Skip to main content
Bioinformation logoLink to Bioinformation
editorial
. 2024 Jan 31;20(1):18–19. doi: 10.6026/973206300200018

Neutrinos to Astrovirology: Signatures

Paul Shapshak 1,*, Milad Zandi 2, Charurut Somboonwit 1, John T Sinnott 1
PMCID: PMC10859944  PMID: 38352902

Abstract

In the 20th century, the concept of terrestrial life's unity was solidified, and the 21st century saw the emergence and establishment of astrovirology. To date, life originating beyond Earth has not been identified. The singular instance where NASA investigated potential microfossils in Martian ejecta found on Earth has since been refuted. This report suggests that a more comprehensive discussion and analysis of life's biosignatures and communication methods are essential. Such approaches are crucial not only to avoid overlooking the possible existence of extra-terrestrial intelligence (ETI) but also to prevent potential human infections that could arise from extra-terrestrial contact. In addition terrestrial infections by microorganism that originally derived from Earth and were returned, require investigation due to potential mutations and subsequent increased pathogenicity.

Keywords: Biosignatures, biodefense, exoplanets, astrobiology, astrovirology, terrestrial, unity life, molecular biology, biochemistry, communication, Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (ETI), neutrino, electromagnetic radiation, Sagan-Kardashev, Dyson, goldilocks, entropy, space exploration, contamination from Earth, extra-terrestrial biosafety zone, NIH, CDC, WHO

Bio signatures:

In 2018, Schwieterman et al. provided a comprehensive review of potential biosignatures on exoplanets, exploring various indicators that might be employed to detect extra-terrestrial life [1]. Concurrently, Stedman et al. advocated for Astrovirology, investigating the possibility of viruses coexisting with life in extra-terrestrial environments [2]. The alleged cellular fossils discovered within Martian ejecta on Earth, as identified by NASA, remain contentious and have largely been dismissed [3, 4]. As a result, the assertion stands that life originating from outside Earth has not yet been confirmed. However, these reviews and wider literature often presuppose goldilocks conditions as a fundamental requirement for life. This concept has sparked much debate. This narrow focus on terrestrial-like habitable zones necessitates a reevaluation. The search for biosignatures should be broadened to encompass diverse environments and chemical and biochemical systems, which are not terrestrial-like.

In expanding this search, it is reasonable to consider an array of astrobiological interactions. For instance, the possibility of extra-terrestrial intelligence in the Milky Way and other galaxies, potentially communicating through neutrino signals in addition to electromagnetic radiation, should be explored. This concept, including laboratory experiments on neutrino signal transmission through the Earth, has been discussed in scientific discourse [5,6, 7]. Such innovative approaches could enhance our capacity to detect and understand life beyond our planet.

Biodefense:

The earlier history of epidemics and pandemics demonstrate general under-preparedness globally for such catastrophes. However, much work has been accomplished by NIH, CDC, and WHO in biomedical research, technology, and organizational skills since the 1918 pandemics [7,8,9]. Biodefensive measures are required for the possibility of remote astrobiological and astrovirological interactions. Additionally, biodefense is needed to broach dangers impelled by off-world evolution of microorganisms originating terrestrially.

Conclusion:

Paradigm shifts from goldilocks models are needed. Creatively, for example, entropy measures could be used to classify elements and biochemicals rather than the serendipity of terrestrial goldilocks zone biochemistry [10]. Hypothesis changes are required if we are not to miss forms of life and intelligence including Sagan-Kardashev and Dyson civilizations. Likely many will be totally foreign to standard terrestrial biochemical models [5- 7,11].

Acknowledgments

G. Rajasekaran (Mathematics Institute, Chennai, India), W. Newman (UCLA, West Los Angeles, CA; Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ), C. Sagan, F. Drake, B. Khare, T. Gold (Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY), and G. Baumslag (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ) , C. Gilvarg, C. Smith, G. Sundharadas, and J. Valanajad, (Princeton University, Princeton, NJ) are thanked for discussions and advice.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Edited by P Kangueane

Citation: Shapshak et al.Bioinformation 20(1):18-19(2024)

Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.

Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.

License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.

Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.

Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.

References


Articles from Bioinformation are provided here courtesy of Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group

RESOURCES