Skip to main content
Medical History logoLink to Medical History
. 1978 Apr;22(2):138–150. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300032270

The British medical profession and contagion theory: puerperal fever as a case study, 1830-1860.

G P Parsons
PMCID: PMC1082213  PMID: 349276

Full text

PDF
138

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ackerknecht E. H. A plea for a "behaviorist" approach in writing the history of medicine. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1967 Jul;22(3):211–214. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/xxii.3.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fleming J. B. Semmelweis commemoration. Puerperal fever: the historical development of its treatment. Proc R Soc Med. 1966 Apr;59(4):341–345. doi: 10.1177/003591576605900413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McIntyre D. M. An epidemic of Streptococcus pyogenes puerperal and postoperative sepsis with an unusual carrier site--the anus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1968 Jun 1;101(3):308–314. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(68)90056-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wangensteen O. H. Nineteenth Century wound management of the parturient uterus and compound fracture: the Semmelweis-Lister priority controversy. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1970 Aug;46(8):565–596. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical History are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES