Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2024 Jan 31;12:e16842. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16842

Application of fenugreek in ruminant feed: implications for methane emissions and productivity

Xiangbiao Zeng 1,#, Yiwen Chen 1,#, Wenjuan Li 1,, Shijun Liu 2,
Editor: Konstantinos Kormas
PMCID: PMC10838068  PMID: 38313019

Abstract

Background

Human demand for meat and dairy products will increase as a result of economic development and population growth, and the farming of ruminants, such as cattle and sheep, will also increase. Methane (CH4) emission from the enteric fermentation of ruminant livestock is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions and a significant contributor to global warming. Meanwhile, growth performance is often limited and animals are more vulnerable to diseases in high-density, intensive farming, greatly reducing livestock productivity, so developing ways to reduce CH4 emissions and improve ruminant productivity has become a research hotspot. Studies have reported that fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) as feed additives have the potential to reduce ruminant methane and improve the productivity. However, systematic reviews of such studies are lacking.

Methodology

In this review, databases of Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and Science Direct were used for the literature search. The initial keywords search was fenugreek or Trigonella foenum-graecum L. For more focused search, we added terms such as methane, rumen fermentation, growth, milk production and antioxidants. All were done for ruminants. The literature that conforms to the theme of this article is selected, summarized, and finally completed this article.

Results

By regulating the rumen microbiome (suppressing protozoans, methanogenic bacteria, and fungi), fenugreek can lower CH4 emissions according to many in vitro anaerobic fermentation experiments. Fenugreek secondary metabolites (saponins and tannins) are responsible for this impact, but it is still unclear exactly how they work. Therefore, more long-term in vivo experiments are needed to verify its efficacy. Fenugreek is also rich in alkaloids, amino acids, flavonoids, saponins and phenolic acids. These compounds have been shown to have beneficial effects on ruminant growth, lactation, and total antioxidant capacity. Therefore, fenugreek has a great opportunity to develop into a new green feed additive.

Conclusions

This review provides a summary of the effect of fenugreek and its bioactive compounds on rumen fermentation, CH4 emissions and production performance by ruminants. In addition, based on the available data, the possible biochemical pathway of fenugreek to reduce CH4 emissions in ruminants was described. Overall, the livestock feed industry has the opportunity to develop natural, environmentally-friendly feed additives based on fenugreek.

Keywords: Fenugreek, Ruminant, CH4, Productivity, Rumen fermentation, Bioactive secondary metabolites

Introduction

Concentrations of methane (CH4) in the atmosphere have soared since 2007, the recent rapid rise in global CH4 concentrations is primarily biogenic, most likely due to agriculture, according to the new data (Saunois et al., 2016). Ruminants play an important role in sustainable agriculture, among which is the transformation of renewable resources into human-edible food (Ripple et al., 2014). But their production processes also serve as a source of greenhouse gases (GHG) for various supply chain activities. One of the main ways ruminants release CH4 is through enteral fermentation, which is the microbial fermentation of feed in the gastrointestinal tract (Thorpe, 2009). The main agricultural source of CH4 and the third-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, behind energy and industry, is enteral fermentation (Frank et al., 2019). Data shows that the global livestock sector contributes roughly 14.5% of all anthropogenic GHG emissions, with ruminants accounting for close to 12% of these emissions and approximately 44% of these emissions are CH4 (Fig. 1) (Gerber et al., 2013). Ruminant GHG emissions are thought to be responsible for around US$0.679 trillion and US$13 billion in damages to the environment and human health, respectively (Goedkoop et al., 2009). Economic development and population growth will further expand human demand for meat and dairy products. By 2050, there will be a 70% increase of global food demand, which is expected to result in a 30–40% increase in agricultural emissions (Hristov et al., 2013). This runs counter to the European Council Directorate-General for Climate Action goal, which states that developed countries must reduce GHG emissions by 80–90% by 2050, compared with 1990 levels (Sanchez-Martinez, Benedetti-Fasil & Christensen, 2019). There is tremendous pressure on food production systems to meet demand while also being environmentally friendly, sustainable, and climate-smart (Hristov et al., 2013). Therefore, novel solutions and more effective CH4 mitigation strategies are required for the sustainable development of ruminant farming (Beauchemin et al., 2020; Tseten et al., 2022).

Figure 1. Global GHG emissions of livestock industry.

Figure 1

(A) Anthropogenic GHG emissions worldwide. (B) GHG emissions contributed by the ruminants.

A further challenge in reducing CH4 emissions from the agricultural sector is the growing demand for milk and meat (Eisler et al., 2014). Ruminant livestock and their products are an important food in human nutrition, especially in less developed countries. How to find a new method that can meet the high yield of high-quality protein, control CH4 emissions and maximize productivity (lactation, growth, immunity and other properties) under the conditions of high density and intensive culture is very vital (Tseten et al., 2022). While numerous technical alternatives are available, implementation of these interventions may be hampered by significant infrastructure and precision nutrition strategy investment costs (Tseten et al., 2022). Adding some plants that are rich in condensed tannins and saponins to feed appears to have the potential to mitigate CH4 emissions and increase productivity due to the direct effect of diet on rumen fermentation patterns (Ku-Vera et al., 2020). Farmers may decide to employ the approach of supplementing animal feed since it has several advantages, including the promotion of growth, improvement of animal health, reduction of GHG emissions of livestock, and sustainability (Du et al., 2018). The addition of supplements to feed or diets may improve nutritional absorption and retention. Since the scientific community and the animal protein community are moving away from the use of antibiotics as growth promoters due to microbial resistance, alternatives are needed (Manyi-Loh et al., 2018). Researchers are becoming more interested in using phytogenous products as feed supplements in animal production (Adegbeye et al., 2019).

Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.), named Trigonella for its triangular-shaped, yellowish flowers and leaves, is an annual herb of the legume family that is native to the Mediterranean region and Indian subcontinent (Syed et al., 2020). Farmed for food, spices, animal feed, and herbal medicine, fenugreek is grown extensively in Asia, Africa, and Europe (Ahmad et al., 2016). Fenugreek is also a dryland crop, the ability of fenugreek to grow in desert regions typified by high temperatures and water scarcity makes it a good choice for future phytogenous feed additives (Wijekoon et al., 2021). Past research on fenugreek has focused on its medicinal functions and nutritional value; products derived from its seeds and leaves have been used extensively in various pharmaceuticals, nutritional products, and clinical treatments (Singh et al., 2022). Fenugreek contains a variety of chemical components, such as saponins, phenolic acid derivatives, steroids, terpenes, alkaloids, flavonoids, amino acids, and fatty acids and their derivatives (Fig. 2) (Singh et al., 2022), which have recently attracted great research interest and are considered to have the potential to mitigate CH4 emissions of ruminants at therapeutically-effective dosages. Dey (2015) found in the simulated rumen fermentation experiment in vitro that incubation of 30 ml of buffered rumen fluid with 2 ml methanol extract of fenugreek leaves for 24 h significantly reduced the total gas and methane production. Kumar et al. (2016) has similar results. Meanwhile, fenugreek as a growth promotor, lactagogue, immunostimulant and antioxidative agent application in animal feed has been widely recognized. Adding 0.04% fenugreek in the diet can significantly improve the growth and plasma biochemical indexes, and enhance the immunity and antioxidant of juvenile blunt snout bream (Yu et al., 2019). This has also been demonstrated in animals such as chickens, rabbits and sheep (Abdel-Wareth et al., 2021; El-Tarabany et al., 2018; Paneru et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022). Fenugreek has been used as a galactologue since ancient times in nations such as China, Egypt and Persia, owing to the role of trigonelline. It has also been demonstrated to increase lactation in animals such as mice, cattle, and sheep (Daddam et al., 2023; Muddathir, 2012; Sevrin et al., 2019). Therefore, it has the potential to be a new type of green product (Acharya, Thomas & Basu, 2008; Huang et al., 2022; Sahoo et al., 2020).

Figure 2. Chemical composition of fenugreek.

Figure 2

This review aims to provide insight into fenugreek in terms of enteric CH4 mitigation efficacy, growth-promoting and lactation-promoting functions in ruminants, possible mode of action, and safety deriving data from reported research data. It could provide clear guidelines for fenugreek application, either as a feed additive or forage supplement. We believe that this article will be of interest to professionals involved in greenhouse gas mitigation, the development of novel feed products for livestock, plant secondary metabolites, and new green antibiotic alternatives.

Survey methodology

The databases of Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and Science Direct were used for the literature search. Articles with unavailable abstracts and nonpeer-reviewed were excluded. The major literature bibliography was also used to search for other connected publications. The initial keywords search was fenugreek or Trigonella foenum-graecum L. For more focused search, we added terms such as methane, rumen fermentation, growth, milk production, antioxidants, all for the sake of the ruminant. The articles that came up in the first search were then carefully reviewed by examining the abstract and scanning the entire text. The literature that conforms to the theme of this article is selected, summarized, and finally completed this article.

Fenugreek as a forage crop

Fenugreek is a bloat-free legume that serves as a medicine or functional food, as well as a fodder crop for livestock and is predominantly cultivated in Southern Europe, Asia and North Africa (Acharya, Thomas & Basu, 2008). Fenugreek has great potential as a substitute forage crop, based on seed yield, nutritional value and yearly output. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is one of the many herbaceous legumes that are currently used as high-nutrient fodder crops. The nutritional content of fenugreek for fodder is higher, or equal to that of alfalfa, at all growth stages (Islam et al., 2017). When alfalfa and fenugreek were compared as fodder for cows, there was no significant difference in the digestibility of the two feeds, however, the fenugreek-fed cows had a lower food intake, but a higher milk output than the alfalfa-fed cows (Alemu & Doepel, 2011). Fenugreek can be used for short-term rotations, because it is rich in crude protein and does not cause flatulence of ruminants, so it has the potential to be used as forage for young ruminants (Nedelkov et al., 2019). Early-harvested whole fenugreek had higher crude protein and fiber concentrations than first-flowering alfalfa, whereas the fiber content of mature fenugreek was lower than alfalfa and their crude protein contents were similar (Niu et al., 2021). Fenugreek is a desirable feed crop in the Canadian cattle sector, because it contains compounds (e.g., diosgenin) that support animal growth and it appears that cows prefer the taste of fenugreek (Harper et al., 2016).

With yields of up to 1,300 kg/hectare, fenugreek seed has the potential to be used in animal feed, however yields vary greatly depending on the variety (Basu et al., 2009). Unfortunately, genetic diversity amongst fenugreek genotypes has rarely been estimated. Fenugreek fodder yield is strongly correlated with climate, being higher in semi-arid areas and lower with frequent rainfall; fenugreek production in southern Alberta during the wet season only produces an average yield of 5.8 tons of dry matter per hectare, which may limit its viability (Mir et al., 1997). Fenugreek is a legume that fixes atmospheric nitrogen 283 kg N ha−1 year−1, reducing the requirement for nitrogen fertilizer for succeeding crops and boosting the growth of subsequent crops in the rotation (Zandi et al., 2015). Fenugreek is a dryland crop, which requires very little water, therefore growing it can reduce irrigation expenses, water consumption, eutrophication of surface water sources and depletion of groundwater sources (Solorio-Sánchez et al., 2014). Fenugreek can also grow adequately in slightly alkaline, or marginally saline soils, however, its ability to grow on saline soils has only been partially assessed (Ahmad et al., 2016).

Overall, fenugreek has great potential as a fodder crop, but its properties also restrict its growth and use, so more research is needed to enhance its crop yield, stability, and performance.

Fenugreek and ruminant CH4 emissions

An introduction to rumen CH4 synthesis

The stomach of ruminants is composed of four interconnected compartments, called rumen, reticulum, omasum and abomasums from front to back, of which the most important and most functional is the rumen (about 80% of the total volume) (Morgavi et al., 2013). The rumen is an anaerobic, methanogenic environment with a diverse and dynamic microbial community. It consists of bacteria (1010 to 1011 organisms/ml), archaea (108 to 109 organisms/ml), protozoa (105 to 106 organisms/ml), fungi (103 to 104 organisms/ml) and an as yet largely uncharacterized virome (Newbold & Ramos-Morales, 2020). They actively participate in the degradation of feed elements that are lignocellulosic (Lourenco, Ramos-Morales & Wallace, 2010). After ruminant ingestion, the carbohydrates are degraded into monomers by rumen microorganisms, which are then fermented into volatile fatty acids (VFAs). The VFAs contain acetate, butyrate and propionate, along with methanol, methylamine and minor VFAs of valerate, iso-butyrate. These VFAs are either digested in the rumen wall to produce CH4 or are absorbed along the ruminal epithelium and used as the ruminant’s energy source (Morgavi et al., 2012; Newbold & Ramos-Morales, 2020).

Methanogens transform the primary fermentation products into CH4 and generate energy. CH4 is mainly produced in ruminants in three ways: (1) Through the action of microbial enzymes and coenzymes, CO2 is reduced with H2 to produce CH4; this is the main pathway of rumen CH4 production. In this method, 4 moles of H2 are used to produce 1 mole of CH4. The chemical reaction for synthesizing CH4 is CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O; (2) using VFAs, such as formic, acetic, propionic and butyric acid, as substrates to synthesize CH4. Formate is a common substitute for H2 for many hydrogenotrophic rumen methanogenic bacteria, accounting for up to 18% of the total CH4 production in the rumen (Hungate et al., 1970); (3) using methyl compounds, such as methanol and ethanol, as substrates to synthesize CH4 (DiMarco, Bobik & Wolfe, 1990; Newbold & Ramos-Morales, 2020).

Secondary metabolites of fenugreek that reduce CH4 emissions and the potential effect on biochemical pathways

Secondary metabolites of fenugreek.

Secondary metabolites are highly bioactive and have been widely used to improve rumen fermentation and also have the potential to influence the growth rate of rumen microbial populations, thereby reducing CH4 emissions from the ruminant gut (Ku-Vera et al., 2020). The potential of tannin (Aboagye & Beauchemin, 2019; Min et al., 2020), saponin (Goel, Makkar & Becker, 2008a; Patra & Saxena, 2009), essential oil (Benchaar et al., 2008) and flavonoid compounds (Olagaray & Bradford, 2019) to mitigate CH4 in the intestinal tract of ruminants has all been evaluated. Secondary metabolites are quite rich in fenugreek, especially in its leaves and seeds, including steroidal saponins, flavonoids, alkaloids, amino acids, phenolic acids and tannins (Table 1) (Omezzine et al., 2017). Figure 3 shows the structural diversity of the compounds isolated from fenugreek. Saponins are high molecular weight glycosides that usually occur as glycosides or polycyclic triterpenes of steroids. Saponins are structurally characterized by either a hydrophobic triterpenoid ring or a steroidal skeleton (Venkata et al., 2017). In the main components of fenugreek seeds, the content of steroidal saponins is about 6.5%. At present, dozens of saponins have been isolated from fenugreek, of which the diosgenin element dominates, which is believed to be the precursor of many sex hormones (Srinivasan, 2006). Flavonoids are polyphenols with the C6-C3-C6 skeleton, which are mainly distributed in seeds, stems and leaves, and more than 10 kinds of flavonoids have been isolated and extracted from fenugreek (Singh et al., 2022). The majority of flavonoids in fenugreek are present as complex glycosides, conjugating with carbohydrates via O- and C-glycosidic bonds, according to the phytochemical examination of the plant (Venkata et al., 2017). It displays anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antibacterial properties and interferes with different bactericidal agents, and has the potential to improve animal welfare (Cushnie & Lamb, 2011). Tannins are a class of water-soluble polyphenolic polymers, which have an important role in controlling parasites and regulating microorganisms (Naumann et al., 2017). Numerous significant phenolic compounds with antioxidant, anticancer, and antibacterial effects, including p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, and chlorogenic acid, have been extracted from fenugreek (Ahmad et al., 2016).

Table 1. Biologically active constituents of fenugreek and their pharmacological efficacy.
Active substances Efficacy References
Alkaloids Hypoglycemic, antioxidant, neuroprotective, anti-migraine, antibacterial, antitumor Zhou, Chan & Zhou (2012)
Amino Acids Insulin stimulating activity, increasing insulin sensitivity Ahmad et al. (2020)
Saponins Anti-bacterial, anti-diabetes, heart protection, anti-cancer Spandan et al., (2017)
Flavonoids Antioxidant, anti-bacterial, hypoglycemic Wang et al. (2019)
Phenolic acids and derivatives Antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-bacterial Yoshikawa et al. (1997), Grusak (2003)
Others Regulatory functions Hasanzadeh et al. (2010)
Figure 3. Structures of fenugreek phytochemicals.

Figure 3

(A) Alkaloids. (B) Saponins. (C) Flavonoids. (D) Phenolic acids and derivatives.

Effect of fenugreek on rumen microbiota.

Rumen microorganisms include ciliate protozoa, anaerobic fungi, anaerobic bacteria and archaea, which all contribute to rumen fermentation; 90% of CH4 emitted from ruminants is produced by rumen microorganisms (Tapio et al., 2017). Because of the symbiotic interaction between archaea and protozoa as well as the presence of active colonies of methanogenic archaea on their exterior surfaces, protozoa are indirectly engaged in the generation of CH4 (Morgavi et al., 2013; Newbold & Ramos-Morales, 2020). Starch, cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and soluble sugars are used by protozoa to create metabolic H2 and VFA, which are needed by archaea to create CH4 (Newbold & Ramos-Morales, 2020). Saponin-containing plants can inhibit CH4 emissions by reducing the protozoal population and changing rumen fermentation conditions (Morgavi, Jouany & Martin, 2008). For example, in an in vitro rumen simulation, adding 11.54 mg fenugreek saponins to a buffer medium containing rumen microorganisms (40 ml), it was found that the antigen-parasite activity was the highest at this time, reaching 39%. Protozoa concentration decreased from 19.5 to 11.9 (×104) per ml and the number of fungi and methanogens also declined (Goel, Makkar & Becker, 2008a). Adding 48, 54, 60, or 66 mg fenugreek plant material to 200 mg vetch-oat hay, as the basal feed in an in vitro rumen simulation, reduced protozoan numbers by 45, 35, 72 and 67%, respectively (Arhabbr, Ablabr & Zitouni, 2014). This was mainly attributed to the strong anti-protozoal activity of saponins. The lipid membranes of bacteria can form compounds with saponins, increasing their permeability and creating an imbalance that triggers microbial breakage (Kumar et al., 2016; Goel & Makkar, 2012; Ibidhi & Salem, 2022). Protozoa and methanogens exhibit endo- or exo-symbiosis in the rumen, so CH4 production by the combination of protozoa and methanogens depends on the extent of symbiosis between methanogens and protozoa, as well as the methanogenesis rate of each methanogenic strain (Machmuller, Soliva & Kreuzer, 2003). Suppressing protozoa reduces their H2 production; methanogenic bacteria need H2 to reduce CO2, so this reduces CH4 production (Tapio et al., 2017). However, there are other reports that although saponins suppress the growth of protozoa and methanogens, they have no effects on CH4 production. This could be due to the slow binding between protozoa and methanogens, or the increased metabolism of methanogens after the addition of saponins, resulting in increased CH4 production (Patra, Kamra & Agarwal, 2006). The effect of saponins on protozoans may be temporary because bacteria can degrade saponins into sapogenins, which do not affect protozoans. Fenugreek saponins also inhibit fungal populations, which, like protozoa, interact closely with methanogens and are thought to promote CH4 production (Goel, Makkar & Becker, 2008a). Li (2015) reported that by adding 50 mg fenugreek extract to 500 mg fermentation substrate, the number of fiber-degrading bacteria Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and Fibrobacter succinogenes are significantly reduced, while methanogenic bacteria and protozoa are not significantly different from the control group. Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens and Fibrobacter succinogenes can not only degrade cellulose, but also perform biohydrogenation, which can reduce unsaturated fatty acids in the rumen to conjugated linoleic acid. CH4 production may be influenced by the fatty acid biohydrogenation pathway, suggesting that this may be an alternative pathway for CH4 reduction in fenugreek (Hassan et al., 2020).

Fenugreek is a superior forage plant that significantly reduces CH4 emissions in simulated in vitro rumen fermentations, which may be related to the abundant tannin in fenugreek (Niu et al., 2021). Naseri, Hozhabri & Kafilzadeh (2013) reported that the tannin content of fenugreek seed was 3.8 g/kg, more than twice that of asparagus root (1.5 g/kg), and much higher than that of alfalfa hay (0.4 g/kg). In a study involving 17 plants containing polyphenols, a negative correlation was observed between total phenol, total tannic acid, or tannin activity, and CH4 production, which indicates the potential CH4-reducing ability of fenugreek (Jayanegara et al., 2009). Tannins can inhibit the interactions between methanogens and protozoans, by binding to adhesion proteins, or part of the cell wall, decreasing interspecies H2 transfer and inhibiting the growth of methanogenic bacteria, thereby reducing the numbers of methanogens and protozoa, directly or indirectly (Doepel et al., 2012). Tannins can also inhibit the production of CH4 by reducing the activity of fiber-degrading bacteria; the H2 provided by fiber degradation is the substrate for the conversion of pyruvate to acetate in the CH4 biosynthesis pathway (Tavendale et al., 2005). Min et al. (2005) showed that concentrated tannin reduced the number of fiber-degrading bacteria in the rumen, thereby reducing the microbial digestibility of dietary fiber polysaccharides and CH4 production. However, the mechanism of action by which fenugreek tannins inhibit CH4 production is not clear. It may influence microbial fermentation through antibacterial activity against specific rumen microbial strains, or selectively regulate specific rumen bacteria and fungi.

Fenugreek flavonoids are effective antibacterial agents, inhibiting gram-positive bacteria by interfering with the formation of cell walls, nucleic acids, or membranes (Olagaray & Bradford, 2019). Oskoueian, Abdullah & Oskoueian (2013) found that quercetin can reduce the proliferation of ciliate protozoa and methanogens in vitro. In addition, plant essential oils generally have antibacterial activity against a variety of rumen microorganisms, can effectively reduce the number of methanogenic bacteria in rumen fluid, and are most effective against gram-positive bacteria (Szumacher-Strabel & Cieslak, 2010). However, there has been no report to date on the effect of fenugreek essential oil on rumen microorganisms in vivo.

Effects of fenugreek on volatile fatty acid production.

The anaerobic environment of the rumen results in incomplete fatty acid metabolism and the final products are VFAs and CO2, so analysis of VFAs can indirectly reflect the status of rumen fermentation (Ugbogu et al., 2019). Adding 10% fenugreek to the alfalfa hay substrate increased the metabolic rate of dry matter (DM) in a rumen simulation, decreasing the VFAs concentration and total gas production (CH4, NH3, CO2). This was attributed to fenugreek contributing a higher proportion of substrate to microbial biomass production, indicating its effectiveness in influencing the supply of metabolized DM to rumen microbes (Naseri, Hozhabri & Kafilzadeh, 2013). Fenugreek- and alfalfa-based substrates did not result in differences in pH, or VFAs production, but fenugreek increased the proportion of propionic acid produced by an in vitro rumen simulation (Mir et al., 1997). Goel, Makkar & Becker (2008a) also observed a slight increase in the proportion of propionic acid in the VFAs produced at low fenugreek concentration (5.6 mg/40 ml). It’s indicated that fermentative FG reduces CH4 uptake by H2 or increases propionic acid uptake by H2 by decreasing methanogenic activity by reducing CH4 production (Mir et al., 1997; Tapio et al., 2017).

Propionic acid is the only gluconeogenic VFA that has the ability to enhance the efficiency of metabolizable energy utilization throughout the animal. In general, the ratio of acetic to propionic acid affects CH4 production, and the lower the ratio, the lower the CH4 production (Moorby & Fraser, 2021). This is because propionic acid provides an alternative pathway to metabolize H2, away from CH4 production (Ku-Vera et al., 2020). The effect of fenugreek on VFAs appears to be mediated by saponins, which can inhibit the growth of gram-positive bacteria and reduce their acetic acid production, while increasing the intestinal adhesion of gram-negative bacteria and their propionic acid production, thereby reducing CH4 production (Jayanegara et al., 2020). Saponin-rich plants can selectively regulate the rumen microbial population to enhance propionic acid production, so a decrease in the ratio of acetic acid to propionic acid is generally accompanied by reduced CH4 production (Ugbogu et al., 2019).

Effect of fenugreek on CH4 emissions.

Many other studies have reported fenugreek’s positive effects on CH4 emissions (Table 2), and no serious adverse effects of fenugreek ingestion in ruminants have been reported to date (Goel, Makkar & Becker, 2008b; Kala, 2019; Mohini, 2007). In an in vitro simulation experiment, CH4 was reduced by 15.1% when 50 mg fenugreek was added to 60 ml fermentation broth, and no significant effects were found on fermentation pH and TVFA’s concentration (Li, 2015). Kumar et al. (2016) found that a 2% fenugreek seed supplement reduced CH4 by 22.8% in an in vitro rumen simulation, improved DM and organic matter digestibility, and increased the feed degradation rate. The addition of 19, 21, 23, or 25% fenugreek to vetch-oat to in vitro rumen simulation, decreased CH4 production by 45, 35, 72, or 67%, respectively, which may be beneficial for improving nutrient utilization and animal growth (Arhabbr, Ablabr & Zitouni, 2014). The positive effects of fenugreek on CH4 emission are mainly attributed to its secondary metabolites. In addition, the content of several fatty acids, especially linoleic acid, is much higher in fenugreek than in other fodder crops, which can reduce the activity of rumen methanobacteria and change the process of biohydrogenation (Islam et al., 2017). However, Silva et al. (2021) reported that supplementation of 16 g of whole-seed fenugreek meal per day in the basal diet of dairy cows has no significant effect on rumen pH, NH3-N, TVFA’s concentration, C2:C3 ratio and enteric CH4 emissions. Rejil & Mohini (2006) also found that TVFA’s concentration, bacterial biomass, total gas as well as CH4 production were not affected after adding fenugreek extracts to the diet. The reasons for this difference may be related to the experimental environment, animal species and the dosage of fenugreek.

Table 2. Effects of fenugreek on CH4 emissions from ruminants.
Source Animal/ organism Doses Effects References
Fenugreek seeds saponin In vitro 11.54 mg/40 ml (buffered rumen fluid) CH4 reduction of 1.97%; 39% reduction in protozoa; methanogens of bacteria and fungi were reduced Goel, Makkar & Becker (2008a)
Fenugreek In vitro 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5% of substrate CH4 inhibition of 19.5%, 26.1%, 35.3%, respectively Pattanaik et al. (2018)
Fenugreek In vitro (100% of fenugreek; 50:50 mixture of fenugreek and alfalfa; 100% of alfalfa) as substrate CH4 (ml/g DM) (42.8, 52.6, 64.1); Methanogen (2, 1, 3.02, 4.23) (×104/mL); acetate: propionate (3.25,3.40,3.56); respectively Niu et al. (2021)
Fenugreek leaf extract In vitro 20 mg/30 ml (buffered rumen fluid) CH4 inhibition of 16.6% (37.3–30.1) (ml/g DM); ratio of acetate to propionate is reduced (3.39–2.85) Dey (2015)
Fenugreek In vitro 19, 21, 23, or 25% of vetch-oat hay CH4 inhibition of 45, 35, 72, or 67%, respectively Arhabbr, Ablabr & Zitouni (2014)
Fenugreek seeds In vitro 66 mg/40 ml (buffered rumen fluid) CH4 reduction of 9.7%; 56% reduction of protozoa (357–157) (×103 per ml) Goel, Makkar & Becker (2008b)
Fenugreek seeds In vitro 2% of substrate CH4 reduction of 22.8% (24.30–18.75) (ml/g DM) Kumar et al. (2016)
Fenugreek seeds In vitro 1% of substrate CH4 reduction of 34.1% Lakhani et al. (2019)
Fenugreek extract In vitro 50 mg/60 ml (buffered rumen fluid) CH4 reduction of 15.1% Li (2015)
Fenugreek seeds In vitro 2% of substrate (wheat straw and concentrates mixture in the ratio of 60:40) CH4 reduction of 19.6 (34.22–27.5) (ml/g DM) Mohini (2007)
Fenugreek seed extracts In vitro 2% of substrate CH4 production, TVFA concentration and bacterial biomass were not affected Rejil & Mohini (2006)
Fenugreek straw In vivo/cull sheep 40% of diet CH4 reduction of 26.8% Bhatt et al. (2021)
Whole-seed fenugreek powder In vivo/dairy cows 16 g/cow/day No significant difference between CH4 and acetate: propionate Silva et al. (2021)

Notes.

DM: dry matter.

Fenugreek in moderate doses does not have harmful effects on ruminants, but more long-term studies in vivo are needed to verify its effect and explore the specific mechanism of action.

Effects on the productivity of ruminants

Changes in the global environment (such as global warming and pandemics) and rising human demand for organic and healthful foods have necessitated greater efforts on the part of animal protein producers (livestock, poultry and aquaculture sectors) in recent years to assure adequate protein at low cost (Capper & Bauman, 2013). Plant-derived chemicals, such as fenugreeks’ bioactive compounds, have been proven in studies to increase animal performance, health, and product quality (Champa Wijekoon et al., 2020). The effects of fenugreek on ruminant growth, lactation, and antioxidant capacity will be discussed in this study (Table 3).

Table 3. Benefits of fenugreek for ruminants.

Performance Plant Parts Animal models Dose/Concentration (diet) Duration Effects References
Growth Fenugreek seed Barbarine lamb 12% of diet 82 d No significant on growth Ibidhi & Salem (2022)
Fenugreek seed extract Holstein dairy heifers 2 g/head/day 35 d Improve intake, digestibility and metabolism to promote growth Taiwo et al., (2023)
Fenugreek seed Lactating Goats 50 g/d 63 d Increase food intake by 5.9% Cayiroglu et al. (2023)
Fenugreek seed Nubian Goats 5%, 10%, 15% of diet 75 d Improve dry matter intake, crude protein intake and nutrient digestibility Mahala (2013)
Fenugreek seed Awassi lambs 2.5 g/head/day, 5 g/head/day, 7.5 g/head/day 42 d No significant on growth Al-Wazeer (2017)
Fenugreek seed Turkish Saanendairy goats 100 g/day 8 weeks No significant on growth Akbag, Savas & Yuceer (2022)
Fenugreek seed Barki rams 20g /head/day or40 g/head/day Dry matter intake increased with 20 g fenugreek seeds/head/ day and decrease with 40 g/head/day Saleh (2004)
Whole-seed fenugreek powder Dairy cows 16 g/cow/day 21 d No significant on growth Silva et al. (2021)
Raw fenugreek seeds Goats 3% of digestible methionine 21 d Improve digestibility coefficient and growth rate Mir & Kumar (2012)
Milk production Fenugreek Lactating goats 30 g/d 6 weeks Milk production ↑37%; feed intake ↑ Hasin et al. (2019)
Fenugreek seed Lactating goats 25% of diet 3 weeks Milk production ↑67%; fat content ↑ Al-Shaikh, Al-Mufarrej & Mogawer (1999)
Fenugreek seed Lactating Beetal goats 10 g/d 30 d Milk production ↑43.9% Sahoo et al. (2020)
Fenugreek seed Goats 2 g/kg/d Milk production ↑110% Alamer & Basiouni (2005)
Fenugreek seed Buffaloes 5% of diet 30 d Milk production ↑9% Degirmencioglu et al. (2016)
Fenugreek Lactating Murrah buffaloes 50 g/d 90 d Milk production ↑28.52% Kirar et al. (2020)
Fenugreek seed Lactating Egyptian buffaloes 150 g/d 16 weeks Milk production ↑18% Mahgoub & Sallam (2016)
Shatavari, Jivanti and Fenugreek Lactating Kankrej cows 1:1:1 (20 g/d) 60 d Milk production ↑24.89% Patel et al. (2017)
Fenugreek seed Surti buffaloes 1.5% 10 weeks Milk production ↑8.87% Choubey et al. (2018)
Fenugreek seed Lactating Beetal goats 10 g/d 30 d Milk production ↑43.85%; levels of lipid peroxidation ↓; superoxide dismutase activity ↑ Sahoo et al. (2020)
Fenugreek seed Dairy goats 50 g/d, 100 g/d 3 months Milk production ↑8.2; milk production ↑34.2% El-Tarabany et al. (2018)
Fenugreek seed Turkish Saanendairy goats 100 g/d 8 weeks Milk fat concentration ↑; milk yield ↑ Akbag, Savas & Yuceer (2022)
Fenugreek seed Lactating goats 50 g/d 63 d Milk production ↑14.88% Cayiroglu et al. (2023)
Fenugreek seed Sudanese desert sheep 2.5 g/kg 7 weeks Milk production ↑; weight ↑ Muddathir (2012)
Antioxidant ability Fenugreek seed Buffalo calves 44 g/100 kg body weight 9 months Improve serum glucose, globulin, antioxidants, T-4 and testosterone levels Kumari et al. (2019)
Fenugreek seed Dairy goats 50 g/d, 100 g/d 3 months Improve physiological, hematological parameters and antioxidant capacity El-Tarabany et al. (2018)
Fenugreek seed Lactating beetal goats 10 g/d 30 d Reduce levels of lipid peroxidation and improve the superoxide dismutase activity Sahoo et al. (2020)
Fenugreek seed extract Holstein dairy heifers 2 g/head/day 35 d Improve antiviral immune status and reduce oxidative stress damage Taiwo et al., (2023)

Nutritive value of fenugreek

Fenugreek seeds contain 58% carbohydrate, 23–26% protein, 6.4% fat, 25% fiber, 6% volatile oil, 3% ash, 1.6% starch, and 0.4% soluble sugar. Fenugreek leaves contain 6% carbohydrate, 4.4% protein, and 1.1% fiber (Syed et al., 2020). Fenugreek seed protein is of good quality, with a higher content and a better amino acid composition than soy protein isolate. Additionally, compared to soy protein, it has higher denaturation temperature, foaming capacity, solubility, and stability, which makes it a useful source of protein for a range of functional meals (Wijekoon et al., 2021). Fenugreek seeds are also abundant in minerals including K, Mg, Ca, Zn, Mn, Cu and Fe; 53 elements have been isolated from fenugreek seeds, of which 11 are essential to the human diet, and their contents are in the order of Fe > Zn > Mn > Cu > Mo > Ni > V > Cr > Co > Si > Se (Srinivasan, 2006). Numerous vitamins, such as vitamins A, B1, B2, C, niacin, and nicotinic acid, are also abundant in fenugreek seeds. There are 17 main fatty acids in fenugreek, including linoleic, oleic, and linolenic acids, the majority of which are unsaturated (Table 4) (Ahmad et al., 2016).

Table 4. Nutrition composition of fresh fenugreek leaves and mature fenugreek seeds.

Nutrient composition Fenugreek seeds Fresh fenugreek leaves References
Moisture 8.84 g 86 g Ahmad et al. (2020)
Crude protein 23 g 4.4 g Ahmad et al. (2020)
Fat 6.41 g 1.1 g Ahmad et al. (2020)
Carbohydrate 58.35 g 6.6 g Ahmad et al. (2020)
Crude fiber 24.6 g 1.1 g Ahmad et al. (2020)
Fatty acids 1.46 g 0.9 g Ahmad et al. (2020)
Ca 160 mg 395 mg Srinivasan (2006)
Fe 14 mg 16.5 mg Srinivasan (2006)
K 530 mg 31 mg Srinivasan (2006)
Mg 160 mg 67 mg Srinivasan (2006)
Cu 33 mg 0.26 mg Srinivasan (2006)
Na 19 mg 76 mg Srinivasan (2006)
P 370 mg 51 mg Srinivasan (2006)
Vitamin A 3 µg Ahmad et al. (2016)
Thiamine 340 µg 40 µg Ahmad et al. (2016)
Riboflavin 290 µg 310 µg Ahmad et al. (2016)
Vitamin B6 0.6 µg Ahmad et al. (2016)
Vitamin C 12–24 mg 52 mg Ahmad et al. (2016)
Ascorbic acid 12–23 mg 52 mg Ahmad et al. (2016)
Folic acid 84 µg Srinivasan (2006)
Nicotinic acid 1.1 mg 0.8 mg Srinivasan (2006)
β-carotene 96 µg 2.3 mg Srinivasan (2006)

Notes.

Values expressed per 100 g.

Growth performance

Fenugreek contains a large amount of essential amino acids, such as lysine and tryptophan, which are more abundant than in conventional cottonseed- and rapeseed-meal and can fully meet the amino acid nutritional requirements for livestock growth and development (Acharya, Thomas & Basu, 2008). Mahala (2013) and Mir & Kumar (2012) reported that dietary supplementation with 3% fenugreek seed improved DMI, crude protein intake, DM digestibility and crude protein digestibility in goats, as well as growth performance. The DMI and apparent total tract digestibility of DM, crude protein, and neutral detergent fiber were greater in dairy heifers given supplementary 2 g/animal/day of fenugreek seed extract as compared to CON (Taiwo et al., 2022). According to a recent study, saponin changed the metabolome and microbial population in the rumen to promote efficient glucose metabolism (Wang et al., 2019). Fenugreek’s capacity to raise insulin sensitivity by obstructing intestinal glucose absorption may potentially be connected to the increase in food intake that it causes. The 4-hydroxy-isoleucine in fenugreek seeds can increase pancreatic insulin release in goats and regulate gluconeogenesis, thereby promoting feed intake and contributing to improved growth performance (Chen et al., 2021). The high nutritional value of fenugreek makes it a high-quality forage crop, but its anti-nutritional content cannot be ignored. Saleh (2004) observed that Barki rams (52.6 kg) had an increase in DM intake with 20 g of fenugreek seeds per head per day and a decrease with 40 g of fenugreek seeds per head per day. The threshold level of secondary metabolites determines whether they act as trophic factors, or as antinutritional factors (Champa Wijekoon et al., 2020). Adding a moderate level of saponins (2–3%) of DM improved the utilization of dietary protein, growth performance, milk yield and fertility of sheep, as well as reducing the parasite burden. However, excessive concentrations of saponins (depending on their source, type, and animal species) combine with proteins to produce complexes that inactivate digestive enzymes and decrease the digestibility of proteins (Malisch et al., 2015). Therefore, it is vital to determine the optimum level of feed supplementation for whole fenugreek, or its extracted components.

Fenugreek has also been used as a feed flavor-enhancer, it is suggested that fenugreek seeds may influence the hypothalamus gland to activate the brain’s hunger center and heighten the desire to eat (Degirmencioglu et al., 2016; Kamel, 2001). Long-term oral administration of fenugreek extract increases food intake and feeding motivation; dairy cattle appear to prefer food with added fenugreek (Degirmencioglu et al., 2016). In addition, fenugreek seeds contain diosgenin, a growth-promoting compound absent from other legumes, which can promote bovine growth through its steroidal properties, potentially replacing synthetic growth promoters (Al-Wazeer, 2017; Shim et al., 2008). Diosgenin appears to stimulate growth hormone secretion from the pituitary gland, which promotes bovine growth (Cao & Yang, 2011). Diocin, a growth hormone secretagogue, may be the cause of the group who took fenugreek supplements’ increase in body weight. Its structure is comparable to that of estrogen, which binds to pituitary cell receptors to boost GH secretion and cause a rise in body weight by releasing hormone (GH-RH).

Milk production and milk quality

Fenugreek is a widely used herb for stimulating milk production and it is effective in various mammals (Javan, Javadi & Feyzabadi, 2017). Feeding goats with 30 g of fenugreek daily increased the milk yield by 37% (Hasin et al., 2019); the daily milk yield from buffalo increased by 18% when 150 g fenugreek was added to the daily diet (Mahgoub & Sallam, 2016); goats fed 2 g/kg fenugreek daily increased their milk production by 110% and growth hormone levels increased, suggesting that more energy from feed intake was directed to growth (Alamer & Basiouni, 2005). The optimal dosage of fenugreek for stimulating ruminant milk production has not been determined.

An important factor affecting lactation is the level of prolactin (PRL). In addition, growth hormone (GH), insulin, leptin, estrogen, progesterone, oxytocin and thyroid hormone-releasing hormone also play important roles in lactation. Fenugreek may increase milk production by stimulating the secretion of endogenous hormones (Tabares, Jaramillo & Ruiz-Cortés, 2014). It was found that the PRL concentration was significantly higher in goats with 2% fenugreek added to the ration than in the control group, and it was hypothesized that the increase in milk production was mediated by stimulation of PRL (Janabi, 2012). Diosgenin in fenugreek can stimulate the secretion of PRL and the release of GH as well as promote mammary gland development and improve milk flow. PRL has estrogen-like effects and can increase milk production by reducing the secretion of dopamine (an inhibitor of prolactin secretion) in the hypothalamus (Sahoo et al., 2020). In a 7-week feeding experiment, the addition of 60 g of fenugreek seeds per day to the ration of goats increased milk production by 13% and serum growth hormone by 28.6% (Alamer & Basiouni, 2005). GH and its effector insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) have the ability to guide nutrition flow to the mammary tissue or directly stimulate the mammary gland to produce milk. It has been advised that buffaloes’ plasma growth hormone may be a potential mediator of the effects of fenugreek (Saleh, 2004). The lactogenic action of fenugreek may also be attributed to the phytoestrogen flavonoid compounds in its seeds, which are structurally similar to the mammalian hormone, 17 β-estradiol and can exert a weak estrogenic effect. Phytoestrogens affect the gonadal and growth axes of the endocrine system, regulating the growth, development and reproduction of mammals, as well as stimulating the proliferation of estrogen receptor-positive human breast cells, changing the structure of the mammary gland and regulating the endocrine system (Cayiroglu et al., 2023; Choubey et al., 2018; Sreeja, Anju & Sreeja, 2010). Fenugreek contains a precursor of niacin which participates in the formation of niacinamide adenine dinucleotides (NAD+) (Sevrin et al., 2019), which is a cofactor for both PARP (a DNA repair enzyme) and sirtuins (longevity proteins). NAD+ has an important function in cell survival and transcriptional regulation (Braidy et al., 2014). The fenugreek alkaloid trigonelline increases the NAD+ content of the mammary gland, extending the lifespan and enhancing the function of mammary gland cells, thereby promoting lactation. Hasin et al. (2019) reported that the non-protein amino acid, 4-hydroxy-idoxuridine in fenugreek seeds increases glucose-induced insulin secretion from goat islet cells, so fenugreek intake extends the mid-lactation peak by stimulating insulin secretion and regulating the insulin/GH/IGF-1 axis. However, fenugreek may be less effective when animals are undernourished, have mammary gland dysplasia, or have hormone dysregulation (El-Tarabany et al., 2018).

Consuming fenugreek also influences the components of milk, such as cholesterol, fatty acids, and lactose, by promoting the expression of genes related to the uptake of glucose (Glut1), the production of galactose (Pgm1, Ugp2), and lactose (B4galt1, Lalba). Additionally, it enhances fluid flow from the mammary epithelial cells into the breast secretory vesicles and increases the expression of key milk proteins (Csn2, Lalba) and an amino acid transporter (Slc7a5), thereby increasing milk production and lactose content (Kirar et al., 2020; Sevrin et al., 2020). In addition, dietary fenugreek reduces the cholesterol content of cows’ milk, increases the concentration of functional fatty acids (linoleic acid, linolenic acid and conjugated linoleic acid) (Shah & Mir, 2004), and improves the flavor and palatability of the milk. Similarly, Akbag, Savas & Yuceer (2022) reported that the addition of fenugreek seeds to cow diets increased the concentration of unsaturated fatty acids in milk, but the concentration of linoleic and linolenic acids in milk did not increase with the addition of fenugreek. This could be because the rumen hydrogenates the majority of these fatty acids.

Management of oxidative stress

Oxidative stress has a great impact on the health and productivity of livestock and poultry, decreasing disease resistance, survival rate, feed reward, growth performance and increasing stunting of young animals. Fenugreek contains abundant flavonoid compounds, especially vitexin, isovitexin and other polyphenols, which function as antioxidants and stimulate the oxidative stress response, both of which scavenge free radicals and ameliorate the oxidative damage they cause to cells (Ruwali et al., 2022). Sahoo et al. (2020) found that goats fed 10 g of fenugreek seeds daily had decreased lipid peroxidation, increased superoxide dismutase activity and improved antioxidant status. This is because of polyphenols acting on the cellular antioxidant signaling pathway, activating related transcription factors and regulating the expression of downstream genes. Under heat stress, total antioxidant capacity and antioxidant enzyme activity were significantly increased and fat peroxidation levels were significantly reduced in goats after ingesting 100 g of fenugreek seeds per day, indicating that fenugreek can effectively alleviate oxidative stress brought about by high-temperature (El-Tarabany et al., 2018). Taiwo et al. (2022) also reported that gene set transcript levels associated with erythrocyte uptake/release of CO2, release/uptake of oxygen, and O2/CO2 exchange in erythrocytes of cows fed a corn silage-based diet plus 2 g/animal/d of fenugreek seed extract were reduced (FDR ≤ 0.05), indicating a decrease in oxidative stress. It’s mainly due to the ability of saponins to scavenge superoxide by forming H2 peroxide intermediates, thus preventing biomolecular damage caused by free radicals (Naidu et al., 2011). In addition, fenugreek contains abundant polyunsaturated fatty acids, which increase the activity of antioxidant enzymes, relieve oxidative stress in mammals and may also improve reproductive performance. Treatment of postpartum buffalo with a Chinese herbal mixture, including fenugreek, accelerated uterine recovery, promoted early uterine cleaning, decreased the duration of the service period and the delay to first insemination, and increased reproductive efficiency (Japheth et al., 2021).

Conclusions and recommendations

CH4 released by ruminants is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and energy loss, and in the upcoming years, ruminant production systems will confront even greater difficulties. As a result, methods to reduce CH4 production while preserving animal health and productivity are being developed and researched. The profound influence of rumen fermentation on ruminant nutrition, food production and the environment has stimulated extensive research into managing the rumen microbiome to maximize productivity and reduce the environmental impact of ruminant production; dietary intervention to achieve these goals is a promising approach. When it comes to controlling the rumen flora and reducing the generation of CH4, fenugreek and its secondary metabolites—such as saponins, tannins, and flavonoid compounds—have shown inconsistent outcomes during rumen fermentation. However, most studies have shown that the addition of fenugreek or its bioactive compounds to the basal feed reduces CH4 production and improves rumen fermentation. In addition, fenugreek, as a dietary additive, can promote animal growth and increase the utilization potential of feed. Its rich nutrient content and the relative abundance of the growth promoter, diosgenin can improve the daily weight gain of beef cattle and sheep, and shorten the achievement of a commercially-acceptable weight. Dietary fenugreek improves milk yield and quality, mainly mediated by flavonoids and trigonelline, which affect the endocrine system and hormone secretion and ameliorate oxidative stress. Therefore, the livestock feed industry has the opportunity to develop natural, environmentally-friendly feed additives based on fenugreek.

This review has identified some gaps and weaknesses in past fenugreek research, which should be addressed by future research, i.e.: (1) Studies on the use of fenugreek to reduce CH4 emissions from ruminants were mostly performed by short-term in vitro simulations; long-term in vivo trials will be needed to confirm the efficacy of fenugreek under real conditions; (2) the mechanisms of action by which fenugreek secondary metabolites influence the composition and metabolic activity of rumen bacteria are poorly understood and further research into effective strategies for CH4 emission reduction is needed; (3) the efficacy of fenugreek in promoting lactation and improving growth performance, and its toxicological safety is influenced by factors such as dose, animal species and strain, and environmental conditions, so future research should aim to improve understanding of these factors. Future research should also aim to improve understanding of the potential benefits of fenugreek, explore the mechanisms of action of its various components and functions, and clarify the optimal level and formulation of fenugreek supplementation, to provide a theoretical basis for further development of its application in ruminants.

Acknowledgments

We thank International Science Editing for editing this manuscript.

Funding Statement

This study was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0901406), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872565). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Wenjuan Li, Email: wjli@shou.edu.cn.

Shijun Liu, Email: liushijun@moogonutrition.com.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Shijun Liu is employed by Shanghai Mugao Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Xiangbiao Zeng conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Yiwen Chen analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Wenjuan Li conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Shijun Liu conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This is a literature review.

References

  • Abdel-Wareth et al. (2021).Abdel-Wareth AAA, Elkhateeb FSO, Ismail ZSH, Ghazalah AA, Lohakare J. Combined effects of fenugreek seeds and probiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass criteria, and serum hormones in growing rabbits. Livestock Science. 2021;251(12):104616. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104616. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Aboagye & Beauchemin (2019).Aboagye IA, Beauchemin KA. Potential of molecular weight and structure of tannins to reduce methane emissions from ruminants: a review. Animals. 2019;9:856. doi: 10.3390/ani9110856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Acharya, Thomas & Basu (2008).Acharya SN, Thomas JE, Basu SK. Fenugreek, an alternative crop for semiarid regions of North America. Crop Science. 2008;48:841–853. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0519. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Adegbeye et al. (2019).Adegbeye MJ, Elghandour M, Monroy JC, Abegunde TO, Salem A, Barbabosa-Pliego A, Faniyi TO. Potential influence of Yucca extract as feed additive on greenhouse gases emission for a cleaner livestock and aquaculture farming - A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;239:118074. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmad et al. (2016).Ahmad A, Alghamdi SS, Mahmood K, Afzal M. Fenugreek a multipurpose crop: potentialities and improvements. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2016;23:300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmad et al. (2020).Ahmad MH, Shukat R, Ishaq A, Syed QA, Ubaid H. Nutritional and therapeutic properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): a review. International Journal of Food Properties. 2020;23:1777–1791. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2020.1825482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Akbag, Savas & Yuceer (2022).Akbag HI, Savas T, Yuceer YK. The effect of fenugreek seed (Trigonella foenum-graecum) supplementation on the performance and milk yield characteristics of dairy goats. Archives Animal Breeding. 2022;65:385–395. doi: 10.5194/aab-65-385-2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Shaikh, Al-Mufarrej & Mogawer (1999).Al-Shaikh MA, Al-Mufarrej SI, Mogawer HH. Effect of fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenumgraecum L) on lactational performance of dairy goat. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 1999;16:177–183. doi: 10.1080/09712119.1999.9706279. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Wazeer (2017).Al-Wazeer A. Effect of fenugreek seeds supplementation on growth performance, digestion coefficient, rumen fermentation and some blood metabolites of Awassi lambs. Kufa Journal for Veterinary Medical Sciences. 2017;8(1):8–18. doi: 10.36326/kjvs/2017/v8i14324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Alamer & Basiouni (2005).Alamer MA, Basiouni GF. Feeding effects of fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) on lactation performance, some plasma constituents and growth hormone level in goats. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2005;8(11):1553–1556. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2005.1553.1556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Alemu & Doepel (2011).Alemu AW, Doepel L. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) as an alternative forage for dairy cows. Animal. 2011;5(9):1370–1381. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111000322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arhabbr, Ablabr & Zitouni (2014).Arhabbr R, Ablabr R, Zitouni M. Effect of Camellia sinensis and Trigonella foenum-greacum saponins on in vitro rumen fermentation of vetch-oat hay. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2014;23:723–729. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.v26i8.16536. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Basu et al. (2009).Basu SK, Acharya SN, Bandara MS, Friebel D, Thomas JE. Effects of genotype and environment on seed and forage yield in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) grown in western Canada. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2009;3(6):305–314. doi: 10.1007/s12230-009-9109-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Beauchemin et al. (2020).Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Eckard RJ, Wang M. Review: fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal. 2020;14:S2–S16. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Benchaar et al. (2008).Benchaar C, Calsamiglia S, Chaves AV, Fraser GR, Colombatto D, McAllister TA, Beauchemin KA. A review of plant-derived essential oils in ruminant nutrition and production. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2008;145:209–228. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bhatt et al. (2021).Bhatt R, Sahoo A, Sarkar S, Saxena V, Soni L, Sharma P, Gadekar Y. Dietary inclusion of nonconventional roughages for lowering enteric methane production and augmenting nutraceutical value of meat in cull sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2021;273(1):114832. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Braidy et al. (2014).Braidy N, Poljak A, Grant R, Jayasena T, Mansour H, Chan-Ling T, Guillemin GJ, Smythe G, Sachdev P. Mapping NAD+ metabolism in the brain of ageing Wistar rats: potential targets for influencing brain senescence. Biogerontology. 2014;15:177–198. doi: 10.1007/s10522-013-9489-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cao & Yang (2011).Cao YC, Yang HJ. Ruminal digestibility and fermentation characteristics in vitro of fenugreek and alfalfa hay combination with or without the inoculation of Neocallimastix sp. YAK11. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2011;169:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.05.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Capper & Bauman (2013).Capper J, Bauman DE. The role of productivity in improving the environmental sustainability of ruminant production systems. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. 2013;1(1):469–489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cayiroglu et al. (2023).Cayiroglu H, Coskun F, Cayan H, Filik AG, Sahin A. Effects of supplemental feeding of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed on milk yield, composition, sensory properties and some blood parameters in lactating goats. Pakistan Journal of Zoology. 2023;55:235–243. [Google Scholar]
  • Champa Wijekoon et al. (2020).Champa Wijekoon SNA, Siow YL, Sura S, Thandapilly S, Sabra A. Canadian sainfoin and fenugreek as forage and functional foods. Crop Science. 2020;61:1–20. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2021).Chen ZL, Hu ZF, Wu BYL, Wang YX, Niu HX. Research progress on nutritional characteristics of fenugreek and its application in ruminant feed. Chinese Journal of Animal Science. 2021;57(8):16–20. doi: 10.19556/j.0258-7033.20200824-05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Choubey et al. (2018).Choubey M, Patel VR, Raval AP, Singh RR. Effect of fenugreek seed supplementation on lactation performance of Surti buffaloes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2018;88(3):62–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Cushnie & Lamb (2011).Cushnie TPT, Lamb AJ. Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2011;38(2):99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Daddam et al. (2023).Daddam JR, Daniel D, Kra G, Pelech I, Portnick Y, Moallem U, Lavon Y, Zachut M. Plant polyphenol extract supplementation affects performance, welfare and the Nrf2-oxidative stress response in adipose of heat stressed dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2023;106(12):9807–9821. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Degirmencioglu et al. (2016).Degirmencioglu T, Unal H, Ozbilgin S, Kuraloglu H. Effect of ground fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) on feed consumption and milk performance in Anatolian water buffaloes. Archives Animal Breeding. 2016;59:345–349. doi: 10.5194/aab-59-345-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Dey (2015).Dey A. Effect of fenugreek leaf extract (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) on in vitro methanogenesis and fermentation of wheat straw-based diet (Triticum aestivum L.) fed to buffaloes. Sri Lanka Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2015;1(1):9–13. doi: 10.4038/sljfa.v1i1.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • DiMarco, Bobik & Wolfe (1990).DiMarco AA, Bobik TA, Wolfe RS. Unusual coenzymes of methanogenesis. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1990;59:355–394. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.002035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doepel et al. (2012).Doepel L, Montgomery JE, Beauchemin KA, King JR, Acharya SN. Ruminal degradability and whole-tract digestibility of protein and fibre fractions in fenugreek haylage. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2012;92:211–217. doi: 10.4141/CJAS2011-101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Du et al. (2018).Du YY, Ge Y, Ren Y, Fan X, Pan KX, Lin LS, Wu X, Min Y, Meyerson LA, Heino M, Chang SX, Liu XZ, Mao F, Yang GF, Peng CH, Qu ZL, Chang J, Didham RK. A global strategy to mitigate the environmental impact of China’s ruminant consumption boom. Nature Communications. 2018;9:4133. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06381-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eisler et al. (2014).Eisler MC, Lee MRF, Tarlton JF, Martin GB, Beddington J, Dungait JAJ, Greathead H, Liu J, Mathew S, Miller H. Agriculture: steps to sustainable livestock. Nature. 2014;507(7490):32–34. doi: 10.1038/507032a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • El-Tarabany et al. (2018).El-Tarabany AA, Teama FEI, Atta MAA, El-Tarabany MS. Impact of dietary fenugreek seeds on lactational performance and blood biochemical and hematological parameters of dairy goats under hot summer conditions. Mljekarstvo. 2018;68:214–223. doi: 10.15567/mljekarstvo.2018.0306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Frank et al. (2019).Frank S, Havlík P, Stehfest E, Van Meijl H, Witzke P, Pérez-Domínguez I, Van Dijk M, Doelman JC, Fellmann T, Koopman JFL. Agricultural non-CO2 emission reduction potential in the context of the 1.5 °C target. Nature Climate Change. 2019;9:66–72. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0358-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerber et al. (2013).Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G. Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: FAOhttps://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e.pdf 2013
  • Goedkoop et al. (2009).Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, van Zelm R. ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlandshttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/302559709_ReCiPE_2008_A_life_cycle_impact_assessment_method_which_comprises_harmonised_category_indicators_at_the_midpoint_and_the_endpoint_level 2009
  • Goel & Makkar (2012).Goel G, Makkar HPS. Methane mitigation from ruminants using tannins and saponins. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2012;44:729–739. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9966-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goel, Makkar & Becker (2008a).Goel G, Makkar HPS, Becker K. Changes in microbial community structure, methanogenesis and rumen fermentation in response to saponin-rich fractions from different plant materials. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008a;105:770–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goel, Makkar & Becker (2008b).Goel G, Makkar HPS, Becker K. Effects of Sesbania sesban and Carduus pycnocephalus leaves and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds and their extracts on partitioning of nutrients from roughage- and concentrate-based feeds to methane. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2008b;147:72–89. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Grusak (2003).Grusak M. Fenugreek: the Genus Trigonella. Plant Science Bulletin. 2003;49:61–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Harper et al. (2016).Harper MT, Oh J, Giallongo F, Lopes JC, Weeks HL, Faugeron J, Hristov AN. Short communication: preference for flavored concentrate premixes by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;99(8):6585–6589. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hasanzadeh et al. (2010).Hasanzadeh E, Rezazadeh SH, Shamsa SF, Dolatabadi R, Zarringhalam J. Review on phytochemistry and therapeutic properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum) Journal of Medicinal Plants. 2010;9:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Hasin et al. (2019).Hasin D, Pampori ZA, Sheikh AA, Aarif O, Bhat IA, Abdullah M. Milk production and hormonal profile as affected by fenugreek supplementation in lactating goats of Kashmir valley. Biological Rhythm Research. 2019;52(7):986–993. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2019.1608732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hassan et al. (2020).Hassan FU, Ebeid HM, Tang ZH, Li MW, Peng LJ, Peng KP, Liang X, Yang CJ. A mixed phytogenic modulates the rumen bacteria composition and milk fatty acid profile of water buffaloes. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;7:569. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hristov et al. (2013).Hristov AN, Oh J, Lee C, Meinen R, Makkar PS. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production - a review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. Rome: FAOhttps://www.fao.org/documents/card/es/c/87178c51-d4d1-515d-9d0e-b5a6937fa631 2013
  • Huang et al. (2022).Huang H, Wang X, Yang L, He WX, Meng TT, Zheng K, Xia X, Zhou YJ, He JH, Liu CM, Zou SW, Xiao DF. The effects of fenugreek extract on growth performance, serum biochemical indexes, immunity and NF-kB signaling pathway in broiler. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2022;9:882754. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.882754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hungate et al. (1970).Hungate RE, Smith W, Bauchop T, Yu I, Rabinowitz JC. Formate as an intermediate in the bovine rumen fermentation. Journal of Bacteriology. 1970;102:389–397. doi: 10.1128/JB.102.2.389-397.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ibidhi & Salem (2022).Ibidhi R, Ben Salem H. Effect of daily or intermittent addition of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L.) seeds to concentrate on intake, digestion, and growth performance of Barbarine lamb. Small Ruminant Research. 2022;216:106792. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Islam et al. (2017).Islam MA, Obour AK, Rule DC, Bandara M, Acharya SN. Forage and seed production potential, nutritive value, and fatty acid profile of fenugreek. Crop Science. 2017;57:1764–1772. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2016.08.0685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Janabi (2012).Janabi AK. Feeding effects of fenugreek seeds (Tringonella foenum-graceum) on lactation performance, some serum constituents and prolactin hormone level in damascus crossbred goats. Diyala Agriculture Science Journal. 2012;4(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Japheth et al. (2021).Japheth KP, Kumaresan A, Patbandha TK, Baithalu RK, Selvan AS, Nag P, Manimaran A, Oberoi PS. Supplementation of a combination of herbs improves immunity, uterine cleansing and facilitate early resumption of ovarian cyclicity: a study on post-partum dairy buffaloes. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2021;272:113931. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.113931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Javan, Javadi & Feyzabadi (2017).Javan R, Javadi B, Feyzabadi Z. Breastfeeding: a review of its physiology and galactogogue plants in view of traditional persian medicine. Breastfeeding Medicine. 2017;12:401–409. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jayanegara et al. (2009).Jayanegara A, Togtokhbayar N, Makkar H, Becker K. Tannins determined by various methods as predictors of methane production reduction potential of plants by an in vitro rumen fermentation system. Animal Feed Science & Technology. 2009;150:230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jayanegara et al. (2020).Jayanegara A, Yogianto Y, Wina E, Sudarman A, Kondo M, Obitsu T, Kreuzer M. Combination effects of plant extracts rich in tannins and saponins as feed additives for mitigating in vitro ruminal methane and ammonia formation. Animals. 2020;10(9):1531. doi: 10.3390/ani10091531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kala (2019).Kala LA. Effect of rumen modifier on methanogenesis and feed digestibility under in vitro conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2019;36(1):99–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamel (2001).Kamel C. Natural plant extracts: classical remedies bring modern animal production solutions. Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes. 2001:31–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirar et al. (2020).Kirar M, Ghosh S, Baghel RP, Jain A, Lakhani GP, Roy B. Effect of fenugreek (METHI) seed supplementation on performance of lactating Murrah buffaloes. Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur. 2020;39(2):175–182. [Google Scholar]
  • Ku-Vera et al. (2020).Ku-Vera JC, Jimenez-Ocampo R, Valencia-Salazar SS, Montoya-Flores MD, Molina-Botero IC, Arango J, Gomez-Bravo CA, Aguilar-Perez CF, Solorio-Sanchez FJ. Role of secondary plant metabolites on enteric methane mitigation in ruminants. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2020;7:584. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar et al. (2016).Kumar D, Singh P, Chaturvedi VB, Verma AK. In vitro digestibility and rumen fermentation parameters of feeds as affected by supplementary Amla powder and fenugreek seeds. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2016;33(1):64–69. doi: 10.5958/2231-6744.2016.00011.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumari et al. (2019).Kumari P, Singh P, Verma AK, Gaur GK, Das A. Effect of molasses based multi-nutrient herbal supplements on hematobiochemicals, serum lipid, antioxidants and hormonal profile in buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2019;89:1356–1362. [Google Scholar]
  • Lakhani et al. (2019).Lakhani N, Kamra DN, Lakhani P, Kala A. Effect of rumen modifier on methanogenesis and feed digestibility under in vitro conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2019;36:99–102. doi: 10.5958/2231-6744.2019.00018.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Li (2015).Li XY. Masters thesis. 2015. The mitigation effects of onion, ginger and fenugreek extracts on the rumen methane production in vitro. [Google Scholar]
  • Lourenco, Ramos-Morales & Wallace (2010).Lourenco M, Ramos-Morales E, Wallace RJ. The role of microbes in rumen lipolysis and biohydrogenation and their manipulation. Animal. 2010;4:1008–1023. doi: 10.1017/S175173111000042x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Machmuller, Soliva & Kreuzer (2003).Machmuller A, Soliva CR, Kreuzer M. Effect of coconut oil and defaunation treatment on methanogenesis in sheep. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 2003;43:41–55. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2003005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mahala (2013).Mahala A. Effect of supplementation of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum -graecum L.) seeds on feed intake, digestibility, N-balance and rumen environment of Nubian Goats. International Journal of Development & Sustainability. 2013;2(2):1214–1223. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahgoub & Sallam (2016).Mahgoub A, Sallam MT. Effect of extract crushed fenugreek seeds as feed additive on some blood parameters, milk yield and its composition of lactating Egyptian Buffaloes. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production. 2016;7(7):269–273. doi: 10.21608/jappmu.2016.48712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Malisch et al. (2015).Malisch CS, Lüscher A, Baert N, Engstrom MT, Studer B, Fryganas C, Suter D, Mueller-Harvey I, Salminen JP. Large variability of proanthocyanidin content and composition in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2015;63:10234–10242. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Manyi-Loh et al. (2018).Manyi-Loh C, Mamphweli S, Meyer E, Okoh A. Antibiotic use in agriculture and its consequential resistance in environmental sources: potential public health implications. Molecules. 2018;23(4):795. doi: 10.3390/molecules23040795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Min et al. (2005).Min BR, Pinchak WE, Fulford JD, Puchala R. Wheat pasture bloat dynamics, in vitro ruminal gas production, and potential bloat mitigation with condensed tannins. Journal of Animal Science. 2005;83:1322–1331. doi: 10.2527/2005.8361322x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Min et al. (2020).Min BR, Solaiman S, Waldrip HM, Parker D, Todd RW, Brauer D. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: a review of plant tannin mitigation options. Animal Nutrition. 2020;6(3):231–246. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mir & Kumar (2012).Mir IA, Kumar R. Effect of feeding fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum-graecum) as feed additive on nutrient utilization in goats. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2012;29(3):256–261. [Google Scholar]
  • Mir et al. (1997).Mir Z, Acharya SN, Mir PS, Taylor WG, Zaman MS, Mears GJ, Goonewardene LA. Nutrient composition, in vitro gas production and digestibility of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) and alfalfa forages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 1997;77:119–124. doi: 10.4141/A96-061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mohini (2007).Mohini RM. In vitro evaluation of feed supplemented with fenugreek seeds (Methi) Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 2007;60(2):107–113. [Google Scholar]
  • Moorby & Fraser (2021).Moorby JM, Fraser MD. Review: new feeds and new feeding systems in intensive and semi-intensive forage-fed ruminant livestock systems. Animal. 2021;15:100297. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morgavi et al. (2012).Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C, Newbold CJ. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal. 2012;6:871–871. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morgavi, Jouany & Martin (2008).Morgavi DP, Jouany JP, Martin C. Changes in methane emission and rumen fermentation parameters induced by refaunation in sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2008;48:69–72. doi: 10.1071/EA07236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Morgavi et al. (2013).Morgavi DP, Kelly WJ, Janssen PH, Attwood GT. Rumen microbial (meta) genomics and its application to ruminant production. Animal. 2013;7:184–201. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Muddathir (2012).Muddathir AK. Effects of oral administration of (fenugreek seeds) on galactagogue, body weight and hormonal Trigonella foenumgraecum L. levels in Sudanese desert sheep. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences. 2012;22(22):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Naidu et al. (2011).Naidu MM, Shyamala BN, Naik JP, Sulochanamma G, Srinivas P. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the husk and endosperm of fenugreek seeds. Lwt-Food Science and Technology. 2011;44:451–456. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2010.08.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Naseri, Hozhabri & Kafilzadeh (2013).Naseri V, Hozhabri F, Kafilzadeh F. Assessment of in vitro digestibility and fermentation parameters of alfalfa hay-based diet following direct incorporation of fenugreek seed (Trigonella foenum) and asparagus root (Asparagus officinalis) Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2013;97:773–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naumann et al. (2017).Naumann HD, Tedeschi LO, Zeller WE, Huntley NF. The role of condensed tannins in ruminant animal production: advances, limitations and future directions. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia-Brazilian Journal of Animal Science. 2017;46:929–949. doi: 10.1590/S1806-92902017001200009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Nedelkov et al. (2019).Nedelkov K, Harper MT, Melgar A, Chen X, Raisanen S, Martins CMMR, Faugeron J, Wall EH, Hristov AN. Acceptance of flavored concentrate premixes by young ruminants following a short-term exposure. Journal of Dairy Science. 2019;102:388–394. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Newbold & Ramos-Morales (2020).Newbold CJ, Ramos-Morales E. Review: ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host. Animal. 2020;14:S78–S86. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Niu et al. (2021).Niu HX, Xu ZJ, Yang HE, McAllister TA, Acharya S, Wang YX. In vitro ruminal fermentation of fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum L.) produced less methane than that of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Animal Bioscience. 2021;34(4):584–593. doi: 10.5713/ajas.20.0114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Olagaray & Bradford (2019).Olagaray KE, Bradford BJ. Plant flavonoids to improve productivity of ruminants - A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2019;251:21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Omezzine et al. (2017).Omezzine F, Bouaziz M, Daami-Remadi M, Simmonds MSJ, Haouala R. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. varied with plant ploidy level and developmental stage. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2017;10:S3622–S3631. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Oskoueian, Abdullah & Oskoueian (2013).Oskoueian E, Abdullah N, Oskoueian A. Effects of flavonoids on rumen fermentation activity, methane production, and microbial population. Biomed Research International. 2013;2013:349129. doi: 10.1155/2013/349129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Paneru et al. (2022).Paneru D, Tellez-Isaias G, Romano N, Lohakare G, Bottje WG, Lohakare J. Effect of graded levels of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds on the growth performance, hematological parameters, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Veterinary Sciences. 2022;9:207. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9050207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Patel et al. (2017).Patel VK, Chauhan HD, Pawar MM, Srivastava AK, Prajapati KB. Effect of herbal galactogogue supplementation on production performance of lactating Kankrej cows. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2017;6(12):2093–2098. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Patra, Kamra & Agarwal (2006).Patra AK, Kamra DN, Agarwal N. Effect of plant extracts on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2006;128:276–291. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Patra & Saxena (2009).Patra AK, Saxena J. The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production. Nutrition Research Reviews. 2009;22:204–219. doi: 10.1017/S0954422409990163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pattanaik et al. (2018).Pattanaik AK, Ingale SL, Baliyan S, Dutta N, Kamra DN, Sharma K. Herbal additives influence in vitro fermentative attributes and methanogenesis differently in cattle and buffalo. Animal Production Science. 2018;58:1064–1072. doi: 10.1071/An15624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Rejil & Mohini (2006).Rejil MC, Mohini M. Effect of fenugreek seed extracts on in-vitro digestibility of feed. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 2006;23(4):202–205. [Google Scholar]
  • Ripple et al. (2014).Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C, Boucher DH. COMMENTARY: ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nature Climate Change. 2014;4:2–5. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruwali et al. (2022).Ruwali P, Pandey N, Jindal K, Singh RV. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): Nutraceutical values, phytochemical, ethnomedicinal and pharmacological overview. South African Journal of Botany. 2022;151:423–431. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2022.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Sahoo et al. (2020).Sahoo R, Nayyar S, Singh C, Kaswan S, Kakkar SS, Jindal R. Effect of fenugreek seeds and probiotic supplementation on antioxidant status and milk production in heat stressed Beetal Goats. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 2020;54:1379–1384. [Google Scholar]
  • Saleh (2004).Saleh HM. Effect of supplementing fenugreek seeds as galactagogue on performance of lactating ewes. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds. 2004;7(2):155–165. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchez-Martinez, Benedetti-Fasil & Christensen (2019).Sanchez-Martinez M, Benedetti-Fasil C, Christensen P. European council directorate-general for climate action. Going Climate-Neutral by 2050. Publications Office of the European Union; Luxembourg: 2019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Saunois et al. (2016).Saunois M, Jackson RB, Bousquet P, Poulter B, Canadell JG. The growing role of methane in anthropogenic climate change. Environmental Research Letters. 2016;11(12):120207. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/120207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Sevrin et al. (2019).Sevrin T, Alexandre-Gouabau MC, Castellano B, Aguesse A, Ouguerram K, Ngyuen P, Darmaun D, Boquien CY. Impact of fenugreek on milk production in rodent models of lactation challenge. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2571. doi: 10.3390/nu11112571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sevrin et al. (2020).Sevrin T, Boquien CY, Gandon A, Grit I, De Coppet P, Darmaun D, Alexandre-Gouabau MC. Fenugreek stimulates the expression of genes involved in milk synthesis and milk flow through modulation of insulin/GH/IGF-1 Axis and oxytocin secretion. Gene. 2020;11(10):1208. doi: 10.3390/genes11101208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shah & Mir (2004).Shah MA, Mir RS. Effect of dietary fenugreek seed on dairy cow performance and milk characteristics. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2004;84:725–729. doi: 10.4141/A04-027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Shim et al. (2008).Shim SH, Lee EJ, Kim JS, Kang SS, Ha H, Lee HY, Kim C, Lee JH, Son KH. Rat growth-hormone release stimulators from fenugreek seeds. Chemistry & Biodiversity. 2008;5:1753–1761. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200890164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Silva et al. (2021).Silva S, Chabrillat T, Kerros S, Guillaume S, Gandra JR, de Carvalho GGP, da Silva FF, Mesquita LG, Gordiano LA, Camargo GMF, Ribeiro CVD, de Araujo M, Alba HDR, Silva R, de Freitas JE. Effects of plant extract supplementations or monensin on nutrient intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation and metabolism in dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2021;275:114886. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114886. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh et al. (2022).Singh N, Yadav SS, Kumar S, Narashiman B. Ethnopharmacological, phytochemical and clinical studies on fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) Food Bioscience. 2022;46:101546. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101546. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Solorio-Sánchez et al. (2014).Solorio-Sánchez F, Solorio-Sánchez B, Basu SK, Casanova-Lugo F, Ayala-Basulto A. Opportunities to grow annual forage legume fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) under Mexican silvapastoral system. America Journal of Social Issues and Humanities. 2014;4(2):86–95. [Google Scholar]
  • Spandan et al. (2017).Spandan C, Shah CP, Chikara SK, Sharma MC, Marcello I. Review on fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and its important secondary metabolite diosgenin. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2017;46(1):22–31. doi: 10.15835/nbha46110996. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Sreeja, Anju & Sreeja (2010).Sreeja S, Anju VS, Sreeja S. In vitro estrogenic activities of fenugreek Trigonella foenum graecum seeds. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2010;131:814–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Srinivasan (2006).Srinivasan K. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): a review of health beneficial physiological effects. Food Reviews International. 2006;22:203–224. doi: 10.1080/87559120600586315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Syed et al. (2020).Syed QA, Rashid Z, Ahmad MH, Shukat R, Ishaq A, Muhammad N, Rahman HUU. Nutritional and therapeutic properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): a review. International Journal of Food Properties. 2020;23:1777–1791. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2020.1825482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Szumacher-Strabel & Cieslak (2010).Szumacher-Strabel M, Cieslak A. Potential of phytofactors to mitigate rumen ammonia and methane production. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 2010;19:319–337. doi: 10.22358/jafs/66296/2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Tabares, Jaramillo & Ruiz-Cortés (2014).Tabares FP, Jaramillo JVB, Ruiz-Cortés ZT. Pharmacological overview of galactogogues. Veterinary Medicine International. 2014;2014:602894. doi: 10.1155/2014/602894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Taiwo et al. (2022).Taiwo G, Sidney T, Idowu M, Echie F, Karnezos TP, Ogunade IM. Dietary fenugreek seed extract improves dry matter intake, apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility, and alters whole blood transcriptome of Holstein dairy heifers. Translational Animal Science. 2022;6(4):txac132. doi: 10.1093/tas/txac132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tapio et al. (2017).Tapio I, Snelling TJ, Strozzi F, Wallace RJ. The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2017;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s40104-017-0141-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tavendale et al. (2005).Tavendale MH, Meagher LP, Pacheco D, Walker N, Attwood GT, Sivakumaran S. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2005;123:403–419. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorpe (2009).Thorpe A. Enteric fermentation and ruminant eructation: the role (and control?) of methane in the climate change debate. Climatic Change. 2009;93:407–431. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9506-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Tseten et al. (2022).Tseten T, Sanjorjo RA, Kwon M, Kim SW. Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminant animals. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2022;32:269–277. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2202.02019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ugbogu et al. (2019).Ugbogu EA, Elghandour M, Ikpeazu VO, Buendia GR, Molina OM, Arunsi UO, Emmanuel O, Salem AZM. The potential impacts of dietary plant natural products on the sustainable mitigation of methane emission from livestock farming. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;213:915–925. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Venkata et al. (2017).Venkata KCN, Swaroop A, Bagchi D, Bishayee A. A small plant with big benefits: fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum Linn.) for disease prevention and health promotion. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2017;61(6):1600950. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2019).Wang B, Ma MP, Diao QY, Tu Y. Saponin-induced shifts in the rumen microbiome and metabolome of young cattle. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:356. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wijekoon et al. (2021).Wijekoon C, Acharya SN, Siow YL, Sura S, Thandapilly S, Sabra A. Canadian sainfoin and fenugreek as forage and functional foods. Crop Science. 2021;61:1–20. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2022).Yang L, Chen L, Zheng K, Ma YJ, He RX, Arowolo MA, Zhou YJ, Xiao DF, He JH. Effects of fenugreek seed extracts on growth performance and intestinal health of broilers. Poultry Science. 2022;101(7):101939. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoshikawa et al. (1997).Yoshikawa M, Murakami T, Komatsu H, Murakami N, Yamahara J, Matsuda H. Medicinal Foodstuffs. IV. Fenugreek Seed. (1): Structures of Trigoneosides Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, IIIa, and IIIb, New Furostanol Saponins from the Seeds of Indian Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 1997;45:81–87. doi: 10.1248/cpb.45.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu et al. (2019).Yu H, Liang H, Ren M, Ji K, Yang Q, Ge X, Xi B, Pan L. Effects of dietary fenugreek seed extracts on growth performance, plasma biochemical parameters, lipid metabolism, Nrf2 antioxidant capacity and immune response of juvenile blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2019;94:211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zandi et al. (2015).Zandi P, Basu SK, Khatibani LB, Balogun MO, Aremu MO, Sharma M, Kumar A, Sengupta R, Li X, Li Y. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed: a review of physiological and biochemical properties and their genetic improvement. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2015;37:1714. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1714-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou, Chan & Zhou (2012).Zhou J, Chan L, Zhou S. Trigonelline: a plant alkaloid with therapeutic potential for diabetes and central nervous system disease. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;19(21):3523–3531. doi: 10.2174/092986712801323171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This is a literature review.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES