ABSTRACT
Catabolism of algal polysaccharides by marine bacteria is a significant process of marine carbon cycling. β1,3/1,4-Mixed-linkage xylan (MLX) is a class of xylan in the ocean, widely present in the cell walls of red algae. However, the catabolic mechanism of MLX by marine bacteria remains elusive. Recently, we found that a marine Bacteroidetes strain, Polaribacter sp. Q13, is a specialist in degrading MLX, which secretes a novel MLX-specific xylanase. Here, the catabolic specialization of strain Q13 to MLX was studied by multiomics and biochemical analyses. Strain Q13 catabolizes MLX with a canonical starch utilization system (Sus), which is encoded by a single xylan utilization locus, XUL-Q13. In this system, the cell surface glycan-binding protein SGBP-B captures MLX specifically, contributing to the catabolic specificity. The xylanolytic enzyme system of strain Q13 is unique, and the enzymatic cascade dedicates the stepwise hydrolysis of the β1,3- and β1,4-linkages in MLX in the extracellular, periplasmic, and cytoplasmic spaces. Bioinformatics analysis and growth observation suggest that other marine Bacteroidetes strains harboring homologous MLX utilization loci also preferentially utilize MLX. These results reveal the catabolic specialization of MLX degradation by marine Bacteroidetes, leading to a better understanding of the degradation and recycling of MLX driven by marine bacteria.
IMPORTANCE
Red algae contribute substantially to the primary production in marine ecosystems. The catabolism of red algal polysaccharides by marine bacteria is important for marine carbon cycling. Mixed-linkage β1,3/1,4-xylan (MLX, distinct from hetero-β1,4-xylans from terrestrial plants) is an abundant red algal polysaccharide, whose mechanism of catabolism by marine bacteria, however, remains largely unknown. This study reveals the catabolism of MLX by marine Bacteroidetes, promoting our understanding of the degradation and utilization of algal polysaccharides by marine bacteria. This study also sets a foundation for the biomass conversion of MLX.
KEYWORDS: marine bacteria, Bacteroidetes, mixed-linkage xylan, red algae, xylan utilization loci, marine carbon cycling
INTRODUCTION
Algal polysaccharides are abundant organic matter in the ocean (1, 2). The catabolism of algal polysaccharides by marine bacteria is a key component of marine carbon cycling (3). Moreover, algal polysaccharides are the most promising candidates for biomass conversion (4, 5). Therefore, insights into the catabolism of algal polysaccharides by marine bacteria have attracted increasing attention (6–11). Bacteroidetes have been known as prominent degraders of algal polysaccharides. They are abundant and widely distributed in the ocean (12). Bacteroidetes generally package genes involved in polysaccharide catabolism in polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL) within their genomes (13).
Xylans are polysaccharides composed of xylose linked by β1,4- and/or β1,3-glycosidic bonds (14). Xylans in the ocean are mainly from terrestrial plant detritus and algae (11, 15). Xylans in the cell walls of terrestrial plants are hetero-β1,4-xylans, which are composed of β1,4-linked xylose with multiple side chains such as α-L-arabinofuranose, 4-O-methyl-glucuronic acid, or acetate (16, 17). Marine algal xylans with known structures, present in the cell walls of green and red algae, are linear homo-xylans, including β1,3-xylan, β1,4-xylan, and β1,3/1,4-mixed-linkage xylan (MLX) (18, 19). Among, MLX contains both β1,3- and β1,4-linkages at a ratio of approximately 1:4, and single β1,3-linkages are irregularly distributed along the β1,4-linked backbone (Fig. 1A) (19–22). MLX is abundant in red algae, especially in orders Palmariales and Nemaliales (19–22), constituting a significant carbon source for marine bacteria.
The catabolism of hetero-β1,4-xylans has been investigated in detail in both animal gut symbionts and marine Bacteroidetes (11, 23–25). Bacteroidetes catabolize hetero-β1,4-xylans through xylan-targeting PULs (XUL). Due to the heterogeneity and complexity of hetero-β1,4-xylans, a large diversity of xylanolytic enzymes, including β1,4-xylanases, β1,4-xylosidases, and xylan-debranching enzymes (e.g., feruloyl esterases and α-L-glucuronidases), is required for their complete degradation (11, 23–25). Analogous to the archetypal starch utilization system (Sus), susC and susD genes, encoding the TonB-dependent receptor and the cell surface glycan-binding protein (SGBP), respectively, are hallmarks of Bacteroidetes XULs (23–26).
The catabolism of algal xylans, especially MLX, is comparatively less studied. Recently, we found that a marine Bacteroidetes, Polaribacter sp. Q13, which was isolated from the surface of red algae collected from Nelson Island, Antarctic, specifically utilizes red algal MLX among different classes of xylans. From this strain, we identified a novel MLX-specific xylanase, Xyn26A, that specifically degrades MLX and produces mixed-linkage xylooligosaccharides (XOs) by attacking the β1,4-linkages following a β1,3-linkage toward the reducing end (27). This specificity shares an interesting similarity to that of bacterial β1,3/1,4-glucanases, which are involved in the catabolism of mixed-linkage β1,3/1,4-glucan (28). Prior to this study, although a few β1,3-xylanases and β1,4-xylanases have been reported to be able to hydrolyze MLX, they are used to elucidate the structure of MLX (29–31). It is unclear whether they are involved in the catabolism of MLX by microorganisms. Therefore, MLX catabolism by marine bacteria is largely unexplored. It is necessary to decipher the complete pathway of MLX catabolism and the mechanism by which strain Q13 preferentially utilizes MLX.
In this study, we provide multiomics and biochemical insights into the catabolism of MLX by strain Q13. This strain catabolizes MLX via an XUL, XUL-Q13. The cell surface glycan-binding protein SGBP-B captures MLX specifically. Then, a distinct xylanolytic enzyme system medicates step-by-step hydrolysis of the β1,3- and β1,4-linkages in MLX in the extracellular, periplasmic, and cytoplasmic spaces of strain Q13. The generated xylose is finally assimilated through the xylose isomerase pathway and the pentose phosphate pathway. Furthermore, other marine Bacteroidetes harboring homologous MLX utilization loci were also found to preferentially utilize MLX.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Identification of an MLX utilization locus in Polaribacter sp. Q13
Strain Q13 is a marine Bacteroidetes that was isolated from the surface of red algae collected from Nelson Island (27). Among structurally diverse xylans from terrestrial plants and marine algae, strain Q13 shows a utilization preference for red algal MLX (27). Genomic analysis of strain Q13 revealed the presence of a putative XUL, XUL-Q13 (locus tag: JOP69_RS09760-RS09905) (Fig. 1B). To determine the function of XUL-Q13 in MLX catabolism, comparative transcriptome and proteome analyses were performed with MLX and control substrates [xylose (Xyl) and glucose (Glc)], respectively, as the sole carbon source. The results showed that most genes in XUL-Q13 were induced by xylose (compared with glucose) and much more strongly by MLX (Fig. 2A). Similarly, among the three substrates, MLX elicited the strongest expression of most XUL-Q13-encoded proteins (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that XUL-Q13 may be involved in MLX catabolism.
XUL-Q13 encodes eight potential xylanolytic enzymes including Xyl43A, Xyn10A, Xyn10B, Xyn26A, Xyl43B, Rex10A, Xyn10C, and Xyl3A (Fig. 2). They belong to glycoside hydrolase (GH) families (http://www.cazy.org/) (32) GH3 (Xyl3A), GH10 (Xyn10A, Xyn10B, Xyn10C, and Rex10A), GH26 (Xyn26A), and GH43 (Xyl43A and Xyl43B). The expression of the eight enzymes was all induced by MLX (Fig. 2), suggesting that they likely mediate MLX degradation. GH10 and GH3/43 enzymes are annotated as β1,4-xylanases and β1,4-xylosidases, respectively, while Xyn26A has been identified as a novel xylanase that specifically degrades MLX (27). In addition to the enzymes, XUL-Q13 encodes a SusC/D-like transporter complex (PsSucC/PsSucD), an additional non-homologous SGBP (SGBP-B) (described below), a hybrid two-component sensor/regulator (PsHTCS), and an inner membrane xyloside transporter of the major facilitator superfamily (PsMFS) (Fig. 2), suggesting that strain Q13 utilizes MLX through a canonical Sus-like paradigm (13). Moreover, the expression of genes encoding xylose isomerase, xylulose kinase, transaldolase, and transketolase, which are located downstream of XUL-Q13, was induced by MLX (Fig. 2), suggesting that xylose is subsequently assimilated through the xylose isomerase pathway and the pentose phosphate pathway (33, 34).
The previously reported XULs from animal gut and marine Bacteroidetes are all associated with the catabolism of hetero-β1,4-xylans (11, 23–25). A comparison of XUL-Q13 with these XULs showed some degrees of synteny, especially genes encoding the SusC/D, HTCS sensor, and MFS transporter (Fig. 1B). However, the MLX-specific xylanase Xyn26A is present in XUL-Q13 but absent from the previously reported XULs (Fig. 1B). Xylan-debranching enzymes present in the previously reported XULs, such as carbohydrate esterases and α-L-glucuronidases, are absent from XUL-Q13 (Fig. 1B), corresponding to the homo-structure of MLX. Therefore, despite a canonical Sus-like model, XUL-Q13 encodes a distinct xylanolytic enzyme system.
To identify bacterial XULs similar to XUL-Q13, Xyn26A homologs were searched against all available bacterial genomes in the Integrated Microbial Genomes with Microbiome Samples (IMG/M) database (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/) (35), and putative XULs containing at least one Xyn26A homolog and one SusC/D pair were manually screened. Ten bacterial genomes were found, all of which are from marine Bacteroidetes (Fig. 3A). These Bacteroidetes are isolated from marine ecosystems of seawater, sediments, algae, and animals, possessing one or more XULs. These XULs exhibit a similar composition of xylanolytic enzyme systems as XUL-Q13 except that two XULs lack GH3 enzymes and two encode additional GH11 enzymes (annotated as β1,4-xylanases) (Fig. 3A and B). Similar to strain Q13, all the Bacteroidetes lack xylan-debranching enzymes, implying their inefficiency in utilizing hetero-β1,4-xylans. To investigate whether these Bacteroidetes can utilize MLX, we chose five strains from the genera Polaribacter, Cellulophage, Algibacter, and Aureibaculum to test their growth on xylans. The result showed that all the strains preferentially utilized MLX for their growth (Fig. 3C), consistent with the growth profile of strain Q13 on xylans (27), indicating that marine Bacteroidetes containing homologous MLX utilization loci also preferentially utilize MLX.
Together, the catabolism of MLX by strain Q13 is carried out by a single XUL, XUL-Q13. XUL-Q13 is analogous to the known XULs that target hetero-β1,4-xylans but encode a distinct xylanolytic enzyme system that contains the MLX-specific xylanase Xyn26A. Xyn26A-containing XULs are restricted to marine ecosystems, which is consistent with the fact that MLX is exclusively observed in marine environments (19–22).
SGBP-B contributes to the catabolic specificity of strain Q13 to MLX
SGBPs are involved in the initial capture of polysaccharides at the cell surface as a prelude to backbone hydrolysis, which contributes to the utilization preference of specific polysaccharides (36, 37). XUL-Q13 encodes two SGBPs, the SusD-like protein PsSusD (also called SGBP-A) and its downstream SGBP-B (Fig. 1B). However, PsSusD bound neither MLX nor hetero-β1,4-xylans [arabinoxylan (GX) or glucuronoxylan (AX)] based on affinity gel electrophoresis and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) analyses (data not shown), revealing the inability of PsSusD to recognize xylans. The inability to bind polysaccharides was also previously observed in other SusD-like proteins (37–39).
Based on the conserved domain analysis, SGBP-B is composed of two carbohydrate-binding domains. ITC analysis showed that SGBP-B had a three- to fourfold lower Kd value for MLX (7.14 µM) than hetero-β1,4-xylans GX (29.9 µM) or AX (19.6 µM), indicating the high affinity of SGBP-B to MLX (Fig. 4). This result suggests that SGBP-B contributes to the catabolic specificity of strain Q13 to MLX.
Degradation of MLX by extracellular xylanases
As mentioned above, XUL-Q13 encodes a distinct xylanolytic enzyme system, which might enable the utilization preference of strain Q13 for MLX. To test this hypothesis, a detailed biochemical investigation was performed with recombinant enzymes that were produced in Escherichia coli and purified by Ni-affinity and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) (Fig. S1).
XUL-Q13 encodes four potential extracellular xylanases: Xyn26A, Xyn10A, Xyn10B, and Xyn10C (27) (Fig. 2). Among them, Xyn26A has been shown to be novel xylanase that specifically hydrolyzes the β1,4-linkages of MLX immediately following a β1,3-linkage and generates XOs containing one β1,3-linkage at the reducing end (Fig. 5A) (27). The other three GH10 xylanases all displayed the highest activity at pH 6.0–7.0 and 40°C–50°C (Fig. 6). Substrate specificity analysis showed that the three GH10 xylanases were all active on MLX, GX, and AX (1.1–270.6 U/mg), but inactive on β1,3-xylan (Fig. 6), indicating that they are versatile xylanases for both MLX and hetero-β1,4-xylans. Time-course assays showed that within the 24 h hydrolytic process, Xyn10A, Xyn10B, and Xyn10C released initially larger then smaller xylooligosaccharides from MLX (Fig. S2), indicating their endolytic mode of action. To analyze the cleavage site(s) of the three xylanases in MLX, their products released from MLX after 24-h hydrolysis were analyzed using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography equipped with a pulsed amperometric detector (HPAEC-PAD). The result showed that Xyn10A released xylose and β1,4-xylobiose (β1,4X2) from MLX, indicating that Xyn10A attacks both β1,3- and β1,4-linkages in MLX (Fig. 5A). Xyn10B released xylose, β1,4X2, β1,4X3, the mixed-linkage xylotriose X3X4X, and other unidentified mixed-linkage XOs (Fig. 5A). Xyn10C released xylose, β1,4X2 and X3X4X (Fig. 5A). The presence of β1,3-linkages in Xyn10B and Xyn10C products suggests that they attack β1,4-linkages in MLX. Three GH10 xylanases from Cryptococcus albidus, Streptomyces liuiduns, and Cryptococcus adeliae have been reported to be able to hydrolyze MLX, which liberate from MLX a mixture containing X3X4X (30, 31), similar to Xyn10B and Xyn10C.
Consistent with the above in vitro biochemical analyses, xylose, β1,4XOs (X2-X4), β1,3X2, X3X4X, and other unidentified mixed-linkage XOs were detected in the culture supernatant of strain Q13 grown on MLX (Fig. 5B). This reflects a synergy of the extracellular xylanases Xyn10A, Xyn10B, Xyn10C, and Xyn26A on MLX degradation.
Xylooligosaccharide degradation by periplasmic and cytoplasmic enzymes
The oligosaccharides generated by extracellular xylanases are transported across the outer membrane of bacterial cells by the SusC/D transporter system and further saccharified in the periplasm and the cytoplasm (13). Based on functional annotation and signal peptide prediction, XUL-Q13 encodes four putative XOs-degrading enzymes: the periplasmic Xyl43B and Xyl3A with type II signal peptides and the cytoplasmic Xyl43A and Rex10A that lack signal peptides (Fig. 2).
Both periplasmic Xyl43B and Xyl3A were annotated as β1,4-xylosidases. Enzyme assays with recombinant Xyl43B and Xyl3A showed that in addition to β1,4X2, they were capable of hydrolyzing β1,3X2 (Fig. 7). With the culture supernatant of strain Q13 as the substrate, we simulated the enzymatic degradation process of XOs in the periplasm. Briefly, the culture supernatant of strain Q13 growing on MLX was incubated with xylosidases Xyl43B and Xyl3A separately, and the products were analyzed by HPAEC-PAD. The result showed that Xyl43B could degrade X3X4X and β1,3X2, and Xyl3A could degrade all the XOs in the culture supernatant (Fig. 5C), indicating that Xyl3A and Xyl43B likely dedicate the complete hydrolysis of β1,3-linkages in the periplasm of strain Q13. Two β1,3-xylosidases have been reported so far, including XloA from Vibrio sp. XY-214 (40) and rSWU43A from Streptomyces sp. SWU10 (41); both are GH43 members. XloA is involved in β1,3-xylan catabolism by Vibrio sp. XY-214, while the role of rSWU43A in Streptomyces sp. SWU10 is unknown (40, 41). So far, Xyl3A is the first GH3 xylosidase capable of degrading β1,3-linkages.
The cytoplasmic Xyl43A was annotated as a β1,4-xylosidase (Fig. 2). Substrate specificity analysis showed that Xyl43A exhibited strikingly high catalytic efficiency on β1,4X2 but extremely low on β1,3X2 (kcat/Km values of 51.0 s−1 mM−1 versus 0.001 s−1 mM−1) (Fig. 7; Fig. S3C), suggesting that Xyl43A is indeed a β1,4-xylosidase, a class of xylanolytic enzymes that release single xylose from the non-reducing end of β1,4XOs (42). Although Rex10A was annotated as a β1,4-xylanase, it showed no activity on any class of xylans (data not shown). Instead, Rex10A degraded β1,4XOs with the degrees of polymerization from three to six (β1,4X3-X6) with kcat/Km values of 2.5–4.4 s−1 mM−1, but no activity on β1,3X2, β1,4X2, or β1,3X3 (Fig. 7; Fig. S3D), indicating that Rex10A is a β1,4-oligoxylanase. Moreover, Rex10A exhibited no activity on β1,4X3 reduced with NaBH4 (Fig. 5D), indicating that Rex10A is a reducing-end xylose-releasing exo-oligoxylanase that attacks β1,4XOs from the reducing ends. This class of xylanolytic enzymes has been reported in one case in GH10 (43). Thus, in the cytoplasm of strain Q13, Xyl43A and Rex10A hydrolyze β1,4XOs from the non-reducing and reducing ends, respectively. In addition, their β1,4-specificity further supports that the β1,3-linkages are hydrolyzed before the XOs are transported into the cytoplasm.
Together, four XO-degrading enzymes are involved in the cascade saccharification of XOs by strain Q13, including Xyl43B, Xyl3A, Xyl43A, and Rex10A. Xyl43B and Xyl3A are scavengers of the β1,3-linkages in XOs in the periplasm, while Xyl43A and Rex10A take charge of the remaining β1,4-linkages in XOs in the cytoplasm.
A model for MLX catabolism by Polaribacter sp. Q13
In summary of the above results, we proposed a working model in which a single XUL, XUL-Q13, enables strain Q13 to specifically utilize MLX (Fig. 8). This model involves MLX capture by SGBPs, MLX degradation by extracellular xylanases, transport of XOs through the outer membrane by SusC/D, hydrolysis of β1,3-linkages by periplasmic xylosidases, and the ultimate saccharification of β1,4XOs and assimilation of xylose by cytoplasmic enzymes (Fig. 8). Although it is analogous to the known XULs that target hetero-β1,4-xylans (11, 23–25), four characteristics underscore the MLX specificity: (i) SGBP-B mediates the capture specificity of strain Q13 to MLX. Cell-surface SGBPs are generally involved in the initial capture of polysaccharides (36, 37). In strain Q13, although SGBP-A (PsSusD) is incompetent in xylan capture, SGBP-B prefers to bind MLX rather than hetero-β1,4-xylans, contributing to the MLX specificity. (ii) XUL-Q13 encodes an MLX-specific xylanase, Xyn26A. Xylan backbone is degraded by xylanases. To degrade hetero-β1,4-xylans, the reported XULs encode β1,4-xylanases especially those from GH10 (11, 23–25). By comparison, the novel xylanase Xyn26A that specifically attacks MLX (27) is only present in XUL-Q13. Xyn26A can be taken as a hallmark to differentiate the MLX-specific XULs from the hetero-β1,4-xylan XULs. However, it is worth mentioning that this type of MLX-targeting XULs is not representative of all XULs that may be capable of MLX degradation (11). (iii) Xylosidases capable of degrading β1,3-linkages are involved in the saccharification of XOs in the periplasm of strain Q13. The XOs that enter the periplasm of strain Q13 contain β1,3-linkages. These β1,3-linkages are hydrolyzed by xylosidases Xyl43B and Xyl3A, further underscoring the MLX specificity of XUL-Q13. (iv) Xylan-debranching enzyme is absent from XUL-Q13. To degrade hetero-β1,4-xylans, whose β1,4-backbone is decorated with multiple side chains, a cardinal feature of bacterial hetero-XULs is the presence of a large diversity of xylanolytic enzymes. In addition to β1,4-xylanases and β1,4-xylosidases, debranching xylanolytic enzymes are required, such as α1,2-glucuronidases (GH67 and GH115), α-L-galactosidase (GH95 and CE97), feruloyl esterases, and acetyl xylan esterases (CE1, CE6, and CE15) (Fig. 1B) (23–26, 44, 45). The lack of these enzymes in XUL-Q13 reflects the homogeneity (or the lack of modifications) of MLX targeted by this type of XULs.
Together, strain Q13 catabolizes MLX with a canonical Sus-like model, in which a cell surface glycan-binding protein and a unique xylanolytic enzyme system contribute to the catabolic specialization to MLX.
Conclusion
Polaribacter sp. Q13 is a member of marine Bacteroidetes isolated from the surface of red algae, which specifically catabolizes MLX. Herein, we uncovered that the catabolic specialization of strain Q13 to MLX is based on an XUL, XUL-Q13. The cell surface glycan-binding protein SGBP-B mediates the capture specificity of strain Q13 toward MLX. The xylanolytic enzymatic cascade dedicates the complete hydrolysis of β1,3- and β1,4-linkages in MLX. Extracellularly, MLX is degraded by four xylanases including an MLX-specific xylanase that attacks precisely the β1,4-linkages following a β1,3-linkage. The β1,3-linkages in the generated XOs are saccharified in the periplasm by two xylosidases. The residual β1,4-linkages in the XOs are completely hydrolyzed in the cytoplasm by a β1,4-xylosidase and a β1,4-oligoxylanase. The generated xylose is finally assimilated through the xylose isomerase pathway and the pentose phosphate pathway. In addition, other marine Bacteroidetes strains harboring homologous MLX utilization loci also preferentially consume red algal MLX. This study sheds light on the catabolism of red algal MLX by marine Bacteroidetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
GX and AX, β1,4XOs (β1,4X2-X6) were purchased from Megazyme (Ireland). GAX and MLX were purchased from Elicityl (France). β1,3-xylan, β1,3X2, β1,3X3, X3X4X, and X4X3X were prepared as previously described (27, 46). p-Nitrophenyl-β-D-xylopyranoside (pNPX) was purchased from Sigma (USA).
Growth assay
All bacterial strains, including Polaribacter sp. Q13 (GenBank: CP074436.1), Polaribacter sp. 11A2H (GenBank: ASM1137902v1), Cellulophage sp. 20_2_10 (GenBank: ASM2347664v1), Cellulophage sp. Z1A5H (GenBank: ASM1137897v1), Algibacter sp. L4_22 (GenBank: ASM2347304v1), and Aureibaculum luteum SM1352 (GenBank: ASM344901v1), were all grown at 20°C in the minimal medium (27) supplemented with 0.2% (wt/vol) carbon source under aerobic conditions. The carbon sources included MLX, GX, AX, GAX, xylose, and glucose. Growth was monitored by measuring OD600, and an increase of OD600 (ΔOD600) was generated to compare the bacterial growth on different carbon sources (27, 47).
Transcriptome analysis
Strain Q13 was cultivated in duplicate in a 20 mL minimal medium containing 0.2% (wt/vol) MLX, xylose, or glucose for 36–48 h to their mid-log phase. Then, cells were harvested separately (4,000 g for 10 min at 4°C), and the total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). After the genomic DNA was removed using DNase I (Takara, Japan), 4 µg RNA from each sample was used to prepare RNA-seq strand-specific libraries with the TruSeq RNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, USA) and RiboZero rRNA removal kit (Epicenter, USA). High-throughput sequencing was performed in paired-end reads on an Illumina Hiseq 6000 platform in Shanghai BIOZERO (China), and the clean reads were separately aligned to the strain Q13 reference genome using Rockhopper (http://cs.wellesley.edu/~btjaden/Rockhopper/). The differential gene expression analysis was performed with edgeR (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html), and the transcript levels were compared based on the RPKM method (48).
Proteome analysis
Strain Q13 was cultivated in triplicate in a 20-mL minimal medium containing 0.2% (wt/vol) MLX, xylose, or glucose for 36–48 h to the mid-log phase (27). Then, cells were collected separately (4,000 g for 10 min at 4°C) for proteome analysis in Shanghai Applied Protein Technology (China). In brief, the SDT buffer (4% SDS, 1 mM DTT, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6) was used for sample lysis and protein extraction. After quantification with a Pierce bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo, USA), 200-µg proteins from each sample were digested with trypsin according to the filter-aided sample preparation procedure (49). The released peptides were separated with a reversed-phase C18 column. Mass spectrometry (MS) and MS/MS data were determined using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo, USA). MS spectra were analyzed with MaxQuant (50). Proteins that were detected in at least two out of three biological replicates were counted as identified. Based on the iBAQ values from MaxQuant analysis, the riBAQ values of each protein were calculated for semi-quantitative comparisons (6). The riBAQ values were then averaged and log-transformed and termed log2 ratios.
Gene cloning and protein production
Gene cloning and protein production were carried out as previously described (27). In brief, genes encoding SGBP-B, Xyl43A, Xyn10A, Xyn10B, Xyn26A, Xyl43B, Rex10A, Xyn10C, and Xyl3A were cloned from the genomic DNA of strain Q13 by PCR amplification and inserted into the pET22b vector (Novagen, USA). The primers used are shown in Table S1. The constructed plasmids were transferred into E. coli BL21 (DE3) for protein production. Xyl43B and Rex10A were partially produced as soluble forms with inclusion bodies also being observed, and all the other proteins were exclusively produced as soluble forms. Recombinant proteins were purified by Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (GE Healthcare, USA) and then fractionated by SEC on a Superdex G200 column (GE Healthcare, USA). The protein purity was determined with SDS-PAGE. Protein concentrations were determined by a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Isothermal titration calorimetry
ITC measurements were performed with MicroCal PEAQ-ITC (Malvern, United Kingdom) at 25°C in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 100 mM NaCl. The concentration of SGBP-B and ligands (MLX, GX, and AX) was 50 µM and 5 mg/mL, respectively. Each ligand was injected into the protein cell 19 times with a stirring speed of 800 rpm. The first injection was 0.4 µL, and the following 18 injections were 3.0 µL. The data were analyzed with Microcal PEAQ-ITC analysis software. The molar concentration of xylans was estimated to fit N (binding site) =1 (51).
Enzyme assays
Unless otherwise noted, the activities of enzymes were performed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 20 mM) under their respective optimum pHs and optimum temperatures. With xylans as the substrates, enzyme activities were determined using the DNS method (27). With XOs as the substrates, enzyme activities were determined by quantifying the produced xylose using the D-xylose kit (Megazyme, Ireland). Reactions were initiated by adding a 10-µL enzyme solution to a 90 µL mixture of NAD+, ATP, hexokinase, xylose mutarotase, xylose dehydrogenase, and XO substrates. After 10-min incubation, reactions were terminated by 150 µL Na2CO3 (1 M). Then, the NADH absorbance at 340 nm was measured. The standard curve was generated with xylose (0–60 µM). With pNPX as the substrate, the 200-µL reaction mixture contained a 10-µL enzyme solution and 190-µL pNPX (2 mM). After a 10-min incubation, 200 µL Na2CO3 (1 M) was added, and the p-nitrophenyl (pNP) absorbance at 405 nm was measured. The standard curve was generated with pNP (0–200 µM). One unit (U) was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 µmol xylose or pNP per minute.
Enzymatic characterization and kinetics
Enzyme characterization was performed with MLX, β1,4X3, and pNPX as the substrate for xylanases (Xyn10A, Xyn10B, and Xyn10C), exo-oligoxylanase (Rex10A), and xylosidases (Xyl3A, Xyl43A, and Xyl43B), respectively. The effect of temperature was determined ranging from 0°C to 60°C at an interval of 10°C. The effect of pH was determined with the Britton–Robinson buffer (40 mM) from pH 4.0 to 10.0. Substrate specificities of xylanases Xyn10A, Xyn10B, and Xyn10C were determined with MLX, GX, AX, and β1,3-xylan (10 mg/mL each) as the substrates. The kinetics of Xyl43A, Xyl43B, Xyl3A, and Rex10A were determined by Michaelis–Menten and Lineweaver–Burk fitting based on initial rates assayed with different concentrations of substrates. When saturation was not attained, the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) was directly given using the equation kcat/Km = V0/[S]/[E] (23, 45).
Modes of action analysis of xylanases
Time-course assays of xylanases Xyn10A, Xyn10B, and Xyn10C were performed as previously described (27). Reaction mixtures containing 90 µL MLX (5 mg/mL) and 10 µL each of xylanases Xyn10A (0.5 mg/mL), Xyn10B (2.4 mg/mL), and Xyn10C (0.6 mg/mL) were incubated in PBS (under their respective optimum pH) at 30°C. The products of each xylanase after 24 h hydrolysis were diluted (10−2–10−3 dilution) with ultrapure water and analyzed by HPAEC-PAD.
Mode of action analysis of Rex10A
For the time-course assay, the reaction mixture containing 140 µL β1,4X6 (50 µM) and 10 µL Rex10A (0.2 mg/mL) in PBS (pH 6.0) was incubated at 30°C. At different time points within 1 h, the reaction was terminated by 150 µL NaOH (30 mM), and the products were analyzed by HPAEC-PAD. To determine the activity of Rex10A on the reduced β1,4X3, β1,4X3 was reduced by NaBH4 according to the method of Leth et al. (45) with minor modifications. In brief, 10 µL NaBH4 (1 M in 200 mM NaOH) was added into 40 µL β1,4X3 (40 mM). After incubation on ice for 1 h, the reaction was quenched by 10 µL acetic acid (1 M), and the mixture was diluted 10-fold in PBS (pH 6.0). As a control, 200 mM NaOH was used instead of NaBH4. Then, 90 µL reduced β1,4X3 was mixed with 10 µL Rex10A (1.0 mg/mL) in PBS (pH 6.0), and the mixture was incubated at 40°C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by boiling for 5 min, and the products were analyzed using TLC, which was performed on the silica gel 60 F254 plate (Sigma, USA). The solvent system was 1-butanol–acetic acid–ultrapure water [13:12:2 (vol/vol/vol)]. XOs were visualized by sulfuric acid–ethanol [1:10 (vol/vol)] after incubation at 100°C for 10 min.
In vivo assay for MLX degradation
Strain Q13 was cultivated in the minimal medium containing 0.2% (wt/vol) MLX for 36–48 h to the mid-log phase. After centrifugation (4,000 g for 10 min at 4°C), the culture supernatant was collected, filtered with a 0.22 µm filter, and diluted 20-fold with ultrapure water. Then, XOs in the supernatant were analyzed with HPAEC-PAD. The culture supernatant was then hydrolyzed by xylosidases Xyl43B and Xyl3A separately. The reaction mixture containing 140 µL diluted supernatant and 10 µL enzyme solution (1 mg/mL each) was incubated at 40°C for 10 min and terminated by 150 µL NaOH (30 mM). After filtration with 0.22 µm filters, the samples were injected into HPAEC-PAD for XO analysis.
High-performance anion-exchange chromatography equipped with a pulsed amperometric detector
HPAEC-PAD was carried out using an ICS-6000 machine equipped with a CarboPac PA200 column (Thermo, USA). Solvents and elution programs were described previously (27). Xylose, β1,4XOs (β1,4X2-X6), β1,3XOs (β1,3X2-X3), X3X4X, and X4X3X were used as standards to identify the peaks in chromatograms.
Bioinformatics
Signal peptides were predicted using SignalP 5.0 (52) and LipoP 1.0 (53). Domain analysis was performed in the NCBI Conserved Domain Database (54) and the Pfam database (55). For XUL comparison, sequence alignments were performed with BLAST+ (version 2.7.1+, E-value 1e−5). The genes and their synteny were drawn with genoPlotR 0.8.9 (56). Xyn26A homologs were searched in the IMG/M database (https://img.jgi.doe.gov/m/) (35) against all available bacterial genomes using BLASTP with a stringency of 35% identity and a cut-off value of 1e−50 (35). Heatmaps were drawn with TBtools (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools/releases) (57).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Cai-Yun Sun and Xiang-Mei Ren from the State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology of Shandong University for their help and guidance with HPLC and HPAEC-PAD.
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2022YFC2807500 and 2022YFC2807503), the Marine S&T Fund of Shandong Province for Qingdao Marine Science and Technology Center (2022QNLM030004-3), the National Science Foundation of China (U2006205, 31961133016, 42306166, and 32200018), the Program of Shandong for Taishan Scholars (tspd20181203), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2021QC024).
N.W., Y.Y., and X.-L.C. conceived and guided the study. F.Z., C.-M.Y., H.-N.S., and T.-T.X. performed the experiments. Z.-Z.S. advised on the bioinformatics analysis. F.Z. and N.W. wrote the manuscript. X.-L.C., Y.Y., Q.-L.Q., and Y.-Z.Z. revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Ning Wang, Email: wangxn2092@163.com.
Xiu-Lan Chen, Email: cxl0423@sdu.edu.cn.
Yang Yu, Email: yuxinhe1022@163.com.
Jennifer F. Biddle, University of Delaware, Lewes, Delaware, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
The RNA-seq data are available in the NCBI SRA database under the accession number PRJNA844361. The mass spectrometry proteome data were deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD035342.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01704-23.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hehemann JH, Boraston AB, Czjzek M. 2014. A sweet new wave: structures and mechanisms of enzymes that digest polysaccharides from marine algae. Curr Opin Struct Biol 28:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P. 1998. Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:237–240. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Arnosti C, Wietz M, Brinkhoff T, Hehemann JH, Probandt D, Zeugner L, Amann R. 2021. The biogeochemistry of marine polysaccharides: sources, inventories, and bacterial drivers of the carbohydrate cycle. Ann Rev Mar Sci 13:81–108. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-032020-012810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kumar M, Sun YQ, Rathour R, Pandey A, Thakur IS, Tsang DCW. 2020. Algae as potential feedstock for the production of biofuels and value-added products: opportunities and challenges. Sci Total Environ 716:137116. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Müller C, Scapini T, Rempel A, Abaide ER, Camargo AF, Nazari MT, Tadioto V, Bonatto C, Tres MV, Zabot GL, Colla LM, Treichel H, Alves SL. 2023. Challenges and opportunities for third-generation ethanol production: a critical review. Eng Microbiol 3:100056. doi: 10.1016/j.engmic.2022.100056 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Unfried F, Becker S, Robb CS, Hehemann J-H, Markert S, Heiden SE, Hinzke T, Becher D, Reintjes G, Krüger K, Avcı B, Kappelmann L, Hahnke RL, Fischer T, Harder J, Teeling H, Fuchs B, Barbeyron T, Amann RI, Schweder T. 2018. Adaptive mechanisms that provide competitive advantages to marine Bacteroidetes during microalgal blooms. ISME J 12:2894–2906. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0243-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Reisky L, Préchoux A, Zühlke M-K, Bäumgen M, Robb CS, Gerlach N, Roret T, Stanetty C, Larocque R, Michel G, Song T, Markert S, Unfried F, Mihovilovic MD, Trautwein-Schult A, Becher D, Schweder T, Bornscheuer UT, Hehemann J-H. 2019. A marine bacterial enzymatic cascade degrades the algal polysaccharide ulvan. Nat Chem Biol 15:803–812. doi: 10.1038/s41589-019-0311-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chen J, Robb CS, Unfried F, Kappelmann L, Markert S, Song T, Harder J, Avcı B, Becher D, Xie P, Amann RI, Hehemann J-H, Schweder T, Teeling H. 2018. Alpha- and beta-mannan utilization by marine Bacteroidetes. Environ Microbiol 20:4127–4140. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Thomas F, Barbeyron T, Tonon T, Génicot S, Czjzek M, Michel G. 2012. Characterization of the first alginolytic operons in a marine bacterium: from their emergence in marine Flavobacteriia to their independent transfers to marine Proteobacteria and human gut Bacteroides. Environ Microbiol 14:2379–2394. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02751.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ficko-Blean E, Préchoux A, Thomas F, Rochat T, Larocque R, Zhu Y, Stam M, Génicot S, Jam M, Calteau A, Viart B, Ropartz D, Pérez-Pascual D, Correc G, Matard-Mann M, Stubbs KA, Rogniaux H, Jeudy A, Barbeyron T, Médigue C, Czjzek M, Vallenet D, McBride MJ, Duchaud E, Michel G. 2017. Carrageenan catabolism is encoded by a complex regulon in marine heterotrophic bacteria. Nat Commun 8:1685. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01832-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Dutschei T, Beidler I, Bartosik D, Seeßelberg J-M, Teune M, Bäumgen M, Ferreira SQ, Heldmann J, Nagel F, Krull J, Berndt L, Methling K, Hein M, Becher D, Langer P, Delcea M, Lalk M, Lammers M, Höhne M, Hehemann J-H, Schweder T, Bornscheuer UT. 2023. Marine Bacteroidetes enzymatically digest xylans from terrestrial plants. Environ Microbiol 25:1713–1727. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fernández-Gómez B, Richter M, Schüler M, Pinhassi J, Acinas SG, González JM, Pedrós-Alió C. 2013. Ecology of marine Bacteroidetes: a comparative genomics approach. ISME J 7:1026–1037. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Martens EC, Koropatkin NM, Smith TJ, Gordon JI. 2009. Complex glycan catabolism by the human gut microbiota: the Bacteroidetes sus-like paradigm. J Biol Chem 284:24673–24677. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R109.022848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Usov AI, Zelinsky ND. 2013. Chemical structures of algal polysaccharides, p 23–86. In Dominguez H (ed), Functional ingredients from algae for foods and nutraceuticals. Elsevier, Cambridge, UK. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hansell DA, Kadko D, Bates NR. 2004. Degradation of terrigenous dissolved organic carbon in the Western Arctic ocean. Science 304:858–861. doi: 10.1126/science.1096175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Scheller HV, Ulvskov P. 2010. Hemicelluloses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:263–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Burton RA, Gidley MJ, Fincher GB. 2010. Heterogeneity in the chemistry, structure and function of plant cell walls. Nat Chem Biol 6:724–732. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Iriki Y, Suzuki T, Nisizawa K, Miwa T. 1960. Xylan of siphonaceous green algae. Nature 187:82–83. doi: 10.1038/187082a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Turvey JR, Williams EL. 1970. Structures of some xylans from red algae. Phytochemistry 9:2383–2388. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)85744-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lahaye M, Rondeau-Mouro C, Deniaud E, Buléon A. 2003. Solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy studies of xylans in the cell wall of Palmaria palmata (L. Kuntze, Rhodophyta). Carbohydr Res 338:1559–1569. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(03)00241-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Viana AG, Noseda MD, Gonçalves AG, Duarte MER, Yokoya N, Matulewicz MC, Cerezo AS. 2011. β-D-(1→4), β-D-(1→3) 'mixed linkage' xylans from red seaweeds of the order Nemaliales and Palmariales. Carbohydr Res 346:1023–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2011.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hsieh YSY, Harris PJ. 2019. Xylans of red and green algae: what is known about their structures and how they are synthesised? Polymers (Basel) 11:354. doi: 10.3390/polym11020354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Rogowski A, Briggs JA, Mortimer JC, Tryfona T, Terrapon N, Lowe EC, Baslé A, Morland C, Day AM, Zheng H, Rogers TE, Thompson P, Hawkins AR, Yadav MP, Henrissat B, Martens EC, Dupree P, Gilbert HJ, Bolam DN. 2015. Glycan complexity dictates microbial resource allocation in the large intestine. Nat Commun 6:7481. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Dodd D, Moon YH, Swaminathan K, Mackie RI, Cann IKO. 2010. Transcriptomic analyses of xylan degradation by Prevotella bryantii and insights into energy acquisition by xylanolytic Bacteroidetes. J Biol Chem 285:30261–30273. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.141788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tang K, Lin Y, Han Y, Jiao N. 2017. Characterization of potential polysaccharide utilization systems in the marine Bacteroidetes Gramella flava JLT2011 using a multi-omics approach. Front Microbiol 8:220. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Despres J, Forano E, Lepercq P, Comtet-Marre S, Jubelin G, Chambon C, Yeoman CJ, Berg Miller ME, Fields CJ, Martens E, Terrapon N, Henrissat B, White BA, Mosoni P. 2016. Xylan degradation by the human gut Bacteroides xylanisolvens XB1A(T) involves two distinct gene clusters that are linked at the transcriptional level. BMC Genomics 17:326. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2680-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhao F, Yu CM, Sun HN, Zhao LS, Ding HT, Cao HY, Chen Y, Qin QL, Zhang YZ, Li PY, Chen XL. 2023. A novel class of xylanases specifically degrade marine red algal β1,3/1,4-mixedlinkage xylan. J Biol Chem 299:105116. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tamura K, Hemsworth GR, Déjean G, Rogers TE, Pudlo NA, Urs K, Jain N, Davies GJ, Martens EC, Brumer H. 2017. Molecular mechanism by which prominent human gut Bacteroidetes utilize mixed-linkage β-glucans, major health-promoting cereal polysaccharides. Cell Rep 21:2030. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chen WP, Matsuo M, Yasui T. 1986. β-1,3-xylanase and β-1,4-xylanase action on rhodymenan. Agric Biol Chem 50:1195–1200. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1986.10867544 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Biely P, Vrsanská M, Tenkanen M, Kluepfel D. 1997. Endo-β-1,4-xylanase families: differences in catalytic properties. J Biotechnol 57:151–166. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(97)00096-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nerinckx W, Broberg A, Duus JØ, Ntarima P, Parolis LAS, Parolis H, Claeyssens M. 2004. Hydrolysis of Nothogenia erinacea xylan by xylanases from families 10 and 11. Carbohydr Res 339:1047–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. 2014. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D490–D495. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Li X, Chen Y, Nielsen J. 2019. Harnessing xylose pathways for biofuels production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 57:56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Jagtap SS, Rao CV. 2018. Microbial conversion of xylose into useful bioproducts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:9015–9036. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9294-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, Hajek P, Ritter S, Varghese N, Seshadri R, Roux S, Woyke T, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. 2021. The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.6.0: new tools and advanced capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D751–D763. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kappelmann L, Krüger K, Hehemann J-H, Harder J, Markert S, Unfried F, Becher D, Shapiro N, Schweder T, Amann RI, Teeling H. 2019. Polysaccharide utilization loci of North Sea Flavobacteriia as basis for using SusC/D-protein expression for predicting major phytoplankton glycans. ISME J 13:76–91. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0242-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Déjean G, Tamura K, Cabrera A, Jain N, Pudlo NA, Pereira G, Viborg AH, Van Petegem F, Martens EC, Brumer H. 2020. Synergy between cell surface glycosidases and glycan-binding proteins dictates the utilization of specific β(1,3)-glucans by human gut Bacteroides. mBio 11:e00095-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00095-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bågenholm V, Reddy SK, Bouraoui H, Morrill J, Kulcinskaja E, Bahr CM, Aurelius O, Rogers T, Xiao Y, Logan DT, Martens EC, Koropatkin NM, Stålbrand H. 2017. Galactomannan catabolism conferred by a polysaccharide utilization locus of Bacteroides ovatus: enzyme synergy and crystal structure of a β-mannanase. J Biol Chem 292:229–243. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.746438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Tauzin AS, Wang Z, Cioci G, Li X, Labourel A, Machado B, Lippens G, Potocki-Veronese G, Young VB. 2022. Structural and biochemical characterization of a nonbinding SusD-like protein involved in xylooligosaccharide utilization by an uncultured human gut Bacteroides strain. mSphere 7:e0024422. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00244-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Umemoto Y, Onishi R, Araki T. 2008. Cloning of a novel gene encoding β-1,3-xylosidase from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. strain XY-214, and characterization of the gene product. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:305–308. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01793-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Phuengmaung P, Fujiwara D, Sukhumsirichart W, Sakamoto T. 2018. Identification and characterization of the first β-1,3-D-xylosidase from a gram-positive bacterium, Streptomyces sp. Enzyme Microb Technol 112:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Rohman A, Dijkstra BW, Puspaningsih NNT. 2019. β-xylosidases: structural diversity, catalytic mechanism, and inhibition by monosaccharides. Int J Mol Sci 20:5524. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Santos CR, Hoffmam ZB, de Matos Martins VP, Zanphorlin LM, de Paula Assis LH, Honorato RV, Lopes de Oliveira PS, Ruller R, Murakami MT. 2014. Molecular mechanisms associated with xylan degradation by Xanthomonas plant pathogens. J Biol Chem 289:32186–32200. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.605105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Déjean G, Blanvillain-Baufumé S, Boulanger A, Darrasse A, de Bernonville TD, Girard A-L, Carrére S, Jamet S, Zischek C, Lautier M, Solé M, Büttner D, Jacques M-A, Lauber E, Arlat M. 2013. The xylan utilization system of the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris controls epiphytic life and reveals common features with oligotrophic bacteria and animal gut symbionts. New Phytol 198:899–915. doi: 10.1111/nph.12187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Leth ML, Ejby M, Workman C, Ewald DA, Pedersen SS, Sternberg C, Bahl MI, Licht TR, Aachmann FL, Westereng B, Abou Hachem M. 2018. Differential bacterial capture and transport preferences facilitate co-growth on dietary xylan in the human gut. Nat Microbiol 3:570–580. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0132-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sun HN, Yu CM, Fu HH, Wang P, Fang ZG, Zhang YZ, Chen XL, Zhao F. 2021. Diversity of marine 1,3-xylan-utilizing bacteria and characters of their extracellular 1,3-xylanases. Front Microbiol 12:721422. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.721422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Martens EC, Lowe EC, Chiang H, Pudlo NA, Wu M, McNulty NP, Abbott DW, Henrissat B, Gilbert HJ, Bolam DN, Gordon JI, Eisen JA. 2011. Recognition and degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides by two human gut symbionts. PLoS Biol 9:e1001221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. 2008. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods 5:621–628. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. 2009. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 6:359–362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J. 2016. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc 11:2301–2319. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Zolotnitsky G, Cogan U, Adir N, Solomon V, Shoham G, Shoham Y. 2004. Mapping glycoside hydrolase substrate subsites by isothermal titration calorimetry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:11275–11280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404311101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Almagro Armenteros JJ, Tsirigos KD, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2019. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol 37:420–423. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Juncker AS, Willenbrock H, Von Heijne G, Brunak S, Nielsen H, Krogh A. 2003. Prediction of lipoprotein signal peptides in Gram-negative bacteria. Protein Sci 12:1652–1662. doi: 10.1110/ps.0303703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Geer LY, Bryant SH. 2017. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D200–D203. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Mistry J, Chuguransky S, Williams L, Qureshi M, Salazar GA, Sonnhammer ELL, Tosatto SCE, Paladin L, Raj S, Richardson LJ, Finn RD, Bateman A. 2021. Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D412–D419. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Guy L, Roat Kultima J, Andersson SGE. 2010. genoPlotR: comparative gene and genome visualization in R. Bioinformatics 26:2334–2335. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. 2020. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 13:1194–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq data are available in the NCBI SRA database under the accession number PRJNA844361. The mass spectrometry proteome data were deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD035342.