Abstract
Background—We evaluated whether the oral intake of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) in association with alpha lipoic acid (ALA), magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D can improve the resorption of subchorionic hematoma in cases of threatened miscarriage. Methods—In this study, we enrolled 56 pregnant women with threatened miscarriage (i.e., subchorionic hematomas, pelvic pain/uterine contractions, and/or vaginal bleeding) between the 6th and the 13th week of gestation. They were treated with vaginal progesterone (200 mg/twice a day) (control group; n = 25) or vaginal progesterone plus oral 200 mg HMWHA, 100 mg ALA, 450 mg magnesium, 2.6 mg vitamin B6, and 50 mcg vitamin D (treatment group; n = 31; DAV®-HA, LoLi Pharma srl, Rome, Italy). An ultrasound scan was performed at the first visit (T0) and after 7 days (T1) and 14 days (T2) until hematoma resorption. Results—At the ultrasound scan, the treatment group showed faster resorption of the subchorionic hematoma compared with the control group, both at T1 (control group 140 (112–180), treated group 84 (40–112), p < 0.0031), and T2 (control group: 72 (48–112), treated group: 0 (0–0), p < 0.0001). Moreover, subjective symptoms, such as vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and uterine contractions, showed a faster decrease in the treatment group than in the control group. Conclusions—The association may more rapidly improve the resolution of threatened miscarriage and related symptoms compared to the standard local protocol.
Keywords: threatened miscarriage, HMWHA, subchorionic hematoma, resorption, vaginal bleeding
1. Introduction
Threatened miscarriage is a widespread early and common pregnancy complication, occurring in about 20–25% of pregnancies [1], and unfortunately can lead to early pregnancy loss.
It is estimated that about one-fifth of pregnant women with threatened miscarriage have a sub-chorionic hematoma, defined as a collection of blood between the chorionic membrane and the uterine wall [2]. Small and medium-sized subchorionic hematomas typically regress, while large ones can become larger and strip at least 30–40% of the placenta away from the endometrium, resulting in compressing the gestational sac and promoting spontaneous abortion [3]. The etiopathogenesis of SCH is yet to be fully elucidated; however, immunological factors, autoimmune diseases, pre-existing medical conditions, infections, history of recurrent pregnancy loss, and uterine malformations are believed to be predisposing factors [4]. Moreover, it seems that SCH is correlated with abnormalities of the maternal immune regulation, associated with the dysfunction and dysregulation of the cytokines expression at the maternal–fetal interface, which can affect the crosstalk between the maternal decidual stromal cells and the fetal trophoblastic cells [4]. A persistence of SCH may correlate with subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes, including not only early and late pregnancy loss but also preterm labor (PTB) and premature rupture of membranes (PROM). Therefore, faster resolution of SCH is necessary to improve pregnancy outcomes [5,6].
Currently, no specific therapy is available to treat SCH; therefore, new strategies are necessary to improve the clinical outcomes.
Nutrition may have an important role in supporting physiological pregnancy, and several nutrients, such as alpha lipoic acid (ALA), magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D, are often required and recommended to support pregnancy [7,8,9], even in the case of SCH [10,11].
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is the major non-protein component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and consists of repeating disaccharide chains of N-acetyl-glucosamine and glucuronic acid [12]. Many of HA’s effects are orchestrated by binding to one or more specific cell receptors or by forming a complex extracellular matrix incorporating other proteoglycans/proteins [13].
Despite its simple linear structure, HA has multiple functions correlated with its molecular weight, which can vary from very low molecular weight (<10 kDa), low molecular weight (100–500 kDa), to high molecular weight (>500 kDa) [14]. While low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid has pro-inflammatory properties [15], HMWHA demonstrates anti-inflammatory properties [16]. In recent years, HA has gained more attention in different branches of medicine without contraindications. Particularly, the investigation of HMWHA and its role throughout the gestational period has been an increasing area of investigation over the past 30 years [17,18,19,20].
HMWHA is present in various fluids and tissues of the reproductive system of humans, such as the stromal structures of the uterus and placenta; the angiogenic regions of decidua basalis; cumulus cells; cervical mucus; and oviductal, uterine, and follicular fluid [18]. Its physiological presence in the extracellular matrix of all the main organs and tissues involved in pregnancy indicates the importance of this molecule for a successful pregnancy.
The growth, proliferation, and differentiation of endometrial cells in the first phase of pregnancy represent the beginning of decidualization. This process, governed by LH and progesterone, is the result of significant changes in endometrium cells in preparation for pregnancy [19].
In the literature, there is no direct correlation between HMWHA and subchorionic SCH resorption. Nevertheless, as aforementioned, SCH can be correlated with abnormalities of the maternal immune regulation associated with the dysfunction and dysregulation of the cytokines expression at the maternal–fetal interface, which can affect the crosstalk between the maternal decidual stromal cells (DSCs) and the fetal trophoblastic cells (EVT). A study by Yang et al. observed, for example, a higher proportion of autoantibodies in women with SCH than in those without (45.35% vs. 21.51%, p = 0.000) [20].
Both DSCs and EVT express HA, and previous studies observed a low expression of HMWHA in DCSs and EVT obtained from miscarriages, compared with the levels of HMWHA observed in normal pregnancies [21,22].
HMWHA is highly expressed in the early stages of pregnancy and plays a role in the formation of the DSC maternal interface, where it stimulates immunomodulation by cell differentiation (e.g., T-naïve into Treg) [23] and decidual macrophages into M2 by CD44 activation of PI3K/Akt-STAT-3/STAT-6 signaling pathways [22]. Moreover, HMWHA induces the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, or inhibits the expression of pro-inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α or IFN-γ [24], which are usually associated with a higher risk of threatened miscarriage [25].
Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate if the use of oral HMWHA in association with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D (whose combination has already been tested in the case of SCH [11]) can improve the outcome of pregnancies with threatened miscarriage by promoting subchorionic hematoma resorption.
2. Materials and Methods
The study was conducted as a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study. This clinical trial was a sub-pilot study of the ClinicalTrials.gov study identification number NCT04874285, approved by the Ethics Committee Alma Res (reference number n. 05/2021). This study was carried out between May 2021 and September 2022, and all procedures were in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki.
The enrolled subjects were randomized into two groups according to a 1:1 ratio through a generator of random and unrepeated numbers that produced different numeric sequences with initials specific to both the study arms. To avoid the lack of blindness affecting the study and representing a limit to its success, the randomization was carried out by a physician who did not participate in the study nor had contact with any patient. Regarding sample size, since no prior literature has assessed the role of HMWHA in association with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D in SCH, we devised this study as a pilot trial. Patients with the following inclusion criteria were enrolled: (i) singleton pregnancy, (ii) maternal age of ≥18 and ≤50 years, (iii) gestational age between the 6th and 13th week, and (iv) threatened miscarriage. Patients with the following exclusion criteria were excluded from the study: (i) multiple pregnancy, (ii) the presence of gestation pathologies (arterial hypertension, maternal autoimmune diseases, antiphospholipid syndrome), and (iii) treatment with anti-hypertensive and anti-coagulant drugs. A total of 56 pregnant women who were eligible according to inclusion criteria and who agreed to participate in the study were enrolled. All patients provided written informed consent. Patients in the control group (n = 25) included pregnant women supplemented with vaginal suppositories of P4 (200 mg twice a day) as standard local protocol; patients in the treatment group (n = 31) included pregnant women supplemented with the same dosage of P4 (200 mg twice a day) plus oral HMWHA (200 mg) in combination with ALA (100 mg), magnesium (450 mg), vitamin B6 (2.6 mg), and vitamin D (50 mcg) (DAV®-HA, Lo.Li pharma s.r.l, Rome, Italy). At least three ultrasounds were performed for each woman—at the time of diagnosis of SCH (T0), after 7 days from the first ultrasound scan (T1), and after 14 days from the first ultrasound scan (T2)—and scans continued until the complete resolution of SCH. A total of 3 patients discontinued the study (2 in the control group and 1 in the treatment group because of miscarriage). A total of 53 patients (n = 23 in the control group and n= 30 in the treatment group) completed the study and were included in the final analysis (Figure 1).
2.1. Sonographic Visualization of a Subchorionic Hematoma
All images of the SCH were obtained using a GE Voluson S8 ultrasound system with transvaginal probe GE (frequency range of 4.0–10.0 MHz) (GE HealthCare, Milan, Italy). SCH was defined as a fluid collection visualized on ultrasound between the gestational sac and the uterine wall. Hematoma resorption during the treatment was calculated by measuring the size of the hematoma at T0 and T1, with the average values compared. During the ultrasound appointment, patients were routinely asked about the presence of vaginal bleeding or cramping symptoms. The ultrasounds were performed by a physician who did not participate in the study and did not usually have contact with patients, thus avoiding biases.
2.2. Primary and Secondary Outcomes
The primary outcome of the study was the reduction/disappearance of subchorionic hematoma. The secondary outcome was the reduction of maternal subjective symptoms such as pelvic pain, vaginal bleeding, and uterine contractions.
3. Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed using SAS® (Version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive analyses of quantitative data are presented in means of mean, standard deviation, standard error, median, 25th and 75th percentiles, minimum, and maximum. Qualitative variables are presented in terms of frequency distributions. Pearson’s Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact Test was applied to analyze the different % composition of qualitative variables related to symptoms between the two groups; McNemar’s Test was used to evaluate the different % composition over time of qualitative variables related to symptoms; because of the non-normality distribution of quantitative variables, the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the variation of the extension of SCH between groups; Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to analyze variation of hematoma resorption over time compared to T0. The level of statistical significance was set below p = 0.05. Data for hematoma resorption are presented in the text as median value [25th percentile–75th percentile].
4. Results
A total of 56 pregnant women with a gestational age between the 6th and 13th week and threatened miscarriage were enrolled at the beginning of the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment group and the control group in terms of demographic and baseline characteristics, such as age, weight, gestational age, previous cesarean section, and previous miscarriages (Table 1).
Table 1.
Control Group (n = 25) |
Treatment Group (n = 31) |
p Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 32.0 ± 2.5 | 32.6 ± 3.8 | 0.46 |
Weight (kg) | 61.2 ± 6.8 | 61.2 ± 7.3 | 0.99 |
Gestational age (weeks) | 8.3 ± 1.0 | 8.6 ± 0.9 | 0.41 |
Parity | 11 (44%) | 16 (52%) | 0.60 |
Previous cesarean section | 3 (12%) | 4 (13%) | 1.00 |
Previous miscarriage | 8 (32%) | 9 (29%) | 1.00 |
At T0, the extension of the SCH was comparable between cases and controls.
Between T1 and T2, there were three total dropouts because of miscarriage: two cases in the control group and one case in the treatment group. The incidence of miscarriage was higher in the control group compared to the treatment group; however, this was not statistically significant. (8% vs. 3.2%, respectively).
The improvement of SCH significantly occurred in both groups over the time compared to T0, as shown in Figure 2, but the time required for healing was different: the treatment group (HMWHA in association with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D) exhibited a significant and faster reduction of the subchorionic hematoma area (mm2) compared with the control group both at T1 (control group 140 (112–180), treated group 84 (40–112), p < 0.0031) and T2 (control group: 72 (48–112), treated group: 0 (0–0), p < 0.0001) (Figure 3).
Concerning the symptoms such as vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and uterine contractions, the changes in these parameters from the baseline (T0) to the following medical controls (T1, T2) are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Symptoms | T0 | T1 | T2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ctrl Group n (%) |
Treat. Group n (%) |
Ctrl Group n (%) |
Treat. Group n (%) |
Ctrl Group n (%) |
Treat. Group n (%) |
|
Vag. bleed. | 15 (65%) | 14 (47%) | 10 (43%) # | 1(3%) *** ### | 2 (8.7%) ### | 0 |
Abd. pain | 23 (100%) | 30 (100%) | 14 (61%) ## | 9 (30%) * ### | 7 (30%) ### | 1 (3%) ** ### |
Uter. Contr. | 23 (100%) | 30 (100%) | 21 (91%) | 12 (40%) *** ### | 12 (52%) ### | 0 |
Abbreviation: ctrl = control; vag. bleed. = vaginal bleeding; abd. = abdominal, uter. contr. = uterine contractions. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. ctrl (Fisher’s Exact Test). # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 ### p < 0.001 vs. T0 (McNemar’s Test).
5. Discussion
Our study highlighted that in case of threatened miscarriage, the oral supplementation of HMWHA in association with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D induces a more rapid SCH absorption compared to only vaginal suppositories of P4 at both T1 (p < 0.0031) and T2 (p < 0.0001). Moreover, related symptoms, such as vaginal bleeding (43% of the control group vs. 3% of the treatment group, *** p < 0.001 at T1), abdominal pain (61% of the control group vs. 30% of the treatment group, * p < 0.05 at T1; 30% of the control group vs. 3% of the treatment group, ** p < 0.01 at T2), and uterine contractions (91% of the control group vs. 40% of the treatment group, *** p < 0.001 at T1) decreased faster and disappeared in the treatment group compared with the control group, thus improving quality of life of pregnant women.
Recently, vaginal and/or oral administration of ALA in association with vitamin D, magnesium, and vitamin B6 was used to improve the outcome of pregnancy in women with SCH [10,11]. It was observed that in the treatment group, the speed of resorption of subchorionic hematoma was significantly superior compared to controls. The treatment decreased all symptoms more rapidly and, in some cases, completely removed all symptoms compared to those observed in the control group.
ALA is a natural antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory molecule that decreases the secretion of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-17) and stimulates the release of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [26,27].
Vitamin D induces a wide range of beneficial effects on pregnancy outcomes and preservation of the uterine quiescence because of its immunological actions [28]. Magnesium is one of the ten essential metals in humans, and its supplementation during pregnancy correlates with a reduced risk of fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia [29]. Vitamin B6 supplementation during pregnancy and lactation is common practice, and it has been demonstrated that its supplementation reduces nausea and vomiting in pregnant women [30].
Despite its role in female reproductive biology and the scientific evidence regarding its supportive role during gestation [31], oral HMWHA has been poorly investigated as a food supplement in pregnant women. The absorption of HA remains still controversial since it is difficult to estimate its distribution throughout the entire body accurately, and some studies have different results [32,33]. However, it was speculated that while smaller molecules of HA are more easily absorbed, larger molecules of HA are absorbed mainly through the portal vein and delivered intact to the gut-associated lymphatic tissue via the M cells [34,35]. Upon its absorption, HMWHA may exercise two supportive effects in combination with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D. First, HA may exercise a molecular-weight-dependent modulation of the mucin nanostructure, which may contribute to the resorption of ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D [36]; second, HA may also act as a regulatory factor of the gut microbiome [37,38], whose homeostasis has an essential influence on the entire body and whose unbalances is accompanied by a differential alteration in epithelial cell expression of TLR4 involved in the innate immunity of intestinal epithelium [39].
A recent study observed that the oral administration of HMWHA during gestation seems to be associated with improvement in pregnancy outcomes [40]. In this observational retrospective study, data from approximately 250 pregnant women, aged between 25 and 41 years old and at the 7th gestational week, were collected. Results clearly demonstrated that the oral supplementation of HMWHA in combination with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D could counteract adverse events in pregnancy, such as PTB, spontaneous contractions, miscarriages, and hospitalization, compared with the control group. Although the authors did not record long-term data on the outcome of the patients (mother and infant), there was no reported scientific evidence showing harmful effects or contraindications regarding the administration of HMWHA during gestation [40].
Therefore, the aim of our pilot study was to test if HMWHA in association with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D could be more beneficial in the case of threatened miscarriage by inducing a SCH absorption compared to a standard treatment protocol with P4.
HMWHA is essential in female reproductive biology, from folliculogenesis to birth. It forms a hydrated and viscoelastic matrix around the oocyte in the ovarian follicles [41], maintains fetal membrane integrity, and is involved in several physiological processes required for a successful pregnancy, such as implantation, immune response, uterine quiescence and cervical remodeling, thus improving pregnancy outcomes [31]. Furthermore, a deficiency in HA has been linked to a greater risk of ascending infection and PTB, and thus, HA supplementation may be protective against infection-mediated preterm birth [42].
HMWHA may also support P4 activity by increasing the expression of a specific P4 receptor known as the Progesterone Receptor Component 1 (PGRMC1) [43], a non-classical progesterone receptor that is upregulated during pregnancy and downregulated near delivery [44] or in pathological gestational conditions [45,46].
Wu et al. conducted an in vitro study in myometrial tissues and a human myometrial cell line, where it was observed that PGRMC1 was expressed in plasma and nuclear membranes in addition to the cytoplasm, suggesting an important function at the maternal–fetal interface. Furthermore, through the use of specific PGRMC1 antibodies, it was observed to modulate P4 activity in myometrial tissue [44]. Additionally, PGRMC1 expression is upregulated in pregnant women and downregulated during term and preterm labor, suggesting a vital role during pregnancy. Moreover, the importance of PGRMC1 in mediating P4 signaling is evidenced by the fact that women who suffered from recurrent miscarriages (RM) and PTB have decreased PGRMC1 expression [47,48].
The expression of PGRMC1 allows to preserve uterine quiescence until labor. It is not by chance, for example, that in the treatment group, pelvic pain, and spontaneous contractions were significantly reduced compared with the control group (Table 2).
It should be noted that the limited number of evaluated patients can represent a limitation of the study. The population represented in the study were Italian Caucasian women between the ages of 26 and 38. It is, therefore, possible that the results described herein may not apply to other population groups with threatened miscarriage. Therefore, other blinded studies with larger sample sizes will be useful to corroborate the reported evidence and strengthen the use of these natural molecules in the management of patients with threatened miscarriage in the presence of SCH.
6. Conclusions
This pilot study highlighted that HMWHA in association with ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D may play a pivotal role in ameliorating medical conditions of pregnant women with threatened miscarriage. The presence and persistence of SCH can impair the outcome of pregnancy, thus inducing early pregnancy loss. Although the etiopathogenesis of SCH is not fully elucidated, an imbalance and alteration of immunity and anti-/pro-inflammatory cytokine equilibrium at the maternal–fetal interface seems to be one of the factors that can promote SCH. In this regard, the association of HMWHA, ALA, magnesium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D may represent an innovative approach to support physiological pregnancy in women with threatened miscarriage by inducing a faster SCH resorption. Future and larger studies are necessary to deepen our preliminary results.
Acknowledgments
We are extremely grateful to Laura Avagliano for her precious scientific support.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.P. and C.A.; formal analysis, G.P., I.N. and A.S.L.; investigation, G.P., I.N. and A.S.L.; data curation, I.N. and A.S.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P.; writing—review and editing, project administration G.P. and C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Ethical approval code: 005/2021, date of approval: May 2021.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Mouri M., Hall H., Rupp T.J. Threatened Abortion. StatPearls; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nagy S., Bush M., Stone J., Lapinski R.H., Gardó S. Clinical significance of subchorionic and retroplacental hematomas detected in the first trimester of pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;102:94–100. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00403-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ali H.Z., Ismail S.K. First Trimester Subchorionic Hematoma and Outcome of Pregnancy. Sch. Int. J. Obstet. Gynec. 2021;4:297–303. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pearlstone M., Baxi L. Subchorionic hematoma: A review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 1993;48:65–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leite J., Ross P., Rossi A., Jeanty P. Prognosis of very large first-trimester hematomas. J. Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:141–1445. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.11.1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bennett G.L., Bromley B., Lieberman E., Benacerraf B.R. Subchorionic hemorrhage in first-trimester pregnancies: Prediction of pregnancy outcome with sonography. Radiology. 1996;200:803–806. doi: 10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Parente E., Colannino G., Picconi O., Monastra G. Safety of oral alpha-lipoic acid treatment in pregnant women: A retrospective observational study. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017;21:4219–4227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Palacios C., Kostiuk L., Peña-Rosas J.P. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;7:CD008873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fanni D., Gerosa C., Nurchi V.M., Manchia M., Saba L., Coghe F., Crisponi G., Gibo Y., Van Eyken P., Fanos V., et al. The Role of Magnesium in Pregnancy and in Fetal Programming of Adult Diseases. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021;199:3647–3657. doi: 10.1007/s12011-020-02513-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Costantino M., Guaraldi C., Costantino D. Resolution of subchorionic hematoma and symptoms of threatened miscarriage using vaginal alpha lipoic acid or progesterone: Clinical evidences. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016;20:1656–1663. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Porcaro G., Brillo E., Giardina I., Di Iorio R. Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA) effects on subchorionic hematoma: Preliminary clinical results. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015;19:3426–3432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Weissmann B., Meyer K., Sampson P., Linker A. Isolation of oligosaccharides enzymatically produced from hyaluronic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 1954;208:417–429. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)65660-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kobayashi T., Chanmee T., Itano N. Hyaluronan: Metabolism and Function. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1525. doi: 10.3390/biom10111525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Atkins E.D., Sheehan J.K. Structure for hyaluronic acid. Nat. New Biol. 1972;235:253–254. doi: 10.1038/newbio235253a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Petrey A.C., de la Motte C.A. Hyaluronan, a crucial regulator of inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:101. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Day A.J., de la Motte C.A. Hyaluronan cross-linking: A protective mechanism in inflammation? Trends Immunol. 2005;26:637–643. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Casale M., Moffa A., Vella P., Sabatino L., Capuano F., Salvinelli B., Lopez M.A., Carinci F., Salvinelli F. Hyaluronic acid: Perspectives in dentistry. A systematic review. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2016;29:572–582. doi: 10.1177/0394632016652906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fouladi-Nashta A.A., Raheem K.A., Marei W.F., Ghafari F., Hartshorne G.M. Regulation and roles of the hyaluronan system in mammalian reproduction. Reproduction. 2017;153:R43–R58. doi: 10.1530/REP-16-0240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Teklenburg G., Salker M., Molokhia M., Lavery S., Trew G., Aojanepong T., Mardon H.J., Lokugamage A.U., Rai R., Landles C., et al. Natural selection of human embryos: Decidualizing endometrial stromal cells serve as sensors of embryo quality upon implantation. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li Y., Wang E., Huang S., Zhu C., Zhang K., Zhang J., Xu H., Shu J. Autoantibodies in association with subchorionic haematoma in early pregnancy. Ann. Med. 2021;53:841–847. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1936150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhu R., Huang Y.H., Tao Y., Wang S.C., Sun Ch Piao H.L., Wang X.Q., Du M.R., Li D.J. Hyaluronan up-regulates growth and invasion of trophoblasts in an autocrine manner via PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK1/2 pathways in early human pregnancy. Placenta. 2013;34:784–791. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang S., Sun F., Han M., Liu Y., Zou Q., Wang F., Tao Y., Li D., Du M., Li H., et al. Trophoblast-derived hyaluronan promotes the regulatory phenotype of decidual macrophages. Reproduction. 2019;157:189–198. doi: 10.1530/REP-18-0450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bollyky P.L., Wu R.P., Falk B.A., Lord J.D., Long S.A., Preisinger A., Teng B., Holt G.E., Standifer N.E., Braun K.R., et al. ECM components guide IL-10 producing regulatory T-cell (TR1) induction from effector memory T-cell precursors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:7938–7943. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017360108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nakamura K., Yokohama S., Yoneda M., Okamoto S., Tamaki Y., Ito T., Okada M., Aso K., Makino I. High, but not low, molecular weight hyaluronan prevents T-cell-mediated liver injury by reducing proinflammatory cytokines in mice. J. Gastroenterol. 2004;39:346–354. doi: 10.1007/s00535-003-1301-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hakeem L.A., Bello Y.O., Obajimi G.O., Onifade A.F.A., Ahmed B., Arowojolu A.O., Morhason-Bello I.O. Inflammatory cytokines in maternal serum between women with threatened miscarriage and normal pregnancy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2024;164:255–261. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shay K.P., Moreau R., Smith E., Smith A.R., Hagen T.M. Alpha-lipoic acid as a dietary supplement: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1790:1149–1160. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Goraca A., Huk-Kolega H., Piechota A., Kleniewska P., Ciejka E., Skibska B. Lipoic acid-biological activity, and therapeutic potential. Pharmacol. Rep. 2011;63:849–858. doi: 10.1016/S1734-1140(11)70600-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Monastra G., De Grazia S., De Luca L., Vittorio S., Unfer V. Vitamin D: A steroid hormone with progesterone-like activity. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;22:2502–2512. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201804_14845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Vernon W.B. The role of magnesium in nucleic-acid and protein metabolism. Magnesium. 1988;7:234–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Falsaperla R., Saporito M., Di Stefano V., Mauceri L., Quattrocchi E., Musolino A., Corsello G. Pyridoxine supplementation during pregnancy, lactation and the first months of life: A review of the literature. Curr. Pediatr. Res. 2017;21:613–619. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Unfer V., Tilotta M., Kaya C., Noventa M., Török P., Alkatout I., Gitas G., Bilotta G., Laganà A.S. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of hyaluronic acid during pregnancy: A matter of molecular weight. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2021;17:823–840. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1931682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Balogh L., Polyak A., Mathe D., Kiraly R., Thuroczy J., Terez M., Janoki G., Ting Y., Bucci L.R., Schauss A.G. Absorption, uptake and tissue affinity of high-molecular-weight hyaluronan after oral administration in rats and dogs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008;56:10582–10593. doi: 10.1021/jf8017029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kawada C., Yoshida T., Yoshida H., Matsuoka R., Sakamoto W., Odanaka W., Sato T., Yamasaki T., Kanemitsu T., Masuda Y., et al. Ingested hyaluronan moisturizes dry skin. Nutr. J. 2014;13:70. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sato Y., Joumura T., Takekuma Y., Sugawara M. Transfer of orally administered hyaluronan to the lymph. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2020;154:210–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.De Souza A.B., Chaud M., Santana M.H.A. Hyaluronic acid behavior in oral administration and perspectives for nanotechnology-based formulations: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019;15:115001. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hansen I.M., Ebbesen M.F., Kaspersen L., Thomsen T., Bienk K., Cai Y., Malle B.M., Howard K.A. Hyaluronic Acid Molecular Weight-Dependent Modulation of Mucin Nanostructure for Potential Mucosal Therapeutic Applications. Mol. Pharm. 2017;14:2359–2367. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koropatkin N.M., Cameron E.A., Martens E.C. How glycan metabolism shapes the human gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:323–335. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Abreu M.T. Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: How bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010;10:131–144. doi: 10.1038/nri2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim Y., de la Motte C.A. The Role of Hyaluronan Treatment in Intestinal Innate Host Defense. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:569. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Parente E., Colannino G., Bilotta G., Espinola M.S.B., Proietti S., Oliva M.M., Neri I., Aragona C., Unfer V. Effect of Oral High Molecular Weight Hyaluronic Acid (HMWHA), Alpha Lipoic Acid (ALA), Magnesium, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin D Supplementation in Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Observational Pilot Study. Clin. Pract. 2023;13:1123–1129. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mahendroo M. Cervical hyaluronan biology in pregnancy, parturition and preterm birth. Matrix Biol. 2019;78–79:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Akgul Y., Word R.A., Ensign L.M., Yamaguchi Y., Lydon J., Hanes J., Mahendroo M. Hyaluronan in cervical epithelia protects against infection-mediated preterm birth. J. Clin. Investig. 2014;124:5481–5489. doi: 10.1172/JCI78765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhao G., Zhou X., Fang T., Hou Y., Hu Y. Hyaluronic acid promotes the expression of progesterone receptor membrane component 1 via epigenetic silencing of miR-139-5p in human and rat granulosa cells. Biol. Reprod. 2014;91:116. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.120295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu W., Shi S., Huang H.J., Balducci J., Garfield R.E. Changes in PGRMC1, a potential progesterone receptor, in human myometrium during pregnancy and labour at term and preterm. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2011;17:233–242. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaq096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Feng L., Antczak B., Lan L., Grotegut C.A., Thompson J.L., Allen T.K., Murtha A.P. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1) expression in fetal membranes among women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) Placenta. 2014;35:331–333. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Feng L., Allen T., Marinello W.P., Murtha A.P. Roles of Progesterone Receptor Membrane Component 1 in Oxidative Stress-Induced Aging in Chorion Cells. Reprod. Sci. 2019;26:394–403. doi: 10.1177/1933719118776790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lyzikova Y.A., Zinovkin D., Pranjol M.Z.I. Increase in FoxP3, CD56 immune cells and decrease in glands PGRMC1 expression in the endometrium are associated with recurrent miscarriages. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020;245:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Choi S.R., Choi H., Jo E., Choi H.Y., Jung S., Jang S., Choi S.J., Hwang S.O. Decreased expression of progesterone receptor membrane component 1 in fetal membranes with chorioamnionitis among women with preterm birth. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2020;301:949–954. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05476-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.