Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias logoLink to American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias
. 2009 Dec;24(6):469–475. doi: 10.1177/1533317509342981

The Role of Caregiver Prosody in Conversations With Persons Who Have Alzheimer’s Disease

Jeff A Small 1, Angela Huxtable 2, Martina Walsh 3
PMCID: PMC10846112  PMID: 19759253

Abstract

This research was supported in part by funding from the British Columbia Medical Services Foundation (BCM02-0115). The funding source had no role in the design, methods, participant recruitment, data collection, interpretation of the study, or in the preparation of the manuscript for publication. Approval for the study was granted by the University of British Columbia Behavioural Ethics Review Board, and participants provided informed consent. This study investigated whether aspects of family caregivers’ prosody (pitch and loudness) would be associated with successful or unsuccessful conversations with spouses who have Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Secondary analysis was conducted of 12 caregivers’ speech when interacting with spouses who have AD. Acoustic analyses were conducted to calculate the fundamental frequency (pitch) and intensity (loudness) of caregivers’ speech. The results showed no significant overall differences between the caregivers’ pitch or loudness in either successful or unsuccessful conversations. However, for 1 subgroup of caregivers, an increase in pitch variation and loudness was associated with unsuccessful communication, whereas for another subgroup the opposite pattern was observed—reduced pitch variation and loudness with unsuccessful communication. The results provide preliminary directions for helping family caregivers become aware of how characteristics of their speech prosody may relate to the quality of communication when interacting with persons who have AD.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, communication, elderspeak, speech prosody, caregiving

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (207.2 KB).

Contributor Information

Jeff A. Small, School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, jsmall@interchange.ubc.ca .

Angela Huxtable, School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Martina Walsh, School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

References

  1. Byrne KB, Orange JB Communication enhancement for family caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. In: Davis BH, ed. Alzheimer Talk, Text and Context: Identifying Communication Enhancements. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:169-189. [Google Scholar]
  2. Orange JB, Van Gennep KM, Miller L., Johnson AM Resolution of communication breakdown in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a longitudinal study. J Appl Commun Res. 1998;26(1):120-138. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ripich DN, Ziol E., Fritsch T., Durand EJ Training Alzheimer’s disease caregivers for successful communication . Clin Gerontol. 1999;21(1):37-56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Small JA, Andersen ES, Kempler D. Effects of working memory capacity on understanding rate-altered speech. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 1997;4(2):126-139. [Google Scholar]
  5. Small JA, Gutman G., Makela S., Hillhouse B. Effectiveness of communication strategies used by caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease during activities of daily living. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;46: 353-367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Small JA, Kemper S., Lyons K. Sentence comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: effects of grammatical complexity, speech rate, and repetition. Psychol Aging. 1997;12(1):3-11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Small JA, Perry J., Lewis J. Perceptions of family caregivers’ psychosocial behaviour when communicating with spouses who have Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2005;20(5):281-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kemper S. Elderspeak: speech accommodations to older adults. Aging Cogn . 1994;1:17-28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Balsis S., Carpenter BD Evaluations of elderspeak in a caregiving context. Clin Gerontol . 2005;29(1):76-96. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kemper S., Harden T. Experimentally disentangling what’s beneficial about elderspeak from what’s not. Psychol Aging. 1999;14(4):656-670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Connor BP, Rigby H. Perceptions of baby talk, frequency of receiving baby talk, and self-esteem among community and nursing home residents. Psychol Aging. 1996;11(1):147-154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O’Connor BP, St. Pierre ES Older persons’ perceptions of the frequency and meaning of elderspeak from family, friends, and service workers. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2004;58(3):197-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ryan EB, Hamilton JM, Kwong See SK Patronizing the old: how do younger and older adults respond to baby talk in the nursing home? Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1994;39(1):21-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Whitbourne SK, Culgin S., Cassidy E. Evaluation of infantilizing intonation and content of speech directed at the aged. Int J Aging Hum Dev . 1995;41(2):109-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Williams KN , Herman R., Gajewski B., Wilson K. Elderspeak communication: impact on dementia care. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2009. ;24(1):11-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hummert M., Shaner JL, Garska TA, Henry C. Communication with older adults: the influence of age stereotypes, context, and communicator age. Hum Commun Res. 1998. ;25(1):124-151. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sachweh S. Granny darling’s nappies: secondary baby-talk in German nursing homes for the aged. J Appl Commun Res. 1998;26(1):52-65. [Google Scholar]
  18. Savundranayagam MY, Ryan EB, Anas AP, Orange JB Communication and dementia: staff perceptions of conversational strategies. Clin Gerontol. 2007;31(2):47-63. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hodgson H. Talking with Alzheimer patients. Activity Directors’ Quart Alzheimer’s Other Demen. 2004;5(2): 23-26. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hummert ML, Mazloff D., Henry C. Vocal characteristics of older adults and stereotyping. J Nonverbal Behav. 1999;23(2):111-132. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaufmann A. Negation and prosody in British English: a study based on the London-Lund Corpus. J Pragm. 2002;34(10-11):1473-1494. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yaeger-Dror ML Intonational prominence on negatives in English . Lang Speech. 1985;28(3):197-230. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yaeger-Dror M. Contraction of negatives as evidence of variance in register-specific interactive rules. Lang Var Change. 1997;9(1):1-36. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ryan EB, Meredith SD, MacLean MJ, Orange JB Changing the way we talk with elders: promoting health using the communication enhancement model. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1995. ;41(2):89-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Small JA Speech and communication (speech styles). In: Birren JE, ed. Encyclopedia of Gerontology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006:551-558. [Google Scholar]
  26. Giles H., Coupland N., Coupland J. Accommodation theory: communication, context, and consequence. In: Giles H, Coupland J, Coupland N, eds. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. New York, NY: : Cambridge University Press; 1991. :1-68. [Google Scholar]
  27. Orange JB, Colton-Hudson A. Enhancing communication in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Top Ger Rehab. 1998;14(2):56-75. [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES