Abstract
Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the most common fetal viral infection and contributes to about 25% of childhood hearing loss by the age of 4 years. It is the leading nongenetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Infants born to seroimmune mothers are not completely protected from SNHL, although the severity of their hearing loss may be milder than that seen in those whose mothers had a primary infection. Both direct cytopathic effects and localized inflammatory responses contribute to the pathogenesis of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-induced hearing loss. Hearing loss may be delayed onset, progressive or fluctuating in nature, and therefore, a significant proportion will be missed by universal newborn hearing screening (NHS) and warrants close monitoring of hearing function at least until 5–6 years of age. A multidisciplinary approach is required for the management of hearing loss. These children may need assistive hearing devices or cochlear implantation depending on the severity of their hearing loss. In addition, early intervention services such as speech or occupational therapy could help better communication, language, and social skill outcomes. Preventive measures to decrease intrauterine CMV transmission that have been evaluated include personal protective measures, passive immunoprophylaxis and valacyclovir treatment during pregnancy in mothers with primary CMV infection. Several vaccine candidates are currently in testing and one candidate vaccine in phase 3 trials. Until a CMV vaccine becomes available, behavioral and educational interventions may be the most effective strategy to prevent maternal CMV infection.
Keywords: ABR thresholds, Auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emissions, Aural preference syndrome, Behavioral audiometry, Betaherpesvirus, Blood-labyrinth barrier, Cerebellar hypoplasia, Cerebral atrophy, CMV PCR, CMV-specific hyperimmune globulin, Cochlear blood–labyrinth barrier, Cochlear implant, Cytomegalic inclusion disease, Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Dried blood spot (DBS), Endocochlear potential, Fluctuating hearing loss, Ganciclovir, Herpesviridae, Human Herpes Virus 5, Icosahedral capsid, Impedance audiometry, Intracranial calcifications, Lenticulostriate vasculopathy, MF59-adjuvanted CMV glycoprotein B subunit vaccine, Migrational abnormalities, Natural killer, Neurotrophins, Newborn hearing screening, Nlrp3, Non-primary maternal infection, Organ of corti, Periventricular echo density, Play audiometry, Pure tone audiometry, Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), Seroimmune, Speech audiometry, Spiral ganglion cells, Spiral ganglion cells, Spiral ganglion neurons, Strain-specific epitopes, Stria vascularis, Tegument layer, Tympanometry, Unique long gene region, Unique short gene region, Valganciclovir, Ventricular adhesions, Ventricular dilatation, Ventriculomegaly, Viral core, Viral lipid bilayer envelope, Viral matrix, Viral replication cycle, Visual reinforcement audiometry, White matter disease
Introduction
Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is the most common congenital infection with a birth prevalence reported around 0.64%.1,2 Cytomegaloviruses are ubiquitous and the largest human viral pathogens with respect to genome size.3–5 Morton and Nance estimated that cCMV contributes to 21% of all hearing loss at birth and 25% of childhood hearing loss by 4 years of age.6 It is also a major cause of cognitive and neurologic deficits.7
Viral Structure
Cytomegalovirus (CMV), also known as human herpes virus 5, is classified in the Herpesviridae family and based on its ability to infect leukocytes, as a beta-herpes virus.3 It is a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) virus. It is characterized by species specificity and a slow replication cycle, often taking as long as 24 hours to produce virus progeny in infected cells and several days to weeks to produce visible cytopathic effects in laboratory cell lines. There is an icosahedral capsid, a tegument layer, a dense core surrounded by an amorphous matrix, and a lipid bilayer envelope with glycoproteins. There is a large dsDNA genome with 230 kilobases, which is organized into unique long (UL) and unique short (US) gene regions with internal and terminal repeats to enable four isomeric forms of the virus.8 Cytomegalovirus gene products are, by convention, designated by whether these are encoded by the UL or US segment, and are numbered from “left-to-right.”9 Table 1 provides a detailed description of virus components.
Table 1:
Major structural components of CMV
Structure | Available information |
---|---|
Lipid envelope | The lipoprotein envelope is derived from the nuclear membrane of an infected host cell and covers the nucleocapsid.11 Cytomegalovirus has a characteristic three-layer architecture—an outer lipid bilayer envelope, inner nucleocapsid, and a middle tegument compartment |
Glycoproteins | There are eight different glycoproteins embedded in the lipid bilayer.11 Envelope surrounds the tegument and contains glycoproteins—the gB complex, the gM/gN complex, the gH/gL/gO “trimeric” complex, and the “pentameric complex” (PC) or pentamer comprising of proteins gH/gL/UL128, 130, and 131. Neutralizing antibodies targeting these glycoproteins are thought to be important component of protective immunity, hence recombinant forms of these proteins are candidates for vaccine development12 |
Receptor-binding motifs | Receptor-binding motifs are involved in virion attachment to host cell surface receptors during the process of infection and endocytosis. Cytomegalovirus utilizes binding to platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα) by glycoproteins gHgLgO (Trimer) and transforming growth factor beta receptor 3 (TGFβR3) to enter in multiple cell types.13 The envelope proteins of the virus facilitate receptor binding by interacting with host cell proteins that act as binding factors and receptors—heparin sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), integrins, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), THY-1 cell surface antigen (CD90) neuropilin-2 (Nrp2), CD147, and OR14I114 |
Envelope protein | The CMV envelope consists of various glycoprotein complexes that enable wide viral tropism15 and facilitate attachment to cell surfaces and viral entry into the cells |
Membrane protein | The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL50 gene encodes a transmembrane protein, pUL50, which acts as a core component of the nuclear egress complex (NEC) for nucleocapsids, which which facilitates capsid transport from the nucleus to the cytoplasm16 |
MHC or HLA proteins | Conserved B- and T-cell epitopes of CMV structural proteins may play an important role in evoking immune responses against CMV. Human-activated NK receptors also bind human CMV-encoded HLA class I-like molecules17 |
Spike protein | Glycoprotein gB is an elongated trimer and is similar to a spike with each protomer comprising 5 domains18 |
Viral tegument | In the mature virus particle, nucleocapsid is surrounded by tegument, a protein-rich layer containing several proteins which serve as targets of the host T lymphocyte response to infection, and hence are relevant to vaccine development. There is a high capsid pressure due to tightly packed, electrostatically repulsive genomic material in CMV, similar to HSV-1.19,20 The β-herpesvirus–specific tegument protein pp150 contributes to a netlike tegument density layer stabilizing the capsid to facilitate the formation of infectious virions.21–23 The tegument domain consists of approximately 30 proteins which play essential roles in the initial stages of infection following virus entry and late stages during virion assembly24 |
Capsid | Cytomegalovirus capsid has four parts—major capsid protein (MCP), triplex dimer (Tri2), triplex monomer (Tri1), and the small capsid protein (SCP).25 Cytomegalovirus capsids have an icosahedral structure with major capsid protein (MCP) being organized in to 150 hexons and 11 penton vertices26 |
Capsomeres | Cytomegalovirus capsid has 162 capsomeres which function as structural subunits.3 The capsid surrounds and encloses the viral dsDNA genome (forming a nucleocapsid) and can be seen as an electron-dense structure in electron micrographs |
Protein core | There are 39 core proteins, which are present in all strains and are highly conserved.27 Among the core proteins, some are involved in cell entry and immunomodulation/immunoevasion; while the function of 17 of them (UL10, UL139 or US33A) has not been determined |
Enzymes | Cytomegalovirus has an essential, maturational serine protease whose catalytic domain, assembling (28 kDa), is released by self-cleavage from a 74-kDa precursor (pPR, pUL80a)28 |
RNA elements | Cytomegalovirus encodes for 26 mature microRNAs (miRNAs) that regulate transcriptions of both virus and host cells and to favor viral infection and inhibit the host’s immune response Cytomegalovirus virion assembly involves the incorporation of RNA into infectious particles, which can be translated in newly infected cells in the absence of CMV genome transcription. It is also believed that nonspecifically incorporated cellular RNAs are crucial for virus assembly Immediate early (IE) mRNA is transcribed within the first few hours after infection of the host cell and the encoded IE proteins, which include multiple isoforms due to extensive splicing, modulate both host and viral gene expression |
Nucleosome | The human CMV genome does not carry histones when encapsidated but nucleosomes are formed after release into the host cell nucleus. Initial nucleosome formation is genetically encoded at the human CMV major immediate early (IE) locus, but as infection proceeds to the late phase, nucleosomes redistribute extensively29 |
DNA | Human cytomegalovirus has a double-stranded DNA genome of approximately 236 kbp containing >170 open reading frames (ORFs) encoding functional proteins.30 The virus encodes approximately 200 genes, including nine gene families, a large number of glycoprotein genes, and homologues of the human HLA class I and G protein-coupled receptor genes31 |
Genome-associated polyprotein | CMV UL80 ORF encodes protease and assembly protein from its N- and C-terminal regions, respectively and a 30-kDa protease is derived by autoproteolytic processing of a polyprotein which is the translation product of the entire UL80 ORF32 |
DNA polymerase | During the early phase of CMV infection in vitro, the virus DNA polymerase is rapidly induced.33 It has immunologic specificity and is the target of the three drugs, ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir34 |
RNA polymerase | CMV utilizes RNA polymerase II to transcribe viral genes and produce viral mRNAs. RNA polymerase I (Pol I)-mediated transcription is active in the nucleolus35 |
HLA, human leukocyte antigens
Cytomegalovirus genome shows high diversity which is attributed to alternative splicing phenomena9,10 and contains many genes that enable the virus to evade host immune responses. Naturally acquired immunity does not protect against reinfection, thereby posing challenges in developing an effective vaccine.
Epidemiology
Congenital cytomegalovirus is the leading nongenetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), accounting for 6–30% of pediatric hearing loss.36–41 In 1964, Medearis et al. described the association between cCMV and SNHL; they noted hearing impairment in more than 40% (2/5) of the survivors with disseminated cCMV, which was described as cytomegalic inclusion disease (CID).42
Cytomegalovirus transmission requires a close contact with body fluids. Infected infants and toddlers are the most important source of infection for women of child-bearing age.43–45 Another common route of CMV transmission is via breast milk from seropositive mothers. Approximately, 85–90% of infants with cCMV have no clinical abnormalities at birth (asymptomatic cCMV), but 10–15% of these children go on to develop SNHL. Among children with symptomatic cCMV, 40–60% develop sequelae including SNHL, cognitive, motor, and vision deficits. In the United States, CMV contributes to 15–25% of childhood hearing loss.46 Among infants with cCMV born to mothers with primary CMV infection during pregnancy, hearing loss and other neurologic sequelae are much more common in children whose mothers acquire primary infection in the first trimester as compared with later in pregnancy.47–49 The incidence of SNHL in children with asymptomatic cCMV ranges between 6 and 25%50–52 and 22–65% in those with symptomatic disease.50
The most important risk factors for SNHL are first trimester primary maternal infections, disseminated infection at birth, and neonatal imaging abnormalities. Other risk factors include using ototoxic drugs, longer NICU stay, fetal distress, and the need for mechanical ventilation during the neonatal period. These risk factors have been associated with SNHL independent of cCMV and therefore, are not very specific. However, the predictors of hearing loss in children with asymptomatic infection and those born following non-primary maternal infection are not known. Most infants with asymptomatic cCMV may not be recognized in a timely fashion because (a) there are no clinical findings at birth; (b) there is no routine screening for cCMV; and (c) it is difficult to collect saliva or urine samples after 2–3 weeks following birth.
In contrast to other congenital infections such as rubella and toxoplasmosis, the prevalence of cCMV increases with higher seroprevalence rates in the population. The incidence of studies from highly seropositive populations such as Brazil, India, and South Africa have demonstrated high prevalence of cCMV. The average prevalence of cCMV infections in high-income countries with low seroprevalence in women of child-bearing age is 0.64–0.7%, compared with 1–6% in resource-limited settings with high seroprevalence.53–55 Although symptomatic cCMV was believed to occur exclusively following primary maternal infection, it is now clear that the frequency of symptomatic cCMV is similar in infected children born following both primary and non-primary maternal infections.56 In addition, the frequency of SNHL in children with cCMV is also similar following primary and non-primary maternal infections. However, children with cCMV following primary maternal infection more frequently develop bilateral and more severe degree of SNHL than those born to mothers with non-primary maternal infection.
Both symptomatic and asymptomatic infants with cCMV shed virus in urine and saliva for prolonged periods, up to 6 years of age. Infants with symptomatic infections shed higher amounts of CMV in urine.57 Some studies have suggested that higher blood CMV viral load may be a predictor of hearing loss,57 but others have not confirmed these findings.46,58,59 Noyola et al.60 reported that hearing loss and progressive hearing loss was associated with a shorter period of CMV shedding. However, Rosenthal et al.46 found that longer duration of viral shedding was associated with delayed onset hearing loss.61
In a prospective study of 14,000 unselected live-born infants spanning 10 years, the incidence of cCMV was noted as 0.53%, with 5.4% symptomatic cases.62 Hearing loss was seen in 22% of the cCMV-infected infants (21% in asymptomatic and 33% in the symptomatic group). Hearing loss may deteriorate in two-third of symptomatic patients and in about 25% of children with asymptomatic cCMV.63,64 Although the incidence of SNHL among infected children born to mothers with primary infection during pregnancy and those born to mothers with non-primary infection was similar, it has been suggested that bilateral and severe/profound loss occurs more often following maternal primary infection.65 As we do not know the predictors of SNHL including progressive and severe/profound loss, current recommendations are to monitor all infected children with regular audiologic evaluations during early childhood, up to 4–6 years of age.62 In a systematic review of 37 studies, the prevalence of cCMV in developed countries was estimated to be 0.58%. SNHL was noted in 12.6%, averaging around 1 out of 3 symptomatic children and 1 out of 10 asymptomatic children. Based on current data, 5 out of every 10,000 children born each year will develop cCMV-related hearing loss.43 The degree of hearing loss is severe to profound in most affected children and in addition, many have a delayed onset, and progression of the deficit. Bilateral loss is more common among symptomatic children.
The Risk of cCMV Varies Based on Geographical Regions and CMV Seroprevalence
Worldwide, cCMV infection affects 0.2–2.5% of all live-born neonates.61,66 Higher prevalence of cCMV infection is seen in populations with higher CMV seroprevalence rates.57–59,67–69 In the United States, northern Europe, and other industrialized countries, 40–60% of the population shows CMV seroprevalence. The prevalence of cCMV is 0.64–0.7%. In contrast, near-universal seroprevalence rates have been observed in developing countries and the cCMV rates between 1 and 6% have been reported in these populations.55,70 Population-based studies in Sweden,71 Canada,61 and the United States50,72 have noted SNHL in 9.3–17% of infants with cCMV infections.65
Vertical Transmission
Cytomegalovirus-related hearing loss occurs following both primary (mother acquires the virus for the first-time during pregnancy) or non-primary maternal infection (seroimmune prior to pregnancy). In regions with high CMV, seroprevalence such as, Asia, South America, and Africa, most cCMV infections occur in children born to mothers with non-primary infections,2 which is attributed to either reactivation of a latent virus or reinfection with new CMV strains. Although intrauterine transmission rate is higher in women with primary infections, vast majority of infected infants are born to mothers with non-primary infections.43 Although the rate of vertical transmission is higher in women who acquire primary infection at later gestations, the risk of symptomatic infection and long-term sequelae are higher when maternal infection occurs during early gestation.
Birth prevalence of cCMV is directly proportional to maternal seroprevalence. High rates of non-primary infections also lead to a higher birth prevalence on a population level despite the lower risk of vertical transmission. Higher rates of CMV reinfections as demonstrated by the acquisition of new serologic responses against strain-specific epitopes were observed in seropositive mothers with infected offspring.73
Most CMV-seropositive mothers (>90%) shed the virus in breast milk.74 About 40–50% of exclusively breastfed infants of seropositive mothers acquire CMV infection during the first 4–6 months of life.75,76 Although postnatal transmission of CMV via breastfeeding can lead to sepsis-like illness in very low birthweight infants, these children have not been noted to experience long-term sequelae that can be specifically attributed to CMV infections.
Pathogenesis
The pathogenesis of SNHL in children with cCMV is not well defined. Both virus-mediated direct cytopathic effects and inner ear inflammatory responses likely contribute to CMV-induced hearing loss.77 In infants with symptomatic cCMV involving the central nervous system, treatment with 6 weeks of ganciclovir may reduce the risk of hearing deterioration at 6 months and possibly at 1 year of age.67 However, one follow-up study comparing 6 weeks vs 6 months of valganciclovir in children with symptomatic cCMV showed no improvement in hearing in the short term; there was a modest improvement in hearing and developmental outcomes in the longer term.68 During early stages of infection and viremia, CMV enters the inner ear from blood (the most important pathway of infection) or through cochlear aqueduct from subarachnoid space, and causes disruption of microcirculation, tissue hyperplasia in the organ of Corti, and cellular damage with loss of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) and changes in the endocochlear potential (EP) (Flowchart 1). The immune response induced by CMV infections including the activation of NK cells and increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines disrupt the blood–labyrinth barrier (BLB).69,78,79 As cochlear implantation can improve hearing in most children with CMV-related SNHL, the neural pathways may be intact in most patients. However, the outcome following cochlear implantation in children with cCMV-related SNHL is more variable compared with children with SNHL due to other causes.80–83
Flowchart 1:
Pathogenesis of CMV-induced hearing loss
A major barrier in understanding the mechanisms of cCMV-induced SNHL is the lack of small animal models. Recently, a murine model has been described where newborn mice infected with murine CMV (MCMV) develop disseminated viral infections including in the cochlea. These pups develop hearing loss similar to that seen in human infants with cCMV.84,85 Findings in this model include hematogenous spread of the virus, induction of inflammatory responses, and the loss of spiral ganglion cells leading to increased auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds.80,84,86,87 Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced inflammation contributes to hearing loss.78,88 Activation of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) in the cochlea and SGN activates caspase 1 with consequent release of IL-1 beta and IL-18.89 Chemokines, such as CCL8, CXCL9, and CXCL10 contributed to tissue inflammation in pups with ABR thresholds >60 dB. The cytopathology in the Organ of Corti was not prominent, but there was notable loss of SGN; increased ABR thresholds suggest that hearing loss may result from lesions in the auditory system other than hair cell loss.78 Although viral antigens have been found in the inner ear,76,90–92 the lack of significant inner ear histopathology along with persistence of inflammation in cochlea of mice with hearing loss indicates that inflammatory response and not direct virus-mediated cytopathology may play an important role in CMV-associated hearing loss.
Survival and neurite extension of the SGN is dependent on afferent input and on expression of the neurotrophins, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and NT3.84,86,87,93 The loss of cochlear nuclei neurons may result in the loss of afferent input during critical period(s) prior to the onset of hearing.80–82 Postnatal days 5–11 have been described as a critical period in mice; the ablation of the cochlea after postnatal day 14 does not result in neuronal loss in cochlear nuclei due to the acquisition of survival (antiapoptotic) functions in these cells.83,85,94
The potential mechanisms of CMV-related hearing loss may include (a) direct viral cytopathic effects; (b) immune response and inflammation leading to loss of SGN cells; (c) disruption of the BLB with damage in the stria vascularis, which is essential for maintaining EP; and (d) involvement of central auditory centers.
Direct Viral Cytopathic Effect
Early immune responses include activation of natural killer (NK) cells with increased expression of inflammatory cytokines and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity.87,96
Immune Response and Inflammation
The stria vascularis (SV) is critical for regulating the unique electrolyte composition of the extracellular fluid within the Organ of Corti and to maintain the EP,97,98 which is the driving force for the transduction current in auditory hair cells.99 It is maintained by high potassium levels in the endolymph.100 Inflammatory cells and viral seeding can disrupt the SV99,101 and consequently, the potassium cycle and EP.101
Disruption of Blood–Labyrinth Barrier Leading to Damage to the SV and Loss of EP
The cochlear BLB in the SV is paramount for the homeostasis of the cochlea.102,103 Li et al. found higher BLB permeability following CMV infection due to disruption of the BLB, microcirculation, and the internal microenvironment.69,85,104
Involvement of Central Auditory Centers
SGNs are the first level of neurons of the auditory system; they receive electrical signal input from cochlear hair cells and transmit to the cochlear nucleus and thereafter to the auditory cortex105 Cytomegalovirus may induce apoptosis in SGN cells106,107 by via altered calcium homeostasis81 or expression of Bax and Bcl-2.106 Flowchart 1 summarizes the current understanding of the pathogenesis of CMV-induced hearing loss.
Viral reactivation and localized host inflammatory responses to reactivation might promote hearing loss as CMV, similar to other herpesviruses, establishes latency after primary infection.60
Clinical Presentation
About 10% of all infants with cCMV are symptomatic, and may present with hepatosplenomegaly, petechial, or purpuric rashes, jaundice with conjugated hyperbilirubinema, and/or microcephaly. The outcomes following cCMV infections are highly variable; most children with symptomatic cCMV develop sequelae such as SNHL, cerebral palsy, neurodevelopmental delay, and loss of vision.70 About 50% of symptomatic neonates develop SNHL, of which two-thirds have neurologic deficits.41,53,108,109
About 10–15% of infants with asymptomatic cCMV with SNHL show permanent sequelae. Among infants with symptomatic infection, intrauterine growth retardation and petechiae are associated with the development of hearing loss. However, further study is needed to identify predictors of hearing loss in children with asymptomatic cCMV. CMV-associated SNHL can be delayed onset, progressive and fluctuating in children with both symptomatic and asymptomatic cCMV.51,110–113 About half of the children with asymptomatic cCMV and hearing loss have bilateral impairment.43,114
Most infants with cCMV are not identified at birth because of the absence of clinical findings and because a significant proportion experience delayed onset and/or progressive SNHL, who are not identified with newborn hearing screening (NHS). Therefore, several strategies are being considered so that infected infants can be monitored closely for hearing loss and provide early intervention to improve outcomes. These strategies include screening of all newborns for cCMV (universal CMV screening) or CMV testing of all infants who fail their NHS (targeted CMV screening). In the United States, several states have enacted legislation mandating targeted CMV screening, CMV education during pregnancy or both. Currently, two of these states (Minnesota and New York) have implemented universal newborn CMV screening. As predictors of SNHL are not known, especially those with asymptomatic cCMV, all infected children should be monitored for hearing loss at least every 6 months through the 1st 5–6 years of age. Early detection and intervention during critical stages of speech and language function improves outcomes in children with CMV-associated hearing loss. Both primary and non-primary maternal CMV infections can lead to symptomatic cCMV infection and SNHL.2 Although bilateral hearing loss is commonly associated with speech delay and is present in almost half of the cCMV-infected infants, recent studies have shown the adverse impact of unilateral SNHL on overall development.111,112
Delayed Onset, Progressive and Fluctuating Hearing Loss
Infants with cCMV can develop delayed onset and progressive SNHL during early childhood, which may continue to progress through adolescence.41,61,115 The risk of developing SNHL after 5 years of age may not differ from that in uninfected children. Overall, 2% of the patients with SNHL require cochlear implantation.116
Children with cCMV have a higher probability of not passing their NHS (5–6%) compared with uninfected children (1–2%). However, a considerable proportion of children with CMV-associated SNHL will be missed on NHS because of delayed onset hearing loss and in some infants with mild hearing impairment.117 Definitions of hearing loss, maternal infection, and neonatal infection are provided in Tables 2 to 4, respectively.
Table 2:
Definitions of hearing loss
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Conductive hearing loss | Hearing loss resulting from the disease process in the outer or middle ear that interferes with conduction of sound to the inner ear |
Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) | Hearing loss due to damage, disease, or other disorders affecting the inner ear (eg., the cochlea) and/or the auditory nerve (cranial nerve VIII). Hearing loss is defined as sensorineural if the air-bone gap is <10 dB |
Normal hearing | The ability to hear sounds between 0 and 20 dB |
ABR threshold | The lowest intensity level at which wave V can be detected and replicated. An ABR click threshold >25 dB or a tone-pip threshold >30 dB is considered abnormal118 |
Mild hearing loss | Detection of sounds at 21–40 dB thresholds. A person with a mild hearing loss may hear some speech sounds but soft sounds are hard to hear119 |
Moderate hearing loss | Detection of sounds at 41–60 dB. A person with a moderate hearing loss may hear almost no speech when another person is talking at a normal level119 |
Severe hearing loss | Detection of sounds at 61–90 dB. A person with severe hearing loss will hear no speech of a person talking at a normal level and only some loud sounds119 |
Profound hearing loss | Detection of sounds only at 91 dB or greater. A person with a profound hearing loss will not hear any speech and is only able to hear very loud sounds119 |
Progressive SNHL | When children with SNHL either at birth or during early childhood experience a worsening of their hearing thresholds during later visits. (Deterioration in hearing of 10 dB or more at any 1 frequency on behavioral audiometry or ABR threshold, documented on two separate evaluations.111,118 Fluctuating and progressive hearing losses are assigned only if there is no concurrent middle ear disease that might influence threshold variation |
Fluctuating SNHL | A change to a worse or better hearing threshold between consecutive assessments: an absolute difference of ≥20 dB in ≥1 frequencies, ≥10 dB across any 2 or 3 adjacent frequencies, ≥10 dB in the average of the pure-tone thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (4-frequency average), or a change from “hearing” to “no response” or vice versa at three adjacent frequencies.116,120 |
Improvement of hearing loss | Defined as a final threshold that is better by 10 dB or more compared with the initial threshold26 |
Stable SNHL | No change in hearing between two assessments |
Late onset or delayed hearing loss | A child with normal hearing at birth, develops hearing loss at follow-up visits. Usually, there are one or more hearing evaluations with a normal threshold documented for each ear before detection of SNHL. |
SNHL at isolated frequencies | Children with ≥25 dB hearing loss in any frequency without affecting the 4-frequency average |
High-frequency hearing loss | A decrease in hearing at 4000, 8000, and 12,000 Hz frequencies only (or a combination of these).111,118 |
dB-Decibel
Table 4:
Definitions of congenital/neonatal CMV infections122
Congenital CMV infection | Cytomegalovirus infection acquired in utero. Diagnosis can be made within the first three weeks of life by detection of CMV in newborn’s urine or saliva |
Postnatal CMV infection | Cytomegalovirus infection acquired in the postnatal period. After three weeks, CMV detection in urine or saliva may indicate either congenital or postnatal CMV infection. Postnatal CMV infection usually is clinically benign or self-limited |
Symptomatic cCMV disease | Defined as a newborn with CMV detected in urine or saliva samples collected within 3 weeks of life, presenting with at least one of the clinical findings at birth: purpura/petechiae, jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly, microcephaly, unexplained neurological abnormality, elevated liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase >100 IU), conjugated hyperbilirubinemia (direct bilirubin >2mg/dL), or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/mm3) |
Asymptomatic cCMV infection | Defined as a newborn with CMV detected in urine or saliva samples collected within 3 weeks of life, who has a normal newborn examination, that is, none of the symptoms defining symptomatic cases |
Primary neurophenotype | Refers to patients with only central nervous system manifestations. They lack the typical somatic manifestations and may appear completely healthy at birth or may have microcephaly. On follow-up, they develop neurologic manifestations and neuroimaging shows polymicrogyria or other cortical dysplasia |
Asymptomatic with isolated hearing loss | Refers to infants with isolated hearing loss at birth but no other symptoms. Categorization of these infants as “symptomatic” or “asymptomatic” is inconsistent, hence considered as a distinct category because they are not truly asymptomatic, but their disease is milder than that of symptomatic infants |
Virologically confirmed congenital CMV infection | Diagnosed on the basis of any of the following:
|
Possible congenital CMV infection | A diagnosis of “possible” congenital CMV infection may be made if all of the following criteria are met:
|
Not infected | Infants in whom CMV is not detected in urine or saliva (via viral culture, shell vial assay, or PCR) during the newborn period do not have congenital CMV. Because of the high sensitivity and specificity of these tests, a negative result excludes the diagnosis of congenital CMV infection. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection can be excluded beyond the newborn period if CMV IgG antibody testing is negative |
Diagnosis
Maternal Infection
Serological Testing
The presence of CMV IgG antibodies during pregnancy in previously seronegative individuals (seroconversion) is definitive evidence of primary maternal CMV infection. However, early prenatal or preconceptional serum specimens are usually not available. Although the presence of CMV IgM antibodies indicates an acute infection, lower specificity of IgM assays and the presence of CMV IgM during reactivation or reinfection with a different virus makes the CMV IgM assays less reliable.123 When both CMV IgG and IgM antibodies are present in a sample, IgG avidity testing could help differentiate between primary and non-primary maternal infection because affinity maturation of IgG antibodies usually takes several months after primary infection. The presence of IgM antibodies along with low-avidity IgG argues for a primary infection whereas high-avidity IgG suggests the likelihood of non-primary infections.124,125
Diagnosis of Fetal Infection
Ultrasound
Ultrasonographic features of fetal CMV infection include echogenic bowel, fetal edema, hepatomegaly, periventricular echo density, ventricular dilatation, cerebellar hypoplasia, and overall growth retardation.126 However, these findings are seen in less than 25% of cCMV-infected fetuses and may also be found in other intrauterine infections and fetal diseases.127
Amniocentesis
Amniotic fluid can be tested for CMV using virus culture and PCR to identify infected fetuses.128 However, amniocentesis should be performed at least 6–7 weeks after primary maternal infection and after 20 weeks of gestation108,129 because the appearance of viral particles in the amniotic fluid only occurs after the fetus begins to urinate. PCR using amniotic fluid is more sensitive (70–90%) than CMV cultures to diagnose fetal CMV infection.130,131
Diagnosis of cCMV in the Newborn Period
Most newborn infants with cCMV shed large amounts of virus in saliva and urine. The presence of infectious viruses, viral antigens, or viral DNA in saliva or urine samples confirms the diagnosis of cCMV (Flowchart 2). Since a substantial proportion of infants acquire CMV either from intrapartum exposure or postnatally from breastfeeding, it is important to test urine or saliva samples collected from infants within the first 2–3 weeks after birth to distinguish cCMV from a postnatal CMV infection. Postnatal infections can result in a sepsis-like syndrome in extremely premature infants and those with a primary immune deficiency such as severe combined immune deficiency. Postnatal CMV infection is not associated with long-term sequelae such as SNHL. Testing of newborn saliva samples using CMV PCR has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific.132 To avoid contamination of saliva with CMV in breast milk from seropositive mothers, it is prudent to collect the saliva sample at least 90 minutes after breastfeeding. However, a large newborn screening study showed that false-positive saliva results are rare.133
Flowchart 2:
Diagnostic algorithm of CMV-induced hearing loss
As traditional culture methods are labor- and resource-intensive, and time-consuming, most clinical microbiology laboratories have phased out this test. In addition, culture-based assays are not suitable for screening large numbers of infants. In contrast, PCRs are less expensive with faster turn-around times, can be scaled up for high throughput capacity, and obviate the need to maintain tissue culture facilities. In addition, storage and transport conditions of samples usually does not affect the reliability of PCR results.134–139
Dried Blood Spot (DBS)
Testing of DBSs collected at the time of newborn metabolic screening for CMV allows retrospective diagnosis in children presenting with clinical findings or sequelae consistent with cCMV. However, there are some limitations such as lower sensitivity of PCR using DBS. Therefore, DBS CMV PCR cannot be used for mass screening for cCMV. The test does show high specificity (>99.9%) and can be useful in some instances.
Cranial Imaging
MRI brain can detect intracranial abnormalities in about a third of patients with probable or confirmed cCMV-induced SNHL. Brain ultrasound and/or MRI imaging findings in children with symptomatic cCMV include intracranial calcifications, migrational abnormalities, white matter disease, cerebral atrophy, ventriculomegaly, ventricular adhesions, and lenticulostriate vasculopathy.140 However, many of these findings such as subependymal cysts and lenticulostriate vasculopathy are not as specific.
Other Evaluations
Ophthalmologic evaluation should be done to rule out chorioretinitis, optic atrophy, or retinal hemorrhages. However, eye findings are infrequent in children with asymptomatic cCMV.
Audiologic Evaluation
All newborns in the United States and most high-income countries undergo hearing screening prior to hospital discharge. More infants with cCMV fail NHS, about 5–6%, compared with 1–2% of uninfected children supporting the strategy that all babies who fail NHS should be tested for cCMV (hearing-targeted CMV screening). Although this approach identifies newborns with CMV-associated hearing loss but without clinical abnormalities, infected infants with asymptomatic cCMV who develop delayed onset hearing loss are not detected, arguing for universal newborn CMV screening. Cost-benefit analyses have shown that both hearing-targeted and universal CMV screening are cost-effective because identification of infants with cCMV and associated hearing loss will permit early intervention such as hearing amplification including cochlear implantation, antiviral therapy, and other measures to improve outcomes.141
In 2013, Utah became the first state to enact a CMV public health initiative on CMV education11 and mandating CMV testing of all infants who fail NHS for CMV.1,75,142 Many other states have enacted legislations mandating education and/or universal CMV screening; Minnesota and New York have recently implemented Universal newborn CMV screening.
CMV-associated SNHL has wide variability with respect to the severity of the loss, laterality, the time of onset, and the type of loss. There is no characteristic audiogram pattern seen in SNHL due to cCMV. Considering that nearly half of all children with cCMV and SNHL pass their NHS,118 and with the lack of predictors or biomarkers to identify those at increased risk for delayed onset and/or progressive SNHL, there is a need to monitor hearing function in all infected children closely during first 4–5 years of age.50,62
Newborn hearing screening is carried out using either otoacoustic emission testing (OAE) or an automated auditory brainstem evoked response (ABR). In children who fail NHS, hearing loss should be confirmed by full-scale diagnostic ABR but unfortunately, ABR testing beyond neonatal age may require sedation. Visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) can be used as early as 7 months of after birth. Audiologic evaluation in older child is performed in a soundproof environment using pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, behavioral audiometry, visual reinforcement audiometry, play audiometry, impedance audiometry, tympanometry, and/or electrophysiologic tests (including auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emissions).
As with children with SNHL from other causes, children with CMV-associated hearing loss should also undergo genetic evaluation to identify the presence of an underlying genetic abnormality. Flowchart 2 describes the diagnostic algorithm for CMV-induced hearing loss.
Treatment
Antiviral Therapy
Ganciclovir and valganciclovir, nucleoside analogs, inhibit CMV replication by disrupting viral DNA synthesis.143 A randomized controlled trial of intravenous ganciclovir for 6 weeks in infants with symptomatic cCMV with central nervous system involvement provided modest benefit by preventing progression of hearing loss and maintaining normal hearing. A subsequent study evaluated 6 weeks versus 6 months of oral valganciclovir therapy in children with symptomatic cCMV; although hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6 months were not different, the 6-month course showed significantly better outcomes at 1 and 2 years of age. Long-term follow-up studies still need to be performed and it is not known whether the benefits of antiviral therapy persist over time. The role of antiviral therapy in children with asymptomatic cCMV and those with mild symptomatic infection is not known and therefore, not recommended for these groups. Antiviral therapy is not recommended for preterm infants born those before 32 weeks of gestation because of the lack of pharmacokinetic data.144
Current guidelines for antiviral therapy in infants with moderate to severe symptomatic cCMV consists of a 6-month course of valganciclovir at 16 mg/kg/dose twice a day.67 A complete blood count, transaminase levels, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine should be done every 2–4 weeks during therapy. Children on treatment should be monitored for bone marrow suppression and in case of persistent neutropenia, valganciclovir should stopped temporarily. In addition, hepatic and renal function should be monitored.73
The management of cCMV-induced induced hearing loss has been summarized in Flowchart 3.
Flowchart 3:
Management of CMV-induced hearing loss
Multidisciplinary Approach
Children with hearing loss should be managed by a multidisciplinary team including audiologists, otolaryngologists, speech pathologists, clinical geneticists, genetic counsellors, and educational specialists. An ophthalmologic evaluation should be completed in all infected children. They should be referred to an early intervention services to meet the needs of hearing-impaired children including preferential seating or frequency-modulated (FM) systems at school. In children with early hearing loss, interventions including hearing amplification before the age of six months improves language outcome.145
Early Intervention Therapy
cCMV warrants periodic audiologic monitoring at 6-month intervals till 5 years of age, with frequent follow-ups 3 monthly when hearing levels are fluctuating. Frequent ear infections in young children lead to conductive hearing loss which superimposes SNHL leading to a delay in obtaining baseline audiologic data and requiring repeated follow-up assessments.
Hearing Aids
In-the-ear and in-the-canal hearing aids are appropriate only for hearing loss less than 60 decibels (dB). Digital and programmable hearing aids have better sound quality, increased precision, improved speech recognition.146,147
Assistive Listening Devices and Bone Conduction Hearing Devices
Bone-anchored implantable hearing aid system (BAHA) is feasible only in children 6 years of age or above because 3 to 4 mm of bone is needed to ensure osseointegration.148
Cochlear Implantation
Implantation at an early age (“critical period” of hearing development) provides better outcomes with bilateral implantation providing improved sound localization and ability to understand speech in noisy surroundings.114,149 These management strategies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in children as young as 12 months, although off-label use can be done in infants <12 months old.150
Hearing aids are recommended for children with unilateral or bilateral SNHL ≥40 db HL, and cochlear implants for those with bilateral SNHL ≥70 db HL. Around 5% of children with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection have SNHL ≥70 dB HL in at least 1 ear by age of 12 months, and half of these children meet current candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation.116
As we have not yet identified specific predictors of cCMV-induced SNHL, all infected children should be monitored with periodic audiologic evaluations to detect delayed onset and progressive hearing loss. Over 55% of the children will develop delayed onset loss occurring after the newborn period and 50% of all children with CMV-related SNHL will have progression or further deterioration of their loss overvtime.50 In a prospective study conducted over 22 years, 5.7% of all cCMV-infected neonates ultimately required hearing amplification (hearing aid or cochlear implantation), with 44.4% of those with symptomatic infection and 3.4% of asymptomatic group requiring hearing rehabilitation.140 Goderis et al. reported that there was a need for hearing amplification in 1.6% in children with asymptomatic and 29.3% in those with symptomatic infections.151
Unilateral hearing loss early in life can have deleterious effects on speech and language development and such children perform worse than their peers.152,153 The term “aural preference syndrome” happens when a single-sided deafness in early childhood reorganizes the developing auditory pathways towards the hearing ear, with weaker central representation of the impaired side. Asymmetric hearing warrants a need for early, effective stimulation in both ears by appropriate fitting of auditory prostheses, including hearing aids and cochlear implants.154
Cytomegalovirus in blood is generally undetectable after one week of valganciclovir therapy. Continuous or intermittent detection of CMV at the age of 1 year has been seen in infants with SNHL. Cytomegalovirus load at diagnosis cannot predict the hearing outcome, but prolonged CMV viremia during treatment is a risk factor for SNHL and neurological sequelae.155 Flowchart 3 demonstrates the management of CMV-induced hearing loss.
Prevention
In seronegative pregnant women, behavioral and hygiene precautions were effective in preventing primary maternal CMV infection.43 The effectiveness of CMV hyperimmune globulin (HIG) to prevent intrauterine transmission of CMV in primary maternal infection has been investigated. Although non-randomized cohort studies have shown that HIG can prevent intrauterine transmission in mothers with primary infection, this benefit was not confirmed in the two randomized placebo controlled clinical trials. Antiviral therapy with valacyclovir has shown promise in preventing intrauterine transmission in women with primary maternal infection.
CMV Hyperimmune Globulin
Cytomegalovirus-specific HIG therapy of pregnant patients with primary CMV infection in early pregnancy has been studied to prevent or reduce cCMV in offspring. In spite of the fact that earlier non-randomized studies have shown the efficacy of CMV HIG prophylaxis in primary maternal infection, the two randomized trials did not decrease the rate of cCMV in the HIG group compared with the placebo group.156,157
Vaccine Development
A report by the Institute of Medicine of the United States National Academy of Sciences designated that the development of a vaccine to prevent or reduce the adverse outcomes of cCMV is a priority.158 Although a licensed CMV vaccine is not available, several candidate vaccines are currently in various stages of development.159 In a phase 2 trial of an MF59-adjuvanted CMV glycoprotein B subunit vaccine in CMV seronegative women enrolled in the postpartum period, provided approximately 50% protection against acquiring primary infection.160,161 However, the efficacy of the vaccine waned during the first 15 months of the study. The same vaccine given to seronegative teenagers failed to demonstrate protection from primary infection compared with placebo.162 An mRNA-based vaccine expressing gB and the pentamer complex (mRNA-1647) examining the effectiveness of the candidate vaccine in preventing primary infection is currently in a phase 3 trial. A major challenge to the development of an effective vaccine is the fact that the majority of infants with cCMV are born to mothers with non-primary maternal infections. It is not known whether candidate vaccines that induce immune responses similar to those following natural infection will also provide protection against cCMV in infants born to seropositive women.
Prevention of Hearing Loss in cCMV-infected Children
Newborn hearing screening identifies about 50% of all infants with cCMV infection who have hearing loss.163 A majority of children with CMV-associated SNHL experience progression of the deficit during early childhood. Among infants with cCMV who pass their NHS, about 5% will have delayed onset loss during early childhood. In addition, predictors or biomarkers of progressive and delayed onset SNHL, especially in children with asymptomatic cCMV have not been defined. Therefore, hearing function of all infected children should be monitored at least every 6 months during the first 4–5 years age and annually thereafter to detect progressive and/or delayed onset SNHL.
A National Institutes of Health consensus panel and the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing have endorsed a goal of universal detection of infants with hearing loss by 3 months of age.164 Cytomegalovirus screening should be made an integral part of NHS program to achieve early detection and confirmation of hearing loss by 3 months of age and interventions for those with SNHL should begin by 6 months of age.11
Future Directions
Future efforts should be directed at elucidation of the mechanisms and pathogenesis of CMV-related hearing loss allowing for developing interventions to prevent or reduce this disability to develop support for newborn CMV screening programs, understanding the reasons for the failure of natural immunity to protect against reinfection/reactivation leading to cCMV, and the development of an effective vaccine to prevent or reduce the disease burden of cCMV including in highly seropositive populations and resource-limited settings.
Table 3:
Definitions of maternal CMV infections121
Term | Definitions |
---|---|
Primary infection | When a maternal seroconversion in a CMV IgG-negative individual occurs during pregnancy or when the serological results are highly suggestive of a primary CMV infection (positive IgM and low IgG avidity antibodies) |
Presumptive primary infection | Some of the maternal CMV infections may have occurred in the months immediately prior to conception and CMV IgM antibody may last up to 3–6 months. Hence, they are considered presumptive primary infections |
Proven primary maternal CMV infection | Mothers who were CMV IgG antibody negative during the first trimester of pregnancy, and did not have subsequent serologic testing, yet gave birth to a congenitally infected newborn, are considered to have a proven primary maternal CMV infection. Primary maternal CMV infections. Both proven primary and presumptive primary maternal CMV infections are grouped together as primary maternal CMV infections |
Recurrent, or non-primary maternal CMV infection | When a congenitally infected neonate is born to a mother showing seroimmunity for CMV in a serum sample obtained before conception or when the serum sample obtained in the first trimester has high IgG avidity antibody. It is also defined as the presence of CMV IgG antibody before pregnancy, or presence of CMV IgG and absence of CMV IgM antibody during first trimester. Non-primary infections during pregnancy could be due to reactivation of mother’s endogenous strain or reinfection with a new strain of CMV |
Uninfected maternal status | Defined as mothers who are CMV IgG seronegative in the first trimester and remain CMV IgG seronegative throughout pregnancy, and deliver an uninfected newborn |
Unknown type of maternal CMV infection | Defined as the presence of CMV IgG antibody and the absence of CMV IgM antibody in the mother at delivery. Mothers whose serologic data are either incomplete or unavailable are also included in this category |
Source of support:
NIH grant DC004163
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: Dr Akhil Maheshwari is associated as Editor-in-Chief of this journal and this manuscript was subjected to this journal’s standard review procedures, with this peer review handled independently of the Editor-in-Chief and his research group.
References
- 1.Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 2007;17(4):253–276. DOI: 10.1002/RMV.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Foulon I, Naessens A, Foulon W, et al. Hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in relation to the maternal trimester in which the maternal primary infection occurred. Pediatrics 2008;122(6):e1123–e1127. DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2008-0770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schleiss MR. Cytomegalovirus. Maternal Immunization 2020:253–288. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814582-1.00013-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wilkinson GWG, Davison AJ, Tomasec P, et al. Human cytomegalovirus: Taking the strain. Med Microbiol Immunol 2015;204(3):273–284. DOI: 10.1007/S00430-015-0411-4/TABLES/1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martí-Carreras J, Maes P. Human cytomegalovirus genomics and transcriptomics through the lens of next-generation sequencing: Revision and future challenges. Virus Genes 2019;55(2):138–164. DOI: 10.1007/S11262-018-1627-3/TABLES/2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morton CC, Nance WE. Newborn hearing screening–A silent revolution. N Engl J Med 2006;354(20):2151–2164. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMRA050700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Elek SD, Stern H. Development of a vaccine against mental retardation caused by cytomegalovirus infection in utero. Lancet 1974;1(7845): 1–5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)92997-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mocarski ES, Bonyhadi M, Salimi S, et al. Human cytomegalovirus in a SCID-hu mouse: Thymic epithelial cells are prominent targets of viral replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90(1):104–108. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.90.1.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma Y, Wang N, Li M, et al. Human CMV transcripts: An overview. Future Microbiol 2012;7(5):577–593. DOI: 10.2217/FMB.12.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gatherer D, Seirafian S, Cunningham C, et al. High-resolution human cytomegalovirus transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(49):19755–19760. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.1115861108/SUPPL_FILE/SD01.XLS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schottstedt DrV, Blümel DrJ, Burger ProfDrR, et al. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) – Revised. Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy 2010;37(6):365. DOI: 10.1159/000322141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Britt WJ, Mach M. Human cytomegalovirus glycoproteins. Intervirology 1996;39(5–6):401–412. DOI: 10.1159/000150510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kschonsak M, Rougé L, Arthur CP, et al. Structures of HCMV trimer reveal the basis for receptor recognition and cell entry. Cell 2021;184(5):1232–1244.e16. DOI: 10.1016/J.CELL.2021.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stein KR, Gardner TJ, Hernandez RE, et al. CD46 facilitates entry and dissemination of human cytomegalovirus. Nature Commun 2019;10(1):1–13. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10587-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gardner TJ, Stein KR, Duty JA, et al. Functional screening for anti-CMV biologics identifies a broadly neutralizing epitope of an essential envelope protein. Nature Commun 2016;7(1):1–15. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee MK, Hyeon S, Ahn JH. The human cytomegalovirus transmembrane protein pUL50 induces loss of VCP/p97 and is regulated by a small isoform of pUL50. J Virol 2020;94(13). DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00110-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Van Bergen J, Koning F. The tortoise and the hare: Slowly evolving T-cell responses take hastily evolving KIR. Immunology 2010;131(3):301. DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2567.2010.03337.X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Burke HG, Heldwein EE. Crystal Structure of the human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B. PLoS Pathog 2015;11(10). DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1005227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yu X, Jih J, Jiang J, et al. Atomic structure of the human cytomegalovirus capsid with its securing tegument layer of pp150. Science 2017;356(6345). DOI: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAM6892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bauer DW, Huffman JB, Homa FL, et al. Herpes virus genome, the pressure is on. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135(30):11216–11221. DOI: 10.1021/JA404008R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Baxter MK, Gibson W. Cytomegalovirus basic phosphoprotein (pUL32) binds to capsids in vitro through its amino one-third. J Virol 2001;75(15):6865–6873. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.6865-6873.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yu X, Shah S, Lee M, et al. Biochemical and structural characterization of the capsid-bound tegument proteins of human cytomegalovirus. J Struct Biol 2011;174(3):451–460. DOI: 10.1016/J.JSB.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dai X, Yu X, Gong H, et al. The smallest capsid protein mediates binding of the essential tegument protein pp150 to stabilize DNA-containing capsids in human cytomegalovirus. PLoS Pathog 2013;9(8). DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1003525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Terhune SS, Schröer J, Shenk T. RNAs are packaged into human cytomegalovirus virions in proportion to their intracellular concentration. J Virol 2004;78(19):10390. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.19.10390-10398.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li Z, Pang J, Dong L, et al. Structural basis for genome packaging, retention, and ejection in human cytomegalovirus. Nature Commun 2021;12(1):1–14. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24820-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Borst EM, Harmening S, Sanders S, et al. A Unique role of the human cytomegalovirus small capsid protein in capsid assembly. mBio 2022;13(5). DOI: 10.1128/MBIO.01007-22/SUPPL_FILE/MBIO.01007-22-S0006.DOCX. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mancebo FJ, Parras-Moltó M, García-Ríos E, et al. Deciphering the potential coding of human cytomegalovirus: New predicted transmembrane proteome. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23(5). DOI: 10.3390/IJMS23052768/S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brignole EJ, Gibson W. Enzymatic Activities of Human Cytomegalovirus Maturational Protease Assemblin and Its Precursor (pPR, pUL80a): Maximal Activity of pPR Requires Self-Interaction through Its Scaffolding Domain. J Virol 2007;81(8):4091. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02821-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zalckvar E, Paulus C, Tillo D, et al. Nucleosome maps of the human cytomegalovirus genome reveal a temporal switch in chromatin organization linked to a major IE protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110(32):13126–13131. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.1305548110/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hage E, Wilkie GS, Linnenweber-Held S, et al. Characterization of Human Cytomegalovirus Genome Diversity in Immunocompromised Hosts by Whole-Genome Sequencing Directly From Clinical Specimens. J Infect Dis 2017;215(11):1673–1683. DOI: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIX157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bankier AT, Beck S, Bohni R, et al. The DNA sequence of the human cytomegalovirus genome. DNA Seq 1991;2(1):1–11. DOI: 10.3109/10425179109008433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jones TR, Sun L, Bebernitz GA, et al. Proteolytic activity of human cytomegalovirus UL80 protease cleavage site mutants. J Virol 1994;68(6):3742. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.68.6.3742-3752.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wahren B, Eriksson B. Cytomegalovirus DNA polymerase inhibition and kinetics. Adv Enzyme Regul 1985;23(C):263–274. DOI: 10.1016/0065-2571(85)90051-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fillet AM, Auray L, Alain S, et al. Natural polymorphism of cytomegalovirus dna polymerase lies in two nonconserved regions located between domains Delta-C and II and between Domains III and I. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004;48(5):1865. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1865-1868.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kostopoulou ON, Wilhelmi V, Raiss S, et al. Human cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex type I virus can engage RNA polymerase I for transcription of immediate early genes. Oncotarget 2017;8(57):96536. DOI: 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.22106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Diener ML, Zick CD, McVicar SB, et al. Outcomes From a Hearing-Targeted Cytomegalovirus Screening Program. Pediatrics 2017;139(2). DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2016-0789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stehel EK, Shoup AG, Owen KE, et al. Newborn hearing screening and detection of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 2008;121(5):970–975. DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2006-3441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grosse SD, Ross DS, Dollard SC. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection as a cause of permanent bilateral hearing loss: A quantitative assessment. J Clin Virol 2008;41(2):57–62. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCV.2007.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Barbi M, Binda S, Caroppo S, et al. A wider role for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in sensorineural hearing loss. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22(1):39–42. DOI: 10.1097/00006454-200301000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park AH, Duval M, McVicar S, et al. A diagnostic paradigm including cytomegalovirus testing for idiopathic pediatric sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2014;124(11):2624–2629. DOI: 10.1002/LARY.24752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dahle AJ, Fowler KB, Wright JD, et al. Longitudinal investigation of hearing disorders in children with congenital cytomegalovirus. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11(5):283–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hanshaw JB. Cytomegaloviruses. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sixth Edition. Published online January 1, 2008:48–56. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-39771-8_1/COVER. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Goderis J, De Leenheer E, Smets K, et al. Hearing loss and congenital cmv infection: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2014;134(5):972–982. DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2014-1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gaytant MA, Steegers EAP, Semmekrot BA, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Review of the epidemiology and outcome. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002;57(4):245–256. DOI: 10.1097/00006254-200204000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cannon MJ, Hyde TB, Schmid DS. Review of cytomegalovirus shedding in bodily fluids and relevance to congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol 2011;21(4):240–255. DOI: 10.1002/RMV.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rosenthal LS, Fowler KB, Boppana SB, et al. Cytomegalovirus shedding and delayed sensorineural hearing loss: Results from longitudinal follow-up of children with congenital infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28(6):515. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0B013E318198C724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Faure-Bardon V, Magny JF, Parodi M, et al. Sequelae of congenital cytomegalovirus following maternal primary infections are limited to those acquired in the first trimester of pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69(9):1526–1532. DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIY1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stagno S, Pass RF, Cloud G, et al. Primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Incidence, transmission to fetus, and clinical outcome. JAMA 1986;256(14):1904–1908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liesnard C, Donner C, Brancart F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Prospective study of 237 pregnancies at risk. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2000;95(6):881–888. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00657-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fowler KB, Boppana SB. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and hearing deficit. J Clin Virol 2006;35(2):226–231. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCV.2005.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Iwasaki S, Yamashita M, Maeda M, et al. Audiological outcome of infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a prospective study. Audiol Neurootol 2007;12(1):31–36. DOI: 10.1159/000096156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Koyano S, Morioka I, Oka A, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus in Japan: More than 2 year follow up of infected newborns. Pediatrics International 2018;60(1):57–62. DOI: 10.1111/PED.13433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dollard SC, Grosse SD, Ross DS. New estimates of the prevalence of neurological and sensory sequelae and mortality associated with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Rev Med Virol 2007;17(5): 355–363. DOI: 10.1002/RMV.544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lanzieri TM, Dollard SC, Bialek SR, et al. Systematic review of the birth prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in developing countries. Int J Infect Dis 2014;22:44. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJID.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ludwig A, Hengel H. Epidemiological impact and disease burden of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Europe. Euro Surveill 2009;14(9):26–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Townsend CL, Forsgren M, Ahlfors K, et al. Long-term outcomes of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56(9):1232–1239. DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIT018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stagno S, Pass RF, Reynolds DW, et al. Comparative study of diagnostic procedures for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 1980;65(2):251–257. DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.65.2.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ross SA, Ahmed A, Palmer AL, et al. Newborn dried blood spot polymerase chain reaction to identify infants with congenital cytomegalovirus-associated sensorineural hearing loss. J Pediatr 2017;184:57–61.e1. DOI: 10.1016/J.JPEDS.2017.01.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ross SA, Novak Z, Fowler KB, et al. Cytomegalovirus blood viral load and hearing loss in young children with congenital infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28(7):588–592. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0B013E3181979A27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Noyola DE, Demmler GJ, Williamson WD, et al. Cytomegalovirus urinary excretion and long term outcome in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Congenital CMV Longitudinal Study Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19(6):505–510. DOI: 10.1097/00006454-200006000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Saigal S, Lunyk O, Larke RP, et al. The outcome in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. A longitudinal follow–up study. Am J Dis Child 1982;136(10):896–901. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970460026006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Foulon I, Naessens A, Foulon W, et al. A 10-year prospective study of sensorineural hearing loss in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 2008;153(1):84–88. DOI: 10.1016/J.JPEDS.2007.12.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Williamson WD, Desmond MM, LaFevers N, et al. Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus. Disorders of language, learning, and hearing. Am J Dis Child 1982;136(10):902–905. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970460032007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pass RF, Stagno S, Myers GJ, et al. Outcome of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Results of long-term longitudinal follow-up. Pediatrics 1980;66(5):758–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yamamoto AY, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Isaac MDL, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection as a cause of sensorineural hearing loss in a highly immune population. Pediat Infect Dis J 2011;30(12):1043–1046. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0B013E31822D9640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hagay ZJ, Biran G, Ornoy A, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: a long-standing problem still seeking a solution. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174(1 Pt 1):241–245. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70401-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Sánchez PJ, et al. Effect of ganciclovir therapy on hearing in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease involving the central nervous system: A randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr 2003;143(1):16–25. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(03)00192-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kimberlin DW, Jester PM, Sánchez PJ, et al. Valganciclovir for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. N Engl J Med 2015;372(10):933–943. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1404599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li X, Shi X, Qiao Y, et al. Observation of permeability of blood–labyrinth barrier during cytomegalovirus-induced hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014;78(7):995–999. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJPORL.2014.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dollard SC, Schleiss MR, Grosse SD. Public health and laboratory considerations regarding newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010;33(Suppl 2). DOI: 10.1007/S10545-010-9125-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ahlfors K, Ivarsson SA, Harris S, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and disease in Sweden and the relative importance of primary and secondary maternal infections. Preliminary findings from a prospective study. Scand J Infect Dis 1984;16(2):129–137. DOI: 10.3109/00365548409087131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Singh G, Gaidhane A. A review of sensorineural hearing loss in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Cureus 2022;14(10). DOI: 10.7759/CUREUS.30703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Duval M, Park AH. Congenital cytomegalovirus: What the otolaryngologist should know. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;22(6):495–500. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hamprecht K, Maschmann J, Vochem M, et al. Epidemiology of transmission of cytomegalovirus from mother to preterm infant by breastfeeding. Lancet 2001;357(9255):513–518. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Stagno S, Reynolds DW, Pass RF, et al. Breast milk and the risk of cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med 1980;302(19):1073–1076. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198005083021908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Brandt CT, Cayé-Thomasen P, Lund SP, et al. Hearing loss and cochlear damage in experimental pneumococcal meningitis, with special reference to the role of neutrophil granulocytes. Neurobiol Dis 2006;23(2):300–311. DOI: 10.1016/J.NBD.2006.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Schachtele SJ, Mutnal MB, Schleiss MR, et al. Cytomegalovirus induced sensorineural hearing loss with persistent cochlear inflammation in neonatal mice. J Neurovirol 2011;17(3):201. DOI: 10.1007/S13365-011-0024-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bradford RD, Yoo YG, Golemac M, et al. Murine CMV-induced hearing loss is associated with inner ear inflammation and loss of spiral ganglia neurons. PLoS Pathog 2015;11(4):e1004774. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1004774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Almishaal AA, Mathur PD, Hillas E, et al. Natural killer cells attenuate cytomegalovirus-induced hearing loss in mice. PLoS Pathog 2017;13(8):e1006599. DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1006599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Harris JA, Rubel EW. Afferent regulation of neuron number in the cochlear nucleus: cellular and molecular analyses of a critical period. Hear Res 2006;216–217(1–2):127–137. DOI: 10.1016/J.HEARES.2006.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rubel EW, Fritzsch B. Auditory system development: Primary auditory neurons and their targets. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002;25:51–101. DOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV.NEURO.25.112701.142849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tierney TS, Russell FA, Moore DR. Susceptibility of developing cochlear nucleus neurons to deafferentation-induced death abruptly ends just before the onset of hearing. J Comp Neurol 1997;378(2):295–306. DOI: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Harris JA, Iguchi F, Seidl AH, et al. Afferent deprivation elicits a transcriptional response associated with neuronal survival after a critical period in the mouse cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci 2008;28(43):10990–11002. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2697-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Leake PA, Hradek GT, Hetherington AM, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes cochlear spiral ganglion cell survival and function in deafened, developing cats. J Comp Neurol 2011;519(8):1526–1545. DOI: 10.1002/CNE.22582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Firbas W, Gruber H, Wicke W. The blood vessels of the limbus spiralis. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1981;232(2):131–137. DOI: 10.1007/BF00505032/METRICS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Miller JM, Le Prell CG, Prieskorn DM, et al. Delayed neurotrophin treatment following deafness rescues spiral ganglion cells from death and promotes regrowth of auditory nerve peripheral processes: Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor. J Neurosci Res 2007;85(9):1959–1969. DOI: 10.1002/JNR.21320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhai SQ, Guo W, Hu YY, et al. Protective effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on the noise-damaged cochlear spiral ganglion. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125(5):449–454. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215110002112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhuang W, Wang C, Shi X, et al. MCMV triggers ROS/NLRP3-associated inflammasome activation in the inner ear of mice and cultured spiral ganglion neurons, contributing to sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Mol Med 2018;41(6):3448–3456. DOI: 10.3892/IJMM.2018.3539/HTML. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Shi X, Qiu S, Zhuang W, et al. NLRP3-inflammasomes are triggered by age-related hearing loss in the inner ear of mice. Am J Transl Res 2017;9(12):5611–5618. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Teissier N, Delezoide AL, Mas AE, et al. Inner ear lesions in congenital cytomegalovirus infection of human fetuses. Acta Neuropathol 2011;122(6):763–774. DOI: 10.1007/S00401-011-0895-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Klein M, Koedel U, Pfister HW, et al. Morphological correlates of acute and permanent hearing loss during experimental pneumococcal meningitis. Brain Pathol 2003;13(2):123–132. DOI: 10.1111/J.1750-3639.2003.TB00012.X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Nadol JB, Hsu W. Histopathologic correlation of spiral ganglion cell count and new bone formation in the cochlea following meningogenic labyrinthitis and deafness. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100(9 Pt 1):712–716. DOI: 10.1177/000348949110000904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ramekers D, Versnel H, Grolman W, et al. Neurotrophins and their role in the cochlea. Hear Res 2012;288(1–2):19–33. DOI: 10.1016/J.HEARES.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Mostafapour SP, Del Puerto NM, Rubel EW. bcl-2 Overexpression eliminates deprivation-induced cell death of brainstem auditory neurons. J Neurosci 2002;22(11):4670–4674. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-11-04670.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lombardi G, Garofoli F, Stronati M. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Treatment, sequelae and follow-up. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23 Suppl 3(SUPPL. 3):45–48. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.506753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hammer Q, Rückert T, Romagnani C. Natural killer cell specificity for viral infections. Nature Immunology 2018;19(8):800–808. DOI: 10.1038/s41590-018-0163-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Nickel R, Forge A. Gap junctions and connexins in the inner ear: Their roles in homeostasis and deafness. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;16(5):452–457. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0B013E32830E20B0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ciuman RR. Stria vascularis and vestibular dark cells: Characterisation of main structures responsible for inner-ear homeostasis, and their pathophysiological relations. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123(2):151–162. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215108002624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Cohen-Salmon M, Regnault B, Cayet N, et al. Connexin30 deficiency causes instrastrial fluid-blood barrier disruption within the cochlear stria vascularis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104(15):6229–6234. DOI: 10.1073/PNAS.0605108104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Mittal R, Aranke M, Debs LH, et al. Indispensable role of ion channels and transporters in the auditory system. J Cell Physiol 2017;232(4):743–758. DOI: 10.1002/JCP.25631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Teissier N, Bernard S, Quesnel S, et al. Audiovestibular consequences of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016;133(6):413–418. DOI: 10.1016/J.ANORL.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Wu J, Han W, Chen X, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and −9 contribute to functional integrity and noise-induced damage to the blood-labyrinth-barrier. Mol Med Rep 2017;16(2):1731–1738. DOI: 10.3892/MMR.2017.6784/HTML. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Juhn SK, Rybak LP. Labyrinthine Barriers and Cochlear Homeostasis. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;91(1–6):529–534. DOI: 10.3109/00016488109138538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kimura RS, Nye CL, Southard RE. Normal and pathologic features of the limbus spiralis and its functional significance. Am J Otolaryngol 1990;11(2):99–111. DOI: 10.1016/0196-0709(90)90006-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Bailey EM, Green SH. Postnatal expression of neurotrophic factors accessible to spiral ganglion neurons in the auditory system of adult hearing and deafened rats. J Neurosci 2014;34(39):13110–13126. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1014-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Li X, Shi X, Wang C, et al. Cochlear spiral ganglion neuron apoptosis in neonatal mice with murine cytomegalovirus-induced sensorineural hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2016;27(4):345–353. DOI: 10.3766/JAAA.15061/BIB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Schmutzhard J, Glueckert R, Pritz C, et al. Sepsis otopathy: Experimental sepsis leads to significant hearing impairment due to apoptosis and glutamate excitotoxicity in murine cochlea. Dis Model Mech 2013;6(3):745–754. DOI: 10.1242/DMM.011205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Manicklal S, Emery VC, Lazzarotto T, et al. The “silent” global burden of congenital cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013;26(1):86–102. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00062-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Boppana SB, Ross SA, Fowler KB. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Clinical outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57 Suppl 4(Suppl 4): S178–S181. DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIT629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Hicks T, Fowler K, Richardson M, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection and neonatal auditory screening. J Pediatr 1993;123(5):779–782. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80859-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ, et al. Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr 1997;130(4):624–630. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70248-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Williamson WD, Demmler GJ, Percy AK, et al. Progressive hearing loss in infants with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 1992;90(6):862–866. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Yow MD, Williamson DW, Leeds LJ, et al. Epidemiologic characteristics of cytomegalovirus infection in mothers and their infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158(5):1189–1195. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90252-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Puhakka L, Lappalainen M, Lönnqvist T, et al. Hearing outcome in congenitally CMV infected children in Finland – results from follow-up after three years age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2022;156. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJPORL.2022.111099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ahlfors K, Ivarsson SA, Harris S. Report on a long-term study of maternal and congenital cytomegalovirus infection in Sweden. Review of prospective studies available in the literature. Scand J Infect Dis 1999;31(5):443–457. DOI: 10.1080/00365549950163969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Lanzieri TM, Chung W, Flores M, et al. Hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 2017;139(3). DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2016-2610/53745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Fowler KB. Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: Audiologic Outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57(Suppl 4): S182–S184. DOI: 10.1093/CID/CIT609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Fowler KB, Dable AJ, Boppana SB, et al. Newborn hearing screening: Will children with hearing loss caused by congenital cytomegalovirus infection be missed? J Pediatr 1999;135(1):60–64. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(99)70328-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Understanding Hearing Loss. Parent’s Guide to Hearing Loss. CDC. Accessed August 16, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hearingloss/parentsguide/understanding/understandinghearingloss.html. [Google Scholar]
- 120.Konrad-Martin D, James KE, Gordon JS, et al. Evaluation of audiometric threshold shift criteria for ototoxicity monitoring. J Am Acad Audiol 2010;21(5):301–304. DOI: 10.3766/JAAA.21.5.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Demmler-Harrison GJ, Miller JA. Group O behalf of the HCCLS. Maternal cytomegalovirus immune status and hearing loss outcomes in congenital cytomegalovirus-infected offspring. PLoS One 2020;15(10). DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0240172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Clinical features and diagnosis - UpToDate. Accessed August 16, 2023.
- 123.Prince HE, Lapé-Nixon M. Role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity testing in diagnosing primary CMV infection during pregnancy. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014;21(10):1377–1384. DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00487-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Davis NL, King CC, Kourtis AP. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Birth Defects Res 2017;109(5):336–346. DOI: 10.1002/BDRA.23601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Navti OB, Al-Belushi M, Konje JC. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy – an update. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021;258:216–222. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2020.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Jückstock J, Rothenburger M, Friese K, et al. Passive immunization against congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Current state of knowledge. Pharmacology 2015;95(5–6):209–217. DOI: 10.1159/000381626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Lipitz S, Hoffmann C, Feldman B, et al. Value of prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of congenital primary cytomegalovirus infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36(6):709–717. DOI: 10.1002/UOG.7657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Mestas E Congenital cytomegalovirus. Adv Neonatal Care 2016;16(1):60–65. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Chiopris G, Veronese P, Cusenza F, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: update on diagnosis and treatment. Microorganisms 2020;8(10):1–17. DOI: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8101516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Revello MG, Lilleri D, Zavattoni M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital human cytomegalovirus infection in amniotic fluid by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41(4):1772–1774. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1772-1774.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Bodéus M, Hubinont C, Bernard P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus by culture and polymerase chain reaction: 98 pregnancies leading to congenital infection. Prenat Diagn 1999;19(4):314–317. DOI: . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Boppana SB, Ross SA, Shimamura M, et al. Saliva polymerase-chain-reaction assay for cytomegalovirus screening in newborns. N Engl J Med 2011;364(22):2111. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1006561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Ross SA, Michaels MG, Ahmed A, et al. Contribution of breastfeeding to false-positive saliva polymerase chain reaction for newborn congenital cytomegalovirus screening. J Infect Dis 2018;217(10): 1612–1615. DOI: 10.1093/INFDIS/JIY057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Boppana SB, Ross SA, Novak Z, et al. Dried blood spot real-time polymerase chain reaction assays to screen newborns for congenital cytomegalovirus infection. JAMA 2010;303(14):1375–1382. DOI: 10.1001/JAMA.2010.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Pinninti SG, Ross SA, Shimamura M, et al. Comparison of saliva PCR assay versus rapid culture for detection of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2015;34(5):536–537. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Kadambari S, Williams EJ, Luck S, et al. Evidence based management guidelines for the detection and treatment of congenital CMV. Early Hum Dev 2011;87(11):723–728. DOI: 10.1016/J.EARLHUMDEV.2011.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Swanson EC, Schleiss MR. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: New prospects for prevention and therapy. Pediatr Clin North Am 2013;60(2):335–349. DOI: 10.1016/J.PCL.2012.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Sahiner F, Cekmez F, Cetinkaya M, et al. Congenital cytomegalovirus infections and glycoprotein B genotypes in live-born infants: A prevalence study in Turkey. Infect Dis (Lond) 2015;47(7):465–471. DOI: 10.3109/23744235.2015.1018316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Fowler KB, Boppana SB. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Semin Perinatol 2018;42(3):149–154. DOI: 10.1053/J.SEMPERI.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Foulon I, De Brucker Y, Buyl R, et al. Hearing loss with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics 2019;144(2). DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2018-3095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Cannon MJ, Griffiths PD, Aston V, et al. Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: What is the evidence of potential benefit? Rev Med Virol 2014;24(5):291. DOI: 10.1002/RMV.1790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Reynolds DW, Stagno S, Hosty TS, et al. Maternal cytomegalovirus excretion and perinatal infection. N Engl J Med 1973;289(1):1–5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197307052890101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Lim Y, Lyall H. Congenital cytomegalovirus – who, when, what-with and why to treat? J Infect 2017;74 Suppl 1:S89–S94. DOI: 10.1016/S0163-4453(17)30197-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Nicloux M, Peterman L, Parodi M, et al. Outcome and management of newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Arch Pediatr 2020;27(3):160–165. DOI: 10.1016/J.ARCPED.2020.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, et al. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102(5):1161–1171. DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.102.5.1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Kuk FK, Kollofski C, Brown S, et al. Use of a digital hearing aid with directional microphones in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 1999;10(10):535–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Bamford J, McCracken W, Peers I, et al. Trial of a two-channel hearing aid (low-frequency compression-high-frequency linear amplification) with school age children. Ear Hear 1999;20(4):290–298. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Federspil PA, Tretbar SH, Böhlen FH, et al. Measurement of skull bone thickness for bone-anchored hearing aids: An experimental study comparing both a novel ultrasound system (SonoPointer) and computed tomographic scanning to mechanical measurements. Otol Neurotol 2010;31(3):440–446. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0B013E3181D2775F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Thomas JP, Neumann K, Dazert S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with congenital single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2017;38(4):496–503. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Colletti L, Mandalà M, Colletti V. Cochlear implants in children younger than 6 months. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;147(1):139–146. DOI: 10.1177/0194599812441572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Goderis J, Keymeulen A, Smets K, et al. Hearing in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection: Results of a longitudinal study. J Pediatr 2016;172:110–115.e2. DOI: 10.1016/J.JPEDS.2016.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.van Wieringen A, Boudewyns A, Sangen A, et al. Unilateral congenital hearing loss in children: Challenges and potentials. Hear Res 2019;372:29–41. DOI: 10.1016/J.HEARES.2018.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Fitzpatrick EM, Gaboury I, Durieux-Smith A, et al. Auditory and language outcomes in children with unilateral hearing loss. Hear Res 2019;372:42–51. DOI: 10.1016/J.HEARES.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Gordon K, Henkin Y, Kral A. Asymmetric hearing during development: The aural preference syndrome and treatment options. Pediatrics 2015;136(1):141–153. DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2014-3520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Kawada J ichi, Torii Y, Kawano Y, et al. Viral load in children with congenital cytomegalovirus infection identified on newborn hearing screening. J Clin Virol 2015;65:41–45. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCV.2015.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Revello MG, Lazzarotto T, Guerra B, et al. A randomized trial of hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus. N Engl J Med 2014;370(14):1316–1326. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1310214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Hughes BL, Clifton RG, Rouse DJ, et al. A Trial of hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med 2021;385(5):436–444. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA1913569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Stratton KR, Durch JS, Lawrence RS. Vaccines for the 21st Century: A Tool for Decisionmaking. DOI: 10.17226/5501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Boppana SB, van Boven M, Britt WJ, et al. Vaccine value profile for cytomegalovirus. Vaccine 2023;41(Suppl 2):S53–S75. DOI: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2023.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Pass RF, Zhang C, Evans A, et al. Vaccine prevention of maternal cytomegalovirus infection. N Engl J Med 2009;360(12):1191–1199. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMOA0804749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Dekker CL, Arvin AM. One step closer to a CMV vaccine. N Engl J Med 2009;360(12):1250–1252. DOI: 10.1056/NEJME0900230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Bernstein DI, Munoz FM, Callahan ST, et al. Safety and efficacy of a cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B (gB) vaccine in adolescent girls: A randomized clinical trial. Vaccine 2016;34(3):313–319. DOI: 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.11.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Sabo DL, et al. A targeted approach for congenital cytomegalovirus screening within newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 2017;139(2). DOI: 10.1542/PEDS.2016-2128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Awad R, Oropeza J, Uhler KM. Meeting the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Standards in a Large Metropolitan Children’s Hospital: Barriers and Next Steps. Am J Audiol 2019;28(2):251–259. DOI: 10.1044/2019_AJA-18-0001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]