Skip to main content
Investigative and Clinical Urology logoLink to Investigative and Clinical Urology
. 2023 Dec 19;65(1):16–22. doi: 10.4111/icu.20230314

2023 Korean sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines for Mycoplasma genitalium by KAUTII

Seung-Ju Lee 1, Jin Bong Choi 2, Sangrak Bae 3, Seong Woong Na 4, Hae Do Jung 5, Hyun Jin Jung 6, Seung Il Jung 7, Phil Hyun Song 8, Gilho Lee 9,
PMCID: PMC10789542  PMID: 38197747

Abstract

The Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation and the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency updated the Korean sexually transmitted infections (STIs) guidelines to respond to the changing epidemiologic trends, evolving scientific evidence, and advances in laboratory diagnostics and research. The main recommendations in the Mycoplasma genitalium infection parts of the Korean STIs guidelines 2023 revision are as follows: 1) For initial treatment: azithromycin 500 mg orally in a single dose, then 250 mg once daily for 4 days. 2) In case of treatment failure or recurrence, a macrolide susceptibility/resistance test is required, when susceptibility/resistance test is not feasible, doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by azithromycin 1 g orally on the first day, then azithromycin 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days and then a test-of-cure should be considered 3 weeks after completion of therapy. 3) In case of macrolide sensitivity, doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by azithromycin 1 g orally initial dose, then azithromycin 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days. 4) In case of macrolide resistance, doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for 7 days. In the Korean STIs guideline 2023, macrolide resistance-guided antimicrobial therapy was emphasized due to the increased prevalence of macrolide resistance worldwide. Therefore, in case of treatment failure or recurrence, a macrolide susceptibility/resistance test is required.

Keywords: Guideline, Mycoplasma genitalium, Sexually transmitted infections

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name icu-65-16-abf001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Mycoplasma genitalium infection is an emerging sexually transmitted infection (STI) that has gained increasing recognition and importance in recent years [1]. It is a small, non-motile, and cell wall-less bacterium that primarily infects the genital tract, causing various clinical manifestations, including urethritis, cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), and infertility [2]. M. genitalium was first identified in the early 1980s and was initially thought to be a commensal organism without any significant pathogenic effects [3]. However, subsequent research has established its role as a significant etiological agent of STIs, warranting the development of guidelines for its diagnosis, management, and prevention.

The prevalence of M. genitalium infection varies across different populations, but recent studies suggest a rising global prevalence, particularly among individuals with high-risk sexual behaviors [4,5,6,7]. The infection is often asymptomatic, making it challenging to identify and control its transmission [8,9]. Furthermore, the recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of M. genitalium strains that are resistant to antibiotics [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. This is a major concern, as it makes it more difficult to treat M. genitalium infections.

The consequences of untreated M. genitalium infection can be severe, with potential complications such as chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, and adverse pregnancy outcomes [2,17,18]. Moreover, M. genitalium has been associated with an increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition and transmission, highlighting the need for comprehensive management strategies to control its spread [19,20,21].

In response to the growing impact of M. genitalium infection, various international guidelines have been developed to assist healthcare professionals in effectively diagnosing and managing this STI [22,23,24]. Among these guidelines are the Korean STIs guidelines, which play a crucial role in the Korean healthcare system, providing evidence-based recommendations tailored to the local epidemiology and clinical practices.

This review article aims to critically evaluate the Korean STI Guidelines for M. genitalium infection, summarizing the key recommendations, their rationale, and the current evidence supporting their implementation. Ultimately, this review aims to enhance clinical decision-making and promote optimal patient care for individuals affected by M. genitalium infection in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (currently the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, KDCA) and the Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation (KAUTII) developed the first Korean STI guidelines in 2011, and later in 2016. The Korean STI guidelines 2016 was the first revision to be published. Six years after that, in 2022, the KDCA and KAUTII carried out the second revision of the guidelines from July 2022 to April 2023.

The development committee consisted of a steering committee, a development committee, a writing committee, an internal review committee, and an external review committee. The writing committee included the insurance team for insurance-related review, just like the first revision of the guideline. The external review committee consisted of the Korean Urological Association, the Association of Korean Urologists, the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Korean Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Korean College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine, the Korean Society of Clinical Microbiology, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, and Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control of KDCA. There was no conflict of interest at the beginning of development, and none was reported until the end of the development.

Following the recommendation of the Korea Medical Guideline Information Center (KoMGi), we took the form of local adaptation to accommodate and develop foreign guidelines to suit the Korean situation. Therefore, various search data sources were searched for the existing treatment recommendations for acceptance development. PubMed (https://www.pubmed.gov), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, https://www.nice.org.uk), KoreaMed (https://www.koreamed.org), Trials registers (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov), SciELO (https://www.scielo.org), Scopus (https://www.scopus.com), Embase (https://www.embase.com), Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com), Cochrane Library (https://www.cochranelibrary.com), National Guideline Clearinghouse, and CMA Infobase: Clinical Practice Guidelines database were used. The search index words were STI index words (“sexually transmitted infection” or “sexually transmitted disease”) and treatment guideline index words (“guideline”, “national guideline”, “practice guideline”, “management guideline”, “consensus”, “recommendation”). The range of publication dates was limited from January 2017 to December 2022, and the latest edition was selected if there was a revision. Then the 10 foreign STI guidelines that were searched were as follows:

  • - Guidelines for the management of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections, World Health Organization (WHO), 2021

  • - Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2021

  • - Sexually Transmitted Infections - Summary of Guidelines, New Zealand, 2017

  • - British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) National Guideline on the Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Related Conditions in Children and Young People, BASHH, 2021

  • - STI Treatment Pocket European Guidelines, International Union Against Sexually Transmitted Infection (IUSTI), 2019

  • - Alberta Treatment Guidelines for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) in Adolescents and Adults, Canada, 2018

  • - Reducing sexually transmitted infections, NICE, 2022

  • - Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases, Japanese Society for Sexually Transmitted Infections (JSSTI), 2020

  • - NT Guidelines for the Management of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Primary Health Care setting, Northern Territory Government, 2019

  • - Australian STI Management Guidelines for Use in Primary Care, ASHM, 2021

After excluding guidelines that were not developed based on evidence or published without references, we evaluated five guidelines, including WHO, CDC, BASHH, IUSTI, and JSSTI. For quality evaluation, the K-AGREE 2.0 (Korean version of AGREE 2.0) evaluation development scale distributed by the KoMGi was used, and four members of the development committee evaluated six areas to obtain standardized scores for each area calculated. After comparing the scores of each area, two guidelines (WHO and CDC) were finally selected.

To adapt to the domestic situation, domestic data were searched and analyzed in all fields. Key questions were derived using the population or patient problem, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) technique. For the search of evidence for the literature review, PubMed and KoreaMed were used. For a recently published systematic review or meta-analysis, previously published literature with low level of evidence was excluded, and case reports were also excluded. The Delphi technique was applied to derive and adopt recommendations for the draft. A total of 17 panels were formed to ensure the representativeness and expertise of the recommendation development group.

The guideline development committee and the review committee for verification of the recommendations adopted by consensus operated independently. Finally, it was certified by the professional bodies that participated in the development: the Korean Urological Association, the Association of Korean Urologists, the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Korean Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Korean College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine, the Korean Society of Clinical Microbiology, the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases, and Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control of KDCA.

RESULTS

The main differences from previous guidelines are shown in Table 1. And the summaries of diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up monitoring in M. genitalium infection are shown in Fig. 1.

Table 1. Differences between the Korean sexually transmitted infection guidelines 2016 and 2023.

The Korean STI guidelines 2016 The Korean STI guidelines 2023
Diagnosis Not described In case of treatment failure or recurrence, a macrolide (azithromycin) susceptibility/resistance test is required.
Initial treatment Azithromycin 500 mg orally in a single dose, then 250 mg once daily for 4 days (total 1.5 g). Azithromycin 500 mg orally in a single dose, then 250 mg once daily for 4 days (total 1.5 g).
Alternative therapy: moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for 7 days.
When susceptibility/resistance test is not feasible Not described Doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by azithromycin 1 g orally on the first day, then azithromycin 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days (total 2.5 g) and then a TOC should be considered 3 weeks after completion of therapy.
In case of macrolide sensitivity Not described Doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by azithromycin 1 g orally initial dose, then azithromycin 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days (total 2.5 g).
In case of macrolide resistance Not described Doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for 7 days.

STI, sexually transmitted infection; TOC, test-of-cure.

Fig. 1. Summary of Mycoplasma genitalium diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up monitoring. NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Fig. 1

1. Diagnosis

M. genitalium can cause a variety of symptoms in both man and woman. However, many people with M. genitalium are asymptomatic [8,9]. The incubation period is usually 2 to 35 days (can be up to 60 days or more), and if left untreated, in woman, it can cause PID [17,18].

In man, M. genitalium can cause symptoms such as:

  • - Asymptomatic (70%)

  • - Urethral discharge

  • - Burning or itching sensation in the urethra

  • - Painful urination

In woman, M. genitalium can cause symptoms such as:

  • - Asymptomatic (40%–75%)

  • - Vaginal discharge

  • - Burning or itching sensation in the vagina

  • - Painful urination

  • - Dyspareunia

  • - Suprapubic or pelvic pain

  • - Vaginal bleeding between periods

  • - Vaginal bleeding after coitus

M. genitalium can cause PID in woman with symptoms such as:

  • - Fever

  • - Suprapubic or pelvic pain

  • - Dyspareunia

  • - Vaginal bleeding

M. genitalium is a small and fastidious bacterium that is difficult to culture in the laboratory. This is because M. genitalium requires a specific growth environment that is difficult to replicate in a laboratory setting. As a result, culture is not a reliable method for diagnosing M. genitalium infection. The most common method for diagnosing M. genitalium is a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). NAATs are highly sensitive and specific; therefore, they can detect even small amounts of bacteria and are unlikely to give false-positive results [25,26]. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a type of NAAT that can be used to detect multiple pathogens in a single test. This makes it a more efficient and cost-effective way to screen for STIs.

In Korea, NAAT, especially multiplex PCR, is popular in diagnosing STIs and is also covered by the medical insurance system. This is because NAATs are considered to be the most accurate and reliable way to diagnose STIs in Korea. NAATs can be performed on a variety of samples, including self-obtained first-voided urine from man and vaginal or endocervical swabs by a physician from woman. Self-collected vaginal swabs by a woman are also available for NAAT and show equivalent sensitivity to physician-collected endocervical swab samples.

In Korea, the domestic prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. genitalium is still low compared to other countries, but fluoroquinolone resistance is high [27,28]. However, due to the increased prevalence of macrolide resistance worldwide, all M. genitalium positive specimens should be traced on an assay capable of detecting macrolide-resistant mutations. A variety of laboratory-developed test methods are available for this purpose [29,30,31]; however, macrolide or quinolone susceptibility/resistance tests for M. genitalium have not yet been activated in Korea.

2. Treatments

The initial therapy for the treatment of M. genitalium, recommended in the Korean STI guidelines 2016, is to administer 500 mg of azithromycin once a day orally, followed by 250 mg once a day for 4 days (total 1.5 g). However, azithromycin 1.5 g therapy may not be effective in cases of infections that have failed after a single dose of azithromycin 1 g or macrolide resistance has been confirmed.

The two-stage therapy involves using doxycycline as first-line therapy to reduce the bacterial load, followed by a high dose of azithromycin to treat macrolide-sensitive M. genitalium. This is a concept developed due to reports that the cure rate with azithromycin monotherapy was lower in high-load infections. Patients were treated with doxycycline, which lowers the load of M. genitalium, for 7 days while waiting for the result of macrolide resistance test. Then, azithromycin 1 g was administered orally, followed by azithromycin 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days (total 2.5 g) or moxifloxacin treatment for 7–10 days [32,33,34].

However, in Korea, the dose of azithromycin prescribed at one time is less than 1.5 g due to reimbursement issues. Therefore, the recommended initial treatment regimen in Korea is azithromycin 500 mg orally on the first day and then 250 mg once a day for 4 days (total 1.5 g).

The recommended treatments are as follows:

  • - Initial treatment: azithromycin 500 mg orally in a single dose, then 250 mg once daily for 4 days (total 1.5 g). In case of treatment failure or recurrence, a macrolide (azithromycin) susceptibility/resistance test is required.

  • - When susceptibility/resistance test is not feasible: doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by azithromycin 1 g orally on the first day, then azithromycin 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days (total 2.5 g) and then a test-of-cure (TOC) should be considered 3 weeks after completion of therapy.

  • - In case of macrolide sensitivity: doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by azithromycin 1 g orally initial dose, then azithromycin 500 mg orally once daily for 3 days (total 2.5 g).

  • - In case of macrolide resistance: doxycycline or minocycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days, followed by moxifloxacin 400 mg orally once daily for 7 days.

3. Follow-up and monitoring

A TOC should be considered in all patients 3 weeks after completing treatment. NAAT is recommended for the TOC of M. genitalium. If the TOC is positive, it means that the infection has not been cured or reinfection, and therefore further treatment may be needed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Korean M. genitalium guideline 2023, macrolide resistance-guided antimicrobial therapy was emphasized due to the increased prevalence of macrolide resistance worldwide. Therefore, in case of treatment failure or recurrence, macrolide (azithromycin) susceptibility/resistance test is required. This guideline will be updated when new facts about STIs are revealed and there is a reasonable need to improve the guideline. These guidelines provide guidance to physicians and other healthcare providers on the prevention and treatment of M. genitalium.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Hoon Choi, Yu-Mi Seo, Byoung Kyu Han, Seung Ki Min, Young Hoon Lee, Hee Ju Cho, Hoon Ah Jang, Seok Cho, Jae Min Chung, Gee Hyun Song, and Han Kyu Chae.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have nothing to disclose.

FUNDING: This work was supported by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA).

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS:
  • Research conception and design: Seung-Ju Lee and Gilho Lee.
  • Data acquisition: Sangrak Bae, Seong Woong Na, Hae Do Jung, and Hyun Jin Jung.
  • Data analysis and interpretation: Seung-Ju Lee, Jin Bong Choi, and Gilho Lee.
  • Drafting of the manuscript: Seung-Ju Lee and Jin Bong Choi.
  • Critical revision of the manuscript: Seung-Ju Lee.
  • Obtaining funding: Seung-Ju Lee.
  • Administrative, technical, or material support: Seung Il Jung and Phil Hyun Song.
  • Supervision: Gilho Lee.
  • Approval of the final manuscript: all authors.

References

  • 1.Munoz JL, Goje OJ. Mycoplasma genitalium : an emerging sexually transmitted infection. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016;2016:7537318. doi: 10.1155/2016/7537318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:418–426. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Taylor-Robinson D, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium : from Chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:498–514. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00006-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cina M, Baumann L, Egli-Gany D, Halbeisen FS, Ali H, Scott P, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium incidence, persistence, concordance between partners and progression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2019;95:328–335. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seña AC, Lee JY, Schwebke J, Philip SS, Wiesenfeld HC, Rompalo AM, et al. A silent epidemic: the prevalence, incidence and persistence of Mycoplasma genitalium among young, asymptomatic high-risk women in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:73–79. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baumann L, Cina M, Egli-Gany D, Goutaki M, Halbeisen FS, Lohrer GR, et al. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: systematic review andmeta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2018;94:255–262. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bachmann LH, Kirkcaldy RD, Geisler WM, Wiesenfeld HC, Manhart LE, Taylor SN, et al. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infection, antimicrobial resistance mutations, and symptom resolution following treatment of urethritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:e624–e632. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sonnenberg P, Ison CA, Clifton S, Field N, Tanton C, Soldan K, et al. Epidemiology of Mycoplasma genitalium in British men and women aged 16–44 years: evidence from the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3) Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1982–1994. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mena L, Wang X, Mroczkowski TF, Martin DH. Mycoplasma genitalium infections in asymptomatic men and men with urethritis attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in New Orleans. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:1167–1173. doi: 10.1086/343829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bissessor M, Tabrizi SN, Twin J, Abdo H, Fairley CK, Chen MY, et al. Macrolide resistance and azithromycin failure in a Mycoplasma genitalium-infected cohort and response of azithromycin failures to alternative antibiotic regimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:1228–1236. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chernesky MA, Jang D, Martin I, Hoang LMN, Naidu P, Levett PN, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium antibiotic resistance-mediating mutations in Canadian women with or without Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44:433–435. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barberá MJ, Fernández-Huerta M, Jensen JS, Caballero E, Andreu A. Mycoplasma genitalium macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance: prevalence and risk factors among a 2013-2014 cohort of patients in Barcelona, Spain. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44:457–462. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murray GL, Bradshaw CS, Bissessor M, Danielewski J, Garland SM, Jensen JS, et al. Increasing macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:809–812. doi: 10.3201/eid2305.161745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kristiansen GQ, Lisby JG, Schønning K. A 5' nuclease genotyping assay for identification of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1593–1597. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00012-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gesink D, Racey CS, Seah C, Zittermann S, Mitterni L, Juzkiw J, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium in Toronto, Ont: estimates of prevalence and macrolide resistance. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62:e96–e101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pitt R, Unemo M, Sonnenberg P, Alexander S, Beddows S, Cole MJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium sampled from the British general population. Sex Transm Infect. 2020;96:464–468. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simms I, Eastick K, Mallinson H, Thomas K, Gokhale R, Hay P, et al. Associations between Mycoplasma genitalium, chlamydia trachomatis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79:154–156. doi: 10.1136/sti.79.2.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bjartling C, Osser S, Persson K. Mycoplasma genitalium in cervicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease among women at a gynecologic outpatient service. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:476.e1–476.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mavedzenge SN, Van Der Pol B, Weiss HA, Kwok C, Mambo F, Chipato T, et al. The association between Mycoplasma genitalium and HIV-1 acquisition in African women. AIDS. 2012;26:617–624. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834ff690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ferré VM, Ekouevi DK, Gbeasor-Komlanvi FA, Collin G, Le Hingrat Q, Tchounga B, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus, human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Togo: a national cross-sectional survey. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25:1560.e1–1560.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vandepitte J, Weiss HA, Bukenya J, Kyakuwa N, Muller E, Buvé A, et al. Association between Mycoplasma genitalium infection and HIV acquisition among female sex workers in Uganda: evidence from a nested case-control study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90:545–549. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Richardson D, Pakianathan M, Ewens M, Mitchell H, Mohammed H, Wiseman E, et al. British Association of Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) United Kingdom national guideline for the management of sexually transmitted enteric infections 2023. Int J STD AIDS. 2023;34:588–602. doi: 10.1177/09564624231168217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021;70:1–187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gilson R, Nugent D, Werner RN, Ballesteros J, Ross J. 2019 IUSTI-Europe guideline for the management of anogenital warts. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:1644–1653. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shipitsyna E, Savicheva A, Solokovskiy E, Ballard RC, Domeika M, Unemo M, et al. Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma genitalium infections in East European countries. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90:461–467. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gaydos CA, Manhart LE, Taylor SN, Lillis RA, Hook EW, 3rd, Klausner JD, et al. Molecular testing for Mycoplasma genitalium in the United States: results from the AMES prospective multicenter clinical study. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57:e01125–e01119. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01125-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seo Y, Park H, Lee G. mgpB genotyping and genetic diversity for antimicrobial resistance of Mycoplasma genitalium. J Med Microbiol. 2022;71:10.1099/jmm.0.001585. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Seo Y, Park H, Lee G. Molecular mechanisms of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance among Korean isolates of Mycoplasma genitalium over a period of five years 2014-2019. J Med Microbiol. 2021;70:10.1099/jmm.0.001460. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Le Roy C, Bébéar C, Pereyre S. Clinical evaluation of three commercial PCR assays for the detection of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:e01478-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01478-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Su JP, Tan LY, Garland SM, Tabrizi SN, Mokany E, Walker S, et al. Evaluation of the SpeeDx ResistancePlus MG diagnostic test for Mycoplasma genitalium on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast quantitative PCR platform. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01245–e01217. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01245-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Drud ST, Njuguna P, Ebeyan S, Erskine S, Holm M, Johansson SC, et al. Evaluation of the ResistancePlus MG FleXible assay for detection of wild-type and 23S rRNA-mutated Mycoplasma genitalium strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:e01900–e01919. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01900-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Read TRH, Fairley CK, Murray GL, Jensen JS, Danielewski J, Worthington K, et al. Outcomes of resistance-guided sequential treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infections: a prospective evaluation. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68:554–560. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li Y, Le WJ, Li S, Cao YP, Su XH. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of moxifloxacin in treating Mycoplasma genitalium infection. Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28:1106–1114. doi: 10.1177/0956462416688562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Durukan D, Read TRH, Murray G, Doyle M, Chow EPF, Vodstrcil LA, et al. Resistance-guided antimicrobial therapy using doxycycline-moxifloxacin and doxycycline-2.5 g azithromycin for the treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection: efficacy and tolerability. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:1461–1468. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Investigative and Clinical Urology are provided here courtesy of Korean Urological Association

RESOURCES