Abstract
The Nyainqentanglha Metallogenic Belt (NMB) is an economically important lead-zinc ore province located in the Central and Southern Lhasa subterrane, Tibet. The NMB consists mainly of skarn-type lead-zinc polymetallic deposits that form at the contact between Late Cretaceous-Eocene intrusive rocks and carbonatite/volcanic-sedimentary strata. These deposits are generally considered to be related to S-type granites formed by the Indo-Asian continental collision. However, the εHf(t) (ave. −1.6) of zircons from the mineralization-related granitoids indicates that it is crust-mantle mixing products. In addition, the volcanic rocks of the Dianzhong Formation, which have a close spatio-temporal relationship with the skarn-type deposits, typically show mantle-derived features. Therefore, the occurrence of AFC processes in mantle-derived material passing through the thick basement of the Lhasa Terrane may better explain the genesis of the mineralization-related granitoids. In this study, we present results on zircon U–Pb ages, major and trace elements of the granitoids associated with skarn-type mineralization from the Narusongduo district. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dating shows that the granite formed in the Paleocene (58.6 ± 0.5 Ma). Combined with published regional data, we propose the mineralization age of the skarn-type deposits in the NMB ranges from the Late Cretaceous to Eocene. Detailed petrology and geochemistry of mineralization-related granitoids are evaluated to constrain the magmatic evolution process. The granitoids have high contents of SiO2 (mean 72.8 %), K2O (mean 4.0 %), Rb (mean 186.9 ppm), DI (differentiation index) 84.7, A/CNK (mean 1.3), and low contents of MgO, TFe, suggesting that the granitoids have undergone strong differentiation. In addition, the continuous decrease of P2O5 with progressive differentiation and the lower average P2O5 abundance suggest that the mineralization-related granitoids belong to the I-type granite. The results suggest that the mineralization-related granitoids in the NMB originated from the mantle and is the fractionated I-type granite formed by the process of AFC (Assimilation and Fractional Crystallization). Considering that Pb and Zn often coexist in deposits, we suggest that magmatic differentiation may play an important role in the formation of the granite-related Pb and Zn mineralization.
Keywords: Nyainqentanglha metallogenic belt, Skarn deposit, I-type granite, AFC process
1. Introduction
During the Paleocene-Eocene, the Lhasa Terrane underwent significant magmatism. The intrusive rocks from this period make up the bulk of the Gangdese batholith and have been extensively studied, accumulating a large amount of chronological and geochemical data [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]]. In addition, volcanic activity peaked during this period, as evidenced by the Linzizong volcanic rocks [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. The intense magmatic activity also led to the formation of the NMB (Nyainqentanglha Metallogenic Belt) (Fig. 1).
The NMB mainly consists of skarn-type deposits formed at the contact zone between the Paleocene-Eocene intrusive and carbonate/volcanic-sedimentary strata [[11], [12], [13]]. In recent years, crypto-explosive breccia-hydrothermal vein deposits have been discovered in the Paleocene-Eocene Linzizong volcanic rocks [9,14,15]; Qin et al., 2022) (Fig. 1). Previous studies suggested that the skarn-type deposits in the NMB are related to S-type granites formed by the India-Asia continental collision [11,[16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]]. However, the relevant isotopic data show that it is a crust-mantle mixed product (e.g. εHf(t) −13.9 ∼ +8.7) [23]. In addition, the volcanic rocks of the Dianzhong Formation, which have a close spatio-temporal relationship with the skarn-type deposits, typically exhibit mantle-derived features [6,24]. Therefore, the occurrence of (AFC (Assimilation and Fractional crystallization) processes in mantle-derived material as it passes through the thick basement of the Lhasa Terrane may better explain the genesis of the mineralization-related granitoids.
This paper presents new zircon U–Pb ages and whole-rock geochemistry from ore-related granite porphyries at the Narusongduo skarn-type lead-zinc deposit. These new data, combined with previously published data, enable us to re-evaluate the petrogenesis of the ore-related magma.
2. Geological background and sample characteristics
The Tibetan Plateau is made up of several terranes, namely the Songpan-Ganzi Complex, Qiangtang, Lhasa, and the Tethyan Himalaya Terranes, arranged from north to south [25]; Fig. 1a). The Lhasa Terrane, which is a significant crustal segment, is considered to have separated from Gondwana during the Carboniferous-Permian and subsequently drifted northwards. After a long geological period, the Lhasa Terrane collided with the Qiangtang Terrane during the Early Cretaceous and with the Indian continent during the Cenozoic [3]; Fig. 1a and b).
Analysis of zircon Lu–Hf isotope data from igneous rocks, sedimentary strata, and metamorphic basement divides the Lhasa Terrane into three distinct tectonic units: southern, central and northern subterranes. These subterranes are separated by the Shiquanhe-Nam Tso Melange Zone (SNMZ) and the Luobadui-Milashan Fault, as reported by Refs. [3,4]. The Central Lhasa Subterrane consists of extensive Carboniferous-Permian metamorphic strata, Lower Cretaceous volcanic-sedimentary strata, Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous sedimentary strata interbedded with abundant volcanic rocks, and widespread Mesozoic felsic magmatism and Paleocene-Eocene felsic magmatism as described by Ref. [12]. The northern Lhasa Subterrane is dominated by a juvenile crust composed of Jurassic-Cretaceous sedimentary rocks, Early Cretaceous volcanic rocks and associated granitoids. The southern Lhasa Subterrane, on the other hand, consists of juvenile crust with locally preserved Precambrian crystalline basement. The Subterrane mainly consists of Cretaceous Andean arc magmatism, Paleocene-Eocene felsic magmatism and Linzizong volcanic rocks, as reported by Refs. [3,11].
The NMB is located in the central and southern Lhasa subterrane. It contains over 20 polymetallic deposits such as the Yaguila lead-zinc-silver, Narusongduo Lead-zinc and Chagele lead-zinc deposits (Fig. 1b; see Table 1 for details). Skarn is the predominant mineralization type within the NMB, accompanied by minor amounts of breccia pipe, vein, and manto deposits [20]. Evidence of ore-related granites is provided by the presence of skarn alteration at the contact zones between the intrusions and surrounding rocks. The ages of the granites associated with mineralization range from 69 to 51 Ma.
Table 1.
No. | Deposit | Type | Mineralization | Samples | Analytical method | Age (Ma) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Yaguila | Skarn Pb–Zn–Ag | Galena, sphalerite, silver, pyrrhotite, pyrite | Quartz porphyry Molybdenite Garnet |
LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Re–Os LA-ICP-MS garnet U–Pb |
65.6 ± 1.2 65.0 ± 1.9 65.0 ± 4.7–68.5 ± 3.4 |
[26] [27] [28] |
2 | Dongzhongsongduo | Skarn Pb–Zn | Galena, sphalerite, silver, magnetite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, pyrite | Granite porphyry | LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb | 54.4 | [29] |
3 | Dongzhongla | Skarn Pb–Zn–Ag–Cu | Galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, pyrite, bornite, chalcocite | Granite porphyry | LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb | 51.2 | [29] |
4 | Mengya'a | Skarn Pb–Zn–Ag | Galena, sphalerite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, pyrite | Muscovite | Ar–Ar | 54.8 ± 0.4 | [22] |
5 | Longmala | Skarn Pb–Zn–Fe–Cu | Galena, sphalerite, magnetite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, pyrite | Biotite monzogranite Molybdenite |
LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Re–Os |
54.6 ± 0.6 53.3 |
[30] [31] |
6 | Maxionglang | Skarn Pb–Zn | Galena, sphalerite, pyrite, and minor chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite | Sericite | Ar–Ar | 69.3 ± 1.6 | [29] |
7 | Leqingla | Skarn Pb–Zn–Fe–Cu | Galena, sphalerite, magnetite, chalcopyrite, molybdenite, pyrrhotite | Biotite granite Molybdenite |
LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Re–Os |
60.8 ± 0.4 59.4 ± 4.5 |
[32] [33] |
8 | Xingaguo | Skarn Pb–Zn | Sphalerite, galena, magnetite, pyrite, marcasite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite | Biotite granite | LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb | 56.5 ± 1.3 | [32] |
9 | Dexin | Hydrothermal Pb–Zn | Galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite, pyrite | Quartz porphyry | LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb | 56.6 ± 0.8 | [34] |
10 | Narusongduo | Cryptoexplosive breccia-skarn Pb–Zn polymetallic | Sphalerite, galena, pyrite, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, rhodochrosite | Granite porphyry Sericite |
LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Ar–Ar |
58.6 ± 0.5 57.8 ± 0.7 |
This paper [35] |
11 | Sinongduo | cryptoexplosive breccia-hydrothermal vein Ag–Pb–Zn | Galena, sphalerite, smithsonite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, silver | Tuff Illite |
LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Ar–Ar |
61.9 ± 0.4 60.9 ± 0.7–63.1 ± 0.7 |
[9] [36] |
12 | Chagele | Skarn Pb–Zn | Sphalerite, galena, pyrite, marcasite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite | Granite porphyry | LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb | 63.3 ± 0.9 | [37] |
13 | Longgen | Skarn Pb–Zn | Sphalerite, galena, chalcopyrite, pyrite, magnetite, pyrrhotite, bornite, molybdenite and arsenopyrite | Granite porphyry Sphalerite |
LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb Rb–Sr |
61.2 ± 0.8 59.1 ± 3.0 |
[12] |
14 | Nuocang | Skarn Pb–Zn | Galena, sphalerite, and minor magnetite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and malachite | Muscovite | Ar–Ar | 59.68 ± 0.6 | [38] |
This study focuses on the mineralization-related granites found in five representative deposits. The petrographic descriptions provided in this study are based on previous research conducted by Refs. [12,13,32]. Among these deposits, the Narusongduo deposit mainly includes two types of mineralization: cryptoexplosive-breccia and skarn. The skarn type orebody is developed at the interface between the granite porphyry and limestone from the Xiala Formation (Fig. 2). This type of mineralization is characterized by the presence of skarn-type mineral assemblages, including garnet and actinolite, and locally high-grade lead-zinc ores (Fig. 3a and b). The Narusongduo granite porphyries, represented by samples TD019-1∼5 and located at coordinates 29°58′15″, 88°46′57″, exhibit a porphyritic texture. They are primarily composed of quartz, alkali feldspar, and biotite. The groundmass consists of smaller quartz, alkali feldspar, and sericite (Fig. 3c and d). In terms of accessory minerals, apatite and zircon are present in these samples. Additionally, slight alteration has been observed in the samples.
3. Analytical methods
3.1. Major and trace elements analysis
To conduct comprehensive rock geochemical analyses, the initial step involved crushing the four samples to 200 meshes using an agate mill, followed by thorough cleaning in distilled water using ultrasonic waves. Subsequently, major and trace element analyses were performed at China's National Geological Experimental Test Center. Major element analyses were carried out using XRF (X-ray fluorescence spectrometry), with an analytical uncertainties of less than 0.5 %. Trace elements were analyzed using an X-series 2 ICP-MS instrument, with an analytical uncertainties of less than 5 %. The results of the element analyses for the granitic porphyry samples are showed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Sample No. | TD019-1 | TD019-2 | TD019-3 | TD019-4 | Sample No. | TD019-1 | TD019-2 | TD019-3 | TD019-4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2(%) | 72.67 | 77.28 | 79.74 | 75.46 | Nb(μg/g) | 10.7 | 11 | 8.05 | 9.75 |
TiO2(%) | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.2 | Ta(μg/g) | 1.08 | 1.03 | 0.8 | 0.85 |
Al2O3(%) | 13.2 | 13.2 | 10.72 | 11.46 | Zr(μg/g) | 152 | 141 | 105 | 140 |
Fe2O3(%) | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 5.12 | Hf(μg/g) | 4.38 | 4.18 | 3.18 | 3.8 |
FeO(%) | 1.2 | 1.06 | 0.88 | 1.13 | La(μg/g) | 31.7 | 21.1 | 30.2 | 63.8 |
MnO(%) | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.1 | 0.05 | Ce(μg/g) | 58.1 | 36.5 | 52.1 | 108 |
MgO(%) | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.38 | Pr(μg/g) | 5.71 | 4.18 | 5.91 | 11.4 |
CaO(%) | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.1 | Nd(μg/g) | 18.1 | 13.8 | 22.8 | 40.7 |
Na2O(%) | 0.76 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.01 | Sm(μg/g) | 2.74 | 2.21 | 2.99 | 5.77 |
K2O(%) | 3.93 | 3.88 | 3.19 | 3.46 | Eu(μg/g) | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.34 |
P2O5(%) | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | Gd(μg/g) | 2.08 | 1.75 | 2.02 | 4.69 |
DI | 87.35 | 86.78 | 89.38 | 81.13 | Tb(μg/g) | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.78 |
A/CNK | 2.34 | 3.02 | 2.77 | 2.98 | Dy(μg/g) | 1.34 | 1.23 | 1.09 | 4.56 |
CIPW(corundum) | 8.1 | 9.12 | 7.15 | 8.18 | Ho(μg/g) | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.97 |
Sr(μg/g) | 6.33 | 6.57 | 6.12 | 5.73 | Er(μg/g) | 0.66 | 0.83 | 0.59 | 2.66 |
Ba(μg/g) | 191 | 339 | 243 | 134 | Tm(μg/g) | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.42 |
Rb(μg/g) | 252 | 246 | 198 | 225 | Yb(μg/g) | 0.72 | 1.07 | 0.74 | 2.57 |
Th(μg/g) | 30.8 | 32.9 | 26.3 | 27.5 | Lu(μg/g) | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.37 |
U(μg/g) | 3.27 | 2.99 | 2.88 | 3.17 | Y(μg/g) | 7.46 | 8.3 | 5.74 | 31.7 |
3.2. LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dating
To investigate the internal structures of zircon and determine suitable locations for zircon isotope analyses, CL images were captured at the Zirconium Year Technology Company in Beijing. LA-ICP-MS was utilized to acquire U–Pb isotope and trace element data at the GPMR (State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources) in Wuhan, China. During the LA-ICP-MS analysis, we calibrated U–Th–Pb concentrations using the NIST SRM 610 external standard and the 29Si internal standard. We utilized ICPMSDataCal for offline selection and integration of background and analyzed signals, time drift correction, and quantitative calibration. Finally, we employed Isoplot to generate Concordia plots, age spectra, and age calculations. The mean age of 206Pb/238U results is reported with an uncertainty of 2-sigma. Detailed analytical results of zircon U–Pb dating can be found in Table 3.
Table 3.
spot | Th(ppm) | U(ppm) | Th/U | 207Pb/206Pb | 1σ | 207Pb/235U | 1σ | 206Pb/238U | 1σ | 207Pb/235U | 1σ | 206Pb/238U | 1σ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TD019-5-1 | 1842.8 | 2058.1 | 0.9 | 0.0509 | 0.0019 | 0.0655 | 0.0025 | 0.0093 | 0.0001 | 64.4 | 2.4 | 59.7 | 0.7 |
TD019-5-2 | 1745.2 | 1556.3 | 1.12 | 0.0524 | 0.0016 | 0.0665 | 0.002 | 0.0092 | 0.0001 | 65.3 | 1.9 | 59.3 | 0.5 |
TD019-5-3 | 1449 | 1757.5 | 0.82 | 0.049 | 0.0013 | 0.0607 | 0.0017 | 0.009 | 0.0001 | 59.8 | 1.6 | 57.6 | 0.5 |
TD019-5-4 | 673.5 | 452.2 | 1.49 | 0.0498 | 0.006 | 0.062 | 0.007 | 0.0092 | 0.0003 | 61.1 | 6.7 | 59.1 | 1.8 |
TD019-5-6 | 561.5 | 268.2 | 2.09 | 0.0539 | 0.0118 | 0.0641 | 0.0131 | 0.0089 | 0.0004 | 63.1 | 12.5 | 57.4 | 2.3 |
TD019-5-7 | 957.8 | 465.7 | 2.06 | 0.0476 | 0.0027 | 0.0591 | 0.0033 | 0.0091 | 0.0001 | 58.3 | 3.1 | 58.1 | 0.7 |
TD019-5-8 | 489.7 | 192.2 | 2.55 | 0.0541 | 0.0117 | 0.064 | 0.0141 | 0.0093 | 0.0004 | 63 | 13.4 | 59.5 | 2.6 |
TD019-5-9 | 1090.9 | 1030.1 | 1.06 | 0.0475 | 0.0021 | 0.0594 | 0.0025 | 0.0091 | 0.0001 | 58.6 | 2.4 | 58.6 | 0.6 |
TD019-5-11 | 286 | 245.5 | 1.16 | 0.0524 | 0.0067 | 0.0658 | 0.0074 | 0.0095 | 0.0002 | 64.7 | 7 | 60.7 | 1.6 |
TD019-5-13 | 604.9 | 346.7 | 1.74 | 0.0477 | 0.003 | 0.0583 | 0.0035 | 0.0089 | 0.0001 | 57.5 | 3.3 | 57.4 | 0.7 |
TD019-5-14 | 598.2 | 317.3 | 1.89 | 0.0517 | 0.0033 | 0.0635 | 0.004 | 0.0091 | 0.0001 | 62.5 | 3.8 | 58.6 | 0.9 |
TD019-5-15 | 1743.6 | 2073.7 | 0.84 | 0.0475 | 0.0012 | 0.0597 | 0.0014 | 0.0092 | 0.0001 | 58.9 | 1.4 | 58.8 | 0.5 |
TD019-5-16 | 738.3 | 340.7 | 2.17 | 0.0527 | 0.0116 | 0.0657 | 0.0134 | 0.0091 | 0.0004 | 64.6 | 12.8 | 58.7 | 2.3 |
TD019-5-17 | 569.1 | 425.6 | 1.34 | 0.0518 | 0.0053 | 0.0676 | 0.0069 | 0.0095 | 0.0002 | 66.4 | 6.5 | 61.2 | 1.5 |
TD019-5-19 | 393.7 | 345.4 | 1.14 | 0.0502 | 0.0045 | 0.062 | 0.0061 | 0.0088 | 0.0002 | 61.1 | 5.9 | 56.4 | 1.4 |
TD019-5-20 | 484.1 | 276.5 | 1.75 | 0.0564 | 0.0095 | 0.0644 | 0.009 | 0.0091 | 0.0003 | 63.4 | 8.6 | 58.2 | 1.9 |
4. Analysis results
4.1. Major and trace elements
In the paper, we tested four samples of granite porphyry from the Narusongduo skarn deposit for whole-rock geochemistry. We supplemented the data published in the literature to make the data statistically significant (see Table S1; [12,13,32].
The SiO2 content is relatively high, ranging from 65.5 % to 79.7 %, with an average of 72.8 %. Al2O3 varies from 10.7 % to 17.9 %, with an average of 13.5 %. CaO, MgO and TFe contents are low. K2O has a higher content, ranging from 1.7 to 7.0 %, with an average of 4.0 %. The Harker diagram shows that the major element all vary nearly linearly with the SiO2 (Fig. 4).
The granite porphyry from the Narusongduo deposit displays a steep pattern for light rare earth elements (LREE) and a flat pattern for heavy rare earth elements (HREE) (see Fig. 5a). The (La/Yb)N ratios range from 14.1 to 31.6. A 'V'-shaped REE distribution pattern is created by negative Eu depletions (δEu = 0.19–0.27). In the primitive mantle-normalized spider diagram, the samples exhibit strong enrichment of Rb, Th, U, and La, and depletion of Nb, Ta, Ba, Eu, and Sr (see Fig. 5b).
4.2. Zircon U–Pb age
The zircon grains in the sample (TD019-5) are transparent and contain only a few inclusions. Their diameters range from 70 μm to 120 μm, and their length to width ratios range from 3:1 to 1:1. Oscillatory zoning is present in all the grains, and their Th/U ratios range from 0.6 to 2.5, indicating a magmatic origin (Table 3, [39]. The 16 spots have 206Pb/238U ages ranging from 56.4 ± 1.4 to 61.2 ± 1.5 Ma, giving a weighted mean 206Pb/238U age of 58.6 ± 0.5 Ma (Fig. 6).
5. Discussion
Magmatic-hydrothermal lead-zinc polymetallic deposits are widespread throughout China, such as the Erdaohe skarn lead-zinc deposit in the Great Hinggan Range [40], the Caixiashan Zn–Pb deposit in the Eastern Tianshan [12], the Huangshaping lead-zinc deposit and the Tongshanling deposit in the Nanling Range [28,41,42]. This paper will specifically focus on the lead-zinc deposit in the NMB.
5.1. The important metallogenic events between Late Cretaceous to Eocene
The NMB is located in the central and southern Lhasa subduction zone, between the Shiquan River-Nam Tso melange zone and the Indus-Yarlung Zangbo suture zone. It has experienced three tectonic-magmatic events, including the Mesozoic subduction of Neotethyan oceanic crust, Palaeogene India-Asia continental collision and Miocene post-collision [4,16,25,43,44]. The NMB contains subduction associated porphyry Copper deposits (e.g. Xiongcun; [45], collision associated lead-zinc deposits (e.g. Longmala; [46], post-collisional associated porphyry copper deposits (e.g. Qulong [47]; and skarn copper deposits (e.g. Jiama; Zheng et al., 2016). It is one of the most important metallogenic belts in the Himalayan-Tibetan continental orogenic system. Skarn is the dominant type of mineralization within the NMB, accompanied by a small amount of breccia pipe, vein and manto deposits. The metallogenic belt hosts over 20 polymetallic deposits, including four significant ones: Yaguila, Mengyaa, Leqingla and Narusongduo.
After analyzing a significant amount of chronological data, we have confirmed that the mineralization period of NMB during the Late Cretaceous-Eocene is second only to the mineralization explosion period of Miocene. These deposits are mainly concentrated in the central and eastern part of the belt. Recently, some deposits have also been discovered in the western region, including Chagele skarn lead-zinc polymetallic deposit, Longgen skarn lead-zinc deposit, and Nuocang skarn lead-zinc polymetallic deposit [10]. The Chagele deposit was dated using the Re–Os method on molybdenite, and an isochron age of 61.49 ± 0.6 Ma was obtained [37]. Notably, some deposits have been found in the Linzizong volcanic sequence in the middle section of the belt, such as the Sinongduo deposit, which is a cryptoexplosive breccia-hydrothermal vein silver-lead-zinc deposit [48], the Narusongduo deposit, which is a cryptoexplosive breccia lead-zinc-silver deposit [35], and the Dexin hydrothermal lead-zinc deposit. The sericite in the quartz sulphide veins from the Sinongduo silver-lead-zinc deposit was dated using 40Ar-39Ar analysis, yielding ages ranging from 60.9 ± 0.7 to 63.1 ± 0.7 Ma [36]. Furthermore, the 40Ar-39Ar age of sericite in the Narusongduo lead-zinc deposit is 57.8 ± 0.7 Ma [35].
Numerous skarn deposits are found in the middle part of the metallogenic belt, primarily occurring at the interface of granitoids and the Takena Formation [49]. By in-situ LA-ICP-MS U–Pb zircon dating, the intrusion age of ore-forming biotite granite in the Leqingla deposit is determined to be 60.8 ± 0.4 Ma, which can be inferred as the mineralization age [32]. Using the molybdenite Re–Os dating method, the isochron age of the Yaguila deposit is determined to be 65.0 ± 1.9 Ma, which is consistent with the zircon U–Pb age (65.6 ± 1.2 Ma) of the ore-forming porphyry within the error range [26,27]. LA-ICP-MS analysis was conducted on zircon U–Pb dating of the biotite monzogranite associated with mineralization at the Longmala deposit, resulting in a weighted mean age of 54.6 ± 0.6 Ma [30]. The age is consistent with the molybdenite Re–Os dating which yielded a weighted mean age of 53.3 Ma [31]. In addition, 40Ar-39Ar dating of muscovite from the Mengya'a deposit yielded a plateau age of 54.8 ± 0.4 Ma [22]. Zircon U–Pb analysis was used to date the Dongzhongla and Dongzhongsongduo deposits, yielding ages of 51.2 Ma and 54.4 Ma, respectively [29]. Furthermore, the Maxionglang sericite was dated using 40Ar-39Ar analysis, yielding an age of 69.3 ± 1.6 Ma [29] (Table 1). Based on the published data, we propose the mineralization age of the skarn-type deposits in the NMB ranges from the Late Cretaceous to Eocene.
5.2. Petrogenesis of the granite related to skarn-type deposits
It is widely believed that the granitoids related to lead-zinc mineralization in the NMB are linked to the formation of S-type granitoids during the collision of the Indo-Asian continents [11,[16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]]. The main evidence for this theory is that the granitoids are mostly peraluminous (as shown in Fig. 7a) and their metallogenic ages are mostly less than 65 Ma, which occurred during the India-Asia collision stage (Yin & Harrison, 2000; [50]. Therefore, it is generally accepted that the granitoids associated with lead-zinc mineralization are co-collision S-type granite. However, this paper challenges the evidence provided by previous researchers. Firstly, it cannot be determined that the granitoids are S-type granite because the S-type and I-type granite classification schemes are independent of the tectonic background. Secondly, peraluminous characteristics are not a robust indicator for judging S-type granite because I-type granite also exhibits peraluminous characteristics (as shown in Fig. 7b) [51,52,53].
5.2.1. Genetic types of the granite related to skarn-type deposits
The zircon U–Pb geochronology results indicate that the granite porphyry in the Narusongduo area is 58.6 ± 0.5 Ma, which is in agreement with the granitoids associated with lead-zinc mineralization in the NMB [11,12].
This paper and literature data indicate that the granitoids associated with lead-zinc mineralization in the NMB are peraluminous and strongly peraluminous (A/CNK>1.0). Moreover, corundum is present to some extent in CIPW standard mineral calculation (Table 2). These features are often observed in S-type granite [51], and researchers have frequently linked mineralization-related granitoids with S-type granite [11,[16], [17], [18], [19],22]. However, this contradicts two facts. Firstly, the granitoids exhibit Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic characteristics that tend to be mantle-derived (Fig. 8, Fig. 9). In Fig. 8, the granitoids associated with mineralization display a wide range of εHf(t) values (−13.9 to 8.7), which fall within the range of crust-derived and mantle-derived rocks in the NMB. This suggests that the granitoids have a composite origin. Fig. 9 shows that the mineralization-related granitoids are distributed between the mantle-derived Linzizong volcanic rocks and the Middle-Upper Crust, Amdo orthogneiss, indicating that the granitoids are a mixture of mantle-derived magma and crustal components. The 87Sr/86Sr data exhibit distinct characteristics. The degree of 87Sr isotope enrichment is lower than that of Amdo orthogneiss, but closer to the mantle-derived Linzizong volcanic rocks, indicating that the granitoids were not formed by remelting of ancient sedimentary rocks, i.e., they are not S-type granite, and should originate from the mantle together with the Linzizong volcanic rocks. Additionally, the 87Sr/86Sr value of the granitoids is higher than that of the Linzizong volcanic rocks. This is because Rb is a large ion lithophile element that tends to aggregate in the magma during the latest stages of magma evolution, i.e., in highly fractionated granites. 87Rb decays into 87Sr, leading to an increase in 87Sr/86Sr in fractionated granites. Therefore, mineralization-related granitoids of the same age will exhibit a higher 87Sr/86Sr value compared to the Linzizong volcanic rocks. Secondly, the Linzizong volcanic rocks are mainly mantle-derived rocks [6,8], which are spatially consistent with the mineralization-associated granitoids. It is generally believed that volcanic rocks are more representative of the source components, which are formed by the direct rise and overflow from the magma chamber. The mantle source characteristics of the Linzizong volcanic rocks indicate that the mineralization-related granitoids with relatively consistent temporal and spatial distributions should also originate from the mantle.
Based on the summary and analysis of this paper and the literature data, it is believed that the mineralization-related granitoids in the NMB are fractionated I-type granites formed by the AFC process when mantle-derived magma intrudes into the thick continental crust (the crystalline basement of the Lhasa terrane). Firstly, we used CIPW to calculate the mineralization-related granitoids, and the DI (differentiation index) value ranges from 75.2 to 94.5, with an average value of 84.7 (Table 2), suggesting strong differentiation. Secondly, the granitoids have high SiO2 (mean 72.8 %), K2O (mean 4.0 %), Rb (mean 186.9 ppm), A/CNK (1.0–3.0, average 1.3), and low contents of MgO, TFe, consistent with the characteristics of fractionated I-type granites. Thirdly, the mineralization-related granitoids are dominated by quartz and potassium feldspar, with low calcareous plagioclase content, which is a mineralogy sign of fractionated I-type granite. However, these features are also often displayed by the S-type granite. This paper denies the petrogenesis of S-type granite because, in addition to the two piece of robust evidence listed above, the evidence for determination S-type granite is ambiguous. Firstly, the main evidence for judging S-type granite includes strong peraluminous (A/CNK>1.1) characteristics, and corundum in CIPW standard minerals. However, these characteristics are ubiquitous in fractionated I-type granite [57]. Furthermore, the high A/CNK value is due to the separation of plagioclase, which leads to the gradual decrease of Ca and Na content (Fig. 10). S-type granite often contains peraluminous minerals such as cordierite, muscovite or garnet, but these minerals are not found in the mineralized granitoids in the NMB. Secondly, the behavior of phosphorus (P) is a crucial indicator for distinguishing between I- and S-type granites in the case of fractionated granites [58]. have shown that P2O5 exhibits opposite trends during fractional crystallization, decreasing in I-type granites and increasing in S-type granites. The continuous decrease of P2O5 with progressive differentiation (as shown in Fig. 4c) and the lower average P2O5 abundance (0.067) in the mineralization-related granitoids suggest that they belong to the I-type granite category.
5.2.2. AFC process
AFC (Assimilation and Fractional Crystalization) process are typically linked to the formation of granitoids. This is due to the high large viscosity of granitic magma, long emplacement time, and its location several kilometers underground, which slows down the dissipation of magma heat and enables ample matter and energy exchange with the surrounding rocks. Additionally, the fractional crystallization of the magma can also occur slowly and completely.
In the Harker diagram, there is a noticeable linear decrease in Al2O3, CaO and Na2O as SiO2 content increases (Fig. 4a, b and c). This is believed to be due to the fractional crystallization of feldspar, which is rich in Sr, Ba, and Eu. The significant loss of Sr, Ba, and Eu (Fig. 5a and b) confirms the separation of feldspar. Potassium feldspar, which is abundant in K and Rb, is a common mineral in the final stage of magma evolution. The high enrichment of K and Rb suggests that granitoids related to mineralization have reached the final stage of magma evolution. The lower content of major elements Fe, Mg, and Ti is often associated with the crystallization differentiation of hornblende, biotite, and iron-titanium minerals, indicating that these minerals have separated during magma evolution. This indicates that potassium feldspar and plagioclase are the main minerals that separate during magma evolution, with a small amount of biotite, muscovite, and hornblende also occurring (Fig. 10a and b).
Granitic magma has a high viscosity and migrates slowly, which leads to assimilation and contamination with surrounding rocks. As a result, it often exhibits isotopic characteristics that are neither enriched nor depleted, and can undergo a wide range of changes. The εHf(t) values of granitoids related to mineralization range from −13.9 to +8.7, with an average value of −1.6 (Fig. 8) [12]. This suggests that the formation of mineralization-related granitoids is linked to interactions between the crust and mantle.
Partitioning processes can significantly enrich incompatible elements, such as Pb, W, Sn, and rare metals [10,[59], [60], [61], [62]]. During magmatic differentiation, Pb is continuously enriched as an incompatible element. This process can lead to a significant enrichment of incompatible elements, up to 30 times higher than the original basaltic parent [56,63,64]. However, unlike highly incompatible elements, Zn behaves as a compatible to moderately incompatible element and is sensitive to changes in mineralogy or major element composition [65]. Given that Pb and Zn often coexist in deposits, we suggest that magmatic differentiation may be one of the causes of Pb and Zn enrichment. However, this does not exclude the possibility that Pb and Zn enrichment in the source area plays an important role in Pb and Zn mineralization.
6. Conclusion
The NMB is a crucial metallogenic belt within the Himalaya-Tibetan continental orogenic system. Skarn is the primary form of mineralization found within the NMB, accompanied by smaller quantities of breccia pipe, vein-type, and manto deposits.
-
(1)
LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dating shows that the granites associated with skarn-type mineralization from the Narusongduo district formed in the Paleocene (58.6 ± 0.5 Ma). Combined with the regional published data, we propose the mineralization age of the skarn-type deposits in the NMB ranges from Late Cretaceous to Eocene.
-
(2)
The granitoids associated with mineralization in the NMB have high SiO2 (mean 72.8 %), K2O (mean 4.0 %), Rb (mean 186.9 ppm), DI (differentiation index) 84.7, A/CNK (mean 1.3), and low contents of MgO, TFe, suggesting that the granitoids have undergone strong differentiation.
-
(3)
The continuous decrease of P2O5 with progressive differentiation and the lower average P2O5 abundances suggest that the mineralization-related granitoids belong to the I-type granite. Based on the published Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic data, we suggest that the granitoids originated from the mantle and underwent the AFC process. The formation of lead-zinc polymetallic deposits may be related to the highly fractional crystallization of the magma.
Funding statement
This paper was supported by Central Finance Research Project Surplus Funds Project of the Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration (JY202109); Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (2022FY101800); National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of IGGE (AS2022J11); National Natural Science Foundation of China (41504063, 42202106).
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Fu Yangang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Duan Zhuang: Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Gao Jianweng: Visualization, Formal analysis, Data curation. Hao Zejiang: Visualization, Data curation. Yang Jianzhou: Visualization, Data curation. Zhao Keqiang: Formal analysis, Data curation. Wang Zhenliang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and detailed comments, which led to a significant improvement of this paper.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24859.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article.
References
- 1.Wen D.R., Chung S.L., Song B., et al. Late Cretaceous Gangdese intrusions of adakitic geochemical characteristics, SE Tibet: petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Lithos. 2008;105(1–2):1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ji W.Q., Wu F.Y., Chung S.L., et al. Zircon U-Pb geochronology and Hf isotopic constraints on petrogenesis of the Gangdese batholith, southern Tibet. Chem. Geol. 2009;262(3):229–245. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhu D.C., Zhao Z.D., Niu Y.L., et al. The Lhasa terrane: record of a microcontinent and its histories of drift and growth. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2011;301(1–2):241–255. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhu D.C., Zhao Z.D., Niu Y.L., et al. The origin and pre-Cenozoic evolution of the Tibetan Plateau. Gondwana Res. 2013;23(4):1429–1454. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yang Z.Y., Tang J.X., Santosh M., et al. Microcontinent subduction and S-type volcanism prior to India–Asia collision. Sci. Rep. 2021;11 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94492-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mo X.X., Niu Y.L., Dong G.C., et al. Contribution of syn-collisional felsic magmatism to continental crust growth: a case study of the Paleogene Linzizong volcanic Succession in southern Tibet. Chem. Geol. 2008;250(1–4):49–67. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lee H.Y., Chung S.L., Lo C.H., et al. Eocene Neo-tethyan slab breakoff in southern Tibet inferred from the Linzizong volcanic record. Tectonophysics. 2009;477(1–2):20–35. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee H.Y., Chung S.L., Ji J.Q., et al. Geochemical and Sr–Nd isotopic constraints on the genesis of the Cenozoic Linzizong volcanic successions, southern Tibet. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2012;53:96–114. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yang Z.Y., Zhao X.Y., Hu G.Y., et al. Geology, geochronology, and geochemistry of the Sinongduo Ag–Pb–Zn deposit in the Gangdese metallogenic belt: implications of intermediate sulfdation mineralization in the Linzizong volcanic succession. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020;127 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jiang H., Jiang S.Y., Li W.Q., Zhao K.D., Peng N.J. Highly fractionated Jurassic I-type granites and related tungsten mineralization in the Shirenzhang deposit, northern Guangdong, South China: evidence from cassiterite and zircon U-Pb ages, geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopes. Lithos. 2018;312–313:186–203. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hou Z.Q., Duan L.F., Lu Y.J., et al. Lithospheric Architecture of the Lhasa terrane and its Control on ore deposits in the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Econ. Geol. 2015;110:1541–1575. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gao R., Xue C., Chi G., Dai J., Dong C., Zhao X., Man R. Genesis of the giant Caixiashan Zn-Pb deposit in Eastern Tianshan, NW China: constraints from geology, geochronology and S-Pb isotopic geochemistry. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020;119 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gao S.B., Chen X., Cheng S., et al. Ore Geology Reviews; 2021. Timing and Genetic Link of Porphyry Mo and Skarn Pb-Zn Mineralization in the Chagele Deposit, Western Nyainqentanglha Belt, Tibet. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu Y.C., Ji X.H., Hou Z.Q., et al. The establishment of an independent Pb-Zn mineralization system related to magmatism: a case study of the Narusongduo Pb-Zn deposit in Tibet. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2015;34(4):539–556. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jiang J.S., Zheng Y.Y., Gao S.B., et al. The newly-discovered late cretaceous igneous rocks in the nuocang district: products of ancient crust melting trigged by Neo–Tethyan slab rollback in the western Gangdese. Lithos. 2018;308–309:294–315. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hou Z.Q., Yang Z.M. Porphyry deposits in continental settings of China: geological characteristics, magmatic-hydrothermal system, and metallogenic Model. Acta Geol. Sin. 2009;83(12):1779–1817. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang B.D., Guo L., Wang L.Q., et al. Geochronology and petrogenesis of the ore-bearing pluton in Chagele deposit in middle of the Gangdese metallogenic belt. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2012;28(5):1647–1662. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 18.Duan Z.M., Li G.M., Li Y.X., et al. Geochronology and geochemical characteristics of ore-bearing porphyry in Longgen lead-zinc deposit of middle-Gangdese metallogenic belt, Tibet. Miner. Deposits. 2014;33:625–638. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duan Z.M., Li G.M., Wang B.D., et al. Geochronology and its geological signifcance of the ore-bearing porphyry in Chagele lead-zinc deposit in middle-Gangdese metallogenic belt, Tibet. J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol. Ed.) 2015;45:1667–1690. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zheng Y.C., Fu Q., Hou Z.Q., et al. Metallogeny of the northeastern Gangdese Pb-Zn-Fe-Mo-W polymetallic belt in the Lhasa terrane, southern Tibet. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015;70:510–532. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zheng Y.Y., Sun X., Gao S.B., et al. Metallogenesis and the minerogenetic series in the Gangdese polymetallic copper belt. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2015;103:23–39. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fu Q., Xu B., Zheng Y.C., et al. Two episodes of mineralization in the Mengya'a deposit and implications for the evolution and intensity of Pb–Zn–(Ag) mineralization in the Lhasa terrane, Tibet. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017;90:877–896. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gao S.B., Chen X., Cheng S., et al. Ore Geology Reviews; 2020. Syncollisional Magmatism at the Longgen Pb–Zn Deposit, Western Nyainqentanglha Belt, Tibet: Petrogenesis and Implications for Regional Polymetallic Metallogeny. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mo X.X., Hou Z.Q., Niu Y.L., et al. Mantle contributions to crustal thickening during continental collision: evidence from Cenozoic igneous rocks in southern Tibet. Lithos. 2007;96(1–2):225–242. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yin A., Harrision T.M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 2000;28:211–280. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xu J., Zheng Y.Y., Sun X., et al. Genesis of the Yaguila Pb-Zn-Ag-Mo skarn deposit in Tibet: Insights from geochronology, geochemistry, and fluid inclusions. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019;172:83–100. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gao Y.M., Chen Y.C., Tang J.X., et al. Re-Os dating of molybdenite from the Yaguila porphyry molybdenum deposit in Gongbo'gyamda area, Tibet, and its geological significance. Geol. Bull. China. 2011;30(7):1027–1036. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li H., Wang C., Zhu D.P., Jiang W.C. Metallogenic environment of skarn-type and vein-type Pb-Zn ore body in the Huangshaping deposit and its implications of deep deposit exploration. Chin. J. Nonferrous Metals. 2023;33(2):630–651. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tang J.X., Wang L.Q., Ci Q., et al. Geological Publishing House; Beijing: 2020. Minerogenetic Series of Ore Deposits in the East Part of the Gangdese Metallogenic Belt [M] pp. 1–226. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang A.P., Zheng Y.C., Fu Q., et al. Ore-forming material sources of the Pb–Zn–(Ag–Fe–Cu) deposits in the northern Gangdese belt, Lhasa terrane: constraints from geology, geochronology and S–Pb isotopes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023;159 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang L.Q., Tang J.X., Deng J., et al. The Longmala and Mengya'a skarn Pb-Zn deposits, Gangdese region, Tibet: evidence from U-Pb and Re-Os geochronology for formation during early India-Asia collision. Int. Geol. Rev. 2015;57(14):1825–1842. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang L.Q., Cheng W.B., Tang J X., et al. U–Pb geochronology, geochemistry, and H–O–S–Pb isotopic compositions of the Leqingla and Xin'gaguo skarn Pb–Zn polymetallic deposits, Tibet, China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2016;115:80–96. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ma W., Liu Y.C., Yang Z.S., et al. Sulfide Re-Os and Rb-Sr ages of Lietinggang-Leqingla Pb-Zn-Fe-Cu-Mo deposit in Tibet and its geological significance. Miner. Deposits. 2020;39:80–96. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gao S.B. China University of Geosciences; 2015. Copper-Iron Polymetal Metallogenic Regularity and Election of Target Areas in the Western of Gangdise Metallogenic Belt, Tibet (PHD Thesis) pp. 37–180. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ji X.H. China University of Geosciences; Beijing: 2013. Study on Geology, Geochemistry and Genesis of Narusongduo Lead–Zinc Deposit, Tibet. (Dissertation Supervisor: Prof. Junfeng Shen) (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li H.F., Tang J.X., Hu G.Y., et al. Fluid inclusions, isotopic characteristics and geochronology of the Sinongduo epithermal Ag-Pb-Zn deposit, Tibet, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019;107:692–706. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gao S.B., Zheng Y.Y., Tian L.M., et al. Geochronology of magmatic intrusions and mineralization of Chagele copper-lead-zinc deposit in Tibet and its implications. Earth Sci. 2012;37(3):508–514. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jiang X.J., Jiang J.S., Gao S.B., et al. 40Ar-39Ar dating, fluid inclusion, and isotopic constraints on the timing, fluid evolution, and deposition of the polymetallic Nuocang Pb–Zn deposit in the western Nyainqentanglha belt. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hoskin P., Schaltegger U. The composition of zircon and igneous andmetamorphic petrogenesis. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2003;53:27–62. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Guo X.G., Gao J.J., Zhang D.H., Li J.W., Xiang A.P., Li C.J., Wang S.Y., Jiao T.L., Ren C.H. Genesis of the Erdaohe skarn Pb-Zn-Ag deposit in the Great Hinggan Range, NE China: evidence from geology, fluid inclusions, and H-O–S isotope systematics. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022;140 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhu D., Li H., Jiang W., Wang C., Hu X., Kong H. Ore-forming environment of Pb-Zn mineralization related to granite porphyry at Huangshaping skarn deposit, Nanling Range, South China. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China. 2022;32:3015–3035. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hu X., Li H., Förster M.W., Elatikpo S.M., Kong H., Wu J., Zhu D. Using apatite to differentiate metallogenic potential and environment of granitic rocks: a case study from the Tongshanling W-Sn-Cu-Pb-Zn ore field, Nanling Range (South China) J. Geochem. Explor. 2023;245 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Huang Y., Ren M.H., Simon M., et al. Middle Triassic arc magmatism in the southern Lhasa terrane: geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic setting. Lithos. 2021:380–381. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xie F.W., Tang J.X. The Late Triassic-Jurassic magmatic belt and its implications for the double subduction of the Neo-Tethys Ocean in the southern Lhasa subterrane, Tibet. Gondwana Res. 2021;97:1–21. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lang X.H., Tang J.X., Li Z.J., et al. U–Pb and Re–Os geochronological evidence for the Jurassic porphyry metallogenic event of the Xiongcun district in the Gangdese porphyry copper belt, southern Tibet, PRC. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2014;79:608–622. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang L.Q., Tang J.X., Leon B., et al. Early Eocene Longmala skarn Pb-Zn-Cu deposit in Tibet, China: geochemistry, fluid inclusions, and H-O-S-Pb isotopic compositions. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017;88:99–115. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang Z.M., Hou Z.Q., White Noel C., et al. Geology of the post-collisional porphyry copper–molybdenum deposit at Qulong, Tibet. Ore Geol. Rev. 2009;36(1–3):133–159. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tang J.X., Ding S., Meng Z., et al. The first discovery of the low sulfdation epithermal deposit in Linzizong volcanics, Tibet: a case study of the Sinongduo Ag polymetallic deposit. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2016;37:461–470. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cao M.J., Qin K.Z., Evans N.J., et al. Titanite in situ SIMS U-Pb geochronology, elemental and Nd isotopic signatures record mineralization and fluid characteristics at the Pusangguo skarn deposit. Tibet. Miner. Deposita. 2021;56(5):907–916. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mo X.X. Magmatism and evolution of the Tibetan plateau. Geol. J. China Univ. 2011;17(3):351–367. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chappell B.W. Aluminium saturation in I- and S-type granites and the characterization of fractionated haplogranites. Lithos. 1999;46(3):535–551. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li X.H., Li Z.X., Li W.X., et al. U–Pb zircon, geochemical and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic constraints on age and origin of Jurassic I- and A-type granites from central Guangdong, SE China: a major igneous event in response to foundering of a subducted flat-slab? Lithos. 2007;96(1–2):186–204. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhu D.C., Mo X.X., Wang L.Q., et al. Petrogenesis of highly fractionated I-type granites in the Zayu area of eastern Gangdese, Tibet: constraints from zircon U-Pb geochronology, geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes. Science in China. 2009;(7):833–848. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 54.Miller C., Schuster R., Klötzli U., Frank W., Purtscheller F. Post-collisional potassic and ultrapotassic magmatism in SW Tibet, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb-O isotopic constraints for mantle source characteristics and petrogenesis. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 1999;40:1399–1424. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Guynn J.H., Kapp P., Pullen A., Heizler M., Gehrels G., Ding L. Tibetan basement rocks near Amdo reveal “missing” Mesozoic tectonism along the Bangong suture, central Tibet. Geology. 2006;34:505–508. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhou J.S., Yang Z.S., Hou Z.Q., et al. The geochemical evolution of syncollisional magmatism and the implications for signifcant magmatic-hydrothermal lead–zinc mineralization (Gangdese, Tibet) Lithos. 2017;288–289:143–155. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wu F.Y., Jahn B.M., Wilde S.A., et al. Highly fractionated I-type granites in NE China (I): geochronology and petrogenesis. Lithos. 2003;66(3–4):241–273. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wolf M.B., London D. Apatite dissolution into peraluminous haplogranitic melts: an experimental study of solubilities and mechanism. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 1994;58:4127–4145. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Blevin P.L., Chappell B.W. Chemistry, origin, and evolution of mineralized granites in the Lachlan fold belt, Australia; the metallogeny of I-and S-type granites. Econ. Geol. 1995;90:1604–1619. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xu B., Jiang S.Y., Luo L., Zhao K.D., Ma L. Origin of the granites and related Sn and Pb-Zn polymetallic ore deposits in the Pengshan district, Jiangxi Province, South China: constraints from geochronology, geochemistry, mineral chemistry, and Sr–Nd–Hf–Pb–S isotopes. Miner. Deposita. 2016;52:337–360. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Xu Y.G., Wang R.C., Wang C.Y., et al. Highly fractionated granites and rare-metal mineralization. Lithos. 2021;398–399 [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wu F.Y., Guo C.L., Hu F.Y., et al. Petrogenesis of the highly fractionated granites and their mineralizations in Nanling Range, South China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2023;39(1):1–36. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
- 63.Meinert L.D., Dipple G.M., Nicolescu S. Economic Geology 100th Anniversary; 2005. World Skarn Deposits; pp. 299–336. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee C.T.A., Morton D.M. High silica granites: terminal porosity and crystal settling in shallow magma chambers. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2015;409:23–31. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Le Roux V., Dasgupta R., Lee C.-T.A. Mineralogical heterogeneities in the Earth's mantle: constraints from Mn Co, Ni and Zn partitioning during partial melting. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2011;307:395–408. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.