It has been an exciting decade with recent trends in spinal trauma management and research having unlocked many breakthroughs in prevention, diagnosis, comprehensive care and post-treatment support worldwide.1 As a result, many new techniques and cutting-edge technologies have surfaced, changing the scenario for a condition that was once considered as an ailment not to be treated and which still poses a major challenge to society since it is amongst the most devastating ailments.2 Researchers are currently looking into different innovative strategies which have the potential to greatly transform the way spine trauma is managed.
Of note, mounting evidence has emerged with regard to the timing and effectiveness of surgery for spinal cord injuries (SCI). This evidence has been recently summarized in systematic reviews and guidelines that support the idea of “Time is Spine”.3 Based on this work, a strong recommendation has emerged that surgical intervention for SCI be undertaken within 24 h after injury.4 Many knowledge gaps remain to be addressed, however, which include the role of ultra-early surgery, the role of expansile duroplasty, the optimal management of mild central cord injury and the practical aspects of implementing a “Time is Spine” protocol in developing countries.4
Recent evidence suggests spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) correlates better with the recovery of neurologic functions following traumatic SCI than mean arterial pressure (MAP),5 although the evidence to support SCPP monitoring remains somewhat controversial. The evidence for optimal hemodynamic management of patients with acute SCI has been summarized in recent systematic reviews and guidelines.6,7 Several knowledge gaps have emerged which include the role of SCPP optimization vs. MAP-directed management and the best physiological targets to target.7
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) promises to be a powerful MRI tool supporting an objective, non-invasive assessment of SCI. It works on the principle of measuring the magnitude and direction of the diffusion of water molecules in the structures being scanned to assess their integrity.8 Tractography uses data collected from DTI to create a visual representation of nerve tracts in 3D.9 The latest tractography algorithm can accurately produce up to 90 % of the actual nerve bundles.10
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are pre-operative care plans that aim to expedite the process of post-operative recovery. The goal is to preserve pre-operative organ function as well as lower the overwhelming stress response after surgery.11 Fundamental principles include pre-operative counselling, proper pre-operative nutrition, refraining from pre-operative fasting and loading of carbohydrates before a certain period, use of standardized anaesthetic agents, analgesics and early ambulation.12 The introduction of ERAS protocols has led to a substantial reduction in the days spent at the hospital and similar morbidity in patients compared to the traditional approach.13
Machine learning and artificial intelligence are very recent developments for management and research in spinal cord injury. Machine learning algorithms find complex, non-linear relationships within large datasets, which would otherwise be less amenable to analysis with traditional logistic regression.14 These have applications in clinical diagnosis, prognostication, decision-making, planning out surgeries and post-surgical recovery and rehabilitation. Algorithms are developed by feeding a plethora of complex data to train the artificial intelligence/machine learning models and develop artificial neural networks with fine-tuned parameters considering every possible outcome. They have huge potential applications in SCI, ranging from predicting the extent of traumatic SCI from imaging to predicting independent walking ability post-traumatic SCI at discharge.15,16
3D printing is a technique that helps manufacture customized and life-size implants, braces, etc. Its application in the development of personalized assistive devices/orthoses is a promising avenue today. It significantly reduces the cost of production, with high-speed fabrication, when compared to traditional orthoses.17 Although 3D-printed lower limb orthoses, including AFOs, have been around for a while, more complex 3D-printed upper limb orthoses, such as the myoelectric hand, are now being developed.18 Furthermore, with the development of neural tissue engineering, 3D bioprinting is receiving huge attention as it is a powerful tool that can accurately print complex structures.19 Significant research is underway in the field of reconstruction of the injured spinal cord using 3D printed ideal biomimetic scaffolds.20
Sacral neuromodulation using an implantable electrical stimulator allows on-demand micturition with low post-void residual urine and lower rates of urinary tract infections.21,22 It needs to be performed at specialized centres and needs team efforts of spine specialists, urologists and rehabilitation experts. Future studies analysing the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as compared to sacral neuromodulation of sacral nerve roots will establish definitive bladder management guidelines in SCI individuals.23
Epidural SCS has exhibited improved motor function in chronic SCI in animal and human trials.24, 25, 26 Transcutaneous SCS is also a promising tool to enhance the functional outcome in patients with SCI, principally while being paired with synchronous rehabilitation.24 It allows ease of application and lower costs. Various studies have demonstrated multi-fold benefits of SCS reducing autonomic and metabolic issues in SCI subjects, improvement in bladder function with improvement in voluntary voiding.27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 Lower thoracic spinal cord stimulation activates the expiratory muscles and allows peak end expiratory pressure augmenting coughing efforts in SCI patients.32,34,35 Further multicentre trials to explore the efficacy and reproducibility of various effects of SCS are the need of the hour to establish protocols for rehabilitation and define outcomes. Moreover, the role of brain-spinal cord computer interfaces represents an emerging area of translational research which shows promise.36
Even though there have been substantial advancements in spine trauma management and research, there is still much that we don't know about this complex issue to effectively meet the existing challenges. One of the significant areas of concern is our limited understanding of the barriers to spinal cord regeneration and the most effective strategies to overcome them. This not only presents a significant challenge for healthcare professionals and researchers alike, it also highlights the need and scope for continued investigation and innovation in this field.
The aim of this Virtual special issue is to familiarize healthcare professionals and translational researchers with some of the recent trends in the management and research of spinal trauma. We encourage readers to incorporate recent trends in the management of their spine trauma patients and to do everything possible within their resources to find innovative solutions to enhance the quality of lives of individuals with SCI such that ‘life after spine trauma can be joyous, fulfilling and worth living’.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- 1.WHO . 2013. Report. Low Back Pain. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World.https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/Ch6_24LBP.pdf Available from: 2019 Jun 13. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murray C.J., Vos T., Lozano R., et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–2223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fehlings M.G., Hachem L., Tetreault Lam Skelly A.C., et al. Timing of decompressive surgery in patients with acute spinal cord injury: systematic review update. Global Spine J. 2023 doi: 10.1177/21925682231197404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fehlings M.G., Hachem L., Tetreault L.A., et al. An update of a clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: recommendations on the role and timing of decompressive surgery. Global Spine J. 2023 doi: 10.1177/21925682231181883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Spinal cord perfusion pressure predicts neurologic recovery in acute spinal cord injury Jordan, Squair W., Bélanger Lise M., et al. Kwon Neurology. Oct 2017;89(16):1660–1667. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Evaniew N., Davies B., Farahbakhsh F., et al. Interventions to optimize spinal cord perfusion in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: an updated systematic review. Global Spine J. 2023 doi: 10.1177/21925682231218737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kwon B.K., Tetreault L.A., Martin A.R., et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: recommendations on hemodynamic management. Global Spine J. 2023 doi: 10.1177/21925682231202348. (forthcoming) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zaninovich O.A., Avila M.J., Kay M., Becker J.L., Hurlbert R.J., Martirosyan N.L. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the diagnosis, prognosis, and assessment of recovery and treatment of spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Mar 1;46(3):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18591. PMID: 30835681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Basser P.J., Pajevic S., Pierpaoli C., Duda J., Aldroubi A., October In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44(4):625–632. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<625::AID-MRM17>3.0. CO;2-O. PMID 11025519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Maier-Hein K.H., Neher P.F., Houde J.C., Côté M.A., Garyfallidis E., Zhong J., et al. The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nat Commun. November 2017;8(1):1349. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x. Bibcode:2017NatCo…8.1349M. PMC 5677006. PMID 29116093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Debono B., Wainwright T.W., Wang M.Y., et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Spine J. 2021 May 1;21(5):729–752. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weimann A., Braga M., Harsanyi L., et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:224–244. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Melnyk M., Casey R.G., Black P., Koupparis A.J. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols: time to change practice? Can Urol Assoc J. 2011 Oct;5(5):342–348. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.11002. PMID: 22031616; PMCID: PMC3202008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Khan O., Badhiwala J.H., Wilson J.R., Jiang F., Martin A.R., Fehlings M.G. Predictive modeling of outcomes after traumatic and nontraumatic spinal cord injury using machine learning: review of current progress and future directions. Neurospine. 2019 Dec;16(4):678. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938390.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McCoy D.B., Dupont S.M., Gros C., et al. Convolutional neural network-based automated segmentation of the spinal cord and contusion injury: deep learning biomarker correlates of motor impairment in acute spinal cord injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:737–744. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.DeVries Z., Hoda M., Rivers C.S., et al. Development of an unsupervised machine learning algorithm for the prognostication of walking ability in spinal cord injury patients. Spine J. 2019 Sep 13;(19):30971–30974. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.007. [Epub]. pii: S1529-9430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D Printing and its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 18.Yoo H.J., Lee S., Kim J., Park C., Lee B. Development of 3D-printed myoelectric hand orthosis for patients with spinal cord injury. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2019 Dec;16(1):1–4. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0633-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuan T.Y., Zhang J., Yu T., Wu J.P., Liu Q.Y. 3D bioprinting for spinal cord injury repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Apr 20;10 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.847344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Joung D., Truong V., Neitzke C.C., et al. 3D printed stem‐cell derived neural progenitors generate spinal cord scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater. 2018 Sep;28(39) doi: 10.1002/adfm.201801850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vastenholt J.M., Snoek G.J., Buschman H.P., van der Aa H.E., Alleman E.R., Ijzerman M.J. A 7-year follow-up of sacral anterior root stimulation for bladder control in patients with a spinal cord injury: quality of life and users' experiences. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(7):397e402. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Martens F.M., den Hollander P.P., Snoek G.J., Koldewijn E.L., van Kerrebroeck P.E., Heesakkers J.P. Quality of life in complete spinal cord injury patients with a Brindley bladder stimulator compared to a matched control group. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(4):551e555. doi: 10.1002/nau.21012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guiho T., Azevedo-Coste C., Bauchet L., et al. Sacral anterior root stimulation and visceral function outcomes in spinal cord injury-A systematic review of the literature over four decades. World Neurosurg. 2022;157 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.041. 218e232.e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tapias Pérez J.H., Medula N., Dolor . vol. 37. Neurología; 2022. www.elsevier.es/neurologia (Spinal Cord Stimulation: Beyond Pain Management PALABRAS CLAVE [Internet]). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cai Y., Reddy R.D., Varshney V., Chakravarthy K v. Spinal cord stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a review of the preclinical and clinical data and future prospects. Bioelectron Med. 2020 Dec 16;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s42234-020-00041-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nagel S.J., Wilson S., Johnson M.D., et al. Spinal cord stimulation for spasticity: historical approaches, current status, and future directions. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2017 Jun;20(4):307–321. doi: 10.1111/ner.12591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Carhart M.R., He Jiping, Herman R., D'Luzansky S., Willis W.T. Epidural spinal-cord stimulation facilitates recovery of functional walking following incomplete spinal-cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2004 Mar;12(1):32–42. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.822763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gad P., Lee S., Terrafranca N., et al. Non-invasive activation of cervical spinal networks after severe paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Sep 15;35(18):2145–2158. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alam M., Ling Y.T., Wong A.Y.L., Zhong H., Edgerton V.R., Zheng Y. Reversing 21 years of chronic paralysis via non‐invasive spinal cord neuromodulation: a case study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 May 20;7(5):829–838. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sachdeva R., Nightingale T.E., Pawar K., et al. Noninvasive neuroprosthesis promotes cardiovascular recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Apr 31;18(2):1244–1256. doi: 10.1007/s13311-021-01034-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Walter M., Lee A.H.X., Kavanagh A., Phillips A.A., Krassioukov A v. Epidural spinal cord stimulation acutely modulates lower urinary tract and bowel function following spinal cord injury: a case report. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1816. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.DiMarco A.F., Geertman R.T., Tabbaa K., Nemunaitis G.A., Kowalski K.E. Restoration of cough via spinal cord stimulation improves pulmonary function in tetraplegics. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Sep 2;43(5):579–585. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1699678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.DiMarco A.F., Kowalski K.E., Geertman R.T., et al. Lower thoracic spinal cord stimulation to restore cough in patients with spinal cord injury: results of a national institutes of health–sponsored clinical trial. Part II: clinical outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 May;90(5):726–732. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.DiMarco A.F., Geertman R.T., Tabbaa K., Polito R.R., Kowalski K.E. Case report: minimally invasive method to activate the expiratory muscles to restore cough. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Sep 3;41(5):562–566. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1357916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.DiMarco A.F., Kowalski K.E., Geertman R.T., Hromyak D.R. Spinal cord stimulation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun 15;173(12):1386–1389. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200601-097CR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ganzer P.D., Colachis S.C., 4th, Schwemmer M.A., et al. Restoring the sense of touch using a sensorimotor demultiplexing neural interface. Cell. 2020 May 14;181(4):763–773.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]