Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 22;30(12):1264–1271. doi: 10.1111/acem.14782

Early Emergency Department Experience with 7-day Extended-Release Injectable Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder

Gail D’Onofrio 1,2, Jeanmarie Perrone 3, Kathryn F Hawk 1,2, Ethan Cowan 4,1, Ryan McCormack 5, Edouard Coupet Jr 1, Patricia H Owens 1, Shara H Martel 1, Kristen Huntley 6, Sharon L Walsh 7, Michelle R Lofwall 7, Andrew Herring 8; ED-INNOVATION Investigators
PMCID: PMC10822018  NIHMSID: NIHMS1920933  PMID: 37501652

Abstract

As the opioid overdose epidemic escalates, there is an urgent need for treatment innovations to address both patient and clinician barriers when initiating buprenorphine in the emergency department (ED). These include insurance status, logistical challenges such as the ability to fill a prescription, transportation, concerns regarding diversion, and availability of urgent referral sites. Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) preparations such as a new 7-day injectable could potentially solve some of these issues. We describe the pharmacokinetics of a new 7-day XR-BUP formulation and the feasibility of its use in the ED setting. We report our early experiences with this medication, (investigational drug CAM2038) in the context of an ongoing clinical trial entitled, Emergency Department-Initiated BUP VAlidaTION (ED INNOVATION), to inform emergency clinicians as they consider incorporating this medication into their practice. The medication was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2018 and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2023 for those 18 years or older for the treatment of moderate to severe opioid use disorder (OUD). We report our experience with approximately 800 ED patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) who received the 7-day XR-BUP preparation in the ED between 6/2020–7/2023.

Keywords: Medications for opioid use disorder, opioid use disorder treatment, injectable buprenorphine

Introduction

New frontline treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) are critical as the opioid overdose epidemic continues to claim lives.1,2,3 The year 2022 was the deadliest to date, with over 109,680 people dying from a drug overdose in the 12 months prior to 12/2022. Among those, 79,770 deaths were attributed to opioids, largely driven by the potent synthetic opioid fentanyl and its derivatives.4 From 2016–2017 alone, the Emergency Department (ED) visits for opioid overdose have increased by nearly 30%.5 Evidence demonstrates that after an ED visit for a non-fatal opioid overdose, patients have a 5% mortality rate within the first year, with a high proportion dying within a month of their ED discharge. If treated with buprenorphine or methadone the mortality rate was decreased more than 50%.6,7 ED-initiated buprenorphine (BUP) has been shown to be effective in rapidly reducing withdrawal and engaging patients in formal addiction treatment.8 ED BUP prescribing increased from 12.3 per 100,000 ED visits in 2002–2003 to 42.8 per 100,000 ED visits in 2016–2017 (odds ratio for linear trend: 3.31; 95% CI: 1.04–10.5),9 with a recent report citing a 300% increase in the number of emergency physicians buprenorphine prescribers from 2016–2021.10 Unfortunately, this increase in number of prescribers was not accompanied by an increase in the number of buprenorphine prescriptions, leading to the conclusion that widespread adoption has lagged. Potential barriers point to stigma, logistical issues regarding patients’ insurance status, ability to fill prescriptions, transportation, the availability of timely follow-up, and concerns about diversion/legal repercussions if prescribing any BUP.11,12,13,14 While very recent federal policies reduced (2021)15 or removed (2023)16 the DATA 2000 X-waiver requirements for any DEA-licensed practitioner to prescribe, substantial increases in buprenorphine access have as yet not been documented.17,10

The ability to administer an extended-release (XR) preparation of BUP potentially addresses many of these challenges, allowing more time to access follow-up care while providing continued medication for a longer duration. XR preparations assure continuation of treatment due to their long duration of action, even if unpleasant or bothersome symptoms occur during induction that can sometimes discourage adherence to daily transmucosal BUP therapy. One FDA -approved and marketed XR-BUP preparation, (Sublocade®), provides the equivalent to one month of medication with a single injection. A second XR preparation, available as weekly and monthly formulations of XR-BUP, received approval as of May 23, 2023, and will be marketed (Brixadi®) in the U.S. for individuals 18 years or old with OUD.18 It is already approved for use in OUD for patients 16-yearold age or older in Europe and Australia.19 Our objective is to report our early experiences with this first U.S. available 7-day XR-BUP preparation (previously known as investigational drug CAM2038) in the context of an ongoing ED research protocol entitled, “Emergency DepartmentINitiated bupreNOrphine VAlidaTION; ED INNOVATION.20 This randomized clinical trial is currently enrolling individuals with OUD comparing traditional sublingual BUP initiation with the 7-day XR-BUP injectable on outcomes of engagement in treatment at 7 and 30 days.

Pharmacokinetics of Buprenorphine

BUP is a semi-synthetic, highly lipophilic, partial opioid agonist with very high affinity at the μopioid receptor. It is primarily available as a transmucosal film or tablet preparation with or without naloxone for treatment of OUD. SL-BUP is readily and rapidly absorbed through oral mucosal membranes.21 Patients are advised to keep the SL tablet or the film under the tongue for approximately 2–6 minutes for complete absorption. Despite rapid absorption, SL-BUP has low bioavailability (40%), which is why relatively large doses are needed to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations.22 Once in plasma and bound to the μ-opioid receptor, buprenorphine has a slow rate of dissociation producing a prolonged duration of action as compared to other opioids.23 It has a large volume of distribution, high protein binding17 and reaches its peak plasma concentration in ~60 minutes after administration, yet there is wide inter-individual variation in both rate of absorption and peak plasma concentrations.18 After 60 minutes, plasma concentrations drop quickly but with a 32-hour terminal half-life, buprenorphine remains available for binding to the μ-receptor for a prolonged period, albeit at decreasing concentrations.24 (Figure 1)

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Linear plasma concentration-time curves of buprenorphine after a single dose of 16 mg sublingual buprenorphine and a single dose of 24 mg subcutaneous CAM2038

Figure 1 reference: CAM2038 Investigators Brochure, Braeburn Inc, Edition 17, 5 April 2023

Long-acting injectable formulations of BUP potentially offer advantages over daily preparations when initiating BUP in ED patients and for improving retention in treatment. Sublocade® a 30-day XR formulation, is available in 100mg and 300mg doses and could potentially have ED applications. However, it is approved by the FDA for administration only after a 7- day lead-in with SL-BUP making its use in the ED impractical. Its rapid rise in blood plasma levels also precludes use in low levels of withdrawal. Off-label rapid Sublocade® initiations have been described in case series only.25 A 7-day XR-BUP preparation that does not require a SL-BUP lead-in period may be very advantageous in an acute care setting. The assured 7 days of medication (with the weekly product) after injection addresses the typically fragmented care hand-off faced by ED patients and the previously mentioned barriers to successful full induction. While an XRformulation in the high-risk period after an ED visit is of potential clinical value, the long-term outcomes require further study. A previous study of a commercially insured cohort did not find advantages in retention of individuals receiving XR medications for OUD, though few patients received XR-BUP and follow up was limited.26

The XR product used in ED-INNOVATION is a 7-day subcutaneous injectable extended preparation of BUP. The 7-day XR-BUP product is available in 8, 16, 24 and 32mg prefilled syringes, which produce plasma concentrations roughly equivalent to daily doses of SL-BUP of ≤ 6mg, 8–10mg, 12–26mg and 18–24mg, respectively.27 After subcutaneous injection of 24mg, plasma concentrations achieve 1.63ng/ml within 4 hours, and 2.35ng/ml at 6 hours. This concentration is associated with μ-opioid receptor binding and activation, which suppresses opioid craving, diminishing reward from full agonists (e.g., fentanyl) and mitigating opioid withdrawal; peak BUP plasma concentrations are typically achieved within 20 hours.28,29, 30 The bioavailability of this product is 6–8 times higher than that of SL-BUP, meaning a lower total dose is needed to achieve equivalent plasma concentrations (Figure 1).31 The terminal half-life is between 70–107 hours, making it suitable for weekly dosing.32 The safety profile of the 7-day XR-BUP product is similar to that of SL-BUP with the exception of mild-to-moderate injection site pain which has been reported in a small number of patients receiving the injection.27, 28

Figure 2 depicts the 7-day XR-BUP syringe. Upon injection XR-BUP forms into a viscous liquid crystalline gel that encapsulates the buprenorphine solution. Over time, the gel biodegrades, releasing BUP at a steady rate over a 1-week period, thus producing a sustained, circulating blood concentration of BUP--avoiding the daily peaks and troughs inherent to daily dosing. The prefilled syringes come in different doses, all in small volumes (< 1 mL). In ED INNOVATION we administer a single 24mg weekly injection dose (without a SL-BUP prescription upon ED discharge), equivalent to the standard ED discharge dosing of 16mg of SL-BUP daily with a weeklong prescription.

Figure 2. Brixadi Injection Instructions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2 reference: Brixadi Prescribing Information, Braeburn Inc, reference ID: 5178299 May 2023

Initial Clinical Trials of CAM2038

Clinical trials of the CAM2038 product have demonstrated non-inferiority to SL-BUP for multiple outcomes. In the clinical trial reported in the FDA application for CAM2038, the response rate, defined as no evidence of illicit opioid use at several pre-specified time points, was found to be noninferior to SL-BUP.33 In the same study, CAM2038 was found to be superior to SL-BUP on the mean percentage of opioid negative urine samples for weeks 4–24 of outpatient treatment.33 Retention in treatment, desire to use opioids and severity of opioid withdrawal signs and symptoms as measured using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) were similar between the CAM2038 and SL-BUP groups.33 A subsequent Phase 3, open-label, multicenter observational study demonstrated that rates of retention in care among patients receiving the CAM2038 product was high, 73.6% at 48-weeks, and the majority [68%, (91/133)] of study participants rated CAM2038 as much better than their previous SL-BUP treatment. Only 4/133 (3%) indicated it was worse.27 The FDA initially approved CAM2038 based on safety and efficacy, but did not allow the manufacturer to bring the medication to market due to an exclusivity clause delay allowed by another manufacturer of a monthly injectable buprenorphine product 34 until May 2023.18

Ongoing ED Clinical Trial of 7-day Injectable XR-BUP Preparation

ED INNOVATION is an ongoing multisite study funded as part of the NIH HEAL InitiativeSM effort to increase access to medications for OUD (MOUD) in general medical settings and to rapidly expand access to ED-initiated BUP. We describe this trial so that the context in which we are administering and the experience with this new 7-day XR-BUP preparation can be understood. A total of 28 diverse EDs (Figure 3) in both type (academic/community), and location (urban/suburban) throughout the U.S. have or are continuing to enroll in ED INNOVATION comparing different preparations of BUP. To date, approximately 1600 patients have been enrolled, half of which received the XR-BUP preparation. All patients are 18 years or older with untreated OUD and are English speaking. They must be in at least mild withdrawal with a Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) 35 score of 4 or greater to receive the injection.36 In the overall trial thus far, only 3% of the eligible individuals refused randomization. Patients are observed in the ED for 2 hours after receiving XR-BUP and discharged with a follow-up appointment for comprehensive addiction treatment within 7 days. It is expected that referral clinicians discuss options that include continuing buprenorphine, including 30-day injectable XR-BUP preparations, depending on patient preference and insurance. One investigator (AH) has successfully transitioned approximately 50 participants to long-acting, 30-day, XR-BUP.37 Follow-up discussion with patients who received the injection have been positive, pointing towards the potential of ED administered 7-day XR-BUP to motivate continued maintenance and treatment engagement, including long-acting 30-day XR-BUP preparations.

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Geographic Location of 28 RCT sites

Feasibility of Implementation and Training of ED Staff on XR-BUP

ED nurses in all 28 sites were trained to administer XR-BUP with minimal added instructions as the syringe is similar to other prefilled injectables (e.g., enoxaparin) used in ED care. Importantly, it does not require refrigeration making it feasible to store in the ED rather than a central pharmacy. There are a few specific caveats: (1) the first subcutaneous injection should not be given in the arm, but can be administered in the upper gluteal area, thigh, or abdomen and (2) the injection site should not be rubbed post-injection. (Figure 2) The upper arm site should only be used after steady state (4 consecutive doses) as this site was associated with approximately 10% lower plasma levels than other sites.38 Few patients refuse the injection. The nursing staff assist in overcoming any hesitancy regarding the injection by reassurance of the small size of the injection needle (23-gauge) and the small volume of fluid (< 1mL).

Patient Experience

While we are not presenting formal qualitative data from participants receiving XR-BUP at this time, the investigators did receive patient feedback during follow-up clinical interactions. Patients articulated that receiving XR-BUP in the ED was a welcome new option. Both ED clinicians and referral clinicians report a high level of enthusiasm for the 7-day XR-BUP formulation. (Table 1) One patient was incarcerated briefly during the following week and expressed gratitude for not facing withdrawal symptoms while in jail. Thus, having the extended duration of medication afforded by the injectable depot formulation for the first week of outpatient treatment seemed to be a stabilizing force, potentially mitigating early treatment ambivalence about taking daily buprenorphine and other barriers (e.g., pharmacy access).39

Table 1.

Illustrative quotations: ED and referral clinicians, and patients receiving XR-BUP (CAM2038)

Quote
ED Nurses
“I’m all set with how to give this injection, it very similar to XXX which we give all the time”
This (injection) is actually really nice, easy to administer”
Patient experience
“Dr...you treated me with a shot in my stomach, I’m still doing great. I praise you for helping me restore normalcy back in my life. I referred another person to you for help with opioid addiction.”
“I definitely want to get that follow-up shot. I love how I have been feeling with this shot and not having to worry about anything now. I am so glad I came to the hospital that day and got a chance to take the shot. I am excited to have started this journey & taking my freedom back 1 day at a time.”
“Took away the ritual of still taking a pill everyday which was triggering for me”
“I heard about the shot I want it. I came here just for the chance to get the shot”
“It was the most amazing medication I’ve ever taken before because it saved my life”.
“I did not feel a thing (from injection)”
Referred Treatment clinician experience
“Thank you, your team enrolled one of my toughest to engage patients”
“Thank you for allowing us to do what’s best for the patient”

Precipitated Withdrawal

As there has been mounting concern about precipitating opioid withdrawal during BUP initiation in the era of fentanyl, we briefly discuss our experience to reassure ED clinicians.40, 41 BUP precipitated withdrawal (PW), in contrast to worsening withdrawal which emerges more gradually over time, has been described as the sudden onset of severe withdrawal signs and symptoms, usually within 1 hour of administration of SL-BUP,42, 43 similar to what happens when a patient with opioid physical dependence receives a large dose of the opioid receptor full antagonist naloxone. Assessment of PW is based on the rapidity of onset of severe withdrawal symptoms, often with substantial increases in COWS scores (≥ 5) necessitating treatment with additional buprenorphine and ancillary medications.

Based on our experiences with all forms of buprenorphine, the concerns over PW with fentanyl use appear to be overstated, as the incidence of PW was < 1%. 44 Only 4 patients who received XR-BUP experienced PW (< 0.5%). There were no clear patient characteristics predictive of PW. All had fentanyl in their point of care urine testing, as did ~76% of the overall sample. The time since last opioid use varied, as did the route of opioid administration.44

The treatment of PW does not differ based on the preparation of buprenorphine received. Worsening withdrawal, defined as no improvement in withdrawal symptoms or any increase in COWS is treated with additional SL-BUP, followed by symptomatic treatment with ancillary medications, such as acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents for myalgias and pains, dicyclomine for abdominal pain, loperamide for diarrhea, ondansetron, prochlorperazine or promethazine for nausea and clonidine for elevated blood pressure, heart rate or restlessness. Treatment of nausea and vomiting with sedating antiemetics such as promethazine, may have dual benefit in patients who might be agitated. When PW occurs, it is treated with high-dose buprenorphine (SL-BUP up to 16–24mg, with additional dosing as needed)45,46 Small doses of benzodiazepines, such as 2mg of lorazepam may be used if anxiety is a prominent symptom. Large doses of benzodiazepines in combination with BUP could potentially result in excessive sedation and requires close-clinical observation. A recent retrospective cohort study of high-dose buprenorphine found the practice to be safe and well tolerated in uncomplicated patients with OUD.47 Oral medications, including additional SL-BUP can be challenging to deliver in patients with PW due to vomiting or reluctance by the participant to receive further dosing. Intravenous access may be beneficial so that medications are more easily administered, titratable and more rapidly therapeutic. Early use of intravenous fluids in patients with multiple episodes of vomiting and diarrhea can help mitigate fluid loss and prevent dehydration contributing to headache, malaise, and nausea.45 Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, has also been more recently used as an adjunct in the treatment of PW by the authors45, but has yet to been studied vigorously.

Referral to Community Providers or Treatment Program

All patients should be referred to community providers or opioid treatment programs for follow up with a specific scheduled appointment. The clinicians and programs should be alerted to information regarding the duration of XR-BUP and the patient needs to be discharged with instructions denoting the XR-BUP administration and communication to the referral clinician to resume or initiate buprenorphine in some formulation ideally before day eight. While it is possible that some individuals who receive XR-BUP may need additional SL-BUP to fully manage their withdrawal symptoms after discharge we do not routinely recommend prescribing additional SL-BUP, as we are using the equivalent to 16mg per day dosing. As with most medications, treatment response is variable and some patients may experience symptom control for longer than 7 days, others substantially shorter. Additional dosing of BUP should be based on clinical assessment by the referral clinician.

Discussion

The vast majority of individuals in this trial tolerated 7-day XR-BUP injectable, even at low levels of withdrawal (COWS scores of 4), allowing for initiation of BUP early in an ED visit. Despite reports suggesting that fentanyl is a major risk factor for PW, we did not see this in our study ED population.44 It is plausible that the ED environment allows the clinicians to initiate BUP without major hesitation as the resources for treating PW are readily available. We share our experiences with this new 7-day XR-BUP formulation to assist other clinicians treating OUD as medication will be available in the near future. XR-BUP should be of great interest to emergency clinicians as a tool to provide flexibility in addressing both clinician concerns and patient barriers during the crucial early period in BUP initiation.

The following are lessons and pearls from patients and clinicians. First and foremost, despite a high prevalence of fentanyl use, PW was rare in our experience and the ED length of stay postinjection was short, only 2 hours. Early observations suggest relatively rapid onset and sustained positive clinical effects that are not dependent on successful attainment of a dispensed prescription of additional SL-BUP in the week following their injection. If the patient presents in severe withdrawal, it is likely that a rescue dose of SL-BUP may be required in the ED along with the injection. A smooth transition to a monthly XR-BUP injectable has been reported in multiple patients and offers potential for increased retention in treatment and several other potential benefits. It is possible that consistent blood levels without peaks and troughs are beneficial to sustain treatment and decrease craving. Patients may also benefit from not having to make daily decisions regarding taking their medication, or other circumstances such as having their medication lost, stolen, confiscated, unable to be continued in short term jail stays, or experiencing pressure to share, sell, divert, or misuse their medications. Finally, the protective effects of an XR-BUP preparation may be more and more important as the proliferation of fentanyl increases the risk of overdose dramatically even with a brief reoccurrence of use.

Initiating buprenorphine treatment by providing full induction dosing and maintenance for 7 days has the potential to improve engagement in ongoing care along the cascade of care, including initiation and retention at 6 months.48 It has recently been reported that engagement in care is a threshold process. Williams and colleagues studied over 19,000 patients with a new buprenorphine initiation episode in primary care. They reported that attainment of the definition of Health Effectiveness and Data Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures for substance use disorders engagement, namely two professional visits within 34 days from an initiation visit for medications for OUD, was met in almost half of patients retained at 6 months. Perhaps even more importantly, only 2.9% who did not meet these criteria, were engaged in care at 6 months.49 Thus, it is conceivable that a 7-day XR BUP preparation with a direct referral may be a first step to meeting this critical threshold along the treatment pathway, by stabilizing patients early. To date, robust data evaluating any form of XR-BUP is quite limited, and we await further trial completions. However, early clinical experience indicates the 7-day XR-BUP injectable eliminates many of the logistical obstacles that occur between ED initiation of BUP and the first follow up visit.

Limitations

We are reporting our early experience with a 7-day XR-BUP injectable, in ED patients with untreated OUD. We did not plan any interim analyses of primary and secondary outcomes in ED INNOVATION. Thus, there may be other negative experiences with this long-acting preparation that are not yet identified.

Supplementary Material

SUPINFO

Funding:

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH HEAL Initiativesm under award numbers UG1DA015831 and UG1DA013035. This research is also supported by the Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse, under contract numbers HHSN271201500065C & 75N95020D00012 (Clinical Coordinating Center, the Emmes Company) and 75N95019D00013 (Data and Statistics Center, the Emmes Company). Braeburn provided CAM2038 free of charge for use in the trial under a written agreement with NIDA.

Footnotes

Summary and Implications

ED-BUP initiation with a recent FDA approved 7-day XR-BUP injectable preparation, is safe and well tolerated, potentially addressing many barriers to care.

Disclaimer

This manuscript reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions, views, and official policy or position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or any of its affiliated institutions or agencies.

*

A complete list of the ED-INNOVATION investigators is provided in the Appendix

Conflicts of Interest: Dr’s Huntley’s spouse is eligible for a defined benefit plan through Pfizer from previous employment. The remaining authors have no competing interests to disclose.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wang QQ, Kaelber DC, Xu R. and Volkow ND, 2021. COVID-19 risk and outcomes in patients with substance use disorders: analyses from electronic health records in the United States. Molecular psychiatry, 26(1), pp.30–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Volkow Nora D. Collision of the COVID-19 and addiction epidemics.2020.Ann Int Med:61–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.D’Onofrio G, McCormack RP, Hawk K. Emergency departments—a 24/7/365 option for combating the opioid crisis. N Engl J Med. 2018. Dec 27;379(26):2487–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NCHS, National Vital Statistics System. 2015-2021. (available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality_public_use_data.htm) Accessed on May 23, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vivolo-Kantor AM, Hoots BE, Scholl L, et al. Nonfatal Drug Overdoses Treated in Emergency Departments — United States, 2016–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:371–376. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6913a3externalicon. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Larochelle MR, Bernson D, Land T, et al. Medication for opioid use disorder after nonfatal opioid overdose and association with mortality: a cohort study. Annals of Int Med. 2018. Aug 7;169(3):13745. 10.7326/M17-3107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weiner SG, Baker O, Bernson D, Schuur JD. One-year mortality of patients after emergency department treatment for nonfatal opioid overdose. Annals of Emerg Med. 2020. Jan 1;75(1):13–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.D’Onofrio G, O’Connor PG, Pantalon MV, et al. Emergency department–initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015. Apr 28;313(16):1636–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rhee TG, D’Onofrio G, Fiellin DA. Trends in the Use of Buprenorphine in US Emergency Departments, 2002–2017. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(10):e2021209. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Larochelle MR, Jones CM, Zhang K. Change in opioid and buprenorphine prescribers and prescriptions by specialty, 2016–2021. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023. Jul 1;248:109933. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109933. Epub 2023 May 18. PMID: 37267746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tsai AC, Kiang MV, Barnett ML, et al. Stigma as a fundamental hindrance to the United States opioid overdose crisis response. PLoS Med. 2019. Nov 26;16(11):e1002969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002969. PMID: 31770387; PMCID: PMC6957118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Im DD, Chary A, Condella AL, et al. Emergency Department Clinicians’ Attitudes Toward Opioid Use Disorder and Emergency Department-initiated Buprenorphine Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Study. West J Emerg Med. 2020. Feb 21;21(2):261–271. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44382. PMID: 32191184; PMCID: PMC7081867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schoenfeld EM, Soares WE, Schaeffer EM, Gitlin J, Burke K, Westafer LM. “This is part of emergency medicine now”: A qualitative assessment of emergency clinicians’ facilitators of and barriers to initiating buprenorphine. Acad Emerg Med. 2021. Aug 9. doi: 10.1111/acem.14369. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34374466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hawk KF, D’Onofrio G, Chawarski MC, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Readiness to Provide Emergency Department–Initiated Buprenorphine. JAMA network open. 2020. May 1;3(5):e204561-. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Department of Health and Human Service, Office of the Secretary. Practice Guidelines for the Administration of Buprenorphine for treating Opioid Use Disorder. April 26, 2021 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration, Diversion Control Division. Elimination of the DATA waiver program December 29, 2022. Accessed January 12, 2023. https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/docs/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Luo Q, Erikson CE. Changes in Waivered Clinicians Prescribing Buprenorphine and Prescription Volume by Patient Limit. JAMA. 2023. May 23;329(20):1792–1794. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.5038. PMID: 37103912; PMCID: PMC10141275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.FDA Approves New Buprenorphine Treatment Option for Opioid Use Disorder, Press release of the Food and Drug Administration, May 23, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pressannouncements/fda-approves-new-buprenorphine-treatment-option-opioid-use-disorder [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Camurus AB (June 26, 2021) Press Release. Camurus announces PDUFA date for Brixadi for the treatment of opioid use disorder in the US; https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/camurusannounces-pdufa-date-for-brixadi-for-the-treatment-of-opioid-use-disorder-in-the-us301320571.html [Google Scholar]
  • 20.D’Onofrio G, Hawk KF, Herring AA, et al. The design and conduct of a randomized clinical trial comparing emergency department initiation of sublingual versus a 7-day extended-release injection formulation of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: Project ED INNOVATION. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2021. May 1;104:106359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Walter DS, Inturrisi CE, 1995. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of buprenorphine in animals and humans. In: Cowan A, Lewis JW (Eds.), Buprenorphine: Combating Drug Abuse with a Unique Opioid. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 113–135 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chiang CN, Hawks RL. Pharmacokinetics of the combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone. Drug and Alcohol Depend. 2003. May 21;70(2):S39–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weinberg DS, Inturrisi CE, Reidenberg B, Moulin DE, Nip TJ, Wallenstein S, et al. 1988. Sublingual absorption [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jones RT, Upton R, 1997. Subchronic buprenorphine study: sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone interactions. NIDA Contract N01DA-4–8306 report, Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies for medication development. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mariani JJ, Mahony, Iqbal MN, Luo SX, Naqvi NHand Levin FR, 2020. Case series: rapid induction onto long-acting buprenorphine injection for high potency synthetic opioid users. The American Journal on addictions, 29(4), pp.345–348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Morgan JR, Walley AY, Murphy SM, Chatterjee A, Hadland SE, Barocas J, Linas BP, Assoumou SA. Characterizing initiation, use, and discontinuation of extended-release buprenorphine in a nationally representative United States commercially insured cohort. Drug and Alcohol Depend. 2021. May 21:108764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Frost M, Bailey GL, Lintzeris N, et al. Long-term safety of a weekly and monthly subcutaneous buprenorphine depot (CAM2038) in the treatment of adult out-patients with opioid use disorder. Addiction. 2019. Aug;114(8):1416–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Walsh SL, Comer SD, Lofwall MR, et al. Effect of buprenorphine weekly depot (CAM2038) and hydromorphone blockade in individuals with opioid use disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA psychiatry. 2017. Sep 1;74(9):894–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Greenwald MK, Comer SD, Fiellin DA. Buprenorphine maintenance and mu-opioid receptor availability in the treatment of opioid use disorder: implications for clinical use and policy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;144:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nasser AF, Heidbreder C, Gomeni R, Fudala PJ, Zheng B, Greenwald MK. A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling approach to support the clinical development of RBP-6000, a new, subcutaneously injectable, long-acting, sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine, for the treatment of opioid dependence. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53(9):813–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Albayaty M, Linden M, Olsson H, Johnsson M, Strandgården K, Tiberg F . Pharmacokinetic evaluation of once-weekly and once-monthly buprenorphine subcutaneous injection depots (CAM2038) versus intravenous and sublingual buprenorphine in healthy volunteers under naltrexone blockade: an open-label Phase 1 study. Advances in therapy. 2017. Feb 1;34(2):560–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haasen C, Linden M, Tiberg F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a buprenorphine subcutaneous depot formulation (CAM2038) for once-weekly dosing in patients with opioid use disorder. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2017. Jul 1;78:22–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lofwall MR, Walsh SL, Nunes EV, Bailey GL, Sigmon SC, Kampman KM, Frost M, Tiberg F, Linden M, Sheldon B, Oosman S. Weekly and monthly subcutaneous buprenorphine depot formulations vs daily sublingual buprenorphine with naloxone for treatment of opioid use disorder: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA internal medicine. 2018. Jun 1;178(6):764–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Braeburn(July 23, 2019) U.S. District Court Orders FDA to Reconsider Application for Final Approval of BRIXADI™ (buprenorphine) Extended-Release Injection for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder https://braeburnrx.com/u-s-district-court-orders-fda-to-reconsider-braeburnsapplication-for-final-approval/ [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wesson DR, Ling W. The clinical opiate withdrawal scale (COWS). Journal of psychoactive drugs. 2003. Jun 1;35(2):253–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.D’Onofrio G, Herring A, Perrone J, Hawk K, Samuels E, Cowan E, et al. 199 Extended-Release Injectable Buprenorphine for Emergency Department Patients with Opioid Use Disorder in Minimal Withdrawal. Ann Emerg Med. 2021. Oct 1;78(4):S80. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Personal communication Herring. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brixadi Prescribing Information, Medication Package Insert. Braeburn Inc, reference ID: 5178299 May 2023 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cooper HLF, Cloud DH, Young AM, Freeman PR. When Prescribing Isn’t Enough - PharmacyLevel Barriers to Buprenorphine Access. N Engl J Med. 2020. Aug 20;383(8):703–705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2002908. PMID: 32813945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Silverstein SM, Daniulaityte R, Martins SS, Miller SC, Carlson RG. “Everything is not right anymore”: Buprenorphine: experiences in an era of illicit fentanyl. International Journal of Drug Policy 74 (2019) 76–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Antoine D, Huhn AS, Strain EC, Turner G, Jardot J, Hammond AS, Dunn KE. Method for successfully inducting individuals who use illicit fentanyl onto buprenorphine/naloxone. The American Journal on Addictions. 2021. Jan;30(1):83–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rosado J, Walsh SL, Bigelow GE, Strain EC. Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone precipitated withdrawal in subjects maintained on 100 mg of daily methadone. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2007. Oct 8;90(2–3):261–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mee-Lee D, Shulman GD, Fishman MJ. The ASAM Criteria. Treatment Criteria for Addictive, Substance-Related, and Co-Occurring Conditions, 3rd ed. 2013:2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.D’Onofrio G, Hawk KF, Perrone J, Walsh SL, Lofwall MR, Fiellin DA, Herring A. Incidence of Precipitated Withdrawal During a Multisite Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine Clinical Trial in the Era of Fentanyl. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. Mar 1;6(3):e236108. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6108. PMID: 36995717; PMCID: PMC10064247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hailozian C, Luftig J, Liang A, 2021. Synergistic Effect of Ketamine and Buprenorphine Observed in the Treatment of Buprenorphine Precipitated Opioid Withdrawal in a Patient With Fentanyl Use. J Addict Med. 2022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Quattlebaum THN, Kiyokawa M, Murata KA. A case of buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal managed with high-dose buprenorphine. Fam Pract. Epub ahead of print 26 June 2021. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmab073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Herring AA, Vosooghi AA, Luftig J, et al. High-Dose Buprenorphine Induction in the Emergency Department for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. JAMA Network Open. 2021. Jul 1;4(7):e2117128-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Williams AR, Nunes EV, Bisaga A, Levin FR, Olfson M. Development of a Cascade of Care for responding to the opioid epidemic. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(1):1–10. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2018.1546862. Epub 2019 Jan 24. PMID: 30675818; PMCID: PMC6404749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Williams AR, Mauro CM, Feng T, et al. Performance measurement for opioid use disorder medication treatment and care retention. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2023. Jun 1;180(6):454–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SUPINFO

RESOURCES