Abstract
Lyme disease is a tick-borne infection caused by the spirochete Borrelia (Borreliella) burgdorferi. Borrelia species have highly fragmented genomes composed of a linear chromosome and a constellation of linear and circular plasmids some of which are required throughout the enzootic cycle. Included in this plasmid repertoire by almost all Lyme disease spirochetes are the 32-kb circular plasmid cp32 prophages that are capable of lytic replication to produce infectious virions called ϕBB-1. While the B. burgdorferi genome contains evidence of horizontal transfer, the mechanisms of gene transfer between strains remain unclear. While we know that ϕBB-1 transduces cp32 and shuttle vector DNA during in vitro cultivation, the extent of ϕBB-1 DNA transfer is not clear. Herein, we use proteomics and long-read sequencing to further characterize ϕBB-1 virions. Our studies identified the cp32 pac region and revealed that ϕBB-1 packages linear cp32s via a headful mechanism with preferentially packaging of plasmids containing the cp32 pac region. Additionally, we find ϕBB-1 packages fragments of the linear chromosome and full-length plasmids including lp54, cp26, and others. Furthermore, sequencing of ϕBB-1 packaged DNA allowed us to resolve the covalently closed hairpin telomeres for the linear B. burgdorferi chromosome and most linear plasmids in strain CA-11.2A. Collectively, our results shed light on the biology of the ubiquitous ϕBB-1 phage and further implicates ϕBB-1 in the generalized transduction of diverse genes and the maintenance of genetic diversity in Lyme disease spirochetes.
Introduction
The bacterium Borrelia (Borreliella) burgdorferi is the causative agent of Lyme disease, the most common tick-borne disease in the Northern Hemisphere [1-3]. Lyme disease spirochetes have complex and highly fragmented genomes composed of a ~900-kb linear chromosome and up to twenty distinct and co-existing linear and circular plasmids that are similar but not identical across the genospecies [4-6].
As a vector-borne pathogen, B. burgdorferi relies on the differential expression of several outer surface lipoproteins to transmit from its tick vector to a vertebrate host [7]. As such, a large fraction of the B. burgdorferi genome encodes outer membrane lipoproteins, mostly carried on the plasmids [6, 8, 9].
In natural populations, genetic variation in outer membrane lipoprotein alleles is associated with species-level adaptations [6, 8-10] and variation in outer membrane lipoprotein alleles across the genospecies is driven primarily by horizontal gene transfer [5, 11-21]. However, the mechanism(s) by which heterologous B. burgdorferi strains exchange genetic material are not well defined.
Viruses that infect bacteria (phages) are key drivers of horizontal gene transfer between bacteria [22]. The genomes of nearly all sequenced Lyme disease spirochetes include the 32-kb circular plasmid (cp32) prophages (Fig 1A and B) [4]. The cp32s carry several outer membrane lipoprotein gene families including bdr, mlp, and ospE/ospF/elp (erps), which are all involved in immune evasion [23-27] and exhibit sequence variation that is consistent with historical recombination amongst cp32 plasmid isoforms [21, 28, 29]. Recent work indicates that cp32 prophages are induced in the tick midgut during a bloodmeal [9, 30, 31]. When induced, cp32 prophages undergo lytic replication where they are packaged into infectious virions designated ϕBB-1 (Fig 1C) [32-34].
In addition to horizontally transferring phage genomes between bacterial hosts (transduction), phages frequently package and horizontally transfer pieces of the bacterial chromosome or other non-phage DNA (generalized transduction) [35]. Generalized transduction was first observed in the Salmonella phage P22 in the 1950s [36] and since then has been observed in numerous other phage species [35, 37-40]. ϕBB-1 is a generalized transducing phage that can horizontally transfer shuttle vectors carrying antibiotic resistance cassettes between B. burgdorferi strains [32]. However, to our knowledge, generalized transduction of anything other than engineered plasmids by ϕBB-1 has not been observed.
Here, we define the genetic material packaged by ϕBB-1 virions isolated from B. burgdorferi strain CA-11.2A. Our proteomics studies confirm that ϕBB-1 virions are composed primarily of capsid and other phage structural proteins encoded by the cp32s; however, putative phage structural proteins encoded by lp54 were also detected. Long-read sequencing reveals that ϕBB-1 virions package a variety of genetic material including cp32 isoforms that are linearized at a region immediately upstream of the erp locus (ospE/ospF/elp) and packaged into ϕBB-1 capsids via a headful genome packaging mechanism at a packaging site (pac). When introduced to a shuttle vector, the pac region promotes the packaging of shuttle vectors into ϕBB-1 virions, demonstrating the utility of ϕBB-1 as a tool to genetically manipulate Lyme disease spirochetes. Additionally, full-length contigs of cp26, lp17, lp38, lp54, and lp56 are recovered from packaged reads as are fragments of the linear chromosome. Finally, long-read sequencing of packaged DNA allowed us to fully resolve most of the covalently closed hairpin telomeres in the B. burgdorferi CA-11.2A genome.
Overall, this study implicates ϕBB-1 in mobilizing large portions of the B. burgdorferi genome, which may explain certain aspects of genome stability and diversity observed in Lyme disease spirochetes.
Results
ϕBB-1 phage purification, virion morphology, and proteomic analysis
In the laboratory, lytic ϕBB-1 replication (Fig 1C) can be induced by fermentation products such as ethanol [41, 42]. We first measured ϕBB-1 titers in early stationary-phase cultures (~1 × 108 cells/mL) of B. burgdorferi B31 or CA-11.2A induced with 5% ethanol, as described by Eggers et al. [41]. Seventy-two hours after induction, bacteria were removed by centrifugation and filtering. Virions were then purified from supernatants by chloroform extraction and precipitation with ammonium sulfate. Purified virions were treated for one hour with DNase to destroy DNA not protected within a capsid and re-chloroformed to inactivate DNAse and quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to measure packaged cp32 copy numbers.
B. burgdorferi strain CA-11.2A consistently produced ~10 times more phage than B31 (Fig 2A) and was selected for further study. Imaging of purified virions collected from CA-11.2A by transmission electron microscopy reveals virions with an elongated capsid and contractile tail (Fig 2B), which is similar to the Myoviridae morphology of ϕBB-1 virions produced by strain B31 in vitro [9, 43, 44] and by a human B. burgdorferi isolate following ciprofloxacin treatment [45].
Mass spectrometry analysis of purified virions identified ten capsid and other structural proteins encoded by the cp32s including the major capsid protein and capsid fibers (Fig 2C, Table S1). We also detected highly conserved predicted phage capsid proteins encoded by lp54 (Fig 2D). While the virions we visualized all appear to have the same elongated capsid morphology, virions with a notably smaller capsid morphology have been isolated and imaged from B. burgdorferi CA-11.2A [32]. These observations raise the possibility that there are multiple intact phages inhabiting the CA-11.2A genome.
ϕBB-1 virions package portions of the B. burgdorferi genome
We performed long-read sequencing on DNA packaged in purified ϕBB-1 virions, as outlined in Figure 3. Although intact B. burgdorferi cells were removed via both centrifugation and filtration prior to chloroform treatment, there is concern that contaminating unpackaged B. burgdorferi chromosomal or plasmid DNA co-purifies with phage virions. To control for this, we spiked purified ϕBB-1 virions with high molecular weight (>20 kb) salmon sperm DNA (Fig 4A) at 1.7 μg/mL, a concentration that approximates the amount of DNA released by 3 × 108 lysed bacterial cells into one milliliter of media [46]. Samples were then treated with DNase overnight followed by phage DNA extraction using a proteinase K/SDS/phenol-chloroform DNA extraction protocol [33]. Purified DNA was directly sequenced using the Nanopore MinION (long read) platform.
Across three replicates, we recovered a total of 110,986 nanopore reads >700 bp in length that met a minimum q-score threshold of 7. Kraken [47] and BLAST analyses indicated that the DNase treatment successfully degraded unpackaged DNA, as only 155 reads (0.14% of the total) with an average length of 1.2kb were derived from the salmon-sperm DNA spike-in (Fig 4B). To further reduce the possibility of unpackaged B. burgdorferi DNA carryover, we imposed a stringent 5kb read-length cutoff, thus reducing the number of salmon-derived reads to zero and leaving a total of 58,399 reads (Fig 4C) with a median length of ~12.3 kb (Fig 4D). Note that we detected a high number of ~32 kb reads in each replicate which are the approximate size of cp32 prophages (Fig 4D, dashed line).
Overall, ~99.6% of packaged reads >5 kb were classified as B. burgdorferi (Fig 5A), the majority of which (~79%) were cp32 isoforms (Fig 5B). Cp32-10 and cp32-3 were preferentially packaged (~32% and ~25%, respectively) followed by cp32-13 and cp32-5 (each at ~10%) (Fig 5B). Reads mapping to cp32-3, cp32-5, cp32-10, and cp32-13 had a mean coverage of over 1,000× (Fig 5C). Cp32-1 reads accounted for only about one percent of all packaged reads (Fig 5B) and had lower mean coverage of approximately 36× (Fig 5C), suggesting that cp32-1 was not undergoing lytic replication. Read length distributions across cp32s indicate that full-length ~32 kb molecules were often recovered for cp32-3, cp32-5, and cp32-13, but less frequently for cp32-1 and cp32-10 (Fig 5D).
Additionally, 11.6% of reads > 5 kb mapped to the linear chromosome and ~6.3% of reads >5 kb mapped to lp54 (Fig 5B). The remaining reads mapped to all the defined genetic elements of B. burgdorferi CA-11.2A including plasmids cp26, lp17, lp36/lp28-4, lp38, lp56, and lp28-3 at 1–2% each (Fig 5B). De novo assembly of packaged reads produced full-length contigs of all cp32s, lp17, cp26, lp36, lp38, lp54, and lp56 (Fig S1), suggesting that full-length versions of these plasmids are packaged by ϕBB-1.
Of note, the CA-11.2A genome was reported to contain a unique plasmid, lp36/lp28-4, that is thought to have arisen from the fusion of lp36 with lp28-4 [48]. De novo assembly of packaged reads resolved lp36/lp28-4 into individual lp36 and lp28-4 contigs (Fig S1E and F). Additionally, whole genome sequencing of our CA-11.2A strain confirmed that lp36 and lp28-4 are separate as no reads that span the lp36-lp28-4 junction were observed and coverage depth was notably different between lp36 and lp28-4 (~200× vs. 25×, respectively, Fig S2A). Furthermore, PCR confirmed the sequencing results (Fig S2B-D). These data indicate that the lp36/lp28-4 plasmid is two distinct episomes in our CA-11.2A strain.
Collectively, these results indicate that in addition to cp32 molecules, ϕBB-1 is capable of packaging non-cp32 portions of the B. burgdorferi genome. We discuss the major packaged DNA species in the following sections.
cp32 molecules are linearized near the erp locus and packaged via a headful mechanism
Our sequencing data provide insight into how ϕBB-1 packages cp32 molecules. Many phage species package linear double-stranded DNA genomes that circularize after being injected into a host [49]. Because DNA isolated from ϕBB-1 virions is thought to be linearized [33], we used PhageTerm [50] to predict the linear ends of packaged DNA. Native DNA termini are present once per linear DNA molecule, but non-native DNA ends produced during sequencing are distributed randomly along DNA molecules. Thus, reads that start at native DNA terminal positions occur more frequently than anywhere else in the genome. PhageTerm takes advantage of this to resolve DNA termini and predict phage packaging mechanisms [50]. PhageTerm identified the termini of packaged cp32 molecules at approximately 26 kb in a region lying immediately upstream of the erp loci (Fig 6A). In agreement with the PhageTerm results, when packaged reads were used to map the physical ends of packaged cp32 molecules, a sharp boundary in coverage depth is observed upstream of the erp loci in all cp32s (Fig 6B-F). Notably, the intergenic region upstream of the erp loci is conserved across the cp32 isoforms found in diverse strains of Lyme disease spirochetes (Fig 6G) [15] and the linear cp32 ends identified by long-read sequencing converge at the same conserved terminal sequence motif (Fig 6H).
PhageTerm predicts that cp32s are packaged by a headful mechanism which supports the previously proposed headful genome packaging mechanism for cp32s [42]. Phages that use the headful packaging mechanism generate a concatemer containing several head-to-tail copies of their genome (Fig 7A). During headful packaging, a cut is made at a defined packaging site (pac site) and a headful (a little more than a full genome) of linear phage DNA is packaged. Once a headful is achieved, the phage genome is cut at non-defined sites, resulting in variable cut positions and size variation in packaged DNA, which we observe in packaged cp32 reads downstream of the initial cut site (Fig 6B-F).
Our results suggest that the cp32 pac site is upstream of the erp loci. If the cp32 pac site is in this region, then DNA molecules containing the pac sequence are expected to be packaged into ϕBB-1 virions. To test this, we cloned the putative cp32-3 pac site (Fig 6G, black bar) into a derivative of the pBSV2 shuttle vector that lacks the promoter and MCS [51], transformed B. burgdorferi strain CA-11.2A, and induced lytic ϕBB-1 replication with 5% ethanol. Supernatants containing virions were collected, filtered, treated with chloroform, and DNase treated as described above. pBSV2 shuttle vector copy numbers were measured by qPCR using primers that target the pBSV2 kanamycin resistance (kan) cassette. To control for possible chromosomal DNA contamination, qPCR was also performed using primers targeting the chromosomal flaB gene. Final packaged pBSV2 copy numbers were calculated by subtracting flaB copy numbers from pBSV2 (kan cassette) copy numbers.
Copy numbers of packaged pBSV2 encoding the cp32-3 pac site were significantly (p<0.001) higher compared to virions collected from the supernatants of cells carrying an empty pBSV2 vector (Fig 7B), indicating that DNA molecules that contain the pac site are preferentially packaged by ϕBB-1 virions.
The cp32 prophages have conserved motifs that occur in a specific arrangement not found in other DNA sequences packaged by ϕBB-1 virions
To identify motif(s) that may be shared between the cp32s and other genomic elements that are packaged into ϕBB-1 virions (e.g., lp54), we first used an iterative BLAST search to identify distantly homologous DNA sequences (Fig 8). A non-redundant list of these diverse DNA sequences were then used as an input dataset for sequence motif discovery via MEME [52]. All five cp32 isoforms found in B. burgdorferi CA-11.2A have the same specific arrangement of conserved sequence motifs around the pac region (Fig 8A and B) and these are conserved in cp32 isoforms across B. burgdorferi (Fig 8C). However, significant matches to these motifs were not identified in other CA-11.2A genetic elements packaged by ϕBB-1 (Supplementary Data file 1), suggesting that packaging of non-cp32 DNA may occur spontaneously or through different mechanisms.
The complete or partial arrangement of motifs found around the pac site of B. burgdorferi cp32 isoforms is conserved in cp32 plasmids and some linear plasmids originating from other Lyme and relapsing fever Borrelia (21 species total) (Fig. 8C). The iterative BLAST search also revealed that a diverse set of circular and linear plasmids in a broader set of Borrelia species share some of the motifs found in B. burgdorferi cp32 isoforms. In total, linear or circular plasmid sequences from 21 different Borrelia species (both Lyme disease and relapsing fever spirochetes) had homology to the B. burgdorferi cp32 pac-containing DNA sequences (Fig 8C).
Deciphering the structure of linear plasmids packaged by ϕBB-1
After the cp32s, lp54 is a major DNA species packaged by ϕBB-1 (Fig 5C). Lp54 is a linear plasmid with covalently closed telomeres that is present in all Lyme disease Borrelia with about a third of its encoded genes being paralogues to genes encoded on the cp32s [6, 53]. De novo assembly of packaged lp54 reads produces a 67.4 kb contig consisting of full-length lp54 (54,021 bp, NC_012194.1) flanked by sequences containing tail-to-tail (7,310 bp) and head-to-head (6,074 bp) junctions (Fig 9A). Read depth for lp54 was >100 for most of the contig; however, read depth drops precipitously at both tail-to-tail and head-to-head junctions (Fig 9A), suggesting that the telomeres of lp54 interfere with sequencing.
B. burgdorferi telomeres contain inverted repeat sequences [54] and we identified the CA-11.2A lp54 inverted repeat sequence as 5′–TTTATTAGTATACTAATAAA (Fig 9B and C, boxed sequences). Our sequencing of the telomeric ends of lp54 extends the reference sequence at the left telomeric end by seven nucleotides (Fig 9B, underlined). Further, compared to the lp54 reference sequence, the packaged left and right junction-spanning sequences each encode an additional 18 bp of sequence (Fig 9B and C). These sequences, although unique at each end (Fig 9D), form perfect hairpin structures (Fig 9E and F). Overall, these data suggest that lp54 molecules with complete telomere sequences are packaged into virions. However, whether linear lp54 with covalently closed telomeres or lp54 replication intermediates that contain head-to-head and tail-to-tail junctions are packaged is unclear.
The de novo assembly approach applied to lp54 was also successful in resolving the telomeric ends of other linear elements of the CA-11.2A genome, including the linear chromosome and plasmids lp17, lp56, and lp38 (Fig 10). Additionally, we were able to resolve left and right telomeres for lp36 (Fig 10), providing yet further evidence that lp36 is not fused to lp28-4.
Discussion
In nature, Lyme disease spirochetes exist as diverse populations of closely related bacteria that possess sufficient antigenic variability to allow them to co-infect and reinfect non-naïve vertebrate hosts [61-72]. Moreover, horizontal gene transfer between Lyme disease spirochetes has been extensively documented [19, 73-77]. Nevertheless, the mechanism underlying horizontal genetic exchange among Lyme disease spirochetes has remained undefined. Our study implicates ϕBB-1 in mediating horizontal gene transfer between Lyme disease spirochetes.
Horizontal gene transfer between heterologous spirochetes likely occurs in the tick midgut during and immediately after a blood meal when spirochete replication rates and densities are at their highest. ϕBB-1 replication is also induced in the tick midgut during a bloodmeal [9, 30, 31] with implications for their facilitation of horizontal gene transfer evidenced by homologous recombination between cp32 isoforms [15-17] and the horizontal transfer of cp32s between Borrelia strains [21].
Our sequencing data indicate that ϕBB-1 virions package portions of the entire B. burgdorferi genome, giving ϕBB-1 the potential to mobilize numerous beneficial alleles during the enzootic cycle via generalized transduction. For example, the circular cp32 prophages are highly conserved across the Borrelia genus [26]; however, cp32 isoforms contain variable regions that encode outer membrane lipoproteins such as Bdr, Mlp, and OspE/OspF/Elp, which are known to facilitate the B. burgdorferi lifecycle [24, 26, 27, 78]. The linear plasmid lp54 encodes the outer membrane lipoproteins OspA and OspB, which are required for B. burgdorferi to colonize the tick midgut [79-81]. The outer membrane lipoprotein OspC, which is required for B. burgdorferi to infect a vertebrate host, is encoded by the circular plasmid cp26 [61, 76, 82]. These alleles (and many others) are packaged by ϕBB-1, which is consistent with a role for phage-mediated transduction of genes encoding essential membrane lipoproteins between heterologous spirochetes.
In B. burgdorferi, the linear chromosome is highly conserved as are the circular plasmids cp32 and cp26 and the linear plasmids lp17, lp38, lp54, and lp56 are all evolutionarily stable [4-6, 16, 83]. However, other plasmids distributed across the genospecies show considerably more variation, encode mostly (87%) pseudogenes, and are thought to be in a state of evolutionary decay [6]. The packaged plasmids for which we recovered full-length contigs include the cp32s, cp26, lp17, lp38, lp54, and lp56 —the same plasmids that are evolutionarily stable across the genospecies [4-6, 16, 83]. These observations suggest that genes encoded on ϕBB-1-packaged plasmids are under positive selection, possibly due to the continuous transduction between Lyme disease spirochetes during the enzootic cycle.
In addition to providing evidence that ϕBB-1 virions package large portions of the B. burgdorferi genome, our study provides insight into ϕBB-1 virion structure and identifies virion proteins present in ϕBB-1. Using mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we confirm that putative capsid and structural genes encoded by the cp32s, such as the major capsid protein P06, are indeed translated and assembled into mature ϕBB-1 virions.
Our long-read sequencing studies indicate that ϕBB-1 packages full-length linear cp32 molecules via a headful mechanism using pac sites. The headful packaging mechanism is used by numerous phages and was first described for E. coli phage T4 in 1967 [84]. After injecting linear DNA into a new host, the phage genome re-circularizes before continuing its replication cycle. Genes encoded near the ends of linear phage genomes are subject to copy number variation and recombination as the phage genome re-circularizes [85]. Our data suggest that the conversion of linear cp32 molecules into circular cp32 molecules occurs in the vicinity of the erp locus, which would facilitate recombination with polymorphic erp alleles encoded by other cp32 isoforms in diverse B. burgdorferi hosts.
In this study, the packaging of specific cp32 isoforms was biased: cp32-3, cp32-5, cp32-10, and cp32-13 were predominantly packaged while cp32-1 was rarely packaged. This result is consistent with observations by Wachter et al. where cp32 isoform copy number and transcriptional activity were not uniform across all cp32 isoforms in B. burgdorferi strain B31: cp32-1, cp32-3, and cp32-6 were predominantly induced (highest copy numbers) and had the highest transcriptional activity while cp32-9 was not induced and was transcriptionally inactive [9]. Variability in the pac region or other regulatory elements involved in cp32 induction may explain why different cp32 isoforms replicate and/or are packaged at different rates. On the other hand, the motifs that are found most broadly in the pac region (e.g., Fig 8C, blue triangle and green square) may represent binding sites for conserved host factors that are present in all Borrelia species whereas the other motifs may represent protein-binding sites or regulatory sequences that are specific to given prophage or plasmids.
In the intergenic region upstream of the erp loci, we identified a 377-bp region that contains the cp32 pac signal. Introducing the cp32 pac region to a shuttle vector facilitated the packaging of the shuttle vector into ϕBB-1 virions. Our identification of the cp32 pac site will be useful for the engineering of recombinant DNA that can be packaged into virions that infect spirochetes, giving ϕBB-1 the potential for use as a tool for the genetic dissection and manipulation of Lyme disease spirochetes.
After the cp32s, lp54 was the most frequently packaged plasmid. This may be related to the evolutionary origins of lp54: about one-third of the genes encoded by lp54 are paralogous to cp32-encoded genes and lp54 is thought to have emerged from an ancient recombination event between a cp32 and a linear plasmid [6]. In addition, lp54 encodes putative phage proteins including a porin (BBA74) [86] and phage capsid proteins that are highly conserved across the genospecies [87], which we detected in purified virions by mass spectrometry. While we observed virions with a distinct elongated capsid morphology, virions with a notably smaller capsid morphology have been observed after induction in vitro [9, 32, 33]. These observations raise the possibility that lp54 may be a prophage, although it is not clear if lp54 produces its own capsids, relies on cp32-encoded capsids, or if both lp54 and cp32 capsid proteins assemble to produce chimeric virions.
Our long-read dataset contained reads that spanned head-to-head and tail-to-tail junctions in lp54. These reads allowed us to define the lp54 telomere sequences; however, whether full-length lp54 molecules are packaged or at which stage of the replication cycle lp54 is packaged is unknown. In B. burgdorferi, both the linear chromosome and linear plasmids have covalently closed hairpin telomeres and replicate via a telomere resolution mechanism [56, 58, 88, 89]. Examination of a naturally occurring lp54 dimer in B. valaisiana isolate VS116 suggests that a circular head-to-head dimer is produced during lp54 replication prior to telomere resolution and replication completion [90]. Linear, covalently closed lp54 molecules may be packaged or lp54 replication intermediates may be packaged.
As obligate vector-borne bacteria, Lyme disease spirochetes live relatively restrictive lifestyles that might be expected to i) limit their exposure to novel gene pools, ii) enhance reductive evolution, and iii) favor the loss of mobile DNA elements. A role for ϕBB-1 in mediating the transduction of beneficial alleles between heterologous spirochetes in local vector and reservoir host populations may explain why cp32 prophages are ubiquitous not only among Lyme disease spirochetes, but also relapsing fever spirochetes.
Methods
ϕBB-1 induction.
Borrelia burgdorferi B31 or CA-11.2A was grown in BSK-II growth medium to 7 × 107/mL and centrifuged at 6,000 × g, 10 min., 35°C to pellet cells, which were resuspended in fresh media to a density of 2 × 108/mL. EtOH was added to a final concentration of 5% and the resuspended culture was incubated at 35°C for an additional 2 hours to induce phage production. The induced culture was then centrifuged at 6,000 × g, 10 min, 35°C and the pellet was resuspended in fresh media to a density of 5 × 107/mL after which it was incubated at 35°C for 72 hours to produce phage. After 72 hours, the culture was centrifuged at 6,000 × g for 10 min to remove cells and the phage-containing supernatant was filtered twice through 0.2 μm filters before storage at 4°C.
cp32 qPCR.
For qPCR, 100 μL of filtered culture supernatant was mixed with 20ul of chloroform to eliminate remaining intact cells and then centrifuged to separate the phases. 80 μL of the aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube, mixed with 0.8 μL of 100X DNaseI reaction buffer (1M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 250 mM MgCl2, 50 mM CaCl2) and DNase treated with 0.8U DNaseI for 1 hour at 37°C. Following DNase treatment, supernatants were mixed with 20 μl chloroform to inactivate DNase, spun to separate phases and the aqueous phase added directly to a qPCR reaction (0.5 μL treated supernatant/10 μL total reaction volume). qPCR was performed using SsoAdvanced Universal Inhibitor-Tolerant SYBR green supermix (BioRad, Hercules, CA) following maufacturer’s instructions, primers that target a conserved cp32 intergenic region between bbp08 and bbp09 (5’-CTTTACACATATCAAGACCTTAAC, 5’-CAAACCACCCAATTTCCAATTCC) and the flaB gene to control for B. burgdorferi chromosomal DNA contamination (5’-TCTTTTCTCTGGTGAGGGAGCT, 5’-TCCTTCCTGTTGAACACCCTCT) [91] at an empirically determined annealing temperature of 55°C. Absolute cp32 and flaB copy numbers were calculated from a standard curve generated using a cloned copy of the target sequences. To estimate phage number for CA-11.2A and correct for any remaining unpackaged cp32 plasmids, five times the number of detected flaB copies was subtracted from the absolute cp32 starting quantity.
ϕBB-1 virion purification for DNA extraction.
Centrifuged, filtered phage supernatants were treated with 1/10th volume of chloroform to lyse any remaining cells and chloroform was allowed to separate at 4°C overnight. The aqueous layer was transferred to a new vessel and mixed with saturated ammonium sulfate to a final concentration of 50%. NaOH was slowly added during ammonium sulfate addition to maintain pH based on the BSK-II phenol red indicator and the final pH was adjusted to 7.5. Precipitations were incubated overnight 4°C and then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 minutes (4°C) to collect phage pellets. Precipitated phages were gently resuspended in SM buffer overnight at 4°C.
ϕBB-1 electron microscopy imaging.
Purified virions (3–4 μl) were absorbed to the surface of freshly glow-discharged, formvar-coated 200 mesh copper grids and negatively stained with 5 μl of 2% methylamine vanadate (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY) prior to viewing on a Hitachi HT7700 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi-High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
ϕBB-1 virion proteomics.
Purified virions (200 μg total protein) were reduced, alkylated, and purified by chloroform/methanol extraction prior to digestion with sequencing grade modified porcine trypsin (Promega). Peptides were separated on an Acquity BEH C18 column (100 x 1.0 mm, Waters) using an UltiMate 3000 UHPLC system (Thermo). Peptides were eluted by a 50 min gradient from 99:1 to 60:40 buffer A:B ratio (Buffer A = 0.1% formic acid, 0.5% acetonitrile. Buffer B = 0.1% formic acid, 99.9% acetonitrile). Eluted peptides were ionized by electrospray (2.4 kV) followed by mass spectrometric analysis on an Orbitrap Eclipse Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo) using multi-notch MS3 parameters. MS data were acquired using the FTMS analyzer over a range of 375 to 1500 m/z. Up to 10 MS/MS precursors were selected for HCD activation with normalized collision energy of 65 kV, followed by acquisition of MS3 reporter ion data using the FTMS analyzer over a range of 100-500 m/z. Proteins were identified and quantified using MaxQuant (Max Planck Institute) TMT MS3 reporter ion quantification with a parent ion tolerance of 2.5 ppm and a fragment ion tolerance of 0.5 Da.
Packaged ϕBB-1 DNA purification.
For DNA extractions, phage were collected and precipitated as described above, with the addition of a DNase treatment prior to ammonium precipitation. The aqueous phage of chloroform supernatants were mixed with 1/100th volume 100X DNAse buffer and 1U/mL DNase I followed by incubated at 37°C for 3 hours and by 4°C overnight. For samples subjected to population sequencing, high molecular-weight salmon sperm DNA (1.7 μg/mL, a concentration that approximates the amount of DNA released by 3 × 108 lysed bacterial cells per milliliter of media) was added prior to DNAse digestion to assess carryover of DNA contained outside of phage capsids.
After ammonium sulfate precipitation and resuspension of phage pellets in SM buffer, EDTA was added to a final concentration of 5 mM and SDS to a final concentration of 0.5%. After addition of 20 μg/mL RNAse and incubation at room temperature for 20 minutes, phage capsids were digested with 200ug/mL proteinase K at 55°C for 1 hour. Samples were extracted twice with an equal volume of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) followed by a single extraction with an equal volume of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24:1) using Qiagen Maxtract High Density medium (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). NaCl was added to 300 mM and DNA was precipitated with 2.5 volumes of 100% EtOH at −20°C overnight. DNA was pelleted by centrifugation (14,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C), washed 3X with 70% EtOH and re-spun for 20 min, at 14,000 × g 4°C. The DNA pellet was gently air-dried followed by resuspension in 10mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5 at 4°C overnight.
Nanopore sequencing.
Sequencing libraries were prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions using library kit SQK-LSK112, native barcoding kit SQK-NBD112.24 and 500 ng of purified phage DNA (Oxoford Nanopore, Oxford, UK). Libraries were sequenced on a MinION MK1-B using a FLO-MIN112 flowcell and default settings until pores were exhausted. Basecalling and demultiplexing was performed with Guppy 6.4.6 using the super high accuracy (SUP) model (dna_r10.4_e8.1_sup.cfg) and default parameters. Run quality control measures were checked with MinIONQC (v1.4.1) [92] and FastQC (v0.11.9). Adaptor trimming was performed using s (v0.2.4) [93]. Reads were deposited in the NCBI BioProject database accession PRJNA1059007 and in Supplementary Data File 2.
Sequence analysis pipeline.
Adapter-trimmed long-reads with quality scores ≥7 were used to isolate ≥ 5kb reads using Filtlong (v0.2.1). ≥5kb reads were mapped to the reference B. burgdorferi CA-11.2A genome (RefSeq assembly: GCF_000172315.2) with minimap2 (v2.26-r1175) [94]. Primary mapping reads with MAPQ >20 were isolated by contig, filtered, and converted to final file formats using Samtools (v1.17) [95] and SeqKit (v2.5.1) [96]. Read statistics for each replicate were graphed and viewed using GraphPad Prism (v10.1.1). For each contig, de novo assemblies were created using Trycycler (v0.5.4) [97], which relied on input assemblies from Flye (v2.9.2-b1786) [98], Raven (v1.8.3) [99], and Minimap2/Miniasm/Minipolish (v2.26-r1175/v0.3-r179/v0.1.2) [94, 100]. The long-read de novo assemblies were then polished with short reads using Minipolish (v0.1.2) [100]. The telomeres of the linear chromosome and linear plasmids were manually identified in SnapGene (v5.3.3), and the hairpin structures were predicted by the Mfold webserver (http://www.unafold.org/mfold/applications/dna-folding-form.php) [101]. The terminal ends of the cp32 prophage genomes were predicted using PhageTerm through the Galaxy webserver (https://galaxy.pasteur.fr/) [50], via input of the ≥5kb long-read sequences. Coverage maps of the primary mapping or primary and supplementary mapping reads were created by mapping ≥ 5kb long-reads to the de novo assembled CA-11.2A genome or the reference B. burgdorferi CA-11.2A genome with Minimap2, converted to final file formats using Samtools, and viewed using R (v4.3.2) and ggplot2 (v3.4.4).
Pac site cloning and qPCR.
The putative pac region from CA-11.2A genomic DNA was amplified using primers 5’-TAGACATGAGCGGCCGCAAGACAAGCTCCTTATAAGTGTTACT-3’and 5’-ATAGCTAGATGCGGCCGCTTACTCCGTAACTCTAAAGAATAATGC-3’, purified and digested with NotI and cloned into Not-I-digested pBSV2_2 [51] to create a shuttle vector in which the CA-11.2A pac region is maintained but cannot be expressed. Vector sequences were verified using long-read sequencing and transformed into CA-11.2A via electroporation [102]. Clones were PCR-screened for maintenance of resident plasmids as previously described using published primers for B. burgdorferi cp32-1, cp26, cp32-3 (which target CA-11.2A cp32-5), cp32-6 (which target CA-11.2A cp32-3), lp28-3, lp17, lp54, lp28-4 [103] and CA-11.2A-specific primers for cp32-3 (5’-TGGGTTGTAGAGTGGCTGTG-3’, 5’-TCACCACTTGCGTAATTCTTGC-3’), cp32-10 (5’-TAGAGCAAAGTCTTGAAAAGACAAC-3’, 5’-CCCACGCTTTGTTGAGACC-3’) and cp32-13 (5’- AATCTGGGCTGTAGAGCAGG-3’, 5’-CTGCTCCTGAGGCTCATCC-3’). Clones transformed with pac plasmids or the empty vector were grown in triplicate to late-log phase in BSK-II and used to generate phage as described above. Encapsidated vector was measured directly from DNase-treated culture supernatants as described above using qPCR primers that target the kan resistance gene on pBSV2_2 (5’-CACCGGATTCAGTCGTCACT-3’, 5’-GATCCTGGTATCGGTCTGCG-3’, 120 bp product). A cloned copy of the kan PCR product was used to generate a standard curve for absolute quantification.
Identification of conserved motifs in B. burgdorferi cp32 isoforms.
The roughly 430 nucleotides upstream of the erp26, erpK, erpG, ospE and erpK genes of the B. burgdorferi CA-11.2A cp32 isoforms cp32-1, cp32-3, cp32-5, cp32-10 and cp32-13 respectively were used as queries for a discontinuous MegaBLAST against the NCBI Nucleotide collection database. The results from these first five BLASTs were combined and sequence hits with more than 80% identity were removed with CD-HIT [104]. The resulting representative sequences were used as queries for discontinuous MegaBLAST against the NCBI Nucleotide collection (nt) database, and sequence hits with more than 80% identity were removed with CD-HIT [104]. This process was iterated twice more for a total of three MegaBLAST searches with a representative list of 80% identity query sequences. The sequence hits from the final MegaBLASTs were combined and sequences with more than 95% identity were removed with CD-HIT [104], generating a list of 178 sequences. These 178 sequences were used as an input dataset for the MEME webserver [52], with custom parameters of “Maximum Number of Motifs” set to “10”, and “Motif Site Distribution” set to “Any number of sites per sequence”. MEME identified motifs in 160 of the input sequences. The Position Weight Matrices (PWMs) of the 10 motifs identified by MEME were used as inputs for FIMO [105] to search for significant sequence matches (q-value < 0.001) in the B. burgdorferi chromosome and the B. burgdorferi cp32-1, cp32-3, cp32-5, cp32-10, cp32-13, cp26, lp17, lp54 plasmid DNA sequences. The cp32 isoforms had nine highly conserved sequence motifs, some motifs present in multiple copies and arranged in a conserved architecture. The cp26, lp17, lp54 and chromosome sequences did not contain this conserved architecture of nine motifs (see Supplementary Data file 1). The sequence logo of each motif was generated by taking the sequence fragments that MEME used to make each PWM, and submitting these sequence fragments to the WebLogo 3.0 webserver [106]. The iterative discontinuous MegaBLAST searches had introduced eukaryotic sequence fragments into the list of 178 non-redundant sequences, suggesting that the search likely reached an endpoint and found most of the related sequences in the NCBI database. To generate a phylogenetic tree, eukaryotic sequence fragments were first removed, and the remaining 149 non-redundant sequences were aligned using the MAFFT webserver [107], with custom parameters of “Direction of nucleotide sequences” set to “Adjust direction according to the first sequence”, and “Strategy” set to E-INS-2. The resulting alignment was used as input for the IQ-TREE webserver [108, 109], with the following command-line: path_to_iqtree -s *.fasta -st DNA -m TEST -bb 1000 -alrt 1000. TreeViewer was used to display the phylogenetic tree [110].
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Patti Rosa for helpful discussions and to the IDeA National Resource for Quantitative Proteomics Center at the University of Arkansas for their assistance with proteomic analyses of phage virions. PRS is supported by NIH grants R21AI151597 and P30GM140963. MK is supported by NIH grant P20GM103474. DRF is supported by NSF GRFP grant 366502. A.S-F. is a M. Jane Williams and Valerie Vargo Presidential Assistant Professor of Biology and is supported by NIH grants K99GM147842 and R00GM147842, and by the Postdoctoral Enrichment Program Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund (G-1021106.01). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Mead PS. Epidemiology of Lyme disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29(2):187–210. Epub 2015/05/23. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adrion ER, Aucott J, Lemke KW, Weiner JP. Health care costs, utilization and patterns of care following Lyme disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116767. Epub 2015/02/05. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Radolf JD, Strle K, Lemieux JE, Strle F. Lyme Disease in Humans. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;42:333–84. Epub 20201211. doi: 10.21775/cimb.042.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schwartz I, Margos G, Casjens SR, Qiu WG, Eggers CH. Multipartite Genome of Lyme Disease Borrelia: Structure, Variation and Prophages. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;42:409–54. Epub 20201217. doi: 10.21775/cimb.042.409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Casjens SR, Mongodin EF, Qiu WG, Luft BJ, Schutzer SE, Gilcrease EB, et al. Genome stability of Lyme disease spirochetes: comparative genomics of Borrelia burgdorferi plasmids. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33280. Epub 20120314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Casjens S, Palmer N, van Vugt R, Huang WM, Stevenson B, Rosa P, et al. A bacterial genome in flux: the twelve linear and nine circular extrachromosomal DNAs in an infectious isolate of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35(3):490–516. Epub 2000/02/15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Samuels DS, Lybecker MC, Yang XF, Ouyang Z, Bourret TJ, Boyle WK, et al. Gene Regulation and Transcriptomics. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;42:223–66. Epub 20201210. doi: 10.21775/cimb.042.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fraser CM, Casjens S, Huang WM, Sutton GG, Clayton R, Lathigra R, et al. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature. 1997;390(6660):580–6. doi: 10.1038/37551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wachter J, Cheff B, Hillman C, Carracoi V, Dorward DW, Martens C, et al. Coupled induction of prophage and virulence factors during tick transmission of the Lyme disease spirochete. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):198. Epub 20230113. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35897-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Qiu WG, Martin CL. Evolutionary genomics of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: findings, hypotheses, and the rise of hybrids. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;27:576–93. Epub 20140403. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brisson D, Drecktrah D, Eggers CH, Samuels DS. Genetics of Borrelia burgdorferi. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:515–36. Epub 2012/09/15. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-011112-112140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qiu WG, Bosler EM, Campbell JR, Ugine GD, Wang IN, Luft BJ, et al. A population genetic study of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto from eastern Long Island, New York, suggested frequency-dependent selection, gene flow and host adaptation. Hereditas. 1997;127(3):203–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1997.00203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haven J, Vargas LC, Mongodin EF, Xue V, Hernandez Y, Pagan P, et al. Pervasive recombination and sympatric genome diversification driven by frequency-dependent selection in Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease bacterium. Genetics. 2011;189(3):951–66. Epub 20110902. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.130773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Combs MA, Tufts DM, Adams B, Lin YP, Kolokotronis SO, Diuk-Wasser MA. Host adaptation drives genetic diversity in a vector-borne disease system. PNAS Nexus. 2023;2(8):pgad234. Epub 20230808. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brisson D, Zhou W, Jutras BL, Casjens S, Stevenson B. Distribution of cp32 prophages among Lyme disease-causing spirochetes and natural diversity of their lipoprotein-encoding erp loci. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(13):4115–28. Epub 20130426. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00817-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Casjens SR, Gilcrease EB, Vujadinovic M, Mongodin EF, Luft BJ, Schutzer SE, et al. Plasmid diversity and phylogenetic consistency in the Lyme disease agent Borrelia burgdorferi. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):165. Epub 20170215. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3553-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Margos G, Hepner S, Mang C, Marosevic D, Reynolds SE, Krebs S, et al. Lost in plasmids: next generation sequencing and the complex genome of the tick-borne pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):422. Epub 2017/06/01. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3804-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barbour AG, Travinsky B. Evolution and distribution of the ospC Gene, a transferable serotype determinant of Borrelia burgdorferi. MBio. 2010;1(4). Epub 20100928. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00153-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marconi RT, Samuels DS, Landry RK, Garon CF. Analysis of the distribution and molecular heterogeneity of the ospD gene among the Lyme disease spirochetes: evidence for lateral gene exchange. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(15):4572–82. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.15.4572-4582.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stevenson B, Casjens S, Rosa P. Evidence of past recombination events among the genes encoding the Erp antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi. Microbiology (Reading). 1998;144 ( Pt 7):1869–79. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-7-1869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Stevenson B, Miller JC. Intra- and interbacterial genetic exchange of Lyme disease spirochete erp genes generates sequence identity amidst diversity. J Mol Evol. 2003;57(3):309–24. Epub 2003/11/25. doi: 10.1007/s00239-003-2482-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Touchon M, Moura de Sousa JA, Rocha EP. Embracing the enemy: the diversification of microbial gene repertoires by phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017;38:66–73. Epub 20170517. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brissette CA, Haupt K, Barthel D, Cooley AE, Bowman A, Skerka C, et al. Borrelia burgdorferi infection-associated surface proteins ErpP, ErpA, and ErpC bind human plasminogen. Infect Immun. 2009;77(1):300–6. Epub 2008/11/13. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01133-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brissette CA, Cooley AE, Burns LH, Riley SP, Verma A, Woodman ME, et al. Lyme borreliosis spirochete Erp proteins, their known host ligands, and potential roles in mammalian infection. Int J Med Microbiol. 2008;298 Suppl 1:257–67. Epub 20080111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stevenson B, Bono JL, Schwan TG, Rosa P. Borrelia burgdorferi erp proteins are immunogenic in mammals infected by tick bite, and their synthesis is inducible in cultured bacteria. Infect Immun. 1998;66(6):2648–54. Epub 1998/05/29. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.6.2648-2654.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stevenson B, Zuckert WR, Akins DR. Repetition, conservation, and variation: the multiple cp32 plasmids of Borrelia species. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;2(4):411–22. Epub 2000/11/15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kenedy MR, Lenhart TR, Akins DR. The role of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface proteins. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;66(1):1–19. Epub 20120521. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00980.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stevenson B, Casjens S, Rosa P. Evidence of past recombination events among the genes encoding the Erp antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi. Microbiology (Reading). 1998;144 (Pt 7):1869–79. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-7-1869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Qiu WG, Schutzer SE, Bruno JF, Attie O, Xu Y, Dunn JJ, et al. Genetic exchange and plasmid transfers in Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto revealed by three-way genome comparisons and multilocus sequence typing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(39):14150–5. Epub 20040916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402745101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sapiro AL, Hayes BM, Volk RF, Zhang JY, Brooks DM, Martyn C, et al. Longitudinal map of transcriptome changes in the Lyme pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi during tick-borne transmission. Elife. 2023;12. Epub 20230714. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tokarz R, Anderton JM, Katona LI, Benach JL. Combined effects of blood and temperature shift on Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression as determined by whole genome DNA array. Infect Immun. 2004;72(9):5419–32. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.9.5419-5432.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Eggers CH, Kimmel BJ, Bono JL, Elias AF, Rosa P, Samuels DS. Transduction by phiBB-1, a bacteriophage of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(16):4771–8. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.16.4771-4778.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eggers CH, Samuels DS. Molecular evidence for a new bacteriophage of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(23):7308–13. Epub 1999/11/26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang H, Marconi RT. Demonstration of cotranscription and 1-methyl-3-nitroso-nitroguanidine induction of a 30-gene operon of Borrelia burgdorferi: evidence that the 32-kilobase circular plasmids are prophages. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(23):7985–95. Epub 2005/11/18. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.23.7985-7995.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fillol-Salom A, Alsaadi A, Sousa JAM, Zhong L, Foster KR, Rocha EPC, et al. Bacteriophages benefit from generalized transduction. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15(7):e1007888. Epub 2019/07/06. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zinder ND, Lederberg J. Genetic exchange in Salmonella. J Bacteriol. 1952;64(5):679–99. doi: 10.1128/jb.64.5.679-699.1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Budzik JM, Rosche WA, Rietsch A, O'Toole GA. Isolation and characterization of a generalized transducing phage for Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains PAO1 and PA14. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(10):3270–3. Epub 2004/05/06. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.10.3270-3273.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mandecki W, Krajewska-Grynkiewicz K, Klopotowski T. A quantitative model for nonrandom generalized transduction, applied to the phage P22-Salmonella typhimurium system. Genetics. 1986;114(2):633–57. Epub 1986/10/01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ebel-Tsipis J, Botstein D, Fox MS. Generalized transduction by phage P22 in Salmonella typhimurium. I. Molecular origin of transducing DNA. J Mol Biol. 1972;71(2):433–48. Epub 1972/11/14. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90361-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chiang YN, Penades JR, Chen J. Genetic transduction by phages and chromosomal islands: The new and noncanonical. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15(8):e1007878. Epub 20190808. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Eggers CH, Gray CM, Preisig AM, Glenn DM, Pereira J, Ayers RW, et al. Phage-mediated horizontal gene transfer of both prophage and heterologous DNA by varphiBB-1, a bacteriophage of Borrelia burgdorferi. Pathog Dis. 2016;74(9). Epub 2016/11/05. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftw107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Eggers CH. Identification and characterization of a bacteriophage of Borrelia burgdorferi Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers 10590. 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rumnieks J, Fuzik T, Tars K. Structure of the Borrelia bacteriophage phiBB1 procapsid. J Mol Biol. 2023:168323. Epub 20231020. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Eggers CH, Casjens S, Hayes SF, Garon CF, Damman CJ, Oliver DB, et al. Bacteriophages of spirochetes. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;2(4):365–73. Epub 2000/11/15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Neubert U, Schaller M, Januschke E, Stolz W, Schmieger H. Bacteriophages induced by ciprofloxacin in a Borrelia burgdorferi skin isolate. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1993;279(3):307–15. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(11)80363-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gillis M, De Ley J, De Cleene M. The determination of molecular weight of bacterial genome DNA from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem. 1970;12(1):143–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb00831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15(3):R46. Epub 20140303. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schutzer SE, Fraser-Liggett CM, Casjens SR, Qiu WG, Dunn JJ, Mongodin EF, et al. Whole-genome sequences of thirteen isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(4):1018–20. Epub 20101008. doi: 10.1128/JB.01158-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Casjens SR, Gilcrease EB. Determining DNA packaging strategy by analysis of the termini of the chromosomes in tailed-bacteriophage virions. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;502:91–111. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier LC, Bikard D, Monot M. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8292. Epub 20170815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Takacs CN, Kloos ZA, Scott M, Rosa PA, Jacobs-Wagner C. Fluorescent Proteins, Promoters, and Selectable Markers for Applications in the Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(24). Epub 2018/10/14. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01824-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W202–8. Epub 20090520. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Casjens S. Evolution of the linear DNA replicons of the Borrelia spirochetes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2(5):529–34. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(99)00012-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tourand Y, Bankhead T, Wilson SL, Putteet-Driver AD, Barbour AG, Byram R, et al. Differential telomere processing by Borrelia telomere resolvases in vitro but not in vivo. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(21):7378–86. Epub 20060825. doi: 10.1128/JB.00760-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tourand Y, Kobryn K, Chaconas G. Sequence-specific recognition but position-dependent cleavage of two distinct telomeres by the Borrelia burgdorferi telomere resolvase, ResT. Mol Microbiol. 2003;48(4):901–11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03485.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kobryn K, Chaconas G. Hairpin Telomere Resolvases. Microbiol Spectr. 2014;2(6). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0023-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Huang WM, Robertson M, Aron J, Casjens S. Telomere exchange between linear replicons of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(13):4134–41. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.13.4134-4141.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chaconas G, Stewart PE, Tilly K, Bono JL, Rosa P. Telomere resolution in the Lyme disease spirochete. Embo J. 2001;20(12):3229–37. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.12.3229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Casjens S, Murphy M, DeLange M, Sampson L, van Vugt R, Huang WM. Telomeres of the linear chromosomes of Lyme disease spirochaetes: nucleotide sequence and possible exchange with linear plasmid telomeres. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26(3):581–96. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6051963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tourand Y, Deneke J, Moriarty TJ, Chaconas G. Characterization and in vitro reaction properties of 19 unique hairpin telomeres from the linear plasmids of the lyme disease spirochete. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(11):7264–72. Epub 20090102. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808918200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Jauris S, Hofmann A, Pradel I, Soutschek E, et al. Immunological and molecular polymorphisms of OspC, an immunodominant major outer surface protein of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 1993;61(5):2182–91. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.5.2182-2191.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Probert WS, Crawford M, Cadiz RB, LeFebvre RB. Immunization with outer surface protein (Osp) A, but not OspC, provides cross-protection of mice challenged with North American isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Infect Dis. 1997;175(2):400–5. doi: 10.1093/infdis/175.2.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Barthold SW. Specificity of infection-induced immunity among Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species. Infect Immun. 1999;67(1):36–42. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.1.36-42.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Brisson D, Vandermause MF, Meece JK, Reed KD, Dykhuizen DE. Evolution of northeastern and midwestern Borrelia burgdorferi, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(6):911–7. doi: 10.3201/eid1606.090329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Nadelman RB, Hanincova K, Mukherjee P, Liveris D, Nowakowski J, McKenna D, et al. Differentiation of reinfection from relapse in recurrent Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(20):1883–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bhatia B, Hillman C, Carracoi V, Cheff BN, Tilly K, Rosa PA. Infection history of the blood-meal host dictates pathogenic potential of the Lyme disease spirochete within the feeding tick vector. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14(4):e1006959. Epub 20180405. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kurtti TJ, Munderloh UG, Hughes CA, Engstrom SM, Johnson RC. Resistance to tick-borne spirochete challenge induced by Borrelia burgdorferi strains that differ in expression of outer surface proteins. Infect Immun. 1996;64(10):4148–53. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.10.4148-4153.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Piesman J, Dolan MC, Happ CM, Luft BJ, Rooney SE, Mather TN, et al. Duration of immunity to reinfection with tick-transmitted Borrelia burgdorferi in naturally infected mice. Infect Immun. 1997;65(10):4043–7. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.10.4043-4047.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hofmeister EK, Glass GE, Childs JE, Persing DH. Population dynamics of a naturally occurring heterogeneous mixture of Borrelia burgdorferi clones. Infect Immun. 1999;67(11):5709–16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.11.5709-5716.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shang ES, Wu XY, Lovett MA, Miller JN, Blanco DR. Homologous and heterologous Borrelia burgdorferi challenge of infection-derived immune rabbits using host-adapted organisms. Infect Immun. 2001;69(1):593–8. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.593-598.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Derdakova M, Dudioak V, Brei B, Brownstein JS, Schwartz I, Fish D. Interaction and transmission of two Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto strains in a tick-rodent maintenance system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(11):6783–8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6783-6788.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Khatchikian CE, Nadelman RB, Nowakowski J, Schwartz I, Wormser GP, Brisson D. Evidence for strain-specific immunity in patients treated for early lyme disease. Infect Immun. 2014;82(4):1408–13. Epub 20140113. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01451-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dykhuizen DE, Polin DS, Dunn JJ, Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V, Dattwyler RJ, et al. Borrelia burgdorferi is clonal: implications for taxonomy and vaccine development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(21):10163–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Stevenson B, Barthold SW. Expression and sequence of outer surface protein C among North American isolates of Borrelia burgdorferi. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994;124(3):367–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07310.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jauris-Heipke S, Liegl G, Preac-Mursic V, Rossler D, Schwab E, Soutschek E, et al. Molecular analysis of genes encoding outer surface protein C (OspC) of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: relationship to ospA genotype and evidence of lateral gene exchange of ospC. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(7):1860–6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.7.1860-1866.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Livey I, Gibbs CP, Schuster R, Dorner F. Evidence for lateral transfer and recombination in OspC variation in Lyme disease Borrelia. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18(2):257–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_18020257.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Will G, Jauris-Heipke S, Schwab E, Busch U, Rossler D, Soutschek E, et al. Sequence analysis of ospA genes shows homogeneity within Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto and Borrelia afzelii strains but reveals major subgroups within the Borrelia garinii species. Med Microbiol Immunol. 1995;184(2):73–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00221390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Hefty PS, Brooks CS, Jett AM, White GL, Wikel SK, Kennedy RC, et al. OspE-related, OspF-related, and Elp lipoproteins are immunogenic in baboons experimentally infected with Borrelia burgdorferi and in human lyme disease patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(11):4256–65. Epub 2002/11/01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Tilly K, Bestor A, Rosa PA. Functional Equivalence of OspA and OspB, but Not OspC, in Tick Colonization by Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect Immun. 2016;84(5):1565–73. Epub 20160422. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00063-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Battisti JM, Bono JL, Rosa PA, Schrumpf ME, Schwan TG, Policastro PF. Outer surface protein A protects Lyme disease spirochetes from acquired host immunity in the tick vector. Infect Immun. 2008;76(11):5228–37. Epub 20080908. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00410-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yang XF, Pal U, Alani SM, Fikrig E, Norgard MV. Essential role for OspA/B in the life cycle of the Lyme disease spirochete. J Exp Med. 2004;199(5):641–8. Epub 20040223. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wang IN, Dykhuizen DE, Qiu W, Dunn JJ, Bosler EM, Luft BJ. Genetic diversity of ospC in a local population of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto. Genetics. 1999;151(1):15–30. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lemieux JE, Huang W, Hill N, Cerar T, Freimark L, Hernandez S, et al. Whole genome sequencing of human Borrelia burgdorferi isolates reveals linked blocks of accessory genome elements located on plasmids and associated with human dissemination. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19(8):e1011243. Epub 20230831. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Streisinger G, Emrich J, Stahl MM. Chromosome structure in phage t4, iii. Terminal redundancy and length determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967;57(2):292–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.2.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Beaulaurier J, Luo E, Eppley JM, Uyl PD, Dai X, Burger A, et al. Assembly-free single-molecule sequencing recovers complete virus genomes from natural microbial communities. Genome Res. 2020;30(3):437–46. Epub 2020/02/23. doi: 10.1101/gr.251686.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Skare JT, Champion CI, Mirzabekov TA, Shang ES, Blanco DR, Erdjument-Bromage H, et al. Porin activity of the native and recombinant outer membrane protein Oms28 of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(16):4909–18. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.16.4909-4918.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kasumba IN, Tilly K, Lin T, Norris SJ, Rosa PA. Strict Conservation yet Non-Essential Nature of Plasmid Gene bba40 in the Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(3):e0047723. Epub 20230403. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00477-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Barbour AG, Garon CF. Linear plasmids of the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi have covalently closed ends. Science. 1987;237(4813):409–11. doi: 10.1126/science.3603026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hinnebusch J, Tilly K. Linear plasmids and chromosomes in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1993;10(5):917–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb00963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Marconi RT, Casjens S, Munderloh UG, Samuels DS. Analysis of linear plasmid dimers in Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolates: implications concerning the potential mechanism of linear plasmid replication. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(11):3357–61. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.11.3357-3361.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pahl A, Kuhlbrandt U, Brune K, Rollinghoff M, Gessner A. Quantitative detection of Borrelia burgdorferi by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(6):1958–63. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1958-1963.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lanfear R, Schalamun M, Kainer D, Wang W, Schwessinger B. MinIONQC: fast and simple quality control for MinION sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(3):523–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom. 2017;3(10):e000132. Epub 20170914. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(18):3094–100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience. 2021;10(2). doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Shen W, Le S, Li Y, Hu F. SeqKit: A Cross-Platform and Ultrafast Toolkit for FASTA/Q File Manipulation. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0163962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G, Vezina B, et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biology. 2021;22(1). doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37(5):540–6. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Vaser R, Šikić M. Time- and memory-efficient genome assembly with Raven. Nature Computational Science. 2021;1(5):332–6. doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00073-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wick RR, Holt KE. Benchmarking of long-read assemblers for prokaryote whole genome sequencing. F1000Research. 2021;8:2138.doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21782.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31(13):3406–15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Samuels DS. Electrotransformation of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Methods Mol Biol. 1995;47:253–9. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-310-4:253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bunikis I, Kutschan-Bunikis S, Bonde M, Bergstrom S. Multiplex PCR as a tool for validating plasmid content of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;86(2):243–7. Epub 20110512. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–2. Epub 20121011. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Grant CE, Bailey TL, Noble WS. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(7):1017–8. Epub 20110216. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14(6):1188–90. Epub 2004/06/03. doi: 10.1101/gr.849004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80. Epub 20130116. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(1):268–74. Epub 20141103. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Minh BQ, Nguyen MA, von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(5):1188–95. Epub 20130215. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Bianchini G, Sánchez-Baracaldo P. TreeViewer - Cross-platform software to draw phylogenetic trees. 2023. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7768343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.