Highlights
-
•
Human T-lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) antenatal testing is not recommended in most countries.
-
•
Avoidance of breastfeeding largely prevents mother-to-child HTLV-1 transmission.
-
•
A total of 7252 pregnant women were tested for HTLV antibodies in Spain.
-
•
Four were HTLV-1+ (rate 0.06%). All were Latin Americans (rate in this group 0.7%).
-
•
Antenatal HTLV testing should be performed along with Chagas disease screening.
Keywords: Pregnant women, Vertical transmission, HTLV-1, Breastfeeding, Migration
Abstract
Objectives
Human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) antenatal screening is not mandatory in Spain. Surveys conducted decades ago reported HTLV-1 seroprevalence rates of 0.2% among foreign pregnant women in Spain. The migrant flow to Spain from HTLV-1 endemic regions in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa has increased during the last decade. Currently, 25% of pregnant women in Spain are foreigners.
Methods
From January 2021 to October 2023 a cross-sectional study was carried out in all consecutive pregnant women attended at eleven Spanish clinics. A commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was used for screening of serum HTLV-1/2 antibodies. Reactive samples were confirmed by immunoblot.
Results
A total of 9813 pregnant women with a median age of 34 years-old were examined. Native Spaniards were 6977 (76.5%). Of 2147 foreigners (23.5%), 903566 (9.9%) were Latin Americans, 416 (4.5%) North Africans, 293 (3.2%) from Romania, and 196 (2.1%) from sub-Saharan Africa. A total of 47 samples were EIA reactive but only five were confirmed as HTLV-1 positive using immunoblot. Infected women came from Paraguay, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Venezuela and Peru. All but one were primigravida, with ages ranging from 20 to 33 years-old. One was HIV-1 positive, and another was infected with Chlamydia trachomatis.
Conclusion
The overall seroprevalence for HTLV-1 among pregnant women in Spain is 0.05% but rises ten-fold (0.55%) among Latin Americans. This rate is higher than in surveys conducted decades ago. Our results support that anti-HTLV testing should be part of antenatal screening in Spain in pregnant women coming from Latin America, as it is already done with Chagas disease.
Introduction
Infection with human T-lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) is a neglected condition, despite being the second most prevalent human retroviral infection worldwide after HIV-1. Current estimates are of 10 million people living with HTLV-1 globally, with high endemic regions located in Equatorial Africa [1,2], Latin America and the Caribbean, northeastern Iran, southwestern Japan, and Australia [3], [4], [5].
The virus is transmitted mostly cell-to-cell following exposure to contaminated biological fluids through sexual contact [6,7]; vertically from mother-to-child and breastfeeding [8]; and parenterally, such as in injection drug users [9], recipients of blood transfusions, or solid organ transplants [10]. Once acquired, HTLV-1 infection is lifelong [11]. Although many HTLV-1-infected individuals are asymptomatic and unaware of their infection, roughly 10% will go to develop clinical manifestations, generally after several decades of silent infection, being the most characteristic conditions HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (HAM) [12] and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) [13].
The diagnosis of HTLV-1 in pregnant women is important for multiple reasons. First, because it will help effectively prevent HTLV-1 transmission to the newborn in most cases, just precluding extended breastfeeding [14,15]. Indeed, vertical contagion may go down from 20% to 2-5% if breastfeeding is avoided [16]. Second, unveiling the new HTLV-1 diagnosis in the mother will favor her clinical assessment and follow-up, making early diagnosis possible for potential future clinical complications, such as development of HAM or ATLL. Third, contact tracing would help identify other HTLV-1 individuals, such as sexual partners, parents, siblings, and other children of the newly diagnosed pregnant women. Fourth, it would help prevent further HTLV-1 infections, either sexually or vertically.
HTLV-1/2 antenatal screening is not mandatory in Spain, even for women coming from HTLV-1 endemic areas. Surveys conducted more than one decade ago reported HTLV-1 seroprevalence rates of 0.2% among foreign pregnant women in Spain [17], [18], [19]. Interestingly, the migrant flow to Spain from Latin American women of childbearing age has increased approximately 3-fold during the last decade compared to prior years [20]. Roughly 25% of current pregnant women in Spain are foreigners [20]. Herein, we report the results of a recent nationwide cross-sectional study of anti-HTLV antibodies in consecutive pregnant women in Spain.
Methods
A nationwide HTLV-1 register was created in Spain in 1989. Main demographics, clinical symptoms/signs, and laboratory findings are collected for each new HTLV-1 case at baseline and longitudinally using a standardized case report form. Members of the Spanish HTLV Network cover nationwide most of the lab facilities where this virus can be diagnosed, including public or private microbiology labs or blood banks [21]. From the coordination center, all members of the network were invited to participate in the current study.
From January 2021 to October 2023 a cross-sectional study was carried out in all pregnant women attending eleven different hospitals distributed across the Spanish geography. A commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA), Abbott Architect rHTLV I/II assay, was used as screening for serum HTLV-1/2 antibodies. Reactive samples were further confirmed by immunoblot (Inno-Lia HTLV-I/II). Demographics (age, country of origin) and other concomitant infections were recorded in all cases.
Statistical analysis
Figures are given in absolute numbers and percentages. Quantitative and qualitative variables are described as medians with interquartile ranges, mean with standard deviations or as proportions. Bivariate comparisons of quantitative variables were performed using the Chi2 test.
All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS package for Windows v25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). All tests were two-tailed and only P-values <0.05 were considered as significant.
Ethical approval
The study was designed as a multicentre and retrospective collection of anonymized and consecutive clinical data associated with serum HTLV-1 antibodies. It was approved by the International University of La Rioja (UNIR) ethics committee (ref. PI047/2023) and Puerta de Hierro University Hospital ethics committee (ref. PI 10/20).
Results
A total of 9813 consecutive pregnant women with a median age of 34 years were examined. Native Spaniards were 6977 (76.5%). Of 2147 foreigners (23.5%), 903 (9.9%) were Latin Americans, 416 (4.5%) North Africans, 293 (3.2%) from Romania, and 196 (2.1%) from sub-Saharan Africa. It was unknown for 689 (7%).
A total of 47 samples were initially reactive by EIA but only 5 were confirmed as HTLV-1 positive using immunoblot. None were positive for HTLV-2. Infected women came from Paraguay, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Venezuela and Peru (Table 1).
Table 1.
Case | Age (years-old) | Country of origin | Year of diagnosis | City of residence | Other infections |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 31 | Paraguay | 2021 | Madrid | No |
2 | 23 | Colombia | 2022 | Madrid | No |
3 | 20 | Dominican Republic | 2023 | Zaragoza | HIV-1 |
4 | 22 | Peru | 2023 | Zaragoza | Chlamydia trachomatis |
5 | 33 | Venezuela | 2023 | Madrid | No |
The five newly diagnosed HTLV-1 women were living in Madrid (2) and Zaragoza (2). One was HIV-1 positive, and another was infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. All but one were primigravida, with ages ranging from 20 to 33 years. The 31 year-old infected woman from Paraguay had already another child who had been breastfed years earlier. The boy is currently living in his country of birth and has not been tested yet for HTLV-1.
Discussion
In our current study, we found an overall seroprevalence for HTLV-1 among pregnant women in Spain of 0.05%. It rose ten-fold (0.55%) among Latin Americans. These rates are higher than those seen in prior surveys conducted more than one and two decades ago in Spain [17], [18], [19].
In Spain, three nationwide studies have been performed previously examining the rate of HTLV infection among pregnant women. The oldest study was conducted in 20,366 pregnant women who attended clinics between 1996 and 1999. Two were positive for HTLV-1 (one from Peru) and 11 for HTLV-2. The overall seroprevalence for HTLV was 0.06% [17], as in the current study.
The second study of antenatal HTLV in Spain was conducted with 20,518 pregnant women who attended clinics in 2006 and 2007, of which 18,266 (89%) were native Spaniards [18]. A total of 946 (4.6%) were from HTLV endemic regions in Latin America and Africa. Two were positive for HTLV-1 and two for HTLV-2. Hence, the overall seroprevalence for HTLV was 0.02%. It rose to 0.2% among pregnant women coming from HTLV-1 endemic regions.
The third antenatal study conducted in Spain included 3,337 foreign pregnant women who attended clinics in 2009 and 2010. Overall, 47% were Latin Americans and 24% were Africans. A total of six HTLV-1 (five from Latin America and one from Africa) and one HTLV-2 (from Ghana) were identified. Hence, the overall HTLV seroprevalence was 0.2%, being 0.3% among Latin American pregnant women [19].
The largest collaborative European study that examined antenatal HTLV infection was conducted 20 years ago [22]. A total of 234,078 pregnant women who attended clinics at seven European countries were examined. Positivity for HTLV-1 was found in 73 and for HTLV-2 in 17. The overall HTLV seroprevalence was 0.04%, roughly 6-fold higher than in blood donors tested at that time.
Prevention of HTLV-1 mother-to-child transmission is considered a priority to tackle this lifelong infection, for which there is neither a curative treatment nor a vaccine [4]. Screening policies for neglected infections, such as HTLV-1, vary in distinct countries, and go from universal testing to targeting only high-risk populations, recommend testing just once in life, testing only sex partners and/or relatives, or request testing only when there is high clinical suspicion.
Universal HTLV-1 antenatal screening was implemented in Japan in 2010, and it was recommended nationally in Brazil in April 2022. These two countries are the ones with the largest number of HTLV-1 infected persons worldwide. Exclusive formula feeding is recommended to mothers with HTLV-1 infection. In Brazil, where the prevalence of HTLV-1 among pregnant women has been estimated around 0.32% [23], recent cost-effective analysis has demonstrated the convenience of introducing universal antenatal HTLV screening [24].
At the recent HTLV European Research Network (HERN) held in Madrid, Spain, UK researchers estimated that 74 HTLV-1 infected babies per year would be avoided in the UK following the introduction of universal screening of pregnant women. This figure takes into consideration the number of pregnant women at risk of infection mostly from Africa and the Caribbean living in the UK; and the 15% rate of vertical HTLV transmission when breastfeeding is not avoided [25]. Using a similar approach in Spain, we estimated that roughly 35 HTLV-1 infected babies should be avoided annually if HTLV antenatal screening became mandatory. Given that most pregnant women from Latin America living in Spain are already being tested for Trypanosoma cruzii (Chagas disease) [26], adding HTLV serological screening would not add a significant job load.
We should acknowledge several limitations of our study. The sample population was not representative for all the country and exclusive sites, as no pregnant women from the Canary Islands and the Balearic Islands were included in the study. It should be noticed that these sites might include a larger number of pregnant women coming from HTLV-1 endemic regions, since their migrant populations are greater than in mainland Spain. Another caveat of our study is that pregnancies were tested during the COVID-19 pandemic period, when its number significantly declined associated with social isolation procedures and global and individual's economic and anthropological uncertainty [27]. However, sampling started after the two major first COVID-19 waves, when fertility rates began to recover in most Western countries.
There are two caveats with respect to the interpretation of our results that would be worth to discuss. First, the specificity of the EIA screening assay was low: only 4 out of 44 initially seroreactive samples were confirmed as HTLV-1 positive using immunoblot. This poor specificity of the commercial assay during pregnancy already has already been highlighted by others [28] and could be associated with the more frequent occurrence of hypergammaglobulinemia in persons from tropical/subtropical regions and/or during gestation. Increasing the threshold for considering reactivity could ameliorate the high rate of false positives without compromising sensitivity [29]. This approach is worthy in the transplantation setting where organ/tissue wastage could be problematic. However, it is less relevant during pregnancy since confirmatory tests can be performed without such urgency.
Another caveat refers to recommend testing to all Latin American pregnant women, when high HTLV-1 endemicity has been demonstrated only for some but not all countries in the continent. Even within the same country, hot spots are recognized whereas other regions depict low HTLV-1 rates [23]. In Spain, the largest migration flow from Latin America includes most countries with confirmed high HTLV-1 endemicity such as Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Argentina, Chile, etc. [3]. On top of that, the Spanish HTLV register has alerted about a progressive erase of microbiological edges between countries in Latin America due to increasing migration flows within the region [21].
Conclusion
In this cross-sectional nationwide study, we found a current overall rate of HTLV-1 infection of 0.05% among pregnant women in Spain that increased ten-fold (up to 0.55%) among Latin Americans. Hence, our results support that anti-HTLV testing should be part of antenatal screening in Spain in all pregnant women coming from Latin America, as it is already being done with Chagas disease [26].
Declarations of Competing Interest
The authors have completed the information regarding conflicts of interest in the requested documentation and have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Acknowledgments
Funding
This work was funded in part by grant UNIR-itei 005/23, Fondos Feder-Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS-PI-21/1717) and Fundación Mutua Madrileña (AP-174112020).
Ethical approval
International University of La Rioja (UNIR) ethics committee ref. PI047/2023 and Puerta de Hierro University Hospital ethics committee ref. PI 10/20.
Author contributions
VS and CdM conceptualized the work, CdM and VS wrote the first draft. All authors contributed with clinical data, and reviewed and edited the draft.
Members of the Spanish HTLV Network
E. Calderón (Hospital Virgen del Rocío & CIBERESP, Sevilla); M. Rodríguez-Iglesias, N. Montiel & T. Trujillo (Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz); I. Viciana (Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga); T. Cabezas (Hospital Torrecárdenas, Almería); A. Lozano, E. Fernández-Fuertes & J.M. Fernández (Hospital de Poniente, Almería); F. García (Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada); R. Benito, S. Algarate & M. Ducons (Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza); L. Roc (Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza); C. Cifuentes & V. Fernández-Baca (Hospital Son Llatzer, Mallorca), J.V Fernández-Montero (Complexo Hospitalario de Santiago, CHUS; Santiago de Compostela); M.D. Maciá (Hospital Son Espases, Mallorca); A. Hernández-Betancor & A.M. Martín (Hospital Insular Hospital Universitario, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria); M.J. Pena (Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria); M. Hernández, A.M. López-Lirola & J.L. Gómez-Sirvent (Hospital Universitario La Laguna, Tenerife); R. Copado (Hospital Dr. José Molina Orosa, Lanzarote); M.E. Cano (Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander); S. Rojo (Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valladolid); J.M. Eirós (Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid); M. Rodríguez (Hospital del Bierzo, Ponferrada); C. Gómez-Hernando (Complejo Hospitalario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo); A. González-Praetorius (Hospital Universitario, Guadalajara); A. Rando (Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona); L. Force (Hospital General, Mataró); E. Miró (Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona); A. Cebollero (Clilab Diagnostics, Barcelona); J.F. Delgado (Hospital Universitario Parc Taulí, Sabadell); G. Rodríguez & L. Fernández-Pereira (Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres); A. Aguilera & S. Pereira (Hospital Conxo-CHUS, Santiago); J. García & R. Arcay (Hospital Cristal-Piñor, Orense); M. Trigo, J. Diz & M. García-Campello (Complejo Hospitalario, Pontevedra); S. Cortizo, S. Pérez & L. Morano (Hospital do Meixoeiro, Vigo); G. Reina (Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona); M. Arazamendi & Y. Salicio (Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián); E. Ugalde, M.C. Nieto & P. Liendo (Hospital Universitario de Basurto); A.J. Goikoetxea (Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Baracaldo); M.D. Ocete (Hospital General Universitario, Valencia); J.M. Ramos & I. Escribano (Hospital Universitario, Alicante); S. Sauleda & M. Pirón (Banco de Sangre & Tejidos, Barcelona); R. González, A. Richart & L. Barea (Centro de Transfusiones, Madrid); A. Jiménez & L. Blanco (Centro de Hemoterapia y Hemodonación de Castilla y León, Valladolid); L. Navarro (Centro de Transfusiones de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia); O. Ayerdi, B. Baza, C. Rodriguez & J. del Romero (Centro Sanitario Sandoval, IdISSC, Madrid); A. Galar, T. Aldamiz, M. Valeiro & L. Pérez (Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid); I. Rodríguez-Avial (Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid); L. Martín-Carbonero (Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid); M. Fernández-Ruiz, P. Parra, N. Redondo & T. Ruiz-Merlo (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre & CIBERINFEC, Madrid); M.J. Pozuelo (Universidad CEU-San Pablo, Madrid); P. Barreiro (Enfermera Isabel Zendal Emergency Hospital, Madrid); A. Treviño, F. de Jesús, O. Corral & V. Soriano (UNIR Health Sciences School, Madrid); I. Pintos, V. Moreno-Torres, P. Carrizo, A. Huertas, J.A. Vargas-Núñez & C. de Mendoza (IIS Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda).
References
- 1.Ngoma AM, Omokoko MD, Mutombo PB, Mvika ES, Muwonga JM, Nollet KE, et al. Population-based prevalence of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2019;24:1277–1290. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gessain A, Ramassamy JL, Afonso PV, Cassar O. Geographic distribution, clinical epidemiology and genetic diversity of the human oncogenic retrovirus HTLV-1 in Africa, the world's largest endemic area. Front Immunol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1043600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gessain A, Cassar O. Epidemiological aspects and world distribution of HTLV-1 infection. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:388. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Legrand N, McGregor S, Bull R, Bajis S, Valencia BM, Ronnachit A, et al. Clinical and public health implications of human T-lymphotropic virus-1 infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2022;35 doi: 10.1128/cmr.00078-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sampaio GCL, Ribeiro JR, de Almeida CN, Boa-Sorte N, Galvão-Castro B, Grassi MF, et al. Human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1 global prevalence associated with the human development index: systematic review with meta-analysis. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2023;39:145–165. doi: 10.1089/AID.2021.0230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nunes D, Boa-Sorte N, Grassi MF, Taylor GP, Teixeira MG, Barreto ML, et al. HTLV-1 is predominantly sexually transmitted in Salvador, the city with the highest HTLV-1 prevalence in Brazil. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Caswell R, Manavi K. Emerging sexually transmitted infections: review of HTLV-1 disease. Int J STD AIDS. 2022;31:92–99. doi: 10.1177/0956462419886940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Percher F, Jeannin P, Martin-Latil S, Gessain A, Afonso PV, Vidy-Roche A, et al. Mother-to-child transmission of HTLV-1 epidemiological aspects, mechanisms and determinants of mother-to-child transmission. Viruses. 2016;8:E40. doi: 10.3390/v8020040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oliveira-Filho AB, Araújo APS, Souza APC, et al. Human T-lymphotropic virus-1 and -2 among people who used illicit drugs in the state of Pará, northern Brazil. Sci Rep. 2019;9:14750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51383-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Toro C, Rodés B, Poveda E, Soriano V. Rapid development of subacute myelopathy in three organ transplant recipients after transmission of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I from a single donor. Transplantation. 2003;75:102–104. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200301150-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hirons A, Khoury G, Purcell DFJ. Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type-1: a lifelong persistent infection, yet never truly silent. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:e2–e10. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30328-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Romanelli LCF, Caramelli P, Martins ML, Gonçalves DU, Proietti FA, Ribas JG, et al. Incidence of human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis in a long-term prospective cohort study of initially asymptomatic individuals in Brazil. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013;29:1199–1202. doi: 10.1089/aid.2013.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arisawa K, Soda M, Endo S, Kurokawa K, Katamine S, Shimokawa I, et al. Evaluation of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma incidence and its impact on non-Hodgkin lymphoma incidence in southwestern Japan. Int J Cancer. 2000;85:319–324. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000201)85:3<319::aid-ijc4>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Takezaki T, Tajima K, Ito M, Ito SI, Kinoshita KI, Tachibana K, et al. Short-term breast-feeding may reduce the risk of vertical transmission of HTLV-I. The Tsushima ATL study group. Leukemia. 1997;11:60–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rosadas C, Taylor GP. Current interventions to prevent HTLV-1 mother-to-child transmission and their effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microorganisms. 2022;10:2227. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10112227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.World Health Organization. Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 [technical report], https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020221; 2021 [accessed 08 July 2023].
- 17.Machuca A, Tuset C, Soriano V, Caballero E, Aguilera A, Ortiz de Lejarazu R, Spanish Study Group HTLV. Prevalence of HTLV infection in pregnant women in Spain. Sex Transm Infect. 2000;76:366–370. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.5.366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Treviño A, Aguilera A, Caballero E, Toro C, Eiros JM, de Lejarazu RO, et al. Seroprevalence of HTLV-1/2 infection among native and immigrant pregnant women in Spain. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2009;25:551–554. doi: 10.1089/aid.2008.0268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Treviño A, Benito R, Caballero E, Ramos JM, Parra P, Roc L, et al. HTLV infection among foreign pregnant women living in Spain. J Clin Virol. 2011;52:119–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). www.ines.es; 2023 [accessed 26 June 2023].
- 21.de Mendoza C, Caballero E, Aguilera A, Requena S, de Lejarazu RO, Pirón M, et al. Human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 infection and disease in Spain. AIDS. 2017;31:1653–1663. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Taylor GP, Bodéus M, Courtois F, Pauli G, Del Mistro A, Machuca A, et al. The seroepidemiology of human T-lymphotropic viruses types I and II in Europe: a prospective study of pregnant women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;38:104–109. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200501010-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vieira BA, Bidinotto AB, Dartora WJ, Pedrotti LG, de Oliveira VM, Wendland EM. Prevalence of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 and 2 (HTLV-1/-2) infection in pregnant women in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94934-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rosadas C, Senna K, da Costa M, Assone T, Casseb J, Nukui Y, et al. Economic analysis of antenatal screening for HTLV-1 in Brazil: an open access cost utility model. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11:e781–e790. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00065-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rosadas C, Costa M, Senna K, Santos M, Taylor G. Cost-utility analysis of HTLV-1 targeted antenatal screening in the UK. AIDS Rev. 2023;27 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.22.2300537. [abstract]25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Basile L., Ciruela P, Requena-Méndez A, Vidal MJ, Dopico E, Martín-Nalda A, et al. Epidemiology of congenital Chagas disease 6 years after implementation of a public health surveillance system, Catalonia, 2010 to 2015. Euro Surveill. 2019;24 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.26.19-00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adelman S, Charifson M, Seok E, Mehta-Lee SS, Brubaker SG, Liu M, et al. State-specific fertility rate changes across the USA following the first two waves of COVID-19. Hum Reprod. 2023;38:1202–1212. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Glasser L, Cyrus S, Machan JT, Mapother J. Human T-lymphotropic virus laboratory testing of maternal blood at time of cord blood donations and clinical implications. Transfusion. 2013;53:1302–1308. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tosswill JHC, Taylor GP. Interpretation of low reactivity in the Abbott Architect rHTLV I/II assay. Transfus Med. 2018;28:326–330. doi: 10.1111/tme.12482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]