Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Feb 5;14:2912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53477-3

Impact of modeled microgravity stress on innate immunity in a beneficial animal-microbe symbiosis

Alexandrea A Duscher 1,2, Madeline M Vroom 1,3, Jamie S Foster 1,
PMCID: PMC10844198  PMID: 38316910

Abstract

The innate immune response is the first line of defense for all animals to not only detect invading microbes and toxins but also sense and interface with the environment. One such environment that can significantly affect innate immunity is spaceflight. In this study, we explored the impact of microgravity stress on key elements of the NFκB innate immune pathway. The symbiosis between the bobtail squid Euprymna scolopes and its beneficial symbiont Vibrio fischeri was used as a model system under a simulated microgravity environment. The expression of genes associated with the NFκB pathway was monitored over time as the symbiosis progressed. Results revealed that although the onset of the symbiosis was the major driver in the differential expression of NFκB signaling, the stress of simulated low-shear microgravity also caused a dysregulation of expression. Several genes were expressed at earlier time points suggesting that elements of the E. scolopes NFκB pathway are stress-inducible, whereas expression of other pathway components was delayed. The results provide new insights into the role of NFκB signaling in the squid-vibrio symbiosis, and how the stress of microgravity negatively impacts the host immune response. Together, these results provide a foundation to develop mitigation strategies to maintain host-microbe homeostasis during spaceflight.

Subject terms: Immunology, Microbiology

Introduction

Spaceflight-induced dysregulation of the innate immune system has long been recognized as a key health issue for astronauts working in the space environment13. Since the time of the first manned flights, more than 50% of returning astronauts have shown evidence of impaired immune function46. Although there are many different environmental hazards associated with spaceflight that may contribute to the altered immune response, microgravity has been shown to impair innate immune cell differentiation, function, and signal transduction610. For example, analysis of monocytes collected from nine astronauts after a two-week spaceflight showed impaired cell adhesion, migration, and cytokine secretion after stimulation with microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs)11.

One key pathway of the innate immune system thought to be associated with the immune dysregulation phenomena in microgravity is the NFκB signaling pathway1215. The NFκB signaling pathway is found in most, if not all, animals and is comprised of transcription factors that are retained in the cytoplasm of a cell until upstream signaling events trigger translocation of homo- or heterodimers into the nucleus where they initiate transcription of NFκB-controlled innate immune genes16. NFκB signaling can be initiated and regulated through the recognition of MAMPs, as well as by reactive oxygen species (ROS)17,18. During spaceflight, gene expression of the NFκB pathway is disrupted in a wide range of cell types6,15,19,20 that may impact bone and muscle loss in vertebrates, as well as regulation of key immune and inflammatory responses21,22.

To further explore how the NFκB signaling pathway is impacted by spaceflight-like conditions, we used the monospecific association between the Hawaiian bobtail squid Euprymna scolopes and the beneficial bacterium Vibrio fischeri as a model system. For more than a decade, the squid-vibrio system has been used to explore how beneficial symbioses are impacted under simulated and actual microgravity conditions due to its high degree of experimental malleability and rapidly inducible phenotypes (Fig. 1)2330. Briefly, E. scolopes have a specialized symbiotic light organ that houses the bioluminescent V. fischeri (Fig. 1A). The squid hatch in an aposymbiotic state (i.e., without V. fischeri) and must acquire their symbionts horizontally from the surrounding environment31. The squid does this with the help of superficial ciliated epithelial appendages (CEA) that circulate the surrounding seawater containing V. fischeri towards pores on the surface of the light organ (Fig. 1B)32.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Overview of the Euprymna scolopes and Vibrio fischeri symbiosis. (A) Hatchling E. scolopes with the location of the symbiotic light organ depicted by the white arrow. Bar, 500 µm. (B) Epifluorescent image of the nascent light organ stained with acridine orange visualizing the superficial ciliated epithelial appendages (CEA) that entrain bacteria into the vicinity of pores (p) on the surface of the light organ. Bar, 50 µm. (C) One-half of the light organ 16 h after inoculation with symbiosis-competent strains of V. fischeri. Acridine orange staining reveals the pattern of pycnotic nuclei (pn) typically associated with the bacteria-induced apoptotic cell death event. The symbiotic V. fischeri also triggers the migration of macrophage-like hemocytes (h) into the blood sinus underlying the CEA. Bar, 50 µm. (D) Example of a high aspect-ratio vessel (HARV) used to simulate low-shear modeled microgravity (LSMMG). Squid, indicated by the black arrows, are in “free fall” suspended in the middle of the HARV. Bar, 3 cm. (E) Timeline of bacteria-induced developmental events in the host under normal gravity conditions compared to low shear modeled microgravity conditions (LSMMG). Stars indicate time points targeted for NanoString gene expression assay.

During the initiation of the symbiosis the squid’s only immune cell, macrophage-like cells called hemocytes, migrate into the blood sinus of the CEA (Fig. 1C). These structures then undergo bacteria-induced apoptosis (i.e., non-inflammatory cell death) (Fig. 1C) and subsequent regression33,34. The normal morphological remodeling of the host light organ tissues is largely driven by the innate immune response to microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), such as lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan (PGN), and is thought to be controlled by the NFκB signaling pathway3538. Under the stress of modeled microgravity conditions, hemocyte migration into the blood sinus of the light organ is delayed compared to gravity controls (Fig. 1E)26, suggesting an altered innate immune response, however, the mechanisms underlying this phenotype are unknown.

In this study, the NFκB signaling pathway was explored in the presence and absence of symbiotic microbes as well as under the stress of simulated microgravity conditions. Due to the high cost of spaceflight, many studies exploring the role of microgravity on immune function have relied on simulating low-shear modeled microgravity (LSMMG) conditions using high-aspect-ratio rotating wall vessel bioreactors (HARVs) (Fig. 1D). The HARVs mimic reduced gravity by maintaining the organism(s) in a state of constant fluid suspension under conditions of low fluid shear. The hydrodynamic forces within the HARV offset the effects of gravity within the chamber, such that the squid or bacteria within the HARV chamber “falls” through the liquid medium at a constant terminal velocity. First designed by NASA, this approach has been widely used for more than 30 years to mimic microgravity and has been shown to correlate with results obtained from space flight conditions3942.

Specifically, in this study genes associated with the putative NFκB signaling pathway were identified from the E. scolopes genome and transcriptome to assess differential gene expression of the pathway under LSMMG conditions over time in the presence and absence of the symbiont V. fischeri. The results of the study revealed those aspects of the pathway that are primarily driven by the onset of the symbiosis and those that were differentially regulated under microgravity-like stress conditions. Together, the results of this study demonstrated how the stress of LSMMG can alter and, in some cases, accelerate the expression of key components of the NFκB signaling pathway, thereby negatively impacting the overall innate immune response of host animals under simulated spaceflight-like conditions.

Results and discussion

Elucidation of key NFκB pathway elements in the host E. scolopes through data mining

Aspects of the NFκB pathway, including both activators and effectors, have been shown to play important roles in the onset of the squid-vibrio symbiosis36,4347; however, the full pathway has not been previously delineated in E. scolopes. To address this issue, innate immune genes associated with NFκB signaling were data mined from the reference transcriptome and genome of E. scolopes48 to generate a more comprehensive understanding of the NFκB pathway in the bobtail squid (Fig. 2, Table 1). From the reference transcriptome, data mining revealed 74 transcripts corresponding to 47 unique genes that mapped to both canonical and non-canonical signaling paths for NFκB (Fig. 2, Table 1). These recovered genes included pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), effector enzymes, adaptor proteins, and several signaling molecules that work in synergy to initiate transcriptional changes related to the host immune response (Fig. 2, Table 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Putative NFκB signaling pathway data mined from Euprymna scolopes reference transcriptome and genome. Genes in dark blue have been found previously in E. scolopes, whereas genes in light blue are being reported here for the first time. Gene with a dotted line was not found in the E. scolopes genome or transcriptome. Elements of the pathway found in E. scolopes included pattern recognition receptors (PRRs, oval), effector enzymes (triangle), and signaling cascade genes (rectangular). PGRP peptidoglycan recognition receptor proteins LysM Lysin motif protein, TLRs toll-like receptors SOD superoxide dismutase, HSPs heat shock proteins, MYD88 Myeloid differentiation primary response 88, TOLIP Toll interacting protein, IRAK interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase, TRAFs tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors, NLRC3 NACHT, LRR and CARD domains-containing protein 3, TAK1 Transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase 1/Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7, TABs TGF-beta-activated kinase and MAP3K7-binding protein, TBK1 Tank-binding kinase 1, IKKs Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase, KBRS1 NFκB inhibitor-interacting Ras-like protein, IKBL Inhibitory kappa-B-like, NLRC3 NLR family CARD domain-containing protein, IκBs NFκB inhibitor, RelA Transcription factor p65/relish; NFκB1 Nuclear factor NFκB.

Table 1.

Targeted genes for NanoString expression assay.

Group Gene name SwissProt annotation Transcript ID Gene ID
PRR EsPGRP1a PGRP1_HUMAN2 g32443.t1 cluster_20358
EsPGRP2 PGRP1_HUMAN TR392087|c0_g2_i3|m.10497 cluster_4678
EsPGRP3 PGRP1_BOSIN c90996_f1p3_2225 cluster_12168
EsPGRP4a PGRP1_CAMDR c13944_f1p1_1948 cluster_11708
PGRP1_CAMDR2 g32454.t1 cluster_11708
EsPGRP5 PGSC2_DROS c202596_f11p9_1744 cluster_2407
PGRP2_HOLDI g26249.t1 cluster_2407
EsTLR1 TOLL8_DROME TR148504|c1_g1_i1|m.29453 cluster_824
TOLL8_DROME2 c72113_f1p0_2169 cluster_824
EsTLR2 TLR21_CHICK TR395607|c0_g1_i2|m.29770 cluster_4721
EsTLR3 TLR22_CHICK TR272699|c0_g1_i1|m.41803 cluster_2800
EsTLR4 TOLL_DROME2 g48290.t1 cluster_22290
EsTLR5b ALS_MOUSE g91545.t1 cluster_27922
EsTLR6a TLR6_MOUSE g31247.t1 cluster_14365
EsGalectin1 LEG1_HAECO TR633522|c3_g2_i1|m.28191 cluster_8370
EsGalectin2b LEG4_MOUSE c95712_f1p2_3429 cluster_16338
LYSM2a LYSM2_DANRE g11540.t1 cluster_17730
LYSM3 LYSM3_CHICK TR298744|c6_g1_i1|m.44844 cluster_3208
Effector enzyme EsSOD SODC_BOMMO TR132802|c5_g2_i1|m.7128 cluster_586
SODC2a SODC_MOUSE g77040.t1 cluster_13902
SODC3a SODC_SCHPO isotig01040|m.9077 cluster_7124
SODC_SCHPO2 c124720_f1p94_1276 cluster_7124
SODMb SODM_RAT c123132_f1p3_1433 cluster_11217
SODM_CHAFE g35029.t1 cluster_20684
HSP71 HSP7C_RAT c35333_f1p15_1997 cluster_11716
HSP7C_RAT2 c36410_f1p4_2104 cluster_11716
HSP7C_ICTPU c196330_f1p3_1314 cluster_11716
HSP90 HS90A_RABIT g6318.t1 cluster_24185
Signaling MYD88_1 MYD88_PANTR c98230_f1p1_1673 cluster_16435
MYD88_2b MYD88_PANTR2 c141455_f3p1_1351 cluster_530
EsIRAK4 IRAK4_HUMAN TR101118|c2_g2_i2|m.40331 cluster_23
IRAK4_2 IRAK4_BOVIN c8160_f6p3_2517 cluster_15833
PBL6_ARATH g88227.t1 cluster_15833
TRAF2 TRAF2_HUMAN g53219.t1 cluster_5541
TRAF3 TRAF3_MOUSE c82312_f1p0_2491 cluster_15867
TRAF4 TRAF4_MOUSE TR683727|c9_g1_i5|m.7586 cluster_9167
TRAF4_MOUSE2 c43236_f1p0_1788 cluster_9167
EsTRAF6 TRAF6_BOVIN1 g38415.t1 cluster_4580
TRAF6_BOVIN2 TR385091|c1_g1_i2|m.21623 cluster_4580
M3K7_PONAB c55278_f2p1_2609 cluster_16222

a Probes were unsuccessful in the NanoString assay.

b Not targeted for NanoString analysis.

As bacteria colonize the host light organ they release MAMPs that are recognized by host PRRs and trigger several innate immune-related developmental changes in the host symbiotic light organ (Fig. 1E)43. Several of the PRRs identified in this study have been previously observed in E. scolopes, such as peptidoglycan recognition proteins (EsPGRPs), galectins (EsGalectin1 and 2), and Toll-like receptors (EsTLR1-6)36,45,46,4951 (Fig. 2, Table 1). PGRPs are highly conserved PRRs that recognize the PGN component of bacterial cell walls52 and previous studies on the E. scolopes PGRPs indicate that they are involved in NFκB signaling within the host light organ36,50. Examination of the reference transcriptome identified all five of the previously reported PGRPs (EsPGRP1-5)36,45. No additional PGRPs were found. Analysis of the PGRP sequences showed that EsPGRP1-3 and EsPGRP5 contained signal peptide sequences, whereas EsPGRP4 harbored two transmembrane helix domains suggesting it may be membrane-bound rather than secreted (Fig. 2; Dataset S1). All the EsPGRPs had the characteristic amidase activity domain and the necessary zinc-binding residues involved in the breakdown of PGN (Dataset S1). Understanding the type of PGN that PGRPs bind to can provide insight into how the squid may detect and respond to different bacterial MAMPs. Additional examination of the EsPGRP catalytic domains suggested that EsPGRP1, 2, and 3 may bind specifically to DAP-type PGN, the dominant form of PGN for gram-negative bacteria, whereas the specific binding capacity of EsPGRP4 and 5 was indeterminable based on the recovered sequences (Fig. S1).

Other PRR categories that were screened in the reference transcriptome and genome included galectins, Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and LysM binding proteins. Galectins are carbohydrate recognition proteins known to bind to microbial surfaces for bacterial recognition and subsequent phagocytosis45,47,5356. Only two galectins were recovered from the reference transcriptome and genome, both of which have been previously reported in the E. scolopes macrophage-like innate immune cells, hemocytes (Fig. 2), yet their involvement in the NFκB pathway is not well understood49. Additionally, six TLRs (EsTLR1-6) were observed, all of which have been previously reported in E. scolopes46. TLRs are hypothesized to initiate the NFκB pathway by recognizing MAMPs and subsequently interacting with the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain of signaling genes, such as MYD88 (Fig. 2, Table 1). Additionally, two previously unreported LysM proteins (LysM2 and 3) were observed in the E. scolopes reference transcriptome and genome (Fig. 2, Table 1). These PRRs were characterized by repeating lysin motifs that have been shown to recognize PGN as well as chitin in plants, fungi, and bacteria5761. Analysis of the LysM sequences did not reveal a signal peptide or transmembrane helix domains suggesting the proteins are confined to the cytoplasm (Fig. 2).

In addition to PRR activators of the NFκB pathway, the analysis revealed several effector enzymes that can modulate the NFκB pathway, including previously unreported isoforms of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and heat shock proteins (HSPs) (Table 1). In hatchling E. scolopes, the crypt spaces within the light organ become oxidatively stressful preventing non-symbiotic bacteria from entering. The squid then utilizes SOD to combat the release of ROS49. Three SODs were recovered that contained copper/zinc-binding domains, including previously identified EsSOD, while a fourth SOD was found with a manganese/iron-binding domain (Table 1, Dataset S1). Additionally, two heat shock proteins, HSP71 and HSP90, were also recovered from the E. scolopes genome and transcriptome that have been shown to modulate aspects of NFκB signaling in other cephalopods62.

Stimulation of PRRs and effector enzymes activates the recruitment of adapter proteins and protein kinases, such as MYD88 and IRAK, respectively63. Although both genes have been previously reported in E. scolopes36, several new isoforms were recovered from the reference transcriptome and genome (Table 1). Once activated, IRAK can then dissociate from MYD88 and interact with ubiquitin ligases, such as TNF receptor-associated factors (TRAFs), which have been shown to polyubiquitinate themselves and other proteins (e.g., IKKγ). These ubiquitinated proteins then recruit protein kinase complexes (e.g. TAK1 and TABs)64 that then activate the IκB kinase (IKK) complex for NFκB driven transcription. Genes associated with the TAK1/TAB and IKK complexes were recovered in E. scolopes (Fig. 2, Table 1). The IKK complex generally consists of three proteins: two catalytic components, IKKβ and IKKα, and a regulatory component, IKKγ, the latter of which was previously reported in E. scolopes36. Interestingly, our analysis revealed transcripts and genes associated with IKKβ but not IKKα. The absence of IKKα in the E. scolopes genome and reference transcriptome was surprising as it has been observed in other cephalopods, such as Octopus vulgaris and Haliotis discus hannai65,66. These results suggest that the IKK complex in the E. scolopes may exhibit an alternate configuration and may not follow the canonical pathway NFκB activation67.

Next, the activated IKK complex typically phosphorylates the NFκB inhibitor, IκBα, which is then polyubiquitinated and targeted for proteasomal degradation. Once the NFκB subunits are freed from IκB they can translocate into the nucleus and initiate transcription. Our analysis recovered sequences associated with the most common forms of the transcription factors in E. scolopes including RelA and NFκB1/p50 (Fig. 2, Table 1). Other putative inhibitor proteins were also recovered from E. scolopes in this analysis including IKBL, KBRS1, NLRC3, and the IκBα related gene IκBζ, all of which have been shown to regulate NFκB transcription by affecting other components in the signaling pathway (Fig. 2, Table 1)6870. Additional NFκB associated signaling transcripts that were found in this analysis of the E. scolopes transcriptome and genome included IKKε, TBK1, TOLIP, additional TRAFs (TRAF2, 3, 4, and 7), TAK1, and TAB1/3 (Fig. 2, Table 1) suggesting that, except for IKKα, E. scolopes harbors all the canonical elements of the NFκB pathway.

Symbiosis state was the major driver of differential gene expression in the host NFκB pathway

To begin to explore how simulated microgravity alters the expression of the NFκB pathway in the E. scolopes light organ, hatchling animals were incubated in the HARVs in both the LSMMG and gravity control positions in the presence and absence of the symbiotic V. fischeri for 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 18, 24 h. Total RNA extracted from host light organs was then screened for differential expression of 33 genes associated with the NFκB pathway using NanoString nCounter direct transcript counts (Table 1; Dataset S2)71. Note due to space limitation in the NanoString 96-well plate configuration there was no symbiotic control for the 24 h LSMMG treatment. Genes were considered significantly differentially expressed (DEGs) at an adjusted p-value cutoff of 0.10, and highly significant at a cutoff of 0.05 (Dataset S3).

Analysis of animals exposed to both LSMMG and gravity controls revealed that the symbiosis state was the major driver of differential gene expression of the NFκB pathway rather than the stress of simulated microgravity (Figs. 3, 4). Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that 59.69% of the variation observed in the expression of NFκB pathway genes was due to the onset of the symbiosis (Fig. 3A). A similar trend is also visualized by heatmap analysis (Fig. 4, Figs. S2S4). The overall shift in differential expression in symbiotic animals occurred 6 h post-inoculation as those animals exposed for only 2 h to V. fischeri clustered with the hatchling and aposymbiotic animals (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Principal component analysis (PCA) of all replicate samples exposed to both simulated microgravity and gravity controls. (A) Samples organized by symbiosis state including newly hatched animals (black), aposymbiotic animals (red) maintained without V. fischeri and symbiotic animals (blue) colonized with V. fischeri. (B) Corresponding PCA color-coded by time in hours (h) depicting a progression of differential gene expression over time. (C) Loading plots of the PCA depicting the specific genes driving the differential expression within the host animal. A cluster of genes within the loading plot is expanded in (D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Heatmap of voom transformed (log-CPM) NanoString gene expression hierarchically clustered by dissimilarities across time and by gravity or low-shear modeled microgravity (LSMMG) treatment. The teal color indicates upregulated expression whereas purple color represents downregulated expression in that associated condition. A detailed description of the targeted genes is listed in Table 1.

Of the different genes examined, PCA loading plots revealed that the differential expression of the PRR EsPGRP2 and signaling gene TBK1 had the largest influence on the onset of the symbiosis (Fig. 3C). EsPGRP2 is one of the most well-studied PGRPs in E. scolopes and has been shown to localize to the cytoplasm of the CEA where it is later secreted into the extracellular mucus and within the crypt spaces of the light organ in response to V. fischeri colonization51. EsPGRP2 has also been shown to be expressed in the accessory nidamental gland, the other symbiotic organ in female E. scolopes used to secrete anti-fouling bacteria during squid egg production72,73. EsPGRP2 is thought to help control potentially harmful excess PGN produced by V. fischeri or other bacteria by breaking it down using its amidase catalytic domain51. Except for 2 h, EsPGRP2 was significantly upregulated in symbiotic animals at all time points compared to aposymbiotic controls in both modeled microgravity and gravity conditions (Fig. 4, Figs. S2S4, Dataset S3). These results support EsPGRP2 importance during the early colonization stages of V. fischeri (Dataset S1).

The other most influential symbiosis-associated gene targeted in this study was TANK Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1), a noncanonical kinase in the IKK family that plays an important role in regulating animal innate immune responses, apoptosis, tumorigenesis, and development7477. Although its role in the squid-vibrio symbiosis is not yet clear, TBK1 was significantly upregulated in all symbiotic animals beginning 6–8 h post-inoculation (Fig. 4, Figs. S2S4, Dataset S3). Recent research in mammalian systems has indicated that TBK1, along with its analog IKKε, can sense bacterial infections through multiple signaling pathways and may be activated through upstream MAMP-driven IKK phosphorylation, as well as by trans-autophosphorylation77,78. In mammalian systems, TBK1 can also be directly activated through TLR2 and MYD88 activation to mobilize transcription factors associated with the NFκB pathway77,79.

In the E. scolopes light organ, analysis of the gene expression patterns indicated that TBK1 expression was highly correlated with PRR EsPGRP2, adaptor protein TRAF3, and regulatory kinases EsIKKγ and IκBζ (Fig. 5, Dataset S4). Similar to the kinase TBK1, EsIKKγ plays an important role in NFκB signaling and assembly kinase complexes80. EsIKKγ contains the NFκB essential modulator (NEMO) domain with polyubiquitination binding sites and the C2H2 (classical)-type/ ‘NEMO’ type zinc finger thought to interact with the other IKK subunits (Dataset S1). EsIKKγ was also significantly upregulated in symbiotic light organs at 10, 16, and 18 h regardless of gravity state suggesting that, together with TBK1, these regulatory kinases may be playing an important role in symbiosis-activation of the host NFκB pathway (Dataset S3).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Network plot of Pearson correlation of voom transformed (log-CPM) NanoString assay gene expression counts to visualize gene expression relationships. Genes that are more highly correlated are closer together according to multidimensional clustering of the absolute values of correlation and are joined by stronger paths. Blue paths indicate positively correlated genes whereas red indicates negatively correlated genes. (A) all correlations with r-value ≥ 0.40. (B) highest correlations with minimum correlation r-value ≥ 0.6.

In addition to the regulatory kinases, TRAF3 expression was also strongly correlated to TBK1 and EsIKKγ (Fig. 5). TRAFs play an important role in innate immunity by interacting with adapter proteins or other kinases to continue signaling cascades by polyubiquitination, which can then recruit other important kinases, such as TBK1, TAK1, and IKKs77. TRAF3 is one of the most functionally diverse of the TRAFs in particular in the regulation of non-canonical NFκB signaling pathways81. This is the first report of TRAF3 in E. scolopes and the sequences not only contained the usual TRAF domains but also had a seven in absentia (SIAH)-type zinc finger that is important in E3 ubiquitin ligases (Dataset S1). The SIAH-type zinc finger is a mammalian homolog to the SINA-type zinc finger first found in Drosophila that can activate NFκB pathways82. In symbiotic animals TRAF3 gene expression was variable between 2 and 8 h post-inoculation, however, the expression became consistently upregulated in symbiotic animals starting at 10 h (Dataset S3). TRAF3 function is not well understood in invertebrates, however, several studies have shown that TRAF3 can respond to viral and bacterial challenges83,84. The strong correlation of TRAF3 expression with TBK1 and IKKε (Fig. 5) suggests it may mediate the activation of a complex between TBK1 and IKKε, although additional research is needed for confirmation.

Impact of low shear modeled microgravity on NFκB pathway gene expression

To explore these results further, samples were separated based on symbiosis state to explore the impact of bacterial colonization and modeled microgravity stress over time on NFκB pathway gene expression in the host squid (Fig. 6, Figs. S5 and S6). Analysis of the NanoString expression data suggested that several genes associated with the NFκB pathway were differentially expressed under the LSMMG treatments compared to gravity controls and that some gene expression was occurring earlier in the targeted developmental timeline in both aposymbiotic and symbiotic conditions (Table 2, Fig. 4, Dataset S3, Figs. S2S4). For example, under normal gravity conditions, differential expression of NFκB pathway genes did not occur until 6 h post inoculation (Dataset S3; Figs. S2S4), whereas under LSMMG conditions several genes including LysM3, TRAF2, TRAF4, IKKε, and IκBα, and IKBL were all significantly upregulated in symbiotic animals beginning 2 h post inoculation (Table 2, Dataset S3). Additionally, other genes including TBK1, IκBζ, EsPGRP3, and EsTRAF6 were also up-regulated earlier compared to the gravity controls (Table 2, Dataset S3). These results suggest that the stress of modeled microgravity may be triggering elements of the NFκB signaling pathway earlier than under gravity controls.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Principal component analysis (PCA) of NanoString gene expression assay samples separated by symbiosis state and HARV treatment. Aposymbiotic (APO) plots include the untreated hatchling animals (triangle) as well as the gravity (circle) and LSMMG (square) treatments. To improve visualization of the data over the developmental timeline, 2 h symbiotic (SYM) data were not included in the PCA and loading plots.

Table 2.

Temporal changes of significantly up-regulated genes in aposymbiotic animals relative to symbiotic animals under gravity and low-sheared modeled microgravity (LSMMG) conditions with adjusted p-value ≤ 0.10a.

2h 6 h 8 h 10 h 12 h 16 h 18 h
Treatment APO SYM APO SYM APO SYM APO SYM APO SYM APO SYM APO SYM
Gravity n/a n/a TRAF4 EsPGRP2 MYD88 EsPGRP2 MYD88 EsPGRP2 IRAK4 EsPGRP2 HSP71 EsPGRP2 n/ab EsPGRP2
MYD88 IκBα HSP90 TBK1 HSP90 TBK1 LysM3 TBK1 TBK1 TBK1
IκBα HSP71 IκBα IKKε IκBα IκBζ IκBζ
EsIKKγ EsPGRP5 IκBζ IKKβ IκBα IκBα
IKBL EsGalectin1 EsIKKγ EsPGRP3 IRAK4
TRAF3 EsTRAF6 EsIKKγ
LysM3 EsIKKγ EsTRAF6
IKBL TRAF3
TRAF2
LSMMG EsPGRP3 IκBα IKBL EsPGRP2 IKBL EsPGRP2 EsTRAF6 EsPGRP2 EsPGRP5 EsPGRP2 n/a EsPGRP2 n/a EsPGRP2
EsGalectin1 TRAF2 TRAF2 TBK1 TLR3 IκBα HSP90 TBK1 HSP90 TBK1 IκBζ TBK1
HSP90c LysM3 LysM3 IκBα TLR4 TBK1 MYD88 IκBα HSP71 IκBα EsPGRP3 IκBζ
IRAK4 IKBL TAB3 HSP90 TAK1 IκBζ EsPGRP3 EsSOD IκBζ IRAK4 EsPGRP3
HSP71 TRAF4 EsSOD TRAF4 IκBζ EsTRAF6 TBK1 IκBα
EsSOD IKKε EsIKKγ TRAF3 EsIKKγ EsTRAF6
TRAF3 TRAF2 TOLIP IRAK4
EsIKKγ
TRAF3
TOLIP

aFold changes and adjusted p-values listed in Dataset S2.

bIndicates no significantly differentially expressed genes at this time point.

cGenes in italics exhibit earlier temporal expression under LSMMG, whereas expression of genes in bold were delayed under LSMMG conditions relative to gravity controls.

Interestingly, two of the differentially expressed genes, IKBL and IκBα, are homologs that both contain ankyrin repeats and serve as inhibitors of NF-κB signaling by blocking nuclear localization and transcriptional activity of RelA (i.e., p65)85. The increased expression of the IKBL and IκBα inhibitors earlier in the bacteria-induced developmental timeline under LSMMG conditions may be associated with the observed delay in innate immune cell activation and trafficking26. Normally, under gravity conditions, MAMP shedding typically occurs through the release of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) by V. fischeri86, and the host responds by trafficking macrophage-like hemocytes into the blood sinus of the CEA within 1–2 h after exposure to V. fischeri. In simulated microgravity conditions, however, there is a delay of up to 8–10 h in the activation of hemocyte trafficking into the CEA blood sinus26, even though there is an LSMMG-induced increase in OMV and MAMP release by V. fischeri29. This disparity in the host response to the elevated MAMPs under simulated microgravity conditions may be correlated to the increase in expression of the IKBL and IκBα inhibitors, thereby delaying NF-κB signaling and downstream gene transcription (e.g., activation of cytokines). Additionally, IKBL gene expression was positively correlated to TRAF2 and LysM3 expression and negatively correlated to EsGalectin1 expression (Fig. 5, Dataset S4). This correlation coupled with the up-regulation of IKBL, TRAF2, and LysM3 expressed in aposymbiotic animals at 6 h (Table 2; Dataset S3) suggests these components of the NF-κB pathway may be stress-inducible, thereby contributing to the delay in innate immune system activation under modeled microgravity stress.

Although there have been no reports of differential expression of LysM under natural or simulated microgravity conditions, differential expression of TRAF2 has been observed using alternative modeled microgravity platforms including Random Positioning Machines and hind-limb unloading87,88. In symbiotic animals, TRAF2 was significantly expressed (p ≤ 0.5) under LSMMG conditions at 2 h (Table 2, Dataset S3). TRAF2 is important in several signaling cascades, including NFκB, oxidative stress-induced apoptotic cell death, and DNA damage responses8992. TRAF2 can both positively and negatively regulate stress-induced cell cytotoxicity and is highly context-dependent92. Additional research will be required to explore the elevated TRAF2, LysM, and IKBL levels and ascertain whether there are specific interactions between these molecules under LSMMG-induced stress.

Additionally, in the aposymbiotic animals, there was a significant increase in the expression of the effectors HSP90, HSP71, and EsSOD, as well as the PRR EsGalactin1 under LSMMG compared to the symbiotic animals. Although the HSPs and SODs are involved in the NFκB pathway, these genes are likely being upregulated as a novel stress response to the simulated microgravity conditions as these genes were not differentially expressed under gravity controls. Numerous studies have shown that HSPs, including HSP90 and HSP70, and SODs are upregulated in both plants and animals in response to spaceflight conditions including microgravity and radiation9398. Additionally, the increased expression of EsGalectin1 in the aposymbiotic animals may also reflect a stress response. Although the increase of galectin-1 expression has not been previously shown to be increased under spaceflight or simulated microgravity conditions, it has been shown to prevent oxidative stress responses in a wide range of animal hosts and may reflect a more broad stress response in the host squid99,100. Interestingly, the increase in these stress-response genes was only observed in the aposymbiotic animals and may suggest that the host may be sensing the V. fischeri in symbiotic animals and overriding some of the LSMMG-induced stress responses in the host tissues.

Not all targeted genes exhibited earlier differential expression, in fact, several genes, such as TRAF3, TRAF4, MYD88, and EsIKKγ, exhibited a delay in expression over time under LSMMG conditions. The delayed expression of these genes was not correlated with each other (Fig. 5) but may signify a disruption to the normal signaling pathway under LSMMG conditions that contributes to the overall delay in the host innate immune response (Fig. 1E). For example, TRAF3 is a key regulator of TLRs101. Additionally, TRAF3 can form a complex with protein kinases TBK-1 and IKKε that leads to the activation of type I interferon102,103. The delayed expression of TRAF3 may impede the complex formation thus dysregulating the host immune response. Additional experimentation will be required to determine the precise function of TRAF3 in E. scolopes under both LSMMG and normal unit gravity conditions.

In summary, the results of this study provided a more comprehensive understanding of the NFκB signaling pathway in E. scolopes during the onset of symbiosis and showed that many genes of the pathway were differentially expressed under the stress of modeled microgravity conditions. Although similar dysregulation has been observed in a wide range of host animals under simulated and natural spaceflight conditions3,104,105, this study provides new insight into how the onset of a beneficial symbiosis under these LSMMG conditions can impact the host innate immune transcriptional responses. The results showed that the major driver of differential gene regulation of the NFκB pathway was the onset of the symbiosis, suggesting that interactions with microbes may trigger key developmental and innate immune responses that, in some cases, supersede microgravity-induced responses. However, some key elements associated with inhibiting the NFκB pathway were upregulated within a few hours of exposure to simulated microgravity conditions indicating that the stress of microgravity can impose rapid physiological changes within the host animal in the presence and absence of beneficial microbes. Additionally, the multi-functional role of many elements of the NFκB signaling pathway in other key pathways, such as apoptosis and crosstalk with the microbiome, likely contributed to the dysregulation observed in the pathway, confounding the elucidation of host innate immune responses during the stress of simulated microgravity. These results do, however, expose the importance of examining host-microbe interactions in situ and in real-time to more fully understand the innate immune response of animals during spaceflight conditions.

Materials and methods

Data mining of the host reference transcriptome and genome

Gene sequences relating to the putative innate immune NFκB pathway in E. scolopes were found by data mining the reference transcriptome and fully assembled genome48. Translated genes were subsequently searched in the NCBI non-redundant databases using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for proteins (BLASTp) to confirm their annotation. The gene level homology was examined as expected values (i.e., E-values) and all hits had E-values < − 45. Domain architecture for each gene was confirmed through InterProScan106 (Dataset S1). Genes that have been found previously in E. scolopes were given the ‘Es’ notion in this study to maintain consistency with previously published literature.

Animal husbandry and general procedures

All cephalopod procedures were approved by both the University of Florida (approval number 201910899) and Kennedy Space Center (approval number GDR-20-128) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees and were performed in accordance with the approved protocols and guidelines. Mature E. scolopes squid were maintained in aquaria within an environmental growth chamber at 23 °C on a 12 h light/dark cycle. Clutches of eggs were removed from the adult tanks and incubated separately in individual aquaria for their full developmental cycle (~ 21 days). After hatching, the juvenile squid were maintained in filtered-sterilized seawater (FSW) as either aposymbiotic (i.e., no symbiosis-competent V. fischeri) or rendered symbiotic. For symbiotic treatments, animals were inoculated with 1 × 105 cells of V. fischeri ES114 per ml of FSW. The concentration of V. fischeri was determined spectrophotometrically (A600nm) as an OD of 1 corresponds to 4 × 108 cells per ml of culture, as previously determined by plate counts107. In all treatments, the onset of symbiosis was monitored by luminescence levels using an ATP photometer (GloMax 20/20 Luminometer, Promega, Corps., Madison, WI).

Simulated low-shear modeled microgravity (LSMMG) conditions

To simulate the LSMMG conditions, a rotary culture system was used with 16 replicate 50-mL volume high-aspect ratio vessels (HARVs; Synthecon, Houston, TX) and rotated at a constant 13 rpm (Fig. 1D). The HARVs were either rotated around a horizontal axis to simulate LSMMG or a vertical axis to serve as a normal gravity (1 × g) control as previously described25,40. For all time points, gravity controls were conducted in HARVs where the axis of rotation was perpendicular to the test system to ensure that the phenotypes detected were not simply the results of being in the HARV system. Both LSMMG treatments and gravity controls were run simultaneously within a environmental growth chamber on a 12 h light/dark cycle and maintained at a constant 23 °C.

Juvenile squid were kept aposymbiotic or symbiotic as described above. The animals were added to the HARVs through an opening on the surface of the HARVs and then sealed with zero headspace. A semipermeable membrane provided aeration for the host and symbiont. Previous studies have shown no change in oxygen levels during animal and bacteria co-incubations30. A total of four replicate animals were incubated in each HARV vessel for 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 18, or 24 h and then animals were removed and immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. Additionally, a subset of animals were collected within 5 min (i.e., 0 h) of hatching and frozen in liquid nitrogen for comparison purposes.

NanoString target gene probe design

Target genes were chosen from the data mining results to give an overall representation of elements of the NFκB pathway in E. scolopes. Optimal fluorescently tagged probes of 100 bp length were designed and synthesized at NanoString Technologies, Inc. in Seattle, WA for the selected genes to ensure no off-target binding. Probes were designed to hit whole genes and not specific isoforms. There were a total of 33 target genes and two housekeeping genes designed and successfully assayed by NanoString gene expression technology (Table 1; Table S1).

RNA extraction and gene expression analysis

Total RNA was extracted in triplicate from dissected light organs using RNeasy and Qiashredder kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). A minimum of three light organs was used for each replicate RNA extraction. RNA was pooled from a minimum of three separate extractions derived from three different technical replicates of HARV exposure to increase overall genetic variability and to ensure that gene expression results were not based on variability between egg clutches.

RNA quantity was assessed using Qubit 2.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and RNA quality was assessed with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). All samples were normalized to 20 ng per µl of RNA and 100 ng of RNA was run for each sample on the NanoString nCounter MAX system (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA). Note due to space limitations in the NanoString 96-well sequencing plate, 24 h LSMMG-treated symbiotic animals were not able to be sequenced and were thus not included in some of the data analysis.

Data were filtered and normalized using nSolver analysis software (v4.0; NanoString Technologies). Background subtraction was performed using the geometric mean of the negative controls and data was normalized using the geometric mean of positive controls for every time point and housekeeping genes (actB3 and pyc1). Voom transformation from the limma package (v3.8) in R was applied to the normalized counts. This transformation used the empirical Bayes method by pooling estimates of sample variance to assess the expression level variance within samples and transform data into log2-counts per million (CPM). This method has been shown to be more useful for smaller sample size studies, such as with NanoString assays108,109. The voom transformed data were passed to a linear model in the limma package to remove the mean–variance relationship and assess statistically significant differentially expressed genes109. Significance values were adjusted according to the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple test correction procedure and considered significantly differentially expressed at adjusted p-values < 0.10 and highly significant at < 0.05. Several R packages were used to further analyze and visualize the expression results including heatmap.2 from gplots, Pearson network correlation analysis using the package ‘corrr’ from ggplot2 and ggraph, and the prcomp() function was used for principal component analysis (PCA). All raw NanoString data generated in this study is available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE247559.

ARRIVE statement

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments). For example, all cephalopod procedures were approved by both the University of Florida (approval number 201910899) and Kennedy Space Center (approval number GDR-20-128) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees and were performed in accordance with the approved protocols and guidelines.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank NanoString Technologies for assistance with probe design, Dr. Christine Schnitzler for assistance regarding data analysis, and all of their donors from experiment.com/squidinspace that contributed to making the NanoString sequencing possible. The work was also supported by NASA Space Biology grants 80NSSC19K0138 and 80NSSC18K1465 awarded to JSF and a NASA Florida Space Grant Consortium Dissertation Improvement grant awarded to AAD. The NanoString experiments were supported by public donations made through the crowdfunding site Experiment.com/squidinspace.

Author contributions

A.D. and M.V. completed experiments and designed the NanoString probes. A.D. performed all data analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the experimental design and editing of the manuscript.

Data availability

All data generated as part of this study is available within this manuscript, including figures, and supplemental materials. Additionally, the NanoString data generated in this study has been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE247559.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-53477-3.

References

  • 1.Cervantes JL, Hong BY. Dysbiosis and immune dysregulation in outer space. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2016;35:67–82. doi: 10.3109/08830185.2015.1027821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Crucian B, et al. Alterations in adaptive immunity persist during long-duration spaceflight. NPJ Microgravity. 2015;1:15013. doi: 10.1038/npjmgrav.2015.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Crucian BE, et al. Immune system dysregulation during spaceflight: Potential countermeasures for deep space exploration missions. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1437. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kimzey, S. L., Fischer, C. L., Johnson, P. C., Ritzmann, S. E. & Mengel, C. E. Hematology and immunology studies. 197–226 (1975).
  • 5.Kimzey SL. Results from Skylab. NASA Johnson Space Center, NASA Johnson Space Center; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paulsen K, et al. Microgravity-induced alterations in signal transduction in cells of the immune system. Acta Astronaut. 2010;67:1116–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.06.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.ElGindi M, et al. May the force be with you (or not): The immune system under microgravity. Cells. 2021;10:1941. doi: 10.3390/cells10081941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garrett-Bakelman FE, et al. The NASA twins study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science. 2019;364:eaau8650. doi: 10.1126/science.aau8650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smith JK. IL-6 and the dysregulation of immune, bone, muscle, and metabolic homeostasis during spaceflight. NPJ Microgravity. 2018;4:24. doi: 10.1038/s41526-018-0057-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sonnenfeld G, Butel JS, Shearer WT. Effects of the space flight environment on the immune system. Rev. Environ. Health. 2003;18:1–17. doi: 10.1515/REVEH.2003.18.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crucian B, Stowe R, Quiriarte H, Pierson D, Sams C. Monocyte phenotype and cytokine production profiles are dysregulated by short-duration spaceflight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2011;82:857–862. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.3047.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boonyaratanakornkit JB, et al. Key gravity-sensitive signaling pathways drive T cell activation. FASEB J. 2005;19:2020–2022. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-3778fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaur I, Simons ER, Kapadia AS, Ott CM, Pierson DL. Effect of spaceflight on ability of monocytes to respond to endotoxins of gram-negative bacteria. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:1523–1528. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00065-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vincent L, Avancena P, Cheng J, Rafii S, Rabbany SY. Simulated microgravity impairs leukemic cell survival through altering VEGFR-2/VEGF-A signaling pathway. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005;33:1405–1410. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-6153-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang Y, et al. Transcriptomics, NF-kappaB Pathway, and their potential spaceflight-related health consequences. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1166. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oeckinghaus A, Hayden MS, Ghosh S. Crosstalk in NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:695–708. doi: 10.1038/ni.2065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hayden MS, Ghosh S. NF-kappaB in immunobiology. Cell Res. 2011;21:223–244. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Morgan MJ, Liu ZG. Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF-kappaB signaling. Cell Res. 2011;21:103–115. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Allen DL, et al. Effects of spaceflight on murine skeletal muscle gene expression. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009;106:582–595. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90780.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mangala LS, et al. Effects of simulated microgravity on expression profile of microRNA in human lymphoblastoid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:32483–32490. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.267765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kwon O, Tranter M, Jones WK, Sankovic JM, Banerjee RK. Differential translocation of nuclear factor-kappaB in a cardiac muscle cell line under gravitational changes. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009;131:064503. doi: 10.1115/1.3128718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pacios S, et al. Osteoblast lineage cells play an essential role in periodontal bone loss through activation of Nuclear Factor-Kappa B. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:16694. doi: 10.1038/srep16694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Casaburi G, Goncharenko-Foster I, Duscher AA, Foster JS. Transcriptomic changes in an animal-bacterial symbiosis under modeled microgravity conditions. Sci. Rep. 2017 doi: 10.1038/srep46318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Duscher AA. Impact of Modeled Microgravity on the Beneficial Symbiosis Between the Hawaiian Squid, Euprymna Scolopes, and its Bioluminescent Partner, Vibrio fisceri. University of Florida; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Duscher AA, et al. Transcriptional profiling of the mutualistic bacterium Vibrio fischeri and an hfq mutant under modeled microgravity. NPJ Microgravity. 2018;4:25. doi: 10.1038/s41526-018-0060-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Foster JS, Khodadad CL, Ahrendt SR, Parrish ML. Impact of simulated microgravity on the normal developmental time line of an animal-bacterial symbiosis. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:1340. doi: 10.1038/srep01340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Foster JS, Wheeler RM, Pamphile R. Host-microbe interactions in microgravity: Assessment and implications. Life. 2014;4:250–266. doi: 10.3390/life4020250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grant KA, Khodadad CL, Foster JS. Role of Hfq in an animal-microbe symbiosis under simulated microgravity conditions. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2014;13:53–61. doi: 10.1017/S1473550413000359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vroom MM, Rodriguez-Ocasio Y, Lynch JB, Ruby EG, Foster JS. Modeled microgravity alters lipopolysaccharide and outer membrane vesicle production of the beneficial symbiont Vibrio fischeri. NPJ Microgravity. 2021;7:8. doi: 10.1038/s41526-021-00138-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vroom MM, Troncoso-Garcia A, Duscher AA, Foster JS. Modeled microgravity alters apoptotic gene expression and caspase activity in the squid-vibrio symbiosis. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22:202. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02614-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McFall-Ngai MJ, Ruby EG. Symbiont recognition and subsequent morphogenesis as early events in an animal-bacterial mutualism. Science. 1991;254:1491–1494. doi: 10.1126/science.1962208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nawroth JC, et al. Motile cilia create fluid-mechanical microhabitats for the active recruitment of the host microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017;114:9510–9516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706926114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Foster JS, McFall-Ngai MJ. Induction of apoptosis by cooperative bacteria in the morphogenesis of host epithelial tissues. Dev. Genes Evol. 1998;208:295–303. doi: 10.1007/s004270050185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Doino JA, McFall-Ngai M. Transient exposures to competent bacteria initiates symbiosis-specific squid light organ morphogenesis. Biol. Bull. 1995;189:347–355. doi: 10.2307/1542152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Foster JS, Apicella MA, McFall-Ngai MJ. Vibrio fischeri lipopolysaccharide induces developmental apoptosis, but not complete morphogenesis, of the Euprymna scolopes symbiotic light organ. Dev. Biol. 2000;226:242–254. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Goodson MS, et al. Identifying components of the NF-kappaB pathway in the beneficial Euprymna scolopes-Vibrio fischeri light organ symbiosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:6934–6946. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6934-6946.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Koropatnick TA, et al. Microbial factor-mediated development in a host-bacterial mutualism. Science. 2004;306:1186–1188. doi: 10.1126/science.1102218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.McFall-Ngai M, Nyholm SV, Castillo MG. The role of the immune system in the initiation and persistence of the Euprymna scolopes–Vibrio fischeri symbiosis. Semin. Immunol. 2010;22:48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2009.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Higginson EE, Galen JE, Levine MM, Tennant SM. Microgravity as a biological tool to examine host-pathogen interactions and to guide development of therapeutics and preventatives that target pathogenic bacteria. Pathog. Dis. 2016;74:ftw095. doi: 10.1093/femspd/ftw095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schwarz RP, Goodwin TJ, Wolf DA. Cell culture for three-dimensional modeling in rotating-wall vessels: An application of simulated microgravity. J. Tiss. Cult. Meth. 1992;14:51–58. doi: 10.1007/BF01404744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nickerson CA, Ott CM, Wilson JW, Ramamurthy R, Pierson DL. Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2004;68:345–361. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.345-361.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nickerson CA, et al. Low-shear modeled microgravity: A global environmental regulatory signal affecting bacterial gene expression, physiology, and pathogenesis. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2003;54:1–11. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00018-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Castillo MG, Salazar KA, Joffe NR. The immune response of cephalopods from head to foot. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015;46:145–160. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chun CK, et al. Effects of colonization, luminescence, and autoinducer on host transcription during development of the squid-vibrio association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105:11323–11328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802369105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Collins AJ, Schleicher TR, Rader BA, Nyholm SV. Understanding the role of host hemocytes in a squid/vibrio symbiosis using transcriptomics and proteomics. Front. Immunol. 2012;3:91. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Melton K. Characterization of Host Toll-Like Receptor Expression in Colonization and Maintenance of Euprymna Scolopes. Southern Illinois University Carbondale; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schleicher TR, VerBerkmoes NC, Shah M, Nyholm SV. Colonization state influences the hemocyte proteome in a beneficial squid-Vibrio symbiosis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2014;13:2673–2686. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.037259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Belcaid M, et al. Symbiotic organs shaped by distinct modes of genome evolution in cephalopods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116:3030–3035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817322116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schleicher TR, Nyholm SV. Characterizing the host and symbiont proteomes in the association between the Bobtail squid, Euprymna scolopes, and the bacterium, Vibrio fischeri. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Troll JV, et al. Peptidoglycan induces loss of a nuclear peptidoglycan recognition protein during host tissue development in a beneficial animal-bacterial symbiosis. Cell. Microbiol. 2009;11:1114–1127. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01315.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Troll JV, et al. Taming the symbiont for coexistence: A host PGRP neutralizes a bacterial symbiont toxin. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;12:2190–2203. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02121.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Royet J, Gupta D, Dziarski R. Peptidoglycan recognition proteins: Modulators of the microbiome and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:837–851. doi: 10.1038/nri3089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shi XZ, et al. A galectin from the kuruma shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus) functions as an opsonin and promotes bacterial clearance from hemolymph. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stowell SR, et al. Microbial glycan microarrays define key features of host-microbial interactions. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014;10:470–476. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Vasta GR. Roles of galectins in infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:424–438. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yu Y, et al. Molecular and biochemical characterization of galectin from amphioxus: Primitive galectin of chordates participated in the infection processes. Glycobiology. 2007;17:774–783. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwm044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Adin DM, Engle JT, Goldman WE, McFall-Ngai MJ, Stabb EV. Mutations in ampG and lytic transglycosylase genes affect the net release of peptidoglycan monomers from Vibrio fischeri. J. Bacteriol. 2009;191:2012–2022. doi: 10.1128/JB.01547-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gust AA, Willmann R, Desaki Y, Grabherr HM, Nurnberger T. Plant LysM proteins: Modules mediating symbiosis and immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:495–502. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kombrink A, Thomma BP. LysM effectors: Secreted proteins supporting fungal life. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003769. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ponting CP, Aravind L, Schultz J, Bork P, Koonin EV. Eukaryotic signalling domain homologues in archaea and bacteria. Ancient ancestry and horizontal gene transfer. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;289:729–745. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shi XZ, et al. Involvement of a LysM and putative peptidoglycan-binding domain-containing protein in the antibacterial immune response of kuruma shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016;54:489–498. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.04.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu X, et al. Acute effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on the immune response in Sepia esculenta larvae. Aquat. Toxicol. 2023;258:106478. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kawai T, Akira S. Signaling to NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptors. Trends Mol. Med. 2007;13:460–469. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Adhikari A, Xu M, Chen ZJ. Ubiquitin-mediated activation of TAK1 and IKK. Oncogene. 2007;26:3214–3226. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Castellanos-Martinez S, Arteta D, Catarino S, Gestal CD. novo transcriptome sequencing of the Octopus vulgaris hemocytes using Illumina RNA-Seq technology: Response to the infection by the gastrointestinal parasite Aggregata octopiana. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Huang J, Zhou M, You W, Luo X, Ke C. Molecular characterization and function of bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP7) in the Pacific abalone, Haliotis discus hannai. Genes (Basel) 2023;14:1128. doi: 10.3390/genes14061128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fontan E, et al. NEMO oligomerization in the dynamic assembly of the IkappaB kinase core complex. FEBS J. 2007;274:2540–2551. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Matondo M, et al. Determination of differentially regulated proteins upon proteasome inhibition in AML cell lines by the combination of large-scale and targeted quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2017 doi: 10.1002/pmic.201600089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Schneider M, et al. The innate immune sensor NLRC3 attenuates Toll-like receptor signaling via modification of the signaling adaptor TRAF6 and transcription factor NF-kappaB. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:823–831. doi: 10.1038/ni.2378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang R, et al. Simulated microgravity-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in rat cerebral arteries. FASEB J. 2014;28:2715–2724. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-245654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Goytain A, Ng T. NanoString nCounter technology: High-throughput RNA validation. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020;2079:125–139. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9904-0_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kerwin AH, Nyholm SV. Symbiotic bacteria associated with a bobtail squid reproductive system are detectable in the environment, and stable in the host and developing eggs. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;19:1463–1475. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.McAnulty SJ, et al. "Failure to launch": Development of a reproductive organ linked to symbiotic bacteria. mBio. 2023;14:e0213122. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02131-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fitzgerald KA, et al. IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:491–496. doi: 10.1038/ni921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Oakes JA, Davies MC, Collins MO. TBK1: A new player in ALS linking autophagy and neuroinflammation. Mol. Brain. 2017;10:5. doi: 10.1186/s13041-017-0287-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shen RR, Hahn WC. Emerging roles for the non-canonical IKKs in cancer. Oncogene. 2011;30:631–641. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhou R, Zhang Q, Xu P. TBK1, a central kinase in innate immune sensing of nucleic acids and beyond. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. 2020;52:757–767. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmaa051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gutierrez-Merino J, Isla B, Combes T, Martinez-Estrada F, Maluquer De Motes C. Beneficial bacteria activate type-I interferon production via the intracellular cytosolic sensors STING and MAVS. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:771–788. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1707015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bono C, et al. Direct TLR2 signaling through mTOR and TBK1 induces C/EBPbeta and IRF7-dependent macrophage differentiation in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2022;40:949–962. doi: 10.1093/stmcls/sxac053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chau TL, et al. Are the IKKs and IKK-related kinases TBK1 and IKK-epsilon similarly activated? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008;33:171–180. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lin M, Ji X, Lv Y, Cui D, Xie J. The roles of TRAF3 in immune responses. Dis. Markers. 2023;2023:7787803. doi: 10.1155/2023/7787803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Polekhina G, et al. Siah ubiquitin ligase is structurally related to TRAF and modulates TNF-alpha signaling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2002;9:68–75. doi: 10.1038/nsb743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Qu F, Xiang Z, Zhou Y, Qin Y, Yu Z. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 from Anodonta woodiana is an important factor in bivalve immune response to pathogen infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;71:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sun SC. The non-canonical NF-kappaB pathway in immunity and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017;17:545–558. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ferreiro DU, Komives EA. Molecular mechanisms of system control of NF-kappaB signaling by IkappaBalpha. Biochemistry. 2010;49:1560–1567. doi: 10.1021/bi901948j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Aschtgen MS, et al. Rotation of Vibrio fischeri flagella produces outer membrane vesicles that induce host development. J. Bacteriol. 2016;198:2156–2165. doi: 10.1128/JB.00101-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhao T, et al. Simulated microgravity promotes cell apoptosis through suppressing Uev1A/TICAM/TRAF/NF-kB-regulated anti-apoptosis and p53/PCNA- and ATM/ATR-Chk1/2- controlled DNA-damage response pathways. J. Cell. Biochem. 2016;117:2138–2148. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hunter RB, et al. Activation of an alternative NF-kappaB pathway in skeletal muscle during disuse atrophy. FASEB J. 2002;16:529–538. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0866com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Fujino G, et al. Thioredoxin and TRAF family proteins regulate reactive oxygen species-dependent activation of ASK1 through reciprocal modulation of the N-terminal homophilic interaction of ASK1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007;27:8152–8163. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00227-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Noguchi T, et al. Recruitment of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family proteins to apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 signalosome is essential for oxidative stress-induced cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:37033–37040. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506771200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Shen HM, et al. Essential roles of receptor-interacting protein and TRAF2 in oxidative stress-induced cell death. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004;24:5914–5922. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.13.5914-5922.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tsuchida M, et al. Pro-apoptotic functions of TRAF2 in p53-mediated apoptosis induced by cisplatin. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2020;45:219–226. doi: 10.2131/jts.45.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Iqbal J, et al. Differential expression of specific cellular defense proteins in rat hypothalamus under simulated microgravity induced conditions: comparative proteomics. Proteomics. 2014;14:1424–1433. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201400019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kozeko L, Talalaiev O, Neimash V, Povarchuk V. A protective role of HSP90 chaperone in gamma-irradiated Arabidopsis thaliana seeds. Life Sci. Space Res. (Amst.) 2015;6:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Novoselova EG, et al. Changes in immune cell signalling, apoptosis and stress response functions in mice returned from the BION-M1 mission in space. Immunobiology. 2015;220:500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2014.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Paul AL, et al. Spaceflight transcriptomes: Unique responses to a novel environment. Astrobiology. 2012;12:40–56. doi: 10.1089/ast.2011.0696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zhao L, Rui Q, Wang D. Molecular basis for oxidative stress induced by simulated microgravity in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;607–608:1381–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zupanska AK, Denison FC, Ferl RJ, Paul AL. Spaceflight engages heat shock protein and other molecular chaperone genes in tissue culture cells of Arabidopsis thaliana. Am. J. Bot. 2013;100:235–248. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Arda-Pirincci P, Aykol-Celik G. Galectin-1 reduces the severity of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis by suppressing inflammatory and oxidative stress response. Bosnian J. Basic Med. Sci. 2020;20:319. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ito K, et al. Thiodigalactoside inhibits murine cancers by concurrently blocking effects of galectin-1 on immune dysregulation, angiogenesis and protection against oxidative stress. Angiogenesis. 2011;14:293–307. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9213-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hoebe K, Beutler B. TRAF3: A new component of the TLR-signaling apparatus. Trends Mol. Med. 2006;12:187–189. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Saha SK, et al. Regulation of antiviral responses by a direct and specific interaction between TRAF3 and Cardif. EMBO J. 2006;25:3257–3263. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Huang XD, et al. Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) from pearl oyster Pinctada fucata. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012;33:652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Corydon TJ, et al. Current knowledge about the impact of microgravity on gene regulation. Cells. 2023;12:1043. doi: 10.3390/cells12071043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Marcu O, et al. Innate immune responses of Drosophila melanogaster are altered by spaceflight. PLoS One. 2011;6:e15361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Mitchell AL, et al. InterPro in 2019: Improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D351–D360. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Boettcher KJ, Ruby EG. Depressed light emission by symbiotic Vibrio fischeri of the sepiolid squid Euprymna scolopes. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:3701–3706. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.7.3701-3706.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Van Laar R, Lincoln M, Van Laar B. Development and validation of a plasma-based melanoma biomarker suitable for clinical use. Br. J. Cancer. 2018;118:857–866. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ritchie ME, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data generated as part of this study is available within this manuscript, including figures, and supplemental materials. Additionally, the NanoString data generated in this study has been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number GSE247559.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES