Abstract
Understanding the cause vs consequence relationship of gut inflammation and microbial dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) requires a reproducible mouse model of human-microbiota-driven experimental colitis. Our study demonstrated that human fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) transfer efficiency is an underappreciated source of experimental variability in human microbiota associated (HMA) mice. Pooled human IBD patient fecal microbiota engrafted germ-free (GF) mice with low amplicon sequence variant (ASV)-level transfer efficiency, resulting in high recipient-to-recipient variation of microbiota composition and colitis severity in HMA Il-10−/− mice. In contrast, mouse-to-mouse transfer of mouse-adapted human IBD patient microbiota transferred with high efficiency and low compositional variability resulting in highly consistent and reproducible colitis phenotypes in recipient Il-10−/− mice. Human-to-mouse FMT caused a population bottleneck with reassembly of microbiota composition that was host inflammatory environment specific. Mouse-adaptation in the inflamed Il-10−/− host reassembled a more aggressive microbiota that induced more severe colitis in serial transplant to Il-10−/− mice than the distinct microbiota reassembled in non-inflamed WT hosts. Our findings support a model of IBD pathogenesis in which host inflammation promotes aggressive resident bacteria, which further drives a feed-forward process of dysbiosis exacerbated gut inflammation. This model implies that effective management of IBD requires treating both the dysregulated host immune response and aggressive inflammation-driven microbiota. We propose that our mouse-adapted human microbiota model is an optimized, reproducible, and rigorous system to study human microbiome-driven disease phenotypes, which may be generalized to mouse models of other human microbiota-modulated diseases, including metabolic syndrome/obesity, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and cancer.
Keywords: Inflammatory bowel diseases, experimental colitis, human microbiota associated mice, fecal microbiota transplant, microbiota transfer efficiency, mouse-adapted, interleukin-10 deficient
Introduction
Human inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are heterogeneous chronic inflammatory conditions driven by microbial activation of dysregulated intestinal immune responses in genetically susceptible hosts1. Host genetic susceptibility loci, such as polymorphisms in Nod2, Il23r, Il-10r, and Il-10, explain <20% of IBD variance2–4 and disease incidence is rising globally5, suggesting that environmental factors (diet, microbiome) are important drivers of IBD. IBD patients have altered intestinal microbiota composition (dysbiosis), functionally characterized by reduced diversity, unstable community structure over time and following perturbation, and expanded aggressive (Gammaproteobacteria, Enterococcaceae, sulfur-reducing bacteria) but reduced beneficial (short-chain fatty acid [SCFA]-producing Clostridiales, Blautia) resident bacteria6–10. Viable microbes are required to develop chronic T-cell mediated intestinal inflammation in most experimental colitis models (i.e. Il-10−/−, Il2−/−, Tcrab −/−, Naïve CD4+ T cell transfer to Rag1/2−/−, Tlr5−/−, Tnf∆ARE mice) in which GF mice have no inflammation but develop progressive intestinal inflammation after colonization with complex microbiota11–16. Aggressive resident bacteria (pathobionts) within the complex gut microbiota are the key drivers of intestinal inflammation17–22; however, whether dysbiotic expansion of pathobionts is a cause or consequence of intestinal inflammation and how the host environment shapes microbial ecology in IBD remain poorly understood.
Colonization of GF animals with defined human bacterial consortia or human fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) are the gold-standard methods to demonstrate causality and investigate mechanisms of human microbiome-driven disease phenotypes23–29. Defined consortia enable strict control of microbiota composition, which facilitates mechanistic studies using genetically modified consortium members but requires selection of bacterial strains by variable criteria28, 30–32. Strain-level genetic and functional variation are human disease-state specific, strongly impact host-microbe interaction, and alter disease severity in experimental colitis models22, 33–38. Because defined consortia may omit strain-specific genetic and functional attributes responsible for human disease phenotypes, direct transplant of human disease-associated feces to GF rodents is an appealing method to study human microbiome-driven diseases.
Human IBD patient FMT to colitis-prone, GF mice (Il-10−/− and Rag1−/− T-cell transfer models) transfers enhanced colitis severity compared to healthy patient FMT and induces a TH17- and TH2-dominant immune phenotype that is characteristic of human IBD26, 39–42. These fecal transplant studies clearly transfer disease phenotype to susceptible mice by human IBD-associated microbes. Importantly, human-to-mouse fecal transplant causes a microbial population bottleneck that engrafts a compositionally distinct microbiome in recipient mice compared to human donor stool, likely due to low human-to-mouse strain-level transfer efficiency (~40%) and host-specific microbe preferences43–46. We took advantage of the microbiota reassembly associated with human-to-mouse FMT to ask if 1) the host environment controls microbiota assembly and inflammatory potential, and 2) mouse-adaptation of human fecal microbiota forms a microbial community that is stable in serial transplant to GF mice and leads to more reproducible experimental phenotypes.
To evaluate the impact of the host inflammatory environment on gut microbiota assembly we transferred pooled feces from human IBD patients with active disease to wild-type (WT) or Il-10−/− mice. Human microbiota-associated (HMA) Il-10−/− mice had lower microbial alpha diversity, higher compositional variability, and expansion of pathobionts compared to HMA WT mice, illustrating the influence of an inflammatory colonic environment on dysbiosis. Serial transfer of non-inflamed (WT) mouse-adapted human microbiota to GF Il-10−/− mice induced less severe colitis than inflamed (Il-10−/−) mouse-adapted human microbiota. Transplant of human fecal microbiota to GF mice resulted in low human-to-mouse transfer efficiency at the strain level, while mouse-adapted human microbiota yielded high strain level transfer efficiency. High microbiota compositional variability in HMA Il-10−/− mice was associated with variable colitis severity, but recipient mice colonized with mouse-adapted human microbiota exhibited low compositional variability and more consistent colitis phenotypes. Our findings suggest that the reproducibility and rigor of HMA animal studies are impacted by the variability of human-to-mouse FMT; however, experimental design can be improved by first adapting the human microbiota to the mouse host followed by transfer of mouse-adapted human microbiota for subsequent highly reproducible mechanistic studies.
Methods
Mouse Lines
GF 129S6/SvEv background wildtype (WT) and Il-10-deficient (Il-10−/−) mice13 were obtained from the National Gnotobiotic Rodent Resource Center (NGRRC) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All animal experiments were conducted under approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols.
Human fecal samples
Human fecal samples from 5 adult patients with active Crohn’s disease (CD) (4 donors) or ulcerative colitis (UC) (1 donor) without prior intestinal surgery or antibiotic exposure within 3 months were collected under an Institutional Review Board approved protocol (Fig S1A). De-identified stool samples were aliquoted immediately after collection in an anaerobic chamber and stored without preservatives at −80°C until use.
Human fecal microbiota and mouse-adapted fecal microbiota colonization of GF mice
Human fecal material from two sets of 3 human donors with active IBD (HM1: Donors 1, 2, 3; HM2: Donors 3, 4, 5) was thawed and pooled in equal proportions by weight under anaerobic conditions (N2:H2:CO2 = 80:10:10), diluted with anaerobically reduced phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to generate a fecal slurry, and administered by 150μl oral gavage to recipient GF 129 WT or 129 Il-10−/− mice at 2mg pooled human donor stool per mouse. Mouse-adapted fecal pellets from HMA 129 WT or 129 Il-10−/− mice were freshly collected and pooled daily between 14- and 21-days post-colonization and frozen at −80°C without preservatives. To generate a standardized slurry of mouse-adapted microbiota, mass collected fecal pellets from all mice in a group were pooled, homogenized, and diluted to 100mg/ml under anaerobic conditions in sterile anaerobically reduced lysogeny broth (LB) with 20% glycerol. Solid particulate matter was pelleted by brief slow centrifugation and slurry supernatant was aliquoted to cryovials for storage at −80°C. Slurry supernatant contains the same microbial community composition as whole fecal material43, 47. Mouse-adapted microbiota slurry generated as above from fecal pellets of HMA 129 WT mice is called non-inflamed mouse adapted microbiota (NIMM), while slurry generated from fecal pellets of HMA colitis-prone 129 Il-10−/− mice is called inflamed mouse adapted microbiota (IMM) (Fig 1A). To colonize GF mice with mouse-adapted microbiota, standardized aliquots of 100mg/ml fecal slurry were thawed under anaerobic conditions, diluted with anaerobically reduced PBS, and administered by oral gavage to recipient GF 129 WT or 129 Il-10−/− mice at 2mg per mouse in 150μl. Fecal pellets from IMM or NIMM associated 129 WT or 129 Il-10−/− mice were collected daily between 14- and 21-days post-colonization when the Il-10−/− recipient microbiota has stabilized and before cage effects are reported to develop48, 49, processed and frozen in aliquots as above to generate standardized slurries of serial passages (-g1, -g2, and -g3) of mouse-adapted microbiota (Fig 1A). All experiments were performed using aliquots from a single production batch of mouse-adapted microbiota. All mouse fecal transplant experiments were performed in BSL-2 isolation cubicles with HEPA-filtered air on a 12-hour dark/light cycle with ad libitum access to autoclaved water and mouse chow (Purina Advanced Protocol Select Rodent 50 IF/6F Auto Diet) using the sterile out-of-isolator gnotobiotic cage technique (Complete cage GM500, Green Line, Tecniplast)50. Cage changes and all animal handling were performed in a laminar flow biosafety cabinet under sterile technique following ultraviolet light treatment and 10-minute Peroxigard sterilization of all equipment and surfaces. We maintained strict GF conditions with the out-of-isolator gnotobiotic technique for at least 2 weeks. We consider the complex microbiota fecal transplant experiments reported here to be ‘near-gnotobiotic’ with low risk of environmental contamination, but not strictly gnotobiotic since they are performed with out-of-isolator gnotobiotic cage technique for durations >2 weeks and sterility could not be monitored due to complex microbiota transplants.
Gene expression by qRT-PCR, Intestine histopathology score, and Fecal lipocalin-2 quantification
Standard molecular assays and histopathology scoring were performed as previously described51–53. Details of these procedures and a list of qPCR primers are found in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures.
Statistical Analyses
Non-sequencing based statistical analyses were performed with Prism 10 (GraphPad) with statistical tests and significance thresholds indicated in figure legends.
16S rRNA Amplicon Metagenomic Sequencing and Analysis
16S rRNA amplicon (variable regions 3–4) sequencing was performed on the Illumina NextSeq 2000 platform, processed, and taxonomically classified through QIIME2 by the UNC Microbiome Core54. Additional details of these procedures are found in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures. Sequence counts data at both the genus and phylum level were extracted from the respective QIIME2 artifact files. The amplicon sequence variant (ASV)-level counts table was generated with forward reads using the following parameters with single-end DADA2 on the QIIME2 (version 2021.2) platform: the first 10 base pairs of each sequence were trimmed, and the sequences were truncated to 180 base pairs as determined by sequence quality using FastQC (version 0.11.9)54, 55. Statistical analysis was conducted with the vegan package (ver.2.6–2) in R (ver. 4.2.2) and visualized with the Shiny application Plotmicrobiome and custom R code (Sun et al. GitHub https://github.com/ssun6/plotmicrobiome, Supplemental File 1). To ensure reproducibility and rigor, the results of our analyses were independently reproduced with custom Python code by a second bioinformatician (JBY) with replicated key figures and reproducible tested code available in a Jupyter Notebook file (Supplemental File 1). R and Python code used in our analyses are available at https://github.com/anhmoss/Mouse-Adaptation-of-Human-Inflammatory-Bowel-Disease-Microbiota-Enhances-Colonization-Efficiency and in Supplemental File 1. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data are available at https://github.com/anhmoss/Mouse-Adaptation-of-Human-Inflammatory-Bowel-Disease-Microbiota-Enhances-Colonization-Efficiency.
To account for varying sequencing depth, all counts data were normalized according to the following formula prior to downstream statistical analyses:
This formula adjusts the pseudo-count to have a similar effect across samples by scaling all samples to the average sequencing depth. ASV transfer efficiency was measured as Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for pairs of samples within a given group or between two groups.
Results
Mouse-adapted human microbiota induces more consistent and reproducible colitis than directly transplanted human microbiota.
Human fecal microbiota transplantation into GF mice can transfer microbe-dependent pathological phenotypes to recipient animals, allowing investigation of microbial mechanisms of human diseases such as IBD23, 26, 56. The large interpersonal variation of human gut microbiota, host-specificity of gut microbial ecology, and variable engraftment of human gut microbes into GF mice pose challenges to transplanted phenotype reproducibility and interpretation43, 45, 46, 57. To understand the impact of recipient host environment on human fecal microbiota engraftment and phenotype transfer in a mouse model of experimental colitis, we transplanted pooled feces from 3 humans with active IBD (2 CD, 1UC) to non-inflamed WT or colitis-susceptible Il-10−/− GF mice (Fig 1A, S1A). We then transplanted these mouse-adapted microbiota to sequential cohorts of non-inflamed WT or colitis-susceptible Il-10−/− GF recipient mice, generating serial transfers of mouse-adapted human microbiota identified as -g1, -g2, and -g3 (Fig 1A). In our nomenclature, different human IBD patient fecal pools are called Human Microbiota (HM1 or HM2) (shown in S1A), feces from HMA WT mice are called Non-Inflamed Mouse-adapted Microbiota (NIMM), and feces from HMA Il-10−/− mice are called Inflamed Mouse-adapted Microbiota (IMM) (Fig 1A). Serial mouse-adapted fecal transplant experiments were only conducted with HM1-dervied HMA mouse stool due to resource constraints; HM1 was selected because the cohort contained both UC and CD donors (Fig 1A; S1A). Because colonic immune stimulation of GF mice is equivalent following transplant of human or mouse microbiota, HMA mice are a clinically relevant model of experimental colitis44, 45.
GF 129 WT mice receiving HM1, NIMM-g1, or NIMM-g2 fecal transplant did not develop colitis as assessed by colon histology, non-invasive fecal lipocalin-2 (f-LCN2), and tissue inflammatory cytokine levels (Fig 1B-D; S1B-C). Transplantation of both human microbiota HM1 and mouse-adapted microbiota IMM-g1 or IMM-g2 to GF 129 Il-10−/− mice induced severe colitis as assessed by colon histology, non-invasive f-LCN2, and inflammatory cytokine levels (Fig 1C-F; S1B,D). IMM-g1 and IMM-g2 induced cecal predominant colitis that was equivalent in severity and kinetics to colitis induced by HM1 (Fig 1E; S1B,D). However, HM1 induced colitis was more variable than IMM-g1 or IMM-g2 induced colitis as quantified by segment and total histology score variance and interquartile range (Fig 1E; Fig S1G). The high phenotypic variance of human microbiome-induced colitis was replicated by a separate cohort (HM2) of pooled feces from 3 humans with active CD transplanted to Il-10−/− GF mice (Fig S1E,F). In contrast to the highly variable phenotype of human microbiome-induced colitis, mouse-adapted microbiome IMM-g1 induced colitis had little variation in severity or distribution within or across independent experiments (Fig 1E,F; S1G,H). To evaluate whether variability in colitis phenotype was related to microbiome composition, we performed 16S amplicon sequencing of input donor microbiota and fecal samples collected from ex-GF 129 WT and 129 Il-10−/− mice colonized for 28 days with human microbiota or mouse-adapted microbiotas (Fig 1A). As we show later in the results (Fig 3), human microbiota transplant to GF mice was associated with significantly lower microbiota engraftment consistency than mouse-adapted microbiota transplant, suggesting that variability in engrafted human microbiota composition may cause variability in colitis phenotypes.
Human microbiome restructures with transplant to GF mice.
To investigate how the recipient host intestinal environment shapes human microbiota engraftment in GF mice, we assessed microbiome compositional variation by calculating the average relative abundance of genera across all samples for each fecal transplant condition. Fig 2 shows taxonomic barplots of the 8 most abundant genera across groups with the remaining lower abundance taxa grouped as “Other” (Fig 2, S2A). The 30 most abundant genera across groups and the relative abundance of genera for individual mice are visualized in barplots in Fig S2. We performed pairwise t-tests to assess differential abundance between groups, excluding genera present in less than 10% of the samples (Table S1).
Pooled human microbiome composition (HM1 input and HM2 input) was compositionally distinct from all colonized mouse groups as visualized by taxonomic barplots and principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) clustering (aka multidimensional scaling), with the strongest separation existing between human and mouse-adapted microbiotas along the first MDS axis (Fig 2, 3A). Compared to human microbiomes, HMA mouse and MA-FMT mouse microbiomes had increased relative abundance of Akkermansia, Lachnoclostridium, Ruminococcus gnavus group, and Hungatella, a low-abundance member of the human gut that was not detectable by 16S in HM1 or HM2 inputs (Fig 2). Bacteroides, a major constituent of the human gut microbiome, was present in HM1 input and HM2 input, and expanded in HM2-associated Il-10−/− mice but reduced in HM1-associated WT and Il-10−/− mice (Fig 2, Table S1). The expansion of Bacteroides in HM2-but reduction in HM1-associated Il-10−/− mice was surprising because Bacteroides was more abundant in HM1 input compared to HM2 input, suggesting stochastic factors influence engraftment of human microbiota in GF mice (Fig 2). These data demonstrate that human microbiota association of GF mice results in major compositional restructuring of the engrafted microbiome that may be partially stochastic.
Recipient host environment influences engraftment composition of human-microbiota associated mice.
The recipient host environment shapes the engrafted microbiome composition of HMA mice (Fig 2, S2, 3A, B). After removing HM1 and HM2 inputs, PCoA showed separation of inflamed mouse-adapted microbiota (IMM) and non-inflamed mouse-adapted microbiota (NIMM) along the first MDS axis (Fig 3B). PERMANOVA test with all mouse recipient groups as the model term demonstrated that approximately 43% of the variation in the data is explained by the recipient host environment (coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.43, p=0.001). Mouse adaptation in the inflamed Il-10−/− host (IMM) enriched for significantly higher relative abundance of Escherichia-Shigella, Parasutterella, Enterococcus, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, Ruminococcus gnavus group, and Bifidobacterium but significantly lower relative abundance of Clostridium innocuum, Blautia, Lachnoclostridium, and multiple other genera within Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococaceae when compared to mouse adaptation in the non-inflamed WT host (NIMM) (Fig 2, S2, Table S1). PCoA of serial microbiota passage within the non-inflamed WT host environment (NIMM-g1, -g2) showed that the global microbiome structure remained stable with no distinct clustering of groups (Fig 3D) and only 7 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) demonstrated significantly differential abundance between NIMM-g1 and -g2 using a cutoff of FDR<0.1 (Fig 2, S2, Table S1). PCoA of serial microbiota passage within the inflamed Il-10−/− host environment (IMM-g1, -g2) similarly showed globally stable microbiome structure with no distinct clustering of groups (Fig 3C, S3A), while no OTUs were differentially abundant between IMM-g1 and -g2 (Fig 2, S2, Table S1). Mouse adaptation in the inflamed Il-10−/− host (IMM) was associated with significantly lower alpha diversity at the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) level compared to the non-inflamed WT host (NIMM), consistent with observations that human IBD patients have lower alpha diversity than healthy humans (Fig 3E, S3B,C)8. Together, these data demonstrate that the composition of the human microbiome is fundamentally restructured with transplant to GF mice and that the recipient host environment strongly shapes the relative abundance of engrafted strains with the inflamed Il-10−/− host (IMM) driving a dysbiotic microbiome defined by lower alpha-diversity, enrichment of pathobionts, and reduction of protective SCFA-producing bacteria relative to the non-inflamed WT host (NIMM).
Human microbiota engrafts with variable composition compared to more consistent engraftment by mouse-adapted microbiota.
Since the human microbiome restructures with transplant to GF mice, we speculated that variability in engrafted microbiota composition may explain the colitis phenotype variability of HMA Il-10−/− mice (Fig 1E, S1E-F). Variability of microbiota composition was quantified by pairwise calculation of Pearson correlation coefficient for all samples within the same group (i.e., all mice within HM1->KO). A high Pearson correlation coefficient indicates compositional similarity between samples in a group, while a low coefficient indicates compositional variability between samples in a group. Human microbiota transplant to 129 Il-10−/− mice (HM1->KO) was associated with significantly lower Pearson correlation coefficients than mouse-adapted microbiota transplants to 129 Il-10−/− mice (IMM-g1->KO, IMM-g2->KO) (Fig 3F, S3D). A similar trend was seen with human microbiota or mouse-adapted microbiota transplant to 129 WT mice (Fig 3F). Pearson correlation coefficients for 129 Il-10−/− recipient mice were consistently lower than 129 WT recipients at each stage of serial passage (i.e., HM1->WT vs HM1->KO or NIMM-g1->WT vs IMM-g1->KO), demonstrating that inflammation promotes variability of microbiome composition while health is associated with microbiome stability (Fig 3F). These results are consistent with observations in humans that the composition of IBD patient microbiomes fluctuate more than healthy controls over time28, 58. Together, these data suggest that 1) inflammation promotes microbiome variability and 2) variability in colitis phenotype with human microbiota transplant may be due to variability in engrafted human microbiota composition, while the more consistent colitis induced by mouse-adapted microbiota may be due to homogeneity of engraftment of mouse-adapted microbiota.
Mouse-adapted human IBD microbiota transfers with higher efficiency than human fecal transplant.
Since HMA mice had significantly different microbiome composition than human donor stool but mouse-adapted FMT mice had highly consistent microbiomes between serial transfer, we evaluated whether mouse-adapted microbiota transfers to GF mice more efficiently than human fecal transplant (Fig 4A-D). To quantify transfer efficiency, we detected all ASVs across all samples and compared ASV abundance between human stool, HMA mice, and mouse-adapted FMT mice across serial transfers (Fig 4A-D). We visualized these data using scatter plots where each dot represents a unique ASV plotted by log10 relative abundance in the input microbiome (x-axis) vs recipient mouse microbiome (y-axis). We quantified transfer efficiency using Pearson correlation coefficient (r), where high Pearson r indicates consistent ASV abundances between samples and high transfer efficiency. We used deep 16S amplicon sequencing rather than whole genomic shot gun sequencing (WGS) because repeat sequencing of the same region allows for exact identification of ASVs in a database-independent manner without reliance on classification algorithms.
Human fecal transplant to WT or Il-10−/− mice was associated with low transfer efficiency and poor transfer of relative composition to recipient mice (Fig 4A-D, S5D-E). Very similar results were seen in WT and Il-10−/− mice. A large proportion of ASVs present in human stool did not transfer to recipient mice, which is illustrated by ASVs falling on the x-axis (Fig 4A,C). The relative abundance (log10 normalized) of non-transferring ASVs demonstrated that even moderately to highly abundant ASVs in human stool did not transfer efficiently to GF mice (Fig 4E,H). ASV relative abundance in human stool had little correlation with relative abundance in recipient mice (Fig 4A,C), leading to a very low ASV level transfer efficiency for human fecal transplant to WT (r=0.34±0.03) or Il-10−/− (r=0.33±0.03) mice (Fig 4B,D). For mouse-adapted FMT, however, ASV relative abundance in MA-FMT input (IMM or NIMM) was highly correlated with relative abundance in recipient mice (Fig 4A,C). Only a small proportion of ASVs present in mouse-adapted microbiota did not transfer to recipient mice, and those non-transferring ASVs were primarily low-abundance strains (Fig 4A,C,F-G,I-J). Serial transfer of mouse-adapted microbiota further improved the correlation between input and recipient microbiomes and reduced non-transferring ASV numbers, leading to very high ASV level transfer efficiency for mouse-adapted FMT to WT (r=0.84±0.02) or Il-10−/− mice (r=0.85±0.05) (Fig 4 A-D). Similar results were found when comparing human microbiome input to mouse-adapted microbiome inputs (Fig S4A-F). Analysis of transfer efficiency at the genus level also demonstrated low transfer efficiency for human fecal transplant but high transfer efficiency for mouse-adapted FMT; however, phylum level analysis showed high transfer efficiency for all conditions, giving a misleading perception of transfer efficiency (Fig 5A-H, S5F).
Some ASVs (falling on the y-axis) in HMA mice were not detected in human stool, representing either mutation of the V3-V4 sequence, in vivo expansion of very low abundance strains undetected at the depth of 16S sequencing utilized, or environmental contamination (Fig 4A,C). To rule out environmental contamination, we performed human FMT to GF mice in strictly gnotobiotic isolators and still detected many ASVs in HMA mice that were not detected in human input stool by 16S Seq (Fig S5D-E). We analyzed an independently published 16S Seq dataset of HMA WT mice colonized and then bred in a gnotobiotic isolator and found similar results of low human-to-mouse but high mouse-adapted-to-offspring mouse transfer efficiency at the ASV level (Fig S5A-C)44. These data demonstrate that a large fraction of the human microbiome does not efficiently engraft GF mice; however, once engrafting strains adapt to the mouse gut they transfer with very high efficiency in serial fecal transplant.
Transfer efficiency varies between taxa.
To assess the transfer efficiency of different taxa from transplant of human microbiota or mouse-adapted microbiota to GF mice, we compared Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between phyla (Fig 5I-N). Unclassified bacteria had the lowest transfer efficiency in all groups, consistent with prior reports (Fig 5I-N)43. Verrucomicrobiota and Fusobacteriota consistently had very high transfer efficiency, which likely reflected that a single species from each phylum was present in donor stool (Fig 5I-N). Akkermansia muciniphila, a known keystone species, is the only human gut member of Verrucomicrobiota and transferred highly efficiently across all transplant conditions and recipients. Transfer efficiencies trended lower for Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota and trended somewhat lower in Proteobacteria in all Il-10−/− mice compared to WT mice (Fig 5I-N).
Inflamed mouse-adapted microbiome induces faster onset colitis than non-inflamed mouse adapted microbiome.
Since mouse-adaptation of human microbiota in the non-inflamed (WT) host reduced the frequency of pathobionts while expanding putatively protective bacteria, we investigated whether NIMM-g1 induces less severe colitis than IMM-g1 when transplanted to Il-10−/− GF mice (Fig 6A). At 14 days post-colonization, NIMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice had significantly lower f-LCN2 levels, cecum- and total colon histologic inflammation than IMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice (Fig 6B, S6A-B). At 28 days post-colonization, NIMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice continued to have significantly reduced cecal inflammation scores and trend toward lower cecal inflammatory cytokine levels but had developed increased rectal inflammation compared to IMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice (Fig 6C). NIMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice had significantly lower maximum segment inflammation on a per-mouse basis compared to IMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice (Fig 6C). However, the increase in rectal inflammation resulted in a non-significant trend toward lower f-LCN2 levels and no difference in total colon histology scores between NIMM-g1 and IMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice at 28 days post-colonization (Fig 6C; S6C). PCoA demonstrated that the microbiome of NIMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice (NIMM-g1->KO) clustered with WT HMA and MA-FMT mice, rather than Il-10−/− HMA or MA-FMT mice (Fig 6E). Alpha diversity of NIMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice was equal to NIMM-g1 colonized WT mice and non-significantly higher than IMM-g1 colonized Il-10−/− mice (Fig 6G). These data suggest that major changes in community restructuring occur during initial adaptation of human microbiota to the non-inflamed mouse host, but that once a stable mouse-adapted community forms it transfers with stable global structure in serial transplant to subsequently inflamed GF host mice. Although PCoA demonstrated that global microbiome structure of NIMM was stable between the inflamed and non-inflamed environments, taxonomic bar plots and differential abundance analysis demonstrate that several taxa undergo changes in frequency (Fig 6F; S6D; Table S1). Putatively protective Blautia and Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group were significantly reduced while the pathobiont containing genera Ruminococcus gnavus group and Hungatella were significantly expanded in Il-10−/− compared to WT mice colonized with NIMM-g1, suggesting that these genera may be particularly responsive to the inflammatory environment – consistent with observations in human IBD microbiome profiling studies (Fig 6F, S6E-H)7, 9, 59, 60. Together, these data demonstrate that human microbiome adaptation is dependent on the host environment, but once a stable mouse-adapted microbiome has been established it remains remarkably stable in composition despite an altered host environment.
Discussion
The role of gut microbiota dysbiosis as cause or consequence of intestinal inflammation is an area of active investigation and debate with clinical importance for the management of IBD1. Transplant of human disease-associated feces to GF rodents is an approach that captures strain-specific functional and genetic variation responsible for human-microbiome driven disease phenotypes without biased selection of defined input strains. Although widely accepted, this approach is complicated by phenotypic and experimental variability of unclear etiology. Our study identified that FMT transfer efficiency is an underappreciated source of experimental variability. Using high depth, low-error rate Illumina 16S amplicon sequencing (16S Seq), we showed that pooled human IBD patient fecal microbiota engrafts GF mice with low ASV-level transfer efficiency, resulting in high recipient-to-recipient variation of microbiota composition and colitis severity in HMA Il-10−/− mice. Human-to-mouse FMT caused a population bottleneck with reassembly of microbiota composition that was host inflammatory environment specific. In the inflamed environment of HMA Il-10−/− mice, the microbiota reassembled with lower microbial alpha diversity, higher recipient-to-recipient microbiota compositional variability, and expansion of pathobionts compared to the distinct microbiota reassembled in the non-inflamed environment of HMA WT mice. Following the initial human-to-mouse population bottleneck and microbiota reassembly, the mouse-adapted human IBD patient microbiota transferred with high efficiency and low compositional variability to GF recipients, which correlated with highly consistent and reproducible colitis phenotypes in Il-10−/− recipient mice. The mouse-adapted microbiota composition was remarkably stable in serial transplant to both inflamed and non-inflamed host environments. We replicated the key finding of low human-to-mouse but high mouse-adapted-to-mouse transfer efficiency at the ASV level by analysis of an independently published 16S Seq dataset of HMA WT mice bred in a gnotobiotic isolator44. Microbiota adaptation in the inflamed environment assembled a more aggressive microbiota than adaptation in the non-inflamed environment, demonstrating that the genetically determined host inflammatory environment shapes dysbiosis that subsequently drives more severe inflammation. Our data demonstrate that host gut inflammation is both a cause and consequence of microbial dysbiosis.
Our data support recent criticism that stochastic ecological processes and donor heterogeneity influence phenotypes in HMA murine models61. We found that OTU based metrics, especially at higher taxonomic levels, over-estimated transfer efficiency compared to ASV analysis23, 44, 61. The low transfer efficiency and population bottleneck of human-to-mouse FMT led to high variability in engrafted microbiota composition between individual recipients of the same human input stool, which correlated with significant variability in colitis severity in recipient Il-10−/− mice. We speculate that stochastic differences in engraftment were accentuated by the bottleneck of human-to-mouse FMT and drove phenotypic variability61. Large interindividual variability of human donor microbiota likely exacerbates this phenomenon in HMA murine studies8, 57, 61. We used pooled human IBD donor stool to mitigate the impact of individual human donor microbiota heterogeneity and replicated our results with 2 pooled human donor pools. Our pooling approach is suitable for experimental designs that require a representative human disease associated microbiome to interrogate mechanistic questions (i.e., the impact of diet or host genetic background) or test therapeutics (i.e., live biotherapeutics or novel biologics); however, studies evaluating microbiome-driven phenotype transfer require an appropriately powered number of individual human donors to establish causality and avoid bias from pseudo-replication61. In our study, both pooled human fecal cohorts HM1 and HM2 contained Bacteroides genus at high abundance. However, following human-to-mouse transplant, Bacteroides abundance dramatically decreased in HM1 recipients but expanded in HM2 recipients. Although our study was not powered to distinguish whether this divergent engraftment arose from microbial ecology of the donor microbiota or stochastic processes, our data suggest that low human-to-mouse transfer efficiency in the setting of donor heterogeneity and stochastic ecological processes is an underappreciated source of variability in HMA animal models. In contrast, transplant of mouse-adapted human microbiota yielded highly reproducible and consistent microbiota composition and colitis phenotypes – an improved model for studying human microbiota driven diseases.
Our data demonstrated that mouse-adaptation of human fecal microbiota was shaped by the host inflammatory environment to form stable microbial communities that reproducibly engrafted GF mice with high efficiency to drive distinct colitis phenotypes. Mouse-adaptation in the inflamed genetically susceptible host assembled an aggressive microbiota with low alpha-diversity and high pathobiont abundance (Enterobacteriaceae, R. gnavus) that drove more severe colitis in serial transplant to Il-10−/− mice than microbiota adapted in the non-inflamed host. Gut inflammation induces host-derived metabolites, such as nitrate, lactate, and ethanolamine, that enhance fitness, abundance, and virulence of aggressive E. coli and promote ectopic gut colonization of inflammation-associated Veillonella species62–66. Adherent and invasive E. coli and other inflammation-associated aggressive resident bacteria drive intestinal inflammation in murine colitis models1, 18, 19, 21. Together with the literature, our data support a model of IBD pathogenesis in which host inflammation in genetically susceptible hosts promotes the expansion, fitness, and virulence of aggressive resident bacteria, which further drive a feed-forward process of dysbiosis exacerbated gut inflammation. This model implies that effective management of IBD requires treating both the dysregulated host immune response and aggressive inflammation-associated microbiota.
Our study benefitted from several strengths including an experimental design that incorporated multiple serial FMT, high recipient mouse numbers, and application of high-depth low error rate sequencing for accurate ASV tracking; however, there were some limitations. First, most experiments were conducted in out-of-isolator gnotobiotic cages, where contamination risk is extremely low but could not be monitored due to the complex FMT inputs. To address this, we replicated key experiments in strict gnotobiotic isolators, confirming our findings of low human-to-mouse ASV-level transfer efficiency and the emergence of ASVs in HMA mice not detected in human input stool. Second, we did not analyze WGS data to compare transfer efficiency of microbial functions vs taxonomic composition. We used 16S Seq rather than WGS because repeat sequencing of the same region allows for exact identification of ASVs in a database-independent manner without reliance on classification algorithms. Future WGS studies are needed to evaluate the impact of taxonomic transfer efficiency on transfer of microbial functions. Third, we did not evaluate the impact of mouse diet on the initial human-to-mouse engraftment bottleneck – an important topic for follow up studies.
Our mouse-adapted human microbiota model is an optimized, reproducible, and rigorous system to study human microbiome-driven disease phenotypes. Multiple approaches (human microbiome profiling, defined consortia animal studies, HMA animal models) can investigate causality and identify mechanisms of microbiota-driven diseases1, 29, 67. Mono-association and defined consortium studies are reductionist approaches where a single variable (i.e., single-gene mutations) can interrogate bacterial mechanisms1, 29. Representative synthetic microbiota, such as hCOM2, PedsCom, and SIHUMI, provide a more ecologically complex system with known input strain identity and the ability to easily track relative abundance by simplified metagenomic sequencing approaches28, 31, 32, 67, 68. However, even large complex defined consortia do not capture the understudied strain level variation that exists in heterogeneous human resident microbiota and contributes to important differences in strain dependent microbiota aggressiveness22, 36, 37, 66. The high transfer efficiency of mouse-adapted human microbiota transplant to GF mice improves phenotype consistency, experiment reproducibility and rigor of mouse models of human microbiota-driven disease. Homogenous repositories of mouse-adapted human microbiota provide an identical microbial starting point for every experiment that can be replicated over time and between institutions/collaborators without transfer of human host genetic material present in human feces to collaborators69, 70. Because of high transfer efficiency and reproducible engraftment, mouse-adapted human microbiota repositories can be expanded in vivo when stocks run low, mitigating limitations of finite human fecal samples. While this study focused on colitis, our mouse-adapted human microbiota approach is a framework that may be generalized to mouse FMT models of other human microbiota-modulated diseases, such as metabolic syndrome/obesity, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and cancer.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the members of the Sartor and Fodor laboratories for helpful comments, suggestions, and support. This study was supported in part by NIH/NIDDK T32DK007737 (SMG), P01DK094779 (RBS), P40OD010995 (RBS), CGIBD P30DK034987 (RBS), Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation Gnotobiotic Facility (RBS), UNC Physician Scientist Training Program Fellowship Award (SMG), Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation Career Development Award (SK). We thank the staff and manager, Josh Frost, of the National Gnotobiotic Rodent Resource Center for gnotobiotic husbandry and mice. The UNC Microbiome Core is funded in part by the UNC Nutrition Obesity Research Center (NORC P30 DK056350).
Footnotes
Competing Interests
None relevant to this study. RBS receives grant support from Gusto Global LLC, Biomica, and ImmunyX, and serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Biomica.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets, R code, and Python code are publicly available at https://github.com/anhmoss/Mouse-Adaptation-of-Human-Inflammatory-Bowel-Disease-Microbiota-Enhances-Colonization-Efficiency and from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
- 1.Sartor RB, Wu GD. Roles for Intestinal Bacteria, Viruses, and Fungi in Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Therapeutic Approaches. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(2):327–39.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, Duerr RH, McGovern DP, Hui KY, et al. Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012;491(7422):119–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang Y, Tian L, Sleiman P, Ghosh S, Hakonarson H, On behalf of the International IBDGC. Bayesian analysis of genome-wide inflammatory bowel disease data sets reveals new risk loci. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2018;26(2):265–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sazonovs A, Stevens CR, Venkataraman GR, Yuan K, Avila B, Abreu MT, et al. Large-scale sequencing identifies multiple genes and rare variants associated with Crohn’s disease susceptibility. Nature Genetics. 2022;54(9):1275–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Alatab S, Sepanlou SG, Ikuta K, Vahedi H, Bisignano C, Safiri S, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2020;5(1):17–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morgan XC, Tickle TL, Sokol H, Gevers D, Devaney KL, Ward DV, et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biology. 2012;13(9):R79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gevers D, Kugathasan S, Denson LA, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Van Treuren W, Ren B, et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease. Cell host & microbe. 2014;15(3):382–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lloyd-Price J, Arze C, Ananthakrishnan AN, Schirmer M, Avila-Pacheco J, Poon TW, et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature. 2019;569(7758):655–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma S, Shungin D, Mallick H, Schirmer M, Nguyen LH, Kolde R, et al. Population structure discovery in meta-analyzed microbial communities and inflammatory bowel disease using MMUPHin. Genome Biology. 2022;23(1):208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Duvallet C, Gibbons SM, Gurry T, Irizarry RA, Alm EJ. Meta-analysis of gut microbiome studies identifies disease-specific and shared responses. Nature Communications. 2017;8(1):1784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sadlack B, Merz H, Schorle H, Schimpl A, Feller AC, Horak I. Ulcerative colitis-like disease in mice with a disrupted interleukin-2 gene. Cell. 1993;75(2):253–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dianda L, Hanby Am Fau - Wright NA, Wright Na Fau - Sebesteny A, Sebesteny A Fau - Hayday AC, Hayday Ac Fau - Owen MJ, Owen MJ. T cell receptor-alpha beta-deficient mice fail to develop colitis in the absence of a microbial environment. 1997(0002–9440 (Print)). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sellon RK, Tonkonogy S, Schultz M, Dieleman LA, Grenther W, Balish E, et al. Resident enteric bacteria are necessary for development of spontaneous colitis and immune system activation in interleukin-10-deficient mice. Infect Immun. 1998;66(11):5224–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aranda R, C. SB, McAllister PL, S.W. B, Yang HY, S.R. T, et al. Analysis of intestinal lymphocytes in mouse colitis mediated by transfer of CD4+, CD45RBhigh T cells to SCID recipients. 1997(0022–1767 (Print)). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vijay-Kumar M, Sanders CJ, Taylor RT, Kumar A, Aitken JD, Sitaraman SV, et al. Deletion of TLR5 results in spontaneous colitis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(12):3909–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schaubeck M, Clavel T, Calasan J, Lagkouvardos I, Haange SB, Jehmlich N, et al. Dysbiotic gut microbiota causes transmissible Crohn's disease-like ileitis independent of failure in antimicrobial defence. Gut. 2016;65(2):225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature. 2008;453(7195):620–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim SC, Tonkonogy SL, Albright CA, Tsang J, Balish EJ, Braun J, et al. Variable phenotypes of enterocolitis in interleukin 10-deficient mice monoassociated with two different commensal bacteria. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4):891–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garrett WS, Gallini CA, Yatsunenko T, Michaud M, DuBois A, Delaney ML, et al. Enterobacteriaceae Act in Concert with the Gut Microbiota to Induce Spontaneous and Maternally Transmitted Colitis. Cell Host & Microbe. 2010;8(3):292–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sokol H, Pigneur B, Watterlot L, Lakhdari O, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Gratadoux J-J, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(43):16731–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gomes-Neto JC, Kittana H, Mantz S, Segura Munoz RR, Schmaltz RJ, Bindels LB, et al. A gut pathobiont synergizes with the microbiota to instigate inflammatory disease marked by immunoreactivity against other symbionts but not itself. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):17707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gilliland A, Chan J, De Wolfe TJ, Yang H, Vallance BA. Pathobionts in IBD: Origins, Underlying Mechanisms, and Implications for Clinical Care. Gastroenterology. 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Turnbaugh PJ, Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Knight R, Gordon JI. The Effect of Diet on the Human Gut Microbiome: A Metagenomic Analysis in Humanized Gnotobiotic Mice. Science Translational Medicine. 2009;1(6):6ra14-6ra. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Cheng J, Duncan AE, Kau AL, et al. Gut Microbiota from Twins Discordant for Obesity Modulate Metabolism in Mice. Science. 2013;341(6150):1241214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CPM, Alou MT, Daillère R, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359(6371):91–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Britton GJ, Contijoch EJ, Mogno I, Vennaro OH, Llewellyn SR, Ng R, et al. Microbiotas from Humans with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Alter the Balance of Gut Th17 and RORγt+ Regulatory T Cells and Exacerbate Colitis in Mice. Immunity. 2019;50(1):212–24.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, Janssen S, Shastri GG, Ilhan ZE, et al. Gut Microbiota Regulate Motor Deficits and Neuroinflammation in a Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Cell. 2016;167(6):1469–80.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eun CS, Mishima Y, Wohlgemuth S, Liu B, Bower M, Carroll IM, et al. Induction of bacterial antigen-specific colitis by a simplified human microbiota consortium in gnotobiotic interleukin-10−/− mice. Infect Immun. 2014;82(6):2239–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rogala AR, Oka A, Sartor RB. Strategies to Diss Host-Microbial Immune Interactions That Determine Mucosal Homeostasis vs. Intestinal Inflammation in Gnotobiotic Mice. Front Immunol. 2020;11:214-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lengfelder I, Sava IG, Hansen JJ, Kleigrewe K, Herzog J, Neuhaus K, et al. Complex Bacterial Consortia Reprogram the Colitogenic Activity of Enterococcus faecalis in a Gnotobiotic Mouse Model of Chronic, Immune-Mediated Colitis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1420-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cheng AG, Ho P-Y, Aranda-Díaz A, Jain S, Yu FB, Meng X, et al. Design, construction, and in vivo augmentation of a complex gut microbiome. Cell. 2022;185(19):3617–36.e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Desai MS, Seekatz AM, Koropatkin NM, Kamada N, Hickey CA, Wolter M, et al. A Dietary Fiber-Deprived Gut Microbiota Degrades the Colonic Mucus Barrier and Enhances Pathogen Susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167(5):1339–53.e21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Darfeuille-Michaud A, Neut C, Barnich N, Lederman E, Di Martino P, Desreumaux P, et al. Presence of adherent Escherichia coli strains in ileal mucosa of patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(6):1405–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Boudeau J, Glasser A-L, Masseret E, Joly B, Darfeuille-Michaud A. Invasive Ability of an Escherichia coliStrain Isolated from the Ileal Mucosa of a Patient with Crohn’s Disease. Infect Immun. 1999;67(9):4499–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Carvalho FA, Barnich N, Sivignon A, Darcha C, Chan CHF, Stanners CP, et al. Crohn’s disease adherent-invasive Escherichia coli colonize and induce strong gut inflammation in transgenic mice expressing human CEACAM. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2009;206(10):2179–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Federici S, Kredo-Russo S, Valdés-Mas R, Kviatcovsky D, Weinstock E, Matiuhin Y, et al. Targeted suppression of human IBD-associated gut microbiota commensals by phage consortia for treatment of intestinal inflammation. Cell. 2022;185(16):2879–98.e24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schmitz JM, Tonkonogy SL, Dogan B, Leblond A, Whitehead KJ, Kim SC, et al. Murine Adherent and Invasive E. coli Induces Chronic Inflammation and Immune Responses in the Small and Large Intestines of Monoassociated IL-10−/− Mice Independent of Long Polar Fimbriae Adhesin A. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2019;25(5):875–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.D’Adamo GL, Chonwerawong M, Gearing LJ, Marcelino VR, Gould JA, Rutten EL, et al. Bacterial clade-specific analysis identifies distinct epithelial responses in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Reports Medicine. 2023;4(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nagao-Kitamoto H, Shreiner AB, Gillilland MG, Kitamoto S, Ishii C, Hirayama A, et al. Functional Characterization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease–Associated Gut Dysbiosis in Gnotobiotic Mice. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2016;2(4):468–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Heller F, Florian P, Bojarski C, Richter J, Christ M, Hillenbrand B, et al. Interleukin-13 Is the Key Effector Th2 Cytokine in Ulcerative Colitis That Affects Epithelial Tight Junctions, Apoptosis, and Cell Restitution. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(2):550–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fuss IJ, Heller F, Boirivant M, Leon F, Yoshida M, Fichtner-Feigl S, et al. Nonclassical CD1d-restricted NK T cells that produce IL-13 characterize an atypical Th2 response in ulcerative colitis. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(10):1490–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brand S. Crohn’s disease: Th1, Th17 or both? The change of a paradigm: new immunological and genetic insights implicate Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2009;58(8):1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fouladi F, Glenny EM, Bulik-Sullivan EC, Tsilimigras MCB, Sioda M, Thomas SA, et al. Sequence variant analysis reveals poor correlations in microbial taxonomic abundance between humans and mice after gnotobiotic transfer. ISME J. 2020;14(7):1809–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lundberg R, Toft MF, Metzdorff SB, Hansen CHF, Licht TR, Bahl MI, et al. Human microbiota-transplanted C57BL/6 mice and offspring display reduced establishment of key bacteria and reduced immune stimulation compared to mouse microbiota-transplantation. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):7805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chung H, Pamp Sünje J, Hill Jonathan A, Surana Neeraj K, Edelman Sanna M, Troy Erin B, et al. Gut Immune Maturation Depends on Colonization with a Host-Specific Microbiota. Cell. 2012;149(7):1578–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rawls JF, Mahowald MA, Ley RE, Gordon JI. Reciprocal Gut Microbiota Transplants from Zebrafish and Mice to Germ-free Recipients Reveal Host Habitat Selection. Cell. 2006;127(2):423–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Goodman AL, Kallstrom G, Faith JJ, Reyes A, Moore A, Dantas G, et al. Extensive personal human gut microbiota culture collections characterized and manipulated in gnotobiotic mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(15):6252–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Maharshak N, Packey CD, Ellermann M, Manick S, Siddle JP, Huh EY, et al. Altered enteric microbiota ecology in interleukin 10-deficient mice during development and progression of intestinal inflammation. Gut Microbes. 2013;4(4):316–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.McCafferty J, Mühlbauer M, Gharaibeh RZ, Arthur JC, Perez-Chanona E, Sha W, et al. Stochastic changes over time and not founder effects drive cage effects in microbial community assembly in a mouse model. ISME J. 2013;7(11):2116–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Faith JJ, Ahern PP, Ridaura VK, Cheng J, Gordon JI. Identifying Gut Microbe–Host Phenotype Relationships Using Combinatorial Communities in Gnotobiotic Mice. Science Translational Medicine. 2014;6(220):220ra11-ra11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van der Lelie D, Oka A, Taghavi S, Umeno J, Fan TJ, Merrell KE, et al. Rationally designed bacterial consortia to treat chronic immune-mediated colitis and restore intestinal homeostasis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chassaing B, Srinivasan G, Delgado MA, Young AN, Gewirtz AT, Vijay-Kumar M. Fecal Lipocalin 2, a Sensitive and Broadly Dynamic Non-Invasive Biomarker for Intestinal Inflammation. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rath HC, Herfarth HH, Ikeda JS, Grenther WB, Hamm TE Jr., Balish E, et al. Normal luminal bacteria, especially Bacteroides species, mediate chronic colitis, gastritis, and arthritis in HLA-B27/human beta2 microglobulin transgenic rats. J Clin Invest. 1996;98(4):945–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13(7):581–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rousta E, Oka A, Liu B, Herzog J, Bhatt AP, Wang J, et al. The Emulsifier Carboxymethylcellulose Induces More Aggressive Colitis in Humanized Mice with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Microbiota Than Polysorbate-80. Nutrients. 2021;13(10):3565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Huttenhower C, Gevers D, Knight R, Abubucker S, Badger JH, Chinwalla AT, et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Halfvarson J, Brislawn CJ, Lamendella R, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Walters WA, Bramer LM, et al. Dynamics of the human gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Microbiology. 2017;2(5):17004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Joossens M, Huys G, Cnockaert M, De Preter V, Verbeke K, Rutgeerts P, et al. Dysbiosis of the faecal microbiota in patients with Crohn’s disease and their unaffected relatives. Gut. 2011;60(5):631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hall AB, Yassour M, Sauk J, Garner A, Jiang X, Arthur T, et al. A novel Ruminococcus gnavus clade enriched in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Genome Medicine. 2017;9(1):103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Walter J, Armet AM, Finlay BB, Shanahan F. Establishing or Exaggerating Causality for the Gut Microbiome: Lessons from Human Microbiota-Associated Rodents. Cell. 2020;180(2):221–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Winter SE, Lopez CA, Bäumler AJ. The dynamics of gut-associated microbial communities during inflammation. EMBO reports. 2013;14(4):319–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Taylor SJ, Winter MG, Gillis CC, Silva LAd, Dobbins AL, Muramatsu MK, et al. Colonocyte-derived lactate promotes E. coli fitness in the context of inflammation-associated gut microbiota dysbiosis. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rojas-Tapias DF, Brown EM, Temple ER, Onyekaba MA, Mohamed AMT, Duncan K, et al. Inflammation-associated nitrate facilitates ectopic colonization of oral bacterium Veillonella parvula in the intestine. Nature Microbiology. 2022;7(10):1673–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fornelos N, Franzosa EA, Bishai J, Annand JW, Oka A, Lloyd-Price J, et al. Growth effects of N-acylethanolamines on gut bacteria reflect altered bacterial abundances in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Microbiology. 2020;5(3):486–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhang S, Morgan X, Dogan B, Martin F-P, Strickler S, Oka A, et al. Mucosal metabolites fuel the growth and virulence of E. coli linked to Crohn’s disease. JCI Insight. 2022;7(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Fischbach MA. Microbiome: Focus on Causation and Mechanism. Cell. 2018;174(4):785–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lubin J-B, Green J, Maddux S, Denu L, Duranova T, Lanza M, et al. Arresting microbiome development limits immune system maturation and resistance to infection in mice. Cell Host & Microbe. 2023;31(4):554–70.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tomofuji Y, Sonehara K, Kishikawa T, Maeda Y, Ogawa K, Kawabata S, et al. Reconstruction of the personal information from human genome reads in gut metagenome sequencing data. Nature Microbiology. 2023;8(6):1079–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Nina FdG, Britta CvB, Gerben M. Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2021;47(12):788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets, R code, and Python code are publicly available at https://github.com/anhmoss/Mouse-Adaptation-of-Human-Inflammatory-Bowel-Disease-Microbiota-Enhances-Colonization-Efficiency and from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.