Skip to main content
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health logoLink to International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
. 2024 Jan 12;21(1):90. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010090

How Is Telehealth Currently Being Utilized to Help in Hypertension Management within Primary Healthcare Settings? A Scoping Review

Haerawati Idris 1,2,*, Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni 2, Tety Rachmawati 2, Asep Kusnali 2, Anni Yulianti 2, Yuni Purwatiningsih 2, Syarifah Nuraini 2, Novia Susianti 2, Debri Rizki Faisal 2, Hidayat Arifin 3, Asri Maharani 4
Editor: Jimmy T Efird
PMCID: PMC10815916  PMID: 38248553

Abstract

Telehealth has improved patient access to healthcare services and has been shown to have a positive impact in various healthcare settings. In any case, little is understood regarding the utilization of telehealth in hypertension management in primary healthcare (PHC) settings. This study aimed to identify and classify information about the types of interventions and types of telehealth technology in hypertension management in primary healthcare. A scoping review based on PRISMA-ScR was used in this study. We searched for articles in four databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Embase in English. The selected articles were published in 2013–2023. The data were extracted, categorized, and analyzed using thematic analysis. There were 1142 articles identified and 42 articles included in this study. Regarding the proportions of studies showing varying trends in the last ten years, most studies came from the United States (US) (23.8%), were conducted in urban locations (33.3%), and had a quantitative study approach (69%). Telehealth interventions in hypertension management are dominated by telemonitoring followed by teleconsultation. Asynchronous telehealth is becoming the most widely used technology in managing hypertension in primary care settings. Telehealth in primary care hypertension management involves the use of telecommunications technology to monitor and manage blood pressure and provide medical advice and counselling remotely.

Keywords: hypertension, primary healthcare, telehealth, telemonitoring

1. Background

Most health systems share common goals of improving patient health, being responsive to patient needs, and ensuring financial sustainability [1]. Health systems differ between countries in terms of their structure, financing, and outcomes. Factors such as socioeconomic status, political framework, and cultural diversity contribute to these differences. For example, the US does not have a universal healthcare system, and most Americans receive health insurance through their employers [2]. In contrast, countries like Canada and the UK have universal healthcare systems that are publicly funded [3]. Countries like Japan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, Australia, and New Zealand provide healthcare to almost all residents, with residents paying some healthcare costs out of pocket [4]. Economic globalization has also played a role, leading to the commercialization of healthcare services and weakening national health systems, particularly in low-income countries [5]. The healthcare spending also varies significantly between countries, with North America spending more than twice as much per capita as the European Union on average [6].

Hypertension has become the major cause of cardiovascular disease and early mortality globally [7]. In 2019, it was found that around 1.28 billion adults aged 30–79 years worldwide had hypertension, with most (two-thirds) living in middle and low-income countries [8]. Elevated blood pressure was responsible for an estimated 4.5 million deaths in men and 4.0 million in women in 2015 [9]. The association between hypertension and premature deaths has also been recorded in several countries [10,11,12].

The increase in the incidence of hypertension is expected to continue [13]. Therefore, hypertension should be detected early and managed properly through education and treatment [14]. This can be managed through the use of telehealth [15]. Telehealth can improve access for isolated people with hypertension in rural areas [16]. Moreover, it might be an acceptable tool by using simple telehealth to diagnose and monitor hypertension among users [17]. In addition, Blood Pressure Telemonitoring is useful both for screening and diagnosing hypertension as well as for improving hypertension management [18]. Likewise, eHealth will support the creation of a network between healthcare professionals in improving screening, hypertension management, and related comorbidities and in the effective prevention of cardiovascular disease [19].

Telehealth technology in developing countries differs from that in developed countries in several ways. Firstly, in developing countries, there is a lack of resources in the health system, leading to challenges in implementing eHealth services [20]. Additionally, the level of development in each country and the commitment of their governments to provide affordable healthcare services play significant roles in determining the success of eHealth models [21]. Furthermore, the asymmetry among healthcare centers, hospitals, and user-ends poses a challenge in fully adopting telehealth technology in developing countries [22]. On the other hand, in developed countries, telehealth services have been slow to be adopted, with uptake being piecemeal and ad hoc [23].

Telehealth can possibly work on the nature of medical services and patient fulfillment. Healthcare providers have widely adopted remote patient monitoring to reduce hospitalization rates and disease management to improve patient self-efficacy [24]. Telehealth can potentially reform and transform the industry by reducing costs and improving quality, access, and patient satisfaction [25,26]. Telehealth is well suited to support patients with chronic, complex, or comorbid conditions, [27] including hypertension. Several previous studies have reported the potential of telehealth to have a positive impact on hypertension management in primary healthcare [28,29,30,31].

The key barriers to hypertension control in primary care include a lack of effective screening and awareness, challenges with accessing treatment, difficulties in managing hypertension once it is treated, medication adherence barriers, lifestyle-related barriers, barriers related to the affordability and accessibility of care, and awareness-related barriers [32,33,34,35]. Patient-related barriers, such as the misinterpretation of blood pressure readings, also contribute to the challenges in hypertension control [36].

Telehealth has shown benefits for hypertension management in primary healthcare. It has the potential to reduce barriers to accessing healthcare and improve clinical outcomes [37]. Telehealth interventions have been used to treat patients with hypertension, heart failure, and stroke, with most interventions employing a team-based care approach [38]. These interventions utilize the expertise of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals to collaborate on patient decisions and provide direct care [39]. Patients using telehealth have seen significant improvements in clinical outcomes such as blood pressure control, which are comparable to patients receiving in-person care [40]. Telehealth can also support team-based care delivery and benefit patients and healthcare professionals by increasing opportunities for communication, engagement, and monitoring outside a clinical setting [41].

Previous literature review studies focused on the benefits and challenges of implementing telehealth in hypertension management in primary healthcare [42,43]. However, research exploring the type of intervention and technology type of telehealth in hypertension management in primary healthcare has not been widely documented. This paper describes the characteristics of telehealth in hypertension management, which can later be used to improve the quality of hypertension services in primary healthcare. The purpose of this review was to identify information on types of interventions and technology from telehealth in the management of hypertension in primary healthcare (PHC) settings.

2. Method

The review follows the procedures and recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) for conducting scoping reviews [44]. The recent JBI guidelines categorize a scoping review as the optimal approach to comprehensively explore the existing literature on a subject by mapping and condensing accessible evidence. Additionally, scoping reviews are well suited to address areas lacking knowledge and offer valuable perspectives to aid decision-making. This evaluation also included PRISMA checklist instructions for reporting an accurate literature review [45].

2.1. Research Questions

In this study, we identified the characteristics of telehealth in hypertension management in primary healthcare through a scoping review by answering the research questions below:

  1. What kind of interventions are carried out in the management of hypertension in PHC settings?

  2. What types of technology are used in the management of hypertension in PHC settings?

2.2. Research Strategy

The bibliographic databases, such as PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Embase, with the aid of a medical research librarian, were used as a structured literature search in conducting the study. Research questions were developed using a PCC (hypertension, telehealth, and primary healthcare). The search strategy compromised search terms using Medical Subject Headings (MESH) for the concepts “telehealth”, “hypertension”, and “primary healthcare” in the health topic database. We used the Boolean operator AND OR. All references from the databases were exported to Mendeley for duplicating removal and final screening. For a total overview of the applied search, see Table 1. To find the selected article, the authors attempted to obtain full-text versions of the articles using Google Scholar, ResearchGate, and other databases.

Table 1.

Search strategy for databases.

Databases Keywords and Query
PubMed “Telemedicine” [Mesh] OR “Mobile health” [tw] OR mHealth [tw] OR eHealth [tw] OR “Tele-Referral” [tw] OR Tele Referral [tw]
Filters: in the last 10 years
“Hypertension” [Mesh] OR “hypertensi” [tw] OR “high blood pressure” [tw]
Filters: in the last 10 years
“Primary Health Care” [Mesh] OR “primary health care” [tw] OR “primary care” [tw]
Filters: in the last 10 years
Scopus (TITLE-ABS-KEY (telemedicine) or title-abs-key (“mobile health”) or title-abs-key (mhealth) or title-abs-key (ehealth) or title-abs-key (tele referral) and title-abs-key (hypertension) or title-abs-key (“high blood pressure”) and title-abs-key (“primary health care”) or title-abs-key (“primary care”)) and pubyear > 2012 and pubyear > 2012
Science direct “high blood pressure” AND telemedicine OR “mobile health” OR “eHealth” AND “primary health care”
Embase ((‘high blood pressure’/exp OR ‘high blood pressure’ OR ‘hypertension’/exp OR hypertension) AND (‘telemedicine’/exp OR telemedicine) OR ‘mobile health’/exp OR ‘mobile health’ OR ‘ehealth’/exp OR ehealth) AND (‘primary health care’/exp OR ‘primary health care’) AND ((controlled clinical trial)/lim OR (randomized controlled trial)/lim) AND (2013–2023)/py

2.3. Eligible Criteria

All reviewers used the inclusion and exclusion criteria to screen the titles, abstracts, and full articles. The articles we submitted referred to articles in the form of research results published in the last ten years (2013–2023) using the document language English. Articles in the form of scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and literature reviews, not in English and not available in full-text form, were excluded from this study. Publications meeting the inclusive criteria, and those for which the first reviewer (Y.P.) was in doubt, were reviewed a second time by other reviewers (S.N., N.S.). In terms of disagreement, a discussion between all reviewers determined inclusion or exclusion.

2.4. Study Selection

We searched and selected papers according to the criteria created and checked for duplicates of existing papers. Three people independently screened them according to title and abstract. The reasons for excluding existing papers until the final results of the selected studies were found are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the PRISMA scoping review study identification and selection process.

2.5. Data Extraction and Analysis

The data were extracted from chosen documents in full text in the following format: author, year, subject, intervention, type of population, type of technology, telehealth objectives, study design, country, software/hardware tools, and study outcomes. The extraction table is presented in Table 2. The results are presented in descriptive statistics, including frequency and percentage values, using Microsoft Excel 2019. The results of the scoping review of this study are presented in the form of map data on the distribution of telehealth use in various countries using the ArcGIS application. Data are presented in the form of diagrams and tables, according to the aim and scope of the review. Thematic analysis is presented based on the themes found. This procedure includes finding emerging patterns, assigning codes to the data, and combining these codes into broad themes that accurately express information to answer research questions [46].

Table 2.

Data extraction results.

Author Year Participant Subject Intervention Population Type Type of Technology Purpose of Telehealth Type of Study Number Primary Healthcare Country Tool of Hardware/Software Outcome
Barsky et al. [47] 2019 Canadian Aboriginal and Tanzanian communities SMS-text-messaging-based system for blood pressure measurement and hypertension management rural Mobile health (SMS text messaging) Monitoring blood pressure mixed methods n/a Canada and East Africa wireless, Bluetooth
  • Difference in blood pressure reduction for active hypertension management messages or passive health behavior messages

  • Quantitative data on blood pressure reading transmissions

  • Qualitative data collected on the operational aspects of the system from healthcare providers, participants, and community leadership

Naqvi et al. [48] 2022 Acute stroke patients with hypertension TASC (Telehealth After Stroke Care) Urban home blood pressure telemonitoring Monitoring blood pressure Pilot randomized trial n/a Northern Manhattan Tablet and monitor
  • Adherence to video visits

  • Retention

  • Home systolic BP

  • Systolic BP control

Vedanthan et al. [49] 2015 nurses Tablet-based Decision Support and Integrated Record keeping (DESIRE) tool rural Mobile health (mHealth) management of hypertension investigative study n/a Rural Western Kenya tablet
  • Usability of the DESIRE tool in the setting of nurse management of hypertension in Rural Western Kenya

  • Identification of critical incidents

  • Suggested design changes

Dos Santos et al. [50] 2013 professionals and hypertensive patients Education program rural Web conference Increase the adherence to the treatment of hypertension. before–after study 2 Brazil n/a
  • Adherence to antihypertensive drugs

  • Adherence to low-salt diet

  • Adherence to physical activity

Buis et al. [51] 2020 people with hypertension, medical assistants, physicians, a nurse, and the current and former director of the Family Medicine clinic BPTrack urban and rural Mobile health (mHealth) Home blood pressure monitoring pre-post pilot study 1 USA mobile applications
  • Change in blood pressure (primary outcome)

  • Change in medication adherence (secondary outcome)

Koopman et al. [52] 2014 patients, nurses, and physicians Home blood pressure telemonitoring n/a Electronic medical record and home blood pressure telemonitoring blood pressure monitoring qualitative study 6 South America USB computer connection, dedicated telemonitoring device with an analog phone line
  • Blood glucose levels

  • Blood pressure levels

Parker et al. [53] 2018 hypertension patients text based telemonitoring system n/a Home blood pressure telemonitoring blood pressure monitoring prospective cohort study 37 South-East Scotland automatic-transmission system
  • Occurrences of systolic and diastolic blood pressure

  • Preference for systolic 134 and diastolic 84 (the threshold for alerts was 135/85)

Fisher et al. [54] 2019 hypertension patients A home-based BP control program n/a telemonitoring blood pressure monitoring prospective cohort implementation n/a USA home monitors
  • Blood pressure control rates

Ma et al. [55] 2022 Chinese hypertensive patients Smartphone-enhanced nurse-facilitated self-care intervention urban mobile health hypertension management Randomized controlled trial with a repeated-measures design 2 China smartphone
  • Body weight

  • Body mass index

  • Diastolic blood pressure

  • Waist circumference

  • Self-care behavior

  • Self-care motivation

  • Self-care self-efficacy

  • Systolic blood pressure

Levine et al. [56] 2018 primary care patients with hypertension virtual visits n/a asynchronous online hypertension management propensity-score-matched, retrospective cohort study with adjustment by difference in differences n/a USA n/a
  • Adjusted difference in mean systolic blood pressure

  • Emergency department visits

  • Specialist office visits

  • Primary care office visits

  • Inpatient admissions

Ashjian et al. [57] 2019 hypertensive patients an interactive voice response (IVR) n/a Electronic health record home blood pressure monitoring observational study 14 USA Aspect Patient Engagement Solution and Microsoft Dynamics 365 platforms
  • IVR call completion rates

  • Number of hypertensive patients enrolled

De Luca et al. [58] 2021 patients diagnosed with hypertension and professionals integrated management hypertension n/a digitally enabled integrated approach (HER), smartphone, computer hypertension management user-centered approach n/a Europe n/a
  • Functional requirements

  • Use cases

Chen et al. [59] 2023 individual online health management urban internet based hypertension management longitudinal study n/a China n/a
  • Amount of exercise

  • Diastolic blood pressure

  • High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

  • Smoking cessation rate

  • Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

  • Systolic blood pressure

Jindal et al. [60] 2018 people with hypertension and diabetes along with comorbid conditions Smartphone application (mWellcare) rural mobile health integrated management of hypertension n/a 5 India tablet-computer-based application
  • Acceptability

  • Feasibility

Doocy et al. [61] 2017 people aged 40 years or older with hypertension Mobile health app urban mobile health improve adherence to guidelines and quality of care a longitudinal cohort study 10 Lebanon tablets
  • Adherence to medication

  • Recording of Blood Pressure (BP) readings

  • Recording of blood sugar measurements

  • Recording of Body Mass Index (BMI) reporting

  • Proportion of patients for whom blood sugar, BP, weight, height, and BMI were recorded using the tablet compared with in-paper records

  • Proportion of providers offering lifestyle counseling

  • Provider inquiry of medical history

  • Patient report of provider inquiry regarding medication complications

Leon et al. [62] 2015 female and male participants in South Africa aged 36 to 78 years old SMS texts n/a mobile health improve adherence to clinic visits and treatment an individually randomized controlled trial 1 South Africa Mobile phone
  • Blood pressure control

Buis et al. [63] 2017 African American patients with uncontrolled hypertension automated text message urban mobile health improve medication adherence among African Americans with uncontrolled HTN unblinded randomized controlled pilot trials 2 USA n/a
  • Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

  • Medication adherence

  • Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

  • Medication adherence self-efficacy

  • Participant satisfaction

Cottrell et al. [17] 2015 patients and clinicians in a national primary care population in England Text messaging (‘Florence’) n/a mobile health for diagnosis and management hypertension evaluation study n/a UK Mobile phone
  • Ascertainment of a diagnosis of hypertension

  • Achievement of hypertension control

Ju et al. [64] 2022 Patients aged ≥19 years were diagnosed with hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, or metabolic syndrome mobile self-management healthcare app n/a Mobile health management of chronic conditions pilot multicenter real world study 17 Republic of Korea mobile app
  • Anxiety

  • Body weight

  • Sleep quality

  • Sleep duration

  • Quality of life

  • Depression

  • Stress

  • BMI

  • Waist circumference

  • Blood sugar levels

  • Blood pressure

  • Blood lipid levels

Nurakysh et al. [65] 2022 patients with diagnosed arterial hypertension Mobile application “MyTherapy” n/a mobile health evaluation of the degree of adherence of patients determined to have hypertension to treatment a multicenter randomized controlled study 1 Kazakhstan mobile phone app
  • Adherence to antihypertensive treatment

Manusov et al. [66] 2019 people with chronic illness, obesity, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and depression UniMóvil, a mobile health clinic rural mobile health improve poor healthcare access delivery a retrospective review of the cohort 1 USA n/a
  • Obesity

  • Diabetes

  • Hypertension

  • Hypertriglyceridemia

  • Low High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL C) Levels

  • Depression

  • Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Domains

Lee et al. [67] 2022 people aged 18 to 75 years, predominantly female, within the University of Pennsylvania Health Systems remote blood pressure monitoring urban Electronic health record remote blood pressure monitoring cohort study n/a USA n/a
  • Number of EHR alerts for persistently elevated BP home readings

  • Number of alerts that clinicians acted on

  • Percentage of alerts that clinicians acted on

  • Type of management used by clinicians (remote or office based)

  • Number of alerts that did not result in changes to the care plan

  • Reasons for not changing the care plan

Marcolinoet al. [68] 2021 people in Brazil, 71% of which were female, consisting of physicians and nurses teleconsultation urban and rural Asynchronous hypertension management mixed methods 34 Brazil Web-based
  • Perceived feasibility

  • Usability

  • Utility

  • Satisfaction

Peters et al. [69] 2017 hypertensive patients aged above 18 years phone call and short-message-service text messaging n/a mobile health blood pressure control quality improvement study 1 USA Mobile phone
  • Mean Systolic Blood Pressures (SBPS)

  • Mean Diastolic Blood Pressures (DBPS)

Debon et al. [70] 2020 female humans in Brazil with arterial hypertension who were workers or retirees use of a mobile health app n/a mobile health monitoring patients with arterial hypertension (AH) a non-randomized, controlled, non-blind trial n/a Brazil smartphone
  • Systolic and diastolic Blood Pressure

  • Food Frequency Questionnaire

  • Appraisal Of Self Care Agency Scale

  • Hemogram

  • Creatinine

  • Uric Acid

  • Sodium

  • Potassium

  • Lipid Profile

  • Glycemia

Davoudi et al. [71] 2020 adults with poorly controlled hypertension an automated text messaging n/a mobile health hypertension management secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial 1 USA n/a
  • Unique phenotypes of patient interactions with an automated text messaging platform for BP monitoring

  • Association between interaction phenotypes and achieving the target BP

McManuset al. [72] 2021 people with treated but poorly controlled hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg) and access to the internet Home and Online Management n/a Home blood pressure telemonitoring hypertension management randomized controlled trial 76 UK Omron
  • Difference in systolic blood pressure (Mean of 2nd and 1/3 readings) after 1 year

  • Difference in diastolic blood pressure after 1 year

Chew et al. [73] 2023 patients and clinical staff a remote blood pressure monitoring program urban Home blood pressure telemonitoring blood pressure monitoring a secondary qualitative study n/a Singapura a Bluetooth-enabled device
  • A better patient–provider partnership based on the mutually trusted data

  • Patients felt reassured

  • Patients trusted the telehealth program

  • Staff felt that the data were trustworthy

  • Patients’ distrust of technology

  • Clinicians’ concerns about the limitations of technologically mediated interactions

  • Uncertainty experiences

Anderssonet al. [74] 2021 patients and 15 professionals interactive web-based system Urban and rural mobile health strengthening patients’ potential for self-management qualitative substudy of a randomized controlled trial n/a Sweden Mobile phone
  • Partnership between patients and healthcare professionals

  • Documentation of BP treatment

  • Roles of patients and professionals in hypertension management

  • Knowledge of BP values and their relation to daily activities and treatment

  • Patients’ understanding of hypertension

  • Communication regarding BP and lifestyle

Kassavou et al. [75] 2019 healthcare providers, commissioners, and patients with either hypertension or both hypertension and type 2 diabetes highly tailored text and voice message n/a mobile health to increase adherence to medication in primary care descriptive and interventional study n/a UK—England Mobile phone
  • Adherence to medication

  • Intervention engagement

  • Fidelity of intervention content

  • Awareness about the necessity to take and maintain adherence to medication

  • Reinforced social support and habit formation

  • Reminded patients to take medication as prescribed

Cottrell et al. [76] 2015 patients and professional users in England with hypertension, CKD, and diabetes text messages n/a mobile health support self-management and education using technology with which patients are already familiar evaluation study 425 UK Mobile phone
  • Agreement with the adapted friends and family statement

  • Professional and patient user satisfaction with the aim for health program

  • Patient activity using florence

  • Minimum target days of texting for hypertension protocols

  • Patient responses to evaluative texts

  • Professional user satisfaction with the program

Abdullah et al. [77] 2016 patients with hypertension and comorbidities a blood pressure telemonitoring service urban home BP telemonitoring blood pressure monitoring a qualitative study design n/a Malaysia MediHome Digital Blood Pressure and Pulse Oximeter 2-in-1 Monitor
  • Patients’ acceptance of a BP telemonitoring service delivered in primary care

  • Patients’ views and experiences of the BP telemonitoring service

  • Patients’ struggles with the perceived usefulness of the BP telemonitoring service

  • Patients’ confusion in making sense of the monitored home BP readings

  • Patients’ feedback on the BP telemonitoring functionalities to improve interactions

  • Patients’ thoughts about the implications of the monitored home BP readings for their hypertension management and overall health

Nau et al. [78] 2021 patients aged 40–70 years videos, web-based education, and text message urban mobile health To support patients with improving lifestyle behaviors for high blood pressure pilot study n/a Australia Mobile phone
  • Intervention feasibility and acceptability

  • Patient ratings of content and behavior changes

  • Changes in behaviors

Ye et al. [79] 2022 patients with hypertension aged between 18 and 85 years video and telephone urban telemedicine visit controlling high blood pressure retrospective cohort study n/a South America n/a
  • Failure to meet the controlling-high-blood-pressure quality measure

  • Poor BP control

Calderón et al. [80] 2023 patient with hypertension SMS-based home BP telemonitoring system urban home bp telemonitoring helps improve adherence to treatment, also improving disease awareness randomized controlled trial 1 Peru omron
  • Change in systolic BP values

  • Change in diastolic BP values

Sin et al. [81] 2020 People aged 21–70 years old in Singapore with Type 2 DM and/or hypertension Telemonitoring urban telemonitoring diabetes and hypertension management cross-sectional survey 2 Singapura n/a
  • Willingness of patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2Dm) and/or hypertension towards the utilization of telemonitoring

Cimini et al. [82] 2022 primary care physicians, one nurse, one pharmacist, and one community health worker a digital solution with a decision support system (DSS) for community health workers (CHWs) n/a telemedicine with video consultations To address and identify at risk patients with uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus (DM) multimethodological 34 Brazil video consultation
  • Frequency of consultations

  • Control of hypertension

  • Control of diabetes mellitus

  • Systolic blood pressure

  • Diastolic blood pressure

  • Glycohemoglobin levels

Shaw et al. [83] 2013 US stakeholders including physicians, nurses, non-physician providers, administrators, and an IT professional with hypertension nurse-delivered self-management phone urban and rural telephone counselling initiating and maintaining specific health behaviors related to hypertension mixed methods approach 3 USA n/a
  • Level of organizational readiness to implement the intervention

  • Specific barriers, facilitators, and contextual factors that may affect organizational readiness to change

  • Organizational barriers and facilitators of successful implementation

Grant et al. [84] 2019 people in the West Midlands, UK with hypertension, including patients, healthcare professionals, and patient caregivers Text message urban and rural mobile health blood pressure monitoring randomized controlled trial n/a UK mobile platform
  • Acceptability of self- and telemonitoring to patients and HCPS

  • Communication

  • Managing data

  • Integrating self-monitoring into hypertension management (structured care)

Saleh et al. [85] 2018 Lebanese hypertensive Short message service (SMS) rural mobile health enhance access among underserved rural and refugee populations to health services specific to hypertension and/or diabetes. mixed methods n/a Lebanon Mobile phone
  • Perceived usefulness of SMSs

  • Perceived ease of reading and understanding SMSs

  • Compliance with SMSs through daily behavioral modifications

  • Receiving and not reading SMSs

  • Behavior change across settings

Vitório et al. [86] 2019 hypertensive patients TeleHAS (tele-hipertensão arterial sistêmica, or arterial hypertension system) urban computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) hypertension management Mixed methods 88 Brazil n/a
  • Feasibility

  • Usability

  • Utility

Teo et al. [87] 2021 middle-aged people in Asia with hypertension Home blood pressure monitoring urban Home blood pressure monitoring, teleconsultation hypertension management a mixed-methods field study n/a Singapura Bluetooth
  • Blood pressure control

  • Cost-effectiveness

  • Patient satisfaction

3. Results

A sum of 1442 documents were identified after searching the selected databases. Also, 484 duplicates were removed. After sifting through 958 titles and abstracts, 440 articles were excluded. The remaining 518 articles were checked based on eligibility requirements, and we found 471 bibliography search results assessed for eligibility (including those papers that could not be obtained in full text). The remaining 47 articles were selected. Articles that were not set in primary healthcare and used the wrong document type were excluded in the final selection process, resulting in 42 articles being included in this study. The process of study selection is outlined in Figure 1.

3.1. Characteristics of Study

The articles included in this study were articles published between 2013 and 2023. Most of the research came from the United States (USA) (n = 10), followed by Brazil (n = 5) and the UK (n = 3), as shown in Figure 2a. According to the type of research, most of the studies included in this study used a quantitative approach followed by qualitative methods and mixed methods, as presented in Figure 2b. Regarding geographical settings, most studies were conducted in urban locations followed by rural locations, as presented in Figure 2c. The number of studies reporting the use of telehealth in hypertension management tended to fluctuate from 2013 to 2023. The highest numbers of published studies were reported in 2019 and 2022 (n = 7), as presented in Figure 2d.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Characteristics of telehealth in hypertension management in primary care settings.

3.2. Type of Intervention

We referred types of telehealth interventions based on the digital intervention categories promoted by WHO to ensure interoperability, i.e., teleconsultation, telemonitoring, teleassistance, and tele-expertise [88]. We added one category telehealth intervention, i.e., tele-education, because some articles used tele-education as an intervention for hypertension management. In this study, we divided types of telehealth interventions into five categories, namely teleconsultation, telemonitoring, teleassistance, tele-expertise, and tele-education. The synthesis of selected paper data using thematic analysis shows that most hypertension management interventions in primary care are of the telemonitoring type, followed by teleconsultation and tele-education interventions, as presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Thematic synthesis based on type of intervention.

Key Themes References
Tele-consultation Dos et al. [50], Fisher et al. [54], Ma et al. [55], De Luca et al. [58], Chen et al. [59], Jindal et al. [60], Leon et al. [62], Buis et al. [63], Ju et al. [64], Nurakysh et al. [65], Manusov et al. [66], Marcolino et al. [68], Chew et al. [73], Andersson et al. [74], Kassavou et al. [75], Shaw et al. [83], Vitório et al. [86], Teo et al. [87]
Tele-monitoring Barsky et al. [47], Naqvi et al. [48], Vedanthan et al. [49], Buis et al. [51], Koopman et al. [52], Parker et al. [53], Fisher et al. [54], Levine et al. [56], Ashjian et al. [57], De et al. [58], Doocy et al. [61], Ju et al. [64], Nurakysh et al. [65], Lee et al. [67], Marcolino et al. [68], Peters et al. [69], Debon et al. [70], Davoudi et al. [71], McManus et al. [72], Chew et al. [73], Andersson et al. [74], Cottrell et al. [76], Abdullah et al. [77], Ye et al. [79], Calderón et al. [80], Sin et al. [81], Cimini et al. [82], Grant et al. [84], Vitório et al. [86]
Tele-expertise Fisher [54], Jindal [60], Marcolino [68], Vitório [86]
Tele-assistance Dos et al. [50]
Others: tele-education Dos et al. [50], Ma et al. [55], De et al. [58], Manusov et al. [66], Marcolino et al. [68], Cottrell et al. [76], Nau et al. [78], Shaw et al. [83], Saleh et al. [85], Vitório et al. [86]

RQ 1. What are the interventions carried out in the management of hypertension in primary healthcare?

3.3. Technology

RQ 2. What is telehealth technology in hypertension management in primary healthcare?

We divided the types of telehealth intervention into three categories based on the study by Mechanic et al. [89], i.e., asynchronous, synchronous, and remote patient monitoring. The results of the data synthesis of selected papers using thematic analysis show that most interventions are of the telemonitoring type, followed by teleconsultation and tele-education interventions, as presented in Table 4.

Table 4.

Thematic synthesis based on the type of technology.

Key Themes References
Asynchronous: SMS text messaging, Tablet-based Decision Support and Integrated Record keeping (DESIRE) tool (mobile health), mobile health app, smartphone, patient-texted system, SMS and IVR messages, internet-based health management, mobile health clinic, mobile health, clinical decision support system, clinical decision support system, web conference Cottrell et al. [17], Barsky et al. [47], Vedanthan et al. [49], Dos et al. [50], Buis et al. [51], Parke et al. [53], Ma et al. [55], Chen et al. [59], Jindal et al. [60], Doocy et al. [61], Leon et al. [62], Buis et al. [63], Ju et al. [64], Manusov et al. [66], Marcolino et al. [68], Peters et al. [69], Debon et al. [70], Davoudi et al. [71], Kassavou et al. [75], Cottrell et al. [76], Nau et al. [78], Grant et al. [84], Saleh et al. [85], Vitório et al. [86]
Synchronous: Virtual visit, teleconsultation online, interactive voice response (IVR), Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure, web-based system, telemedicine visit, telephone, app with decision support system Naqvi et al. [48], Levine et al. [56], Ashjian et al. [57], McManus et al. [72], Andersson et al. [74], Ye et al. [79], Cimini et al. [82], Shaw et al. [83]
Remote patient monitoring: Blood Pressure Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM), monitoring hypertension, telemonitoring, home BP telemonitoring system Koopman et al. [52], Fisher et al. [54], De Luca et al. [58], Lee et al. [67], Chew et al. [73], Abdullah et al. [77], Calderón et al. [80], Sin et al. [81], Teo et al. [87]

4. Discussion

This study aims to identify information related to the types of interventions and types of telehealth technology in managing hypertension in primary healthcare. There were 42 relevant studies in total that were included in the final synthesis. This study was a scoping review describing the utilization of telehealth in hypertension management in primary healthcare. The articles included in this study were published between 2013 and 2023. Most articles were from the US, followed by Brazil and the UK, most of which were implemented in urban areas. Based on research methods, most articles were analyzed using quantitative methods.

The results of our review show that telehealth management interventions in primary healthcare are dominated by telemonitoring (69%). Telemedicine in hypertension management should include the transmission of vital signs and remote monitoring [90]. In the short-to-medium term, telemonitoring may be more effective than usual care [91]. The implementation of telemonitoring for hypertension can be for routine primary healthcare on a large scale with little impact on physician workload [92]. Telemonitoring can potentially improve the primary care management of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) by improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs [93]. A literature review also reported that almost all studies reported that telemonitoring was able to reduce blood pressure in the subjects being measured [94].

Telehealth interventions for hypertension management often involve remote patient monitoring (RPM) devices, such as blood pressure monitors, to track patients’ blood pressure levels [95]. These interventions typically employ a team-based care approach, involving physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals collaborating on patient decisions and providing direct care [38]. Patients using telehealth for hypertension management have seen significant improvements in clinical outcomes, including blood pressure control, which are comparable to patients receiving in-person care [40].

Apart from telemonitoring, our findings also found teleconsultation to be a frequently used intervention in hypertension management in primary care. Teleconsultation is an effective alternative to face-to-face consultation for many patients presenting to primary healthcare [96]. Teleconsultations between non-physicians and doctors located remotely have the potential to reduce the number of referrals to central clinics [97,98]. Teleconsulting services improve the compatibility of primary services and integration with secondary services in rural communities [99].

Our findings show that hypertension management technology in primary healthcare predominantly uses asynchronous technology. Most recent generation telemedicine systems use an asynchronous telemedicine approach [100]. This technology is reliable, simple to operate, has consistent connections, uses standard communication protocols, and has efficient bandwidth. For example, eHealth and mHealth are gradually gaining key roles in managing hypertensive patients [19]. Additionally, Java client applications that send digital camera images and structured XML text as e-mails are designed for use in resource-poor, poorly networked developing countries [101]. The application of advanced technology in rural healthcare settings has the potential to lower the cost of patient care and managed care insurance plans, enabling expert consultation from remote centers [102]. Asynchronous telehealth can shorten waiting times, reduce unnecessary referrals, and increase patient and provider satisfaction levels [103].

Our findings show that telehealth is currently being utilized to help manage hypertension in primary healthcare. It also helps to provide remote access to healthcare professionals and enables the monitoring of blood pressure [37,95]. It has been increasingly used during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure continuity of care and improve access to healthcare services [104]. Studies have shown that telehealth interventions, including remote patient monitoring (RPM) and team-based care, have been effective in treating patients with hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [37]. A collaborative nephrologist–pharmacist telehealth clinic has also been successful in improving difficult-to-control hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [105]. Telehealth-delivered approaches, such as the TEAM intervention, have been shown to improve hypertension care delivery and blood pressure control [39]. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the use of telehealth for the management of hypertension and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [39]. Overall, telehealth has the potential to reduce barriers to accessing healthcare, improve clinical outcomes, and extend services to remote areas, making it a valuable tool in the management of hypertension in primary healthcare settings.

Health systems and healthcare differ between countries. Despite these differences, most health systems aim to improve patient health, be responsive to patient needs, and ensure financial sustainability [106]. Developing countries face more challenges in building strong and reliable health systems compared to developed countries, leading to disparities in public health status and health problems [3]. Health inequalities exist within and between countries, with socioeconomic and cultural inequalities driving health inequities [106].

Our findings show that different countries use different technologies for hypertension management. Telehealth and eHealth technology availability differ between developed and developing countries. In developed countries, the use of telehealth and eHealth services has been increasing, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic [107]. These countries have reached thresholds for telehealth provision, such as a certain level of telecommunication accessibility, a proportion of elders exceeding 10%, or a proportion of health spending occupying more than 3–5% of GDP [108]. On the other hand, developing countries are also utilizing telehealth and eHealth technology, but the models and approaches vary depending on the level of development and government commitment to providing affordable healthcare services [109].

Strengths and Limitations

This study captured the use of telehealth for hypertension management in primary healthcare. The selection process uses four databases with systematic procedures. With wide location coverage, it can describe the implementation of telehealth in various countries. One limitation of this study was that it did not include grey literature reviews in the inclusion criteria. Another limitation was language bias because we searched for articles in English only. Future studies can overcome this limitation.

5. Conclusions

Telehealth is considered to have the potential for the management of hypertension in primary care. The findings of this study show that telehealth interventions in hypertension management in primary healthcare are dominated by telemonitoring. The technology used is more common in asynchronous telehealth. Further studies are needed to evaluate telehealth services in supporting the management of hypertension in primary care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.I. and W.P.N.; methodology, T.R., A.K. and A.Y.; formal analysis, Y.P., S.N. and N.S.; data curation, D.R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A., writing—review and editing, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Darvas Z., Moës N., Myachenkova Y., Pichler D. Bruegel Policy Contribution. EconStor; Bruegel, Brussels: 2018. The macroeconomic implications of healthcare. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hasan A.A., Ambrammal S.K. The healthcare system: Policies and performance in India and ASEAN countries. Int. J. Health Sci. 2022;6:9960–9980. doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS4.10877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shin J.-Y.J., Man K., Zhou W. Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trials. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. International and global issues–differences in health systems, patient populations, and medical practice; pp. 257–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baum F.E. Health systems: How much difference can they make to health inequities? J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2016;70:635–636. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-207071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Uchimura H. Making Health Services More Accessible in Developing Countries: Finance and Health Resources for Functioning Health Systems. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2009. Introduction: Key Factors for Functioning Health Systems; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cancarevic I., Plichtová L., Malik B.H. International Medical Graduates in the United States: A Complete Guide to Challenges and Solutions. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2021. Healthcare systems around the world; pp. 45–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lu W., Yuan J., Liu Z., Su Z.-H., Shen Y.-C., Li S.-J., Zhang H. Worldwide trends in mortality for hypertensive heart disease from 1990 to 2019 with projection to 2034: Data from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2023;31:zwad262. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhou B., Carrillo-Larco R.M., Danaei G., Riley L.M., Paciorek C.J., Stevens G.A., Gregg E.W., Bennett J.E., Solomon B., Singleton R.K., et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: A pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398:957–980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou B., Perel P., Mensah G.A., Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021;18:785–802. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hatano Y., Yano Y., Fujimoto S., Sato Y., Iseki K., Konta T., Moriyama T., Yamagata K., Tsuruya K., Narita I., et al. The Population-Attributable Fraction for Premature Mortality Due to Cardiovascular Disease Associated With Stage 1 and 2 Hypertension Among Japanese. Am. J. Hypertens. 2020;34:56–63. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mirahmadizadeh A., Vali M., Hassanzadeh J., Dehghani S.P., Razeghi A., Azarbakhsh H. Mortality Rate and Years of Life Lost due to Hypertension in the South of Iran between 2004 and 2019: A Population-Based Study. Int. J. Hypertens. 2022;2022:7759699. doi: 10.1155/2022/7759699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen Y., Freedman N.D., Albert P.S., Huxley R.R., Shiels M.S., Withrow D.R., Spillane S., Powell-Wiley T.M., de González A.B. Association of Cardiovascular Disease with Premature Mortality in the United States. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:1230–1238. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Constant A., Geladari E.V., Geladari C.V. Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2016. The Economic Burden of Hypertension. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Djasri H., Laras S., Utarini A. Quality indicators for clinical care of patients with hypertension: Scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e026167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chowdhury F.M., Ayala C., Chang T.E., Dalmat D., Shantharam S., Zhang X. Abstract 218: Effectiveness of Telehealth on Hypertension Management and Control Among Disparate Populations—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 2018;11:A218. doi: 10.1161/circoutcomes.11.suppl_1.218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gafane-Matemane L.F., Mokwatsi G.G., Boateng D. Hypertension management in sub-Saharan Africa: An overview of challenges and opportunities for telemedicine. Connect. Health Telemed. 2023;2:9–22. doi: 10.20517/ch.2022.21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cottrell E., Cox T., O’Connell P., Chambers R. Implementation of simple telehealth to manage hypertension in general practice: A service evaluation. BMC Fam. Pract. 2015;16:83. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0301-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Omboni S., Panzeri E., Campolo L. E-health in hypertension management: An insight into the current and future role of blood pressure telemonitoring. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2020;22:42. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-01056-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Omboni S., Caserini M., Coronetti C. Telemedicine and M-Health in Hypertension Management: Technologies, Applications and Clinical Evidence. High. Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2016;23:187–196. doi: 10.1007/s40292-016-0143-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gu D., Khan S., Khan I.U., Khan S.U., Xie Y., Li X., Zhang G. Assessing the adoption of e-health technology in a developing country: An extension of the UTAUT model. Sage Open. 2021;11:3. doi: 10.1177/21582440211027565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Warr D., Luscombe G., Couch D. Hype, evidence gaps and digital divides: Telehealth blind spots in rural Australia. Health. 2023;27:588–606. doi: 10.1177/13634593211060763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sukkird V., Shirahada K. Optimizing Current Practices in E-Services and Mobile Applications. IGI Global; Hershey, PA, USA: 2018. E-health service model for Asian developing countries: A case of emergency medical service for elderly people in Thailand; pp. 214–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kaur A., Gupta A.K. E-Health Approaches for Developing Countries; Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control (ISPCC); Solan, India. 10–12 October 2019; Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE; 2019. pp. 269–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Suter P., Suter W.N., Johnston D. Theory-Based Telehealth and Patient Empowerment. Popul. Health Manag. 2011;14:87–92. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwamm L.H. Telehealth: Seven Strategies To Successfully Implement Disruptive Technology And Transform Health Care. Health Aff. 2014;33:200–206. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wade V.A., Karnon J., Elshaug A.G., Hiller J.E. A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2010;10:233. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hueppmeier R.J., Single A., Welte I. Situation, motivation, implementation and results of telehealth-enabled health care. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2010;16:187–189. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.004006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lamothe L., Fortin J.-P., Labbé F., Gagnon M.P., Messikh D. Impacts of telehomecare on patients, providers, and organizations. Telemed. J. e-Health. 2006;12:363–369. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wakefield B.J., Holman J.E., Ray A., Scherubel M., Adams M.R., Hillis S.L., Rosenthal G.E. Effectiveness of home telehealth in comorbid diabetes and hypertension: A randomized, controlled trial. Telemed. J. e-Health. 2011;17:254–261. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bingham J.M., Black M., Anderson E.J., Li Y., Toselli N., Fox S., Martin J.R., Axon D.R., Silva-Almodóvar A. Impact of Telehealth Interventions on Medication Adherence for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Hypertension, and/or Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review. Ann. Pharmacother. 2020;55:637–649. doi: 10.1177/1060028020950726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Melius B.N., Conwell W.D. Impact of Telehealth on Health Economics. Sleep Med. Clin. 2020;15:441–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jaffe M.G., DiPette D.J., Campbell N.R.C., Angell S.Y., Ordunez P. Developing population-based hypertension control programs. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública. 2023;46:e153. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chu R.Y.-K., Dong D., Wong S.Y.-S., Lee E.K.-P. Barriers and Determinants to the Underutilized Hypertension Screening in Primary Care Patients in Hong Kong: A Mixed-Method Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2023;20:985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Elnaem M.H., Mosaad M., Abdelaziz D.H., Mansour N.O., Usman A., Elrggal M.E., Cheema E. Disparities in prevalence and barriers to hypertension control: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:14571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Abrahamowicz A.A., Ebinger J., Whelton S.P., Commodore-Mensah Y., Yang E. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hypertension: Barriers and Opportunities to Improve Blood Pressure Control. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2023;25:17–27. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01826-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Benenson I., Prado K. Difficult-to-Control Hypertension in a Primary Care Setting. J. Nurse Pract. 2023;19:104407. doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2022.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jackson T.N., Sreedhara M., Bostic M., Spafford M., Popat S., Beasley K.L., Jordan J., Ahn R. Telehealth Use to Address Cardiovascular Disease and Hypertension in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2011–2021. Telemed Rep. 2023;4:67–86. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sreedhara M., Suvada K., Bostic M., Scott A., Blum E., Jordan J., Beasley K.L. Rapid evaluations of telehealth strategies to address hypertension: A mixed-methods exploration at two US health systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2022;19:E81. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.220219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Drake C., Lewinski A.A., Rader A., Schexnayder J., Bosworth H.B., Goldstein K.M., Gierisch J., White-Clark C., McCant F., Zullig L.L. Addressing Hypertension Outcomes Using Telehealth and Population Health Managers: Adaptations and Implementation Considerations. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2022;24:267–284. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01193-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang J., Li Y., Chia Y., Cheng H., Van Minh H., Siddique S., Sogunuru G.P., Tay J.C., Teo B.W., Tsoi K., et al. Telemedicine in the management of hypertension: Evolving technological platforms for blood pressure telemonitoring. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2021;23:435–439. doi: 10.1111/jch.14194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yatabe J., Yatabe M.S., Okada R., Ichihara A. Efficacy of telemedicine in hypertension care through home blood pressure monitoring and videoconferencing: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Cardio. 2021;5:e27347. doi: 10.2196/27347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Beheshti L., Kalankesh L., Doshmangir L., Farahbakhsh M. Telehealth in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature. [(accessed on 3 May 2023)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9013222/ [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Harrison C.E. Using telehealth in the management of hypertension. Nurs. Stand. 2017;31:44–49. doi: 10.7748/ns.2017.e10618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Peters M.D.J., Marnie C., Tricco A.C., Pollock D., Munn Z., Alexander L., McInerney P., Godfrey C.M., Khalil H. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020;18:2119–2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., O’Brien K.K., Colquhoun H., Levac D. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018;169:467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Clarke V., Braun V., Hayfield N. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Volume 3. SAGE Publications Ltd.; Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2015. Thematic analysis; pp. 222–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Barsky J., Hunter R., McAllister C., Yeates K., Campbell N., Liu P. Analysis of the Implementation, User Perspectives, and Feedback from a Mobile Health Intervention for Individuals Living with Hypertension (DREAM-GLOBAL): Mixed Method Study. [(accessed on 3 May 2023)]. Available online: https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/12/e12639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Naqvi I., Cheung K., Strobino K., Li J., Schmitt K., Garcon M., Li H. Home blood pressure telemonitoring-enhanced versus usual post-acute stroke care in an underserved setting: The telehealth after stroke care pilotrandomized clinical trial. [(accessed on 8 October 2023)];Neurology. 2022 98:S17. doi: 10.1212/WNL.98.18_supplement.783. Available online: https://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&id=L638416316&from=export. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vedanthan R., Blank E., Tuikong N., Kamano J., Misoi L., Tulienge D. Usability and feasibility of a tablet-based Decision-Support and Integrated Record-keeping (DESIRE) tool in the nurse management of hypertension in rural western Kenya. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2015;84:207–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dos Santos M.V.R., Cavalcanti De Oliveira D., De Araújo Novaes M. A telehealth strategy for increasing adherence in the treatment of hypertension in primary care. Telemed. e-Health. 2013;19:241–247. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Buis L.R., Roberson D.N., Kadri R., Rockey N.G., A Plegue M., Danak S.U., Guetterman T.C., Johnson M.G., Choe H.M., Richardson C.R. Understanding the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a clinical pharmacist-led mobile approach (BPTrack) to hypertension management: Mixed methods pilot study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020;22:e19882. doi: 10.2196/19882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Koopman R.J., Wakefield B.J., Johanning J.L., Keplinger L.E., Kruse R.L., Bomar M., Bernt B., Wakefield D.S., Mehr D.R. Implementing home blood glucose and blood pressure telemonitoring in primary care practices for patients with diabetes: Lessons learned. Telemed. e-Health. 2014;20:253–260. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Parker R.A., Paterson M., Padfield P., Pinnock H., Hanley J., Hammersley V.S., Steventon A., McKinstry B. Are self-reported telemonitored blood pressure readings affected by end-digit preference: A prospective cohort study in Scotland. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e019431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fisher N.D.L., Fera L.E., Dunning J.R., Desai S., Matta L., Liquori V. Development of an entirely remote, non-physician led hypertension management program. Clin. Cardiol. 2019;42:285–291. doi: 10.1002/clc.23141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ma Y., Cheng H.Y., Sit J.W.H., Chien W.T. The effects of a smartphone-enhanced nurse-facilitated self-care intervention for Chinese hypertensive patients: A randomised controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2022;134:104313. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Levine D.M., Dixon R.F., Linder J.A. Association of Structured Virtual Visits for Hypertension Follow-Up in Primary Care with Blood Pressure Control and Use of Clinical Services. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2018;33:1862–1867. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4375-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ashjian E.J., Yoo A., Piette J.D., Choe H.M., Thompson A.N. Implementation and barriers to uptake of interactive voice response technology aimed to improve blood pressure control at a large academic medical center. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 2019;59:S104–S109.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2018.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.De Luca V., Lazic V., Birov S., Piesche K., Beyhan O., Pengo M.F., Melgara M., Sherman M.H., Lilja M., Balenovic A., et al. Digitally enabled health service for the integrated management of hypertension: A participatory user-centred design process. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:12442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen B., Dou Y., Yu X., Ma D. Influence of Internet-Based Health Management on Control of Clinical Parameters in Patients with Hypertension: Four-Year Longitudinal Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023;25:e42896. doi: 10.2196/42896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jindal D., Gupta P., Jha D., Ajay V.S., Goenka S., Jacob P., Mehrotra K., Perel P., Nyong J., Roy A., et al. Development of mWellcare: An mHealth intervention for integrated management of hypertension and diabetes in low-resource settings. Glob. Health Action. 2018;11:1517930. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1517930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Doocy S., Paik K.E., Lyles E., Tam H.H., Fahed Z., Winkler E., Kontunen K., Mkanna A., Burnham G. Guidelines and mhealth to improve quality of hypertension and type 2 diabetes care for vulnerable populations in Lebanon: Longitudinal cohort study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5:e158. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Leon N., Surender R., Bobrow K., Muller J., Farmer A. Improving treatment adherence for blood pressure lowering via mobile phone SMS-messages in South Africa: A qualitative evaluation of the SMS-text Adherence SuppoRt (StAR) trial Service organization, utilization, and delivery of care. BMC Fam. Pract. 2015;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0289-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Buis L., Hirzel L., Dawood R.M., Dawood K.L., Nichols L.P., Artinian N.T., Schwiebert L., Yarandi H.N., Roberson D.N., Plegue M.A., et al. Text messaging to improve hypertension medication adherence in african americans from primary care and emergency department settings: Results from two randomized feasibility studies. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5:e9. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ju H., Kang E., Kim Y., Ko H., Cho B. The Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Care App and Human Coaching Program in Primary Care Clinics: Pilot Multicenter Real-World Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2022;10:e34531. doi: 10.2196/34531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nurakysh S., Kurakbayev K., Kosherbaeva L., Tazhiyeva A., Aimakhanova A., Kulkaeva G., Asykbaeva L., Ainabekov M., Fakhradiyev I., Tanabayeva S. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Mobile Application on Adherence of Patients With Arterial Hypertension. Acta Inform. Medica. 2022;30:18–24. doi: 10.5455/aim.2022.30.18-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Manusov E.G., Diego V.P., Smith J., Garza J.R., Lowdermilk J., Blangero J., Williams-Blangero S., Fernandez F. UniMóvil: A Mobile Health Clinic Providing Primary Care to the Colonias of the Rio Grande Valley, South Texas. Front. Public Health. 2019;7:215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lee N.S., Anastos-Wallen R., Chaiyachati K.H., Reitz C., Asch D.A., Mehta S.J. Clinician Decisions after Notification of Elevated Blood Pressure Measurements from Patients in a Remote Monitoring Program. JAMA Netw. Open. 2022;5:e2143590. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Marcolino M.S., Oliveira J.A.Q., Cimini C.C.R., Maia J.X., Pinto V.S.O.A., Sá T.Q.V., Amancio K., Coelho L., Ribeiro L.B., Cardoso C.S., et al. Development and Implementation of a Decision Support System to Improve Control of Hypertension and Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Area in Brazil: Mixed Methods Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021;23:e18872. doi: 10.2196/18872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Peters R.M., Shivakumar N., Xu R., Javaherian K., Sink E., Patel K., Brown A., Huynh J., Blanchard M., Ross W., et al. Assessing the utility of a novel SMS- And phone-based system for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients: Feasibility study. JMIR Cardio. 2017;1:e2. doi: 10.2196/cardio.7915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Debon R., Bellei E.A., Biduski D., Volpi S.S., Alves A.L.S., Portella M.R., De Marchi A.C.B. Effects of using a mobile health application on the health conditions of patients with arterial hypertension: A pilot trial in the context of Brazil’s Family Health Strategy. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:6009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63057-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Davoudi A., Lee N.S., Chivers C., Delaney T., Asch E.L., Reitz C., Mehta S.J., Chaiyachati K.H., Mowery D.L. Patient interaction phenotypes with an automated remote hypertension monitoring program and their association with blood pressure control: Observational study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020;22:e22493. doi: 10.2196/22493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.McManus R.J., Little P., Stuart B., Morton K., Raftery J., Kelly J., Bradbury K., Zhang J., Zhu S., Murray E., et al. Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) using a digital intervention in poorly controlled hypertension: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;372:m4858. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chew E., Teo S.H., Tang W.E., Ng D.W.L., Koh G.C.H., Teo V.H.Y. Trust and Uncertainty in the Implementation of a Pilot Remote Blood Pressure Monitoring Program in Primary Care: Qualitative Study of Patient and Health Care Professional Views. JMIR Hum. Factors. 2023;10:e36072. doi: 10.2196/36072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Andersson U., Bengtsson U., Ranerup A., Midlöv P., Kjellgren K. Patients and Professionals as Partners in Hypertension Care: Qualitative Substudy of a Randomized Controlled Trial Using an Interactive Web-Based System Via Mobile Phone. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021;23:e26143. doi: 10.2196/26143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kassavou A., Houghton V., Edwards S., Brimicombe J., Sutton S. Development and piloting of a highly tailored digital intervention to support adherence to antihypertensive medications as an adjunct to primary care consultations. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cottrell E., Cox T., O’Connell P., Chambers R. Patient and professional user experiences of simple telehealth for hypertension, medication reminders and smoking cessation: A service evaluation. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Abdullah A., Liew S.M., Hanafi N.S., Ng C.J., Lai P.S.M., Chia Y.C., Kiong L.C. What influences patients’ acceptance of a blood pressure telemonitoring service in primary care? A qualitative study. Patient Prefer. Adherence. 2016;10:99–106. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S94687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nau T., Owen A., Mazza D., Smith B.J. Engaging primary care providers in a mobile health strategy to support lifestyle change and blood pressure management. Digit. Health. 2021;7:205520762110667. doi: 10.1177/20552076211066746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ye S., Anstey D.E., Grauer A., Metser G., Moise N., Schwartz J., Kronish I., Abdalla M. The Impact of Telemedicine Visits on the Controlling High Blood Pressure Quality Measure During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Form. Res. 2022;6:e32403. doi: 10.2196/32403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Calderón-Anyosa R., Tincopa J.P., Raza M., Cárcamo C.P. Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Telemonitoring of Blood Pressure with an Adapted Tensiometer with SMS Capability. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2023;13:440–449. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13020033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sin D.Y.E., Guo X., Yong D.W.W., Qiu T.Y., Moey P.K.S., Falk M.-R., Tan N.C. Assessment of willingness to Tele-monitoring interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes and/or hypertension in the public primary healthcare setting. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2020;20:11. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1024-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cimini C.C.R., Maia J.X., Pires M.C., Ribeiro L.B., e Almeida V.S.D.O., Batchelor J. Pandemic-Related Impairment in the Monitoring of Patients With Hypertension and Diabetes and the Development of a Digital Solution for the Community Health Worker: Quasiexperimental and Implementation Study. JMIR Med. Inform. 2022;10:e35216. doi: 10.2196/35216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Shaw R.J., Kaufman M.A., Bosworth H.B., Weiner B.J., Zullig L.L., Lee S.-Y.D., Kravetz J.D., Rakley S.M., Roumie C.L., E Bowen M., et al. Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: The HTN-IMPROVE study. Implement. Sci. 2013;8:106. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Grant S., Hodgkinson J., Schwartz C., Bradburn P., Franssen M., Hobbs F.R., Jowett S., McManus R.J., Greenfield S. Using mHealth for the management of hypertension in UK primary care: An embedded qualitative study of the TASMINH4 randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2019;69:e612–e620. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Saleh S., Farah A., El Arnaout N., Dimassi H., El Morr C., Muntaner C. mHealth use for non-communicable diseases care in primary health: Patients’ perspective from rural settings and refugee camps. J. Public Health. 2018;40:ii52–ii63. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Vitório Silveira D., Marcolino M.S., Machado E.L., Ferreira C.G., Alkmim M.B.M., Resende E.S., Carvalho B.C., Antunes A.P., Ribeiro A.L.P. Development and evaluation of a mobile decision support system for hypertension management in the primary care setting in Brazil: Mixed-methods field study on usability, feasibility, and utility. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2019;7:e9869. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Teo V.H.Y., Teo S.H., Burkill S.M., Wang Y., AL Chew E., Ng D.W., Tang W.E., Koh G.C. Effects of technology-enabled blood pressure monitoring in primary care: A quasi-experimental trial. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2021;30:121–130. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211031780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Neculau A.E., Lăcătuș A.M., Mărginean M. A Guide to Telemedicine in Primary Healthcare. UNICEF; New York, NY, USA: 2022. p. 44. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mechanic O.J., Persaud Y., Kimball A.B. Telehealth Systems. StatPearls; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Omboni S., McManus R.J., Bosworth H.B., Chappell L.C., Green B.B., Kario K. Evidence and Recommendations on the Use of Telemedicine for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: An International Expert Position Paper. [(accessed on 8 July 2023)];Hypertension. 2020 76:1368–1383. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15873. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:221672050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sivakumaran D., Earle K.A. Telemonitoring: Use in the management of hypertension. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2014;10:217–224. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S36749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Hammersley V., Parker R., Paterson M., Hanley J., Pinnock H., Padfield P., Stoddart A., Park H.G., Sheikh A., McKinstry B. Telemonitoring at scale for hypertension in primary care: An implementation study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Purcell R., McInnes S., Halcomb E.J. Telemonitoring can assist in managing cardiovascular disease in primary care: A systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Fam. Pract. 2014;15:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.AbuDagga A., Resnick H.E., Alwan M. Impact of blood pressure telemonitoring on hypertension outcomes: A literature review. Telemed. J. e-Health Off. J. Am. Telemed. Assoc. 2010;16:830–838. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Heizelman R.J. Telehealth and Hypertension Management. Prim. Care Clin. Off. Pract. 2022;49:621–629. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2022.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Carrillo de Albornoz S., Sia K.-L., Harris A. The effectiveness of teleconsultations in primary care: Systematic review. Fam. Pract. 2022;39:168–182. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Dhillon H.S., Doermann A.C., Walcoff P. Telemedicine and rural primary health care: An analysis of the impact of telecommunications technology. Socioecon. Plann Sci. 1978;12:37–48. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(78)90020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Marcolino M.S., Pereira Afonso dos Santos J., Neves D.S., Alkmim M.B.M. Teleconsultations to Provide Support for Primary Care Practitioners and Improve Quality of care--the Experience of a Large Scale Telehealth Service in Brazil. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2015;216:987. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zanaboni P., Scalvini S., Bernocchi P., Borghi G., Tridico C., Masella C. Teleconsultation service to improve healthcare in rural areas: Acceptance, organizational impact and appropriateness. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2009;9:238. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Pandian P.S., Safeer K.P., Shakunthala D.T.I., Gopal P., Padaki V.C. Store and Forward Applications in Telemedicine for Wireless IP Based Networks. J. Netw. 2007;2:58–65. doi: 10.4304/jnw.2.6.58-65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jazayeri D.G. Doctoral Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2002. [(accessed on 8 July 2023)]. TeleMedMail: A Low-Cost Store-and-Forward Telemedicine System for Use in Developing Countries. Available online: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:110433436. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lewis P.A., Mccann R.L., Hidalgo P., Gorman M. Use of store and forward technology for vascular nursing teleconsultation service. J. Vasc. Nurs. 1997;15:116–123. doi: 10.1016/S1062-0303(97)90029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Deshpande A., Khoja S., Lorca J., McKibbon A., Rizo C., Husereau D., Jadad A.R. Asynchronous telehealth: A scoping review of analytic studies. Open Med. 2009;3:e69–e91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Karam S., Drawz P.E. Telemonitoring for Hypertension Management: The Time Is Now. Kidney360. 2022;3:1961. doi: 10.34067/KID.0001302022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dopp J.M., Lange A., Maursetter L. Interdisciplinary telehealth team positively impacts difficult-to-control hypertension in CKD. Kidney360. 2023;4:e817–e823. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Papanicolas I., Cylus J. The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2015. Comparison of healthcare systems performance; pp. 116–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Wang F., Wang J.-D. The determinants of telehealth provision: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:8288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Alverson D. The international digital transformation of healthcare: Telehealth development in the global community. J. Int. Soc. Telemed. e-Health. 2020;8:e13. doi: 10.29086/JISfTeH.8.e13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ramnath V.R. Emerging Practices in Telehealth. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2023. Global telehealth and digital health: How to support programs and infrastructure; pp. 163–182. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES