Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2005 Apr;43(4):1689–1693. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1689-1693.2005

Identification and Distribution of Acanthamoeba Species Genotypes Associated with Nonkeratitis Infections

Gregory C Booton 1,*, Govinda S Visvesvara 2, Thomas J Byers 3,, Daryl J Kelly 1, Paul A Fuerst 1
PMCID: PMC1081337  PMID: 15814986

Abstract

Acanthamoeba is a free-living protozoan genus found in a wide variety of natural habitats, including water, soil, and air. Pathogenic isolates of Acanthamoeba are medically relevant as the causative agent of sight- threatening Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK), serious infections of other organs, and fatal granulomatous amebic encephalitis. Previous work employing DNA sequences of nuclear and mitochondrial small-subunit rRNA genes (SSU rRNA genes) determined the genotypic diversity of Acanthamoeba and found that many named species of Acanthamoeba are associated with particular genotypes. These studies also concluded that nearly all AK infections result from a single molecular genotype: T4. Here, we asked whether Acanthamoeba clinical isolates from non-AK infections are also associated with particular genotypes. DNA sequence determination of nuclear SSU rRNA genes was employed for genotypic identification of 29 isolates of Acanthamoeba from non-AK infections. Sequence analysis demonstrates that T4 is the predominant genotype in non-AK infections, including those in brain, cerebrospinal fluid, nasal passages, skin, and lung. Rare genotypes (T1, T10, and T12) have been isolated from brain infections. We conclude that genotype T4 is the primary genotype in non-AK Acanthamoeba infections, as was the case in AK infections. However, the genotypes that were isolated from brains have not been observed in environmental isolates of Acanthamoeba, and their natural ecological niche is unknown.


The genus Acanthamoeba is a group of nearly 25 named species that has a worldwide distribution. Members of Acanthamoeba are naked (i.e., lacking tests, walls, or tecta with openings), free-living amebae that inhabit a wide range of natural ecological niches, including fresh and brackish water, beach sand, soil, air, etc. (4, 13, 16, 17). Acanthamoeba also has been isolated from humans and animals (16, 18). In addition to its natural distribution, Acanthamoeba can be opportunistically pathogenic, being identified as the causative agent of a painful and sight-threatening infection of the cornea, Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) (22). These infections can occur in otherwise healthy, nonimmunocompromised individuals. In developed countries, AK infections are usually associated with contact lens wear. Improper sterilization procedures have been identified as the cause of a large percentage of such AK infections (2, 22, 25). In developing nations, AK infections are not generally associated with contact lens wear; by contrast, most cases are the result of ocular trauma (6, 23).

Acanthamoeba is also responsible for life threatening infections in patients with immunodeficiency disease. These include documented infections of the skin, nasal passages, lung, and brain (16, 17, 18, 19). In the brain, Acanthamoeba causes a severe encephalitis termed granulomatous amebic encephalitis, which is nearly always fatal (18). Variations in the pathogenicity of different Acanthamoeba strains have been recognized in laboratory studies, but the relevance of these results to human disease is unclear (7).

Traditional taxonomy of Acanthamoeba has used morphological characteristics such as cyst morphology and trophozoite size and shape as classification characters (20). Species of Acanthamoeba are categorized into three morphological groups based largely on the cyst morphology of the species. Molecular analyses, including several of our own studies using nuclear and mitochondrial small-subunit (SSU) rRNA genes, support the morphological group structure of the genus (10, 15, 24). Our work focuses on the SSU rRNA genes of the nucleus (Rns) and the equivalent gene from the mitochondrial genome (rns) (15, 24). Data collected over the last decade now allow us to quickly analyze a clinical or environmental sample using molecular methods to determine and classify the Acanthamoeba sequence genotype (3, 4). Sequence similarities between isolates using these two genes are used to determine phylogenetic relationships between strains and to explore possible correlation with disease phenotypes. The molecular analyses thus far suggest that 15 or more genotypes exist, designated T1, T2, etc. (1, 9, 11, 12, 24, 27, 29). Characterization of genotypes is an active area of investigation, since it is dependent upon the statistical criteria employed to distinguish genotypes and the expanding number of analyzed isolates. Although the major morphological groups are supported by molecular analyses, a number of the named species have not been observed as unique monophyletic entities when examined by molecular methods.

In the present study, we examined Acanthamoeba isolates that were obtained from non-AK infections. The genotypes of these isolates were determined using nuclear rRNA (Rns) gene sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolates.

Most of the 29 non-AK disease samples of Acanthamoeba examined in this study were isolated by G. S. Visvesvara at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA). A few isolates represent samples obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). Five of the non-AK isolates were previously genotyped, and genotyping of 24 isolates was accomplished in the current study (24, 27). The mitochondrial 16S rRNA genotypes of five of these 24 non-AK isolates were previously determined (15). Nuclear rRNA genotypes of new AK (n = 18) and environmental (n = 7) isolates were also determined in these analyses. The data from the 49 newly genotyped isolates were combined with the sequencing/genotyping data from 200 other Acanthamoeba sp. isolates that have been determined in our, and other, laboratories (1, 3, 9, 10 11, 14, 12, 21, 24, 26, 27). Most isolates were cultured axenically in optimal growth medium prior to DNA extraction (4). Following DNA extraction, PCR was used to amplify the nuclear Rns sequences. Nearly complete Rns was amplified using the primers CRN5 (5-TGGTTGATCCTGCCAGTAG) and SSU2-TRUN (5′-TGATCCCTCCGCAGGTTCAC-3′). Sequencing of Rns was done using conserved eukaryotic SSU rRNA gene primers previously used in our laboratory (4, 15, 21, 24). Amplification of a partial Rns region (ASA.S1) that contains a diagnostic fragment with respect to genotype was done using the primers JDP1 (5′-GGCCCAGATCGTTTACCGTGAA-3′) and JDP2 (5′-TCTCACAAGCTGCTAGGGGAGTCA-3′). Sequencing of ASA.S1 was done using the PCR primers and internal primers 892 (5′-CCAAGAATTTCACCTCTGAC-3′) and 892C (5′-GTCAGAGGTGAAATTCTTGG-3′). DNA sequencing of partial or nearly complete Rns was done with an ABI 310 automated fluorescent sequencing system using these primers and methods that have been used previously in our Acanthamoeba studies (4, 15, 21, 24). The sequences that were obtained were aligned with other Acanthamoeba sequences in our Rns database using the alignment program XESEE (5).

Nucleotide sequence accession number

Sequences obtained in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers AY702019 to AY702030 and AY702982 to AY703018.

RESULTS

In this study we have compiled the Acanthamoeba genotype determinations based on Rns from 249 (49 from this study) Acanthamoeba isolates, including isolates obtained from the environment (n = 132), from patients diagnosed with AK (n = 88), and from patients diagnosed with non-AK infections (n = 29). The genotypic identification of the isolates compiled for this study is summarized and presented in Table 1. When isolates were examined as a single group, the large majority, whether environmental, AK, or non-AK, were identified as genotype T4. We believe genotype T4 should be referred to as the A. castellanii species complex until future higher-resolution analyses are sufficient to more accurately differentiate between the morphologically described species within this genotype. Acanthamoeba genotype T4 comprises nearly 72% of the total number of isolates. Three genotypes, T3, T4, and T11, which are phylogenetically very closely related make up 75% of the total number of samples. The second most common individual genotype was T5 (Acanthamoeba lenticulata), which contains 19 environmental isolates (7.6% of total isolates). The remaining genotypes are relatively rare, containing one to seven isolates (about three isolates/genotype for the rare genotypes).

TABLE 1.

Acanthamoeba sp. sources and genotypic determinationsa

Source No. of isolates with Acanthamoeba genotype
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 T15 Total
Environment 0 3 8 73 19 1 3 1 2 1 6 0 2b 7c,d 6 132
AK 0 0 2 83 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 88
Non-AK disease 3 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 29
Total 3 3 10 179 19 2 3 1 2 3 8 1 2 7 6 249
Morphological group II III II II III III I I I III II III NDe III III
a

The 200 isolates included in this study include those previously examined (3, 4, 8, 9, 24, 14, 21, 27, 28, 29). The genotypes of the remainder (n = 49) have been determined for the current study.

b

These two isolates were from a nasal swab and contact lens case and are treated here as environmental samples (27).

c

Five of seven T14 isolates and five others (three T4 and two T11 isolates) were identified by ribotyping (9).

d

Twelve isolates (three T4, two T11, and seven T14 isolates) from stool samples (9) are assumed to be environmental isolates of Acanthamoeba.

e

ND, not done; isolates were not assigned to a morphological group.

Genotypic identification of pathogenic isolates of Acanthamoeba associated with non-AK infections shows that genotype T4, which is associated with the vast majority of AK infections, is also the dominant genotype in non-AK infections. While the dominance of genotype T4 is maintained in all of the three subcategories of Acanthamoeba isolates (environmental, AK, and non-AK), the frequency distribution of genotypes differs by the category. Overall, genotype T4 represents 72% (179/249) of the isolates of Acanthamoeba examined in this study (Table 1). However, T4 is more frequent in infections of the eye. When examined as a single group, the large majority of isolates, whether environmental, AK, or non-AK, were identified as genotype T4 (55.3%, 94.3% and 79.3%, respectively). It should be noted that there are many more isolates from AK infections than isolates derived from non-AK infections.

The specific aim of the present study was the determination of the genotypic distribution of the 24 new non-AK Acanthamoeba sp. isolates combined with five previously characterized strains. The results from Rns sequencing demonstrate that the 29 non-AK isolates belong to four Acanthamoeba genotypes. Twenty-three isolates were categorized as genotype T4, the most commonly observed genotype and the genotype predominantly associated with AK infections. Two of these isolates have previously been classified as A. castellanii. The remainder (n = 21) have not been classified to particular species using the morphological classification system and are all referred to as Acanthamoeba sp. No non-AK infections were found involving either genotype T3 or T11, the other genotypes that have been encountered in AK infections.

Six non-AK isolates were found to be genotypes other than T4. Three isolates were characterized as genotype T1, corresponding to an as-yet-unnamed species of Acanthamoeba. Two isolates from non-AK infections were identified as genotype T10, a genotype that is correlated with the named species Acanthamoeba culbertsoni. Lastly, a single non-AK isolate was found to be genotype T12, correlated with the named species Acanthamoeba healyi. Summarized genotyping results for the non-AK Acanthamoeba sp. isolates are presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Genotypic identification of non-AK disease isolates of Acanthamoeba spp.

OSU/CDC IDa Tissue source Genotype Reference
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V006 Brain T1 15, 24
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-022/CDC V329 Brain T1 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V327 Brain T1 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V017 Sinus T4 Current study; 15
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V168 Skin T4 Current study; 15
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V328 Brain T4 Current study; 15
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V382 Skin T4 Current study; 15
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V390 Skin T4 Current study; 15
A. castellanii CDC V0180:1 Lung T4 15, 24
A. castellanii 40AB Necrotic tissue T4 28
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-009/CDC 12741:1 Lung T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-017/CDC V221 Skin T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-019/CDC V240 Skin T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-020/CDC V245 Skin T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-021/CDC V313 Nasal T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-025/CDC V398 Sinus T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-026/CDC V411 Brain T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-027/CDC V425 Skin T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-029/CDC V501 CSF T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-030/CDC V503 CSF T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-035/CDC V522 Skin T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V021 Skin T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC VE67/H7 Brain T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC VEPV 94-3 Brain T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain CDC V388 Skin T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-046b Brain T4 Current study
Acanthamoeba sp. strain OSU 03-023/CDC V369 Brain T10 Current study
A. culbertsoni CDC V409 Brain T10 15
A. healyi CDC V013 Brain T12 15, 24
a

Isolates without an Ohio State University (OSU) number were obtained prior to the development of the OSU identification system. CDC, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; ID, identification.

b

Isolate provided by F. Schuster, California Department of Health Services.

DISCUSSION

The primary focus of our earlier studies has been the genotype identification of isolates obtained from AK infections. While over 14 genotypic classes (previously called sequence types) have tentatively been identified, nearly all AK-associated strains are classified within a closely related group of genotypes sharing similar Rns and rns genotypes. These three genotypes (T3, T4, and T11) form a single monophyletic group, including a number of the nominal species of the genus Acanthamoeba. The vast majority (∼94%) of AK strains are classified as T4. A single example of a T6 genotype associated with an AK infection has been observed (29). However, the T6 genotype isolate in that situation was obtained from a lens case, not directly from a corneal scrape. Therefore, it is possible that the genotype of the AK infection itself was of a different genotype.

In this study we found genotype T4 associated with all foci of non-AK infections. Specifically, it is found in brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), nasal, skin, and lung infections. This is consistent with the frequent occurrence of genotype T4 in the environment and its apparent ability to exploit available niches opportunistically. In contrast, other rare genotypes are associated only with isolates derived from brain infections. These include genotypes T1 (Acanthamoeba sp.), T10 (A. culbertsoni), and T12 (A. healyi). These species are rarely, if ever, isolated from environmental sources. Their true environmental niche remains unknown, and the reasons for their ability to invade the brain, but apparently not other organ systems, remain unexplained. No non-AK infections are found to be associated with genotypes T3 or T11, genotypes that have been occasionally associated with AK infections.

The initial scheme that we proposed to discriminate genotypes was based on 5% sequence dissimilarity (24). That is, groups that differed by 5% or more in pairwise sequence comparisons for the nuclear Rns sequence are defined as different genotypes. This is an arbitrary figure, however. It was originally chosen using criteria that had been applied in molecular phylogenetic analyses of some bacteria and provided an initial quantitative value for genotypic determination. There are a number of closely related Acanthamoeba groups, including genotypes that are only slightly more divergent from each other than the 5% sequence divergence criterion that was used to establish genotypes. One closely related genotypic cluster includes genotypes T3, T4, and T11. Other closely related groups include T2/6, T10/12/14, and the morphological group I taxa T7/8/9. By observing these phylogenetic relationships, we can next examine the distribution of isolates in genotypes and genotypic clusters.

In the largest genotypic cluster (T3/4/11; n = 197), environmental and AK isolates occur equally (44%). However, only 12% of all T3/4/11 isolates have been associated with non-AK infections. Within this group, T4 represents the most frequent genotype recovered from non-AK infections, presumably because they are the most frequent genotype in the environment. Alternatively, genotype T4 may be more common following culture because it is better adapted to conditions of culture and emerges from an initial mixture of different genotypes as the predominant genotype. However, some recent DNA extractions and PCR performed directly from brain tissue, without possible culture enhancement, have also produced genotype T4 following sequence analysis (G. C. Booton, unpublished data). Because of the sensitivity of PCR methods, future analyses employing direct extraction and analysis of infected tissue compared with results from these same samples following Acanthamoeba culture, DNA extraction, and genotype determination will be better suited to test whether culture enhancement, or selection, of T4 is a serious concern.

Genotype T1 contains only three isolates. However, all are associated with non-AK infections. The natural environmental distribution of Acanthamoeba genotype T1 is unknown, and its normal ecological niche must be unique or occur rarely. No environmental isolates have been recovered of this genotype. The cluster of genotypes T10/12/14 has some similarities to T1, but with an interesting difference. Genotypes T10 and T12, while rare, are similar to T1 in that, when they have been found in disease, they are associated only with non-AK infections. However, the related genotype T14 has never been found in a disease isolate, although it has been found in human fecal samples. This observation has to be viewed cautiously, because T14 isolates from stool samples are assumed to be environmental and not pathogenic. Similarly, our environmental designation of genotype T13, which comprises nasal swab and lens case isolates, is based on samples from this genotype not being isolated from an infection, and this too must be viewed with caution. The two isolates of genotype T13 were originally described as two distinct genotypes (12). However, pairwise sequence comparison of these two isolates shows that their sequences are more than 98% similar and that they should be grouped together as a single genotype, which is what we have done.

The other genotypic groups seem to be rarely associated with disease but rather are associated with environmental sources. The rare genotypic group T2/6 shows a mixed composition, with most (80%) of the isolates being classified as from environmental sources. But, as noted above, the single T6 AK isolate was not directly derived from diseased tissue and may actually be of environmental origin. Genotype T5 (A. lenticulata) is a common genotype that shows 100% association with environmental isolation. Similarly, genotype T15, which is very dissimilar from other genotypes and is associated with the species Acanthamoeba jacobsi, has only been found in environmental isolates (100%). In addition, species of Acanthamoeba morphological group I (Acanthamoeba astronyxis [T7], Acanthamoeba tubiashi [T8], and Acanthamoeba comandoni [T9]) have been isolated only from environmental sources (100%).

In summary, we have examined the largest sample of non-AK Acanthamoeba infection isolates studied to date to determine the genotypic distribution of isolates involved in these serious, often fatal, infections. Comparisons of the nuclear SSU rRNA genes sequences indicate that the majority of the non-AK isolates are genotype T4 (the AK-associated genotype). However, other rare, more distantly related genotypes are also observed in non-AK infections. The non-T4 genotypes found in non-AK infections are not observed in AK infections. In addition, two of these non-AK pathogenic genotypes have not yet been found in environmental isolates. Further, we show that some groups of phylogenetically closely related genotypes are predominantly associated with either environmental, AK, or non-AK isolates. The natural source of rare Acanthamoeba genotypes associated with brain infections is still unknown. Expanded environmental screening of diverse ecological niches of Acanthamoeba spp. is required and may eventually reveal these hidden, but potentially dangerous, habitats.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support of this work by a U.S. National Institutes of Health grant to P.A.F., T.J.B., and G.C.B. (National Eye Institute RO1 EY09073).

REFERENCES

  • 1.Alves, J. M. P., C. X. Gusmão, M. M. G. Teixeira, D. Freitas, A. S. Foronda, and H. T. Affonso. 2000. Random amplified polymorphic DNA profiles as a tool for the characterization of Brazilian keratitis isolates of the genus Acanthamoeba. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 33:19-26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beattie, T. K., A. Tomlinson, A. K. McFadyen, D. V. Seal, and A. Grimason. 2003. Enhanced attachment of Acanthamoeba to extended-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a new risk factor for infection? Ophthalmology 110:765-771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Booton, G. C., D. J. Kelly, Y.-W. Chu, D. V. Seal, E. Houang, D. S. C. Lam, T. J. Byers, and P. A. Fuerst. 2002. 18S ribosomal DNA typing and tracking of Acanthamoeba species isolates from corneal scrape specimens, contact lenses, lens cases, and home water supplies of Acanthamoeba keratitis patients in Hong Kong. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1621-1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Booton, G. C., A. Rogerson, T. D. Bonilla, D. V. Seal, D. J. Kelly, T. K. Beattie, A. Tomlinson, F. Lares-Villa, P. A. Fuerst, and T. J. Byers. 2004. Molecular and physiological evaluation of subtropical environmental isolates of Acanthamoeba spp., causal agent of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 51:192-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cabot, E. L., and A. T. Beckenbach. 1989. Simultaneous editing of multiple nucleic acid and protein sequences with ESEE. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 5:233-234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chang, P. C., and H. K. Soong. 1991. Acanthamoeba keratitis in non-contact lens wearers. Arch. Ophthalmol. 109:463-464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.DeJonckheere, J. 1980. Growth characteristics, cytopathic effect in cell culture, and virulence in mice of 36 type strains belonging to 19 different Acanthamoeba spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39:681-685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dyková, I., J. Lom, J. M. Schroeder-Diedrich, G. C. Booton, and T. J. Byers. 1999. Acanthamoeba strains isolated from organs of freshwater fishes. J. Parasitol. 85:1106-1113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gast, R. J. 2001. Development of an Acanthamoeba-specific reverse dot-blot and the discovery of a new ribotype. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 48:609-615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gast, R. J., D. R. Ledee, P. A. Fuerst, and T. J. Byers. 1996. Subgenus systematics of Acanthamoeba: four nuclear 18S rDNA sequence types. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 43:498-504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hewitt, M. K., B. S. Robinson, P. T. Monis, and C. P. Saint. 2003. Identification of a new Acanthamoeba 18S rRNA gene sequence type, corresponding to the species Acanthamoeba jacobsi Sawyer, Nerad, and Visvesvara, 1992 (Lobosea: Acanthamoebidae). Acta Protozool. 42:325-329. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Horn, M., T. R. Fritsche, R. K. Gautom, K-M. Schleifer, and M. Wagner. 1999. Novel bacterial endosymbionts of Acanthamoeba spp. related to Paramecium caudatum symbiont Caedibacter caryophilus. Environ. Microbiol. 1:357-367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.John, D. T. 1993. Opportunistically pathogenic free-living amebae, p. 143-246. In J. P. Kreier and J. R. Baker (ed.), Parasitic protozoa, 2nd ed., vol. 3. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif..
  • 14.Khan, N. A., E. L. Jarroll, and T. A. Paget. 2002. Molecular and physiological differentiation between pathogenic and nonpathogenic Acanthamoeba. Curr. Microbiol. 45:197-202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ledee, D. R., G. C. Booton, M. H. Awwad, S. Sharma, R. K. Aggarwal, I. A. Niszl, M. B. Markus, P. A. Fuerst, and T. J. Byers. 2003. Advantages of using mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences to classify clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44:1142-1149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marciano-Cabral, F., and G. A. Cabral. 2003. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16:273-307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Marciano-Cabral, F., R. Puffenbarger, and G. A. Cabral. 2000. The increasing importance of Acanthamoeba infections. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 47:29-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Martinez, A. J., and G. S. Visvesvara. 1997. Free-living amphizoic and opportunistic amebas. Brain Pathol. 7:583-598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moura, H., S. Wallace, and G. S. Visvesvara. 1992. Acanthamoeba healyi n. sp. and the isozyme and immunoblot profiles of Acanthamoeba spp., groups 1 and 3. J. Protozool. 39:573-583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pussard, M., and R. Pons. 1977. Morphologie de la paroi kystique et taxonomie du genre Acanthamoeba (Protozoa: Amoebida) Protistologica 8:557-598. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schroeder, J. M., G. C. Booton, J. Hay, I. Niszl, D. V. Seal, M. B. Markus, P. A. Fuerst, and T. J. Byers. 2001. Use of subgenic 18S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing for genus and genotype identification of acanthamoebae from humans with keratitis and from sewage sludge. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1903-1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seal, D. V., A. J. Bron, and J. Hay. 1998. Ocular infection. Investigation and treatment in practice. Martin Dunitz Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
  • 23.Sharma, S., M. Srinivasan, and C. George. 1990. Acanthamoeba keratitis in non-contact lens wearers. Arch. Ophthalmol. 108:676-678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stothard, D. R., J. M. Schroeder-Diedrich, M. H. Awwad, R. J. Gast, D. R. Ledee, S. Rodriguez-Zaragoza, C. L. Dean, P. A. Fuerst, and T. J. Byers. 1998. The evolutionary history of the genus Acanthamoeba and the identification of eight new 18S rRNA gene sequence types. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 45:45-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tomlinson, A., P. Simmons, D. V. Seal, and A. K. McFadyen. 2000. Salicylate inhibition of Acanthamoeba attachment to contact lenses: a way to reduce the risk of infection. Ophthalmology 107:112-117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Walochnik, J., M. Duchêne, K. Seifert, A. Obwaller, T. Hottkowitz, G. Wiedermann, H. Eibl, and H. Aspöck. 2002. Cytotoxic activities of alkylphosphocholines against clinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:685-701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Walochnik, J., E. Haller-Schober, H. Kolli, O. Picher, A. Obwaller, and H. Aspöck. 2000. Discrimination between clinically relevant and non-relevant Acanthamoeba strains isolated from contact lens-wearing keratitis patients in Austria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3932-3936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Walochnik, J., A. Hassl, K. Simon, G. Benyr, and H. Aspöck. 1999. Isolation and identification by partial sequencing of the 18S ribosomal gene of free-living amoebae from necrotic tissue of Basiliscus plumifrons (Sauria: Iguanidae). Parasitol. Res. 85:601-603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Walochnik, J., A. Obwaller, and H. Aspöck. 2000. Correlations between morphological, molecular biological, and physiological characteristics in clinical and nonclinical isolates of Acanthamoeba spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4408-4413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES