Abstract
Precise control of exciton confinement in metal halide perovskites is critical to the development of high‐performance, stable optoelectronic devices. A significant hurdle is the swift completion of ionic metathesis reactions, often within seconds, making consistent control challenging. Herein, the introduction of different steric hindrances in a Cs+ sublattice within CsYb2F7 is reported, which effectively modulates the reaction rate of Cs+ with lead (Pb2+) and halide ions in solution, extending the synthesis time for perovskite nanostructures to tens of minutes. Importantly, the Cs+ sublattice provides a crystal facet‐dependent preference for perovskite growth and thus exciton confinement, allowing the simultaneous occurrence of up to six emission bands of CsPbBr3. Moreover, the rigid CsYb2F7 nano template offers high activation energy and enhances the stability of the resulting perovskite nanostructures. This methodology provides a versatile approach to synthesizing functional heterostructures. Its robustness is demonstrated by in‐situ growth of perovskite nanostructures on Cs+‐mediated metal‐organic frameworks.
Keywords: exciton confinement, growth kinetics, metal‐halide perovskite, metal‐organic framework, sublattice
Efficient steric hindrance management enables precise control of lead‐halide perovskite growth and emission from Cs+‐preconfined nanocrystals. Introducing diverse steric hindrances adjusts the Cs+ reaction rate with lead and halide ions in the solution, prolonging perovskite nanostructure synthesis to several tens of minutes. This approach has the potential to offer fresh perspectives in atomic‐scale nanocrystal engineering.

1. Introduction
Metal‐halide perovskite quantum dots (MHP QDs) have gained prominence in recent years because of their exceptional optical and electronic properties, including high luminescence quantum yield, narrow emission bandwidth, and tunable luminescence.[ 1 ] However, the ionic nature of these compounds also poses several challenges to their synthesis and applications.[ 2 ] Specifically, the nucleation and growth of MHP QDs occur too quickly through rapid ionic metathesis reactions, making it difficult to control with conventional hot injection or precipitation techniques. This poses a major obstacle to controlling the exciton confinement of QDs and a fundamental understanding of their nucleation, growth kinetics, and especially luminescence mechanisms.[ 3 ] Despite enormous efforts, it remains challenging to contain the rapid growth of MHP QDs to achieve controlled exciton confinement.[ 4 ] Unlike the widely used approach of using catalysts to lower the activation energy and thereby expedite organic synthesis, the introduction of steric hindrances can increase the activation energy and thus decelerate the reaction.[ 5 ] Although surface engineering through ligands has proven effective in controlling the synthesis kinetics of perovskite QDs, organic ligands offer only a moderate steric hindrance.[ 6 ]
Herein, we speculate that incorporating Cs+ ions into a rigid nanocrystal lattice might substantially reduce their reactivity toward other ions in solution, allowing subsequent control of the kinetics of perovskite growth on the surface. Moreover, the multifaceted nature of the selected nanocrystal matrix offers varied reaction environments, leading to facet‐specific reaction kinetics on a single nanoplatform. We reason that a rationally designed Cs+‐sublattice nanoplatform will allow perovskite nanostructures to be tailored from multilayers down to molecular dimensions, thereby achieving refined exciton confinement (Figure 1 ). On a Cs+‐sublattice nanoplatform, we can observe fluorescence emissions stemming from various exciton confinements. In addition, the inherent rigidity of the Cs+‐sublattice suggests that the resulting perovskite nanostructures may exhibit enhanced stability.
Figure 1.

Controlling exciton confinement in lead halide perovskites using a Cs+‐preconfined nanoplatform. The enrichment of Cs+ ions in a robust crystalline framework provides a distinct steric hindrance, leading to a marked slowdown of the perovskite synthesis. The varied exposure of the Cs+ sublattice across distinct facets of the CsYb2F7 nanoplatform leads to facet‐dependent perovskite reconstruction and thus to significant variations in the exciton confinement of perovskite nanostructures.
2. Results and Discussion
Alkali metal‐lanthanide fluorides are the most popular host materials for the development of highly stable luminescent nanomaterials.[ 7 ] Using the co‐precipitation method,[ 8 ] we synthesized CsYb2F7 nanoparticles at 290 °C, which serve as Cs+‐preconfined nanocrystals for perovskite synthesis. These nanocrystals have a diameter of about 10 nm and are linked to oleic acid (OA) ligands at the surface (Figure 2A; Figure S1, and Table S1, Supporting Information). A solution containing PbBr2 dissolved in OA, oleylamine (OAm), and 1‐octadencene (ODE) was used for the subsequent growth of lead‐halide perovskites on the surface of as‐prepared CsYb2F7 nanocrystals. As the solution was injected at 180 °C for five minutes, green emission was observed under ultraviolet irradiation, which became brighter over time. Note that no additional Cs+ ions are introduced to the solvent, and the exclusive source of Cs+ ions is CsYb2F7 nanocrystals. The following chemical reaction equation might partially represent the synthesis process, as the inner part of CsYb2F7 is not participating in the reaction:
| (1) |
While general perovskite synthesis can be completed rapidly, the development of green emissions on the CsYb2F7 nanoplatform takes much longer, with a plateau being reached after 30 min following injection (Figure 2B,C; Figure S2, Supporting Information). Moreover, the CsYb2F7 nanoplatform showed negligible changes in morphology after reaction (Figure 2B and Figure S3, Supporting Information). Although CsPbBr3 nanostructures formed on CsYb2F7 exhibited a spectral blue shift and had comparable lifetimes with standard CsPbBr3 quantum dots (Figure S4–S6, Supporting Information), no distinguishable X‐ray diffraction (XRD) peaks corresponding to CsPbBr3 were observed from the emitting nanoplatforms (Figure S7, Supporting Information). These results imply that the observed green emission is from few‐layer perovskites without notable Bragg diffraction. Meanwhile, Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy results confirmed the presence of oleamine on the surface of CsYb2F7/CsPbBr3 (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Intriguingly, when the initial molar ratio of Pb2+ to Cs+ confined in CsYb2F7 was increased, multiple emission bands with fixed peak positions emerged at shorter wavelength regions (Figure 2D). Since Br− ions are the only halogens used, the emergence of these blue‐shifted emission peaks can be attributed to different degrees of exciton confinements.[ 9 ] Therefore, the CsYb2F7 nanoplatform may provide a growth preference for lead‐halide perovskites that depends on the exposed facets.
Figure 2.

Lead halide perovskite synthesis and spectra tuning on a sub‐10 nm CsYb2F7 nanoplatform. A,B) Transmission electron micrographs of CsYb2F7 nanocrystals: pristine A) and post‐reaction B) with Pb2+ and Br− ions. Insets show the corresponding size distributions. C) Emission spectra from CsYb2F7/CsPbBr3 at varying reaction durations, maintaining a 1:0.2 molar ratio of Cs+ to Pb2+. D) Emission spectra of the prepared CsYb2F7/CsPbBr3 products after 30 min of reaction at various Cs+‐to‐Pb2+ ratios (1:0.2, 1:1, and 1:3.6).
Given that a specific crystal facet on a sub‐10 nm nanoplatform has a small surface area and is susceptible to drifting and decomposition under electron beams, we synthesized a larger plate‐like CsYb2F7:Er3+(2%) nanoplatform (30 nm in diameter) that predominantly exposes the (001) facet for perovskite synthesis and structural investigation (Figure 3A and Figure S9, Supporting Information). By co‐doping Er3+ into CsYb2F7 nanoplates, strong red upconversion emission was observed in response to laser pumping at 980 nm, facilitating identification with an optical microscope. After the reaction, elements such as Cs, Yb, Pb, and Br can be identified in a single nanoplate (Figure 3A). The in‐situ growth of CsPbBr3 nanostructures on the nanoplate template was further confirmed by green emission after 365 nm excitation, which coincided with the red upconversion emission from nanoplates (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.

Structural investigation of lead‐halide perovskite nanostructures constructed on CsYb2F7 nanoplates. A) High‐angle annular dark field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of a CsYb2F7 nanoplate after reaction and the corresponding elemental mapping (Cs+, Br−, Yb3+, and Pb2+). B) Optical micrographs of 2% Er3+‐doped CsYb2F7 nanoplates after reaction: under 365 nm excitation (left), 980 nm excitation (middle), and the merged image (right). C,D) HAADF‐STEM images of the CsYb2F7 platform and the CsYb2F7/CsPbBr3 composite. The inset shows the corresponding atomic arrangement from the inverse Fourier transform. E) Crystal structure of the CsYb2F7 nanoplatform and the CsPbBr3 perovskite in side view and top view. The right panel shows the HAADF simulation in top view for the (001) facet of CsYb2F7, the (111) facet of CsPbBr3, and their heterostructural composite.
We next examined the formation of perovskite nanostructures on the CsYb2F7 nanoplate by high‐resolution electron microscopy. High‐angle annular dark‐field (HAADF) imaging showed that crystal lattice sites on the (001) facet of the CsYb2F7 nanoplate became brighter after the reaction, indicating successful growth of Pb2+ ions (Figure 3C,D). It is noteworthy that the structure determined by electron microscopy agrees well with the modeling, showing that the (111) facet of the CsPbBr3 nanostructure is firmly docked to the (001) facet of the nanoplate (Figure 3E). CsPbBr3 reconstruction on the CsYb2F7 nanoplate is likely enabled by the minimal lattice mismatch (<5%) between these two facets.[ 10 ] Extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) was further used to probe the coordination environment surrounding Yb3+ in CsYb2F7 and CsYb2F7/CsPbBr3 (Table S2 and Figure S10, Supporting Information). EXAFS spectra fitting results showed that the surface growth of CsPbBr3 on CsYb2F7 leads to a slight alteration in the coordination number of Yb3+ ions, increasing from 6.7 to 6.9. This suggests that the growth of surface perovskites has a limited impact on the inner coordination characteristics. It is conceivable that the different exposure of the Cs+ sublattice at each facet of the sub‐10 nm CsYb2F7 nanoplatform could lead to varying degrees of versatility in the nucleation and growth of perovskites, as reflected in the occurrence of multiple emission bands as a result of exciton confinements to different extents.
To further explore the potential of this strategy in controlling perovskite growth and exciton confinement, we synthesized CsYb2F7 nanoplates with much lower homogeneity to expose as many crystal facets as possible for the subsequent preparation of lead‐halide perovskites. Compared with products obtained with uniform CsYb2F7 nanoparticles of size sub‐10 nm, two additional excitonic transition bands, blue‐shifted to 402 nm, were observed (Figure 4A). It should be noted that the peak positions of these emission bands are consistent with those of reported low‐dimensional perovskite nanomaterials, suggesting success in molecular‐level engineering of perovskite nanostructures using the Cs+‐sublattice platform.[ 11 ] Moreover, the strong quantum confinement enhances the interaction between the excitons and the surrounding environment, leading to increased nonradiative recombination and drastic luminescence lifetime decline from 8 to 1 ns (Figure 4B). We also found that this new strategy is applicable when switching from bromide to other halides. This allows lead‐halide perovskites with a wide spectral coverage from blue to deep red with no discernible difference for XRD after reaction using a homogeneous nanorod platform (Figure 4C; Figure S11–S15, Supporting Information). A high quantum yield of ≈86% was measured for as‐synthesized CsPbBr3 nanostructures (Figure S16, Supporting Information). Interestingly, the CsPbBr3 nanostructures prepared on the rigid Cs+‐sublattice nanoplatform show significantly improved water resistance compared to their counterparts prepared by conventional methods. When 5% water by volume was added to a cyclohexane solution of perovskite nanomaterials, more than 60% of the original intensity was retained after 30 min, while the CsPbBr3 QDs lost 90% of their original intensity in less than 10 min (Figure 4D).
Figure 4.

Cs+‐confined nanoplatform for the synthesis of lead halide perovskites with tunable luminescence. A) The emission spectrum of CsPbBr3 grown on CsYb2F7 nanoplates with low homogeneity, showing six transition bands. B) The variation of lifetime (from 8 to 1 ns) of the six transition emissions (from 517 to 402 nm) under 365 nm excitation. C) Emission spectra and corresponding photographs of perovskites prepared on nanorod templates with varied halogens. D) A stability comparison between conventional CsPbBr3 quantum dots and their counterparts developed on CsYb2F7 nanoplatforms.
Importantly, we demonstrated that in‐situ growth of highly luminous green‐emitting perovskites on a single crystal of a Cs‐based cyclodextrin (CD) metal‐organic framework (MOF) known as Cs‐β‐CD‐MOF. This achievement underscores the versatility and reliability of the approach for the development of hybrid functional nanosystems (Figure 5 ).
Figure 5.

Conversion of Cs‐β‐CD‐MOFs to bright Cs‐β‐CD‐MOFs/CsPbBr3 hybrids. A) Schematic illustration of the Cs+‐MOF to MOF/Perovskite conversion process. The two 3D frames indicate the crystal structures of the Cs‐β‐CD‐MOFs (left) and Cs‐β‐CD‐MOFs/CsPbBr3 composite (right). B) Images of Cs‐β‐CD‐MOFs/CsPbBr3 composite under ambient light (left) and 365 nm UV stimulation (right).
3. Conclusion
Thus, by employing an ion‐enriched crystalline nanoplatform to control the synthesis kinetics precisely, we have developed a new strategy for preparing MHP nanostructures with tunable luminescence and improved stability. Our study indicates that the abundant crystal facet exposure of the Cs+‐preconfined nanoplatform can effectively impart different growth kinetics to the perovskite structure, resulting in varying degrees of exciton confinement and consequently multiple emission bands. While beam‐sensitive material‐friendly electron microscopy techniques are still needed to fully probe the nature of perovskite nucleation and growth on each facet, we believe that this strategy opens up a new avenue for creating high‐quality functional nanostructures. This development provides new opportunities for nanophotonics, quantum optics, energy conversion, and numerous other applications. We also speculate that this strategy could provide new insights for areas, such as atomic‐scale nanocrystal engineering and the control of excitonic transitions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
4.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE2017‐T2‐2‐110, MOE2016‐T3‐1‐006 (S)), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) (A1983c0038), and National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under the NRF Investigatorship programme (Award No. NRF‐NRF105‐2019‐000, NRF‐CRP18‐2017‐023, and NRF‐CRP19‐2017‐01).
Zhou L., Liang L., Chen J., Zhou X., Liu L., Xi S., Loh K. P., Han Y., He Q., Liu X., Promoted Growth and Multiband Emission in Heterostructured Perovskites Through Cs+‐Sublattice Interaction. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2306398. 10.1002/advs.202306398
Contributor Information
Liangliang Liang, Email: ifellliang@xmu.edu.cn.
Qian He, Email: mseheq@nus.edu.sg.
Xiaogang Liu, Email: chmlx@nus.edu.sg.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
References
- 1.a) Chen Y., Yin J., Wei Q., Wang C., Wang X., Ren H., Yu S. F., Bakr O. M., Mohammed O. F., Li M., Nat. Photonics 2022, 16, 485; [Google Scholar]; b) Sun R., Zhou D. L., Ding Y. J., Wang Y., Wang Y. Q., Zhuang X. M., Liu S. A., Ding N., Wang T. Y., Xu W., Song H. W., Light Sci. Appl. 2022, 11, 340; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wei Y., Li K., Cheng Z., Liu M., Xiao H., Dang P., Liang S., Wu Z., Lian H., Lin J., Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1807592; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zhu H., Pan Y., Peng C., Lian H., Lin J., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202116702; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Kim J. S., Heo J.‐M., Park G.‐S., Woo S.‐J., Cho C., Yun H. J., Kim D.‐H., Park J., Lee S.‐C., Park S.‐H., Yoon E., Greenham N. C., Lee T.‐W., Nature 2022, 611, 688; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Liu X.‐K., Xu W., Bai S., Jin Y., Wang J., Friend R. H., Gao F., Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 10; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Li X., Cao F., Yu D., Chen J., Sun Z., Shen Y., Zhu Y., Wang L., Wei Y., Wu Y., Zeng H., Small 2017, 13, 1603996; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Kovalenko M. V., Protesescu L., Bodnarchuk M. I., Science 2017, 358, 745; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Liu Y., Dong Y., Zhu T., Ma D., Proppe A., Chen B., Zheng C., Hou Y., Lee S., Sun B., Jung E. H., Yuan F., Wang Y.‐K., Sagar L. K., Hoogland S., García De Arquer F. P., Choi M.‐J., Singh K., Kelley S. O., Voznyy O., Lu Z.‐H., Sargent E. H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 15606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Lee K., Kim M., Kim H., J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3791; [Google Scholar]; b) Chen Y.‐M., Zhou Y., Zhao Q., Zhang J.‐Y., Ma J.‐P., Xuan T.‐T., Guo S.‐Q., Yong Z.‐J., Wang J., Kuroiwa Y., Moriyoshi C., Sun H.‐T., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 15905; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Shamsi J., Urban A. S., Imran M., De Trizio L., Manna L., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 3296; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Fan Q., Biesold‐Mcgee G. V., Ma J., Xu Q., Pan S., Peng J., Lin Z., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 1030; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Imran M., Peng L., Pianetti A., Pinchetti V., Ramade J., Zito J., Di Stasio F., Buha J., Toso S., Song J., Infante I., Bals S., Brovelli S., Manna L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a) Duan D. W., Ge C. Y., Rahaman M. Z., Lin C. H., Shi Y. M., Lin H. R., Hu H. L., Wu T. M., NPG Asia Mater 2023, 15, 8; [Google Scholar]; b) Akkerman Q. A., Nguyen T. P. T., Boehme S. C., Montanarella F., Dirin D. N., Wechsler P., Beiglböck F., Rainò G., Erni R., Katan C., Even J., Kovalenko M. V., Science 2022, 377, 1406; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Ashley M. J., O'brien M. N., Hedderick K. R., Mason J. A., Ross M. B., Mirkin C. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10096; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Bera S., Shyamal S., Pradhan N., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 14895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wei Y., Cheng Z., Lin J., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Jiang Y., Sun C., Xu J., Li S., Cui M., Fu X., Liu Y., Liu Y., Wan H., Wei K., Zhou T., Zhang W., Yang Y., Yang J., Qin C., Gao S., Pan J., Liu Y., Hoogland S., Sargent E. H., Chen J., Yuan M., Nature 2022, 612, 679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tan C., Chen J., Wu X.‐J., Zhang H., Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 17089. [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Pei P., Chen Y., Sun C., Fan Y., Yang Y., Liu X., Lu L., Zhao M., Zhang H., Zhao D., Liu X., Zhang F., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1011; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang F., Han Y., Lim C. S., Lu Y., Wang J., Xu J., Chen H., Zhang C., Hong M., Liu X., Nature 2010, 463, 1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Zhu J., Wang S., Yang Z., Liao S., Lin J., Yao H., Huang F., Zheng Y., Chen D., Nanoscale 2022, 14, 3407; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Schafer H., Ptacek P., Eickmeier H., Haase M., J. Nanomater. 2009, 2009, 685624. [Google Scholar]
- 9.a) Guan X., Lei Z., Yu X., Lin C.‐H., Huang J.‐K., Huang C.‐Y., Hu L., Li F., Vinu A., Yi J., Wu T., Small 2022, 18, 2203311; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bekenstein Y., Koscher B. A., Eaton S. W., Yang P., Alivisatos A. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 16008; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Xing J., Zhao Y., Askerka M., Quan L. N., Gong X., Zhao W., Zhao J., Tan H., Long G., Gao L., Yang Z., Voznyy O., Tang J., Lu Z.‐H., Xiong Q., Sargent E. H., Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wang Y., Yang F., Li X., Ru F., Liu P., Wang L., Ji W., Xia J., Meng X., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904913. [Google Scholar]
- 11.a) Yantara N., Jamaludin N. F., Febriansyah B., Giovanni D., Bruno A., Soci C., Sum T. C., Mhaisalkar S., Mathews N., ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 1593; [Google Scholar]; b) Almeida G., Goldoni L., Akkerman Q., Dang Z., Khan A. H., Marras S., Moreels I., Manna L., ACS Nano 2018, 12, 1704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supplementary material of this article.
