Skip to main content
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2023 Apr 20;11:e100963. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.11.e100963

Mediterranean vineyards and olive groves in Croatia harbour some rare and endemic invertebrates

Barbara Anđelić Dmitrović 1, Lara Ivanković Tatalović 1,, Tomislav Kos 2, Petar Crnčan 3, Domagoj Gajski 4, Mišel Jelić 5, Lucija Šerić Jelaska 1,
PMCID: PMC10850877  PMID: 38333190

Abstract

The Mediterranean is characterised by high biodiversity and numerous endemic species. These species are not only present in natural habitats, but also inhabit areas under human influence, such as agricultural lands. In the biodiversity assessment of Mediterranean vineyards and olive orchards within Zadar County, in Croatia, we identified eight endemic species with Mediterranean distribution, six with a Balkan Peninsula distribution, four with Dinaric Alps distribution and three species rare and endangered in Europe. Alongside these species, we have recorded five new species for Croatian fauna, many of those identified by combining morphological characteristics and the DNA barcoding tool. Araneae and Coleoptera contributed the highest number of endemic species and groups with new record were the following: Coleoptera, Diptera and Araneae. Compared to other sites, an olive orchard with ecological pest management (EPM), surrounded by natural ecosystems, had the highest ratio of endemic and rare species. Our findings emphasise that agricultural lands in the Mediterranean can be habitats for endemic and rare species and that future biodiversity research of these habitats is highly important, to monitor potential biodiversity changes and motivate future species and ecosystem conservation.

Keywords: Araneae, Balkan Penninsula, carabids, endemics, gastropoda, Mediterranean, endangered species

Introduction

The coastal part of Croatia, which is situated in the wider Mediterranean region and Balkan Peninsula, has high biodiversity and numerous endemic species (Jelaska et al. 2010). The Mediterranean Region, including the Balkan Peninsula, has high non-marine molluscs diversity and is rich in endemic species (Cuttelod et al. 2011). The Balkan Peninsula and its neighbouring islands are amongst the world's areas with the greatest concentration of terrestrial slugs. There are 101 species of Arionidae, Milacidae, Limacidae and Agriolimacidae in this small area. The vast majority, or 66%, are endemic species with typically relatively small ranges (Wiktor 1997). According to Štamol et al. (2017), there are 328 species and 203 subspecies of land snails inhabiting Croatia. Endemics make a significant part of this malacofauna - 15% of valid species and 46% of valid subspecies are Croatian endemics. Furthermore, both at genus and species level, spiders (Araneae) are another arthropod group that is highly diverse in this area, with numerous endemics within the Balkan Peninsula (Griffiths et al. 2004). Deltshev (1999) identified Croatia as the Balkan Peninsula's country with the second highest number of endemic spider species after Greece. Croatia has 30 endemic spider species, while there are another 31 native to the Balkan Peninsula (Katušić 2017). In terms of insect diversity, Croatia is amongst the richest European countries for Orthopterans (Skejo et al. 2018). Orthopterans are frequently considered significant contributors to farmland biodiversity (Ichihara et al. 2015) and, because the Mediterranean shrubland is especially rich in species, there is a belief that traditional agricultural landscapes have a positive role in keeping the biodiversity of these insects high (Hochkirch 2016). Many orthopteran species and subspecies are present and even recently discovered (Ciplak et al. 2007). Endemic, rare and endangered species of carabid beetles are published within the Red List for Croatia (Vujčić-Karlo et al. 2007) and some of these species are known to appear in the Mediterranean part of the country (Rukavina et al. 2010). Within the genus Carabus, there are several endangered and endemic species with a narrow distribution area that encompasses Croatia and neighbouring Bosnia and Hercegovina (Šerić Jelaska et al. 2004, Jambrošić Vladić and Šerić Jelaska 2020, Jambrošić Vladić 2020). For some groups, there is a lack of knowledge on their distribution and ecology which complicates evaluation of endemic species. This applies to the Croatian ant fauna, whose biodiversity is understudied. Considering that part of Croatia is situated in the Mediterranean Region, which has Europe's richest ant fauna, the number of reported ant species is projected to be larger in the Mediterranean part of Croatia in comparison to other parts of the country (Bračko and G 2006). Half of the Croatian ant species have a Mediterranean distribution, i.e. those that are commonly found in the Mediterranean Region (Bračko and G 2006). Species of Diptera and Hemiptera in agricultural lands have wide geographical distribution and are mainly influenced by the crop type (Franin et al. 2021). In this area, wine and olive oil production has a long history and vineyards and olive groves are common parts of the landscape (Froidevaux et al. 2017). Intensive agriculture is considered as a threat to biodiversity alongside other human interventions to the landscape (Ricketts and Imhoff 2003). The main threat of agricultural production to the ecosystem lies in the application of pesticides, mainly insecticides, then chemical fertilisers, with lack of organic matter in soils, but also in the heavy disturbance of the upper soil layers by machinery. Numerous research studies showed negative impacts of pesticide application to the non-target invertebrates in the agricultural ecological systems (Moreby et al. 1997, Pisa et al. 2015, Ivanković Tatalović et al. 2020) with a high negative impact on soil organisms (Gunstone et al. 2021). In this area, wine and olive oil production has a long history and vineyards and olive groves been common parts of the landscape (Froidevaux et al. 2017, Kavvadias and Koubouris 2019). Intensive agriculture is considered as a threat to biodiversity alongside other human interventions to the landscape (Ricketts and Imhoff 2003). The main of them lies in the application of pesticides, mainly insecticides, then chemical fertilisers. According to Barić and Pajač Živković (2020), IPM have wider aims to benefit human and environmental health and to sustain economically balanced agricultural production. The EPM on the other hand is, in the context of agricultural production, an even higher approach in pest management because it reduces to a minimum or excludes the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilisers in general (EC 889/2008), with the aim to benefit agriculture sustainability even more than IPM. Increasing implementation of biological approaches, including biological control, biopesticides, biostimulants and pheromones is a mutually high priority for sustainable agriculture leaders and practitioners, including those working in organic agriculture and IPM (Baker et al. 2020). Research shows that IPM and EPM do not necessarily negatively affect predatory arthropods, carabid beetles and spiders (Bahlai et al. 2010). Šerić Jelaska et al. (2022b) results show that management affects the composition of the carabids community in terms of predator share and functional diversity (relative to control), but there are no significant differences between the two types of management, IPM and EPM.

This paper aimed to identify rare and endemic invertebrate species in agricultural landscapes as a part of biodiversity assay and to analyse the proportion of endemics within vine and olive groves in Zadar County in Croatia. Fauna of rare, endemic and newly-recorded species were presented for the following invertebrate groups: Gastropoda, Araneae (Arahnida) and Insects - Diptera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera. The emphasis was given to predator groups Araneae (Arahnida) and Carabidae (Coleoptera, Insecta).

Materials and methods

Study sites and sample collection

Studied vineyards and olive groves were situated in Zadar County, in the south of Croatia (Fig. 1). Two sites were within olive orchards, respectively with ecological (OE) and integrated (IO) management and two sites were placed within vineyards with the same management types, ecological (VE) and integrated (VI). Details on agricultural practices applied on these sites are given in Table 1 and Fig. 2. The study locations were in the Köppen climate classification's Mediterranean climatic types (Csa), with wet, mild winters and dry, hot summers (Bolle 2003). Sampling was done in two years, 2018 and 2019, in spring and autumn. The collection periods were in both 2018 and 2019 from April to July and from September to November. Four sampling methods were used: pitfall traps, beating stick with a net method (Schowalter and Chao 2021), Tullgren Funnel method (Macfadyen 1953) and hand picking (Table 2). The first collection method was sampling with pitfall traps (8 cm ø, volume 300 ml) during the season in 2018. Altogether, 12 traps per site were used and placed parallel within the plantation, with the approximate space between the traps of 10 up to 12 m. Traps were buried directly under the olive trees or under the grapevine stumps. Beating stick with a net method was solely applied in vineyards and olive orchards in 2018. The sampling effort was unique during the season and involved hits on five branches on twelve different trees. Sampling of the soil for the Tullgren Funnel method was done once in April and once in October in 2018 at 12 sampling points per site, with 3 litres of the upper 10 cm soil layer being collected.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of Zadar County, Croatia with four study sites (Transverse Mercator Projection, HTRS96/TM): (1) a vineyard with IPM (located in Baštica); (2) an olive orchard with IPM (located in Škabrnja); (3) a vineyard with EPM (located in Nadin); (4) an olive orchard with EPM (located in Poličnik).

Table 1.

The list of study sites with additional information on location of the site, abbreviation, pest management type applied on the site, size of the area, vegetation and weed processing and soil processing in the terms of mulching, ploughing and number of pesticides treatment. Added pesticides have been grouped according to the main active compounds, those being synthetic (Organochlorides and chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organophosphates, Pyrethroids, Neonicotinoids and Ryanoids), biological (Bt kurstaki, Spinosad) and copper ones (Copper(I) oxide or copper oxychloride).

Type of Study Site Location Abbreviation Pest Management Type Area (ha) Vegetation and weed procession Mulching Ploughing Synthetic pesticides* Biological pesticides** Copper compounds
Olive orchard Poličnik, Zadar County, Croatia OE ecological 24 Rocky soil with little plant coverage and regular mowing Yes No 0 4 5
Škabrnja, Zadar County, Croatia OI integrated 0,85 Grass coverage, surrounded by coppice, and regular mowing Yes No 6 0 3
Vineyard Nadin, Zadar County, Croatia VE ecological 15 Tilled soil with weeds Yes Yes 0 0 6
Baštica, Zadar County, Croatia VI integrated 6 Tilled soil with weeds Yes Yes 12 0 3

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The amount of pesticides added at each study site during 2018, shown as grams of active substances applied per hectare. For site abbreviations, see Table 1.

Table 2.

Total number of identified species per taxonomic group and per sampling method used. Number zero (0) indicates that no specimens were caught by the method, while dash (/) indicates that specimens were caught, but not identified to the species level.

Taxon Number of species per sampling method
Pitfall traps Beating stick By hand Tullgren funel
Gastropoda 11 / / 0
Araneae 116 30 7 0
Orthoptera / 11 0 0
Carabidae 65 0 24 0
Other Coleoptera / 0 8 0
Hymenoptera 5 11 3 1
Hemiptera / 15 7 0
Diptera / 14 2 0

Morphological identification and DNA barcoding

Gastropods were identified using the key of Welter-Schultes (2012). Spiders collected by pitfall traps method were classified to species or genus level following araneae - Spiders of Europe site (https://www.araneae.nmbe.ch, accessed on 23 March 2022) (Nentwig 2022). Orthopteran specimens were collected using beating method and pitfall traps and identified using Harz (1969). Carabid beetles collected by pitfall traps were isolated and identified to species following taxonomic keys by Trautner and Geigenmüller (1987), Hurka (1996) and Freude et al. (2004) and the Fauna Europaea nomenclature (Vigna Taglianti 2013). For ant species determination, two keys were used, Seifert (2018) and Lebas et al. (2019) and the AntWeb website (https//:www.antweb.org, accessed on 23 March 2022) (California Academy of Science 2002). For Hemipteran and Dipteran species or morpho-species identification, a photographic guide to Insects of Southern Europe and the Mediterranean was used (Brock 2017).

Species pertaining to the following groups: Araneae and Coleoptera; Carabidae and Chrysomelidae, Hymenoptera; Formicidae, Hemiptera, Diptera, were collected using beating stick with a net method, Tullgren Funnel method and by hand were analysed using the integrative taxonomy approach, combining morphological identification using the above-mentioned taxonomic keys and the DNA barcoding method. Total genomic DNA isolation, PCR amplification, amplicon purification, sequencing and genetic data analysis were performed as described in Anđelić Dmitrović et al. (2022). Individuals identified by the DNA barcoding method are available in the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007).

Data analysis

The information on species distribution was obtained from the following bases: Fauna Europaea (De Jong et al. 2014), Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (GBIF org. 2022), MolluscaBase (https://www.molluscabase.org, accessed on 4 February 2022) (MolluscaBase Eds. 2022), araneae - Spiders of Europe (Nentwig 2022), Orthoptera Species File Version 5.0/5.0 (Cigliano et al. 2022), Barcode of Life Data system (BOLD) (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007, Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013), PESI database (http://www.eu-nomen.eu/ portal/, accessed on 12 May 2022) (de Jong et al. 2015), True hoppers WP database (https://www.truehopperswp.com/, accessed on 12 May 2022), BioLib database (https:// www.biolib.cz/en/main/, accessed on 12 May 2022), The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (https://www.iucnredlist.org/, accessed on 12 May 2022) and FLOW database (Bourgoin and T 2022). The species was listed as endemic with the Mediterranean, Balkan Peninsula or Dinaric Alps distribution only in cases when all data on distribution were in consent. The list of rare and endangered species, amongst all species recorded at studied sites, was obtained using the Red List in the case of carabid beetles (Vujčić-Karlo et al. 2007), araneae - Spiders of Europe site and communication with experts in the case of spiders. Other groups that contain endemic species were also verified for existence of rare and new species for Croatia through correspondence with taxonomic experts and available data in the above-mentioned databases and current papers (Kuntner 1997, Bračko and G 2006, Borowiec and Salata 2012, Borowiec 2014, Gnezdilov et al. 2014, Skejo et al. 2018, Grbac et al. 2019).

Evenness, as well as Shannon, Simpson and Margalef diversity indices were calculated in PAST 4.03 (Hammer et al. 2001, Happe et al. 2019), for Gastropoda, Araneae and Coleoptera, as these groups were regularly collected across seasons using the pitfall trap method and all specimens pertaining to these groups were identified to species by taxonomic experts.

A Venn diagram, depicting number of species per sampling method, was plotted using online software at https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/ (accessed on 25 March 2022).

Results

Endemic, rare and species new to Croatia

Altogether, 280 species of Gastropoda, Araneae, Orthoptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera and Diptera were collected using all sampling methods and the total list of all recorded invertebrate species at five sites is published in GBIF database (Šerić Jelaska et al. 2022a). Pitfall traps yielded most species, followed by the beating stick with a net and hand picking. Only one ant species was collected using the Tullgren funnel (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Venn diagram depicting the number of all collected species per sampling method.

Of the invertebrate fauna collected in vineyards and olive orchards in Zadar County, spiders contributed with the highest number of endemic species, six, distributed either in the Mediterranean Region or in the Dinaric Alps (Table 3). In addition, five endemic carabid beetles were collected; three of which are distributed in the Balkan Peninsula and two in the Mediterranean. In the case of Gastropoda species, Delimasemirugata is endemic to Croatia and Montenegro and Tandoniareuleauxi is endemic to the western Balkan Peninsula and Italy (Bank and Neubert 2020). Additionally, two spider species, Attuluspenicillatus and Zeloteshermani, are described as very rarely found on the Spiders of Europe site. Orthopterans Ephippigerdiscoidalis, Barbitistesyersini and Eupholidopteraschmidti are endemic to the Balkan Peninsula and Italy. Besides these groups, one hemipteran (Latissusdilatatus) and one hymenopteran (Aphaenogasterpicena) endemic species with a Mediterranean distribution were recorded in the study area. Furthermore, the collected species Ditomuscalydonius, while not considered as an endemic species, is listed on the carabid beetles Red List of Croatia (Vujčić-Karlo et al. 2007) as a critically endangered species. Out of 280 (Šerić Jelaska et al. 2022a) recorded species at our study sites, collected and identified using the above-mentioned methods, five had no previous records for Croatia. Those are, Ceratinellabrevipes (Westring, 1851) (Araneae, Lyniphiidae) (Suppl. material 1), one male specimen collected in vineyard with IPM; Anthomyialiturata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Diptera, Tabanidae) (BOLD:ACE4540) (Suppl. material 2), one specimen recorded in vineyard with IPM; Corynopteraperpusilla Winnertz, 1867 (Diptera, Sciaridae) (BOLD:AAN6447) (Suppl. material 3), one specimen recorded in olive orchard with IPM; Psilopaobscuripes Loew, 1860 (Diptera, Ephydridae) (BOLD:AAG7016) (Suppl. material 4), 11 specimens recorded in vineyard with IPM; Aphthonapallida (Bach, 1856) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) (BOLD:ACZ1493) and one specimen recorded in olive orchard with EPM. The endemic and rare species and those new to Croatia have been listed in the Table 3.

Table 3.

List of endemic, rare and endangered species collected in all four sampling sites. M – species with the area limited to the Mediterranean Region; D – species with the area limited to the region of the Dinaric Alps; B – species with the area limited to the Balkan Peninsula.

Class Order Family Species Endemics Rare and/or endangered species New records for Croatia
Gastropoda Stylommatophora Clausiliidae Delimasemirugata (Rossmassler, 1836) B
Stylommatophora Milacidae Tandoniareuleauxi (Clessin, 1887) B
Arachnida Araneae Thomisidae Bassaniodesbufo (Dufour, 1820) M
Araneae Salticidae Attuluspenicillatus (Simon, 1875) *
Araneae Lyniphiidae Ceratinellabrevipes (Westring, 1851) *
Araneae Gnaphosidae Zeloteshermani (Chyzer, 1897) *
Araneae Gnaphosidae Marinarozelotesholosericeus (Simon, 1878) M
Araneae Philodromidae Pulchellodromusbistigma (Simon, 1870) M
Araneae Agelenidae Urocorasmunieri (Simon, 1880) D
Araneae Thomisidae Xysticusapricus L. Koch, 1876 D
Araneae Zodariidae Zodarionelegans (Simon, 1873) M
Insecta Diptera Tabanidae Anthomyialiturata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) *
Diptera Sciaridae Corynopteraperpusilla Winnertz, 1867 *
Diptera Ephydridae Psilopaobscuripes Loew, 1860 *
Coleoptera Carabidae Carabuscaelatusdalmatinus Duftschmid, 1812 B
Coleoptera Chrysomelidae Aphthonapallida (Bach, 1856) *
Coleoptera Carabidae Carabuscoriaceusdalmaticus Géhin, 1885 B
Coleoptera Carabidae Zabrusincrassatus (Ahrens, 1814) B
Coleoptera Carabidae Amaradalmatina Dejean, 1828 M
Coleoptera Carabidae Ditomuscalydonius P. Rossi, 1790 *
Coleoptera Carabidae Olisthopusfuscatus Dejean, 1828 M
Hemiptera Issidae Latissusdilatatus (Fourcroy, 1785) M
Hymenoptera Formicidae Aphaenogasterpicena Baroni Urbani, 1971 D
Orthoptera Tettigoniidae Ephippigerdiscoidalis Fieber, 1853 D
Orthoptera Tettigoniidae Eupholidopteraschmidti (Fieber, 1861) B
Orthoptera Tettigoniidae Barbitistesyersini Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 M

The ratio of endemic, rare and newly-recorded species within Gastropoda, Araneae and Carabidae, comparing to those with wider distribution, is shown in Fig. 4. In the case of Araneae species, endemic and rare species accounted for 7% of the total number of species found. In the Carabidae family, endemics and rare species accounted for 8% of total species, while in Gastropoda, they accounted for 16%.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Ratio of endemic and rare to globally distributed spiders (a), carabid beetles (b) and gastropods (c) analysed for all the sites together.

Comparison of newly-recorded, endemic and rare species distribution amongst our sampling sites showed that, overall, olive orchards with EPM harboured the highest share of endemic species, but not individuals pertaining to these species (Fig. 5). However, the highest abundance and the highest number of newly-recorded species was observed for vineyards with IPM.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Heat map depicting the ratio of each site in the number of endemic, rare and newly-recorded species (a) and the abundance of the corresponding individuals (b). Study sites are denoted with abbreviations as follows: OE - olive orchard with EPM; OI - olive orchard with IPM; VE - vineyard with EPM; VI - vineyard with IPM.

Diversity measures

The Shannon Diversity Index was slightly higher in EPM sites than those with IPM for spiders, but the opposite values were for carabid beetles and gastropods. A similar trend can be observed with Evenness and species richness shown as the Margalef Index, which were higher in IPM than EPM sites. The higest values of diversity indices for Carabidae and Gastropoda was observed in the olive orchard with IPM. Most of the diversity indices measured for Aranaea species were higher in EPM sites. These results are depicted in the Table 4.

Table 4.

Diversity indices for Araneae, Carabidae and Gastropoda collected by pitfall traps for each research site.

Site Taxon Shannon H Simpson 1-D Evenness e^H/S Margalef
Olive orchard with EPM Gastropoda 0.01 0 0.51 0.15
Araneae 3.54 0.96 0.63 9.87
Carabidae 1.87 0.71 0.27 4.22
Olive orchard with IPM Gastropoda 1.41 0.69 0.68 0.98
Araneae 3.29 0.93 0.33 11.72
Carabidae 2.3 0.86 0.3 4.47
Vineyard with EPM Gastropoda 1.26 0.8 1.17 1.24
Araneae 3.53 0.95 0.69 9.27
Carabidae 2.02 0.8 0.24 3.93
Vineyard with IPM Gastropoda 1.01 0.44 0.46 1.41
Araneae 3.21 0.91 0.41 9.8
Carabidae 2.14 0.83 0.28 4.42

Discussion

The biodiversity of the Balkan Peninsula is still poorly researched, with new species and new records to Croatia being continuously reported (e.g. Francuski et al. (2011), Previšić et al. (2014)). We found no prior records in Croatia for five species noted in this study: one Araneae species, three Diptera species and one Coleoptera species. Our results confirmed that agricultural areas could harbour some rare and endemic species. We also found eight endemics with Mediterranean distribution, six with Balkan Peninsula distribution and four with Dinaric Alps distribution. Despite lower values of measured diversity indices, the total number of endemic species and the abundance of rare species were the highest in olive orchards with EPM. This can probably be explained by the fact that this site is, comparing to the other agricultural sites studied, the only one that is surrounded by natural habitats, which can positively impact invertebrate community in adjacent agroecosystems (Duque-Trujillo et al. 2022). Three species are rare and endangered in Europe. All findings were uploaded in the GBIF database (Šerić Jelaska et al. 2022a) as only the second contribution from Croatia in this global database for faunal research, indicating the need for further biodiversity research of the area, especially having in mind high diversity of fauna and high endemism of this area. Further entries of biodiversity data of this area in the GBIF database and similar databases will enable further meta-analyses of diversity on a larger scale.The following is the list of interesting faunistic records:

Class Gastropoda

The Mediterranean Region, from the Iberian Peninsula to the Balkans, is the main centre of diversity and endemism of non-marine molluscs (Cuttelod et al. 2011). Land snails can adapt to challenging environments thanks to a variety of morphological, behavioural and physiological responses to homoeostatic stimuli (Chukwuka et al. 2014). For gastropods, the smallest diversity was observed in the case of olive orchards with EPM. Explanation for this probably lies in the fact that olive orchards with EPM were under more intensive disturbance of soil with mechanisation and this site was characterised by mostly bare soil or with less plant coverage than olive orchards with the IPM site. This negatively impacted gastropod biodiversity in EPM orchards compared to IPM, as most snails and slugs lay their eggs in the ground and need plant coverage for summer aestivation (Godan 1983).

Delimasemirugata (Rossmassler, 1836) (Stylommatophora, Clausiliidae)

D.semirugata is a terrestrial gastropod endemic to Croatia and Montenegro, with Croatia containing the type locality (MolluscaBase Eds. 2022). It is a grazer, as is characteristic to the family Clausiliidae (MolluscaBase Eds. 2022). Genus Delima is rich in species endemic to Croatia and/or its neighbouring countries on the Balkan Peninsula (MolluscaBase Eds. 2022). D.semirugata and its subspecies can be found on the Croatian coast and islands, where they inhabit stony grasslands, smaller rocks and cracks (Štamol et al. 2017). In this study, the species was found on the unmanaged habitat consisting of Mediterranean scrubland, very close to the olive orchard with EPM. Although it was not recorded at the agricultural land itself, this finding proves that the proximity of agricultural activity is not necessarily detrimental to the presence of endemic species.

Tandoniareuleauxi (Clessin, 1887) (Stylommatophora Milacidae)

T.reuleauxi is endemic to the Dinaric Alps and can be found in Italy, Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro (MolluscaBase Eds. 2022). The species lives in xerophilous forests and can be found crawling on limestone rocks in shaded places. If it is rainy, it is active in broad daylight (De Mattia and Pešic 2015).

Order Araneae

Spiders provided the highest number of endemic species in this study because of their capacity to colonise large areas, including agricultural locations (Nyffeler and Sunderland 2003). Despite the high number of endemics with Croatian and Balkan Peninsula distribution (Deltshev 1999), all endemic species were either ones with Mediterranean distribution or Dinaric Alps distribution. This does not necessarily mean that these species are not present in the area. As spiders have a wide range of ecological niches, sampling them requires a combination of techniques and that can leave many species unidentified due to a failure to cover a wide range of microhabitats (Cardoso et al. 2007). Thus, new species and new records are still being described (Deltshev et al. 2022) and this study proved that agroecosystems should not be excluded from such research. Due to their predatory potential on pest species, spiders are essential predatory arthropods in agricultural lands (Samiayyan 2014, Gajski and Pekár 2021). Their richness and diversity promote biocontrol (Cuff et al. 2021). We found that the EPM system resulted in a higher diversity of spiders than the IPM. This is in contrast to prior findings from olive grove studies (Cárdenas et al. 2006, Cardenas et al. 2015). Vineyards with EPM had a higher Shannon and Simpson diversity of spiders than vineyards with IPM, contrary to gastropods and carabid beetles. This could be linked with different ecology and habitat niches between the groups. Spiders are active in canopy and not just on the soil and those species are not directly influenced by soil disturbances with mechanisation, which was more intense in the olive orchard with EPM.

Attuluspenicillatus (Simon, 1875) (Araneae, Salticidae)

There is only ten records of A.penicillatus for Croatia, most of them from the late 19th and early 20th century. It is possible that the species is rare in Croatia, but it could also be that it is poorly researched in this part of the country (L. Katušić, personal communication, 15 February 2022). It is described as very rarely found on the Spiders of Europe site (Nentwig 2022). This is a globally distributed species that prefers warm places on sandy ground (Nentwig 2022). A.penicillatus is an endangered and rare faunistic record.

Zeloteshermani (Chyzer, 1897) (Araneae, Gnaphosidae)

Z.hermani is recorded at multiple sites in the Mediterranean Region of Croatia, but always in low numbers (L. Katušić, personal communication, 15 February 2022) and is described as very rarely found on the Spiders of Europe site (Nentwig 2022). It has a global distribution and can be found under stones in warm sites (Nentwig 2022). Z.hermani is an endangered and rare faunistic record.

Bassaniodesbufo (Dufour, 1820) (Araneae, Thomisidae)

B.bufo is a species of Mediterranean distribution (Nentwig 2022) that can be found in olive orchards (Picchi 2020) as was the case in our study, where it was sampled in olive orchards with both EPM and IPM. The earliest record from Croatia is from the second half of the 19th century (Canestrini and Pavesi 1868) and since then, has been recorded at more sites in the Mediterranean Region of Croatia, including the National Park Kornati (Grbac et al. 2019).

Marinarozelotesholosericeus (Simon, 1878) (Araneae, Gnaphosidae)

M.holosericeus is a Mediterranean endemic, mostly distributed in the western Mediterranean (Di Franco 1997), but it has been recorded in Croatia (Katušić 2017) and Greece (Nentwig 2022). In our study, it was found in olive orchards with EPM.

Pulchellodromusbistigma (Simon, 1870) (Araneae, Philodromidae)

P.bistigma is a small (1.3-1.9 mm) spider with a Mediterranean distribution (Nentwig 2022). The first record for Croatia is from the late 19th century in Dalmatia (Gasperini 1891) and later, it was found in Istria (Muster et al. 2007). We sampled this species in olive orchards, which can be their habitat (Picchi 2020).

Urocorasmunieri (Simon, 1880) (Araneae, Agelenidae)

The area of U.munieri is restricted to the region of Dinaric Alps (Venezia Giulia in Italy, Slovenia and Croatia) (Nentwig 2022). The type locality is in Šibenik area, Croatia (Pantini and Isaia 2019). In this research, U.munieri was collected at every sampling site with high abundance, indicating that it is well adapted for life on agricultural land.

Xysticusapricus L. Koch, 1876 (Araneae, Thomisidae)

This species was recorded for Croatia for the first time by Drakšić and Katušić (2011) in the National Park Kornati. Before that, it was endemic to Italy (Pantini and Isaia 2019). We found two specimens in the olive orchard with EPM and that is the first recorded for the mainland. It used to be erroneously listed as a Central European species, but now it is considered to be a Mediterranean one (Jantscher 2001).

Zodarionelegans (Simon, 1873) (Araneae, Zodariidae)

Z.elegans has a Mediterranean distribution (Nentwig 2022) and was recorded for Croatian by Gasperini (1891). Since then, its presence was noted in Istria, Kvarner, including the Krk Island and Dalmatia Region (Bosmans 1997). We sampled this species in both olive orchards and in vineyards with EPM.

Ceratinellabrevipes (Westring, 1851) (Araneae, Linyphiidae)

Ceratinellabrevipes is a species of global distribution and records exist for all Croatia’s neighbouring countries (Komnenov 2010, Nentwig 2022), so its presence was expected. In this study, the species was sampled in olive orchards and vineyards with IPM. This is a new record for Croatian fauna.

Class Insecta

Two carabid endemic species from this study with the area limited to the Balkan Peninsula belong to the genus Carabus. The Balkan Peninsula is considered a taxon-rich region and the hyper-diverse genus Carabus is present in this region with many endemics and endangered species (Šerić Jelaska et al. 2014). In Croatia, thirty species of the genus Carabus have been identified, including 53 subspecies (Jambrošić Vladić et al. 2019). Like spiders, carabid beetles are essential predatory arthropods in agricultural lands (Šerić Jelaska et al. 2014, Šerić Jelaska and Symondson 2016), whose richness and diversity promote biocontrol (Šerić Jelaska et al. 2022b). In this study, the IPM system resulted in a higher diversity of carabids than the EPM which is opposite to findings for spiders. The explanation is similar to that in the case of gastropods: Carabids are mainly ground active and juveniles develop in the soil and, thus, could be under the direct influence of soil treatments. This impact of soil disturbances by mechanical methods applied in agricultural sites on the diversity of some groups like carabids has been already confirmed (Kromp 1999).

All three orthopteran endemics belong to the family Tettigoniidae (Bush crickets), which are the largest orthopteran group in Croatia (Skejo et al. 2018). About 20% of bush crickets fauna in Croatia is made of Balkan endemics and stenoendemics, which is due to the physical barriers in the landscape (e.g. Dinaric Alps), variable habitats and for the fact that numerous glacial microrefugia existed in the past (Kenyeres et al. 2009, Skejo et al. 2018). In addition, for many Orthoptera species, their status in the IUCN list is described as data deficient, amongst them Paramogoplistesnovaki (Krauss, 1888). The first record of this species was on the island of Hvar (Dalmatia, Croatia) at the close of the 19th century. Since then, several findings of the species were recorded in Croatia as follows: Hvar Island, Neretva River Mouth, Mljet Island and Krka River (Skejo et al. 2018). As a part of our research, P.novaki was recorded in an olive orchard with EPM and this represents the most northern record of this species so far and, thus, contributes to the knowledge of the distribution of this rare species. The distribution of this species in Europe, other than localities in Croatia, includes Greece and Italy (Lazio Region and Sardinia) (Hochkirch 2016).

Ditomuscalydonius P. Rossi, 1790 (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

In the case of carabid beetles, notable was the record of the critically-endangered species D.calydonius (Vujčić-Karlo et al. 2007). D.calydonius needs warms soil to develop (Brandmayr and Brandmayr Zetto 1974). It combines summer aestivation with egg deposition and brood care in the nest, where it collects seeds for larvae to feed on (Brandmayr and Brandmayr Zetto 1974). This record emphasises the fact that agricultural areas could be habitats for rare and endangered species and that it is of high importance to adjust the management type to be more supporting of invertebrate’s diversity (Happe et al. 2019). D.calydonius is an endangered and rare faunistic record.

Carabuscaelatusdalmatinus Duftschmid, 1812 (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

Carabuscaelatus Fabricius 1801 is a species native to the Alps, Dinarides and western Balkans, with a distribution that spans the Dinaric Mountains (Jambrošić Vladić and Šerić Jelaska 2020). We sampled the subspecies Carabuscaelatusdalmatinus in an olive orchard with EPM that is located near the foothills of the Velebit Mountain. C.caelatusdalmatinus, common name Dalmatian crimpled ground beetle, is noted in Albania, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Löbl and Löbl 2017). The adults are active from May to August (Jambrošić Vladić 2020). It is listed as Near threatened in the Red List of Carabid beetles in Croatia, meaning they are not threatened yet, but there is a reasonable concern that they might become in the future (Vujčić-Karlo et al. 2007).

Carabuscoriaceusdalmaticus Géhin, 1885 (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

C.coriaceus is widely distributed in Europe (GBIF org. 2022) and subspecies C.coriaceusdalmaticus can be found in Croatia, Albania, North Macedonia and Greece (Zicha 2015). It is characterised by smoother elytrae and broader posterior lobes compared to the nominate subspecies C.coriaceuscoriaceus (Goidanich 1932). It was collected on all sampling sites.

Amaradalmatina Dejean, 1828 (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

Amaradalmatina (Eng. Dalmatian shiny channel runner) is endemic to the Mediterranean Region (Vigna Taglianti 2013). In this study, it was sampled in olive orchards with EPM and these samples, along with their genetic data, are the first entries for this species in the BOLD database (BOLD:AEN2004) (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013).

Zabrusincrassatus (Ahrens, 1814) (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

This herbivorous carabid species is endemic to the Balkan Peninsula (Vigna Taglianti 2013, Teofilova 2020). In Croatia, it has been sampled at Neretva Delta (Kurbalija 2012) and several localities in Dalmatia (Hvar, Split, Zadar) (Anichtchenko and Guéorguiev 2009). In this study, it was sampled in olive orchards with EPM.

Olistophusfuscatus Dejean, 1928 (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

There are five species of genus Olistophus in Europe and they prefer dry habitats on sandy or limy soils (Trautner and Geigenmüller 1987). O.fuscatus has a Mediterranean distribution and, while it is not listed in Red List of Carabid beetles in Croatia (Vujčić-Karlo et al. 2007), it is considered to be a rare faunistically (Šerić Jelaska and Temunović 2010). In this study, it was collected in olive orchards with EPM and nearby unmanaged sites.

Latissusdilatatus (Fourcroy, 1785) (Hemiptera, Issidae)

L.dilatatus is a type species, by original designation and monotypy, of its genus, which has a Mediterranean distribution (together with Hungary) (Bourgoin and T 2022). It was recorded in Croatia for the first time by Melichar (1906).

Aphaenogasterpicena Baroni Urbani, 1971 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)

Aphaenogasterpicena, endemic to the region of the Dinaric Alps, has only one previous record for Croatia according to www.antweb.org (California Academy of Science 2002, accessed on 21 March 2022). It is widely distributed in Italy, Slovenia and Albania (Boer 2013). This species prefers open fields with little vegetation, like all members of the Aphaenogaster group. The first record for this species in Croatia was in Pakoštane, Zadar County (California Academy of Science 2002, accessed on 21 March 2022). In this study, it was recorded in olive orchards with EPM.

Ephippigerdiscoidalis Fieber, 1853 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae)

E.discoidalis has a distribution range that encompasses zones from Greece to northern Italy (Skejo et al. 2018). In Croatia, it is a common species in a Mediterranean area and it inhabits parts of the Dinaric Alps as well, but only those areaswith a dominant Mediterranean influence (Skejo et al. 2018).

Eupholidopteraschmidti (Fieber, 1861) (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae)

E.schmidti occurs in the Western Balkan Peninsula, from northern Greece in the south, to western Bulgaria, up to northern Italy (Hochkirch 2016, Skejo et al. 2018). It is a medium-sized species, previously considered as a subspecies of E.chabrieri, but molecular phylogenetic analysis confirmed its species status (Allegrucci et al. 2014).

Barbitistesyersini Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae)

B.yersini is a thermophilic species present in the Mediterranean part of Croatia as well as in southern part of the Dinaric karst (Hochkirch 2016, Skejo et al. 2018). In Europe, it has distribution that includes the Western Balkans and part of central Italy (Hochkirch 2016, Skejo et al. 2018).

Aphthonapallida (Bach, 1856) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)

The Coleopteran species of genus Aphthona can be used in biocontrol against weeds, but some species may also cause economic damage on cultivated plants (Özdikmen et al. 2018). The species is widely distributed in Europe (Vigna Taglianti 2013, GBIF org. 2022). In this study, it was recorded in olive orchards with EPM. This is a new record for Croatian fauna.

Anthomyialiturata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Diptera, Tabanidae)

The A.liturata group is most likely an opportunistic species, with larvae that can develop in a wide variety of organic materials (Suwa and Darvas 1998, Pintilioaie et al. 2021). This species is found throughout Europe; however, its small size makes identification difficult. The first record of this species was obtained in vineyards with IPM using the DNA barcoding method as a part of the MEDITERATRI project (Anđelić Dmitrović et al. 2022). This is a new record for Croatian fauna.

Corynopteraperpusilla Winnertz, 1867 (Diptera, Sciaridae)

Winnertz (1867) established the genus Corynoptera for four new species, one of which, C.perpusilla, was later chosen as the type species by Enderlein in 1911 (Hippa et al. 2010). Hippa et al. (2010) reported Corynopteraperpusilla in Croatia’s neighbouring countries. Species from the genus Corynoptera are often examples of the cryptic diversity (Morinière et al. 2019). There is a higher prevalence of unrecorded and ignored species in families with the lowest body sizes, implying that the number of dipteran species in Croatia is likely to be substantially larger than previously reported and, thus, new records are not surprising (Morinière et al. 2019, Anđelić Dmitrović et al. 2022). This genus belongs to the family Sciaridae. Sciaridae, commonly known as Dark wing fungus gnats, are a globally common, but poorly researched dipteran family (Evenhuis et al. 2016), since their small size and superficial homogeneity do not make them attractive to taxonomists and collectors. The first record of this species for Croatian fauna was obtained in olive orchards with IPM using the DNA barcoding method as a part of the MEDITERATRI project (Anđelić Dmitrović et al. 2022). Findings such as this one underline the advantages of molecular tools in species identification, such as the DNA barcoding method (Anđelić Dmitrović et al. 2022, Chimeno et al. 2022).

Psilopaobscuripes Loew, 1860 (Diptera, Ephydridae)

The distribution of this species encompasses European countries: Austria, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Spain and Turkey and North America (Mathis and Zatwarnicki 2010). The first record of this species for Croatian fauna was obtained in a vineyard with IPM using the DNA barcoding method (Anđelić Dmitrović et al. 2022), done as part of the MEDITERATRI project. The flies of this family are often small and this negatively affects their determination.

Conclusions

We confirmed that endemic and rare species are present in agricultural areas of the Mediterranean part of Croatia supporting the importance of agricultural land in preserving and promoting biodiversity. Rare and endemic species were found under both EPM and IPM management systems, showcasing the positive impact of these closer-to-nature management types. Additional research on regional biodiversity in agricultural landscapes is necessary especially having in mind several endangered species being recorded and agriculture as one of the main drivers for biodiversity decline. Additionally, the first records we had for the area justify the need of further biodiversity assessments, in which agricultural sites should be included.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material 1

Supplementary figure 1

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Figure of Ceratinellabrevipes (A) dorsal view; (B) dorsal view of pedipalp; (C) ventral view of pedipalp.

File: oo_774625.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s001.jpg (39.2KB, jpg)
Supplementary material 2

Supplementary figure 2

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Lateral view of Anthomyaliturata.

File: oo_774626.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s002.jpg (26.1KB, jpg)
Supplementary material 3

Supplementary figure 3

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Lateral view of Corynopteraperpusilla.

File: oo_774627.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s003.jpg (18.1KB, jpg)
Supplementary material 4

Supplementary figure 4

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Lateral view of Psilopaobscuripes.

File: oo_774628.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s004.jpg (20.3KB, jpg)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Josip Skejo for his contribution in identifying Orthoptera specimens and Josip Primorac for sorting field samples with ants, as well to professor Stjepan Krčmar, for offering his knowledge on dipteran species and their distribution. We are thankful to all the students and associates who helped with the feldwork and samples preparation. We are also thankful to the owners of olive orchards and vineyards, Miodrag Deša, Josip Ražov and Šime Škaulj in Zadar County who kindly let us conduct our research on their land. This research was funded by The Croatian Science Foundation under the MEDITERATRI Project (HRZZ UIP 05-2017-1046) granted to Lucija Šerić Jelaska and co-funded by the Department of Biology, Faculty of Science at the University of Zagreb. We are also thankful to the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Art (HAZU) for co-funding the research within the Croatian CryoEntoArk project (project number 10-102/324-247-2021).

Grant title

Neonicotinoids and Copper in the Mediterranean Agriculture – their effects on non-target invertebrates (MEDITERATRI Project (HRZZ UIP 05-2017-1046)).

Krio EntoArka – barkodiranje i pohrana DNA i tkiva ugroženih i zaštićenih kukaca u Hrvatskoj (10-102/324-247-2021).

Hosting institution

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science at the University of Zagreb.

Contributor Information

Lara Ivanković Tatalović, Email: lara.ivankovic@biol.pmf.hr.

Lucija Šerić Jelaska, Email: slucija@biol.pmf.hr.

Conflicts of interest

No conflict of interest to declare

Disclaimer: This article is (co-)authored by any of the Editors-in-Chief, Managing Editors or their deputies in this journal.

References

  1. Allegrucci Giuliana, Rampini Mauro, Di Russo Claudio, Lana Enrico, Cocchi Sara, Sbordoni Valerio. Phylogeography and systematics of the westernmost Italian Dolichopoda species (Orthoptera, Rhaphidophoridae) ZooKeys. 2014;437:1–23. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.437.7917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anđelić Dmitrović Barbara, Jelić Mišel, Rota Emilia, Šerić Jelaska Lucija. DNA barcoding of invertebrates inhabiting olive orchards and vineyards accelerates understudied Mediterranean biodiversity assessment. Diversity. 2022;14(3) doi: 10.3390/d14030182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anichtchenko Alexandre, Guéorguiev Borislav. Taxonomic notes on Pelor Bonelli, with description of a new species from Greece (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Zabrini) Biologia. 2009;64(5):937–941. doi: 10.2478/s11756-009-0144-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahlai Christine A., Xue Yingen, McCreary Cara M., Schaafsma Arthur W., Hallett Rebecca H. Choosing organic pesticides over synthetic pesticides may not effectively mitigate environmental risk in soybeans. PLOS One. 2010;5(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker Brian P., Green Thomas A., Loker Ali J. Biological control and integrated pest management in organic and conventional systems. Biological Control. 2020;140:e11250. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bank R. A., Neubert E. Checklist of the land and freshwater Gastropoda of Europe. Last update. 2020;July 16th, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barić B., Pajač Živković I. Suzbijanje prezimljujuće populacije jabukova savijača primjenom entomopatogenih nematoda. Fragmenta Phytomedica. 2020;34(5):23–31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boer Peter. Revision of the European ants of the Aphaenogastertestaceopilosa-group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Tijdschrift voor Entomologie. 2013;156(1):57–93. doi: 10.1163/22119434-00002022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Borowiec L., Salata S. Ants of Greece-checklist, comments and new faunistic data (Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Genus. 2012;23(4):461–563. [Google Scholar]
  10. Borowiec L. Catalogue of ants of Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and adjacent regions (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Genus. 2014;25(1/2):1–340. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bosmans R. Revision of the genus Zodarion Walckenaer, 1833, part II Western and Central Europe, including Italy (Araneae: Zodariidae) Bulletin-British Arachnological Society. 1997;10:265–294. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bourgoin, T FLOW (Fulgoromorpha Lists on The Web): a world knowledge base dedicated to Fulgoromorpha. http://hemiptera-databases.org/flow/ [2022-05-12T00:00:00+03:00]. http://hemiptera-databases.org/flow/
  13. Bračko, G Review of the ant fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Croatia. Acta Entomologica Slovenica. 2006;14:2. [Google Scholar]
  14. Brandmayr P., Brandmayr Zetto T. Parental behaviour and aspects of the biology of Carterus (Sabienus) calydonius Rossi and considerations on parental behaviour already reported on Carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Redia. 1974;55:143–175. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brock P. D. A photographic guide to Insects of Southern Europe & the Mediterranean. Pisces Publications; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  16. Science California Academy of. AntWeb. Version 8.42. https://www.antweb.org. [2022-03-23T00:00:00+02:00]. https://www.antweb.org.
  17. Canestrini G., Pavesi P. Araneidi italiani. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali. 1868;11(3):738–872. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cardenas M., Pascual F., Campos M., Pekar S. The spider assemblage of olive groves under three management systems. Environmental Entomology. 2015;44(3):509–518. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvv030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cárdenas Manuel, Ruano Francisca, García Pedro, Pascual Felipe, Campos Mercedes. Impact of agricultural management on spider populations in the canopy of olive trees. Biological Control. 2006;38(2):188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cardoso Pedro, Henriques Sérgio S., Gaspar Clara, Crespo Luis C., Carvalho Rui, Schmidt Jesper B., Sousa Pedro, Szűts Tamás. Species richness and composition assessment of spiders in a Mediterranean scrubland. Journal of Insect Conservation. 2007;13(1):45–55. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9116-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chimeno Caroline, Hausmann Axel, Schmidt Stefan, Raupach Michael J., Doczkal Dieter, Baranov Viktor, Hübner Jeremy, Höcherl Amelie, Albrecht Rosa, Jaschhof Mathias, Haszprunar Gerhard, Hebert Paul D. N. Peering into the darkness: DNA barcoding reveals surprisingly high diversity of unknown species of Diptera (Insecta) in Germany. Insects. 2022;13(1) doi: 10.3390/insects13010082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chukwuka Christian O., Ejere Vincent C., Asogwa Chinweike N., Nnamonu Emmanuel I., Okeke Ogochukwu C., Odii Elijah I., Ugwu Godwin C., Okanya Loretta C., Levi Chidinma A. Eco-physiological adaptation of the land snail Achatinaachatina (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) in tropical agro-ecosystem. The Journal of Basic & Applied Zoology. 2014;67(2):48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jobaz.2014.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cigliano M. M., Braun H, Eades D. C, Otte D. Orthoptera Species File. Version 5.0/5.0. http://Orthoptera.SpeciesFile.org http://Orthoptera.SpeciesFile.org
  24. Ciplak B., Willemse F., Chobanov D., Heller K. G. Systematic status and distributi-on of Eupholidoptera (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) in the Balkans (north of Central Greece) Articulata . 2007;22(1):33–46. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cuff Jordan P., Drake Lorna E., Tercel Maximillian P. T.G., Stockdale Jennifer E., Orozco‐terWengel Pablo, Bell James R., Vaughan Ian P., Müller Carsten T., Symondson William O. C. Money spider dietary choice in pre‐ and post‐harvest cereal crops using metabarcoding. Ecological Entomology. 2021;46(2):249–261. doi: 10.1111/een.12957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cuttelod A., Seddon M., Neubert E. European red list of non-marine molluscs. Publications Office of the European Union; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  27. de Jong Yde, Kouwenberg Juliana, Boumans Louis, Hussey Charles, Hyam Roger, Nicolson Nicola, Kirk Paul, Paton Alan, Michel Ellinor, Guiry Michael, Boegh Phillip, Pedersen Henrik, Enghoff Henrik, von Raab-Straube Eckhard, Güntsch Anton, Geoffroy Marc, Müller Andreas, Kohlbecker Andreas, Berendsohn Walter, Appeltans Ward, Arvanitidis Christos, Vanhoorne Bart, Declerck Joram, Vandepitte Leen, Hernandez Francisco, Nash Róisín, Costello Mark, Ouvrard David, Bezard-Falgas Pascale, Bourgoin Thierry, Wetzel Florian, Glöckler Falko, Korb Günther, Ring Caroline, Hagedorn Gregor, Häuser Christoph, Aktaç Nihat, Asan Ahmet, Ardelean Adorian, Borges Paulo, Dhora Dhimiter, Khachatryan Hasmik, Malicky Michael, Ibrahimov Shaig, Tuzikov Alexander, De Wever Aaike, Moncheva Snejana, Spassov Nikolai, Chobot Karel, Popov Alexi, Boršić Igor, Sfenthourakis Spyros, Kõljalg Urmas, Uotila Pertti, Gargominy Olivier, Dauvin Jean-Claude, Tarkhnishvili David, Chaladze Giorgi, Tuerkay Michael, Legakis Anastasios, Peregovits László, Gudmundsson Gudmundur, Ólafsson Erling, Lysaght Liam, Galil Bella, Raimondo Francesco, Domina Gianniantonio, Stoch Fabio, Minelli Alessandro, Spungis Voldermars, Budrys Eduardas, Olenin Sergej, Turpel Armand, Walisch Tania, Krpach Vladimir, Gambin Marie, Ungureanu Laurentia, Karaman Gordan, Kleukers Roy, Stur Elisabeth, Aagaard Kaare, Valland Nils, Moen Toril, Bogdanowicz Wieslaw, Tykarski Piotr, Węsławski Jan, Kędra Monika, M. de Frias Martins Antonio, Abreu António, Silva Ricardo, Medvedev Sergei, Ryss Alexander, Šimić Smiljka, Marhold Karol, Stloukal Eduard, Tome Davorin, Ramos Marian, Valdés Benito, Pina Francisco, Kullander Sven, Telenius Anders, Gonseth Yves, Tschudin Pascal, Sergeyeva Oleksandra, Vladymyrov Volodymyr, Rizun Volodymyr, Raper Chris, Lear Dan, Stoev Pavel, Penev Lyubomir, Rubio Ana, Backeljau Thierry, Saarenmaa Hannu, Ulenberg Sandrine. PESI - a taxonomic backbone for Europe. Biodiversity Data Journal. 2015;3 doi: 10.3897/bdj.3.e5848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. De Jong Y., Verbeek M., Michelsen V., Bjørn de Place, Los W., Steeman F., Penev L., et al. Fauna Europaea-all European animal species on the web. Biodiversity Data Journal. 2014;2 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.2.e4034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Deltshev C. A faunistic and zoogeographical review of the spiders (Araneae) of the Balkan Peninsula. Journal of Arachnology. 1999:255–261.
  30. Deltshev C., Naumova M., Matevski D., Indzhov S. New taxonomic and faunistic data on the genus Zodarion Walckenaer, 1826 (Araneae: Zodariidae) in the Balkans, with the descriptions of two new species. Zootaxa. 2022;5174(3):247–261. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.5174.3.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. De Mattia Willy, Pešic Vladimir. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Dalmatian and Montenegrin Tandonia: old issues solved and new problems arise (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Milacidae) Folia Malacologica. 2015;23(3):197–210. doi: 10.12657/folmal.023.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Di Franco F. New considerations about the gnaphosid fauna of Italy (Araneae: Gnaphosidae. Bulettin-British Arachnological Society. 1997;10:242–246. [Google Scholar]
  33. Drakšić M., Katušić L. Preliminary results on the spider (Araneae) fauna of NP Kornati (Croatia); Entomologica Croatica; XXII Symposium Internationale Entomofaunisticum Europae Centralis; Varaždin, Croatia. 2011. 13 [Google Scholar]
  34. Duque-Trujillo D., Hincapié C. A., Osorio M., Zartha-Sossa J. W. Strategies for the attraction and conservation of natural pollinators in agroecosystems: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s13762-022-04634-6. [DOI]
  35. Evenhuis N. L., Pape Thomas, Pont A. C. Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of diptera genus-group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Zootaxa. 2016;4172(1) doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Francuski Ljubinka, Ludoški Jasmina, Vujić Ante, Milankov Vesna. Phenotypic evidence for hidden biodiversity in the Merodonaureus group (Diptera, Syrphidae) on the Balkan Peninsula: conservation implication. Journal of Insect Conservation. 2011;15(3):379–388. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9311-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Franin K., Franin G. K., Maricic B., Marcelic S., Pavlovic M., Kos T., Laznik Z. True bugs (Heteroptera) assemblage and diversity in the ecological infrastructures around the Mediterranean vineyards. Bulletin of Insectology. 2021;74:65–78. [Google Scholar]
  38. Freude H., Harde K. W., Lohse G. A., Klausnitzer B. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Band 2. Adephaga. 1. Carabidae (Laufkäfer) Springe Spektrum; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  39. Froidevaux Jérémy S. P., Louboutin Bastien, Jones Gareth. Does organic farming enhance biodiversity in Mediterranean vineyards? A case study with bats and arachnids. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2017;249:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gajski Domagoj, Pekár Stano. Assessment of the biocontrol potential of natural enemies against psyllid populations in a pear tree orchard during spring. Pest Management Science. 2021;77(5):2358–2366. doi: 10.1002/ps.6262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Gasperini R. Prilog fauni dalmatinskih pauka (Araneae et Opiliones) Godisnij Izvejestaj vel. Real- ke Splitu . 1891:1–18.
  42. org. GBIF. GBIF.org: GBIF Home Page. https://www.gbif.org https://www.gbif.org
  43. Gnezdilov V. M., Holzinger W. E., Wilson M. R. The Western Palaearctic Issidae (Hemiptera, Fulgoroidea): an illustrated checklist and key to genera and subgenera. Trudy Zoologičeskogo Instituta RAN. 2014;318(S1):1–136. [Google Scholar]
  44. Godan D. Pest slugs and snails. Biology and control. Springer; Berlin: 1983. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Goidanich A. Studio delle forme liburniche del genere Carabus (Coleoptera Adephaga) e della loro distribuzione. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia Bologna. 1932;5:53–84. [Google Scholar]
  46. Grbac I., Katušić L., Lukić M. Catalogue of spiders (Araneae) deposited in the Croatian Natural History Museum. Natura Croatica. 2019;28(1) [Google Scholar]
  47. Griffiths H. I., Krystufek B., Reed J. M. Balkan biodiversity. Vol. 10. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gunstone Tari, Cornelisse Tara, Klein Kendra, Dubey Aditi, Donley Nathan. Pesticides and soil invertebrates: A hazard assessment. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.643847. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hammer Ø., Harper D. A., Ryan P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1):9. [Google Scholar]
  50. Happe Anne-Kathrin, Alins Georgina, Blüthgen Nico, Boreux Virginie, Bosch Jordi, García Daniel, Hambäck Peter A., Klein Alexandra-Maria, Martínez-Sastre Rodrigo, Miñarro Marcos, Müller Ann-Kathrin, Porcel Mario, Rodrigo Anselm, Roquer-Beni Laura, Samnegård Ulrika, Tasin Marco, Mody Karsten. Predatory arthropods in apple orchards across Europe: Responses to agricultural management, adjacent habitat, landscape composition and country. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2019;273:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.12.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Harz Kurt. Die Orthopteren Europas / The Orthoptera of Europe. The Hague; 1969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hippa Heikki, Vilkamaa Pekka, Heller Kai. Review of the Holarctic Corynoptera Winnertz, 1867, s. str. (Diptera, Sciaridae) Zootaxa. 2010;2695(1) doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.2695.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hochkirch A., et al. European red list of grasshoppers, crickets and bush-crickets. Publications Office of the EU 2016
  54. Hurka K. Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak republics. Print-centrum; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ichihara Minoru, Matsuno Kazuo, Inagaki Hidehiro, Saiki Chieko, Mizumoto Shunsuke, Yamaguchi Shou, Yamashita Masayuki, Sawada Hitoshi. Creation of paddy levees to enhance the ecosystem service of weed seed predation by crickets. Landscape and Ecological Engineering. 2015;11(1):227–233. doi: 10.1007/s11355-014-0254-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ivanković Tatalović Lara, Anđelić Barbara, Jelić Mišel, Kos Tomislav, A. Benítez Hugo, Šerić Jelaska Lucija. Fluctuating asymmetry as a method of assessing environmental stress in two predatory carabid species within Mediterranean agroecosystems. Symmetry. 2020;12(11) doi: 10.3390/sym12111890. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Jambrošić Vladić Željka, Benítez Hugo A., Pirnat Alja, Hristovski Slavčo, Jelaska Lucija Šerić. Variations in body shape of mountain habitat specialist Carabuscroaticus and its sister species Carabuscaelatus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) populations across Dinaric Alps. Zoomorphology. 2019;138(1):85–96. doi: 10.1007/s00435-018-0428-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Jambrošić Vladić Željka. Ekologija i biogeografija odabranih endemskih epigejskih vrsta trčaka (Coleoptera: Carabidae) dinarskog krša. University of Zagreb. Faculty of Science. Department of Biology; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  59. Jambrošić Vladić Željka, Šerić Jelaska Lucija. Long term changes (1990-2016) in carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in protected forests on Dinaric Karst on Mountain Risnjak, Croatia. European Journal of Entomology. 2020;117:56–67. doi: 10.14411/eje.2020.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jantscher E. Diagnostic characters of Xysticuscristatus, X.audax and X.macedonicus (Araneae: Thomisidae) Bulletin-British Arachnological Society. 2001;12(1):17–25. [Google Scholar]
  61. Jelaska Sven D., Nikolić Toni, Šerić Jelaska Lucija, Kušan Vladimir, Peternel Hrvoje, Gužvica Goran, Major Zoran. Terrestrial biodiversity analyses in Dalmatia (Croatia): A complementary approach using diversity and rarity. Environmental Management. 2010;45(3):616–625. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9437-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Katušić Luka. Pauci Hrvatske i analiza okolišne uvjetovanosti njihove rasprostranjenosti. University of Zagreb. Faculty of Science. Department of Biology; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kavvadias V., Koubouris G. In: Soil Fertility Management for Sustainable Development. Panpatte D., Jhala Y., editors. Springer; Singapore: 2019. Sustainable soil management practices in olive groves. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kenyeres Zoltán, Rácz István A., Varga Zoltán. Endemism hot spots, core areas and disjunctions in European Orthoptera. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia - Series B: Invertebrata. 2009;52(1):189–211. doi: 10.3409/azc.52b_1-2.189-211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Komnenov M. Checklist of spiders (Araneae) of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Uzizaž i Biospeld. 2010;5(2009):52–69. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kromp Bernhard. Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: a review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impacts and enhancement. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 1999;74:187–228. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00037-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kuntner M. A contribution to the knowledge of the Slovenian spider fauna: eleven species new for Slovenia and some other interesting findings (Arachnida, Araneae); Proceedings of the 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology; 16th European Colloquium of Arachnology; Siedlce, Slovenia. 1997. 8 [Google Scholar]
  68. Kurbalija Ana. Pregled entomofaune močvarnih staništa od međunarodnog značenja u Republici Hrvatskoj. Odjel za biologiju, Osijek; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  69. Lebas C., Galkowski C., Blatrix R., Wegnez P. Ants of Britain and Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; London: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  70. Löbl L., Löbl D. Archostemata-Myxophaga-Adephaga. Revised and Updated. Brill Academic Publishers; Leiden, Netherlands: 2017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Macfadyen A. Notes on methods for the extraction of small soil arthropods. The Journal of Animal Ecology. 1953:65–77. doi: 10.2307/1691. [DOI]
  72. Mathis Wayne N., Zatwarnicki Tadeusz. New Species and Taxonomic Clarifications for Shore Flies from the Delmarva States (Diptera: Ephydridae) Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington. 2010;112(1):97–128. doi: 10.4289/0013-8797-112.1.97. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Melichar L. Monographie der Issiden (Homoptera) National Agricultural Library; Maryland, USA: 1906. [Google Scholar]
  74. Eds. MolluscaBase., editor. MolluscaBase. https://www.molluscabase.org https://www.molluscabase.org
  75. Moreby S. J., Sotherton N. W., Jepson P. C. The effects of pesticides on species of non‐target Heteroptera inhabiting cereal fields in southern England. Pesticide Science. 1997;51(1):39–48. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199709)51:1<39::AID-PS611>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Morinière Jérôme, Balke Michael, Doczkal Dieter, Geiger Matthias F., Hardulak Laura A., Haszprunar Gerhard, Hausmann Axel, Hendrich Lars, Regalado Ledis, Rulik Björn, Schmidt Stefan, Wägele Johann‐Wolfgang, Hebert Paul D. N. A DNA barcode library for 5,200 German flies and midges (Insecta: Diptera) and its implications for metabarcoding‐based biomonitoring. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2019;19(4):900–928. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Muster C., Bosmans R., Thaler K. The Philodromus pulchellus-group in the Mediterranean: taxonomic revision, phylogenetic analysis and biogeography (Araneae: Philodromidae) Invertebrate Systematics. 2007;21(1):39–72. doi: 10.1071/IS06014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nentwig W., et al. Spiders of Europe. https://www.araneae.nmbe.ch. [2022-03-23T00:00:00+02:00]. https://www.araneae.nmbe.ch
  79. Nyffeler M., Sunderland K. D. Composition, abundance and pest control potential of spider communities in agroecosystems: a comparison of European and US studies. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2003;95(2-3):579–612. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00181-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Özdikmen H., Bal N., Coral Şahin D. New flea beetles records of Aphthona Chevrolat in Turkey (Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini. Munis Entomology & Zoology. 2018;13(2):395–400. [Google Scholar]
  81. Pantini Paolo, Isaia Marco. Araneae.it: the online Catalog of Italian spiders, with addenda on other Arachnid Orders occurring in Italy (Arachnida: Araneae, Opiliones, Palpigradi, Pseudoscorpionida, Scorpiones, Solifugae) Fragmenta Entomologica. 2019;51(2):127–152. doi: 10.4081/fe.2019.374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Picchi Malayka Samantha. Spiders (Araneae) of olive groves and adjacent semi-natural habitats from central Italy. Arachnologische Mitteilungen: Arachnology Letters. 2020;60(1):1–11. doi: 10.30963/aramit6001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Pintilioaie Alexandru-Mihai, Spaseni Petronel, Jurjescu Ana, Rădac Ioan Alexandru. First record of the alien mantid Hierodulatenuidentata (Insecta: Mantodea) in Romania. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa”. 2021;64(1):37–49. doi: 10.3897/travaux.64.e65489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Pisa L. W., Amaral-Rogers V., Belzunces L. P., Bonmatin J. M., Downs C. A., Goulson D., Kreutzweiser D. P., Krupke C., Liess M., McField M., Morrissey C. A., Noome D. A., Settele J., Simon-Delso N., Stark J. D., Van der Sluijs J. P., Van Dyck H., Wiemers M. Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015;22(1):68–102. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Previšić Ana, Graf Wolfram, Vitecek Simon, Kučinić Mladen, Bálint Miklós, Keresztes Lujza, Pauls Steffen U, Waringer Johann. Cryptic diversity of caddisflies in the Balkans: the curious case of Ecclisopteryx species (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny. 2014;72(3):309–329. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Ratnasingham Sujeevan, Hebert Paul D. N. BARCODING: bold: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org) Molecular Ecology Notes. 2007;7(3):355–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Ratnasingham Sujeevan, Hebert Paul D. N. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) System. PLOS One. 2013;8(7) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ricketts Taylor, Imhoff Marc. Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: Locating priority ecoregions for conservation. Conservation Ecology. 2003;8(2) doi: 10.5751/es-00593-080201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Rukavina I., Mrazović A, Kučinić M., Šerić Jelaska L. Assemblage, zoogeography and endangered status of carabid beetles in forest habitats of the Učka Nature Park. Entomologia Croatica. 2010;14(1-2):121–134. [Google Scholar]
  90. Samiayyan K. Spiders – The generalist super predators in agro-ecosystems. Integrated Pest Management. 2014:283–310. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-398529-3.00016-6. [DOI]
  91. Schowalter Timothy, Chao Jung-Tai. Canopy Insect Sampling. Measuring Arthropod Biodiversity. 2021:467–493. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-53226-0_18. [DOI]
  92. Seifert B. The ants of central and north Europe. lutra Verlags-und Vertriebsgesellschaft; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  93. Šerić Jelaska L., Vujčić-Karlo S, Durbešić P. Notes on the taxonomy of the genus Carabus L. (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Croatia. Acta entomologica Slovenica. Ljubljana. 2004;12:129–138. [Google Scholar]
  94. Šerić Jelaska L., Temunović M. Assessing the conservation status of lower course of Una river using records of Adephagan Coleoptera , editor. 9th European Congress of Entomology 2010
  95. Šerić Jelaska Lucija, Franjević Damjan, Jelaska Sven D., Symondson William O. C. Prey detection in carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in woodland ecosystems by PCR analysis of gut contents. European Journal of Entomology. 2014;111(5):631–638. doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Šerić Jelaska Lucija, Symondson W. O.C. Predation on epigeic, endogeic and anecic earthworms by carabids active in spring and autumn. Periodicum Biologorum. 2016;118(3):281–289. doi: 10.18054/pb.2016.118.3.4709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Šerić Jelaska L., Anđelić Dmitrović B., Ivanković Tatalović L., Rešetnik L. Meditera3. University of Zagreb Faculty of Science; 2022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Šerić Jelaska Lucija, Ivanković Tatalović Lara, Kostanjšek Fran, Kos Tomislav. Ground beetle assemblages and distribution of functional traits in olive orchards and vineyards depend on the agricultural management practice. BioControl. 2022;67(3):275–286. doi: 10.1007/s10526-022-10133-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Skejo Josip, Rebrina Fran, Szövényi Gergely, Puskás Gellért, Tvrtković Nikola. The first annotated checklist of Croatian crickets and grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Ensifera, Caelifera) Zootaxa. 2018;4533(1) doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4533.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Štamol V., Erőss Z. P., Kletečki E., Vuković M. Terrestrial snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of islands of Šolta, Drvenik veli and Drvenik mali (Croatia. Natura Croatica: Periodicum Musei Historiae Naturalis Croatici. 2017;26(1):45–64. doi: 10.20302/NC.2017.26.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Suwa M., Darvas B. Family Anthomyiidae. Papp L., Darvas B., editors. Contributions to a manual of Palaearctic Diptera Volume 3 1998
  102. Teofilova T. M. Pseudomaquises in SW Bulgaria as a habitat for the ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Zoology and Ecology. 2020;30(1):27–36. doi: 10.35513/21658005.2020.1.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  103. Trautner J., Geigenmüller K. Tiger beetles, ground beetles. Illustrated key to the Cicindelidae and Carabidae of Europe. J.Margraf Publishing; Aichtal: 1987. 488. [Google Scholar]
  104. Vigna Taglianti A. Fauna Europaea: Coleoptera, Carabidae. Fauna Europaea version 2.6. https://fauna-eu.org/ https://fauna-eu.org/
  105. Vujčić-Karlo S., Brigić A., Šerić Jelaska L., Kokan B., Hrašovec B. Crveni popis ugroženih vrsta trčaka (Coleoptera, Carabidae) u Hrvatskoj. Državni zavod za zaštitu prirode; Zagreb, Croatia: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  106. Welter-Schultes F. W. European non-marine molluscs, a guide for species identification. Planet Poster Editions; Goettingen, Germany: 2012. 757 [Google Scholar]
  107. Wiktor A. Endemism of slugs within the Balkan Peninsula and adjacent islands (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Arionidae. Milacidae, Limacidae, Agriolimacidae). Genus. 1997;8(1):205–221. [Google Scholar]
  108. Winnertz J. Beitrag zu einer Monographie der Sciarinen. Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft; Wien, Austria: 1867. [Google Scholar]
  109. Zicha O., et al. BioLib.cz. https://www.biolib.cz/ https://www.biolib.cz/

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Supplementary figure 1

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Figure of Ceratinellabrevipes (A) dorsal view; (B) dorsal view of pedipalp; (C) ventral view of pedipalp.

File: oo_774625.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s001.jpg (39.2KB, jpg)
Supplementary material 2

Supplementary figure 2

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Lateral view of Anthomyaliturata.

File: oo_774626.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s002.jpg (26.1KB, jpg)
Supplementary material 3

Supplementary figure 3

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Lateral view of Corynopteraperpusilla.

File: oo_774627.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s003.jpg (18.1KB, jpg)
Supplementary material 4

Supplementary figure 4

MEDITERATRI project team

Data type

Image

Brief description

Lateral view of Psilopaobscuripes.

File: oo_774628.jpg

bdj-11-e100963-s004.jpg (20.3KB, jpg)

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES