Skip to main content
BMC Primary Care logoLink to BMC Primary Care
. 2024 Jan 15;25:28. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02261-3

Diabetes mellitus and associated factors among HIV-positive patients at primary health care facilities in Harare, Zimbabwe: a descriptive cross-sectional study

Rumbidzai Chireshe 1,, Tawanda Manyangadze 1,2, Keshena Naidoo 3
PMCID: PMC10789024  PMID: 38221613

Abstract

Background

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has improved the life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLWH) and has increased the risk of chronic non-communicable diseases. Comorbid HIV and diabetes mellitus (DM) significantly increase cardiovascular disease and mortality risk. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among HIV-positive patients receiving HAART in Zimbabwe and its associated risk factors.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at eight primary healthcare facilities in Harare, Zimbabwe, between January 2022 and March 2023. Non-probability convenience sampling was used to recruit adult HIV-positive patients undergoing HAART attending the facilities. Data were captured on clinical history and socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics, and analyzed using descriptive statistics to determine DM prevalence rates. Additionally, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to examine factors associated with HIV and DM comorbidities.

Results

A total of 450 participants were included in this study, of which 57.6% (n = 259) were female. The majority were married (73.8%) and older than 35 years (80.2%). Most participants had completed high school (87.6%) and 68.9% were employed either formally or self-employed. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was 14.9%. HIV/DM comorbidity was more prevalent in patients who were female, self-employed, and smoked (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the factors associated with DM-HIV comorbidity were gender, age, education, marital status, employment status, smoking, physical activities, duration of HAART, and diet. Age, level of education, marital status, and occupation were not associated with HIV-DM comorbidity. Obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m2), smoking, and alcohol consumption were associated with an increased risk of DM. Regular physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of DM.

Conclusion

A substantial burden of DM was found in PLWH. The intersectoral integration approach is advocated, and active screening for DM is recommended. Gender-specific interventions are necessary to target diseases and health behaviors that differ between men and women. These interventions should be customized to the specific diseases and behaviors of each group.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-024-02261-3.

Keywords: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, DM prevalence, HIV, Non-communicable diseases, PLWH, Primary healthcare, Sub-Saharan Africa, Zimbabwe

Introduction

The burden of disease from HIV remains high, with an estimated 37.7 million individuals globally living with HIV, as reported in 2020, and over 1.5 million people contracting HIV in 2020 alone [1]. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the greatest burden of HIV. Despite significant improvements in HIV-related morbidity and mortality following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), people living with HIV (PLWH) are vulnerable to other co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus [26]. Diabetes Mellitus (DM), an illness resulting from either insulin resistance or deficiency that leads to abnormally elevated blood glucose levels, is one of the most prevalent Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD) worldwide and in Africa [7]. According to previous reports, the prevalence of DM is estimated to range from 2.6% in Togo to 22.5% in Niger, depending on the region. [8] DM was responsible for a 7.0% mortality rate attributed to NCDs in SSA between 1990 and 2015 [9, 10].

In response, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that primary healthcare (PHC) systems provide screening and treatment for NCDs and integration of HIV and primary health systems (PHC) [11]. However, there is limited evidence on the prevalence of diabetes among PLWH at the primary care level in SSA, and the response of health systems to address comorbidities among PLWH. Although world leaders pledged the United Nations General Assembly to address NCDs, the issue of HIV-NCD multimorbidity has not been specifically addressed. According to the World Health Organization's (WHO) Global Action Plan for the Control of NCDs 2013–2020, nations should improve their health systems and combat NCDs by implementing universal health coverage (UHC) and person-centered PHC [12]. Despite attempts by some African countries, such as Ghana and Nigeria, to attain Universal Health Coverage through universal health insurance programs, most populations in Africa access healthcare at government-funded health facilities or pay out-of-pocket. People living with multiple morbidities are further compromised by multiple visits and services from the health sector.

However, there has been some progress towards attaining the Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4, which states that "by 2030, premature mortality from NCDs shall be reduced by one-third through prevention and treatment and be promoted to promote mental health and well-being’ [13, 14]. People living with HIV have benefitted from recommendations such as the WHO Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions (WHO PEN), which have been combined to provide information on the methodologies for the management of co-infections and comorbidities, focusing on the screening, prophylaxis, treatment, and timing of ART for these conditions [15]. The WHO STEPwise chronic disease risk factor surveillance program (STEPS) attempts to quantify the burden of diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). A surveillance program is a straightforward, standardized strategy for gathering, examining, and sharing information on important NCD risk factors in countries. It is a questionnaire-based evaluation that considers both the biochemical and physical parameters. The national authorities of the country implement a coordinated strategy [16].

Several risk factors for DM in PLWH have been identified in previous studies. These include a family history of diabetes, weight gain, lipodystrophy, advanced age, and hepatitis C infection among PLWH receiving protein inhibitor therapy [17]. A noteworthy correlation between diabetes and the duration of antiretroviral therapy was also identified, particularly the use of protease inhibitor drugs [18, 19]. The extended time spent living with HIV, persistent low levels of inflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial damage caused by HIV medication put PLWH at a slightly greater risk of developing diabetes [20]. It has been observed that PLWH taking HAART have a four-fold increased risk of developing diabetes mellitus compared to those without HIV [6, 21, 22]. The underlying mechanisms are believed to be either a direct result of drug side effects or an indirect consequence of immune system reactivation and the subsequent acquisition of health [19]. These mechanisms permit and enhance the impact of conventional risk factors that are independent of HIV infection, such as advanced age, obesity, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, family history, and genetic predisposition [2327].

The direct effects of HIV infection on several organ systems, the toxicity of ART, polypharmacy, social isolation, stigma, and other poorly identified risk factors are only a few of the many factors that likely affect the health of HIV-infected adults. The added burden of another chronic condition, such as DM, adversely affects quality of life [28]. In HIV patients, diabetes has been linked to an increased risk of hospitalization, adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes, and progression to end-stage renal disease, leading to reduced life expectancy and higher treatment costs for this population [5]. Although there is a paucity of reliable information regarding NCD in some resource-constrained clinics and suboptimal NCD care in clinics, the results from our study will highlight these gaps and help guide policymakers and stakeholders in the synchronization of actions to help improve the quality of life for patients with multimorbidity.

This study reports the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) among HIV-infected patients receiving primary health care services at primary care clinics in Harare, Zimbabwe, and associated factors. The findings are intended to identify potential risk factors for DM/HIV comorbidity and potential interventions to improve the integration of care.

Methodology

Study setting

The study setting was primary healthcare clinics (PHC) in Harare, the capital city of Zimbabwe. Clinics provide primary healthcare services for a population of approximately 2.5 million people in urban and rural communities [29]. Eight (8) primary health clinics were selected to represent urban and rural communities. Six of the facilities were located in urban areas, and two were in rural areas.

The majority of PHC facilities in the region are funded by the government or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and provide free access to all people requiring primary care services. These PHC clinics provide a wide range of services such as HIV screening, diabetes and hypertension management, acute and chronic condition management, and health promotion. During each visit, routine blood pressure, weight, temperature, and urine composition measurements were recorded. According to the national guidelines, patients with classic symptoms can be diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) by measuring their plasma glucose levels. Tests, such as the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) test, measure blood glucose after a minimum of eight hours without food or liquids other than water. To screen for diabetes, two blood tests were used: the random plasma glucose test, which measures the blood glucose level when you have not fasted for at least eight hours, and the HbA1C test, which gives an average of your blood glucose levels over the previous two–three months. An abnormal glycosylated hemoglobin test or two abnormal fasting glucose readings were used to diagnose diabetes.

As is the case with most diagnostic tests, if a test result indicates diabetes and the diagnosis is unclear because of laboratory error, it should be repeated. An example would be a patient who exhibited classic hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis symptoms. Because there is a higher chance of concurrence in this instance, it is preferable to repeat the test for confirmation.

Professional nurses and medical officers provided the clinical services. Most continuing clinical care is provided by registered general nurses who have received additional training in HIV management. With the assistance of the hospital's radiology and laboratory departments for diagnostic support, doctors offered supplemental care on a consultation basis. Both paper-based and electronic files are used to store patient data, which are typically linked by means of distinct patient identification numbers. Every clinic visit included the recording of patient information on the stage of HIV disease, incident AIDS-related and non-AIDS illnesses, prescribed medications, and laboratory test results.

Study design

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study at primary healthcare facilities in Harare, Zimbabwe. A mixed-method approach was used to collect quantitative data through data extraction from patient records and qualitative data through semi-structured patient interviews.

Data extracted from patient records included participant demographics, weight, height, past medical history, antiretroviral medication history, and current illnesses, including communicable and non-communicable diseases.

Study population

The population of interest was adult HIV-positive patients receiving primary care services in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Inclusion criteria

  • HIV-positive adults aged 18 years and older

  • Registered as patient at the study site.

  • Receiving primary health services

Exclusion criteria

  • HIV-negative

  • Unable to provide consent.

  • Not registered as a patient at a study site

Sample size and sampling procedure

Purposive sampling was used to recruit the participants who met the inclusion criteria.

The minimum sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula to calculate the prevalence of diabetes in the HIV patient population.

This formula is represented as

=(Z1-a)2×p(1-p)d2

where z=1.96 (critical value at a certain confidence interval in a normal distribution scenario), p=50% (the expected proportion of the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)/HIV), and Marginoferror(d=0.05) (the desired level of absolute precision, taken as 0.05). The values of the parameters in the above formula were determined as follows:

n=1.962×0.5×0.50.052=384

Assuming that 10% will decline to participate in the study, the minimum sample size is given as:

n=384+10%38.4=422.4423

Therefore, a minimum sample size of 423 was used in this study.

Eligible participants were identified from the clinic register and recruited from each of the eight clinics until the sample size was met. The data were collected between January 2022 and March 2023. Clinics 1 to 6 provided services to an urban community, while clinics 7 and 8 were situated in rural/per-urban communities. Clinic 1 had 68 participants, Clinic 2 had 45 participants, Clinic 3 had 53 participants, Clinic 4 had 62 participants, Clinic 5 had 45 participants, Clinic 6 had 70 participants, and rural/peri-urban clinics included Clinic 7 and Clinic 8 with 52 and 55 participants, respectively. A total of 450 participants were recruited for the study.

Data collection methods

Both secondary and primary data collection methods were used in this study, as explained in the following sections. The participants were allocated a study code and no names were recorded.

Reviewing clinical records

Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated from the data extracted from the clinical records. BMI was recorded and classified as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5 kg/m2 – 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0 kg/m2 – 29.9 kg/m2), or obese (≥ 30 kg /m2). For the analysis, two categories of BMI were considered: obese (≥ 30 kg /m2) and non-obese (< 30 kg /m2).

Structured questionnaire

The pilot-tested structured questionnaire served as the primary means by which the data were collected. It was designed to collect information on whether a patient had DM and on the possible risk factors associated with DM in PLWH. The WHO STEPS framework was utilized as a standardized and versatile instrument for identifying non-communicable disease risk factors, including the demographic, behavioral, and clinical features of participants. The sociodemographic variables of the participants included age, gender, marital status, level of education, and employment. The captured behavioral factors included smoking, alcohol consumption, dietary intake, and physical activity. Clinical features included duration of HAART, BP, blood glucose, height, and weight measurements.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using Stata version 17. Descriptive statistics in the form of frequencies and percentages were used to provide a summary of DM/HIV comorbidity and independent variables. The characteristics of HIV-positive patients with DM were described and compared with those of HIV patients without DM comorbidity. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate the existence of an association between risk factors and the DM/HIV comorbidity status. This study constructed bivariate and multiple logistic regression models to ascertain the risk factors associated with DM/HIV comorbidity. A bivariate logistic regression model was used to ascertain whether a given predictor variable affected DM/HIV comorbidity, while multiple regression models controlled for other risk factors. The decision on coefficients was made using p-values at the 5% significance level (P < 0.05).

Independent variables were categorised into three groups: socio-economic, behavioural, and biological factors based on the literature review [17, 2325, 3034]. Socioeconomic factors included age (coded as 1 for ≥ 30 and 0 for < 35), marital status (coded as 1 = married, 2 = single, and 3 = widow/divorced), education (coded as 1 = primary or less, 2 = secondary education, and 3 = tertiary education), employment status (coded as 1 = unemployed, 2 = self-employed, and 3 = formally employed), and gender (coded as 1 = male and 0 = female). As for the risk factors, BMI was classified as 1 = obese (≥ 30 kg /m2) and not obese (< 30 kg /m2). Smoking was classified as 'yes' for smokers (coded as 1) and 'no' for nonsmokers (coded as 0). Alcohol consumption was divided into two categories: 'yes' for patients who consumed alcohol (coded as 1) and 'no' for those who did not consume alcohol. Fruit and vegetable consumption was entered into the analysis as a dummy variable, taking a value of 1 for patients with fruit and vegetable servings at least once a day and zero for patients who rarely take fruit and vegetable servings. Fried/fast food was included as binary, taking a value of 1 if the patient ate fried/fast food at least once per day, and 0 if the patient rarely consumed fried/fast food. Physical activity had two categories: 'yes' (coded as 1 for patients involved in sports and exercises) and 'no' (coded as 0 for patients not involved in sports and exercises). Following previous research, such as Duguma et al. [17], the research included hypertension as a predictor, which had two categories: 'yes' (coded as 1 for patients with hypertension) and 'no' (coded as 0 for patients with no hypertension).

Results

The prevalence of T2DM among HIV-positive patients

A total of 450 participants were included in the study, of which 76.2% resided in urban communities and 23.8% resided in rural communities. The prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) among HIV-positive patients in PLWH receiving primary care services at local clinics in Harare was 14.9% (n = 67). Urban healthcare clinics had a prevalence of 14%, whereas rural healthcare clinics had a prevalence of 0.9%.

The prevalence of diabetes among PLWH was significantly higher in participants from urban areas (14%) than in those from rural clinics (0.9%). There was a gender disparity, with 57.6% of the participants identifying as female. Notably, most participants were over 35 years old (80.2%), while the rest were aged between 18–35. The proportion of married respondents was the highest (73.8%). The level of employment was high with approximately half of the participants being self-employed (49.8%). In terms of BMI, 17.8% of the participants were categorized as obese. Table 1 shows that most participants did not consume alcohol (53.1%), 78.9% did not smoke tobacco cigarettes, and 73.6% were involved in sports, fitness, or recreational activities at least once per day. Furthermore, 49.8% had attended secondary school, 37.8% had attended higher education, 8.7% had attended primary education, and 3.8% had no education. The longer a patient was on HAART, the higher the chances of developing diabetes, and the likelihood of developing DM was higher in patients with comorbid hypertension.

Table 1.

Socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics of participants with and without T2DM co-morbidity

Variables Total (N = 450) DM/HIV status χ2 p-value
HIV only N (%) DM/HIV N (%)
Residence
 Rural 107 (23.8) 103 (26.9) 4 (6.0) 13.77  < 0.05*
 Urban 343 (76.2) 280 (73.1) 63 (94.0)
Gender
 Women 259 (57.6) 209 (54.6) 50 (74.6) 9.4  < 0.05*
 Men 191 (42.4) 174 (45.4) 17 (25.4)
Age
  ≤ 35 89 (19.8) 71 (18.5) 18 (26.9) 2.5 0.05*
  > 35 361 (80.2) 312 (81.5) 49 (73. 1)
Marital status
 Married 332 (73.8) 302 (78.9) 30 (44.8) 34.2 0.05*
 Unmarried 118 (26.2) 81 (21.1) 37 (55.2)
Education
 No education 17 (3.8) 17 (4.4) 0 (0.0) 15.3 0.05*
 Primary education 39 (8.7) 39 (10.2) 0 (0.0)
 Secondary 224 (49.8) 193 (50.4) 31 (46.3)
 Higher education 170 (37.8) 134 (35.0) 36 (53.7)
Occupation
 Unemployed 140 (31.1) 130 (33.9) 10 (14.9) 24.5 0.05*
 Self-employed 224 (49.8) 172 (44.9) 52 (77.6)
 Formally employed 86 (19.1) 81 (21.1) 5 (7.5)
BMI
 Obese 80 (17.8) 75 (19.6) 5 (7.5) 5.7 0.05*
 Not obese 370 (82.2) 308 (80.4) 62 (92.5)
Alcohol
 No 239 (53.1) 193 (50.4) 46 (68.7) 7.6 0.05*
 yes 211 (46.9) 190 (49.6) 21 (31.3)
Smoking
 No 355 (78.9) 293 (76.5) 62 (92.5) 8.8 0.05*
 Yes 95 (21.1) 90 (23.5) 5 (7.5)
Fast foods/fried foods
 Rarely eat 353 (78.4) 300 (78.3) 53 (79.1) 0.02 0.887
 At least five times a day 97 (21.6) 83 (21.7) 14 (20.9)
Fruits and vegetables
 Rarely eat 77 (17.1) 67 (17.5) 10 (14.9) 0.3 0.607
 At least once a day 373 (82.9) 316 (82.5) 57 (85.1)
Exercising
 No 331 (73.6) 271 (70.8) 60 (89.6) 10.4 0.05*
 Yes 119 (26.4) 112 (29.2) 7 (10.4)

*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05

In this study, a significantly greater proportion of women (74.6%) had DM/HIV comorbidity than males. Patients with higher education (53.7%) had DM/HIV comorbidity than those who had no education or primary or secondary level education. A significantly greater proportion of patients aged > 35 years (73.1%) had DM/HIV comorbidity than patients aged < 35 years. Those who were unmarried (55.2%) had a larger proportion of patients with DM/HIV comorbidity than those who were married. There was a significantly greater proportion of self-employed individuals (77.6%) than those who were unemployed or formally employed. A smaller percentage of patients with DM/HIV comorbidity were obese (7.5%) than their counterparts because the risk of DM increases linearly with BMI. There was a significant association between DM comorbidity and gender, education, alcohol consumption, exercise, BMI, occupation, and smoking (P < 0.05). However, the results indicated that there was no association between having DM/HIV and patients’ servings of fruits and vegetables (P > 0.05) among all the risk factors.

The findings in Table 1 indicate that participants from urban communities were significantly more likely to have DM/HIV comorbidity than those from rural communities. Further analysis was conducted on the differences between urban and rural dwelling participants with DM/HIV comorbidities (Table 2).

Table 2.

Simple and multiple logistic regression models for DM/HIV co-morbidity

Independent variables COR p-value AOR p-value
Residence
 Rural 1 1
 Urban 5.8 [2.1, 16.3] 0.00 5.5 [1.9, 15.7] 0.05*
Gender
 Female 1 1
 Male 0.4 [0.2, 0.7] 0.05* 0.4 [0.2, 0.9] 0.05*
Age
 ≤ 35 1 1
 > 35 0.6 [0.3, 1.1] 0.12 0.1 [0.1, 0.3] 0.05*
Education
 Secondary and lower 1 1
 Higher education 2.2 [1.3, 3.6] 0.05* 8.6 [3.2, 23.0] 0.05*
Marital status
 Married 1 1
 Unmarried 3.2 [1.6, 6.3] 0.05* 5 [3.2, 7.8] 0.05*
Religion
 Non-Christianity 1 1
 Christianity 2.3 [0.9, 5.9] 0.09 1.1 [0.3, 4.0] 0.96
Employment status
 Unemployed 1 1
 Self-employed 3.9 [1.9, 8.0] 0.05* 6.4 [2.9, 13.9] 0.05*
 Formally employed 0.8 [0.3, 2.4] 0.50 0.6 [0.2, 2.2] 0.05*
Smoking
 No 1 1
 Yes 0.3 [0.1, 0.7] 0.01* 0.02 [0.006, 0.1] 0.05*
Alcohol
 No 1 1
 Yes 0.5 [0.3, 0.8] 0.01* 2.0 [0.9, 4.8] 0.05*
Fruits & Vegetables
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.2 [0.6, 2.5] 0.61 0.5 [0.2, 1.1] 0.05*
Fried & Fast food
 No 1 1
 Yes 1.0 [0.5, 1.8] 0.89 0.6 [0.3, 1.5] 0.30
Exercise
 No 1 1
 Yes 0.3 [0.1, 0.6] 0.05* 0.3 [0.1, 0.9] 0.05*
BMI
 Non-obese 1 1
 Obese 0.3 [0.1, 0.9] 0.02* 0.7 [0.2, 2.7] 0.62
Duration on HAART 1.1 [1.0, 1.2] 0.05* 1.1 [1.0, 1.3] 0.05*
Hypertensive
 Non- Hypertensive 1 1
 Hypertensive 3.2 [1.9, 5.5] 0.05* 8.4 [3.5, 20.6] 0.05*
 Constant - - 0.01 [0.001, 0.009] 0.00

Ref reference category, CI Confidence Interval, COR Crude Odds Ratios, AOR Adjusted Odd Ratios

*statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05

Logistic regression results of risk factors of T2DM/HIV

Table 2 displays the outcomes derived from the binary logistic regression model for risk factors associated with DM among HIV-positive individuals.

Demographic factors

In comparison to their female counterparts, male participants were less likely to develop Diabetes Mellitus (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 0.5, p < 0.05, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.2–1.0). HIV-positive patients older than 35 had a lower likelihood of developing DM compared to their counterparts (AOR: 0.2, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 0.1–0.3).

Socio-economic factors

HIV-positive individuals who were self-employed displayed a likelihood of contracting Diabetes Mellitus when juxtaposed with their jobless counterparts (AOR: 6.4, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 2.9–13.9). Compared to HIV-positive patients with secondary education and less, patients with higher education were more likely to develop DM (AOR: 8.6, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 3.2–23.0).

Behavioural risk factors

Table 2 presents findings indicating that individuals who are HIV-positive and consume tobacco products are at a decreased risk of developing Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in comparison to non-tobacco users (AOR: 0.02, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 0.006–0.1). Conversely, individuals who are HIV-positive and abstain from alcohol consumption are at a heightened risk of developing DM in comparison to those who do consume alcohol (AOR: 2.0, p < 0.1, 95% CI: 0.9–4.8). Additionally, physical activity in the form of sports and fitness activities is linked with a reduced risk of developing DM/HIV comorbidity (AOR: 0.3, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 0.1–0.9). In terms of dietary habits, HIV-positive individuals who consumed fruits and vegetables at least five times a day exhibited a lower risk of developing DM in comparison to those who rarely consume fruits and vegetables (AOR: 0.5, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 0.2–1.1).

Duration on HAART

Individuals who have been on HAART for more than 2 years are most likely to develop DM/HIV comorbidity (AOR: 1.1, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 1.0–1.3).

Hypertension

HIV-positive individuals who were hypertensive displayed a likelihood of having Diabetes Mellitus when juxtaposed with their non-hypertensive counterparts (AOR: 8.4, p < 0.05, 95% CI: 3.5–20.6).

Discussion

Historically, PHC facilities in Zimbabwe have focused on the management of single disease entities, with a limited inclusion of screening for NCDs among PLWH. The adoption of integrated chronic care models has improved the detection and management of NCDs in PLWH. However, an improved understanding of key risk factors could improve disease prevention strategies and targeted community surveillance.

Our study demonstrated a relatively high prevalence of DM/HIV comorbidity in Harare in Zimbabwe compared to other regions in Africa. This estimated prevalence rate is notably greater than those reported in comparable studies carried out in the SSA region, which typically showed rates between 2 and 14% [35]. In Ethiopia, studies have shown that the prevalence of DM in individuals living with HIV is 8% [25] and 11.4% [17], respectively, which could be because obesity is not a health problem in Ethiopia [36]. Our findings further surpassed the prevalence rates of other studies conducted in Zimbabwe (2.83%) by Magodoro et al. [37], 6.9% established by Cheza et al. [32], and 8.4% by Gonah et al. [33] could be because our study was conducted in urban and rural council clinics providing primary healthcare services, as opposed to secondary (district hospitals), tertiary (provincial), and quaternary (central) health centers, which were the settings used in other studies [32, 33, 37]. Urban primary healthcare facilities are situated in high-density suburbs and rural clinics are extensively accessible. All of these clinics typically serve as the first point of contact for individuals requiring health services. The prevalence of diabetes in PLWH in South African rural settings in 2023 was 8.1% [38, 39], and a higher prevalence of diabetes (12.1%) was reported in urban areas [38, 39].

A significant prevalence of diabetes was noted in urban clinics situated in high-density suburbs (14%) compared to 0.9 prevalence in rural clinics. This could be because two of the urban clinics from the study were donor-funded to treat and supply medication to patients with HIV comorbidities, leading to a large number of patients with comorbidities knowing their diabetes diagnoses and being on record. Another possible factor for the low prevalence of DM in rural communities could be the lower consumption of fast foods. Numerous studies have demonstrated a strong relationship between food and microbiota, demonstrating how the components of various diets may directly affect gut microbiota and may contribute to the development of various diseases, such as diabetes [4042].

Rural Africa is likely to have a disproportionately high percentage of undiagnosed diabetes, which may be primarily caused by the inverse care rule, which is a discrepancy between patients' medical needs and the availability of healthcare. Delays in diagnosis are caused by a variety of issues, including a lack of continuity of care, delayed or improper access to care, and the existence of psychiatric and other comorbidities [43] that underestimate the true prevalence of diabetes mellitus in PLWH [44]. Prioritization in strategic planning to avoid diabetes and its complications is affected by underestimating the prevalence of diabetes and a lack of knowledge about demographic and clinical characteristics in the rural population.

Concerning the variables associated with the development of DM and HIV comorbidity, our investigation highlighted that sex and occupation exhibit a statistically significant association. Women are more likely to seek health care services than males, according to the study, just 40% of males seek medical attention, which results in male patients having a lower risk of getting diabetes than their female counterparts (AOR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.9). This observation accentuates the gender differences that exist in the pathogenesis of DM [4547]. Sex hormones, which have a great impact on energy, metabolism, body composition, vascular function, and inflammatory responses among women compared with men, also help explain the differences in the risk of developing diabetes [48, 49]. A study conducted in Malawi in 2018 indicated that women were more likely to be overweight or obese than men, which is related to a higher risk of developing diabetes [50]. This finding corresponds to other research that suggests that women living with HIV face a higher risk of developing DM [32, 33, 37].

Regarding occupation, our analysis revealed that self-employed patients exhibited higher odds of developing DM than their unemployed counterparts. This could be because those working have a higher probability of moving around, thereby exercising, and can afford to buy and consume a balanced diet. Patients who drink alcohol exhibit a more than twice as much higher propensity of developing DM relative to those who do not consume alcohol (AOR: 2, p < 0.05; 95% CI: 0.9, 4.8). Alcohol intake leads to changes in insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells and can also mediate insulin resistance, resulting in impaired glucose metabolism that can lead to diabetes. The investigation revealed that patients with HIV who smoke have a slightly lower likelihood of developing DM in comparison to their non-smoking counterparts (AOR: 0.02, p < 0.05 95% CI: 0.006, 0.1).

Engaging in physical activities was associated with a lower possibility of developing DM compared to their counterparts, and this difference was statistically significant. This finding can be plausibly explained by the fact that physical activity can enhance patients' sensitivity to insulin, which in turn improves their glucose tolerance [34]. Individuals who participate in physical activities such as sports or fitness activities are less susceptible to DM [34]. This result is consistent with prior research on the prevention and management of diabetes, which has established that physical activity can reduce the incidence of DM in both HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients [5155].

With regard to dietary habits, HIV-positive patients who consume fruits and vegetables more often have a lower risk of developing diabetes. This can be attributed to the fact that fruits and vegetables are rich in dietary fiber, which helps regulate blood sugar levels by slowing the absorption of glucose into the bloodstream. Furthermore, fruits and vegetables are highly nutritious, as they contain vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants that are key to improving insulin sensitivity and reducing the risk of developing DM [34, 56, 57]. Yiga et al. noted that dietary habits are affected by a variety of cultural factors. One's view of one’s body has an impact on how much they eat. Weight loss is a source of stigma and an indication of HIV/AIDS; however, weight gain is related to beauty, dignity, health, richness, and excellent treatment from husbands. Other identified cultural views included high social prestige given to unhealthy fast food and eating out and low social status given to fruits, vegetables, legumes, and minimally processed cereals [58].

Strengths and limitations

This study has some limitations that are worth to be noted. The data collection process involved gathering information from 450 patients who attended eight clinics; however, it is crucial to note that the generalizability of the study findings is limited to PLWH. The focus was on HIV-positive patients; non-HIV patients were not included in the study as references. It is crucial to highlight that information on DM status was based on patients' disclosure and medical records, and the time of diagnosis of DM was not included in the study to determine whether diabetes developed after HIV diagnosis. Consequently, this approach limits the reliability of the data, as some patients could have DM and HIV, but have not yet been diagnosed. Despite the significant contribution of this study, our results cannot be generalized because we only conducted the study at eight facilities. The strengths of the study were the inclusion of traditional risk factors for NCD development, such as tobacco and alcohol use, among others.

Conclusion

Diabetes mellitus is increasingly prevalent among PLWH and contributes significantly to the burden of disease experienced by patients with HIV. Our research indicates a high prevalence of DM/HIV comorbidities, especially in urban communities. Adopting an active screening policy for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), particularly type 2 diabetes and hypertension, is highly recommended as a component of standard HIV care. Owing to the severe lack of resources in the majority of SSA care settings, targeted screening based on factors such as age and sex may be suggested.

The rapid scaling of treatment delivery in the face of severe human capacity constraints can be made possible by task shifting of HIV care in PHC clinics from doctors to nurses and other less-skilled cadres. Despite these achievements, frontline professional training is recommended to keep up with the changing epidemic and its new issues. The adoption of an integrated health model that comprehensively addresses all chronic diseases in patients at the primary care level may help improve the quality of health services provided to PLWH with comorbidities. Early detection of NCD by opportunistic screening of PLWH will facilitate early management and potentially reduce or delay the onset of cardiovascular disease.

Supplementary Information

12875_2024_2261_MOESM1_ESM.docx (62.9KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Appendix 3. English Questionnaire for Objective 2.

Acknowledgements

First, the authors want to thank the almighty God for guiding us throughout this journey. The authors acknowledge the University of KwaZulu Natal for the opportunity to conduct this research, the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe, and the Harare City Council Department of Health for providing support during data collection.

Informed consent

All participants were provided with an information sheet that explained step by step procedures of the research and were reassured verbally. Verbal clarification was also provided before obtaining written consent. Legally Authorized Representatives of illiterate participants provided informed consent for the study. Assurance of confidentiality was provided through further explanations that were given to the participants. No patient information is to be shared without patient consent; patients to be informed about the kind of information being held about them, how and why it might be shared, and with whom it might be shared.

Abbreviations

HAART

Highly active antiretroviral treatment

HIV

Human immunodeficiency virus

CD

Chronic disease

CI

Confidence intervals

DM

Diabetes mellitus

HIC

High-income countries

HIV

Human immunodeficiency virus

LMIC

Low- and middle-income countries

NCDs

Non-communicable diseases

NGOs

Non-governmental organizations

PCNs

Primary Care Nurses

PHC

Primary healthcare

PLWH

People living with HIV

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Science

SSA

Sub-Saharan Africa

T2DM

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

VHWs

Village Health Workers

WHO

World Health Organization

Authors’ contributions

RC contributed to the conceptualization of the paper, data entry, data analysis and writing of the manuscript, while KN and TM contributed to the writing of the manuscript. RC is the corresponding author. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was self-funded by the authors.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials are available.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted by the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (MRCZ/A/2821) and the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BREC/00003160/2021). Throughout the study, participants ensured both anonymity and strict confidentiality. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection, legally Authorized Representatives of illiterate participants provided informed consent for the study. Moreover, the participants were advised that their participation was voluntary and that they were free to withdraw from the interview at any point in time if they experienced discomfort. All data were stored in a lockable steel cupboard and a password-protected laptop accessible only by the study team. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.World Health Organisation . Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. Accountability for the global health sector strategies 2016–2021: actions for impact. 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nyirenda MJ. Non-communicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: understanding the drivers of the epidemic to inform intervention strategies. Int Health. 2016;8(3):157–158. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihw021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin SP, Wu CY, Wang CB, Li TC, Ko NY, Shi ZY. Risk of diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy: A nationwide population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(36):e12268. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chhoun P, Ngin C, Tuot S, Pal K, Steel M, Dionisio J, et al. Non-communicable diseases and related risk behaviors among men and women living with HIV in Cambodia: findings from a cross-sectional study. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2017;16(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0622-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fiseha T, Belete AG. Diabetes mellitus and its associated factors among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients on anti-retroviral therapy in Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4402-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duguma F, Gebisa W, Mamo A, Tamiru D, Woyesa S. Diabetes mellitus and associated factors among adult HIV patients on highly active anti-retroviral treatment. HIV/AIDS-Research and Palliative Care. 2020:657–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Triant VA. Cardiovascular disease and HIV infection. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013;10(3):199–206. doi: 10.1007/s11904-013-0168-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization . Report on the status of major health risk factors for noncommunicable diseases: WHO African Region, 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Badacho AS, Mahomed OH. Sustainability of integrated hypertension and diabetes with HIV care for people living with HIV at primary health care in South Ethiopia: implication for integration. BMC Primary Care. 2023;24(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02204-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Badacho AS, Mahomed OH. Sustainability of integrated hypertension and diabetes with HIV care for people living with HIV at primary health care in South Ethiopia: implication for integration. BMC Primary Care. 2023;24(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Organization WH . United Nations Inter-Agency Task Force on the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases: 2022–2025 strategy. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chestnov O. World Health Organization global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: Switzerland; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bennett JE, Stevens GA, Mathers CD, Bonita R, Rehm J, Kruk ME, et al. NCD Countdown 2030: worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4. The lancet. 2018;392(10152):1072–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31992-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Organization WH, editor Third United Nations high-level meeting on NCDs. WHO. 2018.  https://www.who.int/ncds/governance/third-un-meeting/en. Accessed May 2023.
  • 15.Organization WH. Scoping consultation on noncommunicable diseases and mental health conditions in people living with HIV: meeting report. Global Health Campus, Geneva, Switzerland. 2019;9–10:2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Organization WH . Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duguma F, Gebisa W, Mamo A, Tamiru D, Woyesa S. Diabetes Mellitus and Associated Factors Among Adult HIV Patients on Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Treatment. HIV AIDS (Auckl) 2020;12:657–665. doi: 10.2147/HIV.S279732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lv Z, Chu Y, Wang Y. HIV protease inhibitors: a review of molecular selectivity and toxicity. HIV AIDS (Auckl) 2015;7:95–104. doi: 10.2147/HIV.S79956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Levitt NS, Peer N, Steyn K, Lombard C, Maartens G, Lambert EV, et al. Increased risk of dysglycaemia in South Africans with HIV; especially those on protease inhibitors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;119:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tingstedt JL, Hove-Skovsgaard M, Gaardbo J, Ullum H, Nielsen SD, Gelpi M. The impact of concurrent HIV and type II diabetes on immune maturation, immune regulation and immune activation. APMIS. 2019;127(7):529–537. doi: 10.1111/apm.12956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Avari P, Devendra S. Human immunodeficiency virus and type 2 diabetes. London J Prim Care (Abingdon) 2017;9(3):38–42. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2017.1302872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Quin J. Diabetes and HIV. Clin Med (Lond) 2014;14(6):667–669. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gebrie A, Tesfaye B, Gebru T, Adane F, Abie W, Sisay M. Diabetes mellitus and its associated risk factors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus on anti-retroviral therapy at referral hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2020;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13098-020-00527-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Isa SE, Oche AO, Kang'ombe AR, Okopi JA, Idoko JA, Cuevas LE, et al. Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Adult Cohort in Jos. Nigeria Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2016;63(6):830–835. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abebe SM, Getachew A, Fasika S, Bayisa M, Girma Demisse A, Mesfin N. Diabetes mellitus among HIV-infected individuals in follow-up care at University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.da Cunha GH, Franco KB, Galvão MTG, Lima MAC, Fontenele MSM, Siqueira LR, et al. Diabetes mellitus in people living with HIV/AIDS: prevalence and associated risk factors. AIDS Care. 2020;32(5):600–607. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1695727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goedecke JH, Mtintsilana A, Dlamini SN, Kengne AP. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in African women. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;123:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pahwa S, Deeks S, Zou S, Tomitch N, Miller-Novak L,Caler E, , et al. NIH workshop on HIV-associated comorbidities, coinfections, and complications: summary and recommendation for future research. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2021;86(1):11. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency. 2022 Population & Housing Census - Preliminary 2022. Available from: https://zimbabwe.opendataforafrica.org/anjlptc/2022-population-housing-census-preliminary. Accessed May 2023.
  • 30.Mesfin Belay D, Alebachew Bayih W, Yeshambel Alemu A, Kefale Mekonen D, Eshetie Aynew Y, Senbeta Jimma M, et al. Diabetes mellitus among adults on highly active anti-retroviral therapy and its associated factors in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;182:109125. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rajagopaul A, Naidoo M. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension amongst the HIV-positive population at a district hospital in eThekwini, South Africa. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021;13(1):e1–e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheza A, Tlou B, Zhou DT. Incidence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in HIV patients on ART in a developing country: Case of Zimbabwe's Chitungwiza Central Hospital-A retrospective cohort study (2010–2019) PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0252180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gonah L, Moodley I, Hlongwana K. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in people living with human immunodeficiency virus on antiretroviral therapy in Gweru district, Zimbabwe. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020;12(1):e1–e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v12i1.2473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sami W, Ansari T, Butt NS, Hamid MRA. Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2017;11(2):65–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Monroe AK, Glesby MJ, Brown TT. Diagnosing and Managing Diabetes in HIV-Infected Patients: Current Concepts. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;60(3):453–462. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abebe N, Kebede T, Addise D. Diabetes in Ethiopia 2000–2016 prevalence and related acute and chronic complications; a systematic review. Afr J Diabetes Med. 2017;25(2):7–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Magodoro IM, Esterhuizen TM, Chivese T. A cross-sectional, facility based study of comorbid non-communicable diseases among adults living with HIV infection in Zimbabwe. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:379. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2187-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mashinya F, Alberts M. Van geertruyden JP, Colebunders R Assessment of cardiovascular risk factors in people with HIV infection treated with ART in rural South Africa: a cross sectional study. AIDS Res Ther BioMed Central. 2015;12(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12981-015-0083-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Vries AE, Xaba Z, Moraba SR, Goerlitz L, Tempelman HA, Klipstein-Grobusch K, et al. Unmasking a silent killer: Prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus among people living with HIV in rural South Africa. Tropical Med Int Health. 2023;28(5):367–373. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baothman OA, Zamzami MA, Taher I, Abubaker J, Abu-Farha M. The role of gut microbiota in the development of obesity and diabetes. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12944-016-0278-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wu GD, Bushmanc FD, Lewis JD. Diet, the human gut microbiota, and IBD. Anaerobe. 2013;24:117–120. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moreira APB, Texeira TFS, Ferreira AB. Peluzio MdCG, Alfenas RdCG Influence of a high-fat diet on gut microbiota, intestinal permeability and metabolic endotoxaemia. British Journal of Nutrition. 2012;108(5):801–9. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512001213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Car LT, Papachristou N, Bull A, Majeed A, Gallagher J, El-Khatib M, et al. Clinician-identified problems and solutions for delayed diagnosis in primary care: a PRIORITIZE study. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0530-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bailey SL, Ayles H, Beyers N, Godfrey-Faussett P, Muyoyeta M, du Toit E, et al. Diabetes mellitus in Zambia and the Western Cape province of South Africa: Prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis and management. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;118:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mojumdar SK. Determinants of Health Service Utilization by Urban Households in India: A Multivariate Analysis of NSS Case-level Data. J Health Manag. 2018;20(2):105–121. doi: 10.1177/0972063418763642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guinness L, Paul RC, Martins JS, Asante A, Price JA, Hayen A, et al. Determinants of health care utilisation: the case of Timor-Leste. Int Health. 2018;10(6):412–420. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihy044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kevany S, Murima O, Singh B, Hlubinka D, Kulich M, Morin SF, et al. Socio-economic status and health care utilization in rural Zimbabwe: findings from Project Accept (HPTN 043) J Public Health Afr. 2012;3(1):46–51. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2012.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ciarambino T, Crispino P, Leto G, Mastrolorenzo E, Para O, Giordano M. Influence of Gender in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complication. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(16). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88–98. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Price AJ, Crampin AC, Amberbir A, Kayuni-Chihana N, Musicha C, Tafatatha T, et al. Prevalence of obesity, hypertension, and diabetes, and cascade of care in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional, population-based study in rural and urban Malawi. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(3):208–222. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30432-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, Riddell MC, Dunstan DW, Dempsey PC, et al. Physical Activity/Exercise and Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2065–2079. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Roglic G. WHO Global report on diabetes: A summary. International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases. 2016;1(1):3–8. doi: 10.4103/2468-8827.184853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mabaso RG, Oduntan OA. Knowledge and practices related to diabetes mellitus among adults with diabetes in the Mopani District, Limpopo Province, South Africa : original research. African Vision and Eye Health. 2016;75(1):1–6. doi: 10.4102/aveh.v75i1.324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Duncan AD, Peters BS, Rivas C, Goff L. Reducing risk of Type 2 diabetes in HIV: a mixed-methods investigation of the STOP-Diabetes diet and physical activity intervention. Diabet Med. 2020;37(10):1705–1714. doi: 10.1111/dme.13927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chetty L, Cobbing S, Chetty V. Physical activity and exercise for older people living with HIV: a scoping review. HIV/AIDS-Research and Palliative Care. 2021:1079–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Beigrezaei S, Ghiasvand R, Feizi A, Iraj B. Relationship between Dietary Patterns and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10:122. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_206_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lazarou C, Panagiotakos D, Matalas A-L. The Role of Diet in Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Implications for Public Health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2012;52(5):382–389. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.500258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yiga P, Seghers J, Ogwok P, Matthys C. Determinants of dietary and physical activity behaviours among women of reproductive age in urban sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2020;124(8):761–772. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520001828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12875_2024_2261_MOESM1_ESM.docx (62.9KB, docx)

Additional file 1: Appendix 3. English Questionnaire for Objective 2.

Data Availability Statement

Data and materials are available.


Articles from BMC Primary Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES