Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2023 Nov 2;75(3):708–720. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad422

Potential of rice tillering for sustainable food production

Toshiyuki Takai 1,
Editor: Mary Byrne2
PMCID: PMC10837021  PMID: 37933683

Abstract

Tillering, also known as shoot branching, is a fundamental trait for cereal crops such as rice to produce sufficient panicle numbers. Effective tillering that guarantees successful panicle production is essential for achieving high crop yields. Recent advances in molecular biology have revealed the mechanisms underlying rice tillering; however, in rice breeding and cultivation, there remain limited genes or alleles suitable for effective tillering and high yields. A recently identified quantitative trait locus (QTL) called MORE PANICLES 3 (MP3) has been cloned as a single gene and shown to promote tillering and to moderately increase panicle number. This gene is an ortholog of the maize domestication gene TB1, and it has the potential to increase grain yield under ongoing climate change and in nutrient-poor environments. This review reconsiders the potential and importance of tillering for sustainable food production. Thus, I provide an overview of rice tiller development and the currently understood molecular mechanisms that underly it, focusing primarily on the biosynthesis and signaling of strigolactones, effective QTLs, and the importance of MP3 (TB1). The possible future benefits in using promising QTLs such as MP3 to explore agronomic solutions under ongoing climate change and in nutrient-poor environments are also highlighted.

Keywords: Climate change, food sustainability, grain yield, panicle number, quantitative trait locus (QTL), Oryza sativa, rice, strigolactones, tillering


Recent advances in the mechanisms underlying rice tiller development are reviewed, with a focus on the potential of utilizing tillering for sustainable food production under climate change.

Introduction

At the beginning of crop domestication about 10 000 years ago, the global population was ~5 million and it has slowly increased since then until reaching 2 billion early in the 20th century (Evans, 1998). The Haber–Bosch process, first invented by Haber in 1908, involves the synthesis of ammonia from atmospheric nitrogen (N) and hydrogen (Haber, 1920). Haber’s discovery boosted the production of chemical fertilizer, thereby significantly increasing global agricultural productivity and aiding in the feeding of the growing global population (Erisman et al., 2008). The global population was ~8 billion in 2022 and it is projected to continuously increase until it reaches 9.4–10.1 billion by 2050 (United Nations, 2022), indicating the need for increased food production. However, sustainable solutions must be pursued to address the challenges facing food production within the land that is currently cultivated, which encompasses both nutrient-rich and -poor soils, due to the limits on expansion of agricultural land and high population growth, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa where soil fertility is poor and most local farmers lack the financial means to access chemical fertilizers (Foley et al., 2011; Saito et al., 2019; Tsujimoto et al., 2019).

Notably, population and economic growth have contributed to fossil-fuel combustion and deforestation, resulting in greenhouse gas emissions (e.g. CO2, CH4, and N2O) into the atmosphere and subsequent global warming (IPCC, 2014). Increasing global surface temperatures are projected to exacerbate climate and weather extremes, resulting in climate change that negatively affects crop production (Wheeler and von Braun, 2013; Anderegg et al., 2020; IPCC, 2022). Therefore, developing genetically improved crops adapted to ongoing climate change and nutrient-poor environments is crucial for achieving sustainable food production and ensuring global food security in the future (Bailey-Serres, et al., 2019; Acevedo et al., 2020; Rivero et al., 2021).

Rice (Oryza sativa) is a staple food for over half of the world’s population and is grown in various different regions, from tropical to cold climates (Khush, 2005). Rice yield is a complex trait that is determined quantitatively by the yield components panicle number, spikelet number per panicle, filled spikelet percentage, and individual grain weight. Panicles are produced on productive tillers that develop over time from sowing to heading (Fig. 1A). Spikelets, the constituents of a panicle, are sink organs that absorb carbohydrates and begin to differentiate about 30 days before heading (Hoshikawa, 1975). The filled spikelet percentage and individual grain weight are attributable to photosynthetic assimilates translocated to the sink organs after heading (Ishii, 1995). Among these yield components, the panicle number is highly influenced by the environment because it takes the longest time to be determined (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Development of tillers in rice. (A) Life cycle of rice plants. The periods when each yield component is determined are indicated below. (B) Plant architecture of maize. (C) Plant architecture and panicles in the rice cultivar Takanari, and the near-isogenic lines NIL-MP3 and NIL-fc1. The images of panicles are from Takai et al. (2023) (published under creative commons BY-NC). (D) Longitudinal section of a young rice plant, with an axillary bud shown in detail. (E) Tiller development in Takanari, NIL-MP3, and NIL-fc1 at the time of emergence of the 12th leaf.

The completion of the whole-genome sequencing of rice (International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, 2005) and subsequent progress in genomic technology have accelerated the resolution of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) into single genes involved in rice yield and its components, as well as elucidating the molecular mechanisms that underly them (Xing and Zhang, 2010; Miura et al., 2011; Ikeda et al., 2013). Although numerous QTLs have been identified and cloned for spikelet number per panicle and grain weight (size), effective QTLs that regulate the panicle number remain limited, probably due to factors such as trade-offs with other yield components and low heritability that may require more precise phenotyping for mapping and cloning (Yonezawa, 1997; Wang and Li, 2011). Notably, the causal genes identified for excessive branching phenotypes that led to the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of rice tillering are undesirable for rice cultivation and breeding (Luo et al., 2012). However, the recently identified QTL MORE PANICLES 3 (MP3) can promote tillering and moderately increase the panicle number without negatively affecting spikelet number per panicle (Takai et al., 2014, 2023) and can even enhance grain yield, as seen in a high-yielding elite cultivar grown in paddy fields under elevated atmospheric CO2 and nutrient-poor soils (Takai et al., 2021, 2023). These findings emphasize that tillering and panicle number can play significant roles in achieving increased rice production under ongoing climate change and in nutrient-poor environments. More interestingly, MP3 is a natural allele of OsTB1/FC1 (FINE CULM1; Takeda et al., 2003), an ortholog of the maize (Zea mays) domestication gene Teosinte Branched 1 (TB1), which is involved in the repression of lateral branching and has significantly contributed to the change of maize plant architecture into a single stalk to increase yield (Doebley et al., 1997). This again demonstrates the potential importance of MP3 in modifying tiller/panicle numbers in rice breeding and cultivation, and it provides the incentive for this review of tiller formation and how such QTLs can be utilized to improve yields.

In this review, the architectures of maize and rice plants are introduced in the context of their relationships with TB1 and MP3, respectively. This is followed by a brief overview of rice tiller development that highlights the importance of MP3. A detailed description of recent advances in the molecular mechanisms underlying rice tillering is then presented, with a focus on the biosynthesis and signaling of strigolactones, given that MP3 acts downstream of their signaling pathway (Minakuchi et al., 2010). An overview of promising QTLs related to tiller/panicle number for rice cultivation and breeding is provided next. Finally, ways in which QTLs such as MP3 could facilitate improved tillering and panicle number to help adapt to or overcome ongoing climate change and nutrient-poor environments are proposed and discussed.

Plant architecture in maize and rice

Modern-day maize plants typically have a single stalk with a few short branches, each of which is tipped by large, grain-bearing ears (Fig. 1B), whereas the plants of its wild ancestor, teosinte, have multiple long lateral branches on the main stalk, each tipped by a tassel and bearing many small ears at their nodes (Doebley, 2004). TB1 is a gene that encodes a class II member of the TCP family of transcriptional regulators, and it represses the outgrowth of the axillary meristems and thus affects branch elongation (Doebley et al., 2006). The architecture of maize plants was established by human selection for the highly expressed allele of TB1 in southern Mexico during domestication about 9000 years ago (Doebley et al., 1997; Matsuoka et al., 2002; Studer et al., 2011).

On the other hand, rice plants have natural variations in tiller/panicle number. Based on the number and size of the panicles produced, rice cultivars are broadly classified into panicle-number types (large number of panicles) and panicle-weight types (large-sized panicles) (Hanada, 1993). IR8 was the first high-yielding indica cultivar in the tropics and other subsequent IR series cultivars have followed it. They are all panicle-number types with a high tillering capacity and they contributed to the significant increase in rice productivity in Asia in the late 20th century, called the ‘Green Revolution’ (Peng et al., 2008). Temperate japonica cultivars are adapted to and predominantly grown in Japan, Korea, and northern China. Around the same time as the ‘Green Revolution’, Japanese breeders also developed panicle-number type cultivars (Yonezawa, 1997; Yano et al., 2019). Subsequently, panicle-weight types with large-sized panicles became the favoured plant architecture for increasing yield potential, as represented by new plant-type breeding in the Philippines (Peng and Khush, 2003), ‘super’ hybrid rice breeding in China (Peng et al., 2008), and the super high-yielding rice project in Japan (Kumura, 1995; Yoshinaga et al., 2013). These modern cultivars produce fewer panicles than the old panicle-number-type cultivars.

Takanari is a high-yielding indica cultivar in Japan with large-sized panicles and a functional allele of OsTB1/FC1 (Fig. 1C). When this is replaced with a loss-of-function allele (fc1) in the Takanari genetic background, the subsequent near-isogenic line (NIL-fc1) produces 143% more panicles than Takanari but they are substantially smaller (Fig. 1C; Takai et al., 2023). A trade-off between tiller/panicle number and spikelet number per panicle is often observed in rice plants (Wang and Li, 2011). In contrast, NIL-MP3 in the same Takanari genetic background produces 28% more panicles and they have a similar size to Takanari (Fig. 1C; Takai et al., 2023). MP3 is a natural allele of OsTB1/FC1 and is derived from Koshihikari, a leading temperate japonica cultivar in Japan. Three polymorphisms in the gene are considered to be the functional nucleotide polymorphisms in MP3 (Takai et al., 2023). How MP3 increases the tiller/panicle number without decreasing the panicle size is considered in the next section, which provides an overview of the development of rice tillers.

Development of tillers in rice

Tillers originate from axillary buds that develop at the axil of every leaf. When the leaf primordium of the mother stem differentiates at the shoot apical meristem, an axillary bud differentiates at 180° opposite to it (Hoshikawa, 1975). The axillary bud comprises an axillary meristem, a few leaf primordia, and a prophyll (Fig. 1D). After the bud completes its formation, it enters dormancy via apical dominance and inhibition of bud outgrowth by the shoot apex (Thimann and Skoog, 1934). Once apical dominance is released outgrowth begins, the first leaf derived from the axillary bud emerges from the subtending leaf sheath of the mother stem, and the bud develops as a tiller. Primary tillers refer to those that originate directly from the main stem, whilst secondary tillers arise from the primary tillers, and tertiary tillers develop from the secondary tillers.

Tiller development (tillering) and leaf emergence on the mother stem are closely linked. The ‘synchronously emerging characteristics of leaves and tillers’ is a relationship described by Katayama (1931), where the first leaf of the tiller emerges from the axil of the (n−3)th leaf when the (n)th leaf on the main stem emerges. Leaf–tiller synchronism is generally conserved in primary–secondary tillers and secondary–tertiary tillers. In theory, when the 12th leaf emerges from the main stem, the plant is expected to produce nine primary, 21 secondary, and 10 tertiary tillers. However, in reality, all the tillers might not be developed, as genetic and environmental factors regulate tillering. In terms of the genetic regulation by the alleles of OsTB1/FC1, Takai et al. (2023) observed a total of 10 tillers (four primary and six secondary) at the 12th main-stem leaf emergence in Takanari when plants were grown in pots in a greenhouse with nutrient-rich soil (Fig. 1E). Similarly, NIL-MP3 produced 13 tillers (five primary and eight secondary), whereas NIL-fc1 produced 31 tillers (seven primary, 17 secondary, and seven tertiary). Since higher-order tillers such as the tertiary ones emerge late and have restricted space, they are thinner and lighter and have smaller inflorescence meristems when compared with lower-order tillers. Thus, they form smaller panicles with fewer spikelets (Mu et al., 2005; Yano et al., 2019). This is one of the mechanisms underlying the trade-off between tiller/panicle number and spikelet number per panicle. Furthermore, the thinner and lighter tillers in NIL-fc1 resulted in lodging occurring when plants were grown in paddy fields (Takai et al., 2023). In contrast, no such negative effects were observed for the tiller characteristics of NIL-MP3 and, as noted above, they had similar panicle size to Takanari. These findings indicate that a moderate increase in tiller/panicle number without the contribution of tertiary tillers is desirable to produce strong and productive tillers/panicles, and that MP3 is the beneficial allele that enables it. In terms of environmental regulation, tillering is affected by plant spacing the availability of light and nutrients, and the conditions under which the plants are cultured (Yoshida, 1981). For example, when grown in pots with phosphorous (P)-deficient soil, Takanari and NIL-MP3 produce only five and six tillers, respectively, at the 12th leaf emergence (Takai et al., 2021), which are half the numbers observed when grown in nutrient-rich soil (see results quote above). Despite the significant decrease in tiller numbers in P-deficient soil, NIL-MP3 still tended to produce more tillers than Takanari. The superiority of MP3 in nutrient-poor soils is discussed below.

Rice plants typically show an increase in tiller number according to a sigmoid curve, reach a maximum, and then show a decrease as some tillers die (Fig. 1A). Surviving tillers, also known as productive tillers, can produce panicles. Productive tillers are derived from tillers that have more than two green leaves or are longer than two-thirds of the plant length at the maximum tillering stage (Matsushima, 1959). Unproductive tillers do not produce panicles and often die, and hence are considered at best as useless, or as competitive for resources such as solar energy, assimilates, and nutrients that are important for the productive tillers; thus, fewer unproductive tillers are desired in rice cultivation and breeding in order to achieve a high yield (Khush, 1995; Peng et al., 1999; Ohe and Mimoto, 2002). Notably, the main stem is usually connected to the tillers through vascular bundles (Inosaka, 1958). Wang and Hanada (1982) reported the translocation of assimilates between the main stem and tillers at the 10th leaf age, whilst Nakamura (1959) observed the translocation of P from an unproductive tiller to a productive one at the heading stage, suggesting that unproductive tillers might contribute to the growth of productive tillers. Field experiments have supported this hypothesis, showing that decreasing the number of unproductive tillers by manual removal or by physically restricting tillering tends to decrease grain yield (Ao et al., 2010). The increase in tillering associated with MP3 also increases the number of unproductive tillers (Takai et al., 2023), and hence further studies are required to quantify the contribution of unproductive tillers to grain yield.

Molecular mechanisms underlying rice tillering

As described above, the formation and outgrowth of axillary buds regulate tiller development. It has been demonstrated that OsTB1/FC1 works downstream of the strigolactone (SL) signaling pathway to inhibit the outgrowth of axillary buds (Minakuchi et al., 2010), and this section describes the molecular mechanisms underlying the outgrowth of the buds, including the biosynthesis and signaling of SLs. First, an overview is given of the molecular network associated with axillary bud formation, and the section concludes with a consideration of the importance of MP3 as the allele of OsTB1/FC1 in terms of its role in the molecular networks.

MONOCULM1 (MOC1) was the first gene to be identified that controls rice tillering (Fig. 2A; Li et al., 2003). MOC1 encodes a GRAS family nuclear protein that is involved in the formation of axillary meristems. The moc1 mutant lacks axillary buds, resulting in the development of only a main culm. LAX PANICLE 1 (LAX1) and LAX2 are required for the maintenance and formation of axillary meristems and they might interact with MOC1 (Komatsu et al., 2003; Tabuchi et al., 2011). Xu et al. (2012) and Lin et al. (2012) found that TILLERING AND DWARF 1/TILLER ENHANCER (TAD1/TE), a co-activator of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) complex, degrades MOC1 in a cell cycle-dependent manner, resulting in decreased tiller numbers. In contrast, MOC1 is protected from degradation by physically binding to SLENDER RICE 1 (SLR1), a DELLA protein that acts as a repressor of gibberellin (GA) signaling (Liao et al., 2019). GA is a phytohormone that controls diverse aspects of plant growth and development, including stem elongation (Yamaguchi, 2008). Interestingly, SLR1 can inhibit stem elongation (Ikeda et al., 2001) while increasing the tiller number by supporting MOC1 (Liao et al., 2019); this clearly provides a molecular explanation for the trade-off often observed between plant height and tiller number. Moreover, the physical interaction between MOC1 and MOC3, the rice ortholog of Arabidopsis WUSCHEL (WUS; Lu et al., 2015; Tanaka et al., 2015), can up-regulate the expression of FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER1 (FON1) that encodes the rice ortholog of Arabidopsis CLAVATA1 (CLV1; Suzaki et al., 2004), leading to enhanced tiller bud outgrowth and thus tiller number (Shao et al., 2019). Similar to the moc1 mutant, the moc3 mutant cannot form normal axillary meristems, whereas the fon1 mutant forms them normally but fails to elongate tiller buds. This indicates that MOC3 is involved in the formation of axillary buds while FON1 specifically affects their outgrowth (Shao et al., 2019). The coordinated regulation by MOC1, MOC3, and FON1 reveals a direct connection from the formation of the tiller bud to its outgrowth, although events downstream of FON1 remain unknown.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of formation and outgrowth of axillary buds in rice. (A) Proposed model of axillary bud formation with a focus on MONOCULM1 (MOC1). GA, gibberellic acid. (B) Proposed model of the crosstalk among the phytohormones auxin, cytokinin (CK), and strigolactones (SLs) between shoots and roots. (C) Proposed model of the SL signaling pathway in axillary buds with a focus on OsTB1/FC1 (MP3). ABA, abscisic acid; BR, brassinosteroid. Lines ending with arrows and bars indicate promoting and inhibiting effects, respectively. See main text for details and abbreviations of proteins.

The phenomenon of axillary bud outgrowth, which is controlled by apical dominance, has been the subject of research for over a century in numerous plant species. Auxins, which are a class of plant growth hormones that are mainly synthesized in young leaves located at the shoot apex (Ljung, et al., 2001), are transported basipetally to roots in the polar auxin transport stream and they inhibit axillary bud outgrowth (Snow, 1929; Thimann and Skoog, 1934), although they do not migrate to axillary buds (Fig. 2B) (Booker et al., 2003). In contrast, cytokinins (CKs), a class of plant hormones that are synthesized in shoots (Nordström et al., 2004) and roots (Chen et al., 1985), are transported acropetally in the xylem, and enter axillary buds and promote their outgrowth (Fig. 2B) (Wickson and Thimann, 1958; Sachs and Thimann, 1967; Müller and Leyser, 2010).

Recent advances in molecular biology and the discovery of SLs, a group of terpenoid plant hormones (Gomez-Roldan, et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008), have facilitated the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying apical dominance and hence rice tillering. SLs are synthesized in roots and shoots, transported acropetally in the xylem, and move to axillary buds and inhibit their outgrowth (Fig. 2B) (Domagalska and Leyser, 2011; Kameoka and Kyozuka, 2018). In rice, DWARF27 (D27; Lin et al., 2009), D17/HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 (HTD1; Zou et al., 2006), and D10 (Arite et al., 2007) are proteins that act as enzymes in SL biosynthesis. Hayward et al. (2009) revealed that auxin up-regulates the expression of Arabidopsis MAX3 and MAX4, the orthologs of D17/HTD1 and D10, respectively, via AUXIN RESISTANT1–TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (AXR1–TIR1)-mediated degradation of the auxin/IAA protein in shoots. A similar up-regulation has been observed in D10 in shoots of rice when auxin is applied exogenously (Arite et al., 2007), indicating that auxin increases SL biosynthesis in shoots. On the other hand, Tanaka et al. (2006) observed that auxin down-regulates the expression of pea Isopentenyltransferase (IPT) family genes in the nodal stem, which encode a key enzyme in CK biosynthesis, through the AXR–TIR-dependent auxin signaling pathway. A similar suppression has been observed in IPT genes in rice after auxin treatment (Minakuchi et al., 2010). Exogenous CK analogs can also repress the expression of D27, D17/HTD1, and D10 at the nodes in rice (Xu et al., 2015). Overall, these results clearly show that crosstalk among auxin, SLs, and CK in shoots regulates axillary bud outgrowth, with auxin inhibiting CK biosynthesis but promoting SL biosynthesis, while CK inhibits SL biosynthesis (Fig. 2B) (Beveridge and Kyozuka, 2010).

Upon entering the axillary buds, SLs are perceived by the D14 protein (Fig. 2C) (Nakamura et al., 2013). This belongs to the α/β-fold hydrolase superfamily (Arite et al., 2007) and is thought to be transported to axillary buds via the phloem (Kameoka et al., 2016). Various models have been proposed to explain how D14 transforms into an active signaling state and perceives SLs, but they are still under debate (Yao et al., 2016; Shabek et al., 2018; Seto et al., 2019; Mashiguchi et al., 2021). Other important actors in the SL signaling pathway are D3, an F-box protein (Ishikawa et al., 2005), and D53, a Clp ATPase protein (Jiang et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2013). D53 inhibits the downstream events of SL signaling in the absence of SLs (Jiang et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2013). The reception of SLs by D14 triggers the formation of a protein complex of D14, D3, and D53, resulting in ubiquitination and degradation of D53 via the 26S proteasome pathway (Jiang et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2013). D53 degradation triggers the downstream SL signaling: IDEAL PLANT ARCHITECTURE 1 (IPA1; Jiao et al., 2010; Miura et al., 2010) is induced as a transcriptional activator (Song et al., 2017) and promotes expression of OsTB1/FC1 (Fig. 2C) (Lu et al., 2013). As previously described, OsTB1/FC1, which includes the MP3 allele, is a negative regulator that suppresses axillary bud outgrowth (Takeda et al., 2003; Takai et al., 2023). Upon up-regulation of OsTB1/FC1, its protein enhances the expression of GRASSY TILLER1 (GT1) by directly binding to its promoter (Kumar et al., 2021). OsGT1 is likely to regulate genes such as 9-CIS-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE 1 (OsNCED1) that encode abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis enzymes, which are involved in axillary bud dormancy and hence suppression of axillary bud outgrowth in rice (Luo et al., 2019).

