Abstract
X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs) provide intense pulses that can generate stimulated X-ray emission, a phenomenon that has been observed and studied in materials ranging from neon to copper. Two schemes have been employed: amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) and seeded stimulated emission (SSE), where a second color XFEL pulse provides the seed. Both phenomena are currently explored for coherent X-ray laser sources and spectroscopy. Here, we report measurements of ASE and SSE of the 5.9 keV Mn Kα1 fluorescence line from a 3.9 molar NaMnO4 solution, pumped with 7 femtosecond FWHM XFEL pulses at 6.6 keV. We observed ASE at a pump pulse intensity of 1.7 × 1019 W/cm2, consistent with earlier findings. We observed SSE at dramatically reduced pump pulse intensities down to 1.1 × 1017 W/cm2. These intensities are well within the range of many existing XFEL instruments, which supports the experimental feasibility of SSE as a tool to generate coherent X-ray pulses, spectroscopic studies of transition metal complexes, and other applications.
1. INTRODUCTION
The advent of the X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) [1] has made possible the exploration of many femtosecond-angstrom scale physics phenomena that were previously unobservable [2,3]. One such phenomenon is stimulated X-ray emission, first observed in the form of inner-shell lasing for the neon Kα line at 850 eV [4] and then for the copper Kα line at 8 keV [5]. Stimulated emission can occur by amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) using an XFEL pump pulse [4,6,7] and seeded stimulated emission (SSE) using a two-color XFEL pump and seed pulse [5,8]. The collectively emitted photons (e.g., at the Ne, Mn, and Cu Kα1 lines), can exhibit high levels of coherence and spectral resolution [6,8,9]. Several applications of ASE and SSE are currently under investigation, including novel X-ray spectroscopy probes with potentially enhanced chemical sensitivity [6,8] and the generation of new coherent X-ray sources with properties beyond those provided XFEL pulses [4,5,9–11].
XFEL pulses are based on self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE) [12], which results in limited coherence, temporal and spectral spikes [13], and large intensity fluctuations. Techniques to improve the pulse properties include self-seeding [14–18], fresh slice/bunch seeding [19,20], and the conventional approach of frequency filtering the pulses with a monochromator.
While externally seeded FELs can produce nearly fully coherent [21] and stable pulses, and there are proposed schemes to increase the stability of FELs [22], high-gain, single-pass sources like XFELs have inherent stochastic fluctuations that limit the generation of stable, fully coherent, transform-limited pulses in the hard X-ray regime. This requires a multipass cavity-based system such as, for example, an XFEL oscillator [23,24]. Stimulated X-ray emission is at the heart of a different multipass cavity-based approach to generate intense, stable, transform-limited, femtosecond X-ray pulses. The proposed population inversion X-ray laser oscillator (XLO) [11] uses a two-stage process where the XFEL pulse generates stimulated Kα X-ray emission in a gain medium. The XLO operates with a train of intense XFEL pulses and uses an X-ray optical Bragg cavity to recirculate the stimulated X-ray emission pulses. Critical parameters of the XLO are the pump and seed pulse intensities and the amplification factor (gain) obtained at each cavity passage. Provided that one can achieve an adequate temporal and spatial overlap of pump and seed pulses, the gain is primarily dependent on the pump and seed pulse intensity, the gain medium concentration and thickness, and the number of excited atoms. These parameters are also critical when considering stimulated X-ray emission for spectroscopy applications on transition metal complexes [6,8] or for the generation of phase-stable femtosecond X-ray pulse pairs [9]. The general aim is to obtain stimulated X-ray emission at the lowest possible pump pulse intensity because this facilitates the rapid gain medium replacement required for an XLO (a cavity length of ~10 m corresponds to a pulse spacing of ~33 ns). A lower pump pulse intensity also reduces X-ray-induced electronic structure changes for spectroscopy applications [25,26].
In this paper we report a systematic study that establishes the parameters to minimize the pump pulse intensity for stimulated X-ray emission. It was accomplished by splitting the XFEL undulator in two parts: one tuned to the pump pulse photon energy and the other to the seed pulse photon energy. We measured stimulated X-ray emission at the Mn Kα line in a 3.9 molar NaMnO4 solution, where we varied the pulse parameters over more than two orders of magnitude. We have provided the calculations of pump and seed pulse intensities based on the measured signals and our results can be straightforwardly extrapolated to other emission lines, various gain medium and sample concentrations and thicknesses, as well as XFEL parameters. They provide a benchmark for various applications of the exciting phenomenon of stimulated X-ray emission.
2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
The experiments were performed at the SACLA XFEL facility at Experimental Hutch 5 (EH5), as shown in Fig. 1(a). The SACLA XFEL was configured in two-color mode [27,28]. The first seven undulators were used to generate the seed pulses at the 5.9 keV Mn Kα1 photon energy. These SASE pulses were filtered through a Si (111) channel-cut Bragg crystal, to provide monochromatic seed pulses with < 1 eV FWHM. The exact number changes slightly on a shot-by-shot basis depending on the beam condition upstream of the monochromator. The 14 downstream undulators produced the 7 fs FWHM SASE pump pulses at 6.6 keV, above the Mn K edge [29–31]. The two-color pulses were focused with Kirkpatrick–Baez (KB) mirrors [31–33] to a 120 nm (horizontal) by 180 nm (vertical) FWHM spot size, as determined by knifeedge scans. The beam divergence downstream of the focus was 3.8 mrad (horizontal) and 1.9 mrad (vertical).
Fig. 1.

(a) Experimental layout (not to scale): SACLA XFEL radiation containing the seed and pump pulses is focused with a KB mirror system onto a liquid jet of NaMnO4. 2% of the seed pulse is outcoupled and registered in the seed spectrometer. The resulting stimulated emission is dispersed onto the Kα spectrometer with a Si (220) crystal analyzer. (b) The level diagram and concept behind SSE. The pump pulse (yellow), which is tuned above the Mn K edge, creates a population inverted 1s core hole excited state. The seed pulse (blue) is tuned to the Kα emission line to seed the SSE signal (red). (c) Schematic showing how the pump and seed pulse intensity is varied by moving the gain medium to various distances out of focus along the beam direction.
The gain medium was a concentrated sodium permanganate (NaMnO4) solution (3.9 molar Mn) delivered in a liquid jet, with a 100 μm diameter, located inside a helium-filled vacuum chamber. The nozzle and the recirculating pump system for the jet was designed at SACLA [34]. The estimated pump pulse energy at the gain medium was 40 μJ, corresponding to an intensity of 1.7 × 1019 W/cm2, when the gain medium was fully in focus. For a conceptual figure behind how both pump and seed pulses participated in the SSE process in the NaMnO4 solution, see Fig. 1 (b).
The seed pulse spectra were analyzed with a 2% sampling grating followed by a dispersive spectrometer consisting of an elliptical mirror, Si (111) analyzer crystal, and a 2D multiport CCD (MPCCD) detector located in the experimental hutch 1 (EH1) [35], referred to as the seed spectrometer, as shown in Fig. 1(a). The ASE and SSE spectra were analyzed with a flat Si (220) analyzer crystal reflecting the beam in the horizontal plane onto a second 2D MPCCD detector [9], the Kα spectrometer, as shown in Fig. 1(a). For measurements where the jet was moved 150, 500, and 600 μm out of focus along the beam direction, a 25 μm thick aluminum foil was placed in front of the Kα spectrometer. With this configuration, we recorded the seed pulse and the SSE spectra simultaneously, shot-by-shot. All relevant transmission factors from the experimental setup are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Relevant Experimental Components and Their Corresponding Transmission Factors at 5.9 keV (Used to Correct for the Number of Photons at the Gain Medium)
| Component | Thickness | Transmission (%) |
|---|---|---|
| KB Be windows | 200 μm | 91 |
| KB reflectivity | N/A | 80 |
| Kapton windows | 150 μm | 56 |
| Aluminum foil | 25 μm | 46 |
| X-ray transport losses | N/A | 45 |
| Air path after gain medium | 35 cm | 36 |
| Si (220) analyzer | N/A | 1a |
Resulting from the ratio of horizontal beam divergence (3.8 mrad) and Si (220) Darwin width (27 μrad).
NOTE: The only losses relevant to the seed spectrometer come from the X-ray transport losses and KB reflectivity. The remaining elements in the table are used to correct the Kα spectrometer.
3. ESTABLISHING THE PUMP AND SEED PULSE PARAMETERS FOR SSE
Using the same formula as described by Table 1(e) in Fransson et al. [26], we estimated the pump and seed pulse intensities, as shown in Table 2. The pump pulse energy at the gain medium was estimated to be 40 μJ, as measured by a calibrated inline intensity monitor [32]. For the seed pulse, we base our estimates on the photon counts in regions (a) and (b) of the average seed pulse spectrum shown in Fig. 3, (the photon count in the latter suggests the estimated seed pulse energy at the gain medium to be ~0.01 μJ) and the assumption that the beam size of the seed pulse is the same for the cases of a tuned and detuned monochromator. To obtain the intensity, we only considered the photons that fall within the FWHM of the elliptical Gaussian focus, which is 50% of the total [26]. We then divided this by the pulse duration (7 fs) [36] and area (A) under this focus (FWHM) A = xy × π/4, where x and y are the horizontal and vertical beam sizes at the gain medium.
Table 2.
Distance from Nanofocus, Horizontal (x), and Vertical (y) Beam Size at the Gain Mediuma
| DistanceOut of Focus (μm) | x (nm)FWHM | y (nm)FWHM | Ipump (W=cm2) | Iseed (W=cm2) (δE = 0 eV) | Iseed (W=cm2) (δE =7 eV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 120 | 180 | 1.7 × 1019 | 3.2 × 1015 | 7.9 × 1012 |
| 150 | 690 | 465 | 1.1 × 1018 | 2.2 × 1014 | 5.3 × 1011 |
| 300 | 1260 | 750 | 3.8 × 1017 | 7.4 × 1013 | 1.8 × 1011 |
| 400 | 1640 | 940 | 2.4 × 1017 | 4.5 × 1013 | 1.1 × 1011 |
| 500 | 2020 | 1130 | 1.6 × 1017 | 3.1 × 1013 | 7.4 × 1010 |
| 600 | 2400 | 1320 | 1.1 × 1017 | 2.2 × 1013 | 5.4 × 1010 |
Calculated by assuming the 3.8 mrad (horizontal) and 1.9 mrad (vertical) beam divergence downstream of the focus, and the corresponding pump (Ipump) and seed (Iseed) pulses intensities at the gain medium.
Fig. 3.

Seed pulse spectrum obtained from averaging 1924 single shots, and the corresponding best fit from Eq. (1). The left inset shows the shot-by-shot seed intensity, which exhibits 100% fluctuation and has an estimated average value of 7.8 × 106 (black broken line). The average spectrum and corresponding fit were shifted to δE = 7 eV from Kα1 for demonstration purposes. Next, two regions were selected from the shifted fit: (a) δE = 0 eV and (b) δE = 7 eV. In region (a) 2.0 × 104 photons were observed within FWHM. In region (b) 8.2 × 106 photons were found in a bandwidth of FWHM. Integrated photon counts were computed from the fit. The right inset shows the single shot spectrum corresponding to Fig. 2(b) to illustrate how, even in the case of a detuned seed, enough photons from the low-energy tail can stimulate emission.
We first placed the jet in focus at the maximum pump pulse intensity Ipump =1.7 × 1019 W/cm2 to generate Mn Kα1 ASE (without a seed pulse). The corresponding 2D spectrum is shown in Fig. 2(a), in which the spectral direction is shown along the horizontal axis and the spatial direction is shown along the vertical axis. Moving the gain medium 150 μm out of focus reduced the pump to Ipump = 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2 and resulted in the loss of the ASE signal. This established that the lowest pump pulse intensity to observe ASE from a 3.9 molar NaMnO4 solution was between these two values, at some factor times 1018 W/cm2. We estimated that the minimum pump pulse intensity to observe ASE from the most concentrated Mn gain medium, such as a 25 μm Mn foil, was a factor of 8 lower, corresponding to four times smaller thickness and 33 times larger concentration (78.9 Mn atoms/nm3 for the foil, 2.4 Mn atoms/nm3 in solution). This estimate assumes: (i) that the Raleigh length of the KB mirrors was the same or more than the size of our jet diameter (100 μm), and (ii) that the onset of stimulated emission occurred when the concentration times pump pulse intensity reached a certain value (e.g., twice the concentration requires half the pump pulse intensity), which is an approximation.
Fig. 2.

(a) Selected single-shot ASE spectrum collected at a pump intensity of 1.7 × 1019 W/cm2; single-shot SSE spectrum (center) and seed pulse (right vertical line) at (b) δE = 7 eV above Kα1 and (d) δE = 0 eV at a pump intensity of 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2; (c) detuning scan of Kα1 SSE at a pump intensity of 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2, in which each horizontal row corresponds to the average spectrum for a given seed pulse energy collected across 1924 shots and each seed is indicated by a square box on the diagonal; (e) 1D version of (c), showing Kα1 SSE spectra (solid red lines), in which the center of the seed pulse energy is indicated by a blue vertical line. Each 2D spectrum shown was collected at the Kα spectrometer, and is peak normalized. Each 1D spectrum in (e) is normalized to the peak pixel value from (c).
After establishing the pump pulse intensity limit of 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2 where no ASE was observed, we added the monochromatic seed pulse and scanned its photon energy through the Mn Kα1 line. We started at δE = 7 eV above the Mn Kα1 line, where we already observed SSE, as shown in Fig. 2(b). At this detuning value, only a small fraction of the seed pulse intensity spectrally overlapped with the peak of the Mn Kα1 line (see next section for a detailed discussion). Figure 2(c) shows the heat map of the complete seed pulse scan, where each horizontal line corresponds to the seed pulse photon energy as it is swept through the Mn Kα1 spectrum. As the seed moved closer to the center of the Mn Kα1 line, there was no strong change in the spectral shape and intensity of the SSE signal. See Fig. 2(e) for the corresponding series of SSE spectra. This indicated that this series of SSE was close to the limit of the gain curve, where a stronger seed pulse does not result in a stronger SSE signal.
Our next step was to align the seed pulse photon energy with the center of the Mn Kα1 line, as shown in Fig. 2(d), and reduce the pump pulse intensity by moving the jet progressively out of focus (downstream) along the beam direction, as shown in Fig. 1(c). Because the pump and seed pulses share the same beam line optics and focus, doing so also simultaneously changed the seed pulse intensity. The highest number of Kα1 photons observed from a single shot of SSE, using the correction coefficients given in Table 1, was 2.9 × 108, using a pump pulse intensity of 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2 (corresponding to 150 μm out of focus, as listed in Table 2) and a seed pulse intensity of 9.3 × 1014 W/cm2. For this shot, the seed pulse was detuned by δE = −0.5 eV below Kα1.
An important quantity is the seeding efficiency defined as the photon ratio , where each N corresponds to the number of photons that fall within the measured Kα1 FWHM of that shot. The experimentally obtainable value of ρ depends on the exact spatio-temporal overlap of pump and seed and was difficult to estimate for this experiment without more advanced shot-by-shot diagnostics. was determined by subtracting Nseed [from the first detector, as shown in Fig. 1(a)] from the total photon count registered by the Kα spectrometer in the same bandwidth. The strongest single shot enhancement of Kα1 photons with respect to seed photons within the Kα1 FWHM was ρ = 8.4 × 103. For this single shot of SSE, the pump and seed pulse intensities were 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2 and 2.0 × 1011 W/cm2, respectively. The low Iseed comes from the fact that, for this shot, the seed was detuned by δE = 7 eV above the Kα1 so that only 7.6 × 103 seed photons were estimated to be found within the Kα1 FWHM. Nevertheless, 6.4 × 107 Kα1 photons were observed.
After moving to a pump pulse as low as Ipump = 1.1 × 1017 W/cm2, a seed pulse intensity of Iseed = 7.8 × 1012 W/cm2 was required to observe a single shot of SSE with ρ = 9.8, resulting in an estimated 2.8 × 107 photons in the Kα1 FWHM. This pump pulse intensity is comparable to or even an order of magnitude lower than typical values used in experiments at XFELs using standard μm focusing optics [26].
We now discuss varying the seed pulse intensity at a constant pump pulse intensity. This can be accomplished by detuning the seed pulse photon energy from the Kα1 peak. Figure 3 shows an average seed pulse spectrum collected across 1924 single shots, placed on a log plot and corrected for the number of photons at the gain medium. For illustrative purposes, two spectral regions with the same bandwidth as the spontaneous NaMnO4 Kα1 linewidth, FWHM [6], were selected to compare photon counts when the seed was tuned directly on top of Kα1, as shown in Fig. 2(d) and detuned by δE = 7 eV from Kα1; see Fig. 2(b) for a sample spectrum. Due to the seed’s spectral shape, which contains some Lorentzian character, the total photon count in remained above 104 photons. It is even true that in cases where the seed was detuned by δE = 7 eV, the reduced number of photons (by more than a factor of 400) were still sufficient to stimulate emission.
4. SPECTRAL ANALYSIS AND SEEDING EFFICIENCY
To analyze the spectral characteristics of both the seed pulse and SSE, we projected each detector image onto the energy axis and fit it with a pseudo-Voigt function
| (1) |
where is the Gaussian component, is the Lorentzian component, E is the photon energy, f is the total FWHM, and 0 < η < 1 is the Lorentzian parameter [37].
Seed pulse spectra collected at both spectrometers were cross-correlated. Total beamline transmission (from the undulator hall to the target) was found to be 45%. A two-detector setup was necessary to estimate the amount of seed pulse photons in the Kα1 line spectral bandwidth, especially in case of no detuning. When the seed pulse was detuned, one, in principle, can extract the number of seed pulse photons from the spectral fits using only the Kα spectrometer. It has an intrinsic spectral resolution of 0.24 eV FWHM corresponding to the Darwin width of the Si 220 analyzer crystal. Because this is much narrower than most of our spectral features, we did not attempt to deconvolute, and all reported numbers include this broadening. Note that Figs. 4 and 5 show results derived from fitting results with an R-squared value >0.99.
Fig. 4.

Left: The FWHM, f, of the Mn Kα1 line as a function of the seed pulse detuning at different pump intensities. Lines are drawn for reference. Right: Example of single-shot spectra, in which the seed is δE = 0 eV from the Mn Kα1 line, to further illustrate spectral narrowing.
Fig. 5.

(a) Seeding efficiency as a function of seed photon counts that fall within the spectral range of Kα1 FWHM for two different pump intensities. Shots are displayed for cases where the seed is in the range of δE = [0, + 7] eV for the case of 150 μm out of focus, and δE = [0, + 2] eV for the case of 400 μm out of focus. (b) Photon count distribution of Kα1 and seed pulse photons from a seeded scan at 150 μm out of focus, at a pump pulse intensity of 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2.
At a high pump pulse intensity (150 μm out of focus), we observed a broad spectral width of >3 eV FWHM with little variation, as shown in Fig. 4. The spectral broadening occurred once SSE reached the saturation regime [6]. In contrast, at a reduced pump pulse intensity (400 μm out of focus) the spectral width of the Mn Kα1 line became narrower when the seed pulse was tuned directly to the resonance, with a minimum width <1 eV. We assigned the observed narrowing to what in the optical regime is known as gain narrowing [38]. When fitting the signal in the low gain regime with a fixed seed pulse width, the two-component fit overestimated the Kα1 SSE width due to its weak signal. It also overestimated the seed contribution, because in the gain narrowing regime it becomes impossible to differentiate between the spectral contributions from the seed and the Kα1 line. Therefore, the fits represent an upper limit to the Kα1 SSE width.
Figure 5(a) shows the experimentally determined seeding efficiency ρ as a function of number of seed photons, measured at two different pump intensities (150 and 400 μm out of focus). At high pump pulse intensities, as shown by the yellow squares in Fig. 5(a), the SSE signal was saturated, resulting in a seeding efficiency ρ that was greatest at low seed pulse intensities. At a lower pump pulse intensity, as shown by the blue triangles in Fig. 5(a), we observed no obvious trend for ρ as a function of seed photon count.
Because the losses in an XLO cavity are expected to be high [39], the seed pulse intensity will be low; hence, conditions where ρ is high are required. If an external seed will be used for the initial pass of the XLO, seeding can occur even if the spectral overlap is not yet optimized (i.e., the effective seed pulse intensity is low).
Figure 5(b) indicates that the Kα1 photon number peaks at 3 × 107 photons with a lower probability of reaching ≤ 1 × 107 photons. The latter fact is likely attributed to the high gain of the atomic medium, when every seed pulse, even with a low photon count, initiated the lasing process. The seed pulse, in turn, exhibited close to negative exponential statistics attributed to the SASE pulse filtered through a monochromator.
5. CONCLUSION
To summarize our findings, the lowest pump pulse intensity at which we observed a single shot of SSE at the Mn Kα1 line from a 3.9 molar NaMnO4 solution was 1.1 × 1017 W/cm2, which was three orders of magnitude lower than previously reported ASE results using the same sample [6]. For this case, a seed pulse with intensity 7.8 × 1012 W/cm2 was used and the seeding efficiency was ρ = 9.8. Using our approximation that 50% of the photons fall within the FWHM of a 2D Gaussian focus, a pump pulse intensity of 1017 W/cm2 can be achieved by focusing an XFEL pulse with 1 mJ pulse energy and 7 fs pulse length to a diameter of 9 μm FWHM. This and comparable parameters are routinely achieved at all existing XFELs, and the intensity requirement can be further relaxed when using more concentrated gain media or samples. The highest pump pulse intensities currently available at XFELs are > 1020 W/cm2, suggesting that SSE could be applied to transition metal solutions in the several millimolar range.
This shows the feasibility of carrying out seeded stimulated X-ray emission, which is an emerging field with the potential to develop new nonlinear X-ray spectroscopy methods and generate transform-limited femtosecond X-ray pulses.
Our highest single-shot gain resulting in a seeding efficiency of (ρ = 8.4 × 103) was achieved using a pump pulse intensity of 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2 and a seed pulse intensity of 2.0 × 1011 W/cm2. This is sufficient to overcome the estimated loss in the first round trip of the proposed XLO [11]. The gain almost disappeared below a pump pulse intensity of 2.4 × 1017 W/cm2 (400 μm out of focus) corresponding to an estimated pump spot size of 1.2 μm2 FWHM. The largest number of Kα1 photons observed in a single shot was 2.9 × 108, resulting from a pump pulse intensity of 1.1 × 1018 W/cm2 and a seed pulse intensity of 9.3 × 1014 W/cm2. Because this number scales with the total number of population inverted atoms, it can be further increased by increasing the beam diameter of the pump and seed pulses, while providing the same intensity. This requires a larger XFEL pulse energy than we employed at SACLA. Such pulse energies in the mJ range are available, for example, at the LCLS and European XFEL.
When removing the seed pulse, ASE was observed at a pump pulse intensity of 1.7 × 1019 W/cm2. We estimate that the maximally concentrated Mn foil, ASE/SSE can be observed from pump and seed pulse intensity reduced by a factor of 8. The average FWHM from the measured SSE spectra collected at a given seed pulse energy range from ~0.4 to 3.4 eV, which compares to the spontaneous NaMnO4 Kα1 linewidth of 2.1 eV FWHM [6].
Acknowledgment.
A.H., C.P., and U.B. are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. The experiment at SACLA was performed with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (proposal no. 2017B8066). Part of this work was supported by the Department of Energy (DOE), Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (to U.B.). Additionally, part of this work was supported by Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (to F.D.F.); Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences of the DOE Contracts (to C.P., J.Y., V.K.Y., and J.K.); and NIH (to J.K., J.Y., V.K.Y.). This work was supported by JPSJ KAKENHI (to I.I.). The Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research and NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIGMS or the NIH.
Funding.
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K20604, 22H03877); National Institutes of Health (F32GM116423, GM055302, GM110501, GM126289, P41GM103393); U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02-76F00515, DE-AC02-76SF00515).
Footnotes
Disclosures. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data availability.
Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pellegrini C, “X-ray free-electron lasers: from dreams to reality,” Phys. Scr 2016, 014004 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bostedt C, Boutet S, Fritz DM, Huang Z, Lee HJ, Lemke HT, Robert A, Schlotter WF, Turner JJ, and Williams GJ, “Linac coherent light source: The first five years,” Rev. Mod. Phys 88, 015007 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bergmann U, Yachandra VK, and Yano J, X-ray Free Electron Lasers: Applications in Materials, Chemistry and Biology (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017), Vol. 18. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rohringer N, Ryan D, London RA, Purvis M, Albert F, Dunn J, Bozek JD, Bostedt C, Graf A, Hill R, Hau-Riege SP, and Rocca JJ, “Atomic inner-shell X-ray laser at 1.46 nanometres pumped by an X-ray free-electron laser,” Nature 481, 488–491 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yoneda H, Inubushi Y, Nagamine K, Michine Y, Ohashi H, Yumoto H, Yamauchi K, Mimura H, Kitamura H, Katayama T, Ishikawa T, and Yabashi M, “Atomic inner-shell laser at 1.5-ångström wavelength pumped by an X-ray free-electron laser,”Nature, 524,446–449 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kroll T, Weninger C, Alonso-Mori R, et al. , “Stimulated x-ray emission spectroscopy in transition metal complexes,” Phys. Rev. Lett 120, 133203 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Beye M, Schreck S, Sorgenfrei F, Trabant C, Pontius N, Schüßler-Langeheine C, Wurth W, and Föhlisch A, “Stimulated X-ray emission for materials science,” Nature 501, 191–194 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kroll T, Weninger C, Fuller FD, et al. , “Observation of seeded Mn Kβ stimulated x-ray emission using two-color x-ray free-electron laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett 125, 037404 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang Y, Kroll T, Weninger C, et al. , “Generation of intense phase-stable femtosecond hard X-ray pulse pairs,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2119616119 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Weninger C and Rohringer N, “Transient-gain photoionization x-ray laser,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 063828 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Halavanau A, Benediktovitch A, Lutman A, DePonte D, Cocco D, Rohringer N, Bergmann U, and Pellegrini C, “Population inversion X-ray laser oscillator,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 15511–15516 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bonifacio R, Pellegrini C, and Narducci L, “Collective instabilities and high gain regime in a free electron laser,” Opt. Commun 50, 373–378 (1984). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bonifacio R, De Salvo L, Pierini P, Piovella N, and Pellegrini C, “Spectrum, temporal structure, and fluctuations in a high-gain free-electron laser starting from noise,” Phys. Rev. Lett 73, 70 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pellegrini C, Marinelli A, and Reiche S, “The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers,” Rev. Mod. Phys 88, 015006 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ratner D, Abela R, Amann J, et al. , “Experimental demonstration of a soft x-ray self-seeded free-electron laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett 114, 054801 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yu LH, “Generation of intense uv radiation by subharmonically seeded single-pass free-electron lasers,” Phys. Rev. A 44, 5178–5193 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Allaria E, Appio R, Badano L, et al. , “Highly coherent and stable pulses from the FERMI seeded free-electron laser in the extreme ultraviolet,” Nat. Photonics 6, 699–704 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Amann J, Berg W, Blank V, et al. , “Demonstration of self-seeding in a hard-X-ray free-electron laser,” Nat. Photonics 6, 693–698 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lutman AA, Maxwell TJ, MacArthur JP, Guetg MW, Berrah N, Coffee RN, Ding Y, Huang Z, Marinelli A, Moeller S, and Zemella JCU, “Fresh-slice multicolour X-ray free-electron lasers,” Nat. Photonics 10, 745–750 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Emma C, Lutman A, Guetg MW, Krzywinski J, Marinelli A, Wu J, and Pellegrini C, “Experimental demonstration of fresh bunch self-seeding in an X-ray free electron laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett 110, 154101 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ferrari E, Spezzani C, Fortuna F, et al. , “Widely tunable two-colour seeded free-electron laser source for resonant-pump resonant-probe magnetic scattering,” Nat. Commun 7, 10343 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hemsing E, Halavanau A, and Zhang Z, “Enhanced self-seeding with ultrashort electron beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 125, 044801 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim K-J, Shvyd’ko Y, and Reiche S, “A proposal for an X-ray free-electron laser oscillator with an energy-recovery linac,” Phys. Rev. Lett 100, 244802 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marcus G, Halavanau A, Huang Z, Krzywinski J, MacArthur J, Margraf R, Raubenheimer T, and Zhu D, “Refractive guide switching a regenerative amplifier free-electron laser for high peak and average power hard x rays,” Phys. Rev. Lett 125, 254801 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Alonso-Mori R, Sokaras D, Cammarata M, et al. , “Femtosecond electronic structure response to high intensity XFEL pulses probed by iron X-ray emission spectroscopy,” Sci. Rep 10, 1–7 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fransson T, Alonso-Mori R, Chatterjee R, et al. , “Effects of x-ray free-electron laser pulse intensity on the Mn kβ1,3x-ray emission spectrum in photosystem II–A case study for metalloprotein crystals and solutions,” Struct. Dyn 8, 064302 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hara T, Inubushi Y, Katayama T, Sato T, Tanaka H, Tanaka T, Togashi T, Togawa K, Tono K, Yabashi M, and Ishikawa T, “Two-colour hard X-ray free-electron laser with wide tunability,” Nat. Commun 4, 2919 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Inoue I, Osaka T, Hara T, and Yabashi M, “Two-color X-ray free-electron laser consisting of broadband and narrowband beams,” J. Synchrotron Radiat 27, 1720–1724 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Inoue I, Osaka T, Hara T, et al. , “Generation of narrow-band X-ray free-electron laser via reflection self-seeding,” Nat. Photonics 13, 319–322 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Osaka T, Inoue I, Kinjo R, et al. , “A micro channel-cut crystal X-ray monochromator for a self-seeded hard X-ray free-electron laser,” J. Synchrotron Radiat 26, 1496–1502 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yabashi M, Tanaka H, and Ishikawa T, “Overview of the SACLA facility,” J. Synchrotron Radiat 22, 477–484 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tono K, Togashi T, Inubushi Y, Sato T, Katayama T, Ogawa K, Ohashi H, Kimura H, Takahashi S, Takeshita K, Tomizawa H, Goto S, Ishikawa T, and Yabashi M, “Beamline, experimental stations and photon beam diagnostics for the hard X-ray free electron laser of SACLA,” New J. Phys 15, 083035 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yumoto H, Inubushi Y, Osaka T, Inoue I, Koyama T, Tono K, Yabashi M, and Ohashi H, “Nanofocusing optics for an X-ray free-electron laser generating an extreme intensity of 100 EW/cm2 using total reflection mirrors,” Appl. Sci 10, 2611 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tono K, “Fluid sample injectors for X-ray free electron laser at SACLA,” High Power Laser Sci. Eng 5, e7 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Katayama T, Owada S, Togashi T, Ogawa K, Karvinen P, Vartiainen I, Eronen A, David C, Sato T, Nakajima K, Joti Y, Yumoto H, Ohashi H, and Yabashi M, “A beam branching method for timing and spectral characterization of hard X-ray free-electron lasers,” Struct. Dyn 3, 034301 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Inoue I, Inubushi Y, Osaka T, Yamada J, Tamasaku K, Yoneda H, and Yabashi M, “Shortening x-ray pulse duration via saturable absorption,” Phys. Rev. Lett 127, 163903 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ida T, Ando M, and Toraya H, “Extended pseudo-Voigt function for approximating the Voigt profile,” J. Appl. Crystallogr 33, 1311–1316 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hotz DF, “Gain narrowing in a laser amplifier,” Appl. Opt 4, 527–530 (1965). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Halavanau A, Doyle M, Aquila A, et al. , “Progress report on population inversion x-ray laser oscillator at LCLS,” in International Particle Accelerator Conference (JACoW Publishing, 2022), Vol. 13, pp. 1107–1109. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
