Abstract
Bioisosteric design has become an essential approach in the development of drug molecules. Recent advancements in synthetic methodologies have enabled the rapid adoption of this strategy into drug discovery programs. Consequently, conceptionally innovative practices would be appreciated by the medicinal chemistry community. Here we report an expeditous synthetic method for synthesizing aryl difluoromethyl bicyclopentane (ADB) as a bioisostere of the benzophenone core. This approach involves the merger of light-driven C−F bond activation and strain-release chemistry under the catalysis of a newly designed N-anionic-based organic photocatalyst. This defluorinative coupling methodology enables the direct conversion of a wide variety of commercially available trifluoromethylaromatic C−F bonds (more than 70 examples) into the corresponding difluoromethyl bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanes (BCP) arenes/difluoromethyl BCP boronates in a single step. The strategy can also be applied to [3.1.1]and [4.1.1]propellane systems, providing access to analogues with different geometries. Moreover, we have successfully used this protocol to rapidly prepare ADB-substituted analogues of the bioactive molecule Adiporon. Biological testing has shown that the ADB scaffold has the potential to enhance the pharmacological properties of benzophenone-type drug candidates.
Subject terms: Reaction mechanisms, Synthetic chemistry methodology, Homogeneous catalysis
Bioisosteric design has become an essential approach during drug molecule discovery process. Here, the authors describe a strategy for defluorinative couplings of propellanes, enabling the synthesis of aryl difluoromethyl bicyclopentanes as benzophenone-type bioisosteres.
Introduction
The replacement of a pharmaceutical core with a corresponding bioisostere scaffold has emerged as a useful strategy for modulating bioavailability and metabolic stability in the drug discovery process1–11. Consequently, the design of new bioisosteres has been adopted as a creative and effective manner to increase the potential for developing lead compounds and creating new drugs. Over the last few decades, one tactic that has been explored to improve metabolic stability while maintaining bioactivity is the substitution of the ketone functional group with a difluoromethylene moiety6. In addition, sp3-hybridized small-ring cage hydrocarbons, such as bicyclo- [1.1.1]pentane (BCP), have been recognized as an attractive bioisostere for benzene rings, due to their ability to improve pharmacokinetic properties7–13. While each of these bioisosteres has been extensively studied as a sole functional group isostere in drug development, their merger for the synthesis of difluoromethyl BCP arene as a new surrogate of the benzoyl group and the subsequent evaluation of their pharmacokinetic properties remain largely underexplored (Fig. 1b)14,15. Limited precedents have been reported for the synthesis of difluoromethyl BCPs, primarily relying on the use of activated precursor difluoroalkyl bromide16,17. For instance, the Dell’Amico group disclosed a single example of aryl difluoromethyl bicycloalkane synthesis using aryl difluoromethyl bromide as a coupling partner. However, these current methods lack generalizability across different substrate classes and have limited application to late-stage functionalization. This is because the corresponding alkyl/aryl difluoromethyl bromides are not widely accessible or cost-effective yet, which prevents their practical use by end users18–20. The benzophenone core is a crucial scaffold that occurs in numerous pharmaceuticals and natural products (Fig. 1a)15,21–23. Incorporating the ADB moiety as a new bioisostere would create significant opportunities to access a unique chemical space for benzophenone-type drug design. As such, new reaction designs for the rapid installation of the ADB from readily available starting materials (e.g., trifluoromethylaromatics), would be of considerable value in developing pharmaceuticals.
The C−F functionalization of trifluoromethylarenes (ArCF3) has been identified as an ideal strategy for synthesizing medicinally relevant ArCF2-containing compounds due to the abundance of trifluoromethylarenes and their prevalence in late-stage settings18,24–37. Photoredox catalysis has emerged as a valuable platform in recent years for the C−F bond activation processes, thereby providing access to difluorobenzylic motifs of importance in medicinal chemistry38–53. Recently, a series of impressive advancements have been reported by König38, Jui39,40, Gouverneur41, Molander42,43, Glorius44, Zhang45, Yasuda46, and others, utilizing single-electron reduction of the C−F bond. Typically, the generated aryl difluoromethyl radical is added across π-bond systems to form a new C−C bond39,40,42–44,49–51. Alternatively, we wondered whether it would be possible to intercept other types of bonds, such as the strained propellane system, with difluorobenzylic radicals generated directly from commercially available trifluoromethylarenes, a pathway that might provide a simple, direct protocol to access unique ADB scaffolds (Fig. 1c). Specifically, a single-electron reduction can initiate the selective activation of trifluoromethylarenes by using a reducing excited photocatalyst. The resulting difluorobenzylic radicals would then be trapped by [1.1.1]propellane leading to BCP radicals, which could be engaged in hydrogen atom transfer or borylation generating the desired difluoromethyl BCP arene/difluoromethyl BCP boronate scaffolds.
Several challenges must be addressed to achieve such a general defluorinative coupling transformation: (1) tuning the photocatalytic ability to enable the reductive activation of strong C−F bonds, regardless of their electronic substitution, despite typically high reductive potential39–41; (2) preventing overfunctionalization of the resulting difluoromethyl product as the strength of C−F bond decreases during defluorination;40 (3) selectively trapping the electronphilic difluorobenzylic radicals with propellane before being quenched by the hydrogen atom donor40–42; (4) controlling deleterious propellane oligomerization54. Herein, we report our successful efforts to develop an expedient route to ADB scaffold synthesis from readily accessible trifluoromethylarenes. A broad scope of trifluoromethylarenes coupling with [n.1.1]propellane systems has been demonstrated through two-component and three-component coupling (Fig. 1c). This method allowed for the rapid preparation of ADB analogs of known drugs, one of which is found to be more metabolically stable than its commercial progenitor. We anticipate this strategy would serve as a valuable tool for the synthesis and evaluation of ADB motifs as new bioisosteres of benzophenone-type drug derivatives, ultimately leading to the development of pharmaceuticals.
Results
Reaction optimization
Our investigation into this defluoronative coupling reaction began with the exposure of ArCF3 5 to various photocatalysts in the presence of [1.1.1]propellane and γ-terpinene as hydrogen atom donors (Table 1). To our delight, the desired product, aryl difluoromethyl bicyclopetane 6, was observed in 36% yield when N-phenylphenothiazine (PTH) was used as the photocatalyst, along with a ArCF2–diBCP side-product 7, that arose from propellane dimerization. The less reducing photocatalyst fac-Ir(ppy)3 led to a decreased yield of ArCF2–BCP 6 (6% yield). At this stage, we surmised that selecting the appropriate photocatalyst would be key to improving reaction efficiency. Indeed, a highly reducing o-phosphinophenolate (PO) photocatalyst was more efficient than PTH to increase the yield to 43%50. Based on previous studies on the effect of phosphine group facilitating photo-induced electron transfer processes50, we hypothesized that an ortho-PPh2 substituent on arylamine might have a similar effect to enable a redox cycle of strong reductive ability55,56. To this end, we designed and synthesized different types of o-phosphinoarylamines (PNs) as strongly reductive photocatalysts. Next, we evaluated their effectiveness in catalyzing the defluoroalkylation of 5, a selection of which is shown in Table 1 (see Supplementary Fig. 14 for a list of all evaluated photocatalysts). The best results were obtained with carbazole-based catalyst PCN (1), a highly reducing photocatalyst ( vs. the saturated calomel electrode (SCE) in DMSO) (see Supplementary Information for measurement), which provided the desired product 6 in 74% yield (entry 1). Structurally related PCN (2) also catalyzed the defluoroalkylation but with diminished yield (55% yield). We considered that the accelerated intersystem crossing process to access triplet state of long lifetime and steric protection by introducing the second adjacent–PPh2 account for the improved catalyst efficiency. Interestingly, 2-(diphenylphosphino)biphenyl amine PBN (3), a potential ligand for transition metal catalysis, was also effective to catalyze the reaction giving a 48% yield. In contrast, the structurally similar phenyl-protected secondary amine PBN (4) was less effective (12% yield). Unfortunately, dimethyl-protected tertiary amine diMe-PBN (I) and biphenyl amine BN (II) without ortho-PPh2 substitution, proved to be ineffective at all. These results suggest that both of the N-anion and ortho-PPh2 substituent are crucial for the photocatalytic reactivity. Increasing the amount of [1.1.1]propellane to 3.0 or 5.0 equiv. resulted in a significant decrease in reaction efficiencies due to the unproductive propellane dimerization leading to dimer 7(entries 2−3). Finally, control experiments revealed that the photocatalyst, base and visible-light were all essential for the success of this transformation (entries 5−7). The reaction proceeded poorly in the absence of γ-terpinene (entry 4). Catalyst PCN (1) is an air-stable white solid. Of note, it can be prepared on gram-scale and stored under ambient conditions for months without observing any decomposition.
Table 1.
aPerformed with photocatalyst PCN (1) (10 mol%), trifluomethyl arene (5) (1.0 equiv.), [1.1.1]propellane in DMF (1.2 M, 1.5 equiv.), γ-terpinene (5.0 equiv.), Cs2CO3 (1.2 equiv.).
bYield by 19F-NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixtures using PhCF3 as internal standard
A plausible mechanism for the proposed defluoroalkylation of ArCF3 with [1.1.1]propellane is shown in Fig. 2. Visible-light photoexcitation of electron-rich N-anionic catalyst I would generate a highly reducing excited state II. Single-electron transfer to the trifluoromethylarene 5 ( vs. SCE in DMSO) (see Supplementary Information for measurement) gives rise to the corresponding difluorobenzylic radical 8, which should be rapidly intercepted by [1.1.1]propellane to form the resulting BCP radical 9. The electrophilic radical 9 would then abstract a hydrogen atom from γ-terpinene, thus enabling the desired ADB product 6 and the cyclohexadienyl radical 1057. Finally, a single-electron transfer between 10 and oxidized photocatalyst III would regenerate photocatalyst I, thus completing the catalytic cycle.
Reaction substrate scope
We next evaluated the generality of this defluorinative coupling reaction. As shown in Fig. 3, a myriad of unactivated trifluoromethylaromatics could be engaged under these conditions. A diverse range trifluoromethylarenes bearing electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents were found to be competent substrates (6, 12–29, 30–86% yield). Notably, functional groups such as amides, ethers, esters, anilines, alkenes, alkynes, alkyl chlorides, aryl boronates, unprotected amines, and alcohols, were all well compatible, allowing for practical handles for further derivatization. Given the significance of nitrogen-containing heterocycles in bioactive molecule production, we were pleased to discover that a wide range of pyridine substrates with trifluoromethyl groups at 2-, 3-, and 4-positions were easily accommodated (30−35, 50−85% yield). Moreover, this reactivity could be extended to bicyclic heteroaromatics affording good yields (36−39, 51−72% yield). Particularly, perfluoroalkylarene was readily employed for selectively defluorinative coupling with [1.1.1]propellane (40, 61% yield). Additionally, bis(trifluoromethyl) benzenes yielded selective activation of only one of the C−F bonds giving synthetically useful yields (41−52, 32−71% yield). It is important to note that the corresponding ArCF2Br is not readily available and is challenging to synthesize17–20. This highlights the unique advantage of our approach in terms of accessibility and practicality in the synthesis of these important compounds compared with previous studies. Finally, the compatibility of the defluoroalkylation protocol with biorelevant molecules was also examined. To our delight, a large variety of biologically relevant systems were successfully employed to install the ADB moiety (53−58, 32−73% yield). It is worth noting that pharmaceutical analogs, including fluoxetine, cinacalcet, and triflupromazine, were effective substrates for the late-stage C−F functionalization, delivering the corresponding ADB adducts smoothly (56−58, 32−73% yield). These results further highlight the real-world utility of this defluorinative coupling technology.
The installation of bicyclo[3.1.1]heptane (BCH) scaffolds as a bioisostere of meta-substituted benzenes in bioactive molecules has become an increasingly popular research area58. Pioneer works by Anderson59 and Uchiyama60 group have established a practical protocol for accessing functionalized BCHs employing a radical-based approach61,62. Gratifyingly, our protocol for this defluorinative coupling can be extended to [3.1.1]heptane system (Fig. 4). An array of trifluoromethylaromatics, including pharmaceutical agents, can be utilized to afford ArCF2−BCH products in moderate to good yields (59−69, 35−80% yield). Furthermore, the less-strained [4.1.1]octane system can also be employed in the same way to generate ArCF2−BCO products (64−68, 21−62% yield)63. To our knowledge, this is the first instance of the [4.1.1]octane system engaging in a photocatalytic radical addition process to date.
Scope for three-component coupling
To increase the modularity of our technique for accessing ArCF2−BCP frameworks, we explored the possibility of using a multi-component coupling strategy to approach synthetically versatile ArCF2−BCP boronates, which can be functionalized in a wide range of bond-forming events to fulfill the demands of medicinal chemistry64–68. Indeed, we found that, upon exposing ArCF3 and [1.1.1]propellane with B2pin2 as radical acceptor to 390 nm light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in the presence of PCN photocatalyst at ambient temperature, we could obtain the desired ArCF2−BCP boronate products 69 in 63% isolated yield (Fig. 5). A wide variety of trifluoromethylaromatics, including mono(trifluoromethyl) benzenes, bis(trifluoromethyl) benzenes, trifluoromethyl pyridines and bicyclic heteroaromatics bearing various functional groups can be incorporated under these reaction conditions (69−74, 50−67% yield). [3.1.1]propellane and [4.1.1]propellane systems can also be employed to generate the corresponding aryl difluoromethyl bicycloalkane boronate adducts with different geometries (75 and 76, 27% and 12% yield, respectively) albeit with diminished efficiency. Lastly, we found that this transformation can accommodate drug-like analogs with useful levels of efficiency (77 and 78, 48% and 41% yield, respectively), in which the Bpin group can serve as a universal late-stage functionalization linchpin. For example, the oxidation of BCP boronates 69 led to the medicinally interesting alcohol 79 (72% yield)64. The Bpin group can also be converted into organotrifluoroborate salts 80 (86% yield), a versatile building block that can be utilized in subsequent photoredox functionalization for downstream diversification, such as Minisci reaction (81, 31% yield)66, Giese addition (82, 34% yield)66, Chan-Lam coupling66, arylation67 and so on68.
Preparation of pharmaceutical analogs
To demonstrate the potential of these ArCF2−BCP cores as bioisosteres for benzophenone-type drugs and the applicability of our procedures in drug discovery settings, we conducted defluoronative coupling reactions to the rapid synthesis of ADB-substituted analogs of Adiporon, an established adiponectin receptor agonist69,70. As shown in Fig. 6, a two-step sequence employing condensation and photocatalytic defluorinative coupling is applied to produce three structurally distinct bioisosteres of Adiporon (83 [1.1.1]BCP−Adiporon, 84 [3.1.1]BCH−Adiporon and 85 [4.1.1]BCO−Adiporon). We then tested these ADB pharmaceutical analogs in comparison to their benzophenone-containing counterparts. Interestingly, [1.1.1]BCP substituted analog 83 was found to be metabolically stable, with reduced clearance rates in human liver microsomes, although its membrane permeability (Caco-2) was slightly decreased compared to its parent drug. These findings underline the potential of the ADB scaffold as a beneficial motif for enhancing the pharmacological properties of drug candidates containing a benzophenone core.
In summary, we describe herein that C−F bond functionalization can be merged with strain-release coupling for the expeditous synthesis of difluoromethyl BCP arenes/difluoromethyl BCP boronates. A diverse array of trifluoromethylaromatics can be employed to couple with [1.1.1]propellane as well as [3.1.1]heptane and [4.1.1]octane strain ring systems delivering a diversifiable ArCF2−BCP synthetic linchpin. We demonstrate the applicability of this transformation in synthesizing complex drug substrates, showcasing its potential role in drug discovery. Biological testing of ADB analogs of a known bioactive compound exhibited promising value to the pharmaceutical industry as a substitute for the benzophenone core.
Methods
General procedure for defluorinative coupling of ArCF3 with [n.1.1]Propellane
To a 40 mL vial equipped with a stir bar, suitable photocatalyst PCN (1) (38.9 mg, 0.06 mmol, 10 mol%) or PBN (3) (21.2 mg, 0.06 mmol, 10 mol%) were added, followed by substituted trifluoromethylarenes (0.60 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), Cs2CO3 (235 mg, 0.72 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) or CsOH·H2O (121 mg, 0.72 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), γ-terpinene (480 μL, 3.0 mmol, 5.0 equiv.), anhydrous and degassed DMSO (24.0 mL) in the glovebox and stirring for 30 seconds. A solution of [n.1.1]propellane (1.5~2.0 equiv.) was added at last, and the vial was quickly sealed with Parafilm and PVC tape. Subsequently, the solution was stirred 2 min to accelerate the dissolution of the base. The reaction was stirred and irradiated using 40 W 427 nm blue LED lamps (5 cm away, with a cooling fan & refrigeration air-conditioning at 18 °C to maintain the reaction at room temperature) for 12 hours. The reaction mixture was removed from the light, cooled to ambient temperature, and quenched by exposure to air. diluted with water and EA, and the aqueous layer was extracted with three portions of EA. The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel to afford the desired product.
General procedure for defluorinative three-component coupling
To a 40 mL vial equipped with a stir bar, photocatalyst PCN (1) (77.8 mg, 0.12 mmol, 10 mol%) was added, followed by substituted trifluoromethylarenes (1.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), Cs2CO3 (313 mg, 0.96 mmol, 0.8 equiv.), B2pin2 (918 mg, 3.60 mmol, 3.0 equiv.), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (439 mg, 3.60 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) anhydrous and degassed MeCN (24.0 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere (or nitrogen bubbling) and stirring for 30 s. A Solution of [1.1.1]propellane in DMF (2.5 M) (720 μL, 1.80 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) was added at last, and the vial was quickly sealed with Parafilm and PVC tape. Subsequently, the solution was allowed to be stirred for 2 min to accelerate the dissolution of the base. The reaction was stirred and irradiated using a 40 W 390 nm purple LED lamps (5 cm away, with a cooling fan & refrigeration air-conditioning at 18 °C to maintain the reaction at room temperature) for 6 h. The reaction mixture was removed from the light, cooled to ambient temperature, and quenched by exposure to air. diluted with water and EA, and the aqueous layer was extracted with three portions of EA. The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel to afford the desired difluoromethyl BCP boronates.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22171049), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LDQ23B020001), the Hangzhou leading innovation and entrepreneurship team project (TD2022002), and Research Funds of Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS. We thank Y. Liang (AstraZeneca), and J.M. Lipshultz (Stony Brook University) for helpful discussions. We thank S. Cao, G. Tu, Z. Li, and K. Wei for their help in substrate preparation. We thank B. Zhan, J. Xu for their help in product separation. We thank X. Shi, D. Gu, X. Li, and K. Wang from Instrumentation and Service Center for Molecular Sciences at Westlake University for the facility support. M.C. is grateful to S. Cao for his experimental guidance.
Author contributions
X.Z. conceived the idea and guided the project. M.C., Y.C., X.C., X.Z. designed, performed, and analyzed experiments. X.Z., M.C., Y.C., X.C., and R.S. conceived the photocatalyst design. X.Z. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of the study are available in the paper and its Supplementary Information. All data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
Competing interests
X.Z., X.C., M.C., and R.S. are inventors on a Chinese patent application (Application No. CN202310602778.9). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-44653-6.
References
- 1.Meanwell NA. Improving drug design: an update on recent applications of efficiency metrics, strategies for replacing problematic elements, and compounds in nontraditional drug space. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2016;29:564–616. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thornber CW. Isosterism and molecular modification in drug design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1979;8:563–580. doi: 10.1039/cs9790800563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wermuth CG. Similarity in drugs: reflections on analogue design. Drug Discov. Today. 2006;11:348–354. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lovering F, Bikker J, Humblet C. Escape from flatland: increasing saturation as an approach to improving clinical success. J. Med. Chem. 2009;52:6752–6756. doi: 10.1021/jm901241e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kumari S, Carmona AV, Tiwari AK, Trippier PC. Amide bond bioisosteres: strategies, synthesis, and successes. J. Med. Chem. 2020;63:12290–12358. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meanwell NA. Synopsis of some recent tactical application of bioisosteres in drug design. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:2529–2591. doi: 10.1021/jm1013693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Subbaiah MAM, Meanwell NA. Bioisosteres of the phenyl ring: recent strategic applications in lead optimization and drug design. J. Med. Chem. 2021;64:14046–14128. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Measom ND, et al. Investigation of a bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane as a phenyl replacement within an LpPLA 2 inhibitor. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:43–48. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6b00281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stepan AF, et al. Application of the bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane motif as a nonclassical phenyl ring bioisostere in the design of a potent and orally active γ-secretase inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:3414–3424. doi: 10.1021/jm300094u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pu Q, et al. Discovery of potent and orally available bicyclo[1.1.1]Pentane-derived Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitors. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020;11:1548–1554. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shire BR, Anderson EA. Conquering the synthesis and functionalization of bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanes. JACS Au. 2023;3:1539–1553. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang X, et al. Copper-mediated synthesis of drug-like bicyclopentanes. Nature. 2020;580:220–226. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2060-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nugent J, et al. A general route to bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanes through photoredox catalysis. ACS Catal. 2019;9:9568–9574. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b03190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kraemer Y, et al. Strain-release pentafluorosulfanylation and tetrafluoro(aryl)sulfanylation of [1.1.1]propellane: reactivity and structural insight. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202211892. doi: 10.1002/anie.202211892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu S-B, Long C, Kennelly EJ. Structural diversity and bioactivities of natural benzophenones. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014;31:1158–1174. doi: 10.1039/C4NP00027G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rentería-Gómez A, et al. General and practical route to diverse 1-(difluoro)alkyl-3-aryl Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentanes enabled by an Fe-catalyzed multicomponent radical cross-coupling reaction. ACS Catal. 2022;12:11547–11556. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c03498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cuadros S, et al. A general organophotoredox strategy to difluoroalkyl bicycloalkane (CF2‐BCA) Hybrid Bioisosteres. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202303585. doi: 10.1002/anie.202303585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mandal D, Gupta R, Jaiswal AK, Young RD. Frustrated Lewis-Pair-meditated selective single fluoride substitution in trifluoromethyl groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:2572–2578. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang R-Y, et al. Synthesis of ArCF 2 X and [18 F]Ar-CF 3 via cleavage of the trifluoromethylsulfonyl group. Org. Lett. 2022;24:164–168. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Santos L, et al. Deprotonative functionalization of the difluoromethyl group. Org. Lett. 2020;22:8741–8745. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Acuna, U. M., Jancovski, N. & Kennelly, E. J. Polyisoprenylated benzophenones from clusiaceae: potential drugs and lead compounds. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.9, 1560–1580 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Surana K, Chaudhary B, Diwaker M, Sharma S. Benzophenone: a ubiquitous scaffold in medicinal chemistry. MedChemComm. 2018;9:1803–1817. doi: 10.1039/C8MD00300A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang G, et al. Design, synthesis, and anticancer evaluation of benzophenone derivatives bearing naphthalene moiety as novel tubulin polymerization inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2020;104:104265. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Simur TT, Ye T, Yu Y-J, Zhang F-L, Wang Y-F. C–F bond functionalizations of trifluoromethyl groups via radical intermediates. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022;33:1193–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yoshida S, Shimomori K, Kim Y, Hosoya T. Single C−F bond cleavage of trifluoromethylarenes with an ortho-silyl group. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:10406–10409. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mandal D, Gupta R, Young RD. Selective monodefluorination and Wittig functionalization of gem-difluoromethyl groups to generate monofluoroalkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:10682–10686. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b06770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Idogawa R, Kim Y, Shimomori K, Hosoya T, Yoshida S. Single C–F transformations of o-hydrosilyl benzotrifluorides with trityl compounds as all-in-one reagents. Org. Lett. 2020;22:9292–9297. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Utsumi S, Katagiri T, Uneyama K. Cu-deposits on Mg metal surfaces promote electron transfer reactions. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:1085–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.11.082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dang H, Whittaker AM, Lalic G. Catalytic activation of a single C–F bond in trifluoromethyl arenes. Chem. Sci. 2016;7:505–509. doi: 10.1039/C5SC03415A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Munoz SB, et al. Selective late-stage hydrodefluorination of trifluoromethylarenes: a facile access to difluoromethylarenes. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017;2017:2322–2326. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201700396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wright SE, Bandar JS. A base-promoted reductive coupling platform for the divergent defluorofunctionalization of trifluoromethylarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:13032–13038. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c05044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou F-Y, Jiao L. Asymmetric defluoroallylation of 4-trifluoromethylpyridines enabled by umpolung C−F bond activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202201102. doi: 10.1002/anie.202201102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shen Z-J, et al. Organoboron reagent-controlled selective (deutero)hydrodefluorination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202217244. doi: 10.1002/anie.202217244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Box JR, Avanthay ME, Poole DL, Lennox AJJ. Electronically ambivalent hydrodefluorination of aryl-CF3 groups enabled by electrochemical deep-reduction on a Ni cathode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202218195. doi: 10.1002/anie.202218195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yu Y-J, et al. Sequential C–F bond functionalizations of trifluoroacetamides and acetates via spin-center shifts. Science. 2021;371:1232–1240. doi: 10.1126/science.abg0781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang X, et al. A carbene strategy for progressive (Deutero)hydrodefluorination of fluoroalkyl ketones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202116190. doi: 10.1002/anie.202116190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li L, et al. Carbodefluorination of fluoroalkyl ketones via a carbene-initiated rearrangement strategy. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4280. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31976-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen K, Berg N, Gschwind R, König B. Selective single C(sp 3)–F bond cleavage in trifluoromethylarenes: merging visible-light catalysis with lewis acid activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:18444–18447. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang H, Jui NT. Catalytic defluoroalkylation of trifluoromethylaromatics with unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:163–166. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vogt DB, Seath CP, Wang H, Jui NT. Selective C–F functionalization of unactivated trifluoromethylarenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:13203–13211. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sap JBI, et al. Organophotoredox hydrodefluorination of trifluoromethylarenes with translational applicability to drug discovery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:9181–9187. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c03881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Campbell MW, et al. Photochemical C–F activation enables defluorinative alkylation of trifluoroacetates and -acetamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:19648–19654. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c11059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shreiber ST, et al. Visible-light-induced C–F bond activation for the difluoroalkylation of indoles. Org. Lett. 2022;24:8542–8546. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c03549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ye J-H, Bellotti P, Heusel C, Glorius F. Photoredox-catalyzed defluorinative functionalizations of polyfluorinated aliphatic amides and esters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202115456. doi: 10.1002/anie.202115456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Luo Y-C, Tong F-F, Zhang Y, He C-Y, Zhang X. Visible-light-induced palladium-catalyzed selective defluoroarylation of trifluoromethylarenes with arylboronic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:13971–13979. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c07459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sugihara N, Suzuki K, Nishimoto Y, Yasuda M. Photoredox-catalyzed C–F bond allylation of perfluoroalkylarenes at the benzylic position. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:9308–9313. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c03760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yan S-S, et al. Visible-light photoredox-catalyzed selective carboxylation of C(sp3)−F bonds with CO2. Chem. 2021;7:3099–3113. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ghosh S, et al. HFIP-assisted single C−F bond activation of trifluoromethyl ketones using visible-light photoredox catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202115272. doi: 10.1002/anie.202115272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu C, Li K, Shang R. Arenethiolate as a dual function catalyst for photocatalytic defluoroalkylation and hydrodefluorination of trifluoromethyls. ACS Catal. 2022;12:4103–4109. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c00592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu C, Shen N, Shang R. Photocatalytic defluoroalkylation and hydrodefluorination of trifluoromethyls using o-phosphinophenolate. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:354. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28007-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang J, et al. Late-stage modification of drugs via alkene formal insertion into benzylic C−F bond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202215062. doi: 10.1002/anie.202215062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu J, et al. Construction of C–X (X = S, O, Se) bonds via Lewis acid-promoted functionalization of trifluoromethylarenes. ACS Catal. 2023;13:7339–7346. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c00669. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xu P, et al. Defluorinative alkylation of trifluoromethylbenzimidazoles enabled by spin-center shift: a synergistic photocatalysis/thiol catalysis process with CO 2 •–. Org. Lett. 2022;24:4075–4080. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wiberg KB, Waddell ST. Reactions of [1.1.1]propellane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:2194–2216. doi: 10.1021/ja00162a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li M, et al. Transition-metal-free radical C(sp 3)–C(sp 2) and C(sp 3)–C(sp 3) coupling enabled by 2-azaallyls as super-electron-donors and coupling-partners. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:16327–16333. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b09394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bortolato T, et al. The rational design of reducing organophotoredox catalysts unlocks proton-coupled electron-transfer and atom transfer radical polymerization mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:1835–1846. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c11364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schweitzer-Chaput B, Horwitz MA, de Pedro Beato E, Melchiorre P. Photochemical generation of radicals from alkyl electrophiles using a nucleophilic organic catalyst. Nat. Chem. 2019;11:129–135. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0173-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mykhailiuk PK. Saturated bioisosteres of benzene: where to go next? Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019;17:2839–2849. doi: 10.1039/C8OB02812E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Frank N, et al. Synthesis of meta-substituted arene bioisosteres from [3.1.1]propellane. Nature. 2022;611:721–726. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05290-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Iida T, et al. Practical and facile access to bicyclo[3.1.1]heptanes: potent bioisosteres of meta -substituted benzenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:21848–21852. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zheng Y, et al. Photochemical intermolecular [3σ + 2σ]-cycloaddition for the construction of aminobicyclo[3.1.1]heptanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:23685–23690. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c11501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kleinmans R, et al. ortho -Selective dearomative [2π + 2σ] photocycloadditions of bicyclic aza-arenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:12324–12332. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c02961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fuchs J, Szeimies G. Synthese von [n .1.1]propellanen (n = 2, 3, 4) Chem. Ber. 1992;125:2517–2522. doi: 10.1002/cber.19921251126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kondo M, et al. Silaboration of [1.1.1]propellane: a storable feedstock for bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane derivatives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:1970–1974. doi: 10.1002/anie.201909655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shelp RA, et al. Strain-release 2-azaallyl anion addition/borylation of [1.1.1]propellane: synthesis and functionalization of benzylamine bicyclo[1.1.1]pentyl boronates. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:7066–7072. doi: 10.1039/D1SC01349A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dong W, et al. Exploiting the sp2 character of bicyclo[1.1.1]pentyl radicals in the transition-metal-free multi-component difunctionalization of [1.1.1]propellane. Nat. Chem. 2022;14:1068–1077. doi: 10.1038/s41557-022-00979-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.VanHeyst MD, et al. Continuous flow-enabled synthesis of bench-stable Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane trifluoroborate salts and their utilization in metallaphotoredox cross-couplings. Org. Lett. 2020;22:1648–1654. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yang Y, et al. An intramolecular coupling approach to alkyl bioisosteres for the synthesis of multisubstituted bicycloalkyl boronates. Nat. Chem. 2021;13:950–955. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00786-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Nicolas S, et al. Adiporon, an adiponectin receptor agonist acts as an antidepressant and metabolic regulator in a mouse model of depression. Transl. Psychiatry. 2018;8:159. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0210-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Manley SJ, et al. Synthetic adiponectin-receptor agonist, AdipoRon, induces glycolytic dependence in pancreatic cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:114. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04572-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of the study are available in the paper and its Supplementary Information. All data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.