Antimicrobial resistance is an urgent global public health threat, as approximately 700,000 deaths annually can be attributed to antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections, and this figure is expected to reach 10 million deaths/year by 2050, a number that greatly exceeds the number of deaths resulting from cancer [1,2,3].
The widespread use of antimicrobials in clinical and community settings, as well as in livestock and crop production, is considered one of the main drivers of the phenomenon of antimicrobial resistance [4,5,6]. As a results, over the years, an increased incidence of bacterial resistance has been observed, beginning with the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which has rapidly become the most frequently occurring resistant pathogen, with it being identified in many parts of the world, including Europe [7,8]. A more recent issue is the increasing prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae all over the world, further limiting treatment options [9,10]. Among the pathogens with growing multidrug resistance, the WHO has included the ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species), against which new antibiotics are urgently needed [11,12,13].
In 2015, the WHO developed an action plan to combat antimicrobial resistance, and this plan includes several strategic objectives, such as to improve the awareness and understanding of antimicrobial resistance; to strengthen knowledge and evidence-based guidelines through surveillance and research; to optimize the use of antimicrobials in humans and animals; and to develop the economic case for sustainable investment in new medicines and other interventions to meet the needs of all countries [14,15].
Against this backdrop, this Special Issue includes original articles and reviews that provide insights into antibiotic resistance as well as the development of strategies to counter it, such as surveillance studies of bacterial strains, which may help to alleviate public health concerns, and the search for alternative compounds as potential antimicrobial agents. This Editorial highlights the key findings derived from the published manuscripts.
Mirabela Romanescu’s article (contribution 1) is a systematic review that describes antimicrobial resistance and its main determinants, the modality by which the issue has been globally addressed, and the potential of essential oils as an alternative or auxiliary therapy option. The authors focused on the pathogenesis, mechanisms of resistance, and activities of several essential oils against the six high priority pathogens listed by WHO in 2017 [16]. Lastly, the authors evidenced the need for standardized techniques for analyzing the antimicrobial activities of essential oils, given the heterogeneity of the research designs and techniques used in different studies.
The article by Yin-Chao Tong et al. (contribution 2) is a prevalence study on feline-derived ESBL Escherichia coli and their resistance to antibiotics that considers the potential risk of transmission of this pathogen to humans, especially between pets and their owners; this study investigated the presence of ESBL genes in feline-derived E. coli strains in different areas of China.
Jurgita Aksomaitiene’s article (contribution 3) provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance and the genetic relatedness of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from broiler products, cattle, wild birds, and human feces via whole-genome sequencing and core-genome MLST techniques. In particular, the authors revealed a potential transmission route for C. jejuni between humans and animals, alongside the presence of multiple gene mutations responsible for antimicrobial resistance in C. jejuni genomes, suggesting that Campylobacters in Lithuania have been exposed to selective pressure, mainly in the form of antimicrobial use.
The article by Sattaporn Weawsiangsang et al. (contribution 4) demonstrates that hydroquinine, a compound derived from extracts of Tetrigona apicalis, had bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against several human clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including multidrug-resistant strains. Interestingly, molecular docking analysis and studies of gene expression patterns suggested arginine deiminase -pathway-related proteins as the potential molecular target of hydroquinine in eliciting its antimicrobial effects towards multidrug-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa.
The discovery of novel formulations for use as antibacterial agents is of great importance to fight not only P. aeruginosa [17,18,19], recognized as one of the greatest threats to human health, but also other emerging resistant pathogens, such as Chlamydiae [20,21,22,23,24,25]. In this regard, Marisa Di Pietro et al. (contribution 5) discovered that olive oil polyphenol-based formulations were effective against C. trachomatis, known as the leading cause of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases worldwide. In particular, the formulations were effective against chlamydial elementary bodies, responsible for the transmission and dissemination of the infection and, hence, for the development of chronic complications such as infertility.
Antimicrobial resistance has grown into a serious global menace that impacts not only humans but also animals and plants, and given this backdrop, Yin-Chao Tong’s article (contribution 2) is important, as it evidences the garlic oil’s ability to increase the susceptibility of feline-derived ESBL E. coli to cefquinome. Mizuki Kusumoto et al. (contribution 6) employed a pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics approach to establish appropriate treatment regimens for Flomoxef, an oxacephem antibiotic used in humans, against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales in dogs. This study demonstrated that dosage regimens of 40 mg/kg Flomex every 6 and 8 h can be a non-carbapenem treatment for canine infections of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis, but not for Enterobacter cloacae. The article by JeongWoo Kang et al. (contribution 7) is a bioequivalence study on the generic tulathromycin products extensively utilized in veterinary medicine for treating respiratory infections in cattle and swine due to its broad-spectrum activity against a range of Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and atypical bacteria. This study demonstrates the bioequivalence of four generic tulathromycin products (Tulaject, Tulagen, Toulashot, and T-raxxin) compared to a reference product, Draxxin, using a statistical program for pharmacokinetic parameters. Lastly, Yue Zou’s article (contribution 8) systematically reviews the application of benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives in the discovery of new agrochemicals, summarizing their antibacterial, fungicidal, antiviral, herbicidal, and insecticidal activities. This paper discusses the structural–activity relationship and mechanism of action of these active compounds, aiming to provide new insights and inspiration for the discovery of new pesticides.
Overall, this Special Issue showcases a collection of relevant topics related to the One Health Approach to tackle the overlapping effects antimicrobial resistance is having on human and animal health, agriculture and food, and the environment.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
List of Contributions
Romanescu, M.; Oprean, C.; Lombrea, A.; Badescu, B.; Teodor, A.; Constantin, G.D.; Andor, M.; Folescu, R.; Muntean, D.; Danciu, C.; et al. Current State of Knowledge Regarding WHO High Priority Pathogens—Resistance Mechanisms and Proposed Solutions through Candidates Such as Essential Oils: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119727.
Tong, Y.-C.; Li, P.-C.; Yang, Y.; Lin, Q.-Y.; Liu, J.-T.; Gao, Y.-N.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Jin, S.; Qing, S.-Z.; Xing, F.-S.; et al. Detection of Antibiotic Resistance in Feline-Origin ESBL Escherichia coli from Different Areas of China and the Resistance Elimination of Garlic Oil to Cefquinome on ESBL E. coli. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119627.
Aksomaitiene, J.; Novoslavskij, A.; Malakauskas, M. Whole-Genome Sequencing-Based Profiling of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes and Core-Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing of Campylobacter jejuni from Different Sources in Lithuania. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16017. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242116017.
Weawsiangsang, S.; Rattanachak, N.; Jongjitvimol, T.; Jaifoo, T.; Charoensit, P.; Viyoch, J.; Ross, S.; Ross, G.M.; Baldock, R.A.; Jongjitwimol, J. Hydroquinine Inhibits the Growth of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa via the Suppression of the Arginine Deiminase Pathway Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241813914.
Di Pietro, M.; Filardo, S.; Mattioli, R.; Bozzuto, G.; Molinari, A.; Mosca, L.; Sessa, R. Extra Virgin Olive Oil-Based Formulations: A “Green” Strategy against Chlamydia trachomatis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241612701.
Kusumoto, M.; Jitsuiki, M.; Motegi, T.; Harada, K. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of the Oxacephem Antibiotic Flomoxef against Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales from Dogs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021105.
Kang, J.; Chae, H.; Jeong, S.; Pervin, R.; Hossain, M.A. Evaluation of Biological Equivalence for Generic Tulathromycin Injections in Cattle. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16262. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242216262.
Zou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Song, H.; Cai, Q.; Wang, S.; Yi, C.; Chen, J. Research Progress of Benzothiazole and Benzoxazole Derivatives in the Discovery of Agricultural Chemicals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310807.
Funding Statement
This research received no funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.O’Neill J. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations. 2014. [(accessed on 22 January 2024)]. Available online: https://amr-review.org/Publications.html.
- 2.Aslam B., Wang W., Arshad M.I., Khurshid M., Muzammil S., Rasool M.H., Nisar M.A., Alvi R.F., Aslam M.A., Qamar M.U., et al. Antibiotic resistance: A rundown of a global crisis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018;11:1645–1658. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S173867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Inoue H. Strategic approach for combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR) Glob. Health Med. 2019;1:61–64. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2019.01026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aslam B., Khurshid M., Arshad M.I., Muzammil S., Rasool M., Yasmeen N., Shah T., Chaudhry T.H., Rasool M.H., Shahid A., et al. Antibiotic Resistance: One Health One World Outlook. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11:771510. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.771510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Endale H., Mathewos M., Abdeta D. Potential Causes of Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance and Preventive Measures in One Health Perspective—A Review. Infect. Drug Resist. 2023;16:7515–7545. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S428837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu S., Yang B., Wang Z., Liu Y. Augmented dissemination of antibiotic resistance elicited by non-antibiotic factors. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023;262:115124. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Guo Y., Song G., Sun M., Wang J., Wang Y. Prevalence and Therapies of Antibiotic-Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020;10:107. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abebe A.A., Birhanu A.G. Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Drug Resistance Development and Novel Strategies to Combat. Infect. Drug Resist. 2023;16:7641–7662. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S428103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wilson H., Török M.E. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Microb. Genom. 2018;4:e000197. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Husna A., Rahman M.M., Badruzzaman A.T.M., Sikder M.H., Islam M.R., Rahman M.T., Alam J., Ashour H.M. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases (ESBL): Challenges and Opportunities. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2937. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11112937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.World Health Organization . Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. [(accessed on 22 January 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017. [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Oliveira D.M.P., Forde B.M., Kidd T.J., Harris P.N.A., Schembri M.A., Beatson S.A., Paterson D.L., Walker M.J. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020;33:e00181. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00181-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Venkateswaran P., Vasudevan S., David H., Shaktivel A., Shanmugam K., Neelakantan P., Solomon A.P. Revisiting ESKAPE Pathogens: Virulence, resistance, and combating strategies focusing on quorum sensing. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023;13:1159798. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1159798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.World Health Organization Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. 2015. [(accessed on 22 January 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763.
- 15.Willemsen A., Reid S., Assefa Y. A review of national action plans on antimicrobial resistance: Strengths and weaknesses. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2022;11:90. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01130-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.World Health Organization WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics are Urgently Needed. 2017. [(accessed on 22 January 2024)]. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/bacteria-antibiotics-needed/en/
- 17.Varponi I., Ferro S., Menilli L., Grapputo A., Moret F., Mastrotto F., Marin O., Sandrelli F. Fighting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of D-Q53 CecB, a Synthetic Analog of a Silkworm Natural Cecropin B Variant. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:12496. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li H., Maimaitiming M., Zhou Y., Li H., Wang P., Liu Y., Schäberle T.F., Liu Z., Wang C.Y. Discovery of Marine Natural Products as Promising Antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mar. Drugs. 2022;20:192. doi: 10.3390/md20030192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bondareva N.E., Sheremet A.B., Morgunova E.Y., Khisaeva I.R., Parfenova A.S., Chernukha M.Y., Omran F.S., Emelyanenko A.M., Boinovich L.B. Study of the Antibacterial Activity of Superhydrophilic and Superhydrophobic Copper Substrates against Multi-Drug-Resistant Hospital-Acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25:779. doi: 10.3390/ijms25020779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Di Pietro M., De Santis F., Schiavoni G., Filardo S., Sessa R. Resveratrol in Chlamydia pneumoniae-induced foam cell formation and interleukin-17A synthesis. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2013;27:509–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Di Pietro M., Filardo S., De Santis F., Mastromarino P., Sessa R. Chlamydia pneumoniae and oxidative stress in cardiovascular disease: State of the art and prevention strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;16:724–735. doi: 10.3390/ijms16010724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hakala E., Hanski L., Uvell H., Yrjönen T., Vuorela H., Elofsson M., Vuorela P.M. Dibenzocyclooctadiene lignans from Schisandra spp. selectively inhibit the growth of the intracellular bacteria Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Antibiot. 2015;68:609–614. doi: 10.1038/ja.2015.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hanski L., Vuorela P. Lead Discovery Strategies for Identification of Chlamydia pneumoniae Inhibitors. Microorganisms. 2016;4:43. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms4040043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Filardo S., Di Pietro M., Tranquilli G., Sessa R. Biofilm in Genital Ecosystem: A Potential Risk Factor for Chlamydia trachomatis Infection. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2019;2019:1672109. doi: 10.1155/2019/1672109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kohlhoff S., Hammerschlag M.R. In Vitro Activity of Nafithromycin (WCK 4873) against Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021;65:e0058521. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00585-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
