Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1998 Jun;180(12):3218–3221. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.12.3218-3221.1998

The MTCY428.08 Gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Codes for NAD+ Synthetase

Rita Cantoni 1, Manuela Branzoni 1, Monica Labò 1, Menico Rizzi 1,2, Giovanna Riccardi 1,*
PMCID: PMC107825  PMID: 9620974

Abstract

The product of the MTCY428.08 gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis shows sequence homology with several NAD+ synthetases. The MTCY428.08 gene was cloned into the expression vectors pGEX-4T-1 and pET-15b. Expression in Escherichia coli led to overproduction of glutathione S-transferase fused and His6-tagged gene products, which were enzymatically assayed for NAD synthetase activity. Our results demonstrate that the MTCY428.08 gene of M. tuberculosis is the structural gene for NAD+ synthetase.


NAD+ is a vital and ubiquitous coenzyme involved in a variety of biochemical processes, comprising not only redox reactions but also DNA repair, DNA recombination, and ADP protein ribosylation (7, 17). NAD+ biosynthesis is therefore crucial in all living organisms and can be pursued through a de novo pathway or through a pyridine nucleotide salvage pathway (7, 18).

The ubiquitous enzyme NAD+ synthetase (EC 6.3.5.1) catalyzes the last step in NAD+ biosynthesis transforming deamido-NAD+ into the final product NAD+ by a two step reaction: (i) first it activates deamido-NAD+ through the formation of an adenylated NAD+ in the presence of ATP and magnesium, and then (ii) an ammonia molecule attacks the adenylated intermediate leading to NAD+ (15).

NAD+ synthetase belongs to the amidotransferase family, whose members are responsible for the transfer of the amide nitrogen of glutamine on different substrates in a large number of biochemical processes (20). Amidotransferases are characterized by the presence of two distinct domains, which may either belong to the same polypeptide chain or exist as independent subunits. A glutamine amide transfer (GAT) domain is responsible for the ability to use glutamine as nitrogen source, whereas a synthetase/synthase domain confers the specificity and catalyzes the transfer of ammonia to the substrate. Amidotransferases can be grouped into two families depending on their GAT domains: (i) G-type amidotransferases having a Cys-His-Glu catalytic triad and (ii) F-type or Ntn (N-terminal nucleophile) amidotransferases possessing a conserved N-terminal cysteine (20).

NAD+ synthetase from Bacillus subtilis has been extensively characterized and reported to be strictly ammonia dependent (10), even if the existence of a yet unknown second subunit, bearing the GAT domain, cannot be excluded. The three-dimensional structure of the B. subtilis enzyme in its free form and in complex with ATP has also been reported (12), allowing the assessing of catalytically important residues and confirming the early proposal that NAD+ synthetase, GMP synthetase, asparagine synthetase, and arginosuccinate synthetase constitute a new class of N-type ATP pyrophosphatases (ATP-PPases), characterized by the conserved fingerprint sequence S-G-G-X-D (16).

The major role played by NAD+ synthetase in cellular metabolism is underlined by previously reported studies on B. subtilis mutants: all mutants with altered NAD+ synthetase activity were shown to be severely affected in cellular functionality (5).

The recent resurgence of drug resistance tuberculosis poses a serious threat to the control of the desease and has caused much public concern (4). It has been demonstrated that a lack of nicotinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase activity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis blocks the NAD+ recycling (7). Moreover, the use of the frontline antitubercular drug isoniazid may deplete pools of NAD+: there is a decrease in NAD+ of tubercule bacilli grown in the presence of isoniazid (3). These observations make the de novo NAD+ biosynthesis in general and NAD+ synthetase in particular possible targets for the development of new drugs against this microorganism.

Here we demonstrate that the MTCY428.08 gene from M. tuberculosis is the structural gene for NAD+ synthetase.

The MTCY428.08 gene of M. tuberculosis is the structural gene of NAD+ synthetase.

The use of the B. subtilis NAD+ synthetase sequence as a search probe against the sequenced M. tuberculosis genome showed significant homology with the MTCY428.08 gene, coding for a polypeptide chain 738 residues long. The corresponding amino acid sequence compared with nonredundant databases at the National Center for Biotechnology Information by using the BLAST programs (1, 2) revealed low but significant homology with several NAD+ synthetases. The highest similarity (P, 2.1e−21) was with the corresponding protein from Rhodobacter capsulatus (19). The degrees of sequence identity between the M. tuberculosis MTCY428.08 gene product and NAD+ synthetases from R. capsulatus and a Synechocystis sp. are, respectively, 31.4% (in a 191-residue overlap) and 29.7% (in a 182-residues overlap). The deduced amino acid sequence of the MTCY428.08 gene was aligned, by using the CLUSTAL program (8), with those of other bacterial NAD+ synthetases, revealing a strict conservation of residues showed to be important in catalysis (Fig. 1) (12). The MTCY428.08 amino acid sequence contains the fingerprint sequence SGGXDST (residues 427 to 433) proposed to be characteristic of a new family of ATP-PPases which includes NAD+ synthetase (12, 16).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

(A) Amino acid sequence alignment of the B. subtilis, M. genitalium, R. capsulatus, and M. tuberculosis NAD+ synthetases. The consensus fingerprint sequence for the N-type ATP-PPases (16) is boxed. Identical residues are indicated (asterisks). (B) Amino acids sequence alignment (8) of the A subunit of the B. subtilis Glu-AdT and the N-terminal (N-ter) region of the M. tuberculosis NAD synthetase.

The M. tuberculosis MTCY428.08 gene was cloned from cosmid MTCY428 (11) by PCR, according to standard protocol, into the expression vectors pGEX-4T-1 (14) and pET-15b (Novagen). The resulting plasmids were designated pCAB1 and pBAC2, respectively. pCAB1 and pBAC2 were transformed, by electroporation, into Escherichia coli JM105 and E. coli BL21(DE3), respectively, according to the supplier’s instructions.

Following aerobic growth on 2× YTG medium (Pharmacia-Biotech) in the presence of ampicillin (100 μg/ml), total cell lysates of E. coli JM105, containing plasmid pGEX-4T-1 or pCAB1 (the recombinant plasmid), were prepared 120 min after the start of isopropyl-1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside (IPTG) induction and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). E. coli JM105 cells transformed with the pGEX-4T-1 vector showed high-level expression of the 26-kDa glutatione S-transferase (GST) protein. The presence of a 98-kDa polypeptide (the predicted molecular mass of the M. tuberculosis MTCY428.08 protein fused to GST) was clearly evident in extracts of E. coli JM105 cells harboring plasmid pCAB1 (data not shown). After aerobic growth on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (13) in the presence of carbenicillin (200 μg/ml), total cell lysates of E. coli BL21(DE3), containing plasmid pET-15b or pBAC2 (the recombinant plasmid), were prepared at various times from the start of IPTG induction and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Growth at 37°C, even if the recombinant protein was highly expressed, caused the target protein to accumulate mainly as inclusion bodies. In order to avoid this undesirable effect, the incubation was carried out at 22°C without IPTG induction (Fig. 2, lane 2). In the latter case the His6-tagged protein was purified through affinity chromatography on a Ni chelate resin according to the supplier’s instructions (Fig. 2, lane 6). Care was taken to avoid oxidative conditions, maintaining a stable concentration of β-mercaptoethanol (10 mM) through all the purification steps. The first 30 N-terminal residues of the MTCY428.08 gene product for both the GST-fused and His6-tagged proteins were sequenced, confirming the expected sequence.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

SDS-PAGE analysis of the M. tuberculosis NAD synthetase purification profile. Lanes: 1, molecular weight standards; 2, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-15b) lysate supernatant; 3, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pBAC2) S-30 supernatant; 4, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pBAC2) S-100 supernatant; 5, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pBAC2) ultracentrifuged supernatant; 6, partially purified NAD+ synthetase (arrow).

The activity of the M. tuberculosis NAD+ synthetase enzyme was routinely assayed with ammonia or glutamine as nitrogen source as previously described (9, 21). NAD+ synthetase activity was assayed on crude extracts of E. coli JM105 transformed with plasmids pGEX-4T-1 and pCAB1 or E. coli BL21(DE3) transformed with plasmids pET-15b and pBAC2 and on the partially purified protein. The activity was expressed as nanomoles of NAD+ synthesized per minute per milligram of protein. The results obtained are listed in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Activity of the M. tuberculosis NAD+ synthetase expressed in E. coli

Strain NAD+ synthetase activity (nmol/min/mg of protein)
NH3 dependent Glutamine dependent
JM105(pGEX-4-T1) 0.28 0.28
JM105(pCAB1) 4.06 3.28
BL21(DE3)(pET-15b) 6.19 9.6
BL21(DE3)(pBAC2) 31.93 28.3
His6 tag purified protein 230 90

The identification of the M. tuberculosis NAD+ synthetase was firstly made possible through sequence comparison with other NAD+ synthetases, at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Sequence alignment revealed the strictly conserved sequence fingerprint characteristic of the N-type ATP-PPase (16). Moreover, a careful sequence comparison of the B. subtilis and M. tuberculosis enzymes, in light of the three-dimensional structure available for the former, showed a remarkable conservation of all the catalytically relevant residues (12).

The definitive confirmation that the MTCY428.08 gene codes for NAD+ synthetase was provided by determination of the enzymatic activity. When the dialyzed crude extracts of strain JM105(pCAB1) were assayed, the specific ammonia- or glutamine-dependent activities were found to be similar and roughly 15-fold greater than that of the control strain. The same behavior was detected for the BL21(DE3)(pBAC2) strain, but the specific activities were only six times greater than those of the control strain BL21(DE3)(pET-15b). These low values, even if undoubtedly confirming the presence of NAD+ synthetase activity, may indicate that the enzyme is poorly expressed in its active form. After partial purification, the specific activity increased to a value of 230 nmol min−1 mg of protein−1.

Another aspect clearly evidenced by the sequence alignment shown in Fig. 1 is a striking difference in molecular dimensions for the different NAD+ synthetases, ranging from about 200 residues to 738 amino acids in the case of M. tuberculosis protein. A possible explanation of this fact is that the smaller enzymes represent only the synthetase subunit of the entire amidotransferase where the GAT domain is most likely synthesized as an independent subunit, whereas the bigger enzymes contain both domains on the same polypeptide chain. In this respect the observation that the B. subtilis enzyme (consisting of 271 residues) is strictly ammonia dependent (10) whereas the M. tuberculosis enzyme (consisting of 738 residues) is able to use ammonia or glutamine as nitrogen source with comparable specific activities (this study) is in keeping with our proposal. Recently an extensive study on B. subtilis Glu-tRNAGln amidotransferase (Glu-AdT) was reported. Glu-AdT is a heterotrimeric protein whose A subunit, responsible for the amidotransferase function in this complex enzyme, does not have any obvious sequence relationship either with F-type or G-type known amidotransferases. On the other hand, it has a peculiar signature sequence, strictly conserved among a family of amidases. Therefore, it has been proposed to have a new type of amidase-like domain (6).

Interestingly, we observed significant sequence homology between the N-terminal region (residues 1 to 409) of the M. tuberculosis NAD synthetase and the Glu-AdT A subunit (Fig. 1B). However, the N-terminal domain of NAD synthetase does not possess the signature sequence, shared by Glu-AdT and several amidases (6). In this respect our finding suggests that the N-terminal region of NAD synthetase and the Glu-AdT A subunit may represent two members of a new type of GAT domain.

Our work provides the bases for future extensive characterization of this important enzyme from M. tuberculosis, hopefully including a crystallographic investigation, with the final aim of development of new antitubercular drugs.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Tuberculosis Project (Istituto Superiore di Sanità) contracts 96/D/T5696 and 96/D/T49 and by the European Union Research project BIOMED CT-961241.

We thank S. T. Cole for providing the M. tuberculosis cosmid Y428.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E W, Lipman D J. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Altschul S F, Boguski M S, Gish W, Wooton J C. Issues in searching molecular sequence databases. Nat Genet. 1994;6:119–129. doi: 10.1038/ng0294-119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bekierkunst A. Nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide in tubercle bacilli exposed to isoniazid. Science. 1966;152:525–526. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3721.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bloom B R, Murray C J. Tuberculosis: commentary on a reemergent killer. Science. 1992;257:1055–1064. doi: 10.1126/science.257.5073.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Caramori T, Calogero S, Albertini A, Galizzi A. Functional analysis of the outB gene of Bacillus subtilis. J Gen Microbiol. 1993;139:31–37. doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-1-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Curnow A W, Hong K W, Yuan R, Kim S I, Martins O, Winkler W, Henkin T M, Soll D. Glu-tRNAGln amidotransferase: a novel heterotrimeric enzyme required for correct decoding of glutamine codons during translation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:11819–11826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.22.11819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Foster J W, Moat A G. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthesis and pyridine nucleotide cycle metabolism in microbial systems. Microbiol Rev. 1980;44:83–105. doi: 10.1128/mr.44.1.83-105.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Higgins D G, Sharp P M. CLUSTAL: a package for performing multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene. 1988;73:237–244. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90330-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klingenberg M. Nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotides: spectrophotometric and fluorimetric methods. In: Bergmeyer H U, editor. Methods of enzymatic analysis. Vol. 4. New York, N.Y: Academic Press, Inc.; 1974. pp. 2045–2059. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nessi C, Albertini A, Speranza M L, Galizzi A. The outB gene of Bacillus subtilis codes for NAD synthetase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:6181–6185. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.11.6181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Philipp W J, Poulet S, Eiglmeier K, Pascopella L, Balasubramanian V, Heym B, Bergh S, Bloom B R, Jacobs W R, Jr, Cole S T. An integrated map of the genome of the tubercle bacillus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, and comparison with Mycobacterium leprae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:3132–3137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.3132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rizzi M, Nessi C, Mattevi A, Coda A, Bolognesi M, Galizzi A. Crystal structure of NH3-dependent NAD+ synthetase from Bacillus subtilis. EMBO J. 1996;15:5125–5134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Smith D B, Johnson K S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988;67:31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Spencer R L, Preiss J. Biosynthesis of diphosphopyridine nucleotide: the purification and the properties of diphosphopyridine nucleotide synthetase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1967;242:385–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tesmer J G, Klem T J, Deras M L, Davisson V J, Smith J. The crystal structure of GMP synthetase reveals a novel catalytic triad and is a structural paradigm for two enzyme families. Nat Struct Biol. 1996;3:74–86. doi: 10.1038/nsb0196-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Triz G J. NAD biosynthesis and recycling. In: Neidhardt F C, Ingraham J L, Low K B, Magasanik B, Schaechter M, Umbarger H E, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology; 1987. pp. 557–563. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.White H B. Biosynthetic and salvage pathways of pyridine nucleotide coenzymes. In: Evers J, Anderson B M, You K S, editors. Pyridine nucleotide coenzyme. New York, N.Y: Academic Press, Inc.; 1982. pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Willison J C, Tissot G. The Escherichia coli efg gene and the Rhodobacter capsulatus adgA gene code for NH3-dependent NAD synthetase. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:3400–3402. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.11.3400-3402.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zalkin H. The amidotransferases. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1993;66:203–309. doi: 10.1002/9780470123126.ch5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zalkin H. NAD+ synthetase. Methods Enzymol. 1985;113:297–302. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(85)13042-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES