Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2023 Nov 29;13(1):e00855-23. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00855-23

Complete genome sequence of Brachybacterium sp. GU-2 (Actinomycetota), isolated from the massive coral Porites lobata

Gaurav G Shimpi 1, Pablo De la Vega 1, Bastian Bentlage 1,✉
Editor: J Cameron Thrash2
PMCID: PMC10793313  PMID: 38014935

ABSTRACT

Brachybacterium sp. GU-2 was isolated from the hard coral Porites lobata found in Apra Harbor, Guam, Micronesia. This genome sequence will be beneficial to understand the role of actinomycetes in coral holobionts. The Brachybacterium genome contains several gene clusters for bioactive compounds, including antibiotics.

KEYWORDS: coral microbiome, actinomycetes

ANNOUNCEMENT

Marine Actinomycetota garnered attention to meet growing pharmaceutical demands for antimicrobial and other bioactive compounds of commercial value (1, 2). The genus Brachybacterium (Micrococcales: Dermabacteraceae) comprises ~28 species spanning various ecological niches and have been found associated with scleractinian corals, exhibiting antimicrobial properties (3, 4). Moreover, the species B. conglomeratum was part of a beneficial microorganisms of corals consortium used to mitigate heat stress and prevent coral bleaching and mortality (5). Despite the association with corals and putative beneficial roles in coral health, genome sequences and isolates of coral-associated Brachybacterium spp. are lacking. We provide a genome sequence from the genus Brachybacterium isolated from a coral.

Brachybacterium sp. GU-2 was isolated from Porites lobata from Finger Reef located in Apra Harbor, Guam (13°44′76″N 144°62′88″E). A ~5-cm coral fragment was sampled into sterile seawater. A portion of the fragment was rinsed and crushed in sterile seawater using mortar and pestle to obtain ~25 mL of homogenized slurry composed of coral tissue and skeleton. Next, 10-fold and 100-fold tissue homogenate dilutions were plated onto marine agar (Marine Broth 2216 plus 1.5% agar; Millipore Sigma, USA) and incubated at 23°C for 4 days. A tiny round, convex yellowish-white colony was picked and inoculated in 5 mL of marine broth and incubated for 48 h at 23°C. Three rounds of sub-culturing were performed, and a single colony was selected for the inoculation of 5 mL marine broth that was allowed to grow for 48 h before DNA extraction.

High-molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using the Monarch HMW DNA Extraction Kit T3060 (NEB, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared with non-size-selected DNA using a Native Barcoding Kit (SQK-NBD114.96) and a MinION Sequencer (ONT, UK). Bases were called using Guppy v6.3.7 in MinKNOW software (Mk1B 23.04.6; ONT, UK) which also trimmed barcodes. Flye v2.9.2 was used for genome assembly and genome polishing (6). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. A total of 298,488 reads were assembled into a circular chromosome of ~3.68 Mb (Table 1). While the standard practice for ONT-based bacterial genome assemblies has been incorporation of Illumina data for error correction, the flow cell and sequencing chemistry (version R10.4.1) employed by us has been suggested to provide error rates of reads < 1% to allow for high-quality assemblies (7, 8). The final assembly was checked for completeness (98.83%) and contamination (0.58%) using CheckM v1.2.2 (9) with the lineage-specific (Actinomycetales) option that used 580 genomes and 286 markers. The Brachybacterium genome had a very high GC content (72%), a characteristic of the majority of Actinomycetota (10).

TABLE 1.

Brachybacterium sp. GU-2 genome assembly statistics

NCBI Accession No. Genome size (bp) Coverage (×) ONT Read No. Read N50 (bp) GC content (%) No. of a Genome Completeness b (%)
CDSs 23S 16S 5S
CP133037 3,684,078 696× 298,488 31,270 72 3,312 3 3 3 98.83
a

The number of coding sequences (CDSs) and rRNAs was predicted using RAST (11).

b

Genome completeness was assessed using a set of 580 Actinomycetales genomes and 286 markers by CheckM.

The genome was annotated using NCBI’s Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (12). A total of 9 rRNAs and 51 tRNAs were identified with three 16S rRNA gene copies. All three 16S rRNA gene copies were combined with publicly available sequencing data and aligned using ClstalW (13) prior to maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis using raxmlGUI 2.0 (14, 15) under the TIM3+I + G model identified by ModelTest-NG (16); Brachybacterium sp. GU-2 forms a well-supported monophyletic clade with Brachybacterium conglomeratum, Brachybacterium paraconglomeratum, and Brachybacterium saurashtrense (Fig. 1). The genome sequence provided here represents a resource for understanding the role of Actinomycetota in coral health and has the potential to aid natural product discovery given the presence of several biosynthetic clusters, including, but not limited to, carotenoid and ectoine synthesis, siderophores, and 17 polyketides as well as putative antimicrobial compounds identified by antiSMASH v7.0.1 (17).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Brachybacterium spp. 16S rRNA gene ML phylogeny inferred under the TIM3+I+G model. Bootstrap supports shown on nodes were calculated using 1,000 nonparametric replicates. Scale bar denotes substitutions per site.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Héloïse Rouzé who helped with the collection of the coral sample Brachybacterium sp. that GU-2 was isolated from.

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through award OIA-1946352.

Contributor Information

Bastian Bentlage, Email: bentlageb@triton.uog.edu.

J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA .

DATA AVAILABILITY

ONT reads were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRR25645445. Genome assembly (CP133037) available through NCBI BioProject number PRJNA1005016.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Siro G, Pipite A, Christi K, Srinivasan S, Subramani R. 2022. Marine actinomycetes associated with stony corals: a potential hotspot for specialized metabolites. Microorganisms 10:1349. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. De Simeis D, Serra S. 2021. Actinomycetes: a never-ending source of bioactive compounds-an overview on antibiotics production. Antibiotics 10:483. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mahmoud HM, Kalendar AA. 2016. Coral-associated actinobacteria: diversity, abundance, and biotechnological potentials. Front Microbiol 7:204. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Manivasagan P, Venkatesan J, Sivakumar K, Kim S-K. 2014. Pharmaceutically active secondary metabolites of marine actinobacteria. Microbiol Res 169:262–278. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Santoro EP, Borges RM, Espinoza JL, Freire M, Messias C, Villela HDM, Pereira LM, Vilela CLS, Rosado JG, Cardoso PM, Rosado PM, Assis JM, Duarte GAS, Perna G, Rosado AS, Macrae A, Dupont CL, Nelson KE, Sweet MJ, Voolstra CR, Peixoto RS. 2021. Coral microbiome manipulation elicits metabolic and genetic restructuring to mitigate heat stress and evade mortality. Sci Adv 7:eabg3088. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg3088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. De la Vega P, Shimpi GG, Bentlage B. 2023. Genome sequence of the endosymbiont Endozoicomonas sp. strain GU-1 (Gammaproteobacteria), isolated from the staghorn coral acropora pulchra (cnidaria: scleractinia). Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0135522. doi: 10.1128/mra.01355-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Khrenova MG, Panova TV, Rodin VA, Kryakvin MA, Lukyanov DA, Osterman IA, Zvereva MI. 2022. Nanopore sequencing for de novo bacterial genome assembly and search for single-nucleotide polymorphism. Int J Mol Sci 23:8569. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. Checkm: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Ventura M, Canchaya C, Tauch A, Chandra G, Fitzgerald GF, Chater KF, van Sinderen D. 2007. Genomics of actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 71:495–548. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00005-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Edler D, Klein J, Antonelli A, Silvestro D, Matschiner M. 2021. raxmlGUI 2.0: a graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods Ecol Evol 12:373–377. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13512 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. 2019. Raxml-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35:4453–4455. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B, Flouri T. 2020. Modeltest-NG: a new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 37:291–294. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Biermann F, Alanjary M, Fetter A, Terlouw BR, Metcalf WW, Helfrich EJN, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, Weber T. 2023. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W46–W50. doi: 10.1038/s41573-023-00774-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

ONT reads were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRR25645445. Genome assembly (CP133037) available through NCBI BioProject number PRJNA1005016.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES