenge in LP (h) and IEL fraction (i). Lines in the dot plot show pairing within single mice, and the dot plots show cumulative data of n = 15 biological replicates over three independent experiments. j Mitotracker green in Ctrl vs Ptger4-deleted CD69+CD103+ cells isolated from LP of mice orally challenged with LmOVA. Lines in the dot plot show pairing within single mice, and dot plots show cumulative data of n = 15 biological replicates over three independent experiments. k Distribution of Ctrl vs Ptger4-deleted CD8+ T cells gated in the population of CD45.2+ cells between CD69CD103, CD69+ and CD69+CD103+ populations, upon LmOVA challenge in LP. Lines in the dot plot show mean values; dot plots show cumulative data of n = 15 biological replicates over three independent experiments. Statistics were performed using two-way ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparison correction. a, c Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison correction. h, i Statistics were performed using two-tailed paired t test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To investigate how the intestinal microenvironment might regulate the mitochondrial content of CD8+ T cells, we isolated the interstitial fluid of several tissues and analyzed the fluid using untargeted metabolomics. The analysis revealed a group of metabolites uniquely present in the small intestine, including prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (Fig. 3b, c). PGE2 signaling is constitutive in the gut and it contributes to tissue repair and maintenance of the epithelial barrier41,42. Also, we recently reported that PGE2 controls mitochondrial membrane potential in macrophages43. To test the role of PGE2 in driving the reduction of mitochondrial content in CD8+ T cells, we established an in vitro model to partly mimic the exposure of CD8+ T cells to the tissue environment, and we named these cells (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Treatment with IL-15 and TGF-β induced a phenotype characterized by high expression of the integrin CD103, as compared to cells treated with IL-2 [(IL-2)-T cells] (Supplementary Fig. 5c). (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells substantially reduced their mitochondrial mass and membrane potential upon PGE2 exposure, similar to what we observed for CD8+ T cells isolated from the LP and epithelial layer of the intestine (Fig. 3d). Also, (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells seemed to be more sensitive to the effect of PGE2 treatment on mitochondrial content, as compared to (IL-2)-T cells (Supplementary Fig. 5d, e). PGE2 was able to drive reduction of the mitochondrial content upon IL-15/TGF-β and IL-15-alone conditions (Supplementary Fig. 5f), suggesting that TGF-β signaling, at least in our setting, is not required to mediate the effect of PGE2 on the metabolic fitness of CD8+ T cells. The effect of PGE2 was dependent on its concentration, with as little as 10 nM PGE2 triggering the reduction of mitochondrial mass and membrane potential in (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells (Supplementary Fig. 5g). Finally, the reduction of mitochondrial content in (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells was specifically triggered by PGE2 and PGE1, while exposure to other prostaglandins did not cause any noticeable effect (Fig. 3e). Since PGE2 and PGE1 both signal through EP1-4 receptors, we analyzed receptor expression in vivo across CD8+ T cell subsets. We found that Ptger4, encoding for the EP4 receptor, was uniquely upregulated in CD8+ T cells isolated from the LP and IEL fraction (Supplementary Fig. 5h). Moreover, the single cell data confirmed that Ptger4 transcripts were substantially upregulated in cells occupying the UMAP space of LP and IEL, as compared to cells positioned in the “mLN area” (Fig. 3f). CRISPR-Cas9 mediated Ptger4 deletion impinged on the ability of (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells to sense PGE2 and partially rescued the reduction of mitochondrial content and function (Supplementary Fig. 5i, j).

To investigate whether PGE2-driven reduction of mitochondrial content controls the adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the gut microenvironment and the establishment of the T cell pool, we tested the effect of Ptger4 deletion in the generation of intestinal CD8+ T cells following oral Listeria monocytogenes infection. Recipient mice were co-transferred with control (Ctrl) or Ptger4-deficient naive ovalbumin (OVA)-specific CD8+ T cells that expanded in response to oral challenge with a transgenic strain of Listeria monocytogenes expressing ovalbumin (LmOVA) (Fig. 3g). Ptger4-deficient cells outcompeted control cells in establishing the antigen-specific pool of CD8+ T cells in the LP and in the induced-IEL fraction, upon oral infection with LmOVA, whereas no such difference was observed in mLN (Fig. 3h, i, Supplementary Fig. 5k). Moreover, Ptger4-deficient CD69+CD103+ cells isolated from LP showed higher mitochondrial content, as compared to control counterparts (Fig. 3j). Interestingly, Ptger4-deficient cells isolated from the LP were more prone to retain the CD69-CD103- phenotype, as compared to control cells, and fewer of them acquired expression of CD69 (Fig. 3k). On the other hand, deletion of Ptger4 only minimally affected the ability of LP and epithelium-isolated CD8+ T cells to secrete interferon-γ and TNF (Supplementary Fig. 5l). These data show that the loss of mitochondrial content is, at least in part, a consequence of being in an environment rich in PGE2, and disruption of PGE2 sensing promotes the accumulation of CD8+ T cells in the intestinal LP and epithelial layer. Altogether, we found that the intestinal microenvironment uniquely triggered the reduction of the mitochondrial content of CD8+ T cells. We also identified PGE2 as one of the causative agents initiating this process.

Autophagy and glutathione counterbalance the effect of PGE2 and maintain the pool of T cells in the LP and epithelial layer of the gut

Next, we addressed the issue of how PGE2 exposure influenced the mitochondrial content of CD8+ T cells. Mitochondria are key to regulate cell function. These organelles routinely undergo quality control to test their fitness, and dysfunctional mitochondria are cleared by mitophagy, i.e., mitochondrial autophagy (reviewed in ref. 44). A drop in mitochondrial membrane potential has been shown to trigger clearance of depolarized mitochondria45. Since we showed that PGE2 contributed to the reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential, we hypothesized that mitochondrial depolarization may trigger autophagy-mediated clearance of mitochondria in CD8+ T cells exposed to the gut environment. Indeed, CD8+ T cells upregulated most of the autophagy-related genes (Atg genes) as well as Optn, Prkn, Sqstm1, Ulk1, and Pink1, associated with mitophagy, during their transition from mLN to the LP and IEL compartments of the intestine (Fig. 4a). CD69+CD103+ cells isolated from LP and IEL expressed the lipidated form of LC3 (LC3-II), uniquely formed upon autophagy initiation (Fig. 4b). Treating LP- and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells with the autophagy inhibitor bafilomycin A1 inhibited autophagic flux and drove accumulation of the lipidated form of LC3, suggesting that LP- and IEL-isolated CD69+CD103+ cells actively engaged autophagy (Supplementary Fig. 6a). Moreover, CD8+ T cells isolated from LP and IEL showed reduced expression of p62, encoded by Sqstm1, which is degraded in the autophagy process (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 6b). Finally, transmission electron microscopy provided further evidence that LP and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells upregulated autophagy, as structures resembling autophagosomes were identified only in images of LP CD69+CD103+ and IEL CD69+CD103+ cells (Fig. 4c). Treating (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells with bafilomycin A1 partially blunted the reduction of mitochondrial mass observed upon PGE2 treatment, but failed to rescue the reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential, suggesting that inhibition of autophagy prevented mitochondrial clearance while leaving PGE2 sensing and the subsequent drop of mitochondrial membrane potential unaffected (Fig. 4d). Inhibition of autophagy with wortmannin, a PI3K inhibitor, or SBI-0206965, an ULK1 inhibitor, equally prevented mitochondrial clearance upon treatment with PGE2 (Supplementary Fig. 6c, d). However, both wortmannin and SBI-0206965 also rescued the PGE2-driven reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential (Supplementary Fig. 6c, d). Finally, we tested whether autophagy plays a role in the formation of the pool of gut CD8+ T cells upon oral challenge with LmOVA. We blocked autophagy by deleting Atg5 with CRISPR-Cas9 (Supplementary Fig. 6e) and found that Atg5-deficient CD8+ T cells failed to establish the antigen-specific pool of CD8+ T cells in LP and induced IEL fraction, as compared to control cells (Fig. 4e, f). No consistent changes in the distribution of Ctrl vs Atg5-deficient cells were observed in the pool of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in mLN (Supplementary Fig. 6f). In line with our in vitro results (Fig. 4d), blocking autophagy partially prevented mitochondrial clearance in Atg5-deficient LP CD69+CD103+ cells, as compared to controls (Fig. 4g). These results suggest that failure to clear depolarized mitochondria in intestinal, PGE2-exposed CD8+ T cells negatively impacts the fitness of the intestinal CD8+ T cell pool in the LP and epithelial layer.

Fig. 4. Autophagy and glutathione maintain the fitness of LP and IEL T cells.

Fig. 4

a, j Heatmaps show the expression of selected genes of bulk RNA sequencing data. Color-coding is as per legend (white, low expression; blue, high expression) and shows relative values within each gene. Data show three independent experiments. b Western blot of LC3 isoforms and p62. The data are representative of two independent experiments (LC3) or one experiment (p62). c Transmission electron microscopy of cells isolated from unchallenged mice. Yellow arrowheads indicate double membrane structures characteristic of autophagosomes. Scale bar = 500 nm. The panel shows representative images of one experiment. d Mitotracker green and TMRM in CD8+ T cells activated in (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells polarizing conditions for 5 days and treated with PGE2 in the presence of bafilomycin A1. Lines in the dot plot show mean values ± SEM and the data show n = 3 biological replicates over five independent experiments. ef Distribution of Ctrl vs Atg5-deleted CD8+ T cells within the population of CD45.2+ cells upon LmOVA challenge in LP (e) and IEL fraction (f). Lines in the dot plot show pairing within single mice, and the dot plots show cumulative data of n = 15 biological replicates over three independent experiments. g Mitotracker green in Ctrl vs Atg5-deleted CD69+CD103+ cells isolated from LP of mice orally challenged with LmOVA. Lines in the dot plot show pairing within single mice, and dot plots show cumulative data of n = 15 biological replicates over three independent experiments. h Mitochondrial oxidative state, as indicated by a shift from green to blue fluorescence, in cells isolated from mLN and intestine of Mito-roGFP2-Orp1. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and the data show n = 4 biological replicates over two independent experiments. i CellROX staining. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and the data show n = 3 biological replicates over three independent experiments. k Mass spectrometry analysis of levels of GSH and GSSG in the indicated cell populations. The bars show mean ± SEM. Data show three independent experiments analyzed simultaneously. lm Distribution of Ctrl vs Gclc-deleted CD8+ T cells within the population of CD45.2+ cells upon LmOVA challenge in LP (l) and IEL fraction (m). Lines in the dot plot show pairing within single mice, and the data show n = 8 biological replicates over two independent experiments. d, h, i and k Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison correction. eg, l, m Statistics were performed using two-tailed paired t test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

We wondered whether the PGE2-driven reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential resulted in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and thus altered redox balance, in intestinal CD8+ T cells. We analyzed Mito-roGFP2-Orp1 mice, encoding a mitochondria-targeting redox-sensitive GFP that senses hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)46,47 and found that CD8+ T cells isolated from the intestinal LP and IEL fraction exhibited an increased proportion of cells with oxidized mitochondria, as compared to TN and TCM cells isolated from mLN, while TEM had the most oxidized mitochondria. (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 6g). Although LP and IEL T cells had increased mitochondrial ROS, as quantified in Mito-RoGFP2-Orp1 mice, these cells had low cellular ROS, as quantified by CellROX, compared to the CD8+ T cells resident in the mLN (Fig. 4i). Reconciling these seemingly contradicting data, we found that CD8+ T cells isolated from LP and IEL upregulated a panel of genes associated with “antioxidant activity”, including genes encoding for glutathione peroxidases (Gpx genes), transferases (Gstm genes) and reductase (Gsr) (Fig. 4j). Both the reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) forms of glutathione were elevated in CD69+CD103+ T cells isolated from LP and IEL compared to T cells isolated from the mLN, while the GSH/GSSG ratio was unaltered (Fig. 4k and Supplementary Fig. 6h). These results suggested that upon sensing the gut microenvironment, CD8+ T cells enhance their antioxidant defenses to cope with elevated mitochondrial ROS and maintain a viable intracellular redox balance. To assess the contribution of glutathione in the formation of the intestinal CD8+ T cell pool in gut LP and epithelial layer, we genetically ablated the catalytic subunit of glutamate cysteine ligase (Gclc), an enzyme critical for the de novo synthesis of glutathione, which has previously been shown to be key to T cell development and function48,49 (Supplementary Fig. 6i). Similar to what we observed upon autophagy inhibition, Gclc deletion remarkably affected accumulation of CD8+ T cells in LP and induced-IEL fractions in mice orally challenged with LmOVA (Fig. 4l, m). Glutathione thus appears to be key to sustain the redox balance and viability of the LP and IEL CD8+ T cell pool and to counterbalance the accumulation of ROS resulting from PGE2-driven mitochondrial depolarization.

Got1 links PGE2 with the regulation of mitochondrial content in intestinal LP and epithelial CD8+ T cells

To investigate the mechanisms underlying the regulation of mitochondrial content mediated by PGE2, we first assessed whether PGE2 itself was sufficient to promote autophagy. Treatment of (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells with 100 nM PGE2 induced accumulation of LC3-II, as compared to untreated cells (Fig. 5a), suggesting that PGE2 induces autophagy in CD8+ T cells.

Fig. 5. Got1 links PGE2 with the regulation of mitochondrial content in intestinal LP and epithelial CD8+ T cells.

Fig. 5

a Western blot of LC3-I and LC3-II in (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells cultured for 6 days and treated for 24 h with or without 100 nM PGE2. Dot plot shows quantification by densitometry. Lines in dot plots show mean values. Dot plots show cumulative data of n = 4 biological replicates over two independent experiments. Statistics were performed using two-tailed paired t test. b Cell numbers of CD8+ T cells subsets in mLN, LP and IEL of Drp1fl/flCD4Cre+ and Drp1fl/flCD4Cre mice. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and the data show n = 2–4 biological replicates over two independent experiments. c, d Mitotracker green and TMRM in cells from mLN and intestine of Drp1fl/flCD4Cre+ and Drp1fl/flCD4Cre mice. Lines in the dot plot show mean values and the data show n = 2–4 biological replicates over two independent experiments. e Heatmaps show the expression of Got1 in bulk RNA sequencing data obtained from the indicated cells. Color-coding is as per legend (white, low expression; blue, high expression) and shows relative values within the Got1 gene. Data show three independent experiments. f UMAP of the single cell RNA and ADT sequencing data showing expression across different clusters of Got1. g Mass spectrometry quantification of NAD+ in the indicated cells. The bars show mean ± SEM. Data show three independent experiments analyzed simultaneously. Statistics were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison correction. Mitotracker green (h) and TMRM (i) in Ctrl vs Got1-deleted CD69CD103, CD69+ and CD69+CD103+ cells isolated from LP of mice orally challenged with LmOVA. Lines in the dot plot show pairing within single mice, and dot plots show cumulative data of n = 9 biological replicates over two independent experiments. j Distribution of Ctrl vs Got1-deleted CD8+ T cells gated in the population of CD45.2+ cells between CD69CD103, CD69+ and CD69+CD103+ populations, upon LmOVA challenge in LP. Lines in the dot plot show pairing within single mice; dot plots show cumulative data of n = 9 biological replicates over two independent experiments. k After activation CD8+ T cells migrate and enter the intestine. Here, they sense PGE2 via the EP4 receptor. PGE2 drives the reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential, in part via alteration of the malate-aspartate shuttle, and leads to drop in mitochondrial mass. Autophagy contributes to the clearance of depolarized mitochondria, whereas glutathione maintains the redox balance by scavenging mitochondrial ROS, to ultimately shape the pool of CD8+ T cells. Image created with Biorender.com. hj Statistics were performed using two-way ANOVA and Sidak’s multiple comparison correction. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

As CD8+ T cells in the LP and IEL fraction of the intestine had a fragmented mitochondrial network (Supplementary Fig. 4), and mitochondrial fission plays a role in mitophagy, we tested whether Drp1 was required to mediate the PGE2-driven reduction of mitochondrial content50. Mice carrying a Drp1 deletion in the T cell compartment (Drp1f/fCD4Cre+) showed a normal distribution of CD8+ T cells across mLN, LP and IEL compared to littermate controls (Drp1f/fCD4Cre-) (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, deficiency of Drp1 did not affect the ability of LP and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells to reduce their mitochondrial content and function in the gut microenvironment (Fig. 5c, d). These data suggest that Drp1-deficient cells are able to respond normally to PGE2 in the gut, and are in line with previous reports suggesting that Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission could be dispensable for mitophagy5153.

We used hints from our previous work43 as a framework to further explore PGE2 regulation of mitochondrial content in intestinal LP and epithelial CD8+ T cells. Bulk RNA sequencing showed a strong upregulation of Got1 in CD69+CD103+ cells isolated from the LP (Fig. 5e). This result was confirmed at the single cell level (Fig. 5f) and, of note, both the datasets highlighted that Got1 upregulation occurred only in the LP, sparing IEL (Fig. 5e, f). Got1 encodes an enzyme playing a key role in the activity of the malate-aspartate shuttle (MAS), a system that controls redox balance between mitochondria and cytosol. While other enzymes involved in the MAS were not substantially affected in this setting, the MAS metabolite NAD+ was decreased in CD8+ T cells isolated from the LP and IEL fraction of the gut compared to mLN-isolated counterparts (Fig. 5g). Reduced NAD+ levels likely affected function of the NAD+-dependent enzyme GAPDH, key to regulate glycolytic flux. LP and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells accumulated metabolites upstream of GAPDH, such as hexose phosphate, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP), while the levels of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), downstream of GAPDH, remained unaffected (Supplementary Fig. 7a). All in all, these data build upon our previous work43 and implicate that intestinal PGE2 may affect the function of MAS, and ultimately shape mitochondrial content and function in CD8+ T cells. To test this hypothesis, we deleted Got1 in OVA-specific cells (Supplementary Fig. 7b), transferred them in recipient mice and assessed if Got1 played a role in controlling mitochondrial content and function in CD8+ T cells isolated from the LP and IEL, upon challenge with LmOVA. While Got1 deficiency did not consistently affect the distribution of CD8+ T cells in the LP and IEL (Supplementary Fig. 7c), it did affect the ability of CD8+ T cells to reduce their mitochondrial content and function in response to gut LP entry (Fig. 5h, i). The impairment of the reduction of mitochondrial content was observed only in CD69CD103 and CD69+ T cells, suggesting that additional mechanisms other than the one mediated by Got1 could regulate mitochondrial content in CD8+ T cells. Of note, Got1-deficient cells were less prone to transit to the CD69+ state, and accumulated as CD69CD103 cells (Fig. 5j), reminiscent of the effect driven by Ptger4 deletion (Fig. 3k).

In summary, we identified a mechanism that underlies the adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the intestinal microenvironment. T cells entering the LP and epithelial layer of the gut sense PGE2, expressed in the gut during homeostasis, which drives reduction of mitochondrial mass and membrane potential in these CD8+ T cells, which express EP4. We propose that PGE2 affects the mitochondrial membrane potential via alterations of the malate-aspartate shuttle, autophagy contributes to the clearance of depolarized mitochondria, whereas glutathione maintains the redox balance in PGE2-responding cells to ultimately shape the pool of gut CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5k).

Discussion

Immune responses are initiated in lymphoid tissues, but immune cells carry out their effector function in peripheral tissues. Thus, understanding the adaptation of immune cells to their surrounding environment is key to design new approaches to regulate immunity in a tissue-specific fashion. Investigation of tissue immunity has been hindered by technical limitations that constrain the yield of cells that can be isolated from these tissues and analyzed54. Single cell technologies are now providing a way to partially overcome these limitations, and to capture transcriptional changes that may underscore the adaptation of cells to the tissue microenvironment. In this study, we used single cell RNA sequencing and oligo-tagged antibody staining to characterize how the intestine-specific CD8+ T cell response unfolds across lymphoid (mLN) and peripheral (LP and IEL) tissues. Of note, our analysis focuses on thymus-selected CD8αβ T cells, from their naïve stage in mLN, to their terminally-differentiated stage as induced IEL. We took advantage of the constitutive physiological activation of the gut immune response driven by microbiota and food antigens (reviewed in ref. 55) to investigate the adaptation of T cells to the gut microenvironment. By using this strategy, we overcame the potential alterations of tissue architecture caused by an overt infection that could potentially affect the homeostatic environment of the gut. However, to confirm our findings in an antigen-specific model, we orally challenged mice with L. monocytogenes, to assess the adaptation of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells to the gut, and to test how genetic manipulations of the PGE2-autophagy-glutathione axis affected accumulation of CD8+ T cells in the intestine.

Single cell analysis of the gut CD8+ T cell immune response identified a continuum of transcriptional and surface features that positioned the lamina propria (LP) of the small intestine as a transit site for recently-activated CD8+ T cells (TEM) trafficking from the mLN to the periphery. Despite the limitations inherent to this analysis, such as the “snapshot” nature of it, this finding is in line with the notion that blood vessels that supply the small intestine are embedded within the LP56, suggesting that this tissue acts as a seeding ground for the whole gut, and is the location where T cell adaption to the gut environment likely occurs. Our analysis found that gut adaptation is underscored by transcriptional and metabolic changes, prompting the questions of whether and how the gut microenvironment affects the epigenetic landscape of CD8+ T cells exposed to it. Metabolites such as acetate, produced by the microbiota, may affect the intracellular pool of acetyl coenzyme A that is used as a substrate for acetylating histones and thus regulating gene expression. This may also be an interesting topic of study in light of the ability of gut-resident TRM to rejoin the systemic circulation and immune responses57.

The major metabolic change we identified upon adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the gut environment was a stark reduction in mitochondrial content driven by sensing of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). We suggest that T cells clear mitochondria following a drop in mitochondrial membrane potential driven by PGE2 and its regulation of the malate-aspartate shuttle. Despite mitochondrial depolarization and clearance, intestinal LP and epithelial T cells showed a viable energy balance and the remaining mitochondria could efficiently engage the electron transport chain. Our analysis did not show whether the entire mitochondrial repertoire of a cell was homogeneously affected by PGE2. It is likely that depolarized vs polarized mitochondria are sorted for clearance through autophagy, and it would be interesting to study if and how mitochondria can be controlled at the single organelle level to ultimately support cell viability and function. It is also worth noting that cells in the LP and IEL fraction of the gut showed a reduced ATP:AMP ratio, which may affect their long-term performance in coping with the continuously challenging environment of the gut.

Our metabolomic analysis of the interstitial fluid showed that in steady-state physiological conditions PGE2 is characteristic of the gut microenvironment and affects CD8+ T cell mitochondrial content, leaving other cells, such as macrophages, unaffected. PGE2 has been widely recognized to affect several aspects of T cell immune responses and intestinal physiology41,5862. Indeed, PGE2 is an integral component of the gut environment, essential to promote epithelial maintenance upon the constitutive stress posed by the microflora41,42. While gut IEL have been shown to have reduced mitochondrial mass as well as a different proteome as compared to mLN-resident CD8+ T cells34,63, our data establish a mechanistic link between physiological PGE2 concentrations in the intestine and how they uniquely affect T cells to shape their metabolic profile and adaptation to the gut environment. It remains to be assessed how PGE2 production is regulated in the gut and whether PGE2 concentrations increase in other peripheral tissues upon pathological changes, such as described in the tumor microenvironment64. Similarly, as sensing of PGE2 is affected by expression of EP receptors, the tissue-specific receptor expression likely influences the effect of PGE2 in different cell types. Differently from CD8+ T cells, gut LP-isolated macrophages did not reduce their mitochondrial content. While a subset of gut-resident macrophages, as well as other intestinal cells, was found to express Ptger4 and/or other EP receptors6567, it is likely that additional factors play a role in shaping the mitochondrial content of gut-isolated cells. For instance, we showed that the activation profile of macrophages could circumvent the mitochondrial changes driven by PGE2 exposure43. While our data clearly highlight how the tissue microenvironment impinges on the metabolic fitness of immune cells, the mechanistic link between the sensing of PGE2, the reduction of mitochondrial content, and the acquisition of the bona fine resident memory phenotype is yet to be defined. Tracing experiments of antigen-specific cells across time (from naïve to memory time points) and space (secondary lymphoid tissues to small intestine) will help addressing this point. While PGE2 itself was found to trigger autophagy, this could also occur as a consequence of the PGE2-driven mitochondrial depolarization. The binding of PGE2 to EP4 engages the cAMP/PKA pathway, and it has been suggested that PGE2 may directly activate PI3K68, providing a potential explanation of the effect of the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin in preventing both mitochondrial clearance and reduction of mitochondrial membrane potential, as compared to bafilomycin A1, an inhibitor of late stages of autophagy, the effect of which is restricted to mitochondrial clearance. Our data implicating a role for autophagy in mitochondrial quality control of LP and IEL CD8+ T cells are in line with findings that highlighted autophagy as a key pathway required for the establishment of CD8+ T cell tissue residence69. In addition, while the mitochondrial fission-inducing protein DRP1 is required for mitophagy in cardiomyocytes70, deletion of Drp1 did not prevent the loss of mitochondrial mass observed upon entry of CD8+ T cells in the intestine. It is possible that gut-adapting CD8+ T cells use additional strategies beyond autophagy to clear mitochondria. For example, migratory cells are able to dispose of damaged mitochondria through a process called mitocytosis71.

While deletion of the EP4 receptor promoted the accumulation of CD8+ T cells in the intestinal LP and epithelial layer, tampering with autophagy or glutathione pathways negatively affected the establishment of the T cell pools in the analyzed intestinal compartments, supporting a key role for these processes in regulating T cell function and intestinal homeostasis48,49,7275. Analysis of bona fide memory time points will clarify whether PGE2 sensing, autophagy and glutathione are involved in the establishment of the CD8+ T cell memory compartment in the intestine. Of note, the teleology of our findings may appear peculiar, that is, why LP- and IEL-isolated CD8+ T cells express a receptor (EP4) that hinders their fitness. It is, however tempting to speculate that PGE2 may play a role in ‘updating’ the CD8+ T cell pool. By triggering mitochondrial dysfunction, and thus shortening the life span of the cells76, PGE2 may continuously remodel the CD8+ T cell repertoire to adapt to ever-changing conditions, such as those presented by the microbiota or food antigens. Alternatively, PGE2 sensing and the subsequent reduction of mitochondrial content in T cells, may represent one of the strategies in place in the gut to constrain the CD8+ immune response mediated by TEM. Our results seem to support this hypothesis as Ptger4 deletion not only triggered accumulation of CD8+ T cells in LP and IEL, but also retained them in the CD69CD103 status. While autophagy is intrinsically required to clear the damaged mitochondria and preserve a viable size of the CD8+ T cell compartment, elevated glutathione may be a consequence of the depolarization of mitochondria and elevated mitochondrial ROS driven by PGE2, and could modulate its ‘purging’ effect on the T cell pool. In addition, our findings may aid in the interpretation of the counterintuitive clinical phenomenon of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced colitis (NSAIDs are known inhibitors of PGE2 biosynthesis), suggesting a possible role for the accumulation of CD8+ T cells in driving the disease77. It is however worth noticing that under certain experimental settings, T cells have been shown to be dispensable for the induction of NSAID-triggered colitis59. Finally, our data showed that gut LP and epithelium localization of CD8+ T cells is characterized by reduced mitochondrial content, as well as by reduced levels of NAD+, and a possibly diminished glycolytic flux. The origin of these phenomena likely lies in the effect of PGE2 on the function of the malate-aspartate shuttle, causing the “cooling down” of CD8+ T cell metabolism upon sensing the gut microenvironment, a hypothesis in line with recent literature showing limited metabolic activation of gut-resident T cells78.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have thus far shown limited success in colorectal cancers (CRC79). We speculate that mitochondrial loss in T cells could be an underlying factor contributing to the lack of efficacy of ICI in CRC. While exposure to PGE2 does not appear to diminish T cell function, such as the production of IFN-γ, it nevertheless limits cell numbers in the niche. Moreover, recent data showed that inhibition of PGE2 sensing by EP2 and EP4 receptors promoted the accumulation of CD8+ T cells within tumors80. Our data corroborate these findings by showing that EP4-deficient T cells outcompete wild-type cells to occupy the LP and IEL niche in greater numbers, suggesting that pharmacological blockade of the PGE2 receptor or PGE2 synthesis might increase T cell numbers in the gut. We question whether combining ICI with PGE2 pathway inhibition could enhance the outcome of ICI in CRC by increasing the number of CD8+ T cells in the niche, as previously suggested64. Further, it is likely that ICI efficacy may require T cells to have “fit” mitochondria, and not dysfunctional ones, as result from PGE2 exposure. We speculate that the PGE2-autophagy-glutathione pathway could be targeted to fine-tune the accumulation of CD8+ T cells in the gut, to modulate immune responses underscoring inflammatory bowel disease and cancer.

In summary, we propose that a balance between PGE2 sensing, mitochondrial clearance, and glutathione-regulated redox balance shapes the adaptation of CD8+ T cells to the gut microenvironment and ultimately the establishment of the CD8+ T cell pool. PGE2 is required for gut epithelial stability and repair, therefore, it is an integral part of this tissue’s environmental signature. As T cells transition from the mLN to the gut LP and epithelial layer, they become exposed to PGE2. This causes mitochondrial depolarization and affects mitochondrial fitness. However, T cells adapt by engaging autophagy to clear depolarized mitochondria and augment glutathione synthesis to regulate cellular redox balance—these metabolic adaptations allow gut T cells to maintain function and carry on. Thus, we conclude that the environment surrounding CD8+ T cells impinges on their metabolic choices, complements cytokine sensing and transcriptional rewiring, and allows T cells to adapt and function in the newly encountered tissue niche.

Methods

Mice, in vivo treatments and ethical statement

C57BL/6J mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664), PhAM mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:018397), CD4Cre mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:017336), Drp1floxed mice (gift from Hiromi Sesaki), Great mice (interferon-γ reporter, RRID: IMSR_JAX:017580), major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-restricted ovalbumin (OVA)-specific TCR OT-I transgenic mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:003831), CD45.1 congenic mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:002014), Thy1.1 congenic mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:000406) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Mito-roGFP2-Orp1 mice (tracking mitochondrial H2O2 production)46,47 were a kind gift from Tobias P. Dick (DKFZ).

All mice were maintained in the animal facilities at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics, under specific-pathogen free (SPF) conditions and following institutional animal use and care guidelines. Mice were exposed to a 14 h/10 h light/dark cycle and fed ad libitum with acidified water (pH 2.5–3.3). Euthanasia and animal procedures were conducted on 8–12 weeks old male and/or female mice, age-matched and sex-matched, in compliance to § 4, paragraph 3 of the German Animal Protection Act, animal licenses 35-9185.81/G-20/107 and 35-9185.81/G-20/101, approved by the Regierungspräsidium Freiburg.

To assess the residency of T cells in various tissues, mice were injected intravenously (iv) with 2.5 μg of fluorescently labeled anti-CD45 antibody (clone 30-F11), 10 min before euthanasia, perfusion and analysis.

To establish the antigen-specific Listeria monocytogenes infection model, we proceeded as follows. 104 naive congenically-marked OT-I cells (CD90.1+ in experiments in Fig. 2d, f, CD45.2+ in experiments in Figs. 35 and Supplementary Figs. 47) were adoptively transferred in unchallenged recipient CD90.2+ CD45.1+ mice. In the competition experiments shown in Figs. 35, 104 or 105 (Got1 experiments) naive congenically-marked OT-I cells (CD45.2+ and CD90.2+) and 104 or 105 (Got1 experiments) naive congenically-marked OT-I cells (CD45.2+ CD90.1+) were genetically modified by CRISPR-Cas9 (see details below) and co-transferred in unchallenged recipient CD45.1+ mice. 24 h after the adoptive transfer, recipient mice were challenged with 109 CFU of LmOVA intra-gastric (oral gavage, og). Mice were monitored daily, euthanized and analyzed 7 or 24 days post-infection.

Isolation of cells

To isolate cells from the spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN), the organs were mashed on a 70 μm strainer in medium containing RPMI1640, 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS), 4 mM glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution and 55 μM β-mercaptoethanol (hereafter named complete medium). Cell suspensions were treated with Gey’s solution for 3 min if red blood cell lysis was required. Finally, cells were extensively washed and suspensions used for downstream applications. Purification of CD8+ T cells for sorting or cell culture was performed using a mouse CD8+ T cell isolation kit (Stem Cell Technologies, Cat# 19853), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Isolation of cells from the small intestine was performed as follows. Upon harvesting, fat tissue bordering the small intestine was carefully removed and Peyer’s patches were excised. Small intestines were cut open, washed with ice-cold PBS 1X + 25 mM Hepes, cut into 2 cm-long pieces and collected in medium containing RPMI1640, 25 mM Hepes, 3% FCS, 4 mM glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 55 μM β-mercaptoethanol (hereafter named 3% FCS medium). Small intestines were incubated in 3% FCS medium added with 5 mM EDTA and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 25 min, at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and agitation (1st incubation). After the incubation, cells in suspension were collected, consecutively strained through 100 μm and 40 μm strainers, washed and kept as intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) fraction. The leftover small intestine pieces were thoroughly (4 times) washed by shaking with ice-cold medium containing RPMI1640, 25 mM Hepes, 4 mM glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 55 mM β-mercaptoethanol (hereafter named serum-free medium) added with 2 mM EDTA. Washed small intestine pieces were then finely chopped and incubated in serum-free medium added with 100 μg/ml Liberase TL (Roche) and 50 μg/ml DNAse I (Roche) for 35 min, at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and agitation (2nd incubation). After digestion, suspensions were strained through 70 μm strainers, washed and kept as lamina propria (LP) fraction. LP and IEL were enriched for leukocytes using a three-layers percoll gradient (percoll 75%, 40% and 30%) centrifuged for 20 min, at room temperature, 680 g, without any centrifuge acceleration or brake. The leukocyte layer between percoll 75% and 40% was collected as enriched LP or IEL fraction, extensively washed and suspensions used for downstream applications. In some experiments, 1 μM of KN-62 (Sigma), inhibitor of P2RX7 used to limit cell death during intestine digestion37, was added to media used in the 1st and 2nd incubation.

T cell isolation from the liver was performed as follows. Whole liver was collected in ice cold complete medium, finely chopped and incubated in RPMI1640 added with 1 mg/ml collagenase IA (Sigma) and 50 μg/ml DNAse I (Roche) for 45 min, at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and agitation. After digestion, suspensions were strained through 70 μm strainers, washed and enriched for leukocytes using percoll 33% and centrifuging them for 20 min, at room temperature, 680 g. The leukocyte pellet was collected, extensively washed, red blood cell lysis was performed and suspensions used for downstream applications.

Lung digestion was performed as follows. Lungs were collected in ice-cold complete medium, finely chopped and incubated in complete medium added with 1 mg/ml collagenase IA (Sigma) and 50 μg/ml DNAse I (Roche) for 45 min, at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and agitation. After digestion, suspensions were strained through 70 μm strainers, washed and enriched for leukocytes using a three-layers percoll gradient (percoll 75%, 40% and 30%) centrifuged for 20 min, at room temperature, 680 g, without any centrifuge acceleration or brake. The leukocyte layer between percoll 75% and 40% was collected, extensively washed and suspensions used for downstream applications.

To isolate human PBMCs from fresh blood samples, blood was first diluted 1:1 with PBS 1X + 2% FCS. Samples were then layered in SepMateTM PBMC isolation tubes (Stem Cell Technologies) preloaded with Lymphoprep (Stem Cell Technologies) and centrifuged for 10 min, at room temperature, 1200 g. The PBMC layer was collected and extensively washed in PBS 1X + 2% FCS and suspensions used for downstream applications.

For isolation of cells from human gut biopsies, we proceeded as follows. Fresh or frozen gut biopsies (5 mm; matched with fresh or frozen PBMCs) were mashed through 70 μm strainers in complete medium. Suspensions were extensively washed and finally used for downstream applications.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

To analyze the CD8+ T cell response in humans, we used the surface markers CD45RA, CD27, CD69 and CD103, identifying by flow cytometry five CD8+ T cell populations: CD45RA+CD27+ TN, CD45RACD27 TEM, CD45RA+CD27- TEMRA and CD45RA-CD27+ TCM isolated from blood; CD69+CD103+ TRM isolated from gut biopsies. To analyze the continuum of the gut immune response in mouse we used the surface markers CD62L, CD44, CD69 and CD103, identifying by flow cytometry seven CD8+ T cell populations that approximate the transition of CD8+ T cells from mLN to the intestine: CD62L+CD44 TN, CD62L+CD44+ TCM, CD62LCD44+CD69-CD103 TEM and CD62LCD44+CD69+CD103+ TRM isolated from mLN; CD44+CD69-CD103- and CD44+CD69+CD103+ from LP; and CD44+CD69+CD103+ induced CD8αβ cells from IEL.

Before staining with MitoTrackerTM Green or TMRM, cell suspensions were counted and equal cell numbers were stained to prevent uneven staining of suspensions with different cell numbers, and thus bias the analysis. The following dyes and staining procedures were used. MitoTrackerTM Green FM (Invitrogen) was used to stain cells at a concentration of 100 nM in complete medium, for 30 min, at 37 °C, 5% CO2. In some experiments, 50 μM of Verapamil (Sigma), inhibitor of mitochondrial efflux pumps encoded by Bcrp1 and Mdr1a/b, used to prevent efflux of MitoTrackerTM green FM from mitochondria36, was added to the staining medium. Tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester perchlorate (TMRM, Invitrogen) was used to stain cells at concentrations of 50 or 10 nM, according to the experiment, in complete medium, for 30 min, at 37 °C, 5% CO2. In experiments where TMRM kinetic was analyzed, 500 nM cyclosporin H (Sigma), another inhibitor of mitochondrial efflux pumps used to prevent efflux of TMRM from mitochondria, was added to the staining and acquisition media. In the same experiments, oligomycin (Sigma), inhibitor of complex V of the electron transport chain (ETC) was used at a concentration of 10 μM, whereas carbonilcyanide p-triflouromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP, an ionophore that permeabilize the inner mitochondrial membrane to H+, Sigma) was used at a concentration of 10 μM. CellROXTM Deep Red or Green (Invitrogen) was used to stain cells at a concentration of 250 nM in complete medium, for 30 min, at 37 °C, 5% CO2. In the experiments using Mito-roGFP2-Orp1 mice, gates were set upon treating the cells with the reducing agent DTT (10 mM, 15 min) or the oxidizing reagent diamide (1 mM, 15 min).

Cell viability was quantified by flow cytometry using LIVE/DEADTM blue or near-IR dyes (Invitrogen) or Zombie GreenTM dye (Biolegend), following manufacturer instructions.

Surface staining was performed in PBS 1X + 2% FCS + 5 mM EDTA, for 20 min, on ice, in the dark, upon blocking cells with anti-CD16/32 (clone: 93, Biolegend). The following antibodies (clone in brackets) were used for surface staining of murine cells: anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD8α (53-6.7), anti-CD8β (53-5.8), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD69 (H1.2F3), anti-CD64 (X54-5/7.1), anti-F4/80 (BM8), anti-Ly6G (1A8), anti-TIM4 [54(RMT4-54)], anti-CD45.2 (104), anti-Thy1.1 (OX-7) all from Biolegend; anti-CD103 (2E7), from Invitrogen; anti-Siglec F (E50-2440), from BD. The following antibodies (clone in brackets) were used for surface staining of human cells: anti-CD19 (HIB19), anti-CD3 (HIT3a), anti-CD8 (HIT8a), anti-CD69 (FN50), anti-CD103 (Ber.ACT8), anti-CD45RA (HI100), anti-CD27 (LG3A10), all from Biolegend.

Intracellular staining was performed upon restimulation of ex vivo isolated cells in U-bottom plates coated with anti-CD3 at 5 μg/ml and resuspending the cells in complete medium added with 100 U/ml IL-2 and soluble αCD28 at 0.5 μg/ml, in presence of brefeldin A 1:1000 (Biolegend), under 5% CO2, atmospheric oxygen, at 37 °C in a humidified incubator for 4 h. After surface staining, intracellular staining was performed using Citofix/CytopermTM kit (BD) following manufacturer instructions and using the following antibodies: anti-interferon γ (XMG1.2), anti-TNF (MP6-XT22), all from Biolegend.

Cells were acquired on BD LSRFortessaTM or BD FACSymphonyTM, or they were sorted using BD FACSAriaTM. Raw data were analyzed with FlowJo (BD).

TotalSeqTM antibody staining

TotalSeqTM-A Custom Mouse panel including 198 antibodies was obtained from Biolegend (#99833). The staining procedure was performed immediately after cell sorting and strictly following manufacturer instructions. Specifically, 25 μl of TotalSeqTM-A antibody cocktail were used to label 25 μl of cell suspension containing 5 × 105 cells. Four groups of samples have been prepared for TotalSeqTM-A antibody staining and the following single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), in biological triplicate: 1. naive and central memory CD8+ T cells (CD62L+) isolated from mLN (mLN TN and TCM); 2. effector memory CD8+ T cells (CD62L CD44+) isolated from mLN (mLN TEM); 3. total CD8+ T cells isolated from LP (LP CD8); 4. total CD8+ T cells isolated from IEL (IEL CD8). This strategy was designed to focus the analysis on CD8+ T cells (hence the cell sorting approach), to monitor the entire course of the response (from mLN to IEL) and to enhance the resolution of the analysis to the stages involving the T cell adaptation to the intestinal tissue (hence the higher number of cells analyzed from LP).

Single-cell RNA sequencing

After staining with TotalSeqTM-A antibodies, suspensions were used for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), hereafter briefly described. Following the protocol CG000204 RevD from 10X Genomics, we aimed at analyzing 1000 cells of group 1 (mLN TN and TCM), 5000 cells of group 2 (mLN TEM), 10,000 cells of group 3 (LP CD8) and 5000 cells of group 4 (IEL CD8). At step 2.2, we followed Biolegend instructions to add ADT additive primers. Step 2.3 (and only this step) was performed following the protocol CG000185 RevD from 10X Genomics. 3′ gene expression libraries were further processed following the protocol CG000204 RevD from 10X Genomics, whereas ADT libraries (cell surface protein libraries) were processed following instructions from Biolegend. 3′ gene expression and ADT libraries were quantified by fragment analyzer and pooled for multiplexed sequencing on a NovaSeq 6000 instrument by the Deep-sequencing Facility at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics. 3′ gene expression libraries were run with a read length of 2 × 100 whereas ADT libraries were run with a read length of 2 × 50. Both libraries were sequenced using the following parameters, as recommended by 10X Genomics and Biolegend: Read 1: 28 cycles, i7: 8 cycles, i5: 0 cycles, Read 2: 91 cycles. 50,000 reads/cell were sequenced for 3′ gene expression libraries, 12,500 reads/cell were sequenced for ADT libraries.

Samples were demultiplexed and aligned using Cell Ranger 6.1 (10X Genomics) to genome build mm10 to obtain a raw read count matrix of barcodes corresponding to cells and features corresponding to detected genes. Read count matrices were processed, analyzed and visualized in R v. 4 (R Core Team 2013) using Seurat v. 481 with default parameters in all functions, unless specified. Poor quality cells, with low total unique molecular identifier (UMI) counts (<4000), low number of detected genes (<1500) and high percent mitochondrial gene expression (>20%), were excluded. Filtered samples were normalized using a regularized negative binomial regression (SCTransform)82 and merged. Principal component analysis was performed on merged matrices and the first 50 principal components were used for downstream analysis. Integrated gene expression matrices were visualized with a UMAP83 as a dimensionality reduction approach. For ADT libraries, samples were demultiplexed and then processed with CITE-seq-Count v. 1.4.584. Later merged and harmonized to remove biological replicate associated effects using harmony85. A combined UMAP for RNA and ADT profiles was generated by building a weighted nearest neighbors graph based on their respective PCA projections81. Resolution for cell clustering was determined by evaluating hierarchical clustering trees at a range of resolutions (0–1.2) with Clustree86, selecting a value inducing minimal cluster instability. Differentially expressed genes between clusters were identified as those expressed in at least 25% of cells with a greater than +0.5 log10 fold change and an adjusted p value of less than 0.01, using the FindMarkers function in Seurat v.4 with all other parameters set to default. Ribosomal protein genes were excluded from results. Cluster specific genes were explored for pathway enrichment using Biological Process Gene Ontology annotation with goseq v. 1.40.087. Gene set scores were calculated using the AddModuleScore function in Seurat v.4 with default parameters. Briefly, the average expression levels of each identified gene set were calculated on a single cell level and subtracted by the aggregated expression of randomly selected control gene sets. For this purpose, target genes are binned based on averaged expression, and corresponding control genes are randomly selected from each bin. Cell trajectories and pseudotime estimations were calculated with Slingshot v. 1.6.135, using UMAP projection and pre-calculated clustering as input for getLineages and getCurves functions with default parameters, setting origin to cluster 6. Trajectory-dependent gene regulation was visualized by fitting general additive models79 using gam v. 1.20 (Hastie, T 2020) using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (loess) smooth terms.

Western blot

For western blotting analysis, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS 1X and lysed in 1X Cell Signaling lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCL [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 μg/mL leupeptin), supplemented with 1X Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Cell Signaling, #5871) for 30 min, on ice, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 10 min, at 4 °C. Cleared protein extracts were denatured with NuPAGETM LDS loading buffer (Invitrogen) added with 50 mM DTT for 10 min at 75 °C and loaded onto precast NuPAGETM 4–12% bis-tris protein gels (Invitrogen), or NuPAGETM 12% bis-tris protein gels (these ones were used for LC3 immunoblotting, Invitrogen). Samples were loaded according to the cell number: Between 5 × 104 and 2 × 105 cells per sample were analyzed, normalizing the loading within every experiment. Protein samples were run using MES buffer 1X (Invitrogen). Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using the iBLOT2 system (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer protocols. Membranes were blocked for 1 h with 5% w/v milk in TBS 1X added with Tween-20 0.05% and incubated with primary antibodies in 5% w/v milk in TBS 1X added with Tween-20 0.05% overnight at 4 °C or 1 h at room temperature. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-TOM20 (clone D8T4N, 1:1000, Cell Signaling), anti-TFAM (polyclonal, 1:1000, Abcam), anti-β actin (clone 13E5, 1:10,000, Cell Signaling), anti-OPA1 (clone 18/OPA-1, 1:2000, BD), anti-EP4 (encoded by Ptger4, clone C-4, 1:100, Santa Cruz), anti-ATG5 (clone D5F5U, 1:1000, Cell Signaling), anti-Gclc (clone OTI1A3, 1:1000, Invitrogen), anti-LC3B (polyclonal, 1:3000, Sigma), anti-SQSTM1/p62 (clone D1Q5S, 1:1000, Cell Signaling), anti-Got-1 (clone E4A4O, 1:1000, Cell Signaling). All primary antibody incubations were followed by incubation with secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies (Pierce) in 5% w/v milk in TBS 1X added with Tween-20 0.05% for 1 h at room temperature and visualized using SuperSignal West Pico or Femto Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce) using Biomax MR Film (Kodak) or a Bio-Rad ChemiDocTM Imaging System. Optical density of the signals on the film was quantified using grayscale measurements in ImageJ software (NIH) and converted to fold change, normalized to the loading control.

Fluorescence microscopy

Spinning disk confocal imaging was performed as follows. Cells were isolated and sorted as previously described from unchallenged PhAM mice. A minimal surface staining panel was used for sorting the cells to minimize interference with the PhAM signal during spinning disk acquisition. After sorting, cells were resuspended in complete medium and transferred to Lab-TekTM II chambers (Nunc) coated with poly-D-lysine. Chambers were spun to favor the attachment of the cells to the bottom of the chambers. During the entire experiment, cells were maintained alive at 37 °C, 5% CO2 using a Tokai Hit chamber. Fluorescence of Dendra2 (fluorescent protein in PhAM mice) and Hoechst 33342 (nuclear counterstaining) was acquired using a Zeiss spinning disk confocal with an Evolve (EMCCD) camera. Confocal images were deconvoluted using Huygens software and analyzed using Imaris imaging software.

Transmission electron microscopy

Between 2.5 × 105 and 106 cells were processed for electron microscopy. After FACS sorting, cells were fixed in glutaraldehyde 2.5% in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4, for 20′ at RT, washed in the same buffer, and stored at +4 C until analysis.

Bulk RNA sequencing

For bulk RNA sequencing, 105 cells per target population from each of three biological replicates were isolated, processed and analyzed. RNA was extracted using RNAqueousTM Total RNA isolation kit (Ambion) according to manufacturer instructions and quantified using Qubit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following manufacturer instructions. Libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Single Cell/Low Input RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina and sequenced with a NovaSeq 6000 instrument by the Deep-sequencing Facility at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics. Sequenced libraries were processed with deepTools88,89, using STAR90, for trimming and mapping, and featureCounts91 to quantify mapped reads. Raw mapped reads were processed in R (Lucent Technologies) with DESeq292, to determine differentially expressed genes (adjusted p value < 0.05, log2 fold change > 1) and generate normalized read counts to be visualized as heatmaps using Morpheus (Broad Institute).

Human samples and ethical statement

Biopsies from n = 5 healthy donors presenting for routine endoscopy were included in the study. None of the included biopsies showed macroscopic signs of active inflammation, and patients were asymptomatic. Human participants were recruited from the University Hospital Freiburg in a sequential manner with every patient undergoing endoscopy on the days of recruitment, being approached for participation in the study. Given no pre-selection based on age, gender, medical history (except for gastrointestinal diseases), or any other criteria, we do not perceive any bias in the recruitment of individuals. Blood and intestinal tissue were collected after obtaining the written consent of all study participants and following approval of the Institutional Review Boards (Ethics Committee of the Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg; #407/16 and #14/17). The study was performed in agreement with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013).

Isolation of interstitial fluid

For isolation of tissue interstitial fluid we proceeded as follows adapting an already published protocol93. Upon perfusion with ice cold PBS 1X, tissues (spleen, mLN, small intestine, liver and lungs) were carefully excised to maintain their integrity and collected in ice-cold PBS 1X. Blood was withdrawn by cardiac puncture and maintained on ice in absence of anticoagulants. Fecal content was collected from the lumen of the ileum section of the small intestine and kept on ice. Coagulated blood was spun for 10 min, 5000 g, at 4 °C and serum was collected and kept on ice until further processing. Fecal content was spun for 10 min, 400 g, at 4 °C and supernatant was collected and kept on ice until further processing. Tissues were gently tapped on adsorbing paper, wrapped in a 20 μm nylon mesh and placed in a 1.5 ml tube. Tubes were centrifuged for 5 min, 70 g, 4 °C to remove leftover PBS 1X. Tissue wrapped in the nylon mesh was transferred to another 1.5 ml tube and centrifuged for 10 min, 400 g, 4 °C. The flow-through is tissue interstitial fluid and volumes between 1 and 15 μl were collected. Interstitial fluid was kept on ice until further processing.

Metabolomic analysis

Untargeted metabolomic analysis of interstitial fluid was performed as follows. Nine volumes of ice-cold methanol 100% were added to the interstitial fluid, the samples vortexed and cooled on dry ice. Samples were centrifuged for 3 min, 20,000 g, at −9 °C. Supernatant was collected and samples were stored at −80 °C until further processing following protocols previously described94. Metabolites were analyzed and identified by fragmentation and retention time using Metaboscape software (Bruker).

Targeted metabolomic analysis was performed as follows. After sorting, 2 × 105 cells were resuspended in complete medium and rested for 30 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were washed in ice cold 3% glycerol and the pellet resuspended in extraction solution (ice-cold 80% methanol). Samples were incubated for 5 min on ice and centrifuged for 3 min, 20,000 g, at −9 °C. Supernatant was collected and kept on dry ice. Cell pellets were further resuspended for two more times with extraction solution and treated as previously described to further collect supernatants. Samples were finally dried using a Genevac EZ2 speed vac and stored at −80 °C until further processing following protocols previously described94. Targeted metabolite quantification by LC-MS was carried out using an Agilent 1290 Infinity II UHPLC in line with an Agilent 6495 QQQ-MS operating in MRM mode. MRM settings were optimized separately for all compounds using pure standards. LC separation was on a Phenomenex Luna propylamine column (50 × 2 mm, 3 μm particles) as described previously94. Briefly, a solvent gradient of 100% buffer B (5 mM ammonium carbonate in 90% acetonitrile) to 90% buffer A (10 mM NH4 in water) was used. Flow rate was from 1000 to 750 μL/min. Autosampler temperature was 5 °C and injection volume was 2 µL. Raw data were analyzed using the R package automRm95. Further analysis was performed using MassHunter software (Agilent).

In vitro T cell culture and treatments

Isolated CD8+ T cells from OT-I mice were maintained in the naive status after CRISPR-Cas9 gene targeting by resting them overnight in complete medium added with IL-7 (Peprotech) at 10 ng/ml. Isolated T cells were otherwise activated using plate-bound anti-CD3 (5 μg/ml, inVIVOMAb Cat# BE0002) in complete medium added with 100 U/ml IL-2 (Peprotech) and soluble αCD28 (0.5 μg/ml, inVivoMab Cat# BE0015) under 5% CO2, atmospheric oxygen, at 37 °C in a humidified incubator. At day 2 post activation, and then daily up to day 6, media were refreshed and cells counted and replated at a density of 106 cells/ml [for (IL-2)-T cells] or 1.5 × 106 cells/ml [for (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells]. (IL-2)-T cells were maintained in 100 U/ml IL-2 throughout the culture; to generate (IL-15/TGF-β)-T cells, cells were cultured in 10 ng/ml IL-15 and 10 ng/ml TGFβ starting from day 3 post-activation. Where indicated cells were treated with vehicle control (0.1% ethanol), PGE2 (Sigma) at the indicated concentrations and for the indicated time, PGE1 (Sigma), PGF (Sigma), PGI2 sodium salt (Sigma) and 15-deoxy-Δ12-14 PGJ2 (Sigma) at 100 nM, bafilomycin A1 (Sigma) at 100 nM, Wortmannin (PI3K inhibitor, Selleckchem) at 10 μM and SBI-0206965 (ULK1 inhibitor, Sigma) at 2 μM.

CRISPR-Cas9 gene targeting

The following gRNA were used to target the genes Ptger4, Atg5, Gclc, and Got1 in naive CD8+ T cells: Ptger4 (Mm.Cas9.PTGER4.1.AA; Mm.Cas9.PTGER4.1.AG), Atg5 (Mm.Cas9.ATG5.1.AA; Mm.Cas9.ATG5.1.AB), Gclc (Mm.Cas9.GCLC.1.AC; Mm.Cas9.GCLC.1.AD), Got1 (Mm.Cas9.GOT1.1.AB; Mm.Cas9.GOT1.1.AD). The following guide was used as non-targeting control: Mm.Cas9.GCGAGGTATTCGGCTCCGCG. All guides were purchased from IDT.

To prepare the targeting gRNA-Cas9 complex, equimolar amounts (180 pmol) of Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 tracrRNA (IDT) and gene-specific crRNA (indicated above) were mixed, incubated 5 min at 98 C and cooled at room temperature for 20 min. 60 pmol of recombinant Cas9 (IDT) was mixed and incubated for 20 more min. 5–10 × 106 naive CD8+ T cells isolated from OT-I mice were electroporated using the P4 Primary Cell 4D-NucleofectorTM X Kit and the prepared gRNA-Cas9 complexes. After electroporation, cells were recovered in complete medium added with components from the P4 Primary Cell 4D-NucleofectorTM X Kit and 10 ng/ml of IL-7, overnight, at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were then counted and further used for downstream applications.

Glutathione quantification

For glutathione quantification, 105 cells per target population were sorted and kept on ice until further processing using GSH-GloTM Glutathione Assay (Promega), strictly following manufacturer instructions. 1 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphin-hydrochlorid (TCEP) was used when appropriate to reduce GSSG to GSH, differentially quantify GSSG, and ultimately calculate the GSH/GSSG ratio.

Statistical analysis

Comparisons between two groups were performed using unpaired or paired, two-tailed, Student’s t test. Comparisons between more than two groups were performed using one-way or two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s, Sidak’s or Dunnet’s multiple comparison test according to the experimental settings. Statistical significance is expressed throughout the text as precise p value. Statistical analysis was performed using Graphpad Prism 7 Software.

Statistical analysis of untargeted metabolomic data was performed applying a Student’s t test between respectively: 1. metabolites identified in the small intestine and 2. metabolites identified in all the other tissues. This analysis was used to identify metabolites specifically present in the small intestine tissue. Analysis was performed using Metaboscape software (Bruker).

Further details on the statistical analysis can be found in the figures and the respective figure legends.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (835.3KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (255.6KB, pdf)

Source data

Source Data (26MB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Department of Immunometabolism at the Max Planck Institute for Immunobiology and Epigenetics (MPI-IE) for advice and discussions throughout the project. We specially thank Katharina Borst for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Andrea Quintana and John Sutherland for their technical support, and the Flow Cytometry, Metabolomics, Microscopy, Deep Sequencing, and Animal Facility Cores, as well as the veterinarian and animal welfare officers at the MPI-IE. We thank Federico Caicci and Francesco Boldrin of the Electron Microscopy Lab at the University of Padova for expert processing of samples. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society, the Leibniz Prize (DFG), AI156274 and AI172832 from the N.I.H. (to E.L.P.), the Fritz Thyssen Stiftung für Wissenschaftsförderung (to M.V.), an Alexander von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship (to M.V), and the Medical University of Graz. R.Z. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft – SFB-1479 – Project ID: 441891347. B.B. and E.J.P. were supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft – IMPATH-SFB – Project ID: 256073931. M.C. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft – SFB1218 (project ID: 269925409).

Author contributions

Study design: M.V. Conceptualization, project insight, and data interpretation: M.V., E.L.P., M.C., D.E.S. Performing and analyzing experiments: M.V., D.E.S., P.A., M.C., A.M.K., C.C., A.R., G.E.C., N.R., K.M.G., J.C., F.S., A.H., F.H., D.J.P. Providing advice and materials: M.A.S., F.B., A.M.K., A.-M.G., B.K., N.C.-W., P.H., B.B., R.Z., S., J.M.B., E.J.P. Manuscript writing: M.V., E.L.P. Funding: E.L.P., M.V.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Navdeep Chandel and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

Data can be found under GEO accession number GSE200568, a SuperSeries containing both the scRNAseq data and bulk RNAseq data. Datasets can be found at the following link: Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

E.L.P. is a SAB member of Immunomet Therapeutics. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist regarding this manuscript.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Matteo Villa, Email: matteo.villa@medunigraz.at.

Erika L. Pearce, Email: epearce6@jhmi.edu

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-44689-2.

References

  • 1.Lavelle, E. C. & Ward, R. W. Mucosal vaccines—fortifying the frontiers. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 236–250 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Masopust D, et al. Dynamic T cell migration program provides resident memory within intestinal epithelium . J. Exp. Med. 2010;207:553–564. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang N, Bevan MJ. CD8(+) T cells: foot soldiers of the immune system . Immunity. 2011;35:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Buck MD, et al. Mitochondrial dynamics controls T cell fate through metabolic programming . Cell. 2016;166:63–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Doedens AL, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors enhance the effector responses of CD8(+) T cells to persistent antigen . Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:1173–1182. doi: 10.1038/ni.2714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaech SM, et al. Molecular and functional profiling of memory CD8 T cell differentiation . Cell. 2002;111:837–851. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01139-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pearce EL, et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism . Nature. 2009;460:103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mueller SN, et al. Memory T cell subsets, migration patterns, and tissue residence. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2013;31:137–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kok, L. et al., A committed tissue-resident memory T cell precursor within the circulating CD8+ effector T cell pool. J. Exp. Med.217, e20191711 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.Milner JJ, et al. Heterogenous populations of tissue-resident CD8(+) T cells are generated in response to infection and malignancy. Immunity. 2020;52:808–824.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bartolome-Casado R, et al. Resident memory CD8 T cells persist for years in human small intestine. J. Exp. Med. 2019;216:2412–2426. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schenkel JM, Masopust D. Tissue-resident memory T cells. Immunity. 2014;41:886–897. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Szabo, P. A., Miron, M. and Farber, D. L. Location, location, location: tissue-resident memory T cells in mice and humans. Sci. Immunol. 4, eaas9673 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Wijeyesinghe S, et al. Expansible residence decentralizes immune homeostasis. Nature. 2021;592:457–462. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03351-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boland, B. S. et al., Heterogeneity and clonal relationships of adaptive immune cells in ulcerative colitis revealed by single-cell analyses. Sci. Immunol. 5, eabb4432 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Christo SN, et al. Discrete tissue microenvironments instruct diversity in resident memory T cell function and plasticity. Nat. Immunol. 2021;22:1140–1151. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kurd, N. S. et al., Early precursors and molecular determinants of tissue-resident memory CD8(+) T lymphocytes revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Sci. Immunol. 5 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Mackay LK, et al. Hobit and Blimp1 instruct a universal transcriptional program of tissue residency in lymphocytes. Science. 2016;352:459–463. doi: 10.1126/science.aad2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mackay LK, et al. The developmental pathway for CD103(+)CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells of skin. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:1294–1301. doi: 10.1038/ni.2744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mackay LK, et al. T-box transcription factors combine with the cytokines TGF-beta and IL-15 to control tissue-resident memory T cell fate. Immunity. 2015;43:1101–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Milner JJ, et al. Runx3 programs CD8(+) T cell residency in non-lymphoid tissues and tumours. Nature. 2017;552:253–257. doi: 10.1038/nature24993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pan Y, et al. Survival of tissue-resident memory T cells requires exogenous lipid uptake and metabolism. Nature. 2017;543:252–256. doi: 10.1038/nature21379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Frizzell, H. et al., Organ-specific isoform selection of fatty acid-binding proteins in tissue-resident lymphocytes. Sci. Immunol. 5, eaay9283 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 24.Chang CH, et al. Metabolic competition in the tumor microenvironment is a driver of cancer progression. Cell. 2015;162:1229–1241. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ho PC, et al. Phosphoenolpyruvate is a metabolic checkpoint of anti-tumor T cell responses. Cell. 2015;162:1217–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li C, et al. The transcription factor Bhlhe40 programs mitochondrial regulation of resident CD8(+) T cell fitness and functionality. Immunity. 2019;51:491–507.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reinfeld BI, et al. Cell-programmed nutrient partitioning in the tumour microenvironment. Nature. 2021;593:282–288. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03442-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hayward SL, et al. Environmental cues regulate epigenetic reprogramming of airway-resident memory CD8(+) T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:309–320. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0584-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Masopust D, et al. Cutting edge: gut microenvironment promotes differentiation of a unique memory CD8 T cell population. J. Immunol. 2006;176:2079–2083. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Anderson KG, et al. Intravascular staining for discrimination of vascular and tissue leukocytes. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9:209–222. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Skon CN, et al. Transcriptional downregulation of S1pr1 is required for the establishment of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:1285–1293. doi: 10.1038/ni.2745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mukherji A, et al. Homeostasis in intestinal epithelium is orchestrated by the circadian clock and microbiota cues transduced by TLRs. Cell. 2013;153:812–827. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sitkovsky MV, Ohta A. The ‘danger’ sensors that STOP the immune response: the A2 adenosine receptors? Trends Immunol. 2005;26:299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brenes, A. J. et al., Tissue environment, not ontogeny, defines murine intestinal intraepithelial T lymphocytes. Elife10, e70055 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Street K, et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genom. 2018;19:477. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4772-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Almeida MJ, et al. Dye-independent methods reveal elevated mitochondrial mass in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:725–729.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Scheuplein F, et al. NAD+ and ATP released from injured cells induce P2X7-dependent shedding of CD62L and externalization of phosphatidylserine by murine T cells. J. Immunol. 2009;182:2898–2908. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pham AH, McCaffery JM, Chan DC. Mouse lines with photo-activatable mitochondria to study mitochondrial dynamics. Genesis. 2012;50:833–843. doi: 10.1002/dvg.22050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Del Dotto V, et al. OPA1 isoforms in the hierarchical organization of mitochondrial functions. Cell Rep. 2017;19:2557–2571. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Reinhardt RL, Liang HE, Locksley RM. Cytokine-secreting follicular T cells shape the antibody repertoire. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:385–393. doi: 10.1038/ni.1715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Miyoshi H, et al. Prostaglandin E2 promotes intestinal repair through an adaptive cellular response of the epithelium. EMBO J. 2017;36:5–24. doi: 10.15252/embj.201694660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Patankar JV, et al. E-type prostanoid receptor 4 drives resolution of intestinal inflammation by blocking epithelial necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021;23:796–807. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00708-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sanin DE, et al. Mitochondrial membrane potential regulates nuclear gene expression in macrophages exposed to prostaglandin E2. Immunity. 2018;49:1021–1033.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Palikaras K, Lionaki E, Tavernarakis N. Mechanisms of mitophagy in cellular homeostasis, physiology and pathology. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:1013–1022. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0176-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Narendra D, et al. Parkin is recruited selectively to impaired mitochondria and promotes their autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2008;183:795–803. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fujikawa Y, et al. Mouse redox histology using genetically encoded probes. Sci. Signal. 2016;9:rs1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aad3895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gutscher M, et al. Proximity-based protein thiol oxidation by H2O2-scavenging peroxidases. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:31532–31540. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.059246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lian, G. et al., Glutathione de novo synthesis but not recycling process coordinates with glutamine catabolism to control redox homeostasis and directs murine T cell differentiation. Elife7, e36158 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Mak TW, et al. Glutathione primes T cell metabolism for inflammation. Immunity. 2017;46:1089–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Smirnova E, et al. Dynamin-related protein Drp1 is required for mitochondrial division in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2001;12:2245–2256. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.8.2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Burman JL, et al. Mitochondrial fission facilitates the selective mitophagy of protein aggregates. J. Cell Biol. 2017;216:3231–3247. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201612106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Song M, et al. Mitochondrial fission and fusion factors reciprocally orchestrate mitophagic culling in mouse hearts and cultured fibroblasts. Cell Metab. 2015;21:273–286. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yamashita SI, et al. Mitochondrial division occurs concurrently with autophagosome formation but independently of Drp1 during mitophagy. J. Cell Biol. 2016;215:649–665. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201605093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Steinert EM, et al. Quantifying memory CD8 T cells reveals regionalization of immunosurveillance. Cell. 2015;161:737–749. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jeurissen SH, et al. Lymphocyte migration into the lamina propria of the gut is mediated by specialized HEV-like blood vessels. Immunology. 1987;62:273–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Beura LK, et al. T cells in nonlymphoid tissues give rise to lymph-node-resident memory T cells. Immunity. 2018;48:327–338.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Boniface K, et al. Prostaglandin E2 regulates Th17 cell differentiation and function through cyclic AMP and EP2/EP4 receptor signaling. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:535–548. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chinen T, et al. Prostaglandin E2 and SOCS1 have a role in intestinal immune tolerance. Nat. Commun. 2011;2:190. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Crittenden, S. et al., Prostaglandin E2 promotes intestinal inflammation via inhibiting microbiota-dependent regulatory T cells. Sci. Adv.7, eabd7954 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Lee J, et al. T cell-intrinsic prostaglandin E2-EP2/EP4 signaling is critical in pathogenic TH17 cell-driven inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019;143:631–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.05.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yao C, et al. Prostaglandin E(2) promotes Th1 differentiation via synergistic amplification of IL-12 signalling by cAMP and PI3-kinase. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1685. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Konjar, S. et al., Mitochondria maintain controlled activation state of epithelial-resident T lymphocytes. Sci. Immunol.3, eaan2543 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 64.Zelenay S, et al. Cyclooxygenase-dependent tumor growth through evasion of immunity. Cell. 2015;162:1257–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Morimoto K, et al. Cellular localization of mRNAs for prostaglandin E receptor subtypes in mouse gastrointestinal tract. Am. J. Physiol. 1997;272:G681–G687. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1997.272.3.G681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mukhopadhyay, S. et al., Loss of IL-10 signaling in macrophages limits bacterial killing driven by prostaglandin E2. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20180649 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Na YR, et al. Prostaglandin E(2) receptor PTGER4-expressing macrophages promote intestinal epithelial barrier regeneration upon inflammation. Gut. 2021;70:2249–2260. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kuehn HS, et al. Prostaglandin E2 activates and utilizes mTORC2 as a central signaling locus for the regulation of mast cell chemotaxis and mediator release. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:391–402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.164772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Swadling L, et al. Human liver memory CD8(+) T cells use autophagy for tissue residence. Cell Rep. 2020;30:687–698.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ikeda Y, et al. Endogenous Drp1 mediates mitochondrial autophagy and protects the heart against energy stress. Circ. Res. 2015;116:264–278. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.303356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jiao H, et al. Mitocytosis, a migrasome-mediated mitochondrial quality-control process. Cell. 2021;184:2896–2910.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Corrado M, et al. Macroautophagy inhibition maintains fragmented mitochondria to foster T cell receptor-dependent apoptosis. EMBO J. 2016;35:1793–1809. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kabat AM, et al. The autophagy gene Atg16l1 differentially regulates Treg and TH2 cells to control intestinal inflammation. Elife. 2016;5:e12444. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Puleston, D. J. et al., Autophagy is a critical regulator of memory CD8(+) T cell formation. Elife3, e03706 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 75.Xu X, et al. Autophagy is essential for effector CD8(+) T cell survival and memory formation. Nat. Immunol. 2014;15:1152–1161. doi: 10.1038/ni.3025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kishton RJ, Sukumar M, Restifo NP. Metabolic regulation of T cell longevity and function in tumor immunotherapy. Cell Metab. 2017;26:94–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gibson GR, Whitacre EB, Ricotti CA. Colitis induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Report of four cases and review of the literature. Arch. Intern. Med. 1992;152:625–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Konjar S, et al. Intestinal tissue-resident T cell activation depends on metabolite availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2202144119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2202144119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Makaremi, S. et al., Immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: challenges and future prospects. Biomedicines9, 1075 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 80.Pelly VS, et al. Anti-inflammatory drugs remodel the tumor immune environment to enhance immune checkpoint blockade efficacy. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:2602–2619. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Stuart T, et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–1902.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hafemeister C, Satija R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol. 2019;20:296. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1874-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.McInnes, L. et al. UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection. Journal of Open Source Software3 861 (2018).
  • 84.Roelli, P., bbimber, Flynn, B. santiagorevale, & Gui, G. Hoohm/CITE-seq-Count: 1.4.2 (1.4.2). Zenodo10.5281/zenodo.2590196 (2019).
  • 85.Korsunsky I, et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with harmony. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:1289–1296. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zappia, L. & A. Oshlack, Clustering trees: a visualization for evaluating clusterings at multiple resolutions. Gigascience7, giy083 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 87.Young MD, et al. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Afgan E, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W3–W10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ramirez F, et al. deepTools2: a next-generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W160–W165. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wiig H, Aukland K, Tenstad O. Isolation of interstitial fluid from rat mammary tumors by a centrifugation method. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003;284:H416–H424. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00327.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Edwards-Hicks, J. et al., Metabolic dynamics of in vitro CD8+ T cell activation. Metabolites11, 12 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 95.Eilertz D, Mitterer M, Buescher JM. automRm: an r package for fully automatic LC-QQQ-MS data preprocessing powered by machine learning. Anal. Chem. 2022;94:6163–6171. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (835.3KB, pdf)
Reporting Summary (255.6KB, pdf)
Source Data (26MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Data can be found under GEO accession number GSE200568, a SuperSeries containing both the scRNAseq data and bulk RNAseq data. Datasets can be found at the following link: Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES