Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2024 Jan 2;96(2):615–619. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03980

Speeding-up the Determination of Protein–Ligand Affinities by STD NMR: The Reduced Data Set STD NMR Approach (rd-STD NMR)

Gabriel Rocha , Jonathan Ramírez-Cárdenas , M Carmen Padilla-Pérez , Samuel Walpole §, Ridvan Nepravishta §,, M Isabel García-Moreno , Elena M Sánchez-Fernández , Carmen Ortiz Mellet , Jesús Angulo †,§,*, Juan C Muñoz-García †,*
PMCID: PMC10853903  PMID: 38165272

Abstract

graphic file with name ac3c03980_0003.jpg

STD NMR spectroscopy is a powerful ligand-observed NMR tool for screening and characterizing the interactions of small molecules and low molecular weight fragments with a given macromolecule, identifying the main intermolecular contacts in the bound state. It is also a powerful analytical technique for the accurate determination of protein–ligand dissociation constants (KD) of medium-to-weak affinity, of interest in the pharmaceutical industry. However, accurate KD determination and epitope mapping requires a long series of experiments at increasing saturation times to carry out a full analysis using the so-called STD NMR build-up curve approach and apply the “initial slopes approximation”. Here, we have developed a new protocol to bypass this important limitation, which allows us to obtain initial slopes by using just two saturation times and, hence, to very quickly determine precise protein–ligand dissociation constants by STD NMR.


NMR has become a powerful tool to monitor intermolecular interactions and characterize the structural and dynamic features of recognition processes at different levels of complexity.1,2 A significant number of NMR approaches have been developed and applied with remarkable success to different systems, particularly those involving receptor–ligand interactions of biological interest. Saturation transfer difference NMR (STD NMR) spectroscopy35 is one of the most powerful and versatile NMR techniques used to accurately determine affinities and analyze binding epitope mappings, especially in the case of weak protein–ligand interactions, having increasing application in both academic research and the pharmaceutical industry (e.g., for fragment-based drug discovery, FBDD).

At the molecular level, the biological activity of drugs on macromolecular receptors (usually proteins) is determined by the structural and energetic characteristics governing the formation of the receptor–ligand complex. Therefore, there is great interest in the pharmaceutical industry in new approaches to accurately and rapidly determine the typically weak affinities of protein fragments (hits) for FBDD. The acquisition of full STD build-up curves is essential to obtaining accurate binding epitopes and dissociation constants.6 However, in those cases where full STD NMR build-up analysis cannot be carried out (e.g., limitations in protein availability and/or stability), a single saturation time titration experiment will provide an upper limit of the dissociation constant.7 It is also worth noting that, for small molecule screening purposes, it is generally sufficient to perform single saturation time titration experiments since, normally, the ranking of compounds is more relevant at this stage than the accurate detemination of thermodynamic constants.

STD NMR intensities are proportional to the fraction of bound ligands in solution,8 but it is the monitoring of parameters proportional to the fraction of bound protein in titration experiments which can be used to determine target-ligand binding affinities. Mayer and Meyer proposed a conversion of STD intensities to amplification factors (STD-AF) by multiplying the observed STD by the molar excess of ligand over protein (ε):4

graphic file with name ac3c03980_m001.jpg 1

As we previously demonstrated, differences in 1H T1 relaxation time constants at long saturation times along with fast rebinding effects within the relaxation time scale can have a strong impact on the determination of affinities.6 To remove the effects of these factors, ligand binding epitopes and protein–ligand dissociation constants (KD) have to be determined by monitoring STD NMR initial slopes (STD0)6,9,10 obtained from full STD build-up curves (STD initial growth rates). In this way, following the amplification factors determined from initial slopes (STD-AF0) over a series of titrations, it is possible to construct an isotherm that can be mathematically fit to the law of mass action equation11

graphic file with name ac3c03980_m002.jpg 2

where STD-AF0 is the STD initial slope (STD0) multiplied by the molar excess of ligand over protein (ε). Eq 2 yields both the equilibrium dissociation constant, KD, and the proportionality parameter β.

One of the well-known main drawbacks of employing the initial slope approximation for KD determination is the typically long experimental times required. This can become an insurmountable problem for samples prone to degradation with time. To get accurate initial slopes from a nonlinear saturating hyperbolic STD build-up curve, typically six to nine data points are required to properly sample both the initial growth (e.g., starting at 0.5, 0.75, and 1 s) as well as the plateau (up to 6 to 8 s) of the curve. In addition, the full build-up curve has to be acquired for at least five to six ligand concentrations constituting the different abscissa data points in the binding isotherm. Thus, for instance, for an isotherm of six ligand concentrations and six saturation times for each build-up curve, the KD determination by STD NMR can take roughly 2 to 3 days (note that, for the smallest ligand concentrations and saturation times, more scans and, hence, experimental time is required to obtain an interpretable spectra).

As STD NMR signals arise from intermolecular (protein–ligand) NOEs, we found inspiration in previous NOE data analysis that demonstrated a simplification of the analytical procedure by expanding the linear range of NOE build-up from 1D, 2D NOESY, and exchange experiments.12,13 Further, it is well established that transverse relaxation rates (R2) can be calculated with good accuracy by applying linearization and using two data points only instead of acquiring 16 to 32 data points to fit the corresponding exponential equation.14

In this work, we propose a new analytical approach, the reduced data set STD NMR (rd-STD NMR), to significantly reduce the large experimental time (e.g., 2 to 3 days) required for KD determination by STD NMR (e.g., to 12 to 24 h). Our approach allows a savings of 60 to 80% of NMR experimental time and associated costs. Recently, Monaco et al. reported a new STD NMR method for the determination of protein–ligand dissociation constants based on chemical shift imaging and a concentration gradient of the small molecule.7 This imaging STD NMR protocol has the advantage of requiring one sample only and reducing the experimental time by approximately 80%. However, setting up the imaging STD NMR method requires more sophisticated sample preparation (i.e., the density of protein and ligand buffers have to be optimized, and the diffusion coefficient of the ligand must be determined) and data analysis (nonstandard spectra processing is required), which may seem tedious for standard NMR users. Further, high throughput analysis of tens to hundreds of fragment molecules would require significant steps of optimization. On the contrary, the rd-STD NMR protocol presented herein allows preservation of the ease of automatization and simplicity of sample preparation, STD NMR experimental acquisition, and spectra analysis, allowing also the savings of up to 80% of experimental time.

Results and Discussion

The Reduced-Data Set rd-STD NMR Approach: Apparent STD Initial Slopes from Linearized Analysis

Our new approach is based on the monoexponential description of the accumulation of the STD signal as a function of the saturation time:

graphic file with name ac3c03980_m003.jpg 3

where STD (tSAT) is the observed STD intensity at a given saturation time (tSAT), STDMAX is the maximum STD intensity, and kSAT is the saturation transfer constant. From eq 3, STDMAX and kSAT parameters are obtained by least-squares fitting of the experimental curve. The initial growth rate of the STD build-up curve (STD0) is defined as

graphic file with name ac3c03980_m004.jpg 4

By applying the Napierian logarithm (ln) transformation to eq 3, it can be rearranged as a linear equation:

graphic file with name ac3c03980_m005.jpg 5

where kSAT is the slope of the straight line between two points (STDMAX and STD(tSAT)) and STDMAX can be approximated by measuring the STD intensity at a sufficiently long saturation time (STDLONG). Application of the two-point linearized form of the STD NMR initial slope approximation represented by eq 5 is what we call the reduced data set STD NMR approach (rd-STD NMR), as only two experimental data points are needed to determine the initial slope (STD0, eq 4; STD-AF0, eq 2). In this way, measuring a sufficiently long saturation time STD (STDLONG, assumed to be the asymptotic STDMAX value) and a sufficiently short saturation time STD (STDSHORT, assumed to be at the growing section of the build-up curve), the apparent initial slope can be approached by

graphic file with name ac3c03980_m006.jpg 6

Such an rd-STD NMR approximation constitutes a novel analytical protocol to accelerate the determination of ligand binding epitopes and protein–ligand dissociation constants. Here, we demonstrate, for five different protein–ligand complexes, that the rd-STD NMR approach can determine, in a much faster way than traditional STD NMR analysis, ligand binding epitopes and KD values that are highly similar to those obtained by the traditional full curve method (similar to calorimetry values).

Validation of the rd-STD NMR Approach 1: Analysis of Single-Ligand Concentration Apparent Initial Slope Data (STDapp0). Structural Information from Binding Epitope Mapping

To validate the efficiency of the rd-STD NMR protocol to significantly reduce the experimental time required for binding epitope mapping determination, we studied the binding of the α-glucosidase enzyme with an sp2-iminosugar glycomimetic ligand (ESF45, Figure 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mathematically fitted STD NMR build-up curve of ESF452 binding to α-glucosidase using (A) all saturation times and (B) the new rd-STD NMR approach using only 0.75 and 6 s as data points. (C) STD binding epitope mapping: STD relative values for each ESF452 proton obtained using the full build-up curve initial slopes method (black dots and line), the new rd-STD NMR approach with STDSHORT of 0.5, 0.75, 1 and 2 s (red, blue, green and violet dots and line, respectively) and STDLONG of 6 s, and STD relative values from a single saturation (0.75 s; golden points and line). (D) Binding epitope mappings of ESF452 binding to α-glucosidase were obtained by the three different methods.

For each proton of the ESF452 ligand, eq 6 was used to obtain the value of STDapp0, using STDLONG as the STD intensity at a 6 s saturation time and STDSHORT at 0.75 s. In Figure 1A and B, we compare the mathematically fitted (following eq 3) STD NMR build-up curves of ESF452 using both a full data set (1A; six data points from 0.5 to 6 s of saturation time) and a reduced data set (1B, 0.75 and 6 s), and the STD0 values of each proton were calculated using both approaches.

Figure 1C shows a comparison of the resulting binding epitope mappings of ESF452 using different approximations. The rd-STD NMR approach, using a tSHORT of 0.75 s (Figure 1C, blue line; Figure 1D-2), gave almost identical values to those obtained using the traditional full build-up curves (Figure 1C, black line; Figure 1D-1), with an average difference of 1%. Using the rd-STD NMR protocol with a tSHORT larger than 1 s can result in STDSHORT values close to the asymptotic value STDMAX, leading to very large errors in the determination of kSAT and, hence, the STDapp0 values (see eq 6; Figure 1C, violet line). Importantly, the use of a single saturation time (0.75 s) led to a binding epitope mapping deviating much more significantly from the full build-up curve results (Figure 1C, golden line, Figure 1D-3) than using the rd-STD NMR approach with a tSHORT of 0.75 s.

To test the performance of the rd-STD NMR approach on different samples, three other α-glucosidase-sp2-iminosugar complexes were subjected to the same type of analysis (ligands ESF7, MG277, ONJ, Supporting Information Figures S3, S4, and S5), further validating that the rd-STD NMR approach leads to binding epitope mappings that are almost identical to the much more time demanding full STD build-up curve approximation.

Validation of the rd-STD NMR Approach 2: Analysis of Apparent Initial Slope Data (STDapp0) from Ligand Titration Experiments. Affinity Determination (KD) from Binding Isotherms

The great advantage of rd-STD NMR over the traditional approach really comes into play when the latter involves long experimental times, for instance, when determining dissociation constants. For example, while using the traditional build-up curve to construct the protein–ligand binding isotherm can lead to data sets exceeding 30 experiments and 2–3 days of experimental time (e.g., six data points per ligand concentration, and five ligand concentrations), with the rd-STD NMR approach each isotherm data point can be constructed from as few as two experiments, drastically reducing the total experimental time. To further validate the accuracy of the rd-STD NMR approach, we determined the dissociation constant of a well-known system such as the methyl-β-d-galactoside (β-Gal-OMe) bound to agglutinin 120 from Ricinus communis (RCA120) and compared it with the value obtained from the analysis of full build-up curves. This sample was chosen because of its robustness, high sensitivity, and high spectral dispersion with respect to other carbohydrates. Previous calorimetric titration studies at 293 K reported a KD of 260 μM for the binding of β-Gal-OMe to RCA120.4,15

The magnitudes of the apparent dissociation constants determined from the traditional analysis of full build-up curves and the rd-STD NMR approach are shown in Figure 2 (see also Supporting Information Table S1, Table S3, and Figure S8). Using the full curves, a KD of 271 μM was obtained, while with the rd-STD NMR approach, using a tSHORT of 0.75 s and a STDLONG at 6 s as saturation times, we obtained a value of 262 μM. This result strongly supports that the rd-STD NMR approach is as accurate as the full build-up curve method, yet requiring only a fraction of the experimental time. For our system, the full build-up curves procedure required a total of 44 h of data acquisition, while only 16 h was needed using the novel rd-STD NMR analytical approach, reducing, therefore, the experimental time by more than 60%. Further, we compared those results with a KD determined using one single saturation time only at each ligand concentration to construct the binding isotherm. The results showed that a single saturation time approach leads to much higher errors compared to the full curves and the rd-STD NMR approach (Supporting Information Table S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of the KD values obtained using one saturation time only (green bars) and the rd-STD-AF0 approach (orange bars) for the RCA120-galactoside complex. The KD values obtained by calorimetry4,15 and by STD NMR using full build-up curves are shown as red and blue lines, respectively. The KD obtained using the rd-STD NMR approach at 0.75 s is almost identical to the values obtained from calorimetry and from full build-up curves.

To apply the rd-STD NMR approach, STD NMR spectra at two different saturating times must be employed. Following eq 6, one of the data points must be at sufficiently long saturation times to approximate to STDMAX (STDLONG, typically 6 or 8 s is a good approximation given typical ranges of T1 values of small medium molecules),16 ensuring the plateau of the build-up curve has been reached. The other data point to consider, STDSHORT, should correspond to a saturation time low enough to account for the growth of the STD intensity. The drawback of using very low saturation times (e.g., 0.25–0.5 s) is that it can lead to large errors during integration of STD spectra, for systems producing very weak STD intensities. On the contrary, if tSHORT is too large (above 1 s), STD values can become very similar to STDLONG, leading to very large errors in the determination of STDapp0. From our experience, we propose using 0.75 s as the best compromise for tSHORT (eq 6).

Conclusions

STD NMR spectroscopy is a uniquely suited ligand-observed NMR technique to characterize weak affinity protein–ligand binding and dissociation constants. However, a major drawback comes from the usually long experimental times required. Herein, we report a new approach, based on a reduced data set analysis using only two STD NMR data points instead of the full STD build-up curve, which reduces the experimental time by more than 60%. Our new rd-STD NMR method allows obtainment of binding epitope mappings and KD values that are almost identical to those obtained by the classical full curves approach. We believe rd-STD NMR represents an important step forward in the form of a very powerful approach for academic and industrial settings for fast and accurate characterization of the structural and energetic features governing the formation of weak protein-fragment complexes. We foresee rd-STD NMR making a significant contribution to boost the characterization of target-hit binding features (shorter time required for epitope mapping and KD determination), being a key step in fragment-based drug discovery.

Acknowledgments

J.A., J.R.-C., and G.R. acknowledge the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación for funding through the grants PID2019-109395GB-I00 and PID2022-142879NB-I00. J.R.-C. also acknowledges the associated scholarship PRE2020-092754. J.A. and R.N. acknowledge support of BBSRC, grant BB/P010660/1. S.W. was funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Norwich Research Park Doctoral Training Grant BB/M011216/1. J.C.M.-G. thanks the European Commission for a HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF grant (Sweet2Gel, ID 101064251). This work was supported by grants from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion and the European Regional Development Funds: AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (PID2019-105858RB-I00 to C.O.M and PID2022-141034OB-C21 to E.M.S.-F. and C.O.M). M.C.P.-P. is an FPU fellow (Grant number FPU19/04361). E.M.S.-F. thanks the VII Plan Propio de Investigación y Transferencia from the University of Seville (VIIPPIT-2022-V.1, Modality A2). Technical assistance from the research support services of the University of Seville (CITIUS) is also acknowledged.

Data Availability Statement

We have developed a Web site, which is freely available, to quickly obtain the dissociation constant using both the Langmuir isotherm and the law of mass action, as well as the values of the ligand epitope mapping. Researchers interested in using the Web site should first contact the corresponding authors to request access to it. The Web site is accessible via the following link https://stdrdweb.streamlit.app/.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c03980.

  • The materials and methods section, which includes the description of the synthesis of compounds, sample preparation, and NMR experiments; 1H and 13C NMR spectra and binding epitopes of the ligands and the values of dissociation constants; the raw STD NMR data, which includes the integrated intensities of the STD spectra and the fitted parameters of the STD NMR build-up curves (PDF)

Author Contributions

These authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ac3c03980_si_001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

References

  1. Calle L. P.; Canada F. J.; Jimenez-Barbero J. Application of NMR Methods to the Study of the Interaction of Natural Products with Biomolecular Receptors. Nat. Prod Rep 2011, 28 (6), 1118–1125. 10.1039/c0np00071j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Quintana J. I.; Atxabal U.; Unione L.; Ardá A.; Jiménez-Barbero J. Exploring Multivalent Carbohydrate–Protein Interactions by NMR. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2023, 52 (5), 1591–1613. 10.1039/D2CS00983H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mayer M.; Meyer B. Characterization of Ligand Binding by Saturation Transfer Difference NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38 (12), 1784–1788. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mayer M.; Meyer B. Group Epitope Mapping by Saturation Transfer Difference NMR To Identify Segments of a Ligand in Direct Contact with a Protein Receptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123 (25), 6108–6117. 10.1021/ja0100120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meyer B.; Peters T. NMR Spectroscopy Techniques for Screening and Identifying Ligand Binding to Protein Receptors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42 (8), 864–890. 10.1002/anie.200390233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Angulo J.; Enríquez-Navas P. M.; Nieto P. M. Ligand–Receptor Binding Affinities from Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) NMR Spectroscopy: The Binding Isotherm of STD Initial Growth Rates. Chemistry – A European Journal 2010, 16 (26), 7803–7812. 10.1002/chem.200903528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Monaco S.; Angulo J.; Wallace M. Imaging Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) NMR: Affinity and Specificity of Protein–Ligand Interactions from a Single NMR Sample. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145 (30), 16391–16397. 10.1021/jacs.3c02218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Angulo J.; Nieto P. M. STD-NMR: Application to Transient Interactions between Biomolecules-a Quantitative Approach. Eur. Biophys J. 2011, 40 (12), 1357–1369. 10.1007/s00249-011-0749-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mayer M.; James T. L. NMR-Based Characterization of Phenothiazines as a RNA Binding Scaffold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (13), 4453–4460. 10.1021/ja0398870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Angulo J.; Díaz I.; Reina J. J.; Tabarani G.; Fieschi F.; Rojo J.; Nieto P. M. Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) NMR Spectroscopy Characterization of Dual Binding Mode of a Mannose Disaccharide to DC-SIGN. Chembiochem 2008, 9 (14), 2225–2227. 10.1002/cbic.200800361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maass T.; Ssebyatika G.; Brückner M.; Breckwoldt L.; Krey T.; Mallagaray A.; Peters T.; Frank M.; Creutznacher R. Binding of Glycans to the SARS CoV-2 Spike Protein, an Open Question: NMR Data on Binding Site Localization, Affinity, and Selectivity. Chemistry – A European Journal 2022, 28 (71), e202202614 10.1002/chem.202202614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Macura S.; Ernst R. R. Elucidation of Cross Relaxation in Liquids by Two-Dimensional N.M.R. Spectroscopy. Mol. Phys. 1980, 41 (1), 95–117. 10.1080/00268978000102601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Juranic N.; Zolnai Z.; Macura S. Two-Dimensional Exchange Spectroscopy Revisited: Accounting for the Number of Participating Spins. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society 2000, 65, 285–301. 10.2298/JSC0006285J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cavanagh J.; Fairbrother W. J.; Palmer A. G.; Rance M.; Skelton N. J.. Chapter 8 - Experimental NMR Relaxation Methods. In Protein NMR Spectroscopy, second ed.; Cavanagh J., Fairbrother W. J., Palmer A. G., Rance M., Skelton N. J., Eds.; Academic Press: Burlington, 2007; pp 679–724. 10.1016/B978-012164491-8/50010-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sharma S.; Bharadwaj S.; Surolia A.; Podder S. K. Evaluation of the Stoichiometry and Energetics of Carbohydrate Binding to Ricinus Communis Agglutinin: A Calorimetric Study. Biochemical journal 1998, 333 (3), 539–542. 10.1042/bj3330539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kemper S.; Patel M. K.; Errey J. C.; Davis B. G.; Jones J. A.; Claridge T. D. W. Group Epitope Mapping Considering Relaxation of the Ligand (GEM-CRL): Including Longitudinal Relaxation Rates in the Analysis of Saturation Transfer Difference (STD) Experiments. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 203 (1), 1–10. 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ac3c03980_si_001.pdf (1.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

We have developed a Web site, which is freely available, to quickly obtain the dissociation constant using both the Langmuir isotherm and the law of mass action, as well as the values of the ligand epitope mapping. Researchers interested in using the Web site should first contact the corresponding authors to request access to it. The Web site is accessible via the following link https://stdrdweb.streamlit.app/.


Articles from Analytical Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES