Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems, providing assistance in a variety of patient care and health systems. The aim of this review is to contribute valuable insights to the ongoing discourse on the transformative potential of AI in healthcare, providing a nuanced understanding of its current applications, future possibilities, and associated challenges. The authors conducted a literature search on the current role of AI in disease diagnosis and its possible future applications using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate within 10 years. Our investigation revealed that AI, encompassing machine-learning and deep-learning techniques, has become integral to healthcare, facilitating immediate access to evidence-based guidelines, the latest medical literature, and tools for generating differential diagnoses. However, our research also acknowledges the limitations of current AI methodologies in disease diagnosis and explores uncertainties and obstacles associated with the complete integration of AI into clinical practice. This review has highlighted the critical significance of integrating AI into the medical healthcare framework and meticulously examined the evolutionary trajectory of healthcare-oriented AI from its inception, delving into the current state of development and projecting the extent of reliance on AI in the future. The authors have found that central to this study is the exploration of how the strategic integration of AI can accelerate the diagnostic process, heighten diagnostic accuracy, and enhance overall operational efficiency, concurrently relieving the burdens faced by healthcare practitioners.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic efficiency, disease diagnosis, healthcare evolution, medical information
Introduction
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare enables immediate access to a wide array of medical information sources, including various imaging techniques and genetic data, leading to heightened diagnostic accuracy and expediting the diagnostic process.
By detailing the evolutionary trajectory of AI in healthcare, the study highlights how strategic integration of AI can alleviate the burdens faced by healthcare professionals.
By acknowledging the limitations of current AI methodologies in disease diagnosis, the review serves as a foundation for further research and development, emphasising the need for continuous innovation and adaptation to fully realise the potential of AI in healthcare.
Disease diagnosis is an essential step in effective treatment planning, relying extensively on patient history, multiple laboratory reports, imaging procedures, and biopsies. These components are collectively referred to as “medical diagnostics”1. The diagnostic process is complex, and healthcare practitioners often struggle to arrive at an accurate diagnosis, causing unnecessary distress to patients and compromising their well-being. However, with the digitisation of healthcare and the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI), the risk of human error in diagnosing diseases has been significantly reduced2. The field of diagnostics has witnessed a revolutionary change owing to the enhanced efficiency and accuracy of diagnostic processes engendered by the advent of AI3. Various AI-based methods, ranging from machine learning to deep learning, have been developed to improve clinical systems, uphold patient records, diagnose diseases, and treat various illnesses4. Of particular relevance, a rule-based intelligent system is an AI method extensively employed in the medical field, wherein decisions are derived from pre-established instructions and healthcare protocols2.
AI algorithms enable healthcare practitioners to identify and diagnose a spectrum of diseases by analysing medical images such as ultrasound, MRI, computed tomography (CT), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). AI methodologies including fuzzy logic, artificial neural networks (ANNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and logistic regression (LR) have been successfully used to diagnose complex health conditions with high accuracy rates. Noteworthy among these are tuberculosis, hypertension, stroke, and cerebrovascular disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, liver disease, skin disease, diabetic retinopathy, and chronic diseases4. Moreover, AI algorithms have shown invaluable efficiency in detecting certain cancers in their early stages, such as gastrointestinal or liver cancer, improving patient well-being, and alleviating the economic burden of malignant diseases in the healthcare system5,6. A study conducted by Chen et al.7 in 2020 focused on analysing the use of ANNs in diagnosing liver disease, demonstrating an impressive diagnostic accuracy rate. Another study conducted by Jo et al.8 in 2019 titled “Deep Learning in Alzheimer’s Disease: Diagnostic Classification and Prognostic Prediction Using Neuroimaging Data” concluded that deep-learning AI methods yielded an accuracy of 96% in classifying Alzheimer’s disease. The proficiency of AI algorithms extends beyond disease diagnosis and image analysis, encompassing the ability to process extensive medical data to generate hypotheses and suggest potential diagnoses, enabling healthcare professionals to mitigate cognitive biases and ensure the comprehensive exploration of all conceivable diagnostic alternatives4.
The present study is a review highlighting the critical significance of integrating AI into the medical healthcare framework and meticulously examines the evolutionary trajectory of healthcare-oriented AI from its inception, delving into the current state of development and projecting the extent of reliance on AI in the future.
Materials and methods
We conducted a literature search on the current role of AI in disease diagnosis and its possible future applications using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate within 10 years. Keywords used for our search were; “Artificial Intelligence”, “Disease Diagnosis”, “Healthcare Evolution”, “Traditional Diagnostic Methods,” and “Preventive Healthcare”.
A historical timeline of AI in healthcare
The introduction of AI in the 1950s marked a transformative moment in the healthcare sector, reshaping diagnostic processes, medical imaging, and treatment planning through the integration of machine learning and precision medicine. Over time, the evolution of AI in healthcare has transitioned from its initial knowledge-based system, dependent on medical rules and knowledge, to contemporary AI frameworks that utilise ANNs and statistical methodologies for disease diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. Between 1950 and 1960, AI found its early application in digitising patient health records into electronic health records, facilitating the documentation of a broad range of information including diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions, and laboratory biomarkers. This digital transformation in medical literature paved the way for the development of databases such as PubMed Central (PMC) by the National Library of Medicine (NLM), revolutionising data retrieval and clinical informatics for research purposes9–11.
Technological advancements such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data, data mining, and machine learning have significantly expanded the role of AI in healthcare. The IoT has facilitated the direct connection of physical devices to computer systems, thereby reducing human-to-human or human-to-machine interaction while simultaneously storing large amounts of data. These data require AI applications and machine-learning algorithms for comprehensive analysis and integration. However, it should be noted that machine learning constitutes a shallower facet of AI than deep learning11,12. From the 1970s to the 2000s, AI continued to evolve in various phases. In the early 1970s, certain limitations hindered its progress, marked by high costs and lack of interest, a phase colloquially termed the “AI winter”. This period of stagnation was eventually surmounted when collaborators from Rutgers University and Stanford University organised workshops on Artificial Intelligence in medicine and created the first computer model, “CASNET”, which performed consultations for glaucoma, rendering it the first AI model in ophthalmology to provide tailored management plans based on individual symptom input by physicians for a specific disease. Other models, such as MYCIN, DXplain, and INTERNIST-1, have also been established that use simple machine learning to predict the appropriate antibiotic usage for a specific bacterial infection and generate differential diagnoses10,12.
In the latter part of the 2000s, AI progressed from machine learning to deep learning, characterised by the development of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). These networks can generate outcomes and classify medical knowledge, thereby bypassing the need for intensive manual input and expertise13. The foundation of CNNs, referred to as LeNet, was established in 1998. However, owing to computational limitations and insufficient training of new datasets, its progress slowed down until the 2010s when full fruition was achieved11,14. Following the resolution of these limitations and drawbacks, deep learning has gained prominence in disease prognosis, imaging, and prediction of drug response. Before transitioning to CNNs, an AI algorithm named “Random Forests” was introduced a decade ago to predict drug use outcomes and synthesise images for diagnostic purposes. In contrast to CNNs, it is less expensive and, thus, holds importance12,14. In the modern AI era, CNNs are in high demand for image processing because of their hierarchical data interpretation from the deepest layers that resemble neurons of the human brain. They are highly accurate, similar to the expertise of humans12, and can utilise spatial recognition techniques to assess different imaging modalities, such as X-Ray and CT scans, aiding in diagnosis14. Therefore, for decades, the progression of AI in medicine has come a long way, transcending its prior limitations.
Emerging trends of AI applications for healthcare
AI technologies and algorithms have transformed disease diagnosis by providing healthcare professionals with accurate and efficient tools. Owing to their ability to extract nuanced patterns from complex medical data, machine-learning techniques, particularly deep learning, have gained importance. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become the standard for image-based diagnoses such as tumour detection in radiological scans15. Similarly, ensemble methods such as Random Forest and Gradient Boosting enhance diagnostic accuracy by integrating data from various sources, compensating for individual model limitations16. Reinforcement learning (RL) has also gained popularity for optimising treatment plans and advancing precision medicine by tailoring therapies based on patient-specific characteristics and evolving situations17.
The fusion of AI with conventional medical imaging techniques has expedited disease diagnoses. For instance, the AI-assisted analysis of retinal images aids in the early detection of diabetic retinopathy18. In addition, natural language processing (NLP) enables the rapid analysis of textual clinical records, offering insights for accurate diagnosis and patient care19. In radiology, AI algorithms have shown proficiency in interpreting medical images and assisting radiologists in the detection of various diseases. AI-powered systems can detect anomalies in X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans, resulting in faster and more accurate disease diagnosis20,21. Similarly, AI has made significant advances in pathology, revolutionising the field by speeding slide processing and enhancing disease identification. Research has highlighted the ability of AI to identify cellular and tissue anomalies, enabling pathologists to diagnose diseases with greater accuracy22,23. In dermatology, AI-powered tools such as deep-learning algorithms can accurately identify skin cancer by analysing images, even rivalling the diagnostic acumen of dermatologists. In one study, Haenssle and colleagues demonstrated how AI algorithms can identify melanomas and other skin cancers by analysing images, thereby offering a supplementary diagnostic tool for clinicians21,24. This accelerated data processing translates into faster diagnoses and timely interventions, potentially averting critical outcomes.
AI transforming drug design and therapeutics
Recent research has highlighted the potential of AI in drug design and therapeutic development. Multiple studies have emphasised the role of AI in virtual screening, computer-aided synthesis planning, de-novo molecule generation, and in-silico evaluation of drug properties25,26. One study underscored the significance of AI in analysing biological and genetic information, accelerating drug discovery, and predicting disease progression27. Another provided a comprehensive overview of AI applications in medicinal chemistry and healthcare, including de-novo drug design, activity scoring, and virtual screening28. Collectively, these studies demonstrate the transformative potential of AI in revolutionizing drug design and therapeutic development.
Balancing roles and responsibilities
AI-driven diagnostic procedures present myriad benefits, including speed, accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to process vast amounts of medical data efficiently. Research published in Nature Medicine revealed that AI models for breast cancer diagnosis improved their performance with increased training data, outperforming traditional methods in detecting malignancies in mammograms29. Another study highlighted that implementing AI in medical imaging resulted in substantially curtailed costs because of the diminishing reliance on expensive diagnostic tests and unnecessary procedures30. Amidst these potential advantages, the integration of AI into healthcare also presents challenges and concerns. The foremost among these is the matter of data privacy and security, which assumes critical significance. Healthcare institutions must ensure that patient data used to train AI models is properly anonymized and safeguarded against breaches. A discussion on the potential risks associated with AI in healthcare emphasises the paramount importance of data protection31. Interoperability surfaces as another potential challenge. The seamless integration of AI systems into existing healthcare infrastructure necessitates consistent data exchange. However, technical and organisational hurdles can impede this process. The need for enhanced interoperability has been underscored as pivotal to unlocking the full potential of AI in healthcare32. Furthermore, there is genuine concern about the reliance on AI to make critical medical decisions without a comprehensive understanding of the reasoning behind its decisions. Clear and explainable AI algorithms are vital not only for building trust but also for making better decisions in clinical settings.
The increasing use of AI for disease diagnosis has prompted the emergence of ethical considerations. A pressing issue revolves around the transparency and explainability of AI algorithms. As these systems become increasingly complex, understanding the reasoning behind their decisions becomes challenging. To address this, the establishment of ethical guidelines is imperative to ensure that AI-driven diagnoses are interpretable and capable of providing justifiable explanations for their results. In addition, the application of AI algorithms is susceptible to biases that exist within the training data, potentially leading to biased outcomes. One study demonstrated the presence of racial bias in an AI algorithm used in healthcare, consequently leading to suboptimal care for black patients. Effectively addressing the bias in AI algorithms mandates the cultivation of diverse and representative datasets, accompanied by robust testing procedures to identify and rectify any unjust outcomes33. The use of AI in diagnosing diseases holds great promise for present and future healthcare. By leveraging its advantages, addressing challenges, and ensuring ethical considerations, AI can play a pivotal role in improving the diagnostic accuracy, patient outcomes, and healthcare efficiency.
Comparing the effectiveness of AI and traditional diagnostic methods
In healthcare, AI-based diagnostic technologies, particularly machine-learning and deep-learning algorithms, have attracted substantial interest. These technologies leverage AI’s ability to process and analyse massive volumes of medical data, such as imaging, patient records, and other pertinent information. Visual data interpretation, such as through images or videos, presents certain challenges. Experts in the field must train for several years and continuously update their knowledge to stay abreast of new research and information. However, the demand is rising, and the industry requires more expertise. Consequently, innovative solutions are required, and AI appears to be a promising tool for bridging this expertise gap34.
Strengths, limitations, and integration demands
AI has several advantages in terms of medical diagnosis. One of the main benefits of this method is its capacity to improve diagnostic accuracy. Machine-learning-based AI systems excel in analysing vast amounts of medical data with exceptional accuracy, particularly in radiology35. In addition, AI is adept at handling large datasets. It can process an extensive range of healthcare information and provide healthcare practitioners with a wealth of insights for informed decision-making36. Another promising aspect is the potential transformation that it offers for the management of neurological disorders, with applications in precision neurology and the development of new protocols. The integration of machine and deep learning into AI has the potential to revolutionise patient care for neurological conditions37. However, AI has certain limitations. One notable weakness is the lack of human understanding and judgment. Unlike human decision-making, AI lacks intuitive understanding, clinical judgment, and common sense, potentially leading to errors in decision-making. Dependence on training data also poses challenges. AI machine-learning algorithms can produce biased outcomes if the training data is not diverse and representative36. Privacy and security concerns also arise owing to the extensive use of AI, with concerns about data security and privacy, particularly in the absence of suitable measures35. Finally, the successful integration of AI into clinical practice demands a deep understanding of medical knowledge and careful incorporation into existing practices.
Bridging the gap
When examining the advantages and disadvantages of employing a traditional approach to medical diagnosis compared with AI methodologies, distinct aspects come to light. The traditional approach for medical diagnosis has several strengths. One key benefit is its strong foundation in science and its adherence to evidence-based practice. This approach combines clinical expertise, patient preferences, and the latest research findings to formulate well-informed decisions regarding patient treatment. Moreover, conventional medicine adheres to a systematic diagnostic process, involving comprehensive evaluations, physical examinations, and advanced medical tools, such as diagnostic imaging and laboratory tests, to establish precise diagnoses38. Additionally, traditional medicine excels in managing acute and critical conditions, providing prompt and targeted interventions, such as procedures and medications, to address urgent medical needs39. This approach is further fortified by incorporating evidence-based clinical guidelines that guide numerous medical procedures and ensure standardised and appropriate patient care40.
However, the traditional approach for medical diagnosis has limitations. Diagnostic errors have emerged as a notable drawback leading to delayed or inaccurate diagnoses. The intricate landscape of healthcare, coupled with potential over-reliance on specific diagnostic tests, contributes to diagnostic inaccuracies39. Traditional medicine can emphasise symptom management rather than uncovering and addressing the root causes of diseases. This approach might result in patients receiving incomplete holistic care, particularly because it may neglect the intricate interplay between emotional, psychological, and spiritual factors that impact a patient’s overall well-being. Another area for improvement is the hesitance to adopt non-conventional or complementary therapies despite mounting evidence of their effectiveness in certain cases. This reluctance can hinder the integration of holistic and innovative approaches into mainstream medical practices41.
Regulatory and ethical considerations
The regulatory environment for AI-based medical devices and diagnostic tools is undergoing dynamic expansion and transformation42. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proactive in supervising AI and machine-learning (AI/ML) software integrated into medical devices. A curated inventory maintained by the FDA highlights over 500 medical devices using AI/ML technologies that have secured FDA approval or clearance. These devices follow various regulatory pathways, including 510(k) clearance, de-novo submissions, and Premarket Approval (PMA) applications43. Manufacturers of AI-driven medical devices are urged to remain well-versed in the FDA’s guidelines and regulatory updates to ensure compliance with the latest standards. Recognising the fluid nature of AI/ML technologies, FDA’s regulatory approach is adapting to accommodate these changes. The traditional paper-based regulatory framework may need to align optimally with the development of AI/ML-enabled medical devices. Furthermore, the USA and EU are witnessing the development of dedicated regulatory frameworks for AI/ML-powered medical devices, although differences might exist between these regions44.
Given that AI-augmented diagnostics have the potential to optimise the clinical workflow, safeguarding data privacy and obtaining patient consent is of paramount significance. These diagnostic tools rely on extensive patient data, including sensitive medical information. Consequently, stringent measures for data privacy are imperative to ensure the confidentiality of patient information and comply with regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the USA45,46. Implementing robust data encryption, access controls, and data anonymisation techniques plays a crucial role in minimising the risk of data breaches. Moreover, patient consent is pivotal when integrating patient data into AI-powered diagnostics, and patients should be informed of data usage, potential risks, benefits, and alternatives4. Although AI-driven tools provide valuable insights for diagnosis and treatment planning, the ultimate responsibility for interpreting AI-generated results, considering patient-specific variables, and rendering definitive clinical decisions continues to rest with healthcare professionals. Hence, continuous training is crucial for healthcare professionals to effectively collaborate with AI tools, ensuring a solid understanding of the underlying algorithms, potential biases, and limitations. With the potential for AI to streamline specific tasks, healthcare professionals may refocus their efforts on intricate decision-making and nurturing patient interactions. Achieving a harmonious equilibrium between the benefits and complexities of AI incorporation requires meticulous consideration and well-defined ethical guidelines34,47.
Predictive analytics and AI in preventive healthcare
Recently, AI has transformed our ability to identify individuals susceptible to various diseases and discern subtle indications of illness at an early stage48. By combining genetic information, medical history, and lifestyle data, AI tailors preventive measures, facilitating early intervention and screening for individuals with heightened disease risk. AI recognition technology can perform multi-parameter cluster analysis and simplify images, aiding medical professionals in early lung cancer screening49. In diagnosing and treating heart diseases, AI techniques have been applied to electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, echocardiography, and electronic health records. Clinical genomics benefits from deep learning, which processes large and complex genomic datasets directly. The process of discovering and developing drugs is both time-consuming and costly. However, the accessibility of cost-effective sequencing and imaging technologies, coupled with the growing availability of large cancer datasets (public or private), has resulted in the exploration of AI to enhance the efficiency of this process50–52.
AI can analyse healthcare utilisation patterns and predict disease outbreaks, thereby allowing healthcare providers and policymakers to allocate resources efficiently. This prevents a shortage of resources and improves healthcare in critical situations. In the future, AI models that integrate genetic predispositions and EHR, together with lifestyle and environmental factors, may be able to accurately assess cancer risk for a person in near real-time and suggest personalised options for early intervention and appropriate management of risk factors53. As AI techniques continue to be refined and improved, it will be possible to help mental health practitioners redefine mental illnesses, identify them at an earlier or prodromal stage when interventions may be more effective, and personalise treatments based on an individual’s unique characteristics54. Overall, integrating applications into the field of medicine offers many transformative benefits that extend far beyond our current healthcare paradigms, and its capabilities are poised to revolutionise healthcare on a global scale.
Anticipating the future landscape of AI-Driven diagnosis
To effectively utilise the rapid advancements in AI, several countries that support the development of sophisticated technologies are embarking on the formulation of governance frameworks, including legislation, policy, technological guidelines, and standards, serving as preparatory measures as they embrace the imminent AI-driven era. The implementation of AI technology in healthcare has progressed rapidly in many industrialised nations, including China. This progress is attributed, at least in part, to the augmentation of human resources and capabilities, resulting in high-precision medical care. A significant step in this direction was taken by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which issued a discussion paper, outlining a regulatory framework for software alterations utilising AI and machine learning (AI/ML) as medical devices (SaMD)55. Some instances of prospective AI software for real-world modifications may or may not be aligned with the proposed structure. To date, the FDA has granted complete approval to two AI algorithms that are currently being integrated into clinical trials. The first is IDx-DR, designed to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR), while the second is Viz.AI, which analyses images to identify indicators associated with strokes. These algorithms are characterised as “locked”, signifying that their updates are exclusive to the manufacturer. However, the scope of healthcare applications extends beyond these closed algorithms, encompassing a wide array of possibilities. FDA is actively exploring the concept of a system that facilitates the modification of algorithms through real-world learning and adaptation. This endeavour is pursued with the dual objective of ensuring the continual safety and efficacy of the software as a medical device56. Notably, there have recently been advancements in AI algorithms that assist in the diagnostic process and typically evaluate individual datasets by relying on textual inputs for analysis. However, a distinct concern arises from the potential limitation of these results to specific domains, potentially rendering them inapplicable to other contexts and yielding accurate outcomes within a limited scope of application.
The unique challenges of current medical practices as well as the vast range of diagnostic techniques have led to difficulties within the healthcare system, prompting the development of new systems dependent on information technology (IT). AI is already playing a role in supporting healthcare professionals and improving the diagnosis of diseases. For instance, it is used in the early detection of ectopic pregnancies and the provision of initial treatment options to gynaecologists57. Supervised learning algorithms are those that learn associations by analysing existing samples or training data. As an illustrative example, medical experts categorise images of fractures and ruptures. Inaccuracies or inadequacies in data classification by healthcare professionals can lead to flawed predictions, thereby potentially introducing bias into the trained algorithms. Given its ability to generate robust classification, supervised learning is one of the most widely used AI methods58,59. Currently, AI technology, based on machine learning, has several limitations. The foremost limitation pertains to the variability inherent in the examination and detection apparatus employed across various nations, regions, and healthcare facilities. This results in variations in the quality and resolution of acquired images, inevitably exerting an influence on the precision of the image analysis and, consequently, the accuracy of diagnostic outcomes. Addressing this challenge requires standardisation and harmonisation of inspection equipment. However, it is difficult to achieve this. Second, most machine-learning approaches have inadequate training and verification datasets. One promising approach is transferring learning, which entails acquiring proficiency through a sophisticated model trained on data from a voluminous source domain, such as natural images. The model is then fine-tuned using data from the target domain, where only a small number of annotated images, particularly medical images, are available60. The third restriction of machine-learning-based AI technology is that it is still unreliable for diagnosing uncommon diseases. Owing to the paucity of these illnesses, there are insufficient instances to fulfil the training and verification criteria. To enhance the detection of uncommon illnesses, machine-learning algorithms must be optimised. Existing machine-learning algorithms for illness diagnosis also lack “explanation capacity,” which is the fourth constraint. The output is solely the outcome of training and hard learning. As a result, it is merely a basic assertion based on the discrepancies between sick and normal photographs.
Conclusion
AI has immense potential to revolutionise disease diagnosis and healthcare, propelling the medical field into a new era of accuracy and efficiency. With its ability to analyse vast amounts of data swiftly, AI can assist in early detection, personalised treatment, and informed decision-making. In diagnostics, AI algorithms can analyse medical images such as X-rays, MRIs, and CT scans, identifying subtle anomalies that might be missed by the human eye. This aids in the early detection of diseases, such as cancer, and enables timely interventions to enhance patient outcomes. Moreover, AI can integrate and analyse patient data from diverse sources, aiding in the identification of patterns that can predict disease risk and prognosis. AI’s influence of AI extends beyond diagnostics and transforms the treatment approaches. By analysing genetic data and patient histories, AI can tailor treatments according to individual characteristics, maximising effectiveness while minimising side effects. AI-powered virtual health assistants can provide real-time guidance and support to patients, thereby bridging the gap between medical appointments.
The implications of AI in the medical field are both promising and transformative. The ability to process vast amounts of data, detect patterns, and provide insights will lead to more accurate diagnoses and personalised treatments. This will empower medical professionals by offering data-driven recommendations, enhancing decision-making, and reducing errors. However, this integration also raises ethical and regulatory concerns, such as ensuring patient privacy and maintaining human oversight. The healthcare workforce will need to adapt to AI’s role, acquiring skills to effectively collaborate with intelligent systems. AI-powered remote monitoring and virtual health assistants can extend medical care to underserved areas. While challenges such as data security and bias mitigation persist, the synergy between AI and medicine holds the potential to enhance patient outcomes, streamline workflows, and revolutionise the entire healthcare landscape.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Source of funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors’ contributions
A.A., A.B.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, final approval, and agreeing to the accuracy of the work. A.I., F.J., F.A., H.H., Z.A., S.A., S.A.R., M.K., T.M.: writing—original draft, final approval, and agreeing to the accuracy of the work. M.O.O.: funding acquisition, software, validation, visualisation, and final approval, and agreeing to the accuracy of the work.
Conflicts of interest disclosure
The author, Ali Aamir, declares a conflict of interest as he is currently serving as a reviewer for Annals of Medicine and Surgery.
Research registration unique identifying number (UIN)
Name of the registry is not applicable.
Unique identifying number or registration ID is not applicable.
Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked) is not applicable.
Guarantor
Ali Aamir, Abdul Basit.
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned and externally peer-reviewed.
Footnotes
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Contributor Information
Ali Aamir, Email: aliaamirkhi@gmail.com.
Arham Iqbal, Email: arhamarshadiqbal@gmail.com.
Fareeha Jawed, Email: fareehajawed74@gmail.com.
Faiza Ashfaque, Email: faizaaay75@gmail.com.
Hafiza Hafsa, Email: alizeyoman38@gmail.com.
Zahra Anas, Email: zahraanas179@gmail.com.
Malik Olatunde Oduoye, Email: malikolatunde36@gmail.com;olihealthmagazinewestafrica@gmail.com.
Abdul Basit, Email: ps.abdulbasit@gmail.com.
Shaheer Ahmed, Email: legendofsurgery@gmail.com.
Sameer Abdul Rauf, Email: sameerrauf80@gmail.com.
Mushkbar Khan, Email: mushkibrahimkhan@gmail.com.
Tehreem Mansoor, Email: tehreemmansure@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Al-Antari MA. Artificial intelligence for medical diagnostics-existing and future ai technology! Diagnostics (Basel) 2023;13:688; Published 2023 Feb 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kaur S, Singla J, Nkenyereye L, et al. Medical diagnostic systems using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms: principles and perspectives. IEEE Access 2020;8:228049–228069. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mirbabaie M, Stieglitz S, Frick NR. Artificial intelligence in disease diagnostics: a critical review and classification of the current state of research guiding future direction. Health Technol 2021;11:693–731. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kumar Y, Koul A, Singla R, et al. Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review, synthesizing framework, and future research agenda. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2023;14:8459–8486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Luo H, Xu G, Li C, et al. Real-time artificial intelligence for detection of upper gastrointestinal cancer by endoscopy: a multicentre, case-control, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:1645–1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Memon MH, Li JP, Haq AU, et al. Breast cancer detection in the IOT health environment using modified recursive feature selection. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput 2019;2019:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen YS, Chen D, Shen C, et al. A novel model for predicting fatty liver disease by means of an artificial neural network. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2020;9:31–37; Published 2020 Aug 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jo T, Nho K, Saykin AJ. Deep learning in Alzheimer’s disease: diagnostic classification and prognostic prediction using neuroimaging data. Front Aging Neurosci 2019;11:220; Published 2019 Aug 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Magrabi F, Ammenwerth E, McNair JB, et al. Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support: challenges for evaluating ai and practical implications. Yearb Med Inform 2019;28:128–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaul V, Enslin S, Gross SA. History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;92:807–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bellini V, Badino M, Maffezzoni M, et al. Evolution of hybrid intelligence and its application in evidence-based medicine: a review. Med Sci Monit 2023;29:e939366; Published 2023 Mar 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Barragán-Montero A, Javaid U, Valdés G, et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: a technology review. Phys Med 2021;83:242–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bhatt C, Kumar I, Vijayakumar V, et al. The state of the art of deep learning models in medical science and their challenges. Multimed Syst 2021;27:599–613. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xie S, Yu Z, Lv Z. Multi-disease prediction based on deep learning: a survey. Comput Model Eng Sci 2021;128:489–522. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xu YM, Zhang T, Xu H, et al. Deep learning in CT images: automated pulmonary nodule detection for subsequent management using convolutional neural network. Cancer Manag Res 2020;12:2979–2992; Published 2020 Apr 29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galar M, Fernández A, Barrenechea E, et al. An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes. Pattern Recognit 2011;44:1761–1776. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Noorbakhsh-Sabet N, Zand R, Zhang Y, et al. Artificial intelligence transforms the future of health care. Am J Med 2019;132:795–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA 2016;316:2402–2410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miotto R, Li L, Kidd BA, et al. Deep patient: an unsupervised representation to predict the future of patients from the electronic health records. Sci Rep 2016;6:26094; Published 2016 May 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 2018;18:500–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks [published correction appears in Nature. 2017 Jun 28;546(7660):686]. Nature 2017;542:115–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coudray N, Ocampo PS, Sakellaropoulos T, et al. Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning. Nat Med 2018;24:1559–1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Campanella G, Hanna MG, Geneslaw L, et al. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat Med 2019;25:1301–1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Haenssle HA, Fink C, Schneiderbauer R, et al. Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists. Ann Oncol 2018;29:1836–1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thomas M, Boardman A, Garcia-Ortegon M, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in drug design: opportunities and challenges. Methods Mol Biol 2022;2390:1–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhong F, Xing J, Li X, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug design. Sci China Life Sci 2018;61:1191–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hassanzadeh P, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R. The significance of artificial intelligence in drug delivery system design. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2019;151-152:169–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sahu A, Mishra J, Kushwaha N. Artificial intelligence (AI) in drugs and pharmaceuticals. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2022;25:1818–1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McKinney SM, Sieniek M, Godbole V, et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening [published correction appears in Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7829):E19]. Nature 2020;577:89–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kulkarni S, Seneviratne N, Baig MS, et al. Artificial intelligence in medicine: where are we now? Acad Radiol 2020;27:62–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vayena E, Blasimme A, Cohen IG. Machine learning in medicine: addressing ethical challenges. PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002689; Published 2018 Nov 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019;25:44–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, et al. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019;366:447–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J 2019;6:94–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Martín Noguerol T, Paulano-Godino F, Martín-Valdivia MT, et al. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16(9 Pt B):1239–1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cote MP, Lubowitz JH, Brand JC, et al. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and medicine: a little background goes a long way toward understanding. Arthroscopy 2021;37:1699–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Patel UK, Anwar A, Saleem S, et al. Artificial intelligence as an emerging technology in the current care of neurological disorders. J Neurol 2021;268:1623–1642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kamala YL, Rao KVSN Rama, Josephine B. Manjula. “Comparison and Evaluation of Studies on Precision Medicine using AI,” 2022 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS), Erode, India, 2022, pp. 330–335, doi: 10.1109/ICSCDS53736.2022.9760969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care . Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR. National Academies Press (US); 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Neumann I, Santesso N, Akl EA, et al. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;72:45–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Patuzzo S, Ciliberti R. Non-conventional practice versus evidence-based medicine. a scientific and ethical analysis of the Italian regulation. Acta Biomed 2017;88:143–150; Published 2017 Aug 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, et al. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med 2019;25:30–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Benjamens S, Dhunnoo P, Meskó B. The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. NPJ Digit Med 2020;3:118; Published 2020 Sep 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vokinger KN, Gasser U. Regulating AI in medicine in the United States and Europe. Nat Mach Intell 2021;3:738–739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wang C, Zhang J, Lassi N, et al. Privacy protection in using artificial intelligence for healthcare: chinese regulation in comparative perspective. Healthcare (Basel) 2022;10:1878; Published 2022 Sep 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Price WN, II, Cohen IG. Privacy in the age of medical big data. Nat Med 2019;25:37–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ahuja AS. The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician. PeerJ 2019;7:e7702; Published 2019 Oct 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhou J, Du M, Chang S, et al. Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: detection, functional evaluation, and disease diagnosis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2021;19:29; Published 2021 Aug 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhao W, Yang J, Sun Y, et al. 3D deep learning from CT scans predicts tumor invasiveness of subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 2018;78:6881–6889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sanders WE, Jr, Burton T, Khosousi A, et al. Machine learning: at the heart of failure diagnosis. Curr Opin Cardiol 2021;36:227–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dias R, Torkamani A. Artificial intelligence in clinical and genomic diagnostics. Genome Med 2019;11:70; Published 2019 Nov 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bhinder B, Gilvary C, Madhukar NS, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer research and precision medicine. Cancer Discov 2021;11:900–915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pham KT, Nabizadeh A, Selek S. Artificial intelligence and chatbots in psychiatry. Psychiatr Q 2022;93:249–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Graham S, Depp C, Lee EE, et al. Artificial intelligence for mental health and mental illnesses: an overview. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019;21:116; Published 2019 Nov 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Statement from FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, M.D. on steps toward a new, tailored review framework for artificial intelligence-based medical devices. Accessed: August 14, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-md-steps-toward-new-tailored-review-framework-artificial
- 56.U.S. Food & Drug Administration . Proposed regulatory framework for modifications to artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) based software as a medical device (SaMD). 2019 https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-leearning-software-medical-device
- 57.De Ramón Fernández A, Ruiz Fernández D, Prieto Sánchez MT. A decision support system for predicting the treatment of ectopic pregnancies. Int J Med Inform 2019;129:198–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Panch T, Szolovits P, Atun R. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health systems. J Glob Health 2018;8:020303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rauschert S, Raubenheimer K, Melton PE, et al. Machine learning and clinical epigenetics: a review of challenges for diagnosis and classification. Clin Epigenetics 2020;12:51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Altaf F, Islam SM, Akhtar N, et al. Going deep in medical image analysis: concepts, methods, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access 2019;7:99540–99572. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.