Abstract
Background
Loa loa filariasis (loiasis) is still considered a relatively benign disease. However, recent epidemiologic data suggest increased mortality and morbidity in L. loa infected individuals. We aimed to examine whether the density of L. loa microfilariae (mfs) in the blood is associated with cardiovascular disease.
Methodology
Using a point-of-care device (pOpmètre), we conducted a cross-sectional study to assess arterial stiffness and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in 991 individuals living in a loiasis-endemic rural area in the Republic of the Congo. Microfilaremic individuals were matched for age, sex and village of residence with 2 amicrofilaremic subjects.
We analyzed markers of arterial stiffness (Pulse-Wave Velocity, PWV), PAD (Ankle-Brachial Index, ABI) and cardiovascular health (Pulse Pressure, PP). The analysis considered parasitological results (L. loa microfilarial density [MFD], soil-transmitted helminths infection, asymptomatic malaria and onchocerciasis), sociodemographic characteristics and known cardiovascular risk factors (body mass index, smoking status, creatininemia, blood pressure).
Principal findings
Among the individuals included in the analysis, 192/982 (19.5%) and 137/976 (14.0%) had a PWV or an ABI considered out of range, respectively. Out of range PWV was associated with younger age, high mean arterial pressure and high L. loa MFD. Compared to amicrofilaremic subjects, those with more than 10,000 mfs/mL were 2.17 times more likely to have an out of range PWV (p = 0.00). Factors significantly associated with PAD were older age, low pulse rate, low body mass index, smoking, and L. loa microfilaremia. Factors significantly associated with an elevation of PP were older age, female sex, high average blood pressure, low pulse rate and L. loa microfilaremia.
Conclusion
A potential link between high L. loa microfilaremia and cardiovascular health deterioration is suggested. Further studies are required to confirm and explore this association.
Author summary
Recent epidemiologic data suggested an increased mortality and morbidity in individuals harboring high densities of Loa loa microfilariae in the blood, underscoring the importance of studies on the possible reasons for this excess mortality. This cross-sectional study assessed arterial stiffness and cardiovascular health markers using a point-of-care device (pOpmètre) among 991 sex-, age- and residency-matched individuals living in rural forested areas of Congo. Analyses included known cardiovascular risk factors (body mass index, smoking, blood pressure, creatininemia) and parasitological covariates (onchocerciasis, asymptomatic malaria, soil-transmitted helminths and Loa loa microfilaremia). People with microfilaremia were more likely to have levels of cardiovascular markers indicating arterial stiffness and deteriorated cardiovascular health, compared with those without microfilaremia.
Introduction
Loiasis is a parasitic disease caused by Loa loa, a filarial nematode transmitted by deerflies belonging to the genus Chrysops. Tens of millions of people are exposed to the parasite in Africa and about 15 million are actually infected. In humans, adult worms live under the skin or within peri- or intermuscular fascia layers but can also migrate occasionally under the conjunctiva of the eye (hence the popular name “African eye worm”). Microfilariae (mfs), the embryonic stage of L. loa, can be produced in very large quantities by female worms and circulate in the blood of infected individuals according to a diurnal rhythm, meaning that they are present in the peripheral circulation during the day and confined to the pulmonary circulation at night. The mfs are 6–8 μm in diameter and 250–300 μm in length and it is not uncommon to see individuals with microfilarial densities (MFD) exceeding 100,000 mfs per mL of blood (mfs/mL). This point illustrates the huge quantity of foreign bodies present in the bloodstream which may interact with the vessel walls. Loiasis can be considered a chronic infection for two reasons: adult worms can live up to 20 years and the MFD of untreated individuals remain stable over time [1,2].
In addition to the frequent manifestations such as pruritus, “eye worm” and episodes of transient angioedema called “Calabar swellings”, many case reports suggest that loiasis induces complications affecting different organs such as the heart, the central nervous system, the spleen, and the kidneys [3]. In addition, two retrospective population-based cohort studies demonstrated that people with high L. loa MFD have a significantly reduced life expectancy and that the risk of premature death is proportional to an individual’s MFD [4,5]. Reasons for this excess mortality are still unknown and are probably multifactorial but cardiovascular diseases (CVD) could be one of the causes.
Arterial stiffness reflects the vessel wall damage over a long time. It has been documented that aortic stiffness has a good predictive value for CVD [6], as well as for mortality risk, independently of CVD risk [7]. Several markers are available to assess cardiovascular health and arterial stiffness. Pulse wave velocity (PWV, expressed in meter/second) is considered the gold standard for large artery stiffness diagnosis and enables to predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, independently of traditional risk factors (diabetes, smoking, high cholesterol levels, obesity, and hypertension) [6]. The Ankle–Brachial Index (ABI) is currently the gold standard method to screen for peripheral artery disease (PAD) [8]. Finally, pulse pressure (PP, expressed in mmHg) is a marker of deterioration in cardiovascular health and is commonly used in routine practice [9].
To date, there have been no studies examining the potential influence of L. loa microfilaremia on arterial stiffness. Should such an association exist, it may result from mixed processes such as a chronic inflammation resulting from the host’s response to L. loa microfilaremia, and/or a prolonged exposure of vessel walls to mfs (potentially leading to disruption of vessel wall structure). Moreover, authors conducting research on the burden of loiasis consider it conceivable that a persistent, biologically-based inflammatory profile exists in individuals with L. loa microfilaremia, justifying the present study [10].
We report the results of the first population-based cross-sectional study investigating the relationship between L. loa MFD and cardiovascular health markers in a rural population of the Republic of Congo.
Methods
Ethics statement
This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Congolese Foundation for Medical Research (N° 036/CIE/FCRM/2022) and the Congolese Ministry of Health and Population (N° 376/MSP/CAB/UCPP-21). All participants received clear and appropriate information and signed a written informed consent form for this specific study.
Study design
This cross-sectional study investigated the relationship between L. loa MFDs and cardiovascular health in a rural area of the Republic of the Congo. This study is part of the Morbidity due to Loiasis (MorLo) project, an international collaborative study aimed at evaluating the prevalence and incidence of L. loa-related organ-specific complications in rural areas of Central Africa. The baseline assessment was conducted from May 16 to June 11, 2022, involving individuals from 21 villages near Sibiti, the capital town of the Lékoumou division. Participants will be monitored for three years with instructions to report any health events during the follow-up, and detailed health assessments will be conducted each year. This region is endemic for loiasis, without schistosomiasis, and routine deworming campaigns are conducted to manage soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH) in children.
Participants
The inclusion criteria were residence in the study area since 2019, age 18 or older and having undergone a prior examination for L. loa microfilaremia in 2019 as part of a screening survey for participants selection in a clinical trial [11]. Those with over 500 L. loa mfs/mL in 2019 were matched based on sex and age (within 5 years) with two individuals from the same village who were identified as amicrofilaremic in 2019 (Fig 1). Among individuals with microfilaremia, 42.3% reported at least one eyeworm episode and 24.9% reported at least one episode of Calabar swelling during the previous year. Among amicrofilaremic individuals, 35.2% reported an eyeworm episode and 24.8% reported Calabar swellings. All examinations took place at Sibiti hospital.
Fig 1. Flowchart of the study.
Arterial stiffness examination
Arterial stiffness was assessed through finger-toe pulse wave velocity (ft-PWV) measured by a device called pOpmètre (Axelife SAS, Saint-Nicolas-de-Redon, France). This device enables an easy recording of the pulse wave at the finger and the toe, using two photodiode sensors with infrared ray-scoping pulpar arteries. ft-PWV is derived from the transit time between the foot of the pulse waves of the finger and the toe and exhibits an acceptable correlation with aortic pulse time transit [12]. The device records two indices continuously for 20 seconds: the difference in pulse wave transit time between toe and finger (ft-TT; in milliseconds) and the ft-PWV (in meters per second) which is calculated as (k x subject’s height / ft-TT), where k depends on height. The pOpmètre technique has been validated as a good alternative measurement to carotid-femoral PWV, which requires trained and experimented staff and is invasive because it requires access to the femoral artery [13,14]. In addition, the device can perform arm and ankle systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurements, thus providing ABI (calculated by dividing the ankle SBP by the arm SBP). PP was calculated by subtracting the arm diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from the arm SBP, both measured with an electric sphygmomanometer. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was defined as (SBP– 2 x DBP) / 3. After the placement of the device sensors by a nurse, the patient rested in a supine position for 10 minutes, until a physician performed the assessment of PWV, ABI, and PP. The measurement was systematically repeated once, and a third measurement was taken in case of a discrepancy between the first two measurements.
Standardizations and definitions
As there is currently no established reference for PWV measures in a rural population of Central Africa, we created a reference PWV from our study population. Using data from non-smoking individuals with no obesity/overweight (body mass index <25 kg/m2), no hypertension, no parasitic infection (STH, loiasis and malaria), no lipid abnormalities and no diabetes, 90th percentiles of PWV were calculated by sex and age categories (<30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and ≥70 years old) (S1 Table). A PWV measure was considered ‘out of range’ for an individual if their PWV measure exceeded the 90th percentile of the constructed reference variable, for their specific sex and age category (Fig 1). Hypertension was defined in two ways: first, using the classic definition: SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg (S1 Table: References values #1); second, using only the criterion of DBP ≥90 mmHg (S2 Table: References values #2, S5 and S6 Tables) focusing on peripheral resistance rather than cardiac flow to partially mitigate the "white coat" effect during patient examination. PAD diagnosis was retained when ABI <0.90 [15]. PP was analyzed as a continuous variable.
Laboratory procedures
Each patient had 50 μL of blood collected by finger-prick with a sterile lancet between 10 am and 4 pm to prepare a thick blood smear (TBS). TBS were stained with Giemsa and examined under a microscope at 100× magnification by experimented technicians to count the L. loa mfs and Mansonella perstans mfs (M. perstans is another filarial species endemic in the area). Each TBS was read twice and the arithmetic mean of the counts was used for the statistical analyses. In case of discrepancy between the results of the two readings, the slide was read a third time and the two closest results were averaged. Creatinine levels were measured for each patient in whole blood with a point-of-care device (iSTAT-1; Abbott Point of Care, Princeton, NJ, USA). For logistic reasons, glycated hemoglobin (Hb1Ac) and fasting serum total cholesterol level, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were only measured in a random subset of patients with a point-of-care device (Afinion 2, Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, Bièvres, France).
From venous blood collected in a heparinized tube, a thin blood film stained with RAL 555 (Kit RAL 555, RAL Diagnostics, Martillac, France), a rapid variant of the May-Grünwald Giemsa staining, was prepared to evaluate asymptomatic Plasmodium sp. infection. Using the same blood sample, the participant’s past exposure to Onchocerca volvulus was assessed using an Ov16 Rapid Diagnostic Test (Biplex L. loa/Ov16 RDT; Drugs & Diagnostics for Tropical Diseases, San Diego, California). The Ov16 RDT detects antibodies to Ov16 antigen. Two skin snips were collected from each patient with positive Ov16 RDT using a 2 mm Holth-type corneoscleral punch and incubated in saline at room temperature for 24 hours. Emerged mfs were counted under a microscope, and the individuals’ O. volvulus MFD, expressed as mfs per snip, were calculated using the arithmetic mean of the two snips. Despite schistosomiasis not being endemic in the area, any individual with haematuria underwent microscopic examination of urine (filtration method) for Schistosoma eggs and serological testing (LD BioDiagnostic, Schistosoma ICT IgG IgM).
Finally, the participants were offered the option to provide stool samples for STH screening. STH infections were identified through the microscopic examination of stool specimens. Participants were supplied with a 50-mL plastic stool container and instructed to collect a morning stool sample. The collected specimens were placed in cooling boxes and shipped to the laboratory within 6 hours. Upon arrival, the samples were either immediately processed or stored overnight at 6°C. Using the Kato-Katz method, a thick smear was prepared from each stool sample and these smears were examined under a microscope at 40× magnification.
Statistical analyses
Mean, standard deviation (SD), median, and 10th/90th percentiles of PWV were calculated by age, sex, L. loa microfilaremia status (positive or negative), and L. loa MFD (categorized using interquartile range among individuals with microfilaremia: 1–499, 500–2,499, 2,500–9,999, and ≥10,000 mfs/mL).
Sex, age, mean arterial pressure, pulse rate, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, creatininemia (expressed in μmol/L), malaria status, STH infections presence and intensities (in eggs per gram), L. loa microfilaremia status, and L. loa MFD were described and compared based on PWV status (normal vs out of range) and PAD status (presence or absence). The Chi-2 test and Kruskal-Wallis rank test were performed for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.
Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between (i) the PWV status and PAD and (ii) age (as a continuous variable), sex, smoking status, MAP (<100 or ≥100 mmHg), pulse rate (<60, 60–90, and >90 beats per minute), BMI (<18.5, 18.5–25, and >25 kg/m2), creatininemia level (<60, 60–110 and >110 μmol/L), STH infection presence, L. loa microfilaremia status, and L. loa MFD (1–499, 500–2,499, 2,500–9,999, and ≥10,000 mfs/mL). To address concerns about multicollinearity, the presence of STH infection was categorized as either present of absent, and species were assessed separately in distinct models. Possible interactions between STH species and loiasis were evaluated using a likelihood-ratio test.
Finally, a multivariate linear regression model was conducted to examine the association between PP and age (as a continuous variable), sex, smoking status, MAP (<100 or ≥100 mmHg), pulse rate (<60, 60–90, and >90 beats per minute), BMI (<18.5, 18.5–25, and >25 kg/m2), creatininemia (<60, 60–110, and >110 μmol/L) and L. loa microfilaremia status.
Power calculation
In this study, by employing a 1:2 matching design (1 microfilaremic matched with 2 amicrofilaremic individuals) and incorporating 990 participants, we anticipate a robust statistical power. Specifically, our design allows for nearly 100% power to detect a twofold higher risk (odds ratio, OR) of cardiovascular complications in microfilaremics compared to amicrofilaremics. Additionally, we expect a power of approximately 90% to identify a 1.5-fold higher risk.
Hb1Ac and lipid profiles
Hb1Ac, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL were described by PWV status (S2 Table) and PAD (S3 Table). The Chi-2 test or Fisher’s exact test were performed to assess the distribution of lipid and Hb1Ac anomalies among individuals with out of range PWV and normal PWV, as well as among individuals with or without PAD. Additionally, correlations analyses were conducted to explore the associations between L. loa microfilaremia status and densities, lipid profiles, and glycated hemoglobin (S4 Table).
Results
Of the 991 individuals included, one opted to withdraw from the study, and PWV measurements could not be performed for four other subjects (three with fingertips and/or toes deemed too hard and one with amputation). An additional six subjects did not have ankle blood pressure measurements (probably resulting from severe medial calcific sclerosis or severe PAD), rendering ABI calculation impossible. Moreover, four women were excluded from all analyses because they were pregnant at the time of the examination. Consequently, 982, 976, and 986 individuals were included in the PWV, ABI, and PP analysis, respectively (Fig 1). Mean values, medians and 10th and 90th percentile of PWV measurements by age, sex, and microfilaremia status are presented in S1 Table. HbA1c data were available for only 238 individuals, with only one individual having more than 7%. Additionally, 29, 17, 53, and 13 subjects had >5 mmol/L of total cholesterol, >1.7 mmol/L of triglycerides, <1 mmol/L of HDL and >3.5 mmol/L of LDL, respectively (S2 and S3 Tables).
Only six individuals (0.6%) had M. perstans mfs in their blood (range: 20–660 mf/mL). Twenty-two individuals (2.2%) tested positive for Ov16 RDT and none of them had O. volvulus mfs in the skin snips. Only 16 patients (1.6%) exhibited malaria elements in their blood smears (schizont or trophozoite stages of P. falciparum). Out of 771 individuals (77.8%) who volunteered for stool examinations, 391 cases tested positive for STH eggs (50.7%). Among these, there were no cases of hookworm infection, 332 cases of A. lumbricoides infection (43.1%), and 207 cases of T. trichiura infection (26.8%), with 146 cases exhibiting co-infections (18.8%). T. trichiura and A. lumbricoides infections were correlated with each other (Cramer’s V = 0.342). No schistosomiasis was found in the individuals with haematuria.
Table 1 displays the characteristics of individuals based on whether their PWV values were considered normal or above the threshold (>90th percentile of a population of the same age and sex, considered healthy). High MAP (p<0.001) and high pulse rate (p = 0.003) were associated with out of range PWV measurements. L. loa MFD (in binary, categories or continuous) was not significantly associated with out of range PWV measurements (respectively, p = 0.107; p = 0.073 and p = 0.137). When the analysis used reference population #2 (hypertension defined as DBP ≥90 mmHg), the results were similar for L. loa MFD but different for creatininemia levels with a significant elevation in the out of range PWV group (S5 Table).
Table 1. Distribution of the main characteristics according to Pulse Wave Velocity status.
Total | PWV | p value * | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | Out of range ** | |||
N. subjects (n, %) | 982 | 790 (80.5%) | 192 (19.5%) | |
Sex-ratio (M/F) | 1.67 | 1.70 | 1.59 | 0.709 |
Age in years (mean ± SD) | 50.9 ± 14.8 | 51.0 ± 14.4 | 50.2 ± 16.3 | 0.785 |
Average blood pressure in mmHg (mean ± SD) | 95.3 ± 16.6 | 93.8 ± 15.4 | 101.1 ± 19.6 | <0.001 |
Pulse rate in bpm (mean ± SD) | 64.1 ± 12.3 | 63.4 ± 12.0 | 66.7 ± 13.3 | 0.003 |
Body mass index (mean ± SD) | 21.0 ± 3.2 | 21.0 ± 3.2 | 21.2 ± 3.2 | 0.424 |
Smoking (n, %) | 181 (18.6%) | 147 (18.7%) | 34 (18.0%) | 0.821 |
Creatininemia in μmol/L (mean ± SD) | 71.2 ± 19.3 | 70.9 ± 19.2 | 73.1 ± 18.9 | 0.159 |
Malaria presence (n, %) | 16 (1.6%) | 13 (1.7%) | 3 (1.6%) | 0.929 |
Any STH presence (n, %) | 388 (39.5%) | 307 (38.9%) | 81 (42.2%) | 0.299 |
Hookworm presence (n, %) | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Ascaris lumbricoides presence (n, %) | 329 (33.5%) | 260 (32.9%) | 69 (35.9%) | 0.354 |
Ascaris lumbricoides EPG (mean ± SD) | 24.6 ± 58.8 | 21.5 ± 51.1 | 37.1 ± 84.3 | 0.128 |
Trichuris trichiura presence (n, %) | 206 (21.0%) | 164 (20.8%) | 42 (21.9%) | 0.561 |
Trichuris trichiura EPG (mean ± SD) | 2.2 ± 8.3 | 2.1 ± 8.5 | 2.6 ± 7.8 | 0.458 |
Loa microfilaremia status (n, %) | 0.107 | |||
Positive | 340 (34.6%) | 264 (33.4%) | 76 (39.6%) | |
Negative | 642 (65.4%) | 526 (66.6%) | 116 (60.4%) | |
Loa MFD (mfs/mL) | 0.073 | |||
Mean ± SD | 2,425 ± 7,426 | 2,185 ± 6,899 | 3,412 ± 9,240 | |
Median [IQR] | 0 [0–540] | 0 [0–430] | 0 [0–1,465] | |
Loa MFD categories (n, %) | 0.137 | |||
0 mf/mL | 642 (65.4%) | 526 (66.6%) | 116 (60.4%) | |
1–499 mfs/mL | 91 (9.3%) | 72 (9.1%) | 19 (9.9%) | |
500–2,499 mfs/mL | 80 (8.1%) | 66 (8.4%) | 14 (7.3%) | |
2,500–9,999 mfs/mL | 93 (9.5%) | 73 (9.2%) | 20 (10.4%) | |
≥10,000 mfs/mL | 76 (7.7%) | 53 (6.7%) | 23 (12.0%) |
Abbreviations: PWV, pulse wave velocity; N, number; SD, Standard deviation; MFD, microfilarial density; IQR, interquartile range; N/A, not applicable.
* Chi-2 for categorical variable and Kruskal-Wallis rank test for continuous variables.
** An individual is defined as out of range if his/her PWV is higher than the 90th percentile of the population considered healthy in the same age category (see S1 Table–References values #1).
Individuals with ≥10,000 L. loa mfs/mL were 2.17 more likely to have an out of range PWV (p = 0.006), compared to amicrofilaremic subjects (Table 2). Age was negatively associated with out of range PWV (adjusted Odds-Ratio [aOR] = 0.98, p = 0.008), indicating that younger people were more likely to exceed the threshold relative to their age category (thresholds at 6.1 and 6.0 for males and females under 30, respectively, and thresholds at 15.0 and 12.5 for men and women over 70, respectively. See S1 Table). STH infections were not significantly associated with out of range PWV (aOR = 1.43, p = 0.066). When the variable “Any STH presence” was replaced by “Presence of Ascaris” or “Presence of Trichuris”, all model coefficients were similar with, respectively, an aOR of 1.35 (p = 0.116) and an aOR of 1.24 (p = 0.304). When reference population #2 was used for the analysis, the results were similar, and the effect of loiasis was reinforced, with a significantly higher risk for individuals with Loa MFD >10,000 mfs/mL (aOR = 2.36, p = 0.002), compared to amicrofilaremic subjects (S6 Table).
Table 2. Results from logistic regression model explaining Pulse Wave Velocity status.
PWV > 90th percentile of the PWV in the healthy population (yes/no) * | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aOR | 95% CI | p value | aOR | 95% CI | p value | |
Age | 0.98 | 0.97–0.99 | 0.008 | 0.98 | 0.97–0.99 | 0.008 |
Sex | ||||||
Female | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Male | 0.82 | 0.55–1.24 | 0.355 | 0.81 | 0.54–2.22 | 0.317 |
Smoking | ||||||
No | Ref. | |||||
Yes | 1.03 | 0.66–1.61 | 0.886 | 1.03 | 0.6–1.61 | 0.902 |
Average blood pressure | ||||||
<100 mmHg | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
≥100 mmHg | 2.16 | 1.50–3.11 | <0.001 | 2.13 | 1.48–3.08 | <0.001 |
Pulse rate | ||||||
<60 bpm | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
60–90 bpm | 1.23 | 0.85–1.77 | 0.271 | 1.25 | 0.87–1.81 | 0.229 |
>90 bpm | 1.75 | 0.73–4.20 | 0.207 | 1.82 | 0.75–4.39 | 0.183 |
Body mass index | ||||||
<18.5 kg/m2 | 1.07 | 0.67–1.69 | 0.780 | 1.08 | 0.68–1.71 | 0.752 |
18.5–25 kg/m2 | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
>25 kg/m2 | 1.11 | 0.64–1.92 | 0.665 | 1.12 | 0.64–1.95 | 0.689 |
Creatininemia | ||||||
<60 μmol/L | 0.69 | 0.44–1.07 | 0.099 | 0.67 | 0.43–1.05 | 0.079 |
60–110 μmol/L | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
>110 μmol/L | 1.24 | 0.47–3.25 | 0.665 | 1.22 | 0.46–3.20 | 0.688 |
Any STH presence | ||||||
No | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Yes | 1.43 | 0.98–2.09 | 0.063 | 1.43 | 0.98–2.09 | 0.066 |
MD | 1.44 | 0.93–2.23 | 0.097 | 1.43 | 0.92–2.21 | 0.107 |
Loa microfilaremia status | ||||||
Negative | Ref. | |||||
Positive | 1.35 | 0.96–1.89 | 0.082 | |||
Loa MFD categories (mfs/mL) | ||||||
0 | Ref. | |||||
1–499 | 1.18 | 0.67–2.07 | 0.565 | |||
500–2,499 | 1.03 | 0.55–1.93 | 0.913 | |||
2,500–9,999 | 1.25 | 0.71–2.19 | 0.439 | |||
≥10,000 | 2.17 | 1.25–3.75 | 0.006 |
Abbreviations: PWV, pulse wave velocity; bpm, beats per minute; aOR, adjusted odds-ratio; CI, confidence intervals; MD, missing data
* An individual is defined as out of range if his/her PWV is higher than the 90th percentile of the population considered healthy in the same age category (see S1 Table–References values #1).
Table 3 presents the characteristics of the individuals based on the presence or absence of PAD. Older age (p<0.001), low pulse rate (p<0.001), low BMI (p<0.001), smoking (p<0.001), Loa microfilaremia status (p = 0.015) and L. loa MFD in continuous (p = 0.042) or categories (p = 0.036) were associated with the presence of PAD.
Table 3. Distribution of the main variables of interest according to Peripheral Arterial Disease status.
Total | PAD-* | PAD+* | p value** | |
---|---|---|---|---|
N. subjects (n, %) | 976 | 839 (86.0%) | 137 (14.0%) | |
Sex-ratio (M/F) | 1.69 | 1.67 | 1.80 | 0.710 |
Age in years (mean ± SD) | 50.9 ± 14.7 | 50.0 ± 14.6 | 56.9 ± 13.8 | <0.001 |
Average blood pressure in mmHg (mean ± SD) | 95.3 ± 16.5 | 95.4 ± 16.5 | 94.7 ± 16.8 | 0.465 |
Pulse rate in bpm (mean ± SD) | 64.1 ± 12.3 | 65.0 ± 12.3 | 58.6 ± 11.2 | <0.001 |
Body mass index (mean ± SD) | 21.0 ± 3.2 | 21.2 ± 3.2 | 19.7 ± 2.8 | <0.001 |
Smoking (n, %) | 181 (18.5%) | 141 (16.8%) | 40 (29.2%) | <0.001 |
Creatininemia in μmol/L (mean ± SD) | 71.2 ± 19.3 | 71.2 ± 19.4 | 71.7 ± 17.9 | 0.569 |
Malaria presence (n, %) | 16 (1.6%) | 12 (1.5%) | 2 (2.9%) | 0.210 |
Any STH presence (n, %) | 386 (39.5%) | 331 (39.5%) | 50 (40.1%) | 0.965 |
Hookworm presence (n, %) | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
Ascaris lumbricoides presence (n, %) | 329 (33.6%) | 281 (33.5%) | 47 (34.3%) | 0.962 |
Ascaris lumbricoides EPG (mean ± SD) | 24.7 ± 59.1 | 24.9 ± 60.8 | 22.9 ± 47.5 | 0.904 |
Trichuris trichiura presence (n, %) | 204 (20.9%) | 176 (21.0%) | 28 (20.4%) | 0.959 |
Trichuris trichiura EPG (mean ± SD) | 2.2 ± 8.4 | 2.1 ± 8.2 | 2.9 ± 9.6 | 0.929 |
Loa microfilaremia status (n, %) | 0.015 | |||
Positive | 338 (34.6%) | 278 (33.1%) | 60 (43.8%) | |
Negative | 638 (65.4%) | 561 (66.9%) | 77 (56.2%) | |
Loa MFD (mfs/mL) | 0.042 | |||
Mean ± SD | 2,422 ± 7,438 | 2,368 ± 7,426 | 2,757 ± 7,533 | |
Median [IQR] | 0 [0–535] | 0 [0–440] | 0 [0–860] | |
Loa MFD categories (n, %) | 0.036 | |||
0 mf/mL | 6238 (65.4%) | 541 (66.9%) | 77 (56.2%) | |
1–499 mfs/mL | 91 (9.3%) | 70 (8.7%) | 18 (13.1%) | |
500–2,499 mfs/mL | 80 (8.2%) | 62 (7.4%) | 18 (13.1%) | |
2,500–9,999 mfs/mL | 92 (9.4%) | 81 (9.7%) | 11 (8.0%) | |
≥10,000 mfs/mL | 75 (7.7%) | 62 (7.4%) | 13 (9.5%) |
Abbreviations: PAD- and PAD+, individuals without and with peripheral arterial disease; N, number; SD, Standard deviation; bpm, beats per minute; MFD, microfilarial density; IQR, interquartile range.
* PAD is defined if Ankle–brachial pressure index (ABI) is <0.9
** Chi-2 for categorical variable and Kruskal-Wallis rank test for continuous variables.
According to logistic regression, L. loa microfilaremia status was not significantly associated with the presence of PAD (aOR = 1.46, p = 0.059). Only individuals from the 500–2,499 mfs/mL category presented an increased risk of having PAD, compared to amicrofilaremic subjects (aOR = 2.09, p = 0.019) (Table 4).
Table 4. Results from logistic regression model explaining the presence of Peripheral Arterial Disease.
PAD (yes/no) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aOR | 95% CI | P | aOR | 95% CI | P | |
Age | 1.04 | 1.03–1.06 | < .001 | 1.04 | 1.03–1.06 | <0.001 |
Sex | ||||||
Female | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Male | 0.94 | 0.58–1.51 | 0.788 | 0.94 | 0.58–1.51 | 0.788 |
Smoking | ||||||
No | Ref. | |||||
Yes | 1.98 | 1.24–3.17 | 0.004 | 1.99 | 1.24–3.18 | 0.004 |
Average blood pressure | ||||||
<100 mmHg | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
≥100 mmHg | 0.86 | 0.56–1.34 | 0.516 | 0.84 | 0.54–1.31 | 0.452 |
Pulse rate | ||||||
<60 bpm | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
60–90 bpm | 0.38 | 0.25–0.57 | <0.001 | 0.38 | 0.25–0.57 | <0.001 |
>90 bpm | 0.18 | 0.04–0.83 | 0.028 | 0.19 | 0.04–0.86 | 0.032 |
Body mass index | ||||||
<18.5 kg/m2 | 2.03 | 1.28–3.21 | 0.002 | 2.65 | 1.30–3.27 | 0.002 |
18.5–25 kg/m2 | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
>25 kg/m2 | 0.89 | 0.41–1.92 | 0.773 | 0.87 | 0.40–1.89 | 0.730 |
Creatininemia | ||||||
<60 μmol/L | 1.08 | 0.66–1.77 | 0.769 | 1.09 | 0.66–1.78 | 0.742 |
60–110 μmol/L | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
>110 μmol/L | 0.73 | 0.22–2.39 | 0.606 | 0.77 | 0.24–2.52 | 0.670 |
Any STH presence | ||||||
No | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
Yes | 0.82 | 0.53–1.27 | 0.378 | 0.84 | 0.54–1.31 | 0.451 |
MD | 0.89 | 0.53–1.50 | 0.671 | 0.91 | 0.54–1.52 | 0.715 |
Loa microfilaremia status | ||||||
Negative | Ref. | |||||
Positive | 1.46 | 0.99–2.17 | 0.059 | |||
Loa MFD categories (mfs/mL) | ||||||
0 | Ref. | |||||
1–499 | 1.72 | 0.93–3.18 | 0.083 | |||
500–2,499 | 2.09 | 1.13–3.89 | 0.019 | |||
2,500–9,999 | 0.87 | 0.43–1.79 | 0.715 | |||
≥10,000 | 1.35 | 0.68–2.66 | 0.393 |
Abbreviations: PAD, Peripheral Arterial Disease; bpm, beats per minute; aOR, adjusted odds-ratio; CI, confidence intervals; MD, missing data
PP was strongly associated with age (aß = 0.39, p<0.001) (Table 5). Individuals with L. loa microfilaremia had significantly higher PP measures than amicrofilaremic individuals (aß = 2.00, p = 0.038).
Table 5. Results from linear regression explaining Pulse Pressure (PP).
aß | 95% CI | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (in years) | 0.39 | 0.32–0.45 | <0.001 |
Sex | |||
Female | Ref. | ||
Male | -3.71 | -5.95– -1.47 | 0.001 |
Smoking | |||
No | Ref. | ||
Yes | -1.50 | -3.92–0.92 | 0.224 |
Average blood pressure | |||
<100 mmHg | Ref. | ||
≥100 mmHg | 12.51 | 10.48–14.55 | <0.001 |
Pulse rate | |||
<60 bpm | Ref. | ||
60–90 bpm | -3.03 | -4.98– -1.09 | 0.002 |
>90 bpm | -5.79 | -11.12– -0.45 | 0.034 |
Body mass index | |||
<18.5 kg/m2 | -0.04 | -2.53–2.44 | 0.972 |
18.5–25 kg/m2 | Ref. | ||
>25 kg/m2 | 1.54 | -1.63–4.71 | 0.341 |
Creatininemia | |||
<60 μmol/L | 1.34 | -0.99–3.70 | 0.260 |
60–110 μmol/L | Ref. | ||
>110 μmol/L | 0.56 | -5.06–6.19 | 0.844 |
Any STH | |||
Absence | Ref. | ||
Presence | 0.20 | -1.83–2.24 | 0.844 |
MD | 4.52 | 2.14–6.90 | 0.001 |
Loa microfilaremia status | |||
Negative | Ref. | ||
Positive | 2.00 | 0.11–3.90 | 0.038 |
Abbreviations: bpm, beats per minute; aß, adjusted coefficients; CI, confidence intervals
Discussion
In a population-based cross-sectional study, we established a relationship between L. loa microfilaremia and cardiovascular health markers. This study is the first to reveal heightened arterial stiffness in individuals with loiasis. The presence of L. loa mfs in the blood is associated with excess mortality and the risk of premature death is proportionally associated with the L. loa MFD, but the causes of this excess mortality remain unidentified [4,5]. The possible development of arterial stiffness as a consequence of L. loa microfilaremia could be a contributing factor, especially considering the comprehensive examination of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as smoking, and the inclusion of other potential parasitic cofactors in our analyses. Moreover, at the time of the study, none of the patients reported taking medication for cardiovascular disease. Assessing the evolution of cardiovascular abnormalities after antihelminthic treatment could provide insights into the causality of lesions (if reversible) associated with L. loa microfilaremia, but there is currently no treatment protocol in Congo for hyper-microfilaremia, and it would be ethically challenging to administer such treatment to these patients. The association between high PWV values and L. loa microfilaremia showed an increased risk of 2.17 and 2.36 in individuals with ≥10,000 mfs/mL compared to amicrofilaremic subjects, using reference values #1 and #2, respectively. Bivariate analysis indicated a significant association between the presence of PAD and L. loa microfilaremia. Surprisingly, in the logistic regression model on PAD, the two highest MFD categories (2,500–9,999 and ≥10,000 mfs/mL) did not show a significant association with PAD. This may be attributed to either a lack of statistical power (as there were only 11 and 13 subjects with PAD in these MFD categories, respectively) or to unidentified biological effects. While it cannot be rule out completely, the hypothesis of a compensatory vascular response to high MFD level is deemed unlikely. Further research is imperative to confirm the association between L. loa MFD and PAD and to ascertain whether L. loa microfilaremia leads to vascular complications.
PP is recognized as a robust marker of cardiovascular health deterioration, and its elevation in individuals with microfilaremia (aOR = 2.00, p = 0.038) adds to the concerns about potential cardiovascular implications of loiasis. Arterial stiffness is a strong cardiovascular risk factor and a predictor of all-cause mortality [6,16]. It results from the decrease in elastic properties of large vessels wall, reflected by accelerated PWV, resulting in an earlier reflected wave, that increases systolic and pulse pressures, and thus heart workload. In addition, the defect of arterial compliance allows transmission of pulsatile pressure to peripheral vessels, damaging the vulnerable microvasculature of unprotected organs with low levels of arteriolar resistance, such as the brain or the kidneys [17].
Some study subjects underwent biological tests for Hb1AC and lipids. The results of these tests were not included in our final models because they were performed in less than 25% of the participants, for logistic reasons. However, no association were found between L. loa MFD and lipid profile or Hb1Ac status. There is, therefore, no reason for lipid abnormalities and diabetes to be more prevalent in the microfilaremia population than in the amicrofilaremic population, reassuring us of a possible absence of selection bias. Nevertheless, the prospect of genetic factors influencing both the presence of circulating microfilariae and the risk of cardiovascular disease remains a possible avenue for future exploration.
PWV measurements served as the primary marker of arterial stiffness. The influence of classical cardiovascular risk factors such as male sex and older age, on this marker complicated its analysis. It is crucial to employ well-defined reference values, and this could be considered a limit of this work. The only existing validated reference values for PWV pertain healthy Caucasian populations and do not seem to be adapted for our study population [18,19], and it has been established that African populations have higher PWV and blood pressure values than Caucasian populations [20–22]. Therefore, we defined references from this study population using the 90th percentile of PWV in a sample of the population considered healthy for a given sex and age category. This reference may be specific to our population and further studies are needed to define real reference standards for PWV in rural Central Africa but also to confirm the association between L. loa microfilaremia and high PWV. This need is compounded by the fact that the standards for this population have been defined on a relatively small sample of subjects (see S1 Table).
The gold standard technique to define arterial stiffness in humans is carotid-femoral PWV, with carotid and femoral wave forms assessed by applanation tonometry [23]. In this study, we assessed the presence of arterial stiffness using the finger-toe PWV assessed using a pOpmètre. This alternative is easy-to-use and reliable, and has shown acceptable agreement with the reference technique [12].
Several structural and functional arterial wall changes have been described in vascular aging, as well as in pathological conditions such as hypertension or metabolic diseases. The most important is vascular fibrosis, induced by collagen deposition, elastin fragmentation or degradation, fiber damages due to advanced glycation products, or medial calcifications [24,25]. Thus, arterial stiffness emerged as a multifactorial and complex process, including endothelial dysfunction and interactions between vascular cell components, extracellular matrix, but also endocrine [26], and inflammatory factors. The only existing data concerning the potential impact of a filaria on endothelial functions concern Dirofilaria immitis, the causal agent of cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis (heartworm disease of the dog). It has been shown that infection with larvae of D. immitis could lead to peripheral pulmonary disease [27]. Moreover, when vascular human endothelial cells were cultured in the presence of antigenic extracts of D. immitis adult worms, it induced changes in pathways related to inflammation: increased synthesis of eicosanoids, decrease in endothelial permeability and expression of adhesion molecules involved in the transmigration of neutrophils and monocytes [28].
Numerous studies have investigated the association between helminth infections (Schistosoma species, STH species, Opisthorchis viverrini, Strongyloides stercoralis and O. volvulus), blood pressure and cardiovascular hemodynamics, but none concerned loiasis [28]. Of the 18 studies included in this systematic review, 56% reported no effect; furthermore, anthelmintic treatment across three studies did not demonstrate any subsequent change in blood pressure [29]. In this study population, less than 2% of the population exhibited malaria parasites in their blood and no association with arterial was observed.
Arterial stiffness is also documented in chronic inflammatory diseases [30,31]. A chronic inflammation, a mechanical effect of the mfs on the vasculature caused by high numbers of parasites passing through the vessels and/or loiasis-induced eosinophilia could induce such a phenomenon. Indeed, eosinophilia has been associated with atherosclerotic plaque formation and thrombosis [32]. It is known that a high proportion of individuals infected by L. loa do not present blood mfs and it has been shown that this condition (called “occult loiasis”), as well as the level of MFD in those who have blood mfs, are associated with a genetic familial predisposition which may involve immuno-inflammatory processes [1,33]. It should be noted that microfilaremic and amicrofilaremic subjects included in this study had similar frequencies of eyeworm episodes (42.3 vs. 35.2%, p = 0.164) and of Calabar swellings (24.9 vs. 24.8%, p = 0.961) during the last 12 months.
Certainly, the cross-sectional design falls and the lack of normative values for PWV analysis in our study population constrain the interpretability of our results. To address these limitations, further investigation is warranted to explore the long-term effects, including cardiovascular events and potential excess mortality, among the infected subjects included in this study, as well as to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanistic processes involved in ultrasound-based detection of mediacalcosis and/or atheroma. Overall, the potential cardiovascular complications associated with loiasis may contribute to the elevated mortality observed in infected individuals. This phenomenon could emerge as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in the Central African context. Furthermore, it may exacerbate the escalating socio-economic challenges related to cardiovascular health in rural Africa, particularly given the limited availability of cardiologists and healthcare infrastructure for this population.
Supporting information
Abbreviations: N, number of subjects in the category; MFD, microfilarial density. * Values calculated from individuals with no hypertension (defined as SBP <140 mmHg and DPB <90 mmHg), non-smokers, non-obese/in overweight and with no L. loa microfilaremia. ** Values calculated from individuals with no hypertension (defined as DPB <90 mmHg), non-smokers, non-obese/in overweight and with no L. loa microfilaremia.
(DOCX)
Abbreviations: PWV, pulse wave velocity; N., number; Hb1AC, glycated hemoglobin; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; NA, not applicable. * An individual is defined as out of range if its PWV is higher than the 90th percentile of the population considered healthy in the same age category (see S1 Table–References values #1). ** Threshold at which the measurement is considered out of range: Hb1Ac >7%; Total cholesterol >5 mmol/L; Triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L; HDL <1.0 mmol/L; LDL >3.5 mmol/L; for lipid panel, measurement is considered out of range if one of the lipids is out of range. *** Chi-2 test for categorical variables with all effectives > 5 or fisher’s exact test.
(DOCX)
Abbreviations: PAD, peripherical arterial disease; N., number; Hb1AC, glycated hemoglobin; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; NA: not applicable. * Threshold at which the measurement is considered out of range: Hb1Ac >7%; Total cholesterol >5 mmol/L; Triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L; HDL <1.0 mmol/L; LDL >3.5 mmol/L; for lipid panel, measurement is considered out of range if one of the lipids is out of range. ** Chi-2 test for categorical variables with all effectives > 5 or fisher’s exact test.
(DOCX)
1 Fisher’s exact test. 2 Cramér’s V. 3 Cuzick’s test. * For lipid panel, an individual is considered out of range if at least one of the lipids is out of range (see S2 and S3 Tables).
(DOCX)
Abbreviations: PWV, pulse wave velocity; N, number; SD, Standard deviation; MFD, microfilarial density; IQR, interquartile range; N/A, not applicable. * Chi-2 for categorical variable and Kruskal-Wallis rank test for continuous variables. ** An individual is defined as out of range if his/her PWV is higher than the 90th percentile of the population considered healthy in the same age category (see S1 Table 1 –References values #2).
(DOCX)
Abbreviations: PWV, pulse wave velocity; bpm, beats per minute; aOR, adjusted odds-ratio; CI, confidence intervals. * An individual is defined as out of range if his/her PWV is higher than the 90th percentile of the population considered healthy in the same age category (see S1 Table–References values #2).
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the French Embassy in Republic of Congo. We thank the Lékoumou health district, the medical, paramedical and technical staff of the Sibiti hospital, the PNLO and IRD drivers, and the participants for agreeing to participate.
Data Availability
The anonymized data and related documentations that support the findings of this study are openly available in DataSuds repository (IRD, France) at https://doi.org/10.23708/TEM4LQ. Data reuse is granted under CC-BY license.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC; https://erc.europa.eu/) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [grant agreement No 949963]. CBC is the carrier of this grant. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Garcia A, Abel L, Cot M, Ranque S, Richard P, Boussinesq M, et al. Longitudinal survey of Loa loa filariasis in southern Cameroon: Long-term stability and factors influencing individual microfilarial status. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;52: 370–375. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Noireau F, Pichon G. Population dynamics of Loa loa and Mansonella perstans infections in individuals living in an endemic area of the Congo. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;46: 672–676. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.46.672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Buell KG, Whittaker C, Chesnais CB, Jewell PD, Pion SDS, Walker M, et al. Atypical clinical manifestations of loiasis and their relevance for endemic populations. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6: 1–9. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chesnais CB, Takougang I, Paguélé M, Pion SD, Boussinesq M, et al. Excess mortality associated with loiasis: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;17: 108–116. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30405-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hemilembolo MC, Niama AC, Campillo JT, Pion SD, Missamou F, Whittaker C, et al. Excess mortality associated with loiasis: confirmation by a new retrospective cohort study conducted in the Republic of Congo. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;ofad103. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55: 1318–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sequí-Domínguez I, Cavero-Redondo I, Álvarez-Bueno C, Pozuelo-Carrascosa DP, de Arenas-Arroyo SN, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Accuracy of pulse wave velocity predicting cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI; 2020. pp. 1–13. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C, et al. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial Index: a scientific statement From the American Heart Association. AHA Scientific Statement. 2012;126: 2980–2909. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276fbcb [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tang KS, Medeiros ED, Shah AD. Wide pulse pressure: A clinical review. Journal of Clinical Hypertension. Blackwell Publishing Inc.; 2020. pp. 1960–1967. doi: 10.1111/jch.14051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ramharter M, Butler J, Mombo-Ngoma G, Nordmann T, Davi SD, Zoleko Manego R. The African eye worm: current understanding of the epidemiology, clinical disease, and treatment of loiasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00438-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Campillo J, Bikita P, Hemilembolo M, Louya F, Missamou F, Pion S, et al. Safety and efficacy of levamisole in loiasis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;75: 19–27. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Milan A, Zocaro G, Leone D, Tosello F, Buraioli I, Schiavone D, et al. Current assessment of pulse wave velocity: comprehensive review of validation studies. J Hypertens. 2019;37: 1547–1557. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alivon M, Phuong TVD, Vignon V, Bozec E, Khettab H, Hanon O, et al. A novel device for measuring arterial stiffness using finger-toe pulse wave velocity: Validation study of the pOpmètre. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;108: 227–234. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wilkinson IB, McEniery CM, Schillaci G, Boutouyrie P, Segers P, Donald A, et al. ARTERY Society guidelines for validation of non-invasive haemodynamic measurement devices: Part 1, arterial pulse wave velocity. Artery Res. 2010;4: 34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.artres.2010.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: Executive Summary: A report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2017. pp. e686–e725. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, May M, Anderson SG, Benjamin EJ, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: An individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63: 636–646. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.O’Rourke MF, Safar ME. Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: Cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension. 2005. pp. 200–204. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000168052.00426.65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van Hout MJ, Dekkers IA, Westenberg JJ, Schalij MJ, Widya RL, de Mutsert R, et al. Normal and reference values for cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based pulse wave velocity in the middle-aged general population. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. 2021;23. doi: 10.1186/s12968-021-00739-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Arterial Stiffness’ Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in presence of cardiovascular risk factors: “establishing normal and reference values.” European Heart Journal. 2010. pp. 2320–2322. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schutte AE, Huisman HW, Schutte R, van Rooyen JM, Malan L MN, Reimann M. Arterial stiffness profiles: investigating various sections of the arterial tree of African and Caucasian people. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2011;33: 511–7. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2011.561897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ferreira AV, Viana MC, Mill JG, Asmar RG, Cunha RS. Racial differences in aortic stiffness in normotensive and hypertensive adults. J Hypertens. 1999;17: 631–7. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199917050-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Magalhães P, Capingana DP, Silva ABT, Ferreira AVL, de Sá Cunha R, Rodrigues SL, et al. Age- and gender-specific reference values of pulse wave velocity for African adults: Preliminary results. Age (Omaha). 2013;35: 2345–2355. doi: 10.1007/s11357-012-9504-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, Avolio AP, Chirinos JA, Cockcroft JR, et al. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2015;66: 698–722. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lacolley P, Challande P, Regnault V, Lakatta EG, Wang M. Cellular and Molecular Determinants of Arterial Aging. Early Vascular Aging (EVA). Elsevier; 2015. pp. 7–16. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Smulyan H, Mookherjee S, Safar ME. The two faces of hypertension: Role of aortic stiffness. Journal of the American Society of Hypertension. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2016. pp. 175–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Aroor AR, DeMarco VG, Jia G, Sun Z, Nistala R, Meininger GA, et al. The Role of Tissue Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in the Development of Endothelial Dysfunction and Arterial Stiffness. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2013;4. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Atwell RB. Early stages of disease of the peripheral pulmonary arteries in canine Dirofilariasis. Aust Vet J. 1980;56: 157–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1980.tb05668.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Morchón R, Rodríguez-Barbero A, Velasco S, López-Belmonte J, Simón F. Vascular endothelial cell activation by adult Dirofilaria immitis antigens. Parasitol Int. 2008;57: 441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2008.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pham K, Mertelsmann A, Mages K, Kingery JR, Mazigo HD, Jaka H, et al. Effects of helminths and anthelmintic treatment on cardiometabolic diseases and risk factors: A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17: e0011022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Booth AD, Wallace S, McEniery CM, Yasmin, Brown J, Jayne DRW, et al. Inflammation and Arterial Stiffness in Systemic Vasculitis: A Model of Vascular Inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50: 581–588. doi: 10.1002/art.20002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mäki-Petäjä KM, Hall FC, Booth AD, Wallace SML, Yasmin, Bearcroft PWP, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Associated With Increased Aortic Pulse-Wave Velocity, Which Is Reduced by Anti–Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Therapy. Circulation. 2006;114: 1185–1192. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.601641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marx C, Novotny J, Salbeck D, Zellner KR, Nicolai L, Pekayvaz K, et al. Eosinophil-platelet interactions promote atherosclerosis and stabilize thrombosis with eosinophil extracellular traps. Blood. 2019;134: 1859–1872. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eyebe S, Sabbagh A, Pion SD, Nana-Djeunga HC, Kamgno J, Boussinesq M, et al. Familial aggregation and heritability of Loa loa microfilaremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2018;66: 751–757. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]