Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Immunology
. 2024 Feb 3;215(2):160–176. doi: 10.1093/cei/uxad110

Heterogeneity in RAG1 and RAG2 deficiency: 35 cases from a single-centre

Betul Karaatmaca 1,2,#, Deniz Cagdas 3,4,#,, Saliha Esenboga 5, Baran Erman 6, Cagman Tan 7, Tuba Turul Ozgur 8, Kaan Boztug 9,10,11,12,13, Mirjam van der Burg 14, Ozden Sanal 15, Ilhan Tezcan 16,17
PMCID: PMC10847812  PMID: 37724703

Abstract

Recombination activating genes (RAG)1 and RAG2 deficiency leads to combined T/B-cell deficiency with varying clinical presentations. This study aimed to define the clinical/laboratory spectrum of RAG1 and RAG2 deficiency. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical/laboratory data of 35 patients, grouped them as severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), Omenn syndrome (OS), and delayed-onset combined immunodeficiency (CID) and reported nine novel mutations. The male/female ratio was 23/12. Median age of clinical manifestations was 1 months (mo) (0.5–2), 2 mo (1.25–5), and 14 mo (3.63–27), age at diagnosis was 4 mo (3–6), 4.5 mo (2.5–9.75), and 27 mo (14.5–70) in SCID (n = 25; 71.4%), OS (n = 5; 14.3%), and CID (n = 5; 14.3%) patients, respectively. Common clinical manifestations were recurrent sinopulmonary infections 82.9%, oral moniliasis 62.9%, diarrhea 51.4%, and eczema/dermatitis 42.9%. Autoimmune features were present in 31.4% of the patients; 80% were in CID patients. Lymphopenia was present in 92% of SCID, 80% of OS, and 80% of CID patients. All SCID and CID patients had low T (CD3, CD4, and CD8), low B, and increased NK cell numbers. Twenty-eight patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), whereas seven patients died before HSCT. Median age at HSCT was 7 mo (4–13.5). Survival differed in groups; maximum in SCID patients who had an HLA-matched family donor, minimum in OS. Totally 19 (54.3%) patients survived. Early molecular genetic studies will give both individualized therapy options, and a survival advantage because of timely diagnosis and treatment. Further improvement in therapeutic outcomes will be possible if clinicians gain time for HSCT.

Keywords: autoimmunity, erythroderma, Omenn syndrome, RAG1/2, severe combined immunodeficiency, vasculitis


The recombination activating genes (RAG) are key players for T- and B-cell development and functions. Multifarious clinical presentations have been defined as patients with RAG deficiency. Early diagnosis, effective treatment, and early hematopoietic stem cell transplantation will increase the patients’ chances of survival, especially for late-onset forms.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

The recombination activating genes (RAG) 1 and 2 have essential roles in the early stage of V(D)J [variable (diversity) joining segments] recombination, which provides the plasticity of the adaptive immune system to give reaction to diverse antigens. Therefore, defect in the V(D)J recombination process leads to a restricted antigen receptor repertoire in the adaptive immune system [1].

Schwarz et al. [2] first described RAG gene mutations in patients with T-negative (T–), B-negative (B–), and natural killer cell-positive (NK+) severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in 1996. Further studies showed that human RAG gene mutations have a broad spectrum of clinical and immunological phenotypes other than classical SCID [3, 4]. In SCID patients, clinical findings usually begin in the first year of life, generally soon after birth. Life-threatening opportunistic viral and fungal infections are common. Patients experience recurrent sinopulmonary infections, interstitial pneumonitis, protracted diarrhea, and failure to thrive. Lymphopenia and severe hypogammaglobulinemia are frequent findings. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) should be planned just after the diagnosis of SCID because T- and B-cell reconstitution is curative for SCID [5, 6].

A rare clinical presentation of RAG deficiency is Omenn syndrome (OS). RAG genes have a partial V(D)J recombination activity in OS [1, 7]. Omenn syndrome may result when certain hypomorphic RAG½ gene mutations result in partial V(D)J recombination activity, and leads to an activated oligoclonal T cell proliferation and infiltration in several organs, especially in skin, gut, and liver. The findings of OS are generalized erythroderma, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, eosinophilia, hypogammaglobulinemia, and high immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels. Clinical follow-up and treatment are similar to SCID [7, 8].

If hypomorphic RAG gene mutations are present, residual RAG protein activity is possible which will cause delayed-onset disease forms and mimic common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) or combined immunodeficiency (CID). In delayed-onset RAG deficiency patients, autoimmune cytopenia (AIC), vasculitis, nephritis, and granulomatous lesions in various tissues and organs are common in addition to recurrent sinopulmonary infections [9, 10]. Idiopathic CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia [11], IgA deficiency [12], selective deficiency of polysaccharide-specific antibody responses [13], and hyper-IgM syndrome [14] are other delayed-onset and atypical presentations. Different clinical phenotypes with the same RAG defect even in the same family may support the role of epigenetic factors on the phenotype [1].

Herein, we aimed to elucidate the clinical features, molecular diagnosis, and outcomes of RAG½ deficient patients followed by a tertiary pediatric immunology department over a twenty-year period by describing the variable clinical presentation.

Material and methods

Patients and study design

This study enrolled 35 RAGD patients from 30 families diagnosed in a twenty-year period (1999–2019) at Hacettepe University, Ihsan Dogramaci Children’s Hospital, Division of Pediatric Immunology. We retrospectively noted the clinical and laboratory data from medical records. We recruited the patients into three groups according to the clinical presentations/immunological findings; typical T(–)B(–)NK(+) SCID, OS, and delayed-onset CID (leaky SCID and atypical SCID) [9]. Hacettepe University Institutional Review Board approved the study, and the parents of the patients signed the informed consent.

SCID patients were diagnosed by using the European Society of Immunodeficiency Disorders (ESID) Criteria [15] and International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) guidelines [16]. OS criteria included the presence of erythroderma or atopic/seborrheic dermatitis in the absence of maternal engraftment [7, 17]. Delayed-onset patients with RAG½ mutations were diagnosed with delayed-onset CID, depending on the clinical symptoms and laboratory data [9].

The demographic characteristics of the patients (age of manifestation, age at diagnosis, gender, family history, etc.), clinical and laboratory findings, genetic mutations, HSCT outcomes, and survival were evaluated. RAG deficient patients those with high CD3 count, and high CD45RO value were assessed in terms of maternal engraftment, and karyotype and chimerism analyses were performed.

Flow cytometry

We performed the analysis of peripheral blood lymphocyte populations by one laser three-color flow cytometry (BD Biosciences FACS Calibur, USA). One-hundred microliter of whole blood was obtained and stained with 20 μl of the monoclonal antibodies (CD3(fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)), CD4(FITC), CD8 (peridinin-chlorophyll protein complex (PerCP)), CD16 + 56(APC), and CD19 (phycoerythrin (PE)) (Beckton Dickinson, BD, USA)). Then, the samples were incubated in the dark for 15 min at room temperature.

Sanger sequencing

DNA was isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells after separation using Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequence analysis of RAG½ was performed following PCR amplification of the coding regions with TaqGoldTM (Life Technologies), followed by direct sequencing on an ABI Prism 3130 XL fluorescent sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Bleiswijk, the Netherlands).

Targeted primary immunodeficiency panel screening

The molecular analyses of the patients were performed in the Hacettepe Pediatric Immunology Laboratory [18], Erasmus Center, and CeMM Research Center by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) for primary immune deficiency (PID) [19] and the Sanger Technique.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS® version 22.0 for Windows (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative parameters were reported as means and SD, or as medians with 25th and 75th percentile values in case of skewed distribution. Categorical variables were described using absolute frequencies and proportions with a 95% CI. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Kaplan–Meier test was used for survival analysis.

Results

Patient characteristics

Thirty-five RAG-deficient patients (65.7% male) were included in the study. Eighty percent of cases had parental consanguinity, and 57.1% of the cases had a history of immunodeficiency in siblings or other family members. We subdivided the patients into three groups considering the clinical presentations and immunological findings: typical SCID (patients P1–25); OS (P26–30), and delayed-onset CID (P31–35) [9, 15, 16].

RAG ½ mutations and affected domains

Twenty-five patients had RAG1, and 10 patients had RAG2 deficiency. The RAG½ mutations, and affected RAG½ domains are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1A and B. Mutations were mostly found in the core region for RAG1 and RAG2 genes. P26 and P27 were cousins, and had novel RAG2 mutations affecting the C-terminal non-core domain.

Table 1.

The analysis of the RAG mutations in our cohort

Patients Gene Variant AA change Variant type Zygosity Phenotype Novelty (reference number)
P1 RAG1 c.1524T > C Y508* Nonsense Hom SCID Yes
P2, P3, and P30 RAG1 c.2322G > A R737H Missense Hom SCID and OS No [7]
P4 RAG1 c.2005G > A E669K Missense Hom SCID No [20]
P5, P8, P21, P22, P23, and P28 RAG1 c.1879C > G Y589* Nonsense Hom SCID and OS No [17]
P6 and P7 RAG1 c.2322C > T R737C Missense Hom SCID No [21]
P9 RAG2 c.217C > T/c.712delG Q33*/V238Lfs*10 Nonsense/Del. Frameshift Comp. het. SCID Yes
P10 RAG2 c.707T > G I236R Missense Hom SCID Yes
P11 RAG2 c.1886C > T R229W Nonsense Hom SCID No [2]
P12 RAG2 c.1782C > A S194* Missense Hom SCID No [21]
P13 and P14 RAG2 c.951G > T W317C Missense Hom SCID Yes
P15 RAG1 c.2126G > A G709D Missense Hom SCID No [22]
P16 and P17 RAG1 c.2326C > T R776W Missense Hom SCID No [23]
P18 RAG2 c.746 G > A C249W Missense Hom SCID Yes
P19 RAG1 c.1181G > A/c.2116delA R394Q/R706Gfs*44 Missense/del. frameshift Comp. het. SCID No [24]/Yes
P20 RAG1 c.1181G > A R394Q Missense Hom SCID No [24]
P24 RAG1 c.1780_1781 delTTinsAC F594T Indel Hom SCID Yes
P25 RAG2 c.712delG V238Lfs*10 Del. frameshift Hom SCID Yes
P26 and P27 RAG2 c.1280_1281insTGGATAT N428Gfs*12 Ins. frameshift Hom OS Yes
P29 and P35 RAG1 c.1331C > T A444V Missense Hom OS and CID No [17]
P31 and P32 RAG1 c.1682G > A R561H Missense Hom CID No [7]
P33 RAG1 c.537G > A/c.1443C > T R142Q/A444V Missense/Missense Comp. het. CID No [25]/No [17]
P34 RAG1 c.2095C > T R699W Missense Hom CID No [26]

AA: amino acid; *: stop codon, Hom: homozygous; Comp. het: compound heterozygous; Del: deletion; Ins: insertion.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A-B. Mutations and affected RAG 1 and 2 domains in the patients. #: novel mutations. NBD: nanomer binding domain; PHD domain: the plant homeodomain; ZnA: zinc finger A; ZnB: zinc finger B

All patients with RAG1 and RAG2 deficiency had homozygous mutations, except three patients (RAG 1 deficient P19 and P33 and RAG2 deficient P9) had compound heterozygous mutations. Among the thirty-five patients included in this study, three in the RAG1 gene and six in the RAG2 gene, a totally of nine novel mutations were reported and depicted in Table 1 and Fig. 1A and B. P33 and P34 were previously reported [25, 27].

Clinical manifestations

Common clinical manifestations were recurrent sinopulmonary infections 82.9%, oral moniliasis 62.9%, eczema/dermatitis 42.9%, diarrhea 51.4%, and autoimmunity 31.4% (Table 2 and Fig. 2).

Table 2.

Characteristics of the RAG deficient patients

Patients Presentation Gender Age of manifestation (months) Age
at clinical diagnosis
(months)
Consanguinity Family
history
Clinical
symptoms
Skin
findings
Cytopenia Other autoimmune/inflammatory disease Vaccine-
related
disease
P1 SCID** M 2 6 Yes Yes Diarrhea, pneumonia No No HM and LAP No
P2 SCID M 0 3.5 Yes Yes Oral thrush, diarrhea, and RLRTI No No HSM No
P3 SCID M 1 1 Yes Yes Pneumonia Dermatitis HA and ITP (after HSCT and DC–) No No
P4 SCID M 4 7 No No RLRTI, RURTI, skin abscess, oral thrush, diarrhea, and USI Dermatitis No HM No
P5 SCID M 4 6 Yes Yes Perianal abscess, diarrhea, and oral thrush Dermatitis No HM and LAP BCG lymphadenitis
P6 SCID M 1 6 Yes Yes Oral thrush, diarrhea, pneumonia No No No No
P7 SCID F 1.5 5 Yes Yes USI pneumonia No No No BCG lymphadenitis
P8 SCID M 0.5 2 Yes Yes oral thrush, diarrhea No ITP
(6 years after HSCT)
HM No
P9 SCID F 0 6 No No RLRTI, skin abscess, oral thrush, diarrhea, aphthous stomatitis SD No No BCG lymphadenitis
P10 SCID F 1 25 Yes No RLRTI, skin abscess, oral thrush, and diarrhea No No No No
P11 SCID F 1 10 Yes No CMV retinitis, oral thrush, diarrhea, and pneumonia Dermatitis ITP (CMV) HM, LAP No
P12 SCID M 3 5 Yes No RLRTI and oral thrush Whitish patches No HM No
P13 SCID F 1 3 No* No Oral thrush and pneumonia No AIHA (6 months after HSCT) No No
P14 SCID M 1 7 Yes No RURTI, oral thrush, and aphthous stomatitis DD Leukopenia (bone marrow failure after HSCT) HM No
P15 SCID M 2 3 Yes No Oral thrush and diarrhea No No HM No
P16 * SCID M 0 3 Yes Yes Oral thrush, RLRTI, and RURTI No No No No
P17 * SCID M 1 3 Yes Yes Oral thrush and CMV pneumonia No No No No
P18 SCID M 6 11 Yes Yes RLRTI and RURTI No No No No
P19 SCID M 2 2 No Yes RLRTI Dermatitis No No No
P20 SCID M 1.5 4 Yes No RLRTI, oral thrush, diarrhea, and CMV retinitis DD No No No
P21 SCID M 0.5 4 Yes Yes Oral thrush and pneumonia No Pancytopenia (bone marrow failure, after HSCT) No BCG lymphadenitis
P22 SCID M 2 3 Yes Yes Diarrhea, pneumonia, oral thrush, and CMV pneumonia DD No HM No
P23 SCID F 0.5 3 Yes Yes Diarrhea and oral thrush DD No HM No
P24 SCID M 0.66 1.5 Yes No Pneumonia and USI Dermatitis No No No
P25 SCID M 0 0.2 No Yes DD No No No
P26 OS F 0.5 4.5 Yes Yes Pneumonia and diarrhea Ichthyosis and alopecia No HM No
P27 OS F 2 2.5 No Yes Pneumonia and diarrhea Ichthyosis and alopecia No LAP No
P28 OS F 6 10 Yes No Oral thrush, RURTI, and pneumonia SD, alopecia, and nail dystrophia No HM No
P29 OS F 4 9.5 Yes No Diarrhea, pneumonia, and oral thrush SD No HM No
P30 OS F 2 2.5 Yes Yes RLRTI, oral thrush, diarrhea, and CMV pneumonia SD, alopecia, and DD No HSM No
P31 * CID M 7 78 Yes Yes RLRTI, bronhiectasis, and CMV pneumonia Warts No LAP No
P32 * CID F 36 62 Yes Yes RLRTI Warts and vitiligo No LAP No
P33 CID** M 0.25 10 No No RLRTI, diarrhea, eczema, oral thrush, and CMV pneumonia Granulomatous dermatitis No LAP No
P34 CID M 14 27 Yes No Pneumonia, hemoptysis, and pulmonary hemosiderosis Necrotic wounds No Necrotizan vasculitis No
P35 CID** M 18 19 Yes No Candida cruzei pneumonia, RLRTI No No Progressive neuropathy No

DC: direct coombs; DD: diaper dermatitis; HA: hemolytic anemia HM: hepatomegaly; HSM: hepatosplenomegaly; GIS: gastrointestinal; ITP: immune thrombocytopenic purpura; LAP: lymphadenopathy; RLRTI: recurrent lower respiratory tract infections; RURTI: recurrent upper respiratory tract infections; SD: Seborrheic dermatitis; USI: urinary system infections.

Cousins: P2 and P3; P6 and P7; P26 and P27;*: siblings: P16 and P17; P31 and P32; P1, P33, and P35;**: Do not exactly fulfill the ESID criteria.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Common clinical manifestations of RAG deficient patients. Inflammatory disease: hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy

Autoimmune/inflammatory findings

Autoimmunity was recorded in 11 patients (31.4%); alopecia (n = 4), vitiligo (n = 2), granulomatous skin lesions and IBD (n = 1), vasculitis (n = 1), progressive neuropathy (n = 1), and AIC [AIHA (autoimmune hemolytic anemia), ITP (immune thrombocytopenia)] (n = 2, SCID patients post-HSCT). The ratio of AIC was 2/35 (6%) in RAG½ deficiency in this cohort.

Almost all autoimmune findings were generally associated with the CID group, albeit a patient with vitiligo was in the SCID group and patients with alopecia were in the OS group. (Table 2). Inflammatory disorders including hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy and several forms of dermatitis were quite common in all groups (Table 2/Fig. 2).

Infectious diseases

CMV infection developed in 8/35 patients (SCID = 6, CID = 1, and OS = 1), and in two SCID patients (P11 and P20) retinitis developed as a complication. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura associated with CMV infection developed in P11 at the age of 1.5 mo [2]. Foscarnet and ganciclovir were given. After referral, she was diagnosed with SCID and treated with HSCT successfully. The other SCID patient developed CMV retinitis during the disease course and underwent HSCT. Despite ganciclovir and CMV hyperimmunoglobulin, blindness developed.

Warts occurred in two siblings in the CID group (P31 and P32); the lesions were resistant to cryotherapy and laser in one. They had a previously reported RAG1 mutation (R561H; c.1682 G > A) [7].

Bacillus-Calmette–Guérin (BCG) is a live-attenuated vaccine and is contraindicated in SCID patients. Unfortunately, it is administered soon after birth since tuberculosis is still a public health problem in some countries [28]. BCG is in the national vaccination schedule, and applied at the age of 2 mo in Turkey. As the median (IQR) age at diagnosis was 5 (3–10) mo in our cohort, 23 out of 35 patients received BCG vaccine before the diagnosis of PID. All BCG-vaccinated patients received isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) for tuberculosis prophylaxis. Four SCID patients (P5, P7, P9, and P21) were diagnosed with BCGitis after HSCT and treated with additional anti-mycobacterial drugs.

Laboratory findings

Lymphopenia (88.6%) was the most common laboratory finding (Table 3 [9, 29]), present in 92% of SCID patients (P125), 80% of OS (P2630) patients, and 80% of CID (P3135) patients. The definition of lymphopenia and the normal ranges of lymphocyte subsets used in this manuscript was based on the study of Shearer et al. [29].

Table 3.

Laboratory findings of RAG deficient patients

Patients WBC
(/mm³)
ALC
(/mm³)
ANC(/mm³) AEC
(/mm³)
IgA (mg/dl) IgG (mg/dl) IgM (mg/dl) IgE (IU/l) CD3** CD4** CD8** CD16 + 56** CD19**
SCID
P1 8900 4806 1900 800 251
7–123
4090
304–1231
1
32–203
<1 17/49–76
817
1900–5900
11/31–56
528
1400–4300
21/12–24
1009
500–1700
79/3–15
3796
160–950
1/14–37
48
610–2600
P2 4100 984 2700 80 27
13.5–72
88
294–1165
70
33–154
N/A 1.8/51–77
18
2500–5600
1.9/35–56
19
1800–4000
41/12–23
403
590–1600
73.2/3–14
718
170–830
2.6/11–41
26
430–3000
P3 6300 1000 3300 1400 <6.67
11–14
402
633–1466
<4.17
22–87
<1 2/53–84
20
2500–5500
N/A N/A N/A 2/6–32
20
300–2000
P4 5400 1200 2800 500 9,7
7–123
11
304–1231
358.2
32–203
8.8 28/49–76
336
1900–5900
16.7
200
1400–4300
27/12–24
324
500–1700
57.7/3–15
692
160–950
0.2/14–37
2.4
610–2600
P5 3800 700 800 400 0
7–123
177
304–1231
2
32–203
<1 0/49–76
0
1900–5900
3/31–56
21
1400–4300
46/12–24
322
500–1700
79/3–15
553
160–950
0/14–37
0
610–2600
P6 4700 940 2500 0 <6.67
7–123
404
304–1231
<4.17
32–203
<1 0/49–76
0
1900–5900
7/31–56
66
1400–4300
32/12–24
300
500–1700
66.8/3–15
628
160–950
0/14–37
0
610–2600
P7 1100 300 400 0 18
13.5–72
120
294–1165
11
33–154
<1 0/51–77
0
2500–5600
3/35–56
9
1800–4000
44/12–23
132
590–1600
95/3–14
285
170–830
0/11–41
0
430–3000
P8 17000 1000 15600 300 8
13.5–72
580
294–1165
16
33–154
0/53–84
0
2500–5500
2/35–64
20
1600–4000
26/12–28
260
560–1700
57/4–18
570
170–1100
0/6–32
0
300–2000
P9 2800 400 1500 100 21
7–123
110
304–1231
22
32–203
<1 2/49–76
8
1900–5900
5/31–56
20
1400–4300
46/12–24
184
500–1700
86/3–15
344
160–950
0/14–37
0
610–2600
P10 3200 400 1700 100 21
26–296
510
604–1941
25
71–235
100 10/56–75
40
1400–3700
17/28–47
68
700–2200
33/16–30
132
490–1300
87/4–17
348
130–720
0/14–33
0
390–1400
P11 20300 10200 8932 100 47.3
17–107
641
463–1006
39
46–159
11.3 11.3/49–76
1153
1900–5900
7.38/31–56
752
1400–4300
24.5/12–24
2499
500–1700
70.8/3–15
7221
160–950
3.69/14–37
376
610–2600
P12 6300 1260 4400 500 35
13.5–72
120
294–1165
6
33–154
<1 0.9/51–77
11
2500–5600
1.8/35–56
24
1800–4000
41.5/12–23
529
590–1600
84.7/3–14
1071
170–830
0.7/11–41
10
430–3000
P13 4100 100 3000 0 24
13.5–72
420
294–1165
17
33–154
18.3 0/51–77
0
2500–5600
0.4/35–56
0.4
1800–4000
0.4/12–23
0.4
590–1600
93/3–14
93
170–830
0.4/11–41
0.4
430–3000
P14 100 0 0.1 <22
7–123
884
304–1231
19
33–154
<18 13/49–76
0
1900–5900
0/31–56
0
1400–4300
39/12–24
0
500–1700
57/3–15
0
160–950
0/14–37
0
610–2600
P15 2800 900 1400 0 <6.67
13.5–72
69.9
294–1165
<4.17
33–154
<1 0/51–77
0
2500–5600
1/35–56
9
1800–4000
16/12–23
144
590–1600
86/3–14
774
170–830
0/11–41
0
430–3000
P16 * 4600 800 2900 100 <6.67
13.5–72
136
294–1165
<4.17
33–154
0.1/51–77
0.8
2500–5600
51.1/35–56
1800–4000
25,2/12–23
201
590–1600
57,1/3–14
456
170–830
0.64/11–41
5
430–3000
P17 * 1700 200 1200 0 <6.67
13.5–72
755
294–1165
<4.17
33–154
<1 1/51–77
2
2500–5600
0/35–56
0
1800–4000
3/12–23
6
590–1600
9/3–14
18
170–830
4/11–41
8
430–3000
P18 11900 900 9300 700 225
17–69
1150
463–1006
168
46–159
935 16/49–76
144
1900–5900
13/31–56
117
1400–4300
27/12–24
243
500–1700
67/3–15
603
160–950
8/14–37
72
610–2600
P19 3400 400 2000 200 18
13.5–72
290
294–1165
8
33–154
<1 16/53–84
64
2500–5500
19/35–64
76
1600–4000
20/12–28
80
560–1700
64/4–18
256
170–1100
0.6/6–32
2.4
300–2000
P20 7700 1100 5400 0 <6.67
13.5–72
137
294–1165
<4.17
33–154
66 2/51–77
22
2500–5600
1/35–56
11
1800–4000
24/12–23
264
590–1600
65/3–14
715
170–830
2/11–41
22
430–300
P21 5100 900 2900 200 <6.67
13.5–72
102
294–1165
6.33
33–154
<1 0/51–77
0
2500–5600
73/35–56
63
1800–4000
13/12–23
117
590–1600
72/3–14
648
170–830
1/11–41
9
430–300
P22 7400 1100 4000 0 <6.67
13.5–72
191
294–1165
<4.17
33–154
<1 4/53–84
44
2500–5600
6/35–64
66
1800–4000
8/12–28
88
590–1600
66/4–18
726
170–830
4/6–32
44
430–300
P23 4600 800 3600 100 <6.67
13.5–72
262
294–1165
<4.17
33–154
<1 1/53–84
8
2500–5600
3/35–64
24
1800–4000
26/12–28
208
590–1600
85/4–18
680
170–830
0/6–32
0
430–300
P24 8400 1300 4500 1200 <6.67
9–30
367
376–685
44,1
36–77
43,1 36/53–84
468
2500–5500
36/35–64
468
1600–4000
26/12–28
338
560–1700
56/4–18
728
170–1100
0/6–32
0
300–2000
P25 11600 100 9600 500 <6.67
11–14
888
633–1466
<4.17
22–87
<1 64/53–84
64
2500–5500
10/35–64
10
1600–4000
54/12–28
54
560–1700
28/4–18
28
170–1100
0/6–32
0
300–2000
OS
P26 25600 10240 3072 2560 17.7
13.5–72
126
294–1165
10.7
33–154
<1 9/49–76
921
2500–5600
9/31–56
921
1800–4000
23/12–24
2355
590–1600
83/3–15
8397
170–830
0/14–37
0
430–3000
P27 12200 1220 7320 1220 <6.67
13.5–72
226
294–1165
<4.17
33–154
<1 21/53–84
240
2500–5500
17/35–64
200
1600–4000
28/12–28
380
560–1700
68/4–18
850
170–1100
0/6–32
0
300–3000
P28 7200 2400 1400 500 11
17–69
61
463–1006
32
32–203
>1000 84.2/49–76
2016
1900–5900
41.1/31–56
984
1400–4300
52.7/12–24
1264
500–1700
13.5/3–15
324
160–950
0.5/14–37
12
610–2600
P29 20500 2240 15000 470 <30
17–69
<160
463–1006
<22
32–203
5 31/49–76
694
1900–5900
29/31–56
650
1400–4300
24/12–24
537
500–1700
53/3–15
1187
160–950
0/14–37
0
610–2600
P30 4900 500 1300 2600 <6.67
13.5–72
1180***
294–1165
5.84
33–154
<1 16/51–77
80
2500–5500
17/35–64
200
1600–4000
24/12–23
120
560–1700
64/3–14
320
170–1100
2/11–41
10
300–3000
CID
P31* 19700 1000 17500 100 208
70–303
1040
764–2134
150
69–387
5.37 45/60–76
450
1200–2600
19/31–47
190
650–1500
24/18–35
240
370–1100
46/4–17
460
100–480
8/13–27
80
270–860
P32* 5300 1000 3500 200 48,7
57–282
939
745–1804
154
78–261
14.4 21/56–75
210
1400–3700
13/28–47
130
700–2200
28/16–30
280
490–1300
40/4–17
400
130–720
8/14–33
80
390–1400
P33 4400 2600 1000 0 12
17–69
560
463–1006
11
46–59
<1 49/49–76
1274
1900–5900
36/31–56
936
1400–4300
9/12–24
234
500–1700
44/3–15
1144
160–950
1/14–37
26
610–2600
P34 10500 1000 9100 0 36.2
26–296
1020
604–1941
47.3
71–235
255 45/56–75
450
1400–3700
23/28–47
230
700–2200
35/16–30
350
490–1300
36/4–17
360
130–720
9/14–33
90
390–1400
P35 2200 300 900 0 11
30–107
14
605–1430
8
66–228
<1 40/53–75
120
2100–6200
21/32–51
63
1300–3400
32/14–30
96
620–2000
38/3–15
114
180–920
0/16–35
0
720–2600

: cousins: P2 and P3; P6 and P7; P26 and P27; *: siblings: P16 and P17; P31 and P32; **: [%-/mm3)]; ***: after IVIG treatment; N/A: not applicable.

AEC: Absolute eosinophil count; ALC: Absolute lymphocyte count; ANC: Absolute neutrophil count; WBC: White blood cell.

All of the labs were measured in the first visit.

Fifty-two percent of SCID patients, 80% of OS patients, and 20% of CID patients had low IgA, IgG, and IgM on admission. Normal/high IgG levels in some of the SCID patients were attributed to partially transplacental IgG transfer from their mothers. Most of the patients especially in the OS group had profound hypogammaglobulinemia on the first visit. Laboratory findings of RAG-deficient patients are summarized in Table 3.

Classification of patients with RAG½ deficiency

Typical severe CID patients

Twenty-five patients, 19 males and 6 females were diagnosed with typical T(–) B(–) NK(+) SCID (patients [P] 1–25). The median age of clinical manifestations was 1 (0.5–2) mo and the age at diagnosis was 4 (3–6) mo. The parental consanguinity ratios were 15/17 and 5/8 in patients with RAG1 and RAG2 deficiency, respectively. Early onset of life-threatening infections and lymphopenia were common findings in SCID patients. Almost all patients except P1 and P11 [2] had lymphopenia [29]. Eczema and diaper dermatitis were also common. Clinical and laboratory characteristics are given in Tables 2 and 3.

OS patients

Five female patients were diagnosed with OS (P26P30). P26 and P27 were cousins and had novel RAG2 mutations. The median age of clinical manifestations was 2 (1.25–5) mo, and the age at diagnosis was 4.5 (2.5–9.75) mo. All except one OS patient were born to consanguineous parents (P27’s parents were from the same village). Dermatitis was a common finding in all OS patients. Diffuse erythroderma, exfoliative dermatitis, and diffuse seborrheic dermatitis were present sometimes with alopecia and nail dystrophy. They had very low B-cell counts. Eosinophilia was present in 3/5. Only one patient P28 had elevated IgE [17].

Delayed-onset CID patients

In this cohort, the ratio of hypomorphic defects was 5/35 (14.3%). All (P31P35) were RAG1 deficiency patients with delayed-onset (CID). The median age of clinical manifestations was 14 (3.63–27) mo, and the median age at diagnosis was 27 (14.5–70) mo. The male/female ratio was 4/1. P31 and P32 were siblings presented with recurrent sinopulmonary infections and widespread warts [7]. P33 had skin granuloma, and protracted diarrhea, mimicking inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [25]. P34 had isolated CD4 deficiency when he was admitted with hemoptysis and dyspnea due to pulmonary hemorrhage. He was diagnosed with polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) [26, 27]. Hemoptysis recurred, and Coombs (+) AIHA developed at 18 mo of age. Despite immunosuppressives (steroids, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine) and supportive treatments, vasculitis deteriorated, digital necrosis, and autoamputation developed. P35 was admitted with recurrent sinopulmonary infections and gingival hypertrophy at the age of 1.5 years [17]. Ataxia and progressive neurological deterioration developed when he was 25 mo old.

Survival and outcome

Twenty-eight patients (80%) (SCID; 22, OS; 2, and CID; 4) underwent HSCT. Nineteen had an HLA-matched family donor, five had haploidentical (parent) donors, and four patients had a matched unrelated donor (MUD) (Table 4). Eleven out of 28 patients received pre-transplant conditioning before HSCT, those who did not receive were in the SCID group, and one in the OS group (Table 4). The median (IQR) age at HSCT was 7 (4–13.5) mo, and the success of HSCT was 67.9% (19/28). There was a significant difference in the median (IQR) age at HSCT among the clinical groups (P = 0.002). Median age at HSCT was 6 (3.5–9.9) mo in the SCID group, and it was 90.3 (51.4–115.3) months in the CID group. All except P24 who did not receive pretransplant conditioning are alive and well after HSCT (16/17).

Table 4.

Survival and outcomes of the RAG deficient patients

Patients Presentation HSCT/donor (HLA) Age at HSCT (months) Pre-transplant conditioning GVHD Complications Outcome
P1 SCID** Yes/sister (9/10) 7 No Yes
(grade 1/skin)
No Alive
P2 SCID Yes/father (10/10) 4 No No No Alive
P3 SCID Yes/mother (10/10) 1.5 No Yes (grade 2/skin) HA and ITP Alive
P4 SCID Yes/haplo (father) and haplo (mother) 16 and 25.5 Yes No Recurrent infections Deceased
P5 SCID Yes/haplo (father) 7 Yes Yes (grade 3/skin and GIS) PTLD Alive
P6 SCID Yes/haplo (mother) 9 Yes No Sepsis Deceased
P7 SCID Yes/sister (6/6) 5.5 No Yes (grade 1–2/skin) No Alive
P8 SCID Yes/sister (6/6) 2.5 No Yes (grade 2/skin and liver) ITP Alive
P9 SCID Yes/sister (10/10) 7 and 23 No No Booster HSCT (graft failure) Alive
P10 SCID Yes/sister (10/10) 26.5 No No No Alive
P11 SCID Yes/cousin (10/10) 11 No No CMV retinitis Alive
P12 SCID Yes/mother (10/10) 6 No Yes (grade 1/skin) Anemia and leukopenia Alive
P13 SCID Yes/haplo (father) 3.5 Yes No Treatment resistant AIHA Deceased
P14 SCID Yes/haplo (father) 13.5 Yes No Graft failure, sepsis, and neurologic complications Deceased
P15 SCID Yes/cousin (10/10) 6 No No No Alive
P16 * SCID Yes/MUD (9/10) 9.5 Yes No Pneumonia Deceased
P17 * SCID No N/A Deceased
P18 SCID Yes/sister (10/10) 12.5 No No No Alive
P19 SCID No N/A Deceased
P20 SCID Yes/sister (10/10) 4.5 No Yes (grade 1/skin) Blinded by CMV retinitis Alive
P21 SCID Yes/mother (10/10) 5 No Yes (grade 2/skin and liver) Pancytopenia and immunosuppressive therapy due to chronic GVHD Alive
P22 SCID Yes/sister (10/10) 3.5 No Yes (grade 1/skin) Acute GVHD Alive
P23 SCID No N/A Deceased
P24 SCID Yes/mother (10/10) 3 No Yes (isolated liver) Isolated liver GVHD and pancytopenia Deceased
P25 SCID Yes/brother (10/10) 3.5 No Yes (grade 1/skin) No Alive
P26 OS No N/A Deceased
P27 OS No N/A Deceased
P28 OS Yes/mother (5/6) 24 Yes Yes (grade 1-2/skin/GIS and liver) Abducens palsy and pneumonia Deceased
P29 OS Yes brother (10/10) 10 No No No Alive
P30 OS No N/A Deceased
P31 * CID Yes/sister (10/10) 121 Yes No No Alive
P32 * CID Yes/MUD (10/10) 98 Yes No No Alive
P33 CID** No N/A Deceased
P34 CID Yes/MUD (9/10) 82.5 Yes No Pneumonia and acute kidney failure Deceased
P35 CID** Yes/MUD (cord blood,10/10) 41 Yes No Bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia Deceased

HA: hemolytic anemia; HLA: human leukocyte antigen; ITP: immune thrombocytopenic purpura; MUD: Match unrelated donor; N/A: Not applicable; PTLD: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders.

: cousins: P2 and P3; P6 and P7; P26 and P27.

* : siblings: P16 and P17; P31 and P32.

P1, P33 and P35**: Do not exactly fulfill the ESID criteria.

Twelve patients (SCID; 11, OS; 1) received immunosuppressive treatments (methylprednisolone and cyclosporine) for GVHD (Table 4). P21 with a previously reported homozygous RAG1 mutation (Y589*; c.1879C > G) [17] underwent HLA-identical HSCT from his mother at 4 mo of age. A liver biopsy for persistent transaminase elevation revealed GVHD. MPZ and cyclosporine (CYC) were given. Skin exfoliation, thickening, excoriation, and pancytopenia suggest bone marrow failure developed despite the treatment. Afterwards, he was diagnosed with chronic GVHD. He is under tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatments for chronic GVHD. P24 had a novel RAG1 mutation and was diagnosed with isolated liver GVHD and treated with CYC, MMF, and etoposide. Liver functions deteriorated and progressive liver failure developed despite plasmapheresis and mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. All other patients with acute GVHD were treated with MPZ and/or CYC (Table 4).

Autoimmune cytopenia developed in two SCID patients after HSCT. P8 developed idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) 6 years after HSCT [17], and he was successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia developed 6 mo after HSCT in P13 with a novel RAG2 mutation. Unfortunately, despite the treatment [IVIG, pulse steroids, plasmapheresis (three times), CYC, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, and MMF] and supportive care for persistent AIHA, the patient died before the second HSCT planned from another HLA-matched sibling donor.

In total, 16 patients died during the disease course, including nine patients who underwent HSCT (SCID; 6, OS; 1, and CID; 2). Nineteen patients (54.3%) are alive, and well after HSCT. The 10-year-survival analysis is shown in Fig. 3A for distinctive clinical groups, and in Fig. 3B according to the type of RAG deficiency. Survival differed in the groups; it was maximum in the SCID patients (64%) who mostly had an HLA-matched family donor, and minimum in the OS patients (20%) only P29 survived after a successful HSCT with the full-matched family donor. (Table 4). There was no difference between RAG1 and RAG2 deficient SCID patients in terms of HSCT outcomes, autoimmunity, and survival (P > 0.05).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A. The survival analysis of the three distinct clinical groups. B. The survival analysis according to the type of RAG deficiency

Discussion

Here, we present a large cohort of RAG ½ deficient patients (25 patients with RAG1, 10 with RAG2 deficiency) during a 20-year period from Turkish origin with nine novel mutations. In our study patients were classified as SCID, OS, and CID, and it was also depicted that identical mutations can cause distinct clinical presentations. All novel mutations except one caused SCID phenotype. We believe that the identified novel variants in this study can contribute to the literature, and help to understand the nature of the RAG deficiency.

RAG deficiency was described in various studies from all over the world with different clinical pictures from the first cases until today with raising awareness. RAG mutations were particularly reported from highly consanguineous populations for instance Middle East region [30–32]and Turkey [33, 34], whereas there were also large case series from the Slavic countries [35], Italy [36] and Latin America [37] in which consanguineous marriages seen relatively less common. Noteworthy, similar mutations have been reported from different ethnic origins requiring more research.

Due to the high rate of consanguinity in our population [38, 39], we had a higher rate of homozygous mutations compared to other European nations [36]. RAG½ deficiency is the predominant genetic reason for SCID phenotype in Turkey, and the reported frequency among studies varies between 15.4% and 26% [6, 40]. Furthermore, in the present study, most of the patients had SCID phenotype similar to the studies from the Middle East region [30, 32], and in contrast to Slavic [35] and Italian [36] cohorts in which OS was more prevalent.

The RAG½ gene mutations have a broad spectrum of phenotypes, ranging from SCID, OS, and delayed-onset CID/AS. The RAG deficient patients with SCID and OS generally present with opportunistic infections in early infancy. Diagnosis of delayed-onset CID due to hypomorphic RAG½ deficiency is more challenging due to clinical variation. In some patients, the diagnosis may not be possible [9, 41].

A single mutation may result in a variety of clinical manifestations [7, 13, 16]. Patients with the same RAG mutation may have different phenotypes even in the same family [42], possibly due to epigenetic factors including gene modifiers, environmental factors, infections, and iatrogenic factors [43]. Furthermore, researchers showed that similar mutations in the N-terminal truncation of the RAG1 protein cause different RAG residual protein activity, which leads to distinct clinical phenotypes [44].

The published studies regarding RAG1 and RAG2 deficiencies indicated that more than 60 RAG1 and RAG2 mutations are located in the core regions of the RAG proteins and they affect DNA binding, catalytic activity, or protein stabilization [45]. The core region mutations in our study also comprised the majority of the identified variants. In addition, two patients in our study with OS had a non-core region variant like in the articles of Grazzini et al. [46] and Matthews et al. [47]. These OS patients had severe ichthyosis-like skin lesions and alopecia, and unfortunately deceased before HSCT.

We observed an overall distribution of the causative variants including different types of monoallelic or biallelic variations located in different regions of the RAG1 and RAG2 genes. In addition, we did not detect a founder variant like in the study reported from Slavic countries [35]. Although the consanguinity rate is high among our patients, we think that they are coming from different regions of the country.

In our study group, most of the patients had RAG1 mutations in line with the literature [35, 36]. Interestingly, the majority of the novel mutations were RAG2 mutations presenting with SCID phenotype. P13 and P14 in the SCID group had the same novel homozygous missense mutation in the RAG2 protein core region, which is proposed to disturb the interaction with RAG1 and recombination signal sequence (RSS) and leads to RAG2 c.2152G > T mutation causing p.Trp317Cys. The tryptophan at this position is essential for interaction with RAG1 and cleavage of the DNA and the RSS [48, 49].

In the present study, recruiting some of the patients (P1, P33, and P35) to a clinical group according to the ESID criteria was challenging. Other parameters and clinical characteristics were indicative in grouping. The estimated prevalence of RAG½ mutations, leading to partial enzyme activity and a later presentation varies between 1% and 1.9% in adult PID cohorts [50]. An important finding of this cohort is that the ratio of hypomorphic defects was shown to be 5/25 (20%) for RAG1 deficiency.

Granulomatous diseases were first identified in three patients with compound heterozygous RAGD mutations [10]. Granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) may be associated with RAGD [51]. Granulomatous skin lesions were present in P33, a delayed-onset CID patient, who had previously reported compound heterozygous RAG1 mutations (c.537G > A/ c.1443C > T; R142Q/A444V) [17, 25].

Treatment-resistant severe vasculitis was present in P34 and complicated with digital necrosis [26, 27]. He had a relatively delayed-onset CID caused by a homozygous RAG1 mutation (c.2095C > T; R699W). Similarly, in our study vasculitis was reported in RAG deficient patients. Henderson et al. described an early-onset autoimmune disease, Coombs (+) AIHA and vasculitis, causing digital necrosis, in a compound heterozygous RAG1 deficiency (c.2522 G > A; c.2920 T < C) [52]. Another compound heterozygous RAG1 deficiency patient again with a compound heterozygous defect (c.125A > G, M1V; c.2322 G > A, R737H) again presented with recurrent cutaneous vasculitis [13]. Partial RAG deficiency with vasculitis was reported in another study in six patients [53].

More than half of our patients (SCID; n = 13, OS; n = 4 and CID; n = 1) had a history of intractable diarrhea, a common symptom in SCID patients. It may present with IBD-like disease, autoimmune enteropathy, duodenitis, or severe noninfectious diarrhea. Detected infective agents are pneumocystis jirovecii, Candida species, and viral infections, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and adenovirus [54].

Viral infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the course of RAG deficiency and are challenging for patients. Varicella infections, complicating with subsequent pneumonitis and ITP were reported in RAG-deficient patients [55, 56]. Another accompanying viral infection is CMV, which may progress to retinitis in PID patients. Early suspicion and effective treatment are crucial to prevent visual morbidity and loss in CMV retinitis [57, 58]. Two siblings (P31 and P32) diagnosed with CID presented with widespread warts in our cohort. Efficient cellular and cytotoxic immunity provided by T and NK cells is necessary to cope with HPV infections [59].

A wide range of autoantibodies, anti-cytokine antibodies, and neutralizing antibodies against interferon-α and interferon-ω, may develop in RAG-deficient patients following viral infections [56, 60]. A meta-analysis showed that autoimmunity and inflammatory diseases developed in 67.1% of 134 RAG deficiency. Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases have been reported in delayed-onset CID patients, whereas they were rare in OS and SCID patients [41]. Autoimmune cytopenia, granuloma, skin cancer, vasculitis, neuropathy, interstitial lung disease, and myopathy were detected in 76.2% of patients with RAG1, and 23.8% of the patients with RAG2 deficiency [41].

In our study, AIC developed after the HSCT was performed without a conditioning regimen (P8 and P13). Autoimmune cytopenia following HSCT, especially AIHA, was considered a serious post-HSCT complication with a poor prognosis [61]. Viral infections usually precede the onset of AIC [41]. The ratio of AIC was 2/35 (6%) in RAG½ deficiency in this cohort.

In the present study, 80% of all RAG½ patients who underwent HSCT had a survival rate of 54.3%. The median age at HSCT was 7 (4–13.5) mo, and the HSCT success in the RAG½ deficiency SCID group was 72.7% (16/22), a higher outcome than the general SCID–HSCT outcome (65.7% survival rate over 20 years) in Turkey [6]. Severe pneumonia was the leading cause of death in patients after HSCT. All RAG-deficient patients were diagnosed with SCID in a recently published study from Israel and the HSCT success rate was 68% [32]. The lack of newborn screening has a negative impact on the survival of our study patients, because, it causes a delay in both the PID diagnosis and timely HSCT.

In conclusion, we evaluated a considerable number of RAGD patients and identified certain novel mutations. A high proportion of patients presented with classical SCID phenotype. Early diagnosis, which will be accomplished after national neonatal screening, could improve clinical outcomes and survival. Patients with the lowest survival ratio, the delayed onset/CID patients, were the patients with the most frequent ratio of autoimmune/inflammatory findings. Thus, patients with autoimmunity and inflammation, including vasculitis, should be referred to immunology clinics and evaluated for delayed onset/CID. Early molecular diagnosis may also help in timely management. Definite and individualized therapeutic interventions which could only be possible after early diagnosis will provide a survival advantage, especially for delayed onset/CID patients until HSCT.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AIC

autoimmune cytopenia

AIHA

autoimmune hemolytic anemia

BCG

Bacillus-Calmette–Guérin

CD

cluster of differentiation

CID

combined immunodeficiency

CID-G/AI

combined immunodeficiency with granulomas and/or autoimmunity

CMV

cytomegalovirus

CVID

common variable disease

GVHD

graft versus host disease

HLA

human leukocyte antigen

HSCT

hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

Ig

immunoglobulin

IQR

interquartile ranges

IVIG

intravenous immunoglobulin

ITP

immune thrombocytopenia

MMF

mycophenolate mofetil

NGS

next generation sequencing

NK

natural killer

OS

Omenn syndrome

PID

primary immune deficiency

RAG½

recombination activating gene ½

RSS

recombination signal sequence

SCID

severe combined immunodeficiency.

Contributor Information

Betul Karaatmaca, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Immunology, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Deniz Cagdas, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Immunology, Ankara, Turkey; Section of Pediatric Immunology, Institute of Child Health, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Saliha Esenboga, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Immunology, Ankara, Turkey.

Baran Erman, Section of Pediatric Immunology, Institute of Child Health, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Cagman Tan, Section of Pediatric Immunology, Institute of Child Health, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Tuba Turul Ozgur, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Immunology, Ankara, Turkey.

Kaan Boztug, St. Anna Children’s Cancer Research Institute (CCRI), Vienna, Austria; CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Vienna, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases, Vienna, Austria; St. Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Mirjam van der Burg, Department of Pediatrics, Laboratory for Pediatric Immunology, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Ozden Sanal, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Immunology, Ankara, Turkey.

Ilhan Tezcan, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Immunology, Ankara, Turkey; Section of Pediatric Immunology, Institute of Child Health, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hacettepe University.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no relevant conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Funding

This study is supported by the Hacettepe University Coordination Unit for Scientific Research Projects (TSA-2016-9087).

Data Availability

All data are incorporated into the article and its online supplementary material.

Author Contributions

B.K. collected the data and participated in the review of the files, data generation, entry, and analysis, and wrote the manuscript. D.C. contributed to patient screening, collection of the data, data generation, data analysis, interpretation of the results and wrote the manuscript. S.E., O.S., and T.T.E. contributed to patient screening, data generation, and data analysis. B.E., K.B., M.B., and C.T. contributed to mutation analysis, data generation, and data analysis. I.T. supervised the study, contributed to patient screening, collection of the data, data generation, data analysis, interpretation of the results and wrote the manuscript with B.K. and D.C. All of the authors reviewed it critically for important intellectual content and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work related to its accuracy or integrity.

References

  • 1. Notarangelo LD, Kim M-S, Walter JE, Lee YN.. Human RAG mutations: biochemistry and clinical implications. Nat Rev Immunol 2016, 16, 234–46. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Schwarz K, Gauss GH, Ludwig L, Pannicke U, Li Z, Lindner D, et al. RAG mutations in human B cell-negative SCID. Science 1996, 274, 97–9. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5284.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lee YN, Frugoni F, Dobbs K, Walter JE, Giliani S, Gennery AR, et al. A systematic analysis of recombination activity and genotype–phenotype correlation in human recombination-activating gene 1 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014, 133, 1099–1108.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tirosh I, Yamazaki Y, Frugoni F, Ververs FA, Allenspach EJ, Zhang Y, et al. Recombination activity of human recombination-activating gene 2 (RAG2) mutations and correlation with clinical phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019, 143, 726–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chinn IK, Shearer WT.. Severe combined immunodeficiency disorders. Immunol Allergy Clin 2015, 35, 671–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ikinciogullari A, Cagdas D, Dogu F, Tugrul T, Karasu G, Haskologlu S, et al. Clinical features and HSCT outcome for SCID in Turkey. J Clin Immunol 2019, 39, 316–23. doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00610-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Villa A, Santagata S, Bozzi F, Giliani S, Frattini A, Imberti L, et al. Partial V (D) J recombination activity leads to Omenn syndrome. Cell 1998, 93, 885–96. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81448-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Omenn GS. Familial reticuloendotheliosis with eosinophilia. N Engl J Med 1965, 273, 427–32. doi: 10.1056/nejm196508192730806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Delmonte OM, Schuetz C, Notarangelo LD.. RAG deficiency: two genes, many diseases. J Clin Immunol 2018, 38, 646–55. doi: 10.1007/s10875-018-0537-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Schuetz C, Huck K, Gudowius S, Megahed M, Feyen O, Hubner B, et al. An immunodeficiency disease with RAG mutations and granulomas. N Engl J Med 2008, 358, 2030–8. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa073966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kuijpers TW, Ijspeert H, van Leeuwen EMM, Jansen MH, Hazenberg MD, Weijer KC, et al. Idiopathic CD4+ T lymphopenia without autoimmunity or granulomatous disease in the slipstream of RAG mutations. Blood 2011, 117, 5892–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-329052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kato T, Crestani E, Kamae C, Honma K, Yokosuka T, Ikegawa T, et al. RAG1 deficiency may present clinically as selective IgA deficiency. J Clin Immunol 2015, 35, 280–8. doi: 10.1007/s10875-015-0146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Geier CB, Piller A, Linder A, Sauerwein KM, Eibl MM, Wolf HM.. Leaky RAG deficiency in adult patients with impaired antibody production against bacterial polysaccharide antigens. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0133220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Chou J, Hanna-Wakim R, Tirosh I, Kane J, Fraulino D, Lee YN, et al. A novel homozygous mutation in recombination activating gene 2 in 2 relatives with different clinical phenotypes: Omenn syndrome and hyper-IgM syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012, 130, 1414–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.E. o. A. a. “ESID. org. Available at: https://esid.org/Education/Diagnostic-criteria-PID#” . (accessed).
  • 16. Tangye SG, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Cunningham-Rundles C, Franco JL, Holland SM, et al. Human inborn errors of immunity: 2022 update on the classification from the international union of immunological societies expert committee. J Clin Immunol 2022, 42, 1473–507. doi: 10.1007/s10875-022-01289-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Villa A, Sobacchi C, Notarangelo LD, Bozzi F, Abinun M, Abrahamsen TG, et al. V(D)J recombination defects in lymphocytes due to RAG mutations: severe immunodeficiency with a spectrum of clinical presentations. Blood 2001, 97, 81–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Al-Mousa H, Al-Dakheel G, Jabr A, Elbadaoui F, Abouelhoda M, Baig M, et al. High incidence of severe combined immunodeficiency disease in Saudi Arabia detected through combined T cell receptor excision circle and next generation sequencing of newborn dried blood spots. Front Immunol 2018, 9, 782. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Willmann KL, Klaver S, Doğu F, Santos-Valente E, Garncarz W, Bilic I, et al. Biallelic loss-of-function mutation in NIK causes a primary immunodeficiency with multifaceted aberrant lymphoid immunity. Nat Commun 2014, 5, 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Bai X, Liu J, Zhang Z, Liu C, Zhang Y, Tang W, et al. Clinical, immunologic, and genetic characteristics of RAG mutations in 15 Chinese patients with SCID and Omenn syndrome. Immunol Res 2016, 64, 497–507. doi: 10.1007/s12026-015-8723-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Schuetz C, Neven B, Dvorak CC, Leroy S, Ege MJ, Pannicke U, et al. SCID patients with ARTEMIS vs RAG deficiencies following HCT: increased risk of late toxicity in ARTEMIS-deficient SCID. Blood J Am Soc Hematol 2014, 123, 281–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-01-476432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sobacchi C, Marrella V, Rucci F, Vezzoni P, Villa A.. RAG‐dependent primary immunodeficiencies. Hum Mutat 2006, 27, 1174–84. doi: 10.1002/humu.20408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Xiao Z, Yannone SM, Dunn E, Cowan MJ.. A novel missense RAG-1 mutation results in T− B− NK+ SCID in Athabascan-speaking dine Indians from the Canadian Northwest territories. Eur J Hum Genet 2009, 17, 205–12. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kutukculer N, Gulez N, Karaca NE, Aksu G, Berdeli A.. Novel mutatıons and diverse clinical phenotypes in recombınase-activating gene 1 deficiency. Ital J Pediatr 2012, 38, 1–7. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-38-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Erman B, Bilic I, Hirschmugl T, Salzer E, Boztug H, Sanal O, et al. Investigation of genetic defects in severe combined immunodeficiency patients from Turkey by targeted sequencing. Scand J Immunol 2017, 85, 227–34. doi: 10.1111/sji.12523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Avila EM, Uzel G, Hsu A, Milner JD, Turner ML, Pittaluga S, et al. Highly variable clinical phenotypes of hypomorphic RAG1 mutations. Pediatrics 2010, 126, e1248–52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Taşkıran EZ, Sönmez HE, Ayvaz D, Koşukcu C, Batu ED, Esenboğa S, et al. Hypomorphic RAG1 defect in a child presented with pulmonary hemorrhage and digital necrosis. Clin Immunol 2018, 187, 92–4. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Marciano BE, Huang C-Y, Joshi G, Rezaei N, Carvalho BC, Allwood Z, et al. BCG vaccination in patients with severe combined immunodeficiency: complications, risks, and vaccination policies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014, 133, 1134–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.02.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Shearer WT, Rosenblatt HM, Gelman RS, Oyomopito R, Plaeger S, Stiehm ER, et al. Lymphocyte subsets in healthy children from birth through 18 years of age: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1009 study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003, 112, 973–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Meshaal SS, El Hawary RE, Abd Elaziz DS, Eldash A, Alkady R, Lotfy S, et al. Phenotypical heterogeneity in RAG‐deficient patients from a highly consanguineous population. Clin Exp Immunol 2019, 195, 202–12. doi: 10.1111/cei.13222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Alsmadi O, Al-Ghonaium A, Al-Muhsen S, Arnaout R, Al-Dhekri H, Al-Saud B, et al. Molecular analysis of T–B–NK+ severe combined immunodeficiency and Omenn syndrome cases in Saudi Arabia. Med Genet 2009, 10, 116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-10-116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Greenberg-Kushnir N, Lee YN, Simon AJ, Lev A, Marcus N, Abuzaitoun O, et al. A large cohort of RAG½-deficient SCID patients—clinical, immunological, and prognostic analysis. J Clin Immunol 2020, 40, 211–22. doi: 10.1007/s10875-019-00717-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ulusoy E, Karaca NE, Azarsiz E, Berdeli A, Aksu G, Kutukculer N.. Recombinase activating gene 1 deficiencies without Omenn syndrome may also present with Eosinophilia and bone marrow fibrosis. J Clin Med Res 2016, 8, 379–84. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2316w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Patiroglu T, Akar HH, Burg MVD.. Three faces of recombination activating gene 1 (RAG1) mutations. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2015, 62, 393–401. doi: 10.1556/030.62.2015.4.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sharapova SO, Skomska-Pawliszak M, Rodina YA, Wolska-Kuśnierz B, Dabrowska-Leonik N, Mikołuć B, et al. The clinical and genetic spectrum of 82 patients with RAG deficiency including a c. 256_257delAA founder variant in slavic countries. Front Immunol 2020, 11, 900. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cifaldi C, Rivalta B, Amodio D, Mattia A, Pacillo L, Di Cesare S, et al. Clinical, immunological, and molecular variability of rag deficiency: a retrospective analysis of 22 rag patients. J Clin Immunol 2021, 42, 130–45. doi: 10.1007/s10875-021-01130-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lugo-Reyes SO, Pastor N, González-Serrano E, Yamazaki-Nakashimada MA, Scheffler-Mendoza S, Berron-Ruiz L, et al. Clinical manifestations, mutational analysis, and immunological phenotype in patients with RAG½ mutations: first cases series from Mexico and description of two novel mutations. J Clin Immunol 2021, 41, 1291–302. doi: 10.1007/s10875-021-01052-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Alper OM, Erengin H, Manguoğlu AE, Bilgen T, Cetin Z, Dedeoğlu N, et al. Consanguineous marriages in the province of Antalya, Turkey. Ann Genet 2004, 47, 129–38. doi: 10.1016/j.anngen.2003.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.T. 2016., “In: newsletter, no: 24646. http://www.tuik.gov.tr..”
  • 40. Sanal O, Tezcan I.. Thirty years of primary immunodeficiencies in Turkey. Ann NY Acad Sci 2011, 1238, 15–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Farmer JR, Foldvari Z, Ujhazi B, De Ravin SS, Chen K, Bleesing JJH, et al. Outcomes and treatment strategies for autoimmunity and hyperinflammation in patients with RAG deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019, 7, 1970–1985.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Schuetz C, Pannicke U, Jacobsen E-M, Burggraf S, Albert MH, Hönig M, et al. Lesson from hypomorphic recombination-activating gene (RAG) mutations: why asymptomatic siblings should also be tested. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014, 133, 1211–1215.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Niehues T, Perez-Becker R, Schuetz C.. More than just SCID—the phenotypic range of combined immunodeficiencies associated with mutations in the recombinase activating genes (RAG) 1 and 2. Clin Immunol 2010, 135, 183–92. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. IJspeert H, Driessen GJ, Moorhouse MJ, Hartwig NG, Wolska-Kusnierz B, Kalwak K, et al. Similar recombination-activating gene (RAG) mutations result in similar immunobiological effects but in different clinical phenotypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014, 133, 1124–1133.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.11.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kim M-S, Lapkouski M, Yang W, Gellert M.. Crystal structure of the V(D)J recombinase RAG1–RAG2. Nature 2015, 518, 507–11. doi: 10.1038/nature14174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Grazini U, Zanardi F, Citterio E, Casola S, Goding CR, McBlane F.. The RING domain of RAG1 ubiquitylates histone H3: a novel activity in chromatin-mediated regulation of V (D) J joining. Mol Cell 2010, 37, 282–93. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Matthews AG, Briggs CE, Yamanaka K, Small TN, Mooster JL, Bonilla FA, et al. Compound heterozygous mutation of RAG1 leading to Omenn syndrome. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0121489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Aidinis V, Dias DC, Gomez CA, Bhattacharyya D, Spanopoulou E, Santagata S.. Definition of minimal domains of interaction within the recombination-activating genes 1 and 2 recombinase complex. J Immunol 2000, 164, 5826–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.11.5826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ichihara Y, Hirai M, Kurosawa Y.. Sequence and chromosome assignment to 11p13-p12 of human RAG genes. Immunol Lett 1992, 33, 277–84. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(92)90073-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Lawless D, Geier CB, Farmer JR, Lango Allen H, Thwaites D, Atschekzei F, et al.; NIHR Bio Resource–Rare Diseases Consortium. Prevalence and clinical challenges among adult primary immunodeficiency patients with RAG deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018, 141, 2303–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. John T, Walter JE, Schuetz C, Chen K, Abraham RS, Bonfim C, et al. Unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation in a patient with combined immunodeficiency with granulomatous disease and autoimmunity secondary to RAG deficiency. J Clin Immunol 2016, 36, 725–32. doi: 10.1007/s10875-016-0326-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Henderson LA, Frugoni F, Hopkins G, de Boer H, Pai S-Y, Lee YN, et al. Expanding the spectrum of recombination-activating gene 1 deficiency: a family with early-onset autoimmunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013, 132, 969–971.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.06.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Geier CB, Farmer JR, Foldvari Z, Ujhazi B, Steininger J, Sleasman JW, et al. Vasculitis as a major morbidity factor in patients with partial RAG deficiency. Front Immunol 2020, 11, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.574738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Bulkhi AA, Dasso JF, Schuetz C, Walter JE.. Approaches to patients with variants in RAG genes: from diagnosis to timely treatment. Exp Rev Clin Immunol 2019, 15, 1033–46. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2020.1670060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Abolhassani H, Wang N, Aghamohammadi A, Rezaei N, Lee YN, Frugoni F, et al. A hypomorphic recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) mutation resulting in a phenotype resembling common variable immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014, 134, 1375–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Walter JE, Rosen LB, Csomos K, Rosenberg JM, Mathew D, Keszei M, et al. Broad-spectrum antibodies against self-antigens and cytokines in RAG deficiency. J Clin Invest 2015, 125, 4135–48. doi: 10.1172/JCI80477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Baumal CR, Levin AV, Read SE.. Cytomegalovirus retinitis in immunosuppressed children. Am J Ophthalmol 1999, 127, 550–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00031-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ngai JJ, Chong KL, Oli Mohamed S.. Cytomegalovirus retinitis in primary immune deficiency disease. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med 2018, 2018, 8125806. doi: 10.1155/2018/8125806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Jw L, Sm H.. Warts and all: HPV in primary immune deficiencies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012, 130, 1030–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Goda V, Malik A, Kalmar T, Maroti Z, Patel B, Ujhazi B, et al. Partial RAG deficiency in a patient with varicella infection, autoimmune cytopenia, and anti-cytokine antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2018, 6, 1769–1771.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Sherer Y, Shoenfeld Y.. Autoimmune diseases and autoimmunity post-bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998, 22, 873–81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are incorporated into the article and its online supplementary material.


Articles from Clinical and Experimental Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES