Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0290938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290938

Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans oral isolates reveals high genetic relatedness of mother-child dyads in early life

Naemah Alkhars 1,2, Nisreen Al Jallad 3, Tong Tong Wu 4, Jin Xiao 3,*
Editor: Geelsu Hwang5
PMCID: PMC10793898  PMID: 38232064

Abstract

Candida albicans is a pathogenic fungus recently recognized for its role in severe early childhood caries development (S-ECC). C. albicans oral colonization begins at birth, but the extent of the mother’s involvement in yeast transmission to their children is unclear, therefore, this study used a prospective mother-infant cohort to investigate the maternal contribution of C. albicans oral colonization in early life. Oral samples were collected from 160 mother-child dyads during pregnancy and from birth to two years of life. We used whole-genome sequencing to obtain the genetic information of C. albicans isolates and examined the genetic relatedness of C. albicans between mothers and their children using Multilocus Sequence Typing. Multivariate statistical methods were used to identify factors associated with C. albicans’ acquisition (horizontal and vertical transmissions). Overall, 227 C. albicans oral isolates were obtained from 93 (58.1%) of mother-child pairs. eBURST analysis revealed 16 clonal complexes, and UPGMA analysis identified 6 clades, with clade 1 being the most populated 124 isolates (54.6%). Significantly, 94% of mothers and children with oral C. albicans had highly genetically related strains, highlighting a strong maternal influence on children’s C. albicans acquisition. Although factors such as race, ethnicity, delivery method, and feeding behaviors did not show a significant association with C. albicans vertical transmission, the mother’s oral hygiene status reflected by plaque index (PI) emerged as a significant factor; Mothers with higher dental plaque accumulation (PI >=2) had a significantly increased risk of vertically transmitting C. albicans to their infants [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 8.02 (1.21, 53.24), p=0.03]. Furthermore, Black infants and those who attended daycare had an elevated risk of acquiring C. albicans through horizontal transmission (p <0.01). These findings highlight the substantial role of maternal transmission in the oral acquisition of C. albicans during early life. Incorporating screening for maternal fungal oral carriage and implementing oral health education programs during the perinatal stage may prove valuable in preventing fungal transmission in early infancy.

Introduction

Fungi are diverse and abundant microbial colonizers of human bodies, forming an important part of the mycobiome. Alterations in the mycobiome of specific niches, termed dysbiosis, have been implicated in a range of human diseases [1]. Krom et al. have suggested that fungi may act as keystone species in establishing and maintaining healthy oral ecosystems [2]. The interactions between fungal species and humans can range from mutualistic to parasitic, with the dynamic interplay between them being crucial for maintaining host health [1]. Candida albicans is the most commonly detected fungal organism on human mucosal surfaces [3], and it has been shown to colonize the oral cavity as early as a few hours after birth [4, 5]. This early colonization poses a significant health risk to immunocompromised infants, particularly those with low birth weights [6]. In pediatric medicine, contagious colonization of newborn infants by C. albicans has been recognized, and the transmission has been reported to be vertical and horizontal [7]. Moreover, C. albicans can cause a range of infections in humans, from mucosal infections to systemic infections [8].

C. albicans is a diploid fungal species with significant genetic heterozygosity. Its genome consists of eight pairs of chromosome homologs, ranging in size from 0.95 to 3.3 Mb, totaling up to 16 Mb [9]. This heterozygosity has implications for the study of this organism, including its phenotyping and genotyping. S1 Fig depicts the phylogenetic position of C. albicans within the fungal kingdom.

Phenotyping and genotyping of Candida strains are crucial methods for investigating nosocomial candidiasis. These methods can identify outbreak-related strains, determine the origins of infection, and track the transmission of strains. Additionally, genotyping can help evaluate the diversity of isolates within a carrier and investigate recurrent infections to identify particularly virulent strains, if any. Furthermore, tracking the emergence of drug-resistant strains is vital in guiding the development of new antifungal therapies [10]. The species’ population structure and diversity can also be studied using genotyping methods. For instance, Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) is a useful method for identifying the genetic diversity of isolates within a population and investigating evolutionary relationships among them [11].

In epidemiological studies, the typing methods used to characterize C. albicans isolates vary considerably. Molecular characterization methods are more discriminatory and accurate than phenotypic methods and are therefore preferred. There are two major classes of C. albicans typing methods: non-DNA-based and DNA-based techniques [11]. Non-DNA-based methods include protein fingerprint comparisons and Multilocus Enzyme Electrophoresis (MLEE), while DNA-based methods directly analyze polymorphisms within various DNA markers. DNA-based techniques are classified into conventional typing methods and exact DNA-based techniques. The conventional typing methods include electrophoretic karyotyping (EK), restriction enzyme analysis (REA), and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Furthermore, exact DNA-based techniques generate highly reproducible typing data, such as MLST [11], which has been used successfully in the population genetics and molecular phylogeny studies of C. albicans [12]. Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), Ca3 fingerprinting, and MLST are highly discriminatory and accurate typing methods that outperform phenotypic techniques [13]. Therefore, it is feasible to lead a C. albicans relatedness analysis using the MLST technique [14].

C. albicans is a ubiquitous fungal organism that commonly colonizes the oral cavity of healthy individuals. The prevalence of C. albicans’ carriage varies depending on multiple factors, including age, gender, diet, geographic location, socioeconomic status, immunosuppression, and medication use [15]. Studies have reported that the oral carriage of C. albicans has been detected in 46% of healthy infants and 69% of adults [8, 16]. However, infants are more susceptible to oral candidiasis, with up to 37% of infants experiencing this opportunistic fungal infection, especially until six months of age [17]. Elderly individuals who wear dentures are also at increased risk of developing oral candidiasis, with up to 54% of denture wearers experiencing this condition [17]. Pregnant and postpartum women are also more likely to experience oral candidiasis and C. albicans colonization, possibly due to hormonal changes that affect the oral microbiome [18, 19]. Moreover, C. albicans is also known to cause infections in other body sites, including the genital area. Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common fungal infection that affects up to 75% of women at some point in their lives [20]. Pregnant women, especially in their third trimester, are at higher risk of VVC due to increased estrogen levels in the vaginal mucosa that promote yeast adhesion and penetration [21, 22].

C. albicans is a polymorphic fungus, which can switch between different morphological forms, such as yeast, hyphae, and pseudohyphae, depending on the environmental conditions [23]. This polymorphic nature is considered a key virulence factor that plays a critical role in the transition from commensalism to parasitism [1]. The ability of C. albicans to switch between these forms is thought to facilitate its survival and persistence within the host. Recent studies have shown that the presence of C. albicans can contribute to the development of dental caries by enhancing the cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans, a bacterium commonly associated with dental caries [24, 25]. This may occur through the production of organic acids such as lactic acid by both C. albicans and S. mutans. C. albicans is also known to be capable of fermenting carbohydrates in the diet, producing acids that can dissolve away the mineralized tooth structure, leading to the development of dental caries [26, 27]. Epidemiological data have suggested that C. albicans is involved in the pathogenesis of dental caries [28]. Studies have reported that C. albicans can be detected in the saliva and dental plaque of individuals with dental caries and that its concentration is higher in those with active caries than in those without [24, 29, 30]. Furthermore, C. albicans has been shown to form biofilms on the surface of teeth, which can promote the retention of other microorganisms and contribute to the development of dental caries [25].

Recent research has revealed that the significance of C. albicans as a potent caries microbe has often been underestimated compared to the well-known cariogenic S. mutans [31]. While maternal transmission of S. mutans has been extensively studied and documented as a method by which children are initially colonized with this bacterium [32], transmission patterns of C. albicans in children at high risk of severe early childhood caries (S-ECC) have not yet been investigated. To address this gap in knowledge, a study was conducted to identify and genotype oral C. albicans isolates from mother-child dyads to determine the possibility of vertical transmission in early life. The study also aimed to identify the factors associated with the vertical and horizontal transmission of C. albicans, which could help design measures to limit and prevent the transmission of this pathogenic fungi, possibly reducing the burden of S-ECC experience.

Material and methods

Study population and Candida isolates

Pregnant women and their children were obtained from a birth cohort study that studied the association between early-life oral Candida colonization and the onset of dental caries in children [33]. The study protocol was approved by the University of Rochester Research Subject Review Board (#67191). Written informed consent was obtained from pregnant women to participate in the study and allow the review of their medical records. For children, their legal guardians reviewed and signed a written permission form authorizing their participation and the review of their medical records. The participants were recruited from patients who visited the University of Rochester Highland Family Medicine (HFM) or Eastman Institute for Oral Health (EIOH) Perinatal Dental Clinic between November 2017 and August 2020. The study was fully completed in May 2022. Self-reported questionnaires were administered to gather information on the demographic, socioeconomic, oral behavior, medical, and medication backgrounds of the mothers and children. These questionnaires were then cross-checked with the subjects’ electronic medical records. The authors had access to identifiable participant information during and after the data collection process. To determine the required sample size, a calculation was performed based on the estimated proportion of 60% for the occurrence of identical or highly genetically related C. albicans strains between mothers and children. This proportion was compared with the range of 14% to 41% reported in the literature for the general population [7, 34]. The average of these reported proportions (35%) was used as the null proportion in the calculation. A one-sided z-test with an alpha level of 0.05 was employed to achieve 80% power. Based on these considerations, a total of 30 mother-child pairs were required for the study. The study employed a comprehensive protocol using established techniques for clinical examination and sample collection [35, 36]. Clinical isolates of Candida species were obtained from the saliva and dental plaque of pregnant women and their children, as described in S1 Appendix. These isolates were identified based on their specific color after being grown on BBL™ CHROMagar™ Candida (BD, Sparks, MD, USA). Two isolates per sample were selected and stored in a sterilized 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and kept frozen in a -80°C freezer for future use. For our current study, one isolate was used for subsequent analysis. The study comprised eight visits: prenatal (during the mother’s third trimester) for the mothers and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after delivery, for the infants. The initial/baseline visit for infants typically occurred at 1 month of age. However, for infants who missed the 1-month visit, their initial visit is considered to be the first one when they infant were enrolled in the study. In the case of mothers (n=51), only one isolate was analyzed. Among the children (n=78), the number of isolates varied from one subject to another. For each study visit, when each child tested positive for C. albicans, one isolate was selected for MLST analysis. S1 Table details the number and source of each isolate at different study visit times.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Third-trimester pregnant women (beyond 28 gestational weeks), 18 years of age or older, and eligible for New York State-supported medical insurance based on their income level (≤138% of the federal poverty line) were included in the study. Mothers and infants who had received oral and/or systemic antifungal therapy within 90 days of the initial study visit or had severe systemic medical conditions (such as human immunodeficiency virus infection) that increased their susceptibility to yeast infections were excluded from the study. Infants included in the study were born to the participating mothers, with the exception of those who met any of the following exclusion criteria: 1) being born prematurely (before 37 weeks of gestation), 2) having a low birth weight (less than 2,500 grams), 3) having Down syndrome, 4) having orofacial deformities (such as cleft lip, cleft palate, or oral-pharyngeal mass), or 5) having received oral and/or systemic antifungal treatment prior to the initial study visit.

Oral examination and data/sample collection

Comprehensive oral examination and data/sample collection occurred at all study visits. A comprehensive oral examination (caries score, plaque index, and oral candidiasis) and oral sample collection (saliva and plaque) were performed by 1 of 3 calibrated dentists in a dedicated examination room at the University of Rochester clinics, using standard dental examination equipment, materials, and supplies, under portable lighting, using methods detailed in S1 Appendix. To ensure consistency and reliability of the evaluated criteria, inter- and intra-examiner agreement was determined by κ statistics and exceeded 83% at the calibration.

DNA extraction, illumina library preparation, and whole genome sequencing

Cells from -80°C stock cultures were streaked on Yeast Peptones Dextrose agar (YPD) and then incubated for 48 hours at 37°C. One colony was randomly selected from each dish for DNA extraction, and overnight cultures were prepared. The clinical isolates’ whole genome DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the MasterPure™ kit (Lucigen Corp, Middleton, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Next, the Nextera XT kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to construct libraries with 3 ng of gDNA as input. The Fragment Analyzer and Qubit were used to measure the fragment size profiles and quantify the libraries, respectively. The libraries were standardized to 1.75 nM and sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 using an SP flow cell with 150-bp paired-end reads. Sequence reads were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA: Bioproject number PRJNA926612).

Genome assembly

TrimGalore (version 0.6.7) [37] was used to remove Nextera adapters, low-quality reads (quality <25), and short reads (length <75). The trimmed and filtered reads were used as input into SPAdes (version 3.15.2) [38] for de-novo genome assembly with default settings.

MLST of C. albicans isolates

MLST was performed by the sequencing results of the internal fragment of seven C. albicans housekeeping genes (AAT1a, ACC1, ADP1, MPIb, SYA1, VPS13, and ZWF1b), ranging from 373-491 base pairs (bps) and producing a total of 2883 concatenated nucleotide bps (S2 Table) [39]. Samples that were found to be other than C. albicans were excluded from the analysis, resulting in a complete MLST analysis of 227 samples (51 mothers and 78 children). Novel and previously known alleles for each gene were identified and given an integer number corresponding to an "allelic profile" using the non-redundant database program on the MLST website (https://pubmlst.org). The combination of the seven distinct allelic profiles for each isolate was then considered a unique diploid sequence type (DST). New allele numbers, including new DSTs, were provided by the curator: Dr. Marie-Elisabeth Bougnoux, and their details are presented in S3 Table.

Phylogenetic analysis and global population structure of C. albicans

To investigate the evolutionary relationships among C. albicans isolates, we constructed a dendrogram using the unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic average (UPGMA) analysis of the concatenated MLST sequences [40, 41]. A further 3000 validated isolates archived in the MLST database (https://pubmlst.org) were included in the phylogenetic analysis to explore the evolutionary relationships between the DSTs. The UPGMA trees were generated using MEGA 11 software [42] and displayed using the online tool, Interactive Tree of Life [43]. In addition, we generated a minimum spanning (MS) tree and neighbor-joining (NJ) tree [44] using the online software available at the database (https://online.phyloviz.net/index) [45] and MEGA 11 software [42], respectively. To investigate the evolutionary ancestry patterns among the C. albicans isolates, we categorized the fungal population into clonal complexes (CCs). These CCs represent clusters of genetically closely related isolates. The CCs and the founder DSTs, where possible, were obtained using global optimal eBURST (goeBURST) analysis through the PHYLOViZ 2.0 software [46]. Isolates that shared five out of the seven MLST genes were considered to belong to the same CC [46]. The output of this analysis demonstrated the simplest patterns of descent from the ancestral type for each DST (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Snapshot of the 16 clonal clusters identified by eBURST in 227 clinical oral isolates of C. albicans.

Fig 3

The isolates were grouped into 16 clusters and 31 singletons (not shown in the figure). Lines connecting the sequence types (DSTs) indicate a hierarchical relationship between them, with those differing in just two of the seven sequenced fragments being joined. When a putative ancestral DST was identified for a cluster, its number was marked with a red asterisk. The clonal clusters of related isolates are numbered in boldface font. Note that the color of DSTs and the length of the lines connecting the DSTs does not hold any significance. Each DST is accompanied by the subject ID and the child’s age in months. If no age is specified, it signifies a mother isolate. The caries status is visually represented by font color, with black indicating no caries and red indicating the presence of caries.

Data and statistical analysis

Children were grouped based on their oral C. albicans status, and the characteristics of the two groups (C. albicans positive vs. C. albicans negative) were compared using the t-test for continuous variables and Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables.

Categorical variables were presented as frequencies (%), and continuous variables were described using mean and standard deviation. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with the vertical and horizontal transmission of C. albicans isolated from children (Y/N). The data were analyzed using R Studio v4.2.2. Statistical significance was determined by a p-value < 0.05.

Results

Clinical and demographic features

The studied population included 160 mother-child dyads; Table 1 illustrates the demographic, socioeconomic, medical, and oral characteristics of the participating mothers and their children. The results indicated no significant association between the detection status of C. albicans and child gender, ethnicity, or birth route (p-value > 0.05). However, Black children had a higher rate of C. albicans detection compared to their White or other races counterparts (p-value = 0.007). Furthermore, children diagnosed with oral thrush had a significantly higher rate of C. albicans detection (p-value < 0.001). Additionally, children in the C. albicans positive group received more antifungal treatment and showed a higher rate of S. mutans detection by the age of two years (p-value = 0.002 and 0.003 respectively). With respect to maternal characteristics, children with C. albicans detections were born to mothers with lower mean ages (p-value = 0.02), free of diabetes (p-value = 0.01), and who had received antibiotics treatment during pregnancy (p-value = 0.04), in comparison to those in the C. albicans negative group. Moreover, children whose mothers had higher salivary C. albicans carriage levels had a significantly higher rate of C. albicans detection (p-value = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in relation to mothers’ educational levels, which encompassed middle school, high school, an associate degree typically completed in two years, a bachelor’s degree typically requiring four years, and >College, which is post-graduate study. S2 Fig displays the various feeding practices, such as exclusive breastfeeding, exclusive bottle feeding, a combination of both, night breastfeeding, and night bottle feeding among the enrolled children. At two months, night bottle feeding was significantly higher in the C. albicans positive group (p = 0.02).

Table 1. Demographic, socioeconomic, medical, and dental background of mother-child dyads.

Categories Child C. albicans Status
Enrolled n=160 (%) Negative n=82 (%) Positive n=78 (%) p value
Gender Male 80 (50) 40 (49) 40 (51) 0.75
Race Black 91 (57) 37 (45) 54 (69) 0.007
White 34 (21) 21 (26) 13 (17)
Other 35 (22) 24 (29) 11 (14)
Ethnicity Non-Hispanic 136 (85) 68 (83) 68 (87) 0.45
Birth weight (gm) 3313±425 3315±389 3312±462 0.96
Birth route Vaginal 119 (74) 59 (72) 60 (77) 0.47
Siblings (Y) 107 (67) 54 (66) 53 (68) 0.78
Ever breastfeeding (Y) 115 (72) 63 (77) 52 (67) 0.15
Night bottle feeding (2 months) 102 (64) 44 (54) 58 (74) 0.02
Tooth brushing (Y) 12 months 93 (70) 42 (69) 51 (70) 0.90
18 months 119 (94) 56 (93) 63 (94) 0.87
24 months 117 (73) 56 (100) 61 (98) 0.34
Oral thrush diagnosis (Y) 23 (14) 3 (4) 20 (26) <0.0001
Diaper rash diagnosis (Y) 13 (8) 6 (7) 7 (9) 0.70
Child antibiotic treatment* (Y) 29 (18) 14 (17) 15 (19) 0.72
Child antifungal treatment* (Y) 31 (19) 8 (10) 23 (29) 0.002
2y Child C. albicans detection (Y) 78 (49) na na na
2y Child S. mutans detection (Y) 98 (61) 41 (50) 57 (73) 0.003
Maternal factors Age of mothers (years) 27.5±5.4 28.5±5.8 26.4±4.8 0.02
Employment (Y) 81 (51) 47 (57) 34 (44) 0.08
Emotional condition (Y) 57 (36) 26 (32) 31 (40) 0.29
Smoking (Y) 26 (16) 15 (18) 11 (14) 0.47
Diabetes (Y) 10 (6) 9 (11) 1 (1) 0.01
Hypertension (Y) 20 (13) 11 (13) 9 (12) 0.72
Asthma (Y) 22 (14) 15 (18) 7 (9) 0.09
Vaginal candidiasis during pregnancy (Y) 26 (16) 10 (12) 16 (21) 0.15
Vaginal candidiasis 6m postpartum (Y) 2 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1) 0.97
Antifungal used during pregnancy (Y) 38 (24) 18 (22) 20 (26) 0.58
Antifungal used 6m postpartum (Y) 20 (13) 11 (13) 9 (12) 0.72
Antibiotics used during pregnancy (Y) 55 (34) 22 (27) 33 (42) 0.04
Antibiotics used 6m postpartum (Y) 29 (18) 14 (17) 15 (19) 0.72
Marital status (Married) 35 (22) 23 (28) 12 (15) 0.053
Number of children 0 53 (33) 28 (34) 25 (32) 0.92
1 45 (28) 22(27) 23 (30)
≥2 62 (39) 32 (39) 30 (38)
Education Middle school 15 (9) 7 (9) 8 (10) 0.40
High school 83 (52) 38 (46) 45 (58)
Associate 21 (13) 13 (16) 8 (10)
≥College 41 (26) 24 (29) 17 (22)
Tooth brushing Not daily 11 (7) 4 (5) 7 (9) 0.33
Once 46 (29) 21 (26) 25 (32)
Twice 103 (64) 57 (69) 46 (59)
Salivary C. albicans No 79 (49) 50 (61) 29 (37) 0.002
1-400CFU/ml 38 (24) 19 (23) 19 (24)
>400CFU/ml 43 (27) 13 (16) 30 (38)
Plaque C. albicans No 102 (64) 58 (71) 44 (57) 0.16
1-400CFU/ml 14 (9) 7 (8) 7 (9)
>400CFU/ml 43 (27) 17 (21) 26 (34)
Salivary S. mutans <105 CFU/ml 54 (34) 29 (35) 25 (32) 0.66
≥105 CFU/ml 106 (66) 53 (65) 53 (68)
Plaque S. mutans <106 CFU/ml 102 (64) 53 (65) 49 (64) 0.90
≥106 CFU/ml 57 (36) 29 (35) 28 (36)
Decayed teeth number 2.7±3.8 2.4±3.4 3.1±4.1 0.25
Decayed teeth ≤3 116 (73) 64 (78) 52 (67) 0.11
>3 44 (27) 18 (22) 26 (33)
Missing teeth number 1.1±2.8 1.0±1.8 1.2±3.5 0.69
Missed teeth ≤3 148 (92) 77 (94) 71 (91) 0.49
>3 12 (8) 5 (6) 7 (9)
Filled teeth number 3.0±3.4 3.3±3.4 2.7±3.4 0.31
Filled teeth ≤3 103 (64) 52 (63) 51 (65) 0.79
>3 57 (36) 30 (37) 27 (35)

*Includes either IV, oral suspension, cream/ointments/suppository, or shampoo.

Results are shown in prevalence n (%) or mean (standard deviation).

Candida transmission profile in mother-child dyads

As shown in Fig 1, we compared the detection of Candida spp. in mothers and children at various study time points. The proportion of mother-child pairs with positive Candida detection increased from 9% at one month to 36% at 12 months, then stabilized at 33% from 12 to 18 months before slightly decreasing to 29% at 24 months, as depicted in the upper panel of Fig 1. The middle panel of the figure shows the percentage of mothers and children sharing the same type (green) or different types (blue) of Candida spp. Overall a total of 36 mother-child dyads (22.5% of all pairs) had simultaneous colonization by C. albicans, three (1.9% of all pairs) by C. parapsilosis, two by C. dubliniensis (1.3% of all pairs), and one by Candida lusitaniae (0.6% of all pairs). The lower panel displays the genetic similarity of C. albicans between mothers and children using MLST nucleotide analysis. The purple portion represents a genetic similarity of ≥99%, indicating genetically related isolates, while the pink portion represents a genetic similarity of <99%, indicating a distinct genetic profile. Strikingly, the similarity of genotypic profiles was observed in 94% (n = 34/36) of mother-child dyads with C. albicans.

Fig 1. Oral Candida comparison among mother-child dyads in the first two years of child’s life.

Fig 1

The upper panel demonstrates oral Candida detection status among mother-child dyads. The status is categorized as mother and child both positive of Candida (blue), mother and child both negative of Candida (green), mother negative but child positive of Candida (pink), and mother positive but child negative (purple). Nine percent of the 36 mother-infant dyads had positive Candida detection in their oral cavity at 1 month, whereas 36% of the mother-infant dyads had positive Candida detection at 12 months. The middle panel represents the percentage of mothers and children who share the same type (green) or different type (blue) of Candida species, including C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. dubliniensis, C. lusitaniae, C. krusei, C. glabrata, or C. tropicalis. The lower panel indicates the genetic relatedness of C. albicans between mothers and children by MLST nucleotide analysis; genetically related (purple) ≥ 99% similar and genetically different (pink) <99% similar. C.a, C. albicans.

Transmission rate of C. albicans and factors associated with vertical and horizontal transmission

The transmission of C. albicans was classified as vertical when children were born to mothers who tested positive for this fungus. On the other hand, horizontal transmission was used to describe cases where children were born to mothers who tested negative for C. albicans. To identify the factors associated with vertical and horizontal transmission of C. albicans, logistic regression models were utilized. These models considered various predictor variables such as demographics, delivery method, presence of siblings, attendance at daycare, mother’s plaque index, mother’s salivary C. albicans level, and feeding practices. At one month, 60% of the infants showed vertical transmission of C. albicans, whereas at 18 months, the percentage of vertical transmission was 36% (Fig 2A). The logistic regression analysis revealed that the mother’s plaque index was significantly associated with C. albicans vertical transmission (OR, 8.02 [95% CI, 1.21-53.24]; p = 0.03) (Fig 2B). Additionally, Black race (OR, 3.46 [95% CI, 1.43-8.85]; p = 0.007) and daycare attendance (OR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.18-7.39]; p = 0.02) were positively associated with an increased risk of C. albicans horizontal transmission (Fig 2C).

Fig 2. Time series transmission rate of C. albicans and the factors associated with its vertical and horizontal transmission.

Fig 2

At one month, 60% of the infants displayed vertical transmission of C. albicans, with the remaining 40% experiencing horizontal transmission. However, by the 18-month visit, the percentage of vertical transmission was 36%, while horizontal transmission was 64%. From the multivariate logistic model, the mother’s plaque index was identified as the significant factor associated with C. albicans’ vertical transmission (OR, 8.02 [95% CI, 1.21-53.24]; p = 0.03) (B). Regarding C. albicans horizontal transmission, the factors associated with increased risk included being of Black race (OR, 3.46 [95% CI, 1.43-8.85]; p = 0.007) and attending daycare (OR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.18-7.39]; p = 0.02) (C).

Statistics of C. albicans MLST

For MLST analysis, only one sample per participant was chosen (either saliva or, if the saliva sample was negative, plaque). This resulted in a total of 227 isolates, consisting of 218 saliva samples and 9 plaque samples. A total of 215 unique DSTs were detected from the isolates, and 12 were shared by two isolates. Of the seven fragments analyzed, VPS13 exhibited the highest discriminatory power, with 31 different allele sequences. ZWF1b had the second-highest discriminatory power, with 27 alleles, followed by AAT1a (22 alleles), SYA1 (21 alleles), ACC1 and ADP1 (each with 15 alleles), and MPIb with the lowest variability (7 alleles). Details of the alleles and DSTs for each isolate are shown as metadata in S3 Fig, together with the age, sex, dental caries diagnosis, and source of the isolates.

Phylogenetic analysis and global population structure of 3227 C. albicans isolates

The MLST data can be utilized for phylogenetic analysis using various methods with different levels of complexity. To identify robust subspecific clades, we used a variety of techniques, with a particular emphasis on techniques that rely on differences at nucleotide sites and gross allele sequence differences.

In the eBURST analysis of the 227 C. albicans isolates, 196 were grouped into 16 clonal clusters (CC) using a cluster definition of sharing five or more alleles (Fig 3). The largest cluster, CC 1, included 117 isolates (51.5% of all isolates), with 108 DSTs, and had DST 3883 as the putative ancestral type. CC 2 was the second largest, with 26 isolates (23 DSTs) and no putative founding DST. CC 8 was the third largest, comprising 19 isolates (19 DSTs), with type 3983 predicted as the founding type. CC 7 was composed of five isolates (5 DSTs), with DST 3923 as the putative ancestral type. The remaining CC contained at most four isolates. The remaining 31 isolates (13.7%) were classified as singletons. Among pairs with C. albicans, the CC was identical between mother and child isolates in 64% of cases. Furthermore, we generated MS and NJ trees; these trees provide additional insights into the genetic relatedness and evolutionary history of the C. albicans isolates analyzed in this study (Fig 4). The NJ tree generated five closely related clades.

Fig 4. Minimum spanning (MS) tree and Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree of 227 C. albicans clinical oral isolates from our study.

Fig 4

MS tree was generated based on the allelic profiles of the 227 C. albicans strains isolated from our study by PHYLOViZ visualization (A). NJ tree as determined by p-distance of the 227 C. albicans strains isolated from our study (B). The tree is presented in a radial format to illustrate the relative positions of the isolates that are related to each other. Clades are highlighted with colored shading to help with visualization.

While the eBURST analysis provided a certain perspective on the relationships between isolates, the UPGMA pairwise-difference dendrogram generated for the 227 isolates including a reference strain of C. albicans SC5314 (S3 Fig) took a different approach. It did not consider the specific gene fragment where sequence polymorphisms occurred, resulting in a new perspective. In the UPGMA analysis, isolates with only a few differences in the concatenated sequences across all fragments sequenced were considered similar, regardless of where the polymorphic sites were located. The UPGMA dendrogram showed that several eBURST singleton isolates were dispersed within a wide range of UPGMA clades, and isolates from different CC were mixed with one another and with several eBURST singletons.

To investigate the evolutionary relationship between DSTs, we used the first 3000 DSTs from the database (https://pubmlst.org/) to generate another UPGMA dendrogram (S4 Fig). This dendrogram classified the DSTs into 20 clades, including singletons. Of these clades, 19 had been previously identified [40], and a new clade was formed that included 16 of the study isolates. The study isolates were categorized into six clades. The largest clade (clade 1) contained 122 isolates (53.7%), while the remaining isolates were distributed among clades 2, 4, 8, 12, and the new clade. In 72% of dyads with C. albicans, the UPGMA clade was identical between the mother and child isolates. Additionally, the study found that isolates associated with dental caries diagnosis in mothers or S-ECC in children aged one year or older were present in all six clades, with no significant predominance in any particular clade. Furthermore, there was no significant association observed between clade assignment and caries diagnosis.

Discussion

S-ECC is a growing problem worldwide, particularly among low-income populations [47], and C. albicans has been found to be a common pathogen linked to the emergence of S. mutans bacteria [33] and S-ECC development. Candida colonization in children can result from vertical transmission from the mother or horizontal acquisition from non-maternal sources, and early colonization may contribute to a higher risk of disease later. We employed a molecular-based typing method to investigate the genetic relatedness of oral C. albicans between mothers and their children. Our study found that mothers can pass on highly related strains of C. albicans to their children during early childhood. Furthermore, C. albicans’ vertical transmission from mothers was associated with maternal plaque index. Moreover, demographic factors such as race and daycare attendance played a role in the horizontal transmission of C. albicans. This highlights the crucial role of maternal socioeconomic and oral health behavior in preventing oral Candida colonization.

Various factors can influence Candida colonization, including age, population demographic, oral hygiene status, sampling techniques, and geographical variations, as well as host immunosuppression, systemic diseases like diabetes mellitus, different blood groupings, and tobacco smoking [15, 4851]. Despite previous research indicating that individuals with diabetes are at an increased risk of Candida colonization due to reduced salivary flow rate compared to non-diabetic individuals [5254], our study found that children born to diabetic mothers had a lower risk of C. albicans acquisition. However, in our study, we found that the Black race was the only significant factor associated with horizontal transmission of C. albicans among the factors mentioned above. Some studies suggested that Black individuals could exhibit distinct patterns of oral colonization by this yeast. While it is evident that individuals of Black and African American racial groups face an elevated risk of superficial and invasive Candida infections, the precise causal factors remain ambiguous and may be linked to underlying social determinants of health, disparities in healthcare accessibility, and various socioeconomic inequities [55]. Instead, maternal factor, such as the mother’s plaque index score, was identified as a significant contributing factor to C. albicans’ vertical transmission. Furthermore, our results showed that daycare attendance was a significant contributor to C. albicans’ colonization. Although no studies have assessed the link between attending daycare and oral Candida colonization, previous research indicated that daycare increases the risk of carrying antibiotic-resistant pneumococci in children [56]. This could be attributed to the frequent use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections and other unique features of daycare settings, such as children’s behavior and immature immune systems [57]. Moreover, our results indicated that maternal use of antibiotics during pregnancy was associated with oral colonization by C. albicans in their children. Antibiotics can alter the maternal microbiota, including the vaginal and gastrointestinal environments, which might influence the risk of vertical transmission of C. albicans to neonates. A study by Muanda et al. (2017) suggests that maternal antibiotic use is associated with an increased risk of infant Candida colonization, underscoring the need for further research to elucidate the intricacies of this relationship [58].

Our study did not find a significant association between the delivery method and oral Candida colonization. Some authors suggest that C. albicans can be transmitted from mother to child, with possible sources including delivery, skin, vagina, and perianal region. In a study by Zisova et al., vaginal samples were collected from 80 mothers before delivery, and oral and gastrointestinal samples were taken from their newborns after birth. The study found that all 13 mother-infant pairs with C. albicans had identical strains, suggesting vertical transmission [59].

Likewise, Al-Rusan et al. conducted a study that found the mother’s vaginal Candida to be a significant source of oral Candida in newborns, especially those delivered vaginally [5]. In recent years, multiple studies have explored the transmission of Candida from maternal vaginal mucosa to neonates using DNA molecular typing techniques. These studies concluded that all Candida species present in mother-neonate pairs were indistinguishable [60, 61]. We have not collected vaginal samples that could be a source of Candida transmitted to the children.

Our research showed that infants in the C. albicans positive group were more likely to have been night bottle-fed at two months (p=0.02). In contrast, those in the C. albicans negative group were more likely to have been exclusively breastfed at 12 and 18 months (p=0.04, 0.02, respectively). Research on the relationship between feeding methods and Candida colonization in infants and children has yielded conflicting results. For example, Zöllner and Jorge found that Candida species were less common in predominantly breastfed infants compared to those who were bottle-fed (p < 0.05) [62]. Conversely, Darwazeh and al-Bashir studied 2-11 months infants and observed no significant differences in the frequency or density of Candida species between breastfed, bottle-fed, or mixed-feeding infants (p = 0.14) [49]. Similarly, a systematic review found no significant differences in oral Candida colonization between breastfed and bottle-fed children [63]. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between feeding methods and Candida colonization in infants and children. Moreover, infants in the C. albicans positive group showed a higher likelihood of having a documented history of oral thrush diagnosis and previous use of antifungal medications, aligning with the results reported by Azevedo et al. [64]. Oral thrush is a common infection in early life, affecting 4%-15% of healthy children [65, 66], with C. albicans often being the opportunistic microorganism responsible for the infection [67].

Our study did not reveal a significant association between Candida colonization and having a sibling. This finding is consistent with a study by Hannula et al., where no significant association was reported between having a sibling and Candida colonization in a cohort of 40 infants who were followed up from 2-24 months [68]. However, other studies have reported conflicting results regarding the association between siblings and Candida colonization. For instance, Stecksen-Blicks et al. found that the presence of siblings increased the likelihood of oral Candida colonization in 12-month-old infants [65]. In contrast, Azad et al. reported a decrease in the richness and diversity of the gut microbiome in infants with older siblings [69].

In the current study, vertical transmission of C. albicans was significantly associated with mothers’ plaque score. The oral microbiota of the child can be shaped by the mother’s influence starting from gestation and continuing into early life through various pathways of vertical transmission including delivery method, close contact, feeding, and oral care practices [7072].

MLST has proven to be an effective technique for investigating the population structure and epidemiology of C. albicans [39, 44, 73, 74]. Geographically, the distribution of known clades differs, with some clades being more common in certain regions of the world than others [75]. For instance, clade 2 predominates in the United Kingdom, while clades 14 and 17 are prevalent in Pacific Rim countries [75]. Clade 1, which is the largest among C. albicans clades, has a global distribution [74, 75]. These results imply that regional variations in the prevalence and distribution of C. albicans strains may have significant implications for the diagnosis and treatment of infections caused by the fungus. While McManus et al. reported a significant difference in the distribution of clades between healthy individuals and patients with periodontitis, with clade 1 being enriched in C. albicans isolates from periodontitis patients [76], Gong et al. did not find a significant correlation between patients undergoing hemodialysis or healthy controls and either the sequence types or clades [40]. Similarly, our study did not show a significant correlation between clade assignment and dental caries diagnosis. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research on this patient population by examining a larger number of patients with dental caries over an extended period, possibly before and after treatment, and using MLST to analyze multiple Candida isolates retrieved from each site and investigate multiple carious lesions.

This study had some limitations that should be considered. Firstly, the study was conducted at a single center, so the generalizability of the results may be limited compared to multi-center studies [77]. Secondly, only a limited number of clinical isolates from the study participants were genotyped, mainly salivary isolates, and in cases where C. albicans was not detected in saliva, plaque samples were used instead. Future research could benefit from the comparison of C. albicans isolates obtained from various body parts (e.g., gastrointestinal and vaginal) in addition to oral samples collected from the same subjects or across different subjects. Thirdly, the sample size of mother-child pairs sharing C. albicans was relatively small, which limited statistical power to compare various parameters between the cases or to evaluate associations between molecular types (e.g., C. albicans DSTs) and clinicopathological data (e.g., gender, age, and diagnosis). Finally, while MLST is a well-established method for characterizing C. albicans [39, 44, 75], we did not use a complementary method to verify the genetic relatedness of C. albicans isolates between mothers and their children.

One strength of the study is that it is the first to use MLST to characterize C. albicans isolated from the oral cavities of mother-child dyads.

Future perspectives

Future studies could use higher throughput genome-wide sequencing and more sophisticated models to better understand the population dynamics of medically relevant yeast in different epidemiological settings [78], which could inform preventative and therapeutic treatments and strategies. Moreover, future in vitro studies could help assess the virulence or cariogenic potential of those clinical C. albicans isolates. Additionally, it would be interesting to investigate how C. albicans’ genotypes affect caries susceptibility in different ethnic or geographical populations.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence supporting the transmission of highly related strains of C. albicans from mothers to their children, particularly during early childhood. Maternal factors, such as oral hygiene practice reflected by dental plaque accumulation were found to increase the transmission of C. albicans from mothers to their children. Additionally, race and daycare attendance played a significant role in the acquisition of C. albicans from non-maternal sources. These findings emphasize the importance of maternal socioeconomic status and oral health in preventing the transmission of oral pathogens. Incorporating screening for maternal fungal oral carriage and implementing oral health education programs during the perinatal stage may prove valuable in preventing fungal transmission in early infancy.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

(DOCX)

S1 Appendix. Additional description for methods section.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Number and source of C. albicans isolates used in the MLST analysis.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Characteristics of the seven housekeeping loci used in C. albicans MLST.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Novel allele sequences for each locus identified in our study.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Summary of the current understanding of the ancestry and phylogeny of Candida albicans.

The evolutionary pathway of C. albicans is indicated in italicized typeface on a lighter grey background. Taxonomic classifications are indicated in plain typeface on a darker grey background. The summary was adapted from in addition to using the online databases http://www.catalogueoflife.org/ and http://www.mycobank.org/.

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Child feeding pattern during the first two years of life.

The proportion of children who were exclusively breastfed decreased steadily from 36% at one month to 4% at two years. Conversely, the proportion of children who were exclusively bottle-fed nearly doubled from 29% at one month to 56% at six months, then remained stable from 6 to 12 months before sharply declining at 18 months. Night breastfeeding gradually decreased from 68% at one month to 3% at the age of two years. During the first six months, approximately 70% of children were fed with a bottle at night, but this declined sharply after six months and reached 3% by the time they were 18 months old.

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. UPGMA dendrogram of 227 C. albicans clinical oral isolates from our study.

227 Isolates were grouped into 6 clades. The metadata, including the corresponding DST number, allelic profiles, eBURST clonal complex assignment, UPGMA clade, age, sex, oral source, and the diagnosis of dental caries of each isolate, is displayed on the right. A reference strain of C. albicans SC5314 has been included.

(XLSX)

S4 Fig. UPGMA dendrogram of 3000 C. albicans isolates with different DSTs from the database and 227 clinical isolates from our study.

The DSTs of the population isolates were categorized into 19 clades that were previously identified, and a new clade designated as "N". Additionally, there were some singletons present marked as S. To facilitate easy identification, we have highlighted the DSTs of the isolates from our study in green.

(XLSX)

S1 Dataset. Metadata.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the First Tooth Study members who helped in obtaining saliva and plaque samples from the study participants. They also extend their appreciation to the medical professionals, staff, and clinical administration at the University of Rochester Highland Family Medicine and Perinatal Dental Clinic for their invaluable assistance during the study visits. Furthermore, they acknowledge the University of Rochester Genomic Research Center, particularly Dr. Anthony Gaca, for performing the WGS data.

Data Availability

Sequence reads were deposited and are available from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA; Bioproject number PRJNA926612). Additional isolate sequences and metadata were obtained from the PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org). All other relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

JX; grants K23DE027412 and R01DE031025 from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. https://www.nidcr.nih.gov/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hall RA, Noverr MC. Fungal interactions with the human host: exploring the spectrum of symbiosis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;40:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.10.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Krom BP, Kidwai S, ten Cate JM. Candida and Other Fungal Species: Forgotten Players of Healthy Oral Microbiota. Journal of dental research. 2014;93(5):445–51. doi: 10.1177/0022034514521814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pincus DH, Orenga S, Chatellier S. Yeast identification--past, present, and future methods. Med Mycol. 2007;45(2):97–121. doi: 10.1080/13693780601059936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Xiao J, Fiscella KA, Gill SR. Oral microbiome: possible harbinger for children’s health. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0082-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Al-Rusan RM, Darwazeh AMG, Lataifeh IM. The relationship of Candida colonization of the oral and vaginal mucosae of mothers and oral mucosae of their newborns at birth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123(4):459–63. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Benjamin DK Jr, Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA, McDonald SA, Oh W, Higgins RD, et al. Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2006;117(1):84–92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Waggoner-Fountain LA, Walker MW, Hollis RJ, Pfaller MA, Ferguson JE, 2nd, Wenzel RP, et al. Vertical and horizontal transmission of unique Candida species to premature newborns. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(5):803–8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.5.803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barnett JA. A history of research on yeasts 12: medical yeasts part 1, Candida albicans. Yeast. 2008;25(6):385–417. doi: 10.1002/yea.1595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McManus BA, Coleman DC. Molecular epidemiology, phylogeny and evolution of Candida albicans. Infection, genetics and evolution: journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases. 2014;21:166–78. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Issa SY, Badran EF, Aqel KF, Shehabi AA. Epidemiological characteristics of Candida species colonizing oral and rectal sites of Jordanian infants. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saghrouni F, Ben Abdeljelil J, Boukadida J, Ben Said M. Molecular methods for strain typing of Candida albicans: a review. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;114(6):1559–74. doi: 10.1111/jam.12132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Belen A, Pavon I, Maiden MCJ. Multilocus sequence typing. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;551:129–40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-999-4_11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chowdhary A, Lee-Yang W, Lasker BA, Brandt ME, Warnock DW, Arthington-Skaggs BA. Comparison of multilocus sequence typing and Ca3 fingerprinting for molecular subtyping epidemiologically-related clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Med Mycol. 2006;44(5):405–17. doi: 10.1080/13693780600612230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doman M, Makrai L, Lengyel G, Kovacs R, Majoros L, Banyai K. Molecular Diversity and Genetic Relatedness of Candida albicans Isolates from Birds in Hungary. Mycopathologia. 2021;186(2):237–44. doi: 10.1007/s11046-021-00527-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kleinegger C, Lockhart SR, Vargas K, Soll DR. Frequency, Intensity, Species, and Strains of Oral Candida Vary as a Function of Host Age. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1996;34(9):2246–54. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.9.2246-2254.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Patil S, Rao RS, Majumdar B, Anil S. Clinical Appearance of Oral Candida Infection and Therapeutic Strategies. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1391. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lyu X, Zhao C, Yan ZM, Hua H. Efficacy of nystatin for the treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:1161–71. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S100795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sarifakioglu E, Gunduz C, Gorpelioglu C. Oral mucosa manifestations in 100 pregnant versus non-pregnant patients: an epidemiological observational study. Eur J Dermatol. 2006;16(6):674–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khadija B, Abbasi A, Khan S, Nadeem M, Badshah L, Faryal R. Isolation of pathogenic Candida species from oral cavity of postpartum females, and its association with obstetric and dental problems. Microb Pathog. 2019;131:40–6. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.03.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Choukri F, Benderdouche M, Sednaoui P. In vitro susceptibility profile of 200 recent clinical isolates of Candida spp. to topical antifungal treatments of vulvovaginal candidiasis, the imidazoles and nystatin agents. J Mycol Med. 2014;24(4):303–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2014.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.French W, Gad A. The frequency of Candida infections in pregnancy and their treatment with clotrimazole. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 1977;4(9):640–4. doi: 10.1185/03007997709115284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matheson A, Mazza D. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: A review of guideline recommendations. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57(2):139–45. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jacobsen ID, Wilson D, Wachtler B, Brunke S, Naglik JR, Hube B. Candida albicans dimorphism as a therapeutic target. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012;10(1):85–93. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Raja M, Hannan A, Ali K. Association of oral candidal carriage with dental caries in children. Caries Res. 2010;44(3):272–6. doi: 10.1159/000314675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Falsetta ML, Klein MI, Colonne PM, Scott-Anne K, Gregoire S, Pai CH, et al. Symbiotic relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans synergizes virulence of plaque biofilms in vivo. Infection and immunity. 2014;82(5):1968–81. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00087-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nikawa H, Yamashiro H, Makihira S, Nishimura M, Egusa H, Furukawa M, et al. In vitro cariogenic potential of Candida albicans. Mycoses. 2003;46(11-12):471–8. doi: 10.1046/j.0933-7407.2003.00888.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thein ZM, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP. Effect of oral bacteria on growth and survival of Candida albicans biofilms. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51(8):672–80. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moalic E, Gestalin A, Quinio D, Gest PE, Zerilli A, Le Flohic AM. The extent of oral fungal flora in 353 students and possible relationships with dental caries. Caries Res. 2001;35(2):149–55. doi: 10.1159/000047447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rozkiewicz D, Daniluk T, Zaremba ML, Cylwik-Rokicka D, Stokowska W, Pawinska M, et al. Oral Candida albicans carriage in healthy preschool and school children. Advances in medical sciences. 2006;51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.de Carvalho FG, Silva DS, Hebling J, Spolidorio LC, Spolidorio DM. Presence of mutans streptococci and Candida spp. in dental plaque/dentine of carious teeth and early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol. 2006;51(11):1024–8. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang XQ, Zhang Q, Lu LY, Yang R, Liu Y, Zou J. Genotypic distribution of Candida albicans in dental biofilm of Chinese children associated with severe early childhood caries. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57(8):1048–53. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mitchell SC, Ruby JD, Moser S, Momeni S, Smith A, Osgood R, et al. Maternal Transmission of Mutans Streptococci in Severe-Early Childhood Caries. Pediatr Dent. 2009. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alkhars N, Zeng Y, Alomeir N, Al Jallad N, Wu TT, Aboelmagd S, et al. Oral Candida Predicts Streptococcus mutans Emergence in Underserved US Infants. Journal of dental research. 2022;101(1):54–62. doi: 10.1177/00220345211012385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bliss JM, Basavegowda KP, Watson WJ, Sheikh AU, Ryan RM. Vertical and horizontal transmission of Candida albicans in very low birth weight infants using DNA fingerprinting techniques. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27(3):231–5. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815bb69d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xiao J, Moon Y, Li L, Rustchenko E, Wakabayashi H, Zhao X, et al. Candida albicans Carriage in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries (S-ECC) and Maternal Relatedness. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xiao J, Fogarty C, Wu TT, Alkhers N, Zeng Y, Thomas M, et al. Oral health and Candida carriage in socioeconomically disadvantaged US pregnant women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2618-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/. Accessed 2022.
  • 38.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(5):455–77. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bougnoux ME, Morand S, d’Enfert C. Usefulness of multilocus sequence typing for characterization of clinical isolates of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(4):1290–7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1290-1297.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gong YB, Jin B, Qi H, Zhang R, Zhang XY, Yuan P, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans isolates from the oral cavities of patients undergoing haemodialysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34565-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Choo KH, Lee HJ, Knight NJ, Holmes AR, Cannon RD. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of Candida albicans isolates colonizing acrylic dentures before and after denture replacement. Med Mycol. 2017;55(6):673–9. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myw128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W293–w6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Fordyce MJ, Gow NA, Maiden MC, Odds FC. Population structure and properties of Candida albicans, as determined by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(11):5601–13. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5601-5613.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhou Z, Alikhan NF, Sergeant MJ, Luhmann N, Vaz C, Francisco AP, et al. GrapeTree: visualization of core genomic relationships among 100,000 bacterial pathogens. Genome Res. 2018;28(9):1395–404. doi: 10.1101/gr.232397.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nascimento M, Sousa A, Ramirez M, Francisco AP, Carriço JA, Vaz C. PHYLOViZ 2.0: providing scalable data integration and visualization for multiple phylogenetic inference methods. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(1):128–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mafla AC, Moran LS, Bernabe E. Maternal Oral Health and Early Childhood Caries amongst Low-Income Families. Community Dent Health. 2020;37(3):223–8. doi: 10.1922/CDH_00040Mafla06 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cannon RD, Holmes AR, Mason AB, Monk BC. Oral Candida: clearance, colonization, or candidiasis? Journal of dental research. 1995;74(5):1152–61. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740050301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Darwazeh AM, al-Bashir A. Oral candidal flora in healthy infants. J Oral Pathol Med. 1995;24(8):361–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1995.tb01200.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Oliver DE, Shillitoe EJ. Effects of smoking on the prevalence and intraoral distribution of Candida albicans. J Oral Pathol. 1984;13(3):265–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1984.tb01424.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Alrayyes SF, Alruwaili HM, Taher IA, Elrahawy KM, Almaeen AH, Ashekhi AO, et al. Oral Candidal carriage and associated risk indicators among adults in Sakaka, Saudi Arabia. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0775-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mata AD, Marques D, Rocha S, Francisco H, Santos C, Mesquita MF, et al. Effects of diabetes mellitus on salivary secretion and its composition in the human. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;261(1-2):137–42. doi: 10.1023/b:mcbi.0000028748.40917.6f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Javed F, Klingspor L, Sundin U, Altamash M, Klinge B, Engstrom PE. Periodontal conditions, oral Candida albicans and salivary proteins in type 2 diabetic subjects with emphasis on gender. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Patel M. Oral Cavity and Candida albicans: Colonisation to the Development of Infection. Pathogens. 2022;11(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jenks JD, Aneke CI, Al-Obaidi MM, Egger M, Garcia L, Gaines T, et al. Race and ethnicity: Risk factors for fungal infections? PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(1):e1011025. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Velasquez PA, Parussolo L, Cardoso CL, Tognim MC, Garcia LB. High prevalence of children colonized with penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in public day-care centers. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2009;85(6):516–22. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.de Lencastre H, Santos Sanches I, Brito-Avo A, Sa-Leao R, Saldanha J, Kristinsson KG, et al. Carriage and antibiotic resistance of respiratory pathogens and molecular epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae colonizing children in day-care centers in Lisbon: the Portuguese day-care center initiative. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1999;5 Suppl 4:S55–S63. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1999.tb00858.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Muanda FT, Sheehy O, Bérard A. Use of antibiotics during pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations: a population based cohort study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(11):2557–71. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zisova LG, Chokoeva AA, Amaliev GI, Petleshkova PV, Miteva-Katrandzhieva Tcapital Em C, Krasteva MB, et al. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnant Women and its Importance for Candida Colonization of Newborns. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2016;58(2):108–14. doi: 10.1515/folmed-2016-0018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Filippidi A, Galanakis E, Maraki S, Galani I, Drogari-Apiranthitou M, Kalmanti M, et al. The effect of maternal flora on Candida colonisation in the neonate. Mycoses. 2014;57(1):43–8. doi: 10.1111/myc.12100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hoarau G, Bougnoux ME, Fily A, François N, Loridant S, Jawhara S, et al. Genetic diversity among Candida albicans isolates associated with vertical transmission in preterm triplets. Mycopathologia. 2014;178(3-4):285–90. doi: 10.1007/s11046-014-9803-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zöllner MS, Jorge AO. Candida spp. occurrence in oral cavities of breastfeeding infants and in their mothers’ mouths and breasts. Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research. 2003;17(2):151–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Azevedo MJ, Pereira ML, Araujo R, Ramalho C, Zaura E, Sampaio-Maia B. Influence of delivery and feeding mode in oral fungi colonization - a systematic review. Microb Cell. 2020;7(2):36–45. doi: 10.15698/mic2020.02.706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Azevedo MJ, Araujo R, Campos J, Campos C, Ferreira AF, Falcão-Pires I, et al. Vertical Transmission and Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Yeast Isolates from the Oral Cavity, Gut, and Breastmilk of Mother–Child Pairs in Early Life. International journal of molecular sciences. 2023;24(2). doi: 10.3390/ijms24021449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stecksen-Blicks C, Granstrom E, Silfverdal SA, West CE. Prevalence of oral Candida in the first year of life. Mycoses. 2015;58(9):550–6. doi: 10.1111/myc.12355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Vainionpaa A, Tuomi J, Kantola S, Anttonen V. Neonatal thrush of newborns: Oral candidiasis? Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019;5(5):580–2. doi: 10.1002/cre2.213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hu L, He C, Zhao C, Chen X, Hua H, Yan Z. Characterization of oral candidiasis and the Candida species profile in patients with oral mucosal diseases. Microb Pathog. 2019;134:103575. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hannula J, Saarela M, Jousimies-Somer H, Takala A, Syrjanen R, Kononen E, et al. Age-related acquisition of oral and nasopharyngeal yeast species and stability of colonization in young children. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1999;14(3):176–82. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-302x.1999.140306.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Azad MB, Konya T, Maughan H.S. GD, Field CJ, Sears MR, et al. Infant gut microbiota and the hygiene hypothesis of allergic disease: impact of household pets and siblings on microbiota composition and diversity. Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology. 2013;9(15). doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Fierer N, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(26):11971–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002601107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jost T, Lacroix C, Braegger CP, Rochat F, Chassard C. Vertical mother-neonate transfer of maternal gut bacteria via breastfeeding. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(9):2891–904. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Damle SG, Yadav R, Garg S, Dhindsa A, Beniwal V, Loomba A, et al. Transmission of mutans streptococci in mother-child pairs. Indian J Med Res. 2016;144(2):264–70. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.195042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bougnoux ME, Diogo D, Francois N, Sendid B, Veirmeire S, Colombel JF, et al. Multilocus sequence typing reveals intrafamilial transmission and microevolutions of Candida albicans isolates from the human digestive tract. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(5):1810–20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1810-1820.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Odds FC, Bougnoux ME, Shaw DJ, Bain JM, Davidson AD, Diogo D, et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell. 2007;6(6):1041–52. doi: 10.1128/EC.00041-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Odds FC, Jacobsen MD. Multilocus sequence typing of pathogenic Candida species. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7(7):1075–84. doi: 10.1128/EC.00062-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.McManus BA, Maguire R, Cashin PJ, Claffey N, Flint S, Abdulrahim MH, et al. Enrichment of multilocus sequence typing clade 1 with oral Candida albicans isolates in patients with untreated periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(10):3335–44. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01532-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tsai MH, Wang SH, Hsu JF, Lin LC, Chu SM, Huang HR, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of bloodstream infections caused by Candida albicans in children from 2003 to 2011. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(11):1018 e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Moorhouse AJ, Rennison C, Raza M, Lilic D, Gow NA. Clonal Strain Persistence of Candida albicans Isolates from Chronic Mucocutaneous Candidiasis Patients. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0145888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Geelsu Hwang

14 Sep 2023

PONE-D-23-18282Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans oral isolates reveals high genetic relatedness of mother-child dyads in early life.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xiao,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 29 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Geelsu Hwang, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met.  Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

Additional Editor Comments:

The reviewers asked revisions to be made before publication. Please check the reviewer's comments carefully and address them accordingly.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Overview and general recommendation to the authors:

The presented manuscript, “Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans oral isolates reveals high genetic relatedness of mother-child dyads in early life.”, is an original paper that aimed to assess the vertical and horizontal transmission of oral Candida albicans isolates from the oral cavity of children. The authors concluded that a high number of isolates from children had highly genetically related strains. An important maternal factor associated with the vertical transmission of C. albicans was dental plaque accumulation, whereas race and daycare attendance were associated with horizontal transmission. The authors highlight the importance of the mother in the transmission of C. albicans in early life.

Overall, this manuscript is well written, the subject is innovative and of utmost importance. The title is both appropriate and informative, the abstract sums up well the manuscript and its goal. The “Introduction” provides a good overview of this topic. The “Materials and Methods” are clear. The “Results” are well organized in the text and the tables and figures complement it. However, I do have some questions about the “Results”, “Discussion”, and “Conclusions”. Please find below my concerns and comments on this manuscript. I ask that the authors to consider my suggestions and address each of my comments in their response.

Major comments:

- Although A1 Appendix contains a description of the collection methods, I would like the authors to elaborate and provide more details on the collection protocol. The location of sample collection, the moment of the day, and the requirements for the collection of the samples (e.g. if the participants had to refrain from eating or toothbrushing for a certain period of time before sample collection) should be described. Also, the authors mentioned that mothers had a clinical evaluation. However, in Table 1 (“Results”) the authors have a variable called “Severe early childhood caries”. Did the children also have an oral assessment?

- In line 171, the authors mentioned that the isolates were identified based on their specific color. However, the authors do not describe how they selected and preserved the isolates for subsequent analysis. They also do not state how many isolates they selected per sample. I would recommend the authors to elaborate on that.

- In the section “Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria”, one of the exclusion criteria was “having received oral and/or systemic antifungal treatment prior to the initial study visit.”. It was not clear when the initial study visit took place. Also, why did the authors exclude infants that took antifungals, but not infants who took antibiotics? These are also known to increase the risk of subsequent fungal infections.

- In the “Results”, the authors should write the exact p-values whenever these are <0.05. Also, did the authors ask the participants if they had taken any antibiotics in the previous month (or recently)?

- In Table 1, the amount of C. albicans is expressed in two different ways, namely “Salivary C. albicans (103 CFU/ml)” and “Salivary C. albicans” followed by categories (and the same for S. mutans). I do not understand the first way of categorizing these counts. What does “Salivary C. albicans (103 CFU/ml)” mean? I would advise choosing only one way of presenting the results, as it gets a bit confusing. For plaque samples, only one way was used to present the counts.

- In Table 1, the authors presented the “decayed teeth number” and the “missing teeth number”. However, the “filled teeth number” is missing. Given that the authors measured the DMFT, I would suggest also including this number on the table. Additionally, I would like to ask if the authors tested the association between the overall DMFT score with the presence/absence of C. albicans.

- From lines 287 to 289, the authors describe the dynamics of the colonization over time. They describe that “The group that mother and child are both positive for Candida detection continues to increase from 1 month (9%) to 12 months (36%)”. Did the authors test to check if the increase was significant? The same question applies to lines 304-206, where the authors report that “The vertical transmission displayed a continuous decrease, starting at 60% after one month, declining to 36% at 18 months, and remaining stabile by 24 months (Fig 2A).”

- After logistic regression, the authors found that the mother’s plaque index was associated with C. albicans vertical transmission. Did the authors ask if the mothers have the habit of licking the child’s pacifier, kissing the child on the lips, or sharing cutlery? I would also recommend adding to the “Discussion” a brief comment about the potential routes for vertical transmission.

- In the subchapter “Statistic of C. albicans MLST”, the authors declared to have used a total of 227 isolates for MLST. Could the authors elaborate further on how they selected the isolates and how many isolates did they select per sample? This can be added to the “Materials and Methods” section.

- In “Discussion”, please discuss the fact that you found that children from diabetic mothers were associated with the absence of C. albicans in their oral cavity, contrary to what was expected. Also, the fact that Black race was a factor associated with horizontal Candida albicans transmission should be discussed. Lastly, the authors also observed that maternal antibiotic use during pregnancy was associated with oral colonization by C. albicans in children. Could the authors elaborate on that in the “Discussion”?

- In this study, the authors did not find an association between clade assignment and dental caries diagnosis. However, clade 1 is associated with some oral diseases. Do the authors have any information about the virulence or cariogenic potential of this or the other clades? Would it be useful to perform in vitro experiments to assess the cariogenic potential of these isolates? Maybe this can be added in a paragraph about future perspectives.

- In the “Conclusions” and “Abstract”, the authors suggest implementing strategies to reduce Candida albicans levels in mothers at risk by using antifungals. I disagree with the authors regarding this suggestion. The use of antifungals has an impact on the overall oral mycobiome (besides potentially having an impact also in the gut mycobiome, if the antifungal is taken orally). The oral mycobiome is not composed exclusively by C. albicans and it has an important role in maintaining oral homeostasis. Moreover, nowadays we face a real worldwide problem with antifungal resistance, and thus antibiotics should not be used as a preventive measure. Besides, dental caries is a complex disease associated with biofilms and not a single species. In Table 1, the authors did not observe differences in the presence of Candida albicans in children whose mothers took antifungals during pregnancy. Lastly, the authors verified that the levels of Candida albicans in children were correlated with maternal dental plaque. Given the results from this study, I would strongly suggest rephrasing the “Conclusions” and “Abstract”. Alternative strategies may be more useful and less harmful to prevent the transmission of C. albicans vertically other than the use of antifungals (e.g. oral health education programs during pregnancy, which represents a period of time when parents are particularly available to learn).

Minor comments:

- A reference is missing on line 70 (“This early colonization poses a significant health risk to immunocompromised infants, particularly those with low birth weights.”).

- Please split the sentence that goes from lines 90 to 98 into smaller sentences, as it is difficult to read.

- In Table 1, there may be some typos on the line describing the variable “Salivary C. albicans (103 CFU/ml) 2.8±18.2 .10±.49 5.6±25.8 .065”. Also, in Table 1 please clarify the difference between “Associate” and “>College” in the “Education” variable.

- In line 432 of the “Discussion”, the authors mention a “systematic review and meta-analysis”, but the paper referenced is only a systematic review. Please revise the reference.

Reviewer #2: The authors of this study employ a molecular-based typing method to elucidate the phylogenetic relationship between oral Candida samples from mothers and their respective children. The endeavor to understand the vertical/horizontal transmission of C. albicans is timely and pertinent. This topic has noteworthy implications for both microbiological research and public health. However, while the research is grounded in a solid premise, there are areas that demand clearer explication or deeper exploration.

Major Comments:

1. The methodology section is unclear on the number of clinicians involved in oral examinations and sample collection. If multiple clinicians were involved, was there a standardization process to mitigate inter-clinician variability? This is crucial to ensure the consistency and reliability of the collected samples.

2. The samples were procured from both dental plaque and saliva. These niches might harbor different microbial communities; thus, it's crucial to segregate data derived from these sources. Furthermore, in Table 1, the absence of data on plaque C. albicans from maternal samples requires clarification.

3. In the phylogenetic tree analysis, the inclusion of a reference or control strain, such as SC5314, would have been advantageous. This would provide a benchmark against which the other strains could be compared.

4. The investigation would have benefited from a longitudinal design. Tracking the same mother-child dyads over a prolonged period might offer insights into the persistence, change, or evolution of the C. albicans strains.

Minor Clarifications/Edits:

1. Line261-262: there seems to be no data presented in neither Table1 or S2 Fig for the statement. Please address this.

2. Could authors explain the rationale behind not obtaining maternal samples before childbirth? Such a baseline would have added depth to the understanding of Candida transmission dynamics.

3. The health status, especially any history of salivary gland diseases in both mothers and children, could influence Candida colonization. It would be helpful if the authors provide details or exclusion criteria related to this.

4. S4 Fig, as currently presented, lacks clarity, possibly due to file resolution issues during upload. I recommend resubmitting a high-resolution version to ensure clarity for readers.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 17;19(1):e0290938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290938.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


24 Oct 2023

Response: We appreciate the reviewer’s positive comments!

Major comments:

1- Although A1 Appendix contains a description of the collection methods, I would like the authors to elaborate and provide more details on the collection protocol. The location of sample collection, the moment of the day, and the requirements for the collection of the samples (e.g. if the participants had to refrain from eating or toothbrushing for a certain period of time before sample collection) should be described. Also, the authors mentioned that mothers had a clinical evaluation. However, in Table 1 (“Results”) the authors have a variable called “Severe early childhood caries”. Did the children also have an oral assessment?

Response: Thank you for your comments! We have added more detailed information on clinical sample collection in the appendix.

2- In line 171, the authors mentioned that the isolates were identified based on their specific color. However, the authors do not describe how they selected and preserved the isolates for subsequent analysis. They also do not state how many isolates they selected per sample. I would recommend the authors to elaborate on that.

Response: Thank you for your comments! More details were added. “Two isolates per sample were selected and stored in a sterilized 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and kept frozen in -80 °C freezer for future use. For our current study, one isolate was used for subsequent analysis”. Lines 174-176.

3- In the section “Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria”, one of the exclusion criteria was “having received oral and/or systemic antifungal treatment prior to the initial study visit.”. It was not clear when the initial study visit took place. Also, why did the authors exclude infants that took antifungals, but not infants who took antibiotics? These are also known to increase the risk of subsequent fungal infections.

Response: We appreciate your comments! A new paragraph was added to the methods section, which explained the study visits (Lines 200-207). We excluded those who took antifungal medications because it could eliminate the detection of Candida. You are certainly correct, antibiotic treatment could increase the risk of fungal infection.

4- In the “Results”, the authors should write the exact p-values whenever these are <0.05. Also, did the authors ask the participants if they had taken any antibiotics in the previous month (or recently)?

Response: Thank you for your comments! Exact p-values were written instead of < 0.05.

Yes, all participants were asked about medication consumption including antibiotic treatment and verified with their medical records.

5- In Table 1, the amount of C. albicans is expressed in two different ways, namely “Salivary C. albicans (103 CFU/ml)” and “Salivary C. albicans” followed by categories (and the same for S. mutans). I do not understand the first way of categorizing these counts. What does “Salivary C. albicans (103 CFU/ml)” mean? I would advise choosing only one way of presenting the results, as it gets a bit confusing. For plaque samples, only one way was used to present the counts.

Response: Thank you for your comments! The first line/way represents the mean value � standard deviation, and the second way is break down of the count to different categories. For simplicity, I removed the mean values.

6- In Table 1, the authors presented the “decayed teeth number” and the “missing teeth number”. However, the “filled teeth number” is missing. Given that the authors measured the DMFT, I would suggest also including this number on the table. Additionally, I would like to ask if the authors tested the association between the overall DMFT score with the presence/absence of C. albicans.

Response: Thank you for your comments! Additional rows have been added to the table to include the association between filled teeth and C. albicans status.

Yes, we tested the association between the overall DMFT score with the presence/absence of C. albicans. A significant association was found between mothers’ DMFT and mother salivary and plaque C. albicans carriage.

7- From lines 287 to 289, the authors describe the dynamics of the colonization over time. They describe that “The group that mother and child are both positive for Candida detection continues to increase from 1 month (9%) to 12 months (36%)”. Did the authors test to check if the increase was significant? The same question applies to lines 304-206, where the authors report that “The vertical transmission displayed a continuous decrease, starting at 60% after one month, declining to 36% at 18 months, and remaining stabile by 24 months (Fig 2A).”

Response: Thank you for your comments! We revised the sentence to avoid confusion. We described the descriptive data of the percentage of mothers and infants who had positive Candida detection at different points, no statistical tests were needed. Similarly, for the transmission we looked at the percentage of infants who were colonized with Candida transmitted by the mothers. Revised sentences, “Nine percent of the 36 mother-infant dyads had positive Candida detection in their oral cavity at 1 month, whereas 36% of the mother-infant dyads had positive Candida detection at 12 months”.

“At one month, 60% of the infants showed vertical transmission of C. albicans, whereas at 18 months, the percentage of vertical transmission was 36% (Fig 2A)”.

“At one month, 60% of the infants displayed vertical transmission of C. albicans, with the remaining 40% experiencing horizontal transmission. However, by the 18-month visit, the percentage of vertical transmission was 36%, while horizontal transmission was 64%”. Lines 321-322; 337-339; 355-357.

8- After logistic regression, the authors found that the mother’s plaque index was associated with C. albicans vertical transmission. Did the authors ask if the mothers have the habit of licking the child’s pacifier, kissing the child on the lips, or sharing cutlery? I would also recommend adding to the “Discussion” a brief comment about the potential routes for vertical transmission.

Response: Thank you for your comments! One of the limitations of the study is that we did not ask about the habit of licking the child’s pacifier, kissing the child on the lips, or sharing utensils that could contribute the transmission. Possible routes of vertical transmission have been added to the discussion. Lines 510-513.

9- In the subchapter “Statistic of C. albicans MLST”, the authors declared to have used a total of 227 isolates for MLST. Could the authors elaborate further on how they selected the isolates and how many isolates did they select per sample? This can be added to the “Materials and Methods” section.

Response: Thank you for your comments! A table has been created and added to the supplemental to show the number of isolates used at each study visit and their sources (Table S1). Additionally, more detailed information has been added to the materials and method regarding isolates selection. Lines 174-184.

10- In “Discussion”, please discuss the fact that you found that children from diabetic mothers were associated with the absence of C. albicans in their oral cavity, contrary to what was expected. Also, the fact that Black race was a factor associated with horizontal Candida albicans transmission should be discussed. Lastly, the authors also observed that maternal antibiotic use during pregnancy was associated with oral colonization by C. albicans in children. Could the authors elaborate on that in the “Discussion”?

Response: Thank you for your comments! Several sentences have been added to the discussion concerning diabetes, black race, and maternal use of antibiotics. Lines 449-452; 454-459; 466-472.

“Despite previous research indicating that individuals with diabetes are at an increased risk of Candida colonization due to reduced salivary flow rate compared to non-diabetic individuals (52-54), our study found that children born to diabetic mothers had a lower risk of C. albicans acquisition.

“Some studies suggested that Black individuals could exhibit distinct patterns of oral colonization by this yeast. While it is evident that individuals of Black and African American racial groups face an elevated risk of superficial and invasive Candida infections, the precise causal factors remain ambiguous and may be linked to underlying social determinants of health, disparities in healthcare accessibility, and various socioeconomic inequities (55)”.

“Moreover, our results indicated that maternal use of antibiotics during pregnancy was associated with oral colonization by C. albicans in their children. Antibiotics can alter the maternal microbiota, including the vaginal and gastrointestinal environments, which might influence the risk of vertical transmission of C. albicans to neonates. A study by Muanda et al. (2017) suggests that maternal antibiotic use is associated with an increased risk of infant Candida colonization, underscoring the need for further research to elucidate the intricacies of this relationship (58)”.

11- In this study, the authors did not find an association between clade assignment and dental caries diagnosis. However, clade 1 is associated with some oral diseases. Do the authors have any information about the virulence or cariogenic potential of this or the other clades? Would it be useful to perform in vitro experiments to assess the cariogenic potential of these isolates? Maybe this can be added in a paragraph about future perspectives.

Response: Thank you for your comments! Clade 1 has been reported to be associated with periodontitis. We do not have any information about the cariogenic potential of this clade. A sentence has been added to the new paragraph titled Future Perspectives, to investigate the virulence of theses C. albicans in future studies. Lines 550-551.

12- In the “Conclusions” and “Abstract”, the authors suggest implementing strategies to reduce Candida albicans levels in mothers at risk by using antifungals. I disagree with the authors regarding this suggestion. The use of antifungals has an impact on the overall oral mycobiome (besides potentially having an impact also in the gut mycobiome, if the antifungal is taken orally). The oral mycobiome is not composed exclusively by C. albicans and it has an important role in maintaining oral homeostasis. Moreover, nowadays we face a real worldwide problem with antifungal resistance, and thus antibiotics should not be used as a preventive measure. Besides, dental caries is a complex disease associated with biofilms and not a single species. In Table 1, the authors did not observe differences in the presence of Candida albicans in children whose mothers took antifungals during pregnancy. Lastly, the authors verified that the levels of Candida albicans in children were correlated with maternal dental plaque. Given the results from this study, I would strongly suggest rephrasing the “Conclusions” and “Abstract”. Alternative strategies may be more useful and less harmful to prevent the transmission of C. albicans vertically other than the use of antifungals (e.g. oral health education programs during pregnancy, which represents a period of time when parents are particularly available to learn).

Response: Thank you for your comments! The suggestion of implementing antifungal treatments have been removed and replaced with oral health education programs. Line 48 & 552.

Minor comments:

1- A reference is missing on line 70 (“This early colonization poses a significant health risk to immunocompromised infants, particularly those with low birth weights.”).

Response: Thank you for the catch. The reference has been added. Line 63.

2- Please split the sentence that goes from lines 90 to 98 into smaller sentences, as it is difficult to read.

Response: Thank you for your comment! The sentence has been split for easy understanding. Line 84-90.

3- In Table 1, there may be some typos on the line describing the variable “Salivary C. albicans (103 CFU/ml) 2.8±18.2 .10±.49 5.6±25.8 .065”. Also, in Table 1, please clarify the difference between “Associate” and “>College” in the “Education” variable.

Response: Thank you for your comment! The first reviewer asked for choosing one way to represent the variable, so we decided to remove the mean values of microbiological counts from the table.

An associate degree is typically earned after two years, while a bachelor's degree typically takes four years to complete. More than college is post-graduate study. Lines 283-286.

4- In line 432 of the “Discussion”, the authors mention a “systematic review and meta-analysis”, but the paper referenced is only a systematic review. Please revise the reference.

Response: Thank you for your comment! The sentence revised to systematic review only. Line 494.

Reviewer #2:

The authors of this study employ a molecular-based typing method to elucidate the phylogenetic relationship between oral Candida samples from mothers and their respective children. The endeavor to understand the vertical/horizontal transmission of C. albicans is timely and pertinent. This topic has noteworthy implications for both microbiological research and public health. However, while the research is grounded in a solid premise, there are areas that demand clearer explication or deeper exploration.

Response: We appreciate the positive feedback from the reviewer!

Major Comments:

1. The methodology section is unclear on the number of clinicians involved in oral examinations and sample collection. If multiple clinicians were involved, was there a standardization process to mitigate inter-clinician variability? This is crucial to ensure the consistency and reliability of the collected samples.

Response: Thank you for your comment! A new paragraph was added to the methods sections entitled Oral Examination and Data/Sample Collection. Lines 200-207.

2. The samples were procured from both dental plaque and saliva. These niches might harbor different microbial communities; thus, it's crucial to segregate data derived from these sources. Furthermore, in Table 1, the absence of data on plaque C. albicans from maternal samples requires clarification.

Response: Thank you for your comment! Totally agree that both niches can harbor different microbial communities. As a future research direction, we are planning to segregate those niches. Mother plaque C. albicans data have been added to Table 1.

3. In the phylogenetic tree analysis, the inclusion of a reference or control strain, such as SC5314, would have been advantageous. This would provide a benchmark against which the other strains could be compared.

Response: Thank you for your comment! We have included a reference strain of SC5314 and updated the S3 Fig.

4. The investigation would have benefited from a longitudinal design. Tracking the same mother-child dyads over a prolonged period might offer insights into the persistence, change, or evolution of the C. albicans strains.

Response: Thank you for your comment! We agree with you, a longer longitudinal study will yield more valuable information. The current study ended when children were 2 years of age. We are planning to add more study visits when children get older.

Minor Clarifications/Edits:

1. Line 261-262: there seems to be no data presented in neither Table1 or S2 Fig for the statement. Please address this.

Response: Thank you for your comment! A new row has been added to the Table1 for 2 months night bottle feeding. S2 figure shows various feeding patterns.

2. Could authors explain the rationale behind not obtaining maternal samples before childbirth? Such a baseline would have added depth to the understanding of Candida transmission dynamics.

Response: Thank you for your comment and sorry for the confusion! More detailed information was added in the method section, “Comprehensive oral examination and data/sample collection occurred at 8 time points: prenatal (during mother’s third trimester) for the mothers”. In fact, all maternal samples were obtained before childbirth. Lines 176-178; 200-207.

3. The health status, especially any history of salivary gland diseases in both mothers and children, could influence Candida colonization. It would be helpful if the authors provide details or exclusion criteria related to this.

Response: We appreciate your comments! Medical history was carefully checked from patient report and validating using electronic medical records; and no history of salivary gland disease was detected. It is certainly a great idea to have included it as an exclusion criterion.

4. S4 Fig, as currently presented, lacks clarity, possibly due to file resolution issues during upload. I recommend resubmitting a high-resolution version to ensure clarity for readers.

Response: Thank you for your comment! A new figure has been uploaded.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Point-to-point reponse letter_10242023.docx

Decision Letter 1

Geelsu Hwang

16 Nov 2023

Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans oral isolates reveals high genetic relatedness of mother-child dyads in early life.

PONE-D-23-18282R1

Dear Dr. Xiao,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Geelsu Hwang, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I would like to thank the authors for addressing all my previous comments. I have no further suggestions.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Maria João Maia Azevedo

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Geelsu Hwang

20 Nov 2023

PONE-D-23-18282R1

Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans oral isolates reveals high genetic relatedness of mother-child dyads in early life.

Dear Dr. Xiao:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Geelsu Hwang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Appendix. Additional description for methods section.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. Number and source of C. albicans isolates used in the MLST analysis.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Characteristics of the seven housekeeping loci used in C. albicans MLST.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Novel allele sequences for each locus identified in our study.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Summary of the current understanding of the ancestry and phylogeny of Candida albicans.

    The evolutionary pathway of C. albicans is indicated in italicized typeface on a lighter grey background. Taxonomic classifications are indicated in plain typeface on a darker grey background. The summary was adapted from in addition to using the online databases http://www.catalogueoflife.org/ and http://www.mycobank.org/.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Child feeding pattern during the first two years of life.

    The proportion of children who were exclusively breastfed decreased steadily from 36% at one month to 4% at two years. Conversely, the proportion of children who were exclusively bottle-fed nearly doubled from 29% at one month to 56% at six months, then remained stable from 6 to 12 months before sharply declining at 18 months. Night breastfeeding gradually decreased from 68% at one month to 3% at the age of two years. During the first six months, approximately 70% of children were fed with a bottle at night, but this declined sharply after six months and reached 3% by the time they were 18 months old.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Fig. UPGMA dendrogram of 227 C. albicans clinical oral isolates from our study.

    227 Isolates were grouped into 6 clades. The metadata, including the corresponding DST number, allelic profiles, eBURST clonal complex assignment, UPGMA clade, age, sex, oral source, and the diagnosis of dental caries of each isolate, is displayed on the right. A reference strain of C. albicans SC5314 has been included.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Fig. UPGMA dendrogram of 3000 C. albicans isolates with different DSTs from the database and 227 clinical isolates from our study.

    The DSTs of the population isolates were categorized into 19 clades that were previously identified, and a new clade designated as "N". Additionally, there were some singletons present marked as S. To facilitate easy identification, we have highlighted the DSTs of the isolates from our study in green.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Dataset. Metadata.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point-to-point reponse letter_10242023.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Sequence reads were deposited and are available from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA; Bioproject number PRJNA926612). Additional isolate sequences and metadata were obtained from the PubMLST database (https://pubmlst.org). All other relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES