Abstract
Although carboxylate-based frameworks are commonly used architectures in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), liquid/glass MOFs have thus far mainly been obtained from azole- or weakly coordinating ligand-based frameworks. This is because strong coordination bonds of carboxylate ligands to metals block the thermal vitrification pathways of carboxylate-based MOFs. In this study, we present the example of carboxylate-based melt-quenched MOF glasses comprising Mg2+ or Mn2+ with an aliphatic carboxylate ligand, adipate. These MOFs have a low melting temperature (Tm) of 284 °C and 238 °C, respectively, compared to zeolitic-imidazolate framework (ZIF) glasses, and superior mechanical properties in terms of hardness and elastic modulus. The low Tm may be attributed to the flexibility and low symmetry of the aliphatic carboxylate ligand, which raises the entropy of fusion (ΔSfus), and the lack of crystal field stabilization energy on metal ions, reducing enthalpy of fusion (ΔHfus). This research will serve as a cornerstone for the integration of numerous carboxylate-based MOFs into MOF glasses.
Subject terms: Metal-organic frameworks, Inorganic chemistry
Many MOFs feature carboxylate ligands with strong coordination bonds, hindering thermal melting. Here, authors present a meltable carboxylate MOF designed with a thermodynamically favored component.
Introduction
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are coordination networks with potential pores in a well-ordered structure composed of metal ions and polydentate organic ligands1. Over the past few decades, the field of MOFs has significantly expanded because of their high designability and tunability2. Despite their various properties, the practical applications of MOFs are limited because of their crystalline powder nature and low processability3,4. To overcome the limitations of crystalline MOFs, efforts have been made to transform MOFs into more practical and versatile forms and shapes through integration with polymers, pelletization, and processing into beads5. Among these approaches, meltable MOFs have recently gained significant attention, as their liquid phase allows for molding without dependence on other materials6. Moreover, molten MOFs can generate a distinct type of material, MOF glasses via a melt-quenching process7,8. These glass structures retain the components of the original crystal and exhibit unique properties such as a monolithic manner9, enhanced ion conductivity9, transparency10, and luminescence11. They also have a distorted pore network distinct from the crystalline MOFs12.
To enable melting in a MOF, the MOF must have either a low melting temperature (Tm) or a high thermal decomposition temperature (Td) to satisfy the condition, Tm < Td (Fig. 1). This requirement arises from the fundamental concern that the average local coordination environment of the structures must be maintained while their long-range order is lost13,14. So far, studies on meltable MOFs have mostly focused on zeolitic-imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) with high Td owing to their thermally stable azole ligands, and coordination polymers (CPs) composed of phosphates, amides, and sulfonates, which form weak coordination bonds with metals, thereby lowering the Tm of the framework15,16.
Despite recent advancements in the MOF glass field, an important area that still need attention is the melting and vitrification of carboxylate-based MOFs, which constitute a significant majority of MOFs17. Most carboxylate-based MOFs decompose before vitrification owing to the strong bonds between carboxylate and metal centers, which elevate the Tm of the framework above its Td15,18. Extensive research has been conducted on carboxylate-based MOFs to date; however, to the best of our knowledge, no melting behavior has been reported among MOFs whose structures use purely carboxylates as ligands. Considering the active research on thermally decomposing MOFs to create nanomaterials, such as metal oxides and carbon, the absence of meltable carboxylate-based MOFs becomes even more surprising19. Given the recent discovery of the liquid and glassy states of MOFs, it is possible that earlier researchers in MOF deocomposition studies did not observe or recognize these states in carboxylate-based MOFs. Another possible factor is the prevalent strategies in reticular design. These strategies commonly involve using aromatic ligands to create well-ordered structures and metals with strong coordination bonds to form robust frameworks, resulting in higher crystallinity, porosity, and good stability in MOFs20,21. However, aromatic ligands have few conformations due to their rigid local structure and high symmetry properties, which do not provide entropic benefits for the melting of MOFs13,22. Furthermore, the strong metal-ligand bond directly contributes to increasing the MOF’s Tm, thus hindering its melting.
We introduce meltable carboxylate-based MOFs consisting of Mg2+ or Mn2+ ions and an aliphatic carboxylate linker, adipate (adp, −(OOC)(CH2)4(COO)−). Compared to aromatic carboxylate ligands, aliphatic carboxylate ligands have lower thermal stability and a higher degree of conformational freedom. The d0 and d5 configuration of metals may lead to a reduction in the thermal energy required for the breaking of metal-ligand bonds, owing to their low crystal field stabilization energy (CFSE), which is similar to d10 metals found in existing CP/ZIF glasses7,8,10,15. Additionally, the aliphatic carboxylate amplifies the gap in rotational entropy between the solid and liquid phases of MOFs compared to an aromatic linker, due to its ability to adopt numerous conformations in the liquid phase15,22. Simultaneously, the aliphatic linker may reduce the thermal stability of the framework. Based on these properties, we have previously demonstrated the thermal conversion of aliphatic ligand-based MOFs with low Td into hierarchically nanoporous metal oxides with nanocrystalline frameworks23.
Recently, there have been a few reports on the synthesis of carboxylate-based MOF glasses24–27. However, these studies differ from the present work. The starting materials for glasses in these reports were derived from hydrogen-bonded networks of the metal complexes or from disorder-induced frameworks created through dehydration. Certainly, adopting these approaches is a compelling strategy for synthesizing MOF glasses. These methods not only offer a facile synthesis process with substantial industrial potential but also the capability to vitrify thermally unstable frameworks. Nevertheless, achieving a molten phase in MOFs remains a notable challenge due to its potential to unlock unprecedented applications distinct from non-meltable frameworks. The presence of a liquid phase in MOFs introduces captivating possibilities, including the potential for unconventional structural evolution28, the creation of eutectic composites with other substances29, and the utilization of MOFs as matrix materials themselves30, contrasting with the conventional application of MOFs as solid additives31. Moreover, a fundamental understanding of meltable carboxylate-based MOFs may assist future studies aimed at imparting melt behavior to existing MOFs that have non-meltable properties.
While the existing approaches circumvent the thermodynamic challenges of carboxylate-based frameworks, the absence of a solid-liquid phase transition or Tm in crystalline carboxylate frameworks restricts the variety of reported liquid/glass MOFs27. Consequently, it has impeded the establishment of rational design principles for meltable MOF structures.
Here, we utilize the low Tm of the crystalline MOFs ([Mg4(adipate)4(DMA)(H2O)] = C-Mg-adp and [Mn2(adipate)2(DMA)] = C-Mn-adp) by controlling the enthalpy of fusion (ΔHfus) and the entropy of fusion (ΔSfus) to trigger their thermal transition into the liquid phase, creating the carboxylate-based MOF glasses (G-Mg-adp and G-Mn-adp, respectively). These adipate MOFs exhibit a high glass-forming ability (GFA), signifying their capacity to easily vitrify in their liquid state while preventing recrystallization. X-ray total scattering data and pair distribution functions (PDFs) confirmed that G-Mg-adp retains the connectivity between the carboxylate and metal ions. The mechanical properties of G-Mg-adp were characterized using nanoindentation and exhibited higher hardness (H) and elastic modulus (E) than those of the reported CP glasses.
Result
Materials preparation and characterization
The solvothermal reaction of Mg(NO3)2 ⋅ 6H2O and adipic acid in N,N’-dimethylacetamide (DMA) and methanol (MeOH) yielded block-shaped crystals of [Mg4(adipate)4(DMA)(H2O)]·5DMA·2MeOH·4H2O, C-Mg-adp23. In this structure, the coordination of carboxylate with Mg2+ forms the secondary building units (SBUs) of 1D infinite Mg–O chains along the b-axis, which are interconnected by adp ligands to generate the 3D porous network (Fig. 2a). The building units serve as the SBUs, creating helical 1D Mg-adp chains. The thermal stability of C-Mg-adp was monitored using thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) with a ramp rate of 10 °C min−1 under an inert atmosphere (Supplementary Fig. 1). The TGA trace reveals that after the initial weight loss corresponded to the guest and coordinated molecules, there is a subsequent rapid weight loss indicating MOF decomposition occurred around 320 °C (Td). Interestingly, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements for C-Mg-adp showed an endothermic peak before Td, ranging from 283–300 °C (Fig. 2b), indicating the melting transition of C-Mg-adp. The Tm of C-Mg-adp is 283 °C, which is higher than that of weakly coordinated networks but lower than that of ZIFs14,31. In the subsequent heating after cooling, the glass transition of melt-quenched Mg-adp (G-Mg-adp) was observed at 242 °C (Tg). The liquid fragility index (dynamical parameters) of G-Mg-adp calculated with Tg obtained from various heating rates (10–30 °C min−1) was 33, which implies that its flowing is hardly observed (Supplementary Fig. 2)7. The structural transformations of Mg-adp during melting were examined using X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and in-situ variation temperatures XRPD (VT-XRPD) (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). XRPD data shows that C-Mg-adp exhibits good crystallinity, matching the simulated pattern, whereas the melt-quenched G-Mg-adp only showed diffuse scattering peaks. Also, in-situ VT-XRPD data reveals that C-Mg-adp transition into dried structure begins to lose crystallinity around 225 °C and becomes completely amorphous after exceeding 265 °C.
Upon reaching its Tm, C-Mg-adp was melted and transformed into the glassy monolithic G-Mg-adp through rapid quenching in argon atmosphere (Fig. 2c, d). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed that after vitrification through cooling to room temperature, shards of G-Mg-adp display a smooth surface (Fig. 2e). These observations directly support the occurrence of thermal melting in C-Mg-adp, as indicated by the DSC data. Furthermore, the presence of spike-like and puffed shapes observed during annealing above Tg confirms the transition of Mg-adp into a viscous liquid state (Supplementary Figs. 5 and 6)32.
To confirm that G-Mg-adp had a composition identical to that of C-Mg-adp, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) and infrared (IR) spectroscopy were conducted (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8). The NMR spectrum indicated the presence of adipates after vitrification, and the IR spectrum confirmed that the carboxylate coordination bonds with metal ions were retained with redshift on v(COO-) vibration modes of G-Mg-adp. Thermogravimetric-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TG-GC-MS) analysis revealed that molten Mg-adp produces CO and cyclopentanone gases as partial decomposition products when exposed to its Tm for 3 h. Nevertheless, glass foams obtained after 3 h exhibited the IR peak that was completely consistent with G-Mg-adp, suggesting the persistence of Mg–adipate bonds despite partial decomposition (Supplementary Fig. 9).
The atomic connectivity and structural correlation in C-Mg-adp and G-Mg-adp were probed using X-ray total scattering data (I(Q)) and PDFs (G(r)) (Supplementary Figs. 10−12 and Fig. 3)12,33. I(Q) shows sharp Bragg peaks for C-Mg-adp, unlike G-Mg-adp, indicating the loss of the highly crystalline structure at G-Mg-adp. However, G(r) revealed that the local coordination environments (r < 5 Å) of G-Mg-adp were nearly identical to those of C-Mg-adp. This corresponds to the short-range bonds and correlations between the ligand and Mg ions. As shown in Fig. 3, peaks 1 and 2 in G(r) correspond to the C–O and C–C bond distances in one adipate ligand, and peak 3 corresponds to the Mg–O coordination bond. Notably, after melt-quenching process, a subtle increase in the bond distance is observed at the position of maximum intensity position for Mg–O (Peak 3), while the C–O distance (Peak 1) shortens at its peak. These results align with the occurrence of redshift in v(COO-) IR peaks after melt-quenching, indicating a weakening Mg–O bond strength34. Peak 4 corresponds well with the unconnected C⋯C distance and exhibit a slightly increase in G-Mg-adp, suggesting an expansion of the -O2C–CH2–CH2 bond angle in the adipate ligand during melting. Peak 5 and 6 are associated with C⋯Mg and Mg⋯Mg correlation distances, respectively. In a range of 4 – 5 Å, it is challenging to accurately attribute each peak to its specific origin because there are numerous correlations, but the main contributors are likely to be C⋯C, C⋯O, and O⋯O correlations (Supplementary Fig. 11)35. Overall, there is a slight increase in the Mg–O distance during the transformation from C-Mg-adp to G-Mg-adp, but the atomic correlation in local structures remains nearly the same for both. That is, the Mg-adipate connection maintains intact even after melt-quenching in C-Mg-adp.
Mechanical properties of G-Mg-adp
Understanding the mechanical properties of glassy materials is critical for designing and engineering glass-based products and providing insight into their structure-property relationships36. This has been assessed almost exclusively in ZIF glasses among coordination polymer glasses. Thus, we conducted a nanoindentation test on G-Mg-adp to understand the MOF glasses. This process involves pressing a small indenter into the surface of a sample and measuring the force and displacement during indentation. Using this, the load–depth curves of G-Mg-adp (Supplementary Fig. 13) were determined, resulting in the H and E, as depicted in Fig. 4a. G-Mg-adp shows values of H ≈ 1.18 ± 0.051 and E ≈ 18.29 ± 0.342 GPa, recording the highest values above the reported coordination polymer glasses (Supplementary Table 2 and Fig. 4b)16,37. Notably, while the hardness improves in proportion to Tg in conventional vitreous materials, G-Mg-adp exhibits higher hardness than ZIFs, even though its Tg is less than 50 °C compared to that of ZIFs (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 14). This result can be interpreted, with caution, as being caused by both the highly deformed network structure in G-Mg-adp (see the discussion section below) and the stronger coordination bond of G-Mg-adp compared to ZIF glasses38.
Table 1.
Samples | G-Mg-adp | ZIF-4 | TIF-4 | ZIF-62 | ZIF-76 | Adipic acid [a] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H (GPa) | 1.18 (± 0.051) | 0.92 (± 0.03) | 0.90 (± 0.06) | 0.656 (± 0.005) | 0.682 (± 0.01) | 0.3 |
E (GPa) | 18.29 (± 0.342) | 8.2 (± 0.2) | 7.9 (± 0.3) | 6.58 (± 0.02) | 6.29 (± 0.07) | 10.39 |
H/E (arb. u.) | 0.065 | 0.112 | 0.114 | 0.097 | 0.108 | 0.029 |
H2/E (GPa) | 0.076 | 0.103 | 0.102 | 0.065 | 0.074 | 0.0087 |
Tg (°C) | 242 | 292 | 343 | 318 | 310 | - |
Reference | This work | 12 | 12 | 38 | 38 | 47 |
[a] Values corresponding to the (110) face of adipic acid.
To compare the coordination bond strength in Mg-adp and ZIF-4, as a representative of meltable ZIFs, we conducted calculations by employing the ReaxFF reactive force field. The cluster models as well as crystal structure models for Mg-adp and ZIF-4 were constructed (Supplementary Fig. 16), from which the ligand was intentionally removed. In this system, the stabilization energy was calculated with the equation, ΔE = Etot – (EMOF+ + EL-) (Etot = total system energy; EMOF+ = energy of a charge MOF system; EL- = energy of a charged ligand), in which ΔE reflects the strength of metal−N or O coordinative bonds (Supplementary Table 3). For both models, ΔE of C-Mg-adp are larger negative values than those of ZIF-4, which means that coordination bonds in C-Mg-adp are stronger: an ΔE difference is approximately 4 and 57 kcal mol−1, in the cluster and crystal model, respectively. The crystal model was further optimized to investigate mechanical properties, specifically the bulk modulus related to the glass transition temperature. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the CASTEP package39,40. The results revealed that ZIF-4 exhibited a comparatively larger bulk modulus of 29.9 GPa, surpassing that of C-Mg-adp which shows a bulk modulus of 13.2 GPa. Our calculation shows similar results with previously reported classical simulations utilizing the ReaxFF reactive force field yielded similar results; however, only the bulk modulus defined by Reuss showed a trend consistent with DFT calculations (Supplementary Table 4)41. It is worth noting that all measures of bulk modulus for defect crystal structures at 300 K, which is the simulated structures of the glass MOF, consistently produced similar outcomes. Interestingly, Mg-adp with a defect displayed a negative value for the bulk modulus, indicating an easy glass transition and showing good agreement with the experimental results. The results also agree well with the higher ΔHfus and E values of G-Mg-adp42–44.
Higher hardness implies that the material is stronger; however, it can be easily fractured. Meanwhile, a higher H2/E ratio indicates greater external stress tolerance until fracture45. As shown in Table 1, G-Mg-adp demonstrated similar or higher H2/E values than those in previous studies, resulting in its enhanced strength and toughness over existing coordination polymer glasses. Compared to its originated organic ligand crystal of adipic acid, E and H of G-Mg-adp increased by about 1.6 and 3.7 times more than E(110)and H(110) of adipic acid crystal46, suggesting that MOF glass can contribute to advancing the yield strain.
Thermal Behavior of M-adp (M=Mn2+, Co2+, Tb3+)
The strong metal-carboxylate bond strength on C-Mg-adp is responsible for its high ΔHfus (134.5 kJ/mol), which is attributed to the strong coordination between metal ions and carboxylate ligands but the lack of CFSE character of magnesium cation may relieve the enthalpy gap between the framework and its dissociation form due to kinetically labile bonds47,48. To better understand the effect of CFSE and metal-ligand bond strength on MOF melting, we studied the thermal behavior of series of C-M-adp (M = Mn2+, Co2+, and Tb3+)49 upon heating (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Figs. 17–19). As shown in Fig. 5, only amorphization and decomposition were observed in C-Co-adp (Fig. 5e, f) and C-Tb-adp (Fig. 5h, i), while C-Mn-adp melted and transformed into G-Mn-adp during the cooling process (Fig. 5b, c). The DSC data indicated that C-Mn-adp exhibited Tm of 238 °C and Tg of 179 °C (Supplementary Fig. 20) Also, in-situ VT-XRPD of C-Mn-adp indicated the absence of the crystalline peak after 245 °C, showing a tendency consistent with the DSC results (Supplementary Fig. 21). Mn K-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements revealed that G-Mn-adp exhibits a structure with shorter Mn-Mn distance than C-Mn-adp, while maintain Mn-O and Mn-Mn distance within local structure of C-Mn-adp (Supplementary Fig. 22). The shorter Mn-Mn distance and TG-GC-MS data suggest partial decomposition in molten Mn-adp, while NMR data confirm that the adipate ligand remains in G-Mn-adp, even when Mn-adp exposed to Tm for 3 hours (Supplementary Figs. 23 and 24). These results imply that G-Mn-adp contains some unknown decomposition products that were not detected in the XRPD data.
The non-melting behavior of C-Co-adp and the low Tm of C-Mn-adp, as compared to C-Mg-adp, could partially be attributed to the CFSE47 and ion radius of the metal ions50. Moreover, the absence of melting in C-Tb-adp, which has a high oxidation number metal node, may be attributed to its high metal-ligand dissociation energy51. Besides the type of metal, various factors can influence the Tm of a MOF. The C-M-adp series features a similar 1D infinite M-O chain as the SBU; however, they do not have an isoreticular structure as carboxylate can have varying binding modes. Specifically, C-M-adp series, including Mg, mostly exhibits a 3D structure, while C-Mn-adp forms a 2D structure where the interconnection of SBUs extends only in the form of a sheet (Fig. 5a, d, and g). Since structural influences can be significant in the thermodynamic behavior of MOFs, a direct comparison of thermal trends between these series may be somewhat inaccurate. Nevertheless, the melting behavior of C-Mg-adp and C-Mn-adp can be compared to the tendency that most of the stable liquid CP/MOFs discovered so far contain d10 metal, suggesting that s-block and d5 metals can be candidates for meltable framework design15.
More important driving force for the low Tm of C-Mg-adp and C-Mn-adp is the larger entropic benefit resulting from the aliphatic moiety13,52. Aliphatic carboxylate ligands have many configurations in the liquid phase of the framework than aromatic carboxylates owing to their low symmetry value53–56. Additionally, the rotationally flexible alkyl chain moiety allows the transformation of the porous framework during heating, resulting in the formation of pore-collapsed structure that can reduce the residual ligand entropy in the solid phase (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 27)14,44,57.
Discussion
The glass-forming ability (GFA) of C-Mg-adp (Tg/Tm = 0.93) is much higher than that of most members of the ZIF family as well as the empirical prediction of the Kauzmann “2/3” law58, despite the fact that structurally comparable aliphatic amide-based networks have low GFAs, leading to recrystallization during cooling (Supplementary Fig. 28)14,58. This feature is due, in part, to the relatively strong coordinate bonds, which partially contribute to the stabilization of local structure in the molten phase of MOFs, resulting in a less fragile liquid59–62. In addition, the substantial flexibility of the aliphatic ligands in Mg-adp enables a high degree of deformation in C-Mg-adp structure, leading to the formation of a nonporous and dense phase upon the melting process. Since modulus and hardness are inversely proportional to porosity63,64, this structural deformation is one of the factors contributing to the harder mechanical properties of G-Mg-adp compared to ZIF glasses, which have ultramicroporosity after vitrification65. Moreover, the coordination polymer Mg-adp, constructed through the infinite connection between the aliphatic chain and the 1D chain SBU is reminiscent of an organic polymer. The melt-quenching process could enhance the mechanical properties of G-Mg-adp by inducing structure entanglement and high packing density, akin to what is observed in semicrystalline polymers66,67.
Furthermore, we observed that G-Mg-adp exhibited much higher water stability than C-Mg-adp (Supplementary Fig. 30). While C-Mg-adp rapidly degrades in a small amount of water, G-Mg-adp almost retains its shape and remains immersed even with an excess quantity of water. As revealed in the IR spectra, after soaking in water, the filtered G-Mg-adp (G-Mg-adp-h) maintains the coordination bond between Mg2+ and carboxylate. A red shift was observed in the v(COO-) modes of G-Mg-adp-h, but they revert to the original state after activation at 80 °C in a vacuum. Throughout the entire process, G-Mg-adp consistently maintains an amorphous states and does not undergo crystallization. The origin of the improved water stability in MOF through vitrification may be revealed through detailed structural analysis of G-Mg-adp, G-Mg-adp-h, and activated G-Mg-adp-h. However, a complete survey of these topics is beyond the scope of this paper. Nonetheless, since research on the distinctions in properties between crystals and glasses of CPs/MOFs is still in its infancy, further studies are needed to elucidate the structural transformations occurring during the melting process that influence the chemical stability of glasses.
In summary, we report the discovery of the carboxylate-based MOF glasses obtained via the melt-quenching of a crystalline 3D MOFs. The melting of C-Mg-adp and C-Mn-adp can likely be attributed the high entropy contribution of the aliphatic ligand and the low CFSE of the magnesium and manganese ions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that G-Mg-adp exhibits unique mechanical properties compared to ZIF glasses, owing to the relatively strong coordination bonds of the carboxylate group and its nonporous nature. These results provide valuable insights into the structure-property relationship of MOF glasses. Our study not only expands the range of liquid/glass MOF materials but also provides a promising approach for the development of meltable MOF structures based on carboxylate linkers, which are widely present in MOFs.
Methods
Thermal vitrification of C-M-adp
C-M-adp was hand-grinded before heating, to make bulk powder. The powder samples were placed into a crucible or on a slide glass. The prepared samples were put into a tube furnace and then heated at 10 °C min−1 under argon flow of 100 mL min−1. After reaching the target temperature of Tm or Td, the heating was stopped, and the samples were cooled down naturally under inert gas flow to room temperature.
Mechanical properties measurement
All measurement samples were prepared by placing C-Mg-adp powder between glass slides, clamping the slides with forceps, and then subjecting them to a 10-minute melting process under inert gas conditions. After quenching, the glass slides were separated. All hardness and elastic modulus data were measured by a nanoindenter from Anton-Paar with a Berkovich tip based on the Oliver-Pharr method. Maximum force (load) was 20 mN and a sinusoidal method (known as a continuous stiffness measurement method) was applied in order to measure the variations of hardness and elastic modulus with indentation depth. Since hardness and elastic modulus decreased in low indentation depth due to indentation size effect, their saturated values were selected as the representative values in Supplementary Table 2.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF-2020R1A2C3008908 and NRF-2019M3E6A1103980 to H.R.M.) and Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (2020R 1A 6 C 101B194 to H.R.M.).
Author contributions
M.K. and H.R.M. conceived the idea for the project. M.K. designed the experiments and performed the synthesis and characterization of the crystalline and glass MOFs. H.-S.L. and D.-H.S. analyzed the mechanical properties of the glass MOF under direction of E.-c.J.; S.J.C. simulated models for MOFs and calculated the coordination bond strength and mechanical properties of MOFs. M.K. and H.R.M. wrote the paper, and all the authors contributed to preparing the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Satoshi Horike and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this work are presented in the Letter and the Supplementary Information. Additional data are available on request from the corresponding authors. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Sung June Cho, Email: sjcho@chonnam.ac.kr.
Eun-chae Jeon, Email: jeonec@ulsan.ac.kr.
Hoi Ri Moon, Email: hoirimoon@ewha.ac.kr.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-45326-8.
References
- 1.Batten SR, et al. Coordination polymers, metal–organic frameworks and the need for terminology guidelines. CrystEngComm. 2012;14:3001. doi: 10.1039/c2ce06488j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science. 2013;341:1230444. doi: 10.1126/science.1230444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Horike S, Ma N, Fan Z, Kosasang S, Smedskjaer MM. Mechanics, ionics, and optics of metal-organic framework and coordination polymer glasses. Nano Lett. 2021;21:6382–6390. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bennett TD, Horike S. Liquid, glass and amorphous solid states of coordination polymers and metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018;3:431–440. doi: 10.1038/s41578-018-0054-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yeskendir B, et al. From metal–organic framework powders to shaped solids: recent developments and challenges. Mater. Adv. 2021;2:7139–7186. doi: 10.1039/D1MA00630D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang Y, et al. A MOF glass membrane for gas separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:4365–4369. doi: 10.1002/anie.201915807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bennett TD, et al. Hybrid glasses from strong and fragile metal-organic framework liquids. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8079. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Umeyama D, Horike S, Inukai M, Itakura T, Kitragawa S. Reversible solid-to-liquid phase transition of coordination polymer crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:864–870. doi: 10.1021/ja511019u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chen W, et al. Glass formation of a coordination polymer crystal for enhanced proton conductivity and material flexibility. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:5195–5200. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vaidya S, et al. Transparent and luminescent glasses of gold thiolate coordination polymers. Chem. Sci. 2020;11:6815–6823. doi: 10.1039/D0SC02258F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ail M, et al. Broad mid-infrared luminescence in a metal-organic framework glass. ACS Omega. 2019;4:12081–12087. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bennett TD, et al. Melt-quenched glasses of metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:3484–3492. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b13220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu M, et al. Network-forming liquids from metal–Bis (acetamide) frameworks with low melting temperatures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:2801–2811. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c11718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu M, et al. Designing glass and crystalline phases of metal–bis (acetamide) networks to promote high optical contrast. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:22262–22271. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c10449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma, N. & Horike, S. Metal–organic network-forming glasses. Chem. Rev.122, 4163–4203 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Yu Z, Tang L, Ma L, Hoirke S, Chen W. Recent progress of amorphous and glassy coordination polymers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022;469:214646. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ghasempour H, et al. Metal–organic frameworks based on multicarboxylate linkers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021;426:213542. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Healy C, et al. The thermal stability of metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020;419:213388. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213388. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee JH, Kim MH, Moon HR. Nanocomposite synthesis strategies based on the transformation of well-tailored metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Commun. 2021;57:6960–6974. doi: 10.1039/D1CC01989A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eddaoudi M, et al. Modular chemistry: secondary building units as a basis for the design of highly porous and robust metal−organic carboxylate frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001;34:319–330. doi: 10.1021/ar000034b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ding M, Cai X, Jiang H-L. Improving MOF stability: approaches and applications. Chem. Sci. 2019;10:10209–10230. doi: 10.1039/C9SC03916C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dannenfelser R-M, Yalkowsky SH. Estimation of entropy of melting from molecular structure: a non-group contribution method. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996;35:1483–1486. doi: 10.1021/ie940581z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim TK, et al. Nanoporous metal oxides with tunable and nanocrystalline frameworks via conversion of metal–organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:8940–8946. doi: 10.1021/ja401869h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yin Z, et al. Synergistic stimulation of metal–organic frameworks for stable super-cooled liquid and quenched glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:13021–13025. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c04532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xu W, et al. High-porosity metal-organic framework glasses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202300003. doi: 10.1002/anie.202300003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wei, Y.-S., Fan, Z., Luo, C. & Hoirke, S. Desolvation of metal complexes to construct metal–organic framework glasses. Nat. Synth. 10.1038/s44160-023-00412-5 (2023).
- 27.Chen M-Z, et al. Multi-stage transformations of a cluster-based metal-organic framework: perturbing crystals to glass-forming liquids that re-crystallize at high temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202305942. doi: 10.1002/anie.202305942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.León-Alcaide L, et al. Meltable, glass-forming, iron zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:11258–11264. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c01455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ma N, et al. Eutectic CsHSO4-coordination polymer glasses with superprotonic conductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:18619–18628. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c08624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hou J, et al. Metal-organic framework crystal-glass composites. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2580. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tuffnell JM, et al. Novel metal–organic framework materials: blends, liquids, glasses and crystal–glass composites. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:8705–8715. doi: 10.1039/C9CC01468C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bumstead AM, et al. Formation of a meltable purinate metal–organic framework and its glass analogue. Chem. Commun. 2023;59:732–735. doi: 10.1039/D2CC05314D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Farrow C, et al. PDFfit2 and PDFgui: computer programs for studying nanostructure in crystals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2007;19:335219. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/19/33/335219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Andreeva AB, et al. Soft mode metal-linker dynamics in carboxylate mofs evidenced by variable-temperature infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:19291–19299. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c09499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Meekel EG, Goodwin AL. Correlated disorder in metal–organic frameworks. CrystEngComm. 2021;23:2915–2922. doi: 10.1039/D1CE00210D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bansal, N. P. & Doremus, R. H. Handbook of glass properties (Elsevier, 2013).
- 37.Li S, et al. Mechanical properties and processing techniques of bulk metal–organic framework glasses. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:1027–1034. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b11357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Isotta E, Peng W, Balodhi A, Zevalkink A. Elastic moduli: a tool for understanding chemical bonding and thermal transport in thermoelectric. Mater. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202213649. doi: 10.1002/anie.202213649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Clark SJ, et al. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. fur Krist. —Cryst. Mater. 2005;220:567–570. doi: 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ruiz VG, Liu W, Zojer E, Scheffler M, Tkatchenko A. Density-functional theory with screened van der waals interactions for the modeling of hybrid inorganic-organic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;108:146103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.146103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Burtch NC, Heinen J, Bennett TD, Dubbeldam D, Allendorf MD. Mechanical properties in metal–organic frameworks: emerging opportunities and challenges for device functionality and technological applications. Adv. Mater. 2017;30:1704124. doi: 10.1002/adma.201704124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johnson W, Samwer K. A universal criterion for plastic yielding of metallic glasses with a (T/Tg)2/3 temperature dependence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;95:195501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tveryanovich YS. The relationship between microhardness and glass transition temperature of chalcogenide glasses. Glass Phys. Chem. 2022;48:243–247. doi: 10.1134/S1087659622040149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ma N, et al. Exploration of glassy state in Prussian blue analogues. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4023. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31658-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pintaude, G. Introduction of the Ratio of the Hardness to the Reduced Elastic Modulus for Abrasio. Tribology—Fundamentals and Advancements Ch. 7 (InTech, 2013).
- 46.Mishra MK, Varughese S, Ramamurty U, Desiraju GR. Odd–even effect in the elastic modulii of α, ω-alkanedicarboxylic acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:8121–8124. doi: 10.1021/ja402290h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ohara Y, et al. Formation of coordination polymer glass by mechanical milling: dependence on metal ions and molecular doping for H+ conductivity. Chem. Commun. 2018;54:6859–6862. doi: 10.1039/C8CC02399A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Smith RM, Martell AE, Motekaitis RJ. Prediction of stability constants. I. Protonation constants of carboxylates and formation constants of their complexes with class A metal ions. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1985;99:207–216. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)87970-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim TK, et al. Metal–organic frameworks constructed from flexible ditopic ligands: conformational diversity of an aliphatic ligand. N. J. Chem. 2013;37:4130–4139. doi: 10.1039/c3nj00812f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shannon RD. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A. 1976;32:751–767. doi: 10.1107/S0567739476001551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Moltved KA, Keep KP. The chemical bond between transition metals and oxygen: electronegativity, d-orbital effects, and oxophilicity as descriptors of metal–oxygen interactions. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123:18432–18444. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zheng Q, et al. Understanding glass through differential scanning calorimetry. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:7848–7939. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhao L, Yalkowsky SH. A combined group contribution and molecular geometry approach for predicting melting points of aliphatic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999;38:3581–3584. doi: 10.1021/ie990281n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mauro JC, Loucks RJ, Sen S. Heat capacity, enthalpy fluctuations, and configurational entropy in broken ergodic systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2010;133:164503. doi: 10.1063/1.3499326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Berthier L, Ozawa M, Scalliet C. Configurational entropy of glass-forming liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 2019;150:160902. doi: 10.1063/1.5091961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Stein SE, Brown RL. Estimation of normal boiling points from group contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994;34:581–587. doi: 10.1021/ci00019a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gould SL, Tranchemontagne D, Yaghi OM, Garcia-Garibay MA. Amphidynamic character of crystalline MOF-5: Rotational dynamics of terephthalate phenylenes in a free-volume, sterically unhindered environment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:3246–3247. doi: 10.1021/ja077122c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kauzmann W. The nature of the glassy state and the behavior of liquids at low temperatures. Chem. Rev. 1948;43:219–256. doi: 10.1021/cr60135a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Qiao A, et al. A metal-organic framework with ultrahigh glass-forming ability. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaao6827. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Angell CA. The old problems of glass and the glass transition, and the many new twists. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:6675–6682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tanaka H. Relationship among glass-forming ability, fragility, and short-range bond ordering of liquids. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2005;351:678–690. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.01.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hou J, et al. Halogenated metal–organic framework glasses and liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:3880–3890. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Luo J, Stevens R. Porosity-dependence of elastic moduli and hardness of 3Y-TZP ceramics. Ceram. Int. 1999;25:281–286. doi: 10.1016/S0272-8842(98)00037-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Stepniewska M, et al. Observation of indentation-induced shear bands in a metal−organic framework glass. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:10149–10154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000916117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Frentzel-Beyme L, et al. Quantification of gas-accessible microporosity in metal-organic framework glasses. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:7750. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35372-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Langley NR, Polmanteer KE. Relation of elastic modulus to crosslink and entanglement concentrations in rubber networks. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1974;12:1023–1034. doi: 10.1002/pol.1974.180120601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pawlak A. The entanglements of macromolecules and their influence on the properties of polymers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019;220:1900043. doi: 10.1002/macp.201900043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this work are presented in the Letter and the Supplementary Information. Additional data are available on request from the corresponding authors. Source data are provided with this paper.