While OsTB1/FC1 expression is promoted by IPA1, Guo et al. (2013) determined that the OsTB1/FC1 protein can interact with the OsMADS57 protein that suppresses D14 expression. The reduction in OsMADS57 activity thereby reduces the inhibition of D14 and thus establishes a positive feedback loop among the D14–D3–D53 complex, IPA1, and OsTB1/FC1 (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, recent studies have revealed that OsTB1/FC1 is involved in other rice signaling pathways in addition to SL. F. Wang et al. (2020) showed that CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (OsCCA1), positively controls OsTB1/FC1 expression. Conversely, OsTB1/FC1 expression is down-regulated by SHORT INTERNODES1 (SHI1; Duan et al., 2019) and the D53– BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT 1 (OsBZR1) complex (Fang et al., 2020) as well as by CK (Minakuchi et al., 2010). SHI1 is a plant-specific transcription factor of the SHI family in rice that interacts with IPA1 to inhibit its function (Duan et al., 2019). OsBZR1 functions in the brassinosteroid (BR) signaling pathway (Bai et al., 2007) and forms a D53–OsBZR1 complex in rice with REDUCED LEAF ANGLE1 (RLA1) and DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING (DLT) to suppress OsTB1/FC1 in the presence of BR (Fang et al., 2020). Moreover, the function of OsTB1/FC1 is also suppressed by physical interaction with OsTB2, a homolog of OsTB1/FC1 (Lyu et al., 2020). These findings indicate that OsTB1/FC1 functions as a key integrator of multiple signaling pathways to balance rice tillering (Minakuchi et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2018). The importance of the balancing of this gene is also evident from the fact noted above that NIL-fc1 plants (in which the function in regulating tillering is lost) exhibit an abnormal phenotype of extremely high branching. In this case, the three polymorphisms in MP3 might have the well-executed effect of partially decreasing the function of OsTB1/FC1 to moderately increase tiller/panicle numbers.

Effective QTLs for tiller/panicle number to increase grain yield

As described above, many genes for controlling rice tillering have been identified; however, most studies have used mutant lines with excessive branching phenotypes, which is not applicable to rice cultivation and breeding (Luo et al., 2012). Therefore, increases in rice productivity require effective genes or alleles. Some promising QTLs associated with tiller or panicle number have recently been cloned as a single genes, including MP3 (Zhang et al., 2017; Y. Wang et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2021; Takai et al., 2023).

qWS8/ipa1-2D, is a novel allele of the SL-signaling gene IPA1, and it generates large panicles and a moderate panicle number, resulting in increased grain yield (Zhang et al., 2017). A NIL with a partial loss-of-function allele of the SL biosynthesis gene D17/HTD1 also produce more tillers (~20%) than the parental cultivar with a functional allele and have increased grain yield (Y. Wang et al., 2020). The beneficial alleles of these two genes appear to be useful for future breeding programs, and indeed the allele of D17/HTD1 has already been utilized in modern, high-yielding rice cultivars since the Green Revolution in the 1960s, including IR8 (Y. Wang et al., 2020). However, IPA1 causes a notable trade-off between the panicle number and spikelet number per panicle and dramatically changes the plant architecture, which perhaps makes it harder for farmers to manage plants in paddy fields.

Using a genome-wide association study, Liu et al. (2021) have identified OsTCP19, a negative regulator of rice tillering, and its beneficial allele increases the tiller number and grain yield in response to N application. This allele has largely been lost in modern rice cultivars, and its introduction might be of benefit in recent high-yielding cultivars. Finally, as described above, MP3 is a natural allele of OsTB1/FC1 and moderately promotes tillering, increasing the panicle number by 20–30% and the spikelet number per unit area by 20% without negatively affecting panicle and tiller sizes (Takai et al., 2023). The MP3 allele can be observed in most accessions in the temperate japonica subgroups but is rarely found in the indica subgroup. More interestingly, MP3 (OsTB1/FC1) has not been involved and utilized in artificial selection during domestication or breeding, in contrast to maize TB1, although the reason is unclear (Xu et al., 2011; Takai et al., 2023). Nevertheless, a clear functional differentiation of the MP3 allele between the temperate japonica and indica subgroups indicates that it could be useful in improving indica cultivars. A free-air CO2 enrichment experiment (579 μmol mol−1) has revealed a significant increase in grain yield in NIL-MP3 compared to the parental cultivar Takanari by filling the increased spikelet number at elevated CO2. Based on these results, Takai et al. (2023) concluded that MP3 could contribute to an increase in rice production under climate change with rising atmospheric CO2.

Potential of MP3 for sustainable food production

The moderate promotion of tillering by MP3 notably enhances grain yield at an elevated CO2 concentration projected to be reached this century. MP3 has potential for benefitting various aspects of cropping and it could be an effective genetic factor for sustainable production in rice and other crops. This section considers possible future benefits in utilizing MP3 for agronomic solutions under ongoing climate change and in nutrient-poor environments.

First, MP3 could mitigate rising atmospheric CO2 levels by increasing carbon-capture from the atmosphere and promoting the storage of soil organic carbon (SOC; Fig. 3A). Studies have demonstrated that major C3 cereals produce 10–20% more above-ground biomass at elevated CO2 levels (550–600 μmol mol−1) than at current ambient levels (380–400 μmol mol−1) (Long et al., 2004; Hasegawa et al., 2013). Interestingly, MP3 further enhances the production of above-ground biomass by 3.5% at elevated CO2 due to the greater sink capacity, leading to an increase in carbon capture (Takai et al., 2023). Notably, elevated CO2 stimulates root growth and thus root biomass, resulting in increased C input to the soil (Nie et al., 2013), which generally induces increased storage of SOC until decomposing microorganisms release it (Olson, 1963; Shirato, 2020). Although further studies are required to determine whether MP3 enhances root biomass at elevated CO2, Terrer et al. (2021) have reported that SOC can accumulate as elevated CO2 increases above-ground biomass in grasslands. Given that the global area planted with rice was 164 million ha in 2020 (see https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home), the enhancement of biomass production by MP3 has the potential to substantially increase both land CO2 uptake and SOC storage, and thus ultimately help to alleviate increasing atmospheric CO2 levels (Weigmann, 2019).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Potential future benefits of utilizing MP3 for sustainable food production. (A) Increased carbon capture in above- and below-ground biomass, and increases in soil organic carbon. (B) Improved yields in ratoon cropping systems. (C) Improved crop performance in nutrient-poor soils, particularly under phosphorous deficiency. (D) Improved interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and possible reduction in stimulation of germination of seeds of parasitic plants.

Second, MP3 might be advantageous in the ratoon cropping of rice, which is the practice of harvesting a second crop from the stubble of the first crop (Fig. 3B; Plucknett et al., 1970). Although this cropping system has a long history of being studied in India, the USA, and China, particularly during the 1950s and 1960s (Roy, 1959; Jones, 1993), it has not been widely adopted by farmers due to a lack of suitable rice cultivars, unstable yield, and incompletely established management practices (Plucknett et al., 1970; Yuan et al., 2019). However, it has recently been reconsidered owing to its advantages in terms of reduced labor costs (no need for transplanting a second crop), less water use, and less potential for greenhouse gas emissions than double-cropping of rice due to its shorter growth period (Jones, 1993; Yuan et al., 2019; Song et al., 2022). Generally, the grain yield of the ratoon crop is only 28.6–64.3% of that of the first crop (W. Wang et al., 2020). In terms of increasing grain yield in ratoon crops, many studies have indicated the importance of a higher non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) content and a higher leaf area index (LAI) in the stubble at the harvest of the first crop (Turner and Jund, 1993; He et al., 2019; Nakano et al., 2020, 2021; Tanaka et al., 2022). A high cutting height of the first crop maintains high LAI and a large amount of NSC in the stubble, which are used as sources to promote axillary bud outgrowth after the removal of apical dominance caused by cutting the shoots above (Nakano et al., 2020; W. Wang et al., 2020). Because the increase in grain yield in ratoon cropping is attributable to improved panicle number rather than spikelet number per panicle (Nakano et al., 2020, 2022), the promotion of axillary bud outgrowth by MP3 could enhance grain yield and be useful in the ratoon cropping system, since the genetic factors that directly control ratooning ability remain unidentified (W. Wang et al., 2020).

Third, MP3 may be effective in increasing rice productivity in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where most paddy fields are characterized as nutrient-poor soils (Fig. 3C). Large areas of SSA are deficient in the major nutrients N and P (Saito et al., 2019). Even when P is present in the soil, it is largely fixed by active Al and Fe, rendering it unavailable for absorption by plants (Nishigaki et al., 2019). Inadequate amounts of N and in particular P significantly restrict rice tillering, resulting in reduced panicle numbers and hence a decrease in grain yield (Dobermann and Fairhurst, 2000). Although the application of chemical fertilizers can improve soil nutrient levels, phosphate rock, the source of P fertilizer, is a finite and non-renewable resource (Cordell et al., 2009). Soil erosion induced by increased precipitation caused by global warming can result in substantial losses of soil P (Alewell et al., 2020). Furthermore, local SSA farmers lack the capacity to purchase sufficient fertilizers (Vanlauwe et al., 2014). Therefore, developing application techniques that require the least amount of fertilizer (Tsujimoto, et al., 2019) as well as genetically improving rice varieties to have high nutrient usage efficiencies and/or vigorous growth under nutrient-poor soils is necessary (Ismail et al., 2007; Tsujimoto et al., 2020). Dipping seedling roots in P-enriched slurry, called ‘P-dipping’, is considered a promising and cost-effective technique in fertilizer management for improving usage and rice productivity (De Datta et al., 1990; Rakotoarisoa et al., 2020). Recently, we tested the performance of NIL-MP3 in nutrient-poor soils in the central highland of Madagascar and found that it promoted tillering and produced 19% more panicles and 12% more spikelets per m2 than Takanari, with the exception of fields with severe P deficiency (Takai et al., 2021). The results indicated that the effect of MP3 on tillering considerably surpasses the restriction of tillering by P-deficient soils. Accordingly, we are currently introducing MP3 into a leading Madagascan cultivar, X265 (Diagne et al., 2015) using backcrossing and marker-assisted selection to boost rice productivity in nutrient-poor soils.

Finally, MP3 could be useful in realizing more sustainable and environmentally friendly agriculture through interactions with microorganisms and controlling germination of parasitic weeds (Fig. 3D). As described above, MP3 is a natural allele of OsTB1/FC1 that works downstream of the SL signaling pathway (Takai et al., 2023). In addition to their role as endogenous inhibitors of shoot branching, SLs act as symbiotic signals with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi to acquire inorganic nutrients such as P and N, particularly in nutrient-poor soils (Akiyama et al., 2005; Umehara et al., 2010). SLs exudated from the roots of host plants induce the hyphal branching of AM fungi in the rhizosphere. Developed hyphae reach the root surface of the host plants, produce hyphopodia on the root epidermis, penetrate the roots, form arbuscules in the roots, and complete root colonization (Bonfante and Genre, 2010). Interestingly, recent studies have revealed strong defects in arbuscule formation in d3 mutants that are defective in SL signaling (Yoshida et al., 2012), and weak formation of hyphopodia in d10 and d17 mutants that are defective in SL biosynthesis (Kobae et al., 2018), indicating that some genes of SL biosynthesis and signaling are involved in AM fungal colonization. These results suggest that MP3 can affect the mycorrhization of AM fungi. Unlike the loss-of-functional alleles in these mutants, MP3 is a functional allele and thus could be valuable in breeding cultivars with improved nutrient acquisition through enhanced symbiosis with AM fungi (Chesterfield et al., 2020). Furthermore, SLs act as seed-germination stimulants of root parasitic plants such as Striga and Orobanche species (Bouwmeester et al., 2003). Whilst ‘suicide germination’ induced by the application of SL agonists in the absence of host plants is a promising way to reduce Striga parasitism (Uraguchi et al., 2018), a decrease in SLs released from host plant roots is another important way to help overcome parasitic plants. If the natural variations in OsTB1/FC1 including MP3 influence the amounts of SLs in the root exudates, then the allele that results in lower SLs could be useful in controlling parasitic weeds.

Conclusions

Tillering is a fundamental trait in rice for ensuring a sufficient panicle number and sink size (total spikelet number per unit land area). While efforts are ongoing to improve sustainable crop production in a changing climate by enhancing the ability of plants to produce photosynthetic assimilates such as sugars (Balley-Serres et al., 2019), research on MP3 has demonstrated the importance of improving the panicle number and sink size to enhance grain yield at elevated atmospheric CO2. While both improving the spikelet number per panicle and the panicle number can increase sink size, this review has demonstrated that it is improving the panicle number that might have broader applicability in rice cultivation because it is more beneficial in scenarios such as ratoon cropping and nutrient-poor soils. Due to ongoing climate change, drought and rising temperatures are significant challenges to sustainable crop production. Just as a single stalk is the plant architecture associated with TB1 in maize, upland rice has a low tiller/panicle number probably as an adaptation to limited water availability (Uddin and Fukuta, 2020); however, high yields cannot be expected with a low tiller/panicle numbers. A combination of high tiller/panicle numbers with deeper rooting might be able to mitigate the challenge caused by drought and lead to high-yield performance (Uga et al., 2013). Regarding rising temperatures, while the effects on tillering and panicle numbers require further elucidation, the negative relationship observed between night temperatures and panicle numbers suggests the importance of increasing tiller/panicle numbers under global warming (Peng et al., 2004). Finally, as described in this review, the formation of rice tillers is affected by various factors including heredity, plant hormones, and cultivation environments. Although exogenous application of plant hormones or chemical fertilizers can also alter tillering, this review has demonstrated that inherited genetic regulation is a low-cost and robust option to artificially regulate the tiller/panicle number in rice cultivation, just as humans have brought about the change from teosinte to maize through TB1 during the process of domestication. Therefore, it is proposed that MP3 and its homologs possess significant potential as genetic factors/regulators for ensuring sustainable production in rice and other crops.

Contributor Information

Toshiyuki Takai, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), 305-8686 Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Mary Byrne, University of Sydney, Australia.

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this work.

Funding

This work was supported partly by the Japan Society for the Promotion Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant no. 20H02972).

References

  1. Acevedo M, Pixley K, Zinyengere N, Meng S, Tufan H, Cichy K, Bizikova L, Isaacs K, Ghezzi-Kopel K, Porciello J.. 2020. A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low- and middle-income countries. Nature Plants 6, 1231–1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akiyama K, Matsuzaki K, Hayashi H.. 2005. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 435, 824–827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alewell C, Ringeval B, Ballabio C, Robinson DA, Panagos P, Borrelli P.. 2020. Global phosphorus shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nature Communications 11, 4546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderegg WRL, Trugman AT, Badgley G, et al. 2020. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ao H, Peng S, Zou Y, Tang Q, Visperas RM.. 2010. Reduction of unproductive tillers did not increase the grain yield of irrigated rice. Field Crops Research 116, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arite T, Iwata H, Ohshima K, Maekawa M, Nakajima M, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Kyozuka J.. 2007. DWARF10, an RMS1/MAX4/DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice. The Plant Journal 51, 1019–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bai MY, Zhang LY, Gampala SS, Zhu SW, Song WY, Chong K, Wang ZY.. 2007. Functions of OsBZR1 and 14-3-3 proteins in brassinosteroid signaling in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 13839–13844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bailey-Serres J, Parker JE, Ainsworth EA, Oldroyd GED, Schroeder JI.. 2019. Genetic strategies for improving crop yields. Nature 575, 109–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beveridge CA, Kyozuka J.. 2010. New genes in the strigolactone-related shoot branching pathway. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13, 34–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonfante P, Genre A.. 2010. Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature Communications 1, 48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Booker J, Chatfield S, Leyser O.. 2003. Auxin acts in xylem-associated or medullary cells to mediate apical dominance. The Plant Cell 15, 495–507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bouwmeester HJ, Matusova R, Zhongkui S, Beale MH.. 2003. Secondary metabolite signalling in host–parasitic plant interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6, 358–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen C, Ertl JR, Leisner SM, Chang C.. 1985. Localization of cytokinin biosynthetic sites in pea plants and carrot roots. Plant Physiology 78, 510–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chesterfield RJ, Vickers CE, Beveridge CA.. 2020. Translation of strigolactones from plant hormone to agriculture: achievements, future perspectives, and challenges. Trends in Plant Science 25, 1087–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S.. 2009. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change 19, 292–305. [Google Scholar]
  16. De Datta SK, Biswas TK, Charoenchamratcheep C.. 1990. Phosphorus requirements and management for lowland rice. In: Phosphorus requirements for sustainable agriculture in Asia and Oceania. Proceedings of a Symposium 6–10 March, 1989. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute, 307–323. [Google Scholar]
  17. Diagne A, Kinkingninhoun-Medagbe FM, Amovin-Assagba E, Nakelse T, Toure A.. 2015. Evaluating the key aspects of the performance of genetic improvement in priority food crops and countries in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of rice. In: Waler TS, Alwang J. eds. Crop improvement, adoption and impact of improved varieties in food crops in sub-Saharan Africa. Montpellier and Wallingford: CGIAR and CABI, 108–205. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dobermann A, Fairhurst T.. 2000. Rice: nutrient disorders and nutrient management. Atlanta and Los Baños: Potash & Phosphate Institute, Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada, and International Rice Research Institute. [Google Scholar]
  19. Doebley J. 2004. The genetics of maize evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 38, 37–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Doebley, JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD.. 2006. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127, 1309–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L.. 1997. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386, 485–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Domagalska MA, Leyser O.. 2011. Signal integration in the control of shoot branching. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 12, 211–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Duan E, Wang Y, Li X, et al. 2019. OsSHI1 regulates plant architecture through modulating the transcriptional activity of IPA1 in rice. The Plant Cell 31, 1026–1042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Erisman JW, Sutton MA, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W.. 2008. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience 1, 636–639. [Google Scholar]
  25. Evans LT. 1998. Feeding the ten billion: plants and population growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fang Z, Ji Y, Hu J, Guo R, Sun S, Wang X.. 2020. Strigolactones and brassinosteroids antagonistically regulate the stability of the D53–OsBZR1 complex to determine FC1 expression in rice tillering. Molecular Plant 13, 586–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, et al. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gomez-Roldan G, Fermas S, Brewer PB, et al. 2008. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455, 189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guo S, Xu Y, Liu H, Mao Z, Zhang C, Ma Y, Zhang Q, Meng Z, Chong K.. 2013. The interaction between OsMADS57 and OsTB1 modulates rice tillering via DWARF14. Nature Communications 4, 1566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Haber F. 1920. The synthesis of ammonia from its elements. Nobel Lecture, 2 June 1920. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1918/haber/lecture/. Accessed March 2023.
  31. Hanada K. 1993. Tillers. 1. Plant growth and tillering. In: Matsuo T, Hoshikawa K. eds. Science of the rice plant, vol. 1. Tokyo: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, 222–229. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hasegawa T, Sakai H, Tokida T, et al. 2013. Rice cultivar responses to elevated CO2 at two free-air CO2 enrichment FACE sites in Japan. Functional Plant Biology 40, 148–159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hayward A, Stirnberg P, Beveridge C, Leyser O.. 2009. Interactions between auxin and strigolactone in shoot branching control. Plant Physiology 151, 400–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. He A, Wang W, Jiang G, Sun H, Jiang M, Man J, Cui K, Huang J, Peng S, Nie L.. 2019. Source–sink regulation and its effects on the regeneration ability of ratoon rice. Field Crops Research 236, 155–164. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoshikawa K. 1975. Anatomical illustrations on the rice growth. Tokyo: Nobunkyo. [In Japanese.] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ikeda M, Miura K, Aya K, Kitano H, Matsuoka M.. 2013. Genes offering the potential for designing yield-related traits in rice. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 16, 213–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ikeda A, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Sonoda Y, Kitano H, Koshioka M, Futsuhara Y, Matsuoka M, Yamaguchi J.. 2001. slender Rice, a constitutive gibberellin response mutant, is caused by a null mutation of the SLR1 gene, an ortholog of the height-regulating gene GAI/RGA/RHT/D8. The Plant Cell 13, 999–1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Inosaka M. 1958. Vascular connection of the individual leaves with each other and with the tillers in rice plant. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 27, 191–119. [In Japanese.] [Google Scholar]
  39. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, Sasaki T.2005. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436, 793–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. IPCC. 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. [Google Scholar]
  41. IPCC. 2022. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ishii R. 1995. Photosynthesis, respiration and grain yield. 1. Roles of photosynthesis and respiration in the yield-determining process. In: Matsuo T, Kumazawa K, Ishii R, Ishihara K, Hirata H. eds. Science of the rice plant, vol. 2. Tokyo: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, 691–696. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ishikawa S, Maekawa M, Arite T, Onishi K, Takamure I, Kyozuka J.. 2005. Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant & Cell Physiology 46, 79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ismail AM, Heuer S, Thomson MJ, Wissuwa M.. 2007. Genetic and genomic approaches to develop rice germplasm for problem soils. Plant Molecular Biology 65, 547–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jiang L, Liu X, Xiong G, et al. 2013. DWARF 53 acts as a repressor of strigolactone signalling in rice. Nature 504, 401–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jiao Y, Wang Y, Xue D, et al. 2010. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nature Genetics 42, 541–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Jones DB. 1993. Rice ratoon response to main crop harvest cutting height. Agronomy Journal 85, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kameoka H, Dun EA, Lopez-Obando M, Brewer PB, de Saint Germain A, Rameau C, Beveridge CA, Kyozuka J.. 2016. Phloem transport of the receptor DWARF14 protein is required for full function of strigolactones. Plant Physiology 172, 1844–1852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kameoka H, Kyozuka J.. 2018. Spatial regulation of strigolactone function. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 2255–2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Katayama T. 1931. Analytical studies of tillering in paddy rice. Journal of the Imperial Agricultural Experiment Station 1, 327–374. [In Japanese.] [Google Scholar]
  51. Khush GS. 1995. Breaking the yield frontier of rice. GeoJournal 35, 329–332. [Google Scholar]
  52. Khush GS. 2005. What it will take to feed 50 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Molecular Biology 59, 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kobae Y, Kameoka H, Sugimura Y, Saito K, Ohtomo R, Fujiwara T, Kyozuka J.. 2018. Strigolactone biosynthesis genes of rice are required for the punctual entry of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi into the roots. Plant & Cell Physiology 59, 544–553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Komatsu K, Maekawa M, Ujiie S, Satake Y, Furutani I, Okamoto H, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J.. 2003. LAX and SPA: major regulators of shoot branching in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100, 11765–11770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kumar V, Kim SH, Adnan MR, et al. 2021. Tiller outgrowth in rice (Oryza sativa L.) is controlled by OsGT1, which acts downstream of FC1 in a phyB-independent manner. Journal of Plant Biology 64, 417–430. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kumura A. 1995. Physiology of high-yielding rice plants from the viewpoint of dry matter production and its partitioning. In: Matsuo T, Kumazawa K, Ishii R, Ishihara K, Hirata H. eds. Science of the rice plant, vol. 2. Tokyo: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, 704–736. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li X, Qian Q, Fu Z, et al. 2003. Control of tillering in rice. Nature 422, 618–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Liao Z, Yu H, Duan J, et al. 2019. SLR1 inhibits MOC1 degradation to coordinate tiller number and plant height in rice. Nature Communications 10, 2738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lin H, Wang R, Qian Q, et al. 2009. DWARF27, an iron-containing protein required for the biosynthesis of strigolactones, regulates rice tiller bud outgrowth. The Plant Cell 21, 1512–1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lin Q, Wang D, Dong H, et al. 2012. Rice APC/CTE controls tillering by mediating the degradation of MONOCULM 1. Nature Communications 3, 752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Liu Y, Wang H, Jiang Z, et al. 2021. Genomic basis of geographical adaptation to soil nitrogen in rice. Nature 590, 600–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ljung K, Bhalerao RP, Sandberg G.. 2001. Sites and homeostatic control of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis during vegetative growth. The Plant Journal 28, 465–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR.. 2004. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55, 591–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lu Z, Shao G, Xiong J, et al. 2015. MONOCULM 3, an ortholog of WUSCHEL in rice, is required for tiller bud formation. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 42, 71–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lu Z, Yu H, Xiong G, et al. 2013. Genome-wide binding analysis of the transcription activator IDEAL PLANT ARCHITECTURE1 reveals a complex network regulating rice plant architecture. The Plant Cell 25, 3743–3759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Luo L, Li W, Miura K, Ashikari M, Kyozuka J.. 2012. Control of tiller growth of rice by OsSPL14 and strigolactones, which work in two independent pathways. Plant & Cell Physiology 53, 1793–1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Luo L, Takahashi M, Kameoka H, Qin R, Shiga T, Kanno Y, Seo M, Ito M, Xu G, Kyozuka J.. 2019. Developmental analysis of the early steps in strigolactone-mediated axillary bud dormancy in rice. The Plant Journal 97, 1006–1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lyu J, Huang L, Zhang S, et al. 2020. Neo-functionalization of a Teosinte branched 1 homologue mediates adaptations of upland rice. Nature Communications 11, 725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mashiguchi K, Seto Y, Yamaguchi S.. 2021. Strigolactone biosynthesis, transport and perception. The Plant Journal 105, 335–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sanchez GJ, Buckler E, Doebley J.. 2002. A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 8039–8044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Matsushima S. 1959. Theories and techniques in rice cultivation – theory on yield analysis and its application. Tokyo: Yokendo. [In Japanese.] [Google Scholar]
  72. Minakuchi K, Kameoka H, Yasuno N, et al. 2010. FINE CULM1 (FC1) works downstream of strigolactones to inhibit the outgrowth of axillary buds in rice. Plant & Cell Physiology 51, 1127–1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Miura K, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M.. 2011. The role of QTLs in the breeding of high-yielding rice. Trends in Plant Science 16, 319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song XJ, Ito M, Asano K, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Ashikari M.. 2010. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nature Genetics 42, 545–549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Mu C, Nemoto K, You Z, Yamagishi J.. 2005. Size and activity of shoot apical meristems as determinants of floret number in rice panicles. Plant Production Science 8, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  76. Müller D, Leyser O.. 2010. Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Annals of Botany 107, 1203–1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Nakamura H, Xue YL, Miyakawa T, et al. 2013. Molecular mechanism of strigolactone perception by DWARF14. Nature Communications 4, 2613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nakamura K. 1959. On the translocation of P32 between panicle bearing shoots and barren shoots in rice plant. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 25, 71–72. [Google Scholar]
  79. Nakano H, Tanaka R, Hakata M.. 2022. Nonstructural carbohydrate content in the stubble per unit area regulates grain yield of the second crop in rice ratooning. Crop Science 62, 1603–1613. [Google Scholar]
  80. Nakano H, Tanaka R, Nakagomi K, Hakata M.. 2021. Grain yield response to stubble leaf blade clipping in rice ratooning in southwestern Japan. Agronomy Journal 113, 4013–4021. [Google Scholar]
  81. Nakano H, Tanaka R, Wada H, Okami M, Nakagomi K, Hakata M.. 2020. Breaking rice yield barrier with the ratooning method under changing climatic conditions: a paradigm shift in rice-cropping systems in southwestern Japan. Agronomy Journal 112, 3975–3992. [Google Scholar]
  82. Nie M, Lu M, Bell J, Raut S, Pendall E.. 2013. Altered root traits due to elevated CO2: a meta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar]
  83. Nishigaki T, Tsujimoto Y, Rinasoa S, Rakotoson T, Andriamananjara A, Razafimbelo T.. 2019. Phosphorus uptake of rice plants is affected by phosphorus forms and physicochemical properties of tropical weathered soils. Plant and Soil 435, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
  84. Nordström A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Astot C, Dolezal K, Sandberg G.. 2004. Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin–cytokinin-regulated development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 8039–8044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ohe M, Mimoto H.. 2002. Appropriate time of deep-water treatment for regulation of rice growth. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 71, 335–342. [In Japanese.] [Google Scholar]
  86. Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44, 322–331. [Google Scholar]
  87. Peng S, Cassman KG, Virmani J, Sheehy J, Khush GS.. 1999. Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential. Crop Science 39, 1552–1559. [Google Scholar]
  88. Peng S, Huang J, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong X, Centeno GS, Khush GS, Cassman KG.. 2004. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 9971–9975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Peng S, Khush GS.. 2003. Four decades of breeding for varietal improvement of irrigated lowland rice in the International Rice Research Institute. Plant Production Science 6, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  90. Peng S, Khush GS, Virk P, Tang Q, Zou Y.. 2008. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research 108, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
  91. Plucknett DL, Evenson JP, Sanford WG.. 1970. Ratoon cropping. Advances in Agronomy 22, 285–330. [Google Scholar]
  92. Rakotoarisoa NM, Tsujimoto Y, Oo AZ.. 2020. Dipping rice seedlings in P-enriched slurry increases grain yield and shortens days to heading on P-deficient lowlands in the central highlands of Madagascar. Field Crops Research 254, 107806. [Google Scholar]
  93. Rivero RM, Mittler R, Blumwald E, Zandalinas SI.. 2021. Developing climate-resilient crops: improving plant tolerance to stress combination. The Plant Journal 109, 373–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Roy SK. 1959. Second flowering in Oryza sativa (var indica). Nature 183, 1458–1459.13657166 [Google Scholar]
  95. Sachs T, Thimann KV.. 1967. The role of auxin and cytokinin in the release of buds from dominance. American Journal of Botany 54, 136–144. [Google Scholar]
  96. Saito K, Vandamme E, Johnson JM, et al. 2019. Yield-limiting macronutrients for rice in sub-Saharan Africa. Geoderma 338, 546–554. [Google Scholar]
  97. Seto Y, Yasui R, Kameoka H, et al. 2019. Strigolactone perception and deactivation by a hydrolase receptor DWARF14. Nature Communications 10, 191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Shabek N, Ticchiarelli F, Mao H, Hinds TR, Leyser O, Zheng N.. 2018. Structural plasticity of D3–D14 ubiquitin ligase in strigolactone signalling. Nature 563, 652–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Shao G, Lu Z, Xiong J, et al. 2019. Tiller bud formation regulators MOC1 and MOC3 cooperatively promote tiller bud outgrowth by activating FON1 expression in rice. Molecular Plant 12, 1090–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Shirato Y. 2020. Use of models to evaluate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils. Soil Science and Plant Nutriton 66, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  101. Snow R. 1929. The young leaf as the inhibiting organ. New Phytologist 28, 345–358. [Google Scholar]
  102. Song K, Zhang G, Ma J, Peng S, Lv S, Xu H.. 2022. Greenhouse gas emissions from ratoon rice fields among different varieties. Field Crops Research 277, 108423. [Google Scholar]
  103. Song X, Lu Z, Yu H, et al. 2017. IPA1 functions as a downstream transcription factor repressed by D53 in strigolactone signaling in rice. Cell Research 27, 1128–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Studer, A, Zhao Q, Ross-Ibarra J, Doebley J.. 2011. Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nature Genetics 43, 1160–1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Suzaki T, Sato M, Ashikari M, Miyoshi M, Nagato Y, Hirano H.. 2004. The gene FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER1 regulates floral meristem size in rice and encodes a leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase orthologous to Arabidopsis CLAVATA1. Development 131, 5649–5657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Tabuchi, H, Zhang Y, Hattori S, et al. 2011. LAX PANICLE2 of rice encodes a novel nuclear protein and regulates the formation of axillary meristems. The Plant Cell 23, 3276–3287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Takai T, Ikka T, Kondo K, et al. 2014. Genetic mechanisms underlying yield potential in the rice high-yielding cultivar Takanari, based on reciprocal chromosome segment substitution lines. BMC Plant Biology 14, 295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Takai T, Sakata M, Rakotoarisoa NM, Razafinarivo NT, Nishigaki T, Asai H, Ishizaki T, Tsujimoto Y.. 2021. Effects of quantitative trait locus MP3 on the number of panicles and rice productivity in nutrient‐poor soils of Madagascar. Crop Science 61, 519–528. [Google Scholar]
  109. Takai, T, Taniguchi Y, Takahashi M, et al. 2023. MORE PANICLES 3, a natural allele of OsTB1/FC1, impacts rice yield in paddy fields at elevated CO2 levels. The Plant Journal 114, 729–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M, Ueguchi C.. 2003. The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. The Plant Journal 33, 513–520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Tanaka M, Takei K, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Mori H.. 2006. Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance. The Plant Journal 45, 1028–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Tanaka R, Hakata M, Nakano H.. 2022. Grain yield response to cultivar and harvest time of the first crop in rice ratooning in southwestern Japan. Crop Science 62, 455–465. [Google Scholar]
  113. Tanaka W, Ohmori Y, Ushijima T, Matsusaka H, Matsushita T, Kumamaru T, Kawano S, Hirano HY.. 2015. Axillary meristem formation in rice requires the WUSCHEL ortholog TILLERS ABSENT1. The Plant Cell 27, 1173–1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Terrer C, Phillips RP, Hungate BA, et al. 2021. A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2. Nature 591, 599–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Thimann KV, Skoog F.. 1934. On the inhibition of bud development and other functions of growth substance in Vicia faba. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 114, 317–339. [Google Scholar]
  116. Tsujimoto Y, Rakotoson T, Tanaka A, Saito K.. 2019. Challenges and opportunities for improving N use efficiency for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Production Science 22, 413–427. [Google Scholar]
  117. Tsujimoto Y, Sakata M, Raharinivo V, Tanaka JP, Takai T.. 2020. AZ-97 (Oryza sativa ssp. indica) exhibits superior biomass production by maintaining the tiller numbers, leaf width, and leaf elongation rate under phosphorus deficiency. Plant Production Science 24, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
  118. Turner FT, Jund MF.. 1993. Rice ratoon crop yield linked to main crop stem carbohydrates. Crop Science 33, 150–153. [Google Scholar]
  119. Uddin, MN, Fukuta Y.. 2020. A region on chromosome 7 related to differentiation of rice (Oryza sativa L) between lowland and upland ecotypes. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Uga, Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S, et al. 2013. Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nature Genetics 45, 1097–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Umehara M, Hanada A, Magome H, Takeda-Kamiya N, Yamaguchi S.. 2010. Contribution of strigolactones to the inhibition of tiller bud outgrowth under phosphate deficiency in rice. Plant & Cell Physiology 51, 1118–1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, et al. 2008. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455, 195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. United Nations. 2022. World population prospects 2022: summary of results. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. [Google Scholar]
  124. Uraguchi D, Kuwata K, Hijikata Y, Yamaguchi R, Imaizumi H, Sathiyanarayanan AM.. 2018. A femtomolar-range suicide germination stimulant for the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica. Science 362, 1301–1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Vanlauwe B, Wendt J, Giller KE, Corbeels M, Gerard B, Nolte C.. 2014. A fourth principle is required to define conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: the appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity. Field Crops Research 155, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  126. Wang B, Smith SM, Li J.. 2018. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annual Review of Plant Biology 69, 437–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Wang F, Han T, Song Q, Ye W, Song X, Chu J, Li J, Chen ZJ.. 2020. The rice circadian clock regulates tiller growth and panicle development through strigolactone signaling and sugar sensing. The Plant Cell 32, 3124–3138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Wang W, He A, Jiang G, et al. 2020. Ratoon rice technology: a green and resource-efficient way for rice production. Advances in Agronomy 159, 135–167. [Google Scholar]
  129. Wang Y, Hanada K.. 1982. Translocation of 14C-assimilate among main stem and tillers in rice plants. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 51, 483–491. [In Japanese.] [Google Scholar]
  130. Wang Y, Li J.. 2011. Branching in rice. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14, 94–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Wang Y, Shang L, Yu H, et al. 2020. A strigolactone biosynthesis gene contributed to the green revolution in rice. Molecular Plant 13, 923–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Weigmann K. 2019. Fixing carbon: to alleviate climate change, scientists are exploring ways to harness nature’s ability to capture CO2 from the atmosphere. EMBO Reports 20, e47580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Wheeler T, von Braun J.. 2013. Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341, 508–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Wickson M, Thimann KV.. 1958. The antagonism of auxin and kinetin in apical dominance. Physiologia Plantarum 11, 62–74. [Google Scholar]
  135. Xing Y, Zhang Q.. 2010. Genetics and molecular bases of rice yield. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61, 421–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Xu C, Wang Y, Yu Y, Duan J, Liao Z, Xiong G, Meng X, Liu G, Qian Q, Li J.. 2012. Degradation of MONOCULM 1 by APC/CTAD1 regulates rice tillering. Nature Communications 3, 750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Xu J, Zha M, Li Y, Ding Y, Chen L, Ding C, Wang S.. 2015. The interaction between nitrogen availability and auxin, cytokinin, and strigolactone in the control of shoot branching in rice Oryza sativa L. Plant Cell Reports 34, 1647–1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Xu X, Liu X, Ge S, et al. 2011. Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nature Biotechnology 30, 105–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Yamaguchi S. 2008. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 59, 225–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Yano K, Morinaka Y, Wang F, et al. 2019. GWAS with principal component analysis identifies a gene comprehensively controlling rice architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 116, 21262–21267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Yao R, Ming Z, Yan L, et al. 2016. DWARF14 is a non-canonical hormone receptor for strigolactones. Nature 536, 469–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Yonezawa K. 1997. Dry matter productivity and yield ability. 2. Yield components. In: Matsuo T, Futsuhara Y, Kikuchi F, Yamaguchi H. eds. Science of the rice plant, vol. 3. Tokyo: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Center, 400–412. [Google Scholar]
  143. Yoshida S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute. [Google Scholar]
  144. Yoshida S, Kameoka H, Tempo M, Akiyama K, Umehara M, Yamaguchi S, Hayashi H, Kyozuka J, Shirasu K.. 2012. The D3 F-box protein is a key component in host strigolactone responses essential for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist 196, 1208–1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Yoshinaga S, Takai T, Arai-Sanoh Y, Ishimaru T, Kondo M.. 2013. Varietal differences in sink production and grain-filling ability in recently developed high-yielding rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties in Japan. Field Crops Research 150, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
  146. Yuan S, Cassman KG, Huang J, Peng S, Grassini P.. 2019. Can ratoon cropping improve resource use efficiencies and profitability of rice in central China? Field Crops Research 234, 66–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Zhang L, Yu H, Ma B, et al. 2017. A natural tandem array alleviates epigenetic repression of IPA1 and leads to superior yielding rice. Nature Communications 8, 14789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Zhou F, Lin Q, Zhu L, et al. 2013. D14-SCFD3-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling. Nature 504, 406–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Zou J, Zhang S, Zhang W, Li G, Chen Z, Zhai W, Zhao X, Pan X, Xie Q, Zhu L.. 2006. The rice HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 encoding an ortholog of Arabidopsis MAX3 is required for negative regulation of the outgrowth of axillary buds. The Plant Journal 48, 687–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES