Skip to main content
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery logoLink to Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
. 2016 Nov 11;7(3):141–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2004.07.005

Isolation of Malassezia species from healthy cats and cats with otitis

Simona Nardoni 1,*, Francesca Mancianti 1, Antonello Rum 1,2, Michele Corazza 1,2
PMCID: PMC10832722  PMID: 15922220

Abstract

Lipid-dependent Malassezia species have recently been cultured from veterinary specimens. The identification of Malassezia species isolates from animals is important to clarify the epidemiology of these lipophilic yeasts. Malassezia species were cultured from the external ear canals of 63 out of 99 cats with otitis and 12 of 52 (23%) healthy control cats. The rate of isolation in affected animals versus controls was highly significant (P<0.01). Malassezia pachydermatis was isolated as a pure culture in 33 (45.2%) cats, associated with Malassezia globosa and Malassezia furfur in 20 (50%) and 17 (42.5%) animals, respectively. Three different species were isolated simultaneously in three cats (two cats with M pachydermatis, M globosa and M furfur, one subject with M pachydermatis, M furfur and Malassezia sympodialis). M globosa was isolated as the sole species in two animals. The present work confirms the presence of some lipid-dependent species of Malassezia in both healthy and otitic cats.


The basidiomycetous yeast genus Malassezia includes lipophilic fungi which are an integral part of the commensal skin microbiota of humans and warm-blooded animals. They are also medically important organisms associated with a variety of diseases in man (Guého et al 1998) and animals (Scott et al 2001, Matousek and Campbell 2002) and the skin inflammatory response is a possible consequence of the reaction and/or hypersensitivity to yeast metabolites. Malasseziosis is also considered a perpetuating factor of external otitis in dogs and cats and may be associated with pruritus, minimal pathological changes and the presence of black and waxy cerumen in the ear canal (Scott et al 2001, Mauldin et al 2002).

Malassezia species can be identified by morphological, ultrastructural, biochemical and molecular patterns. Malassezia pachydermatis is the only non-lipid-dependent species, its in vitro growth being enhanced but not dependent on lipid supplementation (Ahearn and Simmons 1998). The other six species Malassezia furfur, Malassezia sympodialis, Malassezia globosa, Malassezia slooffiae, Malassezia obtusa and Malassezia restricta require an exogenous lipid supply for growth (Guého et al 1996, Guillot et al 1996).

M pachydermatis was originally thought to be zoophilic, because of its frequent isolation from a broad spectrum of animals, in particular wild and domestic carnivores, such as dogs, cats, bears, ferrets and foxes. Subsequently, this species was identified in life-threatening fungal septicaemia in low-birth-weight neonates (Van Belkum et al 1994). On the contrary, lipid-dependent Malassezia species yeasts were considered to be strictly anthropophilic; recently, however, several authors have cultured these species from animal specimens: M furfur, M sympodialis and M globosa have been cultured from the skin and the external ear canals of healthy cats and cats with otitis (Bond et al 1996, Bond et al 1997, Crespo et al 1999, Crespo et al 2000). M furfur, M sympodialis, M globosa, M restricta and M obtusa were cultured from healthy ruminants in Spain (Crespo et al 2002): in the same paper the occurrence of M furfur, M slooffiae, M obtusa, M globosa and M restricta in horses free of skin disease is also described. On the basis of these data, the identification of Malassezia species isolates from animals in order to clarify their epidemiology is well established.

The aim of the present paper was to investigate the occurrence and identification of the different Malassezia species from the external ear canal of cats affected by otitis versus healthy controls.

Materials and methods

Cats

The survey was carried out on 151 cats, including 147 domestic shorthair cats, two Persian cats and two Chartreux cats. Physical examination of all animals was conducted before sampling. Fifty-two subjects were randomly chosen among cats of different source with no sign of cutaneous nor other disease to be employed as healthy controls: 99 cats were referred to different practitioners with signs of external otitis, such as pruritus, head shaking, pain, with accumulation of exudate and/or cerumen in the external ear canals and mild to moderate inflammation. Otodectes cynotis was observed by microscopic examination of cerumen in 69 cats affected by otitis. The age of animals ranged from 3 months to 17 years (mean=4.88; σ=3.28). Seventy-three cats (48.4%) were male, 78 (51.6%) were female. None of the cats examined had been treated with otic or systemic drugs in the preceding 5 weeks. The animals' source was recorded, and they were classified as follows: 63 cats kept in four different catteries and 88 subjects from private owners. In this last group, 21 cats had an indoor lifestyle, 25 were kept outdoors, 42 could freely roam indoors and outdoors. Detailed data on the animals included in the survey are reported in Table 1.

Table 1.

Details of the animals included in the survey and of Malassezia species isolated

M pachydermatis M pachydermatis+lipid-dependent species Lipid-dependent species Negative Total
a b c d e
Clinical status
Otitis 13 5 0 1 0 0 11 30
Otitis and otodectic mange 13 8 2 0 20 1 25 69
Healthy 7 4 0 0 0 1 40 52
Lifestyle
Cattery 9 5 2 0 20 2 25 63
Indoors 2 4 0 1 0 0 14 21
Outdoors 8 6 0 0 0 0 11 25
Indoors and outdoors 14 2 0 0 0 0 26 42
Age
≤1 year 8 4 0 1 3 0 10 26
2–5 years 15 7 1 0 7 2 39 71
> 6 years 10 6 1 0 10 0 27 54
Sex
Male 19 10 1 0 9 1 33 73
Female 14 7 1 1 11 1 43 78
Total 33 17 2 1 20 2 76 151

a, M pachydermatis+M furfur.

b, M pachydermatis+M globosa+M furfur.

c, M pachydermatis+M furfur+M sympodialis.

d, M pachydermatis+M globosa.

e, M globosa.

Mycology

Samples were collected from the right and left external ear canals of each animal using sterile cotton swabs. The samples were inoculated on to Mycobiotic agar (Difco, USA) and modified Dixon medium, and incubated at 30 °C: the plates were checked on the fourth day for growth. If any fungal development was observed on the 10th day of incubation, the plates were discarded as negative. When growth was detected on solid media, a maximum of five different colonies were selected from modified Dixon and/or Mycobiotic agar, and processed to obtain the identification of species. M pachydermatis was identified by macro- and microscopic features, and by its ability to grow when subcultured on to lipid-free medium. Lipid-dependent species were identified by checking morphological and biochemical features, as described by Guého et al (1996). The presence of M furfur, M sympodialis and M slooffiae was confirmed by the Tween diffusion test, which allows differentiation between these species, based on their ability to assimilate various polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters (Guillot et al 1996). Bond and Anthony (1995) demonstrated the possible lipid-dependence of some isolates of M pachydermatis: also, the presence of some lipids in the primary culture from the specimen might allow the growth of M furfur in a lipid-free medium. For these reasons, subsequent transfers were performed to distinguish clearly between the two species. The identification of M furfur was confirmed using the Cremophor EL (Sigma) assimilation test, as reported by Raabe et al (1998). The splitting of esculin was also performed as an additional key to identify both M furfur and M sympodialis (Mayser et al 1997). M globosa was identified by its inability to utilise any of the four Tween compounds, and by its unique morphology within the genus. The lack of catalase activity, which is a specific feature of M restricta, was utilised to demonstrate the presence of this species. To confirm the identification, each test was performed in duplicate. Each sample was stained with Diff-Quick, and examined by microscopic morphology for the presence of typical Malassezia species yeast cells.

Statistical analysis

Data obtained from the present survey were analysed by means of the chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Malassezia species positive cultures were obtained from 75 subjects (49.6%): from 12 of 52 (23%) healthy animals and from 63 of 99 (63.6%) cats with otitis. Malassezia occurred in 44 out of 69 (63.7%) animals affected by otodectic mange, and in 19 out of 30 (63.3%) cats with no evidence of O cynotis. Microscopic observation of samples was positive in 78 animals (51.6%): the three subjects from which in vitro growth was not obtained were healthy, with a low number of blastoconidia for microscopic field (average of five or less Malassezia species organisms per 400× field) (Scott et al 2001).

The identification of the different species gave the following results. M pachydermatis was isolated in 73 animals: as a pure culture in 33 cases (45.2%), associated with other Malassezia species in 40 (54.8%) cats. M pachydermatis was associated with M globosa in 20 (50%) cases, with M furfur in 17 (42.5%) cases, with both M globosa and M furfur in two (5%) cases, and with M furfur and M sympodialis in one (2.5%) case. M globosa was recovered from two animals as a pure culture.

M pachydermatis was isolated as the sole species in seven (13.4%) healthy cats and from 26 (26.3%) cats with otitis, including eight subjects without signs of otocariosis, and 13 with otodectic mange. M furfur and M pachydermatis were isolated from 4 (7.7%) healthy cats and 13 (13.2%) cats with otitis, including five subjects with otodectic mange.

The cats harbouring M pachydermatis and M globosa showed signs of otitis, all of them had otocariosis and all of them were living in the same cattery.

One of the two animals from which M globosa was the only cultured species was healthy, while the other one was affected by otodectic mange.

M pachydermatis, M globosa and M furfur were isolated together from two animals with otodectic mange kept in the cattery.

The association M pachydermatis, M furfur and M sympodialis was present in one house-pet cat with otitis.

The rate of isolation in healthy versus diseased animals appeared to be very significant (P<0.01). No statistically significant difference related to age, sex or lifestyle of animals was observed, when analyzing all Malassezia-positive samples.

Discussion

Malassezia species were cultured from nearly one half of the cats examined and M pachydermatis was the most representative species from both healthy cats and cats with otitis. M furfur was isolated as a pure culture by Crespo et al (2000) during a survey on the occurrence of lipophilic yeasts in healthy cats. In our work, it was never isolated as a sole species, being always associated with M pachydermatis. M pachydermatis and M sympodialis had been previously isolated from two cats with otitis externa by Crespo et al (2000), and from feline skin samples by Bond et al (1996). This last species was isolated also in the present survey, confirming its presence in feline species. In our study, M sympodialis was isolated from only one diseased cat, associated with M pachydermatis and M furfur. M globosa had been isolated together with M sympodialis from healthy cat skin (Bond et al 1997) and was also recovered by us from both healthy and diseased cats sharing the same cattery, mostly associated with M pachydermatis and in two cases with M furfur.

Data available in literature show prevalences ranging from less than 10% (Bond et al 1997, Rosychuck and Luttgen 2000) to 20–23% (Guillot et al 1994, Greene 1998) in healthy subjects, and from 19% (Greene 1998) to 41.2% (Crespo et al 2002) in animals affected by otitis. The unhomogeneous nature of the animal populations examined, the strict lipid requirements of these yeast species, the difficulty in maintaining them in culture, the sampling technique and the choice of culture media could be possible factors to explain these differences. In this survey, the rate of Malassezia species isolation in cats with otitis is high if compared with the above-mentioned studies. The differences might be explained by the fact that in our study, 130 of the 151 cats examined were living in a cattery or having contact with the outdoors, where direct transmission of yeasts among animals is possible. Furthermore, predisposing factors for Malassezia species overgrowth in feline species have still not been elucidated and the association with allergic disorders is not as well established as in dogs (Scott et al 2001). The same predisposing factors proposed for canine species are hypothesised: changes in the cutaneous microenvironment, alterations in defence mechanisms, systemic disorders, keratinisation defects, allergic skin diseases and medications (Scott et al 2001, Matousek and Campbell 2002). In our study, otocariosis was diagnosed in 69.9% of subjects with external otitis and Malassezia species was isolated from 44 (63.8%) of them. The percentage of isolation in cats with no evidence of O cynotis infestation was quite similar (63.3%), so any difference between the two groups of animals could be drawn. Other characteristics of the animals such as lifestyle, age and sex were also evaluated with regards both to the prevalence of lipophylic yeasts and to the species of Malassezia isolated, but no significant correlation was found. For this reason, lipid-dependent species could be relatively common in the cutaneous microenvironment of this species, and they could act as M pachydermatis in otitis externa.

References

  1. Ahearn D.G., Simmons R.B. Malassezia Baillon. Kurtzman C.P., Well J.W. The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study, 3rd edn, 1998, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 782–784. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond R., Anthony R.M. Characterization of markedly lipid-dependent Malassezia pachydermatis isolates from healthy dogs, Journal of Applied Bacteriology 78, 1995, 537–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bond R., Anthony R.M., Dodd M., Lloyd D.H. Isolation of Malassezia sympodialis from feline skin, Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology 34, 1996, 145–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bond R., Howell S.A., Hayhood P.J., Lloyd D.H. Isolation of Malassezia sympodialis and Malassezia globosa from healthy pet cats, Veterinary Record 141, 1997, 200–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crespo M.J., Abarca M.L., Cabañes F.J. Isolation of Malassezia furfur from a cat, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37, 1999, 1573–1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crespo M.J., Abarca M.L., Cabañes F.J. Otitis externa associated with Malassezia sympodialis in two cats, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 38, 2000, 1263–1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crespo M.J., Abarca M.L., Cabañes F.J. Occurrence of Malassezia species in horses and domestic ruminants, Mycoses 45, 2002, 333–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greene C.E. (1998) Integumentary infections. In: Greene C.E. (ed). Infectious Diseases of the Dog and Cat (2nd edn). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, pp. 547–554. [Google Scholar]
  9. Guého E., Midgley G., Guillot J. The genus Malassezia with description of four new species, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 69, 1996, 337–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guého E., Boekhout T., Ashbee H.R., Guillot J., Van Belkum A., Faergemann J. The role of Malassezia species in the ecology of human skin and as pathogens, Medical Mycology 36, 1998, 220–229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guillot J., Chermette R., Guého E. Prévalence du genre Malassezia chez les mammifères, Journal de Mycologie Médicale 4, 1994, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guillot J., Guého E., Lesourd M., Midgley G., Chévrier G., Dupont B. Identification of Malassezia species. A practical approach, Journal de Mycologie Médicale 69, 1996, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  13. Matousek J.L., Campbell K.L. Malassezia dermatitis, Compendium of Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 24, 2002, 224–231. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mauldin E.A., Morris D.O., Goldschmidt M.H. Retrospective study: the presence of Malassezia in feline skin biopsies. A clinicopathological study, Veterinary Dermatology 13, 2002, 7–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mayser P., Haze P., Papavassilis C., Pickel M., Gruender K., Guého E. Differentiation of Malassezia species: selectivity of Cremophor EL, castor oil and ricinoleic acid for M furfur, British Journal of Dermatology 137, 1997, 208–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raabe P., Mayser P., Weiß R. Demonstration of Malassezia furfur and M sympodialis together with M. sympodialis in veterinary specimens, Mycoses 41, 1998, 493–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rosychuck R.A.W., Luttgen P. Diseases of the ear. Ettinger S.J., Feldman E.C. Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 5th edn, 2000, WB Saunders: Philadelphia, 986–1002. [Google Scholar]
  18. Scott D.W., Miller W.H., Griffin C.E. Fungal skin diseases, Muller and Kirk's Small Animal Dermatology, 6th edn, 2001, WB Saunders: Philadelphia, pp. 363–374 [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Belkum A., Boekhout T., Bosboom R. Monitoring spread of Malassezia infections in a neonatal intensive care unit by a PCR-mediated genetic typing, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 32, 1994, 2528–2532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES