Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2023 Dec 8;13(1):e01010-23. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01010-23

Complete genome sequences and characteristics of mycobacteriophages Diminimus, Dulcita, Glaske16, and Koreni

Faith W Baliraine 1, Kaitlyn E Mathews 1, Emma G Livingston 1, Clarissa A Martinez 1, Olivia L Donnelly 1, Taryn M Pledger 1, Tadeen Feroz 1, Zoe J Harbison 1, Sarah G Schlimme 2,2, Camila Andrade 1, Keren N Salazar 1, Elise C Berryhill 1, Madelyn M DeLosSantos 1, Hannah L Foree 1, Wanjiru Gicheru 1, Adrienne M Jett 1, Sofia N Mendez 1, Toluwalope M Odebiyi 1, Jacob I Pitman 1, Michael J Tan 1, Josh D McLoud 1, Frederick N Baliraine 1,
Editor: John J Dennehy3
PMCID: PMC10793344  PMID: 38063427

ABSTRACT

Complete genome sequences of four novel mycobacteriophages, Diminimus, Dulcita, Glaske16, and Koreni, isolated from soil are presented. All these bacteriophages belong to subcluster M1, except Koreni that belongs to subcluster A4. Moreover, all have siphovirus morphologies, with genome sizes ranging from 51,055 to 81,156 bp.

KEYWORDS: mycobacteriophages, bacteriophages, Diminimus, Dulcita, Glaske16, Koreni

ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacteriophages are obligate intracellular parasitic viruses of bacteria (1, 2). These viruses play crucial roles in the global ecosystem and impact not only bacterial physiology, diversity, abundance, and virulence but also human, animal, and plant health (3, 4). On the practical side, bacteriophages have multiple applications, including disease diagnosis, phage therapy, food safety, disinfection, correcting dysbiosis, pest control, biosensing, and bioremediation (4 9). Here, we report on four novel lysogenic bacteriophages.

All bacteriophages were isolated from soil samples collected around LeTourneau University in Longview, Texas, in August 2022 (Table 1), using standard protocols (10). Briefly, soil samples were mixed with Middlebrook 7H9 broth prior to spinning (2,000 × g at 4°C) and supernatant filtration (0.22 µm pore size). Filtrates were inoculated with Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 cells and incubated at 37°C for 4 days with shaking at 210 rpm, then filtered again. The samples were then plated with M. smegmatis in 7H9 top agar and purified through three 48-h rounds of plating at 37°C. Plaque morphologies were clear (Table 1). Negative-stain transmission electron microscopy showed the four bacteriophages to have a siphovirus morphotype with isometric capsids (diameter, ~60.75 to 68.21 nm) and flexible tails (length, ~131.60 to 333.00 nm; Table 1), measured using ImageJ (11 13).

TABLE 1.

Properties of four mycobacteriophages isolated from soil samples collected on August 23, 2022 in Longview, Texas, USA

Data for mycobacterium phage a
Characteristic Diminimus Dulcita Glaske16 Koreni
Soil sampling location GPS coordinates 32.46474 N , 94.7272 W 32.464444 N , 94.7275 W 32.465 N , 94.727778 W 32.463333 N , 94.726389 W
Lysate titer (PFU/mL) 1.8 × 1,010 2.0 × 1,010 4.9 × 109 1.4 × 1,010
Plaque morphology after 48 h at 37°C Clear with defined edges Clear with defined edges Clear with defined edges Clear with defined edges
Avg plaque diameter (mm [n-value]) 0.8 (15) 1.0 (10) 1.7 (3) 1.0 (13)
Approx. shotgun coverage (X) 338 479 360 1,490
Genome size (bp) 80,037 80,038 81,156 51,055
GC content (%) 61.6 61.6 61.6 63.9
Overhang sequence ACCTCCTGCAA ACCTCCTGCAA ACCTCCTGCAA CGGCCGGTAA
Overhang length (bases) 11 11 11 10
Cluster M M M A
Subcluster M1 M1 M1 A4
GenBank accession no. OR521083 OR553916 OR553909 OR553901
SRA accession no. SRX19690831 SRX19690832 SRX19690837 SRX19690842
Total no. of reads 185,644 258,101 201,637 528,548
No. of predicted genes 137 137 140 90
No. of predicted tRNAs 19 19 18 0
tRNA type(s) Arg, Asn, Asp, Cys, Gln, Glu, Gly, His, Leu, Lys, Met, Phe, Pro, Ser, Thr, Trp, Tyr, Val Arg, Asn, Asp, Cys, Gln, Glu, Gly, His, Leu, Lys, Met, Phe, Pro, Ser, Thr, Trp, Tyr, Val Trp, Asn, Gln, Tyr, Pro, Ser, Phe, Met, Arg, His, Leu, Lys, Gly, Val, Thr, Asp, Glu
No. of genes with predicted functions 51 52 54 48
% of genes with predicted functions 37.2 38 38.6 53.3
Key predicted lysogenic life cycle genes Serine integrase Serine integrase Serine integrase Serine integrase, immunity repressor
No. of orphams 0 0 1 0
Avg capsid size (nm [n-value]) 61.53 (10) 60.75 (10) 68.21 (3) 61.56 (10)
Avg tail length (nm [n-value]) 323.51 (10) 333.00 (11) 328.30 (3) 131.60 (10)
Isolated by Faith W Baliraine, Taryn M Pledger, Camila Andrade, Chloe I Wade Krista L Anderson,Olivia L Donnelly,Hannah L Foree, Kaitlyn E Mathews Sofia N Mendez, Tadeen Feroz, Amya R Orn, Jerron Hudson Krista L Anderson,Olivia L Donnelly,Hannah L Foree, Kaitlyn E Mathews
a

All bacteriophages were isolated using the enriched isolation method [reference (10)] and purified through three sequential (37°C, 48 h) rounds of plating with Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155 cells in Middlebrook 7H9 top agar. Genome sequencing was accomplished using the Illumina Shotgun sequencing method with 150-base single-end reads using the NEB Ultra II Library sequencing kit (v3 reagents). All had 3′ single-stranded overhang genome ends. Genomic termini were identified through buildups of read start positions and variations in genome-wide coverage and manually verified using Consed version 29 [references (14) and (15) ]. All bacteriophages had a siphovirus morphotype and were predicted to be lysogenic based on the presence of predicted lysogeny-related genes.

Genomic DNA was extracted from lysates of titers ranging from 4.9 × 109 to 2 × 1010 PFU/mL (Table 1) using the Promega Wizard DNA cleanup kit. The NEB Ultra II Library kit was used to prepare the samples for sequencing using Illumina MiSeq (v3 reagents; 150-base single-end reads). Untrimmed reads assembly and verification was performed using Newbler v2.9 (16) and Consed v29 (14, 15). Genome sizes ranged from 51,055 bp (phage Glaske16) to 81,156 bp (phage Koreni) (Table 1). All had 3′ single-stranded overhangs (10–11 bp long) and an average GC content of 62.2% (range: 61.6%–63.9%). This was slightly lower than that of our previous isolates from the same general location and of the isolation host M. smegmatis mc2155 (67.4% GC) (17, 18). Using the gene content similarity (GCS) tool in PhagesDB (19, 20), mycobacteriophages Diminimus, Dulcita, and Glaske16 were assigned to subcluster M1, while Koreni was assigned to subcluster A4 (Table 1) based on ≥35% GCS to other phages in the database.

The genomes were annotated using DNAMaster v5.23.6 (21), Starterator (22), Phamerator (23), BLASTp in NCBI GenBank and PhagesDB (24, 25), GenMark v2.5p (26), HHpred PDB_mmCIF70_17_Apr, Pfam-A_v35, UniProt-SwissProt-viral70_3_Nov_2021 and NCBI_Conserved_Domains_v3.19 databases (27, 28), Glimmer v3.02 (29), DeepTMHMM v. 1.0.24 (30), tRNAscan-SE v2.0 (31, 32), and ARAGORN v1.2.41 (33). Default program settings were utilized in all cases (34). On average, 126 putative protein-coding genes (range: 90–140) and 14 tRNAs (range: 0–19) were predicted (Table 1). Functions were predictable only for 37%–53% of the putative genes across the bacteriophages (Table 1). All bacteriophages had at least one lysogenic lifecycle-associated gene. Diminimus, Dulcita, and Glaske16 encoded serine integrase, while Koreni encoded both serine integrase and an immunity repressor. None had an identifiable gene encoding the excise (Table 1).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Graham Hatfull for his visionary leadership of the Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program, Debbie Jacobs-Sera and Viknesh Sivanathan for their expertise and support, and Daniel Russell of the University of Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute for sequencing and assembling the phage genomes. We appreciate Jordan Angeles, Brianna Mack, and Angela Salazar for preparing the laboratory materials used. We thank Krista Anderson, Jerron Hudson, Amya Orn, and Chloe Wade for helping with isolating some of the bacteriophages. We also thank Jeff Kamykowski of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Digital Microscopy Laboratory for capturing the transmission electron micrographs for these phages. Profuse thanks to the Howard Hughes Medical Institute for their support of the SEA-PHAGES program and to LeTourneau University School of Arts and Sciences for supporting and facilitating this undergraduate bacteriophage research.

Contributor Information

Frederick N. Baliraine, Email: FredBaliraine@letu.edu.

John J. Dennehy, Department of Biology, Queens College, Queens, New York, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

Raw reads of all four reported mycobacteriophages are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database, and their complete genome sequences are available in GenBank database. Their SRA and GenBank accession numbers, together with their respective Uniform Resource Locators, are provided in Table 1. Plaque and TEM images are available in the Actinobacteriophage database and can be accessed by typing the phage name in the database search box. High titer lysates of the phages are archived at the University of Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Jacobs-Sera D, Marinelli LJ, Bowman C, Broussard GW, Guerrero Bustamante C, Boyle MM, Petrova ZO, Dedrick RM, Pope WH, Modlin RL, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF, Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program . 2012. On the nature of mycobacteriophage diversity and host preference. Virology 434:187–201. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.09.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Boeckaerts D, Stock M, Criel B, Gerstmans H, De Baets B, Briers Y. 2021. Predicting bacteriophage hosts based on sequences of annotated receptor-binding proteins. Sci Rep 11:1467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81063-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Naureen Z, Dautaj A, Anpilogov K, Camilleri G, Dhuli K, Tanzi B, Maltese PE, Cristofoli F, De Antoni L, Beccari T, Dundar M, Bertelli M. 2020. Bacteriophages presence in nature and their role in the natural selection of bacterial populations. Acta Biomed 91:e2020024. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i13-S.10819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. García-Cruz JC, Huelgas-Méndez D, Jiménez-Zúñiga JS, Rebollar-Juárez X, Hernández-Garnica M, Fernández-Presas AM, Husain FM, Alenazy R, Alqasmi M, Albalawi T, Alam P, García-Contreras R. 2023. Myriad applications of bacteriophages beyond phage therapy. PeerJ 11:e15272. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jones HJ, Shield CG, Swift BMC. 2020. The application of bacteriophage diagnostics for bacterial pathogens in the agricultural supply chain: from farm-to-fork. Phage 1:176–188. doi: 10.1089/phage.2020.0042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dedrick RM, Freeman KG, Nguyen JA, Bahadirli-Talbott A, Cardin ME, Cristinziano M, Smith BE, Jeong S, Ignatius EH, Lin CT, Cohen KA, Hatfull GF. 2022. Phage therapy of mycobacterium 113 infections: compassionate-use of phages in twenty patients with drug-resistant 114 mycobacterial disease. Clin Infect Dis 76. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hatfull GF, Dedrick RM, Schooley RT. 2022. Phage therapy for antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Annu Rev Med 73:197–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-080219-122208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dedrick RM, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Garlena RA, Russell DA, Ford K, Harris K, Gilmour KC, Soothill J, Jacobs-Sera D, Schooley RT, Hatfull GF, Spencer H. 2019. Engineered bacteriophages for treatment of a patient with a disseminated drug-resistant Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Med 25:730–733. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Elois MA, Silva R da, Pilati GVT, Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Fongaro G. 2023. Bacteriophages as biotechnological tools. Viruses 15:349. doi: 10.3390/v15020349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Graham H. 2018. Phage discovery guide. Howard Hughes Med Institute, Chevy Chase, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH image to imagej: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rueden CT, Schindelin J, Hiner MC, DeZonia BE, Walter AE, Arena ET, Eliceiri KW. 2017. Imagej2: imagej for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform 18:529. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gordon D, Green P. 2013. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 29:2936–2937. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage egnomes. Methods Mol Biol 1681:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen Y-J, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, et al. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380. doi: 10.1038/nature03959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Weiss SM, Happy KK, Baliraine FW, Beach AK, Brobston SM, Martinez CP, Menard KJ, Orton SM, Salazar AL, Frederick GD, Baliraine FN, Stedman KM. 2023. Complete genome sequences and characteristics of seven novel mycobacteriophages isolated in East Texas. Microbiol Resour Announc 12. doi: 10.1128/mra.00335-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mohan A, Padiadpu J, Baloni P, Chandra N. 2015. Complete genome sequences of a Mycobacterium smegmatis laboratory strain (MC2 155) and isoniazid-resistant (4XR1/R2) mutant strains. Genome Announc 3:e01520-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01520-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pope WH, Mavrich TN, Garlena RA, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Jacobs-Sera D, Montgomery MT, Russell DA, Warner MH, Hatfull GF. 2017. Bacteriophages of gordonia spp. mBio 8. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01069-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Retchless AC, Lawrence JG. 2007. Temporal fragmentation of speciation in bacteria. Science 317:1093–1096. doi: 10.1126/science.1144876 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Shaffer C. 2016. Starterator. Available from: http://phages.wustl.edu/starterator
  • 23. Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ismail HD. 2022. Bioinform:a practical guide to NCBI databases and sequence alignments. CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Borodovsky M, McIninch J. 1993. Recognition of genes in DNA sequence with ambiguities. Biosystems 30:161–171. doi: 10.1016/0303-2647(93)90068-n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam S-Z, Rau D, Kübler J, Lozajic M, Gabler F, Söding J, Lupas AN, Alva V. 2018. A completely reimplemented MPI bioinformatics toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J Mol Biol 430:2237–2243. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Gabler F, Nam S-Z, Till S, Mirdita M, Steinegger M, Söding J, Lupas AN, Alva V. 2020. Protein sequence analysis using the MPI bioinformatics toolkit. Curr Protoc Bioinform 72:e108. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Hallgren J, Tsirigos KD, Pedersen MD, Almagro Armenteros JJ, Marcatili P, Nielsen H, Krogh A, Winther O. 2022. DeepTMHMM predicts alpha and beta transmembrane proteins using deep neural networks. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.04.08.487609 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lowe TM, Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE on-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W54–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Chan PP, Lin BY, Mak AJ, Lowe TM. 2021. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 49:9077–9096. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell D, Cresawn S, Hatfull G. 2017. SEA-PHAGES Bioinformatics Guide. Univ Pittsburgh, Sci Educ Alliance-Phage Hunters Adv Genomics Evol Sci. Available from: https://seaphagesbioinformatics.helpdocsonline.com/home. Retrieved 20 May 2022.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Raw reads of all four reported mycobacteriophages are available in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database, and their complete genome sequences are available in GenBank database. Their SRA and GenBank accession numbers, together with their respective Uniform Resource Locators, are provided in Table 1. Plaque and TEM images are available in the Actinobacteriophage database and can be accessed by typing the phage name in the database search box. High titer lysates of the phages are archived at the University of Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES