Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Jan 27;14:2305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52260-8

Cultivation and morphology of jujube (Ziziphus Jujuba Mill.) in the Qi River Basin of Northern China during the Neolithic Period

Yanpeng Li 1,2, Xinying Zhou 2,3,4,, Keliang Zhao 2,3,4, Junchi Liu 2,3,4, Guanhan Chen 2,3,4, Yaping Zhang 2,3,4, Jiacheng Ma 2,3,4, Nan Sun 1,, Xiaoqiang Li 2,3,4
PMCID: PMC10821880  PMID: 38280899

Abstract

This transition from gathering to cultivation is a significant aspect of studying early agricultural practices. Fruit trees are an essential component of food resources and have played a vital role in both ancient and modern agricultural production systems. The jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.), with its long history of cultivation in northern China, holds great importance in uncovering the diet of prehistoric humans and understanding the origins of Chinese agricultural civilization. This paper focuses on the domestication of jujube by analyzing the morphology of jujube stones found in three Neolithic sites in northern China's Qi River basin, Zhujia, Wangzhuang, and Dalaidian. The measurements of these jujube kernels are compared with those found in other areas of northern China, as well as modern jujube kernels that were collected. The measurements revealed that the length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio of sour jujube kernels ranged from 1.36 to 1.78, whereas the L/D ratio of cultivated jujube stones varied between 1.96 and 4.23. Furthermore, jujube stones obtained from Zhujia and Wangzhuang sites exhibit pointed ends and possess an elongated oval or narrow oval shape overall, which is indicative of clearly artificial domestication traits. Therefore, this study suggests that jujube was selected and cultivated as an important food supplement in the Qi River basin no later than around 6200 BP.

Subject terms: Plant sciences, Ecology, Environmental sciences

Introduction

The transition from wild plant systems to artificially cultivated systems during the Holocene is a crucial event in the history of human and Earth ecosystems13. Fruit trees, as important food resources, provide humans with essential nutrients, such as proteins, amino acids, and vitamins, and are integrated into traditional and modern agroecosystems worldwide, playing a vital role in human society48.

To gain a better understanding of the history of domestication, interdisciplinary studies involving archaeology, genetics, and anthropology will be crucial. By combining multiple lines of evidence, researchers can establish a more comprehensive picture of how and when plant domestication took place1,9,10. While there is increasing evidence of fruit tree cultivation in the early Holocene, there is still limited knowledge about their evolutionary history1115. Additionally, the relationship between human subsistence strategies and fruit tree utilization, as well as the impact of fruit tree utilization on human society, have been long overlooked. The middle and lower Yellow River basin in northern China is core area of millet agriculture origin and early fruit tree cultivation area1921. Extensive research has been conducted on cereal agriculture in this region, but there is limited understanding of fruit tree collection, utilization process, cultivation history and exchange by prehistoric inhabitants.

Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.), a member of the genus Ziziphhus (Ziziphus Mill.) in the family Rhamnaceae, is now widely cultivated in northern China, Central Asia, West Asia and northern Africa22. The Jujube fruit is rich in nutrients, has a wide range of medicinal and economic values. It is believed to originated and has a long history of cultivation in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River in northern China2325.There are clear records about the cultivation, management, and processing of jujube in ancient literature such as the Shijing and the Erya, as early as 3000 years ago, which shows that it played a crucial position in the formation of China's dietary culture23.

Extensive research in the fields of molecular biology has been conducted in recent years, providing compelling evidence on the origin and domestication of jujube, and suggested that jujube originated in the middle reaches of the Yellow River 2528. However, currently, there is a lack of conclusive evidence to support this statement in the context of archaeobotany. While some researchers have discovered charred remnants of Jujube at various archaeological sites, it remains uncertain whether these are cultivated or wild varieties29. This ambiguity stems from previous studies lacking a distinct criterion to differentiate between the wild and domesticated types. The main objective of this study is to investigate the cultivation history of jujube and its significance in the prehistoric subsistence. To achieve this, newly discovered charred jujube stones from the Qi River basin, as well as jujube and sour jujube stones gathered from various sites in northern China, were examined (Fig. 1). The findings of this research offer novel evidence regarding the early cultivation, and probably representational morphological evolution of jujube in the northern regions of Neolithic China.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution of Jujube and Sour Jujube Remains in Northern China’s Middle and Lower Yellow River and Overview of the Qi River Basin. (a) Distribution of site locations and range of distribution in different periods of the jujube tree. 1.Miocene fossilized sour jujube leaves; 2.Egoubeigang; 3.Peiligang; 4.Shigu; 5.Shawoli; 6.Zhujia; 7.Dalaidian; 8.Wangzhuang; 9.Anban; 10.Nansha; 11.Zaojiaoshu; 12.Wanggedang; 13.Nanwa; 14.Dongzhao; 15.Taomugang; 16.Zhuanglixi; 17.Liujiazhuang; 18.Daxinzhuang; 19.Zhaimaoliang; 20.Taixi; 21.Nanyangsi; 22.Xipu; 23.Koujia; 24.Xiwusi; 25.Chenzhuang; 26.JianglingHan tomb; 27.MawangduiHan tomb; 28.Shangcun; 29.Baijia; 30.Xiahe; 31.Mapo; 32.Nanshantou; 33.Taosi; 34.Wangchenggang; 35.Jiaochangpu. (b) Distribution of site locations in the Qi River Basin. This map is created using ArcGIS v10.6 (https://www.esri.com/), in-map labels were added in CorelDraw X8 v18.1.0.690 (https://www.coreldraw.com/). Figure (a) base map from (https://www.simplemappr.net/), Figure (b) base map from (https://earth.google.com/). See Supplementary Table S1.

Results

AMS 14C dating

A total of four samples were selected for 14C dating at the Dalaidian, Zhujia, and Wangzhuang sites. Since kernels were relatively rare at the sites, we selected charred millet seeds and charcoal from the same cultural layer as the kernels for AMS 14C dating. Two dating samples were selected from the Zhujia site, including a charred millet seed sample from T3-1 and a charcoal sample from T2-6. At Dalaidian, a charcoal sample was selected for 14C dating at 270 cm in the first site 1–1. A total of one dating sample from ash pits 2–4 was selected from the Wangzhuang site. Chronological data for the other sites were obtained from previous studies by our team and published data from others, as detailed in (Table 1).

Table 1.

AMS14C dates for the 13 archaeological sites discussed in this study.

Site Sample ID Lab code Sample type 14C age (BP) Calibrated age (calBP)(95.4%)
Zhujia ZJ T3-1 Beta-600930 charred seed 5350 + /− 30 BP 6273–6002
Zhujia ZJ T2-6 Beta -600,929 charcoal 5400 + /− 30 BP 6289–6020
Dalaidian DLD 1–1 270 cm Beta -599,783 charcoal 5110 + /− 30 BP 5927–5750
Wangzhuang WZ 2–4 Beta -600,928 Charred seed 3250 + /− 30 BP 3560–3390
Xiwusi XWS-1 QZQ806 Charcoal 2435 + /− 40 BP 2703–2354
koujia KJ-W OZM466 Wheat 1505 ± 30 BP 1509–1308
Taomugang TMG-1 QZQ793 Charcoal 3625 + /− 35 BP 4080–3839
Nansha30 NS11 OZM459 Charred seed 3279 + /− 31 BP 3390–3560

Plant macrofossils

The flotation technique was employed to excavate abundant remains from the layer. This study focuses specifically on the jujube and sour jujube kernels that were excavated. Initially, in order to more clearly determine the types of jujube and sour jujube, we first compared and measured the morphology of the modern kernels collected to establish a clear criterion for judging the species. The cultivated jujube kernel is long and slender overall, with pointed ends and a fine fusiform shape, but the differences between varieties are also more disparate. By contrast, the modern sour jujube has a blunt shape at both ends and an ovate or oval overall morphology. We conducted measurements on the length and diameter of the jujube kernel. Our analysis revealed that L/D values of modern sour jujube grown in the wild ranged from 1.19 to 1.68, while those of modern cultivated jujube ranged from 2.28 to 6.37, with obvious distributional boundaries between the two, and the differences in morphology were very significant. Further analysis using a threshold of 1.9 led to the identification of jujube and sour jujube types (see Supplementary Table S2).

Based on the findings of contemporary kernels, we analyzed and measured the morphology of fifteen kernels that were unearthed from the sites. Firstly, the general morphology shows that all the kernels belong to jujube or sour jujube. The kernels excavated from the sites were classified according to the measurement results, and the L/D of sour jujube ranged from 1.36 to 1.78, and that of cultivated jujube ranged from 1.96 to 4.23, which is similar to the distribution trend of modern kernels.

Jujube kernels exhibit distinct morphological differences across various sites. Three jujube kernels were excavated from the Zhujia site, each having a long oval or narrow ovate shape with a pointed apex and L/D values of 4.23, 2.75, and 2.05 respectively. The cultivated kernels display a slender overall shape, indicating a clear sign of artificial domestication. In contrast, the remaining kernel (Fig. 2a) has an elliptical shape and an L/D value of 1.59, which implies that it is likely from the seed of a sour jujube. One sour jujube, located at the Dalaidian site (Fig. 2f), exhibits an L/D value of 1.36, possesses an oval shape, and features a blunt apex. Conversely, a cultivated jujube from the Wangzhuang site (Fig. 3a) displays an L/D value of 2.00 and is smaller in size. Fusiform in shape, it presents a prominent, slightly curved tip and a blunt base. Two sour jujubes harvested from the Nansha site (Fig. 2b, c) exhibit L/D values of 1.52 and 1.62, respectively, and possess a rhombus-shaped morphology with a bluntly rounded base and a slightly pointed tip. The remaining sample (Fig. 3e), which is a cultivated jujube, displays an L/D value of 2.45 and has an overall elongated, narrowly ovate structure. The two sour jujubes from Xipu and Xiwusi, depicted in Fig. 2b,c, have L/D values of 1.62 and 1.40, respectively, and are roughly elliptical in shape. Moreover, two cultivated jujubes that were unearthed from the Taomugang site exhibit L/D values of 2.51 and 2.11, respectively. One of these jujubes, shown in (Fig. 3b), is obovate, pointed at both ends, with a long beak at the tip, and the other, shown in (Fig. 3d), is angular-ovate, with an obtuse base and a slightly pointed tip. A jujube that was cultivated at the Nanyangsi location (Fig. 3c) exhibits an L/D value of 2.83, is narrowly elliptical, pointed at both ends, and features noticeable longitudinal grooves. Another cultivated jujube from the Koujia location (Fig. 3h) has an L/D value of 1.96, is fusiform in shape, has a small tip at the bottom, and closely resembles the pome of certain present-day cultivated jujubes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sour jujube (Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa) kernels from the sites. (a) Zhujia. (b, c) Nansha. (d) Xipu. (e) Xiwusi. (f) Dalaidian. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) kernels from the sites. (a) Wangzhuang. (b, d) Taomugang. (c) Nanyangsi. (e) Nansha. (f, g, i) Zhujia. (h) Koujia. Scale bar = 1 mm.

The internal structure of the fruit kernels

CT scanning helps us a lot in visualizing the internal structure as well as the external features of the jujube kernels. The results show that one-seeded kernels were predominant among the fruit kernels excavated from the sites (Fig. 4a, e, f), but two-seeded varieties were also found in some cultivated jujubes (Fig. 4b, d). At the same time, we also performed CT scans of the kernels of modern samples and found that most modern cultivated jujubes have two seeds (Fig. 5a,b), whereas sour jujube fruits have one or two seeds in the kernel (Fig. 5c,d), a typical feature that may be related to the frequency of variation and degree of evolution of jujube trees. In addition, the seeds in the kernels of sour jujube fruits are very saturated compared with cultivated jujube fruits, which may be related to the asexual reproduction of cultivated jujube fruits. Sour jujube fruits in the wild state mainly reproduce sexually, and the saturated kernels can improve the germination rate and the survival rate, whereas cultivated jujube fruits mainly reproduce asexually, and this characteristic gradually declines in the process of cultivation over a long period of time.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Three-dimensional structures were reconstructed using CT and the internal structure of jujube (ad) and sour jujube (e, f) in different views of the sites. (ac) Zhujia; (d) Wangzhuang; (e) Dalaidian; (f)Xiwusi. Scare bar = 2 mm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Three-dimensional structures reconstructed using CT and the internal structure of modern jujube (a, b) and sour jujube (c, d) in different views. (a) Zanhuangdazao; (b) Banzao; (c, d) Sour jujube. Scare bar = 2 mm.

Discussion

Evolution of kernel morphology during domestication of the jujube and sour jujube

Kernel size and shape serve as pivotal archaeological indicators for tracing the domestication of perennial woody plant fruits31,32. Measurements reveal a prominent difference in length between contemporary kernel specimens of jujubes and sour jujubes, while archaeological findings at sites highlight a significant contrast in diameter (Fig. 6a). Generally, cultivated jujube kernels are smaller than those of sour jujubes, a feature potentially linked to domestication. It is reasonable to consider the possibility of parallel evolution between the jujube and sour jujube33. The study demonstrates that the size and shape of the jujube kernel are primarily influenced by the corresponding dimensions of the fruit. A substantial correlation exists between the overall length of the fruit and the L/D ratio of the kernel. The primary edible portion of the jujube fruit is the mesocarp. With the elongation of the kernel during domestication, the mesocarp undergoes a corresponding increase in fullness, consequently expanding the edible portion of the fruit15,34.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Morphometrics of jujubes and sour jujubes. (a) Measurements of length and diameter of jujubes and sour jujubes. (b) Trends in the distribution of modern kernels L/D ratios. (c) Trends in the distribution of kernels L/D ratios from the sites.

Additionally, utilizing contemporary measurements of the L/D ratios of jujube and sour jujube, we classified the kernels at the archaeological site into species (Fig. 6b, c). The results indicate a distinct distribution range of L/D values for jujube and sour jujube within the archaeological context. However, a conspicuous linear trend in their L/D values over an extended period is notably absent. This lack of trend may be ascribed to inherent biometric variations among different varieties. The kernels collected from these sites originate from diverse regions, exhibiting noticeable differences in climatic conditions, soil composition, and management strategies. Additionally, a certain lag in the exchange of production technology between different communities during the Neolithic and Bronze Age, combined with ecological isolation stemming from both natural and human factors, ultimately contributed to the parallel evolution of distinct varieties.

Significantly, the L/D value of jujube kernels found in Han Dynasty tombs is recorded as 2.25, and historical documents indicate their affiliation with sour jujube35. Nevertheless, in accordance with our identification criteria and the analysis of morphological characteristics, the sour jujube specimens from these tombs exhibit features indicative of either an artificially domesticated variant or a hybrid form transitioning between sour jujube and jujube. Among the kernels excavated from the three Qi River basin sites, the four cultivated jujube kernels at the Zhujia and Wangzhuang sites (Fig. 3a, f, g, i) demonstrate L/D values ranging from 2.00 to 4.23. These kernels exhibit distinct morphological disparities when compared to sour jujubes, manifesting clear signs of domestication. Upon conducting CT scans, we observed that the two jujube kernels at the Zhujia site (Fig. 4a, b) appeared to have undergone extrusion and deformation during the charring process. I Furthermore, the internal structure of these kernels lacked integrity. Based on these observations, we posit that these cultivated jujube kernels may have been softer and deformed by external forces during the burial process. In the Qi River basin, a type of non-kernel jujube, referred to as “Ruanhemizao,” is present. It possesses fine kernels and a thin endocarp, assuming a slender fusiform shape36. This stands in stark contrast to the noticeable differences observed in other cultivated jujube kernels. The kernels unearthed from the Zhujia site exhibit a certain degree of similarity to “Ruanhemizao,” leading us to infer that the possibility of them belonging to the same species cannot be dismissed".

Early selection strategies for fruit trees in the Qi River Basin

Agricultural production and animal husbandry practices have a longstanding historical background in the Qi River basin of northern China, dating back to the Neolithic period21,37,38. During the Yangshao culture around 6000 BP, subsistence pattern based on agricultural cultivation supplemented by hunter-gathering was established39. Domestication and cultivation of plants added new lights into the broad spectrum of food choices and repertoire of diverse subsistence strategies. Additionally, the growing population pressure forced early communities to seek alternative food sources, making the utilization of fruit tree resources an excellent option 5,9,40. Notably, during this period, the domestication of the jujube entered a crucial stage in its development, significantly enriched the dietary practices of our earliest ancestors.

The intricate cultivation techniques required for the asexual propagation of fruit trees are considered the primary factor contributing to the delayed domestication of specific species 14,15,41,42. Wild populations typically rely on seed reproduction exclusively, and during domestication, the preservation of advantageous genes within a species becomes possible primarily through asexual reproduction. Among the earliest domestication practices, straightforward and convenient propagation techniques, such as cuttings, played a crucial role12. By employing methods like taking cuttings, early humans could obtain high-quality young plants, preserving specific inherited traits. Furthermore, throughout the domestication process, significant modifications can occur in the biological traits of fruit trees, encompassing changes in tree shape, leaf shape, and fruit shape. Notably, alterations in the size and shape of the fruit are inherently connected to the domestication process43,44.

During the initial stages of fruit tree selection, emphasis was placed on edibility; however, biological characteristics such as heightened resistance to pests and diseases, along with improved survival rates, are increasingly gaining significance in the pre-domestication cultivation phase9,12. In light of these considerations, jujube trees hold a distinct advantage in the expansive regions of northern China. The native variety of jujube in northern China is the sour jujube, characterized by widespread distribution and exceptional adaptability, including remarkable tolerance to drought, low soil fertility, saline soils, high temperatures, and late frosts35,45. These characteristics would have proven beneficial during the domestication and subsequent management by early populations. In the early selective domestication of fruit trees by humans, the specific utilization values of these trees have garnered scholarly interest46,47. Relevant studies have demonstrated that jujube is rich in sugar, calories, proteins, fats, and other nutritional values48. Furthermore, it surpasses fruits like apples, pears, and grapes in vitamin content and also exhibits certain medicinal properties49,50. Given this compelling evidence, the jujube tree undoubtedly stands out as one of the most worthwhile fruit trees chosen and cultivated by early communities during the Neolithic period.

Utilization of fruit in the middle and lower Yellow River basin of northern China

The distribution of wild populations plays a crucial role in determining the origin of cultivated crops50. The sour jujube stands out as one of the oldest wild fruit trees in East Asia, exhibiting widespread distribution throughout northern China, particularly in the mountainous and hilly regions of Shaanxi, Shanxi, Henan, Hebei, and Shandong35. Fossilized leaves of the sour jujube tree discovered in the Miocene Shanwang Flora in Linqu County, Shandong Province, China, closely resemble the leaf morphology of contemporary sour jujube51. This significant discovery indicates that sour jujubes were extensively distributed in northern China approximately 12 million years ago, providing substantial evidence for their native origin in China52. The traditional geographic distribution range of cultivated jujube overlaps with that of sour jujubes, implying the widespread distribution of the latter in northern China around 12 million years ago, establishing their native origin in China24. Subsequently, following thousands of years of domestication in this region, jujube trees were introduced to neighboring countries such as Korea and Japan, as well as Central Asia and Europe, through the Silk Road during the Han Dynasty in China about 2000 years ago44,53. Therefore, the distribution pattern of jujube and sour jujube suggests that both species originated in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River.

Ancient Chinese historical documents explicitly record details about both jujube and sour jujube. The Shijing, the earliest historical document documenting the cultivation of jujube trees, contains a description of "Jujube fruit picked in August and rice harvested in October," providing evidence that jujube trees were cultivated on a significant scale as early as 3000 years ago. Additionally, the Erya, an ancient text, offers information on 11 distinct cultivars of jujube trees that can be traced back over 2600 years 23. Furthermore, the Qi Min Yao Shu from the Northern Wei Dynasty (1500 BP) provides comprehensive instructions on seed selection, planting techniques, and processing methods for jujube paste. Works from the Ming and Qing dynasties, including Ben Cao Gang Mu (Compendium of Materia Medica) and Nong Zheng Quan Shu (Whole book on agricultural activities), also contain valuable records related to jujube45.

Jujube cultivation plays a significant role in traditional agroecosystems, with a long history in China. Evidence suggests that fruit trees have been cultivated and utilized in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River in northern China since the middle to late Neolithic period. The reasons behind the early cultivation and utilization of fruit trees are also a topic of great interest. The domestication of perennial fruit trees is a lengthy and intricate process, and the domestication of jujube trees in the Qi River basin approximately 6,000 years ago was not a mere coincidence. Furthermore, this time period coincided with the Holocene climatic optimum54,55. The warm and humid climate provided an ideal natural environment for the growth of fruit trees.

Additionally, the cultivation of crops such as millet through dry farming in the region reached a stage of intensive production around 6,000 BP. This achievement was made possible due to significant advancements during the Peiligang period (9000–7000 BP) and the early Yangshao period (7000–6000 BP). Food has always played a pivotal role in the advancement of human society and the establishment of civilization56.It serves as a fundamental prerequisite, providing a stable source of sustenance that contributes to population growth and the development of social classes40,57. Population pressure in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River increased during the late Yangshao period. Increased food resources were necessary for sustainable development due to the substantial growth in population. Consequently, early communities made an astute choice by diversifying food sources during that time. Moreover, the domestication of the jujube tree was influenced by the stratification of social classes. As fruits were traditionally considered luxury foods and offerings to ancestors, the association between fruits and celebrations may have motivated ancient farmers to dedicate extensive labor towards cultivating and further domesticating fruits in China40. In this context, the process of domesticating the jujube tree in the Qi River basin started and continued extensively. It is noteworthy that agricultural surpluses facilitated the emergence of resident specialists who were liberated from food production58. This spurred the innovation and advancement of agricultural production technologies, providing technical assurance for the domestication and cultivation of jujube trees. In conclusion, the warm and humid climate, population pressure, and accumulation of production technologies have presented practical opportunities for jujube tree domestication in the Qi River basin.

Conclusion

A comprehensive comparative analysis was conducted on kernel remains obtained from the Qi River basin in northern China, along with kernels from 11 distinct sites of varying periods in northern China, alongside modern specimens. This study employed a systematic morphological approach. Based on our measurements of modern fruit kernels, we identified that the extant sour jujube had L/D values ranging from 1.19 to 1.68, while the extant cultivated jujube had ratios that ranged from 2.28 to 6.37. Additionally, we observed that the L/D values of the two were distributed above and below the threshold value of 1.9, indicating a clear distribution boundary. Utilizing the observed distribution pattern, we classified the kernels on the site into different species. Our findings indicate clear distinctions in the kernel morphology of jujube and its cultivated counterpart, featuring pointed ends and elongated shapes typical of domestication. This adaptation was largely driven by the need to increase the thickness of the mesocarp, subsequently enhancing the edible portion of the fruit to meet human food demands. It is noteworthy that the domestication features of the four jujube kernels found at the Zhujia and Wangzhuang sites in the Qi River basin are prominent, and their morphological traits bear a striking resemblance to certain modern cultivated jujube varieties. This indicates that jujube cultivation began in the Qi River basin around 6200 BP at the latest. The discovery of jujube kernel remains dating back to approximately 6000 BP in central China provides compelling phytoarchaeological evidence for the domestication of jujube trees during the Neolithic period in northern China.

Materials and methods

Plant guidelines statement

All the samples involved in our study were collected in a legal and compliant manner, in full compliance with relevant institutional, national and international guidelines and regulations. The charred fruit kernels from the archaeological sites of Nanyangsi, Xipu, Xiwusi, Taomugang, Nansha, Zhujia, Dalaiidan, Wangzhuang and Koujia covered in this paper were collected by The Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) during previous archaeological excavations and are published for the first time. Modern sour jujube kernel specimens were obtained from The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species (Kunming, Yunnan Province, China), and cultivated jujube kernels were collected by IVPP in the core areas of different cultivated jujube species.

Archeological sample collection

In June 2021, we cooperated with The Palace Museum and the Henan Provincial Institute of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology to collect samples from three sites: Dalaidian, Zhujia, and Wangzhuang (Supplementary Fig. S1). In addition, we collected charred kernels from six sites in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River in northern China, including Nanyangsi, Xipo, Xiwusi, Taomugang, Nansha and Koujia, as supporting materials for this study, and the relevant samples are preserved in the Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The samples were obtained primarily from ash pits that were buried within the strata or from sections that contained cultural layers. To prepare the samples for analysis, we used a flotation technique to separate the organic material. Subsequently, we collected the results of the flotation, dried them in a cool and well-ventilated area, and transported them back to the Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. At the laboratory, the samples were carefully sorted, classified, identified, photographed, and analyzed using a Leica M205 C stereo microscope and LAS V4.12 software. The identified phytoarchaeological remains can be broadly categorized into three types, namely charred cereal seeds, weed seeds, and kernels. Among these, charred cereal seeds are the most dominant. Fruit kernels are less frequently encountered and comprise only a small fraction of the excavated plant remains.

Chronology

A total of four AMS dating samples were selected from the Dalaidian, Wangzhuang, and Zhujia sites, of which one charred millet seed and one charcoal sample were selected from the Zhujia site in T3-1 and T2-6, respectively. A charcoal sample was selected from the Dalaidian site at a depth of 270 cm in Sections 1–1. A charcoal sample from the ash pit 2–4 was selected from the Wangzhuang site. The samples used for AMS14C dating were completed on the Beta Lab, and the dating results were corrected according to the Intcal20 calibration curve using the software Calib 8.20 (http://calib.org).

Modern sample

The middle and lower Yellow River basin in northern China is widely recognized as the region where jujube originated earliest and underwent domestication. In order to thoroughly study the morphological changes of jujube during domestication and cultivation, we collected the six most common cultivars and three sour jujube varieties from Gansu, Shaanxi, Shanxi, Henan, Hebei, Shandong, and Inner Mongolia provinces (Supplementary Figs. S2, S3). Subsequently, we measured the morphology of their kernels. Specifically, ten kernels were randomly selected from each variety and their mean value was measured.

Morphological analysis

Morphometric methods have been extensively utilized in the analysis of cereals, legumes, and fruits to examine population variations, and their validity has been widely confirmed59,60. Jujube and sour jujube kernels present distinct morphological differences, which can be accurately assessed through simple morphometric measurements. Consequently, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of jujube kernels excavated from archaeological sites located in the middle and lower regions of the Yellow River in northern China. This analysis primarily involved measurements of kernel length and diameter (Supplementary Table S2).

Image acquisition

Computed Tomography (CT) is an ideal non-destructive technique for studying the internal structure of samples, allowing the acquisition of thousands of continuous images that can be used to produce accurate reconstructions of internal morphology61. To observe the internal structure of date palm kernels more clearly, we performed 225kV three-dimensional fossil micro-CT (225-3D-μCT) scans on some date palm kernels. The raw projections were converted to tomographic slices in raw format using IVPP225kVCT_Recon software, then the raw tomograms were imported into VGstudio 2.2 software and saved. Tiff files, and finally imported into Mimics 19.0 software to obtain images of the 3D structures and different views.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures. (763.3KB, docx)
Supplementary Table S1. (13.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table S2. (17.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the sample assistance of Professor Wang Rui and Dr. Su Tianmin from the Palace Museum, as well as the Hebi City Cultural Relics and Archaeology Task Force. The financial support include National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0801102), the CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (YSBR-019), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 41888101), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2022071).

Author contributions

Y.L., X.Z., N.S., and X.L. Designed the study. Y.L. carried out a major part of the laboratory analyses and wrote the first manuscript of the paper. K.Z. and J.L. contributed to data interpretation and the revision of the manuscript. G.C., Y.Z. and J.M. Participated in field work and sample collection.

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained an error in the Acknowledgements section. Full information regarding the correction made can be found in the correction for this article.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

5/2/2024

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41598-024-60573-x

Contributor Information

Xinying Zhou, Email: zhouxinying@ivpp.ac.cn.

Nan Sun, Email: sunnan@chd.edu.cn.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-52260-8.

References

  • 1.Diamond J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature. 2002;418:700–707. doi: 10.1038/nature01019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zohary D, Hopf M, Weiss E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The origin and Spread of Domesticated Plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin. Oxford University Press; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zeder MA. Core questions in domestication research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015;112:3191–3198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501711112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Purugganan MD, Fuller DQ. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature. 2009;457:843–848. doi: 10.1038/nature07895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hancock JF. Contributions of domesticated plant studies to our understanding of plant evolution. Ann. Bot. 2005;96:953–963. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fuller DQ, et al. The domestication process and domestication rate in rice: Spikelet Bases from the Lower Yangtze. Science. 2009;323:1607–1610. doi: 10.1126/science.1166605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abbo S, Gopher A, Lev-Yadun S. Fruit Domestication in the Near East. In: Janick J, editor. Plant Breeding Reviews. Wiley; 2015. pp. 325–378. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Janick J. Plant Breeding Reviews. Wiley; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stevens C, Lucas L. Archaeobotany: Plant Domestication, in Reference Module in Social Sciences. Elsevier; 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A, Abbo S. The cradle of agriculture. Science. 2000;288:1602–1603. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5471.1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Allaby RG. Two domestications for grapes. Science. 2023;379:880–881. doi: 10.1126/science.adg6617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zohary D, Spiegel-Roy P. Beginnings of Fruit Growing in the Old World: Olive, grape, date, and fig emerge as important Bronze Age additions to grain agriculture in the Near East. Science. 1975;187:319–327. doi: 10.1126/science.187.4174.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dong Y, et al. Dual domestications and origin of traits in grapevine evolution. Science. 2023;379:892–901. doi: 10.1126/science.add8655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kislev ME, Hartmann A, Bar-Yosef O. Early domesticated fig in the Jordan valley. Science. 2006;312:1372–1374. doi: 10.1126/science.1125910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Janick J. The origins of fruits, fruit growing, and fruit breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 2010;25:255–321. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li QW, Chen JY, Zhang QX. Carbonized stones fruit from underground at Peiligang Historical Site in Xinzheng, Henan Province. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2007;29:59–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li YQ. Current situation and consideration of the economy research on means of livelihood in Peiligang Culture. Cult. Relics Southern China. 2018;30:41–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li YQ, et al. The excavation of the Peiligang site of Xinzheng City, Henan, 2018–2019. Chin. J. Archaeol. 2020;85:521–632. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang JP, et al. Early mixed farming of millet and rice 7800 years ago in the middle Yellow River region, China. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e52146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhong H, Li XW, Wang WL, Yang LP, Zhao ZJ. Preliminary research of the farming production pattern in the Central Plain area during the Miaodigou Period. Quat. Sci. 2020;40:472–485. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bettinger RL, Barton L, Morgan C. The origins of food production in north China: A different kind of agricultural revolution. Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev. 2010;19:9–21. doi: 10.1002/evan.20236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.James ER, Michael FF, Quentin CBC, Diane B, Mark WC. A phylogenetic analysis of Rhamnaceae using rbcL and trnL-F plastid DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 2000;87:1309–1324. doi: 10.2307/2656724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qu ZZ, Wu SY. Questions about the origin of jujube cultivation. J. Beijing Univ. Agric. 1983;1:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu MJ, et al. The complex jujube genome provides insights into fruit tree biology. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:5315. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang LH, et al. Genome size variation within species of Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill) and its wild ancestor sour jujube (Z. acidojujuba Cheng et Liu) Forests. 2019;10:460. doi: 10.3390/f10050460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guo MX, et al. Genomic analyses of diverse wild and cultivated accessions provide insights into the evolutionary history of jujube. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021;19:517–531. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li RH, Li XG, Huang J, Gao WH. Genetic relationship of Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba) and sour jujube (Z. spinosa) based on RAPD markers. J. Fruit Sci. 2012;29:366–373. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang CM, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of sour jujube, Ziziphus acidojujuba. Tree Genet. Genomes. 2015;11:809. doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0809-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yan H. A preliminary study on the domestication of Chinese dates. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun N. Charcoal fossil record of holocene vegetation and agricultural activities in the Southeastern Loess Plateau. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.He YH, et al. Study on the change pattern of jujube fruit kernel. Non-wood For. Res. 1997;03:14–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fuller DQ. Long and attenuated: Comparative trends in the domestication of tree fruits. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2018;27:165–176. doi: 10.1007/s00334-017-0659-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Went FW. Parallel evolution. Taxon. 1971;20:197–226. doi: 10.2307/1218877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fuller DQ, Stevens CJ. Between domestication and civilization: The role of agriculture and arboriculture in the emergence of the first urban societies. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2019;28:263–282. doi: 10.1007/s00334-019-00727-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Qu ZZ. Fruit Trees of China: Jujube. China Forestry Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Su HP, Liu XY, Chang FX. Rare and precious varieties of jujube trees—Ruanhemizao. For. Sci. Technol. 1982;11:19–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lu H, et al. Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009;106:7367–7372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900158106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.He KY, Lu HY, Zhang JP, Wang C. Holocene spatiotemporal millet agricultural patterns in northern China: A dataset of archaeobotanical macroremains. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2022;14:4777–4791. doi: 10.5194/essd-14-4777-2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jia X, et al. Agricultural adaptations to topography and climate changes in Central China during the mid- to late-Holocene. Holocene. 2021;31:1705–1715. doi: 10.1177/09596836211033201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shen H, Li XQ. From extensive collection to intensive cultivation, the role of fruits and nuts in subsistence economy on Chinese Loess Plateau. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 2021;13:61. doi: 10.1007/s12520-020-01255-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kislev ME, et al. Response to comment on "early domesticated fig in the jordan valley". Science. 2006;314:1683–1683. doi: 10.1126/science.1133748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fuller DQ, Allaby RG, Stevens C. Domestication as innovation: The entanglement of techniques, technology and chance in the domestication of cereal crops. World Archaeol. 2010;42:13–28. doi: 10.1080/00438240903429680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fuller DQ, Lucas L, Carretero LG, Stevens C. From intermediate economies to agriculture: Trends in wild food use, domestication and cultivation among early villages in southwest Asia. Paléorient. 2010;44:59–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu DH, Ye XQ, Jiang YM. Chinese Dates: A Traditional Functional Food. CRC Press; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu MJ, et al. The historical and current research progress on jujube–A superfruit for the future. Hortic. Res. 2020;7:119. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00346-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.An CB, et al. How prehistoric humans use plant resources to adapt to environmental change: A case study in the western Chinese Loess Plateau during Qijia Period. Holocene. 2014;24:512–517. doi: 10.1177/0959683613520259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jiang HE, et al. The discovery of Capparis spinosa L. (Capparidaceae) in the Yanghai Tombs (2800 years BP), NW China, and its medicinal implications. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007;113:409–420. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2007.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Paudel MR, Poudeyal MR, Devkota HP. Ziziphus spp (Ziziphus jujuba Mill, Ziziphus mauritiana Lam) Himal. Fruits Berries. 2023 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85591-4.00013-15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shahrajabian MH, Sun W, Cheng Q. Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill): A promising fruit from traditional chinese medicine. Ann. Univ. Paedagog Cracoviensis Stud. Nat. 2020 doi: 10.24917/25438832.5.135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jia JX, Jia DX, Ren QM. Chinese Crops and Their Wild Relatives: Fruit Trees Volume. China Agriculture Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chaney, R. W. A Miocene flora from Shantung province, China (Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1940).
  • 52.Huang J, et al. Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers and analysis of chloroplast diversity in Chinese Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill) and Wild Jujube (Ziziphus acidojujuba Mill) PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0134519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stănică F. Twenty years of jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill) research in Romania. Sci. Pap. Ser. B Hortic. 2019;63:17–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang PY, et al. Climate and environment at the Holocene climatic optimum in China. Sci. China Ser. B-Chem. Life Sci. Earth Sci. Chin. 1993;23:865–873. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen FH, et al. Holocene thermal maximum mode versus the continuous warming mode: Problems of data-model comparisons and future research prospects. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2023;66:1683–1701. doi: 10.1007/s11430-022-1113-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Heiser Jr, C. B. Seed to civilization: The story of man’s food. Seed Civiliz. Story Mans Food (1973).
  • 57.Liu L, Chen X. The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Cambridge University Pres; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Childe VG. The urban revolution. Town Plan. Rev. 1950;21:3–17. doi: 10.3828/tpr.21.1.k853061t614q42qh. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Pagnoux C, et al. Inferring the agrobiodiversity of Vitis vinifera L. (grapevine) in ancient Greece by comparative shape analysis of archaeological and modern seeds. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 2015;24:75–84. doi: 10.1007/s00334-014-0482-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chen GH, et al. Morphotype broadening of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) from Oxus civilization 4000 BP. Central Asia. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:16331. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19644-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang YF, et al. Development and applications of paleontological computed tomography. Vertebr. Palasiat. 2019;57:84. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures. (763.3KB, docx)
Supplementary Table S1. (13.2KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table S2. (17.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES