Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Feb 5;19(2):e0296187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296187

A study of roflumilast treatment on functional and structural changes in hippocampus in depressed Adult male Wistar rats

Ghida Hassan 1,*, Sherif A Kamar 2,3, Hagar Yousry Rady 2,4, Dina Sayed Abdelrahim 5,6, Nesma Hussein Abdel Hay Ibrahim 7, Noha N Lasheen 1,8
Editor: Abeer El Wakil9
PMCID: PMC10843119  PMID: 38315652

Abstract

Depression is a common stress disability disorder that affects higher mental functions including emotion, cognition, and behavior. It may be mediated by inflammatory cytokines that interfere with neuroendocrine function, and synaptic plasticity. Therefore, reductions in inflammation might contribute to treatment response. The current study aims to evaluate the role of Protein Kinase (PKA)- cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)- brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) signaling pathway in depression and the effects of roflumilast (PDE4 inhibitor) as potential antidepressant on the activity of the PKA-CREB-BDNF signaling pathway, histology, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Forty Adult male Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: Control group, Positive Control group: similar to the controls but received Roflumilast (3 mg / kg / day) by oral gavage for the last 4 weeks of the experiment, Depressed group which were exposed to chronic stress for 6 weeks, and Roflumilast-treated group which were exposed to chronic stress for 6 weeks and treated by Roflumilast (3 mg / kg / day) by oral gavage for the last 4 weeks of the experiment. The depressed group showed significant increase in immobility time with significant decrease in swimming and struggling times, significant decrease in hippocampal PKA, CERB, BDNF, Dopamine, Cortisone, and Superoxide dismutase while hippocampal Phosphodiesterase-E4, Interleukin-6, and Malondialdhyde levels were significantly elevated. These findings were significantly reversed upon Roflumilast treatment. Therefore, it could be concluded that depression is a neurodegenerative inflammatory disease and oxidative stress plays a key role in depression. Roflumilast treatment attenuated the depression behavior in rats denoting its neuroprotective, and anti-inflammatory effects.

Introduction

Depression is a widespread condition that affects people of all sexes, ages, socioeconomic classes, and species. According to the World Health Organization, depression is considered the main factor contributing to disability. In addition to feelings of guilt, poor focus, low self-esteem, sleep difficulties, and disturbed appetite, it also manifests as a lack of interest, desire, and pleasure [1].

Stress hormones are consistently over-secreted in depression, which leads to severe clinical manifestations and inhibits a sufficient response to stress. These hormones influence higher mental functions including emotion, cognition, and behavior in the brain by acting as neuromodulators. An important risk factor for making someone susceptible to stress-related diseases is chronic stress, which increases the production of corticosteroids and affects corticosteroid-receptor signaling [2]. According to a subsequent research, depression is a complex condition with many underlying causes and has been linked to an increased chance of developing serious medical conditions, including diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, cardiovascular disease, and stroke [1].

It was hypothesized that chronic stress might suppress neurogenesis, retract dendritic processes, and cause neuronal death in the hippocampus since research on people subjected to chronic stress revealed decreased hippocampal sizes [3].

Additionally, depression may cause disturbances in the way the brain regulates glucose and may be linked to cognitive decline. Leptin levels, negative mood, and sleep disruptions were revealed to be strongly positively correlated with one another [4]. Rats’ ventral striatum’s basal and feeding-stimulated dopamine (DA) release can both be reduced by leptin [5]. Furthermore, long-term inhibition of leptin signaling in the ventral tegmental area promotes locomotor activity whereas activation of leptin receptors suppresses firing of ventral tegmental area DA neurons [6]. Major depression may also result from an imbalance of ghrelin feedback in brain areas responsible for mood regulation. It has been discovered that ghrelin controls mood, dopaminergic characteristics, and the growth of the central nervous system. In both mice and people, it has antidepressant effects that have an impact on rewarding behavior [7].

Acute phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein and haptoglobin, as well as inflammatory cytokines like interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and TNF-alpha were shown to be typically related with illness behavior and depression, respectively. Such inflammatory cytokines can interact with any mediator associated with depression, including synaptic plasticity, neurotransmitter metabolism, and neuroendocrine function. Accordingly, inflammatory alterations may play a role in the development of depressive disorders, and as a result, decreasing inflammation may improve treatment outcomes [8].

It has been established that brain monoamines including norepinephrine (NE), serotonin (5-HT), and dopamine (DA), as well as their metabolites, play a role in the etiology of depression. Therefore, NE, 5-HT, and DA neurotransmitter deficits aggravate depressive diseases [9].

Numerous tools were examined, such as the Protein Kinase CAMP-Initiated Reactant Subunit Alpha (PRKACA) overflow, a significant cell signaling pathway that may be linked to the onset of depression by regulating synaptic pliancy, cytokinesis, transcriptional guidance, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis [10]. Additionally, CREB is a transcriptional regulator that controls the expression of brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), a significant biomarker of depression [11], which is crucial for neuronal survival and function [12]. Recently, it was discovered that CREB/BDNF expression is essential for the pathophysiology of depression [13].

The chronic restraint stress (CRS) model is a well-established model for producing depressive-like behavior in animals [14]. It’s interesting to note that CRS results in long-lasting neuroinflammation, which is a key pathophysiologic cause of severe depressive disorders [15]. Furthermore, it was discovered that CRS reduced BDNF levels [16]. However, in the hippocampus and cortex of mammals, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is produced and selectively hydrolyzes cAMP to 5′-AMP. In recent years, it has been speculated as a possible depression drug target [17]. PDE4 inhibitors have been reported to reduce symptoms similar to depression. The PDE4 inhibitors that have currently been discovered include rolipram, roflumilast, ibudilast, MK-0952, HT-0712, GEBR-32a, and FFPM. It has been established that roflumilast plays a part in both synaptic plasticity and learning memory [18]. Roflumilast was discovered to enhance synaptic plasticity and memory formation in rats [19] and to lessen depression-like behavior in mice with Alzheimer disease [20]. According to these studies, roflumilast may one day be used as an antidepressant.

This study investigated the effects of roflumilast (PDE4 inhibitor) on the activity of the PRKACA-CREB-BDNF signaling pathway, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and change in hippocampal histology in male Wistar rats exposed to CRS model of depression. This study demonstrated the PKA-CREB-BDNF signaling pathway role in controlling stress-induced microenvironmental changes connected to a variety of neurological disorders, including depression.

Materials and methods

Ethics approval

All animal protocols complied with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85–23, revised 2011) and were conducted with the approval of Physiology Department and by Faculty of Medicine-Ain Shams University research ethics committee, the approval number is FMASU R 133/2022.

Animals

This study was performed on Forty adult Wistar male rats weighing between 150 and 200 g, purchased from the Holding Company for Biological Products and Vaccines (VACCERA), Helwan, Egypt. In the animal house of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, rats were housed in groups of 4–5 rats in plexiglass cages with a mesh wire cover, with pelleted rat chow (Meladco, El Obour, Egypt) and tap water available ad libitum. To lessen the possibility of animal distress, rats were allowed to acclimatize to the laboratory conditions before any experiments for 2 weeks. Temperature was maintained at 25 °C, relative humidity 50–60%, and 12 h light/dark cycle at 5:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. All efforts were made to reduce unneeded animal suffering or stress, and the handling was done by a trained laboratory specialist with the utmost care and cleanliness. Rats were chosen because their brains are relatively large, the animals are less timid and more intelligent, and some of their brain structure resembles the more primitive elements of human brains, and hence they can be used to model some human behaviors [21].

The methods of Euthanasia, at the end of the experiment animals were killed by overdose of anesthesia. Disposal of animal remains done by incineration.

Rats were randomly divided into four groups:

  1. Control group (n = 10); which were fed balanced chow diet-ad libitum-for 6 weeks.

  2. Positive control group (n = 10); which were similar to the controls but received Roflumilast (Western Pharmaceutical Industries) (WESTABREATH 500 ®) 3 mg / kg / day, by oral gavage, dissolved in distilled water for the last 4 weeks of the experiment [22].

  3. Depressed group (n = 10), which were exposed to chronic restraint stress for 6 weeks. The stress procedure was carried out in a different room by using a mild stress, restraint, which consisted of placing rats in Plexiglas tubes (25 x 8 cm) wide enough to allow comfortable breathing but restricting their movement, for 4 hours per day for 6 weeks performed at fixed time. Every stress session was carried out between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM [23].

  4. Roflumilast-treated group (n = 10): rats were exposed to chronic restraint stress 4 hours per day for 6 weeks and were treated by Roflumilast (Western Pharmaceutical Industries) (WESTABREATH 500 ®) 3 mg / kg / day, by oral gavage, dissolved in distilled water for the last 4 weeks of the experiment [22].

Behavioral tests

At the end of 6 weeks, the experimental period, all animals were subjected to behavioral tests including Open Field Test (OFT) and Forced Swimming Test (FST) [24].

Open Field Test (OFT)

Rats were given one hour to get used to the test room before the test began. Each rat was left alone for five minutes in the middle of a quadrangular arena (60x60 cm, divided into 16 identical squares) that was well-lit. The following characteristics were determined: the number of squares traversed (with all four feet crossed), the amount of time spent in the central zone (central four squares), the frequency of entry, and the latency to leave the central zone. After each rat, the OFT arena was cleaned with 10% alcohol [24].

Forced Swimming Test (FST)

Rats swam in water that was 35 cm deep during FST in a vertical Plexiglass cylinder that was 22 cm in diameter and 50 cm in height. The water was kept at a constant 25 °C temperature. The rats swam for 15 minutes on the first day of training. On the next day (test day), rats swam for five minutes. Calculations of the immobility, swimming, and struggling times were made. Each rat underwent the test just once. Following each animal’s test, the water was replaced [24].

Sacrifice and sample collection

On the day of sacrifice, overnight fasted rats were anaesthetized with intraperitoneal injection of Pentobarbitone (40 mg/kg body weight) with booster doses as needed. The dose was given according to the guideline of rodent anesthesia analgesia formulary-UBC animal care [25].

When the stage of surgical anesthesia (judged by loss of withdrawal reflexes) had been reached, the animal was placed on its back and fixed on the operating table. The rat skull was opened, and the brain was dissected and washed by saline. The hippocampus was reached from the medial side after division of the brain at the mid sagittal plane into right and left hemispheres, followed by removal of the whole brain stem and cerebellum [26].

The hippocampus from all studied groups were stored at -80°C for subsequent biochemical studies:

  • 1-Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) method for PDE-4 and phosphorylated CERB determination

RNA extraction

Total RNA was extracted from homogenized tissues of all different groups using Direct-zol RNA Miniprep Plus (Cat# R2072, ZYMO RESEARCH CORP. USA) and then quantity and quality were assessed by Beckman dual spectrophotometer (USA).

Real time PCR

SuperScript IV One-Step RT-PCR kit (Cat# 12594100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) was utilized for reverse transcription of extracted RNA followed by PCR. 96-well plate StepOne instrument (Applied Biosystem, USA) was used in a thermal profile as follows: 10 minutes at 45 ºC for reverse transcription, 2 minutes at 98 ºC for RT inactivation and initial denaturation by 40 cycles of 10 seconds at 98ºC, 10 seconds at 55 ºC and 30 second at 72 ºC for the amplification step. After the RT-PCR run the data were expressed in Cycle threshold (Ct) for the target genes and housekeeping gene. Normalization for variation in the expression of target genes; PDE-4, and CREB were performed referring to the mean critical threshold (CT) expression values of GAPDH housekeeping gene by the ΔΔCt method. The relative quantitation (RQ) of each target gene is quantified according to the calculation of 2-ΔΔCt method. Primers sequence for PDE-4 gene was; forward 5′- GCTTGAACACCAACGTCCCACGGT -3′, and reverse 5՝- GCTGAGGTTCTGGAAGATGTCGCAG -3′ (gene bank accession number NM_013101.4), CREB gene was; forward 5′- GAGACCTGGCCAGAGGATAC -3′, and reverse 5՝- GTCAGTGAGCAAGAGAACGC -3′ (gene bank accession number NM_001005562.2), and GAPDH housekeeping gene was; forward 5’- CCTCGTCTCATAGACAAGATGGT -3’ and reverse 5’- GGGTAGAGTCATACTGGAACATG -3’ (gene bank accession number NM_001394060.2).

  • 2-Measurements of proteins by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in hippocampus tissues:

Preparation of tissue homogenate

Animals after they were sacrificed, tissues were washed thoroughly and rinsed with ice. They were gently blotted between the folds of a filter paper and weighed in an analytical balance. 10% of homogenate was prepared in 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) using a polytron homogenizer at 4°C. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min for removing the cell debris, unbroken cells, nuclei, erythrocytes and mitochondria. The supernatant (cytoplasmic extract) was used to measure PRKACA, BDNF, IL-6, Dopamine, Cortisol, SOD and MDA according to the manual instructions [27].

Determination of tissue protein

Protein content in the tissue was determined using Genei, Bangalore, protein estimation kit (Bangalore, Indian, Catalog # 2624800021730) [28].

All ELISA kits were measured by ELISA reader. Color absorbance was read at OD range 490 to 630 nm using an Enzyme-Linked Immuno-Sorbent Assay (ELISA) plate reader (Stat Fax 2200, Awareness Technologies, Florida, USA).

Protein Kinase CAMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PRKACA) was measured using Rat Protein Kinase A ELISA Kit (Bio-assay technology laboratory), the concentration of BDNF, IL-6 in tissues (pg/mg) were measured using Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay Kit for BDNF and IL- 6 (Cloud Cone Corporation). DA and Corticosterone (CORT) were measured using Mouse / Rat Dopamine ELISA Assay Kit (Eagle Bioscience, Catalog No, DOU39-K01) and Rat cortisol ELISA Kit (CUSABIO, Catalog No, CSB-E05112r) respectively.

Measurement of oxidative stress markers

The activities of SOD (U/mg) & MDA (nmol/mg) were determined by using Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activity Assay Kit (BioVision, USA, Catalog #K335), and Lipid Peroxidation (MDA) Colorimetric/Fluorometric (BioVision, USA, Catalog # K739) respectively.

(II) Histological studies

Histological studies

The brain hemispheres were processed for paraffin blocks. Serial parasagittal sections were done. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin [29]. Other specimens 1mm3 were immediately fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde and processed for semithin sections. Sections were stained with Toluidine blue [30]. The sections were examined with an Olympus light microscope (CX31) equipped with digital camera in Anatomy department and were photographed.

GFAP immunohistochemistry was done to demonstrate the astrocytes. Sections were Deparaffinated, hydrated and incubated in blocking solution TBT [Tris Base Saline (TBS), 0.5 M pH 7.4 containing 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and 0.05% (v/v) Triton X-100]. Sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber with the anti- glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) mouse monoclonal antibody at a 1:50 dilution. Slides were washed for 5 min in TBS. Immunodetection was performed using biotinylated anti-mouse immunoglobulins then incubation with 3,3 diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen (DAKO) in hydrogen peroxide for 5–10 minutes (brown staining). The sections were lightly counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted [31].

Statistical analysis

All results in this study were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) program, version 20.0 was used to compare significance between groups. One Way ANOVA (Analysis Of Variance) for difference between means of different groups was performed on the results obtained in the present study. Differences were considered significant when P is ≤ 0.05.

Results

Behavioral tests, FST

As regards FST, immobility time was significantly elevated, meanwhile, swimming and struggle times were significantly lowered in untreated depressed groups compared to the controls (P≤0.001). However, immobility time was significantly lowered, swimming time was significantly elevated in treated depressed group compared to the untreated depressed rats (P≤0.001). Immobility and struggle times were significantly elevated in positive control rats, while swimming time was significantly lowered when compared to the control group (P≤0.001), as shown in Fig 1A.

Fig 1. Effects of Roflumilast on: (A) Forced swimming test and (B) Open Field test and (C) Number of crossed squares in Depressed Adult Male Wistar Rats (n = 10).

Fig 1

a: P<0.05 versus control group, b: P<0,05 versus depressed group.

Behavioral tests, OFT

As regards OFT, total number of crossed squares was significantly decreased, meanwhile, time spend in the central zone and latency to leave the central zone were significantly increased in untreated depressed groups compared to the controls (P≤0.001, P≤0.05, P≤0.001 respectively). However, total number of crossed squares was significantly elevated, latency to leave the central zone was significantly lowered in treated depressed group compared to the untreated depressed rats (P≤0.001, P≤0.01 respectively). The total number of crossed squares and the latency to leave the central zone were significantly lowered in positive control rats, when compared to the control group (P≤0.001, P≤0.05 respectively), as shown in Fig 1B & 1C.

Changes in PKA -CREB-BDNF signaling pathway

Regarding hippocampal PKA, CERB and BDNF levels were significantly lowered in untreated depressed group compared to the control group (P≤0.001 for each). they were significantly elevated in Roflumilast-treated depressed group compared to the untreated depressed rats (P≤0.001 for each). Non-significant changes were present in positive controls when compared to negative control ones, as shown in Fig 2B–2D.

Fig 2. Effects of Roflumilast on (A): Phosphodiesterase 4, gene expression (B): CERB gene expression, (C): level of PKA and (D): level of BDNF in Depressed Adult Male Wistar Rats (n = 10).

Fig 2

a: P<0.05 versus control group, b: P<0.05 versus depressed group.

Changes in hippocampal PDE4 gene expression and IL-6

Meanwhile, hippocampal PDE4 and IL-6 levels, they were significantly elevated in untreated and Roflumilast-treated depressed groups compared to the controls (P≤0.001, P≤0.05, P≤0.001, P≤0.05 respectively). However, they were significantly lowered in Roflumilast-treated depressed group compared to the untreated depressed ones (P≤0.001 for both). No significant differences were observed in positive controls when compared to negative control rats, as shown in Figs 2A and 3A.

Fig 3. Effects of Roflumilast on hippocampal levels of: (A) IL6, (B) dopamine and (C) cortisone in Depressed Adult Male Wistar Rats (n = 10)a: P<0.05 versus control group, b: P<0.05 versus depressed group.

Fig 3

Changes in DA and CORT

Both hippocampal DA and CORT were significantly decreased in untreated depressed group compared to the controls (P≤0.001 for each), meanwhile, both were significantly increased in Roflumilast-treated depressed group compared to the untreated depressed rats (P≤0.001 for each), as shown in Fig 3B & 3C.

Oxidative stress markers changes

As shown in Fig 4, the untreated depressed group had significant higher hippocampal MDA level and significant lower hippocampal SOD level when compared to control ones (P≤0.001 for each), while Roflumilast-treated depressed rats had significantly lowered hippocampal MDA and significantly elevated hippocampal SOD compared to the untreated depressed rats (P≤0.001, for each). Non-significant differences were observed when comparing positive controls and negative control rats.

Fig 4. Effects of Roflumilast on hippocampal oxidative stress markers (Malondialdhyde "MDA" and Superoxide Dismutase "SOD") in depressed Adult male Wistar rats (n = 10).

Fig 4

a: P<0.05 versus control group, b: P<0.05 versus depressed group.

Histological results

Histological examination of both the control and positive control groups showed almost the same results in all the examined stained sections, so the selected photomicrographs of the control group will be also representing for the positive control group.

Histological examination of both the control and positive control groups showed almost the same results in all the examined stained sections.

H&E stained sections

Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Control group showed that the hippocampal formation was formed of two regions; the hippocampus proper (Cornu Ammonis, with its four regions; CA1, CA2, CA3 and CA4) and the dentate gyrus (DG) (Fig 5). The cells forming the CA1 region were arranged in three layers: the polymorphic layer, the pyramidal cell layer and the molecular layer. The pyramidal cell layer appeared to be the principal layer of the hippocampus proper and was formed of pyramidal cells with large rounded vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Both the polymorphic and the molecular layers showed scanty scattered glial cells (Fig 6a).

Fig 5. Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Control group.

Fig 5

Fig 6.

Fig 6

a. Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Control group. b. Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Positive control group. c. Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Depressed group. d. Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Roflumilast-treated group.

Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Positive control group showed that the pyramidal cell layer was formed of pyramidal cells with large rounded vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Both the polymorphic and the molecular layers showed scanty scattered glial cells (Fig 6b).

Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Depressed group revealed that most of the pyramidal cells had irregular outlines with dark deeply stained nuclei with pericellular spaces (vacuolations) around some of the pyramidal cells. Also, pericellular vacuolation around the glial cells and spacing within the molecular layer and the polymorphic layers were detected (Fig 6c).

Examination of the H&E stained sections of CA1 region of the Roflumilast-treated group showed that most of the pyramidal cells had large rounded vesicular nuclei with prominent nucleoli. Few pyramidal cells showed irregular outlines and variable sizes with darkly stained nuclei and pericellular spaces. Pericellular vacuolation around the glial cells and spacing within the molecular layer and the polymorphic layers were detected (Fig 6d).

Toliudine blue stained semithin sections

Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Control group showed that the pyramidal layer was formed of densely packed pyramidal cells with large rounded vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli with projecting processes. The presence of glial cells with pale ovoid nuclei and lightly stained cytoplasm was detected within the molecular and polymorphic layers (Fig 7a).

Fig 7.

Fig 7

a. Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Control group. b. Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Positive control group. c. Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Depressed group. d. Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Roflumilast-treated group.

Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Positive control group showed that the pyramidal layer was formed of densely packed pyramidal cells with large rounded vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli (Fig 7b).

Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Depressed group showed the pyramidal cells with irregular outlines, variable sizes and with dark deeply stained nuclei. Many glial cells with pale ovoid nuclei and lightly stained cytoplasm throughout the layers were also detected (Fig 7c).

Examination of the toliudine blue stained semithin sections of CA1 region of the Roflumilast-treated group revealed that most of the pyramidal cells within the pyramidal layer appeared densely packed with large rounded vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli and with projecting processes. Very few pyramidal cells had dark deeply stained nuclei with irregular outline. Few glial cells with pale ovoid nuclei and lightly stained cytoplasm could be seen within the within the molecular and polymorphic layers (Fig 7d).

Immunohistochemical (GFAP) stained sections

Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 region of the Control group showed apparent minimal GFAP immunostaining of the astrocytes represented by minimal brownish color (Fig 8a).

Fig 8.

Fig 8

a. Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 region of the Control group. b. Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 of the Positive control group. c. Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 region of the Depressed group. d. Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 region of the Roflumilast-treated group.

Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 region of the Positive control group showed apparent minimal GFAP immunostaining of the astrocytes represented by minimal brownish color (Fig 8b).

Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 region of the Depressed group showed apparent extensive GFAP immunostaining of the astrocytes with ramifying processes along the layers (Fig 8c).

Examination of the GFAP stained sections of CA1 region of the Roflumilast-treated group revealed apparent minimal GFAP immunostaining of the astrocytes (Fig 8d).

Correlation studies

In the current study, significant negative correlations exist in all studied groups between malondialdhyde (MDA) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CERB), Protein Kinase CAMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PRKACA), Brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), Dopamine (DA) and Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) while a significant positive correlation exists between MDA and Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Corticosterone (CORT) (Table 1). Also, significant negative correlations were observed between PDE4 and CERB, PRKACA, BDNF while there was a significant positive correlation exists between PDE4 and IL-6 (Table 2). In addition, there were significant negative correlations between DA and the immobility time, time Spent in Central Zone, Latency to Leave Central Zone, while significant positive correlations were found between DA and swimming time, struggle time and total no. of crossed squares, as shown in Table 3.

Table 1. Correlations of malondialdhyde (MDA) and other parameters in all studied groups: (cAMP response element-binding protein (CERB), Protein Kinase CAMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PRKACA), Brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), Dopamine (DA), Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Corticosterone (CORT)).

CERB PRKACA BDNF DA SOD PDE4 IL-6 CORT
R -0.65 -0.72 -0.69 -0.67 -0.72 0.66 0.78 0.64
P ≤0.01 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.01

Table 2. Correlations of Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CERB), Protein Kinase CAMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PRKACA), Brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6).

CERB PRKACA BDNF IL-6
R -.0871 -0.894 -0.761 0.809
P ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001

Table 3. Correlations of Dopamine (DA) and findings of behavioral tests in all studied parameters.

Immobility Time Time Spent in Central Zone Latency To Leave Central Zone Swimming Time Struggle Time Total No. Of Crossed Squares
R -0.885 -0.485 -0.664 0.844 0.456 0.741
P ≤0.001 ≤0.01 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.05 ≤0.001

Discussion

Due to the recent trend toward identifying novel therapeutic targets for depression, this study investigated the effects of chronic restraint stress (CRS)-induced depression on many neurotransmitters and mediators in hippocampi, also treatment with roflumilast and its role in alleviation of such changes. This study revealed CRS-induced depressive-like behavior manifested by higher FST immobility time with reduced swimming and struggling times, denoting the development of anhedonia and behavioral despair, key features of human depressive symptomatology [32]. The decreased number of crossed squares and the increased latency to leave central zone in open field test (OFT) reflect a freezing behavior, an index of the depression-associated anxiety [33]. The depressive-like behavior was associated with alteration in some biochemical parameters such Protein Kinase cAMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PRKACA), Phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), Phosphodiesterase E4 (PDE4).

Meanwhile, roflumilast treatment reversed CRS-depressive-like behavior. Similarly, there was lowered immobility time in APP/PS1 transgenic mice, a widely used model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) Wang et al. (2020) [20]. In line, roflumilast reversed cognition deficits and depression-like effects in APP/PS1 transgenic mice [34]. Roflumilast enhanced imipramine’s effect, suggesting its superior efficacy as an adjuvant to standard antidepressants [35]. Our finding is aligned with the study of Hasan et al. (2022) [36], which demonstrated that roflumilast increased rats ‘exploratory potential as it increases number of crossed squares in OFT. In line, Waltrick et al. (2023) [37] demonstrated the antidepressive effects of roflumilast in the form of increased latency to leave central zone.

The underlying mechanism of depression was suggested to be mediated by chronic hypercortisolemia, which results in excessive release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), increased NF-B transcriptional activity, and decreased synthesis of neurotrophic factors in many glucocorticoid receptor rich brain areas, such as the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus, with subsequent induction of structural and functional deficits. This sustained "stress responsive" HPA axis hyperactivity has been linked to the pathophysiology of depression and its associated cognitive dysfunction [38, 39]. PDE inhibitors were, also, suggested to modulate brain functions by altering the cAMP/cGMP/BDNF signaling [40].

In the current study, depression was manifested by reduction in hippocampal Protein Kinase cAMP-Activated Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PRKACA), Phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (CERB) and Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, however, there was a rise of hippocampal Phosphodiesterase E4 (PDE4) level. These changes were reversed by treatment with roflumilast.

BDNF has been found to be essential in sustaining synaptic plasticity, synapse development, and neuronal proliferation. The phosphorylation of cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) regulates BDNF expression, which is a target for alleviating neuron injury. CREB phosphorylation is controlled by cAMP PKA [41]. PDE4, a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) hydrolase, uses the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway to control CREB phosphorylation [42].

In the current study, there was downregulation in hippocampal gene expression of BDNF, denoting reduced intracellular signaling pathways. The lowered BDNF expression confirmed by the significant decrease in CERB and PKA may explain the depressive behavior in depressed rats, herein. Moreover, PDE4 was significantly increased in depressed rats reflecting its role in inducing depression. Similarly, Zhong et al. (2019) [43], suggested that reduction of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) causes neuronal apoptosis. In line, low BDNF levels may be lowered in the cerebral cortex of depressed and suicide subjects [44]. In support, there is a significant inverse relationship between BDNF blood levels and depression scores in depressed patients [45].

As a result, roflumilast, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) that promotes BDNF expression and alleviates depression-induced neuronal injury and apoptosis, induces CREB phosphorylation, similar to Zhang et al. [46]. They suggested that roflumilast affected BDNF through acting on the cAMP/CREB signaling pathway, by inhibiting PDE-4 actions. The elevated IL-6 levels in untreated and Roflumilast-treated depressed groups, despite being lowered in Roflumilast-treated depressed group compared to the untreated depressed ones could be explained by chronic stress-induced activation of inflammatory pathways triggering the development of depression, thus depressive disorders could partly be explained by some inflammatory mediators, namely increased IL-6.

Also, the higher IL-6 levels in depressed rats, herein, could be attributed to depression-induced alteration of local brain activity [47]. As cytokines affect brain activity through neurotransmitter-depletion, neuroendocrine changes, and neural plasticity pathways, inflammatory cytokines may inhibit neurogenesis. In support, anti-inflammatory administration caused recovery or enhancement of neurogenesis [48]. Thus, chronic stress was found to stimulate cytokine release to blood and microglia hindering neurogenesis. Depression was explained by the neurogenic theory which suggested that impaired neurogenesis caused depression, so, anti-depressive drugs could improve neurogenesis [49].

The IL-6-lowering effect of roflumilast, in the present study, could be due to its targeting effects in the neurotrophic pathway in ameliorating the depressive manifestations through lowering the neurotrophic factors, altering the plasticity and neurogenesis in the brain, thereby having anti-depressant potentials. Therefore, the reduced immobility time and the anti-depressant activity, observed herein, could be explained by adjusting neurotrophic pathways.

Therefore, depression, a neurodegenerative inflammatory disease, may be caused by oxidative stress. This was confirmed through the correlation study which showed that the increased oxidative markers in the depressed rats evidenced by higher MDA resulted in decline in the CERB, PRKACA and BDNF. The latter two factors are essential for the neuronal viability and synaptic plasticity in the adult brain that are important in cognitive flexibility and an increased ability to adapt with environmental challenges that may precipitate or exacerbate depressive episodes. On the other side, the increased MDA resulted in significant increase in the PDE4, IL-6.

The lowered hippocampal dopamine (DA), herein, in untreated depressed rats may be attributed to stress-induced downregulation of dopaminergic pathways causing depression, in accordance, many studies [50, 51]. The higher DA levels caused by Roflumilast administration, herein, may be attributed to an increase of DA synthesis and turnover in striatum, thereby the dopamine D1 receptor signaling is enhanced in frontal cortical pyramidal neurons [52].

Interestingly, hippocampal corticosteroid was significantly decreased in untreated depressed rats, despite being significantly elevated in treated depressed ones. This may be attributed to altered corticosteroid level caused by stress exposure in the current study. Lowered blood corticosteroid concentrations were explained by increased metabolism and/or tissue uptake and being independent on steroidogenesis [53]. They suggested that the decline in circulating corticosterone in rats exposed to repeated chronic stressor may be a compensatory mechanism for the higher excitability of serotonergic neurons to limit the deleterious effects of repeated chronic stressor.

Moreover, stress-induced depressive-like behavior, herein, was associated by prominent oxidative stress denoted by higher hippocampal MDA level and lower hippocampal SOD, while roflumilast has antioxidant effects. Therefore, the structural derangement observed in hippocampi of depressed rats is explained by the prominent oxidative stress. Also, roflumilast reserved almost normal hippocampal structural features by its antioxidant defense systems, such as the enzymes superoxide dismutase and catalase [54].

Therefore, the altered hippocampal mediators could be attributed to the evident oxidative stress through raising the neuronal inflammatory agents and apoptotic mediators, leading to neuronal death. In addition, the inflammatory mediators may impair the glial cells, namely astrocytes and microglia, producing neurodegenerative changes [55], which may explain the higher hippocampal IL-6. Moreover, oxidative stress may be the causative agent of dopaminergic neurons damage [56], evidenced by the reduction in DA level in the current study. These findings are in line with Tuon et al. [57]. They suggested that neurodegenerative changes, elevated lipid peroxidation, and lowered superoxide dismutase activity may produce major depressive disorders.

Although corticosteroid level was decreased in the depressed group, there was a significant positive correlation between MDA and corticosteroid level that resulted in altered hippocampal function.

On the other hand, roflumilast treatment ameliorated the oxidative stress evidenced by significant decrease in MDA and significant increase in the SOD, in accordance with Bhatt et al. (2020) [56].

Therefore, the prolonged oxidative stress led to increased PDE4 which in turn decreased CERB, PRKACA and BDNF and increased IL-6, enhancing neuronal susceptibility to injury and development of depression. Besides, it impaired neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity.

In addition, the prominent oxidative stress resulted in lowered antioxidant SOD and reduced DA which is normally responsible for the motivation, arousal, reinforcement, and reward encouraging the brain cells to act in a pleasurable, excitable behaviors. This was confirmed by the correlation study that showed a decline in the motor activity in the depressed group such as swimming time, struggle time and total no. of crossed squares and the rise of the depressed behavior such as significant prolongation in the immobility time, time spent in central zone, latency to leave central zone.

Regarding the histopathological changes in the current study, the PV1 interneuron numbers in hippocampal subdivision were reduced in long-term stress similar to many light microscopic studies [5860]. The Hilar region including PV1 neuronal degenerative changes and/or necrosis were found in cases of chronic stress [61]. Similarly, the pericellular vacuolation around the glial cells and spacing within the molecular layer and the polymorphic layers were detected, indicating degenerative changes. Meanwhile roflumilast-treated group had almost normal hippocampal neuronal appearance.

Selective GFAP immunohistochemical reaction was used to assess the numerical and structural integrity of hippocampal astrocytes according to Webster et al. [62]. In the current study an apparent extensive GFAP reaction of the astrocytes with ramification of their processes along the layers of CA1 in depressed rats, which disagree with Ayuob et al. [63], who found a decrease of labeling of astrocytes adjacent to blood vessels as a characteristic feature for schizophrenia and major depression.

On the other hand, astrocytic GFAP reaction was found to be minimal in CA1 region of the Roflumilast-treated group giving apparent similar picture to the control ones.

Conclusion

Oxidative stress resulted in significant decrease in the CERB, PRKACA and BDNF and significant increase in the PDE4, IL-6. This led to decrease in the cognitive flexibility and decreased the ability to adapt with environmental challenges that may precipitate or exacerbate depressive episodes. In addition, structural affection was proved histomorphologically in different parts and layers of the hippocampus as a result of depression and was further proved by immunohistochemical reaction (GFAP).

All the previous findings were reversed by Roflumilast treatment (PDE4 inhibitor) which attenuated the depression behavior in rats denoting its neuroprotective, and anti-inflammatory effects.

Limitations of the study

One of the strongest challenges that we faced in our study is the sample size. The hippocampus size was small to perform all the above mentioned biochemical and histological studies, although we extracted the hippocampus from both hemispheres. In addition, we faced difficulty in purchasing the required amount of the drug o be able to perform the whole study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Lang U. E., & Borgwardt S. (2013). Molecular mechanisms of depression: perspectives on new treatment strategies. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, 31(6), 761–777. doi: 10.1159/000350094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boswell E. B., Anfinson T. H., & Nemeroff C. B. (1997). Depression associated with endocrine disorders. Depression and physical illness, 255–292. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Campbell S., & MacQueen G. (2006). An update on regional brain volume differences associated with mood disorders. Current opinion in psychiatry, 19(1), 25–33. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000194371.47685.f2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fulton S., Pissios P., Manchon R. P., Stiles L., Frank L., Pothos E. N., et al. (2006). Leptin regulation of the mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway. Neuron, 51(6), 811–822. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krügel U., Schraft T., Kittner H., Kiess W., & Illes P. (2003). Basal and feeding-evoked dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens is depressed by leptin. European journal of pharmacology, 482(1–3), 185–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.09.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hommel J. D., Trinko R., Sears R. M., Georgescu D., Liu Z. W., Gao X. B., et al. (2006). Leptin receptor signaling in midbrain dopamine neurons regulates feeding. neuron, 51(6), 801–810. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schellekens H., Finger B. C., Dinan T. G., & Cryan J. F. (2012). Ghrelin signalling and obesity: at the interface of stress, mood and food reward. Pharmacology & therapeutics, 135(3), 316–326. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dowlati Y., Herrmann N., Swardfager W., Liu H., Sham L., Reim E. K., et al. (2010). A meta-analysis of cytokines in major depression. Biological psychiatry, 67(5), 446–457. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mulinari S. (2012). Monoamine theories of depression: historical impact on biomedical research. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 21(4), 366–392. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2011.623917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gao F., Yang S., Wang J., & Zhu G. (2022). cAMP-PKA cascade: An outdated topic for depression?. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 150, 113030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ihara K., Yoshida H., Jones P. B., Hashizume M., Suzuki Y., Ishijima H., et al. (2016). Serum BDNF levels before and after the development of mood disorders: a case–control study in a population cohort. Translational psychiatry, 6(4), e782–e782. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gass P., & Riva M. A. (2007). CREB, neurogenesis and depression. Bioessays, 29(10), 957–961. doi: 10.1002/bies.20658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hu W., Wu J., Ye T., Chen Z., Tao J., Tong L., et al. (2020). Farnesoid X receptor-mediated cytoplasmic translocation of CRTC2 disrupts CREB-BDNF signaling in hippocampal CA1 and leads to the development of depression-like behaviors in mice. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 23(10), 673–686. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang F., Zhu X., Yu P., Sheng T., Wang Y., & Ye Y. (2022). Crocin ameliorates depressive-like behaviors induced by chronic restraint stress via the NAMPT-NAD+-SIRT1 pathway in mice. Neurochemistry International, 157, 105343. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2022.105343 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li M. X., Li Q., Sun X. J., Luo C., Li Y., Wang Y. N., et al. (2019). Increased Homer1-mGluR5 mediates chronic stress-induced depressive-like behaviors and glutamatergic dysregulation via activation of PERK-eIF2α. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 95, 109682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fujimaki K., Morinobu S., & Duman R. S. (2000). Administration of a cAMP phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor enhances antidepressant-induction of BDNF mRNA in rat hippocampus. Neuropsychopharmacology, 22(1), 42–51. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00084-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.O’Donnell J. M., & Zhang H. T. (2004). Antidepressant effects of inhibitors of cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE4). Trends in pharmacological sciences, 25(3), 158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ashour N. H., El-Tanbouly D. M., El Sayed N. S., & Khattab M. M. (2021). Roflumilast ameliorates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of amyloidogenesis and tauopathy: Involvement of nitric oxide status, Aβ extrusion transporter ABCB1, and reversal by PKA inhibitor H89. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 111, 110366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hasan N., Zameer S., Najmi A. K., Parvez S., Yar M. S., & Akhtar M. (2021). Roflumilast and tadalafil improve learning and memory deficits in intracerebroventricular Aβ1–42 rat model of Alzheimer’s disease through modulations of hippocampal cAMP/cGMP/BDNF signaling pathway. Pharmacological Reports, 73, 1287–1302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang H., Zhang F. F., Xu Y., Fu H. R., Wang X. D., Wang L., et al. (2020). The phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor roflumilast, a potential treatment for the comorbidity of memory loss and depression in Alzheimer’s disease: A preclinical study in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 23(10), 700–711. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ellenbroek B., & Youn J. (2016). Rodent models in neuroscience research: is it a rat race?. Disease models & mechanisms, 9(10), 1079–1087. doi: 10.1242/dmm.026120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu Q., Qi L., Li H., Mao L., Yang M., Xie R., et al. (2017). Roflumilast reduces cerebral inflammation in a rat model of experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. Inflammation, 40, 1245–1253. doi: 10.1007/s10753-017-0567-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bravo J. A., Díaz-Veliz G., Mora S., Ulloa J. L., Berthoud V. M., Morales P., et al. (2009). Desipramine prevents stress-induced changes in depressive-like behavior and hippocampal markers of neuroprotection. Behavioural pharmacology, 20(3), 273–285. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32832c70d9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tõnissaar M., Mällo T., Eller M., Häidkind R., Kõiv K., & Harro J. (2008). Rat behavior after chronic variable stress and partial lesioning of 5-HT-ergic neurotransmission: effects of citalopram. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 32(1), 164–177. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Flecknell P., Lofgren J. L., Dyson M. C., Marini R. R., Swindle M. M., & Wilson R. P. (2015). Preanesthesia, anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia. In Laboratory animal medicine (pp. 1135–1200). Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Scudamore C. L. (2014). A Practical Guide to the Histology of the Mouse. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Asaad G. F., & Mostafa R. E. (2022). Lactoferrin mitigates ethanol-induced gastric ulcer via modulation of ROS/ICAM-1/Nrf2 signaling pathway in Wistar rats. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences, 25(12), 1522. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2022.66823.14656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bradford M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical biochemistry, 72(1–2), 248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bancroft J. and Gamble M. 2002. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 5th ed., Churchill Livingstone publishers, Edinburgh, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Graham L. and Orenstein J.M. Processing tissue and cells for transmission electron microscopy in diagnostic pathology and research. Nature Proto-cols 2007; 2 (10): 2439–2450. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Amal A. M. (2014). Possible protective effect of Ascorbic acid and Alpha-Tocopherol Against damage induced by ionizing radiation in adult albino rat hippocampus. Egyptian journal of Anatomy, 37(2): 303–323. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Strekalova T., Spanagel R., Bartsch D., Henn F. A., & Gass P. (2004). Stress-induced anhedonia in mice is associated with deficits in forced swimming and exploration. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29(11), 2007–2017. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Aboul-Fotouh S (2013). Coenzyme Q10 displays antidepressant-like activity with reduction of hippocampal oxidative/nitrosative DNA damage in chronically stressed rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 104, 105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Feng H, Wang C, He W, Wu X, Li S, Zeng Z, et al. (2019) Roflumilast ameliorates cognitive impairment in APP/PS1 mice via cAMP/CREB/BDNF signaling and anti-neuroinflammatory effects. Metab Brain Dis 34:583–591. doi: 10.1007/s11011-018-0374-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pushpa V.H., Jayanthi M.K. and Ramu R (2021). EVALUATION OF ANTI-DEPRESSANT ACTIVITY OF ROFLUMILAST IN ALBINO MICE. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research,; 12(9): 5051–5056. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hasan N., Zameer S., Najmi A. K., Parvez S., & Akhtar M. (2022). Roflumilast Reduces Pathological Symptoms of Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease in Rats Produced by Intracerebroventricular Streptozotocin by Inhibiting NF-κB/BACE-1 Mediated Aβ Production in the Hippocampus and Activating the cAMP/BDNF Signalling Pathway. Neurotoxicity Research, 40(2), 432–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Waltrick A. P. F., da Silva A. C. F., de Mattos B. A., Chaves Y. C., de Oliveira R. M. W., Prickaerts J., et al. (2023). Long-term treatment with roflumilast improves learning of fear extinction memory and anxiety-like response in a type-1 diabetes mellitus animal model. Behavioural Brain Research, 439, 114217. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.114217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pivonello R., Isidori A. M., De Martino M. C., Newell-Price J., Biller B. M., & Colao A. (2016). Complications of Cushing’s syndrome: state of the art. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology, 4(7), 611–629. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00086-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Feng X., Zhao Y., Yang T., Song M., Wang C., Yao Y., et al. (2019). Glucocorticoid-driven NLRP3 inflammasome activation in hippocampal microglia mediates chronic stress-induced depressive-like behaviors. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 12, 210. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sanders O., & Rajagopal L. (2020). Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of clinical trials and epidemiology with a mechanistic rationale. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease Reports, 4(1), 185–215. doi: 10.3233/ADR-200191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ruan J., Liu L., Shan X., Xia B., & Fu Q. (2019). Anti-depressant effects of oil from fructus gardeniae via PKA-CREB-BDNF signaling. Bioscience Reports, 39(4) doi: 10.1042/BSR20190141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Essam R. M., Ahmed L. A., Abdelsalam R. M., & El-Khatib A. S. (2019). Phosphodiestrase-1 and 4 inhibitors ameliorate liver fibrosis in rats: Modulation of cAMP/CREB/TLR4 inflammatory and fibrogenic pathways. Life sciences, 222, 245–254 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhong F., Liu L., Wei J. L., Hu Z. L., Li L., Wang S., et al. (2019). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor precursor in the hippocampus regulates both depressive and anxiety-like behaviors in rats. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 776. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Duman R. S., & Monteggia L. M. (2006). A neurotrophic model for stress-related mood disorders. Biological psychiatry, 59(12), 1116–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brunoni A. R., Lopes M., & Fregni F. (2008). A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on major depression and BDNF levels: implications for the role of neuroplasticity in depression. The The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 11(8), 1169–1180. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang C., Xing Z., Tan M., Wu Y., & Zeng W. (2021). Roflumilast ameliorates isoflurane-induced inflammation in astrocytes via the CREB/BDNF Signaling Pathway. ACS omega, 6(6), 4167–4174. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 47.Gong H., Su W. J., Cao Z. Y., Lian Y. J., Peng W., Liu Y. Z., et al. (2018). Hippocampal Mrp8/14 signaling plays a critical role in the manifestation of depressive-like behaviors in mice. Journal of neuroinflammation, 15(1), 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jeon S. W., & Kim Y. K. (2016). Neuroinflammation and cytokine abnormality in major depression: Cause or consequence in that illness?. World journal of psychiatry, 6(3), 283. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i3.283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim Y. K., Na K. S., Myint A. M., & Leonard B. E. (2016). The role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in neuroinflammation, neurogenesis and the neuroendocrine system in major depression. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 64, 277–284. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Moreines J. L., Owrutsky Z. L., Gagnon K. G., & Grace A. A. (2017). Divergent effects of acute and repeated quetiapine treatment on dopamine neuron activity in normal vs. chronic mild stress induced hypodopaminergic states. Translational Psychiatry, 7(12), 1275. doi: 10.1038/s41398-017-0039-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Savitz J. B., & Drevets W. C. (2013). Neuroreceptor imaging in depression. Neurobiology of disease, 52, 49–65. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gilleen J., Nottage J., Yakub F., Kerins S., Valdearenas L., Uz T., et al. (2021). The effects of roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase type-4 inhibitor, on EEG biomarkers in schizophrenia: A randomised controlled trial. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 35(1), 15–22. doi: 10.1177/0269881120946300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dremencov E., Grinchii D., Hrivikova K., Lapshin M., Komelkova M., Graban J., et al. (2022). Exposure to chronic stressor upsurges the excitability of serotoninergic neurons and diminishes concentrations of circulating corticosteroids in rats two weeks thereafter. Pharmacological Reports, 74(3), 451–460. doi: 10.1007/s43440-022-00366-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dröge W. (2002). Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiological reviews. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bajpai A., Verma A. K., Srivastava M., & Srivastava R. (2014). Oxidative stress and major depression. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR, 8(12), CC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10258.5292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bhatt S., Nagappa A. N., & Patil C. R. (2020). Role of oxidative stress in depression. Drug discovery today, 25(7), 1270–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tuon T., Meirelles S. S., de Moura A. B., Rosa T., Borba L. A., Botelho M. E. M., et al. (2021). Behavior and oxidative stress parameters in rats subjected to the animal’s models induced by chronic mild stress and 6-hydroxydopamine. Behavioural Brain Research, 406, 113226. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Czeh B, Varga ZK, Henningsen K, Kovacs GL, Miseta A, Wiborg O. 2015. Chronic stress reduces the number of GABAergic interneurons in the adult rat hippocampus, dorsal-ventral and region specific differences. Hippocampus 25:393–405. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Godavarthi SK, Sharma A, Jana NR. 2014. Reversal of reduced parvalbumin neurons in hippocampus and amygdala of Angelman syndrome model mice by chronic treatment of fluoxetine. J Neurochem 130:444–454. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Megahed T, Hattiangady B, Shuai B, Shetty AK. 2015. Parvalbumin and neuropeptide Y expressing hippocampal GABA-ergic inhibitory interneuron numbers decline in a model of Gulf War illness. Front Cell Neurosci 8:447. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Milner TA, Burstein SR, Marrone GF, Khalid S, Gonzalez AD, Williams TJ, et al. 2013. Stress differentially alters mu opioid receptor density and trafficking in parvalbumin-containing interneurons in the female and male rat hippocampus. Synapse 67:757–772. doi: 10.1002/syn.21683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Webster MJ, Knable MB, Johnston-Wilson N, Nagata K, Inagaki M, Yolken RH (2001) Immunohistochemical localization of phosphorylated glial fibrillary acidic protein in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus from patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Brain Behav Immun 15:388–400 doi: 10.1006/brbi.2001.0646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ayuob N. N., Firgany A. E. D. L., El-Mansy A. A., & Ali S. (2017). Can Ocimum basilicum relieve chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression in mice?. Experimental and molecular pathology, 103(2), 153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2017.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Abeer El Wakil

7 Aug 2023

PONE-D-23-15624A Study of Roflumilast Treatment on Functional and Structural Changes in Hippocampus in Depressed Adult Male Wistar RatsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hassan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

This article discusses an interesting point concerning depression behavior which is a common stress disability disorder that affects higher mental functions including emotion, cognition, and behavior. Unfortunately, there are several major concerns raised by the reviewers in the attached documents that will preclude further consideration at this time. We feel that the work is significant and of interest to our readers, and therefore we are willing to consider a thoroughly revised manuscript addressing all of the points raised by the reviewers. Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 21 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Abeer El Wakil, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014299920305033?via%3Dihub

https://karger.com/cpb/article/31/6/761/71413/Molecular-Mechanisms-of-Depression-Perspectives-on

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The idea of the article is interesting, and the manuscript is well written. The experiments are described in sufficient detail. However, a major revision is recommended. Please check the attached file.

Reviewer #2: Need to revise this manuscript before can be accepted.

1. In abstract, anti-apoptotic pathway suggest remove, cause not measured in this study.

2. The positive drug group suppose received drug usually used to treat depression.

3. Please explained from which hemisphere brain was extracted for different methods in this study.

4. Please explain why positive group have elevated immobility and struggle time compared to control group?

5. Please changes the group legend, between positive control and depressed groups. For OFT there was not total number of crossed squares data?

6. Please arrange back the figure for easier to capture the results.

7. Total number of crossed squares results not found in any figure.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: IDRIS LONG

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Comments.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-15624_reviewer-NEW 3.8.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Abeer El Wakil

8 Dec 2023

A Study of Roflumilast Treatment on Functional and Structural Changes in Hippocampus in Depressed Adult Male Wistar Rats

PONE-D-23-15624R1

Dear Dr. Hassan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Abeer El Wakil, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

The concept of the present study seems interesting. The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of depression which is a common stress disability disorder affecting higher mental functions including emotion, cognition, and behavior. It may be mediated by inflammatory cytokines that interfere with neuroendocrine function, and synaptic plasticity. Therefore, reductions in inflammation might contribute to treatment response. The current study evaluates the role of Protein Kinase (PKA)- cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB)- brain derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) signaling pathway in depression and the effects of roflumilast (PDE4 inhibitor) as a potential antidepressant on the activity of the PKA-CREB-BDNF signaling pathway, histology,and pro-inflammatory cytokine production.

In my opinion, the concept of the present study is interesting, and the authors addressed the reviewers'concerns thoroughly. The manuscript in its current form is acceptable for publication at Plos One.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Abeer El Wakil

18 Dec 2023

PONE-D-23-15624R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hassan,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Abeer El Wakil

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-15624_reviewer-NEW 3.8.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer-2 word.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES