Correction: Quality of Life Research (2023) 32:3135–3145 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03461-7
In Table 4 of the original published article, the data in the row “Developing country of origin”, column “Upper CI” should be 0.20, whereas it was mistakenly published as – 0.20.
The correct version of Table 4 with the correct entry is provided below.
Table 4.
Regression analysis predicting HRQoL (VAS)
Step | Variable | Adjusted R2 | R2 change | F change |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Demographic variables | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.0 |
2 | Socio-economic status | 0.05 | 0.05 | 27.1*** |
3 | Job status | 0.08 | 0.03 | 27.9*** |
4 | Not in a relationship | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.0 |
5 | Use of pain medication | 0.11 | 0.03 | 28.6*** |
Final step | Estimatesc | Lower CI | Upper CI | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 0.00 | − 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.873 |
Gender | − 0.10 | − 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.086 |
Developing country of origin | − 0.02 | − 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.835 |
Education level | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.17 | < 0.001 |
Household income | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.001 |
Unemployeda | − 0.32 | − 0.49 | − 0.16 | < 0.001 |
Being on sick leaveb | − 0.46 | − 0.59 | − 0.34 | < 0.001 |
Not in a relationship | 0.01 | − 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.874 |
Use of pain medication | − 0.46 | − 0.63 | − 0.29 | < 0.001 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
HRQoL Health related quality of life, VAS Visual Analog Scale, CI 95% Confidence Interval
aJob status category “Ordinary income” was used as reference level
bJob status category “Ordinary income” was used as reference level
cEstimates were standardized
The original article has been corrected.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.