Abstract
Huntington's disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by CAG trinucleotide repeat expansions in exon 1 of the HTT gene. In addition to germline CAG expansions, somatic repeat expansions in neurons also contribute to HD pathogenesis. The DNA mismatch repair gene, MSH3, identified as a genetic modifier of HD onset and progression, promotes somatic CAG expansions, and thus presents a potential therapeutic target. However, what extent of MSH3 protein reduction is needed to attenuate somatic CAG expansions and elicit therapeutic benefits in HD disease models is less clear. In our study, we employed potent di-siRNAs to silence mouse Msh3 mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner in HdhQ111/+ mice and correlated somatic Htt CAG instability with MSH3 protein levels from simultaneously isolated DNA and protein after siRNA treatment. Our results reveal a linear correlation with a proportionality constant of ~ 1 between the prevention of somatic Htt CAG expansions and MSH3 protein expression in vivo, supporting MSH3 as a rate-limiting step in somatic expansions. Intriguingly, despite a 75% reduction in MSH3 protein levels, striatal nuclear HTT aggregates remained unchanged. We also note that evidence for nuclear Msh3 mRNA that is inaccessible to RNA interference was found, and that MSH6 protein in the striatum was upregulated following MSH3 knockdown in HdhQ111/+ mice. These results provide important clues to address critical questions for the development of therapeutic molecules targeting MSH3 as a potential therapeutic target for HD.
Subject terms: Huntington's disease, Pharmacodynamics
Introduction
Huntington disease (HD) is a rare autosomal dominant movement disorder characterized by progressive involuntary choreatic movements, as well as cognitive and behavioral disturbances 1,2. While neuronal loss in the striatum represents the primary manifestation of HD, the disease affects multiple brain regions, including cortical areas. The underlying cause of HD is an elongated CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in exon 1 of the HTT gene, resulting in the formation of mutant HTT protein with an abnormally long poly-glutamine tail that exhibits a propensity to aggregate 3,4. However, the length of germline CAG repeat expansions is not sufficient to trigger neurodegeneration. Additional somatic expansions are required, which occur specifically in the cell types and tissues most affected in HD 5–7. Studies in mice have highlighted the crucial role of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in mediating these somatic CAG repeat expansions 8–10. Genome-wide association studies have also identified several MMR genes associated with the onset and progression of HD 11,12. Among these MMR genes, MSH3 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for mitigating somatic repeat expansions and potentially slowing HD progression 13,14.
MSH3 forms a heterodimer with MSH2, known as MutSβ, which plays a vital role in the DNA mismatch repair process. MutSβ is responsible for detecting DNA mismatch loops and facilitating their subsequent correction by downstream mismatch repair machinery 15. However, the mechanism by which MutSβ facilitates somatic repeat expansions remains poorly understood. It is believed that extrahelical DNA extrusions formed by strand-slippage within the CAG repeat tract serve as a substrate for MutSβ. Several models exist to explain how subsequent DNA excisions and resynthesis, in the presence of extrusions, can lead to repeat expansions or contractions 16. Importantly, another complex, MutSα, composed of MSH2 and MSH6, exhibits partial overlap in mismatch recognition specificity with MutSβ for repair but not expansions. This overlap may explain the extensive tumorigenesis observed in Msh2 knockout and Msh6/Msh3 double knockout mice, while Msh3 knockout alone is well tolerated in mice 17,18. In humans, heterozygous mutations in MSH3 do not present a clear increased risk of cancer while biallelic loss-of-function or predicted loss-of-function mutations are associated with familial colorectal adenomatous polyposis 19. In contrast, heterozygous mutations in several other MMR genes, including MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, MSH6, and FAN1, are linked to cancer 20–22. These findings suggest that MSH3 may represent a HD-linked MMR gene with an acceptable safety range in terms of cancer risk when its expression is reduced.
Previous studies have shown that reducing MSH3 protein expression, through genetic 9 or pharmacological manipulation 23, effectively prevents somatic CAG repeat expansions. O'Reilly and colleagues successfully utilized di-valent siRNAs (di-siRNAs) to decrease somatic repeat expansions in both HdhQ111/+ and human Htt BAC CAG transgenic mice23. Di-siRNA’s are a novel siRNA scaffold with excellent distribution and durability in the central nervous system (CNS)24. However, prior studies have not investigated the quantitative relationship between MSH3 expression levels and the prevention of somatic instability in detail. Establishing this correlation is crucial for the development of MSH3-targeting drugs and for gaining mechanistic insights into somatic instability. In this study, we systematically analyze Htt CAG somatic instability across a wide range of MSH3 protein expression levels, resulting from treatment of HdhQ111/+ mice with varying doses of a di-siRNA targeting the Msh3 mRNA. Additionally, we explore the impact of pharmacologically reducing somatic repeat expansions on HTT protein accumulation, potentially elucidating further the connection between these two important pathogenic events in HD.
Materials and methods
Di-siRNA
A di-siRNA designed against a previously published sequence within the human MSH3 mRNA 23,24, was selected to target the identical Msh3 sequence in mouse. This sequence has no other genome-wide matches in either human or mouse. This di-siRNA was designed, synthesized, and purified to > 90% full-length product at Atalanta Therapeutics, Inc. Test articles and vehicle (PBS) were assessed in a blinded fashion.
Mice
Cryo-rederived HdhQ111/Q111 mice (Jax strain 00456) were maintained on a mixed CD1/ 129 genetic background by breeding CD1 (Charles River) females with homozygous HdhQ111/Q111 males generating heterozygous mice HdhQ111/+. Genotypes were confirmed from ear biopsies at Laragen Inc. All procedures on the mice were approved by Biogen’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Cambridge, MA) and carried out in strict accordance with the US National Institutes of Health “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” guidelines 25. Further the study was reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines 2.0 (https://arriveguidelines.org/arrive-guidelines). Mice were maintained in a temperature-controlled space with a 12 h light/dark cycle. At study end, mice were euthanized via CO2 asphyxiation, before transcardiac perfusion with ice-cold PBS. Cortex, striatum, and cerebellum from the right brain hemisphere and a portion of the median lobe of the liver were collected and immediately frozen on dry ice. The left-brain hemisphere was placed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h before further processing.
Treatment of mice with di-siRNA
Heterozygous male and female HdhQ111/+ mice were equally balanced in groups for sex and germline CAG repeat size. Mice were treated by intracerebroventricular delivery (ICV) with either 3 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA, 10 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA, or vehicle (PBS) solution (n = 10 per group). For this procedure, mice were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane and maintained on 0–2% isoflurane throughout. Prophylactic analgesia was provided by 1 mg/kg subcutaneous injection of sustained-release buprenorphine. Approximately 10 min before mice were placed into a stereotaxic apparatus, a 1 cm midline incision was made over the dorsal surface of the skull exposing the bregma. Coordinates used for ICV injection into the lateral right ventricle were − 0.45 mm anteroposterior, − 1.1 mm mediolateral, and − 2.4 mm dorsoventral from dura, relative to bregma. A small hole in the skull was made with a hand-held drill to allow access for a 33-gauge flat-tipped 10 mL Hamilton syringe (701) which was slowly lowered into place and delivered 10 µL of test article at a rate of 1 mL/min. The needle was kept in place for 5 min after the completion of the infusion before being slowly removed. The skin incision was closed with sterile sutures and the mice were placed in a heated recovery chamber kept around 37 °C to recover.
Protein, mRNA, and DNA isolation from mouse tissue
Protein, mRNA, and DNA were simultaneously isolated from dissected mouse tissue using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/Protein Mini Kit (QIAGEN, 80004) following the manufacturer's provided protocol. The concentrations of RNA and DNA were determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm using a Nanodrop UV–Vis Spectrometer (ThermoFisher). The protein precipitates were resuspended and fully homogenized in 250 µl of RIPA buffer containing 0.5% SDS by a high intensity ultrasonic water bath at 50A for 30 s (QSonica 500 with a cup horn). The lysates were subsequently normalized for protein content using the BCA protein assay (ThermoFisher).
Determination of somatic CAG repeat expansion index
HTT exon 1, including CAG repeats, was PCR-amplified in a 50 µl reaction using 200 ng of genomic DNA, AmpliTaq Gold 360 Mastermix (Thermofisher), 4% 360 GC enhancer and specific primers. The forward primer, 31329 (ATGAAGGCCTTCGAGTCCCTCAAGTCCTTC), was labeled with 6-FAM, while the reverse primer, 33934 (GGCGGCTGAGGAAGCTGAGGA), was unlabeled 26. The polymerase activation and DNA denaturation was carried out at 95 °C for 10 min. Subsequently, the reaction underwent 35 cycles of PCR amplification with denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 60 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. The PCR products, approximately 413 bp for HdhQ111/+, were mixed with formamide and separated using the ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) along with GeneScan 600 LIZ v2.0 as an internal size standard (Applied Biosystems). The somatic CAG repeat expansion index was determined using the Autogenescan (https://github.com/BranduffMcli/AutoGenescan) and Fragman (Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran 2016, BMC Genetics) software packages, applying a peak height selection threshold of > 10% 27.
Western blotting
For protein analysis, the normalized lysates were separated on NuPAGE™ gels (4–12%) under reducing conditions using the MES SDS Running Buffer system. Subsequently, the proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes using the iBlot™ 2 Gel Transfer system. To block non-specific binding, the membranes were incubated in 5% milk in TBS-T (TBS with 0.05% Tween) and then probed with primary antibodies, which were diluted in 5% milk in TBS-T. The primary antibodies used included 1F6 from Millipore Sigma for MSH3, EPR21017-2 from Abcam for MSH2, EPR3945 from Abcam for MSH6, and C4 from Millipore Sigma and 13E5 from Cell Signaling for actin. Bound antibodies were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Prime, Cytiva) with a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (BioRad) and quantified by densitometry using Image Lab software 6.1 (BioRad). Each sample was quantified from at least two independent gels (unless indicated otherwise) with different loading orders to minimize bias. Furthermore, all samples from the control group were loaded on each gel for normalization purposes (unless indicated otherwise).
RT-qPCR
High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (ThermoFisher) was used to synthesize cDNA from RNA samples. ThermoFisher Taqman qPCR assays were used for MSH3 (Mm00487756_m1), MSH2 (Mm00500563_m1), MSH6 (Mm00487761_m1), and housekeeping gene TBP (Mm01277042_m1). RT-qPCR was performed in a 10 µl reaction using TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix for qPCR (ThermoFisher) following manufacturer protocol on QuantStudio 7 Flex (ThermoFisher). Data were normalized to TBP and analyzed via the 2−ΔΔCT method with ThermoFisher Connect Platform and Microsoft Excel.
Immunofluorescence
Brain hemispheres fixed in neutral buffered formalin were embedded in paraffin and 5 µm serial sections were collected (performed by Inotiv, Boulder, CO). Five sections containing the striatum at approximately 300 µm intervals were stained for DARPP-32 (Abcam ab40801) and Htt (EM48, Millipore Sigma MAB5374) using the Leica Bond autostainer. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized and subjected to heat-induced epitope retrieval using sodium citrate buffer (pH = 6.0). Permeabilization was achieved with 0.1% TX-100 for 30 min, followed by biotin blocking (Abcam ab64212). Following sequential primary antibody incubation for 60 min each, a biotin conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Abcam ab6788) followed by Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated streptavidin (ThermoFisher S21374) for EM48 and an Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (ab150077) for DARPP-32 were used as secondary antibodies. Hoechst nuclear counterstain (Thermo Scientific 62249) was added for 3 min as the final step. Slides were imaged at 20× using the Panoramic P250 slide scanner (3DHISTECH). Regions of interest (ROI) around the striatum were drawn using DARPP-32 reactivity as a reference. Htt positive cells in the striatum were counted by Hoechst co-localization and adaptive thresholding using Visiopharm software. Staining index is calculated as the product of average Htt intensity per cell and the number of Htt positive cells divided by the area of the ROI. DARPP-32 intensity is calculated using Visiopharm as the mean relative fluorescent unit (0–255) of the FITC channel within the striatum normalized to the ROI area (µm2). Each data point is the mean of five sections.
RNAscope
Brain hemispheres fixed in neutral buffered formalin were embedded in paraffin and 5 mm serial sections were collected (performed by Inotiv, Boulder, CO). Sections were stained for MSH3 (Advanced Cell Diagnostics 833309) using RNAscope® VS Universal HRP Reagent Kit (Advanced Cell Diagnostics 323200) on Ventana Discovery Ultra autostainer.
Sections were counterstained with 10 µg/mL Hoechst 33342 (ThermoFisher H3570) for 5 min. Slides were coverslipped with ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant (ThermoFisher P36930) and imaged at 40× confocal on the TissueGnostics TissueFAXS SL scanning system.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 9.3.1. Significant level was defined as p < 0.05. Intergroup differences were tested using Student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA. Multicomparisons were corrected with Tukey’s post hoc test when comparing three or more groups. Data were displayed showing error bars with SDs. Correlation analysis was done with a simple linear regression model. Data were displayed showing 95% confidence interval and R2.
Results
Study design for investigating quantitative relationship between MSH3 expression and somatic instability in HdhQ111/+ mice
Motivated by the need to elucidate the quantitative relationship between MSH3 expression and the prevention of somatic instability, we conducted an in-depth investigation aiming to correlate somatic instability with a wide range of MSH3 protein expression levels in an HD mouse model exhibiting somatic CAG repeat expansions. To accomplish this, our experimental approach involved the dose-dependent repression of MSH3 in HdhQ111/+ mice using ICV of an MSH3 di-siRNA. Prior to this experiment, we performed a small dose finding study in wild-type mice demonstrating a dose-dependent reduction of MSH3 protein upon ICV injection of 0.5 to 20 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA (see Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Material and methods). We next confirmed that our in-house cohort of HdhQ111/+ mice displayed age-dependent CAG somatic expansions in Htt. Measurements of the somatic instability index at 2, 3, 6, and 12 months of age in various brain and peripheral tissues from these mice demonstrated high somatic instability in the striatum and liver, and to a lesser extent in the cortex, cerebellum, spleen, and tail (Supplementary Fig. 2A–F) validating previous findings 28. Notably, there was a > twofold increase in the somatic expansion index between 3 and 6 months of age in the striatum, suggesting an optimal assay window for a 3-month treatment study starting at 3 months of age (Supplementary Fig. 2F).
Consistent with these observations, we treated 3-month-old HdhQ111/+ mice with ICV delivery of vehicle, 3 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA, and 10 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA. These dosages were selected based on findings from the dose finding study (see Supplementary Fig. 1) as well as prior experience with di-siRNAs. Three months after di-siRNA administration, we collected protein, mRNA, and DNA simultaneously from brain and peripheral tissue samples, enabling diverse correlation analyses. Tissue was also collected from untreated 3-month-old mice (baseline) and 6-month-old mice (see Supplementary Fig. 2). These naïve animals were from the same matings as the treated animals and tissues were all processed in parallel. This design (Fig. 1) allows for a quantitative investigation of the correlation between MSH3 reduction and somatic instability.
Dose-dependent reduction of MSH3 protein and mRNA by silencing MSH3 using a di-siRNA in HdhQ111/+ mice
To confirm the dose-dependent repression of MSH3 expression in HdhQ111/+ mice following a 3-month treatment with 3 and 10 nmol of MSH3 di-siRNA, we conducted measurements of Msh3 mRNA and MSH3 protein levels using RT-qPCR and semi-quantitative Western blotting, respectively. These measurements were performed in the striatum, cortex, cerebellum, and liver. As depicted in Fig. 2A, we observed a significant dose-dependent reduction in Msh3 mRNA levels in the striatum (100 ± 18% for vehicle, 83 ± 30% for 3 nmol, and 55 ± 18% for 10 nmol di-siRNA; n = 9–10 per group; mean ± SD) and cortex (100 ± 17% for vehicle, 97 ± 28% for 3 nmol, and 67 ± 20% for 10 nmol di-siRNA; n = 10 per group). A slight numerical reduction in Msh3 mRNA was also noted in the cerebellum. Furthermore, we demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in MSH3 protein levels in the striatum (100 ± 22% for vehicle, 59 ± 27% for 3 nmol, and 25 ± 18% for 10 nmol di-siRNA; n = 10), cortex (100 ± 17% for vehicle, 90 ± 22% for 3 nmol, and 54 ± 26% for 10 nmol di-siRNA; n = 7–9), and cerebellum (100 ± 9% for vehicle, 92 ± 6% for 3 nmol, and 77 ± 6% for 10 nmol di-siRNA; n = 6), as shown in Fig. 2B and C and Supplementary Figs. 5–7 and Supplementary Tables 1–3. Notably, no reductions in Msh3 mRNA and MSH3 protein levels were observed in the liver, as the di-siRNA was directly administered into the CNS (Fig. 2A–C, Supplementary Fig. 8 and Supplementary Table 4). The reduction of MSH3 also did not affect the levels of Msh2 and Msh6 mRNA in the striatum (Fig. 2D), consistent with a previous report (O’Reilly et al., 2023). However, striatal MSH6 protein is significantly (p < 0.05) upregulated upon 10 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA treatment (Fig. 2E, Supplementary Fig. 9 and Supplementary Table 5; 100 ± 26% for vehicle, 82 ± 21% for 3 nmol, and 142 ± 40% for 10 nmol di-siRNA; n = 10). It is noteworthy that there is a significant (p < 0.01) negative linear correlation between the somatic expansion index and MSH6 protein in the 10 nmol treatment group (Supplementary Fig. 3A). No changes in MSH2 protein were observed (Fig. 2E, Supplementary Fig. 10 and Supplementary Table 6). Additionally, a subset of mice treated with 10 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA was sacrificed after only 2 months of treatment. These mice exhibited a 71.5 ± 20.0% reduction in striatal MSH3 protein and a 40.4 ± 13.0% reduction in Msh3 mRNA compared to baseline (Supplementary Figs. 4A–C and 5, Supplementary Table 1). This is very similar to the knockdown observed at the end of the 3 months treatment, indicating a constant knockdown over the 3 months duration of the study. Collectively, these findings demonstrate a dose-dependent reduction of MSH3 upon treatment with the Msh3 mRNA targeted di-siRNA.
Unveiling an inaccessible nuclear MSH3 mRNA pool resistant to knockdown by di-siRNA
Upon comparing striatal and cortical Msh3 mRNA levels with their corresponding protein levels, we identified a linear correlation, substantiating our quantification methods. The striatal mRNA/protein Y-intercept was approximately 43% (with a 95% confidence interval of 30–57%, Fig. 3A) and the cortical samples had a Y intercept of 14% (with a 95% confidence interval of − 4 to 32%, Fig. 3B). These intercepts highlight a disconnect between RNA and protein knockdown levels. To explore this, we used RNAscope to visualize Msh3 transcript localization in the striatum and cortex. We observed a significant pool of Msh3 mRNA in the nucleus (Fig. 3C), which is likely inaccessible to translational machinery and RNA interference. This can account for the observed disconnect between RNA and protein knockdown levels.
Dose-dependent reduction of somatic repeat expansion index by silencing MSH3 using a di-siRNA in HdhQ111/+ mice
We evaluated the impact of MSH3 di-siRNA treatment on somatic CAG repeat expansions in Htt in brain and peripheral tissues of HdhQ111/+ mice. Somatic CAG repeat expansions were quantified from fragment analysis traces by determining a somatic expansion index (SEI) 27. As depicted in Fig. 4A and B, administration of 3 and 10 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA resulted in a reduction of striatal somatic CAG repeat expansions by 45.1 ± 29.4% and 78.1 ± 17.3%, respectively, compared to baseline animals and vehicle-treated animals (3 months baseline: 2.1 ± 0.2; untreated at study end: 5.3 ± 0.9; vehicle-treated mice at study end: 5.6 ± 0.7; treated with 3 nmol di-siRNA at study end: 4.0 ± 1.0; treated with 10 nmol di-siRNA at study end: 2.9 ± 0.6 SEI; mean ± SD, n = 10). Moreover, a significant dose-dependent treatment effect was observed in the cortex (3 months baseline: 1.1 ± 0.11; untreated at study end: 1.8 ± 0.31; vehicle-treated mice at study end: 1.8 ± 0.27; treated with 3 nmol di-siRNA at study end: 1.8 ± 0.21; treated with 10 nmol di-siRNA at study end: 1.5 ± 0.2 SEI; mean ± SD, n = 10) and cerebellum as well (3 months baseline: 0.58 ± 0.07; untreated study end: 0.74 ± 0.18; vehicle-treated mice at study end: 0.73 ± 0.15; treated with 3 nmol di-siRNA at study end: 0.64 ± 0.08; treated with 10 nmol di-siRNA at study end: 0.58 ± 0.08 SEI; mean ± SD, n = 10) (Fig. 4B). Notably, somatic expansions in a peripheral tissue such as the liver were not prevented, consistent with the CNS-specific route of di-siRNA administration (Fig. 4B). The subset of mice treated with 10 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA for only 2 months did show an almost complete prevention of striatal somatic repeat CAG expansions (Supplementary Fig. 4D and E). The SEI’s after 2- or 3-months treatment with 10 nmol are not statistically different (not shown). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that MSH3 di-siRNA treatment effectively prevents the formation of somatic CAG repeat expansions in a dose-dependent manner in HdhQ111/+ mice.
Prevention of somatic CAG repeat expansion is directly proportional to MSH3 protein reduction.
To investigate the quantitative association between MSH3 expression and somatic instability, we generated a plot of striatal MSH3 protein levels against the observed inhibition of somatic expansions in the striatum (Fig. 5). Our analysis utilizing linear regression (R2 = 0.65, p < 0.0001), revealed a clear directly proportional relationship between MSH3 protein levels and the prevention of somatic CAG repeat expansions in HdhQ111/+ mice, with a proportionality constant of approximately 1. These findings provide evidence supporting that MSH3 activity plays a critical role in the rate-limiting step of somatic CAG repeat expansion formation in vivo.
No effect of MSH3 di-siRNA treatment on nuclear Htt staining in HdhQ111/+ mice
Following the successful reduction of CAG somatic repeat expansions in Htt through MSH3 di-siRNA treatment in HdhQ111/+ mice, we sought to investigate the potential implications of this phenomenon on downstream pathogenesis. Notably, crossing HdhQ111/+ mice with Msh2 or Msh3 deficient mice results in a decrease in nuclear Htt accumulation8,9. To determine if our pharmacological intervention targeting MSH3 could reproduce these findings, we conducted immunofluorescence analysis of nuclear HTT in striatal sections obtained from our treatment study (Fig. 6). We observed a significant increase in nuclear HTT staining in untreated and vehicle treated HdhQ111/+ mice at the study's conclusion compared to the mice at the beginning of the treatment (Fig. 6A and B). This observation indicates the existence of an appropriate assay window for detecting treatment effects. However, treatment of HdhQ111/+ mice with 3 or 10 nmol of MSH3 di-siRNA did not induce any significant alterations in the nuclear HTT staining index when compared to vehicle-treated or untreated mice (Fig. 6A and B). Consequently, these findings raise questions regarding the involvement of somatic CAG repeat instability in Htt aggregation in HdhQ111/+ mice above 3 months of age.
Discussion
Our study presents strong evidence for a direct correlation between somatic instability of the CAG repeat within Htt Exon 1 and the levels of pharmacologically manipulated MSH3 in an HD mouse model. The observed proportionality constant of approximately 1 supports the prior hypothesis that the binding of MutSβ to DNA loops formed by slipped CAG repeats is a rate-limiting step in the somatic expansion process. These findings have implications for the development of therapeutic interventions targeting MSH3 in HD and other triplet repeat disorders characterized by somatic instability. According to our results, achieving a complete cessation of somatic expansions would require an almost 100% reduction in MSH3 levels. However, such a substantial reduction may not necessarily be achievable in human subjects. Nonetheless, reducing MSH3 levels by 50%, a reduction considered safe based on genetic studies, could lead to a corresponding 50% decrease in somatic instability. Our pharmacology study corroborates and expands upon the findings of previous genetic mouse studies 9,29. It is noteworthy that all our correlation analyses benefited greatly from the simultaneous isolation of DNA and protein from the same tissue samples, making this approach valuable for future similar experiments. Importantly, despite a significant reduction in the MSH3 protein and somatic expansion index, observed to be 75 ± 18% and 78 ± 17% respectively in the 10 nmol di-siRNA group, there was no evidence of contractions in somatic repeat expansions. Notably, even the two mice that demonstrated over 95% striatal MSH3 knockdown did not display lower somatic repeat expansions than those found in mice at study start. Thus, our data suggests that pharmacological reduction of MSH3 activity can effectively prevent further expansions but may not significantly reduce existing expansions.
Our study did not allow us to determine the specific degree of somatic expansion reduction necessary to achieve therapeutic benefits. For instance, we did not find any evidence of neurodegeneration, as assessed by DARP32 staining, between 3 and 6 months of age in our animals (Supplementary Fig. 11). This finding diverges from a previous report in this mouse model 30 but is consistent with another study that reported only a marginal decrease in DARP32 staining in mice aged 12 months beyond the animals in our study 31. To address in a preclinical setting the degree of somatic expansion reduction to achieve a therapeutic benefit, the utilization of BAC CAG mice, which display somatic instability-dependent HD-like phenotypes at later stages of life 32, may be more appropriate. However, we did successfully demonstrate a clear increase in nuclear HTT accumulations between 3 and 6 months of age in HdhQ111/+ mice. Surprisingly, our treatment did not impact these nuclear HTT protein accumulations, contradicting previous reports that suggest that the knockout of Msh3 or other DNA mismatch repair genes in HdhQ111/+ mice reduces nuclear HTT protein accumulations 8,9. Considering that even HdhQ111/+ mice with a heterozygous Msh3 KO exhibit a significant reduction in accumulations, the pharmacological 75% reduction in MSH3 protein in our study should be sufficient to replicate the genetic findings. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that the somatic expansions observed between birth and 3 months of age triggered the HTT accumulation process beyond a threshold that cannot be rescued solely by reducing somatic repeat expansions. Another possibility is that the genetic knockout of Msh3 leads to compensatory mechanisms that affect HTT protein accumulations, such as a reduction in total HTT protein expression. Similarly, our HdhQ111/+ strain may express higher levels of HTT, leading to somatic repeat expansion-independent accumulation of HTT. Therefore, further investigations are warranted to explore the relationship between somatic CAG repeat expansions and the rate of HTT accumulation in preclinical models. Analyzing MSH3 expression in postmortem brains of HD patients carrying Msh3 variants associated with disease progression hastening or slowing may provide more meaningful insights than relying solely on preclinical models to determine the extent of reduction in somatic CAG repeat expansion, and consequently MSH3 expression, required to achieve therapeutic benefits.
Similar to what has been reported for Htt mRNA 33, our data indicates that a significant portion of MSH3 mRNA is resistant to RNA interference since it is retained in the nucleus. The function of this potential nuclear mRNA pool remains unknown, and unlike nuclear HTT mRNA 34,35, there is no evidence implicating MSH3 mRNA itself in the disease process. Therefore, this resistant Msh3 mRNA pool does not pose a concern for the efficacy of RNA interference-based therapeutic approaches targeting MSH3. However, it does have implications for PK/PD studies of therapeutic siRNAs targeting MSH3. Specifically, measuring MSH3 protein levels is more suitable for assessing the potency of siRNAs targeting MSH3 than measuring MSH3 mRNA levels.
Clinical safety remains a paramount concern when targeting MSH3, given its integral role in the DNA mismatch repair mechanism. By confining MSH3 knockdown to the CNS via intrathecal administration of di-siRNA in humans, we can mitigate potential risks tied to MutSβ activity loss in peripheral tissues, including the colon. Additionally, our findings suggest that MSH6—and, by extension, likely MutSα—could be upregulated via a post-transcriptional compensation mechanism to offset significant MutSβ loss, as observed in the group treated with 10 nmol MSH3 di-siRNA. This discovery is indeed promising and can be explained by how MSH3 and MSH6 compete for stabilization by binding to the common partner protein MSH2, which is well-known in the field 15. However, further investigations are necessary to elucidate whether different cell types exhibit unique responses to the knockdown.
There are several technical limitations in our study worth mentioning. Firstly, we opted to exclude a non-targeting control di-siRNA because such a control might introduce its own unique adverse effects. Consequently, we are unable to conclusively determine whether the impacts we noted, like those on somatic repeat instability, are a result of the di-siRNA modality itself or the targeted suppression of MSH3. Secondly, while biochemical techniques for quantitatively measuring Htt aggregates are now well established 36, the protein isolation procedure we employed is not compatible with these methods. This incompatibility hinders us from substantiating more the absence of influence on HTT aggregation following the acute reduction of MSH3 in HdhQ111/+ mice. Finally, the noted increase in MSH6 protein levels warrants additional verification and scrutiny. The apparent positive correlation between MSH6 protein and mRNA levels, as indicated in Supplementary Fig. 3B, suggests that the utilized antibody accurately measures MSH6 protein. However, confirmation using an antibody validated by knockout experiments or by employing various MSH6-specific antibodies would provide stronger assurance of the results. All these limitations should be considered in future research studies of a similar nature.
Our findings provide valuable support and guidance for the further development of di-siRNAs targeting MSH3 as a potential therapeutic approach for HD disease. It is important to note that all our experiments were conducted using a mouse model expressing a CAG repeat length (~ 111) that is only found in a small subset of HD patients with childhood onset of the disease. Therefore, it is essential to conduct future experiments to determine whether the quantitative relationship between MSH3 protein levels and somatic CAG repeat expansions, as reported here, holds true for germline CAG repeat lengths (~ 40–50) typically observed in the more common adult-onset form of HD. Additionally, investigations are warranted to examine whether these findings extend to very long CTG repeats found in diseases such as DM1. These follow-up studies will provide further insights into the broader applicability and potential efficacy of targeting MSH3 in different contexts of CAG repeat-associated disorders.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dominic Walsh and Sandi Engle for discussion and support, and Ming Liu and YeQing Pi for technical assistance.
Author contributions
Conceptualization C.L.G.-B., A.W., methodology: L.H., N.A.A., D.L., H.M.A., A.W., formal analysis: L.H., N.A.A., N.F.J., J.C.H., N.K., B.M.G., C.L.G.-B., A.W., investigation: R.D., L.H., N.A.A., J.D.L., N.F.J., J.C.H., S.G., C.L.G., M.D., D.T.T., N.K., B.M.G., G.A.K., C.L.G.-B., A.W., writing original draft: A.W., writing review and editing: R.D., L.H., N.A.A., K.E.G., H.M.A., D.R.M., C.L.G., C.L.G.-B., A.W., supervision and project administration: R.D., F.Y., W.D.H., G.A.K., C.L.G., K.E.G., H.M.A., C.L.G.-B., A.W.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information file).
Competing interests
R.M, L.H, N.A.A, D.L, N.F.J, J.C.H, S.G, F.Y, D.R.M, W.D.H, C.L.G, K.E.G, H.M.A, A.W are current or former paid employees and/or shareholders of Biogen. M.D, D.T.T, N.K, B.M.G, G.A.K and C.L.G-B are current or former paid employees and/or shareholders of Atalanta Therapeutics.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Rachelle Driscoll, Lucas Hampton and Neeta A. Abraham.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-52667-3.
References
- 1.Bates GP, et al. Huntington disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2015;1:15005. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tabrizi SJ, Flower MD, Ross CA, Wild EJ. Huntington disease: New insights into molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020;16:529–546. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0389-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.MacDonald ME. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. Cell. 1993;72:971–983. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scherzinger E, et al. Huntingtin-encoded polyglutamine expansions form amyloid-like protein aggregates in vitro and in vivo. Cell. 1997;90:549–558. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80514-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matlik K, et al. Cell type specific CAG repeat expansions and toxicity of mutant Huntingtin in human striatum and cerebellum. bioRxiv. 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.04.24.538082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kennedy L, et al. Dramatic tissue-specific mutation length increases are an early molecular event in Huntington disease pathogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:3359–3367. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mouro Pinto R, et al. Patterns of CAG repeat instability in the central nervous system and periphery in Huntington's disease and in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020;29:2551–2567. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddaa139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wheeler VC, et al. Mismatch repair gene Msh2 modifies the timing of early disease in Hdh(Q111) striatum. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003;12:273–281. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dragileva E, et al. Intergenerational and striatal CAG repeat instability in Huntington's disease knock-in mice involve different DNA repair genes. Neurobiol. Dis. 2009;33:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pinto RM, et al. Mismatch repair genes Mlh1 and Mlh3 modify CAG instability in Huntington's disease mice: Genome-wide and candidate approaches. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.GeM-HD Consortium CAG repeat not polyglutamine length determines timing of Huntington's disease onset. Cell. 2019;178:887–900.e814. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.GeM-HD Consortium Identification of genetic factors that modify clinical onset of Huntington's disease. Cell. 2015;162:516–526. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moss DJH, et al. Identification of genetic variants associated with Huntington's disease progression: A genome-wide association study. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:701–711. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Flower M, et al. MSH3 modifies somatic instability and disease severity in Huntington's and myotonic dystrophy type 1. Brain. 2019;142:1876–1886. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iyer RR, Pluciennik A, Burdett V, Modrich PL. DNA mismatch repair: Functions and mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:302–323. doi: 10.1021/cr0404794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Iyer RR, Pluciennik A. DNA mismatch repair and its role in Huntington's disease. J. Huntingtons Dis. 2021;10:75–94. doi: 10.3233/JHD-200438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hegan DC, et al. Differing patterns of genetic instability in mice deficient in the mismatch repair genes Pms2, Mlh1, Msh2, Msh3 and Msh6. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:2402–2408. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.de Wind N, et al. HNPCC-like cancer predisposition in mice through simultaneous loss of Msh3 and Msh6 mismatch-repair protein functions. Nat. Genet. 1999;23:359–362. doi: 10.1038/15544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Adam R, et al. Exome sequencing identifies biallelic MSH3 germline mutations as a recessive subtype of colorectal adenomatous polyposis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2016;99:337–351. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu B, et al. Analysis of mismatch repair genes in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer patients. Nat. Med. 1996;2:169–174. doi: 10.1038/nm0296-169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chung DC, Rustgi AK. DNA mismatch repair and cancer. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1685–1699. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90660-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Belhadj S, et al. Candidate genes for hereditary colorectal cancer: Mutational screening and systematic review. Hum. Mutat. 2020;41:1563–1576. doi: 10.1002/humu.24057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.O'Reilly D, et al. Di-valent siRNA mediated silencing of MSH3 blocks somatic repeat expansion in mouse models of Huntington's disease. Mol. Ther. 2023 doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alterman JF, et al. A divalent siRNA chemical scaffold for potent and sustained modulation of gene expression throughout the central nervous system. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:884–894. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0205-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.National Research Council (US) Institute for Laboratory Animal Research . Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academies Press (US); 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mangiarini L, et al. Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell. 1996;87:493–506. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee JM, et al. A novel approach to investigate tissue-specific trinucleotide repeat instability. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010;4:29. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee JM, Pinto RM, Gillis T, St Claire JC, Wheeler VC. Quantification of age-dependent somatic CAG repeat instability in Hdh CAG knock-in mice reveals different expansion dynamics in striatum and liver. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tome S, et al. MSH3 polymorphisms and protein levels affect CAG repeat instability in Huntington's disease mice. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Suelves N, Kirkham-McCarthy L, Lahue RS, Gines S. A selective inhibitor of histone deacetylase 3 prevents cognitive deficits and suppresses striatal CAG repeat expansions in Huntington's disease mice. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:6082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05125-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kovalenko M, et al. HttQ111/+ Huntington's disease knock-in mice exhibit brain region-specific morphological changes and synaptic dysfunction. J. Huntingtons Dis. 2018;7:17–33. doi: 10.3233/JHD-170282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gu X, et al. Uninterrupted CAG repeat drives striatum-selective transcriptionopathy and nuclear pathogenesis in human Huntingtin BAC mice. Neuron. 2022;110:1173–1192.e1177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Didiot MC, et al. Nuclear localization of Huntingtin mRNA is specific to cells of neuronal origin. Cell Rep. 2018;24:2553–2560.e2555. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Heinz A, Nabariya DK, Krauss S. Huntingtin and its role in mechanisms of RNA-mediated toxicity. Toxins. 2021 doi: 10.3390/toxins13070487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marti E. RNA toxicity induced by expanded CAG repeats in Huntington's disease. Brain Pathol. 2016;26:779–786. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Landles C, et al. Development of novel bioassays to detect soluble and aggregated Huntingtin proteins on three technology platforms. Brain Commun. 2021;3:231. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information file).