Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Jan 29;14:2374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52279-x

Neurochemical differences in core regions of the autistic brain: a multivoxel 1H-MRS study in children

Ana Dionísio 1,2,#, Ana Espírito 1,2,3,#, Andreia C Pereira 1,2, Susana Mouga 1,2,4, Otília C d’Almeida 1,2,3, Guiomar Oliveira 1,3,4,5, Miguel Castelo-Branco 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC10824733  PMID: 38287121

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition which compromises various cognitive and behavioural domains. The understanding of the pathophysiology and molecular neurobiology of ASD is still an open critical research question. Here, we aimed to address ASD neurochemistry in the same time point at key regions that have been associated with its pathophysiology: the insula, hippocampus, putamen and thalamus. We conducted a multivoxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) study to non-invasively estimate the concentrations of total choline (GPC + PCh, tCho), total N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA + NAAG, tNAA) and Glx (Glu + Gln), presenting the results as ratios to total creatine while investigating replication for ratios to total choline as a secondary analysis. Twenty-two male children aged between 10 and 18 years diagnosed with ASD (none with intellectual disability, in spite of the expected lower IQ) and 22 age- and gender-matched typically developing (TD) controls were included. Aspartate ratios were significantly lower in the insula (tNAA/tCr: p = 0.010; tNAA/tCho: p = 0.012) and putamen (tNAA/tCr: p = 0.015) of ASD individuals in comparison with TD controls. The Glx ratios were significantly higher in the hippocampus of the ASD group (Glx/tCr: p = 0.027; Glx/tCho: p = 0.011). Differences in tNAA and Glx indices suggest that these metabolites might be neurochemical markers of region-specific atypical metabolism in ASD children, with a potential contribution for future advances in clinical monitoring and treatment.

Subject terms: Neuroscience, Autism spectrum disorders

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition with a heterogeneous clinical presentation, affecting different cognitive and behavioural domains. ASD is primarily characterized by difficulties with social interaction and communication, the presence of restrictive and stereotyped behaviours as well as sensory processing difficulties1. Although research has made it possible to increase knowledge about possible etiological factors, understanding the neurobiological basis of ASD is still a major challenge2.

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) is a non-invasive magnetic resonance (MR)-based technique that provides information about the in vivo biochemistry of the human brain by estimating the concentrations of brain metabolites3. The most commonly studied metabolites are N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), choline-containing compounds (tCho), glutamate + glutamine (Glx), and creatine + phosphocreatine (tCr)4. These molecules play specific roles in brain metabolism and are important indicators of neuronal integrity and/or proliferation, neurotransmission and/or metabolism, and cellular energy homeostasis46.

Several studies have suggested that brain metabolite concentrations are different in ASD as compared with neurotypical participants, although findings remain inconsistent3,711.

The controversy present in the 1H-MRS literature in ASD motivated us to contribute to this issue by developing a study investigating four regions relevant to the pathophysiology of ASD: the insula, hippocampus, thalamus and putamen. We selected these regions of interest due to the differences found in ASD in terms of functional anatomy and connectivity and their relation to core symptoms10,12. Despite this fact, they have been scarcely studied and we did not find any study considering the four regions simultaneously in the same individuals.

There is for all these regions some evidence of pathophysiological abnormalities in ASD. The insula is a core region of the saliency network involved in visceral and somatosensory processes, autonomic control, emotional experience, social cognition, decision making, attention and salience processes1315. In agreement with this broad array of functions, it has strong functional connectivity to various other cortical and subcortical areas13,14,16. Structural studies in ASD individuals have found alterations in the insula volume17, sulcus depth18, and gyrification19. Functional abnormalities include reduced regional cerebral blood flow20, decreased (including intrinsic) functional connectivity2124, atypical activation25, diminished regional homogeneity26, and localized changes in subregional organization27. Finally, activation patterns of the insula can potentially distinguish individuals with ASD from typically developing (TD) children28.

The hippocampus plays a critical role in learning and memory2931 and is worth studying in ASD because of the known impairments in episodic memory32. The investigation of the hippocampal volume has revealed inconsistent results, with the literature pointing out decreased33, increased34, or unchanged35 volumes in ASD. Studies have also found functional abnormalities such as decreased functional connectivity in episodic memory retrieval tasks36. In addition, postmortem research reported increased cell density and abnormally small cells in the hippocampus in ASD37.

The thalamus is a core relay structure3840. Atypical thalamocortical connectivity is the predominant finding in ASD studies41. Many authors have described hyperconnectivity of the thalamus in children and adults4144. In addition, differences in the surface area and shape of the thalamus of ASD individuals have also been reported45. Alterations in this region may help explain some autism-related symptoms due to differences in sensorimotor processing in ASD43,44.

The putamen is involved in cognitive (anterior putamen) and sensorimotor processes (posterior putamen)46. Several studies have found increased volume47, asymmetry48, and altered connectivity in the putamen49 in ASD. These regional abnormalities have been associated with core symptomatology. Accordingly, this region likely plays a role in repetitive and restricted behaviours as well as impaired social interactions in ASD47,48.

1H-MRS findings in the insula, hippocampus, thalamus, and putamen

In particular, with respect to the 1H-MRS findings in these four regions the following findings were reported: (1) Lower levels of tCr50 in the left insula and tNAA51 in the insula. (2) Lower tNAA or tNAA /tCr5254, higher tCr55,56 and Glx55, as well as higher tCho56 and tCho/tCr54 were described in the hippocampal-amygdala complex; however, other studies reported higher tNAA and tNAA /tCr57 in the same region. (3) Lower tNAA (or tNAA ratios)50,58,59, tCr50,58, tCho50,58, and Glx59,60 have been found in the thalamus. (4) Higher Glx/Cr61 and lower tNAA50 were found in the putamen.

In spite of the available 1H-MRS literature, these regions remain understudied, in particular the insula, and findings seem inconsistent. Here we present a 1H-MRS study in children diagnosed with ASD. The main objective was to quantify metabolite levels and compare them between groups (ASD and controls), taking advantage from a multivoxel approach that allows the scanning of multiple regions simultaneously as well as the selection of small volumes targeting specific anatomical regions. Based on previous reports, we expected to find altered metabolites in ASD patients in these regions.

Results

Groups were matched for age (t(42) = 0.324, p = 0.748) and handedness (p = 0.233). ASD participants had all FSIQ > 70, defined as absence of intellectual disability by ICD10. However, they presented the expectedly lower intellectual quotient compared with typically developing controls (full-scale IQ: t(42) = − 5.841, p < 0.001; verbal IQ: t(42) = − 6.449, p < 0.001; performance IQ: U = 148.5, p = 0.027).

In the following sections, we present the between-group comparisons for the metabolites in the selected regions-of-interest.

Insula

Total N-acetyl-aspartate ratios in the insula were significantly lower in the ASD group, both as assessed by tNAA/tCr (t(42) = − 2.696, p = 0.010) and by tNAA/tCho (U = 136.0, p = 0.012), as observed in Fig. 1. Total choline and Glx ratios, in turn, did not differ between groups (p ≥ 0.05). Please note that the analysis of metabolite-to-tCho ratios, which has limitations due to the larger variability of Cho in psychiatric diseases, is secondary as it serves mainly as a replication to test the hypothesis whether some of the effects are generalizable even when the method of ratio calculation is changed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Differences in tNAA/tCr and tNAA/tCho between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and control (CTRL) groups (mean ± SD).

Hippocampus

The Glx/tCr (t(37) = 2.302, p = 0.027, Fig. 2) and Glx/tCho (t(37) = 2.691, p = 0.011, Fig. 2) in the hippocampus were significantly higher in the ASD group. Total choline and tNAA ratios, in turn, did not differ between groups (p ≥ 0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Differences in Glx/tCr and Glx/tCho between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and control (CTRL) groups (mean ± SD).

Putamen

The tNAA/tCr ratio in the putamen was significantly lower in the ASD group (U = 131.5, p = 0.015, Fig. 3). Using tCho as reference only a trend level between-group difference was present (t(41) = − 1.829, p = 0.075). Total choline and Glx ratios, in turn, did not differ between groups (p ≥ 0.05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Differences in tNAA/tCr between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and control (CTRL) groups (mean ± SD).

Thalamus

Regarding the thalamus, we did not detect significant between-group differences for any of the metabolites under investigation in this work.

In general, excluding medicated participants did not change the patterns of results except for the putamen where results became only marginally significant (Supplementary Table S1).

Correlations between altered metabolite ratios and intellectual quotient and autism diagnostic scores

In the insula, the tNAA/tCr was negatively correlated with verbal IQ (r = − 0.474, p = 0.026) in the ASD group and with performance IQ in TD controls (rs =− 0.465, p = 0.029). In the hippocampus, we did find a negative correlation between the total scores of ADOS and Glx ratios (Glx/tCr: r = − 0.564, p = 0.012; replicated for Glx/tCho: r = − 0.595, p = 0.007) in the ASD group. We also found a correlation of tNAA/tCho measures between the putamen and insula: rs = 0.717, p < 0.001.

Voxel tissue composition and quality of the 1H-MRS data

No statistically significant differences were observed in the tissue composition, including WM, GM or CSF, comparing ASD with controls in any region but hippocampus (% CSF: U = 158.0, p = 0.049) and thalamus (% WM: t(42) = 2.103, p = 0.042), which showed only marginal differences. We present the tissue proportions in the voxels selected for analyses in each region both for patients and controls in Supplementary Table S2.

We assured that all included metabolites had a Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) ≤ 20%, which is normally used as reliability measure of metabolite concentration. We report the values of other spectral quality parameters (full-width at half maximum, FWHM and signal-to-noise ratio, SNR) in Supplementary Table S3, for completeness and following recent reporting guidelines62.

Discussion

This work allowed to provide further insight into the neurochemical differences involved in ASD in different brain regions. This is important for tailoring new therapeutic interventions that may change different regions in a distinct manner. Here, we studied whether tNAA and Glx ratios to tCr (and whether they could be replicated concerning ratios to tCho), differ in a selection of brain regions that have been described with anatomical and functional abnormalities in ASD, specifically the insula, hippocampus, thalamus and putamen.

The levels of tNAA/tCr were significantly lower in the ASD group both in the insula and in the putamen. Moreover, the ratio to choline (tNAA/tCho) was also significantly lower in the insula. In the hippocampus we observed significantly higher Glx, either using the ratio to total creatine (Glx/tCr) or choline-containing compounds (Glx/tCho). Considering the thalamus, we did not observe any neurochemical between-group differences.

To our knowledge, only one previous study found lower tNAA in the insula51. Friedman et al. in turn, found no differences in tNAA in the insula, but, in line with our results, they also reported lower absolute metabolite levels in the left putamen50. On the other hand, the tNAA differences previously observed in the thalamus50,58 were neither replicated in this study nor by others63. N-acetyl aspartate is a brain metabolite synthesized in the neurons (particularly in mitochondria) and catalyzed in the glia4, being considered an indicative of neuronal density and integrity3 and/or mitochondrial function64 explaining its relation to multiple pathological conditions65. Decreased neuronal or axonal density and impaired mitochondrial metabolism are putative explanations for the lower tNAA in ASD3,66. Differences in tNAA signals in both the insula and putamen, which are connected from the functional and anatomical points of view, suggests future additional studies relating neurochemistry with known alterations in functional connectivity2124,49.

Our observation that tNAA/tCr is not different in the hippocampus, is consistent with previous studies55,56,67,68. Nevertheless, other authors found higher57 or lower52,54 tNAA in this region in ASD. While some of them analyzed the absolute concentration56,67,69, others used the ratio to tCr as a measure54. In these studies, altered tNAA indices were found only in children52,54,57 and in some cases only for one hemisphere52,57. In any case, and in spite of some discrepancies, tNAA seems to be a consistently altered metabolite in ASD.

As far as we are aware, we report for the first time Glx/tCr alterations in the hippocampus alone in children and adolescents with ASD. These measures were higher in the ASD group which is in line with the findings in the right hippocampus for the adult ASD population reported as absolute quantification55. Glutamate, the main excitatory neurotransmitter, is also critically involved in multiple neurodevelopmental processes3,55. Our finding of higher Glx/tCr in the hippocampus in the ASD group is in line with changes in the amount of glutamate receptors described in the ASD literature70, with implications in the excitatory/inhibitory balance11,64 and important functions such as memory and learning29,30,71 which are impaired in ASD32.

Concerning tCho/tCr, we did not detect any significant alterations, unlike other studies50,56,58. However our results are consistent with previous studies that did not find alterations in (total) Cho in ASD participants regarding the insula50 (although this study did find differences in other regions), hippocampus-amygdala complex57, thalamus63 or putamen63.

It is important to uncover links between brain metabolites and ASD symptomatology and cognition51,54,61,64. Therefore, we investigated in an exploratory manner correlations between altered metabolite ratios and clinical and diagnostic measures (IQ, ADOS and ADI-R). In the insula, a weak negative correlation was found between tNAA/tCr and IQ measures (verbal subscale in ASD and performance IQ in the control group). In the hippocampus there was a moderate negative correlation between Glx ratios in the ASD group and total score of ADOS. The observed correlation of tNAA/tCho measures between the putamen and insula suggests that pathology in both structures may be associated. Given that it is known that these structures are strongly associated from the anatomical and functional points of view, this motivates future studies to investigate this relationship.

These data illustrate the complexity of comparing studies and analyzing clinical results from 1H-MRS in general. Although some consistency may be found for some metabolites such as tNAA, on the other hand there is some variability in results, that may be partly accounted for by differences in methodology or sample characteristics. For instance, differences in magnetic field strengths, sample size, age range, diagnostic criteria, regions, metabolite measurement, assessment of hemispheres individually or combined, sedation, medication, or demographic characteristics72, may substantially impact the results.

We adopted a multivoxel approach to address different structures in each individual at the same time point, with the exact same parameters. By using a small voxel size, we were able to study anatomically specific locations that were matched among individuals, enabling a more precise inter-individual analysis. Most 1H-MRS studies lack an effective spatial isolation of the insula, hippocampus or putamen, likely because of the larger voxel volumes studied using single-voxel approaches, that frequently included these regions in auditory or temporal cortex73, in a complex with the amygdala52,57, and in the basal ganglia74, respectively. Moreover, this was achieved at 3 T MRI scanner while the large majority of previous literature used lower static field strength systems (1.5 T)3,9. This was relevant to isolate small structures such as the hippocampus, which has been mainly studied as the combined hippocampal-amygdala complex, and to target rarely investigated ASD-affected regions such as the insula. The possibility of studying these areas is pertinent given the regional-dependency of metabolic alterations64,75. Another strength from our study is that we acquired all MRI images without sedating participants, unlike other studies59,63,76,77. Additionally, even though the inclusion of medicated participants could be a possible source of bias, here we observed the same findings when considering only non-medicated participants (see Supplementary Table S1).

In this study, we assessed Glx/tCr as an indicator of glutamatergic metabolism, due to the higher contribution of glutamate to the Glx 1H-MRS peak, as in other previous studies3. However, quantifying Glx using the current 1H-MRS protocol (i.e. TE = 135 ms) is challenging. Nevertheless, we used a basis set fitting approach which uses an a priori model of the expected peak shape and position as opposed to a simple peak based fitting (based on arbitrary model functions), mitigating quantification challenges. Also, a strict quality control was applied and excluded some Glx peaks from the statistical analysis (resulting in a lower sample size for the hippocampus and the thalamus, Supplementary Table S4). Yet, Glx/tCr results must be interpreted cautiously.

Typically, tCr is used as an internal reference value for calculating metabolite ratios3,6,9. However, there is regional and individual variability in creatine concentrations4, casting doubt on tCr as a suitable reference for metabolite measurements66. We additionally presented ratios to total choline as done previously74,78,79, since tCho/tCr was not different from TD in any of the regions in this study. While all main results were replicated using this reference, our findings should be interpreted in the light of the limitation of using ratios instead of absolute metabolite concentrations, as we cannot exclude that our references are altered.

In our study, we report tNAA (NAA + NAAG), which implies not only the contribution of NAA, which synthesis occurs in neuronal mitochondria4, but also of NAAG, which is synthesized from NAA and glutamate64. Since the signal accounts for both contributions, and NAA and NAAG play a distinct role in neural density and neurotransmission, respectively, lower tNAA signal in the ASD group could be due to decreased NAA, decreased NAAG, or both64.

Conclusions

Here we provide evidence for lower tNAA/tCr in the insula and putamen and higher Glx/tCr in the hippocampus of children with ASD. These molecular changes point out these ratios as potential neurochemical biomarkers for altered metabolism and/or excitatory neurotransmission in ASD in a region-dependent manner. Our results might help understanding the differences that exist in specific brain structures, with potential future implications for the clinical monitoring and treatment of ASD patients.

Methods

This work was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and got the approval from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Coimbra. All participants gave oral informed consent as well as their parents or legal representative gave written informed consent, after explanation of all the objectives of the study and procedures.

Participants

We included 22 male participants with ASD, recruited from the Neurodevelopmental and Autism Unit from Child Developmental Centre, Paediatric Hospital, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal. All participants were aged between 10 and 18 years old and met the diagnostic criteria determined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-51), and scored positive in the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R)80 and in the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)81. Participants were assessed at least twice a year by an experienced multidisciplinary team, including paediatricians specialized in neurodevelopment and psychologists. Five subjects who were taking medication (risperidone, n = 4; methylphenidate, n = 1) to control ASD symptoms continued treatment-as-usual. Additionally, 22 age- and gender-matched typically developing controls (CTRL), free from medication, recruited in district schools, entered in this study. The exclusion criteria for this study included the presence of diagnosed neurodevelopmental, psychiatric or neurological disorders other than ASD, genetic syndrome, serious learning disabilities (Full-Scale IQ inferior to 70 using the Portuguese abbreviated version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3rd edition – WISC-III82 or by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 3rd edition – WAIS-III83, when appropriate), and contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, for the control participants, autism was ruled out by the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ)84 and by the Social responsiveness scale (SRS)85, both filled in by their parents.

Demographic and clinical data are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data.

ASD (n = 22) CTRL (n = 22)
Chronological age (years, mean ± SD [range]) 13.76 ± 2.08 [10.53–18.30] 13.56 ± 2.08 [9.55–18.21]
Sex (male: female) 22:0 22:0
Handedness (right: left) 22:0 19:2a
Full-scale IQ (score, mean ± SD [range]) 91.23 ± 12.29 [70–114] 120.09 ± 19.65 [78–154]
Verbal IQ (score, mean ± SD [range]) 89.68 ± 13.33 [66–117] 123.41 ± 20.60 [80–155]
Performance IQ (score, mean ± SD [range]) 97.27 ± 16.85 [64–124] 111.18 ± 17.49 [84–149]
ADOS (score, mean ± SD [range]) 13.45 ± 3.58 [8–19]
ADI-R (score, mean ± SD [range]) 35.50 ± 10.00 [22–68]

IQ intelligence quotient, ADOS autism diagnostic observation schedule, ADI-R autism diagnostic interview-revised.

aData available from 21 participants.

Multivoxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS)

MRI scanning was performed without sedation, at CIBIT/ICNAS (University of Coimbra) facilities, in a Siemens MAGNETOM TimTrio 3 T (Erlangen, Germany) scanner, provided with a 12-channel birdcage head coil. We started with the acquisition of anatomical data through a high-resolution 3D Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE), with 160 slices, TR (repetition time) = 2300 ms, TE (echo time) = 2.98 ms, TI (inversion time) = 900 ms, FA (flip angle) = 9°, FOV (field-of-view) = 256 × 256 mm2, voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3.

Two-dimensional multivoxel 1H-MRS was applied in two different orientations to estimate metabolites concentration using a PRESS (Point RESolved Spectroscopy) sequence [TR = 1700 ms, TE = 135 ms, FA = 90°, 3 averages, 1024 points, FOV = 160 × 160 mm, VOI (volume-of-interest) = 80 × 80 × 15 mm, thickness = 15 mm]. A 12 × 12 matrix yielded a 13.3 × 13.3 × 15 mm nominal voxel size. This matrix was interpolated to 16 × 16 leading to a voxel nominal spatial resolution of 10.0 × 10.0 × 15 mm; 1.5 mL. Automatic shimming was applied to offset field inhomogeneities and achieve well-resolved peaks for the metabolites in study86 and chemical shift selective (CHESS) weak water suppression was executed at 50 Hz bandwidth. For the 1H-MRS slice prescription, the centre of the VOI was aligned with the brain midline. Specifically, for the insula, putamen, and thalamus, the slice was aligned to AC-PC in the sagittal view, and the bottom of the slice was aligned with the bottom of the corpus callosum. Next, in the coronal view, the structures of interest were centred on the 1H-MRS grid, aiming for symmetric and maximum voxel coverage for each structure in each hemisphere. For the hippocampus region, the 1H-MRS slab was aligned in the sagittal view along the longest axis of the hippocampus and then centred in the VOI for both hemispheres, ensuring symmetric and maximum coverage in each hemisphere. Outer-volume lipid suppression was achieved by applying saturation bands. The 2D-CSI acquisition followed a weighted phase encoding scheme with a Hamming filter. Each 2D 1H-MRS acquisition lasted around 3.7 min.

Participants were watching cartoons to keep them more relaxed and reduce motion during the experiment. Moreover, we used an eyetracking system [SensoMotoric Instruments (SMI), Teltow, Germany] to control positioning and movement throughout scanning.

The 1H-MRS data were analysed with LCModel v. 6.3-1D (Stephen Provencher Inc., Oakville, Canada87), wherein we quantified metabolite levels in institutional units, without water-scaling or correcting for T1 and T2 water or metabolite relaxation times. LCModel uses an a priori model (basis set) of the expected peak shape and position as opposed to a simple peak based fitting (based on arbitrary model functions). The basis set used for fitting included alanine (Ala), creatine (Cr), phosphocreatine (PCr), glutamine (Gln), glutamate (Glu), glycerophosphocholine (GPC), phosphocholine (PCh), gluthatione (GSH), myo-inositol (mI), lactate (Lac), N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG), scyllo-Inositol (Scyllo), and taurine (Tau). Some metabolite peaks were considered as pools of compounds: total choline (tCho), total n-acetyl-aspartate (tNAA) and Glx, as the sum of GPC + PCh, NAA + NAAG, and Glu + Gln, respectively. Ratios to total choline and total creatine (tCr, the pool of Cr + PCr) were computed. Please note that the analysis of ratios to total choline is secondary and serves as a test for replication, because Cho concentration frequently varies in psychiatric diseases. For each region, the mean of both hemispheres was considered. Complementary analyses between hemispheres are reported in Supplementary Table S4. Two researchers (A.D. and A.E.) selected one voxel per brain structure for each participant and hemisphere, namely insula, hippocampus, putamen, and thalamus. Voxels were selected considering the coverage of the region-of-interest while being standardized as much as possible among participants, aiming at the same exact anatomical region. The coverage of the brain regions was evaluated by visual inspection with the BrainCSI software (Jeffrey Yager, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA USA, https://www.nitrc.org/projects/braincsi). In Fig. 4 we illustrate an example of voxel selection, for each region in study, as well as an example of LCModel output spectrum.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Example of the voxel selection, for each region, with an example of LCModel output for the insula (left spectrum) and for the hippocampus (right spectrum). P posterior, A anterior, R right, L left.

Quantification of the proportion of grey matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within each voxel was also carried out using an in-house developed CSI segmentation script resorting to SPM8 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK, https://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8/), with the VBM8 (Structural Brain Mapping Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Jena, Germany) toolbox, run in MATLAB (R2019b, MathWorks, USA). Spectra were visually inspected and datasets with poor fitting or metabolite levels with Cramér-Rao lower bounds > 20% were excluded from the analyses. Other quality metrics, namely FWHM and SNR are provided in Supplementary Table S3.

Statistics

Statistical tests were run in SPSS Statistics (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL), version 27. We first characterized both groups, using descriptive statistics. Then, we evaluated data normality with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Participants’ characteristics and metabolite concentrations in each brain region were compared between groups by computing independent samples t test or its non-parametric equivalent Mann–Whitney U, where appropriate. Handedness was compared using Fisher’s exact test. We report exact p-values for non-parametric comparisons. Additionally, we applied Pearson’s correlation coefficient or Spearman’s rho to investigate correlations between intellectual quotient measures and metabolite levels in each group. For the ASD group alone, we also investigated possible correlations between the diagnostic scores (ADOS/ADI-R) and the levels of altered metabolites in the regions of interest. None of these correlations were corrected for multiple comparisons and are, thus, exploratory. We adopted a significance level of 0.05.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables. (22KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Anne Rijpma from the Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands) for providing us with Matlab script for segmentation of CSI voxel, and all participants for their kind collaboration.

Author contributions

A.C.P. and M.C.-B. conceived and designed the study. A.C.P. and S.M. performed data acquisition and A.D., A.E., A.C.P. and O.C.dA. analysed the data. A.D., A.E., A.C.P., G.O. and M.C.-B. performed data interpretation. A.D. and A.E. wrote the original draft and all authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal (UID/NEU/04950 B& P/2020, PAC- MEDPERSYST, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016428, BIGDATIMAGE, CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000016, Centro 2020 FEDER, COMPETE, PTDC/PSI-GER/30852/2017, COVDATA-DSAIPA/DS/0041/2020, PTDC/PSI-GER/1326/2020).

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Ana Dionísio and Ana Espírito.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-52279-x.

References

  • 1.American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Palmen SJMC, Van Engeland H, Hof PR, Schmitz C. Neuropathological findings in autism. Brain. 2004;127:2572–2583. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baruth JM, Wall CA, Patterson MC, Port JD. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a probe into the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A review. Autism Res. 2013;6:119–133. doi: 10.1002/aur.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rae CD. A guide to the metabolic pathways and function of metabolites observed in human brain 1H magnetic resonance spectra. Neurochem. Res. 2014;39:1–36. doi: 10.1007/s11064-013-1199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ross B, Bluml S. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the human brain. Anat. Rec. 2001;265:54–84. doi: 10.1002/ar.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bertholdo D, Watcharakorn A, Castillo M. Brain proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Introduction and overview. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2013;23:359–380. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aoki Y, Kasai K, Yamasue H. Age-related change in brain metabolite abnormalities in autism: A meta-analysis of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies. Transl. Psychiatry. 2012;2:e69–e69. doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ipser JC, et al. 1H-MRS in autism spectrum disorders: A systematic meta-analysis. Metab. Brain Dis. 2012;27:275–287. doi: 10.1007/s11011-012-9293-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ford TC, Crewther DP. A comprehensive review of the 1H-MRS metabolite spectrum in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2016;9:14. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li D, Karnath HO, Xu X. Candidate biomarkers in children with autism spectrum disorder: A review of MRI studies. Neurosci. Bull. 2017;33:219–237. doi: 10.1007/s12264-017-0118-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ajram LA, et al. The contribution of [1H] magnetic resonance spectroscopy to the study of excitation-inhibition in autism. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2019;89:236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patriquin MA, DeRamus T, Libero LE, Laird A, Kana RK. Neuroanatomical and neurofunctional markers of social cognition in autism spectrum disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016;37:3957–3978. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Augustine JR. Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res. Rev. 1996;22:229–244. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(96)00011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ibañez A, Gleichgerrcht E, Manes F. Clinical effects of insular damage in humans. Brain Struct. Funct. 2010;214:397–410. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0256-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Uddin LQ, Nomi JS, Hébert-Seropian B, Ghaziri J, Boucher O. Structure and function of the human insula. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2017;34:300–306. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kurth F, Zilles K, Fox PT, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB. A link between the systems: Functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Struct. Funct. 2010;214:519–534. doi: 10.1007/s00429-010-0255-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parellada M, et al. Insular pathology in young people with high-functioning autism and first-episode psychosis. Psychol. Med. 2017;47:2472–2482. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dierker DL, et al. Analysis of cortical shape in children with simplex autism. Cereb. Cortex. 2015;25:1042–1051. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kohli JS, et al. Local cortical gyrification is increased in children with autism spectrum disorders, but decreases rapidly in adolescents. Cereb. Cortex. 2019;29:2412–2423. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ohnishi T, et al. Abnormal regional cerebral blood flow in childhood autism. Brain. 2000;123:1838–1844. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.9.1838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Uddin LQ, Menon V. The anterior insula in autism: Under-connected and under-examined. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009;33:1198–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ebisch SJH, et al. Altered intrinsic functional connectivity of anterior and posterior insula regions in high-functioning participants with autism spectrum disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2011;32:1013–1028. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.von dem Hagen EAH, Stoyanova RS, Baron-Cohen S, Calder AJ. Reduced functional connectivity within and between ‘social’ resting state networks in autism spectrum conditions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013;8:694–701. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Francis SM, et al. Hypoconnectivity of insular resting-state networks in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging. 2019;283:104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Di Martino A, et al. Functional brain correlates of social and nonsocial processes in autism spectrum disorders: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Biol. Psychiatry. 2009;65:63–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Paakki JJ, et al. Alterations in regional homogeneity of resting-state brain activity in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res. 2010;1321:169–179. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yamada T, et al. Altered functional organization within the insular cortex in adult males with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from connectivity-based parcellation. Mol. Autism. 2016;7:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13229-016-0106-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Odriozola P, et al. Insula response and connectivity during social and non-social attention in children with autism. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2016;11:433–444. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eichenbaum H. The hippocampus and declarative memory: Cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behav. Brain Res. 2001;127:199–207. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00365-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dekeyzer S, et al. “Unforgettable”—A pictorial essay on anatomy and pathology of the hippocampus. Insights Imaging. 2017;8:199–212. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0541-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Höschl C, Hajek T. Hippocampal damage mediated by corticosteroids–A neuropsychiatric research challenge. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2001;251(Suppl 2):81–88. doi: 10.1007/BF03035134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Salmond C, et al. The role of the medial temporal lobe in autistic spectrum disorders. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005;22:764–772. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Herbert MR, et al. Larger brain and white matter volumes in children with developmental language disorder. Dev. Sci. 2003;6:F11–F22. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sparks BF, et al. Brain structural abnormalities in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Neurology. 2002;59:184–192. doi: 10.1212/WNL.59.2.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Haznedar MM, et al. Limbic circuitry in patients with autism spectrum disorders studied with positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2000;157:1994–2001. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.12.1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cooper RA, et al. Reduced hippocampal functional connectivity during episodic memory retrieval in autism. Cereb. Cortex. 2017;27:888–902. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Raymond GV, Bauman ML, Kemper TL. Hippocampus in autism: A Golgi analysis. Acta Neuropathol. 1996;91:117–119. doi: 10.1007/s004010050401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Keun JTB, et al. Structural assessment of thalamus morphology in brain disorders: A review and recommendation of thalamic nucleus segmentation and shape analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021;131:466–478. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Crosson B. The role of the thalamus in declarative and procedural linguistic memory processes. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:4027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Perry BAL, Lomi E, Mitchell AS. Thalamocortical interactions in cognition and disease: The mediodorsal and anterior thalamic nuclei. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021;130:162–177. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Iidaka T, Kogata T, Mano Y, Komeda H. Thalamocortical hyperconnectivity and amygdala-cortical hypoconnectivity in male patients with autism spectrum disorder. Front. Psychiatry. 2019;10:252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Linke AC, Jao Keehn RJ, Pueschel EB, Fishman I, Müller RA. Children with ASD show links between aberrant sound processing, social symptoms, and atypical auditory interhemispheric and thalamocortical functional connectivity. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2018;29:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cerliani L, et al. Increased functional connectivity between subcortical and cortical resting-state networks in autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:767–777. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ayub R, et al. Thalamocortical connectivity is associated with autism symptoms in high-functioning adults with autism and typically developing adults. Transl. Psychiatry. 2021;11:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01221-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schuetze M, et al. Morphological alterations in the thalamus, striatum, and pallidum in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:2627–2637. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Balsters JH, Mantini D, Wenderoth N. Connectivity-based parcellation reveals distinct cortico-striatal connectivity fingerprints in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Neuroimage. 2018;170:412–423. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sato W, et al. Increased putamen volume in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014;8:957. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Postema MC, et al. Altered structural brain asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder in a study of 54 datasets. Nat. Commun. 2019;101(10):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13005-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Janouschek H, et al. The functional neural architecture of dysfunctional reward processing in autism. NeuroImage Clin. 2021;31:102700. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Friedman SD, et al. Regional brain chemical alterations in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Neurology. 2003;60:100–107. doi: 10.1212/WNL.60.1.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.O’Neill J, et al. Parsing the heterogeneity of brain metabolic disturbances in autism spectrum disorder. Biol. Psychiatry. 2020;87:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Otsuka H, Harada M, Mori K, Hisaoka S, Nishitani H. Brain metabolites in the hippocampus-amygdala region and cerebellum in autism: An 1H-MR spectroscopy study. Neuroradiology. 1999;41:517–519. doi: 10.1007/s002340050795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Endo T, et al. Altered chemical metabolites in the amygdala-hippocampus region contribute to autistic symptoms of autism spectrum disorders. Biol. Psychiatry. 2007;62:1030–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gabis L, et al. 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy markers of cognitive and language ability in clinical subtypes of autism spectrum disorders. J. Child Neurol. 2008;23:766–774. doi: 10.1177/0883073808315423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Page LA, et al. In vivo 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of amygdala-hippocampal and parietal regions in autism. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2006;163:2189. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.12.2189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Suzuki K, et al. Metabolite alterations in the hippocampus of high-functioning adult subjects with autism. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;13:529–534. doi: 10.1017/S1461145709990952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.O’Brien FM, et al. Maturation of limbic regions in Asperger syndrome: A preliminary study using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and structural magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Res. 2010;184:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hardan AY, et al. An MRI and proton spectroscopy study of the thalamus in children with autism. Psychiatry Res. 2008;163:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hegarty JP, et al. A proton MR spectroscopy study of the thalamus in twins with autism spectrum disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2018;81:153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bernardi S, et al. In vivo 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of the attentional networks in autism. Brain Res. 2011;1380:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.12.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Doyle-Thomas KAR, et al. Metabolic mapping of deep brain structures and associations with symptomatology in autism spectrum disorders. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2014;8:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lin A, et al. Minimum reporting standards for in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRSinMRS): Experts’ consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2021;34:e4484. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Levitt JG, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of the brain in childhood autism. Biol. Psychiatry. 2003;54:1355–1366. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00688-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pereira AC, Violante IR, Mouga S, Oliveira G, Castelo-Branco M. Medial frontal lobe neurochemistry in autism spectrum disorder is marked by reduced N-acetylaspartate and unchanged gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate + glutamine levels. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2018;48:1467–1482. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3406-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Danielsen ER, Ross B. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Diagnosis of Neurological Diseases. CRC Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Libero LE, et al. Biochemistry of the cingulate cortex in autism: An MR spectroscopy study. Autism Res. 2016;9:643–657. doi: 10.1002/aur.1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zeegers M, Van Der Grond J, Van Daalen E, Buitelaar J, Van Engeland H. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in developmentally delayed young boys with or without autism. J. Neural Transm. 2007;114:289–295. doi: 10.1007/s00702-006-0501-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kleinhans NM, Schweinsburg BC, Cohen DN, Müller RA, Courchesne E. N-acetyl aspartate in autism spectrum disorders: Regional effects and relationship to fMRI activation. Brain Res. 2007;1162:85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kleinhans NM, et al. Brief report: Biochemical correlates of clinical impairment in high functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2009;39:1079–1086. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0707-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Serajee FJ, Zhong H, Nabi R, Huq AHMM. The metabotropic glutamate receptor 8 gene at 7q31: Partial duplication and possible association with autism. J. Med. Genet. 2003;40:e42–e42. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.4.e42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Choudhury PR, Lahiri S, Rajamma U. Glutamate mediated signaling in the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorders. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2012;100:841–849. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2011.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ostojic J, Kozic D, Ostojic SM. N-acetylaspartate-to-creatine ratio in twelve brain locations among healthy men and women with different levels of education. Neurosci. Lett. 2019;692:23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Brown MS, Singel D, Hepburn S, Rojas DC. Increased glutamate concentration in the auditory cortex of persons with autism and first-degree relatives: A 1H-MRS study. Autism Res. 2013;6:1–10. doi: 10.1002/aur.1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vasconcelos MM, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in school-aged autistic children. J. Neuroimaging. 2008;18:288–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gonçalves J, et al. Testing the excitation/inhibition imbalance hypothesis in a mouse model of the autism spectrum disorder: In vivo neurospectroscopy and molecular evidence for regional phenotypes. Mol. Autism. 2017;8:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0166-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.DeVito TJ, et al. Evidence for cortical dysfunction in autism: A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry. 2007;61:465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Corrigan NM, et al. Atypical developmental patterns of brain chemistry in children with autism spectrum disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:964–974. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Perich-Alsina J, Aduna de Paz M, Valls A, Muñoz-Yunta JA. Thalamic spectroscopy using magnetic resonance in autism. Rev. Neurol. 2002;34(Suppl 1):S68–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Fujii E, et al. Function of the frontal lobe in autistic individuals: A proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study. J. Med. Investig. 2010;57:35–44. doi: 10.2152/jmi.57.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lord C, Rutter M, Le Couteur A. Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 1994;24:659–685. doi: 10.1007/BF02172145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. & Risis, S. Autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) (1999). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 82.Wechsler D, Simões MR, Rocha AM, Ferreira C. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Portuguese Version. Cegoc-Tea; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wechsler D. Manual for the Intelligence Scale for Adults. Lisbon:Cegoc-Tea; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rutter M, Bailey A, Lord C. The Social Communication Questionnaire. Western Psychological Services; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Constantino JN, Gruber CP. Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) Western Psychological Services; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Durmo F, et al. Multivoxel 1H-MR spectroscopy biometrics for preoprerative differentiation between brain tumors. Tomography (Ann. Arbor Mich.) 2018;4:172–181. doi: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn. Reson. Med. 1993;30:672–679. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Tables. (22KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES