Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1992 Aug;99(4):1461–1468. doi: 10.1104/pp.99.4.1461

Interactive Effects of Al3+, H+, and Other Cations on Root Elongation Considered in Terms of Cell-Surface Electrical Potential 1

Thomas B Kinraide 1,2, Peter R Ryan 1,2, Leon V Kochian 1,2
PMCID: PMC1080648  PMID: 16669059

Abstract

The rhizotoxicities of Al3+ and of La3+ to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were similarly ameliorated by cations in the following order of effectiveness: H+ ≈ C3+ > C2+ > C1+. Among tested cations of a given charge, ameliorative effectiveness was similar except that Ca2+ was slightly more effective than other divalent cations and H+ was much more effective than other monovalent cations. H+ rhizotoxicity was also ameliorated by cations in the order C3+ > C2+ > C1+. These results suggest a role for cell-surface electrical potential in the rhizotoxicity of Al3+, La3+, H+, and other toxic cations: negatively charged cell surfaces of the root accumulate the toxic cations, and amelioration is effected by treatments that reduce the negativity of the cell-surface electrical potential by charge screening or cation binding. Membrane-surface activities of free Al3+ or La3+ computed according to a Gouy-Chapman-Stern model correlated well with growth inhibition, which correlated only poorly with Al3+ or La3+ activities in the external medium. The similar responses of Al-intoxicated and La-intoxicated roots to ameliorative treatments provide evidence that Al3+, rather than AlOH2+ or Al(OH)2+, is the principal toxic species of mononuclear Al. Comparisons of the responses of Al-sensitive and Al-tolerant wheats to Al3+ and to La3+ did not support the hypothesis that varietal sensitivity to Al3+ is based upon differences in cell-surface electrical potential.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abe S., Takeda J. Effects of la on surface charges, dielectrophoresis, and electrofusion of barley protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 1988 Jun;87(2):389–394. doi: 10.1104/pp.87.2.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akeson M. A., Munns D. N., Burau R. G. Adsorption of Al3+ to phosphatidylcholine vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989 Nov 17;986(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(89)90269-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barber J. Membrane surface charges and potentials in relation to photosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980 Dec;594(4):253–308. doi: 10.1016/0304-4173(80)90003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kinraide T. B. Assessing the Rhizotoxicity of the Aluminate Ion, Al(OH)(4). Plant Physiol. 1990 Aug;93(4):1620–1625. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.4.1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kinraide T. B., Parker D. R. Cation amelioration of aluminum toxicity in wheat. Plant Physiol. 1987 Mar;83(3):546–551. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.3.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lau A., McLaughlin A., McLaughlin S. The adsorption of divalent cations to phosphatidylglycerol bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Jul 20;645(2):279–292. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90199-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ohki S., Kurland R. Surface potential of phosphatidylserine monolayers. II. Divalent and monovalent ion binding. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Jul 20;645(2):170–176. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(81)90187-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES