Skip to main content
Drug Design, Development and Therapy logoLink to Drug Design, Development and Therapy
. 2024 Feb 1;18:193–213. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S446949

Plants with Anti-Ulcer Activity and Mechanism: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies

Deshanda Kurniawan Prayoga 1,*, Diah Lia Aulifa 2,*, Arif Budiman 3,*, Jutti Levita 4,*,
PMCID: PMC10840521  PMID: 38318501

Abstract

Ulcer disorders including the oral mucosa, large intestine, and stomach mucosa, cause significant global health burdens. Conventional treatments such as non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and cytoprotective agents have drawbacks like mucosal injury, diminish gastric acid secretion, and interact with concurrent medications. Therefore, alternative therapeutic approaches are needed to tackle this health concern. Plants are rich in active metabolites in the bark, roots, leaves, fruits, and seeds, and have been utilized for medicinal purposes since ancient times. The use of herbal therapy is crucial, and regulations are necessary to ensure the quality of products, particularly in randomized studies, to assess their efficacy and safety in treating ulcer disorders. This study aims to explore the anti-ulcer activity of medicinal plants in treating peptic ulcer disease, ulcerative colitis, and aphthous ulcers. Articles were searched in Scopus and PubMed, and filtered for publication from 2013 to 2023, resulting in a total of 460 from Scopus and 239 from PubMed. The articles were further screened by title and abstract and resulted in 55 articles. Natural products, rich in active metabolites, were described to manage ulcer disease by protecting the mucosa, reducing ulcer effects, inhibiting pro-inflammatory factors, and reducing bacterial load, thus improving patients’ quality of life. Natural extracts have proven effective in managing other health problems, including ulcers by reducing pain and decreasing lesions. This review provides an overview of preclinical and clinical studies on medicinal plants, focusing on their effectiveness in treating conditions like peptic ulcers, ulcerative colitis, and aphthous ulcers.

Keywords: anti-ulcers, aphthous ulcer, botanical drugs, peptic ulcer disease, ulcerative colitis

Introduction

The need to replace certain drugs due to their adverse effects exemplifies the universal role of plants in the treatment of disease and the maintenance of health. The utilization of medicinal plants for the treatment of various ailments has been practiced since ancient times and is commonly referred to as phytotherapy.1 The healing effects of medicinal plants come from the fact that they accommodate a wide range of secondary metabolites, called phytochemicals, which can be synthesized again and again in nature. The richest sources of active metabolites are contained in seeds, bark, roots, leaves, and fruits of plants. Therefore, a multitude of plants have employed these phytochemicals as a defense mechanism against pathogens.

Phytochemicals have been used since ancient times for the treatment of various disorders and are generally considered safer as compared to synthetic medicines.2–4 They are widely available in nature, and apart from therapeutic purposes, they are also consumed in the form of nutritional supplements.5 Several plant-derived chemical constituents have been reported to possess anti-ulcerative properties in various preclinical studies. These constituents belong to the class of alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, carotenoids, and saponins.6–8 Numerous botanical products have been confirmed to exhibit antiulcer activity although most studies focused on pharmacological action in animal models.

Ulceration is a crater-shaped lesion or wound that can form on the oral mucosa, large intestine (colon), and stomach mucosa. The formation of an ulcer may cause the region to bleed or discharge unpleasant materials, creating a painful sore that is susceptible to infection. Ulceration can be characterized by flaws in the epithelium, underlying connective tissue, or both. The diagnosis of ulcerative lesions may be difficult due to the wide range of potential causes and presenting characteristics of every organ.9 Despite the existence of various conventional and non-conventional treatment modalities for ulcer management, each approach is associated with certain limitations, including toxicity, low efficacy, and high cost.10 It is crucial to highlight the fact that botanical products may contain a multitude of active constituents that possess both hazardous and advantageous effects. Thus, it is important to use herbal therapy and put in place regulations to ensure the quality of herbal products, especially when it comes to doing more randomized studies to find out how effective and safe different products are at treating ulcer disorders.1

Taking all into consideration, this review aims to provide an in-depth exploration of plants possessing anti-ulcer activity, elucidating their mechanisms of action through a combination of preclinical and clinical studies. By consolidating the current body of knowledge, this review aims to shed light on the potential of plant-based interventions as viable alternatives for the management of gastrointestinal ulcers. This review will encompass a thorough analysis of preclinical studies investigating various plant species and their active metabolites with demonstrated anti-ulcerative properties, as well as a critical evaluation of clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of plant-based interventions in ulcer management. Special emphasis will be placed on elucidating the underlying mechanisms, including their impact on gastric mucosal protection, modulation of acid secretion, anti-inflammatory effects, assessments of symptom relief, ulcer healing rates, and potential preventive effects on ulcer recurrence.

Methods

Initially, the search included references published from 2013 until 2023. Articles were searched in Scopus and PubMed, in addition to Google Scholar. Throughout the search process, synonyms and related terms were used interchangeably as keywords, and the Boolean operator “AND” was utilized to combine and exclude terms as follows: (1) in the Scopus database using the keywords Plants AND Anti-ulcerative Activity AND Clinical Studies, searched within Article title, Abstract, and Keywords, resulted in n = 6; using the keywords Plants AND Anti-ulcerative Activity searched within Article title, Abstract, and Keyword, resulted in n = 90; and using the keywords Plants AND Antiulcer AND Activity searched within Article title, Abstract, Keywords, resulted in n = 364, with a total of 460 articles from Scopus database; (2) in the PubMed database using the keywords Plants AND Anti-ulcerative Activity searched within Abstract, free full text, and in the last 10 years, resulted in n = 239.

All articles found through these searches were further screened and those that met the review’s inclusion criteria (open access, written in English, related to antiulcer activity studied in animal models and humans, not studied in cells or computational simulation), were retrieved and evaluated by the authors. Finally, 55 articles were selected, as depicted in Figure 1. However, during the process, an additional search was conducted to obtain more articles to support the discussion.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The study design of the review.

Results

Of the 55 articles, 50 discussed in vivo (preclinical) methods (Table 1) and 5 discussed clinical (human) studies (Table 2). For example, 16 articles described the mechanisms for peptic ulcer disease, 33 articles described the mechanisms for ulcerative colitis, and 3 articles described the mechanisms for aphthous ulcer. Moreover, 33 articles discussed the active metabolites that demonstrated mechanisms for healing ulcers. Of these studies, 5 confirmed the importance or empirical history of the plants that had mechanisms for healing ulcers.

Table 1.

The Anti-Ulcerative Properties of Various Plants in Preclinical Studies

Medicinal Plants Authority (family), Collected In, Year Plant Part, and Extraction Method (Solvent Used) Animal Used in the Preclinical study (n) Inducement Method and Dose Control (Negative and Positive) Duration (Days) Results Interpretation Ref
Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD)
Annona muricata L. (Annonaceae); Ceara, Brazil; 2015 Leaves; Maceration (Ethanol) In vivo on male and female albino mice (Mus musculus), weight 20–30g (n= 48). Absolute ethanol and indomethacin (NSAID) Vehicle (saline, 0.1 mL/kg p.o) as a negative control and
Omeprazole (30 mg/kg p.o) as a positive control.
1 The extract at doses of 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg produced a significant reduction in lesion area of 92.89%, 94.13%, 97.79%, and 96.55%, respectively.
The dose of 200 mg/kg is the most effective in reducing the incidence of ulcers by 94.13%, and at 400 mg/kg decreased the incidence of ulcers significantly by 91.67% (p < 0.05).
The extract at a dose of 200 and 400 mg/kg was more effective than the standard drug (omeprazole).
Strong activity [11]
Arctium lappa L. (Asteraceae); Parana, Brazil; 2013 Roots; Percolation (Ethanol 96%) In vivo on female Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) weight 180–200g (n=N/A) Bethanechol, Pentagastrin (NSAID), and Histamine Vehicle (water 1 mL/kg i.d.) as a negative control and
Ranitidine (50 mg/kg i.d.) as a positive control.
1 The extract at a dose of 1000 µg/kg prevented the increase of gastric secretion in pylorus-ligated rats stimulated by bethanechol, histamine, or pentagastrin.
The extract at a dose of 10 mg/kg i.d decreased the acidity of gastric secretion stimulated by bethanechol, histamine, or pentagastrin.
Strong activity [12]
Artemisia absinthium L. (Asteraceae); Santa Catarina, Brazil; 2019 Aerial parts; Maceration (Water) In vivo on female Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 280–300g, age 3–4 months old (n=48). Ethanol Vehicle (water 10 mL/kg) as a negative control and Omeprazole (20 mg/kg) as a positive control. 1 The extract at doses of 3%; 10% and 30% presented a gastroprotective effect in the submucosa layer reducing the lesion area by 64.68%, 53.71%, and 90.04%, respectively. Strong activity [13]
Bryophyllum pinnatum L. (Crassulaceae); Dschang, Cameroon; 2015 Leaves; Maceration (Methanol) In vivo on Swiss mice (M. musculus) weight 17–23 g (n= 60) Inoculation of H. pylori bacteria Vehicle (200 µL of a sterile solution of 0.25% Tween 80) and inoculation of H. pylori bacteria as a negative control group and Ciprofloxacin (500 mg/kg) as a positive control group 7 The extract showed significant anti-Helicobacter activity (p < 0.05) with MIC and MBC values of 32 and 256 lg/mL, respectively.
A combination of extract and ciprofloxacin reduced H. pylori colonization of gastric tissue from 100% to 17%.
The extract (85.91 ± 52.91 CFU) and standard (25.74 ± 16.15 CFU) also significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the bacterial load of gastric mucosa as compared to untreated infected mice (11,883 ± 1831 CFU).
Strong activity [14]
Casearia sylvestris Sw. (Salicaceae); Brazil; 2019 Leaves; Infusion (Distilled Water) In vivo on female Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 200–250 g, age 80 days old (n=56). Piroxicam (NSAID) ethanol, and acetic acid Vehicle (water 1 mL/kg P.O.) as a negative control and Omeprazole (40 mg/kg P.O.) as a positive control. 14 The extract at doses of 30 or 300 mg/kg prevented ulcers in the ethanol and piroxicam-induced acute.
At a dose of 300 mg/kg, the extract also sped up the healing of acetic acid-induced ulcers in rats’ stomachs by 48%.
Ultrasonography records show that the extract reduced the thickness of the ulcerous lesions’ walls and the amount of swelling around them. C. sylvestris extract helped rat stomachs heal faster by lowering MPO and NAG activities at ulcers caused by acetic acid.
It also lowered nitrate and LOOH levels, raised mucin and SOD activity, and partially restored GSH levels.
Strong activity [15]
Ceiba speciosa A. St.-Hil. (Malvaceae); Lajeado, Brazil; 2014 Stem bark; Maceration (Solution of 90% Ethanol) In vivo on Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 150–380 g (n=63). Ethanol Vehicle (1 mL saline p.o) as a negative control and Omeprazole (40 mg/kg) as a positive control. 7 C. speciosa A. St.-Hil. extract at dose (20, 40, 80, 400 mg/Kg) reduced the release of TNF-α in human blood and inhibited the activity of p38α, JAK3, and JNK3. Moreover, it reduced the leukocyte recruitment on the pouch exudate and the formation of edema. The extract presented a significant prevention of ulcer formation and a higher reduction than the control drug. In this case reported p-values below the conventional threshold of 0.05, ie 0.01 which indicates a statistically significant result, compared to vehicle and control group. Strong activity [16]
Cinnamomum glanduliferum Wall. (Lauraceae); Cairo, Egypt, 2014. Leaves; Hydro distillation (Water) In vivo on male Wistar albino rats (R. norvegicus) weight 150–170 g (n=60) Ethanol Vehicle (1 mL normal saline p.o) as a negative control and Indomethacin (10 mg/kg) as a positive control. 4 hours Leaves extract at doses of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg significantly (p < 0.05) reduced paw volume to 94, 82 and 69%, respectively, significantly reduced COX-2 activity to 73.8, 50.7 and 21.4 nmol/min/mL, respectively.
C. glanduliferum oil exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) modulatory effect on ethanol-induced gastritis in rats as the level of NO reduced to 32, 37 and 41 lM nitrate/g, a significant (p < 0.05) inhibition of lipid peroxidation via reduction of MDA concentration (1.15, 1.11, and 1.04 nmol/g).
Strong activity [17]
Emex spinosa (L.) Campd. (Polygonaceae); Mirpur, Pakistan; 2022 Leaves; Maceration; Methanol In vivo on white albino rats (R. norvegicus) weight 150–250 g (n=50) Ethanol Vehicle (10 mL/kg distilled water) as a negative control and Omeprazole (20 mg/kg) as a positive control. 14 The leaf extract at 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg reduced acidity and protected the stomach mucosa wall. Strong activity [18]
Melissa officinalis L. (Lamiaceae); Kerman, Iran; 2013 Leaves; Maceration (Methanol) In vivo on male Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 200–250g (n=8) Indomethacin (NSAID) Vehicle (1 mL saline P.O.) as a negative control and Ranitidine (25 mg/kg) as a positive control. 2 The ulcer index was lower in the indomethacin (1.3±0.09 and 1.5±0.19, respectively) compared to the control rats (2.5±0.28).
The extract at a dose of 450 mg/kg did not prevent indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration (2.4 ± 0.26). There was no significant difference in the ulcer index for MO extract (150 and 300 mg/kg) and ranitidine-treated rats.
Weak activity [19]
Phyllanthus niruri L. (Phyllanthaceae); Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2015 Leaves; Maceration (Methanol) In vivo on female Swiss albino rats (R. norvegicus) weight 120–150 g (n=36) Ethanol Vehicle (5 mL/kg distilled water, P.O. + 25 mL/kg of 0.3 M HCl in 60% ethanol) as a negative control and Omeprazole (20 mg/kg) as a positive control. 1 The extract at doses (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg) significantly (p < 0.05) exhibited a reduction of 69.59, 74.32 and 80.40%, respectively in the ethanol- acid induced gastric erosion in all the experimental groups when compared to the control. Strong activity [20]
Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
Spondias mombin L. (Anacardiaceae); Paraíba, Brazil, 2014. Leaves; Percolation (Absolute Ethanol) In vivo on male Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 180–250 g (n=35) Indomethacin (NSAID) and ethanol Injured control (0.9% NaCl solution) as a negative control and Lansoprazole (30 mg/kg) as a positive control. 14 The extract reduced the area of ulcerative lesions induced by ethanol in 23.8, 90.3, and 90.2%, respectively.
In NSAID model, the extract induced protection of 36.8, 49.4, and 49.9%, respectively. GA (10 mg/kg) or EA (7 mg/kg) or the association of GA+ EA (10 + 7 mg/kg) inhibited the ethanol-induced lesions in 71.8, 70.9, and 94.9%., respectively, indicating synergistic action.
The extract (100 mg/kg) decreased acid secretion and H+ concentration in the gastric contents, increased levels of mucus, and showed to be dependent of −SH groups and NO on the protection of the gastric mucosa.
Strong activity [21]
Tagetes erecta L. (Asteraceae); Campinas, Brazil; 2019 Flowers; Hydroalcoholic (Methanol-Water) In vivo on male Swiss mice (M. musculus) weight 20–30 g (n=36) DSS (Dextran Sulfate Sodium) Vehicle (10 mL/kg distilled water, P.O. + 1% Tween 80) as a negative control and 5-ASA (100 mg/kg p.o) as a positive control. 9 The colitis group treated with T. erecta L. (300 mg/kg, once a day for 9 days) presented a weight loss of 11%.
The extract reduced the colon shortening by 16% in relation to the vehicle-treated colitis group, reduced IL-6 levels by 26%, increased the GSH availability by 22%.
Strong activity [22]
Terminalia catappa L. (Combretaceae); Brazil; 2010 Leaves; Percolation (Absolute Ethanol) In vivo on male Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 180–250 g (n=35). Ethanol Vehicle (10 mL/kg saline) as a negative control and Lansoprazole (30 mg/kg) as a positive control. 14 The extract at a dose of 25 mg/kg greatly reduced the number of ulcerative sores caused by ethanol, activated protective factors for the mucosa, such as the nitric oxide (NO) pathway and endogenous prostaglandins.
Oral treatment with extracts for seven and 14 days significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the lesion area (80% and 37%, respectively) compared to the negative control group
Strong activity [23]
Amphiterygium adstringens (Schltdl.) (Anacardiaceae); San Rafael, United States; 2013 Bark; Maceration (Ethanol) In vivo on albino mice (Bagg Albino), age 6–8 weeks (n= 24). DSS (Dextran sulfate sodium) Untreated as the negative control. 10 The extract at dose 200 mg/kg lowered the levels of TNF-α (321.5 ± 24.75 pg/mL), IFN-γ (183.3 ± 12.02 pg/mL) and IL-1β (227.6 ± 8.66 pg/mL) compared to control group.
The extract also decreased the infiltration of inflammatory cells as well as the damage to the colon’s mucosa.
The extract showed induce a wide range of activities like reducing oxidative stress, suppressing inflammation, modulating multiple signal transduction pathways, and inducing apoptosis.
Strong activity [24]
Anneslea fragrans Wall. (Pentaphylacaceae); Yunan, China; 2020 Leave; Ultrasonic-assisted extraction (Methanol) In vivo on Kunming mice (M. musculus Km.) weight 21–23 g (n=20). Bethanechol Vehicle (distilled water + DSS 2.5%, w/v) as a negative control and Sulfasalazine (450 mg/kg) as a control positive 14 A. fragrans Wall. extract at doses of 1000 mg/kg; 2000 mg/kg; 5000 mg/kg enhanced the levels of IL4 and IL10 and decreased the levels of IL6, IL1β, and TNF-α.
Furthermore, in colon tissue, the extract significantly blocked the phosphorylation of the target protein of the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways.
Strong activity [25]
Belamcanda chinensis L. (Iridaceae); Poland; 2014 Rhizome; Maceration; Methanol In vivo on Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 160–220 g (n= 79) TNBS (Trinitrobenzene Sulfonic Acid) Vehicle (Distilled water and TNBS solution 0.3 mL/kg) as a negative control and for the positive control is not applicable. 16 B. chinensis L. exerted a protective effect, lowering the intensity of damage produced by TNBS acid.
The extract at the doses of 30 and 100 mg/kg reduced the macro- and microscopic damage score and the MDA level in colon tissues, and at the dose of 100 mg/kg showed a lower TNF-a and IL-17 concentrations, and SOD activity in colon tissues.
Strong activity [26]
Berberis lycium Royle (Berberidaceae) Fruits; Percolation (Water) In vivo on albino mice (Bagg Albino) weight 10–23 g and age 6–8 weeks old (n= 30) Bethanechol Vehicle (Distilled water and DSS solution 3.5%) as a negative control and 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) (250 mg/kg) as a positive control 14 B. lycium Royle extract treatment significantly improved survival rates, DAI score, colon length, and structural damage in DSS-exposed mice.
It decreased oxi-inflammatory markers and Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokines expression, while enhancing tight junction proteins, IgA levels, and anti-inflammatory cytokines.
It modulated intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and apoptosis, inhibiting inflammatory signaling pathways and increasing Treg cell proliferation.
Strong activity [27]
Brucea javanica L. (Simaroubaceae); Guangdong, China; 2018 Fruits In vivo on male Sprague Dawley (R. norvegicus) weight 210–230 g, Age 7 weeks old (n= 12). TNBS (Trinitrobenzene Sulfonic Acid) Vehicle (distilled water and TNBS solution 25 mg/kg) as a negative control and Azathioprine (9 mg/kg) for the positive control. 7 The extract significantly (p < 0.050) reduced the mucosal damage to the colon, including edema, hyperemia, thickening of the bowel wall, erosions of the mucosa, and ulcers, significantly restored the colon length and body weight, reduced disease activity index (DAI) and colon pathology, decreased histological scores, diminished oxidative stress, and suppressed TLR4, MyD88, TRAF6, NF-kB p65 protein expressions in TNBS-induced UC. Strong activity [28]
Canna x generalis (Cannaceae); Giza, Egypt; 2018 Rhizome; Sonication (Methanol) In vivo on Swiss albino mice (B. albino) weight 20–25 g (n= 30). DSS Vehicle (distilled water and 0.5% CMC_Na) as a negative control and Sulphasalazine (200 mg/kg) as a positive control. 7 The extract restored intestinal mucosal barrier, reduced oxidative stress, the inflammatory cascade, and the activation of the NF-ΡB/TLR4 and NLRP3 pathways in colonic tissues. Medium activity [29]
Centella asiatica L. (Apiaceae); Guangdong, China; 2018 Leaves; Reflux; Ethanol In vivo on albino mice (B. albino) weight 22–24 g and age 8 weeks old (n= 48) Bethanechol Vehicle (Distilled water 3%) as a negative control and 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) (400 mg/kg) as a positive control. 7 The extract at dose 100, 200, 400 mg/kg improved intestinal motility, was able to modify the gut microbiome of the mice that were in pain, by reducing the abundance of colitis-associated genera like Helicobacter, Jeotgalicoccus, and Staphylococcus, altered the community and enhanced α-diversity. Strong activity [30]
Eucheuma cottonii (Solieriaceae); Sabah, Malaysia; 2018 Seaweed; Maceration; Ethanol In vivo on albino mice (B. albino) age 6 weeks old (n= 48) Bethanechol Vehicle (distilled water 3%) as a negative control and Curcumin (0.10 kg) as a positive control. 7 The extracts raised IL-10 levels, decreased colonic damage, and reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Consequently, the extract decreased DSS-induced intestinal inflammation, making it a viable option for the treatment of colitis.
Medium activity [31]
Evodia rutaecarpa (Rutaceae) Juss.; Chengdu, China; 2018 Fruits In vivo on C57BL/6 mice (M. musculus) weight 21–23 g (n=48). Acetic acid Vehicle (distilled water 2.5% and DSS 2.5% dissolved in water) as a negative control. 15 The extract restored the equilibrium of Lactobacillus and Escherichia coli, lowered the concentration of plasmatic lipopolysaccharide (LPS), prevented UC as well as having a possible protective impact on colitis caused by DSS. Strong activity [32]
Forsythia koreana (Oleaceae); Yong-In, Korea; 2015 Flowers In vivo on mice (M. musculus) (n=12). DSS Vehicle (distilled water Contained DSS 4% dissolved in water) as a negative control and 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) (75 mg/kg) as a positive control. 7 At dose of 20 mg/kg the extract reduced the infiltration of inflammatory cells such prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), nitric oxide (NO), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS).
The extract also reduced the symptoms of colitis in mice with DSS-induced colitis, inhibited inflammatory responses by downregulating JAK/STAT, NF-κB, and AP-1 signaling.
Strong activity [33]
Garcinia kola (Clusiaceae); Ibadan, Nigeria; 2013 Seeds; Soxhlet; Petroleum ether In vivo on Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) weight 180–200 g and age 10–12 weeks old (n= 36). DSS Corn oil (2 mL/kg) as a negative control and Sulfasalazine (500mg/kg) as a positive control. 5 G. kola extract significantly prevented the increase in these inflammatory mediators in the colon of DSS-treated rats, also significantly modulated DSS-induced decrease in body weight gain as well as prevented incidence of diarrhea and bleeding. There was a significant (p < 0.05) elevation in the levels of TNF-α and IL-1β in rats exposed to DSS alone when compared with the control group. Strong activity [34]
Vitis vinifera (Vitaceae); Xinjiang; China. Seeds; Water-Ethanol In vivo on female C57BL/6 mice (M. musculus) weight 18–20 g and age 8 weeks old (n= 4) DSS Vehicle (distilled water Contained DSS 200µL dissolved in 0.01 mol/L phosphate-buffered saline) as a negative control and for the positive control is not applicable. 6 The extract treated mucosal injury, inflammatory infiltration, bloody stools, diarrhea, and weight loss, may lessen IEC apoptosis by downregulating the mRNA expression of the inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α as well as the phosphorylation of STAT3. There was a significant (p < 0.05) elevation in the levels of cytokines IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α also (p < 0.05) treated the effects of UC when compared with the control group. Medium activity [35]
Gymnema sylvestre R.Br. (Apocynaceae); Egypt; 2014 Leaves; Ethanol In vivo on Wistar albino rats (R. novergicus) weight 250–280g, age 12 weeks old (n= 42). Acetic acid Vehicle (distilled water contained acetic acid solution 200µL 4%) as a negative control and Mesalazamine (300 mg/kg) for the positive control. 7 The extract significantly (p < 0.05) preserved the mucosal content and inhibited the oxidative and inflammatory response, increased colonic weights compared to control group, showed antioxidant activities, and inhibited acetic acid in colons and showed marked increase in SOD activity compared to control group.
The extract significantly (p < 0.05) lower levels of IL-1b, TNF-α, and IL-6 compared to the animals in vehicle group.
Strong activity [36]
Ilex kudingcha C.J. Tseng (Aquifoliaceae); Chongqing, China; 2012 Leaves; Maceration; Methanol In vivo on male C57BL/6 mice (M. musculus) age 6 weeks (n=24) DSS Vehicle (normal saline 0.9%) as a negative control and for the positive control is not applicable. 7 The extract at dose 50 and 200 mg/kg, respectively, decreased the colonic MDA levels of 0.79±0.07 and 0.63±0.07 nmol/mg protein, reduced the expression of the iNOS and COX-2 genes.
Furthermore, the extract significantly (p < 0.05) and dose-dependently decreased the levels of COX-2 and iNOS mRNA.
Strong activity [37]
Morinda citrifolia L. (Rubiaceae); State of Ceara, Brazil; 2019 Fruits; Distiled water In vivo on male Swiss mice (M. musculus) weight 25–30 g (n= 36) Acetic acid Vehicle (normal saline 0.9%) as a negative control and Dexamethasone (2 mg/kg) for the positive control. 18 hours The extract decreased the macroscopic lesions compared to vehicle group, the extract also reduction wet weight of the colon as well.
Furthermore, pro-inflammatory cytokines, MPO activity, GSH, MDA, NO3/NO2, and COX-2 expression levels decreased.
Strong activity [38]
Olea europaea Hoffmannsegg (Oleaceae); 2021 Leaves In vivo on male albino rats (R. norvegicus) age 6–8 weeks old (n=35). Histamine Untreated (No induced by AA) as negative control and for the positive control is not applicable. 7 The extract demonstrated efficacy in lowering the disease activity index (DAI) and death rate, reduced oxidative stress and inflammation in colon tissue was also demonstrated by the extract, which resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as a significant reduction in colon MDA, MPO, and NO levels as well as an elevation in SOD, CAT, and GPX levels. Strong activity [39]
Polygonum cuspidatum Siebold & Zucc. (Polygonaceae); Pakistan; 2013 Whole plant In vivo on Sprague-Dawley rats (R. norvegicus) weight 150–200 g (n=36) Acetic acid Vehicle (sodium carboxy methyl cellulose suspension 1%) as a negative control and Ranitidine (50 mg/kg) for the positive control Ranitidine. 4 The extract decreased the pH of the gastric juice when compared to the vehicle-treated controls, exhibited a marked gastroprotective effect in the aspirin-induced pyloric ligation ulcerogenesis model.
The extract at doses of 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg afforded significant anti-ulcerogenic proclivity (P < 0.05) evidenced by non-significant changes in the ulcerative biochemical parameters.
Medium activity [40]
Tagetes erecta (Asteraceae); Campinas, Brazil; 2019 Flowers Hydroalcoholic; Methanol-Water (9:1) In vivo on male Swiss mice weight 20–30 gr (n=36). DSS Vehicle (10 mL/kg water + 1% Tween 80) contained DSS as a negative control and 5-aminosalicylic acid (ASA) (100 mg/kg) for the positive control Ranitidine 9 The extract reduced the ulcerated area by 66%, expedited the healing of stomach ulcers, increased GST activity and mucin quantity, decreased LOOH levels, SOD, CAT, and MPO activities, and decreased the lesion area in the recurrence model by 94%, decreased the thickness of the stomach wall and TNF levels, and raised the amount of IL-10. Strong activity [41]
Taraxacum officinale (Asteraceae); 2018 Root; Water In vivo on C57BL/6 mice (M. musculus) aged 6–8 weeks old (n= 40) Bethanechol Vehicle (water 2% w/v contained DSS) as a negative control and for the positive control is not applicable. 10 The extract effectively reduces progressive acute injury as evidenced by decreased body weight loss, reduced disease index severity scores, and shorter colon length during DSS treatment.
It also lessens oxidative stress and inflammatory conditions in the colon of DSS-induced mice. The extract has the potential to be an effective anti-colitis complex mixture.
Strong activity [42]
Terminalia chebula (Combretaceae); Varnasi; 2012 Fruits; Maceration Ethanol In vivo on Inbred Charles-Foster (CF) strain albino rats (R. norvegicus) weight 150–170 g (n= N/A) Acetic acid Vehicle (carboxy methyl cellulose 1.0% in distilled water) contained DSS as a negative control and Sulfasalazine (100 mg/kg) for the positive control Ranitidine 14 The extract shown antibacterial activity and increased antioxidant levels while lowering free radicals and myeloperoxidase activity in colitis caused by acetic acid. Strong activity [43]
Aphthous Ulcer
Morinda citrifolia L. (Rubiaceae); Indonesia; 2017 Leaves; Maceration: Ethanol 96% In vivo on Wistar rats (R. norvegicus) Using a 3 mm diameter burnisher touched on the labial mucosa below the rate for one second. Vehicle (distilled water) as a negative control and triamcinolone acetonide (0.1%) for the positive control. 10 The extract has no significant effect on healing percentage compared to control groups with p = 0.138 and 0.694 (p > 0.05), recovery day for treat group was eighth day and for each control groups were tenth day. Weak activity [44]

Table 2.

The Anti-Ulcerative Properties of Various Plants in Clinical Studies

Medicinal plant (Family), Collected In, Year Plant Part, Class of Metabolites Type of Study Control (Negative and Positive) Duration (Days) Results Interpretation Ref
Punica granatum (Punicaceae); Iran; 2013 Flower; Percolation; Ethanol Phenol Double blind RCT in 210 patients with active or ever had Aphthous ulcers. N/A 10 P. granatum var. extracts have a significant therapeutic impact on mild RAS. Medium activity [45]
Nicotiana tabacum (Solanaceae); Kermanshah, Iran; 2015 Leaves Alkaloid RCT in 60 patients with active or ever had aphthous ulcers for the past 1–5 years. Using placebo as a control group 5 The extract decreased ulcer pain by 79.2% and 93.8% and ulcer size was reduced by 69.1% and 92.2% (days 3 and 5, respectively),
In various established mechanisms, such as the antibody-forming cell response, the suppression of neutrophil-mediated inflammation, the inhibition of endothelial cell release of interleukin (IL)-8, the inhibition of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-10, the release of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ, and the decrease in immune globulin levels in circulation, nicotine and its metabolites have been shown to exhibit immunosuppressive activity and reduce inflammatory condition.
Strong activity [46]
Glycyrrhiza glabra (Fabaceae) Roots Glycyrrhizin acid Randomized control trials (RCT) in 120 patients caused by PUD Negative control is not applicable.
Clarithromycin (500 mg), Amoxycillin (1 g), 20 mg of Omeprazole as the positive control.
210 Thirty percent in both groups had peptic ulcers, and the surrogate for H. pylori eradication and positive therapeutic response G. glabra showed was 83.3% in the LR group compared to 62.5% in the control group (p = 0.018).
Response rate based on endoscopic findings was significantly higher for the extract group to treat PUD.
Strong activity [47]
Zingiber officinale (Zingiberaceae); Atlanta, Georgia; 2015 Roots Gingerol and Shogaols Double-blind RCT in 44 patients with active UC Standard treatment combination with placebo capsules as a control group 84 Gingerol and shogaols administered orally increased the survival and proliferation of IECs and reduced the pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, IL-6, and IL-1b) and increased the anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-22) in colitis models.
Ginger-derived nanoparticles, offer a novel, natural delivery system that can enhance the prevention and treatment of IBD.
Strong activity [48]
Trigonella foenum graecum L. (Fabaceae); Iran; 2020 Seeds; Sonication; Water Flavonoid RCT in 60 patients with active or ever had Aphthous ulcers for the past 1–5 years Negative control is not applicable and Dexamethasone mouthwash was the positive control. 10 Patients receiving the extract showed a significant improvement in the size of the lesion and level of pain starting on the fourth day of treatment. After six days of the intervention, there was a substantial decrease (p < 0.05) in both the ulcer’s size and erythema level. Medium activity [49]

Most of the studies described Brazil (South America) and China as the origin locations of the plant collection, although other countries such as Iran, Egypt, Pakistan, Cameroon (Central Africa), Bangladesh, Poland, Malaysia, Korea, Nigeria (West Africa), and Indonesia were also mentioned.

In the preclinical studies, various types of ulcer inducers were used, eg, ethanol (9 articles), dextran sulfate sodium (8 articles), bethanechol (6 articles), acetic acid (6 articles), indomethacin (3 articles), histamine (2 articles), trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (2 articles), and other inducers (pentagastrin, piroxicam, Helicobacter pylori, and a burnisher). Of those, rats (Rattus norvegicus) were more selected (54.54%) as the animal model than mice (Mus musculus) (45.45%). The description of the diseases is presented below.

Nine plants were confirmed for their strong anti-peptic ulcer disease activity in animal models, twenty plants have shown strong anti-ulcerative colitis activity, and no plant exhibited strong anti-aphthous ulcer activity. Studies in humans indicated that Nicotiana tabacum (Solanaceae), Glycyrrhiza glabra (Fabaceae), and Zingiber officinale (Zingiberaceae) possessed strong antiulcer activity.

Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD)

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is characterized by the presence of damage or ulcers in the mucosal lining of the gastrointestinal tract (GI), which leads to the excessive secretion of gastric acid or pepsin. Typically, these symptoms appear within the gastric region and the proximal segment of the duodenum.50 Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a global problem with a lifetime risk of development ranging from 5–10%.51 In general, there has been a global decline in the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) as a result of enhanced hygienic and sanitary practices, as well as the implementation of effective treatment strategies and the cautious utilization of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Therefore, epidemiological studies have demonstrated a reduction in peptic ulcer incidence, hospital admissions, and death but the case fatality rate has stabilized at 5–10%.52

PUD has various multiple factors. Traditionally, mucosal disruption in patients with peptic disease is considered to be a result of a hypersecretory of acid together with dietary factors or stress. The primary risk factors associated with gastric or peptic ulcers are infection with H. pylori and the utilization of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).53,54 Nevertheless, the incidence of PUD is relatively low among individuals affected by H. pylori or those who use NSAIDs. This suggests that individual susceptibility affects the initial onset of mucosal damage.

The primary goal of presently antiulcer medications is not only limited to controlling the progression of the disease. It also aims to induce remission as quickly as possible and to maintain it for a long time The management of PUD currently uses a variety of conventional treatment modalities, but it’s crucial to remember that each of these treatments has one or more negative side effects. The primary goal of currently used anti-ulcerative medications is not simply to manage the advancement of the ailment. It also aims to promptly initiate and sustain a state of remission over an extended period.55,56 The primary negative consequences encompass gastrointestinal disruptions such as feelings of nausea, vomiting, constipation, and diarrhea, as well as impacts on the cardiovascular system.10

Based on the findings, it has been reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) that approximately 80–85% of the global population relies on natural products for disease management and nutritional supplementation. Botanical products are being utilized as alternative medicines for the treatment of various diseases due to their perceived safety in comparison to synthetic medicines.57 An in vivo or preclinical study of the active metabolites in a plant showed that the metabolites treat peptic ulcer disease by protecting the gastrointestinal mucosa wall, reducing the effects of ulcers, decreasing or reducing the lesion area caused by ulcers, inhibiting cytokine pro-inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, an ulcerative agent, and reducing the bacterial load on the gastric mucosa caused by Helicobacter pylori in the test animal, and clinical studies of the active metabolites showed that the combination of metabolites as a supplement makes a better treatment for PUD.

Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Ulcerative colitis is a long-lasting inflammatory condition of the colon that causes the wall of the colon to become easily detached and wear away at the surface, often with bleeding. Typically, this condition is characterized by inflammation that is localized to the mucosal and submucosal layers of the colon. In general, the onset of the disease occurs within the rectum and progresses in a contiguous manner towards more proximal regions. Ulcerative has no cure and is a lifelong disorder with a significant impact on both physical and mental health.58 The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease remains uncertain. The prominent independent risk factor of familial disease history, which is present in about 8% to 14% of affected people, suggests that a primary genetic component plays a significant role. Individuals who have a family diagnosed with ulcerative colitis are at a significantly elevated risk, approximately four times higher, of developing the same disease.59

There is a growing emphasis in treatment strategies on achieving intestinal healing rather than solely focusing on symptomatic relief, to mitigate the likelihood of long-term complications and the need for surgical interventions.60,61 Treatments can be broadly categorized as those employed to initiate remission, either at the time of diagnosis or during a subsequent flare-up.62 Currently, the dietary management is to improve symptoms while offering support. In recent years, there has been a notable shift in dogma toward the utilization of dietary therapies that target specific mechanisms to induce disease remission.63–65 Most research has focused on how the immune system changes in the early stages, but over the past 20 years, a lot of evidence has shown that ulcerative colitis (UC) is mostly a disease of the epithelial tissue.66 The pathogenesis of the colonic epithelium is mostly caused by metabolic defects, which play a key role and may contribute to the breakdown of the mucosal barrier. Consequently, the epithelium may experience additional harmful effects due to the presence of microbial metabolites, such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and nitric oxide (NO), which can be toxic when present in excessive amounts.67

People with UC can get relief from their symptoms through a variety of pharmacological interventions. However, a large number of these therapeutic medications are linked to serious side effects.68 Therefore, researchers are currently placing increased emphasis on natural compounds,69 as they have the potential to mitigate adverse effects. A clinical study of gingerol and shogaol, which are the active metabolites in the Zingiber officinal plants, found that they were more likely to cause a clinical response and significantly improve a patient’s quality of life.70 Recent research has shown that using natural lipid nanoparticles (nLNP) loaded with 6-shogaol (6S/nLNP) can effectively change the types of bacteria in the gut, cause metabolic changes in feces, and reduce inflammation in a model of acute colitis caused by DSS.71 An in vivo or preclinical study of the active metabolites in a plant showed that the active metabolites inhibited cytokine pro-inflammatory factors such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, an ulcerative agent, in the test animal, also the metabolites protected colon mucosa from ulceration through their strength aspect, such as antioxidant, or anti-inflammatory. According to preclinical and clinical studies.

Aphthous Ulcer (Mouth Ulcer)

Aphthous ulcers, also known as mouth ulcers, show inflamed spots with a white-reddish appearance that develop on the mucous membrane that lines the oral cavity. Despite being painful, these injuries generally undergo spontaneous healing and do not result in any complications. There is variation in the recurrence of canker sores, with certain individuals experiencing a reoccurrence within a few weeks, while others may encounter them after months or even years.72

Aphthous stomatitis is estimated to impact around 20% of the overall population. The prevalence of this phenomenon is slightly higher among females and individuals from affluent socioeconomic backgrounds and countries. Most people get them for the first time when they are a teenager or young adult. The age of onset may be during childhood, but more commonly in the second and third decades of life, becoming less common with advancing age. This disease is more common in women than in men. The cause of aphthous stomatitis is idiopathic and multifactorial but likely involves activation of the cell-mediated immune system. Since acute infections are not the cause of aphthous ulcers, they are not contagious. Local trauma, emotional or physiological stress, allergy or sensitivity, menstruation, or changes in the oral microbiome can all cause aphthous stomatitis. Aphthous ulcers are more prevalent in nonsmokers and smokers who quit and less common in individuals with good oral hygiene practices.73–75

The present treatment plan for this disease primarily focuses on managing symptoms, aiming to alleviate pain, facilitate lesion resolution, and extend the duration between episodes.76 The primary strategy for the treatment is to control the inflammation, suppress the inflammation-associated cells’ activity, reduce the pain of the lesion, and accelerate the healing process.77 The most commonly used anti-inflammatory agents to treat oral cavity inflammations are topical corticosteroids.78

Biological and laser therapies have emerged as novel therapeutic modalities for the treatment of mucosal diseases, garnering considerable anticipation in the medical community. Changes in oral microbiota have been linked to the development,79 which paves the way for probiotic treatments that can be put directly in the mouth. However, long-term exposure to these medications may cause drug resistance, oral flora imbalance, and secondary fungal infections.80

Natural extracts have already been proven effective for managing other oral health problems, apart from ulcers. Several clinical studies have shown the positive effects of natural extracts in reducing the pain and duration of mouth ulcers.45,79,80 A clinical study revealed that patients with aphthous ulcers treated with Nicotiana tabacum E. metabolites were likely to show reduced ulcer lesions compared to placebo, which was the control of the randomized control trial. The metabolites contributed to the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and decreased the size of lesions on oral mucosa.46

Discussion

The investigation of anti-ulcerative activity has also encompassed the study of isolated metabolites derived from plants. The phytochemical constituents in plants have a variety of functions in anti-ulcerative activity, for example, alkaloids were reported for their anti-ulcerative effects by modulating the gastric acid secretion and cytoprotective properties.81 Flavonoids exhibit potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity, contributing to ulcer healing and mucosal protection.82 Saponin has been found to inhibit gastric mucosal injuries induced by factors such as ethanol or indomethacin.83 Tannins, a type of phytochemical can form protective barriers on the mucosal surface,84 and polyphenols, which are also found in plants have multifaceted actions, such as anti-secretory and anti-inflammatory effects.82 Hence, plants are paving the way for the development of targeted and efficacious treatments for ulcerative disorders. The assessment of potential anti-ulcerative activities in plants that are often used to treat ulcers is a very important step in proving that these plants work as medicines. Various plant materials may exhibit multiple types of anti-ulcer effects, including safeguarding the mucosa against ulcers and impeding pro-inflammatory cytokine activity. This is attributed to the fact that individuals with chronic wounds, such as ulcers, tend to have elevated systemic and local levels of TNF-α.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway plays a crucial role in the regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production, including interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). This substance is classified as a proinflammatory cytokine that is rapidly secreted in response to an inflammatory stimulus. It plays a critical role in initiating various intracellular processes and is involved in the development of both acute and chronic inflammatory responses. This leads to the activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB), as well as the promotion of the release of additional pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and proteases.85 The overproduction of TNF-α has a direct correlation with various inflammatory disorders, including arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. Consequently, regulating TNF-α levels can serve as an effective therapeutic approach for managing these diseases.86

Cytokine proinflammatory factors, such as IL-1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ, were found to be upregulated.87 These factors are known to be involved in gastric inflammation caused by H. pylori. The involvement of the acute phase response pathway and NF-kappaB signaling pathways was also suggested.88 TNF-α plays a key role in mediating inflammatory events, involved in both acute and chronic responses.89 IL-6 produces an acute phase response, promoting the induction of intracellular signaling cascades, which give rise to the production of other inflammatory cytokines.90 At first, proinflammatory cytokines help acute wounds heal by boosting the growth of keratinocytes and making them make more antimicrobial peptides. Nevertheless, excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines can result in the persistence of inflammation and impaired wound healing.91,92 Hence, the therapeutic efficacy of chronic wound healing can be attributed to the inhibition of excessive proinflammatory cytokines.93 The extract contained phenolic compounds that demonstrated antioxidant properties by inhibiting oxidative stress, reducing the production of nitric oxide (NO), and preventing the activation of p38. Consequently, this inhibition led to the suppression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), thereby exhibiting anti-inflammatory and antiulcerogenic effects.16

The suggested mechanisms of action are explained through cytoprotective mechanism (causing an increase in gastric mucus), antioxidant activity (preventing depletion of sulfhydryl groups and reducing levels of lipid peroxidation and myeloperoxidase activity in the gastric mucosa), and finally healing ability.94,95 The small size of metabolites facilitates their passage through the mucus layer, enabling them to interact with colonic cells and initiate immune responses.91,93,96,97 Hence, metabolites derived from plants possess the potential to modulate the advancement of intestinal inflammation, thereby offering translational prospects.71 Ulcer, being a chronic inflammatory disease, exhibits distinct characteristics during the progression of chronic inflammation in the colon.98 Notably, the integrity of the mucus layer remains largely unaffected, and the permeability of the epithelial lining undergoes minimal alterations. In contrast, the acute colitis model demonstrates significant compromise to both the mucus layer and the permeability of the epithelial lining.71

In the present study, we found two plants with double anti-ulcerative activities, ie, T. erecta (strong anti-peptic ulcer disease and anti-ulcerative colitis) and M. citrifolia (strong anti-ulcerative colitis and weak anti-aphthous ulcer), thus presuming their potential to be further developed as anti-ulcer botanical drugs.

Conclusion

This review elaborates on an overview of the preclinical and clinical studies that have been done on medicinal plants. It focuses on how well they work to treat conditions such as peptic ulcer disease (PUD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and aphthous ulcers. The phytochemicals and pharmacological properties have also been elucidated. These active metabolites, derived from various plant sources such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and polyphenols, have a variety of functions in the treatment of ulcers and contribute synergistic interactions to the anti-ulcerative efficacy of plant extracts. For most of the plants that have been looked at, however, there is a clear lack of anti-H. pylori activity and clinical studies on metabolites derived from plant studies. The opportunity to conduct such studies is available to determine whether these plants possess both clinical and non-clinical properties. Also, there is a limitation of the study, we found that not all articles explain the controls used in preclinical and clinical studies, not all articles explain where and when the plants were collected, and not all articles explain the extraction method and solvent used which makes this article a constraint. More pharmacological activity assays are needed to figure out the mechanism of how each metabolite works, for example, by studying what proteins, pathways, or genes are altered by the plant extract or metabolite. These studies will be essential to validate the potential use of these metabolites in the treatment of ulcers. From a future perspective in the realm of plants, we can anticipate the isolation and synthesis of the active metabolites from plants for their capability as targeted therapies with enhanced efficacy and reduced potential for adverse effects. This review provides a piece of scientific evidence supporting the utilization of plant metabolites as a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of ulcers.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Rector of Universitas Padjadjaran for funding the APC via the Directorate of Research and Community Engagement.

Disclosure

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest to the research, authorship, or publication of this article.

References

  • 1.Kuna L, Jakab J, Smolic R, Raguz-Lucic N, Vcev A, Smolic M. Peptic ulcer disease: a brief review of conventional therapy and herbal treatment options. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):179. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Choi W, Choi CH, Kim YR, Kim SJ, Na CS, Lee H. HerDing: herb recommendation system to treat diseases using genes and chemicals. Database. 2016;2016:baw011. doi: 10.1093/database/baw011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin LT, Hsu WC, Lin CC. Antiviral natural products and herbal medicines. J Tradit Complement Med. 2014;4(1):24–35. doi: 10.4103/2225-4110.124335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gupta M, Kapoor B, Gupta R, Singh N. Plants and phytochemicals for treatment of peptic ulcer: an overview. South Afr J Bot. 2021;138:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.11.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang L, Zhuang H, Zhang Y, et al. Plants for health: an ethnobotanical 25-year repeat survey of traditional medicine sold in a major marketplace in North-west Yunnan, China. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;224:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.05.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aslam B, Awan T, Javed I, Khaliq T, Khan JA, Raza A. Gastroprotective and antioxidant potential of Glycyrrhiza glabra on experimentally induced gastric ulcers in albino mice. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4:451–460. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ghosh V, Sugumar S, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N. Neem (Azadirachta indica) Oils. In: Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety. Academic Press; 2016:593–599. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim KH, Lee D, Lee HL, Kim CE, Jung K, Kang KS. Beneficial effects of Panax ginseng for the treatment and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases: past findings and future directions. J Ginseng Res. 2018;42(3):239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mortazavi H, Safi Y, Baharvand M, Rahmani S. Diagnostic features of common oral ulcerative lesions: an updated decision tree. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2016/7278925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scally B, Emberson JR, Spata E, et al. Effects of gastroprotectant drugs for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its complications: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(4):231–241. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30037-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bento EB, de B. Júnior FE, de Oliveira DR, et al. Antiulcerogenic activity of the hydroalcoholic extract of leaves of Annona muricata Linnaeus in mice. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016;25(4):609–621. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.01.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.da Silvada Silvada Silva LM, de M. Burci L, Crestani S, et al. Acid-gastric antisecretory effect of the ethanolic extract from Arctium lappa L. root: role of H+, K+-ATPase, Ca2+ influx and the cholinergic pathway. Inflammopharmacology. 2018;26(2):521–530. doi: 10.1007/s10787-017-0378-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boeing T, de Souzade Souza J, da Silva RCV, et al. Gastroprotective effect of Artemisia absinthium L.: a medicinal plant used in the treatment of digestive disorders. J Ethnopharmacol. 2023;312:116488. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116488 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kouitcheu Mabeku LB, Eyoum Bille B, Tchouangueu TF, Nguepi E, Leundji H. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infected mice with Bryophyllum pinnatum, a medicinal plant with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, reduces bacterial load. Pharm Biol. 2017;55(1):603–610. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2016.1266668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.de Oliveira BMM, Serpa PZ, da Costa Zanatta ME, et al. Gastroprotective and gastric healing effects of the aqueous extract of Casearia sylvestris in rodents: ultrasound, histological and biochemical analyzes. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022;298:115660. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dörr JA, Majolo F, Bortoluzzi L, et al. Antiulcerogenic potential of the ethanolic extract of Ceiba speciosa (A. St.-Hil.) ravenna evaluated by in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):15634. doi: 10.3390/ijms232415634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Azaba SS, Abdel Jaleelb GA, Eldahshanc OA. Anti-inflammatory and gastroprotective potential of leaf essential oil of Cinnamomum glanduliferum in ethanol-induced rat experimental gastritis. Pharm Biol. 2017;55(1):1654–1661. doi: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1314512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ajaib M, Ishtiaq S, Ishtiaq M, et al. Analysis of antidiabetic, antiulcer and analgesic potential of traditional ethnomedicinal plant Emex spinosa (L.) Campd. from Azad Jammu and Kashmir. PLoS One. 2022;17(10):1–21. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Saberi A, Abbasloo E, Sepehri G, et al. The effects of methanolic extract of Melissa Officinalis on experimental gastric ulcers in rats. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(7). doi: 10.5812/ircmj.24271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mostofa R, Ahmed S, Begum MM, et al. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory and gastric anti-ulcer activity of Phyllanthus niruri L. (Euphorbiaceae) leaves in experimental rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017;17(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1771-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brito SA, de Almeidade Almeida CLF, de Santana TI, et al. Antiulcer Activity and Potential Mechanism of Action of the Leaves of Spondias mombin L. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:1–20. doi: 10.1155/2018/1731459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meurer MC, Mees M, Mariano LNB, et al. Hydroalcoholic extract of Tagetes erecta L. flowers, rich in the carotenoid lutein, attenuates inflammatory cytokine secretion and improves the oxidative stress in an animal model of ulcerative colitis. Nutri Res. 2019;66:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Silva LP, De Angelis CD, Bonamin F, et al. A medicinal plant from the Caribbean pharmacopeia with anti-Helicobacter pylori and antiulcer action in experimental rodent models. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;159:285–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodriguez-Canales M, Jimenez-Rivas R, Canales-Martinez MM, et al. Protective effect of amphipterygium adstringens extract on dextran sulphate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in mice. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2016/8543561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deng X, Wang Y, Tian L, et al. Anneslea fragrans Wall. ameliorates ulcerative colitis via inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK activation and mediating intestinal barrier integrity. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;278:114304. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Szandruk M, Merwid-Ląd A, Szeląg A. The impact of mangiferin from Belamcanda chinensis on experimental colitis in rats. Inflammopharmacology. 2018;26(2):571–581. doi: 10.1007/s10787-017-0337-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sharma A, Tirpude NV, Kulurkar PM, Sharma R, Padwad Y. Berberis lycium fruit extract attenuates oxi-inflammatory stress and promotes mucosal healing by mitigating NF-κB/c-Jun/MAPKs signalling and augmenting splenic Treg proliferation in a murine model of dextran sulphate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59(6):2663–2681. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02114-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dou YX, Zhou JT, Wang TT, et al. Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system of bruceine D: a new approach for anti-ulcerative colitis. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:5887–5907. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S174146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mahmoud TN, El-Maadawy WH, Kandil ZA, Khalil H, El-fiky NM, El Alfy TSMA. Canna x generalis L.H. Bailey rhizome extract ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis via modulating intestinal mucosal dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, and TLR4/ NF-ҡB and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;269:113670. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li H, Chen X, Liu J, et al. Ethanol extract of Centella asiatica alleviated dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis: restoration on mucosa barrier and gut microbiota homeostasis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;267:113445. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sudirman S, Hsu YH, He JL, Kong ZL, Nakano H. Dietary polysaccharide-rich extract from Eucheuma cottonii modulates the inflammatory response and suppresses colonic injury on dextran sulfate sodiuminduced colitis in mice. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shen P, Zhang Z, Zhu K, et al. Evodiamine prevents dextran sulfate sodium-induced murine experimental colitis via the regulation of NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;110:786–795. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim TW, Shin JS, Chung KS, Lee YG, Baek NI, Lee KT. Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of koreanaside a, a lignan isolated from the flower of forsythia koreana, against LPS-induced macrophage activation and DSS-induced colitis mice: the crucial role of AP-1, NF-κB, and JAK/STAT signaling. Cells. 2019;8(10):1163. doi: 10.3390/cells8101163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Farombi EO, Adedara IA, Ajayi BO, Ayepola OR, Egbeme EE. Kolaviron, a natural antioxidant and anti-inflammatory phytochemical prevents dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis in rats. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;113(1):49–55. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang Y, Wang Y, Shen W, et al. Grape seed polyphenols ameliorated dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis via suppression of inflammation and apoptosis. Pharmacology. 2020;105(1–2):9–18. doi: 10.1159/000501897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aleisa AM, Al-Rejaie SS, Abuohashish HM, Ola MS, Parmar MY, Ahmed MM. Pretreatment of Gymnema sylvestre revealed the protection against acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Le Song J, Qian Y, Li GJ, Zhao X. Anti-inflammatory effects of kudingcha methanol extract (Ilex kudingcha C.J. Tseng) in dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8(4):1256–1262. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Batista JA, de Aguiar Magalhães D, Sousa SG, et al. Polysaccharides derived from Morinda citrifolia Linn reduce inflammatory markers during experimental colitis. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;248:112303. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Elmaksoud HAA, Motawea MH, Desoky AA, Elharrif MG, Ibrahimi A. Hydroxytyrosol alleviate intestinal inflammation, oxidative stress and apoptosis resulted in ulcerative colitis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;142:112073. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ayaz M, Junaid M, Ullah F, et al. GC-MS analysis and gastroprotective evaluations of crude extracts, isolated saponins, and essential oil from Polygonum hydropiper L. Front Chem. 2017;1–11. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2017.00058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Meurer M, Gonçalves B, Cury BJ, et al. Extract of Tagetes erecta L., a medicinal plant rich in lutein, promotes gastric healing and reduces ulcer recurrence in rodents. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022;293:115258. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ding A, Wen X. Dandelion root extract protects NCM460 colonic cells and relieves experimental mouse colitis. J Nat Med. 2018;72(4):857–866. doi: 10.1007/s11418-018-1217-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gautam MK, Goel S, Ghatule RR, Singh A, Nath G, Goel RK. Curative effect of Terminalia chebula extract on acetic acid-induced experimental colitis: role of antioxidants, free radicals and acute inflammatory marker. Inflammopharmacology. 2013;21(5):377–383. doi: 10.1007/s10787-012-0147-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rezeki S, Vidirachmilla N. The effect of noni leaves extract (Morinda citrifolia L) on wound healing percentage of traumatic ulcer in oral mucosa of Wistar rats (rattus norvegicus) by in vivo. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2017;10(4):1735–1740. doi: 10.13005/bpj/1286 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gavanji S, Larki B, Bakhtari A. The effect of extract of Punica granatum var. pleniflora for treatment of minor recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Integr Med Res. 2014;3(2):83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2014.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vaziri S, Mojarrab M, Farzaei MH, Najafi F, Ghobadi A. Evaluation of anti-aphthous activity of decoction of Nicotiana tabacum leaves as a mouthwash: a placebo-controlled clinical study. J Tradit Chin Med. 2016;36(2):160–164. doi: 10.1016/s0254-6272(16)30022-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hajiaghamohammadi AA, Zargar A, Oveisi S, Samimi R, Reisian S. To evaluate of the effect of adding licorice to the standard treatment regimen of Helicobacter pylori. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2016;20(6):534–538. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.07.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang M, Viennois E, Prasad M, et al. Edible ginger-derived nanoparticles: a novel therapeutic approach for the prevention and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and colitis-associated cancer. Biomaterials. 2016;101:321–340. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ansari M, Hashemipour M, Farsinejad A, et al. Clinical efficacy of a buccoadhesive paste from Fenugreek seeds (Trigonella foenum graecum L.) on recurrent aphthous stomatitis: in-vitro assessment of non-toxic concentration and pilot trial. Adv Integr Med. 2022;9(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.aimed.2021.06.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Malik T, Singh K, Gnanapandithan K. Peptic Ulcer Disease. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534792/. Accessed January 25, 2024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lanas A, Chan F. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):613–624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32404-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Agreus L, Talley N, Jones M. Value of the “Test & Treat” strategy for uninvestigated dyspepsia at low prevalence rates of helicobacter pylori in the population. Helicobacter. 2016;21(3):186–191. doi: 10.1111/hel.12267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Narayanan M, Reddy KM, Marsicano E. Peptic ulcer disease and helicobacter pylori infection. Mo Med. 2018;115(3):219–224. doi: 10.1097/00001574-199208010-00019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lanas-Gimeno A, Lanas A. Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulant treatment. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16(6):673–685. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1325870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Molnar T. Pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: similarities, differences and a lot of things we do not know yet. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2014;05(04). doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000253 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Probert CSJ, Dignass AU, Lindgren S, Oudkerk Pool M, Marteau P. Combined oral and rectal mesalazine for the treatment of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis: rapid symptom resolution and improvements in quality of life. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2014;8(3):200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kapoor B, Kaur G, Gupta M, Gupta R. Sub-chronic safety evaluation of aqueous extract of Alangium salvifolium (L.f.) Wangerin leaves in rats. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2017;8(3):108–113. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_69_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Acute severe ulcerative colitis: state of the art treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;32–33:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lynch W, Hsu R. Ulcerative Colitis. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459282/. Accessed January 25, 2024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cowie MR. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(4):195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sz Tun G, Harris A, Lobo AJ. Ulcerative colitis: management in adults, children and young people – concise guidance. Clin Med. 2017;17(5):429–462. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-5-429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Trivedi I, Darguzas E, Balbale SN, et al. Patient understanding of “flare” and “remission” of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2019;42(4):375–385. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lewis JD, Abreu MT. Diet as a trigger or therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(2):398–414.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sarbagili-Shabat C, Sigall-Boneh R, Levine A. Nutritional therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31(4):303–308. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sigall-Boneh R, Levine A, Lomer M, et al. Research gaps in diet and nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease. A topical review by D-ECCO working group [Dietitians of ECCO]. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2017;11(12):1407–1419. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yao CK, Sarbagili-Shabat C. Gaseous metabolites as therapeutic targets in ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(4):682–691. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i4.682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Roediger WEW. Causation of human ulcerative colitis: a lead from an animal model that mirrors human disease. JGH Open. 2019;3(4):277–280. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Steinhart AH, Fernandes A. Clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of nonhospitalized ulcerative colitis: the patient perspective. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;29(6):294–296. doi: 10.1155/2015/214937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ling T, Lang WH, Maier J, Centurion MQ, Rivas F. Cytostatic and cytotoxic natural products against cancer cell models. Molecules. 2019;24(10):2012. doi: 10.3390/molecules24102012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shayesteh F, Haidari F, Shayesteh AA, Mohammadi-Asl J, Ahmadi-Angali K. Ginger in patients with active ulcerative colitis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4193-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yang C, Sung J, Long D, Alghoul Z, Merlin D. Prevention of ulcerative colitis by autologous metabolite transfer from colitogenic microbiota treated with lipid nanoparticles encapsulating an anti-inflammatory drug candidate. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(6):1233. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.InformedHealth.org. Canker Sores (mouth ulcers). Inst Qual Effic Heal Care; 2019. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546250/. Accessed October 1, 2023.
  • 73.Grimaux X, Leducq S, Goupille P, Aubourg A, Miquelestorena-Standley E, Samimi M. Aphthous mouth ulcers as an initial manifestation of sécukinumab-induced inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2018;145(11):676–682. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2018.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Borilova Linhartova P, Janos J, Slezakova S, et al. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis and gene variability in selected interleukins: a case–control study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126(6):485–492. doi: 10.1111/eos.12577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Brignardello-Petersen R. Patients who seek professional treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis probably have an increased risk of having head and neck cancer and other types of cancers. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019;150(2):e24. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu H, Tan L, Fu G, Chen L, Tan H. Efficacy of topical intervention for recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a network meta-analysis. Med. 2022;58. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sridevi Anjuga EP, Aravindha Babu N. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis for dental practitioners. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14:1099–1104. doi: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.11657 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Altenburg A, El-Haj N, Micheli C, et al. The treatment of chronic recurrent oral aphthous ulcers. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(40):665–673. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yuan H, Qiu J, Zhang T, Wu X, Zhou J, Park S. Quantitative changes of Veillonella, Streptococcus, and Neisseria in the oral cavity of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;129. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rostas A, McLean DI, Wilkinson RD. Management of recurrent aphthous stomatitis - A review. Res J Pharm Technol. 2014;7:1193–1195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Muni Raja Lakshmi K, Kiran M, Sai Prasanna K. A review on natural plants for phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activities. J Drug Delivery Ther. 2021;11(2):232–236. doi: 10.22270/jddt.v11i2.4593 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cheng YT, Lu CC, Yen GC. Phytochemicals enhance antioxidant enzyme expression to protect against NSAID-induced oxidative damage of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jo HJ, Kim N, Nam RH, et al. The effect of cochinchina momordica seed extract on gastric acid secretion and morphologic change in aged rat stomach. Gut Liver. 2013;7(5):560–568. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2013.7.5.560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ngoua-Meye-Misso R-L, Sima-Obiang C, Ndong JDLC, Ondo JP, Ovono Abessolo F, Obame-Engonga L-C. Phytochemical screening, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiangiogenic activities of Lophira procera A. Chev. (Ochnaceae) medicinal plant from Gabon. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci. 2018;5:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbas.2017.11.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sorg C. Macrophages in acute and chronic inflammation. Chest. 1991;100(3):173S–175S. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.3.173s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Brenner D, Blaser H, Mak TW. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor signalling: live or let die. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(6):362–374. doi: 10.1038/nri3834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kanji S, Das H. Advances of stem cell therapeutics in cutaneous wound healing and regeneration. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2017/5217967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Morningstar-Wright L, Czinn SJ, Piazuelo MB, Banerjee A, Godlewska R, Blanchard TG. The TNF-alpha inducing protein is associated with gastric inflammation and hyperplasia in a murine model of helicobacter pylori infection. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1–15. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.817237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Coleman JW. Nitric oxide in immunity and inflammation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2001;1(8):1397–1406. doi: 10.1016/S1567-5769(01)00086-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhang J-M, An J. Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int Anesth Clin. 2007;45(2):27–37. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e318034194e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Xiao T, Yan Z, Xiao S, Xia Y. Proinflammatory cytokines regulate epidermal stem cells in wound epithelialization. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01755-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Boniakowski AE, Kimball AS, Jacobs BN, Kunkel SL, Gallagher KA. Macrophage-mediated inflammation in normal and diabetic wound healing. J Immunol. 2017;199(1):17–24. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ashcroft GS MN, Jeong MJ, Ashworth JJ, Hardman M, Jin W. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a therapeutic target for impaired cutaneous wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(1):38–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00748.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Rocha Caldas GF, Oliveira ARDS, Araújo AV, et al. Gastroprotective mechanisms of the monoterpene 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol). PLoS One. 2015;10(8):1–17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Al Asmari A, Al Shahrani H, Al Masri N, Al Faraidi A, Elfaki I, Arshaduddin M. Vanillin abrogates ethanol induced gastric injury in rats via modulation of gastric secretion, oxidative stress and inflammation, Toxicol. Reports. 2016;3:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ahmed I, Roy BC, Khan SA, Septer S, Umar S. Microbiome, metabolome and inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms. 2016;4(2):20. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms4020020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Settanni CR, Ianiro G, Bibbò S, Cammarota G, Gasbarrini A. Gut microbiota alteration and modulation in psychiatric disorders: current evidence on fecal microbiota transplantation. Prog Neuro Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;109:110258. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Keubler LM, Buettner M, Häger C, Bleich A. A multihit model: colitis lessons from the interleukin-10-deficient mouse. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(8):1967–1975. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Drug Design, Development and Therapy are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES