Correction to: Journal of Neurology (2023) 270:4558–4578 10.1007/s00415-023-11807-x
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The corrected detail is provided below:
In section “CBD”, fourth paragraph, which previously read:
Visual dysfunction appears to be another common problem among patients with CBD [37, 42, 45, 48, 51, 55, 56], and is included in the diagnostic criteria for the disease [51, 57, 58]. Although several studies [37, 45, 48] did not find any gross visual impairment on formal testing, one review [41] discussed how this might be due to confounding factors such as limb apraxia, motor deficits or co-existent executive dysfunction which could limit the ability to formally test visuospatial function.
Should read:
Visuospatial dysfunction appears to be another common problem among patients with CBD [37, 42, 45, 48, 51, 55, 56], and is included in the diagnostic criteria for the disease [51, 57, 58]. Although several studies [37, 45, 48] did not find any gross visual impairment on formal testing, one review [41] discussed how this might be due to confounding factors such as limb apraxia, motor deficits or co-existent executive dysfunction which could limit the ability to formally test visuospatial function.