Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0295317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295317

Density of Aedes aegypti and dengue virus transmission risk in two municipalities of Northwestern Antioquia, Colombia

Wilber Gómez-Vargas 1,*, Paola Astrid Ríos-Tapias 2, Katerine Marin-Velásquez 3, Erika Giraldo-Gallo 1, Angela Segura-Cardona 1, Margarita Arboleda 2
Editor: Harapan Harapan4
PMCID: PMC10810462  PMID: 38271346

Abstract

The high infestation of Aedes aegypti populations in Urabá, Antioquia, Colombia represents a risk factor for increased dengue morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine the risk of dengue transmission by estimating the population of Ae. aegypti using entomological indices, density of females per dwelling and inhabitant, and virological surveillance in two municipalities in Colombia. A cross-sectional study was conducted with quarterly entomological surveys in three neighborhoods of Apartadó and Turbo between 2021 and 2022. Aedes indices and vector density per dwelling and per inhabitant were calculated. The Kernel method was used for spatial analysis, and correlations between climatic variables and mosquito density were examined. Virus detection and serotyping in mosquitoes was performed using single-step reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The housing, reservoir, and Breteau indices were 48.9%, 29.5%, and 70.2%, respectively. The mean density of Ae. aegypti was 1.47 females / dwelling and 0.51 females / inhabitant. The overall visual analysis showed several critical points in the neighborhoods studied. There was significant correlation of vector density and relative humidity and precipitation in the neighborhoods 29 de noviembre and 24 de diciembre. Additionally, serotypes DENV-1 and DENV-2 were found. The overall indices for dwellings, reservoirs, and Breteau were lower than those recorded in 2014 in Urabá. The vector density results in this study were similar to those reported in other studies conducted in Latin America, and vector infection was detected. The Aedes and density indices are complementary, emphasizing the importance of continuous surveillance of Ae. aegypti to inform appropriate control strategies and prevent future dengue outbreaks in these municipalities.

Introduction

The incidence of dengue and other arboviruses, such as chikungunya and Zika, in Colombia is closely associated with the density of the Aedes aegypti vector and its breeding sites, which can be found in urban, peri-urban, and rural areas where stagnant water is present [13]. Consequently, vector control measures remain the primary strategy for preventing dengue outbreaks until specific treatments and effective vaccines become available [3]. While Aedes albopictus, another mosquito species, has been found to carry dengue viruses in Colombia, it has not been implicated as a vector thus far [46] and there is no record of its presence in the Urabá region.

The Urabá region is particularly vulnerable to Ae. aegypti infestation due to its climate and high population density. Unregulated urbanization, coupled with inadequate sanitary conditions and deteriorating infrastructure, creates favorable conditions for the reproduction of Ae. aegypti. Although the subregion has achieved approximately 80% coverage of water and sewerage services, rural areas have significantly lower coverage, with less than 33% [7]. As a result, irregular service interruptions occur, leading to water scarcity during certain times of the year. Inhabitants resort to storing water in various containers, thereby facilitating the breeding of the vector.

Entomological surveillance plays a crucial role in monitoring and controlling Ae. aegypti populations. It involves systematic searches for breeding sites containing immature stages (larvae and pupae) as well as adult mosquitoes in urban and peri-urban areas. The objective is to gather information on infestation levels in each locality, serving as a fundamental component of vector control programs [8]. By conducting this surveillance, it becomes possible to assess the risk of arbovirus outbreaks, including dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, in different areas. This information is vital for directing appropriate and timely interventions for vector control [9].

The Colombian Ministry of Health and Social Protection has established the use of entomological or Aedes surveys as an official method for assessing the presence and abundance of Ae. aegypti [1]. These surveys use indices such as the dwelling index, reservoir index, and Breteau index. These indices are based on the number of houses visited and the presence or absence of immature mosquito stages. Despite operational challenges, such as difficulties in accessing residents’ houses or locating hidden breeding sites like gutters or sewers, the results obtained through these indices are used to guide vector control efforts [10]. However, there are concerns regarding the reliability of these surveys as a method for evaluating Ae. aegypti populations. One limitation is that the indices obtained do not take into account the variation in adult mosquito production among different types of containers. Additionally, when vector infestation levels are low, these surveys may not accurately detect the presence of Ae. aegypti [11].

Among the various methods used in entomological surveillance, the collection of adult mosquitoes is particularly valuable as it provides information on the actual number of adult mosquitoes present. This data can be used to calculate the density of Ae. aegypti females per unit area or per inhabitant, which is a more accurate predictor of dengue occurrence [12, 13]. By focusing on adult mosquitoes, this method directly assesses the vector population responsible for disease transmission.

In addition, the use of geographic information systems (GIS) and spatial analysis has become increasingly important in predicting vector dispersion and implementing effective control measures. One useful technique in this regard is kernel density estimation (KDE), which involves smoothing and interpolating the distribution of points across the entire study area. KDE allows for the analysis of focal patterns and provides results that are easily interpretable [14]. By incorporating GIS and spatial analysis, researchers and public health authorities can gain valuable insights into the spatial distribution of Ae. aegypti populations and make informed decisions regarding vector control strategies.

The Urabá region has been experiencing a predominance of acute febrile syndrome, and dengue infection has been identified as a significant contributor to this syndrome since 2007 [15, 16]. A previous study conducted in the municipalities of Apartadó, Necoclí, and Turbo revealed a high frequency of dengue infection, accounting for 37.3% of non-malarial febrile syndromes among the population [15].

Given the ongoing concerns regarding dengue transmission, the present study aimed to assess several indicators related to dengue risk. This included determining the Aedes indices, measuring the density of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, analyzing their spatial distribution, and investigating the correlation between climatic variables (such as temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation) and vector density. Additionally, the study aimed to determine the rate of dengue virus infection. By examining these indicators in three specific neighborhoods of the Apartadó and Turbo municipalities in Antioquia, Colombia, the study aimed to establish the risk of dengue virus transmission in the region.

Materials and methods

Study area

This entomological study was conducted in the subregion of Urabá, specifically in three neighborhoods located in the municipalities of Apartadó and Turbo, which are part of the department of Antioquia in Colombia. The study was carried out between February 2021 and November 2022, in an area known for endemic dengue transmission.

Apartadó Municipality: The municipality of Apartadó (7º 53’ 00" N; 76º 38’ 00" W) covers an area of 600 km2 and has a population of 112,396 inhabitants. The population density in Apartadó is 187 inhabitants per km2, which is higher than the population densities of both the Urabá region (40 inhabitants per km2) and the Antioquia department (93 inhabitants per km2) [17]. The average temperature in Apartadó is 28°C, and the municipality is situated at an altitude of 25 meters above sea level. Among the neighborhoods in Apartadó, the Serranía neighborhood (7° 53’7.65’’ N, 76° 38’2.51’’ W) was selected for this study due to high number of dengue cases in recent years (2018 to 2020: 82 cases) [18]. Serranía is characterized as a low to middle-income area with planned urbanization, high population density and basic infrastructure services such as piped water supply, sewerage, and regular garbage collection (Fig 1). This figure was constructed using Arc-Gis software and the area of the neighborhoods was delimited using the maps of Apartadó and Turbo, Antioquia, Colombia [19].

Fig 1. Map of the study neighborhoods.

Fig 1

Serranía neighborhood, Apartadó, and 29 de noviembre and 24 de diciembre neighborhoods in the Nueva Colonia district, Turbo.

Nueva Colonia is a district located within the municipality of Turbo (7°56’06.9 "N- 76°43’01.6 "W) and is situated at an altitude of 2 meters above sea level. It functions as a population center with approximately 19,364 inhabitants. The population density in Nueva Colonia is 72 inhabitants per km2, with 66.6% residing in 12 neighborhoods distributed among 3,377 houses, and the remaining 33.4% residing in 20 villages [20]. For this study, the neighborhoods of 29 de noviembre (7° 53’6.95’’ N, 76° 38’1.53’’ W) and 24 de diciembre (7° 56’1.93’’ N, 76° 42’9.87’’ W) were selected in Nueva Colonia. These neighborhoods have experienced a significant number of dengue cases and child deaths related to dengue [21] (Fig 1). They are characterized by unplanned urbanization, high population density, and low-income levels. The streets in these neighborhoods are unpaved, and there are puddles due to the lack of sewage systems. Additionally, the population lacks sufficient access to drinking water and regular solid waste collection services.

Information on probable cases of dengue fever

The information on probable cases of dengue fever was obtained from the National Public Health Surveillance System (SIVIGILA) in Apartadó and Turbo for the period 2021–2022. Laboratory confirmation of dengue virus infection was done through RT-PCTR tests in the case of patients recruited ≤ five days of symptom onset and by detection of IgM antibodies by ELISA in those recruited from day six of symptom onset, in accordance with WHO criteria [22].

Weather information

Monthly records of precipitation (mm), relative humidity (%), and temperature (°C) for the period 2021–2022 were obtained from two meterological stations of the Institute de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM) located in Apartadó, Antioquia, Colombia. These data were used to perform correlation analyses between climatological variables and vector density in the three neighborhoods of the two municipalities. It should be noted that the weather information from the meteorological stations in the municipality of Turbo was not available. However, it is important to mention that the township of Nueva Colonia, Turbo, is geographically closer to the municipality of Apartadó than to the municipality of Turbo.

Sample

With a margin of error of 5%, a population proportion (P) of 50%, and a design effect of 1.1, a sample size of 1,608 dwellings was calculated. Considering a potential loss of 10%, a total of 1,518 dwellings were included in the entomological sampling across the three neighborhoods. Out of these, 90 dwellings (5.6%) did not provide a response, resulting in a final sample size of 1,428 dwellings.

The sample size was calculated according to the following formula:

n=Z2NP1PN1e2+Z2P1P

Where;

Z = 1,96 (95%)

N = number of houses in the neighborhood

pq = variance

e = sampling error

The inspection of dwellings and the collection of adult mosquitoes were conducted eight times over a two-year period, from February 2021 to November 2022. A sampling interval of every 10th dwelling was used, and randomly generated numbers assigned to each dwelling were used to determine the starting point from which they were visited, following a clockwise direction. The households served as sampling units for the study.

Entomological surveys

The inspection of houses was conducted using a Google® form, which automatically recorded the relevant information in a Microsoft Excel® workbook. The recorded data included the date, house number, owner’s identification and name, number of inhabitants per house, types of breeding sites found, the positivity for immatures states (larvae and pupae), and the number of mosquitoes collected. The geographical coordinates of each inspected house were obtained using a GPS (Geographical Positioning System). The entomological surveys followed the operational guide provided by the World Health Organization for assessing the productivity of Ae. aegypti breeding sites [23]. The survey team consisted of a community leader, two research assistants, and a biologist. The team thoroughly inspected the dwellings, examining all potential water containers for both immature and adult mosquito stages. The intradomiciliary space, which included areas inside the dwelling such as bedrooms, living rooms, bathrooms, and kitchens, was inspected. Additionally, the peridomiciliary space, which encompassed the open areas of the property such as patios, gardens, and terraces, was also examined. A container containing larvae or pupae was considered positive for the presence of immature mosquito stages.

Pupae collection

The pupae found in the breeding sites were collected by using a standard plastic scoop and transferring them to a small container. From there, they were transferred to labeled plastic jars filled with water using a Pasteur pipette. In the laboratory, the collected pupae were moved to covered pupae emergence containers, where they were left until adult mosquitoes emerged.

For species identification adult mosquitoes were sacrificed by placing them in a -4 °C environment for 30 minutes. Morphological identification of the mosquitoes was used the key of Rueda (2004) [24] and was carried out using a stereomicroscope at the Entomology laboratory of the Instituto Colombiano de Medicina Tropical—CES University (ICMT-CES) in Apartadó, Antioquia, Colombia.

The emerged female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were stored in pools containing 8 to 10 mosquitoes each. The mosquitoes were placed in 1.5 mL cryovial tubes with RNAlater and labeled according to the collection site. The samples were then preserved at 4 °C in the laboratory and later frozen at -80 °C for further processing [25].

Collection of adult mosquitoes

The collection of adult mosquitoes was conducted in the same houses that were inspected. Mosquitoes were captured using Prokopack® aspirators (John W. Hock Co., Gainesville, FL, USA) for a duration of 20 minutes. The collection was carried out between 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM, following the sampling procedure described by Prokopec et al. [26]. After collection, captured mosquitoes were transferred to the Entomology laboratory of the ICMT-CES in Apartadó, Antioquia, Colombia. In the laboratory, the mosquitoes were identified and processed in the same manner as the emerged mosquitoes described previously.

Mosquito processing and DENV detection

The pools of Ae. aegypti females were transported to the ICMT-CES laboratory in Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia for further processing. RNA extraction from each pool of mosquitoes was performed using the Quick-RNA Tissue/Insect Microprep kit from Zymo Research, following the manufacturer’s protocol.

For the detection of dengue virus (DENV), the primers and probe suggested in the protocol by Gurukumar et al. [27] were used. To identify the serotype of the virus, the set of primers and primers described by Santiago et al. [28]. were used. All reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reactions were carried out using the SuperScript® III Platinum® one-step quantitative system. The reactions were performed on a Rotor-Gene Q thermocycler from QIAGEN®. The thermocycling parameters consisted of reverse transcription at 50 °C for 30 minutes, followed by denaturation at 95 °C for 2 minutes. Amplification and fluorescence detection were performed at 95 °C for 15 seconds and 60 °C for 1 minute, respectively, for a total of 40 cycles. Each probe’s amplification curves were evaluated, and a value of Cq ≥ 37 was considered negative for DENV presence.

Data analysis

The data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, USA). The first step involved calculating the proportion of mosquitoes by species based on the collected data. This information was used to determine the prevalence of Ae. aegypti and other mosquito species. Additionally, the data on dwellings with water containers were organized and presented in tables. To evaluate the risk of dengue virus (DENV) transmission, various dengue risk indicators were utilized. This included calculating the Aedes indices, which provide information on the density of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes in relation to the number of houses inspected. The mosquito density, spatial distribution, and their correlation with climatological variables such as precipitation, temperature, and relative humidity were also examined. Furthermore, the rate of DENV infection was determined to assess the likelihood of viral transmission.

The level of infestation by Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and the risk of dengue transmission were assessed using: (i) the housing index (HI), as the percentage of houses infested with larvae and/or pupae; (ii) the deposit index (DI), as the percentage of water reservoirs infested with larvae and / or pupae; and (iii) the Breteau index (BI), as the number of positive reservoirs per 100 houses inspected in a specific location.

Based on WHO criteria, if the BI exceeds 50, HI exceeds 35, and DI exceeds 20, the risk of dengue transmission is considered high. When the BI falls between 5 and 50, it indicates a high density of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes and an increased risk of dengue transmission. Conversely, when the BI is below 5, HI is below 4, and DI is below 3, the likelihood of dengue transmission is considered low [29]. Additionally, indices based on female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were used to calculate mosquito density for each dwelling.

To assess the positivity of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, the percentage of infested houses with at least one female Ae. aegypti mosquito was calculated. The index of female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes per dwelling surveyed (Female/House) and per inhabitant per dwelling surveyed (Female/Inhabitant) were calculated (See S1 Appendix). To represent the spatial distribution of Ae. aegypti presence and overall density indices in each neighborhood, Kernel density relationships were employed. This technique utilizes Kernel density estimation to generate heat maps that highlight areas with higher concentrations of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, helping to identify hotspots of vector infestation. For the construction of these maps (Fig 6), the traditional Aedes indices and the vector density indices obtained by the project with ArcGIS 10.5 software were used (see S1 Appendix).

All collected female mosquitoes were retained for DENV detection. The Minimum Infection Rate (MIR) was then calculated as the number of positive clusters (clusters of mosquitoes with DENV infection) divided by the total number of mosquitoes processed, multiplied by 1000. The MIR provides an estimate of the proportion of mosquitoes infected with DENV [30].

All statistical analyses were conducted using Jamovi version 2.2 [31], with a significance threshold (α) of 0.05. The Friedman test was employed to determine if there were significant differences in the density of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes among the neighborhoods studied. This non-parametric test is used when comparing multiple related samples. To analyze the potential relationship between climatic variables and vector density per neighborhood, both Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used. The choice between these two correlation coefficients depended on the distribution of the data [32].

Ethical considerations

The research protocol was submitted to the Institutional Bioethics Committee of the ICMT-CES in Medellín, and it received approval under Act 66 on June 14, 2019. Informed consent was obtained from each participant before conducting the entomological survey. The researchers sought written consent to enter their homes and carry out the entomological survey.

Results

Mosquito breeding sites and Aedes aegypti presence

The results of the entomological survey showed that out of the 1,518 homes inspected, 91.9% (1,394 homes) had water reservoirs. Among the three neighborhoods, the highest proportion of dwellings with water reservoirs was found in the 24 de diciembre neighborhood, at 99.2%. The neighborhood of 29 de noviembre had a similarly high proportion, with 99.0%. The Serranía neighborhood had a slightly lower proportion, with 93.7%.

Out of the 2,307 water reservoirs inspected, 40.5% (935) were found to have larvae and/or pupae of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes. Among the positive reservoirs, pools or low concrete tanks had the highest positivity rate, accounting for 25.6% (591/935) of the total. The 29 de noviembre neighborhood showed a higher infestation rate compared to other neighborhoods, at 18.2% (421 reservoirs) (Table 1).

Table 1. Type and number of water reservoirs infested with larvae or pupae of Aedes aegypti.

Deposit type Serranía 29 de noviembre 24 de diciembre Total
Positive deposits
n (%)
Deposits
n
Positive deposits
n (%)
Deposits
n
Positive Deposits
n (%)
Deposits
n
Positive deposits
Total
N (%)
Total deposits N
Low concrete tanks 103 (4.5) 493 257 (11.1) 470 231 (10.0) 396 591 (25.6) 1359
Plastic tanks 22 (0.9) 90 67 (2.9) 370 41 (1.7) 216 130 (5.6) 676
Bins 13 (0.6) 88 41 (1.7) 263 44 (1.9) 298 98 (4.2) 649
Tires 3 (0.1) 5 20 (0.9) 68 10 (0.4) 17 33 (1.4) 90
Others* 24 (1.0) 53 36 (1.6) 141 23 (1.0) 54 83 (3.6) 248
Total 165 (7.1) 729 421 (18.2) 928 349 (15.1) 650 935 (40.5) 2307

* Bottles, disposable cups, pet drinking fountains.

The overall index of Ae. aegypti presence in dwellings (HI) was 48.9% (95% CI: 39.2–58.6 ± 24.2). The highest HI was recorded in the 24 de diciembre neighborhood (68.9%, 95% CI: 61.9–75.8 ± 10.1). The overall deposit index (DI) was 29.5% (95% CI: 25.1–34.0 ± 11.1), with the 24 de diciembre neighborhood having a higher DI (36.4%, 95% CI: 30.2–42.7 ± 9.01) compared to the other two neighborhoods. The overall Breteau index was 70.2 (95% CI: 53.6–86.9 ± 41.6), with the highest value in the 29 de noviembre neighborhood (100.4, 95% CI: 77.0–124.0 ± 33.7) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Overall housing, deposits and Breteau indices by neighborhood.

Fig 2

2021–2022.

Species composition and density of mosquitoes collected

At the end of entomological sampling in the Serranía neighborhood, Apartadó, and in the neighborhoods 29 de noviembre and 24 de diciembre in Nueva Colonia, Turbo, during the years 2021 and 2022, a total of 20,050 mosquitoes were collected. Of these, 72.8% (14,618) were Culex spp., 27.1% (5,408) were Ae. aegypti (2,564 females and 2,844 males, with a female to male ratio of 0.9:1.1), and 0.12% (24 individuals) were Anopheles albimanus. The highest proportion of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes was collected in the 24 de diciembre neighborhood, accounting for 12.3% (n = 2,462) (Table 2).

Table 2. Number and percentage of adult mosquitoes collected by neighborhood and species.
Neighborhood Species Female Male Total %
(n) (n) (N)
Serranía Aedes aegypti 555 745 1300 97.4
Culex spp. 28 3 31 2.3
Anopheles albimanus 4 0 4 0.3
Subtotal 587 748 1335 6.7
29 de noviembre Aedes aegypti 816 830 1646 13.1
Culex spp. 5040 5865 10905 86.8
Anopheles albimanus 12 4 16 0.1
Subtotal 5868 6699 12567 62.7
24 de diciembre
Aedes aegypti 1193 1269 2462 12.3
Culex spp. 1777 1905 3682 59.9
Anopheles albimanus 3 1 4 0.1
Subtotal 2973 3175 6148 30.7
Total 9428 10622 20050

Dwellings infested with Ae. aegypti adults accounted for 57.7% (876) of all dwellings, and of which 48.9% (742) were infested with females and 47.8% (726) with males. The highest number of Ae. aegypti was observed in the 24 de diciembre neighborhood, with 514 mosquitoes captured in February 2022 (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Number of Ae. aegypti adults collected in the dwellings of the three study neighborhoods during the 2021–2022 period.

Fig 3

The mean density of Ae. aegypti in the three neighborhoods across the eight samplings was 1.74 mosquitoes per dwelling (95% CI: 1.38–2.11 ± 1.29), and more males than females were collected: 2.02 males per dwelling (95% CI: 1.52–2.51 ± 1.23) versus 1.47 females (95% CI: 0.94–2.0 ± 1.32), a significant difference (Friedman’s test: Q = 5.26, df = 1, p = 0.02) (Fig 4). Furthermore, there was no variation in the number of female mosquitoes captured per dwelling, as indicated by the coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 1 (CV = SD/mean = 0.89).

Fig 4. Aedes aegypti adults collected per household in the three neighborhoods during the 2021–2022 period.

Fig 4

a. Number of Aedes aegypti adult females and males collected per household. b. Number of Aedes aegypti females collected per household. The box plot shows the median, interquartile range (IQR) and mean (■) values.

The mean density of Ae. aegypti females and males per inhabitant in each of the dwellings in the three neighborhoods across the eight samplings was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.45–0.61 ± 0.28). More males than females were collected: 0.55 males / inhabitant (0.43–0.66 ± 0.28) compared to 0.51 females / inhabitant (95% CI: 0.39–0.63 ± 0.29). There were no significant differences between males and females in terms of density per inhabitant (Friedman’s test: Q = 1.64, df = 1, p = 0.20) (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Aedes aegypti adults collected per inhabitant in the three neighborhoods during the 2021–2022 period.

Fig 5

a. Number of Aedes aegypti adult females and males collected per inhabitant. b. Number of Aedes aegypti females collected per inhabitant. The box plot shows median, interquartile range (IQR) and mean (■) values.

Spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti density

Fig 6 shows the spatial distribution of Ae. aegypti density in the surveyed dwellings during the entire study period (Eight cycles: 2021–2022) with Kernel density ratio maps. The maps highlight hot spots of the presence of immature stages and females of Ae. aegypti in the surveyed neighborhoods, indicating areas of high density.

Fig 6. Spatial distribution according to the presence of immature stages and females of Ae. aegypti in dwellings with their respective Kernel density ratio maps in general (eight cycles: 2021–2022).

Fig 6

Serranía (A: Presence, B: Females per dwelling, C: Females per inhabitant), 29 de noviembre and 24 de diciembre (D: Presence, E: Females per dwelling, F: Females per inhabitant).

Relationship of climatic variables and vector density

In the Serranía neighborhood, the vector density of Ae. aegypti females per inhabitant did not show a significant correlation with temperature (rs = 0.29, p = 0.48), relative humidity (rho = -0.200, p = 0.63), or precipitation (rs = -0.027, p = 0.95). However, in the 29 de noviembre and 24 de diciembre neighborhoods, there were significant correlations observed. In the 29 de noviembre neighborhood, there was a significant negative correlation between vector density and relative humidity (rs = -0.78, p = 0.022) and a significant positive correlation between vector density and precipitation (29 nov: rs = 0.750, p = 0.033; 24 dic: rs = 0.733, p = 0.038).

Virus detection assays

For the detection of Dengue virus (DENV) infection, a total of 249 groups or pools consisting of 2,131 Ae. aegypti females were tested using a one-step RT-PCR assay. Among these pools, three were found to be positive for DENV infection. The positive mosquitoes were collected from the 24 de diciembre neighborhood (2 pools) and the Serranía neighborhood (1 pool). Most of the infected females were found within the households. The minimum infection rate (MIR) for DENV was calculated as 1.4 (3 positive pools / 2,131 total individual mosquitoes processed × 1000), indicating the number of positive pools per 1,000 mosquitoes processed. The percentage of positive pools was calculated as 1.2% (3 pools / 249 pools).

During this period, 77 cases of dengue fever were recorded, 56 of which were reported by SIVIGILA and the total number of cases captured by the project was 33 and the number of positive dengue cases in humans was 21 in the neighborhoods mentioned, being 14, 5 and 2 cases in Serranía, 24 de diciembre and 29 de noviembre, respectively. Table 3 describes the number of human cases detected and the positivity ratio, as well as the serotypes found in patient samples and in mosquitoes.

Table 3. Description of dengue virus infection and distribution of serotypes in human patients and mosquitoes, according to neighborhood.
Neighborhood Human cases notified SIVIGILA Human cases captured Project Human positive dengue cases % human positivity Patient serotypes Number of pools analyzed Number of Positive pools % positive mosquitoes Serotype
Serranía 43 19 14 73.7 (14/19) DENV-1 58 1 1.7 (1/58) DENV-1
24-dic 8 10 5 50.0 (5/10) DENV-1 and DENV-2 102 2 2.0 (2/102) DENV-1 and DENV-2
29-nov 5 4 2 50.0 (2/4) DENV-1 89 0 0.0 Undetermi-ned
Total 56 33 21 63.6 (21/33) DENV-1 and DENV-2 249 3 1.2 (3/249) DENV-1 and DENV-2

Discussion

The high Aedes indices observed in our study indicate a substantial presence of mosquito breeding sites within the study areas. The high-density rates of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes further highlights the potential for increased transmission of dengue fever in these neighborhoods. This observation aligns with previous studies conducted in the Antioquia region, which have reported similar patterns [3336], for instance, a study conducted in Urabá documented a 32.5% [34] positivity rate in dwellings, which is lower than the 49% recorded in this study. It is worth noting that the comparison between our study and previous investigations should be interpreted with caution due to potential variations in study design, sampling methods, and geographical factors. However, the consistently high Aedes indices across different studies in the Antioquia region suggest a persistent and concerning issue of mosquito-borne disease transmission.

The high density of Ae. aegypti observed in this study is likely attributed to several factors, including the presence of numerous water reservoirs and the abundance of immature mosquitoes indoors. The shortage of water in the area may have prompted households to store water in tanks within their homes, leading to a higher number of breeding sites. Improper waste disposal and the prevalence of plastic tanks, buckets, and other water storage containers also contribute to the availability of suitable breeding sites for mosquitoes.

It is noteworthy that a significant proportion of water containers were found to harbor mosquito larvae and were left uncovered. This highlights the need for targeted mosquito control measures that prioritize breeding habitats, particularly focusing on water reservoirs suitable for long-term storage.

The overall housing, deposit, and Breteau indices observed in our study were lower than those reported by Alarcón et al. in 2014 in the Urabá region, specifically in one neighborhood of the municipality of Apartadó. Alarcón et al. documented values of 58.8%, 58.8%, and 111.8% for housing, deposits, and Breteau indices, respectively [33], These differences may be attributed to variations in sampling methods, climatic conditions, and local contexts between the two studies. Comparing the results to another study conducted in the El Manzanillo, Itagüí district in Antioquia, the housing and deposit indices were found to be similar, with values of 48.5% and 21.3%, respectively [36]. However, the Breteau index in that study was lower at 33%. These findings suggest some consistency in housing and deposit indices between the studies, while the variation in the Breteau index may be attributed to differences in mosquito breeding habitats and environmental factors.

This study highlights the elevated Aedes indices in the Nueva Colonia neighborhood, suggesting a higher risk of dengue virus transmission for its residents. The comparatively higher indices in the 24 de diciembre and 29 de noviembre neighborhoods, in contrast to the Serranía neighborhood, can be attributed to various factors. These neighborhoods, characterized by lower socioeconomic status, may have intra-domiciliary and peridomiciliary environments with inadequate water storage practices, such as low tanks, plastic containers, and uncovered garbage cans, which provide favorable breeding sites for mosquitoes.

These observations emphasize the importance of implementing targeted mosquito control measures in these neighborhoods to mitigate the risk of DENV transmission. Effective control practices may include regular inspection and elimination of potential breeding sites, promoting proper water storage practices, and raising awareness among residents about the importance of maintaining clean and mosquito-free environments.

The relationship between human density and vector density, particularly the number of Ae. aegypti females, is an important indicator of the risk of dengue transmission, as highlighted by previous studies [37]. This human-vector proximity has been reported by different authors. For instance, a study conducted in Taiwan in 1994 reported a density of 0.07 females/inhabitant [38], while studies in Colombia described densities of 0.5 females/inhabitant [39] and 2.1 females/ dwelling [32]. In other studies conducted in Ibagué, Colombia, Manta, Ecuador, and Posadas, Argentina, densities of 2.2, 1.13, and 1.80 females/dwelling, respectively, were observed, with an average of 1.71 females/dwelling across the three countries [40]. Similarly, a study conducted in Brazil reported densities of 1.60 females/dwelling and 0.42 females/inhabitant [37]. The present study found densities of 1.47 females/dwelling and 0.51 females/inhabitant, with the majority of female Ae. aegypti mosquitoes collected in the Nueva Colonia neighborhood, particularly in the 24 de diciembre neighborhood. These findings align with the results of previous studies conducted in Latin American countries, suggesting a comparable risk of dengue transmission in these areas.

The findings of this study indicate that the vector density, specifically the number of Ae. aegypti females per inhabitant, in the Serranía neighborhood is not significantly correlated with the environmental variables of temperature, humidity, or precipitation, which has a good water supply all year round. This suggests that factors other than these climatic variables may be influencing the vector density in this neighborhood, such as the presence of the vector outside the homes such as disposable containers, tires, among others. On the other hand, the neighborhoods of 29 de noviembre and 24 de diciembre show a significant correlation between vector density and relative humidity as well as precipitation. This implies that the abundance of Ae. aegypti females in these neighborhoods is influenced by the levels of humidity and rainfall. In these neighborhoods, due to the poor water supply, the inhabitants are forced to store water throughout the year, especially in dry weather. These environmental conditions may create suitable breeding habitats for mosquitoes, resulting in increased vector density.

Additionally, when considering the number of females per dwelling, only the neighborhood of 24 de diciembre shows a significant correlation with precipitation. This neighborhood, which also recorded the highest number of dengue cases among the two neighborhoods studied in the Nueva Colonia locality, may be more susceptible to dengue transmission due to the combination of high vector density and favorable environmental conditions. That is why the rains favor the increase of breeding sites and cases of dengue. In dry periods and low temperatures, vectors decrease, a situation that does not stop the transmission of the disease, due to the active biting behavior of the vector that favors the spread of the virus [41]. It can be observed that the impact of rainfall varied according to the neighborhood, this may be due to the differences in the types of water storage containers with Ae. aegypti’s larvae that affects the density of the adult mosquito, as was the case with a study conducted in Ecuador by Stewart-Ibarra et al. [42].

Being located near the equator, as suggested by Carrasquilla et al., [32], Colombia experiences relatively stable temperatures throughout the year, which may explain the lack of significant correlation between temperature and vector density in the Serranía neighborhood. Nevertheless, it is important to note that numerous studies have demonstrated the influence of climatic variables on dengue transmission. Factors such as temperature, humidity, and precipitation have been identified as key drivers of mosquito population dynamics and dengue transmission patterns in various regions [43].

In Brazil, when analyzing the correlation between the total number of insects collected and Ae. aegypti house indices (HI) in relation to climatic variables of temperature, humidity, rainfall, among others, regardless of locality, these variables had a direct influence on the distribution and presence of mosquitoes [44, 45]. Therefore, it is important to highligth that mosquito populations can change, to better adapt to local environmental conditions [46, 47].

The identification of hotspot foci with a specific pattern in the spatial distribution of immature and adult female Ae. aegypti aligns with previous research highlighting the focal nature of Ae. aegypti distribution. It is widely observed that the distribution of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes tends to be highly localized, forming clusters or hotspots of high vector abundance within small clusters of houses.

These hotspots of high vector abundance may exhibit temporal instability, meaning they can vary in location and intensity over time [48, 49].

The findings of this study suggest that the use of indicators of female density per house and per inhabitant provides a more accurate representation of the spatial distribution of Ae. aegypti compared to using presence / absence data of immature stages and females. This is in contrast to a recent study conducted in Brazil, where no consistent pattern in the spatial distribution of Ae. aegypti eggs, larvae, or adults was observed using separate entomological indicators [50]. The example from Apartadó and Carepa, where hotspots of Ae. aegypti infestation were identified based on egg density, highlights the utility of using specific entomological indicators for targeted vector control activities [33]. Similarly, in Medellín, spatial analysis techniques such as Kernel density and hot spot analysis were employed to identify areas with a higher presence of the vector, aiding in the implementation of effective vector control strategies [51].

The laboratory analysis conducted in this study revealed the presence of DENV serotypes 1 and 2 in mosquitoes collected from the 24 de diciembre and Serranía neighborhoods. This finding is consistent with previous entomo-virological studies conducted in Colombia, where all four DENV serotypes have been detected, with serotypes 1 and 2 being the most predominant [6, 30, 32, 52]. Although the infection rates observed in this study were relatively low, with a minimum infection rate of 1.4 and a positivity rate of 1.2%, the high density and large number of infested water reservoirs indicate a significant risk of DENV transmission in the study areas. It is worth noting that no studies investigating vector infection in the Urabá region were found in the literature review conducted. The presence of DENV infection in mosquitoes can be influenced by various factors, including rainfall, the number of mosquitoes tested, and the circulation of DENV among the human population during the study period. Despite the low number of laboratory-confirmed dengue cases among residents of the study neighborhoods, the detection of DENV serotypes 1 and 2 in both human samples mosquito pools in the 24 de diciembre neighborhood, as well as the presence of DENV serotype 1 in both humans and adult mosquito pools in the 24 de diciembre and Serranía neighborhoods, is noteworthy. Of the 21 dengue cases identified, 12 positive cases were identified by RT-PCR, of which the DEN-1 serotype was the most frequent with 75% (9/12), followed by the DEN-2 serotype with 25% (3/12). The remaining nine were identified by detection of IgM antibodies using the Elisa technique and six of these also had the presence of NS1 antigen.

Recent studies conducted in Medellín, Antioquia, analyzed pools of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and found a 13% positivity rate for DENV [53], however there is a lack of studies investigating DENV positivity in mosquitoes in Urabá.

These findings underscore the importance of entomo-virological surveillance as part of the routine surveillance of municipalities which is a useful tool to identify high-risk areas for virus transmission and an epidemiological alert system to directly control critical areas of activity for vector control especially because people circulating or living in places where these infected mosquitoes are identified are exposed to bites most of the day [5457]. Strategies for virological surveillance of Aedes mosquitoes commonly focus on females because females are hematophagous, whereas males are not [58]. Although DENV is transmitted primarily by the bite of female mosquitoes infected with human blood (horizontal transmission), both vertical (in which the infected mosquito is able to transmit the virus to its progeny) and sexual (when an infected male transmits the virus to the female during copulation) transmission have been suggested as an important mechanism for maintaining arbovirus circulation in vector populations [5961]. However, the challenges for the incorporation of entomo-virological surveillance in dengue control programs must have the necessary infrastructure, trained personnel and political (financial) support to implement it and the importance of evaluating its impact on the disease burden in the short, medium, and long term. Its inclusion in control programs should be assessed according to local capacities and the integrated use of other control tools [62]. Detecting DENV infection in mosquitoes provides valuable information for understanding the transmission dynamics and implementing targeted vector control measures to mitigate the risk of dengue transmission.

Conclusions

This study highlights several important findings regarding the risk of dengue transmission and the presence of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes in the neighborhoods under study. The high infestation rates of water reservoirs with mosquito larvae and pupae indicate a conducive environment for mosquito breeding. The presence and density of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, particularly in the Nueva Colonia neighborhood, suggest an increased risk of DENV transmission in these areas.

The detection of females carrying DENV serotypes 1 and 2 in the study neighborhoods, along with the correlation with dengue cases among residents, further supports the likelihood of local transmission. This emphasizes the importance of targeted vector control measures to reduce the risk of dengue transmission in these communities.

The use of entomological indicators, specifically the presence and density of adult female mosquitoes, provides valuable complementary information to traditional Aedes indices. Integrating these indicators into vector surveillance efforts can enhance the understanding of dengue and other arbovirus transmission dynamics, enabling more effective monitoring and control strategies.

Limitations of the study

The study was conducted in only three neighborhoods in two municipalities of Urabá, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other areas within the region. These neighborhoods were selected based on their high dengue burden and specific urban and demographic characteristics, which may differ from other municipalities in Urabá.

The study’s timeframe and duration may also be considered a limitation. The data collection period and the number of monitoring cycles may not capture the full seasonal dynamics and fluctuations in vector density and viral activity, potentially leading to an incomplete representation of the transmission patterns.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their heartfelt thanks to the residents who generously granted access to their homes for the purpose of entomological sampling. The authors also acknowledge the invaluable support and assistance provided by the Health Secretaries of Apartadó and Turbo in Antioquia, Colombia.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation of Colombia under project code 67882. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ministerio de la Protección Social de Colombia, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Gestión para la vigilancia entomológica y control de la transmisión de dengue. Bogotá: MPS; 2012. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/gestion-vigilancia-entomologica-dengue.pdf
  • 2.Olano VA. Editorial: Aedes aegypti en el área rural: implicaciones en salud pública. Biomédica. 2016;36(2):169. Available from: https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/3374/3155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stewart Ibarra AM, Luzadis VA, Borbor Cordova MJ, Silva M, Ordoñez T, Beltrán Ayala E, et al. A social-ecological analysis of community perceptions of dengue fever and Aedes aegypti in Machala, Ecuador. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Méndez F, Barreto M, Arias JF, Rengifo G, Muñoz J, Burbano ME, et al. Human and mosquito infections by dengue viruses during and after epidemics in a dengue–endemic region of Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(4):678–83. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gómez-Palacio A, Suaza-Vasco J, Castaño S, Triana O, Uribe S. Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) infected with the American-Asian genotype of Dengue type 2 virus in Medellín suggests its possible role as vector of dengue fever in Colombia. Biomédica. 2017;37(Supl.2):135–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pérez-Pérez J, Sanabria WH, Restrepo C, Rojo R, Henao E, Triana O, et al. Vigilancia virológica de Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti y Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus como apoyo para la adopción de decisiones en el control del dengue en Medellín. Biomédica. 2017;37(Supl.2):155–66. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v34i2.3474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cámara de Comercio de Medellín para Antioquia. Perfil socioeconómico de la subregión del Urabá [Internet]. Medellín (Colombia); 2015. https://www.camaramedellin.com.co/Portals/0/Biblioteca/Estudios-economicos/cadenas-productivas-regionales/20-3Perfil%20Uraba_Oct14.pdf?ver=2019-03-01-095036-403
  • 8.Ríos Cadavid JF. Aspectos entomológicos del dengue. Infectio. 2004;8(3):231–5. Available from: https://repository.agrosavia.co/handle/20.500.12324/19543 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barrera R. Recomendaciones para el monitoreo de Aedes aegypti. Biomédica. 2016;36(3):454–62. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v36i3.2892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nascimento KLC, da Silva JFM, Zequi JAC, Lopes J. Comparison Between Larval Survey Index and Positive Ovitrap Index in the Evaluation of Populations of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762) North of Paraná, Brazil. Environ Health Insights. 2020;14:1–8. doi: 10.1177/1178630219886570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Focks DA. A review of entomological sampling methods and indicators for dengue vectors. Gainesville, Florida: TDR/WHO; 2003. 40 p. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/68575/?sequence=1 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rodriguez-Figueroa L, Rigau-Perez JG, Suarez EL, Reiter P. Risk factors for dengue infection during an outbreak in Yanes, Puerto Rico in 1991. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1995;52(6):496–502. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reiter PJ. Surveillance and control of urban dengue vectors. In: Gubler DJ, Ooi EE, Vasudevan S, Farrar J, editors. Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Boston, USA; 2014. p. 481–518. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Soares ENL, Santos MAB, Macedo LOD, Santos CVB, Agra MCR, Alves LC, et al. Spatial distribution of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in vulnerable areas for the transmission of arboviruses. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019;52:e20180341. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0341-2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Arroyave E, Londoño AF, Quintero JC, Agudelo-Florez P, Arboleda M, Díaz FJ, et al. Etiología y caracterización epidemiológica del síndrome febril no malárico en tres municipios del Urabá antioqueño, Colombia. Biomédica. 2012;33(Supl.1):99–107. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v33i0.734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Secretaría Seccional de Salud y Protección Social de Antioquia. Vigilancia en salud pública. 2023. Eventos en salud pública por municipio 2007–2022. https://dssa.gov.co/index.php/vigilancia-en-salud-publica
  • 17.DANE. Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda [Internet]. 2018. https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/demografia-y-poblacion/censo-nacional-de-poblacion-y-vivenda-2018/informacion-tecnica
  • 18.Secretaría de Salud de Apartadó. Casos de dengue en Apartadó de 2018, 2019 y 2020, reportados en Sivigila. Alcaldía de Apartadó; 2020.
  • 19.Gobierno de Colombia. Colombia en mapas [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 10]. https://www.colombiaenmapas.gov.co/
  • 20.Gobernación de Antioquia. Corregimiento de Nueva Colonia [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 5]. https://corregimientos.antioquia.gov.co/corregimiento-nueva-colonia/
  • 21.Alcaldía distrital de Turbo. Información sobre el municipio de Turbo [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 10]. http://www.turbo-antioquia.gov.co
  • 22.Instrumento para el diagnóstico y la atención a pacientes con sospecha de arbovirosis [Internet]. Washington D,C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana; Oficina Regional de la Organización Mundial de la Salud; 2016. 102 p. https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/31448/9789275319369_spa.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y
  • 23.WHO. Operational guide for assessing the productivity of Aedes aegypti breeding sites. [Internet]. WHO, World Health Organization; 2011. https://www.who.int/tdr/publications/tdr-research-publications/soppupal-surveys/en/
  • 24.Rueda LM. Pictorial keys for the identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) associated with Dengue Virus transmission. Zootaxa. 2004;589:1–60. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.589.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reinert JF, Harbach RE, Kitching IJ. Phylogeny and classification of Aedini (Diptera: Culicidae), based on morphological characters of all life stages. Zool J Linn Soc. 2004;142(3):289–368. doi: 10.1111/J.1096-3642.2004.00144.X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Galvin WA, Kelly R, Kitron U. A New, Cost-Effective, Battery-Powered Aspirator for Adult Mosquito Collections. J Med Entomol. 2009;46(6):1256–9. doi: 10.1603/033.046.0602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gurukumar K, Priyadarshini D, Patil J, Bhagat A, Singh A, Shah P, et al. Development of real time PCR for detection and quantitation of Dengue Viruses. Virol J. 2009;6(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-6-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Santiago GA, Vergne E, Quiles Y, Cosme J, Vazquez J, Medina JF, et al. Analytical and Clinical Performance of the CDC Real Time RT-PCR Assay for Detection and Typing of Dengue Virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(7):e2311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.WHO. Technical guide for a system of yellow fever surveillance. WHO; 1971.
  • 30.Pérez-Castro R, Castellanos JE, Olano VA, Matiz MI, Jaramillo JF, Vargas SL, et al. Detection of all four dengue serotypes in Aedes aegypti female mosquitoes collected in a rural area in Colombia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111(4):233–40. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760150363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.The Jamovi Project. Jamovi [Internet]. 2022. https://www.jamovi.org/
  • 32.Carrasquilla MCC, Ortiz MI, León C, Rondón S, Kulkarni MA, Talbot B, et al. Entomological characterization of Aedes mosquitoes and arbovirus detection in Ibagué, a Colombian city with co-circulation of Zika, dengue and chikungunya viruses. Parasites Vectors. 2021;14(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04908-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Alarcón EP, Segura ÁM, Rua-Uribe G, Parra-Henao G. Evaluación de ovitrampas para vigilancia y control de Aedes aegypti en dos centros urbanos del Urabá antioqueño. Biomédica. 2014;34(3):409–24. 10.7705/biomedica.v34i3.2134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.López-A YL, Wolff-E MI, Escobar-V JP, Osorio-Q. L. Distribución espacial y habitats larvarios del Aedes aegypti en el departamento de Antioquia. 1990. Rev Colomb Entomol. 1992;18(2):63–72. https://revistacolombianaentomologia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/SOCOLEN/article/download/10096/12842/32001 [Google Scholar]
  • 35.López Y. Vigilancia entomológica de Aedes aegypti en el departamento de Antioquia, 1995. Bol Vect. 1996;7:4–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Giraldo-Hurtado TM, Álvarez-Betancur JP, Parra-Henao G. Factores asociados a la infestación domiciliaria por Aedes aegypti en el corregimiento el Manzanillo, municipio de Itagüí (Antioquia) año 2015. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2018;36(1):34–44. doi: 10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v36n1a05 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rodrigues MDM, Marques GRAM, Serpa LLN, Arduino MDB, Voltolini JC, Barbosa GL, et al. Density of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus and its association with number of residents and meteorological variables in the home environment of dengue endemic area, São Paulo, Brazil. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:115. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0703-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen YR, Hwang JS, Guo YJ. Ecology and control of dengue vector mosquitoes in Taiwan. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1994;10:S78–87. doi: 10.6452/KJMS.199412.0078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Romero-Vivas CME, Falconar AKI. Investigation of relationships between Aedes aegypti egg, larvae, pupae, and adult density indices where their main breeding sites were located indoors. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005;21(1):15–21. doi: 10.2987/8756-971X(2005)21[15:IORBAA]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Talbot B, Sander B, Cevallos V, González C, Benítez D, Carissimo C, et al. Determinants of Aedes mosquito density as an indicator of arbovirus transmission risk in three sites affected by co-circulation of globally spreading arboviruses in Colombia, Ecuador and Argentina. Parasites Vectors. 2021;14(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04984-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Viana DV, Ignotti E. The ocurrence of dengue and weather changes in Brazil: A systematic review. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2013;16(2):240–56. doi: 10.1590/S1415-790X2013000200002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lowe R, Stewart-Ibarra AM. Climate and Non-Climate Drivers of Dengue Epidemics in Southern Coastal Ecuador. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013;88(5):971–81. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dibo MR, Chierotti AP, Ferrari MS, Mendonça AL, Chiaravalloti Neto F. Study of the relationship between Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti egg and adult densities, dengue fever and climate in Mirassol, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2008;103(6):554–60. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762008000600008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.De Oliveira JG, Netto SA, Francisco EO, Vieira CP, Variza PF, Iser BPM, et al. Aedes aegypti in Southern Brazil: Spatiotemporal distribution dynamics and association with climate and environmental factors. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2023;8(2):77. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8020077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cruz LCDTAD, Guimarães AGF, Souza EMD, Ferreira Ferreira, Gomes RDSR, Slhessarenko RD, et al. Influence of climatic variables on the Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus populations in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020;53:e20190185. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0185-2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Laporta GZ, Potter AM, Oliveira JFA, Bourke BP, Pecor DB, Linton YM. Global Distribution of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in a climate change scenario of Regional Rivalry. Insects. 2023;14(1):49. doi: 10.3390/insects14010049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Robert MA, Stewart-Ibarra AM, Estallo EL. Climate change and viral emergence: evidence from Aedes-borne arboviruses. Current Opinion in Virology. 2020;40:41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.LaCon G, Morrison AC, Astete H, Stoddard ST, Paz-Soldan VA, Elder JP, et al. Shifting patterns of Aedes aegypti fine scale spatial clustering in Iquitos, Peru. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(8):e3038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Albrieu-Llinás G, Espinosa MO, Quaglia A, Abril M, Scavuzzo CM. Urban environmental clustering to assess the spatial dynamics of Aedes aegypti breeding sites. Geospat Health. 2018;13(1):654. doi: 10.4081/gh.2018.654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Souza RL, Nazare RJ, Argibay HD, Pellizzaro M, Anjos RO, Portilho MM, et al. Density of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in a low-income Brazilian urban community where dengue, Zika, and chikungunya viruses co-circulate. Parasites Vectors. 2023; 16:159. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05766-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Calle Echeverri DA, Carabali M, Henao E, Henao GP, González S, Restrepo BN. Dinámica espacio-temporal del dengue en la ciudad de Medellín, Colombia. 2008–2013. 2016. https://repository.ces.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10946/2138/Trabajo%20de%20grado?sequence=10&isAllowed=y
  • 52.Velandia-Romero ML, Olano VA, Coronel-Ruiz C, Cabezas L, Calderón-Peláez MA, Castellanos JE, et al. Dengue virus detection in Aedes aegypti larvae and pupae collected in rural areas of Anapoima, Cundinamarca, Colombia. Biomédica. 2017;37(Supl.2):193–200. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v37i0.3584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rúa-Uribe GL, Giraldo-Jaramillo TM, Triana-Chávez O, Rojo R, Henao E, Pérez-Pérez J. Transmisión vertical de virus dengue en Aedes spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) en Medellín, Colombia. Rev Colomb Entomol. 2020;46(1):e6973. doi: 10.25100/socolen.v46i1.6973 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dos Reis IC, Gibson G, Ayllón T, De Medeiros Tavares A, De Araújo JMG, Da Silva Monteiro E, et al. Entomo-virological surveillance strategy for dengue, Zika and chikungunya arboviruses in field-caught Aedes mosquitoes in an endemic urban area of the Northeast of Brazil. Acta Tropica. 2019; 197(4):105061. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gu W, Unnasch TR, Katholi CR, Lampman R, Novak RJ. Fundamental issues in mosquito surveillance for arboviral transmission. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008;102(8):817–22. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.03.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Macedo GA, De Araújo JMG, Schatzmayr HG, Costa FAC, De Filippis AMB, Santos FBD, et al. Virological surveillance for early warning of dengue epidemics in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013;107(3):141–6. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trs091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pérez-Pérez J, Peña-García VH, Calle-Tobón A, Quimbayo-Forero M, Rojo R, Henao E, et al. Entomovirological surveillance in schools: Are they a source for arboviral diseases transmission? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:6137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kow CY, Koon LL, Yin PF. Detection of Dengue Viruses in Field Caught Male Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Singapore by Type-Specific PCR. J Med Entomol. 2001;38(4):475–9. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-38.4.475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Martins VEP, Alencar CH, Kamimura MT, De Carvalho Araújo FM, De Simone SG, Dutra RF, et al. Occurrence of Natural Vertical Transmission of Dengue-2 and Dengue-3 Viruses in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(7):e41386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ferreira-de-Lima VH, Lima-Camara TN. Natural vertical transmission of dengue virus in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus: a systematic review. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2643-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Honório NA, Wiggins K, Eastmond B, Câmara DCP, Alto BW. Experimental vertical transmission of Chikungunya Virus by Brazilian and Florida Aedes albopictus populations. Viruses. 2019;11(4):353. doi: 10.3390/v11040353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.OPS. Evaluación de las estrategias innovadoras para el control de Aedes aegypti: desafíos para su introducción y evaluación del impacto. Washignton D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud; 2019. 72 p. https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51376 [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Harapan Harapan

3 Sep 2023

PONE-D-23-22160Density of Aedes aegypti and Dengue Virus Transmission Risk in Two Municipalities of Northwestern Antioquia, ColombiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gómez-Vargas,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 18 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Harapan Harapan, MD, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that Figures 1 and 6 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1 and 6 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this article, authors present entomological and virological data related to dengue virus and its transmission in three neighborhoods in Colombia. Though findings are largely descriptive, the information adds to the existing knowledge on vector indices in Latin America that affect dengue in the region.

The article is well-written and easy to understand.

I have included several comments in the attached manuscript for authors' consideration.

Reviewer #2: The author's report regarding dengue fever should include an explanation of the laboratory test that was used to determine confirmed dengue cases, either by a serological test (NS-1, IgG, IgM) or viral load. The author should also elaborate on which WHO criteria that was used. The author needs to be careful when citing references. For example, in line 178 references number 20 and 21 did not refer to the WHO diagnostic criteria.

Rather than describing the result, the authors should explain the different findings in the correlation of temperature, humidity, and precipitation with vector density, in Serranía, 29 de noviembre, and 24 de diciembre. Explain why in Serranía there was no correlation between vector density with temperature, humidity, and precipitation, while on 29 de noviembre, and 24 de diciembre significant correlation was observed.

The authors need to elaborate on the inconsistency between Table 3 and the paragraph preceding the Table. The total cases reported by SIVIGILA in the paragraph preceding the table and table were consistent, but there was inconsistency in the Total cases captured by the project in the paragraph preceding the table which was reported to be 21 while in Table 3 the total cases captured by the project was 33 and the human positive dengue cases was 21. The author also needs to put the laboratory test that was used to confirm dengue infection in these people.

The author should consider putting the sample size formula in The Sample subsection line 194 so that the study could easily reproduced by others who want to do similar research in different countries.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-22160_reviewer_Reviewed.pdf

PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0295317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295317.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


18 Oct 2023

Medellín, Colombia, October 18, 2023

Harapan Harapan, MD, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Subject: Response to comments done to the manuscript: Density of Aedes aegypti and Dengue Virus Transmission Risk in Two Municipalities of Northwestern Antioquia, Colombia.

Journal requirements

PLOS ONE style requirements were met, including those related to file naming.

Figures 1 and 6 do not contain [map/satellite] images that may be copyrighted.

In relation to figure 1, in the text on lines 151 to 154 it is explained that: “This figure was constructed using Arc-Gis software and the area of the neighborhoods was delimited using the maps of Apartadó and Turbo, Antioquia, Colombia”.

In relation to figure 6, in the text on lines 330 to 333 it is explained that: “For the construction of these maps (Figure 6), the traditional Aedes indices and the vector density indices obtained by the project with ArcGIS 10.5 software were used (see supplementary information S1).”.

Response to reviewer's comments 1

Suggest to use Aedes instead of aedic throughout the manuscript: Suggested changes were made throughout the manuscript.

80% - Please check throughout the text: Suggested changes were made throughout the manuscript.

Please state the time or duration of this occurrence:

“The Urabá region has been experiencing a predominance of acute febrile syndrome, and dengue infection has been identified as a significant contributor to this syndrome since 2007 (15,16).” (Lines in the text of 146 to 148).

Any citations or data to support this statement? A quote and data were included that supports this statement. “…was selected for this study due to high number of dengue cases in recent years (2018 to 2020: 82 cases) (18).”. (Lines in the text of 146 to 148).

Positivity for immatures?: the positivity for immatures states (larvae and pupae). (Lines in the text of 223 to 224).

Please state which taxonomic keys were used for the identification: was used the key of Rueda (2004). (Line 250).

Suggest to add the number of human cases reported for each period in the secondary axis of Fig 3 to demonstrate the correlation between the mosquito abundance and human cases in the study areas: The number of human cases reported for each period were added on the X axis in Fig 3.

Is this DEN-1 and DEN-2?: The table was corrected.

Please discuss these contrasting findings on climatic variable in a broader context based on what has previously been recorded in literature, particularly in the Americas.

“..which has a good water supply all year round”. (Lines in the text of 580 to 581).

“…such as the presence of the vector outside the homes such as disposable containers, tires, among others”. (Lines in the text of 583 to 584).

“In these neighborhoods, due to the poor water supply, the inhabitants are forced to store water throughout the year, especially in dry weather”. (Lines in the text of 590 to 591).

“That is why the rains favor the increase of breeding sites and cases of dengue. In dry periods and low temperatures, vectors decrease, a situation that does not stop the transmission of the disease, due to the active biting behavior of the vector that favors the spread of the virus (41). It can be observed that the impact of rainfall varied according to the neighborhood, this may be due to the differences in the types of water storage containers with Ae. aegypti's larvae that affects the density of the adult mosquito, as was the case with a study conducted in Ecuador by Stewart-Ibarra et al. (42)”. (Lines in the text of 600 to 609).

“In Brazil, when analyzing the correlation between the total number of insects collected and Ae. aegypti house indices (HI) in relation to climatic variables of temperature, humidity, rainfall, among others, regardless of locality, these variables had a direct influence on the distribution and presence of mosquitoes (44,45). Therefore, it is important to highligth that mosquito populations can change, to better adapt to local environmental conditions (46,47)” (Lines in the text of 619 to 625).

Please provide additional information on the proportion of DENV-1 and DENV-2 among human samples in the study area. This data will strengthen the vector findings:

Additional information was as follows: “Of the 21 dengue cases identified for the project, 12 positive cases were identified by RT-PCR, of which the DEN-1 serotype was the most frequent with 75% (9/12), followed by the DEN-2 serotype with 25% (3/12). The remaining nine were identified by detection of IgM antibodies using the Elisa technique and six of these also had the presence of NS1 antigen.”. (Lines in the text of 669 to 674).

Please also discuss the challenges in conducting entomo-virological surveillance. Even though it is essential, many challenges affect the utility of this approach:

Lines in the text of 679 to 700:

“These findings underscore the importance of entomo-virological surveillance as part of the routine surveillance of municipalities which is a useful tool to identify high-risk areas for virus transmission and an epidemiological alert system to directly control critical areas of activity for vector control especially because people circulating or living in places where these infected mosquitoes are identified are exposed to bites most of the day (48–51). Strategies for virological surveillance of Aedes mosquitoes commonly focus on females because females are hematophagous, whereas males are not (52). Although DENV is transmitted primarily by the bite of female mosquitoes infected with human blood (horizontal transmission), both vertical (in which the infected mosquito is able to transmit the virus to its progeny) and sexual (when an infected male transmits the virus to the female during copulation) transmission have been suggested as an important mechanism for maintaining arbovirus circulation in vector populations (53–55). However, the challenges for the incorporation of entomo-virological surveillance in dengue control programs must have the necessary infrastructure, trained personnel and political (financial) support to implement it and the importance of evaluating its impact on the disease burden in the short, medium, and long term. Its inclusion in control programs should be assessed according to local capacities and the integrated use of other control tools (56)”.

Responses to reviewer's comments 2

The author's report regarding dengue fever should include an explanation of the laboratory test that was used to determine confirmed dengue cases, either by a serological test (NS-1, IgG, IgM) or viral load. The author should also elaborate on which WHO criteria that was used. The author needs to be careful when citing references. For example, in line 178 references number 20 and 21 did not refer to the WHO diagnostic criteria.

“Laboratory confirmation of dengue virus infection was done through RT-PCTR tests in the case of patients recruited ≤ five days of symptom onset and by detection of IgM antibodies by ELISA in those recruited from day six of symptom onset, in accordance with WHO criteria (22).” The reference was updated. (Lines in the text of 177 to 181).

Rather than describing the result, the authors should explain the different findings in the correlation of temperature, humidity, and precipitation with vector density, in Serranía, 29 de noviembre, and 24 de diciembre. Explain why in Serranía there was no correlation between vector density with temperature, humidity, and precipitation, while on 29 de noviembre, and 24 de diciembre significant correlation was observed.

“..which has a good water supply all year round”. (Lines in the text of 580 to 581).

“…such as the presence of the vector outside the homes such as disposable containers, tires, among others”. (Lines in the text of 583 to 584).

“In these neighborhoods, due to the poor water supply, the inhabitants are forced to store water throughout the year, especially in dry weather”. (Lines in the text of 590 to 591).

“That is why the rains favor the increase of breeding sites and cases of dengue. In dry periods and low temperatures, vectors decrease, a situation that does not stop the transmission of the disease, due to the active biting behavior of the vector that favors the spread of the virus (41). It can be observed that the impact of rainfall varied according to the neighborhood, this may be due to the differences in the types of water storage containers with Ae. aegypti's larvae that affects the density of the adult mosquito, as was the case with a study conducted in Ecuador by Stewart-Ibarra et al. (42)”. (Lines in the text of 600 to 609).

“In Brazil, when analyzing the correlation between the total number of insects collected and Ae. aegypti house indices (HI) in relation to climatic variables of temperature, humidity, rainfall, among others, regardless of locality, these variables had a direct influence on the distribution and presence of mosquitoes (44,45). Therefore, it is important to highligth that mosquito populations can change, to better adapt to local environmental conditions (46,47)” (Lines in the text of 619 to 625).

The authors need to elaborate on the inconsistency between Table 3 and the paragraph preceding the Table. The total cases reported by SIVIGILA in the paragraph preceding the table and table were consistent, but there was inconsistency in the Total cases captured by the project in the paragraph preceding the table which was reported to be 21 while in Table 3 the total cases captured by the project was 33 and the human positive dengue cases was 21. The author also needs to put the laboratory test that was used to confirm dengue infection in these people.

The paragraph was corrected:

“During this period, 77 cases of dengue fever were recorded, 56 of which were reported by SIVIGILA and the total number of cases captured by the project was 33 and the number of positive dengue cases in humans was 21 in the neighborhoods mentioned, being 14, 5 and 2 cases in Serranía, 24 de diciembre and 29 de noviembre, respectively.” (Lines in the text of 485 to 490).

The author should consider putting the sample size formula in The Sample subsection line 194 so that the study could easily reproduced by others who want to do similar research in different countries.

The sample size was calculated according to the following formula:

=(Z^2 NP(1-P))/(N-1e^(2 )+Z^2 P(1-P))

Where;

Z =1,96 (95%)

N= number of houses in the neighborhood

pq= variance

e= sampling error

(Lines in the text of 203 to 209).

Kind regards;

Wilber Gómez-Vargas

Gomez.wilber@uces.edu.co

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Harapan Harapan

20 Nov 2023

Density of Aedes aegypti and Dengue Virus Transmission Risk in Two Municipalities of Northwestern Antioquia, Colombia

PONE-D-23-22160R1

Dear Dr. Gómez-Vargas,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Harapan Harapan, MD, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors have addressed the comments satisfactorily. Pls make sure to go through the manuscript to correct minor grammatical and syntax errors.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Harapan Harapan

3 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-22160R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gómez-Vargas,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Harapan Harapan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-22160_reviewer_Reviewed.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES