Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2023 Nov 30;79(Pt 12):1223–1227. doi: 10.1107/S205698902301023X

Dimorphism of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) – the ordered Pna21 structure at 100 K

Matthias Weil a,*, Owen P Missen b,c,, Stuart J Mills c
Editor: W T A Harrisond
PMCID: PMC10833416  PMID: 38313127

A structural phase transition occurs for [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) between 173 K (space group Cmc21; previous single-crystal X-ray data) and 100 K (space group Pna21; current single-crystal X-ray data).

Keywords: crystal structure, phase transition, ordered structure, [Bi2O2]2+ , nitrate group, group–subgroup relationship, Bärnighausen tree

Abstract

The re-investigation of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3), dioxidodibismuth(III) hydroxide nitrate, on the basis of single-crystal X-ray diffraction data revealed an apparent structural phase transition of a crystal structure determined previously (space group Cmc21 at 173 K) to a crystal structure with lower symmetry (space group Pna21 at 100 K). The Cmc21Pna21 group–subgroup relationship between the two crystal structures is klassengleiche with index 2. In contrast to the crystal structure in Cmc21 with orientational disorder of the nitrate anion, disorder does not occur in the Pna21 structure. Apart from the disorder of the nitrate anion, the general structural set-up in the two crystal structures is very similar: [Bi2O2]2+ layers extend parallel to (001) and alternate with layers of (OH) anions above and (NO3) anions below the cationic layer. Whereas the (OH) anion shows strong bonds to the BiIII cations, the (NO3) anion weakly binds to the BiIII cations of the cationic layer. A rather weak O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­action between the (OH) anion and the (NO3) anion links adjacent sheets along [001].

1. Chemical context

During hydro­thermal phase-formation studies of synthetic montanite, a bis­muth(III) oxidotellurate(VI) mineral with composition Bi2TeO6·nH2O (0 ≤ n ≤ 2/3; Missen et al., 2022), small amounts of basic bis­muth(III) nitrate [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) were also obtained when the starting materials Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (Herpin & Sudarsanan, 1965; Laza­rini, 1985), Te(OH)6 and KOH were reacted under hydro­thermal conditions. It is worth noting that no minerals containing both Bi and (NO3) have yet been found and described, with all examples of these compounds being synthetic. A routine unit-cell search at 100 K for selected crystals revealed unit-cell parameters very close to those of previously reported [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) (Henry et al., 2005; 173 K single-crystal X-ray data), however not with a C-centred but with a primitive ortho­rhom­bic unit cell. We therefore decided to determine the crystal structure based on the 100 K data and report here the results of this study.

2. Structural commentary

The previous crystal-structure determination and refinement of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) in space group Cmc21 resulted in a model with the nitrate anion being disordered over two possible orientations. As noted in the original report, this disorder could not be resolved: ‘Attempts to further lower the symmetry to order those anions was not successful and no supercell spots were detected on single crystal and powder diffraction data’ (Henry et al., 2005). The current single-crystal X-ray diffraction data clearly revealed space group Pna21, and the observed disorder of the nitrate anion does not prevail in the primitive unit cell, indicating that an apparent structural phase transition has taken place between 173 K and 100 K. Fig. 1 shows the Bärnighausen tree (Bärnighausen, 1980; Müller, 2013) indicating the group–subgroup relationship between the two space groups and the associated crystal structures, denoted in the following as [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-I for the 173 K data in space group Cmc21 and as [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II for the 100 K data in space group Pna21. The latter is a klassengleiche subgroup of Cmc21 with index 2. All atoms in [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-I that are located on sites with mirror symmetry, viz. atoms Bi1, Bi2, O2, O3 and N1, lie on general positions in [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II. The O1 site in the higher-symmetry structure splits into two sites (O1A, O1B) in the lower-symmetry structure, and the two disordered (half-occupied) sites O4 and O5 fully order.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bärnighausen tree of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3), showing the detailed group–subgroup relationship between the Cmc21 and Pna21 structures.

Apart from the ordering of the (NO3) group, the general structural set-up is very similar in the two crystal structures. [Bi2O2]2+ layers, defined by atoms Bi1, Bi2, and O1, are sandwiched between layers of (NO3) anions (N1, O3–O5) above and (OH) anions (O2) below. Cohesion between the resulting [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) sheets is achieved through presumed weak O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the hydroxide anion and atom O4 of the nitrate anion (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Crystal structures of the [Bi2O2(OH)(NO3)] polymorphs. Strong Bi—O bonds (2.20–2.62 Å) are shown as black lines, weaker Bi—O bonds (2.80–3.00 Å) as grey lines; colour code for both structures: Bi1 blue, Bi2 light blue, N1 purple, O2 associated with the OH group green, all other O atoms white; the O2⋯O hydrogen bond is displayed with green lines. (a) The Pna21 structure of Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II with atoms at the 97% probability level; symmetry codes refer to Table 1 and (b) the Cmc21 structure of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-I (Henry et al., 2005) with atoms shown as spheres of arbitrary radius. In the inset, the nitrate group is rotated by 60° to show the disorder present in Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-I.

Individual bond lengths of the structure units in the two polymorphs differ slightly (Table 1); numerical values are discussed in the following paragraph only for [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II. Within the [Bi2O2]2+ layer, the two BiIII cations exhibit four bonds each [range 2.1964 (8)–2.657 (12) Å] to the O1A and O1B atoms that, in turn, are tetra­hedrally surrounded by the BiIII cations. Such anion-centered [OBi4] tetra­hedra are a common structural motif in inorganic bis­muth(III) compounds (Krivovichev et al., 2013). Additional strong BiIII—O inter­actions of 2.335 (9) and 2.493 (9) Å include the O2 atom of the hydroxide anion in the adjacent layer. On the other hand, the nitrate anion is only weakly bonded to the BiIII cations of the cationic layer, with four Bi1—O3 inter­actions ranging from 2.868 (9) to 2.942 (9) Å, and another weak Bi2—O4 bond of 3.080 (10) Å. Overall, both BiIII cations have eight oxygen atoms as coord­ination partners. The [Bi1O8] coordination polyhedron can be described as a distorted square anti­prism, whereas the [Bi2O5(OH)3] coordination polyhedron shows a significantly greater distortion (Table 1) and is difficult to derive from a simple geometric shape. In both cases, the 6s 2 free electron pair E of BiIII located at the top of the {BiO4} square-pyramid (as defined by the four short Bi—O bonds) is made responsible for the distortion of the polyhedra. The resulting stereochemical effect appears to be less pronounced for the [Bi1O8] coordination polyhedron, but is much clearer with the [Bi2O5(OH)3] coordination polyhedron. This behaviour might possibly be explained by the stronger repulsive inter­action between E and the surrounding (OH) groups. The ordered (NO3) group in [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II has an average N—O bond length of 1.264 Å, which is slightly longer but within the single standard deviation of the mean literature value of 1.247 (29) Å calculated for 468 N—O bonds in nitrates (Gagné & Hawthorne, 2018). The O—N—O bond angles range from 118.7 (10) to 121.3 (11)°, indicating a slight angular distortion. However, the (NO3) group does not deviate from planarity as observed for many nitrates, with deviations of up to 0.02 Å (Jarosch & Zemann, 1983). In [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II, the root-mean-square deviation of fitted atoms is 0.0014 Å, with a deviation for N1 of −0.003 (10) Å from the plane defined by O3, O4(x − 1, y, z) and O5.

Table 1. Comparison of bond lengths (Å) in the Pna21 and Cmc21 structures of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3).

O atoms marked with an asterisk show half-occupancy.

[Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II (Pna21)   [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-I (Cmc21)  
Bi1—O1B i 2.203 (8) Bi1—O1 2.226 (8)
Bi1—O1B ii 2.207 (8) Bi1—O1 a 2.226 (8)
Bi1—O1A 2.226 (8) Bi1—O1 b 2.244 (8)
Bi1—O1A i 2.292 (8) Bi1—O1 c 2.244 (8)
Bi1—O3iii 2.868 (9) Bi1—O3 d 2.873 (11)
Bi1—O3ii 2.868 (8) Bi1—O3 2.911 (4)
Bi1—O3 2.924 (8) Bi1—O3 e 2.911 (4)
Bi1—O3i 2.941 (9) Bi1—O3 f 2.957 (11)
Bi2—O1A 2.197 (8) Bi2—O1 2.239 (7)
Bi2—O1B 2.267 (8) Bi2—O1 g 2.239 (7)
Bi2—O2 2.334 (9) Bi2—O2 2.341 (17)
Bi2—O1A i 2.462 (8) Bi2—O1 h 2.540 (8)
Bi2—O2i 2.493 (9) Bi2—O1 c 2.540 (8)
Bi2—O1B iv 2.619 (8) Bi2—O2 h 2.839 (6)
Bi2—O4v 3.080 (10) Bi2—O2 b 2.839 (6)
Bi2—O2iv 3.149 (9)    
N1—O5 1.251 (14) N1—O5* 1.21 (3)
    N1—O5 j * 1.21 (3) j
N1—O4vi 1.251 (13) N1—O4* 1.19 (2)
    N1—O4 j * 1.19 (2)
N1—O3 1.291 (14) N1—O3 1.272 (16)
O2⋯O4vii 2.953 (14) O2⋯O5* 2.97 (3)
    O2⋯O5 j * 2.97 (3)

Symmetry codes for the Pna21 structure: (i) x −  Inline graphic , −y +  Inline graphic , z; (ii) x, y − 1, z; (iii) x +  Inline graphic , −y +  Inline graphic , z; (iv) x −  Inline graphic , −y +  Inline graphic , z; (v) −x + 1, −y + 1, z −  Inline graphic ; (vi) x − 1, y, z; (vii) −x +  Inline graphic , y −  Inline graphic , z −  Inline graphic . Symmetry codes for the Cmc21 structure: (a) −x, y, z; (b) − Inline graphic  + x, − Inline graphic  + y, z; (c) Inline graphic  − x, − Inline graphic  + y, z; (d) − Inline graphic  + x, Inline graphic  + y, z; (e) −1 + x, y, z; (f) − Inline graphic  + x, − Inline graphic  + y, z; (g) − Inline graphic  + x, − Inline graphic  + y, z; (h) Inline graphic  + x, − Inline graphic  + y, z; (j) 1 − x, y, z.

As shown in Fig. 2, the hydrogen-bonding schemes in the two [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) polymorphs are different. Based on the closest O2⋯O contacts between the hydroxide and the nitrate anion, the acceptor changes from O5 [O⋯O = 2.97 (3) Å] in [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-I to O4 [O⋯O = 2.953 (14) Å] in [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II. The closest contact of O2 to O5 in polymorph-II then is 3.017 (14) Å and that of O2 to O4 in polymorph-I is 3.16 Å. The differences in hydrogen-bonding correlate with the ordering of the (NO3) anion, which might be the driving force for the Cmc21Pna21 phase transition. A similar situation is found for the double salt (NH4)2SeO4·3NH4NO3 for which the high-temperature polymorph shows disorder of one of the nitrate groups that is fully resolved for the low-temperature polymorph (Weil et al., 2023).

Bond-valence sums (Brown, 2002) were computed to validate the crystal structure model of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)-II. For the BiIII—O pair, the parameters of Krivovichev (2012) and for the pair NV—O the parameters of Brese & O’Keeffe (1991) were used (results in valence units with the numbers and types of coordination partners in parentheses): Bi1 3.02 (8, O); Bi2 2.89 (8, O); N1 4.73 (3, O); O1A 2.17 (4, Bi); O1B 2.11 (4, Bi), O2 0.84 (2, Bi); O3 2.06 (5, N + 4Bi); O4 1.72 (2, N + Bi), O5 1.63 (1, N). The results confirm the expected oxidation state of +III for Bi, and also show the underbonding of O2 as being part of the hydroxide group, and of O4 and O5 as possible acceptor atoms of hydrogen bonds.

3. Database survey

As described above, the crystal structures of the [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) polymorphs comprise of [Bi2O2]2+ layers that are typical for Aurivillius phases (Henry et al., 2005). [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) remains the only basic bis­muth(III) nitrate for which this structural motif is known so far in the solid state. As shown for numerous other basic bis­muth(III) nitrate phases obtained under hydrolytic conditions of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, the hexa­nuclear cation [Bi6O4+x (OH)4–x ](6–x)+ with x = 0 and x = 1 was reported to be the predominant species (Nørlund Christensen et al., 2000). Later, Henry et al. (2005) gave a general formula of [Bi6O x (OH)8-x ](10–x)+ for the compositorial range of this complex cation.

A search of the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD, version 2023_1; Zagorac et al., 2019) revealed the following basic bis­muth(III) nitrate phases where this complex cation is part of the crystal structure (designation of the phases as in the original literature): [Bi6O5(OH)3](NO3)5·3H2O (Laza­rini, 1978), [Bi6(H2O)(NO3)O4(OH)4)](NO3)5 (Laza­rini, 1979a ), Bi6O4(HO)4(NO3)6·H2O (Sundvall, 1979), [Bi6O4.5(OH)3.5]2(NO3)11 (Henry et al., 2003), [Bi6O4(OH)4]0.54[Bi6O5(OH)3]0.46(NO3)5.54 (Nørlund Christensen & Lebech, 2012), [Bi6O4(OH)4](NO3)6 (Henry et al., 2006), [Bi6O4(OH)4(NO3)5(H2O)](NO3) (Miersch et al., 2012), [Bi6O4(OH)4(NO3)6(H2O)2]·H2O (Miersch et al., 2012), [Bi6O4(OH)4](NO3)6·4H2O (Laza­rini, 1979b ), [Bi123-OH)42-OH)23-O)84-O)2(NO3)6](NO3)4(H2O)6 (Liu et al., 2007).

4. Synthesis and crystallization

Crystals of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) were obtained in a hydro­thermal reaction as a byproduct from a mixture of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O (0.0786 g), Te(OH)6 (0.0124 g) and KOH (0.0060 g) in a 3:1:2 molar ratio. The reactants were inter­mixed and 3.62 g of water was added to achieve a 2/3 inner volume of the Teflon container. The reaction vessel was enclosed in a steel autoclave, heated to 473 K and reacted for a period of 69 days under autogenous pressure. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature by removing the autoclave from the oven. The solid material obtained after the reaction time was filtered off through a glass frit, washed with mother liquor, water and ethanol and dried in air. Aside from few light-yellow crystals of [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) with a plate-like form, all other products were cryptocrystalline.

5. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. Inspection of the diffraction data revealed twinning by a 180° rotation about the c axis and inversion, which means that the Flack parameter could not be determined. After crystal structure solution, the atomic coordinates and atom labelling were adapted to the Cmc21 structure (Henry et al., 2005) for better comparison. The Bi atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, all other atoms with isotropic displacement parameters each; the H atom of the hydroxide anion (O2) could not be localized. The remaining maximum (3.03 e Å−3) and minimum (−3.58 e Å−3) electron-density peaks are located 1.63 and 1.47 Å away from Bi2 and Bi1, respectively.

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Bi2O2(OH)](NO3)
M r 528.98
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P n a21
Temperature (K) 100
a, b, c (Å) 5.3854 (13), 5.3676 (13), 17.051 (4)
V3) 492.9 (2)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 71.27
Crystal size (mm) 0.09 × 0.08 × 0.01
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Numerical (HABITUS; Herrendorf, 1997)
T min, T max 0.017, 0.524
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 9853, 2798, 2407
R int 0.062
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.881
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.030, 0.057, 0.98
No. of reflections 2798
No. of parameters 48
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters not defined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 3.13, −3.61
Absolute structure Twinning involves inversion, so Flack parameter cannot be determined

Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2016), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), ATOMS (Dowty, 2005) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902301023X/hb8084sup1.cif

e-79-01223-sup1.cif (332.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902301023X/hb8084Isup2.hkl

e-79-01223-Isup2.hkl (223.9KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2310821

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The X-ray centre of the TU Wien is acknowledged for granting free access to the single-crystal X-ray diffractometer. We thank TU Wien Bibliothek for financial support through its Open Access Funding Programme. Support funding was provided to OPM by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship, a Monash Graduate Excellence Scholarship (MGES) and a Robert Blackwood Monash-Museums Victoria scholarship.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Bi2O2(OH)](NO3) Dx = 7.129 Mg m3
Mr = 528.98 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pna21 Cell parameters from 3403 reflections
a = 5.3854 (13) Å θ = 2.9–36.3°
b = 5.3676 (13) Å µ = 71.27 mm1
c = 17.051 (4) Å T = 100 K
V = 492.9 (2) Å3 Plate, light yellow
Z = 4 0.09 × 0.08 × 0.01 mm
F(000) = 888

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 2407 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω–scans Rint = 0.062
Absorption correction: numerical (HABITUS; Herrendorf, 1997) θmax = 38.8°, θmin = 1.2°
Tmin = 0.017, Tmax = 0.524 h = −8→9
9853 measured reflections k = −9→8
2798 independent reflections l = −29→29

Refinement

Refinement on F2 1 restraint
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters not defined
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0213P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.057 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 0.98 Δρmax = 3.13 e Å3
2798 reflections Δρmin = −3.61 e Å3
48 parameters Absolute structure: Twinning involves inversion, so Flack parameter cannot be determined

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component inversion twin.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Bi1 0.04362 (7) −0.00785 (7) 0.23658 (3) 0.00299 (7)
Bi2 0.08217 (8) 0.48199 (6) 0.08442 (4) 0.00432 (8)
O1A 0.2866 (15) 0.2468 (15) 0.1678 (5) 0.0041 (15)*
O1B 0.2840 (15) 0.7394 (15) 0.1683 (5) 0.0053 (15)*
O2 0.4937 (17) 0.4539 (16) 0.0423 (6) 0.0097 (15)*
N1 0.021 (2) 0.4969 (18) 0.3759 (6) 0.0091 (19)*
O3 0.0363 (16) 0.4977 (15) 0.3004 (5) 0.0089 (14)*
O4 0.8650 (17) 0.6351 (17) 0.4084 (6) 0.0148 (19)*
O5 0.1626 (17) 0.3604 (16) 0.4153 (6) 0.0145 (18)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Bi1 0.00314 (12) 0.00303 (15) 0.00279 (14) −0.00018 (11) 0.00001 (12) 0.0001 (2)
Bi2 0.00461 (13) 0.00439 (16) 0.00395 (15) −0.00002 (11) −0.00086 (14) 0.0010 (3)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Bi1—O1Bi 2.203 (8) Bi2—O1B 2.267 (8)
Bi1—O1Bii 2.207 (8) Bi2—O2 2.334 (9)
Bi1—O1A 2.226 (8) Bi2—O1Ai 2.462 (8)
Bi1—O1Ai 2.292 (8) Bi2—O2i 2.493 (9)
Bi1—O3iii 2.868 (9) Bi2—O1Biv 2.619 (8)
Bi1—O3ii 2.868 (8) N1—O5 1.251 (14)
Bi1—O3 2.924 (8) N1—O4v 1.251 (13)
Bi1—O3i 2.941 (9) N1—O3 1.291 (14)
Bi2—O1A 2.197 (8)
O1Bi—Bi1—O1Bii 75.34 (18) O1Ai—Bi2—O1Biv 64.7 (3)
O1Bi—Bi1—O1A 116.2 (3) O2i—Bi2—O1Biv 125.2 (3)
O1Bii—Bi1—O1A 75.8 (3) Bi2—O1A—Bi1 113.5 (3)
O1Bi—Bi1—O1Ai 72.0 (3) Bi2—O1A—Bi1iii 106.4 (3)
O1Bii—Bi1—O1Ai 117.4 (3) Bi1—O1A—Bi1iii 117.4 (4)
O1A—Bi1—O1Ai 73.15 (16) Bi2—O1A—Bi2iii 103.7 (3)
O1A—Bi2—O1B 72.6 (3) Bi1—O1A—Bi2iii 112.2 (3)
O1A—Bi2—O2 71.7 (3) Bi1iii—O1A—Bi2iii 102.1 (3)
O1B—Bi2—O2 77.2 (3) Bi1iii—O1B—Bi1vi 116.1 (4)
O1A—Bi2—O1Ai 70.34 (18) Bi1iii—O1B—Bi2 107.1 (3)
O1B—Bi2—O1Ai 104.4 (3) Bi1vi—O1B—Bi2 115.2 (4)
O2—Bi2—O1Ai 139.4 (3) Bi1iii—O1B—Bi2vii 102.8 (3)
O1A—Bi2—O2i 75.1 (3) Bi1vi—O1B—Bi2vii 107.3 (3)
O1B—Bi2—O2i 147.7 (3) Bi2—O1B—Bi2vii 107.3 (3)
O2—Bi2—O2i 91.8 (3) Bi2—O2—Bi2iii 98.8 (3)
O1Ai—Bi2—O2i 64.8 (3) O5—N1—O4v 121.3 (11)
O1A—Bi2—O1Biv 106.4 (3) O5—N1—O3 120.0 (10)
O1B—Bi2—O1Biv 66.50 (16) O4v—N1—O3 118.7 (10)
O2—Bi2—O1Biv 141.9 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z; (iv) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (v) x−1, y, z; (vi) x, y+1, z; (vii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z.

References

  1. Bärnighausen, H. (1980). MATCH, Commun. Math. Chem. 9, 139–175.
  2. Brese, N. E. & O’Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197.
  3. Brown, I. D. (2002). The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry: The Bond Valence Model. Oxford University Press.
  4. Bruker (2016). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, USA.
  5. Dowty, E. (2005). ATOMS. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.
  6. Gagné, O. C. & Hawthorne, F. C. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 63–78.
  7. Henry, N., Evain, M., Deniard, P., Jobic, S., Abraham, F. & Mentré, O. (2005). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 60, 322–327.
  8. Henry, N., Evain, M., Deniard, P., Jobic, S., Mentré, O. & Abraham, F. (2003). J. Solid State Chem. 176, 127–136.
  9. Henry, N., Mentré, O., Abraham, F., MacLean, E. J. & Roussel, P. (2006). J. Solid State Chem. 179, 3087–3094.
  10. Herpin, P. & Sudarsanan, K. (1965). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. Cristallogr. 88, 590–594.
  11. Herrendorf, W. (1997). HABITUS. University of Giessen, Germany.
  12. Jarosch, D. & Zemann, J. (1983). Monatsh. Chem. 114, 267–272.
  13. Krivovichev, S. V. (2012). Z. Kristallogr. 227, 575–579.
  14. Krivovichev, S. V., Mentré, O., Siidra, O. I., Colmont, M. & Filatov, S. K. (2013). Chem. Rev. 113, 6459–6535. [DOI] [PubMed]
  15. Lazarini, F. (1978). Acta Cryst. B34, 3169–3173.
  16. Lazarini, F. (1979a). Acta Cryst. B35, 448–450.
  17. Lazarini, F. (1979b). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 8, 69–74.
  18. Lazarini, F. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 1144–1145.
  19. Liu, B., Zhou, W., Zhou, Z. & Zhang, X. (2007). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 10, 1145–1148.
  20. Miersch, L., Rüffer, T., Schlesinger, M., Lang, H. & Mehring, M. (2012). Inorg. Chem. 51, 9376–9384. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Missen, O. P., Mills, S. J., Rumsey, M. S., Weil, M., Artner, W., Spratt, J. & Najorka, J. (2022). Phys. Chem. Miner. 49, 21.
  22. Müller, U. (2013). Symmetry Relationships between Crystal Structures: Applications of Crystallographic Group Theory in Crystal Chemistry, International Union of Crystallography Texts on Crystallography. Oxford University Press.
  23. Nørlund Christensen, A. & Lebech, B. (2012). Dalton Trans. 41, 1971–1980. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Nørlund Christensen, A., Chevallier, M.-A., Skibsted, J. & Iversen, B. B. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 265–270.
  25. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  26. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  27. Sundvall, B. (1979). Acta Chem. Scand. 33a, 219–224.
  28. Weil, M., Häusler, T., Bonneau, B. & Füglein, E. (2023). Inorganics, 11, 433.
  29. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.
  30. Zagorac, D., Müller, H., Ruehl, S., Zagorac, J. & Rehme, S. (2019). J. Appl. Cryst. 52, 918–925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902301023X/hb8084sup1.cif

e-79-01223-sup1.cif (332.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698902301023X/hb8084Isup2.hkl

e-79-01223-Isup2.hkl (223.9KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2310821

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES