Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 26;10(3):e25178. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25178

Table 1.

Comparison of different knot tying techniques by run time, knot strength and knot-spread ability.

95 % Confidence Interval
Parameter Contrast Ratioa means Lower Upper p-valueb
Time (sec) Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, open 1.33 (386.6:279.5) 1.244 1.429 <0.001
Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, closed 1.361 (386.6:255.7) 1.27 1.458 <0.001
Extracorporeal, open: Extracorporeal, closed 1.02 (279.5:255.7) 0.953 1.093 0.563
Knot strength (mm) Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, open 0.827 (3.80:4.92) 0.688 0.994 0.043
Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, closed 0.966 (3.80:4.96) 0.805 1.159 0.709
Extracorporeal, open: Extracorporeal, closed 1.168 (4.92:4.96) 0.975 1.4 0.092
Knot-spread ability (mm) Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, open 1.328 (11.72:10.46) 0.782 1.875 <0.001
Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, closed 1.519 (11.77:10.26) 0.976 2.063 <0.001
Extracorporeal, open: Extracorporeal, closed 0.191 (10.46:10.26) −0.347 0.729 0.486
Mistakes Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, open 2.294 (0.36:0.28) 1.261 4.17 0.007
Intracorporeal: Extracorporeal, closed 2.453 (0.36:0.22) 1.353 4.447 0.003
Extracorporeal, open: Extracorporeal, closed 1.07 (0.28:0.22) 0.578 1.981 0.831
a

For ‘Time’ and ‘Knot strength’, ratios correspond to geometric mean ratios. For ‘Knot-spread ability, ratios correspond to differences of means. For ‘Mistakes’, ratios correspond to odds ratios. The geometric mean ratio approximately corresponds to the median ratio.

b

The p-values were calculated using a mixed-effects model. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.