Skip to main content
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology logoLink to Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
. 2023 Nov 2;11(1):79–88. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51934

Mutation and clinical analysis of the CLCC1 gene in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients from Central South China

Linxin Tang 1,2, Xuxiong Tang 1,2, Qianqian Zhao 1,2, Yongchao Li 1,2, Yue Bu 1,2, Zhen Liu 2, Jinchen Li 3,4,5, Jifeng Guo 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Lu Shen 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Hong Jiang 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Beisha Tang 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Renshi Xu 1,9, Wenfeng Cao 1,9, Yanchun Yuan 1,2,, Junling Wang 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
PMCID: PMC10791024  PMID: 37916886

Abstract

Introduction

Recently, chloride channel CLIC‐like 1 (CLCC1) was reported to be a novel ALS‐related gene. We aimed to screen CLCC1 variants in our ALS cohort and further explore the genotype–phenotype correlation of CLCC1‐related ALS.

Methods

We screened rare damaging variants in CLCC1 from our cohorts of 1005 ALS patients and 1224 healthy controls with whole‐exome sequencing in Central South China. Fisher's exact test was conducted for association analysis at the entire gene level and single variant level.

Results

In total, four heterozygous missense variants in CLCC1 were identified from four unrelated sporadic ALS patients and predicted to be putative pathogenic by in silico tools and protein model prediction, accounting for 0.40% of all patients (4/1005). The four variants were c.A275C (p.Q92P), c.G1139A (p.R380K), c.C1244T (p.T415M), and c.G1328A (p.R443Q), respectively, which had not been reported in ALS patients previously. Three of four variants were located in exon 10. Patients harboring CLCC1 variants seemed to share a group of similar clinical features, including earlier age at onset, rapid progression, spinal onset, and vulnerable cognitive status. Statistically, we did not find CLCC1 to be associated with the risk of ALS at the entire gene level or single variant level.

Conclusion

Our findings further expanded the genetic and clinical spectrum of CLCC1‐related ALS and provided more genetic evidence for anion channel involvement in the pathogenesis of ALS, but further investigations are needed to verify our findings.

Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by muscle weakness and atrophy due to degeneration of motor neurons. 1 The number of ALS patients was estimated to increase to 376,674 by 2040. 2 Genetic factors play important roles in the pathogenesis of this disease. 3 , 4 , 5 Approximately 10% of ALS cases are familial ALS (fALS), and the remaining cases are sporadic ALS (sALS). 2 , 6 , 7 The heritability was estimated to be 38%–78% in twin studies, 8 8.5% in large GWAS datasets, 9 and 52.3% in population registers. 5 Mutations in major ALS‐related genes account for approximately 47.7% of fALS and 5.2% of sALS. 10 The missing heritability could be partially explained by unidentified ALS‐related genes. To date, more than 50 genes have been reported to contribute to ALS pathogenesis. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 With advanced sequencing and analysis techniques, an increasing number of novel ALS‐related genes have been identified in recent years, such as genes encoding kinesin proteins involved in axonal transport (KIF5A 15 , 16 and KIF1A 17 ), the apoptosis‐related gene TP73, 18 , 19 the sphingolipid synthesis‐related gene SPTLC1, 20 , 21 , 22 and the fatty acid metabolism‐related gene ACSL5. 23 , 24 , 25 The newly discovered genes broaden our overall understanding of ALS pathogenesis.

In a recent study, the gene chloride channel CLIC like 1 (CLCC1) was reported to be a novel ALS‐related gene. 26 He et al. carried out a burden analysis in a Chinese cohort of 670 sALS patients and 1910 controls and revealed that CLCC1 was associated with ALS. 26 CLCC1, a pore‐forming component of an anion channel on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), regulates the unfolded protein response and cellular homeostasis, and maintains constant homeostasis of ER ions. 26 , 27 Notably, accumulated misfolded proteins and ER stress are important pathways underlying the pathogenesis of ALS. 11 , 28 In a mouse model, ALS‐related CLCC1 mutations and loss of CLCC1 disrupted ER ion homeostasis and then led to ALS‐like symptoms and pathologies. 26 , 29 In addition to ALS, CLCC1 has also been reported to be mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa patients. 30 , 31 The CLCC1‐related phenotype showed clinical and genetic heterogeneity. More studies are required to investigate the genotype–phenotype associations of CLCC1.

In this study, we aimed to (1) screen the CLCC1 mutations in our ALS cohort in Central South China and (2) determine the correlation between clinical manifestations and mutations, further expanding the genetic and clinical spectrum of ALS.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

In total, 1005 ALS patients from the central southern region of China were recruited at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, consisting of 75 fALS and 930 sALS patients. The fALS included AD‐ALS and AR‐ALS. We defined AD‐ALS as ALS diagnosed in family members in at least two consecutive generations, and AR‐ALS as having a consanguineous family history or having at least two family members with ALS symptoms in only one generation. ALS patients were diagnosed by at least two experienced neurologists according to the revised EI Escorial criteria 2015. 32 As HCs, a total of 1224 neurologic disease‐free individuals of Chinese ancestry matched by geography were collected at the Health Center of Xiangya Hospital. The demographic information of all individuals is listed in Table S1. We also selected 6708 whole‐exome sequencing and 780 whole‐genome sequencing data from East Asian individuals without any neurologic disease in the gnomAD database v2 as a control cohort together in association analysis. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals.

Mutation analysis

Peripheral blood samples were collected from all participants, and genomic DNA was extracted by a standard protocol. All patients with ALS underwent whole‐exome sequencing. Sequencing procedures, including quality control and annotation, were the same as previously reported. 33 The variants were mapped to the GRCh37 reference genome.

Rare damaging variants (RDVs) in CLCC1 variants were screened by the following criteria: (1) heterozygous or homozygous variants in the CLCC1 gene; (2) for heterozygous variants, minor allele frequency (MAF) less than 0.1% in 1000 Genomes (1000 Genomes Project), ESP6500s (NHLBI‐ESP project with 6500 exomes), GnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database), and ExAC (Exome Aggregation Consortium); for homozygous variants, MAF less than 1%; (3) absent in our HC cohort; (4) nonsynonymous, indels, frameshift, and putative splice site variants; and (5) pathogenicity defined as predicted to be pathogenic by at least two in silico tools. The in silico prediction tools are listed in Table S2.

As these identified RDVs in CLCC1, we also screened them in publicly available ALS databases, including the ALSdb (http://alsdb.org/), Project MinE (http://databrowser.projectmine.com/), and ALS variant server (http://als.umassmed.edu/).

Other known ALS‐related variants were screened in patients harboring CLCC1 variants by the above standards similar to that of CLCC1. C9orf72 and ATXN2 repeat expansion mutations were also screened to exclude certain pathogenic variants. 8 , 33

Clinical analysis

A comprehensive battery of clinical data, including age, sex, family history, and clinical features such as age at onset (AAO), site of onset, disease duration, physical examination, MMSE (Mini‐Mental State Examination), ECAS (Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen), and ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS‐R) score, were collected from all patients. The progression rate (ΔFS) was calculated as ΔFS = (48‐ALSFRS‐R score at “time of diagnosis”)/duration from onset to diagnosis (month). 34 Survival time was recorded through longitudinal follow‐up analysis.

Protein structural prediction

A three‐dimensional structural model of wild‐type (WT) and mutated CLCC1 protein was predicted by Alphafold2 colab (AlphaFold2.ipynb), and visualization was conducted by PyMol software (Version 2.5.4). DynaMut2 was used to assess protein stability. 35

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 25.0. Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) or median (IQR) were calculated for continuous variables according to whether normality distribution was satisfied. The comparison of continuous variables was assessed by Student's t test or Mann–Whitney U test. For comparison of categorical variables, the chi‐square test was applied. Association analysis of the RDVs was performed across the entire CLCC1 gene and identified variants using Fisher's exact test. p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographics

In total, we analyzed CLCC1 variants in 1005 ALS patients and 1224 HCs of Chinese ancestry in our study. In patients, the AAO (median [IQR]) was 54 (47,62) years old, and the age at sampling was 56 (49,63) years old. The geographically matched HCs were older than ALS patients, with a median age of 68 (65,73) years, to avoid recruiting presymptomatic patients. ALS patients with spinal onset accounted for 75.42% (758/1005), while 18.11% (182/1005) had bulbar onset. Notably, 6.47% (65/1005) of patients presented with spinal and bulbar onset almost simultaneously. The detailed demographic characteristics of all individuals are listed in Table S1.

Mutation analysis of CLCC1 in the ALS cohort

In our cohort, four heterozygous RDVs in CLCC1 were identified in four unrelated sALS patients, accounting for 0.40% of all patients (4/1005). Rare homozygous variants were not identified in our cohort. The four heterozygous variants were c.A275C (p.Q92P), c.G1139A (p.R380K), c.C1244T (p.T415M), and c.G1328A (p.R443Q) (Table 1). Three of four variants were located in exon 10, while the remaining variant was in exon 4 (Fig. 1A). Corresponding with the location in exon 10, the amino acid locations of these variants were located on the cytoplasmic side beyond transmembrane domain 3 (Fig. 1B). Among them, the variant c.G1139A was not found in any public genome database, and variants c.A275C (p.Q92P) and c.G1328A (p.R443Q) were predicted to be pathogenic at a relatively high degree of confidence. Specifically, for these four variants—c.275A>C (p.Q92P), c.1139G>A (p.R380K), c.1244C>T (p.T415M), and c.1328G>A (p.R443Q)—eight, three, two, and six out of nine in silico tools, respectively, predicted them as pathogenic (Table S2). The CADD prediction results of these four variants were damaging (20), tolerable (10.66), tolerable (14.87), and damaging (23.6), respectively. And the Polyphen2 HDIV and HVAR predicted all these four variants to be damaging. In addition, variants c.C1244T (p.T415M) and c.G1328A (p.R443Q) were reported in the ALSdb and Project MinE ALS databases, respectively (Table S3).

Table 1.

CLCC1 rare damaging variants identified in our ALS cohort.

Sample ID Chr1 Exon cDNA change AA change Mutation type dbSNP HCs GnomAD_exome_ALL GnomAD_exome_EAS ExAC 1000 Genomes ESP6500s
XY0254 109490297 4 c.A275C p.Q92P missense NA NA 4.10E‐06 5.85E‐05 NA NA NA
XY0736 109479943 10 c.G1139A p.R380K missense NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
XY0010 109479838 10 c.C1244T p.T415M missense rs759574194 NA 2.87E‐05 1.00E‐04 2.50E‐05 NA NA
XY0098 109479754 10 c.G1328A p.R443Q missense rs758737739 NA 2.11E‐05 6.48E‐05 9.03E‐06 NA NA

Genome position was based on GRCh37. RefSeq accession number: NM_ 001048210 for CLCC1.

Abbreviations: AA, amino acids; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; cDNA, complementary DNA; dbSNP, Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; EAS, East Asian; ESP6500s, NHLBI‐ESP project with 6500 exomes; ExAC, Exome Aggregation Consortium; GnomAD, Genome Aggregation Database; HCs: healthy controls; NA, not available; 1000 Genomes, 1000 Genomes Project.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Rare, putative pathogenic variants in CLCC1 identified in ALS patients. (A) Schematic representation of the CLCC1 transcript NM_001048210. (B) Schematic representation of the CLCC1 protein. Novel putative pathogenic variants in our ALS cohort (red font); pathogenic variants reported by He et al. with functional experiments supported (blue font); truncated variants reported by He et al. (brown font); other rare putative pathogenic variants reported by He et al. (black font). ER, endoplasmic reticulum; TM, transmembrane.

We also screened mutations in other known ALS‐causative genes in these four patients. The patient carrying variant c.A275C (p.Q92P) of CLCC1 also had one unreported missense mutation in EWSR1 (NM_005243:c.G1742A:p.R581H).

Results of association analysis at the CLCC1 gene level and single variant level

In this study, we enrolled two cohorts of controls, our HC cohort and East Asian individuals without any neurologic disease in the gnomAD database v2. Compared with controls, we did not find RDVs in the CLCC1 gene overexpressed in ALS patients at the entire gene level (Table 2). Moreover, Fisher's exact test found that no variant was associated with the risk of ALS (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association analysis results of the identified rare damaging variants in CLCC1.

Model AC (patients) n = 1005 HCs, n = 1224 GnomAD_EAS_non_neuro, n = 7488 a
AC p value OR [95% CI] AC p value OR [95% CI]
Gene level 4 5 1.00 0.97 [0.30–3.21] 33 1.00 0.90 [0.34–2.38]
c.A275C 1 0 0.45 Inf [0.14‐Inf] 0 0.12 Inf [0.83‐Inf]
c.G1139A 1 0 0.45 Inf [0.14‐Inf] 1 0.22 7.45 [0.40–141.60]
c.C1244T 1 0 0.45 Inf [0.14‐Inf] 2 0.31 3.73 [0.26–32.07]
c.G1328A 1 0 0.45 Inf [0.14‐Inf] 0 0.12 Inf [0.83‐Inf]

Abbreviations: AC: allele account; CI, confidence interval; EAS, East Asian; GnomAD, Genome Aggregation Database; HCs: healthy controls; Inf: Infinity; NA: not available; neuro: neurologic disease; OR, odds ratio.

a

GnomAD_EAS_non_neuro included 6708 WES data and 780 WGS data.

Clinical characteristics of ALS patients with variants in CLCC1

Summarizing the clinical manifestations of the four ALS patients carrying RDVs in CLCC1, we found that these four patients shared relatively similar clinical features. The mean AAO of the four patients was 48.50 ± 2.87 years, ranging from 40 to 52 years. All four patients showed spinal onset. The disease progressed rapidly, with the progression rates ΔFS greater than 0.75, and an average ALSFRS‐R score of 41. The survival time ranged from 13 to 30 months. Interestingly, we found that these patients tended to display cognitive decline (50.0%, 2/4). The clinical features of patients with variants in CLCC1 are listed in Table 3.

Table 3.

Clinical manifestations of ALS patients with rare damaging variants in CLCC1.

Patients This study He et al.
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4
Sample ID XY0254 XY0736 XY0010 XY0398 NA
Variants c.A275C c.G1139A c.C1244T c.G1328A NL
Family history Sporadic Sporadic Sporadic Sporadic Sporadic
Sex Female Female Female Male Female (3)
Male (6)
Age at onset 52 50 52 40 45 (34, 74) a
Alive (Y/N) N N N NA NL
Survival (months) 21 13 30 NA 78 (13) b
Site of onset Right distal upper limb Left distal upper limb Right upper limb Left distal upper limb Hand (4)
Lower limb (5)
Muscle weakness and atrophy Generalized Generalized Upper limbs Left limb NA
Reflexes Hyporeflexia Hyperreflexia Hyperreflexia Hyperreflexia in upper limbs NA
Bulbar involved Y N Y N NA
ALSFRS‐R 40/48 38/48 39/48 47/48 NA
ΔFS 1.60 1.11 0.75 1.00 NA
Education level (years) 9 9 12 9 NA
MMSE NA NA 22/30 30/30 NA
ECAS 71/136 NA NA NA NA
EMG OD and CR in all four segments OD and CR in all four segments OD and CR in cervical and lumbar segments OD and CR in bulbar, cervical, and lumbar segments NA

Abbreviations: ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS‐R, ALS functional rating scale revised; CR, chronic reinnervation; ECAS, Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioral ALS Screen; EMG, electromyogram; MMSE, Mini‐Mental State Examination; N, no; NA, not available; NL, not listed; OD, ongoing denervation; PMA, progressive muscular atrophy; Y, yes; ΔFS, progression rate, calculated as (48‐ALSFRS‐R at “time of diagnosis”)/duration from onset to diagnosis (month).

a

Median (IQR).

b

Mean (SD).

P1 (XY0254) was a female carrying variant c.A275C (p.Q92P), characterized by rapid regressive muscle weakness of four limbs and early involvement of the bulbar region. Starting from weakness of the right hand at the age of 52 years, the left upper limb and lower limbs became involved within 3 months, gradually manifesting obvious muscular atrophy of the four limbs. Four months after onset, the patient showed dysarthria without obvious dysphagia. At the time of visit of 5 months since onset, her ALSFRS‐R score was 40/48. Her tendon reflexes were decreased, and no pathological reflex was elicited. An electromyogram (EMG) test showed widespread ongoing denervation and chronic reinnervation of all four segments (bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral). Diagnosed with PMA, this patient did not present any signs of upper motor neuron (UMN) degeneration. She died 21 months after the onset of symptoms.

P2 (XY0736) was a female harboring variant c. G1139A (p.R380K). At the age of 50, she initially presented with weakness and atrophy of the left upper limb, which spread to the right upper limb and lower limbs within 6 months. She developed dysarthria 8 months later. Nine months later, at the first visit, her ALSFRS‐R score was 38/48. Muscle fasciculations were observed in all four limbs. The deep tendon reflexes of the lower limbs were brisk, and palmomental reflexes were positive. The ECAS screen showed naming impairment and executive dysfunction (total score: 71/136, naming domain: 0/8, executive function: 20/48). EMG showed classic widespread chronic reinnervation and ongoing denervation in all four segments. Subsequent axonal damage of peripheral nerves was also observed. She was diagnosed with probable ALS and died of respiratory failure 13 months later.

P3 (XY0010), a female with variant c.C1244T (p.T415M), showed initial symptoms of muscle weakness and atrophy of the right upper limb at 52 years old. Six months later, she complained of memory impairment. Nine months later, her left upper limb was involved. Almost 11 months later, she presented with dysphasia. Twelve months later, at the first visit, her ALSFRS‐R score was 39/48. MMSE showed deficiency mainly in executive and language functions. EMG revealed axonal damage of nerves of the right upper limb as well as ongoing denervation and chronic reinnervation of cervical and lumbosacral regions. Her diagnosis was probable ALS. Nearly 28 months later, at our follow‐up, weakness of her upper limbs deteriorated, and dysphagia developed. The patient died 30 months later.

P4 (XY0398) was a male with variant c.G1328A (p.R443Q) who complained of weakness and atrophy of the left upper limb at 40 years old. He visited 1 month later since onset, and his ALSFRS‐R score was 47/48. His tendon reflexes of the upper limbs were brisk with a positive Hoffmann sign on the left side. Obvious muscular atrophy was observed in the left upper limb. EMG showed ongoing denervation and chronic reinnervation in bulbar, cervical, and lumbosacral segments. His clinical diagnosis was probable ALS laboratory supported. Unfortunately, we lost touch with him in later follow‐up.

Generation and stability analysis of 3D models of CLCC1 protein

We constructed 3D structural models of the WT and mutated CLCC1 proteins (Fig. 2) and assessed their stabilities. In the first model, the amino acid at the 92nd position was converted from a polar amino acid Gln to a nonpolar Pro, and the hydrogen bonds between site 92 and Asn 94 or Asp 88 were disrupted, while hydrogen bonds between site 92 and Ser 91 still existed. In the second model where Lys substituted for Arg at site 380, no hydrogen bond was found in either the predicted WT or mutated protein when the distance was extended to 8 Å. However, DynaMut2 analysis predicted that the variant would decrease the stability of the CLCC1 protein due to the negative free energy values (ΔΔG = −0.49 kcal/mol). The third variant, converting Thr to Met, disrupted the hydrogen bond at site 415, and the mutated protein also showed predicted decreased stability (ΔΔG = −0.45 kcal/mol). In the fourth model, where positively charged Arg 443 was replaced with Gln with no charge, there were no surrounding hydrogen bonds at a distance of 8 Å, but the variant may destabilize the CLCC1 protein (ΔΔG = −0.17 kcal/mol). These altered hydrogen bonds and decreased stabilities implied potential changes in protein function and interaction.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

3D structural prediction models of CLCC1 protein. (A and B) Structure of the 92nd position in wild‐type and mutated CLCC1 (p.Q92P). (C and D) Structure of the 380th position in wild‐type and mutated CLCC1 (p.R380K). (E and F) Structure of the 415th position in wild‐type and mutated CLCC1 (p.T415M). (G and H) Structure of the 443rd position in wild‐type and mutated CLCC1 (p.R443Q). Wild‐type amino acid residues are identified in green labels, mutated amino acid residues are identified in red labels, neighboring amino acid residues are identified in blue labels, hydrogen bonds are identified in yellow dashed lines, and the number above the dashed line is the predicted hydrogen bond length.

Discussion

CLCC1 is a transmembrane protein localized on the ER. It contributes to anion transport between the ER and cytoplasm and maintains ionic homeostasis. 26 Dysfunction of CLCC1 causes misfolding of proteins in the ER. 27 , 29 Reportedly, the c.75C>A (p.D25E) mutation was associated with autosomal‐recessive retinitis pigmentosa in a Pakistani population. 30 , 31 Recently, CLCC1 was reported to be a novel ALS‐related gene, and its functional mutation and loss of CLCC1 caused an ALS‐like phenotype in mice. 26 This finding provides new insight into the pathogenesis underlying ALS. This study is the first to propose the role of disrupted ER ion homeostasis maintained by an ER anion channel in ALS pathogenesis. Interestingly, the ALS‐related variants (including missense and truncated variants) were heterozygous in this recent study. 26 The reported ALS‐related variants decreased the protein level of CLCC1 compared with WT. In vivo, the severity of the ALS‐like phenotype varied in a pattern of CLCC1 dosage dependence. 26 Clinically, the patients with mutations in CLCC1 had high heterogeneity.

In our ALS cohort from Central South China, we discovered four heterozygous RDVs in CLCC1 in four unrelated sALS patients. Our findings broaden the current genetic and clinical spectrum of CLCC1 in ALS and provide clues for further investigation. The four identified rare missense variants were not the same as the variants reported by He et al. 26 In silico prediction and 3D models suggested their potential pathogenicity. Among them, variant c.G1139A (p.R380K) has not been found in any public genome database. Another two heterozygous variants, c.C1244T (p.T415M) and c.G1328A (p.R443Q), were reported in the ALSdb and Project MinE ALS databases, respectively. As detailed clinical information was not accessible, we cannot include the clinical features of the two variants in the public ALS database in the analysis.

Similar to previous reports, 26 the variants identified in this study were also not located in transmembrane regions (Fig. 1). The variants we found were concentrated at exon 10, indicating that exon 10 might be a potential hotspot. To verify this hypothesis, we analyzed the distribution of rare variants of CLCC1 in HCs. Five rare variants were identified in HCs according to the same criteria as in ALS patients except the third criterion (Table S4). There was no tendency of centralization in rare variants identified in HCs, and only one variant was located in exon 10. However, there was no significant difference in the frequency of rare variants within exon 10 between patients and HCs (p = 0.21). Consistently, three of four variants in ALS patients localized at the C‐terminus, while previously reported variants were mostly centralized at the N‐terminus. 26 The variants at the C‐terminus in our study were predicted to affect protein stability. As reported, the N‐terminal variants (K298A, S263R, and W267R) in heterozygous status were as stable as WT CLCC1, while C‐terminal‐truncated mutations might affect full‐length CLCC1 protein stability. 26 Further experiments are required to explore whether the C‐terminal structure is significant for maintaining protein stability and its underlying mechanism.

To summarize the clinical manifestations of CLCC1‐related ALS patients in our cohort, it seemed that they showed relatively severe clinical manifestations, such as earlier AAO, rapid progression, and short survival time. In addition, all patients showed spinal onset, and half of the patients had cognitive impairment. First, the CLCC1‐related ALS patients showed an earlier AAO (48.50 ± 2.87 years, ranging from 40 to 52 years), while our previous work reported a mean AAO of 54.3 ± 10.9 years in sALS patients. 33 Second, the CLCC1‐related patients had short survival times, ranging from 13 to 30 months, except for the patient loss to follow‐up. Moreover, our patients showed relatively rapid progression with a ΔFS greater than 0.75. Consistently, CLCC1‐related ALS patients in this study showed similar spinal onset as ALS patients reported by He et al. Last, two patients in our study manifested cognitive decline mainly in language and executive domains, which are relatively vulnerable in ALS patients. 36 , 37 However, patients harboring CLCC1 variants also showed high heterogeneity clinically. The AAO of CLCC1 patients reported by He et al. ranged from 17 to 74 years, and the survival time ranged from 38 to 135 months. 26 Notably, the sample size in this study was limited, and therefore, larger cohorts are needed to validate the above hypotheses.

In this study, we also provided evidence for the oligogenic model of ALS. 4 , 38 , 39 , 40 In our cohort, patient XY0254 with variant c.A275C (p.Q92P) also harbored an additional variant in another known ALS‐related gene, c.G1742A (p.R581H) in EWSR1. The AAO of this patient was 52 years old. The survival time was 21 months with a ΔFS of 1.60. The frequency of this variant in EWSR1 in the public databases was less than 0.01%, and functional prediction was predicted pathogenic by six out of nine in silico tools. We presumed that the two variants might develop a synergistic effect on the phenotype. As reported, patients carrying more RDVs tended to have an earlier AAO and a more rapid progression. 4 , 38 , 41 , 42

In summary, we screened the rare variants of the recently discovered ALS‐related CLCC1 gene in our ALS cohort from Central South China and found four putative pathogenic variants. The clinical characteristics of CLCC1‐related patients included spinal onset, relatively rapid progression, and possible cognitive decline. Our findings expand the genetic and clinical spectrum of CLCC1‐related ALS and provide more genetic evidence for the pathogenesis related to ion channels and clues for further investigation.

Author Contributions

Linxin Tang performed the majority of the analyses and drafted the article. Xuxiong Tang was responsible for the structural prediction analysis. Qianqian Zhao, Yongchao Li, and Yue Bu contributed to the collection of clinical data. Zhen Liu and Jinchen Li contributed to bioinformatic analyses. Jifeng Guo, Lu Shen, Hong Jiang, Beisha Tang, Renxu, Xu, Wenfeng Cao, and Junling Wang provided critical intellectual contributions and participated in article revision. Yanchun Yuan was responsible for the study concept and design and writing the article.

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation 2030 (STI2030‐Major Projects: 2021ZD0201803 to J.W.); the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2021YFA0805202); the Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#82171431, 81671120, and 81300981 to J.W.); and the Project Program of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders at Xiangya Hospital (#2020LNJJ13 to J.W.).

Supporting information

Supplementary Table 1.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participating patients for their involvement.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China grant 2021YFA0805202; National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 81300981, 81671120, and 82171431; the Project Program of National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders at Xiangya Hospital grant 2020LNJJ13; the Science and Technology Innovation 2030 grant STI2030 Major Projects 2021ZD0201803.

References

  • 1. Brown RH, Al‐Chalabi A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:162‐172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Arthur KC, Calvo A, Price TR, Geiger JT, Chiò A, Traynor BJ. Projected increase in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from 2015 to 2040. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cady J, Allred P, Bali T, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis onset is influenced by the burden of rare variants in known amyotrophic lateral sclerosis genes. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:100‐113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. McCann EP, Henden L, Fifita JA, et al. Evidence for polygenic and oligogenic basis of Australian sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Genet. 2020;58:87‐95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ryan M, Heverin M, McLaughlin RL, Hardiman O. Lifetime risk and heritability of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:1367‐1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bruijn LI, Miller TM, Cleveland DW. Unraveling the mechanisms involved in motor neuron degeneration in ALS. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:723‐749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature. 1993;362:59‐62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Al‐Chalabi A, Fang F, Hanby MF, et al. An estimate of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis heritability using twin data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1324‐1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. van Rheenen W, Shatunov A, Dekker AM, et al. Genome‐wide association analyses identify new risk variants and the genetic architecture of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1043‐1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zou ZY, Zhou ZR, Che CH, Liu CY, He RL, Huang HP. Genetic epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:540‐549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mejzini R, Flynn LL, Pitout IL, Fletcher S, Wilton SD, Akkari PA. ALS genetics, mechanisms, and therapeutics: where are we now? Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Goutman SA, Hardiman O, Al‐Chalabi A, et al. Emerging insights into the complex genetics and pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21:465‐479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shepheard SR, Parker MD, Cooper‐Knock J, et al. Value of systematic genetic screening of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92:510‐518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ghasemi M, Brown RH Jr. Genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8:a024125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Brenner D, Yilmaz R, Müller K, et al. Hot‐spot KIF5A mutations cause familial ALS. Brain. 2018;141:688‐697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nicolas A, Kenna KP, Renton AE, et al. Genome‐wide analyses identify KIF5A as a novel ALS gene. Neuron. 2018;97:1268‐1283.e1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Liao P, Yuan Y, Liu Z, et al. Association of variants in the KIF1A gene with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Transl Neurodegener. 2022;11:46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Russell KL, Downie JM, Gibson SB, et al. Pathogenic effect of TP73 gene variants in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2021;97:e225‐e235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tang X, Yuan Y, Liu Z, et al. Genetic and clinical analysis of TP73 gene in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients from Chinese mainland. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1114022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Johnson JO, Chia R, Miller DE, et al. Association of Variants in the SPTLC1 gene with juvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78:1236‐1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lone MA, Aaltonen MJ, Zidell A, et al. SPTLC1 variants associated with ALS produce distinct sphingolipid signatures through impaired interaction with ORMDL proteins. J Clin Invest. 2022;132:e161908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Mohassel P, Donkervoort S, Lone MA, et al. Childhood amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caused by excess sphingolipid synthesis. Nat Med. 2021;27:1197‐1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Iacoangeli A, Lin T, Al Khleifat A, et al. Genome‐wide meta‐analysis finds the ACSL5‐ZDHHC6 locus is associated with ALS and links weight loss to the disease genetics. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nakamura R, Misawa K, Tohnai G, et al. A multi‐ethnic meta‐analysis identifies novel genes, including ACSL5, associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Commun Biol. 2020;3:526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Saez‐Atienzar S, Bandres‐Ciga S, Langston RG, et al. Genetic analysis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identifies contributing pathways and cell types. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabd9036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Guo L, Mao Q, He J, et al. Disruption of ER ion homeostasis maintained by an ER anion channel CLCC1 contributes to ALS‐like pathologies. Cell Res. 2023;33:497‐515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chu Q, Martinez TF, Novak SW, et al. Regulation of the ER stress response by a mitochondrial microprotein. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Peters OM, Ghasemi M, Brown RH Jr. Emerging mechanisms of molecular pathology in ALS. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1767‐1779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jia Y, Jucius TJ, Cook SA, Ackerman SL. Loss of Clcc1 results in ER stress, misfolded protein accumulation, and neurodegeneration. J Neurosci. 2015;35:3001‐3009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li L, Jiao X, D'Atri I, et al. Mutation in the intracellular chloride channel CLCC1 associated with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. PLoS Genet. 2018;14:e1007504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ma Y, Wang X, Shoshany N, et al. CLCC1 c. 75C>a mutation in Pakistani derived retinitis pigmentosa families likely originated with a single founder mutation 2,000–5,000 years ago. Front Genet. 2022;13:804924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ludolph A, Drory V, Hardiman O, et al. A revision of the El Escorial criteria – 2015. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16:291‐292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Liu Z, Yuan Y, Wang M, et al. Mutation spectrum of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in central South China. Neurobiol Aging. 2021;107:181‐188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kimura F, Fujimura C, Ishida S, et al. Progression rate of ALSFRS‐R at time of diagnosis predicts survival time in ALS. Neurology. 2006;66:265‐267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Rodrigues CHM, Pires DEV, Ascher DB. DynaMut2: assessing changes in stability and flexibility upon single and multiple point missense mutations. Protein Sci. 2021;30:60‐69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Abrahams S, Newton J, Niven E, Foley J, Bak TH. Screening for cognition and behaviour changes in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15:9‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Solca F, Aiello EN, Torre S, et al. Prevalence and determinants of language impairment in non‐demented amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol. 2023;30:606‐611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Nguyen HP, Van Broeckhoven C, van der Zee J. ALS genes in the genomic era and their implications for FTD. Trends Genet. 2018;34:404‐423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ji A‐L, Zhang X, Chen W‐W, Huang W‐J. Genetics insight into the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/frontotemporal dementia spectrum. J Med Genet. 2017;54:145‐154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kirola L, Mukherjee A, Mutsuddi M. Recent updates on the genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Mol Neurobiol. 2022;59:5673‐5694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zhang H, Cai W, Chen S, et al. Screening for possible oligogenic pathogenesis in Chinese sporadic ALS patients. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018;19:419‐425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Pang SY, Hsu JS, Teo KC, et al. Burden of rare variants in ALS genes influences survival in familial and sporadic ALS. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;58:238.e239‐238.e215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1.


Articles from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES