Abstract
The genus Tuber (Tuberaceae, Pezizales) is an important fungal group of Ascomycota both economically and ecologically. However, the species diversity, phylogenetic relationships, and geographic distribution of Tuber species in China remains poorly understood, primarily because descriptions of many new species relied heavily on morphological features with molecular data either not sought or ignored. The misapplication of European and North American names further added to confusion regarding the taxonomy of Chinese Tuber species. In this study, we examined more than 1 000 specimens from China, and performed a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis for Chinese Tuber species using ITS sequences and multilocus sequence data. To infer the phylogeny of Chinese Tuber spp., 11 molecular datasets were assembled, including a concatenated internal transcribed spacers of the nuc rDNA (ITS), nuc rDNA 28S subunit (LSU), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α), and RNA polymerase II subunit (rpb2) dataset as well as 10 ITS datasets (totally including 1 435 sequences from 828 collections with 597 newly generated sequences, and 168 sequences from the types of 63 species). Our phylogenetic tree based on a concatenated multilocus dataset revealed that all Chinese Tuber species nested in nine phylogenetic clades (phylogroups), including Aestivum, Excavatum, Latisporum, Macrosporum, Maculatum, Melanosporum, Puberulum, Rufum and Turmericum. Of these, five phylogroups (Macrosporum, Maculatum, Melanosporum, Puberulum and Rufum) are shared across the continents of Asia, Europe and North America; two phylogroups (Aestivum and Excavatum) are shared by Europe and Asia; and the phylogroups Turmericum and Latisporum are endemic only to Asia. Phylogenetic trees based on 10 ITS datasets confirmed the presence of at least 82 phylogenetic species in China. Of these, 53 are identified as known species, including three new records for China, and 25 species are identified as new to science. Of the new species, nine are described and illustrated in this paper, and the others remain unnamed due to the paucity or absence of ascomatal materials. Accordingly, the confirmed, excluded and doubtful Tuber species in China are discussed. Tuber species showed high endemism. Of the 82 phylogenetic species found in China, 68 species occur only in China, six species are also found in other regions in Asia, and only eight species (T. anniae, T. excelsum-reticulatum, T. formosanum, T. maculatum, T. wenchuanense, Tuber sp. CHN-3, Tuber sp. CHN-10 and Tuber sp. CHN-11) are shared with other continents. Most Tuber species have a small and limited distribution in China, but a few, such as T. formosanum and T. parvomurphium, are widely distributed across China. Some phylogenetically closely related species, such as T. liaotongense and T. subglobosum, as well as T. xuanhuaense and T. lijiangense, show a pattern of allopatric distribution.
Keywords: ectomycorrhizal fungi, novel taxa, Pezizales, truffles
INTRODUCTION
The truffle genus Tuber (Tuberaceae, Pezizales, Pezizomycotina, Ascomycota) is economically and ecologically one of the most important fungal genera. All species in this genus are ectomycorrhizal forming mutually beneficial symbiotic associations with a wide range of host plants including Pinus spp., Picea spp., Larix spp., Pseudotsuga spp., Populus spp., Fagus spp., Corylus spp., Quercus spp., which are dominant trees in North temperate forests (Hall et al. 2007, Trappe et al. 2009, Deng et al. 2014). These fungi play a very important role in forest development and ecological balance (Maser et al. 2008, Courty et al. 2010). Tuber is also the most widely known and studied fungal genus because T. aestivum, T. borchii, T. melanosporum and T. magnatum, the culinarily famous and expensive summer truffle, bianchetto truffle, French black truffle and Italian white truffle, are nested in this genus.
The scientific classification of Tuber has a long history in Europe (Vittadini 1831, Tulasne & Tulasne 1851, Ceruti 1960, Riousset et al. 2001, Ceruti et al. 2003, Jeandroz et al. 2008), and in North America (Harkness 1899, Gilkey 1939, 1954, Trappe et al. 2009, Bonito et al. 2010, 2013, Guevara et al. 2013). However, the knowledge of this genus is absent from China before 1985s. The first scientific record of Tuber in China is T. taiyuanense, a domestic species, harvested under Pinus sp. from Shanxi Province in North China (Liu 1985). Later, Wang (1988) reported seven Tuber species from Liaoning Province in north-eastern China including the new species T. liaotongense. Published information on truffles in southern China began with the publication of T. sinense (Tao et al. 1989), which currently is an important commercial black truffle on the international market although often this is mistakenly called T. indicum.
Since 1991, considerable effort has been focused on Tuber in China, and many species have been added to the list of Chinese species, many of which were based on morphology (mostly earlier than 2005) or both morphology and molecular data (Wang & Li 1991, Hu 1992, Wang et al. 1998, Xu 1999, Wang & He 2002, Chen et al. 2005, Hu & Wang 2005, Chen & Liu 2007, Fan et al. 2011a, b, 2012a–e, 2013a, b, 2014, 2015, 2016a, b, 2018, Fan & Cao 2012, Zhang et al. 2012, Fan & Yue 2013, Qiao et al. 2013, Su et al. 2013, Qing et al. 2015, Huang et al. 2017, Wan et al. 2017a, b, Xu et al. 2017, Fan 2021). Three doctoral theses were focused on phylogenetic and taxonomic work on this genus with evidence from both morphological and molecular data (Song 2005, Chen 2007, Cao 2010), and these contributed much to our understanding of Tuberin China, particularly over the past decade. Despite this we still know little about their phylogenetic relationships and geographic distribution. There is also an urgent need to re-examine species erected based on morphological features with molecular methods. There is also a need to explore the taxonomic positions of some taxa known only from ectomycorrhizal (ECM) root tips.
Identifying Tuberspecies based on morphology alone is often very difficult due to the limited number of morphological features (Kinoshita et al. 2011, 2018, Fan et al. 2018), and the occurrence of cryptic species (Chen et al. 2011, Kinoshita et al. 2011). These factors contribute to confuse species delimitations and definitions, which has led to confusion in the Chinese literature. The taxonomic confusion is more common in the literature written before 2010 when an ITS-based DNA delimitation of Tuberspecies was proposed (Bonito et al. 2010). Molecular analyses based on DNA sequence data provide powerful tools to accurately identify Tuberspecies (Wang et al. 2006a, b, 2007, Bonito et al. 2010, Kinoshita et al. 2011), and facilitate the study of Tuberspecies not only from ascomata but also from environmental DNA sequences, thereby increasing our knowledge of the ecology as well as diversity of these truffles.
In our current study, morphological features and DNA-based molecular analysis were conducted based on more than 1 000 collections garnered in both North and South China over the past two decades. The aim of this paper is to clarify the species diversity, phylogenetic relationships, endemism and geographic distribution of this important truffle genus Tuberin China.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sampling
Samples collected in China over the past two decades were examined. Voucher specimens have been accessioned in the Herbarium Biology Department, Capital Normal University (BJTC). Additional specimens on loan from other fungaria were also studied. The principal herbaria were the Herbarium Mycologicum Academiae Sinicaea at the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HMAS) and the Herbarium of Cryptogams at the Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (HKAS).
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, sequencing and nucleotide alignment
Gleba tissue sampled from fungarium specimens were crushed by shaking for 3min at 30 Hz (Mixer Mill MM 301, Retsch, Haan, Germany) in a 1.5 mL tube together with one 3-mm-diameter tungsten carbide ball, and total genomic DNA was extracted using the E.Z.N.A. Fungal DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc. Norcross, Georgia, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
The following primer pairs were used for PCR amplification and sequencing: ITS1f/ITS4 (White et al. 1990, Gardes & Bruns 1993) were used for the internal transcribed spacers of the nuc rDNA (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2=ITS); LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990) for the nuc rDNA 28S subunit (nrLSU); EF1Tub_for, 2/EF1Tub_rev1 (Bonito et al. 2013) for the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α); fRPB2_5f/RPB2_7r (Bonito et al. 2013) for the RNA polymerase II subunit (rpb2). PCRs were performed in 50µL reactions containing 4µL DNA template, 2µL of each primer (10µM/L), 25µL 2× Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co. Ltd.), and 17µL ddH2O. PCR reactions were run as follows: for the ITS gene, initial denaturation at 94°C for 3min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 50 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min; for the LSU gene, initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 59 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min; for the tef1-α gene, initial denaturation at 94 °C for 90 s, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 35 s, 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min; for the rpb2 gene, initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, with step down starting at 50 °C, decreasing by 1 °C per cycle to 45 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were sent to Beijing Zhongkexilin Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China) for purification and sequencing. The newly generated sequences were assembled and edited using SeqMan (DNA STAR package; DNAStar Inc., Madison, WI, USA) with generic-level identities for sequences confirmed via BLAST queries of GenBank.
A total of 1 344 sequences from 957 collections of Tuberwere used in the molecular phylogenetic analyses. Specimen information is provided in Table S1–S3. Sequences of all DNA regions generated in this study were deposited in GenBank. The sequences obtained from GenBank are based on published literature (Kinoshita et al. 2011, Fan et al. 2011a, b, 2012a–e, 2013a, b, 2014, 2015, 2016a, b, 2018, Fan & Cao 2012, Bonito et al. 2013, Huang et al. 2017, Yan et al. 2018), or selected by using the BLASTn search function of the NCBI database to find similar matches with taxa in Tuber. For ITS sequence data, the genus search tool in UNITE database and emerencia (Nilsson et al. 2005) was used for retrieving Tuber-related ITS sequences, and the ITS sequences with short lengths (≤300bp) were excluded from the final analyses.
Eleven datasets were assembled for this study. Dataset I (ITS/nrLSU/tef1-α/rpb2) contains the backbone species and all phylogroups of Tuber, which were used to infer the phylogenetic placement of Chinese Tuberspecies. This dataset was concatenated and included one to two representative samples per species, with three species of Choiromyces and Labyrinthomyces as outgroup taxa. Datasets II–X (ITS) correspond to nine phylogroups, and include all available sequences of Chinese Tuberspecies, and the sequences of representative (non-Chinese) species (one to two samples per species) for each Tuberphylogroup. These nine ITS-datasets were employed to delimit the Chinese Tuberspecies. Moreover, for making each sequence employed in Datasets II–X to be classified in the homologous phylogroup, we selected the representative sequences of each species using the threshold of 98% ITS sequence similarity as species delimitation according to our research experiences. Sequence similarity is obtained using Mothur v.1.39.5 (Schloss et al. 2009) withminimum match set to 98%, which is less than the species delimitation (95–96%) proposed by Kinoshita et al. (2011) and Bonito et al. (2013), and similar to the threshold (97–98%) usually used for ectomycorrhizal fungal community studies (Smith et al. 2007, Peay 2008, Brock et al. 2009, Hughes et al. 2009), and iteratively constructed the phylogenetic analyses for the representative sequence dataset using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Dataset XI (ITS) contains all Chinese Tuberspecies that were described in previous studies or discovered in this study except for three species that lack available molecular data. These 10 alignments (Dataset II–XI) were used to infer the phylogenetic relationships between Chinese Tuberspecies. Three species that lack molecular data are T. gigantosporum, T. polyspermum, and T. xizangense. We cannot obtain the specimens of T. giganto-sporum and T. xizangense as they may be lost according to the original authors. The molecular data of T. polyspermum is not successfully sequenced.
Sequences were aligned and edited in MAFFT (Katoh & Frith 2012) under default parameters, and manually adjusted for maximum sequence similarity in Se-Al v.2.03a. (Rambaut 2000). Ambiguously aligned regions and gaps in the alignment were excluded before the analyses. For the concatenated dataset (Dataset I), alignments were constructed separately for each of the gene fragments using MAFFT (Katoh & Frith 2012), optimised using BioEdit v.7.0.9 (Hall 1999), then concatenated using SequenceMatrix v.1.7.8 (Vaidya et al. 2011). Unsampled gene regions were coded as missing data and all introns of rpb2, tef1-α were excluded because of the difficulty in alignment. Poorly aligned sites were identified by Gblocks 0.91b (http://www.phylogeny.fr/one_task.cgi?task_type=gblocks&tab_index=2; Castresana 2000; using default options except ALLOWED GAP POSITIONS 5 half) with default parameters. All identified ambiguous sites were excluded before the analyses. Alignments of all datasets used in this study were submitted to TreeBASE (No. 29218).
Phylogenetic analyses
Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses on all eleven datasets in this study were conducted with RAxML v.8.0.14 (Stamatakis et al. 2005, Stamatakis 2006, 2014) and the GTRGAMMAI substitution model (for all 11 datasets) with parameters unlinked. ML bootstrap replicates (1 000) were computed in RAxML with a rapid bootstrap analysis and search for the best-scoring ML tree.
Bayesian inference (BI) was performed with MrBayes v.3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003) as an additional method determining branch support. The best substitution model that fit the data at each locus was evaluated using MrModeltest v.2.3 (Nylander 2004). For the concatenated analysis (DatasetI), each locus is considered a partition and assigned its own best-fitting substitution model, that is HKY+I+G for ITS, rpb2 and tef1-α, GTR+I+G for nrLSU. We used two independent runs with four Markov chains Monte Carlo (MCMC) for 645 000 generations under the default settings. For single gene analysis (Dataset II–XI), the best substitution model for each dataset respectively was HKY+I (Dataset II), HKY+G (DatasetIII), GTR+G (Datasets IV–VII), GTR+I+G (Datasets VIII–IX), SYM+I+G (Dataset X, Phylogroup Excavatum), and GTR+I+G (DatasetXI). The MCMC analysis was run for 10 M generations. Average standard deviations of split frequency (ASDSF) values were far lower than 0.01 at the end of the generations. Trees were sampled every 100 generations after burn-in (25% of trees were discarded as the burn-in phase of the analyses, set up well after convergence), and 50% majority-rule consensus trees were constructed.
Clades with bootstrap support (BS) ≥70% and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) ≥0.99 were considered as significant-support (Hillis & Bull 1993, Alfaro et al. 2003). All phylogenetic trees were viewed with TreeView32 (Page 2001).
RESULTS
Phylogenetic analyses
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberat phylogroup level
The phylogenetic trees of Tuberbased on individual loci (including ITS, nrLSU, tef1-α, rpb2) showed the same major clades as that of the combined Dataset I (Fig.1). There was no strongly supported conflict between single gene phylogenies, except for the nrLSU phylogeny does not resolve Puberulum phylogroup or place T. magnatum within Aaestivum phylogroup (similar to Bonito et al. 2013). So here the combined dataset was used to infer the phylogenetic placement of Chinese Tuberspecies.
Fig. 1.


>Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberinferred from the Dataset I (ITS/nrLSU/tef1-α/rpb2) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. Chinese Tuberspecies are printed in bold.
Dataset I (ITS/nrLSU/tef1-α/rpb2) contained 532 sequences from 96 species, including 278 novel sequences of all four genes from the Chinese collections. Choiromyces alveolatus (HM485332), C. meandriformis (HM485330) and Labyrinthomyces sp. 3 (HM485335) were selected as the outgroup (Bonito et al. 2013). The length of the aligned dataset was 2 793bp after exclusion of poorly aligned sites, with 374bp for ITS, 828bp for nrLSU, 791bp for tef1-α, and 800bp for rpb2. The tree inferred from the ML analysis is illustrated with strong statistical bootstrap from ML and posterior probability from BI support values shown (Fig.1).
This multilocus phylogeny on ML tree resolved 12 clades of Tuberspecies with high statistical support. Of them, 11 clades respectively corresponded to the phylogroup Aestivum, Excavatum, Genadii, Gibbosum, Macrosporum, Maculatum, Melanosporum, Multimaculatum, Puberulum, Rufum and Turmericum (=Japonicum; Kinoshita et al. 2011, Fan et al. 2015) proposed by Bonito et al. (2013), and the remaining one corresponded with the Latisporum phylogroup proposed by Fan et al. (2016a, b). Chinese samples were nested in 9 phylogroups, i.e., Aestivum, Excavatum, Latisporum, Macrosporum, Maculatum, Melanosporum, Puberulum, Rufum and Turmericum, and five phylogroups (Macrosporum, Maculatum, Melanosporum, Puberulum, Rufum) were distributed in Asia, Europe and North America, two phylogroups (Aestivum, Excavatum) evolved in Asia and Europe, and Latisporum and Turmericum were endemic to Asia (Kinoshita et al. 2011, Bonito et al. 2013, Fan et al. 2016a, b). The Bayesian tree reconstructed using Bayesian patitional analysis showed significant support for each phylogroup resulted from ML analysis. However, the BI tree exposed several discrepancies with the ML tree (Fig.1). It showed that Phylogroup Genndii was positioned at the base in BI tree rather than in the middle in ML tree, adjacent to Phylogroup Macrosporum. Phylogroup Turmericum well clustered together with Phylogroups Excavatum and Aestivum and was adjacent to Phylogroup Genndii rather than an independent clade at the base in ML tree, adjacent to Phylogroup Aestivum.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuber at species level
The ITS rDNA barcode marker was employed for the analysis of Chinese Tuberspecies diversity in this study, because ITS works well for the delimitation of species of Tuber(except for species complexes) (Smith et al. 2007, Peay 2008, Brock et al. 2009, Hughes et al. 2009, Kinoshita et al. 2011, Bonito et al. 2013, Fan et al. 2016a, b). A total of 1 031 ITS sequences, including 358 novel sequences from Chinese collections, were obtained for this study. Our multigene phylogenetic analysis revealed that Chinese Tuberspecies were classified in nine clades (Fig.1), therefore ITS sequences were split into nine datasets representing each clade (Datasets II–X). This parsing of species facilitate the molecular phylogenetic analyses by delimiting the large number of Chinese Tuberspecies and detecting the phylogenetic relationships between the Tuberspecies from China and those from other geographic areas, including Japan, Europe and North American. The phylogenetic analyses for all nine datasets are documented below.
1. Phylogroup Aestivum
Dataset II (ITS) comprised 30 sequences from the taxa belonging to phylogroup Aestivum, in which 19 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuberspecimens and ECM root tips of Pinus armandii in China. The length of the dataset was 601bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S1) with statistical support values. Only one species T. sinoaestivum is recognised from China for this lineage. Tubersinoaestivum is sister to the European T. aestivum with strong support (Fig.S1).
2. Phylogroup Excavatum
Dataset III (ITS) comprised 75 sequences from the phylogroup Excavatum, in which 38 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuberspecies. The length of the dataset was 583bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown. In this tree, the Chinese taxa were clearly placed in seven well-supported clades, represented by five known species and two new species (Fig.S2). The five known species are T. badium, T. depressum, T. neoexcavatum, T.sinoexcavatum and T.verrucosivolvum. The two new species are described as T. magnameshanum and T. pseudofulgens in this study.
3. Phylogroup Latisporum
Dataset IV (ITS) comprised 162 sequences from the phylogroup Latisporum, in which 139 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuber species. The length of the dataset was 550bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S3). Our phylogenetic analysis resolved 31 clades with strong support in this phylogroup. Eleven clades correspond to known species, and 20 are putatively new species (Fig.S3). The 11 known species include T. alboumbilicum, T. baoshanense, T. caoi, T. elevatireticulatum, T. griseolivaceum, T. latisporum, T. panzhihuanense, T. parvomurphium, T. polymorphosporum, T. pseudosphaerosporum and T. thailandicum. Of the 20 clades that are putatively new species, 12 clades are from China, and eight are from Japan (Kinoshita et al. 2011). Of the 12 Chinese clades, three are described as new species in this study, i.e., T. huiliense, T. luyashanense, T. microcarpum. The remaining nine clades are not described in this study although they may represent new species. We do not describe them because Tubersp. CHN-2, Tubersp. CHN-4, Tubersp. CHN-5, Tubersp. CHN-6 and Tubersp. CHN-9 are known only from ECM, Tubersp. CHN-1 only have a single ascoma, and ascomata of Tubersp. CHN-3, Tubersp. CHN-7 and Tubersp. CHN-8 was not available for this study.
4. Phylogroup Macrosporum
Dataset V (ITS) comprised 22 sequences from the taxa of phylogroup Macrosporum, in which 14 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuberspecies. The length of the dataset was 647bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S4). This phylogenetic analysis resolved three clades of Chinese samples in this phylogroup, which respectively correspond to T. calosporum, T. glabrum and T. sinomonosporum. Two species are resolved from Japan (Tubersp. 1KA-2010 and Tubersp. 2KA-2010; Kinoshita et al. 2011) in this lineage, possibly native to the Japanese islands.
5. Phylogroup Maculatum
Dataset VI (ITS) comprised 116 sequences of the phylogroup Maculatum, in which 61 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuberspecies. The length of the dataset was 438bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S5). In this tree, the Chinese samples were resolved in six clades, representing six known species and one new species. The known species are T. bomiense, T. hubeiense, T. maculatum, T. microverrucosum, T. pseudomagnatum and T. wumengense. It is interesting that the sequence (JN870099) isolated from the type specimen of T. microverrucosum is resolved into the clade of T. pseudomagnatum and shared 97–99.7% similarity in the ITS region, which suggests they may be conspecific although they have distinctive ascomatal colour differences (yellow for T. pseudomagnatum and brown for T. microverrucosum). However, we hesitate to synonymize the two species formally before more specimens become available for study. The new species is described here as T. excelsum-reticulatum.
6. Phylogroup Melanosporum
Dataset VII (ITS) comprised 210 sequences from the phylogroup Melanosporum, in which 198 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuberspecies. The length of the dataset was 500bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S6). This ITS-based phylogenetic analysis resolved seven clades of Chinese samples from this phylogroup. Of these, five clades are known species: T. formosanum, T. pseudobrumale, T. pseudohimalayense, T. sinense and T. yigongense. One of the remaining two clades is described here as T. variabilisporum sp. nov., and another is designated as Tubersp. CHN-10. Tubersp. CHN-10 is supported by two ITS sequences (JQ639006 from ECM, FM205595) downloaded from GenBank, they shared less than 95.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies and group in a well-supported clade. We are not able to treat this taxon taxonomically until the specimens represented by these sequences become available or new collections are obtained.
7. Phylogroup Puberulum
Dataset VIII (ITS) comprised 217 sequences from the phylogroup Puberulum, in which 155 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuberspecies. The length of the dataset was 561bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S7). A total of 19 clades having strong bootstrap support were recognised from the Chinese samples in this phylogroup. Of them, 12 clades contain 15 previously described species. Including T. anniae, T. huizeanum, T. jinshajiangense, T. lijiangense, T. liui, T. liyuanum, T. microsphaerosporum, T. shidianense, T. shii, T. sino-niveum, T. sinopuberulum, T. sinosphaerosporum, T. vesicoperidium, T. xuanhuaense and T. zhongdianense. The other seven clades are putatively undescribed species as they do not correspond to any described species. Of these seven clades, four clades consist of sequences from ECM root tips or environmental sequences, and thus remain undescribed until ascomatal specimens are collected. Here we temporarily designate them as Tubersp. CHN-11, Tubersp. CHN-12, Tubersp. CHN-13 and Tubersp. CHN-15. DNA analyses revealed that they respectively shared less than 96.9% (for Tubersp. CHN-11), 95.2% (for Tubersp. CHN-12), 97.6% (for Tubersp. CHN-13) and 92.9% (for Tubersp. CHN-15) similarity in the ITS region to other Tuberspecies. The remaining three clades with ascomatal sequences, Tubersp. CHN-14 is represented by three sequences (DQ898182, HXZE1762, HXZE1716). Unfortunately, all three specimens represented by these sequences have been lost or were unavailable, and consequently, we were not able to describe them. Only two clades are here described as T. humilireticulatum and T. sinoborchii. It is interesting that the three morphologically distinct species T. microsphaerosporum, T. sinopuberulum and T. vesicoperidium are all resolved in the T. lijiangense clade with strong support (Fig.S7), and DNA analysis revealed there was the 97–99% ITS similarity between them. These results suggest that these four species are phylogenetically conspecific. However, since there are distinct morphological differences between each of them, and the name T. lijiangense has precedence, we prefer to treat them as the T. lijiangense complex until more samples become available for examination.
8. Phylogroup Rufum
Dataset IX (ITS) comprised 184 sequences from the phylogroup Rufum, in which 159 sequences are isolated from Chinese Tuberspecies. The length of the dataset was 493bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S8). This phylogenetic analysis resolved 11 clades of Chinese taxa in this Tuberphylogroup. Of them, 10 clades are of previously described species: T. cras-situnicatum, T. furfuraceum, T. huidongense, T. liaotongense, T. lishanense, T. microspermum, T. microspiculatum, T. piceatum, T. subglobosum, T. sinoalbidum, T. taiyuanense, T. umbilicatum, T. wanglangense and T. wenchuanense. The other one (designated as Tubersp. CHN-16) did not correspond to any of the described species, suggesting that it is probably new to science. Tubersp. CHN-16 contains one sequence from ascoma (BJTC FAN986) and an ECM-sequence of Quercus liaotungense from China, however, morphological examination revealed that the present ascomata lack mature asci and ascospores, it thus remains undescribed until additional ascomata are collected. Moreover, four species described in this lineage from China in previous studies, including T. furfuraceum, T. microspermum, T. microspiculatum, T. sinoalbidum, were not supported by our ITS-based analysis. Of them, both the sequences from the authentic specimens of T. furfuraceum and T. microspermum were grouped together with T. huidongense; T. microspiculatum clustered with T. umbilicatum; and T. sinoalbidum was resolved in the T. subglobosum clade. However, because all four species mentioned above are morphologically distinct from the species they are molecularly supported with, we treat these clades as species complexes until more specimens are available. They are the T. huidongense complex, T. sinoalbidum complex and T. umbilicatum complex.
9. Phylogroup Turmericum
Dataset X (ITS) comprised 20 sequences from the phylogroup Turmericum, in which 17 sequences were isolated from Chinese Tuberspecies. The length of the dataset was 462bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analysis is shown (Fig.S9). Our phylogenetic analysis resolved five clades of Chinese samples in this phylogroup. Of them, one clade corresponds to T. turmericum, and the other four clades are composed only of sequences from ECM root tips. The four clades of ECM sequence respectively clustered in their own independent clades with strong support and shared lower ITS similarity (less than 95% to other Tuberspecies), thus they may represent undescribed species. Here we temporarily designate them respectively as Tubersp. CHN-17, Tubersp. CHN-18, Tubersp. CHN-19 and Tubersp. CHN-20. Tuber xanthomonosporum, newly described from southwestern China, was resolved in the T.turmericum clade, and shares more than 98% ITS similarity with T.turmericum. We are not able to examine the specimens of this species in this study, so its relationship to T.turmericum needs further study.
The species diversity of Tuberin China
Dataset XI (ITS) comprised 161 sequences of Chinese collections, including all Chinese Tuberspecies determined based on the phylogenetic analyses for Dataset II–X outlined above. Labyrinthomyces sp. 3 (HM485335), Choiromyces alveolatus (HM485332) and C. meandriformis (HM485330) were selected as the outgroups. The length of the dataset was 431bp after alignment and exclusion of poorly aligned sites. ML and BI analyses yielded identical tree topologies; only the tree inferred from the ML analyses is shown (Fig.2). This phylogenetic analysis resolved all Chinese Tubersamples into nine clades and 82 phylogenetic species, which corresponded with the results of the multilocus phylogenetic analyses (Fig.1) and ITS phylogenetic analyses for phylogroups in this study (Fig.1, S1–S9).
Fig. 2.


Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies inferred from the Dataset XI (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species are printed in bold.
Consequently, our phylogenetic analyses revealed 82 phylogenetic species in nine Tuber-phylogroups from the Chinese samplings in this study (Fig.1, 2, S1–S9). Of them, 53 clades correspond well to 53 known species (or species complexes) (Liu 1985, Wang 1988, Tao et al. 1989, Tao & Liu 1990, Wang et al. 1998, Xu 1999, Chen & Liu 2007, Fan et al. 2011a, b, 2012a–e, 2013a, b, 2014, 2015, 2016a, b, Fan & Cao 2012, Zhang et al. 2012, Deng et al. 2014, Li et al. 2014, Huang et al. 2017, Wan et al. 2017a, b, Lin et al. 2018, Yan et al. 2018), including three species new to China, i.e., T. anniae (Fig.2, S7), T. maculatum (Fig.2, S5) and T.thailandicum (Fig.2, S3). Of the remaining 29 clades, nine clades are proposed as new species that are described and illustrated in this paper (see Taxonomy), and 20 represent possibly undescribed species that are not treated taxonomically due to the absence or poor condition of ascomata (see hypothesized species of Tuberin China in Discussion).
Taxonomy
Based on our phylogenetic, morphological and ecological data, nine new species and two new records of Tuberfrom China are described and illustrated here.
In the taxonomic descriptions of species, ‘Q (L/I)’ refers to the length/width ratio of ascospores in side-view; ‘Qm’ refers to the average Q of all ascospores ± standard deviation.
Tuber excelsum-reticulatum L. Fan & T.Li, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842427; Fig.3a–c
Fig. 3.

a–c Tuberexcelsum-reticulatum. a. Ascomata (BJTC FAN863); b. asci and Ascospores under LM; c. Ascospores under SEM.—d–h. Tuberhuiliense. d. Ascomata (BJTC FAN288); e. asci and Ascospores under LM; f–g. Ascospores under SEM; h. Hairs.—i–o. Tuberhumilireticulatum. i–j. Ascomata (BJTC FAN174); k. asci and Ascospores under LM; l–m. Ascospores under SEM; n–o. Hairs.—Scale bars: a, d, i–j=1 cm; b, e, h, k, n–o=50μm; c, f, g, l–m=10μm.
Etymology. excelsum-reticulatum, referring to the prominently high reticulum of the ascospores.
Ascomata sub-globose, 0.5–1.5 cm diam, yellow-white, pale yellow-brown to yellow-brown, often with several superficial furrows, surface smooth, glabrous. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale when young, dark brown at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 320–430μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 190–230μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 8.5–15(–20)μm wide, hyaline, slightly thick-walled, walls 2.5–5μm thick; inner layer 130–200μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae 3–5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Asci 1–3-spored, occasionally 4-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, thin-walled, sessile, 60–80 × 40–57.5μm. Ascospores oblong-ellipsoid, ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, yellow-brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 40–50 × 27.5–30μm, Q(L/I)=1.33–1.82 (Qm=1.54 ± 0.14) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 27.5–37.5 × 20–25μm, Q (L/I)=1.22–1.50 (Qm=1.37± 0.11) (n=30), in 3-spored asci 20–32.5 × 15–25μm, Q(L/I)=1.10–1.50 (Qm=1.28 ± 0.12) (n=30), reticulum (4–)5–7μm high, mostly 4–5(–6) meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil under forest of Picea sp. and Larix sp. mixed with Betula sp.; ascoma occurring in autumn.
Distribution—Known only from Shanxi Province, northern China.
Specimens examined. China, Shanxi Province, Lvliang City, Jiaocheng County, Shenweigou, in soil under Betula platyphylla, alt. 1853 m, N37°51ʹ30ʺ E111°27ʹ22ʺ, 8 Sept. 2017, X.Y. Yan (holotype BJTC FAN863, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=OM265267, nrLSU=OM366224, tef1-α=OM649631, rpb2= OM584281, BJTC FAN864); ibid., in soil under Betula platyphylla of a coniferous and broad-leaf mixed forest, alt. 2003 m, N37°52ʹ16ʺ E111°30ʹ25ʺ, 7 Sept. 2017, X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN849), K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN851); ibid., in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii, K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN853, BJTC FAN859, BJTC FAN860); ibid., in soil of Larix principis-rupprechtii of a coniferous and broad-leaf mixed forest; ibid., in soil under Picea asperata (Picea asperata) of a coniferous and broad-leaf mixed forest, alt. 2160 m, N37°53ʹ5ʺ E111°25ʹ53ʺ, 6 Sept. 2017, K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN834, BJTC FAN835); ibid., in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii, Y.Y. Xu (BJTC FAN871), K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN872); Shanxi Province, Xinzhou City, Nangoumiao, in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii of a coniferous and broad-leaf mixed forest, alt.2184 m, N38°48ʹ31ʺ E111°58ʹ19ʺ, 23 Aug. 2017, K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN755, BJTC FAN757, BJTC FAN758).
Notes—Tuber excelsum-reticulatum is characterised by its higher ornamentation of ascospores reaching 5–7μm on average. The closely similar and related species in China is T. wumengense that also has a deep reticulum on its ascospores, but is differentiated from this new species by its long ellipsoid ascospores (Fan et al. 2016b). Moreover, the ascomata of T. wumengense are more brownish, while that of T. excelsum-reticulatum are more whitish.
This species is frequently encountered in Lvliangshan Mts under Picea-Larix trees, Shanxi Province, North China. Twenty-nine ITS ECM-sequences (three from Shaanxi Province, China, one from North America, 25 from Europe) match this species in our analysis (Fig.S5). The host includes Alnus glutinosa, Epipactis fibri, Pinus contorta, Pinus tabuliformis, Populus alba, Populus simonii, Quercus ilex, Salix alba, Salix caprea, Salix fragilis (Fig.S5). These indicate T. excelsum-reticulatum also occurs in Shaanxi Province, North China, Europe and North America, and has a wide range of hosts. Tuber excelsum-reticulatum shares less than 96.7% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber huiliense L. Fan, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842428; Fig.3d–h
Etymology. huiliense, referring to the type locality.
Ascomata sub-globose, more or less irregular, 0.8–1.6 cm diam, yellow-white, yellow-brown to grey-brown, occasionally dark brown, typically with grey-olive tints when fresh, often with several superficial white furrows, surface smooth, puberulent when young, sometimes abundant in furrows. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale when young, and changing to blackish at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 175–225μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 80–110μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 5–12.5(–15)μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled; inner layer 85–120μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae of 3–5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Hairs arising from the outermost cells of peridium, hyphoid, abundant at furrows, tapered at apex, usually with 1 septa, 30–75 × 2.5–3μm. Asci 1–2-spored, occasionally 3–4-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, thin-walled, sessile or with a very short stipe, 67.5–92.5 × 55–75μm. Ascospores sub-globose to very broadly ellipsoid, brown to dark brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 35–47.5 × 25–36.25μm, Q (L/I)=1.14–1.46 (Qm=1.28 ± 0.11) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 25–40 × 22.5–27.5μm, Q(L/I)=1.10–1.32 (Qm=1.17 ± 0.08) (n=30), reticulum of ornamentation 2.5–5μm high, mostly 4–6(–7) meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil of a forest dominated by Pinus armandii; ascoma occurring in autumn.
Distribution—Known from Sichuan Province, southwestern China.
Specimens examined. China, Sichuan Province, Huili County, in soil of a forest dominated by Pinus armandii, 4 Sept. 2013, J.Z. Cao (holotype, BJTC FAN288, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=OM256781, nrLSU=OM366181, tef1-α=OM649585, rpb2=OM584238).
Notes—The ascomatal appearance of T. huiliense is similar to T. caoi because its ascomata also has olive tints (Fan et al. 2016a), but the ascospores in T. caoi are globose rather than sub-globose to broadly ellipsoid in T. huiliense. Tuberlatisporum is similar to T. huiliense in ascospore shape, but the colour of its sscospores is red-brown to reddish, meshes of ascospore ornament reticulum large (usually with 3–4 meshes/spore width) (Chen & Liu 2007). Analogously, the European T. puberulum is similar to T. huiliense in ascospore shape and peridium hairs. However, the gleba of T. puberulum is brown, never blackish, and its ascomata lack olive tints (Pegler et al. 1993). Phylogenetically, T. puberulum is nested in the Puberulum phylogroup, while T. huiliense is in the Latisporum phylogroup. Tuberhuiliense is closely related to T.luyashanense and T.microcarpum (Fig.2, S3), but both T. luyashanense and T. microcarpum have white ascomata completely lacking olive tints. A sequence (KY684695) from ECM root tip of Quercus sp. in Shaanxi Province matches this species (Fig.S3). That indicates this species may have a wide host range. Tuberhuiliense shares less than 96.7% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber humilireticulatum L. Fan, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842429; Fig.3i–o
Etymology. humilireticulatum, referring to the prominently low reticulum on the ornaments of the ascospores.
Ascomata sub-globose, 0.7–2 cm diam, yellow-white, pale yellow-brown to yellow-brown, surface smooth, glabrous. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale when young, brown to dark brown at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 240–340μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 115–220μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 7–15(–20)μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled; inner layer 120–170μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae 3–5(–7.5)μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Hairs arising from the outermost cells of the peridium, hyphoid, 25–215 × 2.5–5μm, walls thin to slightly thickened, usually with 1–4-septa. Asci 1–3-spored, occasionally 4-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, slightly thick-walled, walls 2–3μm, sessile, 87.5–105 × 60–75μm. Ascospores broadly ellipsoid, yellow-brown to brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 42.5–57.5 × 32.5–50μm, Q (L/I)=1.15–1.50 (Qm=1.35± 0.11) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 30–47.5 × 25–35μm, Q(L/I)=1.15–1.46 (Qm =1.34 ± 0.10) (n=30), in 3-spored asci 32.5–40 × 25–30μm, Q (L/I)=1.12–1.33 (Qm=1.27 ± 0.07) (n=30), reticulum 1.5–2.5μm high, mostly (4–)5–6 meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil under Pinus sp.; ascoma occurring in winter.
Distribution—Known from Yunnan Province, southwestern China.
Specimens examined. China, Yunnan Province, Kunming city, in soil under Pinus sp., 28 Nov.2011, S.P. Li (holotype, BJTC FAN174, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=KT067677, nrLSU=OM366168, tef1-α=KT067724, rpb2= OM584224); ibid., S.P. Li (BJTC FAN175); ibid., J.Z. Cao (BJTC FAN189); Yunnan Province, Huize County, in soil under Pinus sp., 12 Nov. 2015, J.Z. Cao (BJTC FAN485, BJTC FAN486).
Notes—Tuber humilireticulatum is recognised by its lower (<2.5µm high) reticulum on the surface of ascospores Tuber lijiangense is reported with extremely low ascospore ornamentations (Fan et al. 2011a), but the shape of its ascospores is globose or sub-globose. Tuber zhongdianense is also described with the same pattern of ascospore ornamentation, but its ascomata are covered with two types of Hairs(He et al. 2004).
This new species is morphologically difficult to distinguish from others in the Puberulum phylogroup, especially T. borchii, T. huizeanum, T. sinoborchii and T. zhongdianense. However, phylogenetic analysis distinguishes this species (Fig.2, S7). DNA analysis reveals it shares less than 97% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber luyashanense L. Fan, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842430; Fig.4a–f
Fig. 4.

a–f. Tuberluyashanense. a. Ascomata (BJTC FAN1031); b, d. asci and Ascospores under LM; c, f. Ascospores under SEM; e. Hairs.—g–i. Tubermagnameshanum. g. Ascomata (BJTC FAN537); h. asci and Ascospores under LM; i. Ascospores under SEM.—j–o. Tubermicrocarpum. j. Ascomata (BJTC FAN866); k–l. Ascospores under SEM; m–n. asci and Ascospores under LM; o. Hairs.—Scale bars: a, g=1 cm; j=0.5 cm; b, d–e, h, m–o=50μm; c, f, i, k–l=10μm.
Etymology. luyashanense, referring to type locality.
Ascomata sub-globose, 0.6–2.3 cm diam, pure white, whitish or yellow whitish, puberulent, surface smooth or with a few superficial furrows. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale when young, and changing to dark grey to dark brown at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 150–200μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 65–120μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 8–25μm diam, hyaline, thin walled; inner layer 65–110μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae of 3–5(–7.5)μm wide, often with swollen cells of 5–15μm, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Hairs arising from the outermost cells of peridium, seta-like, abundant when young, tapered at apex, hyaline, slightly thickened walls, usually with 1–3 septa, reaching 37.5–150 × 2.5–5μm. Asci 1–2-spored, occasionally 3-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, thin-walled, sessile, 80–105 × 72.5–85μm. Ascospores very broadly ellipsoid to sub-globose, brown to dark brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 42.5–50 × 35–42.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.09–1.36 (Qm=1.22 ± 0.09) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 32.5–41.25 × 27.5–37.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.07–1.23 (Qm=1.15 ± 0.05) (n=30), reticulum 2.5–4μm high, mostly (4–)5–7(–8) meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil under forest of Picea sp. and Larix sp. mixed with Betula sp.; ascoma occurring in autumn.
Distribution—Known only from Shanxi Province, northern China.
Specimens examined. China, Shanxi Province, Ningwu Cunty, Luyashan Mt., in soil under a plantation of Larix principis-rupprechtii, alt. 2200 m, 12 Oct. 2017, X.Y. Yan (holotype, BJTC FAN1031, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS= OM256769, nrLSU=OM366157, tef1-α=OM649637); Shanxi Province, Xinzhou city, Qiuqiangou, in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii of a coniferous and broad-leaf mixed forest, alt. 2099 m, N38°51ʹ22ʺ E112°0ʹ31ʺ, 25 Aug. 2017, K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN776); Xinzhou city, Dashidong, in soil under Picea asperata, alt. 2200 m, N38°24ʹ7ʺ E112°08ʹ3ʺ, 24 Aug. 2017, X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN783); ibid., in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii, Y.Y. Xu (BJTC FAN784); Lvliang City, Jiaocheng County, Pangquangou, alt. 2160m, N37°53ʹ5ʺ E111°25ʹ5ʺ, 6 Sept. 2017, Y.Y. Xu (BJTC FAN801, BJTC FAN802, paratype BJTC FAN803, BJTC FAN804); ibid., in soil under Betula platyphylla, X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN810, BJTC FAN811, BJTC FAN813); ibid., in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii, X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN814, BJTC FAN815, BJTC FAN816); ibid., T Li (BJTC FAN822, BJTC FAN823, BJTC FAN824, BJTC FAN825, BJTC FAN826); ibid., alt. 2160 m, N37°53ʹ5ʺ E111°25ʹ5ʺ, 6Sept. 2017, T Li (BJTC FAN829, BJTC FAN830, BJTC FAN831); ibid., in soil under Picea asperata, alt. 2160 m, N37°53ʹ5ʺ E111°25ʹ5ʺ, 6 Sept. 2017, K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN837, BJTC FAN838, BJTC FAN839, BJTC FAN840, BJTC FAN844, BJTC FAN845).
Notes—Tuber luyashanense is characterised by its white ascomata with puberulent surface and the very broadly ellipsoid ascospores with reticulum of (4–)5–7(–8) meshes across spore width. Tuber latisporum, which is very common in Southwest China, looks similar to this new species when young, but its white ascomata are usually stained red-brown and change to grey brown at maturity according to our observations. Also, its gleba is blackish and ascospores are typically red-brown to reddish (Chen & Liu 2007). Tubermicrocarpum, found in the same region, is closely related and similar to T.luyashanense (Fig.2, S3), but T.microcarpum is distinguished by its small ascomata, seta-like and hyphoid Hairs and spore ornamentations with sparse meshes (4–5/spore width). Three previous sequences extracted from the specimens of north-eastern China, respectively labelled as T. borchii (DQ478623), T. puberulum (DQ478638) and T. rapaeodorum (DQ478641), match T. luyashanense in this study (Fig.S3), extending its distribution from north region to north-eastern region in China. This new species shares less than 92.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber magnameshanum L. Fan, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842431; Fig.4g–i
Etymology. magnameshanum, referring to the large meshes of spore ornamentations.
Ascomata sub-globose, 1.2–1.7 cm diam, red-brown to brown, surfaceminutely verrucose, glabrous, with basal cavity. Odour sharp and smelly, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale when young, dark brown to blackish at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 200–300μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 100–150μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 5–12.5μm diam, hyaline, thin-walled; inner layer 100–180μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae of 2.5–7.5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Asci 1–4-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, more or less thick-walled, walls 2.5–7.65μm thick, with a stipe of 12.5–31μm long, 87–115 × 67–87.5μm. Ascospores broadly ellipsoid, ellipsoid to oblong-ellipsoid, yellow-brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 42.5–50 × 27.5–30μm, Q(L/I)=1.55–1.73 (Qm=1.63 ± 0.06) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 33.5–42.5 × 22.5–30μm, Q (L/I)=1.22–1.89 (Qm=1.41± 0.19) (n=30), in 3-spored asci 27.5–47.5 × 22.5–27.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.20–1.73 (Qm=1.47 ± 0.17) (n=30), in 4-spored asci 32.5–37.5 × 22.5–27.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.27–1.50 (Qm=1.39 ± 0.08) (n=30), reticulum 3.5–6μm high, mostly 2–3 meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil under Pinus armandii forest; ascoma occurring in winter.
Distribution—Known from Sichuan Province, southwestern China.
Specimens examined. China, Sichuan Province, Huidong County, in soil under a forest of Pinus armandii, 4 Jan. 2016, J.Z. Cao (holotype, BJTC FAN537, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=OM256767, nrLSU=OM366212, tef1-α=OM649617).
Notes—Tuber magnameshanum is characterised by its brown smooth ascomata, oblong ascospores and spore ornamentations with large meshes. This species is composed by a strongly supported clade of three Chinese Tuber-excavatum phylogroup species in the phylogenetic analyses (Fig.2, S2), including T. badium, T. depressum and T. neoexcavatum, but the latter three species can be separated from T. magnameshanum by their ascomata with verrucose warts and yellow-brown or brown gleba. Also, the ascospore number per ascus is 2–4-spored in T. neoexcavatum, and the ascospore reticulate ornamentations are higher (2–9μm for T. depressum and 2–13μm for T. badium; Wan et al. 2017b). Tuber magnameshanum shares less than 94.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber microcarpum L. Fan & T.Li, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842432; 4j–o
Etymology. microcarpum, referring to the small size of the ascomata.
Ascomata globose to sub-globose, 0.5–0.8 cm diam, white, whitish or yellow whitish, puberulent when young, slightly convolute or with several superficial furrows. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale when young, and changing to dark grey to dark brown at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 50–100μm thick, single-layered, composed of interwoven hyphae of 3–5(–7.5)μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate, and mixed with sub-globose cells of 5–12.5(–15)μm. Hairs arising from the outermost cells of peridium, seta-like, abundant when young, 60–215 × 2.5–5μm, tapered at apex, walls slightly thickened, usually with 1–4-septa. Asci 1–2(–3)-spored, occasionally 4-spored, sub-globose to elliptic, thin-walled, sessile, 72.5–90 × 57.5–80μm. Ascospores very broadly ellipsoid to sub-globose, brown to dark brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 40–47.5 × 35–42.5μm, Q(L/I)=1.06–1.14 (Qm=1.10 ± 0.03) (n=30), in 2(–3)-spored asci 27.5–37.5 × 25–35μm, Q (L/I)=1.07–1.20 (Qm=1.12 ± 0.04) (n=30), reticulum 2.5–3μm high, mostly (3–)4–5 meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil under a forest dominated by Picea sp. and/or Larix sp.; ascoma occurring in autumn and winter.
Distribution—Known from northern China, Shanxi Province.
Specimens examined. China, Shanxi Province, Guandishan Mt., in soil under forest dominated by Picea sp., alt. 1820 m, 8 Sept. 2017, Y.Y. Xu (holo-type, BJTC FAN866, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=OM256770, nrLSU= OM366225, tef1-α=OM649632, rpb2=OM584282); Shanxi Province, Lvliang City, Jiaocheng County, Shenweigou, in soil under Picea sp., alt. 2003 m, N37°52ʹ16ʺ E111°30ʹ25ʺ, 7 Sept. 2017, X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN848); Lvliang City, Jiaocheng County, Pangquangou, in soil under Picea sp., alt. 1853m, N37°51ʹ3ʺ E111°27ʹ22ʺ, 8 Sept. 2017, Y.Y. Xu (BJTC FAN865, BJTC FAN867); ibid., in soil under Larix sp., T.Li (BJTC FAN880); ibid., X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN881).
Notes—Tuber microcarpum is characterised by its small, puberulent, white to whitish ascomata, sub-globose to broadly ellipsoid ascospores, and spore ornamentations with a small number (4–5) of meshes. Tuber luyashanense is closely related and similar to T. microcarpum (Fig.2, S3), and both occur in the same geographic region. The main differences between them are the following: i) the size of ascomata of T. luyashanense are larger than 10 mm diam on average and reach to 23 mm, but all the individuals of T.microcarpum examined in this study are less than 8 mm diam; ii) the peridium is thick in T. luyashanense, ranging from 150–200μm, but clearly thinner in T. microcarpum, ranging from 50–100μm; iii) the reticulum of ascospores is mostly 5–7 meshes/width in T.luyashanense but 4–5 meshes/width in T. microcarpum.
All the ascomatal specimens of T. microcarpum are collected from the type locality, where it is frequently encountered. How-ever, one ITS sequence (Pk_W6_ECM06) isolated from the ectomycorrhizal root tip of Populus koreana from Hebei Province matches this species (Fig.S3), extending the known distribution of T. microcarpum to that area, too. Tuber microcarpum shares less than 91.4% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuberpseudofulgens L. Fan & X.Y. Sang, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842433; Fig.5a–e
Fig. 5.

a–e. Tuberpseudofulgens. a. Ascomata (BJTC FAN399); b–c. Ascospores under SEM; d–e. asci and Ascospores under LM.—f–i. Tubersinoborchii. f. Ascomata (BJTC FAN171); g. asci and Ascospores under LM; h–i. Ascospores under SEM.—j–m. Tubervariabilisporum. j. Ascospores under SEM; k. ascomata (BJTC FAN362); l–m. asci and Ascospores under LM.—Scale bars: a, f, k=1 cm; d–e, g, l–m=50μm; b–c, h–j=10μm.
Etymology. pseudofulgens, referring to its similarity with Tuber fulgens.
Ascomata sub-globose, 0.9–1.6 cm diam, brown, with several superficial furrows, surface polylateral verrucose, glabrous, with basal cavity. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale when young, and changing to dark brown at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 300–400μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 150–200μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 7.5–12.5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled; inner layer 180–200μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae of 3–6.5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Asci 1–4-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, thin-walled, sessile or with a short stipe, 65–87.5 × 52.5–67.5μm. Ascospores ellipsoid, broadly ellipsoid, yellow-brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 30–42.5 × 22.5–27.5μm, Q(L/I)=1.20–1.70 (Qm=1.44 ± 0.19) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 27.5–37.5 × 22.5–28.75μm, Q (L/I) =1.18–1.40 (Qm=1.28 ± 0.08) (n=30), in 3-spored asci 27.5–32.5 × 22.5–25μm, Q (L/I)=1.22–1.33 (Qm=1.29 ± 0.05) (n=30), in 4-spored asci 22.5–30 × 20–22.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.10–1.50 (Qm=1.24 ± 0.16) (n=30), reticulum 3–5μm high, mostly 2–3 meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil of a mixed forest dominated by Pinus spp., ascoma occurring in autumn and winter.
Distribution—Known from southwestern China.
Specimens examined. China, Yunnan Province, Baoshan City, in soil of a forest dominated by Pinus sp., 27 Nov.2014, J.Z. Cao (holotype, BJTC FAN399, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=OM256757, nrLSU=OM366196, tef1-α=OM649601, rpb2=OM584259); Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Dongchuanqu, in soil under Pinus sp., 22 Sept. 2014, J.Z. Cao (BJTC FAN368); Sichuan Province, Huidong, in soil under Pinus sp., Sept. 2014, J.Z. Cao (BJTC FAN388).
Notes—Tuber pseudofulgens is characterised by its small brown ascomata with a central cavity opening by a basal hole. Tuber fulgens, a European native species, is similar to T. pseudofulgens in its basal hole leading to the inner cavity, but differs by its bright yellow-brown ascomata and globose to sub-globose ascospores (Riousset et al. 2001). This small brown species is possibly rare. There are only three specimens collected since 2014. It shares less than 91.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber sinoborchii T.Li & L. Fan, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842434; Fig.5f–i
Etymology. sinoborchii, referring to its similarity with Tuber borchii in ascomata and ascospores.
Ascomata sub-globose, 0.8–1.2 cm diam, yellow-whitish, yellow-brown to brown, surface smooth, glabrous. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba pale brown when young, brown to black-brown at maturity, marbled with white vines. Peridium 200–250μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 70–100μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 5–12.5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled; inner layer 110–170μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae of 3–5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Asci 1–4-spored, occasionally 5-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, more or less thick-walled, walls 2.5–5μm, sessile, 82.5–117.5 × 62.5–80μm. Ascospores ellipsoid, broadly ellipsoid, sub-globose, yellow-brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 40–57.5 × 27.5–40μm, Q (L/I)=1.22–1.45 (Qm=1.33 ± 0.09) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 30–47.5 × 25–37.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.09–1.58 (Qm=1.27 ± 0.14) (n=30), in 3-spored asci 27.5–40 × 25–32.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.10–1.36 (Qm=1.22 ± 0.09) (n=30), in 4-spored asci 25–37.5 × 22.5–30μm, Q (L/I)=1.09–1.44 (Qm=1.21 ± 0.12) (n=30), reticulum 2.5–5μm high, mostly 4–5 meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil of pine forest dominated by Pinus armandii; ascoma occurring in winter.
Distribution—Known from southwestern China, Yunnan Province.
Specimens examined. China, Yunnan Province, Huize County, in soil under mixed forest with Pinus armandii as dominant, 12 Nov.2011, S.P. Li (holotype BJTC FAN171, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=OM286802, nrLSU=OM366167, tef1-α=OM649573, rpb2=OM584223); Yunnan Province, Huize County, in soil under mixed forest with Pinus armandii as dominant, 12 Nov.2011, S.P. Li (BJTC FAN169, BJTC FAN173).
Notes—Tuber sinoborchii is similar to the European T. borchii in ascomatal appearance and ascospores, but differs by its glabrous ascoma surface (Pegler et al. 1993, Riousset et al. 2001). Tubersinoborchii is very similar to several species in morphology, including T. liui, T. liyuanum, T.huizeanum, T. zhongdianense. They are difficult to separate by morphological evidence alone, and even may be recognized as a morphological species complex of T. liui. DNA analysis is needed for their accurate examination. Tuberborchii is previously reported from China (Wang 1988, Song 2005, Chen 2007), but a recent study (Fan et al. 2016b) reveals that no DNA data support the occurrence of this European species in China. This new species shares less than 97.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber variabilisporum L. Fan & T.Li, sp. nov.—MycoBank MB 842435; Fig.5j–m
Etymology. variabilisporum, referring to the variation of ascospore size.
Ascomata sub-globose, 1.2–2.7 cm diam, dark brown to black-brown, verrucose, sometimes with several superficial furrows. Odour light, flavour not recorded. Gleba brown when young, dark brown to black-brown at maturity, marbled with sparsely white vines. Peridium 190–340μm thick, two-layered: outer layer 120–280μm thick, pseudoparenchymatous, composed of sub-globose cells of 7–15μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled; inner layer 60–90μm thick, composed of interwoven hyphae of 3–7.5μm wide, hyaline, thin-walled, septate. Asci 1–5-spored, occasionally 6-spored, sub-globose to ellipsoid, more or less thick-walled, walls 2–3μm, sessile, 60–72.5 × 52.5–62.5μm. Ascospores ellipsoid, broadly ellipsoid, sub-globose, yellow-brown at maturity, reticulate, excluding ornamentations, in 1-spored asci 30–37.5 × 21.75–27.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.36–1.44 (Qm=1.41 ± 0.03) (n=30), in 2-spored asci 27.5–32.5× 20–23.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.20–1.41 (Qm=1.35 ± 0.08) (n=30), in 3-spored asci 22.5–32.5 × 18.75–21.25μm, Q (L/I)=1.07–1.43 (Qm=1.29 ± 0.19) (n=30), in 4-spored asci 17.5–25.5 × 16.5–20μm, Q (L/I)=1.06–1.33 (Qm=1.19 ± 0.09) (n=30), in 5-spored asci 16.5–22.5 × 13.25–17.5μm, Q (L/I)=1.14–1.42 (Qm=1.25 ± 0.08) (n=30), spino-reticulum 3–5μm high, mostly 4–5 meshes across spore width.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil of pine forest containing Pinus armandii; ascoma occurring in winter.
Distribution—Known from southwestern China.
Specimens examined. China, Sichuan Province, Panzhihua City, in soil under Pinus armandii, 16 Jan. 2014, J.Z. Cao (holotype BJTC FAN362, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS=OM287845, nrLSU=OM366190, tef1-α=OM649595, rpb2=OM584253; BJTC FAN330).
Notes—Tuber variabilisporum is characterised by its ver-rucose ascomata without basal cavity, and yellow-brown ascospores with spino-reticulate ornamentations. Phylogenetically, this new species is placed in Melanosporum phylogroup and closely related to T. pseudohimalayense (Fig.1, 2, S6). Morphologically T. pseudohimalayense, T. pseudobrumale and T. indi-cum complex (including T. formosanum, T. indicum, T. yigongense and T. sinense) may be confused with this new species. Of them, both T.pseudohimalayense and T.pseudobrumale are separated by their ascomata with distinctly basal cavity (Wang et al. 1998, Li et al. 2014). Tuber indicum complex differs from this species by their ascomata covered with pyramidal warts and their red-brown ascospores with isolated spines or irregularly reticulate ornamentations Tao et al. 1989, Hu 1992, Fan et al. 2018). Tuber variabilisporum shares less than 95.5% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. This species seems not uncommon. Only two specimens from Sichuan are available. Other sequences are downloaded from GenBank. This species is known from southwestern China (Sichuan and Yunnan provinces).
Tuberanniae W. Colgan & Trappe, Mycotaxon 64: 438. 1997 —Fig.6a–c
Fig. 6.
a–c. Tuberanniae. a. Ascomata (BJTC FAN640); b. asci and Ascospores under LM; c. Ascospores under SEM.—d–f. Tubermaculatum. d. Ascomata (BJTC FAN869); e. asci and Ascospores under LM; f. Ascospores under SEM.—Scale bars: a, d=1 cm; b, e=50μm; c, f=10μm.
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii; ascoma occurring in autumn.
Distribution—Known from the northern area in China.
Specimens examined. China, Hebei Province, Xinglong County, Wuling Mts, in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii, alt. 1801 m, N40°35' E117°28', 5 Oct. 2016, T.Li (BJTC FAN640); ibid., X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN644, BJTC FAN648); Shanxi Province, Jiaocheng County, Guandishan Mts, in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii, alt. 1879 m, N37°51' E111°27', 6 Sept. 2017, X.Y. Yan (BJTC FAN818, BJTC FAN173); ibid., 8 Sept. 2017, K.B. Huang (BJTC FAN875).
Notes—Tuber anniae is confirmed from Hebei and Shanxi provinces under Larix principis-rupprechtii based on morphological and DNA evidence. Wang et al. (2013) treats T. anniae as a species complex, but our present analysis indicates that it should be treated as a distinct species with a global distribution (Fig.S7). Geographically, like its pattern in Europe and North America (Colgan & Trappe 1997, Wang et al. 2013, Healy et al. 2016), it is also distributed as a cold climate zone species in North China.
Tubermaculatum Vittad., Monogr. Tuberac. (Milano): 45. 1831 —Fig.6d–f
Habitat—Hypogeous, in soil under mixed forest of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Picea sp.; ascoma occurring in autumn.
Distribution—Known from northern China.
Specimens examined. China, Shanxi Province, Lvliang City, Jiaocheng County, in soil under Larix principis-rupprechtii, alt. 1853 m, N37°51' E111°27', 8 Sept. 2017, Y.Y. Xu (BJTC FAN868, BJTC FAN869); ibid., under Picea sp., T.Li (BJTC FAN876, BJTC FAN877, BJTC FAN878).
Notes—The occurrence of T. maculatum in China is confirmed from Shanxi Province under Larix/Picea dominant forest based on molecular and morphological evidence, and an ITS sequence (GU134516) from the ECM of Pinus densiflora in Shaanxi Province also matches this species. Tuber maculatum is originally described from Europe, and also reported from South America, Australia and New Zealand (Bonito et al. 2010, Bulman et al. 2010). In China it is not certain whether T. maculatum is naturally occurring or has been accidentally introduced by man.
DISCUSSION
Asian China is a diverging centre of Tuberin the world
Our study revealed that Tuberis highly represented in, and many species radiate extensively in, China. Of the 12 resolved clades or phylogroups of Tuberworldwide (Kinoshita et al. 2011, Bonito et al. 2013, Fan et al. 2015, 2016a, b), nine phylogroups diversified in China, including species in the Aestivum, Excavatum, Latisporum, Macrosporum, Maculatum, Melanosporum, Puberulum, Rufum and Turmericum phylogroups; and we have presented evidence that two phylogroups, Latisporum and Turmericum, are endemic to Asia, because all molecular signatures of these species are from Asia alone with the only exception of sequence (UDB0752113) isolated from the ECM root tip of Tilia amurensis in Estonia (Fig.1). However, Tilia amurensis is a species native to north-eastern Asia (China, Russian Far East, North Korea and South Korea) according to Species 2000 (https://sp2000.org/), thus we strongly believe that the presence of UDB0752113 in Estonia is a consequence of human activity. Phylogroup Latisporum, the most diverse lineage in Asia, includes 31 species, 23 in China (Fig.S3). Phylogroup Turmericum includes seven species in Asia, five in China (Fig.S9). In general, most of the phylogroups in the genus Tubersuccessfully radiate in China, but Phylogroup Aestivum, a basal evolving lineage (Bonito et al. 2013) with mostly variable morphology, is an exception, as that is poorly represented in this region with only one species T. sinoaestivum (Fig.1, 2, S1). It is notable that the European species T. magnatum was recently found in northern Thailand based on morphological and molecular data (Suwannarach et al. 2017), and is the first record of this lineage in Asia, but it has not been found in China. Moreover, the other six phylogroups also represent many species in China as revealed in this study. It is remarkable that there is no species to be mentioned from Japan by Kinoshita et al. (2011) and this study from either of the Excavatum and Maculatum phylogroups, which are well represented in China. The reason why these phylogroups are missing from Japan remains unknown. China is the third largest country in the world in terms of geographic mass, across wide altitudinal and latitudinal gradients. The climate includes tropical to frigid zones. The truffle host plant ranges include a rich diversity of trees like Larix principis-rupprechtii, Pinus armandii, P. tabulaeformis, P. yunnanensis, Quercus liaotungensis. The genus Tubertherefore evolved a rich diversity in China, including 82 phylogenetic species within nine phylogroups. Compared to Europe (c. 51 accepted species) and North America (c. 54 accepted species), China appears to be the global centre of diversification of the truffle genus Tuber.
The high endemism and narrow geographic area of Tuberin China
The extremely high endemism of Tuberspecies is revealed in China in this study. Among the total 82 Tuberspecies in China, 68 species are endemic, which accounts for 82.9% of Chinese Tuberspecies. Only eight species shared their distribution with other continents, including T. anniae, T. excelsum-reticulatum, T. formosanum, T. maculatum, T. wenchuanense, Tubersp. CHN-3, Tubersp. CHN-10 and Tubersp. CHN-11. Tuberanniae is a species originally described from North America and also occurs in Europe, but now it is also known under Larix sp. in Hebei and Shanxi provinces, northern China (Fig.S7). Tuber maculatum is a common European species. There is a report from Taiwan, but no record from mainland China (Chen 2007). Recently this species is collected several times under mixed woods of Picea sp. and Larix sp. from Shanxi Province of northern China (Fig.S5). Tuber wenchuanense, a Chinese species from Sichuan and Shanxi provinces, is detected in the ECM root tips from both Canada (North America) and Poland (Europe) (Fig.S8). Tuber excelsum-reticulatum, a new Chinese species in this study, is detected in the ECM root tips of different plants from North America and Europe (Fig.S5, and see the comments about this species in Taxonomy). The most outstanding sample is the Asian T. formosanum, which had been found sporulating in natural forests of North America (as Tuber indicum-B, Bonito et al. 2011), and the same situation is also observed in isolated pockets of T. melanosporum in southern Europe (Riousset et al. 2001, Hall et al. 2007). However, the reasons for this biogeographic pattern of distribution for these eight species have not been resolved. They may be naturally distributed, or they might be a deliberate introduction by human activity.
Our analyses also showed that, for most species of Tuberfrom China, each species is limited in its distribution to a relatively narrow region. For example, T. yigongense, a newly described black truffle species, only known from Yigong County in Tibet (Fan et al. 2018), and T. piceatum is probably limited in Tianshan region in Xinjiang Province. More samples include T. caoi, T. glabrum, T. latisporum, T. panzhihuanense, T. pseudobrumale, T. pseudomagnatum, T. pseudosphaerosporum, T. sinoaestivum, T. sinosphaerosporum, which all are limited to Yunnan Province and/or southern Sichuan Province. Also, there are some northern Chinese species including T. liaotongense, T. lishanense and T. xuanhuaense, that are distributed only in the north region of China. The most extreme examples are probably the species T. luyashanense, T. microcarpum and T. excelsum-reticulatum, which are limited to the Lvliangshan Mts in Shanxi Province.
On the other hand, there are a few species with a broad area of distribution. The best examples are T. formosanum from the phylogroup Melanosporum and T. parvomurphium from the phylogroup Latisporum. These species occurred across East Asia including the Far East region of Russia as revealed in this study (Fig.S3, S6). The distinct geographic pattern is helpful for species recognition of the Chinese black truffles, i.e., T. sinense is known from Yunnan and Sichuan provinces, T. yigongense is limited to Tibet only, while T. formosanum is widely distributed throughout mainland China, from southwest to northeast, and the Taiwan islands. The geographic pattern of some sister species is variable in China. For example, the sister species T. jinshajiangense and T.shii share the same region in the southwest area of China (Fig.S7), but the distribution of the sister species T. subglobosum and T. liaotongense are exclusive with T. subglobosum in the southwest and T. liaotongense in the north regions (Fig.S8).
One reason for the relatively narrow distribution of Tuberspecies may be their adaptation to belowground sporulation in which they lost the ability to forcibly discharge their spores and become dependent on animals for the dispersal of their spores. On the other hand, all Tuberspecies are obligate ectomycorrhizal fungi with a broad diversity of trees (Hall et al. 2007, Maser et al. 2008, Trappe et al. 2009). Thus, the movement or migration of the mycophagous animals and ectomycorrhizal host plants would greatly influence the migration and distribution of Tuberspecies. Geographic and climatic factors can affect the migration of both animals and host plants, such as large bodies of water (oceans), high mountain ranges, desert zones, climate zones. These factors can furthermore inhibit the spore dispersal and the gene flow of Tuberspp., and help to drive speciation. The fact that most of the Tuberspecies had a narrow distribution range can explain their high endemism for different geographic regions, and may be why the present Tuberflora in Asia is so different from both Europe (c. 51 accepted species) and North America (c. 54 accepted species).
The congruence and conflict between morphology and DNA molecular data
Our present study revealed that most species of Tuberin China are supported by both morphology and molecular phylogeny. Species with few differences from each other in morphological features are well separated by molecular data. For example, the species T. jinshajiangense and T. shii are closely related and highly similar to each other. The only major morphological difference between them is the ascospore shape, which is globose in the former, while globose to sub-globose in the latter, but ITS-based phylogenetic analysis separated them well (Fig.S7) (Wang et al. 2016). These indicate there is the strong consistency between morphology and DNA molecular data on the species delimitation of the genus Tuber. However, there are some species supported by molecular data but not by morphology, among which almost no morphological differences are observed. These are called cryptic species. Cryptic species are not uncommon in Tuberin China. The outstanding example is a pair of commercial black truffle species, T. formosanum and T. sinense, both of which are commonly called T. indicum in China. These two black truffle species are not distinguishable morphologically, which resulted in the synonymization of the two species by some authors (Song 2005, Chen 2007), but DNA analysis can separate them well (Fig.S6), and a recent study revealed their great difference in geographic distribution that is limited to Yunnan and Sichuan provinces for T. sinense and widely mapped in northeast Asia for T. formosanum (Fan et al. 2018). In contrast, the more challenging problem for species delimitation of Chinese Tuberis that some species have distinct morphological features but are not supported by molecular analysis. Good examples are T. vesicoperidium and T. microspiculatum. Tubervesicoperidium is a rare and morphologically distinct species from Yunnan Province in southwestern China, that is characterised by large, thick-walled, swollen cells in the ascomatal peridium (Fan et al. 2012c), but is not differentiated from T. lijiangense by molecular data in this study (Fig.S7). According to our observation for more than 1 000 specimens in China, the feature of large swollen cells with thickened walls in the peridium is uncommon in Tuberspecies. Similarly, T. microspiculatum differs from T. umbiliculatum in its spiny-reticulate spore ornamentation with veryminute and numerous meshes, but molecular analysis did not support their difference in this study (Fig.S8). Ascomatal colour in Tubervaries greatly for most species (for example, the colour of ascomata changes from white to blackish brown in age in T. latisporum, and from red-brown to blackish in T. sinense). Ascospore ornamentation, on the other hand, is a stable and important feature although with some exceptions, for example, the workable morphological trait to separate T. taiyuanense from T. huidongense is the mesh number of ascospore ornamentations across the spore width, which is usually numbered 5–8 meshes/width in the former while mostly 3–5 in the latter. A new sample in this study, the specimen (BJTC FAN297), is identified as T. pseudohimalayense by DNA analysis (Fig.S6). However, its ascomata had no excavated cavities at the ascomatal base, a feature that diagnoses T. pseudohimalayense, but instead had several deep furrows. The question then, is whether these morphological variations come from environmental factors or actually signal that they are different taxa? In fact, it is very difficult to treat some of these samples because the current DNA data from the selected loci cannot solve taxonomic problems for 100% of the species.
Host specificity and Chinese Tuber species
In general, Tuberspecies are hosted by a wide range of plants including both conifers and broad-leaf trees (Hall et al. 2007). However, some individual species are associated with specific host plants according to our observation. Our investigations show that T. xuanhuaense (14 collections), a commonly encountered species in North China, is harvested under Betula spp., Quercus spp., Pinus spp., Populus spp., but never under Picea spp. and Larix spp., while T.liaotongense (15 collections), another widely distributed species in this region, can be found under all of the trees mentioned above. Tuber lishanense (22 collections) is known from Pinus armandii only in North China. Both T. luyashanense (30 collections) and T.microcarpum (six collections) only came from the Picea-Larix forest in Shanxi Province. Tuber taiyuanense (11 collections), a very common species in the phylogroup Rufum in China, seems to be associated only with Pinus spp. including 2-needled pine (Pinus tabulaeformis), 3-needled pine (Pinus yunnanensis) and 5-needled pine (Pinus armandii), but T.huidongense (42 collections) closely related to T. taiyuanense is hosted by a wide range of plants including both conifers and broad-leaf trees. Tuber sinoaestivum (19 collections) seems to be associated only with 5-needled pines (Pinus armandii and Pinus wallichiana). The host range may be related to the geographic map of Tuberspecies. A good example is two sister species of black truffle, T.sinense (90 collections) and T. formosanum (65 collections). The former is limited to the southwest area of China and probably hosted by only conifers, but the latter is associated with a wide range of trees including both conifers (2-, 3- and 5-needled pines) and broad-leaved trees (Castanea mollissima, Quercus spp., Populus spp.). Accordingly, T. formosanum spread across the southwest and to the northeast regions in East Asia (Fan et al. 2018). In spite of many observations, our knowledge on the host specificity of Tuberspecies in China remains poor. Also, there is no reliable work that whether the host specificity is used as species delimitation in Tuber. How the truffles co-evolute with their hosts is not known. More evidence is therefore needed before we can outline a pattern of the relationship between these truffles and their hosts.
Confirmed species of Tuberin China
Phylogroup Aestivum
Tuber sinoaestivum J.P. Zhang & P.G. Liu, Mycotaxon 122: 75. 2012
Tuber sinoaestivum is a phylogenetically distinct species (Fig.2, S1). It shares less than 93.6% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. Morphologically it is easily confused with the European T.aestivum (Vittadini 1831, Zhang et al. 2012), and is treated as that species in earlier Chinese works (Song 2005, Cao 2010). Its sub-globose Ascospore helps to separate it from T.aestivum that usually has ellipsoidal Ascospores (Riousset et al. 2001). Tuber sinoaestivum is only found in Sichuan and Yunnan provinces in China. A sequence (KP222539) from the ECM root tips of Pinus wallichiana in Kashmir (India) well matches the species T.sinoaestivum (Fig.S1). This indicates T. sinoaestivum also occurs in India.
Phylogroup Excavatum
Tuber badium S.P. Wan, Phytotaxa 296: 233. 2017
This species is described from Yunnan Province based on a single specimen (Wan et al. 2017b). We collected six specimens from southwestern China that phylogenetically and morphologically matches this species in this study (Fig.2, S2). Tuberbadium is morphologically similar to T. neoexcavatum and its allies in China, all of which are probably limited in their geographic regions in the southwest region of China. The diagnoses for this species include the pale ascomata that are completely absent from olive tints, and ellipsoidal to broadly ellipsoidal Ascospores. Tuber badium shares less than 96.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber depressum S.P. Wan, Phytotaxa 296: 233. 2017
This species was recently described from Yunnan Province, China (Wan et al. 2017b), and is very similar to T. neoexcavatum according to the original description. We were not able to examine the type specimen in this study, but our phylogenetic analyses support it as a distinct species (Fig.2, S2). Morphological features of our collections match that written for the description of the type of T. depressum. Tuberdepressum is hardly separable from T. neoexcavatum in morphology alone, but its narrowly ellipsoid Ascospores differ from the latter. This species shares less than 95.1% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber magnameshanum L. Fan (see Taxonomy)
Tuber neoexcavatum L. Fan & Y. Li, Mycotaxon 124: 159. 2013
This species is the most frequently encountered T. excavatum-like species in China. The medium-sized, olive ascomata covered with fine warts is probably a distinctive feature to diagnose it. To our knowledge, this species is mainly distributed along the Jinshajiang Valley. Tuber neoexcavatum shares less than 96.5% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber pseudofulgens L. Fan (see Taxonomy)
Tuber sinoexcavatum L. Fan & Y. Li, Mycotaxon 116: 352. 2011
This species looks like the European T.excavatum in ascomatal appearance, but its Ascospores are very similar to the sub-globose Ascospores of another European native species T. fulgens (Riousset et al. 2001). It shares less than 96.3% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. Not common.
Tuber verrucosivolvum S.P. Wan, Phytotaxa 296: 235. 2011
Tuber verrucosivolvum is diagnosed by the yellow-brown as-comata covered with pyramidal warts (Wan et al. 2017b). Our phylogenetic analyses show this species is distinct and closely related to T. sinoexcavatum (Fig.2, S2). This species shares less than 93.9% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Phylogroup Latisporum
Tuber alboumbilicum Y. Wang & Shu H. Li, Mycol. Progr. 13: 1160. 2014
This species was established based on a single specimen (Li et al. 2014). According to the authors, this species was diagnosed by its whitish ascomata with basal cavity and broadly ellipsoidal Ascospores with reticulate ornaments. The type collection came from southwestern China. Our analyses suggest that IF89261 (DQ478639) from North China is the same species (Fig.2, S3). Tuberalboumbilicum shares less than 94.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuberbaoshanense S.P. Wan, Mycoscience 58: 316. 2017
This species is phylogenetically closely related to T. latisporum (Fig.2, S3), and can hardly be separated from T. latisporum in morphology. According to the authors, T. baoshanense is diagnosed by the dark ascomata (Wan et al. 2017a). However, the dark brown ascomata and even blackish brown individuals are not uncommon for fully mature T. latisporum according to our observation. DNA examination is necessary for the separation of the two species. Tuber baoshanense shares less than 94.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. This species is currently only known from Yunnan Province.
Tuber caoi L. Fan, Mycologia 108: 345. 2016
This is a frequently encountered truffle species in southwestern China (Fan et al. 2016a). Morphologically, it is diagnosed by the combination of grey ascomata often with olive tints, the blackish grey gleba at maturity and the globose Ascospores. Molecular analyses support it as a distinct species (Fig.2, S3). Tubercaoi shares less than 87.5% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber elevatireticulatum K.F. Wong & H.T.Li, Bot. Studies (Taipei) 59 (no. 25): 4. 2018
This species was recently described from Taiwan Islands based on specimens found in soil under Keteleeria fortunei var. cyclolepis (Lin et al. 2018). We were not able to examine the type specimen of this white truffle species, but our DNA analyses support it as a good species. Tuber elevatireticulatum shares less than 96.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. This is the third Tuberspecies found in Taiwan, and phylogenetically it is closely related to the Chinese Tubersp. CHN-7 (from Liaodong peninsula) and the Japanese Tubersp. 10 (Kinoshita et al. 2011) in the phylogroup Latisporum (Fig.2, S3).
Tuber griseolivaceum L. Fan & K.B. Huang, Phytotaxa 309: 168. 2017
Morphologically, T. griseolivaceum is diagnosed by the combination of olive-grey ascomata, blackish gleba at maturity and globose Ascospores. Tubercaoi is somewhat similar in ascomatal colour, but its size is usually smaller, with grey gleba (Huang et al. 2017). This species is found in Yunnan Province, but seems rare. Phylogenetically it is closely related to T. alboumbilicum and T. polymorphosporum in the Latisporum phylogroup (Fig.2, S3). This species shares less than 89.6% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber huiliense L. Fan (see Taxonomy)
Tuber latisporum J. Chen & P.G. Liu, Mycologia 99: 476. 2007
This is one of the most frequently encountered truffle species in southwestern China, and is both morphologically and phylogenetically distinct (Fig.2, S3). The diagnosed features of T. latisporum included: ascomata medium to large in size, usually from white to grey-brown or even dark brown in age, gleba blackish to black at maturity, Ascospores broad ellipsoid or sub-globose, red-brown and covered with roughly reticulate ornaments, odour usually very pungent but pleasant (Chen & Liu 2007). This species is easily confused with its sister species T. panzhihuanense in morphology, but according to our observation, the larger size of ascomata and the dark grey gleba (never black) could potentially help to separate T. panzhihuanense from T. latisporum. This species shares less than 96.5% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber luyashanense L. Fan (see Taxonomy)
Tuber microcarpum L. Fan & T.Li (see Taxonomy)
Tuber parvomurphium L. Fan, Mycologia 108: 349. 2016
This species is characterised by the combination of the small-sized, yellow-white to yellow-brown ascomata, blackish gleba and globose ascospores. Our DNA analyses support T. parvomurphium is a distinct species (Fig.2, S3). It shares less than 95.7% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. This species is originally described from southwestern China (Fan et al. 2016a), but DNA sequences obtained later from both ascomata and ECM tips harvested from Beijing city, Shanxi, Hebei, Liaoning provinces of North China, Japan and Far East of Russia (Fig.S3, Table S3), indicate that T. parvomurphium is widely distributed in East Asia.
Tuber panzhihuanense X.J. Deng & Y. Wang, Mycol. Progr. 12: 558. 2013
This is a large white truffle species that mainly occurs under Pinus spp. along the Jinshajiang Valley. Not uncommon. The largest individuals reach 10 cm diam or more (Deng et al. 2013, this study). Tuber panzhihuanense shares less than 97% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber polymorphosporum S.P. Wan, Mycoscience 58: 313. 2017
This is a commonly encountered species in southwestern China, mainly from north-western Yunnan Province and southwestern Sichuan Province (Wan et al. 2017a, this study). According to the authors, the ascospores that vary in shape from broad ellipsoid to long ellipsoid probably help to diagnose it. Our analyses reveal that T. polymorphosporum is closely related to T. alboumbilicum in the phylogroup Latisporum (Fig.2, S3). This species shares less than 94% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber pseudosphaerosporum L. Fan, Mycotaxon 125: 286. 2013
This species resembles T. panzhihuanense in ascomatal appearance, both being large and white, and in odour, both being pungent. The ascospore shape differentiates them well, with globose ascospores in T. pseudosphaeosporum and ellipsoid ascospores in T. panzhihuanense (Deng et al. 2013, Fan & Yue 2013). Phylogenetically these two large white truffles are not so closely related although they evolved within the same lineage (Fig.2, S3). Tuber pseudosphaerosporum shares less than 94.7% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. It is only known from the Jinshajiang Valley (Fan &Yue 2013, this study).
Tuber thailandicum Suwannar. et al., Mycol. Progr. 14: 3. 2015
Tuber thailandicum was described from Thailand (Suwannarach et al. 2015). We could not harvest its sporocarps in China, but two ITS sequences (AB769932, LC176643) from the ECM root tips of Pinus massoniana in Hunan and Shaanxi provinces revealed its occurrence in China (Fig.2, S3, Table S3). The Japanese Tubersp. 11 (Kinoshita et al. 2011) should be the same species (Fig.2, S3). Our phylogenetic analyses revealed T. thailandicum was closely related to Chinese T. pseudosphaerosporum in the Latisporum phylogroup (Fig.2, S3). Morphologically they were different in ascospore shape, which was broad ellipsoid in T. thailandicum, while globose in T. pseudosphaerosporum. This species shares less than 87.3% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Phylogroup Macrosporum
Tuber calosporum S.P. Wan, Mycoscience 57: 396. 2016
This species was described from Yunnan Province (Wan et al. 2016). We were not able to examine the type specimen, but two specimens collected from Yunnan Province by us phylogenetically match this species with strong support (Fig.2, S4), and morphologically are in accordance with the description. Tuber calosporum is confused with T. glabrum in morphology, the difference probably is the shape of ascospores that is broadly ellipsoid in T. calosporum and ellipsoid in T. glabrum (Fan et al. 2014, Wan et al. 2016). Moreover, we note a peculiar pungent odour from our mature ascomata collections, which is completely absent from T. glabrum. Tubercalosporum shares less than 89.7% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuberglabrum L. Fan & S. Feng, Mycol. Progr. 13: 244. 2014
There are three species from the Macrosporum phylogroup in China. They are very similar in morphology. Of them, T.glabrum is the most frequently encountered along the Jinshajiang Valley. It shares less than 85.6% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber sinomonosporum J.Z. Cao & L. Fan, Mycol. Progr. 13: 245. 2014
This species is originally described as Paradoxa sinensis (Fan et al. 2012a), but later transferred to Tuberas T. sinomonosporum (Fan et al. 2014). The European T. monosporum is easily confused in the ascomatal appearance and ascospore shape. The potential difference between them is probably the size of ascospores, that is (55–)62.5–72.5μm in T. sinomonosporum and 50–60μm diam in T. monosporum according to Fan et al. (2012a). To our knowledge, no DNA data are available for T.monosporum, thus the phylogenetic relationship between the two species remains unknown. Tuber sinomonosporum shares less than 87.9% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies. It is only known from Yunnan Province, China.
Phylogroup Maculatum
Tuber bomiense K.M. Su & W.P. Xiong, Mycotaxon 126: 129. 2013
This species is recognised by the red-brown ascomata covered with fine warts, brown gleba and broadly ellipsoidal Ascospores ornamented with a deep reticulum (Su et al. 2013). The type specimen is collected from Tibet, and the second collection is from Yunnan. This species is probably not common. It shares less than 96.1% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber excelsum-reticulatum L. Fan & T.Li (see Taxonomy)
Tuber hubeiense L. Fan, Mycologia 108: 355. 2016
This species was described from Hubei Province, central China (Fan et al. 2016b). Although the type specimen is available, it is not clear whether it is a rare species or not, because no more truffle investigations were conducted for this region since Dr Zhang collected this specimen thirty years ago. Tuber hubeiense is morphologically difficult to distinguish, and easily confused with T. maculatum and T. puberulum. This specimen was originally determined as T. puberulum (Zhang 1990, Song 2005), and later as T. maculatum (Chen 2007). It shares less than 96% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber maculatum Vittad., Monogr. Tuberac. (Milano): 45. 1831
This is the first molecularly confirmed report of the European T. maculatum in China from ascomatal materials collected from Shanxi Province, North China. This name is misapplied to a specimen (HMAS60233, Zhang 1990) from Hubei Province, central China, but that specimen has since been described as T. hubeiense (Fan et al. 2016b). Two ITS sequences from Qinling Mts, Shaanxi Province, about 500 km southwest of where T. maculatum was collected in Shanxi Province, also match this species. Whether the occurrence of T. maculatum in China is natural or is due to human activity as it is in Australia and New Zealand (Hall et al. 2007) remains unknown. Tuber maculatum shares less than 96.4% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber pseudomagnatum L. Fan (complex), Mycotaxon 121: 300. 2012
This is a frequently encountered truffle species in Jinshajiang Valley, southwestern China. The colour of its ascomata is yellow or bright yellow when immersed in soil, then when open to air, it quickly fades to yellow-whitish and finally yellow-brown. Moreover, the pungent and special odour is unique to this species according to our observations. Our molecular analysis places the sequence of T. microverrucosum into the T. pseudomagnatum clade with strong support (Fig.S5), and DNA analysis reveals that there is more than 97% ITS similarity between them. Tuber microverrucosum is a brown species and nearly completely absent from yellow tints, but its ascospores are highly similar (Fan & Cao 2012, Fan et al. 2012e). The two species are probably conspecific, but there is only one collection of T. microverrucosum, so more samplings will be needed to clarify the taxonomic relationship between the two species. The T. pseudomagnatum complex shares less than 95.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber wumengense L. Fan, Mycologia 108: 359. 2016
This species was originally described from Yunnan and Hubei provinces (Fan et al. 2016b). Our recent investigations in southern Shanxi Province of North China show this species is frequently collected in the Zhongtiaoshan Mts under Pinus armandii. One ECM-sequence of Quercus sp. in Shaanxi, North China matches this species. These indicate T. wumengense can occur with both conifers and broadleaved trees. Morphologically the long ellipsoidal ascospores covered with a deep reticulum are diagnostic for this species. Tuber wumengense shares less than 96% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Phylogroup Melanosporum
Tuber formosanum H.D. Hu & Y. Wang, Mycotaxon 123: 296. 2013
Originally, T. formosanum was described from Taiwan islands, but a recent study revealed this species widely distributed across East Asia (Fan et al. 2018). Morphologically, it is almost indistinguishable from its sister T. sinense in China, both of which are sold as Asian black truffles. This species shares less than 94% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber pseudobrumale Y. Wang & Shu H. Li, Mycol. Progr. 13: 1160. 2014
Although named as T. pseudobrumale, this species looks more similar to T. mesentericum as it has the same ascomatal appearance. Feng has proposed T. pseudomesentericum based on several collections from southwestern China in her Master Thesis, but this is not validly published (Feng 2014). This not uncommon species shares less than 89.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber pseudohimalayense G. Moreno et al., Mycotaxon 63: 218. 1997
Tuber pseudohimalayense is one of the most frequently encountered truffle species in China, with the local name ‘female truffle’, it has been harvested yearly in commercial quantities. This species shares less than 90.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber sinense K. Tao & B. Liu, Shanxi Univ. J., Nat. Sci. Ed. 12: 215. 1989
A recent publication showed that T.sinense is limited to southwestern China (Fan et al. 2018) and is particularly common in Yunnan and Sichuan provinces. Tuber sinense shares less than 94% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber variabilisporum L. Fan (see Taxonomy)
Tuberyigongense L. Fan & W.P. Xiong, Mycotaxon 133: 190. 2018
This black truffle species was recently recorded (Fan et al. 2018), and probably only grows in a small, isolated region in Tibet. This species shares less than 93% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Phylogroup Puberulum
Tuber anniae W. Colgan & Trappe, Mycotaxon 64: 438. 1997
Tuber anniae was originally described from North America (Colgan & Trappe 1997). Our study is the first to confirm the occurrence of this species in China. This species was first detected by ITS-sequencing from ECM root tips of Pinus tabuliformis and Larix principis-rupprechtiii in Hebei Province, and subsequently the ascomata were harvested from Hebei and Shanxi provinces in 2016 and 2017. This species shares less than 97% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuberhuizeanum L. Fan & C.L. Hou, Mycotaxon 122: 166. 2012
This species, like T. liyuanum, is most frequently encountered white truffle species in Jinshajiang Valley. According to our analysis, T. huizeanum and T. liyuanum are closely related and morphologically very similar to each other (Fig.2, S7) (Fan & Cao 2012, Fan et al. 2012e), and share the same geographic region. The two species differ in the shape of Ascospores that are sub-globose to broad ellipsoid in T. huizeanum, and ellipsoid in T. liyuanum. Tuber huizeanum shares less than 97.3% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber humilireticulatum L. Fan (see Taxonomy)
Tuber jinshajiangense L. Fan, Mycologia 108: 349. 2016
This species was originally described from Jinshajiang Valley (Fan et al. 2016a), although it had previously been named as Tuber californicum by Cao (2010). Morphologically, this small white truffle is difficult to distinguish from several globose-spored species including Chinese T. xuanhuaense, and the North American T. californicum, but the phylogenetic analysis separates them well (Fig.2, S7). Moreover, geographically, T. californicum is probably a native species to North America, and T. xuanhuaense is clearly limited to North China, but T. jinshajiangense is found only in southwestern China according to our study. Not uncommon. Tuber jinshajiangense shares less than 93.4% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber lijiangense L. Fan & J.Z. Cao (complex), Mycotaxon 116: 350. 2011
Our present analyses revealed that T. lijiangense (designated as Tubersp. 33 in Bonito et al. 2010), T. microsphaerosporum, T. sinopuberulum and T. vesicoperidium cluster in the same clade with strong support (Fig.2, S7), and share more than 98% similarity in ITS sequence between them, strongly sug-gesting that phylogenetically they are the same species where-as they are morphologically four distinct species. Tuber lijiangense is separated from the others by its sub-globose to globose ascospores; T. microsphaerosporum is recognised by its globose ascospores and asci that contain 1–7 spores. In contrast T.sinopuberulum has sub-globose ascospores; and T. vesicoperidium has huge cells with thickened walls in the peridium. Tuber lijiangense is a frequently encountered truffle species, but the other three species are rare. More collections are needed to clarify the relationships between the four species. Tuber lijiangense shares less than 95.1% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber liui A-S. Xu, Mycosystema 18: 361. 1999
This species is recognised by the large ascospores reaching 70μm in length (Xu 1999). Our phylogenetic analyses show that it is a good species (Fig.2, S7). Tuber liui is probably native to Tibet. It shares less than 96.1% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber liyuanum L. Fan & J.Z. Cao, Mycotaxon 121: 301. 2012
This species is a common truffle species under Pinus spp. in Jinshajiang Valley, southwestern China. Morphologically, this species is diagnosed by pale small to medium sized ascomata, brown gleba and ellipsoidal ascospores with reticulate ornaments. Tuber huizeanum, another frequently encountered white truffle species from the same region, is similar and closely related both morphologically and phylogenetically (Fig.2, S7). However, the ascospores in T. huizeanum are shaped broadly ellipsoid to sub-globose. Tuber liyuanum shares less than 97.6% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber shidianense S.P. Wan & F.Q. Yu, Mycoscience 57: 394. 2016
Phylogenetically, T. shidianense is a distinct species and closely related to both T. jinshajiangense and T. shii (Fig.2, S7). Tuber shidianense has small white ascomata and globose to sub-globose ascospores with reticulated ornaments (Wan et al. 2016), which make it difficult to distinguish from T. shii morphologically. The spore size may be the potentially difference between the two species, which is larger in T. shii (29–56.5μm in length) than in T. shidianense (24–43μm in length). Also, the depth of meshes in spore ornaments is lower in T.shii (2.5–5μm) than in T.shidianense (3–7.7μm). Tuber shidianense shares less than 89.3% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber shii L. Fan & Y.W. Wang, Phytotaxa 269: 282. 2016
This species is sister to T. jinshajiangense in the phylogenetic trees (Fig.2, S7), but morphologically they are distinguished from each other by the shape of ascospores, that is globose in T. jinshajiangense, but globose to sub-globose in T. shii (Wang et al. 2016). This species is rare, only known from Yunnan Province. It shares less than 93.5% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber sinoborchii T.Li & L. Fan (see Taxonomy)
Tuber sinoniveum S.P. Wan, Phytotaxa 298: 257. 2016
According to the original description (Xu et al. 2017), this species is diagnosed by small white ascomata and globose ascospores with reticulate ornaments. Currently, this is a poorly understood species. Our analyses reveal it as a distinct species and closely related to T. sinosphaerosporum (Fig.2, S7). It shares less than 92.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber sinosphaerosporum L. Fan, J.Z. Cao & Y. Li, Mycotaxon 122: 350. 2012
This is a medium to large white truffle species (ascomata reaching 5 cm diam) with reticulate globose ascospores (Fan et al. 2012b). Other white truffle species with globose ascospores in China usually have smaller ascomata with the exception of T.pseudosphaerosporum (Fan & Yue 2013), which, we believe, evolved in the phylogroup Latisporum (Fig.2, S3) rather than the Puberulum phylogroup (Fig.2, S7). Morphologically T. pseudo-sphaerosporum is differentiated from T. sinosphaerosporum by its glabrous ascomata and grey-purple tinted gleba. Tuber sinosphaerosporum has never been harvested from Jinshajiang Valley although it is probably limited to southwestern China. Tuber sinosphaerosporum shares less than 93% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber xuanhuaense L. Fan, Mycologia 108: 350. 2016
Tuber xuanhuaense is one of the most frequently encountered truffle species in North China and is found under both conifers and broad leaf trees. Tuber xuanhuaense was confused with the North American T. californicum in earlier Chinese works (Wang 1988, Tao 1988). It shares less than 95.5% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber zhongdianense X.Y. He, H.M. Li & Y. Wang, Mycotaxon 90: 213. 2004
Tuber zhongdianense is morphologically difficult to distinguish in this phylogroup, and easily confused with the European T. borchii and both Chinese species T. huizeanum and T. hubeiense. Phylogenetic analyses distinguish this species (Fig.2, S7). It shares less than 97.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Phylogroup Rufum
Tuber crassitunicatum L. Fan & X.Y. Yan, Mycologia 110: 774. 2018
Tuber crassitunicatum is similar to T. taiyuanense in the colour of both ascomata and gleba, but its ascospore ornaments are intermediate between having isolated spines and having a spinose-reticulate pattern, which distinguishes T. crassitunicatum from T. taiyuanense. Tuber crassitunicatum is probably a rare species in China, only known from Yunnan and Shanxi provinces. It shares less than 89.4% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber huidongense Y. Wang (complex), Mycotaxon 83: 191. 2002
Our phylogenetic analyses show that T. huidongense (from Yunnan and Sichuan provinces), T. furfuraceum (from Taiwan), T. lannaense (from Thailand), T. microspermum (from Yunnan Province) and the Japanese Tubersp. 3 (Kinoshita et al. 2011) are grouped in the same clade with strong support (Fig.2, S8), and they share more than 97% ITS similarity, which suggests these species are conspecific. However, there was only limited sampling available for these geographically or morphologically distinct ‘species’, and therefore further studies are needed before attempting a formal taxonomic treatment. Tuber huidongense shares less than 90% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber liaotongense Y. Wang, Atti del Secondo Congresso Internazionale sul Tartufo, Spoleto, 24–27 Novembre 1988 (Perugia): 46. 1990
Originally, it was described from Liaoning Province (Wang 1988). The present study shows it is one of the most frequently encountered Tuberspecies in northern China. It shares less than 95.2% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber lishanense L. Fan & X.Y. Yan, Mycologia 110: 776. 2018
Tuber lishanense is diagnosed by its sub-globose ascospores covered with isolated, narrow and densely positioned long spines. This is a very common truffle species under Pinus armandii in the Zhongtiaoshan Mts of Shanxi Province, North China (Yan et al. 2018). Two ITS sequences derived from the collections of Gansu Province match this species (Fig.2, S8), indicating it is also distributed in that region. This species shares less than 94.4% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber piceatum L. Fan, X.Y. Yan & M.S. Song, Mycologia 110: 777. 2018
Tuber piceatum and T. lishanense are sister species (Fig.2, S8). They are the only truffle species with spiny ascospores currently known in China. They differ morphologically in the ascospores that are ellipsoid with short and rare spines in Tuber piceatum, but sub-globose with long and dense spines in T. lishanense. Tuber piceatum is probably limited to the Xinjiang region under Picea sp. (Yan et al. 2018). It shares less than 94.4% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber sinoalbidum L. Fan & J.Z. Cao (complex), Mycotaxon 118: 408. 2011
This species complex contains T. sinoalbidum and T. subglobosum (Fig.2, S8). In morphology, the type specimen of T. sinoalbidum has whitish ascomata and ellipsoidal to broad ellipsoidal ascospores (Fan et al. 2011b), while T. subglobosum has brown ascomata and sub-globose ascospores (Fan et al. 2013a). Tuber sinoalbidum may be rare as only the type specimen is available, but T. subglobosum is one of the most frequently collected species in southwestern China. DNA analysis revealed that the two species share more than 97.3% similarity in ITS sequence. More specimens are needed for their taxonomic treatment. The Japanese sample marked as Tubersp. 3 (Kinoshita et al. 2011) grouped into the clade of T. sinoalbidum complex, which implied Tubersp. 3 may be the same species. Tuber sinoalbidum complex shares less than 95.9% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber taiyuanense B. Liu, Acta Mycol. Sin. 4: 84. 1985
Tuber taiyuanense is one of the most common truffles in China, and widely distributed in both northern and southern regions. It shares less than 97.6% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber umbilicatum J. Chen & P.G. Liu (complex), Mycotaxon 94: 2. 2005
As shown in our analyses, T. umbiliculatum and T. microspiculatum fall into the same clade with strong support (Fig.2, S8), implying they may be conspecific. However, the two species were separated from each other morphologically by the spiny-reticulate ornaments of ascospores, that is 6–8 meshes across the spore width in T. umbiliculatum, but 10–16 in T. microspiculatum (Cao et al. 2011, Fan et al. 2012d). Tuber umbiliculatum is very similar and closely related to T. taiyuanense (Fig.2, S8), and hardly distinguishable based on morphology alone. Geographically, T.umbilicatum is common in the southwestern region, but absent from the northern region of China. Tuber umbilicatum shares less than 97.9% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber wanglangense L. Fan, Mycologia 110: 777. 2018
This species is a rare and poorly understood species, only known from the Sichuan Province. It shares less than 94.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tuber wenchuanense L. Fan & J.Z. Cao, Mycotaxon 123: 99. 2013
This is a rare truffle species with spinose-reticulate ornaments on the surface of ascospores (Fan et al. 2013a). The type specimen of T. wenchuanense is from the Sichuan Province. The Shanxi Province is the second locality in China where this species is recorded. The sequences downloaded from GenBank, JX630932 (from the ECM root tip of Salix arctica in Canada) and AY748863 (from the ECM root tip of Salix caprea in Poland) match T. wenchuanense, which indicate this species also occurs in North America and Europe (Fig.2, S8). Tuberwenchuanense shares less than 90% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Phylogroup Turmericum
Tuber turmericum L. Fan (complex), Mycol. Progr. 14: 2. 2015
This is a very peculiar truffle species from southwest China, which possesses a turmeric coloured gleba in fully mature ascomata, and the asci invariably contain one ascospore (Fan et al. 2015). Tuber xanthomonosporum was described from the same region and published almost at the same time (Qing et al. 2015), and is very similar to T.turmericum in morphology according to its original description. Phylogenetically, the ITS sequences of T.xanthomonosporum are placed in the T.turmericum clade in our phylogenetic trees with strong support (Fig.2, S9). DNA analysis showed both species shared more than 98.6% similarity in ITS sequence. Therefore, these two ‘species’ may be conspecific. We failed to loan the type specimen so a formal taxonomic treatment is still pending. Tuber turmericum shares less than 88.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Hypothesized species of Tuberin China
Phylogroup Latisporum
Tubersp. CHN-1
This taxon is represented by a sequence extracted from an ascomatal specimen (BJTC FAN190). Our phylogenetic analyses support its taxonomic position in Tuber(Fig.2, S3). However, since only one poor ascoma is available for this taxon, we await additional collections prior to describing it. It shares less than 97% similarity in the ITS region with its closest relative.
Tubersp. CHN-2
This taxon is known only from one ECM-sequence (GU134524) of Pinus densiflora from Heilongjiang Province, north-eastern China (Fig.2, S3). Phylogenetic analyses reveal it as a well-supported species with an ITS sequence similarity less than 95.1% to its closest relatives, T. latisporum and its allies. Currently, no fruitbodies are available for this species, so its taxonomic treatment remains to be done.
Tubersp. CHN-3
This taxon is represented by five sequences. Of those, three are extracted from the ascomata collected from the soil of Pinus armandii in Yunnan Province, China. Two are ECM-sequences, respectively from Estonia (UDB0752113, host unclear) and the root tips of Abies sachalinensis in Japan (LC556136). Our phylogenetic analyses position this species in Phylogroup Latisporum (Fig.2, S3), and is closely related to T. huiliense. They share less than 97.6% similarity in ITS sequence. We cannot obtain the ascomatal specimens, so we cannot describe it in this study.
Tuber sp. CHN-4
This taxon is supported by an independent phylogenetic clade composed of ECM-sequences only (Fig.2, S3). The known host plants are Betula costata, Pinus tabuliformis, Populus koreana and Quercus liaotungensis. The sequences in this clade share more than 98% ITS similarity among them, less than 95% to other Tuberspecies. These results support its position as a distinct species, but currently, no sporocarps are available for this species, so its taxonomic treatment is pending.
Tubersp. CHN-5
This species is supported by an ECM-sequence (LC013878) of Pinus tabuliformis in Shaanxi Province, North China (Fig.2, S3).Phylogenetic analyses support it as a distinct species and closely related to T. luyashanense and its allies. DNA analysis shows this taxon shares less than 96.4% similarity in ITS sequence with T. luyashanense and its allies. Currently, no sporocarps are available for this species.
Tuber sp. CHN-6
This species is supported by an ECM-sequence (LC200537) of Pinus bungeana in Shaanxi Province, North China (Fig.2, S3). Phylogenetic analyses support it as a distinct species and closely related to T.sp. CHN-4, T.sp. CHN-5. DNA analysis shows this taxon shares 94.3% similarity in ITS sequence with T.sp. CHN-5 and less than 93.4% similarity with T.sp. CHN-4. Currently, no sporocarps are available for study.
Tubersp. CHN-7
This species is supported by the sequences derived from speci-mens IFS. Wang 89377, 89556 and 89719, collected from north-eastern China. These specimens were originally determined as either T. borchii or T. rapaeodorum (Wang 1988). Our phylogenetic analyses reveal these specimens represent a well-supported species with an ITS sequence similarity of 95.1% to its closest relatives (Fig.2, S3; Fan et al. 2016b). However, we were not able to examine the specimens in this study.
Tubersp. CHN-8
This taxon is represented by three sequences. Of those, one was extracted from the ascocarp collected from the soil under Pinus armandii in Yunnan Province, China. Two were isolated from the ECM root tips of Quercus sp. in Shaanxi Province, China. Our phylogenetic analyses positions this species in the phylogroup Latisporum (Fig.2, S3). The sequences in this clade share more than 98% ITS similarity between them, less than 94.6% to other Tuberspecies. We could not obtain ascomatal material, so further study is pending.
Tubersp. CHN-9
This taxon is known only from one sequence (JX987751) from a soil sample in Guangdong Province, South China (Fig.2, S3). Phylogenetic analyses reveal it as a well-supported species with an ITS sequence similarity of 95.6% to its closest relative T. pseudosphaerosporum. Currently, no sporocarps are available for this species, so its taxonomic treatment awaits.
Phylogroup Melanosporum
Tubersp. CHN-10
This species is recognised by two ITS sequences, one from a personal collection in the Balkan Peninsula (FM205595), another from an ECM root tip in Yunnan Province, China (JQ639006). We were not able to examine the specimen bearing FM205595 in this study, but our molecular analyses clearly support it as distinct species and sister to T. variabilisporum (Fig.2, S6). It shares less than 95.8% similarity in the ITS region with its closest relative.
Phylogroup Puberulum
Tubersp. CHN-11
This species is represented by 19 ECM sequences, two from China (Hebei and Inner Mongolia) and 17 from Europe. The hosts include Betula platyphylla, Larix principis-rupprechtiii, Picea abies, Salix alba and Salix fragilis. No ascomata are available. Phylogenetic analyses (Fig.2, S7) show that it is closely related to Japanese Tubersp. 16 and Tubersp. 17 (Kinoshita et al. 2011). It shares less than 96.9% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tubersp. CHN-12
This species is represented by two ECM sequences, respectively from Pinus densiflora and Tilia amurensis in Heilongjiang Province, north-eastern China. No ascomata are available. Our analyses reveal it as sister to the North American T. californicum (Fig.2, S7). It shares less than 95.2% similarity in the ITS region with its closest relative.
Tubersp. CHN-13
This species is recognised from two ECM sequences from Larix chinensis in Shaanxi Province, North China (Fig.2, S7). No ascomata are available. It shares less than 97.6% similarity in the ITS region with its closest relative.
Tubersp. CHN-14
This species is represented by three Tibetan specimens identified as T. liui respectively by Song (2005) and Chen & Liu (2007). We were not able to examine the specimens in this study, but we think they represent an undescribed species according to our analyses (Fig.2, S7). It shares less than 95.9% similarity in the ITS region with its closest relative.
Tubersp. CHN-15
This species is recognised from four ITS sequences of ECM from a subtropical region of eastern China. Phylogenetic analyses reveal it as related to T. anniae and T. borchii (Fig.2, S7). No ascomata are available for this species. It shares less than 92.9% similarity in the ITS region with its closest relative.
Phylogroup Rufum
Tubersp. CHN-16
This species is represented by a specimen (BJTC FAN986) collected under Pinus tabuliformis from Shanxi Province, China and an ECM-sequence of Quercus liaotungensis in Loess Plateau, China. Our phylogenetic analyses support its description as a new species (Fig.2, S8). However, this specimen is not fully mature, thus more collections are needed before describing this species. This species shares less than 96.4% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Phylogroup Turmericum
Tubersp. CHN-17
Two ITS sequences, one from soil in a subtropical mountain forest (LN910510), another from an ECM root tip in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest (JQ991908), generated a distinct clade in our phylogenetic analyses (Fig.2, S9), supporting our hypothesis that these represent an undescribed species. However, no ascomata of this species were found in this study. It shares less than 88.8% similarity in the ITS region with other Tuberspecies.
Tubersp. CHN-18
The sequence (GQ240940) extracted from an ECM root tip of Pinus massoniana in Sichuan Province generated an isolated clade in the phylogroup Turmericum in our phylogenetic analyses (Fig.2, S9), indicating this clade as a well-supported species with an ITS sequence similarity of 88.7% to its closest relative. No ascomata of this species were found in this study.
Tubersp. CHN-19
The ECM-derived sequence (JQ991907) from Zhejiang Province, north-eastern China, generated an isolated clade in the phylogroup Turmericum (Fig.2, S9), supporting it as a potentially undescribed Tuberspecies with an ITS sequence similarity of 86.7% to its closest relative. No ascomata of this species were found in this study.
Tubersp. CHN-20
The sequence (KX444500) extracted from an ECM root tip of Quercus liaotungensis in Liaoning Province, north-eastern China generated an isolated clade in the phylogroup Turmericum (Fig.2, S9), supporting this clade as an undescribed Tuberspecies. This species clustered with T. flavidosporum from Japan with a moderate support, that indicates they are phylogenetically related to each other. No ascomata of this species were found for this study. Tubersp. CHN-20 shares less than 88.1% similarity in the ITS region with its closest relative.
Excluded and doubtful Tuberspecies in China
Many European and North American species were recorded on the list of Chinese Tuberspecies before molecular phylogenetic analysis was used for the taxonomic treatment of Tuberin China, including T. asa, T. borchii, T. borchii var. sphaero-sporum, T. brumale, T. californicum, T. dryophilum, T. excavatum, T. foetidum, T. melanosporum, T. nitidum, T. oligospermum, T. puberulum and T. rufum (Wang 1988, Zang et al. 1992, Xu 1999, Song 2005, Chen 2007, Cao 2010). More commonly, the Indian species T. indicum s.lat. and T. himalayense are usually listed (Fan et al. 2018). Moreover, some species originally described from China still lack DNA data, including T. gigantosporum, T. polyspermum and T. xizangense (Wang & Li 1991, Xu 1999, Fan et al. 2011b). It is doubtful whether the above species occur in China according to our present study. Here we present the results of investigations of these Tuberspecies in China as follows.
Tuber asa in China was originally reported from Liaoning Province (Wang 1988). A recent study showed those specimens bearing the name T. asa by Dr Y. Wang (1988) are more likely T. xuanhuaense (Fig.S7, Fan et al. 2016a).
Tuber borchii in China was originally recorded from Liaoning Province by Dr Y. Wang (Wang 1988), and later reported again by Song (2005) and Chen (2007). A previous study (Fan et al. 2016b) and this work showed that this European species does not occur in China, and the specimens bearing the name of T. borchii represent two different Chinese endemic species (Fig.2, S3). One is T. luyashanense, a new species described in this study. Another composed of four sequences (including a sequence identified as T. rapaeodorum) is a putatively novel species, which is temporarily identified as Tubersp. CHN-7, and remains undescribed until available specimens are examined or new ones collected.
Tuber borchii var. sphaerosporum (= Tuber sphaerospermum) in China was originally from Chen’s PhD thesis (Chen 2007), and later this specimen was treated as the holotype of the Chinese endemic species T. lijiangense (Fan et al. 2011a). Also, Tuber borchii var. sphaerosporum probably is a species native to Europe (Alvarado et al. 2012).
Tuber brumale in China was mentioned by Prof. M. Zang (1992) based on a black truffle specimen (HKAS 20520). We were not able to examine this specimen but Song (2005) concluded that it is a young T.indicum after re-examining this specimen.
Tuber californicum in China dated from Dr Y. Wang’s work (Wang 1988), in which he reported this North American species from Liaoning Province, and later this species was commonly mentioned by different authors (Tao 1988, Song 2005, Chen 2007, Cao 2010). A recent study revealed this species to be unconfirmed in China, and all available specimens bearing this North American species epithet are T. parvomurphium, a Chinese endemic species in the Latisporum phylogroup (Fan et al. 2016a).
Tuber dryophilum in China was reported originally by Dr Y. Wang (1988) from Liaoning Province. Song (2005) re-examined the specimens bearing this name for a European species in Y. Wang’s Herbarium (IFS). She concluded that these specimens are T. liaotongense based on morphological features, which is further well supported by the DNA data from these specimens by Wang et al. (2007) (also see Fig.S8 in this study). Thus, the occurrence of T. dryophylum in China is not confirmed.
Tuber excavatum in China was first reported from Sichuan Province by B. Wang (Wang 1995). Song (2005) re-examined the specimen cited by B. Wang and concluded that it is T. pseudoexcavatum, a widely distributed species in both Sichuan and Yunnan provinces. Chen (2007) reported this species from Sichuan Province again based on a specimen (HKAS 52006), and followed by Cao (2010). Our present molecular analysis revealed that the specimen does not match the European T. excavatum, but nests within the T. depressum clade, a species newly described from China (Wan et al. 2017b). Thus, the occurrence of T. excavatum is not confirmed in China.
Tuber foetidum in China was originally reported from Sichuan Province based on the specimen HMAS 60230 (Zhang 1990). We were not able to examine this specimen but Song (2005) concluded it is T. liaotongense after re-examining this material.
Tuber gigantosporum was described from southwestern China (Wang & Li 1991). According to the author, the type of this species is lost, and no DNA data are available. This species may be distinct and probably closely related to both T. glabrum and T. calosporum, but DNA data are needed for confirmation.
Tuber indicum s.lat. and T. himalayense. Tuber indicum was originally reported in China by Zang (Zang et al. 1992). He treated the Chinese black truffle as an Indian species rather than T. sinense (Tao et al. 1989), a species based on the Chinese black truffle from Sichuan Province. A recent study showed that both T. indicum s.lat. and T. himalayense were misapplied to Chinese taxa, and no DNA evidence supports the occurrence of the two Indian species in China (Fan et al. 2018). According to our present study, most Tuberspecies map to a narrow geographic area, and the two Indian species are therefore probably native only to India.
Tuber lyonii was reported in China by Song (2005) in her PhD thesis. However, the morphological and molecular examination for those specimens (HMAS 60239, HMAS 60241, HMAS 88575, HMAS 88577) cited by Song (2005) resulted in the description of both T. wenchuanense (Fan et al. 2013a) and T. crassitunicatum (Yan et al. 2018). Thus, the occurrence of the North American T. lyonii in China is not supported.
Tuber melanosporum in China was reported from Hunan Province (Li 1997) based on the specimen MHHNU4973. However, according to Song (2005), this specimen is T. indicum s.lat. rather than the European T. melanosporum. We were not able to study this specimen.
Tuber nitidum and T. rufum were originally described from Europe. Both species are reported from China, and T. nitidum was treated as a synonym of T. rufum (Song 2005, Chen 2007, Cao 2010). Tuber nitidum was reported from Sichuan Province based on the specimen HMAS60220 (Zhang 1990), but recently a new species T. wanglangense was described based on the same specimen (Yan et al. 2018). Tuber rufum was recorded from Gansu Province by Wang (1988), but a recent work showed that the two specimens (IFS Y.Wang 89245, IFS Y. Wang 89257) cited by Wang (1988) are con-specific with T. lishanense, a newly described species from northern China (Yan et al. 2018). Thus, currently no evidence supports the occurrence of either T. nitidum or T. rufum in China.
Tuber oligospermum in China was reported only from Tibet (Xu 1999). Song (2005) examined the specimen (HXZE851) cited by Xu (1999), and found the exoperidium of ascomata of this specimen is pseudoparenchymatous. She thus considered this specimen to not be T. oligospermum, but a species related to T.californicum. Tuber oligospermum is mainly distributed around the Mediterranean Sea (Moreno-Arroyo et al. 2000, Alvarado et al. 2012), and morphologically this Mediterranean species is highly similar to several Chinese species including T. lijiangense and T. shii.
Tuber polyspermum was described from China based on mor-phological evidence (Fan et al. 2011b). However, the molecular data of this species is confused, and we failed to re-extract any of the DNA from the type specimen in this study. Considering the fact that it is very similar to T. taiyuanense and its allies in morphology and occupies the same geographic region, we prefer to treat this species as a doubtful species.
Tuber puberulum in China was originally reported from Liaoning Province (Wang 1988), then from Sichuan Province (Zhang 1990) and Hubei Province (Song 2005). We could not study the specimen (IFS. Y. Wang 86748) cited by Wang (1988) from Liaoning. Zhang’s specimen from Sichuan could not be traced, but some specimens (HMAS60225, HMAS60226) from the same locality at the same time represent T.polymorphosporum as revealed in this study. The specimen HMAS60233 from Hubei cited by Song (2005) was described as T.hubeiense (Fan et al. 2016b). Moreover, our present study revealed that two sequences (DQ478638 and DQ478639) based on the collections from Gansu Province and marked as T. puberulum by Wang (Wang et al. 2007) are respectively identified as T. luyashanense and T. alboumbilicum in this study (Fig.S3). Thus, the occurrence of T. puberulum is not confirmed in China.
Tuber rapaeodorum in China was originally reported by Dr Y. Wang from the eastern area of Liaoning Province (Wang 1988). However, our present analysis showed that one of his specimens (IFS Y. Wang 89719, ITS=DQ478640) represents an undescribed species together with three samples misidentified as T. borchii in the Asian clade of Latisporum, and closely related to T. elevatireticulatum from Taiwan (Lin et al. 2018) and Tubersp. 10 from Japan (Kinoshita et al. 2011). Here it is temporarily identified as Tubersp. CHN-7, and remains undescribed until additional specimens are collected (Fig.S3).
Tuber xizangense was described from Tibet (Xu 1999). Song (2005) re-examined the type specimen and treated it as a doubtful species as she could not find ascospores in the specimen. No DNA data are available for this species, so we follow Song and treat this species as doubtful.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements We are very grateful to Dr Jinzhong Cao for his taxonomic and nomenclatural discussions and valuable suggestions to improve our work. Dr Ian R. Hall, Tuberexpert from New Zealand, is greatly appreciated for the excellent and professional revision of our manuscript and the proof reading in English. We are thankful to Mr Kai-Bing Huang, Bao-Dong He, Ms Xiao-Yu Sang, Yan-Wei Wang, Meng Chen, Li-Jie Guo, Shuang Feng and Peng-Rui Zhang for providing valuable collections, images and kind help for this study. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31750001, 31270058) and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 5172003).
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Material: https://studiesinmycology.org/
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Aestivum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset II (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Excavatum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset III (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Latisporum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset IV (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Macrosporum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset V (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Maculatum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset VI (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Melanosporum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset VII (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Puberulum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset VIII (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Rufum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset IX (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Turmericum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset X (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Taxa for multiple-gene analysis used in the presented study and GenBank accession numbers of their sequences. Sequences newly generated for this study are in bold.
Chinese Tubercollections used in the presented study and GenBank accession numbers of their ITS sequences. Sequences newly generated and new species are both in bold. (? misidentified collections in previous study).
Table S3International Tubercollections (except China) used in the presented study and GenBank accession numbers of their ITS sequences.
REFERENCES
- Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 255–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alvarado P, Moreno G, Manjon JL. 2012. Comparison between Tuber gennadii and T.oligospermum lineages reveals the existence of the new species T.cistophilum (Tuberaceae, Pezizales). Mycologia 104: 894–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonito G, Gryganskyi AP, Trappe JM, et al. 2010. A global meta-analysis of TuberITS rDNA sequences. Molecular Ecology 19: 4994–5008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonito G, Smith ME, Nowak M, et al. 2013. Historical biogeography and diversification of Truffles in the Tuberaceae and their newly identified southern hemisphere sister lineage. PLoS One 8: e52765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonito G, Trappe JM, Donovan S, et al. 2011. The Asian black truffle Tuberindicum can form ectomycorrhizas with North American host plants and complete its life cycle in non-native soils. Fungal Ecology 4: 83–93. [Google Scholar]
- Brock PM, Döring H, Bidartondo MI. 2009. How to know unknown fungi: the role of a herbarium. New Phytologist 181(3): 719–724. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bulman SR, Visnovsky SB, Hall IR, et al. 2010. Molecular and morphological identification of truffle-producing Tuberspecies in New Zealand. Mycological Progress 9: 205–214. [Google Scholar]
- Cao JZ. 2010. The genus Tuber in China. PhD thesis, Jinlin Agricultural University, Changchun. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Cao JZ, Chi WD, Fan L, et al. 2011. Notes on the neotype of Tubertaiyuanense. Mycotaxon 116: 7–11. [Google Scholar]
- Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(4): 540–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ceruti A. 1960.Elaphomycetales et Tuberales. In: Bresadola J Iconographia Mycologia 28 suppl. 2: 1–48. [Google Scholar]
- Ceruti A, Fontana A, Nosenzo C. 2003. Le specie Europe del Genere Tuber, Una revisione storica. Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Italy. [Google Scholar]
- Chen J. 2007. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Tuberin China (Pezizales, Ascomycetes, Ascomycotina). PhD thesis, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J, Guo SX, Liu PG. 2011. Species recognition and cryptic species in the Tuberindicum complex. PloS One 6: e14625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J, Liu PG. 2007. Tuberlatisporum sp. nov.and related taxa, based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycologia 99: 475–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen J, Liu PG, Wang Y. 2005. Tuberumbilicatum, a new species from China, with a key to the spinose-reticulate spored Tuberspecies. Mycotaxon 94: 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Colgan W, Trappe J. 1997. Nats truffle and truffle-like fungi 7: Tuberanniae sp. nov.(Ascomycota). Mycotaxon 64: 437–442. [Google Scholar]
- Courty PE, Buée M, Diedhiou AG, et al. 2010. The role of ectomycorrhizal communities in forest ecosystem processes: New perspectives and emerging concepts. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 42: 679–698. [Google Scholar]
- Deng XJ, Liu PG, Liu CY, et al. 2013. A new white truffle species, Tuberpanzhihuanense from China. Mycological Progress 12: 557–561. [Google Scholar]
- Deng XJ, Yu FQ, Liu PG. 2014. Contribution to confirmed & synthesized on mycorrhizae of Tuberindicum s.l. with two dominated & subalpine broadleaf trees in southwestern China. American Journal of Plant Sciences 5: 3269–3279. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L. 2021. Current taxonomic and geographic situation on Asian black truffles. Journal of Fungal Research 1: 6–11. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ. 2012. Two new species of white truffle from China. Mycotaxon 121: 297–305. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ, Hou CL. 2013a. Tubersubglobosum and T.wenchuanense – two new species with spino-reticulate ascospores. Mycotaxon 123: 95–101. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ, Li Y. 2012a. Tubermicrosphaerosporum and Paradoxa sinensis spp. nov. Mycotaxon 120: 471–475. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ, Li Y. 2012b. Tubersinosphaerosporum sp. nov.from China. Mycotaxon 122: 347–353. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ, Li Y. 2013b. A reassessment of excavated Tuberspecies from China based on morphology and ITS rDNA sequence data. Mycotaxon 124: 155–163. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ, Liu YY, et al. 2011a. Two new species of Tuberfrom China. Mycotaxon 116: 349–354. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ, Yu J. 2012c. Tuberin China: T.sinopuberulum and T.vesicoperidium spp. nov. Mycotaxon 121: 255–263. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Cao JZ, Zheng ZH, et al. 2012d. Tuberin China: T.microspermum and T.microspiculatum spp. nov. Mycotaxon 119: 391–395. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Feng S, Cao JZ. 2014. The phylogenetic position of Tuberglabrum sp. nov. and T.sinomonosporum nom. nov., two Paradoxa-like truffle species from China. Mycological Progress 13: 241–246. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Han L, Zhang PR, et al. 2016a. Molecular analysis of Chinese truffles resembling Tubercalifornicum in morphology reveals a rich pattern of species diversity with emphasis on four new species. Mycologia 108: 344–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Hou CL, Cao JZ. 2011b. Tubersinoalbidum and T.polyspermum – new species from China. Mycotaxon 118: 403–410. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Hou CL, Li Y. 2012e. Tubermicroverrucosum and T.huizeanum – two new species from China with reticulate Ascospores. Mycotaxon 122: 161–169. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Liu XH, Cao JZ. 2015. Tuberturmericum sp. nov., a Chinese truffle species based on morphological and molecular data. Mycological Progress 14: 111–116. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Yue SF. 2013. Phylogenetic divergence of three morphologically similar truffles: Tubersphaerosporum, T.sinosphaerosporum, and T.pseudosphaerosporum sp. nov. Mycotaxon 125: 283–288. [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Zhang JL, Li T, et al. 2018. Chinese black truffles: Tuberyigongense sp. nov., taxonomic reassessment of T.indicum s.l., and re-examination of the T.sinense isotype. Mycotaxon 133: 183–196. 11 citation on Dimensions. 10.5248/133.185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fan L, Zhang PR, Yan XY. 2016b. Phylogenetic analyses of Chinese Tuberspecies that resemble T.borchii reveal the existence of the new species T.hubeiense and T.wumengense. Mycologia 108: 354–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng S. 2014. Molecular systematics study of spino-reticulum species in Tuberin East China. Master thesis, Capital Normal University, Beijing. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Gardes M, Bruns TD. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilkey HM. 1939. Tuberales of North America. Oregon State Monographs. Studies in Botany 1: 1–63. [Google Scholar]
- Gilkey HM. 1954. Order Tuberales. North American Flora II 1: 1–36. [Google Scholar]
- Guevara G, Bonito G, Trappe JM, et al. 2013. New North American truffles (Tuberspp.) and their ectomycorrhizal associations. Mycologia 105: 194–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall IR, Brown GT, Zambonelli A. 2007. Taming the truffle. The history, lore, and science of the ultimate mushroom. Timber Press, Portland. [Google Scholar]
- Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
- Harkness HW. 1899. California hypogeous fungi. Proceedings of the Californian Academy of Sciences III 1: 241–292. [Google Scholar]
- He XY, Li HM, Wang Y. 2004. Tuberzhongdianense sp. nov.from China. Mycotaxon 90: 213–216. [Google Scholar]
- Healy RA, Zurier H, Bonito G, et al. 2016. Mycorrhizal detection of native and non-native truffles in a historic arboretum and the discovery of a new North American species, Tuberarnoldianum sp. nov. Mycorrhiza 26: 781–792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182–192. [Google Scholar]
- Hu HT.1992. Tuberformosanum sp. nov.and its mycorrhizal associations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Forestry, National Taiwan University; 6: 79–86. [Google Scholar]
- Hu HT, Wang Y. 2005. Tuberfurfuraceum sp. nov. from Taiwan. Mycotaxon 93: 155–157. [Google Scholar]
- Huang KB, Chen M, Fan L. 2017. Tubergriseolivaceum sp. nov., a new olive-gray truffle species from China based on morphological and DNA data. Phytotaxa 309: 166–172. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes KW, Petersen RH, Lickey EB. 2009. Using heterozygosity to estimate a percentage DNA sequence similarity for environmental species’ delimitation across basidiomycete fungi. New Phytologist 182: 795–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeandroz S, Murat C, Wang Y, et al. 2008. Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Tuber, the “true truffles”. Journal of Biogeography 35: 815–829. [Google Scholar]
- Katoh K, Frith MC. 2012. Adding unaligned sequences into an existing alignment using MAFFT and LAST. Bioinformatics 28: 3144–3146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinoshita A, Nara K, Sasaki H, et al. 2018. Using mating-type loci to improve taxonomy of the Tuberindicum complex, and discovery of a new species, T.longispinosu. PLoS One 13: e0193745.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kinoshita A, Sasaki H, Nara K. 2011. Phylogeny and diversity of Japanese truffles (Tuberspp.) inferred from sequences of four nuclear loci. Mycologia 103: 779–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li JZ. 1997. The newly recorded species of the macrofungi resources from Hunan (3). Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Normalis Hunanensis 20: 77. [Google Scholar]
- Li SH, Zheng LY, Liu CY, et al. 2014. Two new truffles species, Tuberalboumbilicum and Tuberpseudobrumale from China. Mycological Progress 13: 1157–1163. [Google Scholar]
- Lin CL, Tsai MJ, Fu CH, et al. 2018. Tuberelevatireticulatum sp. nov., a new species of whitish truffle from Taiwan. Botanical Studies 59: 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu B. 1985. New species and new records of hypogeous fungi from China (I). Acta Mycologica Sinica 4: 84–89. [Google Scholar]
- Maser C, Claridge AW, Trappe JM. 2008. Trees, truffles, and beasts: how forest function. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick. [Google Scholar]
- Moreno-Arroyo B, Infante F, Pulido E, et al. 2000. The biogeography and taxonomy of Tuberoligospermum (Tul. & C. Tul.) Trappe (Ascomycota). Cryptogamie Mycologie 21: 147–152. [Google Scholar]
- Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, et al. 2005. Approaching the taxonomic affiliation of unidentified sequences in public databases – an example from the mycorrhizal fungi. BMC Bioinformatics 6: 178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nylander J. 2004. MrModeltest 2.2. Computer software distributed by the University of Uppsala. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Sweden. [Google Scholar]
- Page RD. 2001. TreeView. Glasgow University, Glasgow. [Google Scholar]
- Peay KG. 2008. Role of habitat size, isolation and environment in assemblage dynamics and host relations of ectomycorrhizal fungi. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
- Pegler DN, Spooner BM, Young TWK. 1993. British truffles: A revision of British hypogeous fungi. Royal Botanic Gardens, England. [Google Scholar]
- Qiao P, Liu PG, Hu HT, et al. 2013. Typification of Tuberformosanum (Tuberaceae, Pezizales, Ascomycota) from Taiwan, China. Mycotaxon 123: 293–299. [Google Scholar]
- Qing Y, Li SH, Liu CY, et al. 2015. Tuberxanthomonosporum, a new Paradoxa-like species from China. Mycotaxon 130: 61–68. [Google Scholar]
- Rambaut A. 2000. Estimating the rate of molecular evolution: incorporating non-contemporaneous sequences into maximum likelihood phylogenies. Bioinformatics 16: 395–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riousset L, Riousset G, Chevalier G, et al. 2001. Truffes d’Europe et de Chine. Institut National de la Recherche Agroncmique INRA, Paris. [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 7537–7541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith ME, Douhan GW, Rizzo DM. 2007. Ectomycorrhizal community structure in a xeric Quercus woodland based on rDNA sequence analysis of sporocarps and pooled roots. New Phytologist 174: 847–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song MS. 2005. Taxonomic and molecular systematic studies on Tuberin China. PhD thesis, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-vI-HPC: maximum-likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H. 2005. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21: 456–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su KM, Xiong WP, Wang Y, et al. 2013. Tuberbomiense, a new truffle species from Tibet, China. Mycotaxon 126: 127–132. [Google Scholar]
- Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Lumyong S. 2015. A new whitish truffle, Tuberthailandicum from northern Thailand and its ectomycorrhizal association. Mycological Progress 14: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Suwannarach N, Kumla J, Meerak J, et al. 2017. Tubermagnatum in Thailand, a first report from Asia. Mycotaxon 132: 635–642. [Google Scholar]
- Tao K.1988.Taxonomic study on hypogeous fungi of China. Master thesis, The University of Shanxi, Taiyuan. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Tao K, Liu B. 1990. Ecology and nutritive value of Tubersinense. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition) 13: 319–321. [Google Scholar]
- Tao K, Liu B, Zhang D. 1989. A new species of the genus Tuberfrom China. Journal of Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition) 12: 215–218. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Trappe JM, Molina R, Luoma DL, et al. 2009. Diversity, ecology, and conservation of truffle fungi in forests of the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon. [Google Scholar]
- Tulasne LR, Tulasne C. 1851. Fungi hypogaei. Friedrich Kfincksieck, Paris. [Google Scholar]
- Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. 2011. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27: 171–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vittadini C. 1831. Monographia Tuberacearum. Milan. [Google Scholar]
- Wan SP, Tang L, Zheng Y, et al. 2017a. Two novel Tuberspecies (Tuberaceae, Pezizales) in the Latisporum group from China. Mycoscience 58: 312–319. [Google Scholar]
- Wan SP, Wang XH, Zheng Y, et al. 2016. Tubershidianense and T.calosporum, two new truffle species from southwest China. Mycoscience 57: 393–399. [Google Scholar]
- Wan SP, Xu WJ, Tan NW, et al. 2017b. Three excavatum species Tuberbadium, T.depressum and T.verrucosivolvum from Sichuan Province, China. Phytotaxa 296: 228–238. [Google Scholar]
- Wang B. 1995. The Tuberresources in Sichuan Province. Edible Fungi 6: 4. [Google Scholar]
- Wang XH, Benucci GMN, Xie XD, et al. 2013. Morphological, mycorrhizal and molecular characterization of Finnish truffles belonging to the Tuberanniae species-complex. Fungal Ecology 6: 269–280. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y. 1988. First report of study on Tuberspecies from China. Atti del II Congresso Internazionale sul Tartufo, Spoleto. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, He XY. 2002. Tuberhuidongense sp. nov.from China. Mycotaxon 83: 191–194. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Li ZP. 1991. A new species of Tuberfrom China. Acta Mycologica Sinica 10: 263–265. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Moreno G, Riousset LJ, et al. 1998. Tuberpseudoexcavatum sp. nov., a new species from China commercialised in Spain, France and Italy with additional comments on Chinese truffles. Cryptogamie Mycologie 19: 113–120. [Google Scholar]
- Wang YJ, Tan ZM, Murat C, et al. 2007. Molecular taxonomy of Chinese truffles belonging to the Tuberrufum and Tuberpuberulum groups. Fungal Diversity 24: 301–328. [Google Scholar]
- Wang YJ, Tan ZM, Zhang DC, et al. 2006a.Phylogenetic and populational study of the Tuberindicum complex. Mycological Research 110: 1034–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YJ, Tan ZM, Zhang DC,et al. 2006b.Phylogenetic relationships between Tuberpseudoexcavatum, a Chinese truffle, and other Tuberspecies based on parsimony and distance analysis of four different gene sequences. FEMS Microbiology Letters 259: 269–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YW, Li XD, Fan L. 2016. Tubershii sp. nov.a sister species of T.jinshajiangense from China in Puberulum group. Phytotaxa 269: 279–286. [Google Scholar]
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, et al. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, et al. (eds), PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications: 315–322. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Xu AS.1999. A taxonomic study of the genus Tuberin Xizang. Mycosystema 18: 361–365. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Xu WJ, Wan SP, Huang LL, et al. 2017. Tubersinoniveum, a new white Chinese truffle species from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 298: 253–260. [Google Scholar]
- Yan XY, Cao JZ, Fan L. 2018. Four new Tuberspecies added to the Rufum group from China based on morphological and molecular evidence. Mycologia 110: 771–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zang M, Pu CX, Wu JM, et al. 1992. A confirmatory Tuberindica distributed in China. Edible Fungi of China 11: 19. [In Chinese.] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang BC. 1990. Systematics of hypogeous Pezizales and taxonomy of the Chinese genera and species. PhD thesis, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang JP, Liu PG, Chen J. 2012. Tubersinoaestivum sp. nov., an edible truffle from southwestern China. Mycotaxon 122: 73–82. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Aestivum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset II (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Excavatum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset III (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Latisporum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset IV (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Macrosporum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset V (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Maculatum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset VI (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Melanosporum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset VII (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Puberulum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset VIII (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Rufum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset IX (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Phylogeny of Chinese Tuberspecies of Turmericum phylogroup inferred from the Dataset X (ITS) using the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Bootstrap values over 70% are shown above the individual branches. Thick black branches received Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥0.99. New species and new sequences are printed in bold.
Taxa for multiple-gene analysis used in the presented study and GenBank accession numbers of their sequences. Sequences newly generated for this study are in bold.
Chinese Tubercollections used in the presented study and GenBank accession numbers of their ITS sequences. Sequences newly generated and new species are both in bold. (? misidentified collections in previous study).
Table S3International Tubercollections (except China) used in the presented study and GenBank accession numbers of their ITS sequences.

