Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1982 Aug;45(8):705–710. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.45.8.705

The relationship between the size of a muscle afferent volley and the cerebral potential it produces.

S Gandevia, D Burke, B McKeon
PMCID: PMC1083160  PMID: 6290605

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the size of an afferent neural input produced by electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve at the ankle and the size of the early components of the evoked cerebral potential. For five of six subjects the first peak of the afferent neural volley recorded in the popliteal fossa was uncontaminated by either motor efferents or cutaneous afferents. This was established by measuring the conduction times of motor fibres in the posterior tibial nerve and cutaneous fibres in the sural and posterior tibial nerves over the ankle to popliteal fossa segment. It is likely therefore that the first peak of the afferent volley contained predominantly, if not exclusively, activity in rapidly conducting afferents from the small muscles of the foot. The size of the two earliest components of the cerebral potential did not increase in direct proportion to the size of the afferent volley which produced it. The early components of the cerebral potential reached a maximum when the responsible muscle afferent volley was less than 50% of its maximum.

Full text

PDF
705

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burke D., Gandevia S. C., McKeon B., Skuse N. F. Interactions between cutaneous and muscle afferent projections to cerebral cortex in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982 Apr;53(4):349–360. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke D., Skuse N. F., Lethlean A. K. Cutaneous and muscle afferent components of the cerebral potential evoked by electrical stimulation of human peripheral nerves. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981 Jun;51(6):579–588. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90202-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cracco R. Q., Cracco J. B. Somatosensory evoked potential in man: far field potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1976 Nov;41(5):460–466. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(76)90057-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DAWSON G. D. The relative excitability and conduction velocity of sensory and motor nerve fibres in man. J Physiol. 1956 Feb 28;131(2):436–451. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DEBECKER J., DESMEDT J. E. LES POTENTIELS 'EVOQU'ES C'ER'EBRAUX ET LES POTENTIELS DE NERF SENSIBLE CHEZ L'HOMME. UTILISATION DE L'ORDINATEUR NUM'ERIQUE MNEMOTRON. Acta Neurol Psychiatr Belg. 1964 Dec;64:1212–1248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Desmedt J. E., Cheron G. Central somatosensory conduction in man: neural generators and interpeak latencies of the far-field components recorded from neck and right or left scalp and earlobes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Dec;50(5-6):382–403. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(80)90006-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisen A., Elleker G. Sensory nerve stimulation and evoked cerebral potentials. Neurology. 1980 Oct;30(10):1097–1105. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.10.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evarts E. V. Motor cortex reflexes associated with learned movement. Science. 1973 Feb 2;179(4072):501–503. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4072.501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GIBLIN D. R. SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH LESIONS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 May 8;112:93–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb26744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gandevia S. C., McCloskey D. I. Joint sense, muscle sense, and their combination as position sense, measured at the distal interphalangeal joint of the middle finger. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(2):387–407. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goodwin G. M., McCloskey D. I., Matthews P. B. The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain. 1972;95(4):705–748. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.4.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones S. J., Small D. G. Spinal and sub-cortical evoked potentials following stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978 Mar;44(3):299–306. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90305-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee R. G., Tatton W. G. Motor responses to sudden limb displacements in primates with specific CNS lesions and in human patients with motor system disorders. Can J Neurol Sci. 1975 Aug;2(3):285–293. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100020382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lesser R. P., Koehle R., Lueders H. Effect of stimulus intensity on short latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979 Sep;47(3):377–382. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90289-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MARK R. F., STEINER J. Cortical projection of impulses in myelinated cutaneous afferent nerve fibres of the cat. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 6;142(3):544–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marsden C. D., Merton P. A., Morton H. B. Is the human stretch reflex cortical rather than spinal? Lancet. 1973 Apr 7;1(7806):759–761. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92141-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McCloskey D. I. Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev. 1978 Oct;58(4):763–820. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1978.58.4.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Phillips C. G. The Ferrier lecture, 1968. Motor apparatus of the baboon's hand. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1969 May 20;173(1031):141–174. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1969.0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pierrot-Deseilligny E., Morin C., Bergego C., Tankov N. Pattern of group I fibre projections from ankle flexor and extensor muscles in man. Exp Brain Res. 1981;42(3-4):337–350. doi: 10.1007/BF00237499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. ROSNER B. S., SCHMID E., NOVAK S., ALLISON J. T. Responses at cerebral somatosensory I and peripheral nerve evoked by graded electrocutaneous stimulation. Am J Physiol. 1959 May;196(5):1083–1087. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.196.5.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rushton D. N., Rothwell J. C., Craggs M. D. Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. Brain. 1981 Sep;104(3):465–491. doi: 10.1093/brain/104.3.465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schieppati M., Ducati A. Effects of stimulus intensity, cervical cord tractotomies and cerebellectomy on somatosensory evoked potentials from skin and muscle afferents of cat hind limb. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981 Apr;51(4):363–372. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90100-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Starr A., McKeon B., Skuse N., Burke D. Cerebral potentials evoked by muscle stretch in man. Brain. 1981 Mar;104(Pt 1):149–166. doi: 10.1093/brain/104.1.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Starr A. Sensory evoked potentials in clinical disorders of the nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1978;1:103–127. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.01.030178.000535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsumoto T., Hirose N., Nonaka S., Takahashi M. Analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials to lateral popliteal nerve stimulation in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972 Oct;33(4):379–388. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES