Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases gastrointestinal morbidity and associated mortality. Clinical and preclinical studies implicate gut dysbiosis as a consequence of TBI and an amplifier of brain damage. However, little is known about the association of gut dysbiosis with structural and functional changes of the gastrointestinal tract after an isolated TBI. To assess gastrointestinal dysfunction, mice received a controlled cortical impact or sham brain injury and intestinal permeability was assessed at 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, and 3 d after injury by oral administration of 4 kDa FITC Dextran prior to euthanasia. Quantification of serum fluorescence revealed an acute, short-lived increase in permeability 4 h after TBI. Despite transient intestinal dysfunction, no overt morphological changes were evident in the ileum or colon across timepoints from 4 h to 4 wks post-injury. To elucidate the timeline of microbiome changes after TBI, 16 s gene sequencing was performed on DNA extracted from fecal samples collected prior to and over the first month after TBI. Differential abundance analysis revealed that the phylum Verrucomicrobiota was increased at 1, 2, and 3 d after TBI. The Verrucomicrobiota species was identified by qPCR as Akkermansia muciniphila, an obligate anaerobe that resides in the intestinal mucus bilayer and produces short chain fatty acids (e.g. butyrate) utilized by intestinal epithelial cells. We postulated that TBI promotes intestinal changes favorable for the bloom of A. muciniphila. Consistent with this premise, the relative area of mucus-producing goblet cells in the medial colon was significantly increased at 1 d after injury, while colon hypoxia was significantly increased at 3 d. Our findings reveal acute gastrointestinal functional changes coupled with an increase of beneficial bacteria suggesting a potential compensatory response to systemic stress after TBI.
Subject terms: DNA sequencing, Animal disease models, Bioinformatics, Mouse, Fluorescence imaging, Optical imaging, Neurodegeneration, Microbial communities, Microbiota, Large intestine, Colon, Small intestine, Ileum, Experimental models of disease
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major source of death and disability with approximately 2.8 million people suffering a TBI annually in the United States alone1,2. The initial brain insult and ensuing secondary injury cascade result in complex damage and dysfunction not only to the brain but also to other organ systems3,4. Increasing evidence suggests that the neuroenteric axis is altered following TBI, compromising bidirectional coordination of external and internal stimuli by the central and enteric nervous systems5,6. Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction, including dysmotility, fecal incontinence and sepsis, is well documented in the TBI population7–9. Indeed, at one or more years after injury, TBI is associated with a 2.5-fold increase in the incidence of digestive system conditions and 12-fold increase in death due to septicemia9,10. Rodent models of TBI recapitulate aspects of GI dysfunction seen in humans, including altered transit time11 and increased intestinal permeability5,12. Such perturbations to normal GI function may result in disrupted nutrient absorption and bacterial translocation, potentially contributing to deleterious central nervous system outcomes5,6,13,14.
The microbiota residing in the intestinal tract mediate signaling along the neuroenteric axis15. The cells of the small and large intestine interact with microbes and microbial metabolites to affect direct and indirect signaling to the central nervous system. The gut’s native bacterial populations are critical for maintaining GI health by contributing to intestinal metabolism and digestion and influence many systems critical for normal development of the brain and immune system16–19. Changes to the gut microbiome have been reported after TBI, although the specific findings vary (reviewed in20). Experimental perturbation of the microbiome worsens outcomes after experimental TBI6,21,22. More specifically, TBI-associated pathology and neurologic deficits are exacerbated by the induction of colitis early after injury22 and with the introduction of intestinal pathogens at chronic timepoints6. Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis after experimental TBI is associated with greater neuroinflammation and reduced hippocampal neurogenesis, compromising potentially reparative neuroplasticity21. Given that gut-to-brain signaling can affect multiple outcomes, it is important to understand the brain-to-gut changes that are initiated after TBI.
TBI can affect not only GI function and the gut microbiome, but also the structural integrity of the GI tract. Acute small intestinal villi blunting and chronic thickening of the muscularis mucosae have been noted after experimental brain injury5,6,13. Moreover, due to the close association between the gut microbiota and the intestinal epithelium, deleterious changes to the gut microbiome are often associated with damage to the intestinal tract and vice versa23–25.
The intestinal microbiome has been posited as a potential therapeutic target after TBI26, but how the GI tract is altered by TBI is still poorly understood. To test the hypothesis that TBI initiates intestinal dysfunction and damage in concert with gut dysbiosis, we induced a controlled cortical impact (CCI) brain injury in mice. Damage to the GI tract was assessed at multiple timepoints over a 4 wk post-injury period by quantifying morphological features of crypt-villi and crypt structures and goblet cells in the small and large intestines. The fecal microbiome was then profiled at corresponding timepoints by performing 16 s rRNA gene sequencing.
Methodology
Subjects
C57BL/6J male mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories at 4–8 wks of age (ntotal = 125). Mice were allowed to acclimate within the University of Kentucky Medical Center animal vivarium for at least one week prior to any procedures. The vivarium was maintained at a constant temperature with a 14/10 h light/dark cycle. Unless otherwise stated, mice were provided food and water ad libitum.
For microbiome studies, mice were co-housed by injury condition following inoculation with a common microbiome to minimize inter-individual variation (see pre-injury microbiome normalization methods for additional information). All other mice were co-housed regardless of injury condition with their cage-mates as determined upon arrival to the vivarium.
All procedures were approved by the University of Kentucky’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, under IACUC protocol 2019-3170, and all experiments were performed in accordance with the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” and relevant regulations27.
CCI surgery, group randomization
Adult mice (8–10 wks of age) were randomized into CCI or sham injury groups using a random list generator (random.org). CCI mice received a moderate brain injury (1.1 mm depth, 3.5 m/s speed) as previously described28. In short, mice were initially anesthetized using 3% isoflurane and placed in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments). Once the head was stabilized, anesthesia was maintained at 2.5% isoflurane for the duration of the surgery. The scalp was shaved and disinfected prior to analgesic administration via subcutaneous injection (0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in sterile saline; 2 mg/kg bodyweight). A midline incision was made and the scalp retracted. A 5 mm diameter craniotomy was made over the left parietal cortex midway between bregma and lambda. The 3 mm diameter, rounded impactor tip was centered over the craniotomy and a cortical contusion was produced using an electromagnetically driven impactor device (Leica Biosystems). The craniotomy site was then closed with a cranioplasty to protect the brain from further damage. Following surgery, mice were placed on a heated pad to maintain body temperature until they were ambulatory. Sham-injured mice served as the control group and underwent all procedures except the impact. A priori power analysis was not performed because GI histology outcomes had not been assessed previously within the lab. Thus, group sizes were based upon published data from TBI studies assessing GI tissue outcomes5,6,29. Group sizes for each experimental parameter are provided in Supplemental Table 1.
Intestinal permeability assay
Intestinal permeability was assessed as previously published30 in mice that were euthanized at 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, or 3 d after sham injury or CCI (nsham = 2–3/timepoint; nCCI = 6–9/timepoint). All mice were fasted approximately 10–13 h prior to euthanasia to allow for complete clearance of the GI tract. Mice designated for the 4 h group were fasted overnight prior to surgery. Mice surviving 8 h were fasted beginning 2 h prior to surgery. To assess permeability, 4 kDa FITC dextran (100 mg/ml; FD4, Sigma Aldrich, CAS: 60842-46-8) was administered 4 h prior to euthanasia by oral gavage at a dose of 44 mg/100 g body weight. Mice designated for euthanasia 4 h after injury were gavaged directly after they regained consciousness from surgery. A single sham mouse from the 4 h assessment group was excluded due to a gavaging error.
Mice were euthanized by overdose of sodium pentobarbital (Fatal Plus, 150 mg/kg i.p.). A midline laparotomy was then immediately performed, followed by a thoracotomy to expose the heart for blood collection from the left atria. If insufficient blood was collected, the right auricle was clipped and pooled blood was collected. Mice were excluded if an insufficient amount of blood was able to be collected after clipping the right auricle (Sham: n8hr = 1, n1d = 1, n3d = 1 | CCI: n1d = 1, n3d = 2). Blood was allowed to clot at room temperature and was then spun down in a centrifuge (4 °C; 1500xG for 15–20 min). Serum was stored at -20 °C until analysis. After blood collection, mice were perfused with heparinized saline and tissue collection proceeded as outlined below. Serum fluorescence was measured on a plate reader (Synergy | HTX multi-mode reader; Gen5 Image+) and concentration of FITC dextran was determined based upon a standard curve.
Pimonidazole-HCl administration
To assess intestinal hypoxia after TBI (nsham = 11, nCCI = 6–7/timepoint), mice received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 60 mg/kg pimonidazole-HCl (Hypoxyprobe-1/HP1 | Hypoxyprobe, Inc.) 1 h prior to euthanasia as per manufacturer instructions. Under hypoxic conditions, HP1 is reduced and forms protein adducts that can then be detected using antibodies against this protein adduct31.
Euthanasia, tissue collection and processing
Animals were euthanized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (Fatal Plus, 150 mg/kg i.p.), and were transcardially perfused with heparinized saline. The small and large intestine were dissected out together for processing (described below) before resuming perfusion with 10% buffered formalin. As previously described28, brains were removed from the skull after an overnight post-fix in 10% buffered formalin, and further post-fixed for 24 h prior to cryoprotection with 30% sucrose solution. Brains were snap frozen and stored at -80 °C. Brains were cut coronally at 40 μm thickness using a freezing, sliding microtome (Microm HM430; Thermo Scientific) and stained with Cresyl Echt Violet to assess gross histology. After evaluation by two blinded investigators without knowledge of other outcome parameters, one sham mouse was excluded from the study due to substantial damage to the brain along the perimeter of the craniotomy. One mouse euthanized 4 h after CCI was excluded due to an absence of cortical tissue damage, implicating technical failure of the impact.
Following removal of the intact small intestine and colon, the ileum was identified as the distal third of the small intestine and separated. For the colon, the cecum was excluded and the medial and distal portions of the colon were dissected out together for further processing. The dissected ileum and colon were each Swiss rolled onto syringe plungers32 before overnight post-fixation in 10% buffered formalin. Swiss-rolled tissue was then pinned and transferred to 70% ethanol for paraffin embedding. Tissue was cut on a rotary microtome (Finesse; Shandon) at a 4 μm thickness and mounted on positively charged slides. Tissue was air dried overnight and then baked overnight at 50ºC.
Histology, immunohistochemistry and image analysis
Histology was performed on GI tissue collected from animals generated for several experiments within the present study (nsham = 3–6/timepoint; nCCI = 6–10/timepoint). Animals euthanized at 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, and 3 d after injury were also utilized for the FITC dextran permeability assay described above, while the 1 wk and 2 wk mice were generated for the specific purpose of GI tissue analysis. Tissue for the 4 wk timepoint was collected from the animals that were utilized for the microbiome studies. Analysis of HP1 immunofluorescence was performed on the 1d and 3d groups. All tissue processing, staining, immunolabeling, and measurements were taken by a researcher blinded to brain injury status and timepoint.
Alcian Blue staining
Swiss-rolled intestinal tissue sections were stained with Alcian Blue (VECTOR labs | H-3501), as per manufacturer instructions, to label acidic mucins with a pH < 2.5. Tissue was then counterstained with nuclear fast red. Slides were scanned at 20 × with a Zeiss Axio Scan Z.1 digital slide scanner allowing for a single high-resolution, zoomable image of each slide.
Quantification of intestinal morphological parameters
Intestinal tissue stained with Alcian Blue and nuclear fast red was used to assess alterations to the morphology of both the small and large intestine. The functional unit within the ileum is the crypt-villi structure, which consists of a villus surrounded by invaginations known as crypts. Within the colon, the medial region (ascending colon) was differentiated from the distal region (descending colon) based on the presence of transverse folds. As crypt structures within the medial colon are shorter than those of distal colon, crypt depth was measured separately for these regions. Either increased or decreased ileum crypt-villi distance or colon crypt depth is indicative of damage to the GI tract and can be associated with altered nutrient absorption, damage and inflammation33–36.
Within the HALO image analysis platform (version 3.2; Indica Labs), all well-oriented ileum crypt-villi and colon crypt structures, as determined using published criteria37, were measured along the length of the Swiss roll. The length from the tip of the villus to the base of that villi’s crypts was measured in the ileum while the distance from the luminal edge of the crypt to its base was measured in the colon. The minimum number of crypt-villi structures quantified per ileum was 20. Then minimum number of crypts measured per colon region was 10. Crypt-villi distance and crypt depth values were averaged for each animal.
Alcian Blue staining quantification
For the ileum, Alcian Blue-labeled goblet cells were manually counted within well-oriented crypt-villi structures within five randomly placed square fields (area = 1.5 mm2). Images of well-oriented villi within the field were exported at a resolution of 5000 pixels/in using the “Figure Maker” tool in HALO for manual counting within Adobe Photoshop (version 4 for iPad; Adobe). Goblet cells were counted if they had positive staining and a clearly identifiable nucleus.
Within the colon, individual well-oriented crypts within the medial and distal colon were manually outlined using HALO software. Due to the tight packing of goblet cells, colonic goblet cells were quantified using the Area Quantification v1.0 algorithm within HALO to determine the area of Alcian Blue-positive tissue relative to the individual crypt area. This algorithm was adjusted per staining run to account for lighter or darker Alcian Blue labeling. The percent Alcian Blue-positive staining was averaged across crypts separately within the medial and the distal colon per animal.
Colon hypoxia immunohistochemistry
Swiss-rolled intestinal tissues were deparaffinized using xylenes and rehydrated through an ethanol gradient into ddH2O. To perform antigen retrieval, slides were placed in a 1 × citric acid antigen unmasking solution (pH 6.0; VECTOR Labs | H-3300) for 4 min in a pressure cooker (Instant Pot LUX; Instant Pot Company). After pressure was released, slides were cooled to room temperature before washing in 1 × TBS. Tissue was blocked in 5% normal horse serum (NHS) in 0.1% Triton X-100 in 1 × TBS (TBS-T) before overnight incubation in biotinylated mouse anti-HP1 mAb (1:50 | Hypoxyprobe, Inc) or rabbit anti-HIF1α pAb (1:100 | Abcam) within a humidified chamber at 4 °C or at room temperature. After washing in 1 × TBS, tissue labeled with anti-HIF1α was incubated in donkey anti-rabbit biotin (1:1000 | Jackson ImmunoResearch). Slides labeled against HP1 or HIF1α were then incubated in streptavidin Alexa 594 (1:1000 | Invitrogen). Omission of primary antibody served as a negative control. HP1 labeled slides were scanned on a Zeiss Axio Scan Z.1 digital slide scanner at 20x while HIF1α labeled slides were imaged on a Nikon C2plus confocal microscope at 10x. HP1 and HIF1α provide similar labeling patterns in the colon38.
Colon hypoxia quantification
Healthy colon tissue is more hypoxic at the luminal edge compared to the crypt base39. To determine the effects of CCI on this hypoxic gradient, three visual fields with at least three well-oriented crypts were identified within the distal colon and exported from HALO using the “Figure Maker” tool. These images were imported into FIJI (ImageJ version 1.53 k40) to plot the pixel intensity profile from luminal edge to crypt base as a means of assessing both the degree (intensity) and depth of hypoxia. Using the line tool, two lines were drawn at the edges of each crypt from the luminal edge to the base of the crypt. After all lines were drawn, a gaussian blur was applied (σ radius = 3 μm) to minimize the effect that unlabeled goblet cells had on the pixel intensity profile. The pixel intensity gradient was plotted for the red channel using the “plot profile” tool. Because each intensity profile consisted of differing numbers of X, Y coordinates, points were interpolated within R to provide Y-values along an X-axis normalized to a percent distance (0–100% with 1% increments). The two interpolated hypoxia profiles for each crypt were then averaged to provide an overall pixel intensity profile of hypoxia from luminal edge to crypt base. Crypt hypoxia profiles were averaged within a field. Field hypoxia profiles were then averaged for each animal. Hypoxia intensity and depth profiles were imported from R to GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software) to calculate the area under the curve and peak intensity after subtracting the baseline of each curve.
Pre-injury microbiome normalization and fecal collection
Because preliminary work suggested pre-injury microbiome variation between cages (data not shown), we normalized the microbiome of all mice prior to injury by flushing the GI tract with the osmotic laxative polyethylene glycol (PEG; Macrogol 4000, 425 g/L | Fortrans) as per the paradigm described by Wrzosek et al.41. The mice were then inoculated with cecal contents from age and sex matched mice as described below. Only mice utilized as part of microbiome experiments underwent microbiome normalization.
Cecal content collection
Conventionally raised, male mice were used as cecal content donors (n = 10). To allow for stabilization of their microbiome within our facilities, mice were acclimated to the vivarium with normal bedding and cage changes for 3 wks after their arrival. Following euthanasia at 8–9 wks of age, the cecum was rapidly removed and its contents extruded into a sterile, DNase-free, polypropylene tube. Equal parts, by weight, from each animal were mixed and vortexed to a homogenate that was aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C until reconstitution for administration.
Whole bowel irrigation and microbiome transplant
Five-week-old mice were allowed to acclimate for one week prior to the three-week whole bowel irrigation procedure. This allowed for mice to be injured within our target age range of 8–10 wks of age. One hour prior to whole bowel irrigation, mice were placed in a clean, bedding-free cage to prevent coprophagy, with free access to water. Mice were gavaged four times at 20 min intervals with 200 µl of PEG solution41. This procedure visibly cleared the contents from the large intestine and was effective in reducing overall DNA content within the colon’s luminal contents (Supplemental Fig. 1). Cecal content homogenates were reconstituted immediately prior to gavage by thawing the homogenates in a warm water bath and rapidly diluting 100-fold in sterile 1 × PBS. Animals were gavaged with reconstituted cecal material 4 h after the final PEG gavage, and again weekly for the next 3 wks (Fig. 1A). Throughout the inoculation period, additional steps were taken to minimize microbiome differences prior to injury by using a mixed bedding approach42. Prior to injury, all animals were co-housed, and at cage change, soiled bedding from all cages were mixed and redistributed in equal parts with fresh bedding. The week after the final microbiota inoculation, animals underwent sham or CCI injury as described above. Following surgery, mice were co-housed by injury group and the mixed bedding approach was continued within each injury group.
Weight of animals was monitored with each inoculation, 1 and 2 d prior to injury, on the date of surgery, and then again at each fecal collection timepoint after injury. Body weight changes across time were equivalent for mice randomized into sham and CCI groups (Supplemental Fig. 2).
Microbiome analyses
Read processing and alpha and beta diversity
Adapter sequences were trimmed within the Illumina MiSeq platform and the resultant raw reads were imported into R (version 3.6.3-4.1.2 as released). The raw and processed 16s rRNA gene sequencing data discussed within this document have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus43 and are accessible through the accession number GSE239472 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE239472). All pre-processing and processing was conducted in R using RStudio44, based on the workflow outlined by Callahan et al.45. Low quality sequences were filtered out and the remaining sequences were trimmed to a consistent length by trimming the first 13 bases and truncating the final 10 bases as determined by read quality profiles. Forward and reverse reads were joined and sequence variants inferred using Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm (DADA2) to generate an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table46. Chimeric sequences were removed and samples containing fewer than 10,000 high quality reads were excluded from further downstream analysis. Two samples from a single sham animal (3 d and 2 wk) were excluded for having low read counts prior to filtering. Prior to filtering there was an average of 137,413 reads per sample (minimum = 23,253 | maximum = 320,550) with an average of 29% of reads being discarded as low quality. After filtering for low-quality reads there was average of 98,351 reads per sample with a minimum number of reads of 11,691 and a maximum of 320,550. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA reference database (v132) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using DECIPHER47. Within the Phyloseq package48, the ASV table, sample metadata, taxonomy information, and phylogenetic tree were merged into a Phyloseq object for diversity analysis.
Diversity metrics were calculated in R primarily utilizing the Phyloseq and Microbiome packages48,49. Due to the high level of variability in read depth, alpha diversity metrics were calculated using data rarefied to a read depth of 10,000. To assess beta diversity, ASVs were transformed into relative abundance values and “distance” values were generated for three commonly used beta diversity metrics: Bray Curtis dissimilarity, UniFrac distance, and Weighted UniFrac distance. Diversity metrics have been reviewed by Kers and Saccenti50.
Differential abundance analysis (ANCOM-BC)
Differential abundance analysis was conducted using Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC v1.2) within R51. Importantly, this analysis accounts for the compositionality that is inherent to microbiome data sets52. Additionally, this analysis controls for the false discovery rate (FDR) and reports adjusted p-values (q-values). This analysis was conducted at different taxonomic levels by collapsing the ASV table by taxonomic rank (Phylum, Class, Order, and Family) to compare sham and CCI injury groups at each timepoint. Genus and species level comparisons were not conducted due to increasing uncertainty for assigning a read to a genus or species with each progressive taxonomic rank.
Despite efforts to normalize the microbiome in all mice prior to CCI, our subsequent analysis detected a difference in the CCI and sham groups prior to injury. At the order level, Erysipelotrichales was more abundant at pre-injury baseline in the CCI group compared to the sham group (Supplemental Fig. 3). This suggests that our approach to microbiome normalization was largely effective but could not extinguish all pre-existing microbiome variation among the mice.
qPCR to assess Akkermansia muciniphila
Utilizing the same DNA isolated for 16s rRNA gene sequencing, qPCR was conducted using a custom TaqMan probe for A. muciniphila (Fwd: 5’ CGGTGGAGTATGTGGCTTAAT; Rev: 5’ CCATGCAGCACCTGTGTAA; Probe: 5’ CGCCTCCGAAGAGTTCGCATG; [20x]) and a 16 s pan-bacterial primer/probe set (Assay ID: Ba04930791_s1, ThermoFisher Scientific, # 4331182, [20x]). A 10 μl reaction was conducted with sample [DNA] = 5 ng/μl diluted as recommended by the manufacturer. Samples were run in triplicate on MicroAmp Fast Optical 96-well reaction plates (0.1 ml; # 4346907) and within-plate sample position was randomized. Reactions were carried out on a QuantStudio 7 Flex (Applied Biosystems) under the default parameters for use with Universal Master Mix.
Data output from qPCR were analyzed using the comparative CT (2−∆∆Ct) method53 to compare sham and CCI mice at 1, 2, and 3 d post-injury normalized to pre-injury. The ∆Ct value was derived by subtracting the mean Ct from the universal 16s probe from the mean Ct of the A. muciniphila probe for each sample (∆Ct = CtA. muciniphila − Ct16s), and the ∆∆Ct was derived by subtracting the ∆Ctpre-injury from ∆Ctpost-injury (∆∆Ct = ∆Ctpost-injury − ∆Ctpre-injury).
Statistical analyses
All analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 9 unless otherwise specified with each animal considered to be an experimental unit. For statistical analysis of GI permeability data, sham mice from all timepoints were binned into a single sham group (n = 9) and compared against CCI mice that survived 4 h (n = 7), 8 h (n = 8), 1 d (n = 7), or 3 d (n = 6) by one-way ANOVA. Post-hoc analyses were conducted using Holm-Šídák's multiple comparisons test for each timepoint against sham controls. The reported group sizes reflect the exclusion of mice as detailed in Supplemental Table 1. Ileum crypt-villi, colon crypt, and Alcian Blue measurement data were assessed by two-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Holm-Šídák's multiple comparisons tests. For hypoxia parameters, sham animals from both timepoints were binned for data analysis and a one-way ANOVA was performed followed by post-hoc Holm-Šídák's multiple comparisons tests. For all tests, α = 0.05. Model assumptions were checked by plotting the residuals on QQ plots.
Statistical comparisons for alpha diversity were conducted by mixed-effects ANOVA. Statistical analysis and graphing of beta diversity was conducted within R. Beta diversity ordination distances were compared by PERMANOVA (nperm = 999) using the “adonis” function within the vegan package (v2.6-2 as described previously45). Post-hoc, pairwise comparisons were conducted using the “pairwise.adonis” function contained within the RVAideMemoire package (v0.9-81-2)54, and p-values were adjusted using the FDR by 2-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli (Q:1%) for comparisons of interest for experimentally relevant comparisons only (nperm = 999; FDR adj α = 0.05)55. Comparative CT data generated from qPCR output were analyzed by pairwise one-tailed t-tests with Welch’s correction to test for an increase in A. muciniphila in CCI mice compared to sham mice. For qPCR data, model assumptions were checked by plotting the residuals on QQ plots leading to linearization of the data using a log10 transform for statistical comparisons but were back-transformed for graphical presentation.
Results
Intestinal permeability
Although several studies have examined parameters related to intestinal permeability in rodent models of TBI, the majority have relied on ex vivo or invasive in situ permeability assays, measurement of permeability biomarkers in blood, and inferences drawn from measurements of tight junction protein levels5,13,29,56–58. We chose to employ an established, noninvasive method for assessing intestinal permeability in mice30 which has not yet been widely employed in neurotrauma models. Serum fluorescence was measured 4 h after oral gavage of 4 kDa FITC dextran. Under healthy conditions, paracellular permeability to FITC dextran within the GI tract should be minimal, leading to low serum fluorescence levels.
Permeability differed significantly among sham controls and mice euthanized at 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, and 3 d after CCI (Fig. 2; F(4,32) = 3.094; p = 0.03). Subsequent post-hoc comparisons of injured groups to the sham control group revealed increased GI permeability at 4 h after injury (p < 0.01), but not at 8 h, 1 d or 3 d post-CCI. These data are consistent with our interpretation that brain injury causes transient intestinal barrier dysfunction.
Ileum and colon morphology
Changes in GI morphology have been reported in both the short and long term in various models of TBI5,6,13,29. Therefore, we assessed GI morphology in the ileum and colon over a comprehensive time course including 4 h, 8 h, 1 d, 3 d, 1 wk, 2 wk, and 4 wk after CCI or sham injury. Because alterations in the small intestine’s crypt-villi structure are indicative of damage33,35,36, villi morphology was assessed by measuring the crypt-villi distance in well-oriented regions of both sham (Fig. 3A) and CCI mice (Fig. 3B). Within the ileum, crypt-villi distance was not significantly altered by CCI (main effect of injury, F(1, 66) = 2.59, p = 0.11) and did not vary as a function of time post-injury (F(6, 66) = 0.21, p = 0.97; Fig. 3C). Further, no interaction was observed between injury and time post-injury (F(6, 66) = 1.33, p = 0.26).
Within the colon, shortened crypt depth is associated with acute inflammation while increased depth is associated with latent inflammation34,59. To assess whether CCI alters colon crypt morphology, the crypt depth was measured in the medial and distal regions of the colon for sham (Fig. 3D) and CCI mice (Fig. 3E). These two regions were quantified separately due to regional differences in function and crypt depth between the medial and distal portions of the colon. CCI had no overall effect on medial colon crypt depth (F(1,66) = 0.05, p = 0.82; Fig. 3F) or distal colon crypt depth (F(1,66) = 3.64, p = 0.11; Fig. 3G). No effect of time post-injury was observed in the medial colon (F(6,66) = 1.18, p = 0.33), but a main effect was present in the distal colon (F(6,66) = 5.87, p < 0.0001). However, no interaction was observed between injury and time in the medial colon (F(6,66) = 1.28, p = 0.28) or distal colon (F(6,66) = 1.29, p = 0.27), suggesting no overt morphological changes in the large intestine due to injury.
Gut microbiome
Alpha diversity
To evaluate the hypothesis that TBI alters the microbiome, fecal samples were collected at multiple timepoints in mice surviving 4 wks following sham or CCI injury. Fecal microbial DNA was analyzed using 16s rRNA gene sequencing. Alpha diversity, a measure of within-sample diversity, was assessed by using Shannon Diversity Index and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity (PD). Shannon Diversity Index assesses within-sample diversity while accounting for richness (the number of observed taxa present) and evenness (the distribution of each taxon). Faith’s PD accounts for richness and evenness, as well as for phylogenetic distance between bacteria. Shannon diversity (Fig. 4A) was not altered with collection timepoint (F(3.32, 41.50) = 0.87; p = 0.47), but was reduced in the CCI group (F(1,75) = 8.03; p < 0.01) independent of time (F(1,75) = 1.08; p = 0.38). Faith’s PD (Fig. 4B) was not altered with collection timepoint (F(3.24, 34.53) = 0.44; p = 0.74), injury condition (F(1,11) = 3.20; p = 0.10), or their interaction (F(6,64) = 1.37; p = 0.24). A difference in Shannon diversity without a change in Faith’s PD suggests reduced richness and evenness within closely related phyla.
Beta diversity
To continue to investigate community level changes in the microbiome, we analyzed beta diversity, a between-sample comparison method used to determine the extent that bacterial profiles differ from each other. Beta diversity was assessed by three common measures: Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, UniFrac distance and weighted UniFrac distance. Beta diversity metrics have been reviewed by IMPACTT-investigators60. CCI induced a change in beta diversity when comparing groups for Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (p < 0.01; Fig. 4C), a well-established ecological calculation that provides a quantitative metric of how dissimilar two groups are from one another61. Additionally, CCI altered weighted UniFrac distance (p < 0.01; Fig. 4E) and there was a trend present with UniFrac distance (p = 0.053; Fig. 4D). UniFrac distance, weighted or unweighted, is a newer method of calculating differences between communities created specifically for 16 s rRNA gene sequencing data in which differences between groups are determined by shared taxa while accounting for phylogenetic distance62. After correcting for multiple-testing, post-hoc pairwise PERMANOVA for both Bray–Curtis and UniFrac showed no significant differences between comparisons of interest (Sham versus CCI at matched timepoints, and timepoint to timepoint comparisons within an injury group). Post-hoc comparison matrices are presented for Bray–Curtis dissimilarity within Supplemental Table 2 and for weighted UniFrac within Supplemental Table 3.
Differential abundance analysis
We next sought to identify differences in bacterial taxa between the CCI and sham-injured animals. To visualize these results, the relative abundance of each taxa at phylum and family levels was represented as a function of timepoint within each injury group (Supplemental Fig. 5). Consistent with prior studies63,64, large changes between injury and sham groups were not observed. The primary visual impression is that the effect of CCI on the microbiome is subtle with a potential difference being the phylum Verrucomicrobiota between sham and CCI mice (Supplemental Fig. 5). Within the Verrucomicrobiota phylum, the family Akkermansiaeceae shows a similar trend (Supplemental Fig. 5).
To identify statistically significant differences in taxa between sham and CCI mice, we performed differential abundance analysis (ANCOM-BC) at phylum, class, order, and family taxonomic levels. The primary taxa altered after CCI was the phylum Verrucomicrobiota, which showed an early increase in CCI mice which was statistically significant at 1, 2, and 3 d post-injury when compared to time-matched sham animals (Fig. 5A). This increase was also statistically significant at the class level at these same time points (Verrucomicrobiae; data not shown) and at the order level at 2 and 3 d post-injury (Verrucomicrobiales; Fig. 5B).
The Verrucomicrobiota species typically residing in the mammalian GI tract is Akkermansia muciniphila. Because 16s sequencing does not provide sufficient resolution for consistent identification at the species level, we performed qPCR to directly assess whether A. muciniphila changed with CCI. We found that A. muciniphila was increased within the microbiome of injured mice at 2 d (t(8.47) = 1.92, p = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.18, 2.06]) and 3 d (t(8.12) = 1.90, p = 0.046, 95% CI [-0.23, 2.46]), with a trend at 1 d (t(10.86) = 1.38, p = 0.10, 95% CI [-0.31, 1.35]; Fig. 5C). These findings confirm that the increase in Verrucomicrobiota with CCI is due to an increase in A. muciniphila.
Intestinal goblet cell quantification
Given that A. muciniphila lives within the mucus layer and is increased after CCI, we investigated the effect of CCI on ileal and colonic goblet cells. Mucus produced by goblet cells primarily acts as a lubricant while forming a selective barrier that limits epithelial interaction with luminal contents and bacteria65. Goblet cells also produce anti-microbial peptides that shape the microbiome66–68. Mucus contained within goblet cells was labeled using the muciniphilic dye, Alcian Blue.
CCI did not alter the number of goblet cells within the ileum (main effect: F(1,66) = 0.10; p = 0.76; Fig. 6A–C). Goblet cell number varied as a function of time post-injury (F(6,66) = 4.92; p < 0.001), but this effect did not depend on injury status (F(6,66) = 1.05; p = 0.40). Goblet cell density was assessed in the medial (Fig. 6D–F) and distal (Fig. 6G–I) regions of the colon. Within the medial colon a significant interaction between injury condition and time post-injury was observed (F(6,66) = 2.65; p = 0.02) with a significant main effect of timepoint (F(6,66) = 8.94; p < 0.0001), but no main effect of injury (F(1,66) = 0.01; p = 0.92). Post-hoc comparisons revealed a significant increase in goblet cell density at 1 d in CCI mice compared to sham mice (Fig. 6F; p = 0.03). Within the distal colon, goblet cell density was not altered by injury condition (F(1,66) = 0.82; p = 0.38), but varied across timepoints (F(6,66) = 12.93; p < 0.0001) without a significant interaction (Fig. 6I; F(6,66) = 1.67; p = 0.14).
Colon hypoxia
To further investigate the means by which A. muciniphila may be increasing after CCI we assessed colon hypoxia using pimonidazole-HCl in sham (Fig. 7A) and CCI mice (Fig. 7B). Because A. muciniphila is an obligate anaerobe and lives in relatively close association with the host epithelium, its abundance has been shown to increase under hypoxic conditions. For example, Alam et al.69 showed that wound-induced hypoxia results in a preferential increase of A. muciniphila at the site of hypoxia. These microbes then in turn promote epithelial contributions to wound healing69.
Under healthy circumstances, the colon exists in a state of physiologic hypoxia. As cells migrate out of the crypt stem-cell niche toward the lumen they shift toward oxidative phosphorylation which leads to decreased partial pressure of oxygen. As such, luminal facing epithelial cells exist in a state of hypoxia39. Importantly, epithelial injury in conditions such as colitis leads to reduced mitochondrial oxygen utilization and diminished intestinal epithelial hypoxia70. Disturbances in oxygen distribution can alter the degree of hypoxia as well as its penetration within the crypt. Immunolabeling for pimonidazole-HCl protein adducts formed under hypoxic conditions allows for visualization and quantification of the hypoxic gradient within the colon via analysis of staining intensity as a function of distance along the luminal-basal axis (Fig. 7C). Following CCI, hypoxia appeared more intense with deeper penetration into crypt structures. Indeed, both the area under the curve (F(2,21) = 3.64; p = 0.04) and peak intensity (F(2,21) = 4.1; p = 0.03) of hypoxyprobe-1 labeling revealed progressive increases over the first days after CCI. Area under the curve showed a significant increase at 3 d (p = 0.03; Fig. 7D) while peak hypoxic intensity showed a trend toward an increase at 1 d (p = 0.06) and was significantly elevated at 3 d post-injury (p = 0.03; Fig. 7E). Colon hypoxia was not notably altered at the 4 h timepoint that corresponds with increased intestinal permeability (Supplemental Fig. 6).
Discussion
In this study, we assessed effects of a moderate severity contusive brain injury on GI tract barrier function and morphology, the fecal microbiome and colon hypoxia. Using a noninvasive FITC dextran permeability assay, intestinal permeability was found to increase at 4 h after CCI injury, returning fully to the level of sham controls by 1 d. To determine if this early change in permeability contributed to tissue damage along the GI tract, we evaluated small and large intestinal morphology. CCI did not alter ileal crypt-villi distance or colon crypt-depth at the time of the permeability increase or at subsequent timepoints spanning a month after the injury. Fecal microbiome analyses revealed a reduction in Shannon diversity in the CCI group and alterations in beta diversity between groups. Differential abundance analysis identified increases in the phylum Verrucomicrobiota at 1, 2, and 3 d post-injury. The Verrucomicrobiota species, A. muciniphila, was confirmed by qPCR to increase over the same time. To assess physiological factors known to either coincide with or propagate growth of this obligate anaerobe, mucus-producing goblet cells and colonic hypoxia were evaluated. CCI led to increased goblet cell density in the medial colon at 1 d post-injury but did not affect goblet cells within the ileum or distal colon. In addition, CCI promoted an early increase in colon hypoxia that was statistically significant by 3 d post-injury.
Several previous studies support that TBI increases permeability of the GI tract. Clinically, increased permeability of the small intestine can be detected by an increased lactulose: mannitol ratio in the urine after oral administration of these two non-metabolized sugars71. This approach has also been used to infer TBI-related increases in gut permeability in rats from 3 h to 1 wk after injury29,58. Its interpretation may not be straightforward, as an elevated lactulose: mannitol ratio can result from either increased paracellular transport of lactulose (i.e. increased permeability) or a decrease in mannitol due to loss of absorptive area in the gut consequent to damage to ileal villi structures29. Increased paracellular permeability after brain injury is believed to be due to loss or dysfunction of tight junction proteins that regulate paracellular flux. Reductions in several tight junction proteins have been demonstrated following rodent experimental TBI in the ileum at 3–12 h5,57 and 3 d72, in the cecum at 3 d73, and in the proximal colon at 2 wk post-injury74.
Here, we found only a transient increase in GI permeability at 4 h using a noninvasive intestinal permeability assay to measure paracellular movement of FITC dextran from the intestinal lumen into the bloodstream. The brief nature of the alteration in permeability in our study as compared to more sustained dysfunction reported in other studies may be due, in part, to differences in injury severity, injury model, or permeability assay. Notably, prior studies that identified increased FITC dextran permeability up to 12 h after weight drop injury in mice5,13,56 or rats57 used an invasive approach in which the intestinal tract is removed from the abdominal cavity, ligated and injected with FITC dextran before being returned to the body cavity. These manipulations may have contributed to a more protracted permeability disruption.
Changes in intestinal barrier function often correspond with changes to the specialized crypt-villi and crypt structures that line the small and large intestine, respectively. Contusion TBI in rodents has been reported to induce structural damage in the ileum. However, many prior studies have focused on a single region of the GI tract and a single timepoint after injury, utilizing qualitative or semi-quantitative assessments. Here, we performed a quantitative histological examination of ileal crypt-villi distance and colon crypt depth over an extended time course. We found that CCI did not induce changes to the crypt-villus length in the small intestine or crypt depth in the colon at any timepoint. These data contrast findings of epithelial lifting29,57 and either villus lengthening12 or shortening13 within the first several hours, and decreases in villus length and crypt depth over the period from 1 to 7 d post-injury29,58,72. A potential caveat to several of these studies is that postmortem histological examinations were performed on segments of the ileum that had previously been externalized from the mouse or rat, ligated and injected with FITC dextran to assay GI permeability5,13,56,57. Thus, tissue ischemia, hypoxia or inflammation resulting from this procedure may have exaggerated effects of the TBI. As the majority of studies noting GI tissue pathology employed injury parameters described as creating a severe TBI12,29,57,72, overt GI histological damage may be a consequence of severe, rather than moderate, experimental TBI. For example, images of brain histology provided in Ma, Y. et al.72 demonstrate loss of not only of cortex but also the underlying hippocampus, while the moderate CCI employed here results in a contusion localized to the cortex, leaving the hippocampus grossly intact (see Fig. 1). Few studies have examined histopathology within the colon after TBI. Following severe CCI, edema was reported in some rats at 6 h12, but no damage was detected at 3 d73. While Ma, E. et al.6 found no histological damage in the colon at 1 d consistent with our findings, they noted increased crypt depth and smooth muscle layer thickness at 28 d, suggestive of delayed or progressive damage. Our data argue that moderate CCI is not associated with overt histological damage to the small or large intestine over the first 4 wk after injury. It is possible, however, that small, localized regions of shortening/lengthening were not appreciated due to the large number of crypt-villi and crypt structures we assessed along the longitudinal axis of the Swiss-rolled tissue preparations.
Mice with CCI had reduced gut microbiome alpha diversity compared with sham controls, as measured by Shannon Diversity. This effect was not dependent upon timepoint after injury but is consistent with observations of reduced alpha diversity in previous studies73,75. Microbiome composition differed among experimental groups with respect to beta diversity, with most notable differences in the 4 wk post-injury group, in line with late changes in beta diversity reported in other studies of CCI75.
Changes in the compositional abundance of the gut microbiome after TBI are complex and vary across studies, as recently reviewed by Hanscom, Loane and Shea-Donohue20. Here, moderate CCI resulted in relatively limited alterations in the microbiome, with significant increases in taxa within the phylum Verrucomicrobiota at 1, 2 and 3 d. The lack of widespread changes may be due in part to stringent efforts to minimize variation in pre-injury microbiome composition. We first cleared the microbiome with PEG before inoculating mice with a common microbiome collected from the cecal contents of age- and sex-matched mice and then used a mixed bedding approach to maintain similar microbiomes prior to injury. As mentioned above, the use of moderate, rather than severe, injury may also have resulted in more limited changes to the microbiome than previously reported. Increases in the phylum Verrucomicrobiota have been observed in mice75,76, rats64,72 and humans77 after brain injury, affirming the robustness of this observation across species and injury model.
Although the major gut microbe within this phylum is A. muciniphila, our study is the first to our knowledge to utilize qPCR to confirm that the Verrucomicrobiota species increased after TBI is A. muciniphila. This species is a gram-negative bacteria that is most prevalent in the colon where it resides in the intestinal mucus layer78. A. muciniphila is critical to maintaining normal gut health79, with alterations in abundance influencing intestinal epithelial growth, differentiation80, integrity81, and wound healing69. An early increase in A. muciniphila may be part of a compensatory response to systemic damage initiated by TBI. Recently, A. muciniphila levels were shown to be reduced at 1 wk and 4 wk in mice receiving CCI of a similar severity to the present study82, suggesting that trauma-induced changes in A. muciniphila may be biphasic.
A. muciniphila feeds off of the intestinal mucus layer and, by doing so, signals to the host to increase and maintain mucus production83 while also influencing intestinal stem cell differentiation and subsequent outgrowth80. Based on the important role that A. muciniphila plays in maintaining the intestinal mucus layer, we investigated changes to the mucus-producing goblet cells. Numbers of goblet cells in the ileum were unchanged with moderate CCI. However, goblet cell density increased within the medial colon at 1 d post-injury, with no change in the distal colon. Transverse folds of the medial colon may provide a more stable mucosal niche for bacteria than in the distal region of the colon84. An increase in density could reflect increases in goblet cell number or size. The goblet cell response to inflammation is complicated in that, under most inflammatory conditions, goblet cell differentiation factors generally increase, leading to greater numbers of goblet cells85. Some inflammatory conditions such as ulcerative colitis, however, are associated with a reduction in the number and size of goblet cells86,87. Only one other study has assessed goblet cells after brain injury, finding no difference in the cecum at 3 d after a mild closed head injury88. As the mucus layer plays a key role in barrier function and mediates numerous host-microbe interactions, future studies should consider assessing changes to the mucus layer thickness and composition after TBI.
Both bacterial products and epithelial metabolism can alter oxygen availability within the intestinal lumen39,89. Our findings show that CCI leads to a progressive increase in colon hypoxia over 3 d following injury. Together with the increase in goblet cell density at 1 d, we hypothesize that posttraumatic hypoxia leads to conditions within the colon that promote A. muciniphila proliferation. As an obligate anaerobe, A. muciniphila thrives in hypoxic conditions present in the healthy colonic GI tract. Due to the relatively close association of A. muciniphila with the epithelium, hypoxic conditions within the epithelium and lumen can promote the growth of this obligate anaerobe69.
Colon hypoxia following TBI may provide mechanistic insight as to how microbe-epithelial interactions are altered after TBI. Under homeostatic conditions within the colon, the microbiota promote anaerobic luminal conditions that support Firmicutes and suppress host inflammation90. Some anaerobic bacteria, such as A. muciniphila, produce butyrate, a short chain fatty acid that is a major fuel source for the host epithelium91–93. Processing of butyrate through mitochondrial β-oxidation to produce ATP is an oxygen-intensive process that results in the physiologic hypoxic gradient89. Increased colon hypoxia after TBI may reflect elevated oxidative phosphorylation in epithelial mitochondria. A. muciniphila produces both acetate and butyrate in vitro when grown in both human and porcine mucins91, so it is possible that elevated A. muciniphila generates a localized increase in butyrate that stimulates further mitochondrial β-oxidation. Therefore, increased goblet cell density in the proximal colon may support greater butyrate generation and potentiate mitochondrial mediated hypoxia. In models of colitis, supplementation with butyrate attenuates colon inflammation and histological damage94. Additional experiments are needed to address butyrate levels and the role of epithelial mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in TBI. Cecal butyrate concentration did not change following severe CCI75, but severe injury may preclude the endogenous compensatory response observed in this study of moderate CCI. However, we did not observe significant changes in Clostridia, the class most commonly associated with butyrate production92, suggesting other circulating factors such as cortisol may stimulate epithelial oxygen utilization95. The cellular and molecular responses triggered by an early increase in GI permeability that initiate the potentially reparative increases in A. muciniphila, goblet cell density and colon hypoxia are yet to be elucidated.
From a potential treatment perspective, others have shown beneficial effects of direct administration of A. muciniphila as a means of treatment for neurological conditions in rodent models of depression96, Alzheimer’s disease97, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis98. Additionally, dietary supplementation of the fermentable fiber inulin increases A. muciniphila and was found to increase thalamic and hippocampal blood flow after closed head TBI76, suggesting that inulin and perhaps A. muciniphila are beneficial after TBI. More broadly, fecal A. muciniphila levels have been proposed as a marker for discriminating between healthy controls and patients with both intestinal and extra-intestinal conditions99.
We acknowledge that this study has several limitations. Regarding experimental design, only male mice were utilized in these studies. Very few TBI studies assessing changes to the GI tract or microbiome have included female mice100,101 which may limit translatability of findings. Additionally, not all experimental procedures were carried out in all mice which limits the ability to directly correlate outcomes. Further, only mice from the 4 wk timepoint underwent microbiome normalization and injury condition-specific group housing. Although we saw no morphological damage at any time point, it is possible that these conditions affected histological parameters at 4 wk as compared to those measured at earlier time points in mice with a naturally occurring microbiome. Despite our efforts to standardize the microbiota, there were still minor differences detected at baseline by differential abundance analysis. Differences in microbiota prior to injury could alter the intestinal response to brain injury. It is possible that overnight fasting prior to gavage with FITC dextran may have had a more pronounced effect upon intestinal permeability than daytime fasting. Future studies could standardize fasting relative to the light/dark cycle for assessment of intestinal permeability.
Conclusions
Overall, our findings add to the field’s understanding of the complexity of the GI tract’s response to TBI. Our current working hypothesis is visually summarized in Fig. 8. Our primary findings are that TBI induces an early, transient increase in intestinal permeability and a bloom of A. muciniphila that corresponds temporally with increased medial colon goblet cell density and increased colon hypoxia in the absence of altered GI tract morphology. Since this bacterium has been associated with improved barrier integrity and general gut health, the increase in A. muciniphila with TBI may reflect a beneficial compensatory alteration in the gut microbiome sufficient to limit histological damage to the GI tract after moderate TBI. Because of the unique role of A. muciniphila, potential interventions that prolong or promote the growth of this bacteria warrant further investigation as novel therapeutics after TBI.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Jack Miller for his assistance with image analysis, Nathan R. Shelman, MD for his assistance with GI pathology assessment, the University of Kentucky Pathology Core for the processing of intestinal tissue for paraffin embedding, and the University of Kentucky Genomics Core for their sequencing services. The authors also thank Neeraj Kapur, PhD, Tatiana Goretsky, PhD and Emily Bradford, PhD for sharing their resources and providing training and technical assistance.
Abbreviations
- ANCOM-BC
Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction
- ANOVA
Analysis of variance
- ASV
Amplicon Sequence Variants
- CCI
Controlled Cortical Impact
- d
Day(s)
- DADA2
Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm
- ddH2O
Double distilled water
- DNA
Deoxyribonucleic acid
- FDR
False discovery rate
- FITC
Fluorescein isothiocyanate
- GI
Gastrointestinal
- HCl
Hydrochloride
- HP1
Hypoxyprobe-1 (brand name for pimonidazole-HCl)
- hr
Hour(s)
- i.p.
Intraperitoneal
- kDa
Kilodalton
- mAb
Monoclonal antibody
- min
Minute(s)
- NCBI
National Center for Biotechnology Information
- NHS
Normal horse serum
- pAb
Polyclonal antibody
- PBS
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PEG
Polyethylene glycol
- qPCR
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- rmANOVA
Repeated measures ANOVA
- rRNA
Ribosomal ribonucleic acid
- TBI
Traumatic brain injury
- TBS
Tris-buffered saline
- TBS-T
0.1% Triton X-100 in 1 × TBS
- wk(s)
Week(s)
Author contributions
A.J.D., T.A.B., and K.E.S. designed the experiments. A.J.D. performed all experiments, image analysis, microbiome analysis, and generated all figures. A.J.D. and K.E.S. analyzed and interpreted data. SE provided input on microbiome analyses. A.J.D. and K.E.S. wrote the manuscript with input from S.E. and T.A.B.
Funding
The work was supported in part by a National Institutes of Health training Grant (5T32 NS077889) and fellowship funds from the Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Research Trust.
Data availability
Reporting on methodology, analysis and results are in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines102. 16s rRNA gene sequencing data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository under accession number GSE239472 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE239472). All other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-53430-4.
References
- 1.Selassie AW, Zaloshnja E, Langlois JA, Miller T, Jones P, Steiner C. Incidence of long-term disability following traumatic brain injury hospitalization, United States, 2003. J. Head Trauma Rehab. 2008;23:250. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000314531.30401.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2017;66:1–16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kemp CD, Cotton B, Johnson C, Weaver K. How we die: The impact of non-neurological organ dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2006;203:S36–S36. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.05.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krishnamoorthy V, Temkin N, Barber J, Foreman B, Komisarow J, Korley FK, Laskowitz DT, Mathew JP, Hernandez A, Sampson J, et al. Association of early multiple organ dysfunction with clinical and functional outcomes over the year following traumatic brain injury: A transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury study. Crit. Care Med. 2021;49:1769–1778. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bansal V, Costantini T, Kroll L, Peterson C, Loomis W, Eliceiri B, Baird A, Wolf P, Coimbra R. Traumatic brain injury and intestinal dysfunction: uncovering the neuro-enteric axis. J. Neurotrauma. 2009;26:1353–1359. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ma EL, Smith AD, Desai N, Cheung L, Hanscom M, Stoica BA, Loane DJ, Shea-Donohue T, Faden AI. Bidirectional brain-gut interactions and chronic pathological changes after traumatic brain injury in mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017;66:56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carlos Dourado C, de Miranda N, Engler TM, Barbosa de Oliveira S. Disfunção intestinal em pacientes com lesão cerebral decorrente de acidente vascular cerebral e traumatismo craniencefálico: estudo retrospectivo de uma série de casos. Texto Contexto Enfermagem. 2012;21:905–911. doi: 10.1590/S0104-07072012000400022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Falcão de Arruda IS, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE. Benefits of early enteral nutrition with glutamine and probiotics in brain injury patients. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2004;106:287–292. doi: 10.1042/cs20030251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Harrison-Felix C, Whiteneck G, Devivo MJ, Hammond FM, Jha A. Causes of death following 1 year postinjury among individuals with traumatic brain injury. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:22–33. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200601000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Harrison-Felix C, Whiteneck GG, Jha A, DeVivo MJ, Hammond FM, Hart DM. Mortality over four decades after traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 2009;90:1506–1513. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Olsen AB, Hetz RA, Xue H, Aroom KR, Bhattarai D, Johnson E, Bedi S, Cox CS, Jr, Uray K. Effects of traumatic brain injury on intestinal contractility. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2013;25:593–e463. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Feighery L, Smyth A, Keely S, Baird AW, O'Connor WT, Callanan JJ, Brayden DJ. Increased intestinal permeability in rats subjected to traumatic frontal lobe percussion brain injury. J. Trauma. 2008;64:131–137. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181568d9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bansal V, Ryu SY, Blow C, Costantini T, Loomis W, Eliceiri B, Baird A, Wolf P, Coimbra R. The hormone ghrelin prevents traumatic brain injury induced intestinal dysfunction. J. Neurotrauma. 2010;27:2255–2260. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santos A, Gonçalves P, Araújo JR, Martel F. Intestinal permeability to glucose after experimental traumatic brain injury: effect of gadopentetate dimeglumine administration. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2008;103:247–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Margolis KG, Cryan JF, Mayer EA. The microbiota-gut-brain axis: From motility to mood. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:1486–1501. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Erny D, Hrabě de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, Wieghofer P, Staszewski O, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Mahlakoiv T, Jakobshagen K, Buch T, et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat. Neurosci. 2015;18:965–977. doi: 10.1038/nn.4030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. The central nervous system and the gut microbiome. Cell. 2016;167:915–932. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thaiss CA, Zmora N, Levy M, Elinav E. The microbiome and innate immunity. Nature. 2016;535:65–74. doi: 10.1038/nature18847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thion MS, Low D, Silvin A, Chen J, Grisel P, Schulte-Schrepping J, Blecher R, Ulas T, Squarzoni P, Hoeffel G, et al. Microbiome influences prenatal and adult microglia in a sex-specific manner. Cell. 2018;172:500–516.e516. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hanscom M, Loane DJ, Shea-Donohue T. Brain-gut axis dysfunction in the pathogenesis of traumatic brain injury. J. Clin. Investig. 2021 doi: 10.1172/jci143777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Celorrio M, Abellanas MA, Rhodes J, Goodwin V, Moritz J, Vadivelu S, Wang L, Rodgers R, Xiao S, Anabayan I, et al. Gut microbial dysbiosis after traumatic brain injury modulates the immune response and impairs neurogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2021;9:40. doi: 10.1186/s40478-021-01137-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hanscom M, Loane DJ, Aubretch T, Leser J, Molesworth K, Hedgekar N, Ritzel RM, Abulwerdi G, Shea-Donohue T, Faden AI. Acute colitis during chronic experimental traumatic brain injury in mice induces dysautonomia and persistent extraintestinal, systemic, and CNS inflammation with exacerbated neurological deficits. J. Neuroinflamm. 2021;18:24. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-02067-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hinrichsen F, Hamm J, Westermann M, Schröder L, Shima K, Mishra N, Walker A, Sommer N, Klischies K, Prasse D, et al. Microbial regulation of hexokinase 2 links mitochondrial metabolism and cell death in colitis. Cell Metab. 2021;33:2355–2366.e2358. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kayama H, Okumura R, Takeda K. Interaction between the microbiota, epithelia, and immune cells in the intestine. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2020;38:23–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-070119-115104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang L, Liu C, Zhao W, He C, Ding J, Dai R, Xu K, Xiao L, Luo L, Liu S, et al. Impaired autophagy in intestinal epithelial cells alters gut microbiota and host immune responses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018 doi: 10.1128/aem.00880-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhu CS, Grandhi R, Patterson TT, Nicholson SE. A review of traumatic brain injury and the gut microbiome: Insights into novel mechanisms of secondary brain injury and promising targets for neuroprotection. Brain Sci. 2018 doi: 10.3390/brainsci8060113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.National Research Council . Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press (US); 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Littlejohn EL, DeSana AJ, Williams HC, Chapman RT, Joseph B, Juras JA, Saatman KE. IGF1-stimulated posttraumatic hippocampal remodeling is not dependent on mTOR. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:663456. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.663456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hang CH, Shi JX, Li JS, Wu W, Yin HX. Alterations of intestinal mucosa structure and barrier function following traumatic brain injury in rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2776–2781. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i12.2776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gupta J, Nebreda AR. Analysis of intestinal permeability in mice. Bio-protocol. 2014;4:e1289. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.1289. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aguilera KY, Brekken RA. Hypoxia studies with pimonidazole in vivo. Bio-Protocol. 2014;4:e1254. doi: 10.21769/bioprotoc.1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Moolenbeek C, Ruitenberg EJ. The ‘Swiss roll’: a simple technique for histological studies of the rodent intestine. Lab. Anim. 1981;15:57–60. doi: 10.1258/002367781780958577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brown I, Bettington M, Rosty C. The role of histopathology in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease and other malabsorptive conditions. Histopathology. 2021;78:88–105. doi: 10.1111/his.14262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.DeRoche TC, Xiao SY, Liu X. Histological evaluation in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol. Rep. (Oxf.) 2014;2:178–192. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ensari A. The malabsorption syndrome and its causes and consequences. In: McManus LM, Mitchell RN, editors. Pathobiology of Human Disease. Academic Press; 2014. pp. 1266–1287. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Owens SR, Greenson JK. The pathology of malabsorption: Current concepts. Histopathology. 2007;50:64–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Levine DS, Haggitt RC. Normal histology of the colon. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1989;13:966–984. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198911000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Campbell Eric L, Bruyninckx Walter J, Kelly Caleb J, Glover Louise E, McNamee Eóin N, Bowers Brittelle E, Bayless Amanda J, Scully M, Saeedi Bejan J, Golden-Mason L, et al. Transmigrating neutrophils shape the mucosal microenvironment through localized oxygen depletion to influence resolution of inflammation. Immunity. 2014;40:66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Singhal R, Shah YM. Oxygen battle in the gut: Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in metabolic and inflammatory responses in the intestine. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:10493–10505. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.011188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wrzosek L, Ciocan D, Borentain P, Spatz M, Puchois V, Hugot C, Ferrere G, Mayeur C, Perlemuter G, Cassard A-M. Transplantation of human microbiota into conventional mice durably reshapes the gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6854. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25300-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Miyoshi J, Leone V, Nobutani K, Musch MW, Martinez-Guryn K, Wang Y, Miyoshi S, Bobe AM, Eren AM, Chang EB. Minimizing confounders and increasing data quality in murine models for studies of the gut microbiome. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5166. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D991–995. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC (2020).
- 45.Callahan B, Sankaran K, Fukuyama J, McMurdie P, Holmes S. Bioconductor Workflow for Microbiome Data Analysis: From raw reads to community analyses. F1000Research. 2016;5:1492. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8986.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wright ES. Using DECIPHER v2.0 to analyze big biological sequence data in R. R J. 2016;8:352–359. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2016-025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lahti LS. microbiome R package. Bioconductor. 2017 doi: 10.18129/B9.bioc.microbiome. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kers JG, Saccenti E. The power of microbiome studies: some considerations on which alpha and beta metrics to use and how to report results. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:796025. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.796025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lin H, Peddada SD. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3514. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17041-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gloor GB, Macklaim JM, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ. Microbiome datasets are compositional: And this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Herve, M. Package ‘RVAideMemoire’. Testing and Plotting Procedures for Biostatistics 0.9-81-2 edn (2023).
- 55.Martinez Arbizu, P. pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis. R package version 0.4 (2020).
- 56.Bansal V, Costantini T, Ryu SY, Peterson C, Loomis W, Putnam J, Elicieri B, Baird A, Coimbra R. Stimulating the central nervous system to prevent intestinal dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. J. Trauma. 2010;68:1059–1064. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d87373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lang Y, Fu F, Sun D, Xi C, Chen F. Labetalol prevents intestinal dysfunction induced by traumatic brain injury. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang X, Jiang X. Effects of enteral nutrition on the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa and dopamine receptor expression in rats with traumatic brain injury. J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr. 2015;39:114–123. doi: 10.1177/0148607113501881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rubin DC, Levin MS. Mechanisms of intestinal adaptation. Baillière's Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2016;30:237–248. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.IMPACTT-investigators, Beta-diversity distance matrices for microbiome sample size and power calculations: How to obtain good estimates. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022;20:2259–2267. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bray JR, Curtis JT. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 1957;27:326–349. doi: 10.2307/1942268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: A new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:8228–8235. doi: 10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Angoa-Pérez M, Zagorac B, Anneken JH, Briggs DI, Winters AD, Greenberg JM, Ahmad M, Theis KR, Kuhn DM. Repetitive, mild traumatic brain injury results in a progressive white matter pathology, cognitive deterioration, and a transient gut microbiota dysbiosis. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:8949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65972-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Nicholson SE, Watts LT, Burmeister DM, Merrill D, Scroggins S, Zou Y, Lai Z, Grandhi R, Lewis AM, Newton LM, et al. Moderate traumatic brain injury alters the gastrointestinal microbiome in a time-dependent manner. Shock. 2019;52:240–248. doi: 10.1097/shk.0000000000001211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gustafsson JK, Johansson MEV. The role of goblet cells and mucus in intestinal homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:785–803. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00675-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Artis D, Wang ML, Keilbaugh SA, He W, Brenes M, Swain GP, Knight PA, Donaldson DD, Lazar MA, Miller HRP, et al. RELMβ/FIZZ2 is a goblet cell-specific immune-effector molecule in the gastrointestinal tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004;101:13596–13600. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404034101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Liévin-Le Moal V, Servin Alain L. The front line of enteric host defense against unwelcome intrusion of harmful microorganisms: Mucins, antimicrobial peptides, and microbiota. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006;19:315–337. doi: 10.1128/cmr.19.2.315-337.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.McGuckin MA, Ouellette AJ, Wu GD. Secreted effectors of the innate mucosal barrier. In: Smith P, Blumberg R, MacDonald T, editors. Principles of Mucosal Immunology. 2. Garland Science; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Alam A, Leoni G, Quiros M, Wu H, Desai C, Nishio H, Jones RM, Nusrat A, Neish AS. The microenvironment of injured murine gut elicits a local pro-restitutive microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1:15021. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2015.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Litvak Y, Byndloss MX, Bäumler AJ. Colonocyte metabolism shapes the gut microbiota. Science. 2018 doi: 10.1126/science.aat9076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sequeira IR, Lentle RG, Kruger MC, Hurst RD. Standardising the lactulose mannitol test of gut permeability to minimise error and promote comparability. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e99256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ma Y, Liu T, Fu J, Fu S, Hu C, Sun B, Fan X, Zhu J. Lactobacillus acidophilus exerts neuroprotective effects in mice with traumatic brain injury. J. Nutr. 2019;149:1543–1552. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Simon DW, Rogers MB, Gao Y, Vincent G, Firek BA, Janesko-Feldman K, Vagni V, Kochanek PM, Ozolek JA, Mollen KP, et al. Depletion of gut microbiota is associated with improved neurologic outcome following traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2020;1747:147056. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.147056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Li H, Sun J, Du J, Wang F, Fang R, Yu C, Xiong J, Chen W, Lu Z, Liu J. Clostridium butyricum exerts a neuroprotective effect in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury via the gut-brain axis. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2018;30:e13260. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Opeyemi OM, Rogers MB, Firek BA, Janesko-Feldman K, Vagni V, Mullett SJ, Wendell SG, Nelson BP, New LA, Mariño E, et al. Sustained dysbiosis and decreased fecal short-chain fatty acids after traumatic brain injury and impact on neurologic outcome. J. Neurotrauma. 2021;38:2610–2621. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yanckello LM, Fanelli B, McCulloch S, Xing X, Sun M, Hammond TC, Colwell R, Gu Z, Ericsson AC, Chang YH, et al. Inulin supplementation mitigates gut dysbiosis and brain impairment induced by mild traumatic brain injury during chronic phase. J. Cell Immunol. 2022;4:50–64. doi: 10.33696/immunology.4.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Urban RJ, Pyles RB, Stewart CJ, Ajami N, Randolph KM, Durham WJ, Danesi CP, Dillon EL, Summons JR, Singh CK, et al. altered fecal microbiome years after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma. 2020;37:1037–1051. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Geerlings SY, Kostopoulos I, de Vos WM, Belzer C. Akkermansia muciniphila in the human gastrointestinal tract: When, where, and how? Microorganisms. 2018 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6030075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rodrigues VF, Elias-Oliveira J, Pereira ÍS, Pereira JA, Barbosa SC, Machado MSG, Carlos D. Akkermansia muciniphila and gut immune system: A good friendship that attenuates inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, and diabetes. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:934695. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.934695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kim S, Shin YC, Kim TY, Kim Y, Lee YS, Lee SH, Kim MN, Ook E, Kim KS, Kweon MN. Mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila accelerates intestinal stem cell-mediated epithelial development. Gut Microbes. 2021;13:1–20. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1892441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Reunanen J, Kainulainen V, Huuskonen L, Ottman N, Belzer C, Huhtinen H, de Vos WM, Satokari R. Akkermansia muciniphila adheres to enterocytes and strengthens the integrity of the epithelial cell layer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:3655–3662. doi: 10.1128/aem.04050-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zheng Z, Wang S, Wu C, Cao Y, Gu Q, Zhu Y, Zhang W, Hu W. Gut microbiota dysbiosis after traumatic brain injury contributes to persistent microglial activation associated with upregulated lyz2 and shifted tryptophan metabolic phenotype. Nutrients. 2022 doi: 10.3390/nu14173467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Belzer C, de Vos WM. Microbes inside—from diversity to function: The case of Akkermansia. ISME J. 2012;6:1449–1458. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Donaldson GP, Lee SM, Mazmanian SK. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:20–32. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yang S, Yu M. Role of goblet cells in intestinal barrier and mucosal immunity. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021;14:3171–3183. doi: 10.2147/jir.S318327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gersemann M, Becker S, Kübler I, Koslowski M, Wang G, Herrlinger KR, Griger J, Fritz P, Fellermann K, Schwab M, et al. Differences in goblet cell differentiation between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Differentiation. 2009;77:84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Smillie CS, Biton M, Ordovas-Montanes J, Sullivan KM, Burgin G, Graham DB, Herbst RH, Rogel N, Slyper M, Waldman J, et al. Intra- and inter-cellular rewiring of the human colon during ulcerative colitis. Cell. 2019;178:714–730.e722. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Houlden A, Goldrick M, Brough D, Vizi ES, Lénárt N, Martinecz B, Roberts IS, Denes A. Brain injury induces specific changes in the caecal microbiota of mice via altered autonomic activity and mucoprotein production. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;57:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Furuta GT, Turner JR, Taylor CT, Hershberg RM, Comerford K, Narravula S, Podolsky DK, Colgan SP. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent induction of intestinal trefoil factor protects barrier function during hypoxia. J. Exp. Med. 2001;193:1027–1034. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.9.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Byndloss MX, Olsan EE, Rivera-Chávez F, Tiffany CR, Cevallos SA, Lokken KL, Torres TP, Byndloss AJ, Faber F, Gao Y, et al. Microbiota-activated PPAR-γ signaling inhibits dysbiotic Enterobacteriaceae expansion. Science. 2017;357:570–575. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Li Z, Hu G, Zhu L, Sun Z, Jiang Y, Gao MJ, Zhan X. Study of growth, metabolism, and morphology of Akkermansia muciniphila with an in vitro advanced bionic intestinal reactor. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:61. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02111-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rivera-Chávez F, Zhang LF, Faber F, Lopez CA, Byndloss MX, Olsan EE, Xu G, Velazquez EM, Lebrilla CB, Winter SE, et al. Depletion of butyrate-producing clostridia from the gut microbiota drives an aerobic luminal expansion of salmonella. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:443–454. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Singh V, Lee G, Son H, Koh H, Kim ES, Unno T, Shin JH. Butyrate producers, "The Sentinel of Gut": Their intestinal significance with and beyond butyrate, and prospective use as microbial therapeutics. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:1103836. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1103836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Zhang M, Zhou Q, Dorfman RG, Huang X, Fan T, Zhang H, Zhang J, Yu C. Butyrate inhibits interleukin-17 and generates Tregs to ameliorate colorectal colitis in rats. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:84. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0500-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Roosevelt TS, Ruhmann-Wennhold A, Nelson DH. Adrenal corticosteroid effects upon rat brain mitochondrial metabolism. Endocrinology. 1973;93:619–625. doi: 10.1210/endo-93-3-619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ding Y, Bu F, Chen T, Shi G, Yuan X, Feng Z, Duan Z, Wang R, Zhang S, Wang Q, et al. A next-generation probiotic: Akkermansia muciniphila ameliorates chronic stress-induced depressive-like behavior in mice by regulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Appl Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021;105:8411–8426. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11622-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ou Z, Deng L, Lu Z, Wu F, Liu W, Huang D, Peng Y. Protective effects of Akkermansia muciniphila on cognitive deficits and amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nutr. Diabetes. 2020;10:12. doi: 10.1038/s41387-020-0115-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Blacher E, Bashiardes S, Shapiro H, Rothschild D, Mor U, Dori-Bachash M, Kleimeyer C, Moresi C, Harnik Y, Zur M, et al. Potential roles of gut microbiome and metabolites in modulating ALS in mice. Nature. 2019;572:474–480. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1443-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lopetuso LR, Quagliariello A, Schiavoni M, Petito V, Russo A, Reddel S, Del Chierico F, Ianiro G, Scaldaferri F, Neri M, et al. Towards a disease-associated common trait of gut microbiota dysbiosis: The pivotal role of Akkermansia muciniphila. Digest. Liver Dis. 2020;52:1002–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Baskin BM, Logsdon AF, Janet Lee S, Foresi BD, Peskind E, Banks WA, Cook DG, Schindler AG. Timing matters: Sex differences in inflammatory and behavioral outcomes following repetitive blast mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav. Immun. 2023;110:222–236. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Sgro M, Iacono G, Yamakawa GR, Kodila ZN, Marsland BJ, Mychasiuk R. Age matters: Microbiome depletion prior to repeat mild traumatic brain injury differentially alters microbial composition and function in adolescent and adult rats. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0278259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, Dirnagl U, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biol. 2020;18:e3000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Reporting on methodology, analysis and results are in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines102. 16s rRNA gene sequencing data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository under accession number GSE239472 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE239472). All other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.